Jump to content

Canada Line: Difference between revisions

Route map:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Stations: "literally no"
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Rapid transit line in Metro Vancouver, Canada}}
{{future infrastructure}}
{{Use Canadian English|date=April 2024}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2024}}
{{Infobox rail line
| color = {{rcr|TransLink (BC)|Canada}}
| name = Canada Line <div style="float:right;">{{rail-interchange|vancouver|canada|size=25}}</div>
| logo = Canadaline.svg
| logo_width =
| image = Canada Line Train 201807.jpg
| image_width =
| caption = Canada Line train pulling into Marine Drive station
| type = [[Rapid transit]]
| system = [[SkyTrain (Vancouver)|SkyTrain]]
| locale = [[Metro Vancouver]], British Columbia
| start = [[Waterfront station (Vancouver)|Waterfront]]
| end = [[YVR–Airport station|YVR–Airport]] & [[Richmond–Brighouse station|Richmond–Brighouse]]
| stations = 17
| daily_ridership = 120,000 (2023)<ref>{{cite web|title=Transit Service Performance Review|url=https://www.translink.ca/-/media/translink/documents/plans-and-projects/managing-the-transit-network/tspr/2023_transit_service_performance_review.pdf|work=TransLink|accessdate=November 11, 2024}}</ref>
| website = {{URL|TheCanadaLine.com}}
| open = {{Start date and age|2009|08|17}}
| close =
| owner = [[TransLink (British Columbia)|TransLink]], InTransitBC
| operator = [[AtkinsRéalis|ProTrans BC]]
| character =
| stock = [[SkyTrain (Vancouver) rolling stock#Hyundai Rotem EMU|Rotem EMU]], 2 cars per trainset
| linelength = {{convert|19.2|km|mi|abbr=on}}
| tracklength =
| tracks = 2
| gauge = {{track gauge|sg|allk=on|first=metric}}
| electrification = {{750 V DC|conductor=third rail}}
| speed = {{convert|80|km/h|mph|abbr=on}}
| map = {{switcher
| {{maplink-road|from=Canada Line.map}} Canada Line highlighted in teal <hr />
| Show interactive map
| [[File:Canada Line.svg|275px]]
| Show static map
| {{Canada Line|inline=yes}}
| Show route diagram
}}
}}
The '''Canada Line''' is a [[rapid transit]] line in [[Greater Vancouver]], British Columbia, Canada, that is part of the [[SkyTrain (Vancouver)|SkyTrain]] system. The line is owned by [[TransLink (British Columbia)|TransLink]] and InTransitBC and is operated by [[SNC-Lavalin|ProTrans BC]]. Coloured turquoise on route maps, it operates as an [[airport rail link]] between [[Vancouver]], [[Richmond, British Columbia|Richmond]], and the [[Vancouver International Airport]] (YVR). The line comprises 16 stations and {{convert|19.2|km|mi}} of track; the main line runs from Vancouver to Richmond while a {{convert|4|km|mi|adj=on}} [[spur line]] from [[Bridgeport station (SkyTrain)|Bridgeport station]] connects to the airport.<ref name="CanadaLineFAQ">{{cite web |url=http://canadaline.ca/aboutFAQ.asp |title=Frequently Asked Questions |publisher=Canada Line/TransLink |access-date=June 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090831040524/http://www.canadaline.ca/aboutFAQ.asp |archive-date=August 31, 2009}}</ref> It opened on August 17, 2009, ahead of the [[2010 Winter Olympics]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Canada Line linking Vancouver and Richmond to open Aug. 17 |url=https://vancouversun.com/Canada+Line+open/1859013/story.html |work=Vancouver Sun |access-date=August 4, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090807065913/http://www.vancouversun.com/Canada%20Line%20open/1859013/story.html |archive-date=August 7, 2009}}</ref>


The Canada Line was anticipated to have 100,000 boardings per day in 2013 and 142,000 boardings per day by 2021, but it has consistently exceeded early targets.<ref name="Canada Line">[http://canadaline.ca/allFacts.asp Canada Line] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060830013244/http://canadaline.ca/allFacts.asp |date=August 30, 2006}}</ref> Ridership has grown steadily since opening day, with average ridership of 83,000 per day in September 2009,<ref name="marketwire.com">{{cite press release |url=http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Cubic-Corporation-NYSE-CUB-1052390.html |title=Cubic, TransLink Report Record Use of New Fare Collection System for Canada Line |date=September 30, 2009 |access-date=October 10, 2009}}</ref> 105,000 per day in March 2010,<ref name=":3">{{cite web |url=http://finance.alphatrade.com/story/2010-01-20/CNW/201001201302CANADANWCANADAPR_C2486.html |date=January 20, 2010 |publisher=VANOC Communications |title=Are you prepared to travel during the 2010 Winter Games in Vancouver? |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707120028/http://finance.alphatrade.com/story/2010-01-20/CNW/201001201302CANADANWCANADAPR_C2486.html |archive-date=July 7, 2011}}</ref> and over 136,000 passengers per weekday in June 2011.<ref name="New record">{{cite news |url=http://www.translink.ca/en/About-Us/Media/2011/August/TransLink-reports-transit-ridership-heading-for-a-new-record.aspx |publisher=Translink |title=TransLink reports transit ridership heading for a new record |date=August 22, 2011 |access-date=December 28, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111020085954/http://www.translink.ca/en/About-Us/Media/2011/August/TransLink-reports-transit-ridership-heading-for-a-new-record.aspx |archive-date=October 20, 2011}}</ref> During the 17 days of the 2010 Winter Olympics, the line carried an average of 228,190 passengers per day.<ref name="duringolympics">{{cite web |url=https://vancouversun.com/sports/2010wintergames/TransLink+carried+million+passengers+during+Games/2715010/story.html |title=TransLink carried 26{{nbsp}}million passengers during Games |work=Vancouver Sun |access-date=March 23, 2010}}{{dead link|date=March 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref>
{{Redirect|RAV}}
[[Image:RAV route.jpg|thumb|286px|Map showing the planned route of the Canada Line.]]
The '''Canada Line''', formerly known as the '''Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Line''' ("RAV Line"), is a new [[rapid transit]] line of the Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority ([[TransLink (Vancouver)|TransLink]]) currently under construction. The line is being built and will be operated by a private sector engineering firm, [[SNC-Lavalin]], for 35 years. The line will be the third in [[Greater Vancouver Regional District|Greater Vancouver]], [[Canada]] and will be added to the existing rapid transit system but will not use [[linear induction motor]] technology. Despite the fact the line will use different technology, it is unclear whether or not it will be branded "SkyTrain". The line is planned to connect downtown [[Vancouver]] to the [[Vancouver International Airport]] and [[Richmond, British Columbia|Richmond]] City Centre in time for the [[2010 Winter Olympics]]. Governance of the project is through RAV Project Management (RAVCO), a subsidiary of TransLink.


Governance of the project was through Canada Line Rapid Transit Inc. (CLCO), formerly RAV Project Management Ltd. (RAVCO), a reflection of the original "Richmond–Airport–Vancouver" name).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.translink.bc.ca/About_TransLink/Operating_Co.asp |title=TransLink Operating Companies |publisher=TransLink |access-date=December 2, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080822142508/http://www.translink.bc.ca/About_TransLink/Operating_Co.asp |archive-date=August 22, 2008}}</ref> The line was built by [[SNC-Lavalin]], and InTransitBC is under contract with TransLink to manage the line for its first 35 years, until 2044. The Canada Line is operationally independent from British Columbia Rapid Transit Company, which operates SkyTrain's [[Expo Line (SkyTrain)|Expo]] and [[Millennium Line|Millennium]] lines<ref name="RelationshipWithSkyTrain">{{cite web |url=http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/faq.htm#skytrain |title=Frequently Asked Questions, Canada Line |publisher=Rapid Transit Office, City of Vancouver |access-date=December 2, 2008}}</ref> but is considered a part of the SkyTrain network. Like the other two SkyTrain lines in Metro Vancouver, it is also [[light metro]] rapid transit, using fully automated trains on grade-separated guideways.<ref name="TransLink-CanadaLineSkyTrain">{{cite web |url=http://www.translink.ca/en/Rider-Info/Canada-Line.aspx |title=Making the Connection to a World of Choice |publisher=TransLink |access-date=April 23, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090821224043/http://www.translink.ca/en/Rider-Info/Canada-Line.aspx |archive-date=August 21, 2009}}</ref> However, the trains are powered by conventional motors with [[third rail]] electrical pickup rather than the linear induction system used on the other SkyTrain lines.
==Timeline==


== Route ==
*In 1995, BC Transit (a crown corporation responsible for public transit) expressed desire to create a special service of either [[bus rapid transit]] (BRT) or automated light rapid transit service connecting the cities of [[Richmond, British Columbia|Richmond]], [[Vancouver]], and the [[Vancouver International Airport]] in one of the transit improvement plans.
{{stack |[[File:North Arm Bridge shot from SkyTrain 3622.JPG|thumb|Canada Line bridge over the Fraser River]] }}
**Passages underground were reserved at the Concord Pacific development close to the Cambie bridge.
The Canada Line begins in [[Downtown Vancouver]] at [[Waterfront station (Vancouver)|Waterfront station]] ({{convert|0.0|km|disp=sqbr|abbr=on}}) in a [[cut-and-cover]] subway tunnel beneath [[Granville Street]]. It quickly goes into twin-bored tunnels, heading southwest beneath Granville Street, then curving southeast to follow [[Davie Street]] through [[Yaletown]]. The tunnels then dive deeper to pass below [[False Creek]] before rising back up to [[Olympic Village station]] ({{convert|2.7|km|disp=sqbr|abbr=on}}). There, the line transitions back to a cut-and-cover tunnel (which is noted by the tunnel changing from a circular to a square shape), heading south under [[Cambie Street]]. This section has some portions where the two sets of tracks are stacked vertically. The line emerges from the ground just south of 64th Avenue, climbing to an elevated guideway.<ref>{{cite web |title=Overview and Route Map |url=http://www.canadaline.ca/aboutOverview.asp |publisher=InTransitBC |access-date=December 17, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061216162355/http://www.canadaline.ca/aboutOverview.asp |archive-date=December 16, 2006}}</ref>
*In [[2003]], ten companies or consortia submitted 'Expressions of Interest' in this project.
*In December [[2003]], this was short listed down to three who were given a 'Request for Proposal'. These three consortia were:
**RAVLink Transportation, which included [[Fluor]] Canada, [[Siemens AG]] Canada, [[MTR Corporation]], and [[Balfour Beatty]] Capital Projects,
**RAVxpress, which included [[Bombardier]], [[AMEC]], [[Bouygues]] Travaux Publics, and [[Bilfinger Berger]], and
**SNC-Lavalin/Serco, which included [[SNC-Lavalin]] and [[Serco]].
*On [[June 30]], [[2004]], after twice voting to cancel the project, the TransLink Board approved the RAV line but maintained the right to cancel the project if none of the bids meet the approved budget of $1.35 billion.
*On [[November 19]], [[2004]], RAVCO recommended that the [[SNC-Lavalin]]/[[Serco]] (now known collectively as InTransitBC) proposal for a fully automated, grade-separated system be accepted. This 'Best and Final Offer' bid was $343 million over the approved budget. The project was, however, brought to within the funding allowance, through various cost trimming measures, including design changes, the contractor agreeing to lower their bid, and the province contributing another $65 million.
*On [[December 1]], [[2004]], the TransLink board gave final approval for the project.
*On [[July 29]] [[2005]] the final contract to design, build and operate the RAV Line was signed between InTransitBC and Translink. Serco is no longer a partner to InTransitBC and 2 pension funds have been brought into the partnership.
*In October 2005, the utilities relocation and roadwork was started.
*On [[November 25]], [[2005]], the design of the new trains was unveiled and [[ROTEM|Rotem]] was announced as the supplier of the trains.
*The line is expected to be operational in November [[2009]], just in time for the [[2010 Winter Olympics]] held in Vancouver.


The line continues elevated across the [[North Arm Bridge]] over the North Arm of the [[Fraser River]], leaving [[Vancouver]] and entering [[Richmond, British Columbia|Richmond]]. Just beyond [[Bridgeport station (SkyTrain)|Bridgeport station]] ({{convert|11.1|km|disp=sqbr|abbr=on}}) at a [[flying junction]], the line splits, with the Richmond branch heading south on elevated tracks along No. 3 Road and terminating at [[Richmond–Brighouse station]] ({{convert|14.5|km|disp=sqbr|abbr=on}}). The airport branch turns west and crosses the [[Middle Arm Bridge]] over the Middle Arm of the Fraser River, connecting to stations on [[Sea Island (British Columbia)|Sea Island]] and terminating at [[YVR–Airport station]] ({{convert|15.0|km|disp=sqbr|abbr=on}}). Portions of the airport branch are at grade in order to accommodate a future elevated taxiway for aircraft over the line. Both branches narrow to a single track as they approach their respective terminus stations. Just before Bridgeport station is the Operations and Maintenance Centre (OMC) facility, which houses Canada Line trains that are not in use.
==Project funding and management==
RAVCO was set up by the agencies funding the transit line to oversee project design, procurement, construction and implementation. The public contributions to the budget comes from the following sources:


== Stations ==
* [[Government of Canada]]: $450 million
* Government of [[British Columbia]]: $365 million
* [[Vancouver International Airport|Vancouver Airport]] Authority: $300 million
* [[TransLink (Vancouver)|TransLink]]: $400 million


Station construction was designed as a two-stage process. Sixteen original stations opened at the same time as the line did. Three additional stations are planned, and may be built in the future. The stations are listed below.
The British Columbia government initially committed $300 million but when the project went over-budget, they contributed an extra $65 million, and TransLink committed an extra $100 million by selling some of its assets.


Each Canada Line station is slightly different in appearance, designed to blend in with the surrounding neighbourhood. For example, [[Langara–49th Avenue station]] is designed to fit into the area's low-density residential neighbourhood.{{Citation needed|date=August 2009}}
These sums are all in [[2006]] dollars, except for the Government of Canada's contribution which will be paid out when constructed, and is estimated to be equivalent of $419 million 1993 dollars.


The five busiest stations have platforms {{convert|50|m|ft}} long, while the rest of the stations have {{convert|40|m|ft|adj=on}} platforms that can be easily extended to 50 metres. The termini at YVR–Airport and Richmond–Brighouse stations are single-tracked, whereas the [[Waterfront station (Vancouver)|Waterfront station]] terminus is double-tracked. The double-tracking is necessary to accommodate the three-minute headways between trains on the Waterfront–Bridgeport portion of the line. King Edward station is the only station with a stacked configuration, and [[Broadway–City Hall station]] is the only station with a double-height ceiling over the platforms. [[Vancouver City Centre station]] is linked to [[Pacific Centre]] mall and Vancouver Centre Mall, in addition to having street level access. All direct transfers to the Expo and Millennium Lines must be made at Waterfront station; there is no direct connection from Vancouver City Centre station to Granville station. However, it is possible to transfer between those two stations via a short walk through Pacific Centre or Vancouver Centre Mall.
In addition to the public funding, the line will be built as a private-public partnership where the private contractor, InTransitBC, will provide the project for a fixed price. InTransitBC will be responsible for the remaining costs to construct the project, including any increases in construction costs (other than changes to the scope of the project). Since the contract was signed, InTransitBC's $300 million contribution has escalated by $400 million due to increases in construction costs. The total private sector funding of the project is approx. $700 million. The private sector will operate the line for 35-years in return for a share in the operating revenue of the line.


<gallery mode="packed" heights="150px">
==Route description==
File:Canada Line 001.JPG|Real-time information is provided on every station platform.
[[Image:SkyTrain2009.png|thumb|right|350px|The Canada Line (red) as part of the Greater Vancouver's rapid transit network in 2010.]]
File:Canada Line False Creek tunnel construction.jpg|Construction taking place on the south shore of False Creek, at the site of [[Olympic Village station]], April 14, 2006
Image Granvillemallskytrain.jpg|Construction of Vancouver City Centre station, below Granville Street between Robson and Georgia, April 9, 2008
</gallery>


Stations were configured to allow for the future installation of fare gates, and received fare gates in 2013 as part of full implementation throughout all SkyTrain stations. Every station has an up escalator and an elevator, but only the three terminal stations have down escalators.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.vancourier.com/issues07/012107/news/012107nn5.html |title=Disabled advocate down on Canada Line station design |last=Hasiuk |first=Mark |publisher=The Vancouver Courier |access-date=December 3, 2008 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20090131204513/http://archive.vancourier.com/issues07/012107/news/012107nn5.html |archive-date=January 31, 2009}}</ref>
The Vancouver section of the line is projected to run underground from [[Waterfront Station (Vancouver)|Waterfront Station]], with a [[Tunnel|cut-and-cover]] tunnel under [[Granville Street]] between Hastings and Dunsmuir and a bored tunnel under Granville and [[Davie Street]]s and [[False Creek]] to the 2nd Avenue station on [[Cambie Street]], where it will run as a cut-and-cover tunnel as far as 64th Avenue with the two directions either side-by-side or stacked on separate decks.


Until late 2019, six stations (Vancouver City Centre, Olympic Village, Broadway–City Hall, [[Marine Drive station|Marine Drive]], [[Templeton station|Templeton]], and YVR–Airport) were equipped with self-service flight check-in kiosks which allowed customers to check into their flights at [[Vancouver International Airport]] while at these stations.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Other Locations|url=https://www.yvr.ca/en/passengers/flights/check-in/other-locations|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191205114232/https://www.yvr.ca/en/passengers/flights/check-in/other-locations|archive-date=December 5, 2019|access-date=March 1, 2021|website=yvr.ca}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Other Locations|url=https://www.yvr.ca/en/passengers/flights/check-in/other-locations|url-status=live|access-date=March 1, 2021|website=yvr.ca|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160429153615/http://www.yvr.ca:80/en/passengers/flights/check-in/other-locations |archive-date=April 29, 2016 }}</ref>
From there, the line will be elevated, crossing the North Arm of the [[Fraser River]] via a new cable-stayed bridge. At the proposed Bridgeport Station, the line would split, with the main line heading south on an elevated track along Number 3 Road to Richmond City Centre. A branch would connect Bridgeport Station to Vancouver International Airport, crossing the Middle Arm of the Fraser River via a bridge.


