Jump to content

Norrington Table: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverted edits by 192.76.8.33 (talk) to last version by 192.76.8.4
FredWalsh (talk | contribs)
262 edits
→References: see also
 
(75 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Table that ranks Oxford Colleges}}
The '''Norrington Table''' is an annual ranking of the [[Colleges of the University of Oxford|college]]s of the [[University of Oxford]] based on a score computed from the fraction of undergraduate students earning each of the various [[British undergraduate degree classification|degree classifications]] based on that year's [[final examination]]s.
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2019}}

The '''Norrington Table''' is an annual ranking of the [[Colleges of the University of Oxford|college]]s of the [[University of Oxford]] based on a score computed from the proportions of undergraduate students earning each of the various [[British undergraduate degree classification|degree classifications]] based on that year's [[final examination]]s.
There exists a table in the Merton College JCR dubbed the Norrington table, after the college's unusual downfall in the 2015 ranking. It is said to signify the college's ancestral right to occupy the top positions in the ranking and the members of the college have a duty to protect the table from those trying to steal it.


== Overview ==
== Overview ==
Currently, the Norrington Table is calculated by awarding 5 points for a student who receives a 1st [[British undergraduate degree classification|Class degree]], 3 points for a 2:1, 2 for a 2:2 and 1 for a 3rd, divided by the maximum possible score (i.e., the number of finalists in that college multiplied by 5), and expressed as a percentage (rounded to 2 decimal places) per college. Although the difference between the highest places on the table is usually very slight, the top colleges remain very competitive about their rankings on the Table. Their competitiveness has been heightened in recent years by increased media attention on the rankings.
The rankings of each college in the Norrington Table are calculated by awarding 5 points for a student who receives a First [[British undergraduate degree classification|Class degree]], 3 points for a 2:1, 2 for a 2:2 and 1 for a Third; the total is then divided by the maximum possible score (i.e. the number of finalists in that college multiplied by 5), and the result for each college is expressed as a percentage, rounded to 2 decimal places. Although the differences between the highest places on the table are usually slight, the top colleges remain very competitive about their rankings in the Table. Their competitiveness has been heightened in recent years by increased media attention towards the rankings.


Previously the university had refused to endorse an official table, leading to inaccuracies (see Criticisms below), so the university finally published its own rankings using examination results from all final year undergraduates in 2005.
Previously the university had refused to endorse an official table, leading to inaccuracies (see [[Norrington Table#Criticisms|Criticisms]] below), so the university finally published its own rankings using examination results from all final year undergraduates in 2005.


== History of the Norrington Table ==
== History==


Contrary to popular belief, the Norrington Table was not created in 1962 by [[Arthur Lionel Pugh Norrington|Sir Arthur Norrington]], who was then president of [[Trinity College, Oxford|Trinity College]]. Norrington did not invent the idea of producing a table of the results of [[Colleges of the University of Oxford|Oxford Colleges]]. Rather, he suggested a refinement to the weightings given to results by a pre-existing table. Norrington's scoring system was suggested in 1963 and abandoned after 1985, owing to changes in the Oxford examination system.<ref>http://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/exams</ref>
Contrary to popular belief, the Norrington Table was not created in 1962 by [[Arthur Lionel Pugh Norrington|Sir Arthur Norrington]], who was then president of [[Trinity College, Oxford|Trinity College]]. Norrington did not invent the idea of producing a table of the results of [[Colleges of the University of Oxford|Oxford colleges]]. Rather, he suggested a refinement to the weightings given to results in a existing table. Norrington's scoring system was suggested in 1963 and abandoned after 1985, owing to changes in the Oxford examination system.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/exams|title=Examinations and assessments &#124; University of Oxford|website=www.ox.ac.uk}}</ref>


On 5 September 1963, Norrington had a letter published in ''[[The Times]]'', in which he objected to the table that their correspondent had invented two days earlier (3 September 1963, p.&nbsp;12). The Times had previously published a table of Oxford Colleges' results in 1962 (29 August 1962, p.&nbsp;5).
On 5 September 1963, Norrington had a letter published in ''[[The Times]]'', in which he objected to the table that their correspondent had published two days earlier (3 September 1963, p.&nbsp;12). ''The Times'' had previously published a table of Oxford colleges' results in 1962 (29 August 1962, p.&nbsp;5).


