Jump to content

Talk:A Day in the Life: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Delmé Quartet: new section
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: also-beatles.
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header|search=y}}
{{Talk header|search=y}}
{{Notice|Consensus per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/The_Beatles#Closure this RfC closure] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/The_Beatles this RfM closure] is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.}}
{{Notice|Consensus per [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_mediation/The_Beatles#Closure this RfC closure] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/The_Beatles this RfM closure] is to use "the Beatles" mid-sentence.}}
{{ArticleHistory
{{ArticleHistory
Line 35: Line 35:
|topic=music
|topic=music
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Day In The Life, A|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject The Beatles|class=GA|importance=High|martin=yes|also-beatles=yes|display=Beatles|song=yes}}
{{WikiProject The Beatles|importance=High|martin=yes|display=Beatles}}
{{WikiProject Rock music|class=GA|importance=mid|listas=Day In The Life, A}}}}
{{WikiProject Rock music|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Progressive Rock|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Songs}}
{| class="infobox" width="200px"
}}
!align="center"|[[Image:Vista-file-manager.png|50px|Archive]]<br/>[[Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page|Archives]]
{{archives}}
----
|-
|
[[/Archive 1|1]] · [[/Archive 2|2]]
|}

==GA Nom==
I think this is good enough for a nomination for GA. Cheers, '''[[User:Kodster|<font color="7F007F">'''Kodster'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Kodster|'''Willis''']]) (''[[Special:Contributions/Kodster|Look what I can do]]'') 01:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, its got a good chance. [[User:Realist2|Realist2]] ([[User talk:Realist2|talk]]) 01:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

===Wait a second===
[[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] offered (I think) to peer review this article. So I think it would be advisable to wait for him before doing anything GA-related with this. Thanks. Cheers, '''[[User:Kodster|<font color="7F007F">'''Kodster'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Kodster|'''Willis''']]) (''[[Special:Contributions/Kodster|Look what I can do]]'') 19:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Kodster, causious? Why? Nothing wrong with a peer review mind, i know you can do it!!! [[User:Realist2|Realist2]] ([[User talk:Realist2|talk]]) 23:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
About the genre, it should be symphonic rock because you guys even say that it's the first example of symphonic rock in the article called symphonic rock. So that, I'm guessing, is a reliable source. If not it should be deleted from the Article called Symphonic Rock. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Palaciopalermo12|Palaciopalermo12]] ([[User talk:Palaciopalermo12|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Palaciopalermo12|contribs]]) 01:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Audio sample==
We could probably make a solid fair use argument for a short audio sample or two, especially those sections of the song that are the subject of intense detail in the article. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
:I missed the one in the infobox, but maybe the orchestral section or some of the ending babble would be an interesting addition to the article. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 17:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

That would be very good, but the Wiki-Police frown on including more than 30 seconds of one song. You could reduce one sample to 15 seconds, and include another, but you will be arrested if you do more. :) --[[User:Andreasegde|Sun, sea, and sand...]] ([[User talk:Andreasegde|talk]]) 19:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

:Hmm, that's no good. Oh well, maybe we could split up a couple of more relevant audio samples and use those instead of the one that is currently in the infobox.[[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 19:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

== GA Review: on Hold ==

You appear to have a wonderfully researched article here. I enjoyed reading it very much, and learned quite a bit about the song. I'm placing the article on hold for 7 days until the following can be fixed. It's mostly copy editing and MOS problems.


'''Lead'''
* Please list the full names of John Lennon and Paul McCartney in the lead, preferably in the first sentence.
**'''DONE'''
* The first sentence in the 3rd paragraph should probably be placed in the first paragraph as it states how important the song is. I would also add a sentence that includes information from the "Recognition" section of the article: you want your readers to know in the lead what an influential song this remains.
**'''DONE'''
* Watch the copy editing. ''Rolling Stone'' should be in italics.
**'''DONE'''
* Consider the order of the lead: it should mirror the order of topics in the article itself.
**'''DONE'''- but doing so kinda altered some of the top points a little

'''Lyrical inspiration'''
* Variate sentence starts so the prose flows better. You have multiple sentences that start with "Lennon..." A better start to this section would read as, "While reading the the ''Daily Mail'' on January 17, 1967, John Lennon started to..."
**'''DONE'''
* The same in the latter portion of this section, many sentences start with "McCartney..."
**'''DONE'''
* Make sure all dates read as Month Day, Year, per [[MOS:DATE]].
**'''DONE'''
* The information about the auction of the lyrics seems rather tacked on at the end of this section. Is there a more appropriate place to put it?
**'''DONE''' - moved to recognition section, since they sold for so much, its a sign of the somgs recognition

'''Recording'''
* If the beginning of the line of the song is, "Woke up, fell out of bed", capitalize the first word.
**'''DONE'''
* I don't believe there is an MOS rule on how to capitalize The Beatles vs. the Beatles, but it should be kept consistent throughout the article. I noticed both ways.
**'''DONE'''
* Why is this portion: ''given a (costume) piece'' in parentheses?
**'''DONE''' - It doesnt seem to be like that now

'''After the chord'''
* This portion: ''spliced together apparently at random sections some of which would play forward ("Never could be any other way") and others backward (possibly "Will Paul be back as Superman?")'' is confusing. I think you're referring to backmasking, but it's quite an awkward sentence. You might consider breaking it up to explain it better.
**'''DONE'''
* There is a fact tag in this section. It must be resolved.
**'''DONE''' - not a major issue, removed

'''Song structure'''
* Watch for [[WP:Jargon]] here. If there are musical terms (I've never seen the word "outro", for example) link or provide a brief explanation of them. Preferably both.
**'''DONE''' - Me neither lol, removed

'''Recognition'''
* The blockquote is unnecessary in this section, as the quote is too short to substantiate it.
**'''DONE'''
* Link "Grammy" and the category it was nominated for.
**'''DONE''' - couldnt do catagory though, kept coming up as red link.

