Paleodictyon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Brandmeister (talk | contribs) +cat |
→History of study: trace fossils researcher > trace fossil researcher |
||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Trace fossil}} |
|||
{{italic title}} |
|||
{{Ichnobox |
|||
[[Image:Paleodictyon P.San García Algeciras I03.JPG|thumb|right|''Paleodictyon imperfectum'' in Oligocen-Miocen sandrock.]] |
|||
| image = Paleodictyon P.San García Algeciras I03.JPG |
|||
| image_caption = ''Paleodictyon imperfectum'' in Oligocene-Miocene sandrock |
|||
| fossil_range = {{Fossil range|Cambrian|Recent }} |
|||
| taxon = Paleodictyon |
|||
| authority = [[Giuseppe Giovanni Antonio Meneghini|Meneghini]], 1850 |
|||
}} |
|||
| ⚫ | '''''Paleodictyon''''' is a [[trace fossil]], usually interpreted to be a [[burrow]], which appears in the geologic marine record beginning in the [[Precambrian]]/Early [[Cambrian]]<ref name=AA/> and in modern ocean environments.<ref name="Swinbanks">Swinbanks, D. D., 1982: ''Paleodictyon'': the traces of infaunal xenophyophores? Science, v. 218, 47-49.</ref><ref>Ksiazkiewicz, M., 1970: Observations on the ichnofauna of the Polish Carpathians, in Crimes, T. P., and Harper, J. C., eds. Trace Fossils, Geological Journal, Special Issue 3, 283-322.</ref><ref>Ekdale, A. A., 1980: Graphoglyptid burrows in modern deep-sea sediment: Science 207, 304-306.</ref> ''Paleodictyon'' were first described by [[Giuseppe Giovanni Antonio Meneghini|Giuseppe Meneghini]] in 1850.<ref name=AA/> The origin of the trace fossil is enigmatic and numerous candidates have been proposed. |
||
[[Image:Paleodictyon P.San García Algeciras M02.JPG|thumb|right|''Paleodictyon minimum''.]] |
[[Image:Paleodictyon P.San García Algeciras M02.JPG|thumb|right|''Paleodictyon minimum''.]] |
||
| ⚫ | '''''Paleodictyon''''' is a |
||
</ref> Alternatively, it has been suggested that it may be a cast of a [[xenophyophore|xenophyophoran]] [[protist]].<ref name="Swinbanks" /> |
|||
==Description== |
|||
| ⚫ | Much modeling work has been done on ''Paleodictyon''. Roy Plotnick, trace |
||
''Paleodictyon'' consist of thin tunnels or ridges that usually form hexagonal or polygonal-shaped honeycomb-like network.<ref name=AA>[http://ichnology.ku.edu/invertebrate_traces/tfimages/paleodictyon.html KU Ichnology - Studying the Traces of Life] IBGS Research Group</ref> Both irregular and regular nets are known throughout the stratigraphic range of ''Paleodictyon'', but it is the striking regular honeycomb pattern of some forms such as ''P. carpathecum'' and ''[[Paleodictyon nodosum|P. nodosum]]'' which make it notable and widely studied. |
|||
Individual mesh elements may be millimeters to centimeters, usually from 1-1.5 to 2-3 cm, and entire mesh patterns can cover areas up to a square meter. The edges or threads that make up the mesh are usually cylindrical or ellipsoid in cross-section, and some forms have vertical tubes connecting the mesh upwards to the [[sediment-water interface]]. [[Adolf Seilacher|Dolf Seilacher]] proposed in 1977 that it may be a trap for food, a mechanism for farming, or a foraging path.<ref>Seilacher, A., 1977: Pattern analysis of ''Paleodictyon'' and related trace fossils in Crimes, T. P., Harper, J. C., Trace Fossils 2: Geological Journal, Special Issue 9, 289-334. |
|||
| ⚫ | The [[IMAX]] film ''[[Volcanoes of the Deep Sea]]'' describes the search for a living animal that produces the ''Paleodictyon'', using the deep-water submersible [[DSV Alvin]] near volcanic vents that lie 3500 |
||