Norrington wrote: "Your Correspondent has analysed the final examination results this year and gives an order of merit, among the first colleges, based on the percentage of Firsts and Seconds. This, in effect, is the same as basing it on the percentage of Thirds, and gives it no extra credit for Firsts. College A, for example, that gets 20 Firsts, 60 Seconds, and 20 Thirds scores less by this method than College B that gets no Firsts, 81 Seconds and 19 Thirds, but surely A has, in reality, done much better than B. A better result, I submit, is obtained by a points system in which a First scores more than a second and a Second more than a Third. If you make the points 3, 2, and 1 respectively and calculate what percentage of its "possible" each college has secured, you will find that College A, with 200 points out of 300, has scored 66.67 per cent, and B, with 181, only 60 per cent. This method of calculation will be found to promote Magdalen and Merton, which come surprisingly low in your Correspondent's order." (5 September 1963, p.&nbsp;13)
Norrington wrote: "Your Correspondent has analysed the final examination results this year and gives an order of merit, among the first colleges, based on the percentage of Firsts and Seconds. This, in effect, is the same as basing it on the percentage of Thirds, and gives it no extra credit for Firsts. College A, for example, that gets 20 Firsts, 60 Seconds, and 20 Thirds scores less by this method than College B that gets no Firsts, 81 Seconds and 19 Thirds, but surely A has, in reality, done much better than B. A better result, I submit, is obtained by a points system in which a First scores more than a second and a Second more than a Third. If you make the points 3, 2, and 1 respectively and calculate what percentage of its "possible" each college has secured, you will find that College A, with 200 points out of 300, has scored 66.67 per cent, and B, with 181, only 60 per cent. This method of calculation will be found to promote Magdalen and Merton, which come surprisingly low in your Correspondent's order." (5 September 1963, p.&nbsp;13)


In 1986, when Oxford for the first time split Second Class honours into Upper Seconds and Lower Seconds, ''The Times'' unilaterally adopted the [[Tompkins Table]], which gives more weight to a First class degree: five points for a First, three for a 2.1, two for a 2.2, and one for a Third. This system was invented in 1981 by Peter Tompkins, of [[Birkenhead]], as a method of classifying the results of [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]] colleges, and a table compiled by Tompkins on this basis was published on 28 August by ''The Times'' (28 Aug 1981, p.&nbsp;10) alongside a table using the Norrington scoring system, which had been compiled by the ''[[Cambridge Evening News]]''. The Tompkins Table became the preferred rating for [[Colleges of the University of Cambridge|Cambridge colleges]] and has prevailed for Oxford colleges, too, since 1986.
In 1986, when Oxford for the first time split Second Class honours into Upper Seconds and Lower Seconds, ''The Times'' unilaterally adopted the [[Tompkins Table]], which gives more weight to a First class degree: five points for a First, three for a 2.1, two for a 2.2, and one for a Third. This system was devised in 1981 by Peter Tompkins, of [[Birkenhead]], to classify the results of [[University of Cambridge|Cambridge]] colleges, and a table compiled by Tompkins on this basis was published on 28 August by ''The Times'' (28 Aug 1981, p.&nbsp;10) alongside a table using the Norrington scoring system, which had been compiled by the ''[[Cambridge Evening News]]''. The Tompkins Table became the preferred rating for [[Colleges of the University of Cambridge|Cambridge colleges]] and has prevailed for Oxford colleges as well since 1986.