{|class="wikitable
It is very likely that the [[Millennium Line]] will be extended west along Broadway to Cambie Street, where it will be possible to transfer to the Canada Line at Broadway/City Hall station. As indicated in material presented by the City of Vancouver at public meetings in early 2006, this station is being planned with such a future extension in mind.
! Station
! City
! Connections
! Location
|-
| [[Waterfront station (Vancouver)|Waterfront]]
| rowspan="9" |[[Vancouver]]
| {{plainlist|
* {{rint|size=20|vancouver|seabus}} [[SeaBus]]
* {{rint|size=20|vancouver|expo}} [[Expo Line (SkyTrain)|Expo Line]]
* {{rint|size=20|vancouver|wce}} [[West Coast Express]]
* {{rint|size=20|vancouver|rapidbus|R5}} [[R5 Hastings St|R5 RapidBus]]
}}
| Granville, between Pender and Hastings
|-
| [[Vancouver City Centre station|Vancouver City Centre]]
|
| Granville at Georgia
|-
| [[Yaletown–Roundhouse station|Yaletown–Roundhouse]]
|
| Davie near Mainland
|-
| [[Olympic Village station|Olympic Village]]
|
| Cambie at West 2nd Ave
|-
| [[Broadway–City Hall station|Broadway–City Hall]]
| {{rint|size=20|vancouver|bus|99}} [[99 B-Line]]
| Cambie at West Broadway
|-
| [[King Edward station|King Edward]]
|
| Cambie at King Edward
|-
| [[Oakridge–41st Avenue station|Oakridge–41st Avenue]]
| {{rint|size=20|vancouver|rapidbus|r4}} [[R4 41st Ave|R4 RapidBus]]
| Cambie at West 41st; next to [[Oakridge Centre]]
|-
| [[Langara–49th Avenue station|Langara–49th Avenue]]
|
| Cambie at West 49th; near [[Langara College]]
|-
| [[Marine Drive station|Marine Drive]]
|
| Cambie at Marine
|-
| [[Bridgeport station (SkyTrain)|Bridgeport]]
| [[Richmond, British Columbia|Richmond]]
|
| Major transit exchange for suburban buses; branches split; adjacent to [[River Rock Casino Resort]]
|-
! colspan="4" |Richmond–Brighouse branch
|-
| [[Capstan station|Capstan]]
| rowspan="4" |Richmond
|
| No. 3, between Capstan Way and McMyn Way
|-
| [[Aberdeen station (SkyTrain)|Aberdeen]]
|
| No. 3 at Cambie; adjacent to [[Aberdeen Centre]]
|-
| [[Lansdowne station (SkyTrain)|Lansdowne]]
|
| No. 3 at Lansdowne; adjacent to [[Lansdowne Centre]]
|-
| [[Richmond–Brighouse station|Richmond–Brighouse]]
|
| No. 3 at Saba; adjacent to [[Richmond Centre (mall)|Richmond Centre]]
|-
! colspan="4" |YVR–Airport branch
|-
| [[Templeton station|Templeton]]
| rowspan="3" |Richmond
|
| North of [[Grant McConachie Way]]; east of Templeton
|-
| [[Sea Island Centre station|Sea Island Centre]]
|
| Near [[Air Canada]] service centre
|-
| [[YVR–Airport station|YVR–Airport]]
| {{rint|size=20|air|link=Vancouver International Airport}} [[Vancouver International Airport|YVR]]
| Attached by walkways to YVR Main Terminal
|}


=== Additional stations ===
==Stations==
{{future building}}
Stations are proposed to be built in two stages: 16 stations will be built for the line's projected opening prior to the 2010 Winter Olympics, with up to three additional stations being added after the line opens. The proposed stations are listed below.


Provisions have been made to allow for the addition of the following [[infill station]]s in the future:
Each station along the Canada Line is planned to be slightly different in appearance, and designed to blend in with the surrounding neighbourhood. [[Yaletown-Roundhouse Station]], for instance, may be built in brick to match Yaletown's heritage whereas [[Langara-49th Avenue Station ]] will fit into a more traditional residential neighbourhood.


* 33rd Avenue (Cambie Street at West 33rd Avenue, next to Queen Elizabeth Park)<ref name="futurestns">{{cite web |last=Chan |first=Kenneth |date=August 19, 2015 |title=Four stations could be added to SkyTrain Canada Line |url=https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/four-stations-could-be-added-to-skytrain-canada-line |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180320064052/https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/four-stations-could-be-added-to-skytrain-canada-line |archive-date=March 20, 2018 |access-date=August 4, 2017 |website=DailyHive}}</ref>
There have been recent complaints about the location of the Broadway-City Hall station. Critics say that it is not close enough to Broadway and it is too far north on Cambie St. Officials have taken this complaint seriously and they are debating whether or not to move the station north 50 metres, so it will be closer to Broadway. Moving the station 50 metres will cost an extra $3 million, which is to be shared equally among the City of Vancouver (which has approved the expenditure), Translink and InTransitBC.
* 57th Avenue (Cambie Street at West 57th Avenue)<ref name="futurestns" /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/developer-onni-to-pay-for-new-canada-line-station-in-vancouver-1.3511997 |date=March 30, 2016 |access-date=August 4, 2017 |website=CBC News |title=Developer Onni to pay for new Canada Line station in Vancouver}}</ref>
*: The future of a 57th Avenue (Cambie Street and West 57th Avenue) in Vancouver is not fully known at this time. The original plan was that one day a station could be built, but new documents and talk between TransLink and the City of Vancouver raise the possibility of it never happening. The station was part of the broad policy statement adopted in 2014 by city council for the redevelopment of the Pearson Dogwood lands. But in June 2017 Susan Haid, city assistant director of planning for Vancouver South, submitted a report to Vancouver council stating that "though it is desirable to achieve a future station at 57th Avenue there are a number of key challenges," Haid wrote in her report. "Currently, the station is not considered in regional transportation plans and is not considered a regional priority such as the Broadway Corridor line." Haid also added to her report that, "Should the station not be attainable in the long-term future, the financial contribution towards a future station would be re-allocated to address the amenity priorities identified for Pearson Dogwood and those in and around the Cambie Corridor consistent with the respective public benefit strategies."<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.straight.com/news/929446/challenges-derail-arrival-new-canada-line-station-cambie-street-south-vancouver |title=Challenges derail arrival of new Canada Line station on Cambie Street in South Vancouver |date=June 26, 2017 |work=Georgia Straight Vancouver's News & Entertainment Weekly |access-date=December 18, 2017}}</ref>
* YVR Terminal 3 (near YVR Terminal 3)
*: The master plan for the Vancouver International Airport for 2027 indicates that this station would be built alongside the airport's proposed Northeast Terminal expansion.<ref name="futurestns" /><ref>{{Cite web|date=2007|title=YVR: Your Airport 2027|url=http://www.yvr.ca/-/media/yvr/documents/community/yvr_masterplan.pdf?la=en#:~:text=YEAR%20MASTER%20PLAN-,YOUR%20AIRPORT%202027%3A%2020%2DYEAR%20MASTER%20PLAN,and%20achieving%20key%20strategic%20objectives|access-date=February 22, 2022}}</ref>


== Transit connections ==
Station platforms will be only 40 metres long, extendible to 50 metres long. The YVR terminus and the Richmond-Brighouse terminus will each be single-tracked, whereas the Waterfront Station terminus will be double-tracked to accommodate the shorter headways required for interlined service from the two branches. King Edward Station will be the only station with a stacked configuration and Broadway-City Hall Station will be the only station with a double height ceiling over the platforms. Vancouver City Centre Station will be linked to Pacific Centre Mall and Vancouver Centre Mall in addition to having street level access. There will be no direct connection from Vancouver City Centre Station to the Expo Line's Granville Station. All direct transfers to the Skytrain will be made at Waterfront Station.


[[File:Vancouver Transit Network Map (svg).svg|thumb|right|Canada Line (sky blue) as part of the Metro Vancouver transit system in 2016]]
All stations will be configured to allow for the future installation of fare gates if required.
Many transit services connect with the Canada Line and form an important part of the service. With the opening of the line, most bus routes in Richmond, and connecting services from White Rock, Tsawwassen, and Ladner, doubled their service frequency. Waterfront station provides connections to the [[R5 Hastings St]], [[Expo Line (SkyTrain)|Expo Line]], [[West Coast Express]], and [[SeaBus]]. [[Broadway–City Hall station|Broadway–City Hall]] provides a connection to the [[99 B-Line]] service.


There are currently only two routes serving [[Vancouver International Airport]]: the N10 NightBus, running parallel to the Canada Line along [[Granville Street]], and route 412, running between [[Vancouver International Airport#Airport South|Airport South]] and [[Bridgeport station (SkyTrain)|Bridgeport station]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=NightBus |url=https://www.translink.ca/schedules-and-maps/nightbus |access-date=April 1, 2024 |website=www.translink.ca |language=en-CA}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=412 Bridgeport Station/Sea Island South |url=https://www.translink.ca/schedules-and-maps/route/412/direction/1/schedule |access-date=April 1, 2024 |website=www.translink.ca |language=en-CA}}</ref> Riders on these bus routes are not subject to the YVR AddFare.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Questions and answers about the YVR AddFare |url=https://buzzer.translink.ca/2010/01/questions-and-answers-about-the-yvr-addfare/ |access-date=April 1, 2024 |website=The Buzzer blog|date=January 9, 2010 }}</ref> The [[Airport Station (TransLink)|Airport Station exchange]] was downgraded to a regular bus stop on September 7, 2009, a few weeks after the opening of the line. Bus routes that used this loop were discontinued (as in the case of the 424 and the [[98 B-Line]]), short-turned (as in the case of the 100, renamed 100 Marpole Loop), or redirected to [[Bridgeport station (SkyTrain)|Bridgeport station]] (as in the case of the 620, C90, and C92).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.translink.ca/en/Rider-Info/Canada-Line/Transit-Services.aspx |title=Connecting Transit Services |publisher=TransLink |access-date=July 29, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090809053111/http://www.translink.ca/en/Rider-Info/Canada-Line/Transit-Services.aspx |archive-date=August 9, 2009}}</ref>
Every station will have elevators and an escalator travelling up, but will not necessarily have an escalator going down (except for the airport stations, which will have escalators travelling in both directions). [http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Jz-JcGv2YbMJ:www.richmondreview.com/portals-code/list.cgi%3Fpaper%3D45%26cat%3D23%26id%3D651057%26more%3D+richmond+review+%22canada+line%22+escalator&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=firefox-a]


Work began in May 2021 to extend the Millennium Line from [[VCC–Clark station]] west along [[Broadway (Vancouver)|Broadway]] to the new [[Arbutus station]], allowing for a transfer to the Canada Line at Broadway–City Hall station.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 13, 2021 |title=Broadway Subway Project reaches major construction phase |url=https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2021TRAN0065-000906 |access-date=April 27, 2022 |website=BC Gov News {{!}} Transportation and Infrastructure}}</ref> As indicated in material presented by the City of Vancouver at public meetings in early 2006, this station was designed with such a future extension in mind. A "knock-out" panel was installed in the concourse that would facilitate construction of a connection between the station and a Broadway-corridor SkyTrain extension.
===Vancouver section===
[[Image:DSCF1504.jpg|thumb|Construction taking place on the south shore of False Creek, at the site of [[Olympic Village Station]]. This is where the tunnel boring machine will begin its work.]]


The Canada Line uses the same fare system as the rest of the transit system managed by TransLink, with two exceptions:<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.translink.ca/Fares-and-Passes/Canada-Line-YVR-AddFare.aspx |title=Canada Line YVR AddFAre |access-date=January 1, 2018 |publisher=TransLink |website=translink.ca |archive-date=March 24, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180324060155/https://www.translink.ca/Fares-and-Passes/Canada-Line-YVR-AddFare.aspx |url-status=dead }}</ref>
*[[Waterfront Station (Vancouver)|Waterfront]] (connection to [[Expo Line|Expo]] and [[Millennium Line|Millennium]] Lines, [[West Coast Express]] and [[SeaBus]])
*[[Vancouver City Centre Station|Vancouver City Centre]] (Granville Street at Robson Street)
*[[Yaletown-Roundhouse Station|Yaletown-Roundhouse]] (Davie Street near Mainland Street)
*[[Olympic Village Station|Olympic Village]] (Cambie Street at West 2nd Avenue; planned for after 2010, but included in the initial project after the City of Vancouver provided funding)
*[[Broadway-City Hall Station|Broadway-City Hall]] (Cambie Street at West Broadway)
*[[King Edward Station|King Edward]] (Cambie Street at King Edward Avenue)
*[[Oakridge-41st Avenue Station|Oakridge-41st Avenue]] (Cambie Street at West 41st Avenue, next to Oakridge Centre)
*[[Langara-49th Avenue Station|Langara-49th Avenue]] (Cambie Street at West 49th Avenue)
*[[Marine Drive Station|Marine Drive]] (Cambie Street at Southwest Marine Drive)


* The YVR AddFare, started in January 2010, is a surcharge that applies to some passengers leaving the airport and travelling eastbound to Bridgeport station and beyond. Passengers headed away from the airport must pay a $5 AddFare on top of the regular fare to leave the Sea Island stations unless they are travelling on a monthly pass; or a DayPass or a single-use Compass Ticket not that was not purchased on Sea Island.
===Richmond section===
* Travel between the Sea Island stations is free to everyone. There is no additional fare for passengers travelling toward the airport. Such trips require a special Sea Island ticket that is free to obtain at any ticket machine at the Sea Island stations. These tickets are not valid for tapping out at other stations; an exit ticket is required for Sea Island ticketholders exiting at any station outside of Sea Island.
[[Image:98laneclosed.jpg|thumb|Canada Line construction in Richmond, near No. 3 Road at Capstan Way.]]
Trains outbound to Richmond's commercial centre will stop at:
*[[Bridgeport Station|Bridgeport]] (north of Bridgeport Road in Richmond; major transit exchange for suburban buses; link to Airport branch)
*[[Aberdeen Station (Richmond)|Aberdeen]] (No. 3 Road at Cambie Road)
*[[Lansdowne Station|Lansdowne]] (No. 3 Road at Lansdowne Road; 3-4 blocks away from the [[Richmond Olympic Oval]] speed skating venue)


The Canada Line operates on a "Fare Paid Zone" system. Passengers are required by law to possess a valid fare when they are in Fare Paid Zones. Fare Paid Zones are clearly marked, and fares can be bought from Compass Vending Machines at all stations. Fare inspections are mostly conducted by the [[South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Police Service]]. Passengers who fail to pay the fare or do not have a valid fare may be fined $173 and/or removed from the station or train.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.translink.ca/Fares-and-Passes/Fare-Infractions/FAQs.aspx |title=Fare Infraction FAQs |website=TransLink |access-date=January 16, 2018 |archive-date=January 17, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180117011954/https://www.translink.ca/Fares-and-Passes/Fare-Infractions/FAQs.aspx |url-status=dead }}</ref>
*[[Richmond-Brighouse Station|Richmond-Brighouse]] (No. 3 Road at Cook Road, adjacent to the Richmond Centre shopping mall)


Canada Line attendants are the customer service staff for the Canada Line. They are easily identifiable by their green uniforms. They provide customer service, troubleshoot certain problems with the trains, observe and report safety issues, and check fares.
===Airport branch===
<!--
Trains outbound from Vancouver to [[Vancouver International Airport]] will split from the main line after Bridgeport Station, stopping at:
* Waterfront: SeaBus, Route 160, 210, 211, 4, 7, 3
*[[Templeton Station|Templeton]] (likely to be located north of Grant McConachie Way, near Templeton Street)
* Vancouver City Centre: Route 4, 7, 10, 16, 17, 240, 242, 246, 250, 251, 252, 257
*[[Sea Island Centre Station|Sea Island Centre]] (likely to be located on Grant McConachie Way, near the [[Air Canada]] service centre)
* Yaletown-Roundhouse: Route C21, C23
*[[YVR-Airport Station|YVR-Airport]] (adjacent to the main terminal of Vancouver International Airport)
* Olympic Village: Route 84, 50
===Post 2010===
* Broadway-City Hall: Route 50, 99, 9
====Vancouver====
* King Edward: Route 15, 25, 33
*[[33rd Avenue Station|33rd Avenue]] (Cambie Street at West 33rd Avenue, next to Queen Elizabeth Park)
* Oakridge-41st: Route 41, 43
*[[57th Avenue Station|57th Avenue]] (Cambie Street at West 57th Avenue)
* Langara 49th: Route 49
====Richmond====
* Marine Drive: Route 100, 3, 15, 17
*[[Capstan Way Station|Capstan Way]] (No. 3 Road at Capstan Way)
* Bridgeport: Route 301, 311, 351, 352, 354, 407, 425, 601, 602, 603, 604, 620 (to Ferry)
*[[Westminster Station|Westminster]] (No. 3 Road at Westminster Highway; deferred on [[30 June]] [[2004]] to after 2010)
* Aberdeen: Route 410, 407
* Lansdowne: Route 402, 405
* Richmond Centre-Brighouse: Route 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 407, 410, 430, 480, C95, C96
-->


==Technology==
== Technology ==
{{Main|SkyTrain (Vancouver) rolling stock#Hyundai Rotem EMU}}
The Canada Line will not use Bombardier's proprietary SkyTrain linear induction technology, but rather another fully automated transit vehicle using more conventional motors than the linear induction motor used in trains on the Expo and Millennium lines. This was largely a consequence of the scope of the Request for Proposals process for the Public-Private Partnership, the terms of which refused to allow Bombardier to include efficiencies in combining operations or rolling stock orders for the new line with those for the existing Skytrain lines. This placed all bidders on a level playing field. The RFP also required that the system have an ultimate capacity of 15,000 pphpd (leaving the choice of technology and platform length to the proponent) and required a minimum travel time between YVR and downtown Vancouver of 24 minutes. <ref>[http://www.canadaline.ca/files/uploads/docs/doc177.pdf Best and Final Offer Stage Report & Recommendations] (PDF)</ref>
[[File:Canada Line Train.jpg|thumb|A train parked at the Canada Line Operations and Maintenance Centre near [[Bridgeport station (SkyTrain)|Bridgeport station]]]]
The Canada Line uses a fleet of trains built by [[Hyundai Rotem|Rotem]], a division of [[Hyundai Motor Group]]. The trains are powered by conventional electric motors, rather than the [[Linear motor|linear induction motor]]s used by the Expo and Millennium Line's [[Bombardier Advanced Rapid Transit|Bombardier ART]] trains. Canada Line trains are operated by the same SelTrac automated train control system used in the rest of the SkyTrain network.


