Public administration theory: Difference between revisions
m Added: The field continues to evolve, incorporating insights from other disciplines like behavioral economics and data science to address complex challenges such as climate change, public health crises, and economic inequality. However, a significant challenge lies in balancing competing priorities and managing the inherent tensions between efficiency and equity, accountability and responsiveness. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| (176 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Field of political science}} |
|||
'''[[Public administration]] theory''' is the amalgamation of history, organizational theory, social theory, political theory and related studies focused on the meanings, structures and functions of public service in all its forms. |
|||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
{{lead too long|date=December 2023}} |
|||
{{too long|date=December 2023}} |
|||
}} |
|||
Public administration theory refers to the study and analysis of the principles, concepts, and models that guide the practice of public administration. It provides a framework for understanding the complexities and challenges of managing public organizations and implementing public policies. |
|||
A standard course of study in PhD dedicated to public administration, public administration theory often recounts major historical foundations for the study of [[bureaucracy]] as well as [[epistemological]] issues associated with public service as a profession and as an academic field. |
|||
The goal of public administrative theory is to accomplish politically approved objectives through methods shaped by the constituency. To ensure effective public administration, administrators have adopted a range of methods, roles, and theories from disciplines such as economics, sociology, and psychology. Theory building in public administration involves not only creating a single theory of administration but also developing a collection of theories. Administrative theory primarily focuses on the ideas and perspectives of various scholars. |
|||
In Public Administration theory there is three different common types of how to understand public administration. The three different theories are New Public Management Theory, Classical Public Administration Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory, these each are different perspectives of ways that an administrator practices public administration. |
|||
Public administration theory encompasses various frameworks and concepts that guide the practice of managing public organizations and implementing public policies. Classical, neoclassical, and modern theories contribute to understanding the complexities of public administration. |
|||
Important figures of study include: [[Max Weber]], [[Frederick Winslow Taylor]], [[Luther Gulick (social scientist)|Luther Gulick]], [[Mary Parker Follett]], [[Chester Barnard]], [[Herbert A. Simon]], and [[Dwight Waldo]]. [[Herbert A. Simon|Herbert Simon]] advanced a public administration theory that was informed by [[positivism]]. The influence of positivism today can be seen in journals such as the ''Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory'' and the ''[[Journal of Policy Analysis and Management]]''.<ref>Whetsell, Travis and Patricia M. Shields (forthcoming) "The Dynamics of Positivism in the Study of Public Administration: A Brief Intellectual History and Reappraisal, [[Administration & Society]]. (doi:10.1177/0095399713490157) Also see Simon, Herbert. 1947 [[Administrative Behavior]]</ref> Notable Public Administration Theorist such as Max Weber expressed the importance of values in the development of public administration theory. However, theory cannot simply be derived from empirical observation of facts, it must be constructed using value judgement s that direct our empirical observations and then guide out interpretation of those observations. Values are essential for the construction of public administration theories because it takes into account the meaningful ethical principles and philosophies of a culture which ensure appropriate theory practice. Public Administration theories are put into practice or considered through a few distinct strategies: Parallel, Transfer, or Collaboration also known as the theory-gap practice. This practice is used to transfer knowledge between practitioners and scholars.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|url = |title = Revisiting the (Lost) Art of Ideal-Typing in Public Administration|last = Stout|first = Margaret|date = Dec. 2010|journal = Administrative Theory & Praxis|doi = |pmid = |access-date = 10/14/2015}}</ref> |
|||
== |
==Classical Theory== |
||
Rooted in the early 20th century, scholars like Max Weber and Frederick Taylor emphasized hierarchical structures, division of labor, and bureaucratic principles to enhance efficiency in public organizations. |
|||
Public Administration Theory recently has been divide into three branches. The three branches are, Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. Each of these three branches study Public Administration from a different perspective. These types of theories are some of the ways which an administrator can understand and exercise their duties as a public administrator. |
|||
This theory closely aligns with Woodrow Wilson’s public administration ideals. The Classical Public Administration Theory prioritizes efficiency in organizational work, professionalization, a pragmatic approach to bureaucracy, and merit-based promotions. The classical system includes a strict definition of responsibilities and objectives and control over all involved functions. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Since the 1980s, the classical system has been rejected by governments in favor of a market-based model of public organization. |
|||
