2016 Indian banknote demonetisation: Difference between revisions
→Criticism: Updates to add opinions of leading economic experts. Prioritized over political views to match |
m Undid revision 1265608364 by Eyesnore (talk) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Demonetisation of Indian banknotes}} |
|||
{{pp-protected|small=yes}} |
|||
{{Use dmy dates|date= |
{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2020}} |
||
{{ |
{{Use Indian English|date=December 2016}} |
||
{{Infobox News event |
|||
{{merge from|Aakrosh Diwas|date=December 2016}} |
|||
| image = Queue at Bank to Exchange INR 500 and 1000 Notes - Salt Lake City - Kolkata 2016-11-10 02103.jpg |
|||
{{multiple issues| |
|||
| caption = Queues outside a bank to exchange demonetised banknotes in [[Kolkata]] on 10 November 2016 |
|||
{{cleanup|date= December 2016|reason= The article title and content of article need to correlated and focussed}} |
|||
| date = {{Start date and age|2016|11|08|df=yes|p=yes}} |
|||
{{unfocused|date=December 2016}} |
|||
| time = 20:00 IST (14:00 UTC) |
|||
| reported deaths = 82<ref name=CatchNews /> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Narendra Modi}}<!-- this section is transcluded on Premiership of Narendra Modi --> <section begin="Lead"/> |
|||
{{Notice | Heading= Title Change | Kindly refrain from moving this article to a new title until consensus is reached on the talk page of this article.}} |
|||
On 8 November 2016, the [[Government of India]] announced the [[Legal tender#Demonetization|demonetisation]] of all [[Indian 500-rupee note|₹500]] and [[Indian 1000-rupee note|₹1,000]] banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]]. It also announced the issuance of new ₹500 and [[Indian 2000-rupee note|₹2,000]] banknotes in exchange for the demonetised banknotes.<ref name="withdrawaloflegal">{{cite web|url=https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=38520|title=Withdrawal of Legal Tender Status for ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 Notes: RBI Notice (Revised)|date=9 November 2016|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> Prime Minister [[Narendra Modi]] said that this decision would curtail the [[shadow economy]], increase cashless transactions and reduce the use of illicit and [[counterfeit]] cash to fund illegal activity and terrorism.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Modi-urges-country-to-become-a-cashless-society/article16710453.ece|title=Modi urges country to become a cashless society|date=27 November 2016|work = [[The Hindu]]}}</ref><ref name="India Today2">{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/live-pm-narendra-modi-addresses-nation/1/805755.html|title=Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs 500, Rs 2000 notes and black money|date=8 November 2016|access-date=9 November 2016|work=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-500-and-Rs-100-notes-pulled-out-of-circulation-immediately-PM-Narendra-Modi/articleshow/55315473.cms|title=Notes out of circulation|date=8 November 2016|work=The Times of India}}</ref> |
|||
<!---[[File:No 500 1000.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A store displaying the demonetisation message: "Withdrawal of legal tender status for ₹500 and ₹1000 notes", at the cash counter]]---> |
|||
The [[demonetisation]] of [[Indian 500-rupee note|₹500]] and [[Indian 1000-rupee note|₹1,000]] banknotes was a policy enacted by the [[Government of India]] on 8 November 2016. All {{INRConvert|500}} and {{INRConvert|1000}} banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]] ceased to be [[legal tender]] in India after 9 November 2016.<ref name=withdrawaloflegal>{{cite web|title=Withdrawal of Legal Tender Status for ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 Notes: RBI Notice (Revised)|url=https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=38520|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|accessdate=8 November 2016|date=8 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The announcement of demonetisation was followed by prolonged cash shortages in the weeks that followed, which created significant disruption throughout the economy.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/demonetisation-to-drag-india-behind-china-in-gdp-growth-rob-fastest-growing-economy-tag/articleshow/55492970.cms|title=Demonetisation may drag India behind China in GDP growth, rob fastest-growing economy tag|last=Saikia|first=Bijoy Sankar|date=18 November 2016|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=5 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21711035-withdrawing-86-value-cash-circulation-india-was-bad-idea-badly|title=The dire consequences of India's demonetisation initiative|date=3 December 2016|newspaper=The Economist|access-date=5 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://english.manoramaonline.com/in-depth/demonetization-india-anniversary.html|title=Demonetization Announcement Anniversary 2017 {{!}} Onmanorama|work=OnManorama|access-date=7 November 2017}}</ref> People seeking to exchange their banknotes had to stand in lengthy queues, and several deaths were linked to the rush to exchange cash.<ref name="Aljazeera-1" /><ref name="death-ref1">{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/15/demonetisation-death-toll-rises-to-25-and-its-only-been-6-days/|title=Demonetisation Death Toll Rises To 25 And It's Only Been 6 Days|work=huffingtonpost|access-date=15 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161116020908/http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/15/demonetisation-death-toll-rises-to-25-and-its-only-been-6-days/|archive-date=16 November 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
The announcement was made by the [[Prime Minister of India]] [[Narendra Modi]] in an unscheduled live televised address at 20:15 [[Indian Standard Time]] (IST) on 8 November.<ref name="auto">{{cite news|last1=Bhatt|first1=Abhinav|title=Watch PM Modi's Entire Speech on Discontinuing 500, 1000 Rupee Notes|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modi-speaks-to-nation-tonight-at-8-pm-1622948|accessdate=8 November 2016|publisher=NDTV India|date=8 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/live-narendra-modis-address-to-nation/article9320548.ece |title=Demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes: RBI explains |date=8 November 2016 |website=The Hindu |access-date=10 November 2016}}</ref> In the announcement, Modi declared that use of all ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]] would be invalid after midnight of that day, and announced the issuance of new ₹500 and [[Indian 2000-rupee note|₹2,000]] banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi New Series]] in exchange for the old banknotes. However, the banknote denominations of ₹100, ₹50, ₹20, ₹10 and ₹5 of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]] remained legal tender and were unaffected by the policy. |
|||
According to a 2018 report from the [[Reserve Bank of India]] ₹15.3 [[lakh]] [[crore]] (15.3 trillion rupees on the [[Long and short scales|short scale]]) of the ₹15.41 lakh crore in demonetised bank notes, or approximately 99.3%, were deposited in banks, leading analysts to state that the effort had failed to remove [[Indian black money|black money]] from the economy.<ref name=FTdemonetisationFail /><ref name=BBCdemonetisationFail /> The [[BSE SENSEX]] and [[NIFTY 50]] stock indices fell over 6% on the day after the announcement.<ref name="stockcrash9nov" /> The move reduced the country's [[industrial production]] and its [[Gross domestic product|GDP]] growth rate.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/demonetization-gst-slowed-down-gdp-growth-of-india-1123939-2018-01-06|title=Thanks to Demonetisation and GST, India's GDP growth hit a 4-year low at 6.5 per cent|website=India Today|date=6 January 2018 |language=en|access-date=2 October 2018}}</ref> It is estimated that 1.5 million jobs were lost.<ref name="theguardian.com">{{Cite web|date=2018-08-30|title=Demonetisation drive that cost India 1.5m jobs fails to uncover 'black money'|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/30/india-demonetisation-drive-fails-uncover-black-money|access-date=2021-07-31|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref> The move also saw a significant increase in digital and cashless transactions throughout the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO202109554061272.view?orgId=kodisa|title=Moving from Cash to Cashless Economy: Toward Digital India|publisher=Korea Distribution Science Association}}</ref> |
|||
The government claimed that the demonetisation was an effort to stop counterfeiting of the current banknotes allegedly used for funding [[terrorism in India|terrorism]], as well as a crack down on [[Indian black money|black money in the country]].<ref name="India Today">{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/live-pm-narendra-modi-addresses-nation/1/805755.html |title=Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs 500, Rs 2000 notes and black money |date=8 November 2016 |accessdate=9 November 2016 |work=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-500-and-Rs-1000-notes-pulled-out-of-circulation-immediately-PM-Narendra-Modi/articleshow/55315473.cms|title= Notes out of circulation|work= The Times of India|date= 8 November 2016}}</ref> The move was described as an effort to reduce [[Corruption in India|corruption]], the use of drugs, and [[smuggling]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://m.firstpost.com/india/rs-500-rs-1000-note-ban-narendra-modis-demonetisation-move-a-death-knell-to-hawala-trade-3101610.html|title= Corruption fight|work=first post|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BJP-hopes-demonetisation-will-pay-rich-dividends-in-state-polls/articleshow/55359573.cms|title=BJP policy|work= The Times of India|date=10 November 2016}}</ref> However, in the days following the demonetisation, banks and ATMs across the country faced severe cash shortages.<ref name="dryatm"/><ref name="IEchaos"/> The cash shortages had detrimental effects on a number of small businesses, [[Agriculture in India|agriculture]], and transportation, while people seeking to exchange their notes had lengthy waits, and several deaths were linked to the rush to exchange cash.<ref name="Aljazeera-1"/><ref name="death-ref1"/> Also, following Modi's announcement, the [[BSE SENSEX]] and [[NIFTY 50]] stock indices crashed for the next two days.<ref name="stockcrash9nov"/> |
|||
Initially, the move received support from some central bankers as well as from some international commentators. The move was also criticised as poorly planned and unfair, and was met with protests, litigation, and strikes against the government in several places across India. Debates also took place concerning the move in both houses of [[Parliament of India|Parliament]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/parliament-live-congress-pm-modi-raincoat-dr-manmohan-singh-opposition/1/878509.html |title=Demonetisation debate in Parliament: Disaster, says Chidambaram; high cash economy corrupt, counters Jaitley : India, News – India Today |publisher=Indiatoday.intoday.in |date=9 February 2017 |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-oppostion-parties-countrywide-protest-bandh-call-november-28-4391208/|title=Demonetisation: Opposition calls for countrywide protest on November 28|publisher=[[The Indian Express]]|access-date=23 November 2016|date=23 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/demonetisation-protest-sure-to-succeed-with-peoples-support/articleshow/55607966.cms|title='Demonetisation protest sure to succeed with people's support'|newspaper=[[The Economic Times]]|access-date=24 November 2016|date=24 November 2016}}</ref><section end="Lead"/> |
|||
The consensus is that demonetisation was not the right move to target black money, and was unsuccessful.<ref name="decoded" /><ref name=ArunKumar>{{cite book |last1=Kumar |first1=Arun |title=Demonetization and Black Economy |date=20 December 2017 |publisher=Penguin Random House India Private Limited |isbn=978-93-87326-41-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vs5SDwAAQBAJ |access-date=24 October 2023 |language=en}}</ref> Moreover, it was based on an incorrect understanding of what constitutes black money.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ramakumar |first1=R. |title=Note-Bandi: Demonetisation and India's Elusive Chase for Black Money |date=16 February 2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-909272-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=T59MDwAAQBAJ |access-date=24 October 2023 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
==Background== |
==Background== |
||
The Indian government had demonetised banknotes on two prior occasions—once in 1946 and once in 1978—and in both cases, the goal was to combat tax evasion via "[[Indian black money|black money]]" held outside the formal economic system.<ref name=IE2016>{{cite news |title=Demonetisation: Three times India faced the big move |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-narendra-modi-currency-ban-rs-500-rs-1000-1946-1978-4381683/ |access-date=18 October 2018 |work=The Indian Express |date=16 November 2018}}</ref> In 1978, the [[Janata Party]] coalition government demonetised banknotes of {{₹|1000}}, {{₹|5000}} and {{₹|10000}}, again in the hopes of curbing [[counterfeit money]] and black money.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/uzZItqeHdMPHHgFJaq2BnM/A-history-of-demonetization-in-India.html | title=Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes may be back, if history is a guide | work=Live Mint | date=9 November 2016 | access-date=9 November 2016 | author=Gopika Gopakumar, Vishwanath Nair}}</ref> |
|||
In 2012, the [[Central Board of Direct Taxes]] recommended against demonetisation, saying in a report that "demonetisation may not be a solution for tackling black money or shadow economy, which is largely held in the form of [[Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988|benami properties]], bullion and jewelry."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/demonetisation-black-money-corruption-banks-atms-modi-finance-ministry4375205/|title=At least 4 months needed to replace demonetised notes, not 50 days: Here's why|date=14 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://dor.gov.in/sites/default/files/Measures_Tackle_BlackMoney.pdf|title=Measures to Tackle Black Money in India and Abroad}}</ref> According to data from income tax probes, black money holders kept only 6% or less of their wealth as cash, suggesting that targeting this cash would not be a successful strategy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cash-has-only-6-share-in-black-money-seizures-reveals-income-tax-data/story-JfFuTiJYtxKwJQhz2ApxlL.html |title=Why govt's demonetisation move may fail to win the war against black money |work=Hindustan Times |date=12 November 2016 |access-date=12 November 2016 |author=Appu Esthose Suresh}}</ref> |
|||
Historically, previous Indian governments had demonetised bank notes. In January 1946, banknotes of 1,000 and 10,000 rupees were withdrawn and new notes of 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 rupees were introduced in 1954. The [[Janata Party]] coalition government had again demonetised banknotes of 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 rupees on 16 January 1978 as a means of curbing [[counterfeit money]] and black money.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/uzZItqeHdMPHHgFJaq2BnM/A-history-of-demonetization-in-India.html | title=Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes may be back, if history is a guide | work=Live Mint | date=8 November 2016 | accessdate=9 November 2016 | author=Gopika Gopakumar, Vishwanath Nair}}</ref> |
|||
== Demonetisation process == |
|||
In 2012, the [[Central Board of Direct Taxes]] had recommended against demonetisation, saying in a report that "demonetisation may not be a solution for tackling black money or economy, which is largely held in the form of [[Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988|benami properties]], bullion and jewellery".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/demonetisation-black-money-corruption-banks-atms-modi-finance-ministry4375205/|title=At least 4 months needed to replace demonetised notes, not 50 days: Here’s why|date=14 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>http://dor.gov.in/sites/upload_files/revenue/files/Measures_Tackle_BlackMoney.pdf</ref> According to data from income tax probes, black money holders keep only 6% or less of their ill-gotten wealth as cash, hence targeting this cash may not be a successful strategy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cash-has-only-6-share-in-black-money-seizures-reveals-income-tax-data/story-JfFuTiJYtxKwJQhz2ApxlL.html |title=Why govt's demonetisation move may fail to win the war against black money |work=Hindustan Times |date=12 November 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016 |author=Appu Esthose Suresh}}</ref> |
|||
{{multiple image |
|||
| width = |
|||
| direction = vertical |
|||
| image1=India 500 INR, MG series, 2014, obverse.jpg | alt1=INR 500 banknote |
|||
| image2=India 1000 INR, MG series, 2006, obverse.jpg | alt2=INR 1000 banknote |
|||
| footer = Demonetised {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]] |
|||
}} |
|||
===Preparation and announcement=== |
|||
On 28 October 2016 the total banknotes in circulation in India was {{INRConvert|17.77|t}}. In terms of value, the annual report of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) of 31 March 2016 stated that total bank notes in circulation valued to {{INRConvert|16.42|t}} of which nearly 86% (around {{INRConvert|14.18|t}}) were ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes. In terms of volume, the report stated that 24% (around 22.03 billion) of the total 90266 million banknotes were in circulation.<ref name="equipped">{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/web-edits/rs-500-rs-1000-notes-are-banks-equipped-to-replace-1874-crore-pieces-of-notes-4364746/|title=Are banks equipped to replace 2,300 crore pieces of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes?|date=9 November 2016|work=[[The Indian Express]]|accessdate=9 November 2016|author=Damodaran, Harish}}</ref> |
|||
The plan to demonetise the {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes was initiated between six and ten months before it was a report by the [[State Bank of India]] (SBI) analysed possible strategies and effects of demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Rs-500-Rs-1000-note-rumours-not-polls-behind-cash-surge-SBI/articleshow/51736091.cms |title=Rs 500, Rs 1,000 note rumours, not polls, behind cash surge: SBI |work=The Times of India |date=8 April 2016 |access-date=12 November 2016}}</ref> In May 2016, the [[Reserve Bank of India]] had started preparing for new banknotes and confirmed the design of {{₹|2000}} banknotes in August 2016. The printing of new banknotes started in October when the news stories of forthcoming new banknotes appeared in the media.<ref name="cnbchistory">{{cite web | url=https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/08/india-demonetization-news-modis-black-money-move-kept-a-closely-guarded-secret.html | title=India demonetization news: Modi's black money move kept a closely guarded secret| website=[[CNBC]]| date=9 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-in-the-works-for-6-months-10-people-in-the-loop-including-raghuram-rajan-116111000009_1.html|title=Demonetisation: In the works for 6 months, 10 people in the loop, including Raghuram Rajan|last=Roychoudhury|first=Arup|date=10 November 2016|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=23 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-of-rs-500-1000-notes-move-was-in-the-pipeline-for-months/article9321244.ece|title=Move was in the pipeline for months|date=9 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> On 27 October 2016, the [[Hindi]] daily ''[[Dainik Jagran]]'' published a report quoting RBI sources speaking of the forthcoming of {{₹|2000}} banknotes alongside withdrawal of {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes.<ref>{{cite news |last=Dube |first=Brajesh |date=2016-10-27 |title=अब आएगा दो हजार का नोट |url=http://epaper.jagran.com/epaperimages3/27102016/lucknow/26ayd-pg18-0.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161111210806/http://epaper.jagran.com/epaperimages3/27102016/lucknow/26ayd-pg18-0.pdf |archive-date=2016-11-11 |access-date=2024-03-18 |work=[[Dainik Jagran]] |pages=14}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=2016-11-11 |title=Journalist broke story about currency demonetisation a fortnight back |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/journalist-broke-story-about-currency-demonetisation-a-fortnight-back/story-3OpgtR5ehdzkRRrwQITLgK.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231007141916/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/journalist-broke-story-about-currency-demonetisation-a-fortnight-back/story-3OpgtR5ehdzkRRrwQITLgK.html |archive-date=2023-10-07 |access-date=2016-11-12 |work=[[Hindustan Times]]}}</ref> On 21 October 2016, ''[[Business Line|The Hindu Business Line]]'' had also covered a story on demands to withdraw the banknotes to prevent hoarding of black money.<ref>{{cite news |last1=G Naga |first1=Sridhar |last2=Vageesh |first2=NS |date=2016-10-21 |title=Coming soon to your wallet: ₹2,000 notes |url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/coming-soon-to-your-wallet-2000-notes/article9252371.ece |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170225034010/http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/coming-soon-to-your-wallet-2000-notes/article9252371.ece |archive-date=2017-02-25 |access-date=2024-03-18 |work=[[Business Line|The Hindu Business Line]]}}</ref> |
|||
The Board of the Reserve Bank of India met on Nov 8th, 2016, 5:30 PM to consider a letter from the Ministry of Finance regarding demonetization. "Two key reasons for the proposal cited in the government letter were: (1) between 2011 and 2016, the supply of 500- and 1,000-rupee bills had grown by 76 and 108 percent, respectively, while India's economy had only grown by 30 percent during this period; and (2) cash typically facilitated "black money." The board was further told that the measure was also intended to encourage greater financial inclusion and to incentivize greater digitization of the economy. The board approved the proposal, but not before making a few trenchant comments. It noted that the measure may not have the desired effect on black money because most people do not hold undeclared wealth in cash. It further worried about the negative effects on growth that were likely to occur in the short run. Possibly the most damning observation was that the primary fact on which the government had based its proposal—that the supply of 500- and 1,000-rupee bills had far outstripped the growth rate of the economy—was simply wrong. The board pointed out the embarrassing fact that the government had compared GDP growth in real terms with the growth of currency supply in nominal terms. In fact, nominal GDP growth had summed to over 80 percent between 2011 and 2016 and hence was in line with the growth of the currency bills to be demonetized."<ref name="Lahiri 63, 55–74">{{Cite journal|last=Lahiri|first=Amartya|date=2020-02-01|title=The Great Indian Demonetization|journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives|volume=34|issue=1|pages=63, 55–74|doi=10.1257/jep.34.1.55|issn=0895-3309|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Patel |first1=Urjit R |title=The Minutes of the 561st meeting of the Central Board of Directors of the Reserve Bank of India |url=http://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/download/DeMon%201stattachment.pdf |website=humanrightsinitiative.org |access-date=31 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=ENS Economic Bureau |title=Govt, RBI discussed note ban for six months; Directors warned against short-term negative effect |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/business/govt-rbi-discussed-note-ban-for-six-months-directors-warned-against-short-term-negative-effect-5621665/ |access-date=31 December 2021 |agency=Indian Express |date=March 12, 2019}}</ref> |
|||
