Sodomy laws in the United States: Difference between revisions
Chrisitizer (talk | contribs) →Military: Changed tense for consistency Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
(343 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Aspect of United States law}} |
|||
[[Image:Map of US sodomy laws.svg|right|thumb|400px|U.S. [[sodomy laws]] by the year when they were repealed or struck down. |
|||
[[File:Decriminalization of same-sex sexual intercourse in the United States.svg|thumb|right|400px|'''Decriminalization of sodomy laws in the United States'''{{div col|colwidth=7em}} |
|||
{{legend|#fefd65|Laws repealed or struck down before 1970.}} |
|||
{{legend|Black|1962}}{{legend|MidnightBlue|1971}}{{legend|MediumBlue|1972}}{{legend|RoyalBlue|1973}}{{legend|SteelBlue|1974}}{{legend|CornflowerBlue|1975}}{{legend|DeepSkyBlue|1976}}{{legend|LightSkyBlue|1977}}{{legend|LightBlue|1978}}{{legend|PowderBlue|1979}}{{legend|#b9d7ff|1980}}{{legend|Green|1983}}{{legend|Lime|1985}}{{legend|#800000|1992}}{{legend|#aa0000|1993}}{{legend|#d40000|1996}}{{legend|Red|1997}}{{legend|#e27f90|1998}}{{legend|#f2b3be|1999}}{{legend|#fc0|2001}}{{legend|#ebeb14|2003}}{{div col end}}]] |
|||
{{legend|#fc0|Laws repealed or struck down from 1970 to 1979.}} |
|||
{{legend|DarkOrange|Laws repealed or struck down from 1980 to 1989.}} |
|||
{{legend|OrangeRed|Laws repealed or struck down from 1990 to 1999.}} |
|||
{{legend|#e00000|Laws repealed or struck down from 2000 to 2002.}} |
|||
{{legend|DarkRed|[[Lawrence v. Texas|Laws struck down by the Supreme Court of the United States]] in 2003.<ref> As of April 2014, 17 states either have not yet formally repealed their laws against sexual activity among consenting adult, or have not revised them to accurately reflect their true scope in the aftermath of Lawrence v. Texas.</ref> }}]] |
|||
[[File:Sodomy laws in the United States.svg|right|thumb|400px|'''Current status of state statutes regarding sodomy and bestiality. All sodomy statutes have been invalidated (ruled unconstitutional) by state courts or ''Lawrence v. Texas'', but 12 have not been repealed by their state legislatures.''' |
|||
'''[[Sodomy law]]s in the United States''', which outlawed a variety of [[Human sexual activity|sexual acts]], were historically universal. While they often targeted [[homosexuality|sexual acts between persons of the same sex]], many statutes employed definitions broad enough to outlaw certain [[heterosexuality|sexual acts between persons of different sexes]] as well, sometimes even acts between [[marriage|married persons]]. |
|||
{{legend|Lightgrey|No statute banning sodomy}} |
|||
Through the 20th century, the gradual [[liberalization]] of American sexual morals led to the elimination of sodomy laws in most states. During this time, the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] upheld the constitutionality of sodomy laws in ''[[Bowers v. Hardwick]]'' in 1986. However, in 2003 the Supreme Court reversed the decision with ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'', invalidating sodomy laws in the remaining 14 states ([[Alabama]], [[Florida]], [[Idaho]], [[Kansas]], [[Louisiana]], [[Michigan]], [[Mississippi]], [[Missouri]] (statewide), [[North Carolina]], [[Oklahoma]], [[South Carolina]], [[Texas]], [[Utah]], and [[Virginia]]). |
|||
{{legend|#f2b3be|Statute bans bestiality}} |
|||
{{legend|#cc2f4a|Statute bans same-sex sodomy}} |
|||
{{legend|#800000|Statute bans sodomy}}]] |
|||
{{Sex and the law}} |
|||
The United States has inherited [[sodomy laws]] which constitutionally outlawed a variety of [[sexual acts]] that are deemed to be illegal, illicit, unlawful, unnatural and/or immoral from the colonial-era based laws in the 17th century.<ref name="Gaylaw">{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BZTnDgeygHkC&q=history+of+sodomy+laws+Christianity&pg=PA161 | title=Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet | publisher=Harvard University Press | last=Eskridge | first=William N. | author-link=William Eskridge | year=2009 | pages=161| isbn=9780674036581 }}</ref> While they often targeted [[homosexuality|sexual acts between persons of the same sex]], many sodomy-related statutes employed definitions broad enough to outlaw certain [[heterosexuality|sexual acts between persons of different sexes]], in some cases even including acts between [[marriage|married persons]]. |
|||
==History== |
|||
In 1779, [[Thomas Jefferson]] wrote a law in Virginia which contained a punishment of [[castration]] for men who engage in sodomy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs10.html |title=Amendment VIII: Thomas Jefferson, A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments |publisher=Press-pubs.uchicago.edu |date= |accessdate=2014-03-11}}</ref> Jefferson intended this to be a liberalization of the sodomy laws in Virginia at that time, which prescribed death as the maximum penalty for the crime of sodomy. It was rejected by the Virginia Legislature.<ref>{{cite web|author=Patricia S. Ticer, State Senator (D-30) in the |url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/virginia/virginia.htm |title=Virginia |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2011-08-31}}</ref> |
|||
Through the mid to late 20th century, the gradual [[decriminalization]] of American sexuality law led to the elimination of anti-sodomy laws in most U.S. states. During this time, the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] upheld the constitutionality of its [[sodomy law]]s in ''[[Bowers v. Hardwick]]'' in 1986. However, in 2003, the Supreme Court came to a new opinion and reversed the decision with ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'', invalidating all sodomy laws in the remaining 14 states: [[Alabama]], [[Florida]], [[Idaho]], [[Kansas]], [[Louisiana]], [[Michigan]], [[Mississippi]], [[Missouri]], [[North Carolina]], [[Oklahoma]], [[South Carolina]], [[Texas]], [[Utah]] and [[Virginia]]. |
|||
Prior to 1962, sodomy was a [[felony]] in every state, punished by a lengthy term of [[imprisonment]] and/or hard labor. In that year, the [[Model Penal Code]] (MPC) — developed by the [[American Law Institute]] to promote uniformity among the states as they modernized their statutes — struck a compromise that removed consensual sodomy from its criminal code while making it a crime to [[solicit]] for sodomy. In 1962 [[Illinois]] adopted the recommendations of the [[Model Penal Code]] and thus became the first state to remove criminal penalties for consensual sodomy from its criminal code,<ref name=canaday>{{cite web | last = Canaday | first = Margot | title = We Colonials: Sodomy Laws in America | publisher = [[The Nation]] | date = September 3, 2008 | url = http://www.thenation.com/article/we-colonials-sodomy-laws-america | accessdate = February 7, 2014 }}</ref> almost a decade before any other state. Over the years, many of the states that did not repeal their sodomy laws had enacted legislation reducing the penalty. At the time of the ''Lawrence'' decision in 2003, the penalty for violating a sodomy law varied very widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction among those states retaining their sodomy laws. The harshest penalties were in [[Idaho]], where a person convicted of sodomy could earn a life sentence. [[Michigan]] followed, with a maximum penalty of 15 years imprisonment while repeat offenders got life. |
|||
==History== |
|||
By 2002, 36 states had repealed their sodomy laws or their courts had overturned them. By the time of the 2003 Supreme Court decision, the laws in most states were no longer enforced or were enforced very selectively. The continued existence of these rarely enforced laws on the statute books, however, was often cited as justification for [[discrimination]] against gay men and lesbians. |
|||
=== Up to ''Lawrence v. Texas'' === |
|||
Colin Talley argues that the sodomy statutes in colonial America in the 17th century were largely [[Unenforced law|unenforced]]. The reason he argues is that male-male eroticism did not threaten the social structure or challenge the gendered division of labor or the patriarchal ownership of wealth.<ref>Colin L. Talley, "Gender and male same-sex erotic behavior in British North America in the seventeenth century." ''Journal of the History of Sexuality'' (1996): 385-408. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4629616 online]</ref> There were gay men on General Washington's staff and among the leaders of the new republic,<ref>William E Benemann, ''Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendships'' (2006).</ref> even though in Virginia there was a maximum penalty of death for sodomy. In 1779, [[Thomas Jefferson]] tried to reduce the maximum punishment to [[castration]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs10.html |title=Amendment VIII: Thomas Jefferson, A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments |publisher=Press-pubs.uchicago.edu |access-date=2014-03-11 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140204050905/http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs10.html |archive-date=2014-02-04 }}</ref> It was rejected by the Virginia legislature.<ref>{{cite web |author=Patricia S. Ticer |author-link=Patsy Ticer |url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/virginia/virginia.htm |title=Virginia |publisher=Glapn.org |access-date=2011-08-31 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004213546/http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/virginia/virginia.htm |archive-date=2011-10-04 }}</ref> Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]] authoring the majority opinion in ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' stated that American laws targeting same-sex couples did not develop until the last third of the 20th century and also wrote that:<ref>Lawrence v. Texas, [[List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 539|539 U.S.]] [https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/558/ 558] (2003).</ref> |
|||
{{Blockquote|text=Early American sodomy laws were not directed at homosexuals as such but instead sought to prohibit nonprocreative sexual activity more generally, whether between men and women or men and men. Moreover, early sodomy laws seem not to have been enforced against consenting adults acting in private. Instead, sodomy prosecutions often involved predatory acts against those who could not or did not consent: relations between men and minor girls or boys, between adults involving force, between adults implicating disparity in status, or between men and animals.}} |
|||
On June 26, 2003, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] in a 6-3 decision in ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' struck down the [[Texas]] same-sex sodomy law, ruling that this private sexual conduct is protected by the liberty rights implicit in the [[Due process|due process clause]] of the [[United States Constitution]]. This decision invalidated all [[U.S. state|state]] sodomy laws insofar as they applied to noncommercial conduct in private between consenting civilians and reversed the Court's 1986 ruling in ''[[Bowers v. Hardwick]]'' that upheld [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]]'s sodomy law. |
|||
In 1950, New York enacted a new statute that divided the crime of sodomy into 3 degrees. First degree sodomy, with a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment, is defined as being done by force as in rape, or an act with an animal or a dead body. Second degree sodomy, with a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, includes acts ''per os or per anum'' by a person over 21 years old with a person under 18 years old. Third degree sodomy, which is a misdemeanor with a maximum of 6 months in prison, is any act ''per os or per anum'' not amounting to first or second degree sodomy. With this new law, New York became the first state to reduce the crime of sodomy from a felony to a misdemeanor. A [[Psychopathy|psychopathic]] offender law was included with this statute, but covered only sexual acts with minors or with the use of force or threats. In 1950, the Attorney General issued an opinion that the governing sodomy law covered both participants in an act of [[fellatio]], the wording of the law being broader for oral sex than for anal. This opinion would be affirmed by a court interpretation more than a decade later. |
|||
Before that 2003 ruling, 27 states, the [[District of Columbia]], and 4 [[U.S. territory|territories]] had repealed their sodomy laws by [[legislation|legislative action]], 9 states had had them overturned or invalidated by [[State court (United States)|state court]] action, 4 states still had same-sex sodomy laws, and 10 states, [[Puerto Rico]], and the [[U.S. military]] had laws applying to all regardless of gender. In 2005 [[Puerto Rico]] repealed its sodomy law, and in 2006 [[Missouri]] repealed its law against "homosexual conduct". In 2013, [[Montana]] removed "sexual contact or sexual intercourse between two persons of the same sex" from its definition of deviate sexual conduct, [[Virginia]] repealed its lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute, and sodomy was legalized in the [[US armed forces]]. |
|||
In 1965, New York enacted a new statute repealing the crime of sodomy. Due to opposition to repealing the crime of sodomy, New York enacted a new statute at the same time that criminalized sodomy and reduced the maximum penalty from 6 months to 3 months, and excluded married couples. It created the category of sexual misconduct, defined as engaging in sexual intercourse with another person without such person's consent and engaging in sexual conduct with an animal or a dead human body, which became a class A misdemeanor. Since the new statute repealing the crime of sodomy would only be effective on September 1, 1967, it never took effect. |
|||
In 2005, basing its decision on ''Lawrence'', the [[Supreme Court of Virginia]] in ''[[Martin v. Ziherl]]'' invalidated § 18.2-344, the Virginia stature making fornication between unmarried persons a crime.<ref>Google Scholar: [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17488130752261924182& ''Martin v.Ziherl''], accessed April 9, 2011</ref> |
|||
Prior to 1962, sodomy was a [[felony]] in every state punished by a lengthy term of imprisonment or [[hard labor]]. In that year, the [[Model Penal Code]] (MPC) — developed by the [[American Law Institute]] to promote uniformity among the states as they modernized their statutes — struck a compromise that removed consensual sodomy from its criminal code while making it a crime to [[solicit]] for sodomy. In 1962, [[Illinois]] adopted the recommendations of the Model Penal Code and thus became the first state to remove criminal penalties for consensual sodomy from its criminal code,<ref name=canaday>{{cite web | last = Canaday | first = Margot | title = We Colonials: Sodomy Laws in America | publisher = [[The Nation]] | date = September 3, 2008 | url = http://www.thenation.com/article/we-colonials-sodomy-laws-america | access-date = February 7, 2014 | url-status=live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140126111019/http://www.thenation.com/article/we-colonials-sodomy-laws-america | archive-date = January 26, 2014 }}</ref> almost a decade before any other state. Over the years, many of the states that did not repeal their sodomy laws had enacted legislation reducing the penalty. |
|||
[[Louisiana]]'s statutes still include "unnatural carnal copulation by a human being with another of the same sex" in their definition of "[[Crime against nature|crimes against nature]]", punishable (in theory) by a fine of up to $2,000 or a prison sentence of up to five years, with or without [[hard labor]];<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=78695 |title=Louisiana RS 14:89 |publisher=Legis.state.la.us |date= |accessdate=}}</ref> however, this section was further [[Mootness|mooted]] by the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit]] in 2005 in light of the ''Lawrence'' decision.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nola.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/news-9/111466958966450.xml |title=Sodomy law revisions are upheld on appeal, Times-Picayune |publisher=Nola.com |date= |accessdate=2012-03-18}}</ref> |
|||
On March 12, 1971, the [[Idaho House of Representatives]] voted was 55-5 in favor of House Bill 161, which enacted the entire [[Model Penal Code]] (MPC) in Idaho, which included repealing common-law crimes and the "crime against nature" law. The bill passed the [[Idaho Senate]] on March 25, 1971 and the vote was 34-1. It was signed on April 9, 1971 by Governor [[Cecil Andrus]]. It took effect on January 1, 1972. On January 25, 1972, the Idaho House voted was 44-28 in favor of House Bill 101, which repealed the provisions of House Bill 161, which had adopted the MPC. The bill passed the Idaho Senate on March 27, 1972 and the vote was 30-5. It was signed on March 27, 1972 by Governor Cecil Andrus. It took effect on April 1, 1972. On March 22, 1972, the Idaho House voted was 49-15 in favor of House Bill 59, which restored a criminal code framework after the repeal of House Bill 161, which included reinstating common-law crimes and reintroduced the felony "crime against nature" law, which included a minimum five-year penalty with no maximum limit. The bill passed the Idaho Senate on February 1, 1972 and the vote was 34-1. It was signed on February 18, 1972 by Governor Cecil Andrus. It took effect on April 1, 1972. |
|||
In ''State v. Whiteley'' (2005), the [[North Carolina Court of Appeals]] ruled that the [[crime against nature]] statute, N.C. G.S. § 14-177,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-177.html |title=G.S. § 14-177 |publisher=Ncga.state.nc.us |date= |accessdate=2013-12-05}}</ref> is not unconstitutional on its face because it may properly be used to criminalize sexual conduct involving minors, non-consensual or coercive conduct, public conduct, and prostitution.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.aoc.state.nc.us/www/public/coa/opinions/2005/040636-1.htm |title=State v. Whiteley, 172 NC App 772 (04-636) 08/16/2005 |publisher=Aoc.state.nc.us |date= |accessdate=2014-03-11}}</ref> |
|||
At the time of the ''Lawrence'' decision in 2003, the penalty for violating a sodomy law varied widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction among those states retaining their sodomy laws. The harshest penalties were in [[Idaho]], where a person convicted of sodomy could earn a life sentence. [[Michigan]] followed, with a maximum penalty of 15 years' imprisonment while repeat offenders got life.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://casetext.com/statute/michigan-compiled-laws/chapter-750-michigan-penal-code/subchapter-crime-against-nature-or-sodomy/section-750158-crime-against-nature-or-sodomy-penalty|title=Section 750.158 - Crime against nature or sodomy; penalty, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.158 | Casetext Search + Citator|website=casetext.com}}</ref> By 2002, 36 states had repealed their sodomy laws or their courts had overturned them. By the time of the 2003 Supreme Court decision, the laws in most states were no longer enforced or were enforced very selectively. The continued existence of these rarely enforced laws on the statute books, however, are often cited as justification for [[discrimination]] against gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals. |