Classical Public Administration is one of the three main branches of public administration theory. This branch includes notable theorist such as Woodrow Wilson and Max Weber, whom contributed notable works to public administration. In the United States of America, Woodrow Wilson is known as ''<nowiki/>'The Father of Public Administration' ,'' writing the "The Study of Administration" in 1887. In this work, Wilson advocated that a bureaucracy should be ran like a business, promoting ideas like a merit based promotions, and a nonpartisan system. Woodrow Wilson focuses on two main things when looking at Public Administration which are providence and process. Providence is important, by referring to the administrators place in all governmental structures. The process refers to what public administrators do, and how they do it.<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
== |
==New Public Management Theory== |
||
In the 1980s, the New Public Management Theory (NPM) was created to make the civil service more efficient. To do so, it utilized private-sector management models. Giving local agencies more freedom in how they delivered services to citizens, the theory experimented with using decentralized service delivery models. |
|||
Advocates of NPM look to replace the disciplinary, academic, or moral emphasis of traditional public administration with a more “businesslike” perspective. |
|||
New Public Management asset of administrative practices,a consulting fad, and a body of theory that interprets recent developments in public administration. Many scholars argue persuasively that scholars should pay more attention to New Public management as a theory than as a fad.<ref>{{Cite journal|title = Gurus, Theory, and Practice: A Reply to Catlaw and Chapman|url = http://www.jstor.org/stable/4624570|journal = Public Administration Review|date = 2007-03-01|pages = 342|volume = 67|issue = 2|first = Stephen|last = Page}}</ref> New public management is part and parcel of the massive intrusion of freemarket values into public space, which threatens to drive out political values altogether. It is worth noting that,in this sense, new public management is the radical opposite of the notion of migrating political values into "private" space in the interest of further democratizing society. However, new public management theory fails to addresses political questions in a meaningful way. This theory looks at public administration from it's roots of capitalism, and goes on through the perspective of global capitalism. Intentional or not, new public management has served the interests of elites, particularly corporate elites, has degraded the ability of governments to address the public interest, and has served as a vehicle for elevating the apolitical governance of free trade and other supranational organizations,which have fully embraced thepolitical philosophy of economic rationalism and new managerialism.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal|title = One More Time|url = http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/ATP1084-1806350302|journal = Administrative Theory & Praxis|date = 2013-09-01|issn = 1084-1806|pages = 356–377|volume = 35|issue = 3|doi = 10.2753/ATP1084-1806350302|first = Sean A.|last = McCandless|first2 = Mary E.|last2 = Guy}}</ref> |
|||
== Postmodern Public Administration theory == |
|||
The internal operations of almost all existing government organizations are referred to as post-modern public administration. Even members of Congress in Washington, D.C. or Department of Public Safety staff members who handle paperwork for applicants seeking a driver's license at any DPS location. Public administration is a broad concept to include all functions in the executive branch that have an impact on the general public. Members of public administration come in different forms and quantities. When understanding the theory of postmodern public administration, it is important to make a differentiation between postmodern theory and the postmodern era as well as being able to differentiate between post-modernity (period of time) and [[Postmodernism/Philosophy|postmodernism]] (theory/philosophy). |
|||
When looking at this theory, it is important to distinguish between postmodern theory and the postmodern era or to differentiate between postmodernity (period of time) and postmodernism (theory/philosophy). Postmodern theory evolves out of the postmodern era. Chuck Fox and Hugh Miller are two of the main contributors to postmodern theory because they opened eyes to recognize the postmodern condition and how it was playing out in public administration and and public policy. This theory began in the 1990's, even though this theory had been around in other disciplines for awhile.This theory has been created through three intellectual movements, interrogating the loop model of democracy, showing that it is largely a myth, showing the symolblic nature of policy and politics in the United States, and discourse theory. One of the downsides of this theory is that it is easy to fall into the slippery slope of relativism. This theory also provided us, we hope, with the tools to rebuild our infrastructures of symbolic and social order. There are still many controversies over this theory, however the theory still remains rooted in public administration theory. This theory addresses big questions of what is right and wrong and tries to address the issue to find antidotes for anomie and relativity.<ref>{{Cite journal|url = |title = Postmodern Public Administration: In The Shadow Of Postmodernism|last = King|first = Cheryl|date = September 7, 2015|journal = Administrative Theory & Praxis|doi = |pmid = |access-date = }}</ref> |
|||