In the past, the [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP) had opposed demonetisation. BJP spokesperson [[Meenakshi Lekhi]] had said in 2014 that "The ''aam aurat''s and the ''aadmi''s (general population), those who are illiterate and have no access to banking facilities, will be the ones to be hit by such diversionary measures."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/the-measure-is-anti-poor-when-bjp-opposed-demonetisation-during-upa-govt/story-1HSYEYCaX3SaIsRS6q2rhJ.html|title=The measure is 'anti-poor': When BJP opposed demonetisation during UPA govt|date=12 November 2016|work=Hindustan Times|accessdate=12 November 2016|author=Kumar Uttam}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/11/bjp-had-a-very-different-view-on-demonetisation-in-2014/|title=BJP Had A Very Different View on Demonetisation in 2014|date=11 November 2016|publisher=Huffingtonpost.in|author=Betwa Sharma|accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-bjp-aap-currency-ban-4370935/|title=Explain opposition to similar move by UPA: AAP to BJP on demonetisation|date=12 November 2016|work=The Indian Express|accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sanjeev-singh-blog/how-bjp-had-termed-demonetisation-as-anti-poor-in-2014/|title=How BJP had termed demonetisation as 'anti-poor' in 2014|work=The Times of India|author=|accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> On 8 May 2014, [[RuPay]], domestic card system, was launched.<ref>{{cite web|author=IANS |url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/pranab-launches-rupay-indias-own-card-payment-network/article5989370.ece |title=Pranab launches RuPay, India’s own card payment network |publisher=The Hindu |date=2014-05-08 |accessdate=2014-08-14}}</ref> The Government of India had launched [[Jan Dhan Yojana]] for [[financial inclusion]] of people having no banking system in August 2014. The Government of India devised an Income Declaration Scheme (IDS), which opened on 1 June and ended on 30 September 2016. Under the scheme, the [[black money]] holders could come clean by declaring the assets, paying the tax and penalty of 45% thereafter. The scheme yielded {{INRConvert|65250|c|lk=c}} from 64,275 declarations with 45% of it as the revenue to the government.<ref name="Firstpost 2016">{{cite web | title=Rs 500, Rs 1000 banned; Rs 2000 to come: Did we miss these Twitter, RBI hints? | website=Firstpost | date=9 November 2016 | url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/rs-500-rs-1000-banned-rs-2000-to-come-did-we-miss-these-twitter-rbi-hints-3095984.html | accessdate=29 November 2016}}</ref> The [[Unified Payments Interface]] was launched by [[National Payments Corporation of India]] in April 2016 to encourage cashless payments.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/What-is-Unified-Payment-Interface/article14593189.ece|title=What is Unified Payment Interface?|website=[[The Hindu]]|date=26 August 2016|accessdate=30 November 2016|last=Saha|first=Manojit}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Union Council of Ministers|Union cabinet]] was apprised of the plan on 8 November 2016 in a meeting in the evening convened by Prime Minister Modi.<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/one-year-of-note-ban-the-ultra-secret-move-that-no-one-came-to-know-for-several-months/articleshow/61528334.cms | title=One year of note ban: The ultra-secret move that no one came to know for several months| newspaper=The Economic Times| date=7 November 2017| last1=Sinha| first1=Smita}}</ref> Soon after the meeting, Modi announced the demonetisation in an unscheduled live national televised address at 20:15 [[Indian Standard Time|IST]].<ref name="auto">{{cite news|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/pm-modi-speaks-to-nation-tonight-at-8-pm-1622948|title=Watch PM Modi's Entire Speech on Discontinuing 500, 1000 Rupee Notes|date=8 November 2016|publisher=NDTV India|last1=Bhatt|first1=Abhinav|access-date=8 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/live-narendra-modis-address-to-nation/article9320548.ece|title=Demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes: RBI explains|date=8 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu|access-date=10 November 2016}}</ref> He declared circulation of all {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]] as invalid effective from the midnight of the same day, and announced the issuance of new {{₹|500}} and {{₹|2000}} banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi New Series]] in exchange for the demonetised banknotes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/demonetisation-anniversary-a-year-later-heres-what-prime-minister-narendra-modi-had-said-on-8-november-2016-4198753.html|title=Demonetisation anniversary: Full text of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech from 8 November, 2016 – Firstpost|website=First Post|date=8 November 2017|access-date=26 February 2018}}</ref> |
|||
Modi said that the queues due to demonetisation were the last queues that would end all other queues.<ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/pm-narendra-modis-top-quotes-parivartan-rally-moradabad-this-queue-is-the-last-queue-to-end-all-queues-4408467/</ref><ref>http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/A-queue-to-end-all-queues-PM-Narendra-Modi-hard-sells-demonetisation-in-Moradabad/articleshow/55770739.cms</ref> |
|||
===Information leak rumours=== |
|||
==Televised address== |
|||
After the announcement of demonetisation, a prominent businessman claimed to have received prior tip-offs and rumours warning of the move and after seeing leaked photos of new {{₹|2000}} notes "knew what was coming", allowing them to preserve their money by converting it into smaller denominations.<ref>{{cite web|first=Aman|last=Sethi|url=https://www.thequint.com/business/2016/11/11/before-pms-announcement-rumours-of-demonetisation-abounded |title=Before PM's Announcement, Rumours of Demonetisation Abounded |publisher=The Quint |date=6 November 2016 |access-date=12 November 2016}}</ref> A [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP) member from [[Rajasthan Legislative Assembly]], [[Bhawani Singh Rajawat]], claimed in a video that wealthy businessmen were informed about the demonetisation before it occurred. He later denied making the comments.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/demonetisation-ambani-adani-were-informed-and-thus-made-arrangements-says-bjp-mla/447944/|title=Demonetisation: Ambani, Adani were informed and thus made arrangements, says BJP MLA|date=17 November 2016|access-date=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/nov/17/adanis-ambanis-already-knew-about-currency-ban-bjp-mla-caught-on-camera-1539642.html|title=Adanis, Ambanis already knew about currency ban: BJP MLA caught on camera|access-date=24 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Cash exchange and withdrawal=== |
|||
On 8 November 2016, an announcement was made by the [[Prime Minister of India]] [[Narendra Modi]] in an unscheduled live televised address to the nation at 20:15 [[Indian Standard Time|IST]].<ref name="auto"/><ref name="auto1"/> In the announcement, Modi declared circulation of all ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]] as invalid effective from the midnight of the same day, and announced the issuance of new ₹500 and [[Indian 2000-rupee note|₹2,000]] banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi New Series]] in exchange for the old banknotes. |
|||
[[File:2016 Indian currency note demonetisation.jpg|thumb|People gathered at an ATM of [[Axis Bank]] on 16 November 2016 in [[Mehsana]], Gujarat to withdraw cash following deposit of demonetised banknotes in bank.]] |
|||
The Reserve Bank of India stipulated that the demonetised banknotes could be deposited with banks over a period of fifty days until 30 December 2016. The banknotes could also be exchanged for legal tender over the counter at all banks. The limit for such exchange was {{₹|4000}} per person from 8 to 13 November, was increased to {{₹|4500}} from 14 to 17 November, and reduced to {{₹|2000}} from 18 to 25 November.<ref name="revisedguidelines" /><ref name="rbirevision" /><ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/Govt_decisions_on_oldNotes17112016.pdf|title=17 November Government press release|website=Ministry of Finance, Government of India|access-date=17 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161117213433/http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/Govt_decisions_on_oldNotes17112016.pdf|archive-date=17 November 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> The exchange of banknotes was stopped completely on 25 November, although the government had previously stated that the volume of exchange would be increased after that date.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-modi-said-exchange-limit-to-be-hiked-after-november-24-exchange-stopped-4393985/|title=All note exchange stopped from today, PM Modi goes back on promise of hike after November 24|date=25 November 2016}}</ref> International airports also facilitated an exchange of banknotes for foreign tourists and out-bound travellers, amounting to a total value of {{₹|5000}} per person.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/outlets-that-will-accept-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes-in-next-72-hours/articleshow/55317768.cms|title=Outlets that will accept Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes in next 72 hours|date=8 November 2016|newspaper=The Economic Times|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> Fuel pumps, government hospitals, railway and airline booking counters, state-government recognised dairies and ration stores, and crematoriums were allowed to accept the demonetised banknotes until 2 December 2016.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/press_note_01122016.pdf|title=With effect from the midnight of 2nd December, 2016, old Rs. 500 bank notes will not be accepted at petrol, diesel and gas outlets of Public Sector Oil and Gas Marketing Companies as well as for purchase of Air Tickets at Airports; However, supply of LPG continues to be in the exempted category for the purpose of payment through old Rs. 500 bank notes.|date=1 December 2016|website=Ministry of Finance, Government of India|access-date=11 January 2017}}</ref> |
|||
After the official announcement by Prime Minister Modi, the [[Governor of the Reserve Bank of India]], [[Urjit Patel]], and Economic Affairs secretary, Shaktikanta Das explained in a press conference that while the supply of notes of all denominations had increased by 40% between 2011 and 2016, the ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes increased by 76% and 109% respectively in this period owing to forgery. This forged cash was then used to fund terrorist activities against India. As a result the decision to eliminate the notes had been taken.<ref name="News 18">{{cite web|url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/why-were-the-notes-scrapped-rbi-chief-and-economic-affairs-secretary-explain-1309756.html|title=Why Were the Notes Scrapped? RBI Chief, Economic Affairs Secy Explain|date=8 November 2016|accessdate=9 November 2016|work=News 18}}</ref> |
|||
Cash withdrawals from bank accounts were restricted to ₹10,000 per day and {{₹|20000}} per week per account from 10 to 13 November.<ref name="withdrawaloflegal"/> This limit was increased to {{₹|24000}} per week from 14 November 2016.<ref name="revisedguidelines">{{cite web|url=http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/MoF_reviewed_availability_distribution_Notes.pdf|title=Finance Ministry has reviewed the position regarding availability and distribution of all denominations of bank notes|publisher=Ministry of Finance, Government of India|access-date=13 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161114012438/http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/MoF_reviewed_availability_distribution_Notes.pdf|archive-date=14 November 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="rbirevision">{{cite web|url=https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=10706&Mode=0|title=Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of existing ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- Bank Notes – Revision in limits|publisher=Reserve Bank of India |access-date=17 March 2017}}</ref> Limits on cash withdrawals from Current accounts/ Cash credit accounts/ Overdraft accounts were withdrawn later. RBI increased the withdrawal limit from Savings Bank account to {{₹|50000}} from the earlier {{₹|24000}} on 20 February 2017 and then on 13 March 2017, it removed all withdrawal limits from savings bank accounts.<ref name="FE1">{{Cite news|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/rbi-removes-limit-on-cash-withdrawal-banks-go-back-to-pre-demonetisation-era/586375/|title=RBI removes limit on cash withdrawal, banks go back to pre-demonetisation era|date=13 March 2017|work=The Financial Express|access-date=26 May 2017|language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
Patel also informed that the decision had been made about six months ago, and the printing of new banknotes of denomination ₹500 and ₹2,000 had already started. However, only the top members of the government, security agencies and the central bank were aware of the move. But media had reported in October 2016 about the introduction of ₹2,000 denomination well before the official announcement by RBI. This statement has led to much debate, because the Reserve Bank governor six months before the announcement was Raghuram Rajan, while the new banknotes have the signature of the newly appointed governor, [[Urjit Patel]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Sridhar|first1=G Naga|last2=Vageesh|first2=NS|title=Coming soon to your wallet: ₹2,000 notes|url=http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/coming-soon-to-your-wallet-2000-notes/article9252371.ece|work=[[Business Line]]|date=21 October 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-of-rs-500-1000-notes-move-was-in-the-pipeline-for-months/article9321244.ece|title=Move was in the pipeline for months|date=9 November 2016|work=The Hindu|accessdate=9 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
A daily limit on withdrawals from ATMs was also imposed varying from {{₹|2000}} per day until 14 November,<ref name="ATMsnotdispensing">{{cite web|title=ATMs –Non-dispensing of Old High Denomination Notes – Closure of operations|url=https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=10683&Mode=0|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|access-date=8 November 2016|date=8 November 2016}}</ref> and {{₹|2500}} per day until 31 December.<ref name="revisedguidelines" /><ref name="rbirevision" /> This limit was increased to {{₹|4500}} per day from 1 January,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=10807&Mode=0|date=30 December 2016|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|title=Cash withdrawal from ATMs – Enhancement of daily limits |access-date=17 March 2017}}</ref> and again to {{₹|10000}} from 16 January 2017.<ref name="FE1"/> From 17 November, families were allowed to withdraw {{₹|250000}} for wedding expenses. Farmers were permitted to withdraw {{₹|25000}} per week against crop loans.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetisation-weddings-shaktikanta-das-government-economic-affairs-secretary/1/812730.html|title=Demonetisation rule modified, families can withdraw Rs 2.5 lakh for weddings from one a count|work=India Today|date=17 November 2016|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
==Exchanging old notes== |
|||
{{news release|section|date= December 2016}} |
|||
{{update section|date=November 2016}} |
|||
[[File:2016 Indian currency note demonetisation.jpg|thumb|People gathered at ATM of [[Axis Bank]] in [[Mehsana]], Gujarat to withdraw cash following deposit of demonetised currency notes in bank on 15 November 2016.]] |
|||
=== Ordinance and Acts === |
|||
The Reserve Bank of India laid down a detailed procedure for the exchange of the demonetised banknotes with new [[Indian 500-rupee note|₹500]] and [[Indian 2000-rupee note|₹2,000]] banknotes of the [[Mahatma Gandhi New Series]] and [[Indian 100-rupee note|₹100]] banknotes of the preceding [[Mahatma Gandhi Series]].<ref name="withdrawaloflegal" /> Following are the key points: |
|||
The Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016 was issued on 28 December 2016, ending the liability of the government for the demonetised banknotes. The ordinance also imposed fines on people found carrying out transactions with them after 8 November 2016, or holding more than ten of them after 30 December 2016. It provided for the exchange of the banknotes after 30 December for people who had been outside India between 9 November and 30 December.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Specified Banknotes Ordinance, 2016|url=http://dea.gov.in/sites/default/files/Ordinance%2010%20of%202016%2030.12.2016.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cabinet-clears-ordinance-to-punish-people-holding-banned-notes-beyond-deadline/story-QwwN1lGHU9NuhJP2ntalmM.html|title=Cabinet clears ordinance to punish people holding banned notes beyond deadline|date=28 December 2016|newspaper=hindustantimes.com/|access-date=10 January 2017}}</ref> The Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017 was notified on 1 March 2017, replacing the ordinance.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/0uUjg2IQGUnIAxQNRokFVK/Govt-notifies-law-to-make-possession-of-old-Rs500-Rs1000-no.html|title=Govt notifies law to make possession of old Rs500, Rs1000 notes punishable|work=Live Mint|date=1 March 2017|access-date=18 October 2018}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:People gathered at SBI ATM in Paravur near Kollam city in Kerala due to Indian currency demonetisation, Nov 2016.jpg|right|thumb|Long queue in front of [[State Bank of India|SBI]] ATM at [[Paravur, Kollam|Paravur]] near the city of [[Kollam]] in [[Kerala]], 19th November 2016.]] |
|||
* Citizens will have until 30 December 2016 to tender their old banknotes at any office of the RBI or any bank branch and credit the value into their respective bank accounts.<ref name=withdrawaloflegal /> |
|||
* Cash withdrawals from bank accounts were restricted to ₹10,000 per day and ₹20,000 per week per account from 10 to 13 November 2016.<ref name=withdrawaloflegal /> This limit was increased to ₹24,000 per week from 14 November.<ref name="revisedguidelines">{{cite web|url=http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/MoF_reviewed_availability_distribution_Notes.pdf|title=Finance Ministry has reviewed the position regarding availability and distribution of all denominations of bank notes|website=Ministry of Finance, Government of India|accessdate=13 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="rbirevision">{{cite web|url=https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=10706&Mode=0|title=Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of existing ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- Bank Notes – Revision in limits|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|accessdate=13 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
* For immediate cash needs, the old banknotes could be exchanged for the new ₹500 and ₹2,000 banknotes as well as ₹100 banknotes over the counter of bank branches by filling up a requisition form along with a valid ID proof.<ref name=withdrawaloflegal /> It was announced that this facility would be available until 30 December 2016. |
|||
** Initially, the limit was fixed at ₹4,000 per person from 8 to 13 November 2016. |
|||
** This limit was increased to ₹4,500 per person from 14 to 17 November 2016.<ref name="revisedguidelines" /><ref name="rbirevision" /> |
|||
** The limit was reduced to ₹2,000 per person from 18 November 2016.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=http://finmin.nic.in/press_room/2016/Govt_decisions_on_oldNotes17112016.pdf|title=The Central Government takes several decisions to facilitate farmers, small traders, Group ‘C’ Employees of Central Government including equivalent levels in the Defence and Para Military Forces, Railways and Central Public Sector Enterprises in the aftermath of the cancellation of the legal tender character of the old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes; Also decides to reduce the limit of exchange of old Rs. 500/- and Rs. 1000/- notes across the counter in banks from Rs. 4500/- to Rs. 2000/-with effect from 18th November, 2016.|last=|first=|date=|website=Ministry of Finance, Government of India|publisher=|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
** All exchange of banknotes was abruptly stopped from 25 November 2016.<ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-modi-said-exchange-limit-to-be-hiked-after-november-24-exchange-stopped-4393985/</ref> |
|||
* Initially, all ATMs were dispensing banknotes of only ₹50 and ₹100 denominations and cash withdrawals from ATMs were restricted to ₹2000 per day.<ref name=ATMsnotdispensing>{{cite web|title=ATMs –Non-dispensing of Old High Denomination Notes – Closure of operations|url=https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=10683&Mode=0|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|accessdate=8 November 2016|date=8 November 2016}}</ref> From 14 November onwards, ATMs recalibrated to dispense new ₹500 and ₹2000 notes will allow a maximum withdrawal of ₹2,500 per day, while other ATMs dispensing banknotes of only ₹50 and ₹100 denominations will allow a maximum withdrawal of ₹2000 per day.<ref name=revisedguidelines /><ref name="rbirevision" /> |
|||
==Objectives and outcomes== |
|||
However, exceptions were given to petrol, [[CNG]] and gas stations, government hospitals, [[Indian Railways|railway]] and airline booking counters, state-government recognised dairies and ration stores, and crematoriums to accept the old ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes until 11 November 2016, which was later extended to 14 November 2016 and once again to 24 November 2016.<ref>{{cite news|title=Govt extends old notes exemption deadline to midnight Nov 24|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-move-secretary-economic-affairs-shaktikanta-das-press-conference-in-new-delhi/article9343621.ece|accessdate=14 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=FAQs on Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of the existing Bank Notes in the denominations of ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/-|url=https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/FAQView.aspx?Id=119|publisher=Reserve Bank of India|accessdate=13 November 2016}}</ref> International airports were also instructed to facilitate an exchange of notes amounting to a total value of ₹5,000 for foreign tourists and out-bound passengers.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/outlets-that-will-accept-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes-in-next-72-hours/articleshow/55317768.cms | title=Outlets that will accept Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes in next 72 hours | work=The Economic Times | date=8 November 2016 | accessdate=9 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The government said that the main objective of the exercise was curbing [[Indian black money|black money]], which included income which had not been reported and thus was untaxed; money gained through corruption, illegal goods sales and illegal activities such as [[human trafficking]]; and [[counterfeit currency]]. Other stated objectives included expanding the tax base and increasing the number of taxpayers; reducing the number of transactions carried out by cash; reducing the finances available to terrorists and radical groups such as the [[Naxalite]] Maoists; and integrating the formal and informal economies.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/sH5FSnXPkuAhknhzuPgH3M/Demonetisation-and-the-fight-against-black-money.html | title=Demonetisation and the fight against black money| date=7 November 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/demonetisation-was-not-designed-only-to-fight-black-money-says-finance-minister-jaitley | title=Demonetisation Was Not Designed Only to Fight Black Money, Says Finance Minister Jaitley| date=30 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/demonetisation-achieved-objectives-quite-substantially-govt/articleshow/65598015.cms | title=Demonetisation achieved objectives quite substantially: Govt – Times of India| website=[[The Times of India]]| date=29 August 2018}}</ref> |
|||
===Shifting of goalposts=== |
|||