'''Cover versions'''
* The proper way to refer to a song is in quotations, which you have done so far, but here you have the song in italics. Although albums should be italicized.
**'''DONE'''
* Link the date of June 16, 2007.
**'''DONE'''

'''References'''
* Please go through to make sure the red linked dates are fixed.
* I noticed a source that would not pass FAC due to reliability (No. 31) because it is a fansite. I did not check all online sources for reliability, but you will have to track down better sources if you would like to take this to FAC.
* Additionally, I would recommend you take the article to WP:LOCE to have them take a shot at all the tiny, tiny points of MOS prior to nominating this.
**Sorted red links, as for rest of sources, im not sure if their gonna bother with FA so have left for now.

'''Images'''
* Please clean up the fair use rationale for Image:Back cover.gif.
**'''DONE''' - Removed, unnessary

You can respond here or on my talk page if you have further comments or questions. Thank you. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 20:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

OK took care of list. [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#0f0">Realist</span><span style="color:#120A8F">'''<sup>2</sup>'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#EF9B0F ">''''''Come Speak To Me''''''</span>]]) 00:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks for taking care of these. I'm going to read the article fresh tomorrow and assess its progress. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 00:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
::OK, cheers. [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#0f0">Realist</span><span style="color:#120A8F">'''<sup>2</sup>'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#EF9B0F ">''''''Come Speak To Me''''''</span>]]) 00:55, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

:::I gave it a thorough copy edit, but I always miss stuff, as does everyone. You seem to have taken care of the majority of the problems, but I need you to check where I altered sentences for better flow - to make sure it is still factually accurate. Again, I just couldn't understand that sentence about playing the garbled portion forwards and backwards - that's my biggest concern. Let me read it through once more within the next 24 hours to make sure I got everything, but I think it will pass nicely. --[[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 14:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

::::I read it the second it came up on my watchlist. Your edits are spot on. [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#0f0">Realist</span><span style="color:#120A8F">'''<sup>2</sup>'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#EF9B0F ">''''''Come Speak To Me''''''</span>]]) 14:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


===Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination===
I am glad to report that this article nomination for [[WP:GA|good article]] status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of April 25, 2008, compares against the [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|six good article criteria]]:

:'''1. Well written?:''' PASS
:'''2. Factually accurate?:''' PASS
:'''3. Broad in coverage?:''' PASS
:'''4. Neutral point of view?:''' PASS
:'''5. Article stability?''' PASS
:'''6. Images?:''' PASS

Nice job. An excellent tribute to the band and the song, and a wonderful addition to Wikipedia. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|Good article reassessment]]. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.<!-- Template:PGAN --></div>— [[User:Moni3|Moni3]] ([[User talk:Moni3|talk]]) 15:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Cheers!!!!!!!!!!!!! [[User:Realist2|<span style="color:#0f0">Realist</span><span style="color:#120A8F">'''<sup>2</sup>'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:Realist2|<span style="color:#EF9B0F ">''''''Come Speak To Me''''''</span>]]) 15:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

== References marked as written in English? ==

There is hardly any point to marking every reference as written in English, because it is ''assumed'' that every reference is in English; when it is not, then that's when you typically use that field. Otherwise, it adds unnecessary information. <span style="font-size: 1.1em;">[[User:Gary King|<font color="#02e">Gary</font>&nbsp;<font color="#02b"><b><font size="+1"><i>K</i></font>ing</b></font>]]&nbsp;<font size="-1">([[User talk:Gary King|<font color="#02e">talk</font>]])</font></span> 03:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

==McCartney - piano and piano?==

It says McCartney is listed as playing piano and piano (E chord), shouldn't this be under piano, with stating that he playedt he final E chord? [[User:Speedboy Salesman|Speedboy Salesman]] ([[User talk:Speedboy Salesman|talk]]) 14:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

==Final Chord==
The rustling heard at the end of the final chord (if you turn your headphones really loud) is not "rustling papers" if you take Geoff Emerick's word from his book "Here, There, and Everywhere: My Life Recording the Music of The Beatles". According to Geoff; Ringo shifted in his seat making that clothes/chair noise heard, and earning a stern look from McCartney.
I think Geoff's book should be quoted more often, because he seems to have that engineering mind and certainly an amazing attention to detail. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:TomasMFC|TomasMFC]] ([[User talk:TomasMFC|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TomasMFC|contribs]]) 20:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== "I'd Love to turn you on" ==

I'm aware this has been disputed in the past as to who to credit this line to, and I thought it originally fine to credit it to McCartney, until I noticed that the citation for this bit of information contains contradictory quotes from both the songwriters as to who wrote it; Lennon claiming McCartney wrote it and McCartney claiming that Lennon did:

JOHN 1980:''Paul's contribution was the beautiful little lick in the song 'I'd love to turn you on.' I had the bulk of the song and the words, but he contributed this little lick floating around in his head that he couldn't use for anything. I thought it was a damn good piece of work."''


PAUL 1984: "That was mainly John's, I think. I remember being very conscious of the words 'I'd love to turn you on' and thinking, Well, that's about as risque as we dare get at this point. Well, the BBC banned it. It said, 'Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall' or something. But I mean that there was nothing vaguely rude or naughty in any of that. 'I'd love to turn you on' was the rudest line in the whole thing. ''But that was one of John's very good ones.''

Seeing how the source contradicts itself, it can hardly be used as a reliable source to say that McCartney wrote the lick, as, well, it contains the exact same information as far as McCartney saying that Lennon wrote it. The article should, if anything, acknowledge the disagreement or probably just not say anything about the lick.


Additionally, I strongly feel this line should be omitted from the article:

McCartney also provided a short, wordless vocal bridge back into Lennon's part of the song.