The selection of Rotem was largely a consequence of the request for proposals process for the public-private partnership, whose terms did not allow Bombardier to consider efficiencies in combining operations or rolling-stock orders for the new line with those for the existing system.<ref name=":0" /> This placed all bidders on a level playing field, albeit at the cost of not necessarily picking the most efficient choice for long-term operation. The RFP also required that the system have a capacity of 15,000 passengers per hour in each direction (leaving the choice of technology and platform length to the proponent) and a maximum travel time between the airport and downtown Vancouver of 24 minutes.<ref>[http://www.canadaline.ca/files/uploads/docs/doc177.pdf Best and Final Offer Stage Report & Recommendations] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090304224720/http://www.canadaline.ca/files/uploads/docs/doc177.pdf |date=March 4, 2009}} (PDF)</ref>
==Vehicles==
[[Image:BannerFront.jpg|thumb|286px|Artist's conception of the RAV Line Vehicle in 2009.]]
The trains ([[ROTEM]] LRV) will be designed and built by [[ROTEM|Rotem Company]], a division of [[Hyundai]] Motor Group.


The fleet consists of 32 fully automated two-car articulated trains, for a total of 64 cars.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=January 21, 2020 |title=Metro Vancouver's Canada Line adds first 4 of dozen new trains, boosting service |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/6442509/metro-vancouvers-canada-line-adds-first-4-of-dozen-new-trains-boosting-service/|access-date=June 19, 2024 |website=CBC News}}</ref> The capacity of the trains is estimated at 334 people per pair of cars (comfortably) or 400 people at [[crush load]]. The trains have a top speed of {{convert|80|km/h}} in normal operation and {{convert|90|km/h}} in catch-up mode.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 14, 2007 |title=Canada Line Fact Sheet The Canada Line Vehicle |url=http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/documents/20071214UpdatedFactSheetNo.1CanadaLineVehicle.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326090147/http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/documents/20071214UpdatedFactSheetNo.1CanadaLineVehicle.pdf |archive-date=March 26, 2009 |access-date=June 16, 2015 |publisher=canadaline.ca (TransLink)}}</ref> Each married pair of gangway-connected cars is {{Convert|41|m|ftin}} long and {{Convert|3|m|ftin}} wide, and longer and wider than the Bombardier ART fleet used on the Expo and Millennium lines.<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 14, 2007 |title=Canada Line Fact Sheet The Canada Line Vehicle |url=http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/documents/20071214UpdatedFactSheetNo.1CanadaLineVehicle.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326090147/http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/documents/20071214UpdatedFactSheetNo.1CanadaLineVehicle.pdf |archive-date=March 26, 2009 |access-date=June 16, 2015 |publisher=canadaline.ca (TransLink)}}</ref> Each train has LED electronic displays on the exterior to indicate the terminus station and on the interior to display the next station and the terminus station, a useful feature considering the line has two branches.
In total twenty fully-automated articulated trains are on order. Capacity of the new trains is estimated at 334 people, with a top speed of 80 km/h. Married pairs of gangway connected cars will be 41 metres long and 3 metres wide, both longer and wider than the [[Bombardier Advanced Rapid Transit|ART]] fleet used by the current [[Vancouver SkyTrain|SkyTrain]] lines, and will have electronic ‘Next Destination’ signs on each train.


In 2018, twelve additional trainsets were ordered by Translink from Hyundai Rotem at a cost of $88 million to increase capacity on the line.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chan |first=Kenneth |date=February 24, 2018 |title=TransLink accelerates full order of 80 new SkyTrain cars by 2020 |url=https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/translink-new-skytrain-cars-2020 |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=Daily Hive - Urbanized |language=en}}</ref> The sole-source contract allowed for commonality between the two train models, and reduced the number of specialized tools and parts required.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://service.ariba.com/Discovery.aw/ad/viewRFX?id=4931583 |title=NOI-Customized Train Cars |website=service.ariba.com |access-date=February 13, 2018}}</ref> These were delivered in 2019 and 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Saltman |first=Jennifer |date=July 22, 2019 |title=New Canada Line cars headed for Vancouver |url=https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/new-canada-line-cars-headed-for-vancouver |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=Vancouver Sun |language=en-CA}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Little |first=Simon |date=January 21, 2020 |title=Metro Vancouver's Canada Line adds first 4 of dozen new trains, boosting service |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/6442509/metro-vancouvers-canada-line-adds-first-4-of-dozen-new-trains-boosting-service/ |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=Global News |language=en-US}}</ref>
==Controversies==
The plans for the new line have generated much controversy. Opponents have claimed that the approval process was undemocratic and dishonest. They say that the projected ridership figures were grossly inflated <ref>[http://nid-66.newsdetail.bc.ndp.ca/ Come clean on RAV line, MacPhail tells Campbell][http://thetyee.ca/Views/2005/11/28/RAVReward/ Larry Campbell's RAV Reward]</ref>, which will mean that taxpayers and transit riders passengers will have to cover the shortfall in revenue, that the official claim that the project had nothing to do with Vancouver's bid to host the [[2010 Winter Olympics]] was not credible.<ref>[http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/displayarticle464.html Privatization: Cabinet leak proves Liberals will do anything for a P3]</ref>


=== Canada Line Hyundai Rotem specifications ===
Many people believe that it would be more cost-effective to run the line down the rail corridor that already exists along Arbutus Street and is currently zoned for transit use. The transit planners, however, said that the Arbutus corridor does not have the major concentration of transit destinations and origins that exist along the Cambie Street corridor and are necessary to provide the ridership required for this project to be successful. Also the Arbutus corridor is longer than the Cambie corridor and would cause longer travel times. The City of Vancouver wants to run a future streetcar line down the Arbutus corridor and recently won a Supreme Court of Canada decision against the CPR upholding the City's right to rezone the lands for a transportation corridor (the CPR had wanted to develop the corridor with housing).


* Car builder: [[Hyundai Rotem]], South Korea<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
The construction of street-level [[light rail]] trams would have been significantly cheaper than the proposed system, which requires grade separation (tunnels or elevated lines), but the operation cost and the City of Vancouver made it clear they would oppose any grade-level transit along the Cambie Street corridor. Also, the contributions by the federal government and the airport authority were contingent on service times that such a system would not have been able to achieve.
* Car body: brushed [[stainless steel]], with a [[Polyvinyl chloride|vinyl]] wrap at the outer ends
* Unit numbers: pairs numbered 1xx and 2xx where xx increments from 01 to 32
* Fleet of: 32 two-car train sets<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* Train length: {{convert|41|m|ftin|abbr=on}}<ref name="Fact Sheet">{{cite web |url=http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/documents/20071214UpdatedFactSheetNo.1CanadaLineVehicle.pdf |title=Canada Line Fact Sheet The Canada Line Vehicle |publisher=canadaline.ca (TransLink) |date=December 14, 2007 |access-date=June 16, 2015 |page=2 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326090147/http://vancouver.ca/engsvcs/transport/rto/canadaline/documents/20071214UpdatedFactSheetNo.1CanadaLineVehicle.pdf |archive-date=March 26, 2009}}</ref>
* Car width: {{convert|3|m|ftin|abbr=on}}<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* Car height: {{convert|3.6|m|ftin|abbr=on}}<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* [[Track gauge]]: {{track gauge|sg|allk=on}}
* Total weight: {{convert|76|t}} (empty)<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* [[Ground propulsion|Propulsion system]]: Mitsubishi Electric (MELCO) [[Alternating current|AC]] [[traction motor]]s<ref>{{cite web |url=https://bc.mbta.com/uploadedfiles/Business_Center/Bidding_and_Solicitations/Hyundai%20Part%208%20-%20Section%20B-5,%20Tab%20I.3%20(Past%20Performance).pdf |title=RFP No. CAP 27-10 New Orange and Red Line Vehicles |publisher=Hyundai Rotem |archive-date=August 21, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210821014824/https://bc.mbta.com/uploadedfiles/Business_Center/Bidding_and_Solicitations/Hyundai%20Part%208%20-%20Section%20B-5,%20Tab%20I.3%20(Past%20Performance).pdf}}</ref>
* Max. speed: {{convert|80|km/h|mph|abbr=on}}<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* [[Electric power|Power]]: 750 [[Volt|V]] [[Direct current|DC]]<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* [[Railway brake|Braking system]]: [[Railway air brake|Pneumatic]] wheel [[Disc brake#Railroad and tram use|disc brake]]<ref name="Fact Sheet" />
* Capacity (per train set): 342 passengers (41 seats)<ref name="Project Record">{{cite web |title=Railway Systems-Project Record View |url=https://www.hyundai-rotem.co.kr/Eng/Business/Rail/Business_Record_View.asp?brid=64 |website=Hyundai-Rotem |publisher=Hyundai Rotem |access-date=January 8, 2017}}</ref>
* Capacity: 5,000 to 15,000 passengers per hour
* Coupling/numbering arrangement: All [[Drawbar (haulage)#Rail|married]] pairs.
* [[Railway signalling|Signalling system]]: [[moving block]] controlled by [[Linienzugbeeinflussung#Cable loops|cable Loop]], [[Thales Rail Signalling Solutions]] from Toronto, Ontario<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thalesgroup.com/Markets/Security/Documents/Main_CBTC_references/?LangType=2057 |title=Urban Rail Signalling Projects |publisher=Thales Group |access-date=October 9, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120512112950/http://www.thalesgroup.com/Markets/Security/Documents/Main_CBTC_references/?LangType=2057 |archive-date=May 12, 2012}}</ref>


== Name ==
It is claimed that the portion of the cost of this line that TransLink is covering will be at the expense of improving bus service in Greater Vancouver. As the funding is likely to be provided by property taxes collected from throughout the Lower Mainland, this would mean that many communities that would be most hurt by the funding crunch (such as the North Shore, which is served primarily by buses and ageing [[SeaBus]]es which need to be replaced) could end up paying for a disproportionate share. (The western North Shore municipalities have the highest real estate prices in the Lower Mainland and therefore the highest property taxes.)


During the planning and public consultation stages, the line was known as the "Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Line", or RAV for short. The name "Canada Line" was adopted in 2005 to coincide with the beginning of construction.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2005/05-h264e.htm |title=Canada Line Launcher As Partners Unveil Vehicle |publisher=Transport Canada |date=September 25, 2005 |access-date=June 10, 2009 |quote=The Honourable David L. Emerson... gathered to unveil the Canada Line name and the vehicle design for the Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Rapid Transit Project. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090918115455/http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2005/05-h264e.htm |archive-date=September 18, 2009}}</ref> Some early documents also refer to it as the "Olympic Line",<ref name="marigni">{{cite web |url=http://www.marigni.com/olympicline.pdf |title=The Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Rapid link Project: The RAVP/Olympic line |access-date=June 10, 2009 |date=January 2003 |first1=Viven |last1=Chiu |first2=Patrick |last2=Rault |publisher=Study Marigni |quote=With the Whistler-Vancouver Olympic bid, this issue has been put under pressure, and the name of this line is temporarily chosen accordingly, in this study. Like recommended by previous studies, this study considers a line opening in phase with the 2010 Olympic game, it must be clear that the rail link need is studied independently of the Olympic bid, and its realization should not be tied to the Olympic bid success.... The Olympic line is considered as a regional link more than a local service. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714033859/http://www.marigni.com/olympicline.pdf |archive-date=July 14, 2011}}</ref> in recognition of the [[2010 Winter Olympics]], continuing the practice by which the Expo and Millennium lines were named after significant events occurring at the time of construction. This name was adopted for the demonstration modern [[Tram|streetcar]] service that operated along the [[Vancouver Downtown Historic Railway|Downtown Historic Railway]] for a two-month period centred on the Olympics.<ref>{{cite web |title=Olympic Line |publisher=The City of Vancouver |url=http://olympichostcity.vancouver.ca/gettingaround/publictransit/olympic-line/ |access-date=June 7, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100408222502/http://olympichostcity.vancouver.ca/gettingaround/publictransit/olympic-line/ |archive-date=April 8, 2010}}</ref>
Opponents of the RAV line's public-private partnership believe it was politically motivated and that it will cost more money because of the private involvement. The private involvement has, however, allowed for the costs to be known and largely fixed up-front.


== Timeline ==
Although the contract is supposed to ensure that no cost over-runs are passed on to TransLink and thus the public, there is a concern that it may somehow cost the public more in the future. The primary risk to TransLink is that it is required to guarantee 90% of projected ridership and to make up the shortfall in revenue if this is not achieved. The other potential risk would be if TransLink were to cause delays in the project by not meeting their responsibilities; they might be required to pay the costs for these delays and to ensure that the project is completed in time.