Under the revised guidelines issued on 17 November 2016, families were allowed to withdraw ₹250,000 for wedding expenses from one account provided it was [[Know your customer|KYC]] compliant. The rules were also changed for farmers who are permitted to withdraw ₹25,000 per week from their accounts against crop loan.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetisation-weddings-shaktikanta-das-government-economic-affairs-secretary/1/812730.html|title=Demonetisation rule modified, families can withdraw Rs 2.5 lakh for weddings from one account|work=India Today|date=17 November 2016|accessdate=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The government was described as '[[Moving the goalposts|shifting the goalposts]]'<ref>{{cite news |last1=Sabnavis |first1=Madan |title=One year of demonetisation: Changing goal posts and limited impact |url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/one-year-of-demonetisation-changing-goal-posts-and-limited-impact-117110600176_1.html |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=Business Standard India |date=6 November 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=RBI report on demonetisation: How Centre, BJP kept moving the goalposts |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/rbi-report-on-demonetisation-how-centre-bjp-kept-moving-the-goalposts/833966/ |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=The Financial Express |date=31 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title='PM Modi Shifting Goalposts on Demonetisation': On 4th Anniversary Congress Asks What Was Achieved |url=https://www.news18.com/news/politics/pm-modi-shifting-goalposts-on-demonetisation-on-4th-anniversary-congress-asks-what-was-achieved-3056774.html |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=News18 |date=8 November 2020 |language=en}}</ref> with respect to the goals of the demonetisation exercise. The initial stated goal was to curb black money, corruption, and terrorism, but as it became apparent that almost all the cash was being exchanged,<ref>{{cite news |title=Demonetisation: As money flowed back in, how goalposts were shifted |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/demonetisation-rbi-annual-report-arun-jaitley-pm-narendra-modi-as-money-flowed-back-in-how-goalposts-were-shifted-4821566/ |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=The Indian Express |date=31 August 2017 |language=en}}</ref> the goals were expanded to include making India a cashless economy, neutralisation of money held by Maoists, terrorists and human traffickers, among others.<ref>{{cite news |title=Instant Recall: How Modi Government Kept Changing Demonetisation's Goalposts |url=https://thewire.in/economy/modi-demonetisation-aims-golas |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=The Wire}}</ref> |
|||
===Black money=== |
|||
== Prior leakage of information == |
|||
The government estimated that ₹5 trillion, or approximately 20%, of the demonetised banknotes would be permanently removed from circulation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/demonetisation-black-money-cash-crunch-rs-14-lakh-crore-in-old-notes-are-back-only-rs-75000-crore-out-rbi4465542/|title=Demonetisation: Rs 14 lakh crore in old notes are back, only Rs 75,000 crore out|date=9 January 2017|newspaper=The Indian Express|language=en|access-date=22 January 2017}}</ref> However, according to a 2018 report from the RBI, 99.3% of the demonetised banknotes, or ₹15.3 trillion of the ₹15.41 trillion that had been demonetised, were deposited with the banking system. The banknotes that were not deposited were worth ₹107.2 billion.<ref name="itoday1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/demonetisation-what-india-gained-and-lost-1327502-2018-08-30|title=Demonetisation: What India gained, and lost|last=Dutta|first=Prabash K.|date=30 August 2018|website=India Today|language=en|access-date=12 October 2018}}</ref> Commentators concluded that the government had failed in its aim of purging black money from the economy.<ref name="FTdemonetisationFail">{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/7dbe0e14-8d8a-11e7-a352-e46f43c5825d|title=India demonetisation failed to purge black money|website=Financial Times|date=31 August 2017|access-date=31 August 2017|last1=Mundy|first1=Simon|last2=Kazmin|first2=Amy|last3=Stacey|first3=Kiran}}</ref> |
|||
====Evasion==== |
|||
Several exact details pertaining to the decision to demonetise the notes had been published on 1 April 2016 in a [[Gujarat]]i newspaper called ''Akila'', including for instance, that there would be around 2 months' time to exchange banned notes, and that new notes in the ₹2,000 denomination would be issued.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Local-dailys-April-1-joke-turns-news-break-of-the-year/articleshow/55381283.cms|title=Local daily's April 1 joke turns news break of the year – Times of India|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indiasamvad.co.in/investigation/pm-modi-ministers-leaked-info-on-scrapping-rs-1000-in-april-17750 |title=Not a secret? Modi's ministers had leaked info about scrapping of Rs 1,000 in April |publisher=Indiasamvad.co.in |date=26 October 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016 |author=Sanjeev Singh}}</ref> The editor of the newspaper claimed that it was only an [[April fools day|April fool's day]] prank.<ref>{{cite web|author=Basant Rawat |url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1161111/jsp/frontpage/story_118632.jsp |title=Psst! A prank to save your black buck |work=The Telegraph|location=Kolkota |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Shop accepting 500 1000 rupee notes.jpg|thumb|A jewellery store in a shopping mall with a notice "We accept {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} notes", even after they were no longer valid banknotes.]] |
|||
There were reports of people circumventing the restrictions imposed on exchange transactions by conducting multiple transactions at different bank branches, and by sending hired people, employees, and followers in groups to exchange large amounts of demonetised banknotes at banks.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Parmar|first1=Beena|title=Despite Rs 4000-cap on money exchange, loophole allows multiple transactions|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/despite-rs-4000-cap-on-money-exchange-loophole-allows-multiple-transactions/story-lbw8xw5XCHvsS5DOawWB1O.html|access-date=13 November 2016|work=Hindustan Times|date=13 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-in-chennai-to-beat-cash-limit-they-send-full-teams-to-bank-4375951/|title=Demonetisation: In Chennai, To beat cash limit, they send full teams to bank|date=15 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref> In [[Gujarat]], [[Delhi]] and many other major cities, sales of gold increased post-demonetisation, surging the price as much as {{INRConvert|45|k}} from the ruling price of {{INRConvert|31.9|k}} per {{Convert|10|g}}.<ref name="Gold Price">{{cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2016/nov/10/gold-price-recovers-on-renewed-demand-1536940.html|title=Gold price recovers on renewed demand |date=10 November 2016 |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |access-date=10 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/scramble-for-gold-in-gujarat-after-demonetisation/article9323127.ece?homepage=true | title=Scramble for gold in Gujarat after demonetisation | work=[[The Hindu]] | date=9 November 2016 | access-date=9 November 2016 | author=Langa, Mahesh}}</ref> The [[Enforcement Directorate]] raided several [[forex]] establishments making backdated entries.<ref>{{cite news|title=Enforcement Directorate raids forex shops making back date entries|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/enforcement-directorate-raids-forex-shops-making-back-date-entries/articleshow/55373554.cms|work=The Economic Times|date=16 November 2016}}</ref> Money laundering using backdated accounting was carried out by co-operative banks,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Netas-using-co-op-banks-for-backdated-FDs-DDs/articleshow/55467204.cms|title=Netas using co-op banks for backdated FDs, DDs – Times of India|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=17 November 2016 }}</ref> jewellers,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/commodities/news/jewellers-issue-backdated-invoices-to-clients/articleshow/55349735.cms|title=Jewellers issue backdated invoices to clients – The Economic Times|newspaper=The Economic Times|date=10 November 2016|last1=Sahgal|first1=Ram}}</ref> sellers of mobile phones,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.in/back-dated-receipts-used-apple-iphone-sales-after-demonetisation-report-706095|title=Back-dated receipts used for Apple iPhone sales after demonetisation: Report|first=Pranshu|last=Rathi|website=[[International Business Times]]|date=29 November 2016}}</ref> and several other businesses.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/demonetisation-tiffin-service-to-dental-implants-all-tried-to-beat-system-swap-old-notes-income-tax-department-raids-4410874/|title=Tiffin service to dental implants: All tried to beat system, swap old notes|date=5 December 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The cash deposited into ''[[Hundi (cash collection box)|hundis]]'' (cash collection boxes in temples and gurudwaras) are exempted from inquiry by the tax department; this is sometimes to launder money.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thenewsminute.com/article/rs-500rs-1000-demonetisation-temple-money-hundis-not-come-under-scanner-52701|title=Rs 500/Rs 1000 demonetisation: Temple money from hundis not to come under scanner|date=10 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/13/13-ways-in-which-indians-will-convert-their-black-money-into-whi/|title=13 Ways In Which Indians Will Convert Their Black Money Into White Even After Demonetisation}}</ref> After the demonetisation, there was a spike in donations in the form of the demonetised banknotes in temples.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/demonetisation-temples-across-india-receive-high-currency-notes-as-donations-3112230.html|title=Demonetisation: Temples across India receive high currency notes as donations|date=18 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/religious-places-getting-over-the-demon-of-note-ban/articleshow/56041804.cms|title=Religious places getting over the 'demon' of note ban – Times of India|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=18 December 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhubaneswar/Rush-to-offer-Rs-500-Rs-1000-donations-at-Puri-Temple/articleshow/55347249.cms|title=Rush to offer Rs 500, Rs 1000 donations at Puri Temple|work=[[The Times of India]]|date=10 November 2016|first1=Debabrata|last1=Mohapatra }}</ref> People booked large numbers of railway tickets to dispose of unaccounted cash. This came to the notice of the [[Indian Railways]] authorities, who imposed restrictions to check evasion.<ref name=":0">{{cite news|title=Rlys sets 5000 as cash refund limit for tickets|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Rlys-sets-5000-as-cash-refund-limit-for-tickets/articleshow/55444673.cms|access-date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Railways say, no cash refund for tickets booked between Nov 9-11|url=http://zeenews.india.com/economy/railways-say-no-cash-refund-for-tickets-booked-between-nov-9-11_1949831.html|access-date=15 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
A fortnight before the official announcement, a news report in the Hindi daily ''[[Dainik Jagran]]'' quoting RBI sources mentioned about the coming release of new 2000 rupee note alongside withdrawal of 500 and 1000 rupee notes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://epaper.jagran.com/epaper/27-oct-2016-16-lucknow-archive-edition-ayodhya-Page-18.html# |title=ePaper link from Hindi daily Dainik Jagran of 27th Octomber 2016|work=Dainik Jagran Epaper |accessdate=23 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/journalist-broke-story-about-currency-demonetisation-a-fortnight-back/story-3OpgtR5ehdzkRRrwQITLgK.html |title=Journalist broke story about currency demonetisation a fortnight back |work=Hindustan Times |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Counterfeit banknotes=== |
|||
A businessman reportedly admitted in an interview that he had received prior warning of the impending demonetisation from a source in the government, and that he had sufficient time to convert most of his money into smaller denominations.<ref>{{cite web|author=Aman Sethi|url=https://www.thequint.com/business/2016/11/11/before-pms-announcement-rumours-of-demonetisation-abounded |title=Before PM's Announcement, Rumours of Demonetisation Abounded |publisher=The Quint |date=6 November 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable floatright" |
|||
|+Number of counterfeit banknotes detected in banks (April – March)<ref name="wire2018a"/><ref name="rbi1920">{{Cite book |url=https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/AnnualReport/PDFs/0RBIAR201920DA64F97C6E7B48848E6DEA06D531BADF.PDF |title=Reserve Bank of India Annual Report 2019-20 |publisher=Reserve Bank of India |pages=183}}</ref> |
|||
!Denomination |
|||
!style="text-align:right" |2015–16 |
|||
!style="text-align:right" |2016–17 |
|||
!style="text-align:right" |2017–18 |
|||
!style="text-align:right" |2018–19 |
|||
!style="text-align:right" |2019–20 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹1 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |2 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |3 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |4 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |3 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |4 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹2 and ₹5 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |2 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |80 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |1 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |- |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |22 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹10 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |134 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |523 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |287 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |345 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |844 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹20 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |96 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |324 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |437 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |818 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |510 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹50 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |6,453 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |9,222 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |23,447 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |36,875 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |47,454 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹100 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |221,447 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |177,195 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |239,182 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |2,21,218 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |1,68,739 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹200 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |NA |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |NA |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |79 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |12,728 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |31,969 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹500 (old) |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |261,695 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |317,567 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |127,918 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |971 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |11 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹500 (new) |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |NA |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |199 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |9,892 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |21,865 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |30,054 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹1000 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |143,099 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |256,324 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |103,611 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |717 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |72 |
|||
|- |
|||
|₹2000 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |NA |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |638 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |17,929 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |21,847 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |17,020 |
|||
|- |
|||
|Total |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |632,926 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |762,027 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |522,783 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |3,17,384 |
|||
|style="text-align:right" |2,96,695 |
|||
|} |
|||
After demonetisation, there was an increase in the number of counterfeit {{₹|100}} and {{₹|50}} banknotes. The number of counterfeit {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} (demonetised version) banknotes saw an increase in 2016–17 and subsequently a decline in 2017–18. But in 2017–18, there was an increase in counterfeit {{₹|500}} and {{₹|2000}} (new version) banknotes than the previous year.<ref name="wire2018a">{{Cite web|url=https://thewire.in/economy/how-successful-was-demonetisation-four-takeaways-from-the-rbis-annual-report|title=How Successful was Demonetisation? Four Takeaways From the RBI's Annual Report|date=30 August 2018|website=The Wire|access-date=13 October 2018}}</ref> There has been no significant change in the number of counterfeit banknotes detected. In 2017–18, the number of detected counterfeit banknotes was close to the number before demonetisation.<ref name="mintsep18"/> Additionally, after demonetisation, only 0.0035% of the {{₹|1000}} banknotes were found to be counterfeit.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/only-12-of-demonetised-1000-notes-did-not-return-rbi/article19587973.ece|title=Only 1.2% of ₹1,000 notes not returned to banks: RBI report|date=30 August 2017|access-date=26 February 2018|via=www.thehindu.com|newspaper=The Hindu}}</ref> The number of counterfeit banknotes of {{₹|500}} and {{₹|2000}} (new version) detected continue to increase while overall number declined in 2018-9 and 2019–20.<ref name="rbi1920"/> |
|||
===Tax collection=== |
|||
The chairman of the [[State Bank of India]] had also openly spoken in April 2016 about the possibility of demonetisation of {{INR}}500 and {{INR}}1000 notes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Rs-500-Rs-1000-note-rumours-not-polls-behind-cash-surge-SBI/articleshow/51736091.cms |title=Rs 500, Rs 1,000 note rumours, not polls, behind cash surge: SBI |work=The Times of India |date=8 April 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
{{Image frame |align=left |caption=Tax-to-GDP ratio (%)<ref name="mintsep18"/>|content= |
|||
{{Graph:Chart|width=350|height=100|xAxisTitle=Financial Year|yAxisTitle=Tax-to-GDP ratio (%)|type=line|x=2011–12, 2012–13, 2013–14, 2014–15, 2015–16,2016–17,2017–18,2018–19|y=10.2,10.4,10.1,10,10.6,11.2,11.6|colors=#ff8000}}}} |
|||
The number of income tax returns filing increased from 43.3 million to 52.9 million between the financial year of 2016 and 2017, which was not a significant increase compared to the increase between 2015 and 2016. The tax compliance had increased with a number of income tax returns filing increased but the majority of them were from salaried and non-business class. The income tax collections increased in the financial year of 2017 due to Income Disclosure Scheme 2016. If adjusted for it, the increase in tax collection was modest. The tax-to-GDP ratio has increased due to expanding tax base.<ref name="mintaa18">{{cite web | url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/C4Q8mpskSbfEzmG8ZWBY9H/Can-we-measure-demonetisations-impact-on-income-tax-collect.html | title=Has demonetisation really boosted income tax collections?| date=23 May 2017}}</ref><ref name="mintsep18"/> An analysis of the economic data shows that there has been no substantial increase in the number of new tax payers or direct tax collection due to demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/did-demonetisation-increase-tax-base-not-really-1772370 | title=Did Demonetisation Increase Tax Base? Not Really}}</ref><ref name="mintaa18"/><ref>{{Cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/did-cash-ban-help-raise-tax-base-itrs-rising-but-not-tax-collection/articleshow/65896757.cms | title=Did cash ban help raise tax base? ITRs rising, but not tax collection| newspaper=The Economic Times| date=25 September 2018| last1=Sharma| first1=Tanisha}}</ref> Indirect tax/GDP ratio also remained on the trend path and had no visible impact.<ref name="Lahiri 63, 55–74"/> |
|||
The use of demonetised banknotes was allowed for the payment of municipal and local civic body taxes, leading to a jump in their revenue collections. For example, the [[Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation]] reported collecting about ₹1.6 billion in cash payments of outstanding and advance taxes within the first four days of demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/hyderabad/demonetisation-impact-greater-hyderabad-municipal-corporation-collects-over-rs-160-crore-in-just-four-days_1949989.html|title=Demonetisation impact: Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation collects over Rs 160 crore in just four days|date=15 November 2016|publisher=india.com}}</ref> |
|||
A BJP MLA from Rajasthan, Bhawani Singh Rajawat, claimed in a video that '[[Ambani]] and [[Gautam Adani|Adani]]' were informed about the demonetisation, and made arrangements. However, he later said that it was an [[Off the record (journalism)|off-the-record]] conversation, and officially denied the comments.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/demonetisation-ambani-adani-were-informed-and-thus-made-arrangements-says-bjp-mla/447944/|title=Demonetisation: Ambani, Adani were informed and thus made arrangements, says BJP MLA|date=17 November 2016|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/nov/17/adanis-ambanis-already-knew-about-currency-ban-bjp-mla-caught-on-camera-1539642.html|title=Adanis, Ambanis already knew about currency ban: BJP MLA caught on camera|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Digital payments=== |
||
The push for digital payments was one of the stated intentions of demonetisation.<ref name="mintdigpay">{{cite web | url=https://www.livemint.com/Industry/yjsk66xEwwIe7OOqcoC92N/Was-the-boost-in-digital-payments-after-demonetization-tempo.html | title=Was the boost in digital payments after demonetization temporary?| date=26 April 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine|last=Heller|first=Nathan|title=India Takes a Big Step Back from Cash|url=https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/india-takes-a-big-step-back-from-cash|magazine=The New Yorker}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite journal|last=Dwivedi|first=Yogesh|title=India taking a step on the road to cashless economy|url=https://theconversation.com/india-taking-a-step-on-the-road-to-cashless-economy-70309|journal=The Conversation|date=20 December 2016 }}</ref><ref name=":6">{{Cite journal|last=Wade|first=Shepard|title=A Cashless Future Is The Real Goal Of India's Demonetization Move|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2016/12/14/inside-indias-cashless-revolution/|journal=Forbes}}</ref> There was an immediate and sharp jump in digital payments in November–December 2016 owing to shortages of cash. The debit card point of sales transactions was twice the size of value suggested by trends before demonetisation. The value of credit cards increased but no sharp growth was seen. The mobile wallet transactions picked up immediately after demonetisation, followed by a dip in mid-2017 due to easing cash shortages. There was again sharp rise thereafter. By April 2018, the volume of the digital payments had doubled.<ref name="mintdigpay"/> After return of the cash, the growth in digital payment had been modest.<ref name="mintsep18"/><ref name="mintdigpay"/> |
|||