Because there is no citation for it. When I first read this, I came to the Discussion page for this article, where someone said that, although sources contradict themselves, this person, a self-proclaimed Beatles expert, "hear(s) Paul everytime." Although, I've spoken to another self-proclaimed Beatles expert who has read hundreds of Beatles books and she claims the exact opposite, saying the John said he wanted it to sound like "the end of the world," requesting extra echo in his headphones. The point is that this is not a reliable source at all, and unless one is cited, ''the article should NOT make claims about who the vocalist is on this part,'' especially since the bit is so filled with echo that it really isn't possible to tell just by listening. An encyclopedia is for general knowledge on a subject and, while that may be important, if there is no definitive source, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia.

I would make these changes myself, but when I tried to remove that McCartney had sang the wordless vocal part, I was accused of being "disruptive" for removing content before other editors had come to consensus (as if consensus is always correct). Anyway, I feel I've made a perfectly logical argument for necessary changes to this page, and if other, more frequent editors prefer to discount them, that's not my problem.

peace/love,
Andy Jones. [[User:Andrewlargemanjones|Andrewlargemanjones]] ([[User talk:Andrewlargemanjones|talk]]) 03:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
::My apologies; it seems I have somewhat taken Paul's quote out of necessary context, it goes on to say:

::I wrote... that was co-written. The orchestra crescendo and that was based on some of the ideas I'd been getting from Stockhausen and people like that, which is more abstract. So we told the orchestra members to just start on their lowest note and end on their highest note and go in their own time... which orchestras are frightened to do. That's not the tradition. But we got 'em to do it."

::Which makes my previous claim that Paul said that John wrote the lick dubious. I myself am not sure whether he means the lick was co-written or the whole piece and, in hindsight whether "one of John's very good ones" is referring to the line or to the piece as a whole, whereas John definitely stated that Paul McCartney contributed the lick. At any rate, since John did say this, and Paul's quote about it is confusing, my concern on that section of the article is not much. However, I still feel the same way about the nonlyrical "ahh ahh ahh ahh" vocals in between Paul and John's part.[[User:Andrewlargemanjones|Andrewlargemanjones]] ([[User talk:Andrewlargemanjones|talk]]) 06:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Actually, I've changed my mind about not taking action to fix the article. There is no longer any discussion on this page about the nonlyrical bridge back to John's part, so I'm taking upon myself to delete that Paul contributed it, and I feel justified for the following reasons:

::::ONE: There is no citation, and the part is so drenched in echo and reverb and such that it is really difficult to discern just by listening.

::::TWO: It is commonly accepted that John sings that part, not Paul. Every Beatles fan I've ever discussed it with, outside of people on Wikipedia say it is John's. I sang this song on karaoke, and the two parts were separated, and this part was with John's part.

::::THREE: Paul McCartney sang this song live recently, and had another vocalist sing this part. That doesn't prove anything, but it certainly doesn't help the case that it is McCartney's.

::::Now I'm not going to put that John sang it in there, because I have no citation that claims that he did, though, yes, I'll be honest and say that I'm about 95 percent convinced that John both composed and sang this part of the song. But as far as this article is concerned, it shouldn't say either, and I'm repairing this error.

::::Peace/Love,
::::Andy Jones. [[User:Andrewlargemanjones|Andy Jones]] ([[User talk:Andrewlargemanjones|talk]]) 06:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

::::: Actually, I think it is important to specify who sings the Ahhhs. As many people, I had always assumed it was John, but after a discussion about it in a Beatles news group whose participants are writers and even a music writer with the New York Times, it was pointed out that it was McCartney who sang that part. Ever since then, when I hear the song, it has become so obvious it is McCartney singing the Ahhhs. In addition, I think that portion of the song is out of Lennnon's singing range, so it would have made practical sense for John to have Paul sing that part even if he had originally intended himself to sing it originally. [[Special:Contributions/69.122.122.147|69.122.122.147]] ([[User talk:69.122.122.147|talk]]) AR <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 21:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

(outdent) Yes, 'twould be nice to specify this but (as indicated in the article footnote) there is currently no reliable source. Cheers, [[User:Wrapped in Grey|Wrapped in Grey]] ([[User talk:Wrapped in Grey|talk]]) 09:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

While there isn't a reliable source, there have recently been multitracks of some songs from the Sgt. Pepper album (not "A Day in the Life") released on the Internet. Years ago (long before the Internet) I heard bootleg multitracks of "A Day in the Life". There was a track that had the "Ahhh" part without the echo/reverb. It is clearly Lennon. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.190.199.59|68.190.199.59]] ([[User talk:68.190.199.59|talk]]) 07:53, 6 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== [[Talk:Sgt._Pepper's_Lonely_Hearts_Club_Band#Genres|See here]] ==

Discussion about genre of this [[Sgt._Pepper's_Lonely_Hearts_Club_Band|album]] and this [[A Day in the Life|song]]. <tt><span style="background-color:#de0000">[[User talk:Helpsloose|<font color="#fcd115">Hel</font>]][[User:Helpsloose|<font color="white">pslo</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Helpsloose|<font color="#fcd115">ose</font>]]</span></tt> 01:03, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


== THX Deep Note==

The [[deep note|THX Deep Note]] sounds a lot like the crescendo in this song, could it be worth referencing? Also The famous Mac start up sound is a Deep note that is a sound that not directly related to this song, could be noted for being a highly recognized sound much like the one in the song. It's a C Major chord, stretched out as wide as possible. But I do not think there is that much to say about the sounds, they could be put in the see also section of the page, deep note any way. [[User:Grosscha|Max ╦╩]] ([[User talk:Grosscha|talk]]) 16:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

:I'm not sure how relevent that is to the article; it seems like trivia to me. Anway, you need a reference to a reliable source to put that in the article. [[Special:Contributions/67.184.14.87|67.184.14.87]] ([[User talk:67.184.14.87|talk]]) 22:16, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

== Paul's Voice on Download ==
Anyone noticed that Paul's voice changed to a distant echo in recent downloads of the song? What's up with that.