|||
On January 31, 2013, the [[Senate of Virginia]] passed a bill repealing § 18.2-345, the lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute enacted in 1877, by a vote of 40 to 0. On February 20, 2013, the [[Virginia House of Delegates]] passed the bill by a vote of 62 to 25 votes. On March 20, 2013, [[Governor of Virginia|Governor]] [[Bob McDonnell]] signed the repeal of the lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute from the [[Code of Virginia]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://openstates.org/va/bills/2013/SB969/ |title=SB 969|publisher=Open:States |accessdate=April 13, 2013 }}</ref> |
|||
On June 26, 2003, the [[United States Supreme Court]] struck down in the ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' decision the following jurisdictions (14 US states, 1 US territory and the [[Uniform Code of Military Justice]]) that statutes criminalized consensual sodomy: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri (rest of the state outside of the [[Missouri Court of Appeals#Jurisdiction|Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District]]), North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas, United States Armed Forces, Utah and Virginia. On June 26, 2003, at the time of the ''Lawrence v. Texas'' decision, the following jurisdictions (20 US states, 1 US territory and the Uniform Code of Military Justice) had statutes criminalizing consensual sodomy: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas, United States Armed Forces, Utah and Virginia. |
|||
On March 12, 2013, a three-judge panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]] struck down § 18.2-361, the crimes against nature statute. On March 26, 2013, [[Attorney General of Virginia]] [[Ken Cuccinelli]] filed a petition to have the case reheard ''[[en banc]]'', but the Court denied the request on April 10, 2013, with none of its 15 judges supporting the request.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy_n_3051758.html |title=Ken Cuccinelli Loses Petition To Uphold Anti-Sodomy Law |publisher=The Huffington Post |accessdate=04/10/2013 }}</ref> On June 25, Cuccinelli filed a petition for certiorari asking the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] to review the Court of Appeals decision, which was rejected on October 7.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy-supreme-court_n_3498444.html|title= Ken Cuccinelli Appeals To Defend Virginia's Anti-Sodomy Law At Supreme Court |date=June 25, 2013|publisher=Huffington Post}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/07/court-wont-hear-va-appeal-over-sodomy-law/2935613/|title=Court won't hear Va. appeal over sodomy law|publisher=USA Today|date=October 7, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
=== Post ''Lawrence v. Texas'' === |
|||
On February 7, 2014, the Virginia Senate voted 40-0 in favor of revising the crimes against nature statue to remove the ban on same-sex sexual relationships. On March 6, 2014, the Virginia House of Delegates voted 100-0 in favor of the bill. On April 7, the Governor submitted slightly different version of the bill. It was enacted by the Legislature on April 23, 2014. The law took effect upon passage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?141+sum+SB14 |title=LIS > Bill Tracking > SB14 > 2014 session |publisher=Leg1.state.va.us |date= |accessdate=2014-04-25}}</ref> |
|||
In 2005, Puerto Rico repealed its sodomy law, and in 2006, [[Missouri]] repealed its law against "homosexual conduct". In 2013, [[Montana]] removed "sexual contact or sexual intercourse between two persons of the same sex" from its definition of deviate sexual conduct, [[Virginia]] repealed its [[Lascivity|lewd and lascivious]] cohabitation statute, and sodomy was legalized in the [[US armed forces]]. In 2005, basing its decision on ''Lawrence'', the [[Supreme Court of Virginia]] in ''[[Martin v. Ziherl]]'' invalidated § 18.2-344, the Virginia statute making fornication between unmarried persons a crime.<ref>Google Scholar: [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17488130752261924182& ''Martin v.Ziherl''], accessed April 9, 2011</ref> |
|||
In April 2014, a proposed Louisiana bill sought to revise the state's crime against nature law, maintaining the existing prohibition against sodomy during the commission of rape and child sex abuse, and against sex with animals, but removing the unconstitutional prohibition against sex between consenting adults. The bill was defeated on April 15, 2014 by a vote of 66 to 27.<ref>{{cite news|last=O'Donoghue|first=Julia |title=Louisiana House votes 27-66 to keep unconstitutional anti-sodomy law on the books|url=http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/04/post_558.html|accessdate=April 16, 2014|newspaper=Times-Picayune|date=April 15, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
On January 31, 2013, the [[Senate of Virginia]] passed a bill repealing § 18.2-345, the lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute enacted in 1877. On February 20, 2013, the [[Virginia House of Delegates]] passed the bill by a vote of 62 to 25 votes. On March 20, 2013, [[Governor of Virginia|Governor]] [[Bob McDonnell]] signed the repeal of the lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute from the [[Code of Virginia]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://openstates.org/va/bills/2013/SB969/ |title=SB 969 |date=20 February 2013 |publisher=Open:States |access-date=April 13, 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131224083840/http://openstates.org/va/bills/2013/SB969/ |archive-date=December 24, 2013 }}</ref> On March 12, 2013, a three-judge panel of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit|Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]] struck down § 18.2-361, the crimes against nature statute. On March 26, 2013, [[Attorney General of Virginia]] [[Ken Cuccinelli]] filed a petition to have the case reheard ''[[en banc]]'', but the Court denied the request on April 10, 2013, with none of its 15 judges supporting the request.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy_n_3051758.html |title=Ken Cuccinelli Loses Petition To Uphold Anti-Sodomy Law |work=[[HuffPost|The Huffington Post]] |date=10 April 2013 |access-date=2013-04-10 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130413164023/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy_n_3051758.html |archive-date=2013-04-13 }}</ref> On June 25, Cuccinelli filed a petition for certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Court of Appeals decision, which was rejected on October 7.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy-supreme-court_n_3498444.html|title=Ken Cuccinelli Appeals To Defend Virginia's Anti-Sodomy Law At Supreme Court|date=June 25, 2013|publisher=Huffington Post|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130702072057/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy-supreme-court_n_3498444.html|archive-date=July 2, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/07/court-wont-hear-va-appeal-over-sodomy-law/2935613/|title=Court won't hear Va. appeal over sodomy law|publisher=USA Today|date=October 7, 2013|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171025130706/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/10/07/court-wont-hear-va-appeal-over-sodomy-law/2935613/|archive-date=October 25, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
As of April 2014, 17 states either have not yet formally repealed their laws against sexual activity among consenting adult, or have not revised them to accurately reflect their true scope in the aftermath of Lawrence v. Texas. Often, the sodomy law was drafted to also encompass other forms of sexual conduct such as bestiality, and no attempt has subsequently succeeded in separating them. Fourteen states' statutes purport to ban all forms of sodomy, some including oral intercourse, regardless of the participants' genders: [[Alabama]], [[Florida]], [[Georgia (US state)|Georgia]], [[Idaho]], [[Louisiana]], [[Maryland]], [[Massachusetts]], [[Michigan]], [[Minnesota]], [[Mississippi]], [[North Carolina]], [[South Carolina]], and [[Utah]]. Four states specifically target their statutes at same-sex relations only: [[Oklahoma]], [[Kansas]]<ref name="kansas-sodomy-law">Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3505 (2010).</ref><ref name=sulzberger2012nyt/> [[Kentucky]], and [[Texas]]. |
|||
On February 7, 2014, the Virginia Senate voted 40-0 in favor of revising the crimes against nature statute to remove the ban on same-sex sexual relationships. On March 6, 2014, the Virginia House of Delegates voted 100-0 in favor of the bill. On April 7, the Governor submitted a slightly different version of the bill. It was enacted by the legislature on April 23, 2014. The law took effect upon passage.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?141+sum+SB14 |title=LIS > Bill Tracking > SB14 > 2014 session |publisher=Leg1.state.va.us |access-date=2014-04-25 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310172112/http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?141+sum+SB14 |archive-date=2014-03-10 }}</ref> On February 26, 2019, the Utah legislature voted to eliminate the crime of sodomy between consenting adults.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://fox13now.com/2019/02/26/adultery-and-sodomy-among-consenting-adults-closer-to-being-legal-in-utah/ |title=Adultery and sodomy among consenting adults closer to being legal in Utah|date=26 February 2019}}</ref> Governor [[Gary Herbert]] signed the bill into law on March 26, 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://890kdxu.production.townsquareblogs.com/governor-signs-bill-making-adultery-and-sodomy-legal-between-consenting-adults/|title=Governor Signs Bill Making Adultery and Sodomy Legal Between Consenting Adults|first=Craig|last=Bennett|date=March 26, 2019|website=News Talk KDXU}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fox13now.com/2019/03/25/adultery-and-sodomy-among-consenting-adults-are-no-longer-illegal-in-utah/|title=Adultery and sodomy among consenting adults are no longer illegal in Utah|date=26 March 2019}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Alabama]] ([http://law.onecle.com/alabama/criminal-code/13A-6-65.html Alab. Code 13A-6-65.]) |
|||
* [[Florida]] ([http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/798.02 Fld. Stat. 798.02.]) ([http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/800.02 Fld. Stat. 800.02.]) |
|||
* [[Georgia (US state)|Georgia]] ([http://laws.vatavia.net/georgia.html#Sodomy Ga. Stat. 16-6-18.]) ([http://laws.vatavia.net/georgia.html#Fornication Ga. Stat. 16-6-18.]) |
|||
* [[Idaho]] ([http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/idstat/Title18/T18CH66SECT18-6605.htm I.C. § 18-6605.]) ([http://www.legislature.idaho.gov/idstat/Title18/T18CH66SECT18-6605.htm I.C. § 18-6605.]) |
|||
* [[Kansas]] ([http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_21/Article_35/21-3505.html Kan. Stat. 21-3505.]) |
|||
* [[Kentucky]] ([http://law.justia.com/codes/kentucky/2012/chapter-510/510.100 KY Rev Stat § 510.100.]) |
|||
* [[Louisiana]] ([http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=78695 R.S. 14:89.]) |
|||
* [[Maryland]] ([http://law.justia.com/codes/maryland/2010/criminal-law/title-3/subtitle-3/3-321 Md. Code Ann. § 3-321.]) ([http://www.justdetention.org/pdf/legalresources/Maryland%203-322.pdf Md. Code Ann. § 3-322.]) |
|||
* [[Massachusetts]] ([http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/mgl/272-34.htm MGL Ch. 272, § 34.]) ([https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section35 MGL Ch. 272, § 35.]) |
|||
* [[Michigan]] ([http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-750-158 MCL § 750.158.]) ([http://www.sodomy.org/laws/michigan/indecency_male.html MCL § 750.338.]) ([http://www.sodomy.org/laws/michigan/indecency_female.html MCL § 750.338a.]) ([http://www.sodomy.org/laws/michigan/indecency_both.html MCL § 750.338b.]) |
|||
* [[Minnesota]] ([https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609.293 Minn. Stat. 609.293.]) ([http://www.sodomy.org/laws/minnesota/fornication.html Minn. Stat. 609.34.]) |
|||
* [[Mississippi]] ([http://www.mscode.com/free/statutes/97/029/0059.htm Miss. Code § 97-29-59.]) |
|||
* [[North Carolina]] ([http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-177.html G.S. § 14-177.]) ([http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/14-criminal-law/14-184.html G.S. § 14-184.]) ([http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-186.pdf G.S. § 14-186.]) |
|||
* [[Oklahoma]] ([http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/os/os%5F21%2D886.rtf Okla. Stat. § 21-886.]) |
|||
* [[South Carolina]] ([http://www.sodomy.org/laws/southcarolina/fornication.html S.C. Code § 16-15-60.]) ([http://law.justia.com/codes/south-carolina/2012/title-16/chapter-15/section-16-15-120 S.C. Code § 16-15-120.]) |
|||
* [[Texas]] ([http://law.onecle.com/texas/penal/21.06.00.html Tx. Code § 21.06.]) |
|||
* [[Utah]] ([http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_05_040300.htm Ut. Code 76-5-403.]) |
|||
On May 23, 2019, the [[Alabama House of Representatives]] passed, with 101 voting yea and 3 absent, Alabama Senate Bill 320, repealing the ban on "deviate sexual intercourse". On May 28, 2019, the [[Alabama State Senate]] passed Alabama Senate Bill 320, with 32 yea and 3 absent. The bill took effect on September 1, 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://lsa.alabama.gov/PDF/LRS/2019-summaries.pdf|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200630230147/http://lsa.alabama.gov/PDF/LRS/2019-summaries.pdf|archive-date=2020-06-30|title=Act 2019-465, SB320}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="AL SB 320">[https://legiscan.com/AL/bill/SB320/2019 AL SB 320]</ref> Alabama is the southernmost continental state to repeal their sodomy law as of 2023. |
|||
==Federal law== |
|||
Sodomy laws in the United States were largely a matter of state rather than federal jurisdiction, except for laws governing the District of Columbia and the U.S. Armed Forces. |
|||
===District of Columbia=== |
|||
In 1801, Congress enacted the [[District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801]] that continued all criminal laws of Maryland and Virginia in the now formally structured District, with those of Maryland applying to that portion of the District ceded from Maryland, and those of Virginia applying to that portion ceded from Virginia. At the time, Maryland had a sodomy law applicable only to free males with a punishment of "labour for any time, in their discretion, not exceeding seven years for the same crime, on the public roads of the said county, or in making, repairing or cleaning the streets or bason [sic] of Baltimore-town" and the death penalty for slaves committing sodomy, while Virginia had a penalty of 1–10 years for free persons committing sodomy, but had the death penalty for slaves committing sodomy. The law went into effect on February 27, 1801.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
In 1831, Congress established penalties in the District of Columbia for a number of crimes, but not for sodomy. It specified that "every other felony, misdemeanor, or offence not provided for by this act, may and shall be punished as heretofore[.]" At the time, Maryland and Virginia had a penalty of 1–10 years for committing sodomy. It went into effect in March 2, 1831.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
In 1892, Congress passed a law for the District of Columbia that states that "for the preservation of the public peace and the protection of property within the District of Columbia." Labeled in the law as vagrants were "all public prostitutes, and all such persons who lead a notoriously lewd or lascivious course of life[.]" All offenders had to post bond of up to $200 for good behavior for a period of six months. The law went into effect on July 29, 1892.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
In 1898, Congress deleted the word "notoriously" from the provision concerning a lewd or lascivious course of life, thereby allowing prosecution of those without notoriety. The bond for good behavior was raised to $500, and the law was made clearly gender-neutral. The law went into effect on July 8, 1898.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
{{Delayed|2020-10-01|On March 18, 2020, the Maryland legislature voted to repeal its sodomy law. The bill became law in May 2020 without the signature of [[Governor of Maryland|Governor]] [[Larry Hogan]].<ref name="Maryland Legislation HB0081">{{cite web |url=http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/HB0081?ys=2020RS|title=Maryland Legislation HB0081|publisher=mgaleg.maryland.gov }}</ref>|In May 2020, Maryland passed into law a repeal of the crime of sodomy, effective October 1st, 2020.<ref name="Maryland Legislation HB0081"/>}} While the original text of the bill intended to repeal both the state's sodomy law and [[Crime against nature|unnatural or perverted sexual practice]] law, amendments from the [[Maryland Senate]] urged to solely repeal the sodomy law.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Maryland HB81 {{!}} 2020 {{!}} Regular Session|url=https://legiscan.com/MD/bill/HB81/2020|access-date=2020-09-11|website=LegiScan|language=en}}</ref> On March 31, 2023, the Maryland legislature voted to repeal the unnatural and perverted sexual practice law. The bill was sent to Governor [[Wes Moore]] for signature. As he did not veto the bill within 30 days of passage, Moore allowed for the bill to become law without his signature, and the repeal took effect on October 1, 2023.<ref>{{cite news |title=Bill to repeal Md. sodomy law to take effect without governor's signature |url=https://www.washingtonblade.com/2023/05/19/bill-to-repeal-md-sodomy-law-to-take-effect-without-governors-signature/ |access-date=May 19, 2023 |work=[[The Washington Blade]] |date=May 19, 2023}}</ref> |
|||
In 1901, Congress adopting a new code for the District of Columbia that expressly recognized [[Common law offence|common-law crimes]], with a penalty for them of up to five years and/or a $1,000 fine. The law went into effect on March 3, 1901.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