Postmodern theory evolves out of the postmodern era. Chuck Fox and Hugh Miller are two of the main contributors to postmodern theory because they were able to recognize the postmodern condition and how it was playing out in public administration and [[Public policy of the United States|public policy]]. Fox and Miller argue that the traditional approach to public administration "robs public administration theorists of the independence required to imagine more emancipating conditions of work and governance."<ref>Fox, C.J., & Miller, H.T. (1995). ''Postmodern public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity.'' Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.</ref> Miller proposes a network model based on economic utility which would explain events better than traditional approach to public administration. Miller states that "policy networks provide a way of processing dissension, articulating values, and airing possible policy implementation strategies. Maneuvering on behalf of the public interest in this complex politically subtle network is the task of post-progressive public administration."<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Miller | first1 = H.T. | year = 1994 | title = Post-Progressive Public Administration: Lessons from Policy Networks | journal = Public Administration Review | volume = 54 | issue = 4| pages = 378–386 | doi=10.2307/977386| jstor = 977386 }}</ref> This theory began in the 1990s, even though this theory had been around in other disciplines for a while. An estimation of time could date back to [[Plato]] and his ideas of a public and communal government where there are policy making actions and steps through levels of democracy. This theory has since been revisited and changed through three intellectual movements, interrogating the loop model of democracy, which many have argued that it is largely a myth, showing the symbolic nature of policy and politics in the United States, and discourse theory. One of the downsides of this theory is that it is based on the slippery slope of [[relativism]]. This theory also provides people with the tools to rebuild our infrastructures of symbolic and social order. This theory addresses big questions of what is right and wrong and tries to address the issue to find antidotes for [[anomie]] and [[Relativity Theory (The Outer Limits)|relativity]].<ref>King, Cheryl (September 7, 2015). "Postmodern Public Administration: In The Shadow Of Postmodernism".''Administrative Theory & Praxis''.</ref> |
|||
== Public Administration Theory Development == |
|||
| ⚫ | Public Administration theory is derived from several contemporary theory building tools such as Max Weber's Ideal type method. Theories are also derived from studies of evolving governments around the world, such as China's expanding bureaucracy. Different aspects to take into account are: accountability, state-citizen relations, and services for all in times of fiscal scarcity. When developing theories, the most effective theories are the ones tailored for a particular country taking aspects such as values into account. When empirical evidence is the only aspect taken into account it leads to |
||
The founding father of postmodern public administration is commonly referred to as [[Woodrow Wilson]], while many can find his roots of inspiration from the works of [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]. Using [[Woodrow Wilson]] as a reference point, it can be shown that in his essay The Study of Administration, is it “traditionally accepted that with his study, Wilson applied [[Positivism|positivist]] principles to public administration…based on the belief that social reality would be objectively known with the separation of positivist traditional values from facts.” (Traces of Postmodernism in the New Public Management Paradigm, Kerim Ozcan-Veysel Agca).<ref>Özcan, Kerim (Sept. 2010). "Traces of Postmodernism in the New Public Management Paradigm" (PDF).''www.todaie.edu''. Retrieved April 13, 2016.</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | The ideal-type method developed by Max Weber is a useful tool in contemporary public administration theory development |
||
| ⚫ | |||
=== Theory- Gap Practice === |
|||
| ⚫ | Public Administration theory is derived from several contemporary theory building tools such as Max Weber's Ideal type method. Theories are also derived from studies of evolving governments around the world, such as China's expanding bureaucracy. Different aspects to take into account are: accountability, state-citizen relations, and services for all in times of fiscal scarcity. When developing theories, the most effective theories are the ones tailored for a particular country taking aspects such as values into account. When empirical evidence is the only aspect taken into account it leads to an ineffective policy because the theory will not reflect the values of the citizens, resulting in bad citizen- state relationships.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|title = Revisiting the (Lost) Art of Ideal-Typing in Public Administration|last = Stout|first = Margaret|date = December 2010|journal = Administrative Theory & Praxis | volume=32 | issue=4 | pages=491–519 | doi=10.2753/ATP1084-1806320401 | s2cid=143643451 }}</ref> The Theory-Gap Practice is used to analyze the correlations between Public Administration theory and practice. The three fields of the theory gap-practice that describe the relationship between scholars and practitioners are: Parallel, Transfer, and Collaboration strategy. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
== '''Important Figures in Public Administration Theory''' == |
|||
