Talk:Canada's History: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Magazines}}, {{WikiProject Canada}}. Tag: |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Magazines |
{{WikiProject Magazines|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Canada |
{{WikiProject Canada|importance=low|history=yes}} |
||
}} |
|||
==What the hell is this writing== |
==What the hell is this writing== |
||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
The article has since been trimmed somewhat and streamlined as well. Can we please now remove the warning from the top saying that it is "confusing and unclear?" <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.225.139.121|66.225.139.121]] ([[User talk:66.225.139.121|talk]]) 19:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The article has since been trimmed somewhat and streamlined as well. Can we please now remove the warning from the top saying that it is "confusing and unclear?" <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.225.139.121|66.225.139.121]] ([[User talk:66.225.139.121|talk]]) 19:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== More stuff == |
|||
<ref name="bbc beaver">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8528672.stm|title=How spam filters dictated Canadian magazine's fate|last=Sheerin|first=Jude|date=29 March 2010|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=29 March 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Would that be a good reference to incorporate? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|'''Q'''wertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Qwertyxp2000|contribs]]) 01:53, 6 August 2018 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:24, 12 February 2024
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What the hell is this writing
[edit]There is no flow or rythm in the article.It's simply a mesh of disconnected sentences.A horrific task to copyedit.--Mike robert (talk) 16:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
The article has since been trimmed somewhat and streamlined as well. Can we please now remove the warning from the top saying that it is "confusing and unclear?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.139.121 (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
More stuff
[edit]Would that be a good reference to incorporate? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 01:53, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
References
- ^ Sheerin, Jude (29 March 2010). "How spam filters dictated Canadian magazine's fate". BBC News. Retrieved 29 March 2010.