In March 2022, Idaho repealed its sodomy law.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Idaho S1325 | 2022 | Regular Session |url=https://legiscan.com/ID/bill/S1325/2022}}</ref> The repeal was a result of a lawsuit brought on in September 2020 by a plaintiff known as John Doe. John Doe alleged his constitutional rights were violated when he was forced to register as a sex offender upon moving to Idaho due to a conviction for "oral sex" 2 decades prior.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Boone |first=Rebecca |date=September 24, 2020 |title=Idaho man sues over state's anti-sodomy law |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/idaho-man-sues-over-states-anti-sodomy-law/2020/09/24/7aa497e0-feaa-11ea-b0e4-350e4e60cc91_story.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20210223220600/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/idaho-man-sues-over-states-anti-sodomy-law/2020/09/24/7aa497e0-feaa-11ea-b0e4-350e4e60cc91_story.html|archive-date=February 23, 2021}}</ref> On May 17, 2023, the Minnesota legislature passed an Omnibus Judiciary and Public Safety Bill that included provisions repealing the state's sodomy, adultery, fornication, and abortion laws. On May 19, Governor [[Tim Walz]] signed the bill into law. It took effect the following day.<ref name="auto">{{Cite web |title=SF 2909 Status in the Senate for the 93rd Legislature (2023 - 2024) |url=https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/bill.php?b=Senate&f=SF2909&ssn=0&y=2023&keyword_type=all&keyword=sodomy |access-date=2023-05-19 |website=www.revisor.mn.gov}}</ref> |
|||
In 1935, Congress passed a law for the District of Columbia that made it a crime for "any person to invite, entice, persuade, or to address for the purpose of inviting, enticing, or persuading any person or persons...to accompany, to go with, to follow him or her to his or her residence, or to any other house or building, inclosure, or other place, for the purpose of prostitution, or any other immoral or lewd purpose." It imposed a fine of up to $100, up to 90 days in jail, and courts were permitted to "impose conditions" on anyone convicted under this law, including "medical and mental examination, diagnosis and treatment by proper public health and welfare authorities, and such other terms and conditions as the court may deem best for the protection of the community and the punishment, control, and rehabilitation of the defendant." The law went into effect on August 14, 1935.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
As of October 1, 2023, the following jurisdictions (12 U.S. states) had statutes criminalizing consensual sodomy: Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. These statutes penalties are not enforceable due to the [[binding precedent]] of ''Lawrence v. Texas'', meaning consensual sodomy cannot be prosecuted.<ref name="sulzberger2012nyt" /> |
|||
In 1941, Congress enacted a new solicitation law for the District of Columbia that labeled a "vagrant" any person who "engages in or commits acts of fornication or perversion for hire." The law went into effect on December 17, 1941.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
* [[Florida]] ([http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0800/Sections/0800.02.html Fld. Stat. 800.02.]) |
|||
In 1948, Congress enacted the first sodomy law in the District of Columbia, which established a penalty of up to 10 years in prison or a fine of up to $1,000 for sodomy. Also included with this sodomy law was a psychopathic offender law and a law "to provide for the treatment of sexual psychopaths in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes." The law went into effect on June 9, 1948.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
* [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]] ([https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?crid=84b9825b-6e2c-4713-a135-da4cc4608fa5 O.C.G.A. § 16-6-2]) |
|||
* [[Kansas]] ([http://kslegislature.org/li/b2017_18/statute/021_000_0000_chapter/021_055_0000_article/021_055_0004_section/021_055_0004_k/ Kan. Stat. 21-3505.]) |
|||
* [[Kentucky]] ([https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=19767 KY Rev Stat § 510.100.]) |
|||
* [[Louisiana]] ([https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/law.aspx?d=78695 R.S. 14:89.]) |
|||
* [[Massachusetts]] ([https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section34 MGL Ch. 272, § 34.]) ([https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section35 MGL Ch. 272, § 35.]) – [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/193/S2561 2023 repeal bill] |
|||
* [[Michigan]] ([http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-750-158 MCL § 750.158.]) ([http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-750-338 MCL § 750.338.]) ([http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-750-338a MCL § 750.338a.]) ([http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-750-338b MCL § 750.338b.]) [https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Bills/Bill?ObjectName=2023-HB-4431 – 2023 partial repeal bill] |
|||
* [[Mississippi]] ([https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?crid=db150b6e-3929-4379-9d15-e12d49445e5a Miss. Code § 97-29-59.]) |
|||
* [[North Carolina]] ([http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-177.html G.S. § 14-177.]) |
|||
* [[Oklahoma]] ([http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os21.pdf §21-886.]) |
|||
* [[South Carolina]] ([https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c015.php S.C. Code § 16-15-60.]) |
|||
* [[Texas]] ([https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.21.htm Tx. Penal Code § 21.06.]) |
|||
==Sodomy laws by jurisdiction in the United States of America== |
|||
In 1953, Congress changed the solicitation law in the District of Columbia so that the jail term of up to 90 days was retained, but the maximum fine was raised to $250, and the reference to the power of judges to "impose conditions" on the defendant was removed. The law went into effect on June 29, 1953.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
Below is a table of sodomy laws in the jurisdictions in United States of America and penalties as applicable to the [[binding precedent]] of ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sodomy.org/laws/ |title=United States Sodomy Laws |access-date=30 October 2023 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131216194515/http://www.sodomy.org/laws/ |archive-date=16 December 2013}}</ref><ref>GLAPN - Case Law: {{cite web |url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/legal.htm |title=Case law |access-date=17 August 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111001012638/http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/legal.htm |archive-date=2011-10-01 }}</ref> The most recent jurisdiction to repeal its sodomy ban is [[Maryland]]. |
|||
In 1981, after the District of Columbia regained home rule from Congress, it enacted a law that repealed the sodomy law, as well as other consensual acts, and made the sexual assault laws gender-neutral. However, the U.S. House exercised the power that it retained to veto laws passed by the District of Columbia Council. On October 1, 1981, the House voted 281-119 to disallow the new law.<ref>[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/97-1981/h214 TO TABLE THE PHILLIP CRANE MOTION TO DISCHARGE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF H. RES. 208, THE RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE ACTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL IN REVISING CRIMINAL PENALITIES IN CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES.]</ref><ref>[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/97-1981/h216 TO PROCEED TO THE CONSIDERATION OF H. RES. 208, THE RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE ACTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL IN REVISING CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. (MOTION AGREED TO)]</ref><ref>[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/97-1981/h215 TO DISCHARGE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF H. RES. 208, THE RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE ACTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL IN REVISING CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. (MOTION AGREED TO)]</ref><ref>[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/97-1981/h218 TO ADOPT H. RES. 208, THE RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE ACTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL IN REVISING CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES (MOTION AGREED TO)]</ref><ref>[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/97-1981/h217 TO LIMIT DEBATE TO TWO HOURS ON H. RES. 208, THE RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE ACTION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COUNCIL IN REVISING CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN CERTAIN SEX-RELATED OFFENSES. (MOTION AGREED TO)]</ref><ref>[http://beta.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-resolution/208/ H.Res.208 - A resolution disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the District of Columbia Sexual Assault Reform Act of 1981.]</ref> In 1983, one of the House vetoes by Congress was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of ''Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha'', but the law was repealed by an act of Congress in a revision to the home-rule law required by the Supreme Court decision.<ref name="DC Sodomy law">[http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/districtofcolumbia.htm District of Columbia]</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center |
|||
====Repeal==== |
|||
In 1993, the District of Columbia passed a law repealing the sodomy law, but this time Congress did not interfere and allowed the law to go into effect.<ref name="DC Sodomy law" /> |
|||
===Military=== |
|||
Although the U.S. military discharged soldiers for homosexual acts throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century, U.S. military law did not expressly prohibit homosexuality or homosexual conduct until February 4, 1921.<ref>[http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/USA0103.pdf UNITED STATES]</ref> |
|||
On March 1, 1917, the [[Articles of War]] of 1916 were implemented. This included a revision of the Articles of War of 1806, the new regulations detail statutes governing U.S. military discipline and justice. Under the category Miscellaneous Crimes and Offences, Article 93 states that any person subject to military law who commits "assault with intent to commit sodomy" shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.<ref name="usni">{{cite web|author= |url=http://www.usni.org/news-and-features/dont-ask-dont-tell/timeline |title=Key Dates in US Policy on Gay Men and Women in the United States Military |publisher=usni.org |date= |accessdate=2014-03-22}}</ref> |
|||
On June 4, 1920, Congress modified Article 93 of the Articles of War of 1916. It was changed to make the act of sodomy itself a crime, separate from the offense of assault with intent to commit sodomy.<ref name="usni" /> It went into effect on February 4, 1921.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20081004163647/http://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/ref/AW/index.html The Articles of War]</ref> |
|||
On May 5, 1950, the [[Uniform Code of Military Justice|UCMJ]] was passed by Congress and was signed into law by President [[Harry S. Truman]], and became effective on May 31, 1951. Article 125 forbids sodomy among all military personnel, defining it as "any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offence."<ref name="usni" /> |
|||
As for the [[United States armed forces|U.S. Armed Forces]], the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces|Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces]] has ruled that the ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' decision applies to Article 125, severely narrowing the previous ban on sodomy. In both ''United States v. Stirewalt'' and ''[[United States v. Marcum]]'', the court ruled that the "conduct [consensual sodomy] falls within the liberty interest identified by the Supreme Court,"<ref>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: [http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/03-0433.htm U.S. v. Stirewalt, September 29, 2004], accessed August 16, 2010</ref> but went on to say that despite the application of ''Lawrence'' to the military, Article 125 can still be upheld in cases where there are "factors unique to the military environment" that would place the conduct "outside any protected liberty interest recognized in ''Lawrence''."<ref name=marcum>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: [http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/02-0944.htm U.S. v. Marcum, August 23, 2004], accessed August 16, 2010</ref> Examples of such factors include [[rape]], [[fraternization]], public sexual behavior, or any other factors that would adversely affect good order and discipline. Convictions for consensual sodomy have been overturned in military courts under ''Lawrence'' in both ''United States v. Meno''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.uscg.mil/legal/cca/court_of_criminal_appeals_opinions/Year2008/20080409%20United%20States%20v.%20Smith%2066%20MJ%20556.pdf |title=United States v. Webster M. Smith |publisher=Uscg.mil |accessdate=2013-10-21}}</ref> and ''United States v. Bullock''.<ref>{{cite court|litigants=United States v. Bullock|reporter=ARMY|opinion=20030534|court=United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals|date=2004 |url=http://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Portals/Files/ACCAOther.nsf/0bc71293164e694c85256cfa0067d74e/5b8a0766fac739f985256f5c006ea3be/$FILE/mo-bullock,km.doc|accessdate=2013-11-03}}</ref> |
|||
====Repeal==== |
|||
On December 26, 2013, President [[Barack Obama]] signed into law the [[National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014]], which repealed the ban on consensual sodomy found in Article 125.<ref>{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Chris|title=Defense bill contains gay-related provisions |url=http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/12/20/defense-bill-contains-gay-related-provisions/|accessdate=December 21, 2019|newspaper=Washington Blade|date=December 20, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
==State and territorial laws prior to ''Lawrence v. Texas''== |
|||
<!--Note: Multiple LGBT rights in U.S. state articles link to this section. Please update links accordingly if renaming this section--> |
|||
Below is a table of sodomy laws and penalties in U.S. states and territories prior to their invalidation in 2003.<ref>SodomyLaws.org: [http://www.sodomy.org/laws/ "United States Sodomy Laws," January 28, 1998], accessed August 17, 2010</ref><ref>GLAPN - Case Law: [http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/legal.htm], accessed September 25, 2010</ref> |
|||
The table indicates which acts or groups were covered under each sodomy law, as pertaining to consenting adults. It also indicates the year and method of repeal or strikedown. |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" ! type="number" |
|||
|- style="font-size: 95%;" | |
|- style="font-size: 95%;" | |
||
! rowspan= |
! rowspan=4|Jurisdiction |
||
! rowspan= |
! rowspan=4|Date statute struck down |
||
! rowspan=4|Date statute repealed |
|||
! colspan=5|Covered |
|||
! |
! colspan=8|Covered by statute |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! rowspan=2| Bestiality |
|||
! colspan=4| Opposite-sex intercourse |
|||
! colspan=2| Same-sex intercourse |
|||
|- |
|||
! Anal sex |
|||
! Married intercourse |
|||
! Oral sex |
! Oral sex |
||
! Unmarried intercourse |
|||
! Anal sex |
! Anal sex |
||
! Oral sex |
|||
! Homosexual<br>couples |
|||
! Unmarried<br>heterosexual<br>couples |
|||
! Married<br>couples |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Alabama}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'') |
|||
| 2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2019 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [http://alisondb.legislature.state.al.us/alison/CodeOfAlabama/1975/13A-6-221.htm Ala. Code 1975 § 13A-6-220 - 221] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File: |
| rowspan=2 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*[[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]]<br>(''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Alaska}} |
||
|data-sort-value="1973" rowspan=3 | N/A |
|||
| 1971/<br>1980 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1980<br/><small>(sodomy)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1971<br/><small>(crime against nature, unnatural carnal copulation by means of the mouth, or otherwise)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.akleg.gov/basis/statutes.asp#11.61.140 A.S. 11.61.140] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
**1971: Oral sex decriminalized |
|||
**1980: Anal sex decriminalized |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|American Samoa}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1979 |
|||
|1979 |
|||
|colspan= |
| colspan=7 |<span style="display:none"></span>N/A |
||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1979) |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Arizona}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2001 |
|||
|2001 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.azleg.gov/viewDocument/?docName=http://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/01411.htm A.R.S. § 13-1411] |
||
| [[File: |
| rowspan=7 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Arkansas}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2001<br/>(''[[Jegley v. Picado]]'')<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/jegley.aspx |title=Jegley v. Picado 80 S.W.3d 332 |publisher=Apa.org |access-date=2014-03-11 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131104130022/http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/jegley.aspx |archive-date=2013-11-04 }}</ref> |
|||
|1975/<br>2001/<br>2005 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2005 |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1975<br/><small>(law reinstated in 1977)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=1a473db1-e8fc-4389-9b9a-cf0908512261&nodeid=AAFAADAAFAACAAS&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FAAF%2FAAFAAD%2FAAFAADAAF%2FAAFAADAAFAAC%2FAAFAADAAFAACAAS&level=5&haschildren=&populated=false&title=5-14-122.+Bestiality.&indicator=true&config=00JAA2ZjZiM2VhNS0wNTVlLTQ3NzUtYjQzYy0yYWZmODJiODRmMDYKAFBvZENhdGFsb2fXiYCnsel0plIgqpYkw9PK&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A4WVD-4YB0-R03N-R0JY-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=3e63c634-d523-400b-b3f2-bf0f70b0df26 A.C.A. § 5-14-122] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1975, reinstated against same-sex 1977) |
|||
*[[Arkansas Supreme Court]]<br>(''Jegley v. Picado'')<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/jegley.aspx |title=Jegley v. Picado 80 S.W.3d 332 |publisher=Apa.org |date= |accessdate=2014-03-11}}</ref> |
|||
*Legislative repeal (2005, separate ban on bestiality)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/assembly/2005/R/Acts/Act1994.pdf |title=Senate Bill 984 |publisher=Arkansas State Legislature |date= |accessdate=October 15, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|California}} |
||