The [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]] (CPI ( M)) alleged that the BJP unit in [[West Bengal]] had advance knowledge about the impending announcement, and deposited money just before the announcement.<ref>{{cite web|author=Pooja Mehta |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-bjp-knew-of-pm-modi-s-demonetisation-plan-bengal-unit-transferred-rs-1-crore-before-announcement-cpim-2272432 |title=BJP knew of PM Modi's demonetisation plan, Bengal unit transferred Rs 1 crore before announcement: CPI(M) & Updates at Daily News & Analysis |work=Daily News and Analysis |date=17 February 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2016/nov/11/west-bengal-bjp-knew-about-demonetisation-deposited-rs-1-crore-hours-before-announcement-cpm-1537470.html |title=West Bengal BJP knew about demonetisation, deposited Rs 1 crore hours before announcement: CPM |work=The New Indian Express |date=5 August 2013 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> [[Aam Aadmi Party]] leader [[Arvind Kejriwal]] also claimed that there had been some leakage regarding the move.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/pm-s-friends-were-given-advance-information-on-demonetization-it-is-a-surgical-strike-on-common-people-says-kejriwal-265342.html |title='PM's Friends' Were Given Advance Information on demonetisation, It Is A Surgical Strike on Common People Says Kejriwal |work=The Times of India |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=10 Nov 2016-08:02 pm , PTI |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-bjp-and-its-friends-knew-about-demonetization-a-week-before-kejriwal-doubts-modi-s-war-on-black-money-2272145 |title=BJP and its friends knew about demonetization a week before: Kejriwal doubts Modi's war on black money |work=Daily News and Analysis |date=17 February 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> Kejriwal questioned how Sanjeev Kamboj, a BJP leader in [[Punjab, India|Punjab]], posted about the ₹2000 notes days before the official announcement, and alleged that a sudden spike in bank deposits between July and September 2016 was also due to information leakage.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/580660/bjp-informed-friends-beforehand-demonetisation.html|title=BJP informed 'friends' beforehand about demonetisation: Kejriwal|work=Deccan Herald}}</ref> The Congress party demanded a probe into this huge jump in bank deposits before the demonetisation.<ref>http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/probe-massive-jump-in-bank-deposits-before-demonetisation-congress/articleshow/55774512.cms</ref> |
|||
The currency-to-GDP ratio was 12.1% in 2015–16. It declined to 8.8% in 2016–17 due to demonetisation but increased again to 10.9% in 2017–18.<ref name="wire2018a"/> The currency-to-GDP ratio was only marginally lower compared to levels before demonetisation.<ref name="mintsep18"/> |
|||
Nitish Kumar,<ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/nitish-kumar-questions-bjp-silence-on-land-purchase-ahead-of-demonetisation-4411915/</ref><ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/jdu-steps-up-attack-at-bjp-on-land-deal-claims-huge-cash-paid-4415677/</ref> Arvind Kejriwal<ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/arvind-kejriwal-demonetisation-narendra-modi-black-money-4400219/</ref> and Rahul Gandhi<ref>http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/jd-u-rjd-demand-probe-into-bjp-s-land-purchase-spree-in-bihar/story-iBMuWygvKWK4qpToPkJfMK.html</ref> alleged that the BJP made large purchases of land in Bihar ahead of the demonetisation because they had prior information. |
|||
===Banknotes in circulation=== |
|||
== Reactions == |
|||
{{Image frame |align=right|caption=Cash in circulation<ref>{{cite web |title=Reserve Bank of India - Press Releases |url=https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx |website=rbi.org.in |access-date=11 November 2021}}</ref>|content= |
|||
{{Graph:Chart |
|||
| yAxisTitle = Cash in circ. (₹ trillions) |
|||
| xAxisAngle=-45 |
|||
| width = 400 |
|||
| height = 100 |
|||
| type = line |
|||
| x = Mar '16, Oct '16, Mar '17, Oct '17, Mar '18, Oct '18, Mar '19, Oct '19, Mar '20, Oct '20, Mar '21, Oct '21 |
|||
| y = 16.63, 17.77, 13.35, 16.35, 18.29, 19.73, 21.37, 22.58, 24.47, 27.15, 28.54, 29.44 |
|||
}} |
|||
}} |
|||
On 28 October 2016, the total banknotes in circulation in India were valued at ₹17.77 trillion; what proportion of this derived from {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes was unknown. In its annual report of March 2016, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) stated that total banknotes in circulation valued ₹16.42 trillion, of which nearly 86% (around ₹14.18 trillion) derived from {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes. In terms of volume, the report stated that 24% (around 22.03 billion) of the total 90.26 billion (9026.6 crore) banknotes in circulation were {{₹|500}} and {{₹|1000}} banknotes.<ref name="equipped">{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/web-edits/rs-500-rs-1000-notes-are-banks-equipped-to-replace-1874-crore-pieces-of-notes-4364746/|title=Are banks equipped to replace 2,300 crore pieces of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes?|date=9 November 2016|work=[[The Indian Express]]|access-date=9 November 2016|author=Damodaran, Harish}}</ref> |
|||
Before demonetisation (November 2016), there were banknotes worth ₹17.97 trillion in the market. The demonetised banknotes constituted 86.4% of it.<ref name="itoday1" /> The banknotes in circulation had reached to the level before demonetisation in March 2018.<ref name="mintsep18">{{cite web|url=https://www.livemint.com/Industry/G0nNMoXXS8eVmW1oqUa1TP/Demonetisation-has-impacted-GDP-growth-to-black-money.html |title=From GDP growth to black money, costs outweigh benefits of demonetisation|first1=Vishnu|last1=Padmanabhan|access-date=20 October 2018|date=3 September 2018|work=[[Mint (newspaper)|Mint]]}}</ref> By March 2018, there were banknotes worth ₹18.03 trillion in the market; an increase of 9.9%. New banknotes of {{₹|2000}} and {{₹|500}} constitute 80.6% of it. Thus, small domination banknotes increased by only 5.8%.<ref name="itoday1" /> The volume of banknotes in the market increased by 2.1%.<ref name="wire2018a" /> The banknotes in circulation had further increased to ₹19.5 trillion in September 2018<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/currency-in-circulation-slows-down-since-may-finds-sbi-report/article25027689.ece | title=Currency in circulation slows down since May| date=24 September 2018}}</ref> and ₹21.41 trillion in March 2019, 19.14% higher than the level before demonetisation.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/cash-in-circulation-jumps-19-1-from-pre-demonetisation-level-5637325/|title=Cash in circulation jumps 19.1 per cent from pre-demonetisation level|date=22 March 2019|website=The Indian Express|language=en-IN|access-date=25 March 2019}}</ref> Five years after demonetisation, the currency in circulation was at a record high of ₹29.17 trillion on 29 October 2021.<ref>{{cite news |title=Five Years Since Demonetisation, Value Of Cash In Circulation Up 64% |url=https://www.ndtv.com/business/five-years-since-demonetisation-currency-notes-rise-64-in-value-terms-2602165 |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=NDTV.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Nearly 5 years since note ban: Cash with public rising, at all-time high |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/business/nearly-5-years-since-note-ban-cash-with-public-rising-at-all-time-high-7607688/ |access-date=11 November 2021 |work=The Indian Express |date=5 November 2021 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
===Support=== |
|||
===Terrorism and internal security=== |
|||
The decision met with mixed initial reactions Several bankers like [[Arundhati Bhattacharya]] (Chairperson of [[State Bank of India]]) and [[Chanda Kochhar]] (MD & CEO of [[ICICI Bank]]) appreciated the move in the sense that it would help curb black money.<ref name="IndiaInc">{{cite web | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/narendra-modi-rs-500-1000-sbi-arundhati-bhattacharya-icici-chanda-kochhar-here-is-how-india-inc-reacted-4364818/ | title=Govt demonitises Rs 500, 1000 notes: Here is how India Inc reacted | work=[[The Indian Express]] | date=8 November 2016 | accessdate=9 November 2016}}</ref> Businessmen [[Anand Mahindra]] ([[Mahindra Group]]), [[Sajjan Jindal]] ([[JSW Group]]), [[Kunal Bahl]] ([[Snapdeal]] and [[FreeCharge]]) also supported the move adding that it would also accelerate e-commerce.<ref name="IndiaInc" /> Infosys founder [[N. R. Narayana Murthy]] praised the move.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/demonetisation-we-should-all-be-celebrating-says-narayana-murthy/articleshow/55357977.cms|title=Demonetisation: We should all be celebrating, says Narayana Murthy |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/move-to-withdraw-rs-500-1000-notes-master-stroke-narayana-murthy-4365782/|title=Move to withdraw Rs 500, 1,000 notes masterstroke |author=Narayana Murthy|date=9 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Initially following demonetization, activities and attacks by the Maoist [[Naxalite]] radical groups decreased, which was attributed to lack of finance following demonetisation. The surrender rate had reached its highest.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Demonetisation-leads-to-largest-Maoist-surrenders/articleshow/55675983.cms|title=Demonetisation leads to highest ever surrender of Maoists in a month – Times of India|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=29 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Cops-look-for-Maoists-with-old-currency/articleshow/55377997.cms|archive-url=https://archive.today/20161128064247/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Cops-look-for-Maoists-with-old-currency/articleshow/55377997.cms|archive-date=28 November 2016|title=Cops look for Maoists with old currency|work=[[The Times of India]]|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="indiatimes.com">{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Modis-demonetization-set-to-cripple-Naxalites-financially/articleshow/55379177.cms|title=Modi's demonetization set to cripple Naxalites financially |work=[[The Times of India]]|date=12 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/this-is-how-big-note-ban-will-affect-maoist-activities-in-chhattisgarh-1624880|title=This Is How Big Note Ban Will Affect Maoist Activities In Chhattisgarh|website=NDTV.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-to-hit-maoist-activities-in-chhattisgarh-police-4372900/|title=Demonetisation to hit Maoist activities in Chhattisgarh: Police|date=13 November 2016}}</ref> The activities returned within few months.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.firstpost.com/politics/congress-says-demonetisation-didnt-affect-maoism-says-17-naxal-attacks-took-place-since-note-ban-4216031.html | title=Congress says demonetisation didn't affect Maoism, says 17 Naxal attacks took place since note ban| date=18 November 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.firstpost.com/india/demonetisation-caused-little-disruption-to-maoist-economy-in-bastar-extortion-remains-major-source-of-funding-4831321.html | title=Demonetisation caused little disruption to Maoist economy in Bastar, extortion major source of funding| date=27 July 2018}}</ref> There was a decrease in the terror activities in [[Jammu and Kashmir (state)|Jammu and Kashmir]].<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/demonetisation-effect-funds-tap-turns-dry-for-terror-and-maoist-groups/articleshow/55448082.cms | title=Demonetisation effect: Funds tap turns dry for terror and Maoist groups| newspaper=The Economic Times| date=13 July 2018| last1=Jain| first1=Bharti}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/did-demonetisation-impact-terrorism | title=Did demonetisation impact terrorism?| date=23 November 2017}}</ref> |
|||
==Other effects== |
|||
Finance Minister [[Arun Jaitley]] said that demonetisation would clean the complete economic system, increase the size of economy and revenue base. He mentioned the demonetisation along with the upcoming [[Goods and Services Tax (India)|Goods and Services Tax (GST)]] as "an attempt to change the spending habit and lifestyle."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report-war-on-black-money-scrapping-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-will-expand-economy-increase-revenue-says-jaitley-2271883 |title=War on black money: Scrapping Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes will expand economy, increase revenue, says Jaitley |work=[[Daily News and Analysis]] |date=10 November 2016 |accessdate=10 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Cashless ATM.jpg|thumb|Cashless ATM as on 1 December]] |
|||
===Shortage of cash=== |
|||
The [[Indian National Congress]] spokesperson [[Randeep Surjewala]] welcomed the move but remained sceptical on the consequences that would follow.<ref name="Cong">{{cite web | url=http://www.india.com/news/india/rs-500-1000-currency-notes-banned-congress-raises-questions-against-narendra-modi-govts-shocking-move-1636286/ | title=Rs 500 & 1000 currency notes banned: Congress raises questions against Narendra Modi govt’s shocking move | publisher=India.com | date=8 November 2016 | accessdate=9 November 2016}}</ref> Chief Minister of Bihar [[Nitish Kumar]] supported the move.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/nitish-backs-modi-on-demonetisation/article9323442.ece|title=Nitish welcomes demonetisation move|date=9 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Nitish-Kumar-supports-Modis-demonetisation-move/articleshow/55336788.cms|title=Nitish Kumar supports Modi's demonetisation move |work=Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/bihar-cm-nitish-supports-decision-to-withdraw-demonetisation-currency-rs-1000-rs-500-notes-4366034/|title=Bihar CM Nitish Kumar supports decision to withdraw Rs 1000, Rs 500 notes|date=9 November 2016|work=Indian Express}}</ref> The demonetisation also got support from Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh [[Nara Chandrababu Naidu]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonitisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-naidu-had-inkling-of-the-ban/article9320914.ece|title=Demonetisation of Rs. 500, Rs. 1000 notes: Naidu had inkling of the ban?|first=K.|last=Venkateshwarlu|date=9 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/andhra-cm-naidu-asked-for-demonitisation-of-rs-500-rs-1-000-notes-in-october-116110900626_1.html|title=Andhra CM Naidu asked for demonetisation of Rs 500, Rs 1,000 notes in October|first=B. S.|last=Reporter|date=9 November 2016|via=Business Standard}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2016/nov/08/chandrababu-naidu-welcomes-demonetisation-move-1536401.html|title=Chandrababu Naidu welcomes demonetisation move}}</ref> Former Chief Election Commissioner of India [[S. Y. Quraishi]] said demonetisation could lead to long term electoral reforms.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/demonetisation-could-lead-to-long-pending-electoral-reforms/story-tXYgT7hw6Q3TQUbPuIUucO.html|title=Demonetisation could lead to long-pending electoral reforms|date=11 November 2016}}</ref> Indian social activist [[Anna Hazare]] hailed demonetisation as a revolutionary step.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/anna-hazare-hails-demonetisation-calls-it-revolutionary-step/articleshow/55354898.cms|title=Anna Hazare hails demonetisation, calls it 'revolutionary' step |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonitisation-a-revolutionary-step-to-fight-corruption-anna-hazare-4367070/|title=Demonetisation a revolutionary step to fight corruption: Anna Hazare|date=10 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/notes-ban-anna-hazare-hails-pm-narendra-modis-revolutionary-step-kejriwal-criticizes-it-1623922|title=Notes Ban: Anna Hazare Hails PM Narendra Modi's 'Revolutionary' Step, Kejriwal Criticizes It}}</ref> The [[President of India]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]] welcomed the demonetisation move by calling it bold step.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/president-pranab-mukherjee-welcomes-demonetisation-of-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes_1947632.html|title=President Pranab Mukherjee welcomes demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes|date=8 November 2016|publisher=india.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-of-rs-1000-and-rs-500-notes-bold-step-president-pranab-mukherjee-4364815/|title=Demonetisation of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes bold step: President Pranab Mukherjee|date=8 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/president-pranab-mukherjee-welcomes-demonetisation-of-rs-1-000-rs-500-notes-1623081|title=President Pranab Mukherjee Welcomes Demonetisation of Rs 1,000, Rs 500 Notes|publisher=ndtv.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-a-bold-step-says-pranab-mukherjee/article9320915.ece|title=A bold step, says Pranab Mukherjee|date=9 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> The opinion of the masses varied both ways on micro-blogs and social media sites like Twitter.<ref name="ToI Twitter reaction">{{cite news|url=http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/everything-social/rs-500-1000-notes-pulled-out-how-twitter-reacted/|title=Rs 500, 1000 notes pulled out: How Twitter reacted|date=8 November 2016|work=Times of India Blogs|accessdate=8 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Queue at ATM for INR 100 Notes - Howrah 2016-11-08 1773.JPG|thumb|Queue at an ATM for {{INR}}100 banknotes in [[Howrah]], on 8 November 2016, 22:23 (IST)|right]] |
|||
The scarcity of cash due to demonetisation led to chaos, and people faced difficulties in depositing or exchanging the demonetised banknotes due to long queues outside banks and ATMs across India.<ref name="dryatm">{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-chaos-atms-run-dry-161109061403011.html|title=India demonetisation: Chaos as ATMs run dry|publisher=[[Al Jazeera Media Network|Al Jazeera]]|date=9 November 2016|access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref><ref name=IEchaos>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend-4371373/|title=Demonetisation: Chaos grows, queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|work=Indian Express|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first=Mayuresh|last=Ganapatye|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetisation-long-queues-banks-atms-mumbai/1/830100.html|title=Demonetisation: Month later, long queues still outside banks and ATMs in Mumbai|publisher=India Today|date=8 December 2016}}</ref> The ATMs were short of cash for months after demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/demonetisation-pain-returns-one-fourth-atms-across-india-running-dry-again/story-kwOMTU7I3xEVyeIGYsHSLP.html|title=Demonetisation pain returns: One-fourth of ATMs across India running dry again|date=7 February 2017|work=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/as-atms-dry-up-bankers-say-normalcy-will-return-soon-4609546/ |title=As ATMs dry up, bankers say normalcy will return soon |work=The Indian Express |date= 11 April 2017|access-date=25 April 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Visakhapatnam/atms-run-out-of-cash-in-many-areas/article18129175.ece |title=ATMs run out of cash in many areas |newspaper=The Hindu |date=19 April 2017 |access-date=25 April 2017|last1=Gopal |first1=B. Madhu }}</ref> |
|||
By and large, international response was positive which saw the move as a bold crackdown on corruption.<ref name="IMF-response"/><ref name="Chinese state media"/><ref name="Swedish Minister"/> [[International Monetary Fund]] (IMF) issued a statement supporting Modi's efforts to fight corruption by the demonetisation policy.<ref name="IMF-response">{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/imf-supports-pm-modi-s-demonetization-move-in-fight-against-corruption-116111100142_1.html|title=Support by IMF|date=11 November 2016|work=Business Standard}}</ref> |
|||
During the demonetisation, police and tax officials across India seized ₹6.1 billion in unaccounted money, including ₹1.1 billion in new banknotes.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/59509184.cms | title=17% of cash seized in raids during demonetisation were in new notes – Times of India| website=[[The Times of India]]| date=9 July 2017}}</ref> Reports in the media noted that although the general public faced a severe cash shortage, some individuals were able to amass tens of millions of rupees in new banknotes; they thus described the demonetisation exercise as being futile.<ref name="242cr">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/cash-crunch-rs-242-crore-in-new-currency-seized-after-demonetisation/story-ZFidspQbfQqcIGbQPcgtPJ.html|title=Cash crunch? Rs 242 crore in new currency seized after demonetisation|date=9 December 2016|publisher=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.catchnews.com/india-news/over-rs-164-crore-black-money-seized-in-new-notes-has-note-ban-failed-1481558486.html|title=Over Rs 164 crore black money seized in new notes. Has note ban failed?|website=CatchNews.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/police-seize-new-currency-notes-worth-crores-across-several-cities/|title=As India struggles for its next Rs 2,000, new currency seized across country can fill gunny bags|date=9 December 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Chinese state media ''[[Global Times]]'' praised the move and termed it as "fierce fight against black money and corruption."<ref name="Chinese state media">{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/china-state-media-praises-modi-but-says-he/article9343797.ece|title=State media praises Modi, but says he can learn from China's crusade against corruption|first=Atul|last=Aneja|date=14 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> Former [[Prime Minister of Finland]] and Vice-President of European Commission [[Jyrki Katainen]] welcomed the demonetisation move stressing that bringing transparency will strengthen Indian economy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-to-help-financial-system-eu/articleshow/55399290.cms|title=European Union welcomes India's step on demonetisation |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.news18.com/news/business/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-will-help-financial-system-european-union-1311545.html|title=India's Crackdown on Black Money Will Help Financial System: European Union|date=13 November 2016}}</ref> [[BBC]]'s South Asia Correspondent [[Justin Rowlatt]] in his article praised the move for its secrecy and success and elaborated on reason behind demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37974423|title=Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight|first=Justin|last=Rowlatt|date=14 November 2016|work=bbc.com}}</ref>[[Tim Worstall]] termed the demonetisation as welcome macroeconomic effect in his article in Forbes magazine.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/11/17/indias-rs-500-and-1000-demonetisation-is-lowering-interest-rates-and-also-inflation/#62464fde2edf|title=India's Rs 500 And 1,000 Demonetization Is Lowering Interest Rates And Also Inflation|first=Tim|last=Worstall|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref> Swedish Minister of Enterprise [[Mikael Damberg]] supported the move by calling it bold decision.<ref name="Swedish Minister">{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/interview-with-mikael-damberg/article9340999.ece?w=alauto|title=Swedish ICT sector wouldn't have been so successful without Indian help|first=Arun|last=S|date=13 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> |
|||
===Transport === |
|||
Singapore-based paper ''The Independent'' published a laudatory article on the move titled "Modi does a [[Lee Kuan Yew]] to stamp out corruption in India." Lee Kuan Yew was the Singaporean Prime Minister and is considered the architect of modern Singapore. "From making up his mind to rolling it out, a new Lee Kuan Yew is born in India. It will be reflected in the legacy of this Prime Minister," the article said.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://theindependent.sg/modi-does-a-lee-kuan-yew-to-stamp-out-corruption-in-india/|title=Modi does a Lee Kuan Yew to stamp out corruption in India|date=10 November 2016|newspaper=The Independent|access-date=15 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The All India Motor Transport Congress claimed that about 800,000 truck drivers and conductors were affected with the shortage of cash, with around 400,000 trucks stranded on major highways across India.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-demonetization-with-no-cash-on-hand-4-lakh-trucks-stranded-on-highways-2273414|title=Demonetization: With no cash on hand, 4 lakh trucks stranded on highways|access-date=14 November 2016|date=14 November 2016}}</ref> Major toll plazas in Gujarat and on the Delhi-Mumbai highways also saw long queues as toll plaza operators refused the demonetised banknotes.<ref name="toll">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/toll-collection-suspended-across-the-country-till-nov-11-highways-ministry/story-1bAQIFhgp3R26ja4z9OdDK.html |title=Toll tax suspended on national highways till Nov 11, banks open this weekend |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |access-date=10 November 2016|date=9 November 2016 }}</ref> The [[Ministry of Road Transport and Highways]] subsequently announced a suspension of toll collections on all national highways across the country until 2 December as well as acceptance of demonetised {{₹|500}} banknotes as a toll from 2 to 15 December.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/toll-plaza-collection-on-national-highways-suspended-till-december-2/story/241027.html|title=Toll collection on all national highways suspended till December 2|website= Business Today|date=24 November 2016 |access-date=17 October 2018}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Stock market=== |
||
