Talk:Regional effects of climate change: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot |
m Replacing Template:Ds/talk notice with Template:Contentious topics/talk notice. BRFA. |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk page of redirect}}{{Skip to talk}} |
|||
{{ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|cc}} |
||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{sanctions|See [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change#Climate_change:_discretionary_sanctions|the description of the sanctions]].}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{Environment|climate change=yes|class=|importance=}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Meteorology|class=|importance=}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
||
| Line 12: | Line 6: | ||
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
||
|algo = old(30d) |
|algo = old(30d) |
||
|archive = Talk:Regional climate change/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:Regional effects of climate change/Archive %(counter)d |
||
| ⚫ | |||
}}{{archives|search=yes}} |
|||
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|||
* <nowiki>[[Effects of climate change#Variations between regions]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Variations between regions) has been [[Special:Diff/1075566094|deleted by other users]] before. <!-- {"title":"Variations between regions","appear":{"revid":1069883358,"parentid":1069879445,"timestamp":"2022-02-04T15:34:51Z","removed_section_titles":["Regional effects"],"added_section_titles":["Variations between regions"]},"disappear":{"revid":1075566094,"parentid":1075564774,"timestamp":"2022-03-06T13:28:39Z","removed_section_titles":["Variations between regions","CITEREFBeckZimmermannMcVicarVergopolan2018","CITEREF2008","CITEREFHoegh-GuldbergJacobTaylorBindi2018"],"added_section_titles":[]}} --> |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
}} |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Regional effects of global warming]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=701941586 my edit]. If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090327043445/http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/adcc/BookCh4Jan2006.pdf to http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/adcc/BookCh4Jan2006.pdf |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
== The section "regional impacts" is problematic== |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner]]:Online</sub></small> 13:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
I have a problem with the section "regional impacts". |
|||
* Firstly, it's the same title as the article's title which is somehow odd. |
|||
* Secondly, it leads to repetition because e.g. Africa is mentioned there and then again later in the "most vulnerable" section. |
|||
* Thirdly, the section is just a collection of bullet point lists (where it's unclear if all bullet points for one region come from the same reference, or if the sources of the bullet points are different). It will be hard to keep those bullet points up to date, and we are linking to the relevant sub-articles. Should we maybe just use excerpts from those regional sub-articles? Although we only have the following sub-articles for regions so far: Europe, Africa, South Asia, Caribbean, MENA. We have a lot of country articles by now though (52). Maybe we rather just point people there? |
|||
I like the sections that come later in this article, it's just the section called "regional impacts" which I find problematic. [[User:EMsmile|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile|talk]]) 08:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
: I've tried to improve the situation by renaming the section to "By region" and moving it towards the end of the article, therefore giving it less significance. It's still not great. Wondering if those bullet point lists are adding that much value or if they just repeat what is said elsewhere in the article. [[User:EMsmile|EMsmile]] ([[User talk:EMsmile|talk]]) 03:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 8 March 2024
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Effects of climate change Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Effects of climate change |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
The section "regional impacts" is problematic
[edit]I have a problem with the section "regional impacts".
- Firstly, it's the same title as the article's title which is somehow odd.
- Secondly, it leads to repetition because e.g. Africa is mentioned there and then again later in the "most vulnerable" section.
- Thirdly, the section is just a collection of bullet point lists (where it's unclear if all bullet points for one region come from the same reference, or if the sources of the bullet points are different). It will be hard to keep those bullet points up to date, and we are linking to the relevant sub-articles. Should we maybe just use excerpts from those regional sub-articles? Although we only have the following sub-articles for regions so far: Europe, Africa, South Asia, Caribbean, MENA. We have a lot of country articles by now though (52). Maybe we rather just point people there?
I like the sections that come later in this article, it's just the section called "regional impacts" which I find problematic. EMsmile (talk) 08:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've tried to improve the situation by renaming the section to "By region" and moving it towards the end of the article, therefore giving it less significance. It's still not great. Wondering if those bullet point lists are adding that much value or if they just repeat what is said elsewhere in the article. EMsmile (talk) 03:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)