| ⚫ | The ideal-type method developed by Max Weber is a useful tool in contemporary public administration theory development because the method takes into account the culture of a society that is then integrated into a theory. Weber referred to it as cultural science or interpretive sociology, which, is to understand ideas and practices from within their own intellectual and cultural horizon and on the basis of categories that are grounded in a meaningful social and historical context. According to Margaret Stout, Ideal-type methods are used to frame observation and analysis and to evaluate what is found. Weber's method must be developed using value judgments that direct our empirical observations and then guide our interpretation of those observations. Through this theory building method, Weber insisted that all interpretations of meaning must remain at best "a peculiarly plausible hypothesis", as opposed to a claim of relevance of a theory. Weber's purpose for using this method is to clarify the importance of values in sense making, but how they are also extremely important for the conduct of meaningful social science.<ref name=":0" /> Weber’s interpretive sociology employs a type of functional analysis that begins with the whole, proceeds to the parts, and then goes back from the parts to the whole. His ideal-type method is thereby simultaneously useful in both the study of social structure and social action. Social action is linked to subjective meaning at the individual level of analysis, and structural forms are a consequence or construction of social action. This combination is particularly valuable to public administration because the manner in which administrative action and the social structures of governance interrelate requires an approach that considers both. On the one hand, ideal-types enable consideration of things like alternative meanings of important concepts or alternative motivations held by social actors. On the other hand, they enable analysis of associated or resulting social structures. In this way, an ideal-type can concurrently help interpret the meaning of the administrative role as well as critique the institutions of governance.<ref name=":0" /> |
||
=== Theory-gap practice === |
|||
'''Parallel-''' Proponents of this strategy of relating theory and practice believe that practical knowledge cannot be derived from theories. For the practitioners of this strategy, practice and theory remain separate components of knowledge. Practical knowledge aims to how to handle problems in particular situations while theory aims at handling a specific situation in a general set of principles. Advocates for the parallel strategy claim there can be a complementary relationship between practical and theoretical knowledge or that they can substitute each other in certain situations because particular situations will require practice and theory to work together. Thus advocates that champion parallel strategy argue that it is essential for management studies to maintain an autonomous communication system.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal|title = Parallel, Transfer, or Collaboration strategy of relating theory to practice? A case study of public management debate in Germany.|last = Vogel|first = Rick|date = 2010|journal = Public Administration| volume=88 | issue=3 | pages=680–705 | doi=10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01828.x }}</ref> |
|||
'''Transfer-''' This second strategy frames the theory-practice problem as one of translating and diffusing research knowledge into management. This strategy confronts the issue of public managers lack of interest or studying of the work of scholars. This is the result of the scholarly work not being easily applicable to practice, and the complexity of the journals, thus knowledge is not being transferred from theory to practice. The transfer strategy proponents claim the popularizing the scholarly work, and making it more relevant to current issues faced in public administration would enhance the transfer of knowledge from scholars to street level bureaucrats and public managers. However, some argue this approach falls short of expectations because many practitioners of public administration have little influence on the content of knowledge offered by scholars.<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
'''Collaboration'''- This strategy aims to enhance communication between scholars and practitioners before the theory is developed in order to build a dialectic method of inquiry, building on the idea that communication is necessary throughout the whole theory building process in order to have a well development practical theory.<ref name=":2" /> Scholars Van de Ven and P.E. Johnson put it as: |
|||
"Engagement is relationship that involves negotiation and collaboration between researchers and practitioners in a learning community; such a community jointly produces knowledge that can both advance the scientific enterprise and enlighten a community of practitioners."<ref name=":2" /> |
|||
== Important figures in public administration theory == |
|||
=== Max Weber === |
|||
[[File:Max_Weber_1894.jpg|thumb|146x146px|Max Weber, one of the many theorists.]] |
|||
Max Weber was a German political economist, social scientist, and renowned Philosopher is an important father to the theory of Public Administration and the bureaucratic side of it. He did extensive research studying ancient and modern states to gather a better perspective of bureaucracies in multiple eras for his Magnum Opus Economy and Society published in 1922. That piece of work has contributed countless insight into the Public Administration Theory. Max Weber considered bureaucracy to be the most rational form of administration yet devised by man. In his writings he asserts that domination is exerted through administration and that for legal domination to take place bureaucracy is required. |
Max Weber was a German political economist, social scientist, and renowned Philosopher is an important father to the theory of Public Administration and the bureaucratic side of it. He did extensive research studying ancient and modern states to gather a better perspective of bureaucracies in multiple eras for his Magnum Opus Economy and Society published in 1922. That piece of work has contributed countless insight into the Public Administration Theory. Max Weber considered bureaucracy to be the most rational form of administration yet devised by man. In his writings he asserts that domination is exerted through administration and that for legal domination to take place bureaucracy is required. |