=== Recent rankings ===
=== Recent rankings ===
Below is the Norrington Table for the [[academic year]] 2014/15, based on interim data:<ref>[http://www.ox.ac.uk/about/facts-and-figures/undergraduate-degree-classifications "Undergraduate Degree Classifications"]. Accessed 26 August 2015.</ref>
Below is the Norrington Table for the [[academic year]]s 2021/22 and 2019/20 along with mean values for the period 2006 to 2019.<ref name="ox.ac.uk" />

{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!College/<br />Hall
!2022 Score<br />%
!2020 Score<br />%
!Mean Score<br />(2006–2019)<br />%
|-
|-
|[[Merton College, Oxford|Merton]]
! Rank
|80.9
! College
|81.0
! Norrington Score
|75.60
|-
|-
|[[Lincoln College, Oxford|Lincoln]]
| 1
|80.7
| [[Magdalen College, Oxford|Magdalen]]
| 76.32%
|79.5
|71.06
|-
|-
|[[Harris Manchester College, Oxford|Harris Manchester]]
| 2
|77.7
| [[New College, Oxford|New]]
| 75.15%
|77.4
|65.90
|-
|-
|[[The Queen's College, Oxford|Queen's]]
| 3
|77.7
| [[Wadham College, Oxford|Wadham]]
| 74.11%
|81.7
|69.90
|-
|-
|[[St Peter's College, Oxford|St Peter's]]
| 4
|77.6
| [[Balliol College, Oxford|Balliol]]
| 73.96%
|81.5
|67.94
|-
|-
|[[St Catherine's College, Oxford|St Catherine's]]
| 5
|77.2
| [[Lincoln College, Oxford|Lincoln]]
| 73.00%
|82.5
|70.48
|-
|-
|[[Wadham College, Oxford|Wadham]]
| 6
|76.8
| [[St Catherine's College, Oxford|St Catherine's]]
| 72.52%
|80.9
|71.91
|-
|-
|[[St John's College, Oxford|St John's]]
| 7
|76.5
| [[St John's College, Oxford|St John's]]
| 72.17%
|80.2
|74.49
|-
|-
|[[Somerville College, Oxford|Somerville]]
| 8
|76.4
| [[St Anne's College, Oxford|St Anne's]]
| 72.07%
|72.8
|68.27
|-
|-
|[[Pembroke College, Oxford|Pembroke]]
| 9
|75.8
| [[Keble College, Oxford|Keble]]
| 72.00%
|78.0
|69.03
|-
|-
|[[Keble College, Oxford|Keble]]
| 10
|75.8
| [[Corpus Christi College, Oxford|Corpus Christi]]
| 71.52%
|76.6
|69.65
|-
|-
|[[Magdalen College, Oxford|Magdalen]]
| 11
|75.7
| [[Worcester College, Oxford|Worcester]]
| 71.43%
|77.4
|75.42
|-
|-
|[[Mansfield College, Oxford|Mansfield]]
| 12
|75.6
| [[Oriel College, Oxford|Oriel]]
| 71.33%
|75.5
|68.44
|-
|-
|[[New College, Oxford|New College]]
| 13
|75.5
| [[Jesus College, Oxford|Jesus]]
| 71.22%
|83.5
|74.65
|-
|-
|[[Brasenose College, Oxford|Brasenose]]
| 14
|74.9
