User talk:Antony-22: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 2602:306:BC06:F520:F8E6:B024:B7B8:74EC - "→Do-It-Yourself Biology: " |
|||
| (490 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Archive box| |
{{Archive box| |
||
[[/Archive 1| |
2006–2009: [[/Archive 1|1]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive 2| |
2010: [[/Archive 2|2]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive 3| |
2011: [[/Archive 3|3]], [[/Archive 4|4]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2012: [[/Archive 5|5]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2013: [[/Archive 6|6]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2014: [[/Archive 7|7]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2015: [[/Archive 8|8]], [[/Archive 9|9]], [[/Archive 10|10]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2016: [[/Archive 11|11]], [[/Archive 12|12]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2017: [[/Archive 13|13]], [[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 1|N1]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2018: [[/Archive 14|14]], [[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 2|N2]]<br/> |
||
[[/Archive |
2019: [[/Archive 15|15]], [[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 2#GMOs|N2]]<br/> |
||
2020: [[/Archive 16|16]], [[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 3|N3]], [[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 4|N4]]<br/> |
|||
2021: [[/Archive 17|17]], [[User talk:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)/Archive 5|N5]]<br/> |
|||
2022: [[/Archive 18|18]]<br/> |
|||
2023: [[/Archive 19|19]] |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
== Ga CoConspirator Chart == |
|||
==DYK for The Play of Wit and Science== |
|||
{{ivmbox |
|||
|image = Updated DYK query.svg |
|||
|imagesize=40px |
|||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#17 May 2016|17 May 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[The Play of Wit and Science]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that in '''''[[The Play of Wit and Science]]''''', Wit wins Science's heart by slaying the monster Tediousness?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Play of Wit and Science]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-07&end=2016-05-27&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=The_Play_of_Wit_and_Science The Play of Wit and Science])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
|||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 13:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Thank for helpful visual of Trump coconspirators, and please ignore this note if you made editorial choices to leave this off, but |
|||
==DYK for National Strategic Computing Initiative== |
|||
{{ivmbox |
|||
|image = Updated DYK query.svg |
|||
|imagesize=40px |
|||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#19 May 2016|19 May 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[National Strategic Computing Initiative]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that a goal of the '''[[National Strategic Computing Initiative]]''' is to combine [[big data]] methods with [[Supercomputer|supercomputing]] technology usually used for [[Computer simulation|physical simulation]]s?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/National Strategic Computing Initiative]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-09&end=2016-05-29&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=National_Strategic_Computing_Initiative National Strategic Computing Initiative])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
|||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 12:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
SCOTT HALL actually fits in a number of circles, Imthink all (?). You correctly list him in coffee county breach circle (Acts 134,144 to 149; Counts 32 to 37) bottom right, but he is involved in overt acts 127 and 128, pp 59-60 (but not charged with Kutti, et al in Cts 30-31, p.89) and with Jeffrey Clark in Act 110, pg 50, but not charged in his act. Hall is the only person touching all/nearly all bubbles, so might be the sole link to bring a the RICO charge (?). |
|||
==DYK nomination of Postdoctoral researcher unionization== |
|||
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Postdoctoral researcher unionization]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/Postdoctoral researcher unionization|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 20:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Ignore if you only bubbled co-count-charged folks. Great visual. good teaching tool. |
|||
==DYK for Postdoctoral researcher unionization== |
|||
ThanKs [[User:CiteFinder|CiteFinder]] ([[User talk:CiteFinder|talk]]) 02:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:{{Ping|CiteFinder}} I'm glad you found it useful! Yes, the diagram is only based on the criminal counts, and not on the overt acts that are part of the racketeering count. It turned out to be quite a project to understand how the 41 criminal counts related to each other and the defendants. Doing the same for the 161 overt acts would be even more work! [[User:Antony-22|Antony–'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 22:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
::Love you added colors! Really nice touch! [[User:CiteFinder|CiteFinder]] ([[User talk:CiteFinder|talk]]) 06:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== A kitten for you! == |
|||
[[File:Cute grey kitten.jpg|left|150px]] |
|||
It was great to meet you at Wikiconference North America! Thank you for coming to my talk and sharing your thoughts/ideas/concerns about AI & the future of Wikipedia throughout the conference – stay in touch and keep the ideas coming, please! :) |
|||
[[User:Accedie|<font face="courier" color="black">'''Accedie'''</font>]][[User talk:Accedie|<font face="courier" color="black"><sup>'''talk to me'''</sup></font>]] 22:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<br style="clear: both;"/> |
|||
:@[[User:Accedie|Accedie]]: It was great talking to you too! I will follow up soon. Also, take a look at [[List of crossings of the Dnieper]]: I imported a lot of information from Ukrainian Wikipedia some time ago, but I used Google Translate and probably didn't get all the transliterations right. [[User:Antony-22|Antony–'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 23:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==DYK for Michigan prosecution of fake electors== |
|||
{{ivmbox |
{{ivmbox |
||
|image = Updated DYK query.svg |
|image = Updated DYK query.svg |
||
|imagesize=40px |
|imagesize=40px |
||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions# |