| rowspan=5|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1976 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1976 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=286.5. Cal. Penal Code § 286.5] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Colorado}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1972 |
|||
|1972 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=138e9a63-f874-4ac1-ac5b-501498be6729&nodeid=AASAATAADAAE&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FAAS%2FAASAAT%2FAASAATAAD%2FAASAATAADAAE&level=4&haschildren=&populated=false&title=18-9-202.+Cruelty+to+animals+-+aggravated+cruelty+to+animals+-+service+animals+-+short+title.&indicator=true&config=014FJAAyNGJkY2Y4Zi1mNjgyLTRkN2YtYmE4OS03NTYzNzYzOTg0OGEKAFBvZENhdGFsb2d592qv2Kywlf8caKqYROP5&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A61P5-WSW1-DYDC-J397-00008-00&ecomp=7gf59kk&prid=ed2a5327-2146-4fdb-bd18-3bc5f640c4f7 C. R. S. A. § 18-9-202] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Connecticut}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1971 |
|||
|1971 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_952.htm#sec_53a-73a C. G. S. A. § 53a-73a] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Delaware}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1973 |
|||
|1973 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://delcode.delaware.gov/title11/c005/sc02/index.html#775 11 Del.C. § 775] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|District of Columbia}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1993 |
|||
|1993 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/22-1012.01 D.C. Code § 22–1012.01.] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1995) |
|||
*Legislative repeal (2004) |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Florida}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas''; <small>unnatural and lascivious act</small>) |
|||
|2003 |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1971<br/>(''[[Franklin v. State]]''; <small>crimes against nature</small>)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0800/Sections/0800.02.html |title=800.02 Unnatural and lascivious act. A person who commits any unnatural and lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree |publisher=Archive.flsenate.gov |access-date=2013-12-02 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131204021448/http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899%2F0800%2FSections%2F0800.02.html |archive-date=2013-12-04 }}</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1974<br/><small>(crimes against nature)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=828.126&URL=0800-0899/0828/Sections/0828.126.html West's F. S. A. 828.126] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| colspan=7 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0800/Sections/0800.02.html West's F. S. A. 800.02] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court (''Lawrence v. Texas''); <br>NOTE: ''[[Franklin v. State]]'', 1971, struck down original "crimes against nature" statute; sodomy still could be prosecuted under a separate statute against "unnatural and lascivious acts";<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0800/Sections/0800.02.html |title=800.02 Unnatural and lascivious act. A person who commits any unnatural and lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree |publisher=Archive.flsenate.gov |date= |accessdate=2013-12-02}}</ref> law against adultery also retained<ref>{{cite web|url=http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0700-0799/0798/Sections/0798.01.html |title=Flsenate Archive: Statutes & Constitution > View Statutes |publisher=Archive.flsenate.gov |date= |accessdate=2014-03-11}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Georgia (U.S. state)|name=Georgia}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1998<br/>(''[[Powell v. Georgia]]'') |
|||
|1998 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=82475f7e-6ca9-4b04-bac7-7128667845d7&nodeid=AAQAAHAAI&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FAAQ%2FAAQAAH%2FAAQAAHAAI&level=3&haschildren=&populated=false&title=16-6-6.+Bestiality.&indicator=true&config=00JAA1MDBlYzczZi1lYjFlLTQxMTgtYWE3OS02YTgyOGM2NWJlMDYKAFBvZENhdGFsb2feed0oM9qoQOMCSJFX5qkd&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A6348-FV61-DYB7-W0MC-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=e213c6a4-1172-48d4-80d4-9a0d1f60f74b O.C.G.A. § 16-6-6] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| colspan=7 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=329dd255-95b1-489d-9a11-473d96eafa8c&nodeid=AAQAAHAAD&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FAAQ%2FAAQAAH%2FAAQAAHAAD&level=3&haschildren=&populated=false&title=16-6-2.+Sodomy%3B+aggravated+sodomy%3B+medical+expenses.&indicator=true&config=00JAA1MDBlYzczZi1lYjFlLTQxMTgtYWE3OS02YTgyOGM2NWJlMDYKAFBvZENhdGFsb2feed0oM9qoQOMCSJFX5qkd&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A6348-FV61-DYB7-W0M6-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=5bfaca77-063c-4426-8601-091a05ce9731 O.C.G.A. § 16-6-2] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*[[Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state)|Supreme Court of Georgia]]<br>(''[[Powell v. Georgia]]'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Guam}} |
||
| rowspan=2|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1978 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1978 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.guamcourts.org/CompilerofLaws/GCA/09gca/9gc070.PDF 9 GCA § 70.40.] |
|||
| |
|||
| rowspan=6 colspan=9| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Hawaii}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1973 |
|||
|1973 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol14_Ch0701-0853/HRS0711/HRS_0711-1109_0008.htm HRS § 711-1109.8] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Idaho}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|1971/<br>2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2022 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1971<br/><small>(law reinstated in 1972)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title18/T18CH66/SECT18-6602/ I.C. § 18-6602] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1971,<br>laws reinstated 1972) |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Illinois}} |
||
| rowspan=3|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1962 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1962 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/072000050K12-35.htm 720 I.L.C.S. 5/12-35] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal, the first state to do so |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Indiana}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1976 |
|||
|1976 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://iga.in.gov/laws/2022/ic/titles/35#35-46-3-14 I.C. 35-46-3-14] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Iowa}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1978 |
|||
|1978 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/code/2023/717C.1.pdf I.C.A. § 717C.1] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Kansas}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1969<br/><small>(opposite-sex intercourse)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [http://ksrevisor.org/statutes/chapters/ch21/021_055_0004.html K.S.A. 21-5504] |
||
| [[File: |
| rowspan=2 colspan=4| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| [[File: |
| colspan=2 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] K.S.A. 21-5504 |
||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1969 for heterosexuals, same-sex sexual activity still illegal - the first state to target LGBT people)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/kansas.htm |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Kansas |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2012-08-05}}</ref> |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Kentucky}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1992<br/>(''[[Kentucky v. Wasson]]'') |
|||
|1992 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1974<br/><small>(opposite-sex intercourse)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=49351 KRS § 525.137] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=2 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=19767 KRS § 510.100] |
||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1974 for heterosexuals, same-sex sexual activity still illegal)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/kentucky.htm |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Kentucky |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2012-08-05}}</ref> |
|||
*[[Kentucky Supreme Court]]<br>(''[[Kentucky v. Wasson]]'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Louisiana}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=1106716 LSA-R.S. 14:89.3] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=7 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/law.aspx?d=78695 LSA-R.S. 14:89] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Maine}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1976 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1976 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://legislature.maine.gov/statutes/17/title17sec1031.html 17 M.R.S.A. § 1031] |
|||
| |
|||
| rowspan=2 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Maryland}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1999<br/>(''[[Williams v. Glendening]]''; <small>anal sex</small>) |
|||
|1999 |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1998<br/>(''Williams v. Glendening''; <small>opposite-sex oral sex and same-sex intercourse</small>) |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1990<br/>(''[[Schochet v. State]]''; <small>opposite-sex intercourse</small>)<ref>Google Scholar: [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5007559118764883432& Stephen Adam Schochet v. State of Maryland, October 9, 1990], accessed March 11, 2011</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2023<br/><small>(unnatural and perverted sexual practice)</small><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/SB0054?ys=2023RS|title=Legislation - SB0054|website=mgaleg.maryland.gov}}</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| |
|||
2020<br/><small>(sodomy)</small><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://legiscan.com/MD/bill/HB81/2020|title = Maryland HB81 | 2020 | Regular Session}}</ref> |
|||
*[[Maryland Court of Appeals]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://govt.westlaw.com/mdc/Document/N59462ED09E1E11E9BECFBE167A0DFBF9?viewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem&contextData=(sc.Default) MD Code, Criminal Law, § 10-606.] |
|||
**Schochet v. State (1990)<br><small>(heterosexuals)</small><ref>Google Scholar: [http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5007559118764883432& Stephen Adam Schochet v. State of Maryland, October 9, 1990], accessed March 11, 2011</ref> |
|||
**Williams v. Glendening (1998)<br><small>(oral sex, homosexuals, ruling)</small> |
|||
**Williams v. Glendening (1999)<br><small>(anal sex, consent decree)</small> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Massachusetts}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1974<br/>(''[[Commonwealth v. Balthazar]]'')<ref>Massachusetts Cases: [http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/366/366mass298.html Commonwealth v. Richard L. Balthazar, 366 Mass. 298] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303181753/http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/366/366mass298.html |date=2016-03-03 }}, accessed March 11, 2011</ref> |
|||
|1974 |
|||
| rowspan=2|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section77C M.G.L.A. 272 § 77] |
||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
[https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section34 M.G.L.A. 272 § 34] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=6 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section34 M.G.L.A. 272 § 34] |
||
----- |
|||
| |
|||
[https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleI/Chapter272/Section35 M.G.L.A. 272 § 35] |
|||
*[[Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court|Massachusetts Supreme<br>Judicial Court]]<br>(''Commonwealth v. Balthazar'') (1974)<ref>Massachusetts Cases: [http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/366/366mass298.html Commonwealth v. Richard L. Balthazar, 366 Mass. 298], accessed March 11, 2011</ref> |
|||
**(''GLAD v. Attorney General'') (2002)<ref>Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts: [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ma&vol=sjcslip/8539&invol=1 ''GLAD v. Attorney General'', February 21, 2002], accessed August 17, 2010</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Michigan}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|1990/<br>2003 |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
1990<br/>(''[[Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelley|Michigan Organization for<br>Human Rights v. Kelley]]''; <small>applied directly to [[Wayne County, Michigan|Wayne County]]; uncertain whether ruling was binding statewide; reversed in 1992 in ''[[People v. Brashier]]''</small>)<ref name="mohrkelly-court">{{cite court |litigants=Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelley |opinion=No. 88–815820 CZ slip op. |court=Mich. 3rd Cir. Ct. |date=July 9, 1990 }}</ref><ref>''Gay Times'': [http://www.gaytimes.co.uk/Hotspots/GayGuide-action-Region-regionid-23.html Michigan] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928031636/http://www.gaytimes.co.uk/Hotspots/GayGuide-action-Region-regionid-23.html |date=2011-09-28 }}</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(il02ukiazoaozcsifnxjsmbi))/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-750-158 M.C.L.A. 750.158] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan="6" | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=MCL-750-158 M.C.L.A. 750.158] |
||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
[http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(qo2qsufl2ayqeggz4ok13c1y))/mileg.aspx?page=GetObject&objectname=mcl-750-338 M.C.L.A. 750.338] |
|||
| |
|||
----- |
|||
*Michigan 3rd Circuit Court<br>(''[[Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelley|Michigan Organization for<br>Human Rights v. Kelley]]'') (1990)<br><small>(Applied directly to [[Wayne County, Michigan|Wayne County]] prosecutors, uncertain whether ruling was binding on all prosecutors statewide)</small><ref name="mohrkelly-court">{{cite court |litigants=Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelley |vol= |reporter= |opinion=No. 88–815820 CZ slip op. |pinpoint= |court=Mich. 3rd Cir. Ct. |date=July 9, 1990 |url= |accessdate= |quote=}}</ref><ref>''Gay Times'': [http://www.gaytimes.co.uk/Hotspots/GayGuide-action-Region-regionid-23.html Michigan]</ref> |
|||
[http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(qo2qsufl2ayqeggz4ok13c1y))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-750-338a M.C.L.A. 750.338a] |
|||
*[[Michigan Court of Appeals]]<br> (''People v. Brashier'') (1992)<br><small>(Court upheld sodomy law, effectively reversing ''MOHR v. Kelly'')</small><ref name="glapn-mohrkelley">{{cite web | url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/michigan/michigan.htm | title=Sodomy laws - Michigan | publisher=Gay & Lesbian Archives of the Pacific Northwest | accessdate=August 2, 2013}}</ref><ref name="brashier-court">{{cite court |litigants=People v. Brashier |vol= |reporter= |opinion=496 NW 2d 385 |pinpoint= |court=Mich. App. |date= December 29, 1992 |url=http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6352384100321621325 |accessdate=August 2, 2013 |quote=}}</ref> |
|||
----- |
|||
[http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(qo2qsufl2ayqeggz4ok13c1y))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-750-338b M.C.L.A. 750.338b] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Minnesota}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2001<br/>(''[[Doe v. Ventura]]'') |
|||
|2001 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2023 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.294 M.S.A. § 609.294] |
||
| [[File: |
| colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*[[Minnesota Court of Appeals]]<br>(''Doe v. Ventura'')<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/minnesota/doevventura.htm |title=Doe v Ventura |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2014-03-11}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Mississippi}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| colspan=7| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=f61ff3ec-3068-4194-994f-f0e7ce32c270&nodeid=ABYAAPAABABC&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FABY%2FABYAAP%2FABYAAPAAB%2FABYAAPAABABC&level=4&haschildren=&populated=false&title=%C2%A7+97-29-59.+Unnatural+intercourse.&indicator=true&config=00JABhZDIzMTViZS04NjcxLTQ1MDItOTllOS03MDg0ZTQxYzU4ZTQKAFBvZENhdGFsb2f8inKxYiqNVSihJeNKRlUp&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A8P6B-8B52-8T6X-73W5-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=438ed9a5-8b95-4ab4-b018-92f5c2225d86 Miss. Code Ann. § 97-29-59] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Missouri}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas''; <small>rest of the state outside of the [[Missouri Court of Appeals#Jurisdiction|Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District]]</small>) |
|||
|1999/<br>2003 |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1999<br/>(''[[State of Missouri v. Cogshell]]''; <small>Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District only</small>) |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2006 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=566.111 V.A.M.S. 566.111] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
| rowspan=8 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| |
|||
*Missouri Court of Appeals,<br>Western District<br>(''State of Missouri v. Cogshell'') (1999)<br><small>(Western District counties only)</small> |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'')<br><small>(rest of Missouri)</small> |
|||
*Legislative repeal (2006) |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Montana}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1997<br/>(''[[Gryczan v. State]]'')<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thetaskforce.org/press/releases/pr118_070497 |title=Montana Kills Sodomy Law |publisher=Thetaskforce.org |date=1997-07-04 |access-date=2011-08-31 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110804183605/http://www.thetaskforce.org/press/releases/pr118_070497 |archive-date=2011-08-04 }}</ref> |
|||