As a combined effect of demonetisation and the [[2016 United States presidential election|US presidential election]], the stock market indices dropped to an around six-month low in the week following the announcement. The day after the demonetisation announcement, [[BSE SENSEX]] crashed nearly 1,689 points and [[NIFTY 50]] plunged by over 541 points.<ref name="stockcrash9nov">{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/markets/stock-market-news-november-9-2016/article9322930.ece|title=Sensex crashes 1,689 points on black money crackdown, U.S. election|newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|access-date=9 November 2016|date=9 November 2016|last1=Rukhaiyar|first1=Ashish}}</ref> By the end of the intraday trading section on 15 November 2016, the [[BSE SENSEX]] index was lower by 565 points and the [[NIFTY 50]] index was below 8100 intraday.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/local-markets/sensex-sinks-514pts-midcap-down-4demonetisationearnings_7965381.html|title=Sensex sinks 514pts, Midcap down 4% on demonetisation & earnings |date=15 November 2016 |publisher=[[moneycontrol.com]]|access-date=16 November 2016}}</ref> There were marginal effects on the stock market during November–December 2016.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.livemint.com/Money/hRb1noUQV17fmP0o1GNQEJ/How-much-has-demonetisation-affected-the-stock-market.html|title=How much has demonetisation affected the stock market?|last=Chakravarty|first=Manas|date=3 January 2017|work=LiveMint|access-date=17 October 2018}}</ref> A data study (July 2016 – February 2017) of 54 companies across 13 sectors listed with the [[National Stock Exchange of India|NSE]] showed that companies in cement, cotton and rubber sectors showed an increase in total trades while companies in automotive, clothing, foods, paper, real estate, retail, steel, sugar, tea and textiles sectors showed a decrease in total trades after demonetisation.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320487258|title=Impact of Demonetisation on Indian Stock Market|last=Mukundan|first=Anagha|date=1 June 2017|doi=10.13140/rg.2.2.24870.63042|publisher=A P J Abdul Kalam Technological University}}</ref> Demonetisation had a negative impact on stock market returns evidenced from NIFTY 50 and other NIFTY sectoral indices.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Anoop|first1=Patil|last2=Parab|first2=Narayan|last3=Reddy|first3=Y. V|date=2018|title=Analyzing the Impact of Demonetization on the Indian Stock Market: Sectoral Evidence using GARCH Model|journal=Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal|language=en|volume=12|issue=2|pages=104–116|doi=10.14453/aabfj.v12i2.7|issn=1834-2000|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
|||
===Industrial output=== |
|||
The Indian Supreme Court while hearing one among a slew of cases filed against the sudden demonetisation decision in various courts<ref>http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report-petitions-against-demonetization-centre-files-caveat-in-sc-2272138</ref>, observed that it "appears to be carpet bombing and not surgical strike" which government repeatedly claims it to be.<ref>http://newsable.asianetnews.tv/money/sc-currency-ban-affidavit</ref> |
|||
There was a reduction in industrial output as industries were hit by the cash shortage.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/Demonetisation-hit-economy-Jamir/article17349806.ece|title=Demonetisation hit economy: Jamir|date=23 February 2017|work=The Hindu|access-date=26 February 2017|language=en}}</ref> The [[Purchasing Managers' Index]] (PMI) fell to 46.7 in November 2016 from 54.5 in October 2016, recording its sharpest reduction in three years.<ref name=BS-PMI>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/slowdown-due-to-demonetisation-pmi-services-shrinks-in-november-after-17-months-116120501411_1.html|title=Slowdown due to demonetisation: PMI services shrinks in November after 17 months|first=Dilasha|last=Seth|date=6 December 2016|via=Business Standard|newspaper=Business Standard India}}</ref> A reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below shows contraction. This indicates a slowdown in both manufacturing and services industries.<ref name=WorryingNumbers>{{Cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/01/03/five-worrying-numbers-that-show-demonetisation-impact-on-economy/|title=5 Bleak Numbers That Show Demonetisation Impact On The Economy}}</ref> The PMI report also showed that the reduction in inflation in November 2016 was due to a shortage in money supply.<ref name=BS-PMI /> |
|||
The growth in eight core sectors such as cement, steel and refinery products, which constitute 38% of the [[Index of industrial production]] (IIP), was only to 4.9 percent in November 2016, as compared with 6.6 percent a month prior.<ref name=WorryingNumbers /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/demonetisation-impact-three-sets-of-numbers-tell-us-how-modis-gamble-has-slowed-the-economy-3185066.html|title=Demonetisation impact: Three sets of numbers tell us how Modi's gamble has slowed the economy|date=3 January 2017}}</ref> |
|||
Nobel laureate Indian economist [[Amartya Sen]], severely critcized the demonetisation move calling it a "despotic action" among other things.<ref>http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Amartya-Sen-terms-demonetisation-a-despotic-action/article16730675.ece</ref><ref>http://www.india.com/news/india/amartya-sen-criticises-demonetisation-drive-says-narendra-modi-declared-all-indians-crook-1665167/</ref> |
|||
===Agriculture=== |
|||
[[Kaushik Basu]], Senior Vice-President and Chief Economist of the World Bank, called it a "major mistake" and that the "damage" is likely to be much greater than any purported benefits.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-damage-greater-than-its-benefits-says-kaushik-basu-116111101733_1.html |title=Demonetisation damage greater than its benefits, says Kaushik Basu |work=Business Standard |date=12 November 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=PTI |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/gst-good-economics-demonetisation-is-not-kaushik-basu/articleshow/55375545.cms |title=GST good economics; demonetisation is not: Kaushik Basu |work=The Economic Times |date=11 November 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/27/opinion/in-india-black-money-makes-for-bad-policy.html</ref> |
|||
Demonetisation adversely affected transactions in the [[Agriculture in India|agriculture sector]], which are heavily dependent on cash.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/nidhi-nath-srinivas/how-demonetisation-has-affected-indias-agricultural-and-food-ma/|title=How Demonetisation Has Affected India's Agricultural And Food Markets|newspaper=Huffington Post India|access-date=24 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161125110124/http://www.huffingtonpost.in/nidhi-nath-srinivas/how-demonetisation-has-affected-indias-agricultural-and-food-ma/|archive-date=25 November 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> Due to scarcity of the new banknotes, many farmers had insufficient cash to purchase seeds, fertilisers and pesticides needed for the plantation of [[rabi crop]]s usually sown around mid-November.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/demonetisation-farmers-fear-loss-of-crops-and-income-after-currency-ban-3111694.html|title=Demonetisation: Farmers fear loss of crops and income after currency ban|date=18 November 2016|newspaper=Firstpost|language=en-US|access-date=24 November 2016}}</ref> Farmers and their unions conducted protest rallies in [[Gujarat]], [[Amritsar]] and [[Muzaffarnagar]] against the demonetisation as well as against restrictions imposed by the [[Reserve Bank of India]] on [[District Cooperative Central Bank|district cooperative central banks]] which were ordered not to accept or exchange the demonetised banknotes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/EgxO4VZMZJKpkiFwEvHEUL/Demonetisation-Farmers-protest-in-Muzaffarnagar-over-cash-s.html|title=Demonetisation: Farmers protest in Muzaffarnagar over cash shortage|agency=[[Press Trust of India]]|date=22 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-at-gujarat-protests-farmers-dump-milk-vegetables-on-road-4385111/|title=Demonetisation: At Gujarat protests, farmers dump milk, vegetables on road|date=20 November 2016|newspaper=The Indian Express|access-date=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/farmers-in-amritsar-stage-protest-burn-pm-modi-s-effigy/story-NlBIKQoj479XSv1DfQ5QAJ.html|title=Farmers in Amritsar stage protest against demonetisation, burn PM Modi's effigy|date=19 November 2016|newspaper=Hindustan Times}}</ref> |
|||
The shortage of cash led to plunge in demand which in turn led to a crash in the prices of crops. Farmers were unable to recover even the costs of transportation from their fields to the market from the low prices offered.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/farmers-forced-to-dump-the-produce-as-note-ban-turns-bumper-crop-worthless/story-q79Oaf8eGTLX0yaHXwkJLL.html|title=Farmers forced to dump their produce as note ban turns bumper crop worthless|date=26 December 2016|newspaper=Hindustan Times|access-date=15 January 2017}}</ref><ref name=50psOnions>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/onion-prices-crash-india-crop-farmers-dumps-crop-mandi/1/841577.html|title=Oh-nion: Farmers in crisis dump produce in markets instead of selling at 50 paise a kilo|date=23 December 2016 |publisher=India Today|access-date=15 January 2017}}</ref> Some farmers dumped their produce in protest against the government.<ref name=ludhianaprotest>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/demonetisation-protest-farmers-throw-vegetables-on-road/|title=Demonetisation protest: Farmers throw vegetables on road|date=7 January 2017|access-date=15 January 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-at-gujarat-protests-farmers-dump-milk-vegetables-on-road-4385111/|title=Demonetisation: At Gujarat protests, farmers dump milk, vegetables on road|date=20 November 2016|access-date=15 January 2017}}</ref> |
|||
Pronab Sen, former Chief Statistician and Planning Commision of India member, called it a "hollow move" since it did not really address any of the purported goals of tackling black money or fake currency.<ref>http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/uzvIE84KGXy1xvp06pTazM/Demonetization-is-a-hollow-move.html</ref> |
|||
Demonetisation resulted in the relative erosion of agricultural wages and weak bargaining power of farmers for their produce.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/two-years-after-demonetisation-crisis-in-rural-india/story-tgyDzJhZSro5sPPtabcKXP.html|title=Two years after demonetisation, farmers and rural workers are unhappy|last=Kishore|first=Roshan|date=7 November 2018|work=Hindustan Times|access-date=17 November 2018|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
[[Prabhat Patnaik]], a former professor of economics at the [[Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi]] called the move 'witless' and 'anti-people'. He criticised the simple way in which black money was assumed as "a hoard of cash", saying that it would have little effect in eliminating "black activities" while "causing much hardship to common people.".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Patnaik|first1=Prabhat|title=Demonetization: Witless and Anti-People|url=http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/1/9151/Demonetization-Witless-and-Anti-People|accessdate=13 November 2016|work=The Citizen|date=9 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Real GDP growth rate=== |
|||
Noted economist and journalist, T. N. Ninan wrote in the [[Business Standard]] that demonetisation 'looks like a bad idea, badly executed on the basis of some half-baked notions'.<ref>http://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/t-n-ninan-four-weeks-later-116120201131_1.html</ref> [[Deepak Parekh]] (Chairman of [[Housing Development Finance Corporation|HDFC]]) had initially appreciated the decision to ban the Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes, but later said that the move had derailed the economy, and expressed skepticism about its outcome.<ref>http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/hdfc-chairman-deepak-parekh-hits-out-at-demonetisation-drive-says-it-derailed-economy/467791/</ref><ref>http://www.firstpost.com/business/hdfcs-deepak-parekh-says-economy-has-derailed-in-short-term-due-to-demonetisation-3145486.html</ref> |
|||
{{Image frame |align=center |caption=Real GDP growth rate – Quarterly (%)<ref name="hindugdp"/><ref name="toi72"/><ref name="wire63"/><ref name="hindu74"/>|content= |
|||
{{Graph:Chart|width=500|height=100|xAxisTitle=Quarterly results in Financial Year|yAxisTitle=Real GDP growth rate (%)|type=line|x=Q1'15,Q2'15,Q3'15,Q4'15,Q1'16,Q2'16,Q3'16,Q4'17,Q1'17,Q2'17,Q3'17,Q4'18,Q1'18,Q2'18,Q3'18,Q14'19|yTitle=|y=7,7.4,7.2,9.1,7.9,7.5,7,6.1,5.7,6.3,7.2,7.6,7.7,8.2|colors=#0000aa}}}} |
|||
{{Image frame |caption=Real GDP growth rate – Year-on-Year (%)<ref name="GDPImpact"/>|align=left|content= |
|||
{{Graph:Chart|width=200|height=100|xAxisTitle=Financial Year|yAxisTitle=Real GDP growth rate (%)|type=line|x=2015–16,2016–17,2017–18,2018–19|y=8,7.1,6.5,|colors=#ff8000}}}} |
|||
{| class="wikitable" align="right" |
|||
|+Real GDP growth rate<ref name="hindugdp">{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/gdp-growth-slips-to-57-in-april-june/article19594596.ece|title=GDP growth slips to 5.7% in April–June|date=31 August 2017|work=The Hindu|access-date=19 October 2018|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref name="toi72">{{Cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/gdp-grows-at-5-quarter-high-of-7-2-in-oct-dec/articleshow/63118408.cms|title=GDP grows at 5-quarter high of 7.2% in Oct–Dec|work=The Times of India|access-date=19 October 2018}}</ref><ref name="wire63">{{Cite web|url=https://thewire.in/economy/gdp-growth-recovers-6-3-september-quarter|title=GDP Growth Recovers to 6.3% in September Quarter|website=The Wire|access-date=19 October 2018}}</ref><ref name="hindu74">{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/gdp-growth-accelerates-to-74-in-julysept-manufacturing-rebounds-significantly/article7933726.ece|title=GDP growth accelerates to 7.4 % in July–Sept. manufacturing rebounds significantly|last=Raghavan|first=Tca Sharad|date=30 November 2015|work=The Hindu|access-date=20 October 2018|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> (base year 2011–12) |
|||
!Financial Year |
|||
!Quarter |
|||
!Quarterly |
|||
!Yearly |
|||
|- |
|||
| rowspan="4" |2015–16 |
|||
|Q1 (April–June) |
|||
|7% |
|||
| rowspan="4" |8%<ref name="GDPImpact" /> |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q2 (July–September) |
|||
|7.4% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q3 (October–December) |
|||
|7.2% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q4 (January–March) |
|||
|9.1% |
|||
|- |
|||
| rowspan="4" |2016–17 |
|||
|Q1 (April–June) |
|||
|7.9% |
|||
| rowspan="4" |7.1%<ref name="GDPImpact">{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/demonetisation-impact-gdp-dips-sharply-in-jan-mar-quarter-to-6-1-manufacturing-mining-disappoints-3502487.html|title=Demonetisation impact: GDP dips sharply in Jan–Mar to 6.1%; India loses fastest growing tag|date=31 May 2017|publisher=Firstpost.com|access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q2 (July–September) |
|||
|7.5% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q3 (October–December) |
|||
|7% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q4 (January–March) |
|||
|6.1% |
|||
|- |
|||
| rowspan="4" |2017–18 |
|||
|Q1 (April–June) |
|||
|5.7% |
|||
| rowspan="4" |6.5% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q2 (July–September) |
|||
|6.3% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q3 (October–December) |
|||
|7.2% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q4 (January–March) |
|||
|7.6% |
|||
|- |
|||
| rowspan="4" |2018–19 |
|||
|Q1 (April–June) |
|||
|7.7% |
|||
| rowspan="4" | |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q2 (July–September) |
|||
|8.2% |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q3 (October–December) |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|||
|Q4 (January–March) |
|||
| |
|||
|} |
|||
<br /> |
|||
Global analysts cut their forecasts of India's real [[Gross domestic product|GDP]] growth rate for the financial year 2016–17 by 0.5 to 3% due to demonetisation.<ref name=LivemintGDP>{{cite web|url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/gG3pF45hFU53GyXE1BwIuJ/Cash-crunch-Analysts-cut-India-GDP-growth-forecast.html|title=Cash crunch: Analysts cut India GDP growth forecast|last=Livemint|date=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref name=FinexGDP>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/economists-bearish-on-the-india-growth-story-predicts-sub-6-per-cent-for-fy-2017/486381/|title=Demonetisation a big blow! GDP growth may dip below 6% in FY17|date=26 December 2016}}</ref> India's GDP in 2016 is estimated to be US$2.25 trillion, hence, each 1 per cent reduction in growth rate represents a shortfall of US$22.5 billion (₹1.54 trillion) for the Indian economy.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2014&ey=2021&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=26&pr1.y=13&c=534&s=NGDPD&grp=0&a= | title=World Economic Outlook Database | publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]] | date=October 2016}}</ref> According to [[Societe Generale]], quarterly GDP growth rates would drop below 7% for an entire year at a stretch for the first time since June 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/17/india-demonetisation-news-india-could-see-four-consecutive-quarters-of-below-7-percent-growth.html|title=India set for slowest growth period as demonetization dents economy|first=Saheli Roy|last=Choudhury|website=[[CNBC]]|date=17 January 2017}}</ref> |
|||
The Q4'16–17 rate was 6.1% as against a forecast of 7.1% by economists.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/demonetisation-hits-growth-gdp-growth-slows-to-6.1-percent-in-march-quarter/story/253394.html |title=Demonetisation effect: GDP growth slows down to 6.1% in March quarter |publisher=Businesstoday.in |date=1 June 2017 |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> The rate for the financial year 2016–17 was 7.1%, a reduction from the 8% in 2015–16.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/demonetisation-impact-gdp-dips-sharply-in-jan-mar-quarter-to-6-1-manufacturing-mining-disappoints-3502487.html |title=Demonetisation impact: GDP dips sharply in Jan–Mar to 6.1%; India loses fastest growing tag |date=31 May 2017 |publisher=Firstpost.com |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> This drop was attributed to demonetisation by economists.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/demonetisation-brings-gdp-down-6-060112447.html |title=Demonetisation brings GDP down to 6.1 per cent: Top economists stand vindicated |publisher=In.news.yahoo.com |date=1 June 2017 |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> |
|||
Chief Ministers of several Indian states like [[Mamata Banerjee]]<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/one-month-of-pain-and-harrassment-pm-must-clarify-mamata-banerjee-1635504}}</ref>, [[Arvind Kejriwal]]<ref>http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/demonetization-is-nothing-but-a-big-bjp-scam-kejriwal-116111200849_1.html</ref> and [[Pinarayi Vijayan]]<ref>http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-kerala-cm-pinarayi-vijayan-ministers-on-dharna-say-demonetisation-destroying-cooperative-sector-2274629</ref> have criticized and led major protests against the decision in their states and in parliament. Initially, the move to demonetise and try to hinder black money was appreciated, but the manner in which it was carried out by causing hardships to common people was criticised.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/2016/11/11/dear-pm-modi-demonetisation-brahmastra-could-have-spared-the-poor|title=Dear PM Modi, Demonetisation 'Brahmastra' Could Have Spared The Poor|date=8 November 2016|publisher=Bloomberg Quint|author=Raghav Bahl|accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> A [[Public Interest Litigation]] (PIL) was filed in [[Madras High Court]] by M Seeni Ahamed, General Secretary of the [[Indian National League]], to scrap the decision. The High Court dismissed the PIL stating that it could not interfere in monetary policies of the government.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55353472.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst |title=Govt's demonetisation move fit for country's security, development: HC |work= The Economic Times |date=10 November 2016 |accessdate=10 November 2016}}</ref> Similar PILs were also filed in the [[Supreme Court of India]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pils-supreme-court-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-illegal/1/807124.html |title=PILs in Supreme Court against making Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes illegal |work=India Today |date=10 November 2016 |accessdate=10 November 2016}}</ref> [[Supreme Court of India]] is yet to decide on the matter. It is listed for hearing on 2 December 2016. Former [[World Bank]] Chief Economist, [[Kaushik Basu]], said that the 'damage' is likely to be much greater than any possible benefits.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-damage-greater-than-its-benefits-says-kaushik-basu-116111101733_1.html |title=Demonetisation damage greater than its benefits, says Kaushik Basu |work=Business Standard |date=12 November 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=PTI |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/gst-good-economics-demonetisation-is-not-kaushik-basu/articleshow/55375545.cms |title=GST good economics; demonetisation is not: Kaushik Basu |work=The Economic Times |date=11 November 2016 |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The GDP growth rate for Q1'17–18 dropped to 5.7%, compared to 7.9% a year prior,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/economic-growth-slows-to-5-7-in-april-june-as-demonetisation-pain-lingers/story-yzvW9XdOUuzfWoWv5B5QTL.html |title=GDP growth rate down to 5.7% in April–June, demonetisation pain lingers | business news |publisher=Hindustan Times |date= 31 August 2017|access-date=25 February 2018}}</ref> the lowest since March 2014. This drop was attributed to demonetisation as well as inventory drawdown by companies due to the forthcoming implementation of the [[Goods and Service Tax (India)|Goods and Service Tax]].<ref>{{Cite news|author=Press Trust of India |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/india-paid-hefty-price-for-note-ban-5-7-gdp-growth-worrying-kaushik-basu-117090100584_1.html |title=India paid hefty price for note ban, 5.7% GDP growth worrying: Kaushik Basu | Business Standard News |publisher=Business-standard.com |date=1 September 2017 |access-date=25 February 2018|newspaper=Business Standard India }}</ref><ref name="hindugdp"/> The GDP started to recover from 2017–18 and clocked 8.2% growth in 2018–19.<ref name="toi72"/><ref name="hindu74"/><ref>{{Cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/indias-gdp-grows-at-8-2-per-cent-in-2018-19-q1/articleshow/65623967.cms | title=India's GDP grows at 8.2 per cent in 2018–19 Q1| newspaper=The Economic Times| date=31 August 2018}}</ref> The ''Hindustan Times'' in November 2021 reviewed GDP trends in the years following the demonetization, and concluded that due to unpredented GDP contraction amid the [[COVID-19 pandemic]] and strong base effects, “the waters are now far too muddied to make any scientific assessment about demonetisation’s impact” on GDP.<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/five-years-since-demonetisation-what-has-changed-101636310390379.html| title=Five years since demonetisation: What has changed?| author=Roshan Kishore| newspaper=The Hindustan Times| date=8 November 2021}}</ref> |
|||
Several government ministers had declared before the demonetisation that they were holding large amounts of cash, including Arun Jaitley, who had more than 65 lakh rupees in cash. This led to speculation about whether and when the ministers had deposited the cash they held.<ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/demonetisation-ministers-cash-jaitley-modi/</ref><ref>http://thewire.in/83783/ministers-queue-exchange-currency-notes-asks-rti-activist/</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Employment=== |
||
{{Image frame |align=center|caption=Employed workforce<ref name="CMIE2"/><ref name="Tnnjob"/>|content= |
|||
{{Graph:Chart|width=400|height=100|xAxisTitle=Four monthly result|yAxisTitle= Employed people (in million)|type=line|x=Apr'16, Aug'16, Dec'16, Apr'17, Aug'17, Dec'17,Apr'18,Aug'18, Dec'18|y=401,403,406.5,405,,,401,398,|colors=#0000aa|xAxisAngle=-90}}}} |
|||