||
=== Woodrow Wilson === |
|||
[[File:Thomas Woodrow Wilson.jpg|left|thumb|157x157px|Thomas Woodrow Wilson, another one of the theorists of Public Administration.]] |
|||
Woodrow Wilson defined public administration as a detailed and systematic execution of public law, he divided government institutions into two separate sectors, administration and politics. According to him politics is dealt with policy formulation and questions regarding such, whereas administration is equipped with carrying said policies out. In his own words in his early essay, |
Woodrow Wilson defined public administration as a detailed and systematic execution of public law, he divided government institutions into two separate sectors, administration and politics. According to him politics is dealt with policy formulation and questions regarding such, whereas administration is equipped with carrying said policies out. In his own words in his early essay, "The Study of Administration" he said "it is getting to be harder to run a constitution than to frame one." Wilson very much so tried to establish a distinction between politics and administration; he saw administration as a field of business which lies outside politics. He thought the theory of public administration existed simply because of technicalities and was around for the behind the scenes business aspect of politics. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Frederick Taylor was an engineer by profession who saw much of life from a scientific aspect. He is a popular less conservative contributor to the Theory of Public Administration in that he produced his own, very popular, theory of traditional public administration, The Scientific Management Theory. He was concerned with finding the best and most efficient way to complete a task for a particular job, reducing the overall labor a worker had to exert with the least amount of movements. Frederick Taylors work approached motivation with a very authoritative, cold, scientific motivator which weighed heavy over any sort of humane aspect to scientific management. Overall many intricacies in Public Administration such as management, control and accounting are subject to scientific principles and Taylor draws on these to find his own, efficient theory approach to Public Administration Theory. |
Frederick Taylor was an engineer by profession who saw much of life from a scientific aspect. He is a popular less conservative contributor to the Theory of Public Administration in that he produced his own, very popular, theory of traditional public administration, The Scientific Management Theory. He was concerned with finding the best and most efficient way to complete a task for a particular job, reducing the overall labor a worker had to exert with the least amount of movements. Frederick Taylors work approached motivation with a very authoritative, cold, scientific motivator which weighed heavy over any sort of humane aspect to scientific management. Overall many intricacies in Public Administration such as management, control and accounting are subject to scientific principles and Taylor draws on these to find his own, efficient theory approach to Public Administration Theory. |
||
== Public administration theory in practice == |
|||
Public administration theory guides the practice of managing government agencies. Classic theories like Max Weber's bureaucracy emphasize hierarchy and rules, while contemporary theories focus on collaboration and citizen engagement. In practice, administrators apply these theories to enhance efficiency, transparency, and responsiveness in public services. Examples include implementing performance measurement systems, adopting e-governance tools, and fostering partnerships with the community. The field continues to evolve, incorporating insights from other disciplines like behavioral economics and data science to address complex challenges such as climate change, public health crises, and economic inequality. However, a significant challenge lies in balancing competing priorities and managing the inherent tensions between efficiency and equity, accountability and responsiveness. The goal is to optimize government functions, uphold accountability, and meet the needs of citizens. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
* [[Lean Government]] |
* [[Lean Government]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
*{{cite web|last1=Myrick|first1=Darrel|title=Frederick Taylor as a Contributor to Public Administration|url=http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/8584/Myrick_Taylor%20Article.pdf|website=Unisa|publisher=Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences|access-date=2015-11-17|ref=7}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{wikiquote}} |
|||
*[http://www.civilservant.org.uk/northcotetrevelyan.pdf The Northcote-Trevelyan Report] |
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20141222072511/http://www.civilservant.org.uk/northcotetrevelyan.pdf The Northcote-Trevelyan Report] |
||
*[https://www.yoopery.com/2020/03/similarities-of-public-and-private-administration.html Similarities between public and private administration] |
|||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Sociology]] |
||
[[Category:Subfields of political science]] |
|||
[[Category:Public administration]] |
[[Category:Public administration]] |
||
Latest revision as of 05:42, 19 December 2024
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Public administration theory refers to the study and analysis of the principles, concepts, and models that guide the practice of public administration. It provides a framework for understanding the complexities and challenges of managing public organizations and implementing public policies.