* Between 1990 and 1992, BC Transit and [[WSP Global|N.&nbsp;D. Lea]] (now WSP Global) consultants studied intermediate-capacity transit system options in the Vancouver–Richmond corridor.<ref>Summary of Intermediate Capacity Transit System Studies, 10-year Development Plan 1995–2006, BC Transit, Stephen Gardner and Glen Leicester, March 1995, page 11</ref>
Another controversy arose after the contract was awarded. InTransitBC's winning proposal included [[cut and cover|cut-and-cover]] [[tunnel]] along Cambie Street under the northbound roadway, rather than the theoretical bored tunnel that had been previously discussed in public consultations. This construction method was not widely publicized until the environmental review process. Business owners along Cambie Street feel that digging up the street to build this tunnel would significantly affect traffic and force many smaller businesses to close. The contractor maintains cut-and-cover will be cheaper, with less construction uncertainty, and that the stations will now be much closer to the surface and therefore more accessible. InTransitBC's winning bid also allowed extension of the tunnel to 64th Avenue, well past the minimum requirement of 49th Avenue set out in the RFP. Placing the tunnel under the roadway also saved excavation of the treed median, as was proposed in the RAVxpress's proposal for a permanent open trench in the median for the guideway south of 49th Avenue. The original InTransitBC cut and cover proposal was to use precast tunnel segments, but this has since been changed to cast in place sections, since precast sections must be connected linearly from one end to the other, and with the tight time frames, the ability of cast in place construction to be built in a piecemeal fashion (i.e. if unforeseen delays were encountered along the route) provided more flexibility for the construction schedule.
* From September 1991 through August 1993, the TRANSPORT 2021 Steering Committee carried out an extensive program of research and public consultation to create "A Long Range Transportation Plan for Greater Vancouver". Under Project Director M. L. (Martin Crilly), a comprehensive transportation investment and financing strategy was envisioned for the region. Until today all existing and proposed road and transit investments have been put forth in this plan. The plan calls for the provision of an intermediate-capacity transit system from Richmond to Vancouver's central business district.<ref>A Long-Range Transportation Plan for Greater Vancouver, Transport 2021 Report, September 1993, 65 pages, A joint Project of the GVRD and the Province of British Columbia</ref>
* In fall of 1994, N.&nbsp;D. Lea and [[Delcan]] consultants carried out studies examining technologies, operating feasibility, ridership, capital and operating costs, traffic impacts, and development potential in three corridors, including the Richmond–Vancouver corridor. These studies were prepared as input into BC Transit's 10-Year Development Plan. They did not include a spur line to the Vancouver International Airport.<ref>Summary of Intermediate Capacity Transit System Studies, 10-year Development Plan 1995–2006, preface</ref>
* In 1995, BC Transit (a crown corporation responsible for public transit) expressed a desire to create a special [[bus rapid transit]] (BRT) or automated rapid transit (ART) service connecting the cities of [[Richmond, British Columbia|Richmond]] and [[Vancouver]] and the [[Vancouver International Airport]] in one of the transit improvement plans.
** Underground rights-of-way were reserved at the Concord Pacific development close to the Cambie bridge.
* From mid-1997 to mid-1998 a number of BRT routes for Vancouver-airport/Richmond were evaluated, and the preferred route and station locations were selected.<ref>98BLine_BRT_Evaluation Study, September 1993, page 6, IBI group, Transport Canada</ref>
* June 24, 1998, the minister in charge of BC Transit, [[Joy MacPhail]], announced plans to build a Vancouver–Richmond ALRT: "The new line would link Richmond city centre, the airport and Downtown Vancouver—probably running north-south through Vancouver along the Cambie Street corridor." "MacPhail said the province wants to accelerate the construction of rapid transit to Richmond as part of a bid to bring the 2010 Winter Olympics to the Lower Mainland."<ref>Skytrain line to Airport Proposed, Vancouver Sun, June 25, 1998, by Scott Simpson</ref>
* In 1999, detailed design of the Vancouver-Airport/Richmond BRT was carried out.
* On April 1, 1999, The Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink) was created under the direction of CEO Ken Dobell, previously city manager for the City of Vancouver.
* In April 2000, TransLink adopted its Strategic Transportation Plan 2000–2005. The plan noted that future transit lines have equal priority, and recommended the planning and design of a Richmond-Airport-Vancouver (RAV) rapid transit line.
* May 2000 saw the approval of the RAV study, while construction had begun on the BRT service between Richmond Centre, Airport Station exchange, and downtown Vancouver.
* In 2000, a Transport Canada report on rail access to the airport estimated it would cost $1.3{{nbsp}}billion for a SkyTrain expansion using the Cambie route and $738{{nbsp}}million for a light rail system along the Arbutus corridor.<ref>Richmond-downtown link on transit wish list, Vancouver Sun, Amy O'Brian, December 5, 2002</ref>
* In December 2000, TransLink received the report on public-private partnerships for road and transportation infrastructure, the model that would be used to finance, construct, and operate the new Canada Line.
* On April 1, 2001, bus operators and other CMBC employees went on strike, delaying full implementation of the Vancouver-Airport-Richmond BRT by four months.
* That same month, TransLink reaffirmed a Vancouver–Richmond line including a connection to the airport, and approved a recommendation by the TransLink CEO that, based on greater benefits from a private-sector perspective and community concerns, at-grade rail transit be excluded from further analysis and that analysis in Vancouver be restricted to underground options.
* On August 1, 2001, the 98 B-Line BRT service began service in the corridor, ultimately carrying over 20,000 passengers per day, while plans were already under way for an ART service to replace it. This proposed service was projected to carry over 100,000 passengers per day.
* On December 10, 2001, the federal government under Jean Chrétien announced over $2.0{{nbsp}}billion in funding for large infrastructure projects; the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund established by this budget would fund the federal government's contribution to the Canada Line. The government stipulated that the fund promote private-public partnerships where appropriate.<ref>Bill C-49, Budget Implementation Act, 2001, Part 6,37th parliament, 1st session.</ref>
* In April 2002, work was started on the third phase, project definition. This ten-month task consisted of a technical evaluation to determine if it was possible to build the line by 2010.
* In 2003, ten companies or consortia submitted expressions of interest in the project.
* In December 2003, this was shortlisted to the following three consortia, which were given a request for proposal:
** RAVLink Transportation, which included [[Fluor Corp.|Fluor Canada]], [[Siemens AG]] Canada, [[MTR Corporation]], and [[Balfour Beatty]] Capital Projects;
** RAVxpress, which included [[Bombardier Transportation|Bombardier]], [[AMEC]], [[Bouygues]] Travaux Publics, and [[Bilfinger Berger]]; and
** SNC-Lavalin/Serco, which included [[SNC-Lavalin]] and [[Serco]].
* On April 16, 2004, the federal government under Prime Minister Paul Martin increased its funding promise from $300&nbsp;million to $450&nbsp;million.<ref>Frances Bula, Secret plan to explain federal RAV funds, Vancouver Sun, October 4, 2004</ref><ref>RAV line resurrected as B.C. offers to cover cost overruns, Vancouver Sun, Nicholas Read, Ayesha Bhatty, and Jim Beatty, June 11, 2004</ref>
* On June 10, 2004, the provincial government restated its commitment to the Canada Line, increasing funding from $300 to $370&nbsp;million, and earmarked $170&nbsp;million for the Evergreen Line.<ref>Hop Aboard, RAV proponents urge, Gordon Campbell, Vancouver Sun, June 17, 2004</ref><ref>The Road Less Travelled, TransLink's Improbable Journey from 1999 to 2008, Trevor Wales, 2008, page 43, says it occurred in October 2004</ref>
* On June 30, 2004, after twice voting to cancel the project, the TransLink Board approved the RAV line but maintained the right to cancel the project if none of the bids met the approved budget of $1.35&nbsp;billion.
* On November 19, 2004, RAVCO recommended that the [[SNC-Lavalin]]/[[Serco]] (now known as InTransitBC) proposal for a fully automated, grade-separated system be accepted. This "best and final offer" bid was $343&nbsp;million over the approved budget. The project was, however, brought within the funding allowance through various cost-trimming measures, including design changes, the contractor agreeing to lower its bid, and the province contributing another $65&nbsp;million.
* On December 1, 2004, the TransLink board gave final approval for the project.
* On July 29, 2005, the final contract to design, build, and operate the RAV Line was signed by InTransitBC and TransLink. Serco was no longer a partner to InTransitBC, and two pension funds were brought into the partnership.
* In October 2005, the utilities relocation and road work was started.
* On November 25, 2005, the design of the new trains was unveiled, and [[Hyundai Rotem]] was announced as the supplier of the trains. It was announced that the new line would be called the Canada Line as a funding condition from the federal government.<ref name=":0">{{cite press release |url=http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2005/05-h264e.htm |title=Canada Line launched as partners unveil vehicle |date=November 25, 2005 |access-date=December 17, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090918115455/http://www.tc.gc.ca/mediaroom/releases/nat/2005/05-h264e.htm |archive-date=September 18, 2009}}</ref>
* The line opened at 1&nbsp;p.m. local time on August 17, 2009, on budget and three and a half months ahead of schedule, and six months ahead of the [[2010 Winter Olympics]] held in Vancouver. It began normal revenue service on the following day.
* On September 30, 2009, it was announced that the Canada Line had seen an average of 82,500 passengers per day since opening, putting it well on track to reach its ridership target of 100,000 per day within two years.<ref name="marketwire.com" />
* On December 28, 2009, it was revealed that the average daily ridership (including weekends) has grown to 93,000 and has occasionally exceeded 100,000, three years ahead of expectations.<ref name="Canada Line Delivers a Smooth Ride">{{cite news |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/canada-line-delivers-a-smooth-ride/article1413646/ |work=[[The Globe and Mail]] |location=Canada |title=Canada Line Delivers a Smooth Ride |date=December 28, 2009 |access-date=December 28, 2009}}</ref>
* On February 5, 2010, ridership reached a (then) record of 135,000 during a campaign to encourage residents to use transit prior to the Olympics.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://vancouversun.com/Vancouver+drivers+urged+forgo+cars+when+viaducts+close+this+week/2514368/story.html |date=February 2, 2010 |work=Vancouver Sun |title=Vancouver drivers urged to forgo cars when viaducts close this week |access-date=October 4, 2018 |archive-date=October 27, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171027024823/http://www.vancouversun.com/Vancouver+drivers+urged+forgo+cars+when+viaducts+close+this+week/2514368/story.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> Further single-day records included 157,000 on February 11, 2010,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/translink/status/9033164024 |title=Twitter / TransLink BC: Record day on Canada Line |publisher=[[Twitter.com]] |date=February 12, 2010 |access-date=May 19, 2012}}</ref> and 210,000 on February 15, 2010, with all 20 trains running.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://buzzer.translink.ca/index.php/2010/02/a-huge-weekend-for-transit-plus-canada-line-increases-trains-today/#comments |title=The Buzzer blog " A huge weekend for transit, plus Canada Line increases trains today |publisher=Buzzer.translink.ca |date=February 15, 2010 |access-date=May 19, 2012}}</ref>
* Overall, the [[2010 Winter Olympics]] saw the Canada Line's ridership increase by 118 percent to an average of 228,190 per day for 17 days, with a single-day record of 287,400 on February 19, 2010. Its regular non-Olympic ridership was stated as being 104,674 per weekday.<ref name="duringolympics" />
* In February 2011, Translink revealed that the average daily ridership of the Canada Line had grown to 110,000 per day.<ref name="Rise in transit">{{cite web |title=Rise in transit use called Olympic legacy |url=http://www.bclocalnews.com/surrey_area/surreyleader/news/115777789.html |publisher=BC Local News |access-date=February 11, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707215629/http://www.bclocalnews.com/surrey_area/surreyleader/news/115777789.html |archive-date=July 7, 2011}}</ref>
* In September 2021, construction began on [[Capstan station]] at Capstan Way; the station opened in December 2024.<ref>{{cite news |last=Little |first=Simon |date=December 20, 2024 |title=Canada Line's Capstan Station officially opens in Richmond |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/10928453/capstan-station-canada-line-open/ |work=Global News |access-date=December 20, 2024}}</ref>


== Project funding ==
Serco left the InTransitBC partnership with no public explanation as to why. InTransitBC has brought in additional "private" partners comprising public pension fund management companies to help finance InTransitBC's share of the project (now upwards of $700 million) following increases in construction costs. There are those who feel that since the main purpose these companies was to guarantee the loans and help finance the project, the public ownership of the public pension fund management companies exposes the public to additional risk, therefore reducing the main advantage of a Public-Private Partnership (that is that private companies assume the financial risk of cost over-runs). The pension funds involved are British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (bcIMC), who manage the BC Public Service Pension funds, and Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (Caisse), who manage the Quebec Public Service Pension funds.


The Canada Line was built as a [[public-private partnership]]. Funding was provided by both government agencies and a private partner, the proponent. As of March 2009, the entire project was expected to cost $2.054&nbsp;billion. The premier of BC stated that the project was on budget and ahead of schedule.<ref>Press release, Office of the Premier, March 27, 2009</ref> When approved in December 2004, the cost was given as $1.76&nbsp;billion.<ref name="Jonathan Fowlie 2004">Richmond keeps RAV on track, Joel Baglole and Jonathan Fowlie, with files from Jim Beatty and Frances Bula. The Vancouver Sun, November 30, 2004, pg. B.2</ref>
==Name of the line==
Initially called the "'''RAV Line'''", the line is now officially known as the "'''Canada Line'''".


The public contributions to the budget come from the following sources:
Other names were also considered:
*'''Olympic Line''': Although not officially tied to the [[2010 Winter Olympics]], hosting the Olympics was a part of the rationale for building the line.
*'''RAV Line''': The Richmond-Airport-Vancouver line.


* [[Government of Canada]]: $450&nbsp;million
==See also==
* Government of [[British Columbia]]: $435&nbsp;million
* [[98 B-Line]]
* [[Vancouver International Airport|Vancouver Airport]] Authority: $300{{nbsp}}million
* [[TransLink (British Columbia)|TransLink]]: $334&nbsp;million
* City of [[Vancouver]]: $29&nbsp;million<ref>TransLink Annual Report 2008, page 64</ref>


These sums are all in 2006 dollars, except for the government of Canada's contribution, which will be paid out when constructed, and is estimated to be equivalent of $419&nbsp;million 2003 dollars.<ref>[http://www.canadaline.ca/uploads/NewsReleases/News113.pdf Canada Line Final Project Report: Competitive Selection Phase, Final Assessment of Value for Money] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071025125609/http://www.canadaline.ca/uploads/NewsReleases/News113.pdf |date=October 25, 2007}}, July 29, 2005, figure 3, page 15</ref>
==Notes==
<div class="references-small"><references /></div>


The private partner was expected to contribute $200&nbsp;million, and be responsible for any construction cost overruns.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.canadaline.ca/aboutUs.asp |title=About Us |publisher=InTransitBC |access-date=December 17, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070203063053/http://www.canadaline.ca/aboutUs.asp |archive-date=February 3, 2007}}</ref> As of November 7, 2009, InTransitBC has invested $750&nbsp;million. InTransitBC is a joint venture company owned by SNC-Lavalin, the Investment Management Corporation of BC ({{notatypo|bcIMC}}), and the [[Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec]].<ref>[http://www.intransitbc.ca/about-intransitbc.html About] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090531011429/http://www.intransitbc.ca/about-intransitbc.html |date=May 31, 2009}}, InTransitBC</ref><ref>[http://www.richmond.ca/__shared/assets/Canada_Line_Info_Bulletin_1413140.pdf Canada Line Info Bulletin No. 14] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706202230/http://www.richmond.ca/__shared/assets/Canada_Line_Info_Bulletin_1413140.pdf |date=July 6, 2011}} March 3, 2006. Information on the nature of the public/private partnership.</ref>
==External links==
*[http://www.canadaline.ca/ Canada Line ] - Project Site by RAVCO
*http://www.policyalternatives.ca/documents/BC_Office_Pubs/rav.pdf - Report on project by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
*[http://www.translink.bc.ca/Plans_Projects/Richmond_Airport/default.asp Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Rapid Transit] - TransLink's page for the line.
*[http://www.translink.bc.ca/ TransLink] - The regional transportation authority of the [[Greater Vancouver Regional District]].
* [http://www.doravright.ca/ Do RAV Right] - A coalition of businesses affected by the proposal for a cut and cover tunnel along Cambie Street.
* [http://www.marigni.com/olympicline.pdf A 2003 study]
* [http://www.translink.bc.ca/About_TransLink/News_Releases/news05090601.asp Press release on station names - May 9, 2006]


The BC government had committed $370&nbsp;million, but when the bid came in over budget, it contributed an extra $65&nbsp;million. TransLink also put in extra money by committing money from the sale of the Sexsmith Park and Ride in Richmond and from the introduction of a special fare in the Airport Zone.<ref name="Jonathan Fowlie 2004" />
{{SkyTrain Stations}}


In November 2004, bid costs were reduced by postponing the construction of a walkway between Waterfront station and the cruise ship terminal, removing Westminster station, and moving Richmond Centre station and the end of the line several hundred metres north. TransLink would further pay for the cost of reinstallation of the trolley wires along Cambie. As a way to further reduce the best and final offer, RAVCO no longer required that the proponent provide for 59 ticket vending machines and 38 ticket validating machines or for a police unit to operate on the RAV line. RAVCO also shifted responsibility for moving trolley wires from SNC-Lavalin to TransLink.<ref>RAV line builder shaves ,2m off price: 'I think we have a fully financed project': McCallum, Jonathan Fowlie, The Vancouver Sun, November 29, 2004. pg. A.1.</ref> Costs were also decreased due to decisions to single-track sections on the Richmond and airport branches. The Richmond branch was single-tracked from Ackroyd Road onward in large part due to Richmond's city council pressuring for the visual profile of the overhead line to be reduced for esthetic reasons.
[[Category:Airport rail links|Vancouver]]

[[Category:Canadian regional rail systems]]
On July 11, 2006, a decision was made to relocate Broadway station half a block north at a cost of $3{{nbsp}}million to allow for better integration of the station with Broadway and a new development in the area. The funding was provided as follows: one third from the City of Vancouver, one third from TransLink, and one third from surplus funding available to CLCO.<ref>Vancouver council minutes, July 11, 2006</ref>
[[Category:TransLink (Vancouver)]]

[[Category:Transportation in Greater Vancouver]]
In February 2007, TransLink approved the addition of a pedestrian and bicycle path to the Canada Line Bridge and agreed not to postpone the construction of a station at 2nd Avenue (Olympic Village station), but instead build it to be ready when the line opens. The $10{{nbsp}}million cost of the bridge bike path was paid for by TransLink and not considered part of the cost of the Canada Line. The Olympic Village station cost an additional $29{{nbsp}}million.<ref name="luba">RAV bridge to take pedestrians, Frank Luba, The Province, February 17, 2005. pg. A.21</ref>

RAVCO was set up by the agencies funding the transit line to oversee project design, procurement, construction, and implementation. This TransLink subsidiary, later renamed Canada Line Rapid Transit Inc (CLCO), made distributions to the builder as work progressed.

The table below lists the year-by-year contributions (in millions of dollars) made by various governments on a year-by-year basis up to December 31, 2008.<ref>TransLink annual report 2006, 2007 and 2008</ref><ref>Airport authority Annual Report 2006, 2007, 2008</ref> Contributions by TransLink are total disbursements minus contributions from the City of Vancouver, the government of British Columbia, and the government of Canada. Calculations show that TransLink has contributed $271{{nbsp}}million to date. It has committed an additional $52{{nbsp}}million in its 2009 budget.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Year
! Vancouver
! BC government
! Canadian government
! Total disbursements through TransLink
! Airport disbursements
|-
| 2008
| $7.1
| $59.6
| $93.4
| $163.2
| $46.8
|-
| 2007
| $14.9
| $58.4
| $167.4
| $336.7
| $94.6
|-
| 2006
| $6.9
| $17.2
| $125.6
| $322.5
| $108.4
|-
| 2005
| $1.1
| $117.1
| $108.9
| $209.4
| $15.7
|}

The private sector will operate the line for 35 years in return for a share of its operating revenue.

In early 2006, TransLink decided not to install turnstiles at Canada Line stations, but stations would be designed to accommodate controlled access to allow TransLink to install them for less cost if it wished to do so in the future.<ref>Canada Line Fact Sheet No. January 22, 24, 2006</ref> On April 9, 2009, TransLink, the provincial government, and the government of Canada announced joint funding of $100&nbsp;million to introduce turnstiles at all 49 SkyTrain stations.<ref>[https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/no-turnstiles-for-skytrains-until-2012-1.862286 No turnstiles for SkyTrains until 2012], August 14, 2009, British Columbia, CBC News</ref> While a large portion of this funding will be used on the Expo and Millennium Lines, a portion will be used on the Canada Line stations. The federal government is contributing $30&nbsp;million and the province is adding $40&nbsp;million toward fare gates, or controlled access gates.

== Construction ==
{{unreferenced section|date=May 2021}}
Construction began in October 2005 and was completed in August 2009.

At initial completion, the line comprised the following construction elements:

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right"
!Segment type
!Length
|-
| Tunnel || {{convert|9080|m|abbr=on|disp=br()}}
|-
| Elevated || {{convert|7349|m|abbr=on|disp=br()}}
|-
| Bridge || {{convert|614|m|abbr=on|disp=br()}}
|-
| At-grade || {{convert|1385|m|abbr=on|disp=br()}}
|}

In addition to the {{convert|18.4|km}} of track above, there are about {{convert|500|m}} of track in the OMC.