It's either a Left/Right audio balance with the vocals heavily panned to one side over the other, or the source hasn't recorded the stereo aspect of the song properly.
The same has happened with songs such as "Yellow Submarine."
[[User:Styk0n|Styk0n]] ([[User talk:Styk0n|talk]]) 04:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

== There's a chorus in A Day in the Life? ==
The article currently states:

The line "I'd love to turn you on" ... serves as a chorus to the first section of the song.

Although that line concludes the first section of the song, I don't think that should be called a chorus. I followed the link to the cite and it doesn't appear to even contain the word 'chorus'. [[Special:Contributions/67.184.14.87|67.184.14.87]] ([[User talk:67.184.14.87|talk]]) 22:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

:OK, it's been a week or so. Nobody's commented one way or another so I will make the change. [[Special:Contributions/67.184.14.87|67.184.14.87]] ([[User talk:67.184.14.87|talk]]) 14:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

:I had a go at fixing this among some other changes I was making, but it's still not right; I'll have another go (if you don't beat me to it :-) [[Special:Contributions/87.114.146.27|87.114.146.27]] ([[User talk:87.114.146.27|talk]]) 13:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

== Cliched? ==

I'm not sure what the point is of calling the final chord 'obviously cliched', even though it was descibed as such in the referenced article. What does that mean, cliched? Is it a criticism? Another way of saying it's common? Overused? Or a comment on the chord itself (e.g., the final chord of Sgt. Pepper)? Without any explanation (and there isn't any explanation in the sourced article) it just sounds like an opinion that's not particularly noteworthy...definitely not explanatory or encyclopedic-hence the deletion. [[Special:Contributions/70.91.35.27|70.91.35.27]] ([[User talk:70.91.35.27|talk]]) 21:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Tim
:Agree, just because an opinion is offered does not mean we should accept it, especially when the opinion lacks an argument to support it. Many, many, classical pieces end on a "grand chord", so this may be the origin of the comment, but without the author's justification, I don't think it advances a reader's understanding of the piece. --[[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 21:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

==Genre?==
Is the genre really just rock? It seems to be more like progressive rock or psychedelic rock with the orchestra in the background and unconventional breaks in the song. [[User:DAK4Blizzard|DAK4Blizzard]] ([[User talk:DAK4Blizzard|talk]]) 08:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
:A lot of changes ago the infobox said the genre was progressive rock and psychedelic rock. [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=A_Day_in_the_Life&diff=next&oldid=273434648] I don't know why this was changed. I think this should be undone. [[Special:Contributions/90.130.209.83|90.130.209.83]] ([[User talk:90.130.209.83|talk]]) 20:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
::Finally it's been considered [[psychedelic rock]] on Wikipedia. For a long time I pushed for it being called psychedelic rock/[[progressive rock]]/[[symphonic rock]], but my edits were always rejected. Now it seems that people are beginning to agree with us. [[User:Krobertj|Krobertj]] ([[User talk:Krobertj|talk]]) 15:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) There shouldn't be a genre in the edit box because '''there are no reliable sources cited for any genre in the article.''' What any editor thinks is the proper genre doesn't matter; only [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] matter. &mdash; [[User:John Cardinal|John Cardinal]] ([[User talk:John Cardinal|talk]]) 17:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
::I finally made it Progressive Rock/Psychedelic Rock and I sourced it. Now I have to make [[Helter Skelter (song)|Helter Skelter Proto-Metal]]
:::I'm not sure that's a [[WP:RS|reliable source]]. What do [[Allmusic]] or [[Rolling Stone]] call it? And please don't change Helter Skelter to "[[proto-metal]]", that's just a redirect. [[User:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#0000FF">Rodhull</span>]][[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#FF0000">andemu</span>]] 15:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
::::The source said it was prog rock because it combined two separate pieces. That's pretty dumb. If I yodel something, and you yodel something different, and we put it together, is that prog rock? In any case, the source is from user contributed entries and so unreliable. I removed prog rock. &mdash; [[User:John Cardinal|John Cardinal]] ([[User talk:John Cardinal|talk]]) 21:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

== Reference ==
The song is pseudo-covered by Harvey Milk in the song "Death Goes to the Winner." They use the lyrics "got up, got out of bed, put a pistol to my head" or something like that and then promptly end the song with a layered chord meant to be reminiscent of the famous "A Day in the Life" chord. Might be worth adding to the covers/references section of the article <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/98.26.23.138|98.26.23.138]] ([[User talk:98.26.23.138|talk]]) 19:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Love Version ==

On the Love version of the song, what's said right before the song? It sounds like "Sugar plum fairy, sugar plum fairy", but I'm not sure. [[User:Deserted Cities|Deserted Cities]] ([[User talk:Deserted Cities|talk]]) 14:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


"This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject."
Please keep this in consideration when creating new sections on this talk page, please. This isn't directed just to you, but to everyone.
[[User:Styk0n|Styk0n]] ([[User talk:Styk0n|talk]]) 04:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

==500 Greatest songs list==
I removed the opening section about it being on that rolling stones list because the list it's self is completely irrelevent. Also it's already at the bottom of the page under recognition[[User:Skute|Skute]] ([[User talk:Skute|talk]])

== Similarity to Deep Purple song Hush ==

The chorus section in between the Paul McCartneys part is almost same as the chorus in deep purple version of [[Hush (Billy Joe Royal song)]] released around the same time. The similarity is a little too much to ignore. Should this be mentioned? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.154.172.34|67.154.172.34]] ([[User talk:67.154.172.34|talk]]) 10:27, 26 August 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1kZ9zYr7kk check the part at 3:04 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.154.172.34|67.154.172.34]] ([[User talk:67.154.172.34|talk]]) 10:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

http://www.reference.com/browse/Hush_(song)
[[Special:Contributions/67.154.172.34|67.154.172.34]] ([[User talk:67.154.172.34|talk]]) 10:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
:: This one was written, recorded and released first. [[Informed Person]] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Informed Person|Informed Person]] ([[User talk:Informed Person|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Informed Person|contribs]]) 23:26, 2 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== 1978 single image ==