</ref> Alternatively, it has been suggested that it may be a cast of a [[xenophyophore|xenophyophoran]] [[protist]].<ref name="Swinbanks" /><ref>Hermann Ehrlich. [https://books.google.com/books?id=V-5qdziJIXAC&dq=Paleodictyon&pg=PA137 Paleodictyon Honeycomb Structure in Biological Materials of Marine Origin] (Springer Netherlands) 1: 137-141. ISSN 2211-0593.</ref> [[Mark McMenamin]] proposed that ''Paleodictyon'' represents a microburrow nest structure. The nest structure empties once the juveniles mature and disperse.<ref name="Dynamic Paleontology: Using Quantif">{{cite book |last1=McMenamin |first1=Mark A. S. |year=2016 |title=Dynamic Paleontology: Using Quantification and Other Tools to Decipher the History of Life |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-319-22776-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Barras|first1=Colin|title=Leonardo fossil sketch may depict early nests|journal=Nature|date=16 November 2012|doi=10.1038/nature.2012.11841|s2cid=191382775|url=http://www.nature.com/news/leonardo-fossil-sketch-may-depict-early-nests-1.11841}}</ref> |
|||
==History of study== |
|||
| ⚫ | Much modeling work has been done on ''Paleodictyon''. Roy Plotnick, trace fossil researcher at University of Illinois at Chicago, modeled the form as resulting from the iterative modular growth of an unknown organism.<ref>Plotnick, R. 2003: Ecological and L-system based simulations of trace fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 45-58.</ref> Garlick and Miller modeled it as a burrow with a relatively simple burrow algorithm.<ref>Garlick, G. D., and Miller, W., 1993: Simulations of burrowing strategies and construction of ''Paleodictyon'': Journal of Geological Education 41, 159-163.</ref> |
||
==Hypotheses about origin== |
|||
[[File: Palaeodictyon.JPG|thumb|220px|left|''Paleodictyon'' from [[Miocene]] of [[Savio (river)|Fiume Savio]]]] |
|||
The question is whether these patterns are burrows of marine animals such as worms<ref name=AA/> or fossilized remains of ancient organisms (sponges or algae).<ref>William J. Broad [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/science/25fossil.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1 Diving Deep for a Living Fossil]</ref> Observations on ''Paleodictyon'' using [[Euler graph]] theory suggest that it is unlikely to be an excavation trace fossil, and that it is more likely to be an imprint or body fossil, or to be of abiotic origin.<ref>Honeycutt, CE, and Plotnick, RE. 2005. Mathematical analysis of ''Paleodictyon'': a graph theory approach. Lethaia 38:345–350.</ref> |
|||
[[File:Occultammina sp.png|thumb|The [[Xenophyophorea|xenophyophore]] ''[[Occultammina]]'' has been suggested as a possible identity for the maker of ''Paleodictyon'', but this remains controversial.]] |
|||
It has been suggested that ''Paleodictyon'' may represent a body fossil of a [[Xenophyophorea|xenophyophore]], a type of giant [[foraminifera]]. The infaunal xenophyophore ''[[Occultammina]]'' does bear some physical resemblance to ''Paleodictyon'' and the abyssal habitat of modern xenophyophores is indeed similar to the inferred paleoenvironment where fossil graphoglyptids are found; however, the large size (up to 0.5 m) and regularity of many graphoglyptids as well as the apparent absence of collected sediment particles (known as xenophyae) in their fossils casts doubt on the possibility. Further, modern xenophyophores lack the regular hexagonal symmetry common to ''Paleodictyon''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Levin|first=Lisa A.|date=February 1994|title=Paleoecology and Ecology of Xenophyophores|url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/palaios/article/9/1/32-41/100347|journal=PALAIOS|volume=9|issue=1|pages=32–41|doi=10.2307/3515076|jstor=3515076|bibcode=1994Palai...9...32L}}</ref> Modern examples of ''Paleodictyon'' have been discovered; however, examination failed to reveal [[Stercomata|stercomare]]s, a hardened [[test (biology)|test]], [[protoplasm]], or xenophyophore [[DNA]]. The trace may alternately represent a burrow or a [[Hexactinellid|glass sponge.]]<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Rona|first1=Peter A.|last2=Seilacher|first2=Adolf|last3=de Vargas|first3=Colomban|last4=Gooday|first4=Andrew J.|last5=Bernhard|first5=Joan M.|last6=Bowser|first6=Sam|last7=Vetriani|first7=Costantino|last8=Wirsen|first8=Carl O.|last9=Mullineaux|first9=Lauren|last10=Sherrell|first10=Robert|last11=Frederick Grassle|first11=J.|date=September 2009|title=Paleodictyon nodosum: A living fossil on the deep-sea floor|url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0967064509001799|journal=Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography|language=en|volume=56|issue=19–20|pages=1700–1712|doi=10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.05.015|bibcode=2009DSRII..56.1700R}}</ref> |