The goal of public administrative theory is to accomplish politically approved objectives through methods shaped by the constituency. To ensure effective public administration, administrators have adopted a range of methods, roles, and theories from disciplines such as economics, sociology, and psychology. Theory building in public administration involves not only creating a single theory of administration but also developing a collection of theories. Administrative theory primarily focuses on the ideas and perspectives of various scholars.
Public administration theory encompasses various frameworks and concepts that guide the practice of managing public organizations and implementing public policies. Classical, neoclassical, and modern theories contribute to understanding the complexities of public administration.
Classical Theory
[edit]Rooted in the early 20th century, scholars like Max Weber and Frederick Taylor emphasized hierarchical structures, division of labor, and bureaucratic principles to enhance efficiency in public organizations.
This theory closely aligns with Woodrow Wilson’s public administration ideals. The Classical Public Administration Theory prioritizes efficiency in organizational work, professionalization, a pragmatic approach to bureaucracy, and merit-based promotions. The classical system includes a strict definition of responsibilities and objectives and control over all involved functions.
Since the 1980s, the classical system has been rejected by governments in favor of a market-based model of public organization.
New Public Management Theory
[edit]In the 1980s, the New Public Management Theory (NPM) was created to make the civil service more efficient. To do so, it utilized private-sector management models. Giving local agencies more freedom in how they delivered services to citizens, the theory experimented with using decentralized service delivery models.
Advocates of NPM look to replace the disciplinary, academic, or moral emphasis of traditional public administration with a more “businesslike” perspective.
Postmodern Public Administration theory
[edit]The internal operations of almost all existing government organizations are referred to as post-modern public administration. Even members of Congress in Washington, D.C. or Department of Public Safety staff members who handle paperwork for applicants seeking a driver's license at any DPS location. Public administration is a broad concept to include all functions in the executive branch that have an impact on the general public. Members of public administration come in different forms and quantities. When understanding the theory of postmodern public administration, it is important to make a differentiation between postmodern theory and the postmodern era as well as being able to differentiate between post-modernity (period of time) and postmodernism (theory/philosophy).