<gallery mode="packed" heights="150px">
File:Canada Line cut and cover construction 2007.JPG|Cut and cover construction on Cambie Street just south of 25th Avenue, February 23, 2007
File:Canada Line Construction, Vancouver, Cambie Street at 25th.jpg|Cut and cover construction on Cambie Street just north of 25th Avenue, February 23, 2007
File:Canada Line Construction 2007, Vancouver, BC.jpg|Cut and cover construction on Cambie Street between 41st and 49th Avenue, June 7, 2007
File:Canada Line Construction Vancouver 2007 Cambie and 41st.jpg|Cut and cover construction on Cambie Street at Cambie and 41st Avenue, June 7, 2007
File:Elevated guideway construction, YVR, Nov 18, 2006.jpg|Elevated guideway construction at YVR, November 18, 2006
File:Span to span launching or overhead cantilever truss system.PNG|Graphical representation of movement of truss system used to install guideway segments
File:Elevated guideway construction, YVR, Nov 18, 2006, end view.jpg| Elevated guideway construction at YVR, November 18, 2006, end view
File:Guideway segment installation, September 30, 2006.jpg|Detail of crane component of overhead cantilever truss system, September 30, 2006, near Sea Island Centre
File:Canada Line TBM Installation, June 10, 2006, 3.jpg|TBM installation in preparation for boring tunnel under False Creek June 10, 2006
File:TBM Installation, June 10, 2006.jpg|TBM installation apparently required construction of round portals on south side of excavation, June 10, 2006
File:Bored tunnel, Oct 5, 2006.jpg|Configuration of site reflects support for tunnelling operation underway under False Creek Inlet on October 5, 2006
File:TBM Installation, June 10, 2006, 2.jpg|Detail of [[tunnel boring machine]] showing wheels that allow the machine to roll along the round contoured concrete track. June 10, 2006.
</gallery>

== Controversies ==

Opponents have claimed that the approval process was undemocratic and dishonest. In 2004, critics said that the projected ridership figures were grossly inflated;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nid-66.newsdetail.bc.ndp.ca/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040228040432/http://nid-66.newsdetail.bc.ndp.ca/ |archive-date=February 28, 2004 |title=Come clean on RAV line, MacPhail tells Campbell][https://thetyee.ca/Views/2005/11/28/RAVReward/ Larry Campbell's RAV Reward |publisher=BC NDP |access-date=February 13, 2018}}</ref> ridership projections were exceeded in 2010 and subsequent years.<ref name=":3" /><ref name="New record" /> Opponents also argued that the official claim that the project had nothing to do with Vancouver's bid to host the [[2010 Winter Olympics]] was not credible.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/cabinet-leak-proves-liberals-will-do-anything-for-a-p3 |title=Privatization: Cabinet leak proves Liberals will do anything for a P3 |publisher=Canadiandemocraticmovement.ca |date=October 4, 2004 |access-date=May 19, 2012 |archive-date=April 15, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120415083802/http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/cabinet-leak-proves-liberals-will-do-anything-for-a-p3/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>

=== Public-private partnerships ===

Opponents of the RAV line's public-private partnership (P3) believe it was politically motivated and that it will cost more money because of the private involvement. However, the private involvement allowed for construction costs to be known and fixed up front. After raising its contribution to $435&nbsp;million, the BC minister of transport and premier reaffirmed that this was the final contribution and that any cost overruns would be the responsibility of the proponent.<ref>Campbell's 'kaputski' on RAV line financing tops the list of keepers so far, Vaughn Palmer, The Vancouver Sun, December 3, 2004. p. A3</ref> The Canadian Union of Public Employees opposed the use of a P3 to design, build, and operate the Canada Line. The P3 process did not allow precise plans to be developed with public consultation, but limited discussion to certain abstract parameters, while leaving actual design details to the private partner.

=== Ridership projections ===

Before the building of the line, TransLink had projected that it would require a 100,000 passenger/day average to reach the "break even point". They also projected that it would take about three years for capacity to reach this point and that TransLink would be responsible for the loss. However, the Canada Line reached its projected ridership goal in late 2010, three years early.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sinoski |first=Kelly |date=June 2, 2010 |title=Canada Line races toward capacity |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/90468/canada-line-races-toward-capacity/ |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=Global News |language=en-US |quote=The line has been recording an average of 94,000 trips per day – just shy of its capacity of 100,000 riders, a number TransLink had not expected to reach until 2013.}}</ref> In 2017, TransLink CEO Kevin Desmond suggested that the Canada Line was underbuilt for its ridership, especially because more people moved into [[transit-oriented development]]s along the line following its completion.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Canada Line is definitely under-built, says TransLink CEO|url=https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/translink-2017-kevin-desmond-canada-line-built-skytrain|url-status=live|access-date=February 22, 2021|website=dailyhive.com|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171231235119/http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/translink-2017-kevin-desmond-canada-line-built-skytrain |archive-date=December 31, 2017 }}</ref> In 2019, former Vancouver city councillor Gord Price noted that the desire to have the line open in time for the 2010 Winter Olympics, as well as not exceeding the budget, led to cautious decision making.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kretzel |first=Lasia |date=August 16, 2019 |title=Canada Line changed direction of transit in Metro Vancouver: former councillor |url=https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2019/08/16/canada-line-10-years/ |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=CityNews Vancouver}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Molko |first=David |date=February 14, 2020 |title='Confidence' the biggest transportation legacy of Vancouver Olympics, experts say |url=https://bc.ctvnews.ca/confidence-the-biggest-transportation-legacy-of-vancouver-olympics-experts-say-1.4812541 |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=British Columbia |language=en}}</ref> In 2018, 20 additional trainsets were purchased to increase capacity on the line by 35 percent.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fong |first=Jim |date=January 21, 2020 |title=Canada Line increasing its commuter capacity by 35% by spring 2020 |url=https://bc.ctvnews.ca/canada-line-increasing-its-commuter-capacity-by-35-by-spring-2020-1.4777334 |access-date=April 26, 2023 |website=CTV News British Columbia |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":2" />

=== Alignment and grade separation ===

==== Vancouver ====

Although the latest proposal for rapid transit did not include an option for rapid transit down the Arbutus corridor along the abandoned CPR right of way, Vancouver council reopened debate on this issue. Given that the rail right of way is currently zoned for transit use with space available for transit lines, running the line down the Arbutus corridor may have been more cost-effective than tunnelling under Cambie. The planners and RAVCO, however, countered that the Arbutus corridor does not have the major concentration of transit destinations and origins that exist along the Cambie Street corridor, such as [[Vancouver City Hall]], [[Vancouver General Hospital]], [[Oakridge Centre]], and [[Langara College]], which are necessary to provide the ridership required for this project to be successful. Also the Arbutus corridor is longer than the Cambie corridor and would cause longer travel times. The Cambie corridor further had greater potential for future ridership growth.<ref>Community Consultation Discussion Guide and Feedback Form, March 2003, Translink and RAVP, p.9</ref>

The Project Definition Report further specified that any service had to be able to travel from Waterfront station in downtown Vancouver to the airport in 25 minutes or less. At-grade transit, either along Cambie or the Arbutus corridor, was ruled out as a result. The reason or origin for this exact requirement was not specified, although travel times were considered an important factor in attracting new riders and in retaining existing riders, who were now required to make an extra transfer relative to the existing bus service.

All partner contributions were made upon the specifications set in the Project Definition Report. Any "significant change" would allow each partner to reconsider its respective contribution. As the Arbutus corridor proposal could not meet the specifications, this could put participation of funding partners in jeopardy.

Residents along Cambie Boulevard created the Cambie Boulevard Heritage Society in 1994, which opposed any alteration to a wide green centre median that is currently a grassy area with various species of trees, including cherry trees donated by the City of Yokohama on occasion of the 1967 Canadian Centennial. The residents had already been mobilized in 1989 in response to the possibility of elevated rail along Cambie Boulevard.<ref>Cambie Boulevard trees leave activist smiling, Sandra Thomas, The Vancouver Courier, November 2, 2007</ref> In effect the residents were opposed to surface, trench, or elevated rail along much of Cambie Street. Even cut-and-cover construction raised concerns over construction impacts and temporary traffic diversions. Cost and ridership risks were also concerns to property tax–paying residents. Advertisements asked residents to join "to prevent Vancouver's worst traffic nightmare and from burdening ourselves and our children with unnecessary tax risks for years to come". The society suggested that the line instead be constructed along Arbutus, where its impact and cost would be minimal.<ref>Help Save Cambie Boulevard, and so much more, ''Vancouver Courier'', February 22, 2004, p. 21, paid ad</ref> Despite the society's concerns, one of the final two proposals for the Canada Line in 2004 involved a trench in the centre of Cambie Street from 49th to 64th Avenues.

On June 18, 2004, the TransLink Board voted 6–6 to oppose sending the project to the "best and final offer" stage. Opponents of the project favoured a proposal to build a line along the Cambie corridor involving a minimal amount of tunnelling, at a saving of about $300&nbsp;million over the previously fully grade-separated proposal. The province responded to the suggestion by withdrawing funding until after the 2010 Olympics; Minister of Transport Kevin Falcon said that such a change of scope could no longer be accommodated in the time left before 2010. Mayors and councillors sitting on the TransLink Board, however, could not come to an agreement on this alternate plan of action.<ref>''Vancouver Sun'', June 18, 19, 22</ref> The impasse created a stir in the business community, which joined together and called for the province to take over control of the project. "The Coalition FOR a Lower Mainland Rapid Transit Solution" in a newspaper ad called on the premier to "please rescue our rapid transit". The Vancouver Board of Trade, the Council of Tourism Associations, and Tourism Vancouver led the call on the premier.<ref>Business Coalition wants Victoria to take over RAV line, Brian Morton, ''Vancouver Sun'', June 23, 2004</ref> While the board ultimately voted to proceed, the incident had lasting repercussions for TransLink.

==== Richmond ====

When the results of the bidding process indicated that an elevated option in Richmond was the winning bid, Richmond council engaged in some last-minute opposition to the RAV line and refused to give RAVCO the green light.

Objections to the elevated line included its visual impact and the impact and cost of any extensions into Richmond. The line would have varied impact on businesses along No. 3 Road.



In November 2004, a survey of 11,750 people was conducted by RAVCO to determine if people in Richmond supported an elevated or at-grade service in Richmond. Of the respondents, 58 percent favoured an elevated option.<ref>Councillors say they could forego RAV, Jonathan Fowlie, Vancouver Sun, November 25, 2004</ref> [[File:98laneclosed.jpg|thumb|Closure and dismantling of 98 B-Line busway on No. 3 Road at Capstan Way to make way for Canada Line, April 2006]]

Even after the survey, however, another option was brought forward. On November 22, 2004, Richmond council considered whether an elevated guideway along No. 3 Road in Richmond was appropriate. If an at-grade service was not feasible, council had instructed staff to look into the possibility of relocating the elevated guideway further west, along Minoru Boulevard. In response, residents along Minoru Boulevard presented a petition containing 666 signatures opposing the Minoru alignment. In the petition they "indicated that if Translink and RAVCO were not prepared to construct an at-grade system on No. 3 Road, then the project should be abandoned in favour of bus service on No. 3 Road."<ref>Minutes, Richmond Council General Purpose Committee Meeting, November 22, 2004</ref>

When further surveys and public consultation conducted by city staff in December indicated that residents did not support the realignment along Minoru Boulevard, council was left to either turn down the development or support the best and final offer. They chose to go ahead with the project. As a final compromise, part of the elevated track in Richmond was single-tracked to reduce visual impact.

=== Impact on local businesses<span id="Impact on local businesses"></span> ===

[[File:Cambie Street cut, Dec 21, 2007.jpg|thumb|left|One side of the street was cut off from traffic and parking was affected.]]

[[File:Businessopen.png|thumb|right|The "business is open" logo]]

For the entire consultation process, it was assumed that any underground construction along the Cambie corridor would be by bored tunnel.{{Citation needed|date=July 2009}} It was only upon the publication of the winning bid that it became apparent that the portion of the line from 64th to 2nd Avenues would be constructed using cut-and-cover construction. This raised concern over the disruption of local business on [[Cambie Street]]. Businesses in [[Yaletown]] and No. 3 Road in Richmond would also be affected by the construction. Although construction in the downtown was mostly by bored tunnel, businesses in Yaletown were caught off guard when it turned out that Yaletown-Roundhouse station would be north of Pacific Boulevard on Davie Street, rather than south of Pacific Boulevard.<ref>Yaletown RAV stop stirs it up, William Boei, The Vancouver Sun, December 7, 2005. pg. B.2</ref> InTransitBC responded by launching an advertising campaign promoting local business on the line.<ref>{{cite press release |title=Business is open, are you? |publisher=InTransitBC |url=http://www.canadaline.ca/files/docs/BusinessIsOpenReleaseMarch202006.pdf |date=March 20, 2006 |access-date=March 9, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070217112255/http://www.canadaline.ca/files/docs/BusinessIsOpenReleaseMarch202006.pdf |archive-date=February 17, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Krangle |first=Karenn |work=Vancouver Sun |date=March 4, 2003 |title=Translink seeks public input on rapid Richmond route; [Final Edition] |page=B.2}}</ref> Despite these efforts, businesses on Cambie Street experienced significant loss of business. After numerous failed appeals to the provincial government for compensation, store operators unsuccessfully sued for compensation. However, since the completion of the Canada Line, the line has been linked to rising property values along Cambie Street and in Richmond.<ref name="G&M J10">{{cite news |last=Stuek |first=Wendy |date=January 10, 2011 |title=Canada Line workers to take strike vote |work=Globe and Mail |location=Canada |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/canada-line-workers-to-take-strike-vote/article1864945/ |url-status=dead |access-date=January 20, 2011 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130203215308/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/canada-line-workers-to-take-strike-vote/article1864945/ |archive-date=February 3, 2013}}</ref>

=== Impact on expansion of other transit options ===

It had been pointed out that construction of the Canada Line would do little to improve transit or alleviate congestion on the Broadway corridor to UBC, which serves more than 100,000 weekday trips on bus services, with many trips continuing to [[University of British Columbia]]. In addition, the [[Evergreen Extension]] rapid transit project was delayed (until 2016). As TransLink is solely responsible for funding bus operations, any shortage of funding may translate into cuts in bus service.

=== Hiring practices ===
{{POV section|date=July 2013}}

There were several labour disputes related to wages and unionization between employees and contractors working on the construction of the Canada Line. To excavate the final {{convert|2|km}} of the tunnel underneath the downtown core a crew of 36 Latin American workers were brought to Canada from Costa Rica, Ecuador and Colombia in April 2006. The employer, a joint partnership of SELI Canada and SNC (Pacific) engaged workers to assemble the tunnel boring machine (TBM) and begin excavations. Pay stubs and testimony evidence from the workers indicated that they were paid US$1,000 monthly in exchange for 65-hour work weeks (less than $4 per hour). The Latin Americans, all on temporary work permits, joined the Construction and Specialized Workers Unions Local 1611 and, in a majority vote, won union certification on June 23, 2006. This was the first time in Canadian history that a group of temporary foreign workers in the construction industry had successfully exercised their right to form a union. Before the union had a chance to begin collective bargaining, workers' wages were increased to $14.21 per hour and hours were reduced to 40 hours per week with overtime concessions as required by BC labour law. The union was not consulted, and the unilateral pay raise led to an unfair labour practice complaint from the CSWU 1611. The BC Labour Relations Board (BCLRB) sided with the employer's (SELI–SNCP) explanation that there had been a mistake in calculations of wages during the months before the workers voted to join the union. The employer stalled negotiations for a collective agreement until they were ordered back to the bargaining table in August 2006 by the BCLRB.<ref>Mark Brown, BCLRB vice-chair, July 30, 2006 "The Employer cannot simply refuse to meet to bargain collectively based on its view of the Union's applications. The Employer cannot set preconditions to the commencement of collective bargaining. In doing so, the Employer has violated Sections 11 and Section 47 (the requirement to bargain in good faith and begin bargaining within 10 days of certification) of the BC Labour Code." Brown ordered the Employer to meet with the union within 10 days.</ref>

In September, bargaining broke down. On September 21, 2006, CSWU 1611 workers threatened a strike vote to bring the employer back to the bargaining table.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Labour strife plagues Canada Line construction|work=CKNW News Talk 980|url=http://www.cknw.com/news/news_local.cfm?cat=7428545912&rem=48044&red=80154523aPBIny&wids=410&gi=1&gm=news_local.cfm|access-date=October 19, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927064705/http://www.cknw.com/news/news_local.cfm?cat=7428545912&rem=48044&red=80154523aPBIny&wids=410&gi=1&gm=news_local.cfm|archive-date=September 27, 2007}}</ref>

After almost two years of litigation, the BC Labour Relations Board ruled against the union's claims of unfair labour practices.<ref>http://www.lrb.bc.ca/decisions/B040$2008.pdf {{Dead link|date=February 2022}}</ref>

In a separate complaint, the union claimed discrimination against the workers based on their country of origin. Even with the newly imposed wage of $14.21 per hour, the Latin Americans were earning half the wages of European (Italian, Spanish and Portuguese) workers with whom they worked alongside and performed the same underground TBM operations.

On November 9, 2007, the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruled that the Latin American workers had been intimidated to sign a petition against being represented by their union.<ref>{{Cite news|title=BC transit line builders coerced workers, tribunal rules|publisher=Canadian Broadcasting Corporation|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-transit-line-builders-coerced-workers-tribunal-rules-1.675329=|access-date=December 23, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Official document on the ruling|work=BC Human Rights Tribunal|url=http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/decisions/2007/pdf/nov/423_CSWU_Local_1611_v_SELI_Canada_and_others_(No_3)_2007_BCHRT_423.pdf|access-date=December 23, 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923182848/http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/decisions/2007/pdf/nov/423_CSWU_Local_1611_v_SELI_Canada_and_others_(No_3)_2007_BCHRT_423.pdf|archive-date=September 23, 2015}}</ref> The tribunal found that the workers were intimidated and coerced to sign a petition in the fear of possibly losing future job prospects with their employer. The petition would have prevented them from being represented by a union before the tribunal and would also have created evidence that could have jeopardized the ongoing investigation by the tribunal over perceived discrimination.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Canada Line companies intimidated foreign workers: Tribunal|work=[[Global Television Network]]|url=http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=f8250bcd-3939-4176-974f-82a7b86459f6&k=69555|access-date=December 23, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071204191449/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=f8250bcd-3939-4176-974f-82a7b86459f6&k=69555|archive-date=December 4, 2007}}</ref>

Upon completion of the tunnels in March 2008, the workers were laid-off and returned to their home countries.<ref>[http://www.journalofcommerce.com/article/id26954 Union calls SLCP-SELI Joint Venture's Canada Line foreign-worker lay-offs "a set up" – Journal of Commerce] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502180621/http://www.journalofcommerce.com/article/id26954 |date=May 2, 2013}}. Journalofcommerce.com. Retrieved July 26, 2013.</ref> Only five of the workers were re-hired by SELI after their arrival back to their home countries.