|1997 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2013<br/><small>(same-sex intercourse)</small><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2013/04/montana-governor-signs-bill-to-strike-down-obsolete-sodomy-law/ |title=Montana governor signs bill to strike down obsolete sodomy law – LGBTQ Nation |date=18 April 2013 |publisher=Lgbtqnation.com |access-date=2013-10-21 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131025164740/http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2013/04/montana-governor-signs-bill-to-strike-down-obsolete-sodomy-law/ |archive-date=2013-10-25 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://laws.leg.mt.gov/legprd/LAW0210W$BSIV.ActionQuery?P_BILL_NO1=107&P_BLTP_BILL_TYP_CD=SB&Z_ACTION=Find&P_SESS=20131 |title=LAWS Detailed Bill Information Page |publisher=Laws.leg.mt.gov |access-date=2013-10-21 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131022014908/http://laws.leg.mt.gov/legprd/LAW0210W$BSIV.ActionQuery?P_BILL_NO1=107&P_BLTP_BILL_TYP_CD=SB&Z_ACTION=Find&P_SESS=20131 |archive-date=2013-10-22 }}</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1974<br/><small>(opposite-sex intercourse)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/title_0450/chapter_0080/part_0020/section_0180/0450-0080-0020-0180.html MCA 45-8-218] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative action (1974)<br><small>(heterosexual oral and anal sex only - the reference to "crimes against nature" was repealed and replaced with "deviate sexual relations"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/usa/montana/montana.htm |title=Montana |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2011-08-31}}</ref>)</small> |
|||
*[[Montana Supreme Court]]<br>(''Grcyzan v. State'')<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thetaskforce.org/press/releases/pr118_070497 |title=Montana Kills Sodomy Law |publisher=Thetaskforce.org |date=1997-07-04 |accessdate=2011-08-31}}</ref> |
|||
*Legislative action (2013) repealed "deviant sexual relations"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2013/04/montana-governor-signs-bill-to-strike-down-obsolete-sodomy-law/ |title=Montana governor signs bill to strike down obsolete sodomy law – LGBTQ Nation |publisher=Lgbtqnation.com |date= |accessdate=2013-10-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://laws.leg.mt.gov/legprd/LAW0210W$BSIV.ActionQuery?P_BILL_NO1=107&P_BLTP_BILL_TYP_CD=SB&Z_ACTION=Find&P_SESS=20131 |title=LAWS Detailed Bill Information Page |publisher=Laws.leg.mt.gov |date= |accessdate=2013-10-21}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Nebraska}} |
||
| rowspan=5 |<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1978 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1978 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=28-1010 Neb. Rev. St. § 28-1010] |
|||
| |
|||
----- |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
[https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=54-904 Neb. Rev. St. 54-904] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Nevada}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1993 |
|||
|1993 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-201.html#NRS201Sec455 N. R. S. 201.455] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|New Hampshire}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1975 |
|||
|1975 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/644/644-8.htm N.H. Rev. Stat. § 644:8g] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|New Jersey}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1978 |
|||
|1978 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.state.nj.us/health/vph/documents/4_22-17%20Text%202018.pdf N. J. S. A. 4:22-17] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|New Mexico}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1975 |
|||
|1975 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://nmonesource.com/nmos/nmsa-unanno/en/item/18530/index.do#!fragment/undefined/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWsBGB7LqC2YATqgJIAm0A5AMwAMAtAJwCC91lAlADTJYAuAUwgBFRAMIBPKpS4QBRBKPFTKMuQpABlLIT4AhKQCUAogBljANWYA5AMLGufMBmh8scDhyA NMSA § 30-9A-3] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|New York}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1980<br/>(''[[New York v. Onofre]]''; <small>excluded the [[New York National Guard]]</small>) |
|||
|1980/<br>2000 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2000 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/130.20 McKinney's Penal Law § 130.20] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*[[New York Court of Appeals]]<br>(''[[New York v. Onofre]]'') (1980)<br><small>(excluding the [[New York National Guard]])</small> |
|||
*Legislative repeal, 2000<br><small>(applied to New York National Guard) |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|North Carolina}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| colspan=7| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.ncleg.net/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_14/gs_14-177.html N.C.G.S.A. § 14-177] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Northern Mariana Islands}} |
||
| rowspan=3|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1983 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1983 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| colspan=7 |<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|North Dakota}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1973 |
|||
|1973 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.ndlegis.gov/cencode/t12-1c20.pdf NDCC, § 12.1-20-12] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| rowspan=2 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Ohio}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1974 |
|||
|1974 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-959.21/3-21-2017 R.C. § 959.21] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Oklahoma}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas''; <small>same-sex intercourse</small>) |
|||
|1988/<br>2003 |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1988<br/>(''[[Newsom v. State]]''; <small>opposite-sex intercourse</small>) |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=7| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://oksenate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-12/os21.pdf 21 Okl. St. Ann. § 886] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*[[Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals]]<br>(''Newsom v. State'') (1988)<br><small>(heterosexuals)</small> |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'')<br><small>(homosexuals)</small> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Oregon}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1972 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1972 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors167.html O. R. S. § 167.333] |
|||
| |
|||
| rowspan=4 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Pennsylvania}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1980<br/>(''[[Commonwealth v. Bonadio]]'')<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20100710013622/http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/pabonadio.html Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Michael BONADIO, Patrick Gagliano, Shane Wimbel, and Dawn Delight a/k/a Mildred I. Kannitz, Appellees]</ref> |
|||
|1972/<br>1980 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2022<br/><small>(homosexuality)<ref>{{cite web |date=July 15, 2022 |title=Homosexuality finally removed from Pa. Crimes Code after being first discovered in Upper Darby |url=https://www.wesa.fm/politics-government/2022-07-15/homosexuality-pa-crimes-code}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=July 8, 2022 |title=Bill to Remove 'Homosexuality' from PA Crimes Code Passes Senate and Heads to Governor |url=https://patch.com/pennsylvania/horsham/bill-remove-homosexuality-pa-crimes-code-passes-senate}}</ref></small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1995<br/><small>(unmarried opposite-sex intercourse and same-sex intercourse)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1972<br/><small>(married opposite-sex intercourse)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/18/00.031.029.000..HTM 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3129] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative action, 1972<br><small>(married couples only)</small> |
|||
*[[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]<br>(''Commonwealth v. Bonadio'')<br><small>(all other relationships)</small><ref>[http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/pabonadio.html] {{wayback|url=http://wings.buffalo.edu/law/bclc/web/pabonadio.html |date=20100710013622 }}</ref> |
|||
*Legislative repeal, 1995 |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Puerto Rico}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
| 1974/<br>2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2006<br/><small>(opposite-sex anal sex and same-sex anal and oral sex)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1974<br/><small>(opposite-sex oral sex)</small> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=ee57689a-935b-4347-8dee-550682c84175&nodeid=ABNAAFAABAAEAABAAE&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FABN%2FABNAAF%2FABNAAFAAB%2FABNAAFAABAAE%2FABNAAFAABAAEAAB%2FABNAAFAABAAEAABAAE&level=6&haschildren=&populated=false&title=%C2%A7+4773.+Bestiality&indicator=true&config=00JABkODU1MGI4OC1hMmRkLTQ2MGYtOGY1NS03YjVjOWM4YjJlZjAKAFBvZENhdGFsb2d0HiKld62itjBDGzN8H7lV&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5CFX-3331-66SD-80B6-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=0adf41ae-c360-44cc-9a36-12dfbd84eba8 P.R. Laws tit. 33, § 4773] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative action (1974)<br><small>(heterosexual oral sex only)</small> |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'')<br><small>(all other forms)</small> |
|||
*Legislative repeal (2006)<ref>[http://www.ilga.org/statehomophobia/Legal%20Wrap%20Up%20Survey%20July%202006.pdf ] {{wayback|url=http://www.ilga.org/statehomophobia/Legal%20Wrap%20Up%20Survey%20July%202006.pdf |date=20061020161253 }}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Rhode Island}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1998 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1998 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [http://webserver.rilegislature.gov//Statutes/TITLE11/11-10/11-10-1.htm Gen.Laws 1956, § 11-10-1] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|South Carolina}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=3 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c015.php Code 1976 § 16-15-120] |
||
| |
|[[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=2 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] Code 1976 § 16-15-120 |
||
| |
|[[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|South Dakota}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1977 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1977 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://sdlegislature.gov/Statutes/22-22-42 SDCL § 22-22-42] |
|||
| |
|||
| rowspan=2 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Tennessee}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1996<br/>(''[[Campbell v. Sundquist]]'') |
|||
|1996 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1996<br/><small>(same-sex intercourse)</small><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://wpln.org/post/nashville-man-cleared-of-1995-homosexual-acts-conviction-but-cases-linger-for-41-others/|title=Nashville Man Cleared Of 1995 'Homosexual Acts' Conviction, But Cases Linger For 41 Others|first=Tony|last=Gonzalez|date=November 14, 2016|website=wpln.org}}</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1989<br/><small>(opposite-sex intercourse)</small><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/tennessee.htm |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Tennessee |publisher=Glapn.org |access-date=2012-08-05 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130424021340/http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/tennessee.htm |archive-date=2013-04-24 }}</ref> |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=1d888751-a48e-422e-bfe3-527237155e4e&nodeid=ABNAALAACAAO&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FABN%2FABNAAL%2FABNAALAAC%2FABNAALAACAAO&level=4&haschildren=&populated=false&title=39-14-214.+Criminal+offenses+against+animals.&indicator=true&config=025054JABlOTJjNmIyNi0wYjI0LTRjZGEtYWE5ZC0zNGFhOWNhMjFlNDgKAFBvZENhdGFsb2cDFQ14bX2GfyBTaI9WcPX5&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A5YN8-H0Y0-R03M-H4XK-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=7267360d-6a04-4441-b2eb-99dac1df045f T. C. A. § 39-14-214] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1989 for heterosexuals, same-sex sexual activity still illegal)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/tennessee.htm |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Tennessee |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2012-08-05}}</ref> |
|||
*[[Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals|Tennessee Court of Criminal<br>Appeals]]<br>(''Campbell v. Sundquist'')<br><small>(appeal denied by the<br> [[Tennessee Supreme Court]]) |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Texas}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|2003 |
|||
----- |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
1970<br/>(''[[Buchanan v. Batchelor]]''; <small>reversed in 1971 by the [[United States Supreme Court]]</small>) |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1974<br/><small>(opposite-sex anal and oral sex</small><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/texas.htm |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Texas |publisher=Glapn.org |access-date=2011-08-31 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004214019/http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/texas.htm |archive-date=2011-10-04 }}</ref>) |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/docs/pe/htm/pe.21.htm V. T. C. A., Penal Code § 21.09] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
| colspan=4| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| colspan=2 | [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.21.htm V. T. C. A., Penal Code § 21.06] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative action (1974)<br><small>(heterosexual oral and anal sex only - the reference to "sodomy" was repealed and replaced with "homosexual conduct"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/texas.htm |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Texas |publisher=Glapn.org |date= |accessdate=2011-08-31}}</ref>)</small> |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! {{flagicon|United States of America}} [[United States Armed Forces]] |
|||
![[LGBT rights in Utah|Utah]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|1971/<br>2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2013 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/934 10 U.S. Code § 934 - Art. 134.] |
||
| [[File: |
| rowspan=1 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal (1971, reinstated in full 1972) |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
!{{flag|United States of America}} |
|||
![[LGBT rights in Vermont|Vermont]] |
|||
| colspan=9|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1977 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
!{{flag|Utah}} |
|||
![[U.S. Virgin Islands|Virgin Islands]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|1985 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2019 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
----- |
|||
| |
|||
1971<br /><small>(law reinstated in 1972)</small> |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Chapter9/76-9-S301.8.html U.C.A. 1953 § 76-9-301.8] |
|||
| rowspan=5 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
!{{flag|Vermont}} |
|||
![[LGBT rights in Virginia|Virginia]] |
|||
| rowspan=2|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|2003 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1977 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/13/008/00352 13 V.S.A. § 352] |
||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] |
|||
| |
|||
*U.S. Supreme Court<br>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
*[[Supreme Court of Virginia]]<br>(''[[Martin v. Ziherl]]'') (2005) |
|||
*Legislative repeal (lewd and lascivious cohabitation only, 2013) |
|||
*[[United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit]]<br />(''Moose v. MacDonald'') (2013) |
|||
*Legislative repeal (anal and oral sex, 2014)<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/virginia-lawmakers-repeal-sodomy-ban/2014/03/06/20e81b82-a55b-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html | title=Virginia lawmakers repeal sodomy ban | publisher=The Washington Post | date=6 March 2014 | accessdate=18 May 2014 | author=Weiner, Rachel}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
!{{flag|United States Virgin Islands|name=Virgin Islands of the United States}} |
|||
![[LGBT rights in Washington|Washington]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1985 |
|||
|1976 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://advance.lexis.com/documentpage/?pdmfid=1000516&crid=6ccba29b-ca7b-45b5-a0bc-72ddc8ed9a07&nodeid=AAQACKAAD&nodepath=%2FROOT%2FAAQ%2FAAQACK%2FAAQACKAAD&level=3&haschildren=&populated=false&title=%C2%A7%E2%80%822062.+Bestiality&indicator=true&config=014DJAA3OWU1MmYyMC1kNzRhLTQ4NDAtYTMxZS01YzJhMzBkZDA0NDMKAFBvZENhdGFsb2dSOvVciRp0EcGxvMymeAXd&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fstatutes-legislation%2Furn%3AcontentItem%3A56WP-9MJ1-6G1M-90CG-00008-00&ecomp=7gf5kkk&prid=4747f1ae-5ea2-487c-8553-e735e6efac9f 14 V.I.C. § 2062] |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
! |
!{{flag|Virginia}} |
||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2003<br/>(''Lawrence v. Texas'') |
|||
|1976 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>2014<br /><small>(anal and oral sex)</small><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/virginia-lawmakers-repeal-sodomy-ban/2014/03/06/20e81b82-a55b-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html | title=Virginia lawmakers repeal sodomy ban | newspaper=The Washington Post | date=6 March 2014 | access-date=18 May 2014 | author=Weiner, Rachel | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140307004912/http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/virginia-lawmakers-repeal-sodomy-ban/2014/03/06/20e81b82-a55b-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html | archive-date=7 March 2014 }}</ref> |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
----- |
|||
| |
|||
2013<br /><small>(lewd and lascivious cohabitation)</small> |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter8/section18.2-361/ Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-361] |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
!{{flag|Washington}} |
|||
![[LGBT rights in Wisconsin|Wisconsin]] |
|||
| rowspan=4|<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
|||
|1983 |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1976 |
|||
|colspan=5|N/A |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=16.52.205 West's RCWA 16.52.205] |
|||
| |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