|||
==The search for a living animal== |
|||
| ⚫ | The [[IMAX]] film ''[[Volcanoes of the Deep Sea]]'' describes the search for a living animal that produces the ''Paleodictyon'', using the deep-water submersible [[DSV Alvin]] near volcanic vents that lie {{convert|3500|m}} underwater in the [[Mid-Atlantic Ridge]]. They found and took samples from many of the ''[[Paleodictyon nodosum]]'' honeycomb burrows. However, no creatures were found in any of them. They theorized that the burrows were being used for cultivating/trapping bacteria by whichever creature created them.<ref name=AA/><ref>Rona, P. A.; Seilacher, A.; Luginsland, H.; Seilacher, E.; de Vargas, C.; Vetriani, C.; Bernhard, J. M.; Sherrell, R. M.; Grassle, J. F.; Low, S.; Lutz, R. A. [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AGUFMOS32A0241R Paleodictyon, a Living Fossil on the Deepsea Floor] American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2003</ref> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{ |
{{Reflist}} |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
*{{IMDb title|id= |
*{{IMDb title|qid=Q3562746|id=tt0331068|title=Volcanoes of the Deep Sea (2003)}} |
||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Taxonbar|from=Q7127150}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{trace-fossil-stub}} |
|||
[[Category:Undescribed species]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:39, 30 October 2024
| Paleodictyon Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
| |
| Paleodictyon imperfectum in Oligocene-Miocene sandrock | |
Trace fossil classification 
| |
| Ichnogenus: | Paleodictyon Meneghini, 1850 |
Paleodictyon is a trace fossil, usually interpreted to be a burrow, which appears in the geologic marine record beginning in the Precambrian/Early Cambrian[1] and in modern ocean environments.[2][3][4] Paleodictyon were first described by Giuseppe Meneghini in 1850.[1] The origin of the trace fossil is enigmatic and numerous candidates have been proposed.
Description
[edit]Paleodictyon consist of thin tunnels or ridges that usually form hexagonal or polygonal-shaped honeycomb-like network.[1] Both irregular and regular nets are known throughout the stratigraphic range of Paleodictyon, but it is the striking regular honeycomb pattern of some forms such as P. carpathecum and P. nodosum which make it notable and widely studied.
Individual mesh elements may be millimeters to centimeters, usually from 1-1.5 to 2-3 cm, and entire mesh patterns can cover areas up to a square meter. The edges or threads that make up the mesh are usually cylindrical or ellipsoid in cross-section, and some forms have vertical tubes connecting the mesh upwards to the sediment-water interface. Dolf Seilacher proposed in 1977 that it may be a trap for food, a mechanism for farming, or a foraging path.[5] Alternatively, it has been suggested that it may be a cast of a xenophyophoran protist.[2][6] Mark McMenamin proposed that Paleodictyon represents a microburrow nest structure. The nest structure empties once the juveniles mature and disperse.[7][8]
History of study
[edit]Much modeling work has been done on Paleodictyon. Roy Plotnick, trace fossil researcher at University of Illinois at Chicago, modeled the form as resulting from the iterative modular growth of an unknown organism.[9] Garlick and Miller modeled it as a burrow with a relatively simple burrow algorithm.[10]
Hypotheses about origin
[edit]
The question is whether these patterns are burrows of marine animals such as worms[1] or fossilized remains of ancient organisms (sponges or algae).[11] Observations on Paleodictyon using Euler graph theory suggest that it is unlikely to be an excavation trace fossil, and that it is more likely to be an imprint or body fossil, or to be of abiotic origin.[12]
