Jump to content

Change of fiber: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
References: not a stub any longer
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Given a [[fibration]] ''p'':''E''→''B'', the '''change of fiber''' is a map between the fibers induced by paths in ''B''.
In algebraic topology, given a [[fibration]] ''p'':''E''→''B'', the '''change of fiber''' is a map between the fibers induced by paths in ''B''.


Since a covering is a fibration, the construction generalizes the corresponding facts in the theory of [[covering space]]s.
Since a covering is a fibration, the construction generalizes the corresponding facts in the theory of [[covering space]]s.
Line 5: Line 5:
== Definition ==
== Definition ==
If ''β'' is a path in ''B'' that starts at, say, ''b'', then we have the homotopy <math>h: p^{-1}(b) \times I \to I \overset{\beta}\to B</math> where the first map is a projection. Since ''p'' is a fibration, by the [[homotopy lifting property]], ''h'' lifts to a homotopy <math>g: p^{-1}(b) \times I \to E</math> with <math>g_0: p^{-1}(b) \hookrightarrow E</math>. We have:
If ''β'' is a path in ''B'' that starts at, say, ''b'', then we have the homotopy <math>h: p^{-1}(b) \times I \to I \overset{\beta}\to B</math> where the first map is a projection. Since ''p'' is a fibration, by the [[homotopy lifting property]], ''h'' lifts to a homotopy <math>g: p^{-1}(b) \times I \to E</math> with <math>g_0: p^{-1}(b) \hookrightarrow E</math>. We have:
:<math>g_t: p^{-1}(b) \to p^{-1}(\beta(t))</math>.
:<math>g_1: p^{-1}(b) \to p^{-1}(\beta(1))</math>.
(There might be an ambiguity and so <math>\beta \mapsto g_1</math> need not be well-defined.) Let <math>\operatorname{Pc}(B)</math> denotes the set of [[path class]]es in ''B''. We claim that the construction determines the map:
(There might be an ambiguity and so <math>\beta \mapsto g_1</math> need not be well-defined.)
Let <math>\operatorname{Pc}(B)</math> denote the set of [[path class]]es in ''B''. We claim that the construction determines the map:
:<math>\tau: \operatorname{Pc}(B) \to </math> the set of homotopy classes of maps.
:<math>\tau: \operatorname{Pc}(B) \to </math> the set of homotopy classes of maps.
Suppose β, β' are in the same path class; thus, there is a homotopy ''h'' from β to β'. Let
Suppose β, β' are in the same path class; thus, there is a homotopy ''h'' from β to β'. Let
:<math>K = I \times \{0, 1\} \cup \{0\} \times I \subset I^2</math>.
:<math>K = I \times \{0, 1\} \cup \{0\} \times I \subset I^2</math>.
Then, drawing a picture, there is a homeomorphism <math>I^2 \to I^2</math> that restricts to a homeomorphism <math>K \to I \times \{0\}</math>. Thinking ''K'' signifies time zero, by the homotopy lifting property, we can lift the homotopy <math>p^{-1}(b) \times I^2 \to I^2 \overset{h}\to B</math> to <math>\widetilde{h}</math>. Then <math>\widetilde{h}_1</math> is a homotopy from <math>g_1</math> to <math>g_1'</math>.
Drawing a picture, there is a homeomorphism <math>I^2 \to I^2</math> that restricts to a homeomorphism <math>K \to I \times \{0\}</math>. Let <math>f: p^{-1}(b) \times K \to E</math> be such that <math>f(x, s, 0) = g(x, s)</math>, <math>f(x, s, 1) = g'(x, s)</math> and <math>f(x, 0, t) = x</math>.

Then, by the homotopy lifting property, we can lift the homotopy <math>p^{-1}(b) \times I^2 \to I^2 \overset{h}\to B</math> to ''w'' such that ''w'' restricts to <math>f</math>. In particular, we have <math>g_1 \sim g_1'</math>, establishing the claim.


It is clear from the construction that the map is a homomorphism: if <math>\gamma(1) =\beta(0)</math>,
It is clear from the construction that the map is a homomorphism: if <math>\gamma(1) =\beta(0)</math>,
:<math>\tau([\beta] \cdot [\gamma]) = \tau([\beta]) \circ \tau([\gamma])</math>
:<math>\tau([c_b]) = \operatorname{id}, \, \tau([\beta] \cdot [\gamma]) = \tau([\beta]) \circ \tau([\gamma])</math>
where <math>c_b</math> is the constant path at ''b''. It follows that <math>\tau([\beta])</math> has inverse. Hence, we can actually say:
:<math>\tau: \operatorname{Pc}(B) \to </math> the set of homotopy classes of homotopy equivalences.
Also, we have: for each ''b'' in ''B'',
:<math>\tau: \pi_1(B, b) \to</math> { [ƒ] | homotopy equivalence <math>f : p^{-1}(b) \to p^{-1}(b)</math> }
which is a group homomorphism (the right-hand side is clearly a group.) In other words, the fundamental group of ''B'' at ''b'' acts on the fiber over ''b'', up to homotopy. This fact is a useful substitute for the absence of the [[structure group]].


== Consequence ==
== Consequence ==
One consequence of the construction is the below:
One can get a substitute for a [[structure group]]. Indeed, suppose ''B'' is path-connected. Then
*The fibers of ''p'' over a path-component is homotopy equivalent to each other.

== References ==
*James F. Davis, Paul Kirk, [http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~aar/papers/davkir.pdf Lecture Notes in Algebraic Topology]
*May, J. [http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/CONCISE/ConciseRevised.pdf A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology]


{{topology-stub}}
[[Category:Algebraic topology]]

Latest revision as of 06:26, 5 September 2016

In algebraic topology, given a fibration p:EB, the change of fiber is a map between the fibers induced by paths in B.

Since a covering is a fibration, the construction generalizes the corresponding facts in the theory of covering spaces.

Definition

[edit]

If β is a path in B that starts at, say, b, then we have the homotopy where the first map is a projection. Since p is a fibration, by the homotopy lifting property, h lifts to a homotopy with . We have:

.

(There might be an ambiguity and so need not be well-defined.)

Let denote the set of path classes in B. We claim that the construction determines the map:

the set of homotopy classes of maps.

Suppose β, β' are in the same path class; thus, there is a homotopy h from β to β'. Let

.

Drawing a picture, there is a homeomorphism that restricts to a homeomorphism . Let be such that , and .

Then, by the homotopy lifting property, we can lift the homotopy to w such that w restricts to . In particular, we have , establishing the claim.

It is clear from the construction that the map is a homomorphism: if ,

where is the constant path at b. It follows that has inverse. Hence, we can actually say:

the set of homotopy classes of homotopy equivalences.

Also, we have: for each b in B,

{ [ƒ] | homotopy equivalence }

which is a group homomorphism (the right-hand side is clearly a group.) In other words, the fundamental group of B at b acts on the fiber over b, up to homotopy. This fact is a useful substitute for the absence of the structure group.

Consequence

[edit]

One consequence of the construction is the below:

  • The fibers of p over a path-component is homotopy equivalent to each other.

References

[edit]