Postmodern theory evolves out of the postmodern era. Chuck Fox and Hugh Miller are two of the main contributors to postmodern theory because they were able to recognize the postmodern condition and how it was playing out in public administration and public policy. Fox and Miller argue that the traditional approach to public administration "robs public administration theorists of the independence required to imagine more emancipating conditions of work and governance."[1] Miller proposes a network model based on economic utility which would explain events better than traditional approach to public administration. Miller states that "policy networks provide a way of processing dissension, articulating values, and airing possible policy implementation strategies. Maneuvering on behalf of the public interest in this complex politically subtle network is the task of post-progressive public administration."[2] This theory began in the 1990s, even though this theory had been around in other disciplines for a while. An estimation of time could date back to Plato and his ideas of a public and communal government where there are policy making actions and steps through levels of democracy. This theory has since been revisited and changed through three intellectual movements, interrogating the loop model of democracy, which many have argued that it is largely a myth, showing the symbolic nature of policy and politics in the United States, and discourse theory. One of the downsides of this theory is that it is based on the slippery slope of relativism. This theory also provides people with the tools to rebuild our infrastructures of symbolic and social order. This theory addresses big questions of what is right and wrong and tries to address the issue to find antidotes for anomie and relativity.[3]
The founding father of postmodern public administration is commonly referred to as Woodrow Wilson, while many can find his roots of inspiration from the works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Using Woodrow Wilson as a reference point, it can be shown that in his essay The Study of Administration, is it “traditionally accepted that with his study, Wilson applied positivist principles to public administration…based on the belief that social reality would be objectively known with the separation of positivist traditional values from facts.” (Traces of Postmodernism in the New Public Management Paradigm, Kerim Ozcan-Veysel Agca).[4]
Public Administration theory development
[edit]Public Administration theory is derived from several contemporary theory building tools such as Max Weber's Ideal type method. Theories are also derived from studies of evolving governments around the world, such as China's expanding bureaucracy. Different aspects to take into account are: accountability, state-citizen relations, and services for all in times of fiscal scarcity. When developing theories, the most effective theories are the ones tailored for a particular country taking aspects such as values into account. When empirical evidence is the only aspect taken into account it leads to an ineffective policy because the theory will not reflect the values of the citizens, resulting in bad citizen- state relationships.[5] The Theory-Gap Practice is used to analyze the correlations between Public Administration theory and practice. The three fields of the theory gap-practice that describe the relationship between scholars and practitioners are: Parallel, Transfer, and Collaboration strategy.
Max Weber's ideal-type method
[edit]The ideal-type method developed by Max Weber is a useful tool in contemporary public administration theory development because the method takes into account the culture of a society that is then integrated into a theory. Weber referred to it as cultural science or interpretive sociology, which, is to understand ideas and practices from within their own intellectual and cultural horizon and on the basis of categories that are grounded in a meaningful social and historical context. According to Margaret Stout, Ideal-type methods are used to frame observation and analysis and to evaluate what is found. Weber's method must be developed using value judgments that direct our empirical observations and then guide our interpretation of those observations. Through this theory building method, Weber insisted that all interpretations of meaning must remain at best "a peculiarly plausible hypothesis", as opposed to a claim of relevance of a theory. Weber's purpose for using this method is to clarify the importance of values in sense making, but how they are also extremely important for the conduct of meaningful social science.[5] Weber’s interpretive sociology employs a type of functional analysis that begins with the whole, proceeds to the parts, and then goes back from the parts to the whole. His ideal-type method is thereby simultaneously useful in both the study of social structure and social action. Social action is linked to subjective meaning at the individual level of analysis, and structural forms are a consequence or construction of social action. This combination is particularly valuable to public administration because the manner in which administrative action and the social structures of governance interrelate requires an approach that considers both. On the one hand, ideal-types enable consideration of things like alternative meanings of important concepts or alternative motivations held by social actors. On the other hand, they enable analysis of associated or resulting social structures. In this way, an ideal-type can concurrently help interpret the meaning of the administrative role as well as critique the institutions of governance.[5]
Theory-gap practice
[edit]Parallel- Proponents of this strategy of relating theory and practice believe that practical knowledge cannot be derived from theories. For the practitioners of this strategy, practice and theory remain separate components of knowledge. Practical knowledge aims to how to handle problems in particular situations while theory aims at handling a specific situation in a general set of principles. Advocates for the parallel strategy claim there can be a complementary relationship between practical and theoretical knowledge or that they can substitute each other in certain situations because particular situations will require practice and theory to work together. Thus advocates that champion parallel strategy argue that it is essential for management studies to maintain an autonomous communication system.[6]
Transfer- This second strategy frames the theory-practice problem as one of translating and diffusing research knowledge into management. This strategy confronts the issue of public managers lack of interest or studying of the work of scholars. This is the result of the scholarly work not being easily applicable to practice, and the complexity of the journals, thus knowledge is not being transferred from theory to practice. The transfer strategy proponents claim the popularizing the scholarly work, and making it more relevant to current issues faced in public administration would enhance the transfer of knowledge from scholars to street level bureaucrats and public managers. However, some argue this approach falls short of expectations because many practitioners of public administration have little influence on the content of knowledge offered by scholars.[6]
Collaboration- This strategy aims to enhance communication between scholars and practitioners before the theory is developed in order to build a dialectic method of inquiry, building on the idea that communication is necessary throughout the whole theory building process in order to have a well development practical theory.[6] Scholars Van de Ven and P.E. Johnson put it as:
"Engagement is relationship that involves negotiation and collaboration between researchers and practitioners in a learning community; such a community jointly produces knowledge that can both advance the scientific enterprise and enlighten a community of practitioners."[6]
Important figures in public administration theory
[edit]Max Weber
[edit]
Max Weber was a German political economist, social scientist, and renowned Philosopher is an important father to the theory of Public Administration and the bureaucratic side of it. He did extensive research studying ancient and modern states to gather a better perspective of bureaucracies in multiple eras for his Magnum Opus Economy and Society published in 1922. That piece of work has contributed countless insight into the Public Administration Theory. Max Weber considered bureaucracy to be the most rational form of administration yet devised by man. In his writings he asserts that domination is exerted through administration and that for legal domination to take place bureaucracy is required.