| [[Hertford College, Oxford|Hertford]]
| 71.17%
|80.4
|70.81
|-
|-
|[[Worcester College, Oxford|Worcester]]
| 15
|74.4
| [[Christ Church, Oxford|Christ Church]]
| 71.06%
|78.8
|71.52
|-
|-
|[[Oriel College, Oxford|Oriel]]
| 16
|74.3
| [[Harris Manchester College, Oxford|Harris Manchester]]
| 70.91%
|79.8
|69.54
|-
|-
|[[University College, Oxford|University]]
| 17
|74.1
| [[St Hilda's College, Oxford|St Hilda's]]
| 70.45%
|78.9
|70.85
|-
|-
|[[St Hilda's College, Oxford|St Hilda's]]
| 18
|73.9
| [[Mansfield College, Oxford|Mansfield]]
| 70.30%
|78.3
|67.99
|-
|-
|[[Balliol College, Oxford|Balliol]]
| 19
|73.7
| [[Trinity College, Oxford|Trinity]]
| 70.12%
|78.6
|72.62
|-
|-
|[[Corpus Christi College, Oxford|Corpus Christi]]
| 20
|73.6
| [[University College, Oxford|University]]
| 70.09%
|77.0
|71.00
|-
|-
|[[St Anne's College, Oxford|St Anne's]]
| 21
|72.8
| [[St Hugh's College, Oxford|St Hugh's]]
| 70.00%
|77.0
|69.51
|-
|-
|[[Christ Church, Oxford|Christ Church]]
| 22
|72.5
| [[Exeter College, Oxford|Exeter]]
| 69.79%
|75.6
|72.02
|-
|-
|[[St Edmund Hall, Oxford|St Edmund Hall]]
| 23
|71.8
| [[St Peter's College, Oxford|St Peter's]]
| 69.70%
|76.5
|68.08
|-
|-
|[[St Benet's Hall, Oxford|St Benet's Hall]]
| 24
|71.7
| [[Brasenose College, Oxford|Brasenose]]
| 69.69%
|69.5
|62.76
|-
|-
|[[St Hugh's College, Oxford|St Hugh's]]
| 25
|71.2
| [[The Queen's College, Oxford|The Queen's College]]
| 69.25%
|78.8
|68.55
|-
|-
|[[Hertford College, Oxford|Hertford]]
| 26
|70.6
| [[Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford|Lady Margaret Hall]]
| 69.22%
|79.2
|70.39
|-
|-
|[[Trinity College, Oxford|Trinity]]
| 27
|70.3
| [[Merton College, Oxford|Merton]]
| 69.07%
|79.1
|71.30
|-
|-
|[[Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford|Lady Margaret Hall]]
| 28
|69.7
| [[Somerville College, Oxford|Somerville]]
| 68.93%
|75.7
|68.11
|-
|-
|[[Jesus College, Oxford|Jesus]]
| 29
|68.5
| [[St Edmund Hall, Oxford|St Edmund Hall]]
| 68.24%
|78.0
|71.26
|-
|[[Exeter College, Oxford|Exeter]]
|68.0
|75.8
|69.09
|-
|[[Wycliffe Hall, Oxford|Wycliffe Hall]]
|60.0
|63.6
|67.43
|-
|[[Regent's Park College, Oxford|Regent's Park]]
|68.9
|74.3
|64.13
|-
|[[St Stephen's House, Oxford|St Stephen's House]]
|50.0
|80.0
|59.46
|-
|-
| 30
| [[Pembroke College, Oxford|Pembroke]]
| 65.14%
|}
|}