On December 3, 2008, the BC Human Rights Tribunal found in favour of the discrimination complaint.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/decisions/2008/pdf/dec/436_CSWU_Local_1611_v_SELI_Canada_and_others_(No_8)_2008_BCHRT_436.pdf |title=C.S.W.U. Local 1611 v. SELI Canada and others (No. 8), 2008 BCHRT 436|access-date=July 25, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923182856/http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/decisions/2008/pdf/dec/436_CSWU_Local_1611_v_SELI_Canada_and_others_(No_8)_2008_BCHRT_436.pdf |archive-date=September 23, 2015}}</ref> The decision prohibits employers from discrimination based on a workers' country of origin. Migrant workers must not suffer wage discrimination based on low wage labour markets in their countries of origin. The Latin Americans workers were awarded the difference in wages with an additional $10,000 each in punitive damages. The total award averaged approximately $50,000 per worker or $2.5{{nbsp}}million.

SELI Canada appealed the decision to the BC Supreme Court. In December 2012, SELI agreed to a settlement offer by the union. The Latin American workers voted unanimously to accept a settlement. The settlement provided payments worth 50% of the original award.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGULrLjGFug |title=Canada Line Temporary Foreign Workers paid B.C. Human Rights Tribunal settlement |date=June 28, 2013 |access-date=July 26, 2013 |publisher=Journal of Commerce |website=YouTube}}</ref>

== Notes ==
{{notelist}}

== References ==
{{reflist}}

== External links ==
{{Commons category}}

{{Attached KML|display=title,inline}}

* [http://www.thecanadaline.com The Canada Line website]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20090821224043/http://www.translink.ca/en/Rider-Info/Canada-Line.aspx Canada Line] – [[TransLink (British Columbia)|TransLink]]'s page for the line
* [http://www.policyalternatives.ca/documents/BC_Office_Pubs/rav.pdf High Risk – An Analysis of the Proposed Public-Private Partnership for the Richmond/Airport/Vancouver Rapid Transit Project], May 2003, by Blair Redlin, Report by the [[Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives]]

{{TransLink services}}

[[Category:Canada Line| ]]
[[Category:Airport rail links in Canada]]
[[Category:Railway lines opened in 2009]]
[[Category:2009 establishments in British Columbia]]
[[Category:Transport in Richmond, British Columbia]]
[[Category:Public–private partnership projects in Canada]]
[[Category:Rapid transit lines in Canada]]
[[Category:750 V DC railway electrification]]

Latest revision as of 11:46, 21 December 2024

Canada Line
Canada Line train pulling into Marine Drive station
Overview
OwnerTransLink, InTransitBC
LocaleMetro Vancouver, British Columbia
Termini
Stations17
Websitethecanadaline.com
Service
TypeRapid transit
SystemSkyTrain
Operator(s)ProTrans BC
Rolling stockRotem EMU, 2 cars per trainset
Daily ridership120,000 (2023)[1]
History
OpenedAugust 17, 2009; 15 years ago (2009-08-17)
Technical
Line length19.2 km (11.9 mi)
Number of tracks2
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in) standard gauge
ElectrificationThird rail750 V DC
Operating speed80 km/h (50 mph)
Route map
Map Canada Line highlighted in teal
SeaBus
to Lonsdale Quay
West Coast Express
to Mission
Waterfront
Expo
Line
Vancouver City Centre
Yaletown–Roundhouse
Olympic Village
Broadway–City Hall
King Edward
33rd Avenue (future)
Oakridge–41st Avenue
Langara–49th Avenue
57th Avenue (future)
Marine Drive
North Arm Bridge
over Fraser River
Vancouver Zone 1
Richmond Zone 2
Operations and
maintenance centre
Bridgeport
Capstan
Aberdeen
Lansdowne
Richmond–Brighouse
Middle Arm Bridge
over Fraser River
Templeton
Sea Island Centre
YVR Terminal 3 (future)
YVR–Airport
Vancouver International Airport

Handicapped/disabled access All stations are accessible

The Canada Line is a rapid transit line in Greater Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, that is part of the SkyTrain system. The line is owned by TransLink and InTransitBC and is operated by ProTrans BC. Coloured turquoise on route maps, it operates as an airport rail link between Vancouver, Richmond, and the Vancouver International Airport (YVR). The line comprises 16 stations and 19.2 kilometres (11.9 mi) of track; the main line runs from Vancouver to Richmond while a 4-kilometre (2.5 mi) spur line from Bridgeport station connects to the airport.[2] It opened on August 17, 2009, ahead of the 2010 Winter Olympics.[3]

The Canada Line was anticipated to have 100,000 boardings per day in 2013 and 142,000 boardings per day by 2021, but it has consistently exceeded early targets.[4] Ridership has grown steadily since opening day, with average ridership of 83,000 per day in September 2009,[5] 105,000 per day in March 2010,[6] and over 136,000 passengers per weekday in June 2011.[7] During the 17 days of the 2010 Winter Olympics, the line carried an average of 228,190 passengers per day.[8]

Governance of the project was through Canada Line Rapid Transit Inc. (CLCO), formerly RAV Project Management Ltd. (RAVCO), a reflection of the original "Richmond–Airport–Vancouver" name).[9] The line was built by SNC-Lavalin, and InTransitBC is under contract with TransLink to manage the line for its first 35 years, until 2044. The Canada Line is operationally independent from British Columbia Rapid Transit Company, which operates SkyTrain's Expo and Millennium lines[10] but is considered a part of the SkyTrain network. Like the other two SkyTrain lines in Metro Vancouver, it is also light metro rapid transit, using fully automated trains on grade-separated guideways.[11] However, the trains are powered by conventional motors with third rail electrical pickup rather than the linear induction system used on the other SkyTrain lines.

Route

[edit]
Canada Line bridge over the Fraser River

The Canada Line begins in Downtown Vancouver at Waterfront station (0.0 km [0 mi]) in a cut-and-cover subway tunnel beneath Granville Street. It quickly goes into twin-bored tunnels, heading southwest beneath Granville Street, then curving southeast to follow Davie Street through Yaletown. The tunnels then dive deeper to pass below False Creek before rising back up to Olympic Village station (2.7 km [1.7 mi]). There, the line transitions back to a cut-and-cover tunnel (which is noted by the tunnel changing from a circular to a square shape), heading south under Cambie Street. This section has some portions where the two sets of tracks are stacked vertically. The line emerges from the ground just south of 64th Avenue, climbing to an elevated guideway.[12]

The line continues elevated across the North Arm Bridge over the North Arm of the Fraser River, leaving Vancouver and entering Richmond. Just beyond Bridgeport station (11.1 km [6.9 mi]) at a flying junction, the line splits, with the Richmond branch heading south on elevated tracks along No. 3 Road and terminating at Richmond–Brighouse station (14.5 km [9.0 mi]). The airport branch turns west and crosses the Middle Arm Bridge over the Middle Arm of the Fraser River, connecting to stations on Sea Island and terminating at YVR–Airport station (15.0 km [9.3 mi]). Portions of the airport branch are at grade in order to accommodate a future elevated taxiway for aircraft over the line. Both branches narrow to a single track as they approach their respective terminus stations. Just before Bridgeport station is the Operations and Maintenance Centre (OMC) facility, which houses Canada Line trains that are not in use.

Stations

[edit]

Station construction was designed as a two-stage process. Sixteen original stations opened at the same time as the line did. Three additional stations are planned, and may be built in the future. The stations are listed below.

Each Canada Line station is slightly different in appearance, designed to blend in with the surrounding neighbourhood. For example, Langara–49th Avenue station is designed to fit into the area's low-density residential neighbourhood.[citation needed]

The five busiest stations have platforms 50 metres (160 ft) long, while the rest of the stations have 40-metre (130 ft) platforms that can be easily extended to 50 metres. The termini at YVR–Airport and Richmond–Brighouse stations are single-tracked, whereas the Waterfront station terminus is double-tracked. The double-tracking is necessary to accommodate the three-minute headways between trains on the Waterfront–Bridgeport portion of the line. King Edward station is the only station with a stacked configuration, and Broadway–City Hall station is the only station with a double-height ceiling over the platforms. Vancouver City Centre station is linked to Pacific Centre mall and Vancouver Centre Mall, in addition to having street level access. All direct transfers to the Expo and Millennium Lines must be made at Waterfront station; there is no direct connection from Vancouver City Centre station to Granville station. However, it is possible to transfer between those two stations via a short walk through Pacific Centre or Vancouver Centre Mall.

Stations were configured to allow for the future installation of fare gates, and received fare gates in 2013 as part of full implementation throughout all SkyTrain stations. Every station has an up escalator and an elevator, but only the three terminal stations have down escalators.[13]

Until late 2019, six stations (Vancouver City Centre, Olympic Village, Broadway–City Hall, Marine Drive, Templeton, and YVR–Airport) were equipped with self-service flight check-in kiosks which allowed customers to check into their flights at Vancouver International Airport while at these stations.[14][15]

Station City Connections Location
Waterfront Vancouver Granville, between Pender and Hastings
Vancouver City Centre Granville at Georgia
Yaletown–Roundhouse Davie near Mainland
Olympic Village Cambie at West 2nd Ave
Broadway–City Hall 99 B-Line Cambie at West Broadway
King Edward Cambie at King Edward
Oakridge–41st Avenue R4 RapidBus Cambie at West 41st; next to Oakridge Centre
Langara–49th Avenue Cambie at West 49th; near Langara College
Marine Drive Cambie at Marine
Bridgeport Richmond Major transit exchange for suburban buses; branches split; adjacent to River Rock Casino Resort
Richmond–Brighouse branch
Capstan Richmond No. 3, between Capstan Way and McMyn Way
Aberdeen No. 3 at Cambie; adjacent to Aberdeen Centre
Lansdowne No. 3 at Lansdowne; adjacent to Lansdowne Centre
Richmond–Brighouse No. 3 at Saba; adjacent to Richmond Centre
YVR–Airport branch
Templeton Richmond North of Grant McConachie Way; east of Templeton
Sea Island Centre Near Air Canada service centre
YVR–Airport Vancouver International Airport YVR Attached by walkways to YVR Main Terminal

Additional stations

[edit]

Provisions have been made to allow for the addition of the following infill stations in the future:

  • 33rd Avenue (Cambie Street at West 33rd Avenue, next to Queen Elizabeth Park)[16]
  • 57th Avenue (Cambie Street at West 57th Avenue)[16][17]
    The future of a 57th Avenue (Cambie Street and West 57th Avenue) in Vancouver is not fully known at this time. The original plan was that one day a station could be built, but new documents and talk between TransLink and the City of Vancouver raise the possibility of it never happening. The station was part of the broad policy statement adopted in 2014 by city council for the redevelopment of the Pearson Dogwood lands. But in June 2017 Susan Haid, city assistant director of planning for Vancouver South, submitted a report to Vancouver council stating that "though it is desirable to achieve a future station at 57th Avenue there are a number of key challenges," Haid wrote in her report. "Currently, the station is not considered in regional transportation plans and is not considered a regional priority such as the Broadway Corridor line." Haid also added to her report that, "Should the station not be attainable in the long-term future, the financial contribution towards a future station would be re-allocated to address the amenity priorities identified for Pearson Dogwood and those in and around the Cambie Corridor consistent with the respective public benefit strategies."[18]
  • YVR Terminal 3 (near YVR Terminal 3)
    The master plan for the Vancouver International Airport for 2027 indicates that this station would be built alongside the airport's proposed Northeast Terminal expansion.[16][19]

Transit connections

[edit]
Canada Line (sky blue) as part of the Metro Vancouver transit system in 2016

Many transit services connect with the Canada Line and form an important part of the service. With the opening of the line, most bus routes in Richmond, and connecting services from White Rock, Tsawwassen, and Ladner, doubled their service frequency. Waterfront station provides connections to the R5 Hastings St, Expo Line, West Coast Express, and SeaBus. Broadway–City Hall provides a connection to the 99 B-Line service.

There are currently only two routes serving Vancouver International Airport: the N10 NightBus, running parallel to the Canada Line along Granville Street, and route 412, running between Airport South and Bridgeport station.[20][21] Riders on these bus routes are not subject to the YVR AddFare.[22] The Airport Station exchange was downgraded to a regular bus stop on September 7, 2009, a few weeks after the opening of the line. Bus routes that used this loop were discontinued (as in the case of the 424 and the 98 B-Line), short-turned (as in the case of the 100, renamed 100 Marpole Loop), or redirected to Bridgeport station (as in the case of the 620, C90, and C92).[23]

Work began in May 2021 to extend the Millennium Line from VCC–Clark station west along Broadway to the new Arbutus station, allowing for a transfer to the Canada Line at Broadway–City Hall station.[24] As indicated in material presented by the City of Vancouver at public meetings in early 2006, this station was designed with such a future extension in mind. A "knock-out" panel was installed in the concourse that would facilitate construction of a connection between the station and a Broadway-corridor SkyTrain extension.

The Canada Line uses the same fare system as the rest of the transit system managed by TransLink, with two exceptions:[25]

  • The YVR AddFare, started in January 2010, is a surcharge that applies to some passengers leaving the airport and travelling eastbound to Bridgeport station and beyond. Passengers headed away from the airport must pay a $5 AddFare on top of the regular fare to leave the Sea Island stations unless they are travelling on a monthly pass; or a DayPass or a single-use Compass Ticket not that was not purchased on Sea Island.
  • Travel between the Sea Island stations is free to everyone. There is no additional fare for passengers travelling toward the airport. Such trips require a special Sea Island ticket that is free to obtain at any ticket machine at the Sea Island stations. These tickets are not valid for tapping out at other stations; an exit ticket is required for Sea Island ticketholders exiting at any station outside of Sea Island.

The Canada Line operates on a "Fare Paid Zone" system. Passengers are required by law to possess a valid fare when they are in Fare Paid Zones. Fare Paid Zones are clearly marked, and fares can be bought from Compass Vending Machines at all stations. Fare inspections are mostly conducted by the South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority Police Service. Passengers who fail to pay the fare or do not have a valid fare may be fined $173 and/or removed from the station or train.[26]

Canada Line attendants are the customer service staff for the Canada Line. They are easily identifiable by their green uniforms. They provide customer service, troubleshoot certain problems with the trains, observe and report safety issues, and check fares.

Technology

[edit]
A train parked at the Canada Line Operations and Maintenance Centre near Bridgeport station

The Canada Line uses a fleet of trains built by Rotem, a division of Hyundai Motor Group. The trains are powered by conventional electric motors, rather than the linear induction motors used by the Expo and Millennium Line's Bombardier ART trains. Canada Line trains are operated by the same SelTrac automated train control system used in the rest of the SkyTrain network.

The selection of Rotem was largely a consequence of the request for proposals process for the public-private partnership, whose terms did not allow Bombardier to consider efficiencies in combining operations or rolling-stock orders for the new line with those for the existing system.[27] This placed all bidders on a level playing field, albeit at the cost of not necessarily picking the most efficient choice for long-term operation. The RFP also required that the system have a capacity of 15,000 passengers per hour in each direction (leaving the choice of technology and platform length to the proponent) and a maximum travel time between the airport and downtown Vancouver of 24 minutes.[28]

The fleet consists of 32 fully automated two-car articulated trains, for a total of 64 cars.[29] The capacity of the trains is estimated at 334 people per pair of cars (comfortably) or 400 people at crush load. The trains have a top speed of 80 kilometres per hour (50 mph) in normal operation and 90 kilometres per hour (56 mph) in catch-up mode.[30] Each married pair of gangway-connected cars is 41 metres (134 ft 6 in) long and 3 metres (9 ft 10 in) wide, and longer and wider than the Bombardier ART fleet used on the Expo and Millennium lines.[31] Each train has LED electronic displays on the exterior to indicate the terminus station and on the interior to display the next station and the terminus station, a useful feature considering the line has two branches.