Removed per [[WP:NFCC]]: the image does not give a rationale for use with this article. Any attempt to come up with a rationale for this use should take into account: (from WP:NFCC) 'Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding' & that the article topic is a famous album track. [[User:Wrapped in Grey|Wrapped in Grey]] ([[User talk:Wrapped in Grey|talk]]) 06:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
:You seem to like to remove content from Beatles articles. <b>[[User:Radiopathy|<font color="#006600">R</font><font color="#0D8147">ad</font><font color="#009966">io</font><font color="#009999">pa</font><font color="#1E99CC">th</font><font color="#67B2DE ">y</font>]]</b> [[User talk:Radiopathy|•talk•]] 01:55, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

== Live versions ==

I had never heard a live version of "A Day in the Life" until ''Saturday Night Live'' on December 11, 2010. If anyone has information on other versions, it could make a good subsection, noting backing musicians, how the various sound effects were accomplished, etc. [[User:InkQuill|'''<span style="background:Red;color:Blue"> &nbsp;~ InkQuill&nbsp;</span>''']] 02:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

== Genres ==

The genre is starting to look ridiculous. Do we really need four genres for one song? I would suggest removing [[avant-garde music|avant-garde]] because I don't know if it's really a genre, simply music that's considered ahead of its time. --[[User:John of Lancaster|John of Lancaster]] ([[User talk:John of Lancaster|talk]]) 20:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

== Trip sequence ==

Can someone find information regarding the trip sequence? [[User:AmericanLeMans|AmericanLeMans]] ([[User talk:AmericanLeMans|talk]]) 19:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

== 24-bar bridge is actually 23 bars ==

The 24-bar orchestral bridge is actually 23 bars in duration. You can check this yourself by counting along with Mal Evans (and continuing to count once he gets drowned out). The final note of the crescendo comes on the first beat of the 24th bar, which is the first bar of the McCartney middle section, thus the duration of the orchestral crescendo is actually 23 bars. I believe that this article, years ago, actually used to refer to the bridge as 23 bars. If a source is needed (I don't see a source for the fact that it's 24 bars), my recollection is that Ryan and Kehew refer to it as 23 bars in [[Recording the Beatles]], but I would have to check. [[User:Jeferman|Jeferman]] ([[User talk:Jeferman|talk]]) 15:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
:I found the quote in Ryan and Kehew: "It was decided that the empty space left between John's verses and Paul's middle section would be comprised of 23 bars.... [U]pon reaching Bar 24, the piano dropped into a quarter-note vamp on E major. Two bars later, Mal set off an alarm clock, and the other band members dropped back in." I'm going to make the change in the article. [[User:Jeferman|Jeferman]] ([[User talk:Jeferman|talk]]) 00:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
::It has been suggested that most people disagree with the fact that the bridge is 23 bars, and that the article should say that it is 24 bars. I have problems with this for 2 reasons:
::# It is a verifiable fact that the bridge is 23 bars in duration—just count the bars.
::# I have provided a very reputable source which states that the bridge is 23 bars long.
::I understand that it ''seems'' like 24 would be the right number, given that it's a multiple of 4, but it's simply not the case. Maybe the Beatles even intended for it to be 24 and they just screwed up the counting, but that's speculation and it's neither here nor there—they recorded a 23-bar section and the article is reporting on the song as it exists, so it must say that the bridge is 23 bars. —[[User:Jeferman|Jeferman]] ([[User talk:Jeferman|talk]]) 18:05, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

George Martin: "It was Paul's idea to leave 24 bars empty, which we would fill in later with something. We asked him, 'What are you going to do with it?' 'Well,' he replied, 'let's worry about it later. Let's play the 24 bars down anyway.' So, in order to keep the 24 bars regular, we got Mal Evans, the Beatles' roadie, to shout, '1, 2, 3, 4,' at the beinning of every bar. And, in order to make the song less boring, we put tape echo on it. So, on the original tapes, you can hear Mal's voice with an echo as the bars go through. At the end of it, just to make sure we didn't forget the 24th bar, he sounded an alarm clock."

Paul McCartney: "Then I went around to all the trumpet players and said, 'Look all you've got to do is start at the beginning of the 24 bars and go through all the notes on your instrument from the lowest to the highest-- and the highest has to happen on that 24th bar, that's all."

They seem fairly knowledgeable about music, and this song in particular. [[User:Piriczki|Piriczki]] ([[User talk:Piriczki|talk]]) 18:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I've seen these quotes before, and I think they lend credence to the theory that they intended for it to be 24 bars long, and they simply messed up and made it 23. But none of this changes the fact that '''it is actually 23 bars long''', which can be verified by anyone who counts it. Shouldn't the article reflect what actually happens in the song? —[[User:Jeferman|Jeferman]] ([[User talk:Jeferman|talk]]) 18:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

:Here's the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usNsCeOV4GM video]. Exactly when does the count begin? (although I can't hear [[Mal Evans]] at all — is this a re-mix?) Immediately after Jagger in his red t-shirt? [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 18:56, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

::The 1st bar begins at 1:40 in that video, with the word "turn." Mal's not very audible in this version, it must be a remix they did recently (in fact it doesn't have the cross-fade from the prior track so it is definitely a remix). But you can hear Ringo's hi-hat throughout providing the quarter note, so you can count the measures that way. Also if you have the Anthology version (I can't find it on YouTube) it has just the original backing track, no orchestra, and you can hear Mal counting all the way through. The version on LOVE I think has Mal more audible as well. The measure where McCartney changes to E major on the piano, which is the same measure where the orchestra plays an E major on the first beat and then cuts out, is the 24th measure, but this is the 1st measure of the next section, and thus the duration of the bridge is 23 measures. —[[User:Jeferman|Jeferman]] ([[User talk:Jeferman|talk]]) 19:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
:::Ah yes, the smiling be-spectacled Lennon and then the smiling moustachioed McCartney. Lennon was lazily singing the last three words of the verse "turn you on" over the start of the bridge, yes? So in which bar is the alarm clock? [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 19:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