{{Image frame|align=center |caption=Monthly unemployment rate<ref name=UnemploymentCMIE /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/IND/india/unemployment-rate|title = India Unemployment Rate 1991-2021}}</ref>|content={{Graph:Chart|width=600|height=100|xAxisTitle=Monthly result|yAxisTitle= Unemployment Rate %)|type=line|x=Avg2015,Jan16,Feb16,Mar16,Apr16,May16,Jun16,Jul16,Aug16,Sep16,Oct16,Nov16,Dec16,Jan17,Feb17,Mar17,Apr17,May17,Jun17,Jul17,Aug17,Sep17,Oct17,Nov17,Dec17,Jan18,Feb18,Mar18,Apr18,May18,Jun18,Jul18,Aug18,Sep18,Oct18,Nov18,Dec18,Jan19,Feb19,Mar19,Apr19,May19,Jun19,Jul19,Aug19|y=5.6,8.7,8.5,8.7,8.9,9.7,8.9,8.5,9.6,8.4,6.7,6.5,6.4,5.9,5.0,4.7,3.9,4.0,4.1,3.4,4.1,4.6,5.0,4.7,4.7,5.0,5.9,6.0,5.6,5.1,5.8,5.7,6.3,6.5,6.8,6.7,7.0,6.9,7.2,6.7,7.3,7.0,7.9,7.3,8.2|colors=#0000aa|xAxisAngle=-90}} }} |
|||
Demonetisation caused a loss of jobs and a decline in wages, particularly in the unorganised and informal sector and as well as in small enterprises.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://scroll.in/article/827349/a-woman-construction-worker-in-jharkhand-lost-even-her-meagre-wages-in-10-weeks-since-demonetisation|title=Cashless and demonetised: Meet three Indians who once had jobs|first=Anumeha|last=Yadav|date=29 January 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/jobs/now-demonetisation-set-to-cost-400000-jobs/454305/|title=Now, Demonetisation set to cost 400,000 jobs|date=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://thewire.in/economy/unprecedented-job-losses-wage-decline-unorganised-sector-post-demonetisation|title=Unprecedented Job Losses, Wage Decline in Unorganised Sector Post Demonetisation|website=The Wire}}</ref> Migrant workers were adversely affected by demonetisation.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.caravanmagazine.in/vantage/demonetisation-migrant-labourers-kerala|title=How Demonetisation Is Affecting Migrant Labourers In Kerala|last=Maganti|first=Rahul|date=18 November 2016|work=The Caravan|access-date=24 August 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-impact-migrant-workers-head-back-home-116120901022_1.html|title=Demonetisation impact: Migrant workers head back home|last=Dave|first=Sohini Das & Vimukt|date=10 December 2016|work=Business Standard India|access-date=25 August 2018}}</ref> |
|||
According to the report prepared by the [[Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy]] (CMIE), the number of employed people was 401 million in January–April 2016, 403 million during May–August 2016, and 406.5 million in September–December 2016. After demonetisation in November 2016, the number fell to 405 million in January–April 2017. So there was fall of 1.5 million in number of people employed.<ref name="Tnnjob">{{Cite news|url=https://www.timesnownews.com/business-economy/industry/article/demonetisation-effect-15-million-jobs-lost-in-first-4-months-of-the-year/65815|title=Demonetisation effect: 1.5 million jobs lost in first 4 months of the year|access-date=3 July 2018|language=en-GB}}</ref> CMIE also reported that the number of persons employed was 406.7 million in 2016–17 which fell by 0.1% to 406.2 million in 2017–18. So the employment had stagnated which resulted in employment rate decline. The employment rate fell from 42.59% in 2016–17 to 41.45% in 2016–17. The unemployment rate also declined from 7.51% in 2016–17 to 4.66% in 2017–18 because of the shrinking employed force. The number of the employed force fell from 439.7 million in 2016–17 to 426.1 million in 2017–18. CMIE attributed the impact to demonetisation as well as implementation of [[Goods and Services Tax (India)|Goods and Services Tax]] in July 2017.<ref name="CMIE2">{{Cite web|url=https://www.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=warticle&dt=2018-07-17%2009:45:21&msec=123|title=Employment stagnates in 2017–18|last=Vyas|first=Mahesh|date=17 July 2018|website=CMIE|language=EN|archive-url=https://archive.today/20181019054555/https://www.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=warticle&dt=2018-07-17%2009:45:21&msec=123|archive-date=19 October 2018|access-date=19 October 2018}}</ref><ref name=UnemploymentCMIE>{{cite web | url=https://unemploymentinindia.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=wsttimeseries&index_code=050050000000&dtype=total | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181020063652/https://unemploymentinindia.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=wsttimeseries&index_code=050050000000&dtype=total | url-status=dead | archive-date=20 October 2018 | title=Unemployment}}</ref> |
|||
A Congress-led opposition, which includes 13 political parties, opposed the [[Modi ministry|current government]] on the demonetisation issue in the Winter Session of the [[Indian Parliament]] on 16 November 2016. The [[Chief Minister of West Bengal]] [[Mamata Banerjee]] also met the President [[Pranab Mukherjee]] to oppose the demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-demonetization-debate-likely-to-hot-up-winter-session-didi-to-knock-on-president-s-door-2273770|title= Debate on demonetisation, in winter session|work=DNA India.com|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Demonetisation-People-battle-it-out-at-banks-netas-ready-for-war-in-Parliament/articleshow/55424673.cms|title= Winter Session debate|work=The Times of India|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/winter-session-oppn-to-target-govt-on-demonetisation-orop-gst-116111401558_1.html|title=Opposition to target government on demonetisation|work=Business Standard|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/live-november-15-2016-effect-of-demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes/article9348006.ece|title=Government and Opposition prepare for winter session of Parliament, on demonetisation|work=The Hindu|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/demonetisation-janata-dal-u-gives-suspension-of-business-notice-as-parties-gear-up-for-war-in-parliament_1949763.html|title= Parties gear up for debate on demonetisation|work=zeenews.India.com|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/opposition-parties-agree-to-raise-notes-issue-in-session/articleshow/55424453.cms|title= Parties agree to raise notes issue in session|work=The Economic Times|date=15 November 2016}}</ref> The debate on demonetisation is known to be initiated by [[Indian National Congress]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/live-parliament-lok-sabha-rajya-sabha-demonetization-congress-bjp-tmc-rahul-mamata-modi-sena-black-money-banks-atms-2273883|title=Congress on demonetisation|work= DNA India|date=16 November 2016}}</ref> and [[Anand Sharma]] in the [[Rajya Sabha]] on 16 November 2016,<ref>{{cite web|url= http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/url-live-winter-session-of-parliament-begins-today-narendra-modi-speech-rahul-gandhi-arun-jaitley-demonetisation-effects/446936/|title= Anand Sharma speaks on demonetisation|work=The Financial Express|date=16 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/live-updates/parliament-debate-on-demonetisation-1950128|title= Congress initiates demonetisation debate|work=Zeenews.India.com|date= 16 November 2016}}</ref> while Banerjee is known to be the first to oppose the current government on the demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/Whys-Didi-against-demonetisation/articleshow/55378644.cms|title=Why's Mamata Banerjee against demonetization?|work=[[The Times of India]]|date=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
It is estimated that 1.5 million jobs were lost, according to ''[[The Guardian]]''.<ref name="theguardian.com"/> |
|||
On 16 November 2016, Banerjee led a rainbow delegation comprising political parties of [[Trinamool Congress]], [[Aam Aadmi Party]], BJP ally [[Shiv Sena]], Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (of Hardik Patel) and National Conference to [[Rashtrapati Bhawan]] to protest against the decision to withdraw the {{INR}}500 and {{INR}}1000 banknotes. A memorandum was submitted to the [[President of India]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]] demanding rollback of the decision.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-mamata-banerjee-leads-protest-march-to-rashtrapati-bhavan-4379517/|title=Demonetisation of Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes: Mamata Banerjee leads protest march to Rashtrapati Bhavan|publisher=[[The Indian Express]]|accessdate=17 November 2016}}</ref> Outside the Parliament in a rally the same day, [[Saugata Roy]], a member of parliament from the opposition [[Trinamool Congress]] Party, commented, "People are in utter distress, especially the informal sector is totally disrupted. Poor people, daily wage earners, they're all facing difficulty"<ref name="Aljazeera-1"/> |
|||
===Cost to banks=== |
|||
In the demonetisation debate on the first day of the Winter Session of Parliament at the Rajya Sabha, on 16 November 2016, [[Pramod Tiwari]] from the [[Indian National Congress]], accused [[Narendra Modi]] for the demonetisation{{what|reason=What is meant by "accused"?|date=December 2016}} and compared him to [[Mussolini]], [[Hitler]] and [[Qadhafi]], while [[Prem Chand Gupta]] questioned a statement of Modi from the unscheduled TV broadcast on 8 November, "If it was planned 10 months ago, how did RBI Governor [[Urjit Patel]] sign on new note?". While on the other side, [[Praful Patel]] criticised the demonetisation by stating "the government was not even prepared to recalibrate the ATMs while announcing the move. People's suffering unimaginable. Nobody is questioning the government's intention, but you are unprepared to execute the move". Later, the former [[Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh]] [[Mayawati Prabhu Das]] stated the situiation to "a financial emergency", by saying "It looks as if ''[[India|Bharat]]'' has shut down." Also, [[Sitaram Yechury]] from [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)|Communist Party of India]], questioned the government on the demonetisation move by stating "only 6% of black money in India is in cash to drive his point that demonetisation won't curb illicit wealth."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/live-parliament-proceedings-november-16-2016/article9351846.ece|title=As it happened: Parliament proceedings — November 16, 2016 |publisher=[[The Hindu]]|accessdate=16 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Before demonetisation, the RBI had spent ₹34.21 billion to print banknotes in 2015–2016 (July to June). The cost of printing new banknotes rose to ₹79.65 billion in 2016–17 and ₹49.12 billion in 2017–18.<ref name="itoday1"/> This resulted in a decline in the dividend paid to the government from ₹658.76 billion in 2015–16 to ₹306.59 billion in 2016–17 and ₹500 billion in 2017–18.<ref name="itoday1"/><ref name=FirstPostDividend>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/rbi-dividend-halves-to-rs-30659-cr-demonetisation-hero-turns-out-to-be-villain-for-narendra-modi-govt-3918167.html|title=RBI dividend halves to Rs 30,659 cr: Demonetisation hero turns out to be villain for Narendra Modi govt|date=11 August 2017|access-date=31 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/opinion/script-gone-wrong-rbi-takes-demonetisation-hit-cuts-dividend-to-govt-by-more-than-half/story-y8lXWKpupQecLnTA9AwSjJ.html|title=Script gone wrong: RBI takes demonetisation hit and government gets a cut|date=11 August 2017|access-date=31 August 2017}}</ref> It was estimated that this decrease in income for the government could cause the fiscal deficit for the financial year 2016–17 to increase from the targeted 3.2% to 3.4%.<ref name=YahooDividend>{{cite web|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/half-dividend-full-fallacy-rbi-154100516.html|title=Half dividend, full fallacy: RBI implies Modi & Urjit Patel got demonetisation wrong|access-date=31 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170822220750/https://in.news.yahoo.com/half-dividend-full-fallacy-rbi-154100516.html|archive-date=22 August 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref> The [[Indian Air Force]] was paid ₹294.1 million to move banknotes after demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://english.manoramaonline.com/news/nation/2018/07/08/iaf-charged-ferry-currency-notes-post-demonetisation.html | title=IAF charged Rs 29.41cr to ferry currency notes post-demonetisation}}</ref> |
|||
The banks incurred the cost in collection, storage, and movement of banknotes across the country, as well as the cost of re-calibrating ATMs for the new banknotes (as they differed in size from the old ones).<ref>{{cite web | url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/rbi-demonetisation-bad-loans-economy-5357208/ | title=About false promises| date=14 September 2018}}</ref> |
|||
On 17 November 2016, in a rally against demonetisation of {{INR}}500 and {{INR}}1000 notes, led by the [[Chief Minister of Delhi]] [[Arvind Kejriwal]] and his West Bengal counterpart [[Mamata Banerjee]] at Azadpur Mandi, the biggest vegetable and fruits wholesale hub in the [[New Delhi|national capital]], Arvind Kejriwal demanded the withdraw of demonetisation in 3 days, or else there would be a [[rebellion]], he said. Banerjee also stated "I give the government 3 day ultimatum, fix things or withdraw the demonetisation scheme".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/live-kejriwal-mamata-protest-against-demonetisation-at-azadpur-market/story-9s1OoTJ1XgN6fFXSD6x36I.html|title=Resolve cash crunch in 3 days or face rebellion: Mamata, Kejriwal to Govt|publisher=[[Hindustan Times]]|accessdate=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
=== Welfare schemes === |
|||
In the demonetisation debate on the second and third day of the Winter Session of Parliament, on 17 and 18 November 2016, the opposition and the government clashed over the demonetisation issue, bringing the house to continuous halts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/winter-session-of-parliament-parliament-proceedings-november-18-2016/article9360240.ece|title=As it happened: RS, LS adjourned till Monday|publisher=[[The Hindu]]|accessdate=18 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Demonetisation negatively impacted the [[Midday Meal Scheme]] due to the shortage of funds.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-telangana/Midday-meal-workers-hit-by-demonetisation/article16740823.ece|title=Midday meal workers hit by demonetisation|last=Dayashankar|first=K. m|date=2 December 2016|work=The Hindu|access-date=24 August 2018|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://cms.deccanherald.com/content/589551/demonetisation-hits-mid-day-meal.html|title=Demonetisation hits mid-day meal scheme too|date=3 January 2017|website=Deccan Herald|language=en|access-date=24 August 2018}}{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://thewire.in/uncategorised/costs-demonetisation-tribals-schools|title=The Costs of Demonetisation: Farm Economy Takes a Hit, Mid-Day Meal Scheme in Peril|website=The Wire|access-date=24 August 2018}}</ref> |
|||
=== Deaths due to demonetisation === |
|||
On 24 November 2016, in the demonetisation debate, the former [[prime minister of India]] [[Manmohan Singh]] said "this scheme will hurt small industries, the farming sector. The GDP can decline by about 3 per cent due to this move", while he also questioned "I would like to ask the Prime Minister examples of countries where people have deposited their money in the banks and not allowed to withdraw their own money." and later also said "It is no good that on each day banks bring out new notifications. It doesn't reflect properly on Prime Minister's Office, Finance Minister and the [[Reserve Bank of India]]. Cooperative banking system has been prevented from handling cash".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Both-Houses-adjourned-PM-absent/article16692735.ece|title=Parliament Proceedings - Both Houses adjourned; PM absent|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref> Singh at last termed the demonetisation move as an "organized loot, legalized plunder of the common people".<ref>{{cite web | url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/is-modi-proving-manmohan-singh-right-with-slew-of-u-turns-on-cash-ban/articleshow/55632062.cms | title=Is Modi proving Manmohan Singh right with slew of U-turns on cash ban?}}</ref> |
|||
Several people were reported to have died from standing in queues for hours to exchange their demonetised banknotes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetosation-deaths-congress-modi-government/1/808721.html|title=Demonetisation: Rush for cash kills 2 in Kerala, 1 in Maharashtra; Congress blames Modi government|work=India Today|date=11 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.uniindia.com/demonetisation-96-year-old-died-while-standing-in-queue/states/news/684631.html|title=Demonetisation: 96 year-old died while standing in queue|agency=United News of India|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Three People Die While Waiting in Queue To Exchange Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 Currency Notes|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/11/73-year-old-dies-waiting-in-queue-to-exchange-discontinued-curre/|work=Huffington Post India|date=11 November 2016|access-date=13 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161113002732/http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/11/73-year-old-dies-waiting-in-queue-to-exchange-discontinued-curre/|archive-date=13 November 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> Deaths were also attributed to lack of medical help due to refusal of demonetised banknotes by hospitals.<ref>{{cite news|title=Mumbai: Baby dies waiting for medical help as hospital refuses Rs 500 & 1000 currency notes|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/mumbai-baby-dies-waiting-for-medical-help-as-hospital-refuses-rs-500-1000-currency-notes-1642581/|access-date=13 November 2016|publisher=India.com|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/cover-story/Doc-says-no-to-deposit-in-Rs-500-notes-baby-dies-awaiting-help/articleshow/55380976.cms|title=Doc says no to deposit in Rs 500 notes, baby dies awaiting help |work=Mumbai Mirror}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Sadaguru Pandit|newspaper=Hindustan Times|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/baby-dies-after-doctor-refuses-to-take-rs-500-and-rs-1000-notes-for-treatment-in-mumbai/story-xxSBtmK39xdcAx0hfhViEL.html|title=Infant's death: Doc booked over claims of refusing treatment in Mumbai|date=12 November 2016}}</ref> In one month after the demonetisation was announced, 82 people died according to a detailed list compiled by Catch News.<ref name="CatchNews">{{cite news |last1=Staff |first1=The Wire |title=The Costs of Demonetisation: Death Toll Rises to 82, Eight Million Workers Remain Unpaid |url=https://thewire.in/uncategorised/the-costs-of-demonetisation-death-toll-rises-to-82-eight-million-bidi-workers-remain-unpaid |access-date=2023-01-02 |work=[[The Wire (India)]] |date=2016-12-02}}</ref> By the end of December 2016, political opposition leaders claimed that over 100 people had died due to demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-demonetization-government-not-mourning-over-100-deaths-due-to-cash-crunch-says-opposition-2280902|title=Demonetization: Government not mourning over 100 deaths due to cash-crunch, says Opposition|date=8 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/mamata-attacks-modi-over-cash-withdrawal-limit-demonetisation-deaths-116123100489_1.html|title=Mamata attacks Modi over cash withdrawal limit, demonetisation deaths|last=IANS|date=31 December 2016|via=Business Standard|newspaper=Business Standard India}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/around-105-died-but-twitter-king-modi-didn-t-mention-it-lalu-on-demonetisation/story-XGSe6LlYLiKdTBoBBL4zJL.html|title=Around 105 died, but 'Twitter king' Modi didn't mention it: Lalu on demonetisation|date=22 December 2016|publisher=Indo-Asian News Service}}</ref> In March 2017, the government stated that they received no official report on deaths connected to demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2017/mar/17/no-official-report-on-deaths-due-to-demonetisation-government-1582474.html |title=No official report on deaths due to demonetisation: Government |publisher=The New Indian Express |date=17 March 2017 |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> Later in December 2018, the then [[Minister of Finance (India)|Finance Minister]] [[Arun Jaitley]] reported in parliament that four people, three bank personnel and one customer of the [[State Bank of India]], died during demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.oneindia.com/india/after-two-years-of-denial-govt-admits-death-due-to-demonetisation-2824960.html|title=After two years of denial, govt admits death due to demonetisation|first=Deepika|last=S|date=19 December 2018|website=One India}}</ref> |
|||
== |
==Legal issues== |
||
M. Seeni Ahamed, General Secretary of the [[Indian National League]], filed a [[public interest litigation in India|public interest litigation]] (PIL) to scrap the decision of demonetisation. The High Court dismissed the PIL, stating that it could not interfere in monetary policies of the government.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55353472.cms |title=Govt's demonetisation move fit for country's security, development: HC |newspaper= The Economic Times |date=10 November 2016 |access-date=10 November 2016}}</ref> Similar PILs were also filed in the [[Supreme Court of India]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/pils-supreme-court-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-illegal/1/807124.html |title=PILs in Supreme Court against making Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes illegal |work=India Today |date=10 November 2016 |access-date=10 November 2016}}</ref> In November 2017, the [[Supreme Court of India]] referred all cases which have similarity to demonetisation to constitutional bench to review the legality of the demonetisation, implementation irregularities and violation of people's rights by limits on cash withdrawals.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.livemint.com/Politics/i2HFNZCdECO3Hn1qqXpyLI/SC-refers-individual-cases-against-demonetisation-to-constit.html | title=SC refers individual cases against demonetisation to constitution bench| date=3 November 2017}}</ref> |
|||
{{main article|Aakrosh Diwas}} |
|||
As the demonetisation was opposed in both houses of the [[Indian parliament|parliament]], it triggered organised [[Bandh|nationwide strikes]] across India, noticeably starting 28 November 2016.<ref name="bandh1">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/live-opposition-protests-over-demonetisation-today-parties-divided-over-bandh/story-gSNK8OiyW2oy6VMumKOjVN.html|title=As it happened: Bharat Bandh affects some states, business as usual in others|publisher=[[Hindustan Times]]|accessdate=28 November 2016}}</ref> In the state of [[Bihar]], 15 trains were blocked and stranded, while the states of [[West Bengal]], [[Maharashtra]] and [[Uttar Pradesh]] saw protest marches and rallies led by opposition parties.<ref name="bandh1"/> In the state of [[Kerala]], shops and business establishments were shut, with school and colleges closed throughout the state, while movements of private vehicles were also disrupted in Northern Kerala.<ref name="bandh1"/> |
|||
The government had initially announced that any person who was unable to deposit the demonetised banknotes by 31 December 2016 would be given an opportunity to do so until a later date.<ref name="withdrawaloflegal" /> However, the government allowed only [[Non-Resident Indian]]s (NRIs) to deposit demonetised banknotes after 31 December 2016.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/rbi-turns-away-people-wanting-to-exchange-old-notes/345392.html |title=RBI turns away people wanting to exchange old notes |publisher=Tribuneindia.com |date=3 January 2017 |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> As a result, many people were left stranded with demonetised banknotes. People petitioned the courts to allow a deposit of the demonetised banknotes.<ref>{{cite web|last=Nanjappa |first=Vicky |url=http://www.oneindia.com/india/unable-deposit-demonetised-currency-in-rbi-1000-approach-supreme-court-2391049.html |title=Unable to deposit demonetised currency in RBI, 1,000s to approach Supreme Court |work=Oneindia |date=1 April 2017 |access-date=26 June 2017}}</ref> In November 2017, the Supreme Court dismissed 14 petitions related to demonetisation, and asked petitioners to file pleas with a constitutional bench which would deal with cases related to demonetisation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/sc-disposes-of-petitions-seeking-fresh-chance-to-deposit-old-notes-4921749/lite/|title=SC disposes of petitions seeking fresh chance to deposit old notes|date=4 November 2017|work=Indian Express}}</ref> |
|||
==Effects and aftermath== |
|||
{{news release|section|date= December 2016}} |
|||