In 2018, twelve additional trainsets were ordered by Translink from Hyundai Rotem at a cost of $88 million to increase capacity on the line.[32] The sole-source contract allowed for commonality between the two train models, and reduced the number of specialized tools and parts required.[33] These were delivered in 2019 and 2020.[34][35]

Canada Line Hyundai Rotem specifications

[edit]

Name

[edit]

During the planning and public consultation stages, the line was known as the "Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Line", or RAV for short. The name "Canada Line" was adopted in 2005 to coincide with the beginning of construction.[40] Some early documents also refer to it as the "Olympic Line",[41] in recognition of the 2010 Winter Olympics, continuing the practice by which the Expo and Millennium lines were named after significant events occurring at the time of construction. This name was adopted for the demonstration modern streetcar service that operated along the Downtown Historic Railway for a two-month period centred on the Olympics.[42]

Timeline

[edit]
  • Between 1990 and 1992, BC Transit and N. D. Lea (now WSP Global) consultants studied intermediate-capacity transit system options in the Vancouver–Richmond corridor.[43]
  • From September 1991 through August 1993, the TRANSPORT 2021 Steering Committee carried out an extensive program of research and public consultation to create "A Long Range Transportation Plan for Greater Vancouver". Under Project Director M. L. (Martin Crilly), a comprehensive transportation investment and financing strategy was envisioned for the region. Until today all existing and proposed road and transit investments have been put forth in this plan. The plan calls for the provision of an intermediate-capacity transit system from Richmond to Vancouver's central business district.[44]
  • In fall of 1994, N. D. Lea and Delcan consultants carried out studies examining technologies, operating feasibility, ridership, capital and operating costs, traffic impacts, and development potential in three corridors, including the Richmond–Vancouver corridor. These studies were prepared as input into BC Transit's 10-Year Development Plan. They did not include a spur line to the Vancouver International Airport.[45]
  • In 1995, BC Transit (a crown corporation responsible for public transit) expressed a desire to create a special bus rapid transit (BRT) or automated rapid transit (ART) service connecting the cities of Richmond and Vancouver and the Vancouver International Airport in one of the transit improvement plans.
    • Underground rights-of-way were reserved at the Concord Pacific development close to the Cambie bridge.
  • From mid-1997 to mid-1998 a number of BRT routes for Vancouver-airport/Richmond were evaluated, and the preferred route and station locations were selected.[46]
  • June 24, 1998, the minister in charge of BC Transit, Joy MacPhail, announced plans to build a Vancouver–Richmond ALRT: "The new line would link Richmond city centre, the airport and Downtown Vancouver—probably running north-south through Vancouver along the Cambie Street corridor." "MacPhail said the province wants to accelerate the construction of rapid transit to Richmond as part of a bid to bring the 2010 Winter Olympics to the Lower Mainland."[47]
  • In 1999, detailed design of the Vancouver-Airport/Richmond BRT was carried out.
  • On April 1, 1999, The Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority (TransLink) was created under the direction of CEO Ken Dobell, previously city manager for the City of Vancouver.
  • In April 2000, TransLink adopted its Strategic Transportation Plan 2000–2005. The plan noted that future transit lines have equal priority, and recommended the planning and design of a Richmond-Airport-Vancouver (RAV) rapid transit line.
  • May 2000 saw the approval of the RAV study, while construction had begun on the BRT service between Richmond Centre, Airport Station exchange, and downtown Vancouver.
  • In 2000, a Transport Canada report on rail access to the airport estimated it would cost $1.3 billion for a SkyTrain expansion using the Cambie route and $738 million for a light rail system along the Arbutus corridor.[48]
  • In December 2000, TransLink received the report on public-private partnerships for road and transportation infrastructure, the model that would be used to finance, construct, and operate the new Canada Line.
  • On April 1, 2001, bus operators and other CMBC employees went on strike, delaying full implementation of the Vancouver-Airport-Richmond BRT by four months.
  • That same month, TransLink reaffirmed a Vancouver–Richmond line including a connection to the airport, and approved a recommendation by the TransLink CEO that, based on greater benefits from a private-sector perspective and community concerns, at-grade rail transit be excluded from further analysis and that analysis in Vancouver be restricted to underground options.
  • On August 1, 2001, the 98 B-Line BRT service began service in the corridor, ultimately carrying over 20,000 passengers per day, while plans were already under way for an ART service to replace it. This proposed service was projected to carry over 100,000 passengers per day.
  • On December 10, 2001, the federal government under Jean Chrétien announced over $2.0 billion in funding for large infrastructure projects; the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund established by this budget would fund the federal government's contribution to the Canada Line. The government stipulated that the fund promote private-public partnerships where appropriate.[49]
  • In April 2002, work was started on the third phase, project definition. This ten-month task consisted of a technical evaluation to determine if it was possible to build the line by 2010.
  • In 2003, ten companies or consortia submitted expressions of interest in the project.
  • In December 2003, this was shortlisted to the following three consortia, which were given a request for proposal:
  • On April 16, 2004, the federal government under Prime Minister Paul Martin increased its funding promise from $300 million to $450 million.[50][51]
  • On June 10, 2004, the provincial government restated its commitment to the Canada Line, increasing funding from $300 to $370 million, and earmarked $170 million for the Evergreen Line.[52][53]
  • On June 30, 2004, after twice voting to cancel the project, the TransLink Board approved the RAV line but maintained the right to cancel the project if none of the bids met the approved budget of $1.35 billion.
  • On November 19, 2004, RAVCO recommended that the SNC-Lavalin/Serco (now known as InTransitBC) proposal for a fully automated, grade-separated system be accepted. This "best and final offer" bid was $343 million over the approved budget. The project was, however, brought within the funding allowance through various cost-trimming measures, including design changes, the contractor agreeing to lower its bid, and the province contributing another $65 million.
  • On December 1, 2004, the TransLink board gave final approval for the project.
  • On July 29, 2005, the final contract to design, build, and operate the RAV Line was signed by InTransitBC and TransLink. Serco was no longer a partner to InTransitBC, and two pension funds were brought into the partnership.
  • In October 2005, the utilities relocation and road work was started.
  • On November 25, 2005, the design of the new trains was unveiled, and Hyundai Rotem was announced as the supplier of the trains. It was announced that the new line would be called the Canada Line as a funding condition from the federal government.[27]
  • The line opened at 1 p.m. local time on August 17, 2009, on budget and three and a half months ahead of schedule, and six months ahead of the 2010 Winter Olympics held in Vancouver. It began normal revenue service on the following day.
  • On September 30, 2009, it was announced that the Canada Line had seen an average of 82,500 passengers per day since opening, putting it well on track to reach its ridership target of 100,000 per day within two years.[5]
  • On December 28, 2009, it was revealed that the average daily ridership (including weekends) has grown to 93,000 and has occasionally exceeded 100,000, three years ahead of expectations.[54]
  • On February 5, 2010, ridership reached a (then) record of 135,000 during a campaign to encourage residents to use transit prior to the Olympics.[55] Further single-day records included 157,000 on February 11, 2010,[56] and 210,000 on February 15, 2010, with all 20 trains running.[57]
  • Overall, the 2010 Winter Olympics saw the Canada Line's ridership increase by 118 percent to an average of 228,190 per day for 17 days, with a single-day record of 287,400 on February 19, 2010. Its regular non-Olympic ridership was stated as being 104,674 per weekday.[8]
  • In February 2011, Translink revealed that the average daily ridership of the Canada Line had grown to 110,000 per day.[58]
  • In September 2021, construction began on Capstan station at Capstan Way; the station opened in December 2024.[59]

Project funding

[edit]

The Canada Line was built as a public-private partnership. Funding was provided by both government agencies and a private partner, the proponent. As of March 2009, the entire project was expected to cost $2.054 billion. The premier of BC stated that the project was on budget and ahead of schedule.[60] When approved in December 2004, the cost was given as $1.76 billion.[61]

The public contributions to the budget come from the following sources:

These sums are all in 2006 dollars, except for the government of Canada's contribution, which will be paid out when constructed, and is estimated to be equivalent of $419 million 2003 dollars.[63]

The private partner was expected to contribute $200 million, and be responsible for any construction cost overruns.[64] As of November 7, 2009, InTransitBC has invested $750 million. InTransitBC is a joint venture company owned by SNC-Lavalin, the Investment Management Corporation of BC (bcIMC), and the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec.[65][66]

The BC government had committed $370 million, but when the bid came in over budget, it contributed an extra $65 million. TransLink also put in extra money by committing money from the sale of the Sexsmith Park and Ride in Richmond and from the introduction of a special fare in the Airport Zone.[61]

In November 2004, bid costs were reduced by postponing the construction of a walkway between Waterfront station and the cruise ship terminal, removing Westminster station, and moving Richmond Centre station and the end of the line several hundred metres north. TransLink would further pay for the cost of reinstallation of the trolley wires along Cambie. As a way to further reduce the best and final offer, RAVCO no longer required that the proponent provide for 59 ticket vending machines and 38 ticket validating machines or for a police unit to operate on the RAV line. RAVCO also shifted responsibility for moving trolley wires from SNC-Lavalin to TransLink.[67] Costs were also decreased due to decisions to single-track sections on the Richmond and airport branches. The Richmond branch was single-tracked from Ackroyd Road onward in large part due to Richmond's city council pressuring for the visual profile of the overhead line to be reduced for esthetic reasons.

On July 11, 2006, a decision was made to relocate Broadway station half a block north at a cost of $3 million to allow for better integration of the station with Broadway and a new development in the area. The funding was provided as follows: one third from the City of Vancouver, one third from TransLink, and one third from surplus funding available to CLCO.[68]

In February 2007, TransLink approved the addition of a pedestrian and bicycle path to the Canada Line Bridge and agreed not to postpone the construction of a station at 2nd Avenue (Olympic Village station), but instead build it to be ready when the line opens. The $10 million cost of the bridge bike path was paid for by TransLink and not considered part of the cost of the Canada Line. The Olympic Village station cost an additional $29 million.[69]

RAVCO was set up by the agencies funding the transit line to oversee project design, procurement, construction, and implementation. This TransLink subsidiary, later renamed Canada Line Rapid Transit Inc (CLCO), made distributions to the builder as work progressed.

The table below lists the year-by-year contributions (in millions of dollars) made by various governments on a year-by-year basis up to December 31, 2008.[70][71] Contributions by TransLink are total disbursements minus contributions from the City of Vancouver, the government of British Columbia, and the government of Canada. Calculations show that TransLink has contributed $271 million to date. It has committed an additional $52 million in its 2009 budget.

Year Vancouver BC government Canadian government Total disbursements through TransLink Airport disbursements
2008 $7.1 $59.6 $93.4 $163.2 $46.8
2007 $14.9 $58.4 $167.4 $336.7 $94.6
2006 $6.9 $17.2 $125.6 $322.5 $108.4
2005 $1.1 $117.1 $108.9 $209.4 $15.7

The private sector will operate the line for 35 years in return for a share of its operating revenue.

In early 2006, TransLink decided not to install turnstiles at Canada Line stations, but stations would be designed to accommodate controlled access to allow TransLink to install them for less cost if it wished to do so in the future.[72] On April 9, 2009, TransLink, the provincial government, and the government of Canada announced joint funding of $100 million to introduce turnstiles at all 49 SkyTrain stations.[73] While a large portion of this funding will be used on the Expo and Millennium Lines, a portion will be used on the Canada Line stations. The federal government is contributing $30 million and the province is adding $40 million toward fare gates, or controlled access gates.

Construction

[edit]

Construction began in October 2005 and was completed in August 2009.

At initial completion, the line comprised the following construction elements:

Segment type Length
Tunnel 9,080 m
(29,790 ft)
Elevated 7,349 m
(24,111 ft)
Bridge 614 m
(2,014 ft)
At-grade 1,385 m
(4,544 ft)

In addition to the 18.4 kilometres (11.4 mi) of track above, there are about 500 metres (1,600 ft) of track in the OMC.

Controversies

[edit]

Opponents have claimed that the approval process was undemocratic and dishonest. In 2004, critics said that the projected ridership figures were grossly inflated;[74] ridership projections were exceeded in 2010 and subsequent years.[6][7] Opponents also argued that the official claim that the project had nothing to do with Vancouver's bid to host the 2010 Winter Olympics was not credible.[75]

Public-private partnerships

[edit]

Opponents of the RAV line's public-private partnership (P3) believe it was politically motivated and that it will cost more money because of the private involvement. However, the private involvement allowed for construction costs to be known and fixed up front. After raising its contribution to $435 million, the BC minister of transport and premier reaffirmed that this was the final contribution and that any cost overruns would be the responsibility of the proponent.[76] The Canadian Union of Public Employees opposed the use of a P3 to design, build, and operate the Canada Line. The P3 process did not allow precise plans to be developed with public consultation, but limited discussion to certain abstract parameters, while leaving actual design details to the private partner.

Ridership projections

[edit]

Before the building of the line, TransLink had projected that it would require a 100,000 passenger/day average to reach the "break even point". They also projected that it would take about three years for capacity to reach this point and that TransLink would be responsible for the loss. However, the Canada Line reached its projected ridership goal in late 2010, three years early.[77] In 2017, TransLink CEO Kevin Desmond suggested that the Canada Line was underbuilt for its ridership, especially because more people moved into transit-oriented developments along the line following its completion.[78] In 2019, former Vancouver city councillor Gord Price noted that the desire to have the line open in time for the 2010 Winter Olympics, as well as not exceeding the budget, led to cautious decision making.[79][80] In 2018, 20 additional trainsets were purchased to increase capacity on the line by 35 percent.[81][35]

Alignment and grade separation

[edit]

Vancouver

[edit]

Although the latest proposal for rapid transit did not include an option for rapid transit down the Arbutus corridor along the abandoned CPR right of way, Vancouver council reopened debate on this issue. Given that the rail right of way is currently zoned for transit use with space available for transit lines, running the line down the Arbutus corridor may have been more cost-effective than tunnelling under Cambie. The planners and RAVCO, however, countered that the Arbutus corridor does not have the major concentration of transit destinations and origins that exist along the Cambie Street corridor, such as Vancouver City Hall, Vancouver General Hospital, Oakridge Centre, and Langara College, which are necessary to provide the ridership required for this project to be successful. Also the Arbutus corridor is longer than the Cambie corridor and would cause longer travel times. The Cambie corridor further had greater potential for future ridership growth.[82]

The Project Definition Report further specified that any service had to be able to travel from Waterfront station in downtown Vancouver to the airport in 25 minutes or less. At-grade transit, either along Cambie or the Arbutus corridor, was ruled out as a result. The reason or origin for this exact requirement was not specified, although travel times were considered an important factor in attracting new riders and in retaining existing riders, who were now required to make an extra transfer relative to the existing bus service.

All partner contributions were made upon the specifications set in the Project Definition Report. Any "significant change" would allow each partner to reconsider its respective contribution. As the Arbutus corridor proposal could not meet the specifications, this could put participation of funding partners in jeopardy.

Residents along Cambie Boulevard created the Cambie Boulevard Heritage Society in 1994, which opposed any alteration to a wide green centre median that is currently a grassy area with various species of trees, including cherry trees donated by the City of Yokohama on occasion of the 1967 Canadian Centennial. The residents had already been mobilized in 1989 in response to the possibility of elevated rail along Cambie Boulevard.[83] In effect the residents were opposed to surface, trench, or elevated rail along much of Cambie Street. Even cut-and-cover construction raised concerns over construction impacts and temporary traffic diversions. Cost and ridership risks were also concerns to property tax–paying residents. Advertisements asked residents to join "to prevent Vancouver's worst traffic nightmare and from burdening ourselves and our children with unnecessary tax risks for years to come". The society suggested that the line instead be constructed along Arbutus, where its impact and cost would be minimal.[84] Despite the society's concerns, one of the final two proposals for the Canada Line in 2004 involved a trench in the centre of Cambie Street from 49th to 64th Avenues.

On June 18, 2004, the TransLink Board voted 6–6 to oppose sending the project to the "best and final offer" stage. Opponents of the project favoured a proposal to build a line along the Cambie corridor involving a minimal amount of tunnelling, at a saving of about $300 million over the previously fully grade-separated proposal. The province responded to the suggestion by withdrawing funding until after the 2010 Olympics; Minister of Transport Kevin Falcon said that such a change of scope could no longer be accommodated in the time left before 2010. Mayors and councillors sitting on the TransLink Board, however, could not come to an agreement on this alternate plan of action.[85] The impasse created a stir in the business community, which joined together and called for the province to take over control of the project. "The Coalition FOR a Lower Mainland Rapid Transit Solution" in a newspaper ad called on the premier to "please rescue our rapid transit". The Vancouver Board of Trade, the Council of Tourism Associations, and Tourism Vancouver led the call on the premier.[86] While the board ultimately voted to proceed, the incident had lasting repercussions for TransLink.

Richmond

[edit]

When the results of the bidding process indicated that an elevated option in Richmond was the winning bid, Richmond council engaged in some last-minute opposition to the RAV line and refused to give RAVCO the green light.

Objections to the elevated line included its visual impact and the impact and cost of any extensions into Richmond. The line would have varied impact on businesses along No. 3 Road.


In November 2004, a survey of 11,750 people was conducted by RAVCO to determine if people in Richmond supported an elevated or at-grade service in Richmond. Of the respondents, 58 percent favoured an elevated option.[87]

Closure and dismantling of 98 B-Line busway on No. 3 Road at Capstan Way to make way for Canada Line, April 2006

Even after the survey, however, another option was brought forward. On November 22, 2004, Richmond council considered whether an elevated guideway along No. 3 Road in Richmond was appropriate. If an at-grade service was not feasible, council had instructed staff to look into the possibility of relocating the elevated guideway further west, along Minoru Boulevard. In response, residents along Minoru Boulevard presented a petition containing 666 signatures opposing the Minoru alignment. In the petition they "indicated that if Translink and RAVCO were not prepared to construct an at-grade system on No. 3 Road, then the project should be abandoned in favour of bus service on No. 3 Road."[88]

When further surveys and public consultation conducted by city staff in December indicated that residents did not support the realignment along Minoru Boulevard, council was left to either turn down the development or support the best and final offer. They chose to go ahead with the project. As a final compromise, part of the elevated track in Richmond was single-tracked to reduce visual impact.

Impact on local businesses

[edit]
One side of the street was cut off from traffic and parking was affected.
The "business is open" logo

For the entire consultation process, it was assumed that any underground construction along the Cambie corridor would be by bored tunnel.[citation needed] It was only upon the publication of the winning bid that it became apparent that the portion of the line from 64th to 2nd Avenues would be constructed using cut-and-cover construction. This raised concern over the disruption of local business on Cambie Street. Businesses in Yaletown and No. 3 Road in Richmond would also be affected by the construction. Although construction in the downtown was mostly by bored tunnel, businesses in Yaletown were caught off guard when it turned out that Yaletown-Roundhouse station would be north of Pacific Boulevard on Davie Street, rather than south of Pacific Boulevard.[89] InTransitBC responded by launching an advertising campaign promoting local business on the line.[90][91] Despite these efforts, businesses on Cambie Street experienced significant loss of business. After numerous failed appeals to the provincial government for compensation, store operators unsuccessfully sued for compensation. However, since the completion of the Canada Line, the line has been linked to rising property values along Cambie Street and in Richmond.[92]

Impact on expansion of other transit options

[edit]

It had been pointed out that construction of the Canada Line would do little to improve transit or alleviate congestion on the Broadway corridor to UBC, which serves more than 100,000 weekday trips on bus services, with many trips continuing to University of British Columbia. In addition, the Evergreen Extension rapid transit project was delayed (until 2016). As TransLink is solely responsible for funding bus operations, any shortage of funding may translate into cuts in bus service.