::::In the middle section he begins counting, at the beginning of each bar, at "love" (check the Anthology version) and at the end he begins counting at "turn" which can be heard on the released version. [[User:Piriczki|Piriczki]] ([[User talk:Piriczki|talk]]) 19:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::You're saying the versions differ? And I thought we were talking about the middle bridge here, at time 1:40? [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 19:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

::::::No, it's the same backing track. Evans counted out the bars in the middle and at the end. On the released version, his voice is only audible in the end section. If you want to hear him in the middle section, listen to the Anthology version. [[User:Piriczki|Piriczki]] ([[User talk:Piriczki|talk]]) 20:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::::So Lennon was lazy with five words, not three? And we can all start counting from blissful McCartney at 1:39? [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 20:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

== It is played in a medley ==

In the [[A Day in the Life#Variations|Variations]] section, the article says, "''Paul McCartney has been performing this song in a majority of his live shows since his 2008 tour, with his latest performance being on ''Saturday Night Live'' on 11 December 2010. It is played in a medley with 'Give Peace a Chance'.''" Now, is that second sentence referring to the way it's usually played (in/since the 2008 tour), or just the way it was played on SNL? If the former interpretation is correct, perhaps the second sentence should be merged into the first one, with the second half of the first sentence split off into its own sentence. - [[User:Dcljr|dcljr]] <small>([[User talk:Dcljr|talk]])</small> 00:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
:I'd say "check the source" but there isn't one, so added a citation needed tag for now. [[User:Uniplex|Uniplex]] ([[User talk:Uniplex|talk]]) 08:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

== Songs about automobiles ==

Not sure this categorization is so fitting. The category seems to be more for the Beach Boys-like car songs à la "[[Little Deuce Coupe]]" and alike, rather than such a song. Maybe {{Cl|Vehicle wreck ballads}} would be better (though I'm not sure if it's a ballad...) --[[User:The Evil IP address|The Evil IP address]] ([[User talk:The Evil IP address|talk]]) 20:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

== Soundwave picture!!!!! ==

What happened to the picture of the songs sound wave?!?!?!
GET IT BACK <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.220.240.104|24.220.240.104]] ([[User talk:24.220.240.104|talk]]) 22:45, 1 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Beatles RfC ==


== 2nd or 3rd verse?==
You are invited to participate in an RfC at [[Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/The Beatles]] on the issue of capitalising the definite article when mentioning that band's name in running prose. This long-standing dispute is the subject of an open mediation case and we are requesting your help with determining the current community consensus. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ [[User:GabeMc|<font color="green">GabeMc</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:GabeMc|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/GabeMc|contribs]])</sup> 23:07, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
I believe the line "I'd love to turn you on" is first sung after the third verse not the second, so in the section entitled "Musical Structure and Development/Basic Track" I would propose changing the first line of the 2nd paragraph to "As a link between the end of the third verse...". <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Drewbigs|Drewbigs]] ([[User talk:Drewbigs#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drewbigs|contribs]]) 15:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Piece at the end ==
== Atlantic magazine source ==


Check it out... [https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/05/how-the-beatles-wrote-a-day-in-the-life/527001/ Atlantic article] by Nicholas Dawidoff from May 2017. [https://getpocket.com/explore/item/how-the-beatles-wrote-a-day-in-the-life Reprinted by getpocket.com] with permission. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 08:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
There'a a piece at the end of the song on the [[Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band]] album from 0:05:07 - 0:05:33. Except that it was removed in future releases of the song. Has it been mentioned in this article. Because it would be nice to have some form of information. Or at least an idea on what it is. Is it just some random extra they added to the end of [[A Day in the Life]] to tie in with the psychedelic / experimental nature of the album? '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] &#124; [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 11:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


== Not Only THX Deep Note ==
== 2 Musical structure and recording Comment ==


The lyric is "Woke up, got out of bed...", not "Woke up, fell out of bed..." as stated in the section "2 Musical structure and recording"[[User:SpencerCollins|SpencerCollins]] ([[User talk:SpencerCollins|talk]]) 13:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Piano Chord at the end of the song is inspiring Macintosh startup chime (confirmed by Apple's former sounds designer, Jim Reekes) and PlayStation 2 boot chime (unconfirmed, but pure coincidence) [[User:Beezanteeum|Beezanteeum]] ([[User talk:Beezanteeum|talk]]) 02:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


== John Lennon, not Paul McCartney, sings the "Ahh's" after the middle section where Paul sings ==
== Shortened radio version ==


The article says Paul McCartney sings the "Ahh's" after the middle section of the song. Paul just sings the part that begins with "Woke up, fell out of bed\Dragged a comb across my head" and ends up with "Made my way upstairs and had a smoke\Somebody spoke and I went into a dream". The "Ahh's" one hears after that is the main singer of the song, namely John Lennon. Can the article be change to reflect this? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dkf12|Dkf12]] ([[User talk:Dkf12#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dkf12|contribs]]) 04:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I have this album and I heard some noise at the end of the song and the album version's running time is 5:35, and I also listed to the song on [[YouTube]] to see the length of the radio version and I discovered that the running time is 5:05. Where it says "length" I think that it should say 5:35 (album version) and 5:05 (radio edit.) On the radio version they cut out the part that I heard on the album version. I would like some comments using the words "agree" and "disagree." I would also like anyone who leaves those comments to explain why he/she agrees or disagrees--[[User:Kevjgav|Kevjgav]] ([[User talk:Kevjgav|talk]]) 16:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. You may change the article yourself; just make sure you cite your change with a reputable and authoritative source which is able to discount [https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/inside-track-sgt-peppers-lonely-hearts-club-band the existing highly reputable and authoritative citation], which supports McCartney being the vocalist. --[[User:Sixsevenfive|Sixsevenfive]] ([[User talk:Sixsevenfive|talk]]) 07:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
== Filling the Albert Hall ==