!{{flag|West Virginia}} |
|||
![[LGBT rights in Wyoming|Wyoming]] |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1976 |
|||
|1977 |
|||
|colspan= |
| colspan=7 |<span style="display:none">#</span>N/A |
||
| |
|- |
||
!{{flag|Wisconsin}} |
|||
*Legislative repeal |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1983 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/944/iii/18 W.S.A. 944.18] |
|||
| rowspan=2 colspan=8| [[File:X mark.svg|15px]] |
|||
|- |
|||
!{{flag|Wyoming}} |
|||
|<span style="display:none">#</span>1977 |
|||
| [[File:Yes check.svg|15px]] [https://wyoleg.gov/statutes/compress/title06.pdf W.S.1977 § 6-4-601] |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
== |
===Federal law=== |
||
Sodomy laws in the United States were largely a matter of state rather than federal jurisdiction, except for laws governing the District of Columbia and the U.S. Armed Forces. |
|||
{{Portal|United States|LGBT}} |
|||
*[[Crime against nature]] |
|||
===District of Columbia=== |
|||
*[[LGBT rights in the United States]] |
|||
In 1801, the [[6th United States Congress]] enacted the [[District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801]], a law that continued all criminal laws of [[Maryland]] and [[Virginia]], with those of Maryland applying to the portion of the District ceded from Maryland and those of Virginia applying to the portion ceded from Virginia. As a result, in the Maryland-ceded portion, [[sodomy]] was punishable with up to seven years' imprisonment for free persons and with the [[Capital punishment in Maryland|death penalty]] for [[Slavery in the United States|enslaved persons]], whereas in the Virginia-ceded portion it was punishable between one and ten years' imprisonment for free persons and with the [[Capital punishment in Virginia|death penalty]] for enslaved persons. Maryland repealed the death penalty for slaves in 1809 and modified the penalty for all persons to match Virginia's terms of imprisonment. In 1847, the Virginia-ceded portion was [[District of Columbia retrocession|given back to Virginia]], thus only the Maryland law had effect in the district.<ref name="Painter">{{cite web |last=Painter |first=George |title=The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - District of Columbia |date=2005-01-31 |publisher=[[Gay and Lesbian Archives of the Pacific Northwest]] |url=http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/districtofcolumbia.htm |access-date=2022-12-11}}</ref> In 1871, Congress enacted the [[District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871]], a law that reorganized the district government and granted it [[District of Columbia home rule|home rule]]. All existing laws were retained unless and until expressly altered by the new city council. Direct rule was reinstated in 1874. The criminal status of sodomy became ambiguous until 1901, when Congress passed legislation recognizing [[common law crime]]s, punishable with up to five years' imprisonment or a fine of $1,000.<ref name="Painter"/> |
|||
*[[List of sex-related court cases in the United States]] |
|||
In 1935, Congress made it a crime in the district to solicit a person "for the purpose of [[prostitution]], or any other immoral or lewd purpose". In 1948, Congress enacted the first law specific to sodomy in the district, which established a penalty of up to ten years in prison or a fine of up to $1,000, regardless of sexuality. [[Oral sex]] was included in the law's application. Also included with this law was a psychopathic offender law and a law "to provide for the treatment of sexual psychopaths".<ref name="Painter"/> The [[Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia|metropolitan police department]] eventually had several officers whose sole job was to "check on homosexuals". Multiple court cases dealt with the issue in the following years. Many of the published sodomy and solicitation cases during the 1950s and 1960s reveal clear [[entrapment]] policies by the local police, some of which were disallowed by reviewing courts. In 1972, settling the case of ''Schaefers et al. v. Wilson'', the D.C. government announced its intention not to prosecute anyone for private, consensual adult sodomy, an action disputed by the [[U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia]]. The action came as part of a stipulation agreement in a court challenge to the sodomy law brought by four gay men.<ref name="Painter"/> |
|||
In 1973, Congress again granted the district home rule through the [[District of Columbia Home Rule Act]]. It provided for [[Council of the District of Columbia|a new city council]] that could pass its own laws. However laws regarding certain topics, such as changes to the criminal code, were restricted until 1977. All laws passed by the D.C. government are subject to a mandatory 30-day "congressional review" by Congress. If they are not blocked, then they become law.<ref>{{cite web |title=Chronology of the District of Columbia's Denial of Democracy |publisher=D.C. Vote |url=https://www.dcvote.org/history/ |access-date=2022-12-11}}</ref> In 1981, the D.C. government enacted a law that repealed the sodomy law, as well as other consensual acts, and made the sexual assault laws [[Gender-neutral language|gender neutral]]. However, the Congress overturned the new law.<ref>{{cite web |title=H.Res.208 - A resolution disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the District of Columbia Sexual Assault Reform Act of 1981. |website=[[Congress.gov]] |publisher=[[United States Congress]] |url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-resolution/208 |access-date=2022-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210618042400/https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-resolution/208 |archive-date=2021-06-18}}</ref> A successful legislative repeal of the law followed in 1993. This time, Congress did not interfere.<ref>{{cite news |last=Sanchez |first=Rene |title=D.C. Repeals Sodomy Law |date=1993-04-08 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/04/08/dc-repeals-sodomy-law/41859dbd-e4c7-443e-a99f-7830c9976e35/ |access-date=2022-12-11}}</ref><ref name="Painter"/> In 1995, all references to sodomy were completely removed from the criminal code, and in 2004, the D.C. government repealed an outdated law against fornication.<ref>{{cite web |title=D.C. Sodomy Law |publisher=[[Human Rights Campaign]] |date=2007-03-08 |url=http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/d.c.-sodomy-law |access-date=2013-11-02 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2016-11-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161115063230/http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/entry/d.c.-sodomy-law}}</ref> |
|||
===Military=== |
|||
{{Main|Section 839(a) of title 10 United States Code § 925 - Article 125.}} |
|||
Although the U.S. military discharged soldiers for homosexual acts throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century, U.S. military law did not expressly prohibit homosexuality or homosexual conduct until February 4, 1921.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/USA0103.pdf|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160205150317/https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/USA0103.pdf|url-status=dead|title=United States|archivedate=February 5, 2016}}</ref> |
|||
On March 1, 1917, the [[Articles of War]] of 1916 were implemented. This included a revision of the Articles of War of 1806, the new regulations detail statutes governing U.S. military discipline and justice. Under the category Miscellaneous Crimes and Offences, Article 93 states that any person subject to military law who commits "assault with intent to commit sodomy" shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.<ref name="usni">{{cite web|url=http://www.usni.org/news-and-features/dont-ask-dont-tell/timeline|title=Key Dates in US Policy on Gay Men and Women in the United States Military|publisher=usni.org|access-date=2014-03-22|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140323045435/http://www.usni.org/news-and-features/dont-ask-dont-tell/timeline|archive-date=2014-03-23}}</ref> |
|||
On June 4, 1920, Congress modified Article 93 of the Articles of War of 1916. It was changed to make the act of sodomy itself a crime, separate from the offense of assault with intent to commit sodomy.<ref name="usni" /> It went into effect on February 4, 1921.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/ref/AW/index.html|title=HyperWar: The Articles of War, Approved June 4, 1920|date=October 4, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081004163647/http://ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USA/ref/AW/index.html |archive-date=2008-10-04 }}</ref> |
|||
On May 5, 1950, the [[Uniform Code of Military Justice]] was passed by Congress and was signed into law by President [[Harry S. Truman]], and became effective on May 31, 1951. Article 125 forbids sodomy among all military personnel, defining it as "any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offence."<ref name="usni" /> |
|||
As for the [[United States armed forces|U.S. Armed Forces]], the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces|Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces]] has ruled that the ''[[Lawrence v. Texas]]'' decision applies to Article 125, severely narrowing the previous ban on sodomy. In both ''United States v. Stirewalt'' and ''[[United States v. Marcum]]'', the court ruled that the "conduct [consensual sodomy] falls within the liberty interest identified by the Supreme Court,"<ref>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: [http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/03-0433.htm U.S. v. Stirewalt, September 29, 2004] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100525185749/http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/03-0433.htm |date=May 25, 2010 }}, accessed August 16, 2010</ref> but went on to say that despite the application of ''Lawrence'' to the military, Article 125 can still be upheld in cases where there are "factors unique to the military environment" that would place the conduct "outside any protected liberty interest recognized in ''Lawrence''."<ref name=marcum>U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: [http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/02-0944.htm U.S. v. Marcum, August 23, 2004] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100407072727/http://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/opinions/2004Term/02-0944.htm |date=April 7, 2010 }}, accessed August 16, 2010</ref> Examples of such factors include [[rape]], [[fraternization]], public sexual behavior, or any other factors that would adversely affect good order and discipline. Convictions for consensual sodomy have been overturned in military courts under ''Lawrence'' in both ''United States v. Meno''<ref>{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Webster M. Smith |reporter=USCG |opinion=CMG0224 |court=United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals |date=2008 |url=http://www.uscg.mil/legal/cca/court_of_criminal_appeals_opinions/Year2008/20080409%20United%20States%20v.%20Smith%2066%20MJ%20556.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925224430/http://www.uscg.mil/legal/cca/court_of_criminal_appeals_opinions/Year2008/20080409%20United%20States%20v.%20Smith%2066%20MJ%20556.pdf |archive-date=2012-09-25 |access-date=2022-04-15}}<!-- omit url=http://www.uscg.mil/legal/cca/court_of_criminal_appeals_opinions/Year2008/20080409%20United%20States%20v.%20Smith%2066%20MJ%20556.pdf since "cite court" doesn't currently support archive-url --></ref> and ''United States v. Bullock''.<ref>{{cite court |litigants=United States v. Bullock |reporter=Army |opinion=20030534 |court=United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals |date=2004 |url=http://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Portals/Files/ACCAOther.nsf/0bc71293164e694c85256cfa0067d74e/5b8a0766fac739f985256f5c006ea3be/$FILE/mo-bullock,km.doc |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202094924/http://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Portals/Files/ACCAOther.nsf/0bc71293164e694c85256cfa0067d74e/5b8a0766fac739f985256f5c006ea3be/$FILE/mo-bullock,km.doc |archive-date=2017-02-02 |access-date=2020-04-15}}<!-- omit url=http://www.jagcnet.army.mil/Portals/Files/ACCAOther.nsf/0bc71293164e694c85256cfa0067d74e/5b8a0766fac739f985256f5c006ea3be/$FILE/mo-bullock,km.doc since "cite court" doesn't currently support archive-url --></ref> |
|||
====Repeal==== |
|||
On December 26, 2013, President [[Barack Obama]] signed into law the [[National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014]], which repealed the [[Section 839(a) of title 10 United States Code § 925 - Article 125.|Article 125]] ban on consensual sodomy.<ref>{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Chris|title=Defense bill contains gay-related provisions|url=http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/12/20/defense-bill-contains-gay-related-provisions/|access-date=December 21, 2013|newspaper=Washington Blade|date=December 20, 2013|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131222202759/http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/12/20/defense-bill-contains-gay-related-provisions/|archive-date=December 22, 2013}}</ref> |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist |
{{Reflist|refs= |
||
<ref name=sulzberger2012nyt>{{Citation |last=Sulzberger |first=A.G. |author-link=A. G. Sulzberger |date=21 Jan 2012 |title=Kansas Law on Sodomy Stays on Books Despite a Cull |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |at=nytimes.com |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/us/sodomy-law-remains-official-in-kansas.html |access-date=21 Jan 2012 |url-access=subscription |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122074721/http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/us/sodomy-law-remains-official-in-kansas.html |archive-date=January 22, 2012 }}</ref> |
|||
<ref name=sulzberger2012nyt>{{Citation |last=Sulzberger |first=A.G. |publication-date=20 Jan 2012 |
|||
|title=Kansas Law on Sodomy Stays on Books Despite a Cull |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |at=nytimes.com |
|||
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/21/us/sodomy-law-remains-official-in-kansas.html|accessdate=21 Jan 2012 |
|||
|quote=A version of this article appeared in print on January 21, 2012, on page A13 of the New York edition with the headline: Kansas Law On Sodomy Stays on Books Despite a Cull. }}</ref> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
* Ellen Ann Andersen, ''Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation'' (University of Michigan Press, 2006), ISBN |
* Ellen Ann Andersen, ''[https://archive.org/details/outofclosetsinto0000ande Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation]'' (University of Michigan Press, 2006), {{ISBN|0-472-11397-6}}, Ch. 4 "Sodomy Reform from Stonewall to ''Bowers''," Ch. 5 "Sodomy Reform from ''Bowers'' to ''Lawrence''", accessed June 2, 2022 |
||
* Carlos A. Ball, ''From the Closet to the Courtroom: Five LGBT Rights Lawsuits that have Changed our Nation'' (Beacon Press, 2010), |
* Carlos A. Ball, ''[https://archive.org/details/fromclosettocour0000ball From the Closet to the Courtroom: Five LGBT Rights Lawsuits that have Changed our Nation]'' (Beacon Press, 2010), accessed June 2, 2022 {{ISBN|0-8070-0078-7}} |
||
* Patricia A. Cain, ''Rainbow Rights: The Role of Lawyers and Courts in the Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights Movement'' (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000), ISBN |
* Patricia A. Cain, ''[https://archive.org/details/rainbowrightsrol0000cain Rainbow Rights: The Role of Lawyers and Courts in the Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights Movement]'' (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000), {{ISBN|0-8133-2618-4}}, Ch. 4 "Private Rights: 1950-1985", accessed June 2, 2022 |
||
* William N. Eskridge, ''Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861-2003'' (NY: Viking, 2008), ISBN |
* William N. Eskridge, ''Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861-2003'' (NY: Viking, 2008), {{ISBN|0-670-01862-7}} |
||
* Leslie Moran, ''The Homosexual(ity) of Law'' (NY: Routledge, 1996) |
* Leslie Moran, ''The Homosexual(ity) of Law'' (NY: Routledge, 1996) |
||
* Martha C. Nussbaum, ''From Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law'' (NY: Oxford University Press, 2010), ISBN |
* Martha C. Nussbaum, ''From Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law'' (NY: Oxford University Press, 2010), {{ISBN|0-19-530531-0}} |
||
* Jason Pierceson, ''Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada'' (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005) |
* Jason Pierceson, ''[https://archive.org/details/courtsliberalism0000pier/ Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada]'' (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005), accessed June 2, 2022 |
||
* Daniel R. Pinello, ''Gay Rights and American Law'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003) |
* Daniel R. Pinello, ''[https://archive.org/details/gayrightsamerica0000pine Gay Rights and American Law]'' (Cambridge University Press, 2003), accessed August 26, 2010 |
||
* Jerald Sharum "Controlling Conduct: The Emerging Protection of Sodomy in the Military" in ''Albany Law Review'', vol. 69, No. 4, 2006 |
* Jerald Sharum "Controlling Conduct: The Emerging Protection of Sodomy in the Military" in ''Albany Law Review'', vol. 69, No. 4, 2006 |
||
Line 628: | Line 473: | ||
*[http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/introduction.htm ''The Sensibilities of Our Forefathers: The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States''] by George Painter |
*[http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/introduction.htm ''The Sensibilities of Our Forefathers: The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States''] by George Painter |
||
{{ |
{{LGBT in the United States}} |
||
{{Criminalization of homosexuality}} |
|||
[[Category:Legal history of the United States]] |
[[Category:Legal history of the United States]] |
||
[[Category:History of |
[[Category:History of LGBTQ civil rights in the United States]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:LGBTQ law in the United States]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:LGBTQ-related lists]] |
||
[[Category:United States |
[[Category:Repealed United States legislation]] |
||
[[Category:Criminalization of homosexuality]] |
Latest revision as of 03:31, 22 December 2024
The United States has inherited sodomy laws which constitutionally outlawed a variety of sexual acts that are deemed to be illegal, illicit, unlawful, unnatural and/or immoral from the colonial-era based laws in the 17th century.[1] While they often targeted sexual acts between persons of the same sex, many sodomy-related statutes employed definitions broad enough to outlaw certain sexual acts between persons of different sexes, in some cases even including acts between married persons.