In a 4:1 majority judgement in January 2023, the [[Supreme Court of India]] refused to strike down the demonetisation decision of 2016 on the basis of proportionality, saying that the process followed by the government to take the action was not flawed, even if the move did not achieve its objectives.<ref>{{cite news |author=Scroll Staff |title=Supreme Court upholds demonetisation by 4:1 majority |url=https://scroll.in/latest/1040990/demonetisation-cannot-be-struck-down-says-supreme-court |access-date=2023-01-02 |work=[[Scroll.in]] |date=2023-01-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Demonetisation is valid, says SC in 4:1 majority judgment; Justice Nagarathna dissents |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-demonetisation-verdict/article66329113.ece |access-date=28 May 2023 |work=The Hindu |date=2 January 2023 |language=en-IN}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Supreme Court upholds demonetisation: What was the challenge about? |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/supreme-court-upholds-demonetisation-what-was-the-challenge-about-8356303/ |access-date=28 May 2023 |work=The Indian Express |date=2 January 2023 |language=en}}</ref> The dissenting judgement said that the procedure of notification of demonetisation by the government was unlawful, while agreeing with the majority decision that the government has the authority to take such a decision, regardless of the validity of the reasons for the decision.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mandhani |first1=Apoorva |title=Justice Nagarathna's dissent in demonetisation case — 'well-intentioned but unlawful' |url=https://theprint.in/judiciary/justice-nagarathnas-dissent-in-demonetisation-case-well-intentioned-but-unlawful/1294347/ |access-date=28 May 2023 |work=ThePrint |date=2 January 2023}}</ref> |
|||
===Cash rush=== |
|||
[[File:Queue at ATM for INR 100 Notes - Howrah 2016-11-08 1773.JPG|thumb|Queue at an ATM for {{INR}}100 banknotes in [[Howrah]], on 8 November 2016, 22:23 (IST)]] |
|||
[[File:Queue at Bank to Exchange INR 500 and 1000 Notes - Salt Lake City - Kolkata 2016-11-10 02103.jpg|thumb|People queue outside a private bank to deposit and exchange old {{INR}}500 and {{INR}}1000 banknotes in [[Kolkata]] on 10 November 2016.]] |
|||
== Reactions == |
|||
The scarcity of cash due to demonetisation led to chaos, and most people holding old banknotes faced difficulties exchanging them due to endless lines outside banks and ATMs across India, which became a daily routine for millions of people waiting to deposit or exchange the {{INR}}500 and {{INR}}1000 banknotes since 9 November.<ref name="dryatm">{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-chaos-atms-run-dry-161109061403011.html|title=India demonetisation: Chaos as ATMs run dry|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|accessdate=9 November 2016}}</ref><ref name=IEchaos>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend-4371373/|title=Demonetisation: Chaos grows, queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="Aljazeera-1">{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-takes-toll-poor-161116172745225.html|title=India: Demonetisation takes its toll on the poor|date=16 November 2016|publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]|accessdate=17 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-move-chaos-grows-queues-get-longer-at-banks-atms-on-weekend/article9337803.ece|title=Queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend|date=12 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> ATMs were running out of cash after a few hours of being functional, and around half the ATMs in the country were non-functional.<ref name=IEchaos /> Sporadic violence was reported in [[New Delhi]], but there were no reports of any grievous injury,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/delhi/2016/nov/13/demonetisation-sporadic-violence-in-delhi-cops-receive-45k-calls-1538063.html|title=Demonetisation: Sporadic violence in Delhi, cops receive 4.5K calls|work=New Indian Express}}</ref> people attacked bank premises and ATMs,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bareilly/Unrest-erupts-in-UP-towns-as-cashless-crowds-vent-ire-on-bank-staff/articleshow/55528509.cms|title=Unrest erupts in UP towns as cashless crowds vent ire on bank staff – Times of India|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/meerut/In-western-UP-violence-marks-day-13-of-demonetisation/articleshow/55545397.cms|title=In western UP, violence marks day 13 of demonetisation – Times of India|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/demonetisation-effect-atm-vandalism-on-rise-1652843/|title=Demonetisation effect: ATM vandalism on rise|date=18 November 2016|publisher=|accessdate=24 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-angry-customers-break-banks-glass-door-in-kollam-4371720/|title=Demonetisation: Angry customers break bank’s glass door in Kollam|date=12 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Kochi/no-cash-frustrated-man-smashes-atm-glass-wall/article9340047.ece|title=No cash: ‘frustrated’ man smashes ATM glass wall|first=Staff|last=Reporter|date=13 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thequint.com/videos/2016/11/12/demonetisation-modi-rs-2000-rs-500-bank-officials-black-money-goons-attack-bank-officials-takes-its-toll-violence|title=Hid in Washroom For an Hour: Official After Attack at IDBI Bank}}</ref> and a ration shop was looted in [[Madhya Pradesh]] after the shop owner refused to accept {{INR}}500 banknotes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/bhopal/villagers-loot-pds-shop-over-invalid-after-dealer-refuses-scrapped-banknotes/story-pHFaVKqlz28OETJfvONS1M.html|title=Villagers loot fair price shop after dealer refuses scrapped banknotes|date=12 November 2016|work=Hindustan Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1161113/jsp/nation/story_118946.jsp|title=Nerves snap in long cash wait, shop looted}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.businessinsider.in/Villagers-looted-ration-shops-in-Madhya-Pradeshafter-the-shop-owner-refused-to-accept-old-notes/articleshow/55388557.cms|title=Villagers looted ration shops in Madhya Pradesh after the shop owner refused to accept old notes}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.news18.com/news/india/demonetisation-fallout-cashless-villagers-loot-pds-shop-in-mps-chhatarpur-village-1311252.html|title=Demonetisation Fallout: Cashless Villagers Loot PDS Shop in MP's Chhatarpur Village|date=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Reactions of economists=== |
|||
Most economists across the ideological spectrum, except those considered partisan, were broadly critical of the demonetisation as an economic policy.<ref name="voxdev">{{Cite news|url=https://voxdev.org/topic/institutions-political-economy/economic-and-political-consequences-india-s-demonetisation|title=The economic and political consequences of India's demonetisation|last1=Banerjee|first1=Abhijit|date=21 June 2017|work=VoxDev|access-date=3 November 2018|last2=Kala|first2=Namrata|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
Nobel laureate [[Amartya Sen]], called the demonetisation a "despotic action" and said that it "undermines notes, it undermines bank accounts, it undermines the entire economy of trust."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/demonetisation-effects-will-last-long/article17370434.ece|title=Demonetisation effects will last long|date=26 February 2017|work=The Hindu|access-date=26 February 2017|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Amartya-Sen-terms-demonetisation-a-despotic-action/article16730675.ece|title=Amartya Sen terms demonetisation a despotic action|last=PTI|newspaper=The Hindu|date=30 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.india.com/news/india/amartya-sen-criticises-demonetisation-drive-says-narendra-modi-declared-all-indians-crook-1665167/|title=Amartya Sen criticises demonetisation drive, says Narendra Modi declared all Indians 'crook'|first=|last=|date=26 November 2016}}</ref> Former [[World Bank Chief Economist|senior vice-president and chief economist of the World Bank]] [[Kaushik Basu]], called it a "major mistake" and said that the "damage" is likely to be much greater than any possible benefits.<ref name="Business Standard">{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/demonetisation-damage-greater-than-its-benefits-says-kaushik-basu-116111101733_1.html |title=Demonetisation damage greater than its benefits, says Kaushik Basu |work=Business Standard |date=12 November 2016 |access-date=12 November 2016|last1=Roychoudhury |first1=Arup }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|author=PTI |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/gst-good-economics-demonetisation-is-not-kaushik-basu/articleshow/55375545.cms |title=GST good economics; demonetisation is not: Kaushik Basu |newspaper=The Economic Times |date=11 November 2016 |access-date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/27/opinion/in-india-black-money-makes-for-bad-policy.html|title=In India, Black Money Makes for Bad Policy|date=27 November 2016|newspaper=The New York Times|last1=Basu|first1=Kaushik}}</ref> [[Pronab Sen]], former Chief Statistician and Planning Commission of India member, called it a "hollow move" since it did not really address any of the purported goals of tackling black money or fake currency.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/uzvIE84KGXy1xvp06pTazM/Demonetization-is-a-hollow-move.html|title=Demonetization is a hollow move|first=Pronab|last=Sen|date=14 November 2016}}</ref> [[Prabhat Patnaik]], a former professor of economics at the [[Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi]] called the move 'witless' and 'anti-people'. He criticised the assumption that black money was "a hoard of cash", saying that it would have little effect in eliminating "black activities" and would "caus[e] much hardship to common people."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Patnaik|first1=Prabhat|title=Demonetization: Witless and Anti-People|url=https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/1/9151/Demonetization-Witless-and-Anti-People|access-date=13 November 2016|work=The Citizen|date=9 November 2016|archive-date=19 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161119141220/https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/NewsDetail/index/1/9151/Demonetization-Witless-and-Anti-People|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Columbia University]] economist [[Jagdish Bhagwati]], however, praised the demonetisation, calling it “a courageous and substantive economic reform that, despite the significant transition costs, has the potential to generate large future benefits.”<ref>{{cite web|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/war-on-black-money-demonetisation-is-a-courageous-reform-that-will-bring-substantive-benefits/|title=War on black money: Demonetisation is a courageous reform that will bring substantive benefits|publisher=The Indian Express |date=14 December 2016 |access-date=31 October 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Several people were reported to have died from standing in queues for hours to exchange their old banknotes.<ref name="indianexpress.com">{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-deaths-in-maharashtra-kerala-narendra-modi-4370296/|title=Two dead in Maharashtra, Kerala in country-wide rush to junk banned notes|date=11 November 2016|work=Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetosation-deaths-congress-modi-government/1/808721.html|title=Demonetisation: Rush for cash kills 2 in Kerala, 1 in Maharashtra; Congress blames Modi government|work=India Today}}</ref><ref>http://www.uniindia.com/demonetisation-96-year-old-died-while-standing-in-queue/states/news/684631.html</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/farmer-standing-in-line-to-exchange-notes-dies-of-heart-attack-116111200942_1.html|title=Farmer standing in line to exchange notes dies of heart attack|first=Press Trust of|last=India|date=12 November 2016|work=Business Standard}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Three People Die While Waiting in Queue To Exchange Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 Currency Notes|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/11/73-year-old-dies-waiting-in-queue-to-exchange-discontinued-curre/|accessdate=13 November 2016|date=11 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=2 die in queue to exchange banned notes at bank|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2-die-in-country-wide-rush-to-junk-banned-notes/articleshow/55374158.cms|accessdate=13 November 2016|work=The Times of India|date=11 November 2016}}</ref> Deaths were also attributed to lack of medical help due to refusal of old banknotes by hospitals.<ref>{{cite news|title=Mumbai: Baby dies waiting for medical help as hospital refuses Rs 500 & 1000 currency notes|url=http://www.india.com/news/india/mumbai-baby-dies-waiting-for-medical-help-as-hospital-refuses-rs-500-1000-currency-notes-1642581/|accessdate=13 November 2016|publisher=India.com|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/cover-story/Doc-says-no-to-deposit-in-Rs-500-notes-baby-dies-awaiting-help/articleshow/55380976.cms|title=Doc says no to deposit in Rs 500 notes, baby dies awaiting help |work=Mumbai Mirror}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/baby-dies-after-doctor-refuses-to-take-rs-500-and-rs-1000-notes-for-treatment-in-mumbai/story-xxSBtmK39xdcAx0hfhViEL.html|title=Infant's death: Doc booked over claims of refusing treatment in Mumbai|date=12 November 2016}}</ref> As of 15 November 2016, the attributed death toll was 25.<ref name="death-ref1">{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/11/15/demonetisation-death-toll-rises-to-25-and-its-only-been-6-days/|title=Demonetisation Death Toll Rises To 25 And It's Only Been 6 Days|work=huffingtonpost|accessdate=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/demonetisation-row-many-lives-lost-for-crores-of-unaccounted-money-in-only-5-days/445560/|title=Demonetisation crisis: 25 people dead in a week already|date=14 November 2016|work=The Financial Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetisation-deaths-in-country/1/811009.html|title=25 deaths in a week: PM Modis demonetisation drive takes a toll on aam aadmi|work=India Today}}</ref> In an interview, [[Chief Minister of Delhi]] [[Arvind Kejriwal]] lashed out at a BBC reporter who asked him to justify his 19 November claim that 55 deaths were linked to demonetisation.<ref>Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Published:November 19, 2016 [http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/arvind-kejriwal-lashes-out-at-bbc-reporter-questioning-him-on-demonetisation-4384031/?campaign_id=A100 Arvind Kejriwal gets angry at BBC reporter questioning him on demonetisation] (Accessed on 20 November 2016)</ref> While, the CMD of [[Punjab National Bank]] said that panic after demonetisation started fading on 19 November 2016.<ref>The Hindu [http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/panic-following-withdrawal-of-notes-has-largely-faded/article9365673.ece Panic following withdrawal of notes has largely faded – PNB CMD] (Accessed on 20 November 2016)</ref> As of 8 December 2016, there were still long queues at banks and ATMs.<ref>http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/28-days-of-demonetisation-no-let-up-in-rush-at-banks-atms/articleshow/55838985.cms</ref><ref>http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetisation-long-queues-banks-atms-mumbai/1/830100.html</ref> |
|||
Nobel laureate [[Richard Thaler]], initially, praised the demonetisation of larger currency notes as "a policy I have long supported, First step towards cashless and good start on reducing corruption.", but was befuddled with the introduction of even bigger Rs.2000 banknote later on.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy-politics/story/nobel-prize-economics-winner-richard-thaler-pm-narendra-modi-demonetisation-rs2000-92073-2017-10-10|title=Nobel winner Richar Thaler applauded PM Narendra Modi's demonetisation; did not favour Rs 2000 note|date=10 October 2017|publisher=Business Today}}</ref> Economist and journalist T. N. Ninan wrote in the [[Business Standard]] that demonetisation 'looks like a bad idea, badly executed on the basis of some half-baked notions'.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/t-n-ninan-four-weeks-later-116120201131_1.html|title=T N Ninan: Four weeks later|first=T. N.|last=Ninan|date=2 December 2016|via=Business Standard|newspaper=Business Standard India}}</ref> [[Steve Forbes]] described the move as "sickening and immoral."<ref name="forbes">{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2016/12/22/what-india-has-done-to-its-money-is-sickening-and-immoral/|title=What India Has Done To Its Money Is Sickening And Immoral|first=Steve|last=Forbes|website=[[Forbes]]}}</ref> Forbes wrote that "[w]hat India has done is commit a massive theft of people's property without even the pretense of due process—a shocking move for a democratically elected government."<ref name="forbes" /> Nobel laureate [[Paul Krugman]] opined that it was difficult to see gains from demonetisation, while there might be significant costs to it.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/htls-2016-demonetisation-gains-uncertain-says-noble-laureate-paul-krugman/story-dFszJMERsydirqemQXcZ7L.html|title=HTLS 2016: Demonetisation gains uncertain, says Nobel laureate Paul Krugman|date=2 December 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Stock market crash=== |
|||
Economic analyst Vivek Kaul stated in a [[BBC]] article that "demonetisation had been a failure of epic proportions."<ref name="BBCdemonetisationFail">{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-41100613|title=India rupee: Illegal cash crackdown failed – bank report|date=30 August 2017|access-date=31 August 2017|work=BBC News}}</ref> [[Jayati Ghosh]], C. P. Chandrasekhar and [[Prabhat Patnaik]] wrote that demonetisation was unnecessary and unsuccessful, while it damaged the economy and adversely affected the lives and rights of the Indian people.<ref name="decoded">{{cite book |last1=Ghosh |first1=Jayati |last2=Chandrasekhar |first2=C. P. |last3=Patnaik |first3=Prabhat |title=Demonetisation Decoded: A Critique of India's Currency Experiment |date=16 March 2017 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-351-66401-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=whRdDgAAQBAJ |access-date=24 October 2023 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
As a combined effect of demonetisation and [[United States presidential election, 2016|US presidential election]], the stock market indices dropped to an around six-month low in the week following the announcement. The day after the demonetisation announcement, [[BSE SENSEX]] crashed nearly 1,689 points and [[NIFTY 50]] plunged by over 541 points.<ref name="stockcrash9nov">{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/markets/stock-market-news-november-9-2016/article9322930.ece|title=Sensex crashes 1,689 points on black money crackdown, U.S. election|publisher=[[The Hindu]]|accessdate=9 November 2016}}</ref> By the end of the intraday trading section on 15 November 2016, the [[BSE SENSEX]] index was lower by 565 points and the [[NIFTY 50]] index was below 8100 intraday.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/local-markets/sensex-sinks-514pts-midcap-down-4demonetisationearnings_7965381.html|title=Sensex sinks 514pts, Midcap down 4% on demonetisation & earnings |publisher=[[moneycontrol.com]]|accessdate=16 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Reactions of industrialists=== |
|||
===Transportation halts=== |
|||
The decision met with mixed initial reactions. Several bankers like [[Arundhati Bhattacharya]] (Former Chairperson of [[State Bank of India]]) and [[Chanda Kochhar]] (MD & CEO of [[ICICI Bank]]) favored the demonetization in order to curb black money.<ref name="IndiaInc">{{cite web | url=https://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/narendra-modi-rs-500-1000-sbi-arundhati-bhattacharya-icici-chanda-kochhar-here-is-how-india-inc-reacted-4364818/ | title=Govt demonitises Rs 500, 1000 notes: Here is how India Inc reacted | work=[[The Indian Express]] | date=8 November 2016 | access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> Businessmen [[Anand Mahindra]] ([[Mahindra Group]]), [[Sajjan Jindal]] ([[JSW Group]]), [[Kunal Bahl]] ([[Snapdeal]] and [[FreeCharge]]) also supported the move, adding that it would also accelerate e-commerce.<ref name="IndiaInc" /> Infosys founder [[N. R. Narayana Murthy]] praised the move.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/demonetisation-we-should-all-be-celebrating-says-narayana-murthy/articleshow/55357977.cms|title=Demonetisation: We should all be celebrating, says Narayana Murthy |newspaper=The Economic Times|date=10 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/move-to-withdraw-rs-500-1000-notes-master-stroke-narayana-murthy-4365782/|title=Move to withdraw Rs 500, 1,000 notes masterstroke |author=Narayana Murthy|date=9 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
[[Deepak Parekh]] (Chairman of [[Housing Development Finance Corporation|HDFC]]) had initially appreciated the decision of demonetisation, but later said that the move had derailed the economy, and expressed skepticism about its outcome.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.financialexpress.com/economy/hdfc-chairman-deepak-parekh-hits-out-at-demonetisation-drive-says-it-derailed-economy/467791/|title=HDFC Chairman Deepak Parekh hits out at demonetisation drive, says it derailed economy|date=8 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.firstpost.com/business/hdfcs-deepak-parekh-says-economy-has-derailed-in-short-term-due-to-demonetisation-3145486.html|title=HDFC's Deepak Parekh says economy has derailed in short term due to demonetisation|date=8 December 2016}}</ref> Industrialist [[Rajiv Bajaj]] criticised demonetisation, saying that not just the execution, but the concept of demonetisation was wrong in itself.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/business/economy/demonetisation-idea-wrong-dont-blame-its-execution-rajiv-bajaj-4529180/|title=Demonetisation idea wrong, don't blame its execution: Rajiv Bajaj|date=17 February 2017}}</ref> |
|||
After the demonetisation was announced, about 800,000 truck drivers were affected with scarcity of cash, with around 400,000 trucks stranded at major highways across India were reported.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-demonetization-with-no-cash-on-hand-4-lakh-trucks-stranded-on-highways-2273414|title=Demonetization: With no cash on hand, 4 lakh trucks stranded on highways|accessdate=14 November 2016}}</ref> While major highway toll junctions on the Gujarat and Delhi-Mumbai highways also saw long queues as toll plaza operators refused the old banknotes. |
|||
===Political reactions=== |
|||
[[Nitin Gadkari]], the [[Ministry of Road Transport and Highways|Minister of Transport]], subsequently announced a suspension of toll collections on all national highways across India until midnight of 11 November, later extended until 14 November and again until midnight of 18 November, and yet again till 2 December.<ref name="toll">{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/toll-collection-suspended-across-the-country-till-nov-11-highways-ministry/story-1bAQIFhgp3R26ja4z9OdDK.html |title=Toll tax suspended on national highways till Nov 11, banks open this weekend |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |accessdate=10 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/no-toll-charges-on-national-highways-till-nov-18-midnight-116111400435_1.html|title=No toll charges on National Highways till Nov 18 midnight|agency=Press Trust of India|date=14 November 2016|newspaper=Business Standard India|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