I won't change the article until I find an authoritative source. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:CBA0:4470:3507:D6B1:36B6:79C|2600:1700:CBA0:4470:3507:D6B1:36B6:79C]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:CBA0:4470:3507:D6B1:36B6:79C|talk]]) 16:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


:[https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/music/article-an-answer-we-havent-known-for-all-these-years-who-sang-the-ahh-part-in/ There is a school of thought] that holds that the answer is unresolved. But the source we use quotes Abbey Road engineer Sam Okell, who maintains it's McCartney:
&nbsp;&nbsp; [[Royal Albert Hall#Pop culture references]] quotes the "4000 holes" passage, thusly:
::“Paul’s main vocal track is in stereo, because we gave it some spread with the Waves S1 Stereo Imaging plug-in, so it has a different sound than John’s lead. We also split off two little bits to be able to pan them left and right. His fourth vocal track is the ‘aaah’ section, and below it is an ‘Aah delay’ aux track. Further down are the three first-generation vocal tracks, out of which we pulled the non-singing material, like a bit of piano, the alarm clock, and Mal Evans doing the orchestra bar count.”
: In the song "A Day in the Life" by the Beatles, Albert Hall is mentioned. The verse goes as follows:
:As he seems to have had access to the original tracks, he would seem to be the best source we've got. (McCartney doesn't recall.) [[User:Barte|Barte]] ([[User talk:Barte|talk]]) 19:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
:: I read the news today, oh boy <br> four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire <br> and though the holes were rather small <br> they had to count them all <br> now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall <br> I'd love to turn you on.
&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not sure whether to be relieved or disappointed by its source that puts to rest the idea that 4000 (undoubtedly "very small") [[core sample]]s had been taken at points, say (if Blackburn has moors) [https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Blackburn,+Blackburn+with+Darwen,+UK/53.5466163,-2.2567044/@53.5454739,-2.4732936,10z/data=!4m9!4m8!1m5!1m1!1s0x487b741704ba4199:0x37471046e7905a42!2m2!1d-2.487529!2d53.748575!1m0!3e0?hl=en within about a half hour] (without traffic) from the [[Manchester Outer Ring Road]] near the [[moors murders|moors where murder victims]] had been buried! Still, 4000 ''is'' a ''rough'' estimate of the seating capacity of the hall; any chance that one of the configurations implied by the variable capacity mentioned in ''that'' article has ~4000 as a reasonable approximation of the seating plan for some of the "[[Royal Albert Hall#top|350 events including ... rock and pop]]"?<br>--[[User:Jerzy|Jerzy]]•[[User talk:Jerzy|t]] 03:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)<br>


::Thanks for that, {{u|Barte}}. I hadn't realised this point had received such attention over the years.
== It was ranked the 28th greatest song of all time by Rolling Stone magazine.[5] ==
::I suggest we include mention, via the ''Globe and Mail'' piece you link to, of the differing views; although several of Emerick's recollections of Beatles sessions have been shot down by biographers or been proved to be incorrect over the years, it probably is worth saying that he credited the "aah" section to Lennon as did David Crosby, who was there at the time when the Beatles completed the track (and who's mentioned a few times in our article). To my ears, it's definitely McCartney singing, but like one or two of the individuals quoted by the ''Globe and Mail'' writer, I first had to get past the assumption that it must be Lennon. Once you actually listen to it without that assumption, I think it's clear it's McCartney's voice. (Not that a personal opinion from one of us has any bearing, I know ...) [[User:JG66|JG66]] ([[User talk:JG66|talk]]) 02:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


:::For what it’s worth, [[Giles Martin]] said on [https://twitter.com/mashupmartin/status/867576504187838465?s=21 Twitter in 2017] that it’s John with a heavily reverbed Paul harmonizing. This can be a real Rorschach test with people. Everyone seems very certain in their opinion, but I haven’t actually seen a reliable secondary source say one way or the other who is singing. <span style="font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 40px black">[[User:Tkbrett|<b><span style="color: #000000;">Tkbrett</span></b>]][[User talk:Tkbrett|<span style="color: #FF0000;"> (✉)</span>]]</span> 04:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
You have this stated two different ways in this article. It was ranked the 28th greatest song of all time by Rolling Stone magazine.[5] in the Opening paragraph of "A Day in The Life" In the Recognition and Reception Paragraph, you have it listed as Rolling Stone ranked "A Day in the Life" at number 26 on the magazine's list of "The 500 Greatest Songs of All Time",[5] It should be listed in both as 28th.[[Special:Contributions/2602:306:CF3B:E300:9064:BC54:C469:A54|2602:306:CF3B:E300:9064:BC54:C469:A54]] ([[User talk:2602:306:CF3B:E300:9064:BC54:C469:A54|talk]]) 21:55, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}}. Thanks, now corrected. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 21:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


::::How about removing McCartney from the sentence (e.g.: "This transition consists of vocalised "aah"s, reinforcing the dream aspect...") with a footnote covering the controversy? I think the Giles Martin tweet is referenceable, as well. [[User:Barte|Barte]] ([[User talk:Barte|talk]]) 05:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
== "When" ==
:::::I'll be honest I '''always''' thought it was John, but that could be because, if I recall correctly, ''The Beatles: Rock Band'' showed John signing that part, although that game did get quite a few things wrong (i.e. Ringo playing drums on "Back in the USSR")... Like Tkbrett said I think Giles' opinion is important (since he had access to all the original tracks when remixing it). To me it'd be important to distinguish. – '''[[User:Zmbro|zmbro]]''' <sub>([[User talk:Zmbro|talk]])</sub> 13:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I gave this a try, noting parenthetically that the matter is unresolved and using the existing cite plus the two mentioned in this discussion. (For the record, I also always thought it was John.)[[User:Barte|Barte]] ([[User talk:Barte|talk]]) 14:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