It has been suggested that Paleodictyon may represent a body fossil of a xenophyophore, a type of giant foraminifera. The infaunal xenophyophore Occultammina does bear some physical resemblance to Paleodictyon and the abyssal habitat of modern xenophyophores is indeed similar to the inferred paleoenvironment where fossil graphoglyptids are found; however, the large size (up to 0.5 m) and regularity of many graphoglyptids as well as the apparent absence of collected sediment particles (known as xenophyae) in their fossils casts doubt on the possibility. Further, modern xenophyophores lack the regular hexagonal symmetry common to Paleodictyon.[13] Modern examples of Paleodictyon have been discovered; however, examination failed to reveal stercomares, a hardened test, protoplasm, or xenophyophore DNA. The trace may alternately represent a burrow or a glass sponge.[14]
The search for a living animal
[edit]The IMAX film Volcanoes of the Deep Sea describes the search for a living animal that produces the Paleodictyon, using the deep-water submersible DSV Alvin near volcanic vents that lie 3,500 metres (11,500 ft) underwater in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. They found and took samples from many of the Paleodictyon nodosum honeycomb burrows. However, no creatures were found in any of them. They theorized that the burrows were being used for cultivating/trapping bacteria by whichever creature created them.[1][15]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e KU Ichnology - Studying the Traces of Life IBGS Research Group
- ^ a b Swinbanks, D. D., 1982: Paleodictyon: the traces of infaunal xenophyophores? Science, v. 218, 47-49.
- ^ Ksiazkiewicz, M., 1970: Observations on the ichnofauna of the Polish Carpathians, in Crimes, T. P., and Harper, J. C., eds. Trace Fossils, Geological Journal, Special Issue 3, 283-322.
- ^ Ekdale, A. A., 1980: Graphoglyptid burrows in modern deep-sea sediment: Science 207, 304-306.
- ^ Seilacher, A., 1977: Pattern analysis of Paleodictyon and related trace fossils in Crimes, T. P., Harper, J. C., Trace Fossils 2: Geological Journal, Special Issue 9, 289-334.
- ^ Hermann Ehrlich. Paleodictyon Honeycomb Structure in Biological Materials of Marine Origin (Springer Netherlands) 1: 137-141. ISSN 2211-0593.
- ^ McMenamin, Mark A. S. (2016). Dynamic Paleontology: Using Quantification and Other Tools to Decipher the History of Life. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-22776-4.
- ^ Barras, Colin (16 November 2012). "Leonardo fossil sketch may depict early nests". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11841. S2CID 191382775.
- ^ Plotnick, R. 2003: Ecological and L-system based simulations of trace fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 45-58.
- ^ Garlick, G. D., and Miller, W., 1993: Simulations of burrowing strategies and construction of Paleodictyon: Journal of Geological Education 41, 159-163.
- ^ William J. Broad Diving Deep for a Living Fossil
- ^ Honeycutt, CE, and Plotnick, RE. 2005. Mathematical analysis of Paleodictyon: a graph theory approach. Lethaia 38:345–350.
- ^ Levin, Lisa A. (February 1994). "Paleoecology and Ecology of Xenophyophores". PALAIOS. 9 (1): 32–41. Bibcode:1994Palai...9...32L. doi:10.2307/3515076. JSTOR 3515076.
- ^ Rona, Peter A.; Seilacher, Adolf; de Vargas, Colomban; Gooday, Andrew J.; Bernhard, Joan M.; Bowser, Sam; Vetriani, Costantino; Wirsen, Carl O.; Mullineaux, Lauren; Sherrell, Robert; Frederick Grassle, J. (September 2009). "Paleodictyon nodosum: A living fossil on the deep-sea floor". Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 56 (19–20): 1700–1712. Bibcode:2009DSRII..56.1700R. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.05.015.
- ^ Rona, P. A.; Seilacher, A.; Luginsland, H.; Seilacher, E.; de Vargas, C.; Vetriani, C.; Bernhard, J. M.; Sherrell, R. M.; Grassle, J. F.; Low, S.; Lutz, R. A. Paleodictyon, a Living Fossil on the Deepsea Floor American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2003