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2023/November#25 November 2023|25 November 2023]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Michigan prosecution of fake electors]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that some of the '''[[Michigan prosecution of fake electors|Michigan fake electors]]''' attempted to enter the [[Michigan State Capitol|State Capitol]], but were turned away by the [[Michigan State Police|state police]]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Michigan prosecution of fake electors]]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2023-11-15&end=2023-12-05&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Michigan_prosecution_of_fake_electors Michigan prosecution of fake electors])</small>, and the hook may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics/Monthly DYK pageview leaders|the statistics page]] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User: |
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 00:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC) |
||
== |
== Seasons Greetings == |
||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 4px solid #FFD700; background-color:#E2E7FF;" |
|||
|align="left"|[[File:Embroidery-christmas-candles.jpg|225px]] |
|||
|align="center"|<b style="color:peach"><i style="font-size:large">Merry Christmas, {{BASEPAGENAME}}!</i><br /> Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity. |
|||
|align="right"|[[File:Christmas Card (49269002876).jpg|225px]] |
|||
|} [[User:RAJIVVASUDEV|RV]] ([[User talk:RAJIVVASUDEV|talk]]) 09:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:People in the line of succession to the British throne]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:People in the line of succession to the British throne]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People in the line of succession to the British throne]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
As a past contributor, you are invited to participate in the third annual '''[[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2016|Wiki Loves Pride]]''' campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to [[LGBT]] culture and history. How can you help? |
|||
:# Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work '''[[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2016/Results|here]]''' |
|||
:# Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons |
|||
:# Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project ('''[[:wikidata:Wikidata:WikiProject LGBT|Wikidata]]''', '''[[:commons:Commons:LGBT Free Media Collective|Wikimedia Commons]]''', '''[[:wikivoyage: Wikivoyage:LGBT Expedition|Wikivoyage]]''', [[:meta: Wikimedia LGBT/Interwiki|etc]].) |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:DrKay|DrKay]] ([[User talk:DrKay|talk]]) 10:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Looking for topics? The '''[[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride/Tasks|Tasks]]''' page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles. |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Early life and career of Kamala Harris]] for deletion == |
|||
This campaign is supported by the '''[[:meta:Wikimedia LGBT/Portal|Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group]]''', an officially recognized affiliate of the [[Wikimedia Foundation]]. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow '''[https://www.facebook.com/WikimediaLGBT Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook]'''. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. One does ''not'' need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please [[Wikipedia talk:Wiki Loves Pride 2016|leave a message on the campaign's talk page]]. |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Early life and career of Kamala Harris]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early life and career of Kamala Harris]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Thanks, and happy editing! ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 22:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Bohbye|Bohbye]] ([[User talk:Bohbye|talk]]) 05:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==DYK nomination of San Joaquin River Viaduct== |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California]] for deletion == |
|||
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[San Joaquin River Viaduct]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''[[Template:Did you know nominations/San Joaquin River Viaduct|your nomination's entry]]''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] ([[User talk:Cowlibob|talk]]) 11:12, 5 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
==DYK for San Joaquin River Viaduct== |
|||
{{ivmbox |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Bohbye|Bohbye]] ([[User talk:Bohbye|talk]]) 05:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|image = Updated DYK query.svg |
|||
|imagesize=40px |
|||
== Thanks! == |
|||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#9 June 2016|9 June 2016]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[San Joaquin River Viaduct]]''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that construction of [[California High-Speed Rail]]'s '''[[San Joaquin River Viaduct]]''' involves eliminating the last [[Level crossing|at-grade rail crossing]] in the city of [[Fresno, California|Fresno]]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/San Joaquin River Viaduct]]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-30&end=2016-06-19&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=San_Joaquin_River_Viaduct San Joaquin River Viaduct])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]]. |
|||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[File:Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar.png|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for the ride back! [[User:Mathnerd314159|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159|talk]]) 01:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] <sub> ''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''</sub> 05:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[I Will Possess Your Heart]]== |