:The [https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/inside-track-sgt-peppers-lonely-hearts-club-band ''Sound On Sound'' source] now appears to have been inadvertently omitted; I will therefore reinstate it.--[[User:Sixsevenfive|Sixsevenfive]] ([[User talk:Sixsevenfive|talk]]) 09:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
In the "Basic Track" sub section, , there's a "when" footnote - "when did George Martin say it was decided to keep the alarm clock in?" Is that really important? Can O remove the "when"? The source for the statement does have a date, but even so - what does it matter?--[[User:Daveler16|Daveler16]] ([[User talk:Daveler16|talk]]) 17:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)


==McCartney has in recent time noted Elvis Presley's influence on the song==
== [[Delmé Quartet]] ==
It's even in Day Trippin magazine.[https://daytrippin.com/2022/06/14/paul-mccartneys-lifelong-admiration-for-elvis-presley/] [[User:Speakfor23|Speakfor23]] ([[User talk:Speakfor23|talk]]) 18:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


:Day Trippin' is a blog hosted on [[WordPress.com]], not a reliable source ([[WP:PRS]]). <span style="font-weight:bold;text-shadow:1px 1px 40px black">[[User:Tkbrett|<b><span style="color: #000000;">Tkbrett</span></b>]][[User talk:Tkbrett|<span style="color: #FF0000;"> (✉)</span>]]</span> 19:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Formed in 2062, the quartet comprised Granville Delmé Jones and Jurgen Hess (violins), John Underwood (viola) and Joy Hall (cello). The first three all played on this record. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 23:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:54, 10 March 2024

Former featured articleA Day in the Life is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleA Day in the Life has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 14, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
September 17, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
October 9, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
April 22, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
April 25, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

2nd or 3rd verse?

[edit]

I believe the line "I'd love to turn you on" is first sung after the third verse not the second, so in the section entitled "Musical Structure and Development/Basic Track" I would propose changing the first line of the 2nd paragraph to "As a link between the end of the third verse...". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewbigs (talkcontribs) 15:41, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic magazine source

[edit]

Check it out... Atlantic article by Nicholas Dawidoff from May 2017. Reprinted by getpocket.com with permission. Binksternet (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not Only THX Deep Note

[edit]

Piano Chord at the end of the song is inspiring Macintosh startup chime (confirmed by Apple's former sounds designer, Jim Reekes) and PlayStation 2 boot chime (unconfirmed, but pure coincidence) Beezanteeum (talk) 02:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Lennon, not Paul McCartney, sings the "Ahh's" after the middle section where Paul sings

[edit]

The article says Paul McCartney sings the "Ahh's" after the middle section of the song. Paul just sings the part that begins with "Woke up, fell out of bed\Dragged a comb across my head" and ends up with "Made my way upstairs and had a smoke\Somebody spoke and I went into a dream". The "Ahh's" one hears after that is the main singer of the song, namely John Lennon. Can the article be change to reflect this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkf12 (talkcontribs) 04:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. You may change the article yourself; just make sure you cite your change with a reputable and authoritative source which is able to discount the existing highly reputable and authoritative citation, which supports McCartney being the vocalist. --Sixsevenfive (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I won't change the article until I find an authoritative source. 2600:1700:CBA0:4470:3507:D6B1:36B6:79C (talk) 16:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a school of thought that holds that the answer is unresolved. But the source we use quotes Abbey Road engineer Sam Okell, who maintains it's McCartney:
“Paul’s main vocal track is in stereo, because we gave it some spread with the Waves S1 Stereo Imaging plug-in, so it has a different sound than John’s lead. We also split off two little bits to be able to pan them left and right. His fourth vocal track is the ‘aaah’ section, and below it is an ‘Aah delay’ aux track. Further down are the three first-generation vocal tracks, out of which we pulled the non-singing material, like a bit of piano, the alarm clock, and Mal Evans doing the orchestra bar count.”
As he seems to have had access to the original tracks, he would seem to be the best source we've got. (McCartney doesn't recall.) Barte (talk) 19:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, Barte. I hadn't realised this point had received such attention over the years.
I suggest we include mention, via the Globe and Mail piece you link to, of the differing views; although several of Emerick's recollections of Beatles sessions have been shot down by biographers or been proved to be incorrect over the years, it probably is worth saying that he credited the "aah" section to Lennon as did David Crosby, who was there at the time when the Beatles completed the track (and who's mentioned a few times in our article). To my ears, it's definitely McCartney singing, but like one or two of the individuals quoted by the Globe and Mail writer, I first had to get past the assumption that it must be Lennon. Once you actually listen to it without that assumption, I think it's clear it's McCartney's voice. (Not that a personal opinion from one of us has any bearing, I know ...) JG66 (talk) 02:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For what it’s worth, Giles Martin said on Twitter in 2017 that it’s John with a heavily reverbed Paul harmonizing. This can be a real Rorschach test with people. Everyone seems very certain in their opinion, but I haven’t actually seen a reliable secondary source say one way or the other who is singing. Tkbrett (✉) 04:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How about removing McCartney from the sentence (e.g.: "This transition consists of vocalised "aah"s, reinforcing the dream aspect...") with a footnote covering the controversy? I think the Giles Martin tweet is referenceable, as well. Barte (talk) 05:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be honest I always thought it was John, but that could be because, if I recall correctly, The Beatles: Rock Band showed John signing that part, although that game did get quite a few things wrong (i.e. Ringo playing drums on "Back in the USSR")... Like Tkbrett said I think Giles' opinion is important (since he had access to all the original tracks when remixing it). To me it'd be important to distinguish. – zmbro (talk) 13:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I gave this a try, noting parenthetically that the matter is unresolved and using the existing cite plus the two mentioned in this discussion. (For the record, I also always thought it was John.)Barte (talk) 14:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Sound On Sound source now appears to have been inadvertently omitted; I will therefore reinstate it.--Sixsevenfive (talk) 09:43, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

McCartney has in recent time noted Elvis Presley's influence on the song

[edit]

It's even in Day Trippin magazine.[1] Speakfor23 (talk) 18:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Day Trippin' is a blog hosted on WordPress.com, not a reliable source (WP:PRS). Tkbrett (✉) 19:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]