Through the mid to late 20th century, the gradual decriminalization of American sexuality law led to the elimination of anti-sodomy laws in most U.S. states. During this time, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of its sodomy laws in Bowers v. Hardwick in 1986. However, in 2003, the Supreme Court came to a new opinion and reversed the decision with Lawrence v. Texas, invalidating all sodomy laws in the remaining 14 states: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and Virginia.
History
[edit]Up to Lawrence v. Texas
[edit]Colin Talley argues that the sodomy statutes in colonial America in the 17th century were largely unenforced. The reason he argues is that male-male eroticism did not threaten the social structure or challenge the gendered division of labor or the patriarchal ownership of wealth.[2] There were gay men on General Washington's staff and among the leaders of the new republic,[3] even though in Virginia there was a maximum penalty of death for sodomy. In 1779, Thomas Jefferson tried to reduce the maximum punishment to castration.[4] It was rejected by the Virginia legislature.[5] Justice Anthony Kennedy authoring the majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas stated that American laws targeting same-sex couples did not develop until the last third of the 20th century and also wrote that:[6]
Early American sodomy laws were not directed at homosexuals as such but instead sought to prohibit nonprocreative sexual activity more generally, whether between men and women or men and men. Moreover, early sodomy laws seem not to have been enforced against consenting adults acting in private. Instead, sodomy prosecutions often involved predatory acts against those who could not or did not consent: relations between men and minor girls or boys, between adults involving force, between adults implicating disparity in status, or between men and animals.
In 1950, New York enacted a new statute that divided the crime of sodomy into 3 degrees. First degree sodomy, with a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment, is defined as being done by force as in rape, or an act with an animal or a dead body. Second degree sodomy, with a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, includes acts per os or per anum by a person over 21 years old with a person under 18 years old. Third degree sodomy, which is a misdemeanor with a maximum of 6 months in prison, is any act per os or per anum not amounting to first or second degree sodomy. With this new law, New York became the first state to reduce the crime of sodomy from a felony to a misdemeanor. A psychopathic offender law was included with this statute, but covered only sexual acts with minors or with the use of force or threats. In 1950, the Attorney General issued an opinion that the governing sodomy law covered both participants in an act of fellatio, the wording of the law being broader for oral sex than for anal. This opinion would be affirmed by a court interpretation more than a decade later.
In 1965, New York enacted a new statute repealing the crime of sodomy. Due to opposition to repealing the crime of sodomy, New York enacted a new statute at the same time that criminalized sodomy and reduced the maximum penalty from 6 months to 3 months, and excluded married couples. It created the category of sexual misconduct, defined as engaging in sexual intercourse with another person without such person's consent and engaging in sexual conduct with an animal or a dead human body, which became a class A misdemeanor. Since the new statute repealing the crime of sodomy would only be effective on September 1, 1967, it never took effect.
Prior to 1962, sodomy was a felony in every state punished by a lengthy term of imprisonment or hard labor. In that year, the Model Penal Code (MPC) — developed by the American Law Institute to promote uniformity among the states as they modernized their statutes — struck a compromise that removed consensual sodomy from its criminal code while making it a crime to solicit for sodomy. In 1962, Illinois adopted the recommendations of the Model Penal Code and thus became the first state to remove criminal penalties for consensual sodomy from its criminal code,[7] almost a decade before any other state. Over the years, many of the states that did not repeal their sodomy laws had enacted legislation reducing the penalty.
On March 12, 1971, the Idaho House of Representatives voted was 55-5 in favor of House Bill 161, which enacted the entire Model Penal Code (MPC) in Idaho, which included repealing common-law crimes and the "crime against nature" law. The bill passed the Idaho Senate on March 25, 1971 and the vote was 34-1. It was signed on April 9, 1971 by Governor Cecil Andrus. It took effect on January 1, 1972. On January 25, 1972, the Idaho House voted was 44-28 in favor of House Bill 101, which repealed the provisions of House Bill 161, which had adopted the MPC. The bill passed the Idaho Senate on March 27, 1972 and the vote was 30-5. It was signed on March 27, 1972 by Governor Cecil Andrus. It took effect on April 1, 1972. On March 22, 1972, the Idaho House voted was 49-15 in favor of House Bill 59, which restored a criminal code framework after the repeal of House Bill 161, which included reinstating common-law crimes and reintroduced the felony "crime against nature" law, which included a minimum five-year penalty with no maximum limit. The bill passed the Idaho Senate on February 1, 1972 and the vote was 34-1. It was signed on February 18, 1972 by Governor Cecil Andrus. It took effect on April 1, 1972.
At the time of the Lawrence decision in 2003, the penalty for violating a sodomy law varied widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction among those states retaining their sodomy laws. The harshest penalties were in Idaho, where a person convicted of sodomy could earn a life sentence. Michigan followed, with a maximum penalty of 15 years' imprisonment while repeat offenders got life.[8] By 2002, 36 states had repealed their sodomy laws or their courts had overturned them. By the time of the 2003 Supreme Court decision, the laws in most states were no longer enforced or were enforced very selectively. The continued existence of these rarely enforced laws on the statute books, however, are often cited as justification for discrimination against gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals.
On June 26, 2003, the United States Supreme Court struck down in the Lawrence v. Texas decision the following jurisdictions (14 US states, 1 US territory and the Uniform Code of Military Justice) that statutes criminalized consensual sodomy: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri (rest of the state outside of the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District), North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas, United States Armed Forces, Utah and Virginia. On June 26, 2003, at the time of the Lawrence v. Texas decision, the following jurisdictions (20 US states, 1 US territory and the Uniform Code of Military Justice) had statutes criminalizing consensual sodomy: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Texas, United States Armed Forces, Utah and Virginia.
Post Lawrence v. Texas
[edit]In 2005, Puerto Rico repealed its sodomy law, and in 2006, Missouri repealed its law against "homosexual conduct". In 2013, Montana removed "sexual contact or sexual intercourse between two persons of the same sex" from its definition of deviate sexual conduct, Virginia repealed its lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute, and sodomy was legalized in the US armed forces. In 2005, basing its decision on Lawrence, the Supreme Court of Virginia in Martin v. Ziherl invalidated § 18.2-344, the Virginia statute making fornication between unmarried persons a crime.[9]
On January 31, 2013, the Senate of Virginia passed a bill repealing § 18.2-345, the lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute enacted in 1877. On February 20, 2013, the Virginia House of Delegates passed the bill by a vote of 62 to 25 votes. On March 20, 2013, Governor Bob McDonnell signed the repeal of the lewd and lascivious cohabitation statute from the Code of Virginia.[10] On March 12, 2013, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit struck down § 18.2-361, the crimes against nature statute. On March 26, 2013, Attorney General of Virginia Ken Cuccinelli filed a petition to have the case reheard en banc, but the Court denied the request on April 10, 2013, with none of its 15 judges supporting the request.[11] On June 25, Cuccinelli filed a petition for certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Court of Appeals decision, which was rejected on October 7.[12][13]
On February 7, 2014, the Virginia Senate voted 40-0 in favor of revising the crimes against nature statute to remove the ban on same-sex sexual relationships. On March 6, 2014, the Virginia House of Delegates voted 100-0 in favor of the bill. On April 7, the Governor submitted a slightly different version of the bill. It was enacted by the legislature on April 23, 2014. The law took effect upon passage.[14] On February 26, 2019, the Utah legislature voted to eliminate the crime of sodomy between consenting adults.[15] Governor Gary Herbert signed the bill into law on March 26, 2019.[16][17]
On May 23, 2019, the Alabama House of Representatives passed, with 101 voting yea and 3 absent, Alabama Senate Bill 320, repealing the ban on "deviate sexual intercourse". On May 28, 2019, the Alabama State Senate passed Alabama Senate Bill 320, with 32 yea and 3 absent. The bill took effect on September 1, 2019.[18][19] Alabama is the southernmost continental state to repeal their sodomy law as of 2023.
On March 18, 2020, the Maryland legislature voted to repeal its sodomy law. The bill became law in May 2020 without the signature of Governor Larry Hogan.[20] While the original text of the bill intended to repeal both the state's sodomy law and unnatural or perverted sexual practice law, amendments from the Maryland Senate urged to solely repeal the sodomy law.[21] On March 31, 2023, the Maryland legislature voted to repeal the unnatural and perverted sexual practice law. The bill was sent to Governor Wes Moore for signature. As he did not veto the bill within 30 days of passage, Moore allowed for the bill to become law without his signature, and the repeal took effect on October 1, 2023.[22]
In March 2022, Idaho repealed its sodomy law.[23] The repeal was a result of a lawsuit brought on in September 2020 by a plaintiff known as John Doe. John Doe alleged his constitutional rights were violated when he was forced to register as a sex offender upon moving to Idaho due to a conviction for "oral sex" 2 decades prior.[24] On May 17, 2023, the Minnesota legislature passed an Omnibus Judiciary and Public Safety Bill that included provisions repealing the state's sodomy, adultery, fornication, and abortion laws. On May 19, Governor Tim Walz signed the bill into law. It took effect the following day.[25]
As of October 1, 2023, the following jurisdictions (12 U.S. states) had statutes criminalizing consensual sodomy: Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. These statutes penalties are not enforceable due to the binding precedent of Lawrence v. Texas, meaning consensual sodomy cannot be prosecuted.[26]
- Florida (Fld. Stat. 800.02.)
- Georgia (O.C.G.A. § 16-6-2)
- Kansas (Kan. Stat. 21-3505.)
- Kentucky (KY Rev Stat § 510.100.)
- Louisiana (R.S. 14:89.)
- Massachusetts (MGL Ch. 272, § 34.) (MGL Ch. 272, § 35.) – 2023 repeal bill
- Michigan (MCL § 750.158.) (MCL § 750.338.) (MCL § 750.338a.) (MCL § 750.338b.) – 2023 partial repeal bill
- Mississippi (Miss. Code § 97-29-59.)
- North Carolina (G.S. § 14-177.)
- Oklahoma (§21-886.)
- South Carolina (S.C. Code § 16-15-60.)
- Texas (Tx. Penal Code § 21.06.)
Sodomy laws by jurisdiction in the United States of America
[edit]Below is a table of sodomy laws in the jurisdictions in United States of America and penalties as applicable to the binding precedent of Lawrence v. Texas.[27][28] The most recent jurisdiction to repeal its sodomy ban is Maryland.
Jurisdiction | Date statute struck down | Date statute repealed | Covered by statute | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bestiality | Opposite-sex intercourse | Same-sex intercourse | ||||||||||
Anal sex | Married intercourse | Oral sex | Unmarried intercourse | Anal sex | Oral sex | |||||||
Alabama | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
20032019 | Ala. Code 1975 § 13A-6-220 - 221 | |||||||||
Alaska | N/A | (sodomy) 1971 |
1980A.S. 11.61.140 | |||||||||
American Samoa | 1979 | N/A | ||||||||||
Arizona | 2001 | A.R.S. § 13-1411 | ||||||||||
Arkansas | (Jegley v. Picado)[29] |
20011975 |
2005
A.C.A. § 5-14-122 | |||||||||
California | N/A | 1976 | Cal. Penal Code § 286.5 | |||||||||
Colorado | 1972 | C. R. S. A. § 18-9-202 | ||||||||||
Connecticut | 1971 | C. G. S. A. § 53a-73a | ||||||||||
Delaware | 1973 | 11 Del.C. § 775 | ||||||||||
District of Columbia | 1993 | D.C. Code § 22–1012.01. | ||||||||||
Florida | (Lawrence v. Texas; unnatural and lascivious act) 1971 |
2003(crimes against nature) |
1974West's F. S. A. 828.126 | West's F. S. A. 800.02 | ||||||||
Georgia | (Powell v. Georgia) |
1998N/A | O.C.G.A. § 16-6-6 | O.C.G.A. § 16-6-2 | ||||||||
Guam | N/A | 1978 | 9 GCA § 70.40. | |||||||||
Hawaii | 1973 | HRS § 711-1109.8 | ||||||||||
Idaho | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
20031971 |
2022
I.C. § 18-6602 | |||||||||
Illinois | N/A | 1962 | 720 I.L.C.S. 5/12-35 | |||||||||
Indiana | 1976 | I.C. 35-46-3-14 | ||||||||||
Iowa | 1978 | I.C.A. § 717C.1 | ||||||||||
Kansas | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003(opposite-sex intercourse) |
1969K.S.A. 21-5504 | K.S.A. 21-5504 | ||||||||
Kentucky | (Kentucky v. Wasson) |
1992(opposite-sex intercourse) |
1974KRS § 525.137 | KRS § 510.100 | ||||||||
Louisiana | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003N/A | LSA-R.S. 14:89.3 | LSA-R.S. 14:89 | ||||||||
Maine | N/A | 1976 | 17 M.R.S.A. § 1031 | |||||||||
Maryland | (Williams v. Glendening; anal sex) 1998 1990 |
1999(unnatural and perverted sexual practice)[32] 2020 |
2023MD Code, Criminal Law, § 10-606. | |||||||||
Massachusetts | (Commonwealth v. Balthazar)[34] |
1974N/A | M.G.L.A. 272 § 77
|
M.G.L.A. 272 § 34
| ||||||||
Michigan | (Lawrence v. Texas) 1990 |
2003M.C.L.A. 750.158 | M.C.L.A. 750.158
| |||||||||
Minnesota | (Doe v. Ventura) |
20012023 | M.S.A. § 609.294 | |||||||||
Mississippi | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003N/A | Miss. Code Ann. § 97-29-59 | |||||||||
Missouri | (Lawrence v. Texas; rest of the state outside of the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District) 1999 |
20032006 | V.A.M.S. 566.111 | |||||||||
Montana | (Gryczan v. State)[37] |
1997(same-sex intercourse)[38][39] 1974 |
2013MCA 45-8-218 | |||||||||
Nebraska | N/A | 1978 | Neb. Rev. St. § 28-1010
| |||||||||
Nevada | 1993 | N. R. S. 201.455 | ||||||||||
New Hampshire | 1975 | N.H. Rev. Stat. § 644:8g | ||||||||||
New Jersey | 1978 | N. J. S. A. 4:22-17 | ||||||||||
New Mexico | 1975 | NMSA § 30-9A-3 | ||||||||||
New York | (New York v. Onofre; excluded the New York National Guard) |
19802000 | McKinney's Penal Law § 130.20 | |||||||||
North Carolina | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003N/A | N.C.G.S.A. § 14-177 | |||||||||
Northern Mariana Islands | N/A | 1983 | N/A | |||||||||
North Dakota | 1973 | NDCC, § 12.1-20-12 | ||||||||||
Ohio | 1974 | R.C. § 959.21 | ||||||||||
Oklahoma | (Lawrence v. Texas; same-sex intercourse) 1988 |
2003N/A | 21 Okl. St. Ann. § 886 | |||||||||
Oregon | N/A | 1972 | O. R. S. § 167.333 | |||||||||
Pennsylvania | (Commonwealth v. Bonadio)[40] |
1980(homosexuality)[41][42] 1995 1972 |
202218 Pa.C.S.A. § 3129 | |||||||||
Puerto Rico | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003(opposite-sex anal sex and same-sex anal and oral sex) 1974 |
2006P.R. Laws tit. 33, § 4773 | |||||||||
Rhode Island | N/A | 1998 | Gen.Laws 1956, § 11-10-1 | |||||||||
South Carolina | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003N/A | Code 1976 § 16-15-120 | Code 1976 § 16-15-120 | ||||||||
South Dakota | N/A | 1977 | SDCL § 22-22-42 | |||||||||
Tennessee | (Campbell v. Sundquist) |
1996(same-sex intercourse)[43] 1989 |
1996T. C. A. § 39-14-214 | |||||||||
Texas | (Lawrence v. Texas) 1970 |
2003(opposite-sex anal and oral sex[45]) |
1974V. T. C. A., Penal Code § 21.09 | V. T. C. A., Penal Code § 21.06 | ||||||||
United States Armed Forces | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
20032013 | 10 U.S. Code § 934 - Art. 134. | |||||||||
United States of America | N/A | |||||||||||
Utah | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
20031971 |
2019
U.C.A. 1953 § 76-9-301.8 | |||||||||
Vermont | N/A | 1977 | 13 V.S.A. § 352 | |||||||||
Virgin Islands of the United States | 1985 | 14 V.I.C. § 2062 | ||||||||||
Virginia | (Lawrence v. Texas) |
2003(anal and oral sex)[46] 2013 |
2014Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-361 | |||||||||
Washington | N/A | 1976 | West's RCWA 16.52.205 | |||||||||
West Virginia | 1976 | N/A | ||||||||||
Wisconsin | 1983 | W.S.A. 944.18 | ||||||||||
Wyoming | 1977 | W.S.1977 § 6-4-601 |
Federal law
[edit]Sodomy laws in the United States were largely a matter of state rather than federal jurisdiction, except for laws governing the District of Columbia and the U.S. Armed Forces.