=== Past rankings ===
=== Past rankings ===
Norrington Table rankings since 2006:<ref name="ox.ac.uk">[http://www.ox.ac.uk/about/facts-and-figures/undergraduate-degree-classifications The official interim Norrington Table on the Oxford University website accessed on 19 August 2014]</ref>
Norrington Table rankings from 2006 to 2019 by college, ordered by mean rank, and omitting all [[Permanent private hall|PPHs]] since they take very few undergraduates, with the exception of [[Regent's_Park_College,_Oxford|Regent's Park]]:<ref name="ox.ac.uk">{{cite web|url=http://www.ox.ac.uk/about/facts-and-figures/undergraduate-degree-classifications|title=Undergraduate Degree Classifications {{!}} University of Oxford|website=www.ox.ac.uk|accessdate=23 November 2020}}</ref>


[[File:NorringtonTable.png]]
[[File:Norrington Table rankings 2006-2019.png]]


== Criticisms ==
== Criticisms ==
The table is biased towards colleges which have larger than average numbers of students in science subjects such as chemistry and mathematics,{{citation needed|date=December 2010}} where a higher proportion attain a 1st Class degree compared to arts degrees (where more students attain a 2.1), a feature in respect of which scores are adjusted in the corresponding [[Tompkins Table]] at Cambridge.
The table is biased towards colleges with above average proportions of students in science subjects such as chemistry and mathematics,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Stokes|first1=Matt|last2=Lewis|first2=Alis|last3=Restall|first3=James|title=Merton plummet in latest Norrington Table|url=http://oxfordstudent.com/2012/08/16/magdalen-top-dogs-in-norrington-table/|website=The Oxford Student|accessdate=16 June 2017|date=16 August 2012}}</ref> in which a higher proportion attain a first-class degree compared to humanities (in which more students attain a 2:1). The corresponding [[Tompkins Table]] at Cambridge makes an adjustment for this feature.


[[John Lucas (philosopher)|John Lucas]], Fellow of [[Merton College, Oxford]], presented a critique of the Norrington Table in a 1980 article titled Norrington Blues.<ref>Lucas, John R., [http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jrlucas/itolduso/norrblue.html "Norrington Blues"], ''Oxford'' (May 1980), pp. 45-49.</ref>
[[John Lucas (philosopher)|John Lucas]], Fellow of [[Merton College, Oxford|Merton]], presented a critique of the Norrington Table in a 1980 article titled "Norrington Blues".<ref>Lucas, John R., [http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jrlucas/itolduso/norrblue.html "Norrington Blues"], ''Oxford'' (May 1980), pp. 45–49.</ref>

==Other tables and debate over use of Norrington name==

The Norrington Table has inspired other tables ranking the performance of [[Oxford colleges]], such as the "Vegetarian Norrington Table", which was first published in 2016.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.veggienorringtontable.com|title=Vegetarian Norrington Table | publisher=Oxford University Animal Ethics Society|accessdate=21 April 2019}}</ref> A play on the original, the Vegetarian Norrington Table ranks the best and worst colleges in Oxford not for their undergraduate examination results, but for the quality of their [[vegetarian]] and [[vegan]] food, using data collected from staff and students of the [[University of Oxford|University]].<ref>{{cite web|first1=Toby|last1=Clyde|url= https://www.oxfordstudent.com/2016/10/05/voting-opens-vegetarian-norrington-table/|title=Voting Opens On A 'Vegetarian Norrington Table' | publisher=[[The Oxford Student]]|accessdate=21 April 2019|date=5 October 2016}}</ref> The table caused some controversy, however, as a number of college [[bursars]] argued that it bore no relation to the original and further questioned its metrics.<ref>{{cite web|first1=Jack|last1=Hunter|url=https://cherwell.org/2016/12/08/mansfield-tops-first-veggie-norrington-table/|title=Mansfield tops first 'Veggie Norrington Table'| publisher=[[Cherwell (newspaper)|The Cherwell]]|accessdate=21 April 2019|date=8 December 2016}}</ref> The current top-ranked college in the Vegetarian Norrington Table is [[Mansfield College, Oxford|Mansfield College]], followed by [[Worcester College]], with [[Kellogg College]] in third.

There have been attempts to rework the original Norrington Table, specifically in light of debates surrounding access and the equality of {{section link|Oxford University#Admission}} process. In 2018, one article used geographical data to rank colleges based on the percentage of undergraduate students from poorer backgrounds. In this same report, the Vice President of the [[Oxford University Student Union]] announced work was underway on an "alternative Norrington Table" which would seek to measure [[social mobility]] as well as academic success in colleges.<ref>{{cite web|first1=Alan|last1= Rusbridger|url=https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/if-oxford-shrugs-alan-rusbridger-admissions-lmh|title=If Oxford shrugs| publisher=[[Prospect (magazine)|Prospect]]|accessdate=22 April 2019|date=18 September 2018}}</ref>

==See also==
* [[Tompkins Table]]


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}



== External links ==
{{authority control}}
* [http://www.mattmayer.com/fun/norrington/ Norrington Table rankings 2000–2007]


[[Category:1963 establishments in England]]
[[Category:1963 establishments in England]]

Latest revision as of 19:09, 9 July 2024

The Norrington Table is an annual ranking of the colleges of the University of Oxford based on a score computed from the proportions of undergraduate students earning each of the various degree classifications based on that year's final examinations.