Woodrow Wilson
[edit]
Woodrow Wilson defined public administration as a detailed and systematic execution of public law, he divided government institutions into two separate sectors, administration and politics. According to him politics is dealt with policy formulation and questions regarding such, whereas administration is equipped with carrying said policies out. In his own words in his early essay, "The Study of Administration" he said "it is getting to be harder to run a constitution than to frame one." Wilson very much so tried to establish a distinction between politics and administration; he saw administration as a field of business which lies outside politics. He thought the theory of public administration existed simply because of technicalities and was around for the behind the scenes business aspect of politics.
Frederick Winslow Taylor
[edit]Frederick Taylor was an engineer by profession who saw much of life from a scientific aspect. He is a popular less conservative contributor to the Theory of Public Administration in that he produced his own, very popular, theory of traditional public administration, The Scientific Management Theory. He was concerned with finding the best and most efficient way to complete a task for a particular job, reducing the overall labor a worker had to exert with the least amount of movements. Frederick Taylors work approached motivation with a very authoritative, cold, scientific motivator which weighed heavy over any sort of humane aspect to scientific management. Overall many intricacies in Public Administration such as management, control and accounting are subject to scientific principles and Taylor draws on these to find his own, efficient theory approach to Public Administration Theory.
Public administration theory in practice
[edit]Public administration theory guides the practice of managing government agencies. Classic theories like Max Weber's bureaucracy emphasize hierarchy and rules, while contemporary theories focus on collaboration and citizen engagement. In practice, administrators apply these theories to enhance efficiency, transparency, and responsiveness in public services. Examples include implementing performance measurement systems, adopting e-governance tools, and fostering partnerships with the community. The field continues to evolve, incorporating insights from other disciplines like behavioral economics and data science to address complex challenges such as climate change, public health crises, and economic inequality. However, a significant challenge lies in balancing competing priorities and managing the inherent tensions between efficiency and equity, accountability and responsiveness. The goal is to optimize government functions, uphold accountability, and meet the needs of citizens.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Fox, C.J., & Miller, H.T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
- ^ Miller, H.T. (1994). "Post-Progressive Public Administration: Lessons from Policy Networks". Public Administration Review. 54 (4): 378–386. doi:10.2307/977386. JSTOR 977386.
- ^ King, Cheryl (September 7, 2015). "Postmodern Public Administration: In The Shadow Of Postmodernism".Administrative Theory & Praxis.
- ^ Özcan, Kerim (Sept. 2010). "Traces of Postmodernism in the New Public Management Paradigm" (PDF).www.todaie.edu. Retrieved April 13, 2016.
- ^ a b c Stout, Margaret (December 2010). "Revisiting the (Lost) Art of Ideal-Typing in Public Administration". Administrative Theory & Praxis. 32 (4): 491–519. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806320401. S2CID 143643451.
- ^ a b c d Vogel, Rick (2010). "Parallel, Transfer, or Collaboration strategy of relating theory to practice? A case study of public management debate in Germany". Public Administration. 88 (3): 680–705. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01828.x.
- Brownlow, Louis. "Woodrow Wilson and Public Administration." Jstor. American Society for Public Administration, n.d. Web. 17 Nov. 2015.
- Myrick, Darrel. "Frederick Taylor as a Contributor to Public Administration" (PDF). Unisa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Retrieved 2015-11-17.
External links
[edit]