|||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article [[I Will Possess Your Heart]] you nominated for [[WP:GA|GA]]-status according to the [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]]. [[Image:Time2wait.svg|20px]] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MarioSoulTruthFan|MarioSoulTruthFan]]</small> -- [[User:MarioSoulTruthFan|MarioSoulTruthFan]] ([[User talk:MarioSoulTruthFan|talk]]) 10:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:East Glebe & Potomac station]] for deletion == |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[I Will Possess Your Heart]]== |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:East Glebe & Potomac station]], to which you have [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/authorship/en.wikipedia.org/East_Glebe_%26_Potomac_station significantly contributed], is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or if it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article [[I Will Possess Your Heart]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has failed [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]]; see [[Talk:I Will Possess Your Heart]] for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:MarioSoulTruthFan|MarioSoulTruthFan]]</small> -- [[User:MarioSoulTruthFan|MarioSoulTruthFan]] ([[User talk:MarioSoulTruthFan|talk]]) 11:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
The discussion will take place at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Glebe & Potomac station]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
|||
== Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[I Will Possess Your Heart]]== |
|||
The article [[I Will Possess Your Heart]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold [[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]]. The article is close to meeting the [[WP:GA?|good article criteria]], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See [[Talk:I Will Possess Your Heart]] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by [[User:Legobot|Legobot]], on behalf of [[User:Carbrera|Carbrera]]</small> -- [[User:Carbrera|Carbrera]] ([[User talk:Carbrera|talk]]) 03:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit [[User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier|the configuration page]]. Delivered by ''[[User:SDZeroBot|SDZeroBot]]'' ([[User talk:SDZeroBot|talk]]) 01:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> |
|||
== Do-It-Yourself Biology == |
|||
Most of the information on the Do-It-Yourself Biology page is woefully out of date. In fact most people in the community don't even call it Do-It-Yourself Biology anymore, they call it Biohacking, see google trends or Motherboard or the tons of other news articles that were used as modern citations(i.e. in the last year). Biopunk has really never been a term associated with Do-It_yourself Biology except maybe briefly in it's infancy and by a poorly written book that has had no traction in the movement. No one uses the term "wetware hacking" ever. |
|||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|||
The introduction of the article was modernized but you reverted it, statements like " DIY biology is primarily undertaken by individuals with extensive research training from academia or corporations, who then mentor and oversee other DIY biologists with no formal training." are wrong. It is not primarily undertaken by individuals with extensive training, even from the beginning of the movement. |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
There are statements like "For example, the Glowing Plant project intends to grow the arabidopsis, or rose, plant with a bioluminescent gene naturally occurring in Fireflies.[39]". Someone intending to do something should not belong in a wikipedia article. |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Also, many things are sourced very poorly like using an article in "Seed magazine" as a citation 4 times! |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|||
I don't understand why you reverted most of the changes to use information cited from 2001 but nothing in 2014 to present. Doesn't that seem wrong? Please let the edits stand, all of them were cited and modernized. There is no reason to revert them. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2602:306:BC06:F520:5921:A1F7:5537:F536|2602:306:BC06:F520:5921:A1F7:5537:F536]] ([[User talk:2602:306:BC06:F520:5921:A1F7:5537:F536|talk]]) 15:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
</div> |
|||
:I agree that the article needs to be overhauled, including with more recent sources. The main issue is that text on Wikipedia needs to be cited to third-party reliable sources, and cannot rely on your own first-hand knowledge of the topic. See [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. This is especially important if you are trying to remove text that is already supported by sources. It would greatly help if you can point to a source that says that, for example, DIY biology and body modification are part of the same community, as you claim. I've seen no sources that support that so far, and one that directly refutes it. Same with you statements about the terms "biohacking" and "biopunk". In general it is okay to add text from more recent sources, but if you want to remove sourced text you need to justify that pretty strongly by showing that reliable sources support the change. [[User:Antony-22|Antony–'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 02:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> |
|||
== [[Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case)]] == |
|||
::So when a statement has no source, I need to find a source to refute it? Most everything I deleted and overwrote had more modern and reliable sources(as compared to things like "Seed magazine") put in its place. Please go back and see what you reverted. I pointed you towards google trends for biohacking and biopunk and Do-it-yourself biology(I don't know if there really is a better way to look at it?). It is clear that Biohacking is the popular term, again the modern articles I posted all refer to it as Biohacking. Obviously, there is no citation that says "Biohacking is the more popular term". But a simple internet search for biopunk shows that it is associated with Science fiction genres not actual people, just like cyberpunk is a sci-fi genre associated with people called "hackers" not "cyberpunks". DIY Biology is not really a community anymore they have started to fall under the term Biohacking, many of what were previously called DIY Biologist are also what people call Grinders. This is again a hard source to cite because where does one find an article that says "People involved in the group formerly known as DIY Biologist are now also part of the subculture called Grinders"? Instead I posted relevant articles about DIY medical implantation, experiments like microbiome transplants that involve both biology and body modification, if you want I can even find articles of people who are involved in the community formerly known as DIYBio who also have implants but those who aren't familiar with the scene might have difficulty connecting the two. There is also a project out of Counter Culture Labs for a bacterial sunblock, which is body modification(which I did not cite). I know offhand half a dozen individuals who participate in Biohacking that also have implants(while this last one is obviously anecdotal it is still relevant). The Austin Biohacking community is composed of both Grinders and DIYBio people, they do stuff together(again difficult to cite). I interact with many of the biohacker communities and so have lost of knowledge in this area. I am not trying to fuck up the article, I am just trying to improve it. Everything or almost everything that was changed had tons of sources and they were all from the last two years. I would appreciate it if we could figure out a way where you don't revert changes I make especially when they are cited. |