Overview

[edit]

The rankings of each college in the Norrington Table are calculated by awarding 5 points for a student who receives a First Class degree, 3 points for a 2:1, 2 for a 2:2 and 1 for a Third; the total is then divided by the maximum possible score (i.e. the number of finalists in that college multiplied by 5), and the result for each college is expressed as a percentage, rounded to 2 decimal places. Although the differences between the highest places on the table are usually slight, the top colleges remain very competitive about their rankings in the Table. Their competitiveness has been heightened in recent years by increased media attention towards the rankings.

Previously the university had refused to endorse an official table, leading to inaccuracies (see Criticisms below), so the university finally published its own rankings using examination results from all final year undergraduates in 2005.

History

[edit]

Contrary to popular belief, the Norrington Table was not created in 1962 by Sir Arthur Norrington, who was then president of Trinity College. Norrington did not invent the idea of producing a table of the results of Oxford colleges. Rather, he suggested a refinement to the weightings given to results in a existing table. Norrington's scoring system was suggested in 1963 and abandoned after 1985, owing to changes in the Oxford examination system.[1]

On 5 September 1963, Norrington had a letter published in The Times, in which he objected to the table that their correspondent had published two days earlier (3 September 1963, p. 12). The Times had previously published a table of Oxford colleges' results in 1962 (29 August 1962, p. 5).

Norrington wrote: "Your Correspondent has analysed the final examination results this year and gives an order of merit, among the first colleges, based on the percentage of Firsts and Seconds. This, in effect, is the same as basing it on the percentage of Thirds, and gives it no extra credit for Firsts. College A, for example, that gets 20 Firsts, 60 Seconds, and 20 Thirds scores less by this method than College B that gets no Firsts, 81 Seconds and 19 Thirds, but surely A has, in reality, done much better than B. A better result, I submit, is obtained by a points system in which a First scores more than a second and a Second more than a Third. If you make the points 3, 2, and 1 respectively and calculate what percentage of its "possible" each college has secured, you will find that College A, with 200 points out of 300, has scored 66.67 per cent, and B, with 181, only 60 per cent. This method of calculation will be found to promote Magdalen and Merton, which come surprisingly low in your Correspondent's order." (5 September 1963, p. 13)

In 1986, when Oxford for the first time split Second Class honours into Upper Seconds and Lower Seconds, The Times unilaterally adopted the Tompkins Table, which gives more weight to a First class degree: five points for a First, three for a 2.1, two for a 2.2, and one for a Third. This system was devised in 1981 by Peter Tompkins, of Birkenhead, to classify the results of Cambridge colleges, and a table compiled by Tompkins on this basis was published on 28 August by The Times (28 Aug 1981, p. 10) alongside a table using the Norrington scoring system, which had been compiled by the Cambridge Evening News. The Tompkins Table became the preferred rating for Cambridge colleges and has prevailed for Oxford colleges as well since 1986.