Hiring practices

[edit]

There were several labour disputes related to wages and unionization between employees and contractors working on the construction of the Canada Line. To excavate the final 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) of the tunnel underneath the downtown core a crew of 36 Latin American workers were brought to Canada from Costa Rica, Ecuador and Colombia in April 2006. The employer, a joint partnership of SELI Canada and SNC (Pacific) engaged workers to assemble the tunnel boring machine (TBM) and begin excavations. Pay stubs and testimony evidence from the workers indicated that they were paid US$1,000 monthly in exchange for 65-hour work weeks (less than $4 per hour). The Latin Americans, all on temporary work permits, joined the Construction and Specialized Workers Unions Local 1611 and, in a majority vote, won union certification on June 23, 2006. This was the first time in Canadian history that a group of temporary foreign workers in the construction industry had successfully exercised their right to form a union. Before the union had a chance to begin collective bargaining, workers' wages were increased to $14.21 per hour and hours were reduced to 40 hours per week with overtime concessions as required by BC labour law. The union was not consulted, and the unilateral pay raise led to an unfair labour practice complaint from the CSWU 1611. The BC Labour Relations Board (BCLRB) sided with the employer's (SELI–SNCP) explanation that there had been a mistake in calculations of wages during the months before the workers voted to join the union. The employer stalled negotiations for a collective agreement until they were ordered back to the bargaining table in August 2006 by the BCLRB.[93]

In September, bargaining broke down. On September 21, 2006, CSWU 1611 workers threatened a strike vote to bring the employer back to the bargaining table.[94]

After almost two years of litigation, the BC Labour Relations Board ruled against the union's claims of unfair labour practices.[95]

In a separate complaint, the union claimed discrimination against the workers based on their country of origin. Even with the newly imposed wage of $14.21 per hour, the Latin Americans were earning half the wages of European (Italian, Spanish and Portuguese) workers with whom they worked alongside and performed the same underground TBM operations.

On November 9, 2007, the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruled that the Latin American workers had been intimidated to sign a petition against being represented by their union.[96][97] The tribunal found that the workers were intimidated and coerced to sign a petition in the fear of possibly losing future job prospects with their employer. The petition would have prevented them from being represented by a union before the tribunal and would also have created evidence that could have jeopardized the ongoing investigation by the tribunal over perceived discrimination.[98]

Upon completion of the tunnels in March 2008, the workers were laid-off and returned to their home countries.[99] Only five of the workers were re-hired by SELI after their arrival back to their home countries.

On December 3, 2008, the BC Human Rights Tribunal found in favour of the discrimination complaint.[100] The decision prohibits employers from discrimination based on a workers' country of origin. Migrant workers must not suffer wage discrimination based on low wage labour markets in their countries of origin. The Latin Americans workers were awarded the difference in wages with an additional $10,000 each in punitive damages. The total award averaged approximately $50,000 per worker or $2.5 million.

SELI Canada appealed the decision to the BC Supreme Court. In December 2012, SELI agreed to a settlement offer by the union. The Latin American workers voted unanimously to accept a settlement. The settlement provided payments worth 50% of the original award.[101]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Transit Service Performance Review" (PDF). TransLink. Retrieved November 11, 2024.
  2. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". Canada Line/TransLink. Archived from the original on August 31, 2009. Retrieved June 17, 2009.
  3. ^ "Canada Line linking Vancouver and Richmond to open Aug. 17". Vancouver Sun. Archived from the original on August 7, 2009. Retrieved August 4, 2009.
  4. ^ Canada Line Archived August 30, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ a b "Cubic, TransLink Report Record Use of New Fare Collection System for Canada Line" (Press release). September 30, 2009. Retrieved October 10, 2009.
  6. ^ a b "Are you prepared to travel during the 2010 Winter Games in Vancouver?". VANOC Communications. January 20, 2010. Archived from the original on July 7, 2011.
  7. ^ a b "TransLink reports transit ridership heading for a new record". Translink. August 22, 2011. Archived from the original on October 20, 2011. Retrieved December 28, 2009.
  8. ^ a b "TransLink carried 26 million passengers during Games". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved March 23, 2010.[permanent dead link]
  9. ^ "TransLink Operating Companies". TransLink. Archived from the original on August 22, 2008. Retrieved December 2, 2008.
  10. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions, Canada Line". Rapid Transit Office, City of Vancouver. Retrieved December 2, 2008.
  11. ^ "Overview and Route Map". InTransitBC. Archived from the original on December 16, 2006. Retrieved December 17, 2006.
  12. ^ Hasiuk, Mark. "Disabled advocate down on Canada Line station design". The Vancouver Courier. Archived from the original on January 31, 2009. Retrieved December 3, 2008.
  13. ^ "Other Locations". yvr.ca. Archived from the original on December 5, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
  14. ^ "Other Locations". yvr.ca. Archived from the original on April 29, 2016. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
  15. ^ a b c Chan, Kenneth (August 19, 2015). "Four stations could be added to SkyTrain Canada Line". DailyHive. Archived from the original on March 20, 2018. Retrieved August 4, 2017.
  16. ^ "Developer Onni to pay for new Canada Line station in Vancouver". CBC News. March 30, 2016. Retrieved August 4, 2017.
  17. ^ "Challenges derail arrival of new Canada Line station on Cambie Street in South Vancouver". Georgia Straight Vancouver's News & Entertainment Weekly. June 26, 2017. Retrieved December 18, 2017.
  18. ^ "YVR: Your Airport 2027" (PDF). 2007. Retrieved February 22, 2022.
  19. ^ "NightBus". www.translink.ca. Retrieved April 1, 2024.
  20. ^ "412 Bridgeport Station/Sea Island South". www.translink.ca. Retrieved April 1, 2024.
  21. ^ "Questions and answers about the YVR AddFare". The Buzzer blog. January 9, 2010. Retrieved April 1, 2024.
  22. ^ "Connecting Transit Services". TransLink. Archived from the original on August 9, 2009. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
  23. ^ "Broadway Subway Project reaches major construction phase". BC Gov News | Transportation and Infrastructure. May 13, 2021. Retrieved April 27, 2022.
  24. ^ "Canada Line YVR AddFAre". translink.ca. TransLink. Archived from the original on March 24, 2018. Retrieved January 1, 2018.
  25. ^ "Fare Infraction FAQs". TransLink. Archived from the original on January 17, 2018. Retrieved January 16, 2018.
  26. ^ a b "Canada Line launched as partners unveil vehicle" (Press release). November 25, 2005. Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved December 17, 2006.
  27. ^ Best and Final Offer Stage Report & Recommendations Archived March 4, 2009, at the Wayback Machine (PDF)
  28. ^ "Metro Vancouver's Canada Line adds first 4 of dozen new trains, boosting service". CBC News. January 21, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2024.
  29. ^ "Canada Line Fact Sheet The Canada Line Vehicle" (PDF). canadaline.ca (TransLink). December 14, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2015.
  30. ^ "Canada Line Fact Sheet The Canada Line Vehicle" (PDF). canadaline.ca (TransLink). December 14, 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2015.
  31. ^ Chan, Kenneth (February 24, 2018). "TransLink accelerates full order of 80 new SkyTrain cars by 2020". Daily Hive - Urbanized. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  32. ^ "NOI-Customized Train Cars". service.ariba.com. Retrieved February 13, 2018.
  33. ^ Saltman, Jennifer (July 22, 2019). "New Canada Line cars headed for Vancouver". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  34. ^ a b Little, Simon (January 21, 2020). "Metro Vancouver's Canada Line adds first 4 of dozen new trains, boosting service". Global News. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  35. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Canada Line Fact Sheet The Canada Line Vehicle" (PDF). canadaline.ca (TransLink). December 14, 2007. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2015.
  36. ^ "RFP No. CAP 27-10 New Orange and Red Line Vehicles" (PDF). Hyundai Rotem. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 21, 2021.
  37. ^ "Railway Systems-Project Record View". Hyundai-Rotem. Hyundai Rotem. Retrieved January 8, 2017.
  38. ^ "Urban Rail Signalling Projects". Thales Group. Archived from the original on May 12, 2012. Retrieved October 9, 2011.
  39. ^ "Canada Line Launcher As Partners Unveil Vehicle". Transport Canada. September 25, 2005. Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved June 10, 2009. The Honourable David L. Emerson... gathered to unveil the Canada Line name and the vehicle design for the Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Rapid Transit Project.
  40. ^ Chiu, Viven; Rault, Patrick (January 2003). "The Richmond-Airport-Vancouver Rapid link Project: The RAVP/Olympic line" (PDF). Study Marigni. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 14, 2011. Retrieved June 10, 2009. With the Whistler-Vancouver Olympic bid, this issue has been put under pressure, and the name of this line is temporarily chosen accordingly, in this study. Like recommended by previous studies, this study considers a line opening in phase with the 2010 Olympic game, it must be clear that the rail link need is studied independently of the Olympic bid, and its realization should not be tied to the Olympic bid success.... The Olympic line is considered as a regional link more than a local service.
  41. ^ "Olympic Line". The City of Vancouver. Archived from the original on April 8, 2010. Retrieved June 7, 2010.
  42. ^ Summary of Intermediate Capacity Transit System Studies, 10-year Development Plan 1995–2006, BC Transit, Stephen Gardner and Glen Leicester, March 1995, page 11
  43. ^ A Long-Range Transportation Plan for Greater Vancouver, Transport 2021 Report, September 1993, 65 pages, A joint Project of the GVRD and the Province of British Columbia
  44. ^ Summary of Intermediate Capacity Transit System Studies, 10-year Development Plan 1995–2006, preface
  45. ^ 98BLine_BRT_Evaluation Study, September 1993, page 6, IBI group, Transport Canada
  46. ^ Skytrain line to Airport Proposed, Vancouver Sun, June 25, 1998, by Scott Simpson
  47. ^ Richmond-downtown link on transit wish list, Vancouver Sun, Amy O'Brian, December 5, 2002
  48. ^ Bill C-49, Budget Implementation Act, 2001, Part 6,37th parliament, 1st session.
  49. ^ Frances Bula, Secret plan to explain federal RAV funds, Vancouver Sun, October 4, 2004
  50. ^ RAV line resurrected as B.C. offers to cover cost overruns, Vancouver Sun, Nicholas Read, Ayesha Bhatty, and Jim Beatty, June 11, 2004
  51. ^ Hop Aboard, RAV proponents urge, Gordon Campbell, Vancouver Sun, June 17, 2004
  52. ^ The Road Less Travelled, TransLink's Improbable Journey from 1999 to 2008, Trevor Wales, 2008, page 43, says it occurred in October 2004
  53. ^ "Canada Line Delivers a Smooth Ride". The Globe and Mail. Canada. December 28, 2009. Retrieved December 28, 2009.
  54. ^ "Vancouver drivers urged to forgo cars when viaducts close this week". Vancouver Sun. February 2, 2010. Archived from the original on October 27, 2017. Retrieved October 4, 2018.
  55. ^ "Twitter / TransLink BC: Record day on Canada Line". Twitter.com. February 12, 2010. Retrieved May 19, 2012.
  56. ^ "The Buzzer blog " A huge weekend for transit, plus Canada Line increases trains today". Buzzer.translink.ca. February 15, 2010. Retrieved May 19, 2012.
  57. ^ "Rise in transit use called Olympic legacy". BC Local News. Archived from the original on July 7, 2011. Retrieved February 11, 2011.
  58. ^ Little, Simon (December 20, 2024). "Canada Line's Capstan Station officially opens in Richmond". Global News. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
  59. ^ Press release, Office of the Premier, March 27, 2009
  60. ^ a b Richmond keeps RAV on track, Joel Baglole and Jonathan Fowlie, with files from Jim Beatty and Frances Bula. The Vancouver Sun, November 30, 2004, pg. B.2
  61. ^ TransLink Annual Report 2008, page 64
  62. ^ Canada Line Final Project Report: Competitive Selection Phase, Final Assessment of Value for Money Archived October 25, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, July 29, 2005, figure 3, page 15
  63. ^ "About Us". InTransitBC. Archived from the original on February 3, 2007. Retrieved December 17, 2006.
  64. ^ About Archived May 31, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, InTransitBC
  65. ^ Canada Line Info Bulletin No. 14 Archived July 6, 2011, at the Wayback Machine March 3, 2006. Information on the nature of the public/private partnership.
  66. ^ RAV line builder shaves ,2m off price: 'I think we have a fully financed project': McCallum, Jonathan Fowlie, The Vancouver Sun, November 29, 2004. pg. A.1.
  67. ^ Vancouver council minutes, July 11, 2006
  68. ^ RAV bridge to take pedestrians, Frank Luba, The Province, February 17, 2005. pg. A.21
  69. ^ TransLink annual report 2006, 2007 and 2008
  70. ^ Airport authority Annual Report 2006, 2007, 2008
  71. ^ Canada Line Fact Sheet No. January 22, 24, 2006
  72. ^ No turnstiles for SkyTrains until 2012, August 14, 2009, British Columbia, CBC News
  73. ^ "Come clean on RAV line, MacPhail tells Campbell][https://thetyee.ca/Views/2005/11/28/RAVReward/ Larry Campbell's RAV Reward". BC NDP. Archived from the original on February 28, 2004. Retrieved February 13, 2018.
  74. ^ "Privatization: Cabinet leak proves Liberals will do anything for a P3". Canadiandemocraticmovement.ca. October 4, 2004. Archived from the original on April 15, 2012. Retrieved May 19, 2012.
  75. ^ Campbell's 'kaputski' on RAV line financing tops the list of keepers so far, Vaughn Palmer, The Vancouver Sun, December 3, 2004. p. A3
  76. ^ Sinoski, Kelly (June 2, 2010). "Canada Line races toward capacity". Global News. Retrieved April 26, 2023. The line has been recording an average of 94,000 trips per day – just shy of its capacity of 100,000 riders, a number TransLink had not expected to reach until 2013.
  77. ^ "Canada Line is definitely under-built, says TransLink CEO". dailyhive.com. Archived from the original on December 31, 2017. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  78. ^ Kretzel, Lasia (August 16, 2019). "Canada Line changed direction of transit in Metro Vancouver: former councillor". CityNews Vancouver. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  79. ^ Molko, David (February 14, 2020). "'Confidence' the biggest transportation legacy of Vancouver Olympics, experts say". British Columbia. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  80. ^ Fong, Jim (January 21, 2020). "Canada Line increasing its commuter capacity by 35% by spring 2020". CTV News British Columbia. Retrieved April 26, 2023.
  81. ^ Community Consultation Discussion Guide and Feedback Form, March 2003, Translink and RAVP, p.9
  82. ^ Cambie Boulevard trees leave activist smiling, Sandra Thomas, The Vancouver Courier, November 2, 2007
  83. ^ Help Save Cambie Boulevard, and so much more, Vancouver Courier, February 22, 2004, p. 21, paid ad
  84. ^ Vancouver Sun, June 18, 19, 22
  85. ^ Business Coalition wants Victoria to take over RAV line, Brian Morton, Vancouver Sun, June 23, 2004
  86. ^ Councillors say they could forego RAV, Jonathan Fowlie, Vancouver Sun, November 25, 2004
  87. ^ Minutes, Richmond Council General Purpose Committee Meeting, November 22, 2004
  88. ^ Yaletown RAV stop stirs it up, William Boei, The Vancouver Sun, December 7, 2005. pg. B.2
  89. ^ "Business is open, are you?" (PDF) (Press release). InTransitBC. March 20, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 17, 2007. Retrieved March 9, 2007.
  90. ^ Krangle, Karenn (March 4, 2003). "Translink seeks public input on rapid Richmond route; [Final Edition]". Vancouver Sun. p. B.2.
  91. ^ Stuek, Wendy (January 10, 2011). "Canada Line workers to take strike vote". Globe and Mail. Canada. Archived from the original on February 3, 2013. Retrieved January 20, 2011.
  92. ^ Mark Brown, BCLRB vice-chair, July 30, 2006 "The Employer cannot simply refuse to meet to bargain collectively based on its view of the Union's applications. The Employer cannot set preconditions to the commencement of collective bargaining. In doing so, the Employer has violated Sections 11 and Section 47 (the requirement to bargain in good faith and begin bargaining within 10 days of certification) of the BC Labour Code." Brown ordered the Employer to meet with the union within 10 days.
  93. ^ "Labour strife plagues Canada Line construction". CKNW News Talk 980. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved October 19, 2006.
  94. ^ http://www.lrb.bc.ca/decisions/B040$2008.pdf [dead link]
  95. ^ "BC transit line builders coerced workers, tribunal rules". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved December 23, 2007.
  96. ^ "Official document on the ruling" (PDF). BC Human Rights Tribunal. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2015. Retrieved December 23, 2007.
  97. ^ "Canada Line companies intimidated foreign workers: Tribunal". Global Television Network. Archived from the original on December 4, 2007. Retrieved December 23, 2007.
  98. ^ Union calls SLCP-SELI Joint Venture's Canada Line foreign-worker lay-offs "a set up" – Journal of Commerce Archived May 2, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Journalofcommerce.com. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
  99. ^ "C.S.W.U. Local 1611 v. SELI Canada and others (No. 8), 2008 BCHRT 436" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2015. Retrieved July 25, 2013.
  100. ^ "Canada Line Temporary Foreign Workers paid B.C. Human Rights Tribunal settlement". YouTube. Journal of Commerce. June 28, 2013. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
[edit]
KML is from Wikidata