District of Columbia
[edit]In 1801, the 6th United States Congress enacted the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801, a law that continued all criminal laws of Maryland and Virginia, with those of Maryland applying to the portion of the District ceded from Maryland and those of Virginia applying to the portion ceded from Virginia. As a result, in the Maryland-ceded portion, sodomy was punishable with up to seven years' imprisonment for free persons and with the death penalty for enslaved persons, whereas in the Virginia-ceded portion it was punishable between one and ten years' imprisonment for free persons and with the death penalty for enslaved persons. Maryland repealed the death penalty for slaves in 1809 and modified the penalty for all persons to match Virginia's terms of imprisonment. In 1847, the Virginia-ceded portion was given back to Virginia, thus only the Maryland law had effect in the district.[47] In 1871, Congress enacted the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, a law that reorganized the district government and granted it home rule. All existing laws were retained unless and until expressly altered by the new city council. Direct rule was reinstated in 1874. The criminal status of sodomy became ambiguous until 1901, when Congress passed legislation recognizing common law crimes, punishable with up to five years' imprisonment or a fine of $1,000.[47]
In 1935, Congress made it a crime in the district to solicit a person "for the purpose of prostitution, or any other immoral or lewd purpose". In 1948, Congress enacted the first law specific to sodomy in the district, which established a penalty of up to ten years in prison or a fine of up to $1,000, regardless of sexuality. Oral sex was included in the law's application. Also included with this law was a psychopathic offender law and a law "to provide for the treatment of sexual psychopaths".[47] The metropolitan police department eventually had several officers whose sole job was to "check on homosexuals". Multiple court cases dealt with the issue in the following years. Many of the published sodomy and solicitation cases during the 1950s and 1960s reveal clear entrapment policies by the local police, some of which were disallowed by reviewing courts. In 1972, settling the case of Schaefers et al. v. Wilson, the D.C. government announced its intention not to prosecute anyone for private, consensual adult sodomy, an action disputed by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. The action came as part of a stipulation agreement in a court challenge to the sodomy law brought by four gay men.[47]
In 1973, Congress again granted the district home rule through the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. It provided for a new city council that could pass its own laws. However laws regarding certain topics, such as changes to the criminal code, were restricted until 1977. All laws passed by the D.C. government are subject to a mandatory 30-day "congressional review" by Congress. If they are not blocked, then they become law.[48] In 1981, the D.C. government enacted a law that repealed the sodomy law, as well as other consensual acts, and made the sexual assault laws gender neutral. However, the Congress overturned the new law.[49] A successful legislative repeal of the law followed in 1993. This time, Congress did not interfere.[50][47] In 1995, all references to sodomy were completely removed from the criminal code, and in 2004, the D.C. government repealed an outdated law against fornication.[51]
Military
[edit]Although the U.S. military discharged soldiers for homosexual acts throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century, U.S. military law did not expressly prohibit homosexuality or homosexual conduct until February 4, 1921.[52]
On March 1, 1917, the Articles of War of 1916 were implemented. This included a revision of the Articles of War of 1806, the new regulations detail statutes governing U.S. military discipline and justice. Under the category Miscellaneous Crimes and Offences, Article 93 states that any person subject to military law who commits "assault with intent to commit sodomy" shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.[53]
On June 4, 1920, Congress modified Article 93 of the Articles of War of 1916. It was changed to make the act of sodomy itself a crime, separate from the offense of assault with intent to commit sodomy.[53] It went into effect on February 4, 1921.[54]
On May 5, 1950, the Uniform Code of Military Justice was passed by Congress and was signed into law by President Harry S. Truman, and became effective on May 31, 1951. Article 125 forbids sodomy among all military personnel, defining it as "any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offence."[53]
As for the U.S. Armed Forces, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has ruled that the Lawrence v. Texas decision applies to Article 125, severely narrowing the previous ban on sodomy. In both United States v. Stirewalt and United States v. Marcum, the court ruled that the "conduct [consensual sodomy] falls within the liberty interest identified by the Supreme Court,"[55] but went on to say that despite the application of Lawrence to the military, Article 125 can still be upheld in cases where there are "factors unique to the military environment" that would place the conduct "outside any protected liberty interest recognized in Lawrence."[56] Examples of such factors include rape, fraternization, public sexual behavior, or any other factors that would adversely affect good order and discipline. Convictions for consensual sodomy have been overturned in military courts under Lawrence in both United States v. Meno[57] and United States v. Bullock.[58]
Repeal
[edit]On December 26, 2013, President Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, which repealed the Article 125 ban on consensual sodomy.[59]
References
[edit]- ^ Eskridge, William N. (2009). Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Harvard University Press. p. 161. ISBN 9780674036581.
- ^ Colin L. Talley, "Gender and male same-sex erotic behavior in British North America in the seventeenth century." Journal of the History of Sexuality (1996): 385-408. online
- ^ William E Benemann, Male-Male Intimacy in Early America: Beyond Romantic Friendships (2006).
- ^ "Amendment VIII: Thomas Jefferson, A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments". Press-pubs.uchicago.edu. Archived from the original on 2014-02-04. Retrieved 2014-03-11.
- ^ Patricia S. Ticer. "Virginia". Glapn.org. Archived from the original on 2011-10-04. Retrieved 2011-08-31.
- ^ Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
- ^ Canaday, Margot (September 3, 2008). "We Colonials: Sodomy Laws in America". The Nation. Archived from the original on January 26, 2014. Retrieved February 7, 2014.
- ^ "Section 750.158 - Crime against nature or sodomy; penalty, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.158 | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com.
- ^ Google Scholar: Martin v.Ziherl, accessed April 9, 2011
- ^ "SB 969". Open:States. 20 February 2013. Archived from the original on December 24, 2013. Retrieved April 13, 2013.
- ^ "Ken Cuccinelli Loses Petition To Uphold Anti-Sodomy Law". The Huffington Post. 10 April 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-04-13. Retrieved 2013-04-10.
- ^ "Ken Cuccinelli Appeals To Defend Virginia's Anti-Sodomy Law At Supreme Court". Huffington Post. June 25, 2013. Archived from the original on July 2, 2013.
- ^ "Court won't hear Va. appeal over sodomy law". USA Today. October 7, 2013. Archived from the original on October 25, 2017.
- ^ "LIS > Bill Tracking > SB14 > 2014 session". Leg1.state.va.us. Archived from the original on 2014-03-10. Retrieved 2014-04-25.
- ^ "Adultery and sodomy among consenting adults closer to being legal in Utah". 26 February 2019.
- ^ Bennett, Craig (March 26, 2019). "Governor Signs Bill Making Adultery and Sodomy Legal Between Consenting Adults". News Talk KDXU.
- ^ "Adultery and sodomy among consenting adults are no longer illegal in Utah". 26 March 2019.
- ^ "Act 2019-465, SB320" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-06-30.
- ^ AL SB 320
- ^ "Maryland Legislation HB0081". mgaleg.maryland.gov.
- ^ "Maryland HB81 | 2020 | Regular Session". LegiScan. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
- ^ "Bill to repeal Md. sodomy law to take effect without governor's signature". The Washington Blade. May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
- ^ "Idaho S1325 | 2022 | Regular Session".
- ^ Boone, Rebecca (September 24, 2020). "Idaho man sues over state's anti-sodomy law". Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 23, 2021.
- ^ "SF 2909 Status in the Senate for the 93rd Legislature (2023 - 2024)". www.revisor.mn.gov. Retrieved 2023-05-19.
- ^ Sulzberger, A.G. (21 Jan 2012), "Kansas Law on Sodomy Stays on Books Despite a Cull", The New York Times, nytimes.com, archived from the original on January 22, 2012, retrieved 21 Jan 2012
- ^ "United States Sodomy Laws". Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 30 October 2023.
- ^ GLAPN - Case Law: "Case law". Archived from the original on 2011-10-01. Retrieved 17 August 2010.
- ^ "Jegley v. Picado 80 S.W.3d 332". Apa.org. Archived from the original on 2013-11-04. Retrieved 2014-03-11.
- ^ "800.02 Unnatural and lascivious act. A person who commits any unnatural and lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree". Archive.flsenate.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-12-04. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
- ^ Google Scholar: Stephen Adam Schochet v. State of Maryland, October 9, 1990, accessed March 11, 2011
- ^ "Legislation - SB0054". mgaleg.maryland.gov.
- ^ "Maryland HB81 | 2020 | Regular Session".
- ^ Massachusetts Cases: Commonwealth v. Richard L. Balthazar, 366 Mass. 298 Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, accessed March 11, 2011
- ^ Michigan Organization for Human Rights v. Kelley, No. 88–815820 CZ slip op. (Mich. 3rd Cir. Ct. July 9, 1990).
- ^ Gay Times: Michigan Archived 2011-09-28 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Montana Kills Sodomy Law". Thetaskforce.org. 1997-07-04. Archived from the original on 2011-08-04. Retrieved 2011-08-31.
- ^ "Montana governor signs bill to strike down obsolete sodomy law – LGBTQ Nation". Lgbtqnation.com. 18 April 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-10-25. Retrieved 2013-10-21.
- ^ "LAWS Detailed Bill Information Page". Laws.leg.mt.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-10-22. Retrieved 2013-10-21.
- ^ Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Michael BONADIO, Patrick Gagliano, Shane Wimbel, and Dawn Delight a/k/a Mildred I. Kannitz, Appellees
- ^ "Homosexuality finally removed from Pa. Crimes Code after being first discovered in Upper Darby". July 15, 2022.
- ^ "Bill to Remove 'Homosexuality' from PA Crimes Code Passes Senate and Heads to Governor". July 8, 2022.
- ^ Gonzalez, Tony (November 14, 2016). "Nashville Man Cleared Of 1995 'Homosexual Acts' Conviction, But Cases Linger For 41 Others". wpln.org.
- ^ "The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Tennessee". Glapn.org. Archived from the original on 2013-04-24. Retrieved 2012-08-05.
- ^ "The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - Texas". Glapn.org. Archived from the original on 2011-10-04. Retrieved 2011-08-31.
- ^ Weiner, Rachel (6 March 2014). "Virginia lawmakers repeal sodomy ban". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 7 March 2014. Retrieved 18 May 2014.
- ^ a b c d e Painter, George (2005-01-31). "The History of Sodomy Laws in the United States - District of Columbia". Gay and Lesbian Archives of the Pacific Northwest. Retrieved 2022-12-11.
- ^ "Chronology of the District of Columbia's Denial of Democracy". D.C. Vote. Retrieved 2022-12-11.
- ^ "H.Res.208 - A resolution disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the District of Columbia Sexual Assault Reform Act of 1981". Congress.gov. United States Congress. Archived from the original on 2021-06-18. Retrieved 2022-12-11.
- ^ Sanchez, Rene (1993-04-08). "D.C. Repeals Sodomy Law". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2022-12-11.
- ^ "D.C. Sodomy Law". Human Rights Campaign. 2007-03-08. Archived from the original on 2016-11-15. Retrieved 2013-11-02.
- ^ "United States" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 5, 2016.
- ^ a b c "Key Dates in US Policy on Gay Men and Women in the United States Military". usni.org. Archived from the original on 2014-03-23. Retrieved 2014-03-22.
- ^ "HyperWar: The Articles of War, Approved June 4, 1920". October 4, 2008. Archived from the original on 2008-10-04.
- ^ U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: U.S. v. Stirewalt, September 29, 2004 Archived May 25, 2010, at the Wayback Machine, accessed August 16, 2010
- ^ U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces: U.S. v. Marcum, August 23, 2004 Archived April 7, 2010, at the Wayback Machine, accessed August 16, 2010
- ^ United States v. Webster M. Smith, USCG CMG0224 (United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals 2008), archived from the original on 2012-09-25.
- ^ United States v. Bullock, Army 20030534 (United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals 2004), archived from the original on 2017-02-02.
- ^ Johnson, Chris (December 20, 2013). "Defense bill contains gay-related provisions". Washington Blade. Archived from the original on December 22, 2013. Retrieved December 21, 2013.
Further reading
[edit]- Ellen Ann Andersen, Out of the Closets and Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation (University of Michigan Press, 2006), ISBN 0-472-11397-6, Ch. 4 "Sodomy Reform from Stonewall to Bowers," Ch. 5 "Sodomy Reform from Bowers to Lawrence", accessed June 2, 2022
- Carlos A. Ball, From the Closet to the Courtroom: Five LGBT Rights Lawsuits that have Changed our Nation (Beacon Press, 2010), accessed June 2, 2022 ISBN 0-8070-0078-7
- Patricia A. Cain, Rainbow Rights: The Role of Lawyers and Courts in the Lesbian and Gay Civil Rights Movement (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000), ISBN 0-8133-2618-4, Ch. 4 "Private Rights: 1950-1985", accessed June 2, 2022
- William N. Eskridge, Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861-2003 (NY: Viking, 2008), ISBN 0-670-01862-7
- Leslie Moran, The Homosexual(ity) of Law (NY: Routledge, 1996)
- Martha C. Nussbaum, From Disgust to Humanity: Sexual Orientation and Constitutional Law (NY: Oxford University Press, 2010), ISBN 0-19-530531-0
- Jason Pierceson, Courts, Liberalism, and Rights: Gay Law and Politics in the United States and Canada (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005), accessed June 2, 2022
- Daniel R. Pinello, Gay Rights and American Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003), accessed August 26, 2010
- Jerald Sharum "Controlling Conduct: The Emerging Protection of Sodomy in the Military" in Albany Law Review, vol. 69, No. 4, 2006