Recent rankings

[edit]

Below is the Norrington Table for the academic years 2021/22 and 2019/20 along with mean values for the period 2006 to 2019.[2]

College/
Hall 		2022 Score
% 		2020 Score
% 		Mean Score
(2006–2019)
%
Merton 80.9 81.0 75.60
Lincoln 80.7 79.5 71.06
Harris Manchester 77.7 77.4 65.90
Queen's 77.7 81.7 69.90
St Peter's 77.6 81.5 67.94
St Catherine's 77.2 82.5 70.48
Wadham 76.8 80.9 71.91
St John's 76.5 80.2 74.49
Somerville 76.4 72.8 68.27
Pembroke 75.8 78.0 69.03
Keble 75.8 76.6 69.65
Magdalen 75.7 77.4 75.42
Mansfield 75.6 75.5 68.44
New College 75.5 83.5 74.65
Brasenose 74.9 80.4 70.81
Worcester 74.4 78.8 71.52
Oriel 74.3 79.8 69.54
University 74.1 78.9 70.85
St Hilda's 73.9 78.3 67.99
Balliol 73.7 78.6 72.62
Corpus Christi 73.6 77.0 71.00
St Anne's 72.8 77.0 69.51
Christ Church 72.5 75.6 72.02
St Edmund Hall 71.8 76.5 68.08
St Benet's Hall 71.7 69.5 62.76
St Hugh's 71.2 78.8 68.55
Hertford 70.6 79.2 70.39
Trinity 70.3 79.1 71.30
Lady Margaret Hall 69.7 75.7 68.11
Jesus 68.5 78.0 71.26
Exeter 68.0 75.8 69.09
Wycliffe Hall 60.0 63.6 67.43
Regent's Park 68.9 74.3 64.13
St Stephen's House 50.0 80.0 59.46

Past rankings

[edit]

Norrington Table rankings from 2006 to 2019 by college, ordered by mean rank, and omitting all PPHs since they take very few undergraduates, with the exception of Regent's Park:[2]

Criticisms

[edit]

The table is biased towards colleges with above average proportions of students in science subjects such as chemistry and mathematics,[3] in which a higher proportion attain a first-class degree compared to humanities (in which more students attain a 2:1). The corresponding Tompkins Table at Cambridge makes an adjustment for this feature.

John Lucas, Fellow of Merton, presented a critique of the Norrington Table in a 1980 article titled "Norrington Blues".[4]

Other tables and debate over use of Norrington name

[edit]

The Norrington Table has inspired other tables ranking the performance of Oxford colleges, such as the "Vegetarian Norrington Table", which was first published in 2016.[5] A play on the original, the Vegetarian Norrington Table ranks the best and worst colleges in Oxford not for their undergraduate examination results, but for the quality of their vegetarian and vegan food, using data collected from staff and students of the University.[6] The table caused some controversy, however, as a number of college bursars argued that it bore no relation to the original and further questioned its metrics.[7] The current top-ranked college in the Vegetarian Norrington Table is Mansfield College, followed by Worcester College, with Kellogg College in third.

There have been attempts to rework the original Norrington Table, specifically in light of debates surrounding access and the equality of Oxford University § Admission process. In 2018, one article used geographical data to rank colleges based on the percentage of undergraduate students from poorer backgrounds. In this same report, the Vice President of the Oxford University Student Union announced work was underway on an "alternative Norrington Table" which would seek to measure social mobility as well as academic success in colleges.[8]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Examinations and assessments | University of Oxford". www.ox.ac.uk.
  2. ^ a b "Undergraduate Degree Classifications | University of Oxford". www.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 23 November 2020.
  3. ^ Stokes, Matt; Lewis, Alis; Restall, James (16 August 2012). "Merton plummet in latest Norrington Table". The Oxford Student. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  4. ^ Lucas, John R., "Norrington Blues", Oxford (May 1980), pp. 45–49.
  5. ^ "Vegetarian Norrington Table". Oxford University Animal Ethics Society. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
  6. ^ Clyde, Toby (5 October 2016). "Voting Opens On A 'Vegetarian Norrington Table'". The Oxford Student. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
  7. ^ Hunter, Jack (8 December 2016). "Mansfield tops first 'Veggie Norrington Table'". The Cherwell. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
  8. ^ Rusbridger, Alan (18 September 2018). "If Oxford shrugs". Prospect. Retrieved 22 April 2019.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Norrington_Table&oldid=1233564417"