|||
Hi, I wanted to let you know there was a move discussion at [[Talk:Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case)]] leading to the current title. While you weren't the first to move the page after the discussion, I would recommend checking the talk page before moving contentious topics, as titles that result from successful move discussions can only be overridden by another discussion. I'm sure you know this, but I just wanted to say something rather than sending a template. Thanks! [[User_talk:Asukite|<span style="color:Purple;font-size:medium;font-family:Bradley Hand ITC"> ASUKITE</span>]] 18:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::After going through the article again a number of the citations were dead links, blogposts and a satirish news article by Newitz that said things such as "The Internet boom was a joke. Steve Jobs is a dink, Bill Gates is a fascist, and Carly Fiorina has lost the Midas touch. The days of Mondo 2000 are long over." and "Say McDonald's patented the arm, and whenever you used your own arm, you had to pay 10¢ to the boys who brought you the Happy Meal. That would suck, wouldn't it?" These seem hardly reliable. I made more edits and I gave explanations for each one. If you revert changes please give an explanation as to why after each reversion. I tried to make the edits as individual and contained as possible so I could provide explanation for each and global reversions should be unnecessary. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2602:306:BC06:F520:F8E6:B024:B7B8:74EC|2602:306:BC06:F520:F8E6:B024:B7B8:74EC]] ([[User talk:2602:306:BC06:F520:F8E6:B024:B7B8:74EC|talk]]) 20:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:23, 6 December 2024
 |
|
|
2006–2009: 1 |
Ga CoConspirator Chart
[edit]Thank for helpful visual of Trump coconspirators, and please ignore this note if you made editorial choices to leave this off, but
SCOTT HALL actually fits in a number of circles, Imthink all (?). You correctly list him in coffee county breach circle (Acts 134,144 to 149; Counts 32 to 37) bottom right, but he is involved in overt acts 127 and 128, pp 59-60 (but not charged with Kutti, et al in Cts 30-31, p.89) and with Jeffrey Clark in Act 110, pg 50, but not charged in his act. Hall is the only person touching all/nearly all bubbles, so might be the sole link to bring a the RICO charge (?).
Ignore if you only bubbled co-count-charged folks. Great visual. good teaching tool. ThanKs CiteFinder (talk) 02:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- @CiteFinder: I'm glad you found it useful! Yes, the diagram is only based on the criminal counts, and not on the overt acts that are part of the racketeering count. It turned out to be quite a project to understand how the 41 criminal counts related to each other and the defendants. Doing the same for the 161 overt acts would be even more work! Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 22:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- Love you added colors! Really nice touch! CiteFinder (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]
It was great to meet you at Wikiconference North America! Thank you for coming to my talk and sharing your thoughts/ideas/concerns about AI & the future of Wikipedia throughout the conference – stay in touch and keep the ideas coming, please! :)
Accedietalk to me 22:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Accedie: It was great talking to you too! I will follow up soon. Also, take a look at List of crossings of the Dnieper: I imported a lot of information from Ukrainian Wikipedia some time ago, but I used Google Translate and probably didn't get all the transliterations right. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 23:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Michigan prosecution of fake electors
[edit]
On 25 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michigan prosecution of fake electors, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some of the Michigan fake electors attempted to enter the State Capitol, but were turned away by the state police? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michigan prosecution of fake electors. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Michigan prosecution of fake electors), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
[edit]
|
Merry Christmas, Antony-22! Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity. |
.jpg)
|
RV (talk) 09:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of People in the line of succession to the British throne for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People in the line of succession to the British throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.DrKay (talk) 10:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Early life and career of Kamala Harris for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early life and career of Kamala Harris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Bohbye (talk) 05:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General of California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Bohbye (talk) 05:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Thanks for the ride back! Mathnerd314159 (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
Nomination of Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boulder Bridge and Ross Drive Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Hog Farm Talk 05:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of East Glebe & Potomac station for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Glebe & Potomac station, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Glebe & Potomac station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to let you know there was a move discussion at Talk:Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (classified documents case) leading to the current title. While you weren't the first to move the page after the discussion, I would recommend checking the talk page before moving contentious topics, as titles that result from successful move discussions can only be overridden by another discussion. I'm sure you know this, but I just wanted to say something rather than sending a template. Thanks! ASUKITE 18:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)