[[Indian National Congress]] spokesperson [[Randeep Surjewala]] welcomed the move but remained skeptical on the consequences that would follow.<ref name="Cong">{{cite web | url=https://www.india.com/news/india/rs-500-1000-currency-notes-banned-congress-raises-questions-against-narendra-modi-govts-shocking-move-1636286/ | title=Rs 500 & 1000 currency notes banned: Congress raises questions against Narendra Modi govt's shocking move | publisher=India.com | date=8 November 2016 | access-date=9 November 2016}}</ref> Chief Minister of Bihar [[Nitish Kumar]] supported the move.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/nitish-backs-modi-on-demonetisation/article9323442.ece|title=Nitish welcomes demonetisation move|date=9 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu}}</ref> The demonetisation also got support from the then Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh [[Nara Chandrababu Naidu]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonitisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-naidu-had-inkling-of-the-ban/article9320914.ece|title=Demonetisation of Rs. 500, Rs. 1000 notes: Naidu had inkling of the ban?|first=K.|last=Venkateshwarlu|date=9 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/andhra-cm-naidu-asked-for-demonitisation-of-rs-500-rs-1-000-notes-in-october-116110900626_1.html|title=Andhra CM Naidu asked for demonetisation of Rs 500, Rs 1,000 notes in October|first=B. S.|last=Reporter|date=9 November 2016|via=Business Standard|newspaper=Business Standard India}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2016/nov/08/chandrababu-naidu-welcomes-demonetisation-move-1536401.html|title=Chandrababu Naidu welcomes demonetisation move|website=The New Indian Express|date=8 November 2016 }}</ref> Former Chief Election Commissioner of India [[S. Y. Quraishi]] said demonetisation could lead to long term electoral reforms.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/demonetisation-could-lead-to-long-pending-electoral-reforms/story-tXYgT7hw6Q3TQUbPuIUucO.html|title=Demonetisation could lead to long-pending electoral reforms|date=11 November 2016}}</ref> Indian social activist [[Anna Hazare]] hailed demonetisation as a "revolutionary step".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonitisation-a-revolutionary-step-to-fight-corruption-anna-hazare-4367070/|title=Demonetisation a revolutionary step to fight corruption: Anna Hazare|date=10 November 2016}}</ref> Former [[President of India]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]] welcomed the demonetisation move by calling it a "bold step".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-a-bold-step-says-pranab-mukherjee/article9320915.ece|title=A bold step, says Pranab Mukherjee|date=9 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu}}</ref> Chief Ministers of several Indian states like [[Mamata Banerjee]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/one-month-of-pain-and-harrassment-pm-must-clarify-mamata-banerjee-1635504|title=One Month Of Pain And Harassment, PM Must Clarify: Mamata Banerjee|website=NDTV.com}}</ref> [[Arvind Kejriwal]]<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/demonetization-is-nothing-but-a-big-bjp-scam-kejriwal-116111200849_1.html|title=Demonetization is nothing but a big BJP scam: Kejriwal|last=ANI|date=12 November 2016|via=Business Standard|newspaper=Business Standard India}}</ref> and [[Pinarayi Vijayan]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-kerala-cm-pinarayi-vijayan-ministers-on-dharna-say-demonetisation-destroying-cooperative-sector-2274629|title=Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan, ministers stage dharna outside RBI office – Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis|date=18 November 2016}}</ref> have criticised and led major protests against the decision in their states and in parliament. Initially, the move to demonetise and try to hinder black money was appreciated, but the manner in which it was carried out by causing hardships to common people was criticised.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/2016/11/11/dear-pm-modi-demonetisation-brahmastra-could-have-spared-the-poor|title=Dear PM Modi, Demonetisation 'Brahmastra' Could Have Spared The Poor|date=8 November 2016|publisher=Bloomberg Quint|author=Raghav Bahl|access-date=12 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
A Parliamentary panel report in April 2017 stated that rural households and "honest taxpayers" were the worst hit by demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/economy/honest-taxpayers-rural-household-hardest-hit-due-to-demonetisation-parliamentary-panel-2256385.html|title=Honest taxpayers, rural household hardest hit due to demonetisation: Parliamentary Panel|date=11 April 2017|publisher=Moneycontrol.com|access-date=25 April 2017}}</ref> It said that it was not just the poor that suffered, but the manufacturing sector was impacted too.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/demonetisation-rural-household-honest-taxpayers-worst-due-to-the-step-says-parliamentary-committee/623835/|title=Demonetisation: Rural household, honest taxpayers worst due to the step, says Parliamentary committee|author=Jjayesh shanrilal|date=11 April 2017|publisher=The Financial Express|access-date=25 April 2017}}</ref> According to the panel, demonetisation created significant disruption throughout economy, because it was carried out without prior study or research.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/business/demonetisation/2017/apr/10/demonetisation-created-significant-disruption-throughout-economy-parliamentary-panel-1592129.html|title=Demonetisation created significant disruption throughout economy: Panel|date=10 April 2017 |publisher=The New Indian Express|access-date=25 April 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://164.100.47.5/committee_web/ReportFile/12/96/233_2018_6_15.pdf|title=Committee report}}</ref> An [[Indian National Congress]] led opposition which includes 13 political parties, opposed the government on the issue of demonetisation in the Winter Session of the [[Indian Parliament]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-demonetization-debate-likely-to-hot-up-winter-session-didi-to-knock-on-president-s-door-2273770|title= Debate on demonetisation, in winter session|work=DNA India.com|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/winter-session-oppn-to-target-govt-on-demonetisation-orop-gst-116111401558_1.html|title=Opposition to target government on demonetisation|work=Business Standard|date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/opposition-parties-agree-to-raise-notes-issue-in-session/articleshow/55424453.cms|title= Parties agree to raise notes issue in session|work=The Economic Times|date=15 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Agriculture=== |
|||
{{Missing information|section|effects of demonetisation on agriculture and farmers|date=November 2016}} |
|||
On 16 November 2016, [[Mamata Banerjee]] led a delegation comprising political parties of [[Trinamool Congress]], [[Aam Aadmi Party]], BJP ally [[Shiv Sena]] and National Conference to [[Rashtrapati Bhawan]] to protest against the demonetisation. A memorandum was submitted to the [[President of India]] [[Pranab Mukherjee]] demanding rollback of the decision.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-of-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-mamata-banerjee-leads-protest-march-to-rashtrapati-bhavan-4379517/|title=Demonetisation of Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes: Mamata Banerjee leads protest march to Rashtrapati Bhavan|publisher=[[The Indian Express]]|access-date=17 November 2016|date=16 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="Aljazeera-1">{{cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/11/india-demonetisation-takes-toll-poor-161116172745225.html|title=India: Demonetisation takes its toll on the poor|date=16 November 2016|publisher=[[Al Jazeera Media Network|Al Jazeera]]|access-date=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
Transactions in the [[Agriculture in India|Indian agriculture sector]] are heavily dependent on cash and were adversely affected by the demonetisation of ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.in/nidhi-nath-srinivas/how-demonetisation-has-affected-indias-agricultural-and-food-ma/|title=How Demonetisation Has Affected India's Agricultural And Food Markets|newspaper=Huffington Post India|access-date=2016-11-24}}</ref> Due to scarcity of the new banknotes, many farmers have unsufficient cash to purchase seeds, fertilisers and pesticides needed for the plantation of [[rabi crop]]s usually sown around mid-November.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/business/demonetisation-farmers-fear-loss-of-crops-and-income-after-currency-ban-3111694.html|title=Demonetisation: Farmers fear loss of crops and income after currency ban - Firstpost|date=2016-11-18|newspaper=Firstpost|language=en-US|access-date=2016-11-24}}</ref> Farmers and their unions conducted protest rallies in [[Gujarat]], [[Amritsar]] and [[Muzaffarnagar]] against the demonetisation as well as against restrictions imposed by the [[Reserve Bank of India]] on [[District Cooperative Central Bank|district cooperative central banks]] which were ordered not to accept or exchange the demonetised banknotes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.livemint.com/Politics/EgxO4VZMZJKpkiFwEvHEUL/Demonetisation-Farmers-protest-in-Muzaffarnagar-over-cash-s.html|title=Demonetisation: Farmers protest in Muzaffarnagar over cash shortage|last=PTI|date=2016-11-22|newspaper=http://www.livemint.com/|access-date=2016-11-24}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-at-gujarat-protests-farmers-dump-milk-vegetables-on-road-4385111/|title=Demonetisation: At Gujarat protests, farmers dump milk, vegetables on road|date=2016-11-20|newspaper=The Indian Express|access-date=2016-11-24}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/farmers-in-amritsar-stage-protest-burn-pm-modi-s-effigy/story-NlBIKQoj479XSv1DfQ5QAJ.html|title=Farmers in Amritsar stage protest against demonetisation, burn PM Modi’s effigy|date=2016-11-19|newspaper=http://www.hindustantimes.com/|access-date=2016-11-24}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/demonetisation-gujarat-farmers-warn-of-stopping-milk-supply-demand-note-exchange-at-co-op-banks-3114610.html|title=Demonetisation: Gujarat farmers warn of stopping milk supply; demand note-exchange at co-op banks - Firstpost|date=2016-11-19|newspaper=Firstpost|language=en-US|access-date=2016-11-24}}</ref> |
|||
[[Prem Chand Gupta]], a member of the [[Rashtriya Janata Dal]], questioned a statement of Modi from the unscheduled TV broadcast on 8 November, "If it was planned 10 months ago, how did RBI Governor [[Urjit Patel]] sign on new note?". [[Praful Patel]], a member of the [[Nationalist Congress Party]], stated that "the government was not even prepared to recalibrate the ATMs while announcing the move. People's suffering are unimaginable. Nobody is questioning the government's intention, but you are unprepared to execute the move". Later, the former [[Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh]] [[Mayawati]] called the situation "a financial emergency", saying, "It looks as if ''[[India|Bharat]]'' has shut down." Also, [[Sitaram Yechury]] from the [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)|Communist Party of India]], questioned the government on the demonetisation move by stating "only 6% of black money in India is in cash to drive his point that demonetisation won't curb illicit wealth."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/live-parliament-proceedings-november-16-2016/article9351846.ece|title=As it happened: Parliament proceedings — November 16, 2016 |newspaper=[[The Hindu]]|access-date=16 November 2016|date=16 November 2016 |last1= |first1= }}</ref> |
|||
===Banking=== |
|||
[[File:Rush outside SBI night.jpg|thumb|400px|A [[State Bank of India]] branch remained open at night, and a long queue of people waited outside the ATM to withdraw money]] |
|||
On 17 November 2016, [[Chief Minister of Delhi]] [[Arvind Kejriwal]] and his West Bengal counterpart [[Mamata Banerjee]] led a rally against demonetisation at Azadpur Mandi, the biggest vegetable and fruits wholesale market in [[New Delhi]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/live-kejriwal-mamata-protest-against-demonetisation-at-azadpur-market/story-9s1OoTJ1XgN6fFXSD6x36I.html|title=Resolve cash crunch in 3 days or face rebellion: Mamata, Kejriwal to Govt|publisher=[[Hindustan Times]]|access-date=17 November 2016|date=17 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
In the first four days after the announcement of the step, about {{INRConvert|3|t}} in the form of old ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes had been deposited in the banking system and about {{INRConvert|500|b}} had been dispensed via withdrawals from bank accounts, ATMs as well as exchanges over the bank counters. Within these four days, the banking system has handled about 180 million transactions.<ref name="revisedguidelines" /> The [[State Bank of India]] reported to have received more than {{INRConvert|300|b}} in bank deposit in first two days after demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/banking-and-finance/state-bank-of-india-gets-rs-38677-crore-deposit-in-2-days-4370826/|title=State Bank of India gets Rs 38,677 crore deposit in 2 days|date=12 November 2016|work=Indian Express}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/state-bank-of-india-says-it-has-received-deposits-worth-rs-53-000-crore/story-FDoUfqDOmC5ls3OAZSe2jM.html|title=State Bank of India says it has received deposits worth Rs 53,000 crore|date=11 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/banking-finance/demonetisation-drive-windfall-for-banks-coffers-richer-by-rs-2-2-lakh-cr-already/444188/|title=Demonetisation drive windfall for banks, coffers richer by Rs 2.2 lakh cr already|date=12 November 2016}}</ref> A spike in the usage of debit card and credit card post demonetisation was also reported.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/card-usage-surges-microlending-grinds-to-a-halt/article9341086.ece?w=alauto|title=Micro lending badly hit; surge in use of cards|first1=Manojit|last1=Saha|first2=Ashish|last2=Rukhaiyar|date=13 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> |
|||
On 24 November 2016, former prime minister [[Manmohan Singh]] said "this scheme will hurt small industries, the farming sector. The GDP can decline by about 3 percent due to this move". He called the demonetisation an "organised loot, legalised plunder of the common people".<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/is-modi-proving-manmohan-singh-right-with-slew-of-u-turns-on-cash-ban/articleshow/55632062.cms | title=Is Modi proving Manmohan Singh right with slew of U-turns on cash ban?| newspaper=The Economic Times| date=26 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Both-Houses-adjourned-PM-absent/article16692735.ece|title=Parliament Proceedings – Both Houses adjourned; PM absent|access-date=24 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu|date=24 November 2016|last1=Vasudeva|first1=Vikas|last2=Pathak|first2=Vikas}}</ref> |
|||
Between November 10 and November 27, banks reported exchange and deposits of demonetised banknotes worth {{INRConvert|8.45|t}} (exchange of {{INRConvert|339.48|b}} and deposits of {{INRConvert|8.11|t}}). During this period, an amount of {{INRConvert|2.16|lc|lk=lc}} had been withdrawn by people from their accounts.<ref name="TIEb2016">{{cite web | title=Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana: Post ‘last chance’ IDS, comes a new declaration scheme | website=The Indian Express | date=29 November 2016 | url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/business-others/pradhan-mantri-garib-kalyan-yojana-ids-scheme-4400491/ | accessdate=29 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
[[Bandh|Strikes]] were organised across India. Opposition parties like the [[Indian National Congress]], [[Bahujan Samaj Party]], [[Trinamool Congress]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/oppositions-countrywide-protest-over-notes-ban-on-monday-next-1629159?site=full|title=Oppositions will protest|date=23 November 2016|work=ndtv.com}}</ref> DMK, JD(U), AIADMK, [[Nationalist Congress Party]], Left, [[Rashtriya Janata Dal]] and the [[Samajwadi Party]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/demonetisation-drive-opposition-to-observe-aakrosh-diwas-on-nov-28/story-KZ9hMDXjWeXpg3n1z4ZFwN.html|title=Akrosh Diwas|date=23 November 2016|work=Hindustan times}}</ref> decided to observe 'Akrosh Diwas' as, a protest campaign day on 28 November <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/1161124/jsp/nation/story_121022.jsp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161124154609/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1161124/jsp/nation/story_121022.jsp|url-status=dead|archive-date=24 November 2016|title=Opposition stands together|date=23 November 2016|work=Telegraph India, Calcutta}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/politics/demonetisation-cpim-to-observe-november-28-as-akrosh-diwas-4391889/|title=CPI(M), 28 November as Akrosh Diwas|date=23 November 2016|work=Indian Express}}</ref> and launch protests in front of banks, demanding that money be returned to people.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-modi-attends-lok-sabha-but-no-progress-in-demonetisation-debate-with-oppn/story-kqCXDAyBe30aWZIlYhZOaO.html|title=November 28, Akrosh Diwas by opposition|date=23 November 2016|work=Hindustan Times}}</ref> In the state of [[Bihar]], 15 trains were blocked and stranded, while the states of [[West Bengal]], [[Maharashtra]] and [[Uttar Pradesh]] saw protest marches and rallies led by opposition parties.<ref name="bandh1">{{cite web|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/live-opposition-protests-over-demonetisation-today-parties-divided-over-bandh/story-gSNK8OiyW2oy6VMumKOjVN.html|title=As it happened: Bharat Bandh affects some states, business as usual in others|publisher=[[Hindustan Times]]|access-date=28 November 2016|date=28 November 2016}}</ref> In the state of [[Kerala]], shops and business establishments were shut, with schools and colleges closed throughout the state, while movements of private vehicles were also disrupted in Northern Kerala.<ref name="bandh1" /> |
|||
In [[Malda district|Malda]], a district believed to be a transit-point for fake Indian currencies,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/bank-accounts-for-sale-in-malda-west-bengal/1/808124.html|title=Exclusive: Bank accounts for sale in West Bengals Malda!}}</ref> a large sum of cash deposits in dormant accounts were also reported. According to [[The Economic Times]], more than 80 percent of fake currency in India originates from Malda district in [[West Bengal]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/life-has-come-to-standstill-in-indias-counterfeit-capital/articleshow/55406694.cms|title=Life has come to standstill in India's counterfeit capital |work=The Economic Times}}</ref> |
|||
Former Indian Chief Election Commissioner, [[Om Prakash Rawat|O. P. Rawat]] stated that 'the note ban had absolutely no impact on black money', and that record amounts of money had been seized in polls held after demonetisation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/op-rawat-cec-note-ban-black-money-polls-assembly-elections-mizoram-5474369/|title=OP Rawat: 'Note ban had absolutely no impact on black money. During polls we seized a record amount'|date=2 December 2018}}</ref> |
|||
===Business=== |
|||
===International reactions=== |
|||
By the second week after demonetisation of {{INR}}500 and {{INR}}1,000 banknotes, cigarette sales across India witnessed a fall of 30–40%,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/companies/cigarette-sales-down-30-40/448647/|title=Cigarette sales down 30–40%|accessdate=18 November 2016|publisher=[[The Financial Express (India)|Financial Express]]}}</ref> while E-commerce companies saw up to a 30% decline in [[cash on delivery]] (COD) orders.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.thehindu.com/business/Industry/ecommerce-firms-see-30-decline-in-cash-on-delivery-orders-post-demonetisation/article9354147.ece|title=E-commerce firms see 30% decline in cash on delivery orders post demonetisation|date=2016-11-16|newspaper=The Hindu|language=en-IN|issn=0971-751X|access-date=2016-11-18}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/business/business-others/rs-500-rs-1000-notes-demonetisation-e-commerce-cash-on-delivery-4379522/|title=E-commerce cash-on-delivery orders down by up to 30 per cent|date=2016-11-17|newspaper=The Indian Express|access-date=2016-11-18}}</ref> Several e-commerce companies hailed the demonetisation decision as an impetus to an increase in [[E-commerce payment system|digital payments]]. They believe that it would lead to a decline in COD returns which is expected to cut down their costs.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://techcircle.vccircle.com/2016/11/17/flipkart-snapdeal-shopclues-say-demonetisation-good-for-e-commerce-industry/|title=Flipkart, Snapdeal, Shopclues say demonetisation good for e-commerce industry|date=2016-11-17|newspaper=Techcircle.in – India startups, internet, mobile, e-commerce, software, online businesses, technology, venture capital, angel, seed funding|language=en-US|access-date=2016-11-18}}</ref> |
|||
By and large, initial international response was positive which saw the move as a bold crackdown on corruption.<ref name="IMF-response"/><ref name="Chinese state media"/><ref name="Swedish Minister"/> The [[International Monetary Fund]]'s spokesperson Gerry Rice told that it supported the efforts to fight corruption and illegal finances but cautioned about the disruptions.<ref name="IMF-response">{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/imf-supports-pm-modi-s-demonetization-move-in-fight-against-corruption-116111100142_1.html|title=Support by IMF|date=11 November 2016|work=Business Standard}}</ref> |
|||
Chinese state media ''[[Global Times]]'' praised the move as a "fierce fight against black money and corruption."<ref name="Chinese state media">{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/china-state-media-praises-modi-but-says-he/article9343797.ece|title=State media praises Modi, but says he can learn from China's crusade against corruption|first=Atul|last=Aneja|date=14 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu}}</ref> Former [[Prime Minister of Finland]] and vice-president of European Commission [[Jyrki Katainen]] welcomed the demonetisation move stressing that bringing transparency will strengthen the Indian economy.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-to-help-financial-system-eu/articleshow/55399290.cms|title=European Union welcomes India's step on demonetisation |newspaper=The Economic Times|date=13 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.news18.com/news/business/indias-crackdown-on-black-money-will-help-financial-system-european-union-1311545.html|title=India's Crackdown on Black Money Will Help Financial System: European Union|date=13 November 2016}}</ref> [[BBC]]'s South Asia Correspondent [[Justin Rowlatt]] in his article praised the move for its secrecy.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-37974423|title=Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight|first=Justin|last=Rowlatt|date=14 November 2016|work=bbc.com}}</ref> [[Tim Worstall]] wrote in ''[[Forbes]]'' that demonetisation was having positive macroeconomic effects.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/11/17/indias-rs-500-and-1000-demonetisation-is-lowering-interest-rates-and-also-inflation/|title=India's Rs 500 And 1,000 Demonetization Is Lowering Interest Rates And Also Inflation|first=Tim|last=Worstall|website=[[Forbes]]|access-date=24 November 2016}}</ref> Swedish Minister of Enterprise [[Mikael Damberg]] supported the move by calling it a bold decision.<ref name="Swedish Minister">{{Cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/interview-with-mikael-damberg/article9340999.ece?w=alauto|title=Swedish ICT sector wouldn't have been so successful without Indian help|first=Arun|last=S|date=13 November 2016|newspaper=The Hindu}}</ref> |
|||
The demand for point of sales (POS) or card swipe machines has increased.<ref name=et1116>{{citation |title=Demonetisation gets 'acche din' for swipe-machine makers |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55429945.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=15 November 2016 }}</ref> E-payment options like PayTM and PayUMoney has also seen a rise.<ref>{{citation |title=To stay afloat, Coimabtore traders seek card swipe machines |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/coimbatore/To-stay-afloat-Coimabtore-traders-seek-card-swipe-machines/articleshow/55519849.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=20 November 2016 }}</ref> According to data of Pine Labs, the demand for its POS machines doubled after the decision. Further it states that the debit card transactions rose by 108% and credit card transactions by 60% on 9 November 2016.<ref name=et1116/> |
|||
The demonetisation also came in for sharp criticism from media outside India,<ref name="Reckless Blunder">{{cite news|title=Modi's demonetisation move a reckless bungle: Foreign media|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/modis-demonetisation-move-a-reckless-bungle-foreign-media/articleshow/56210502.cms|work=[[The Times of India]]|date=28 December 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/OldNewsPage/?Id=9260|title="Worst Mistake of PM Modi's Career": World Media and Economists Decry Demonetisation "Havoc" in India|first=Gayeti|last=Singh|date=23 November 2016|work=The Citizen|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170116192244/https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/OldNewsPage/?Id=9260|archive-date=16 January 2017}}</ref> with ''[[The New York Times]]'' saying that the demonetisation was "atrociously planned" and that it did not appear to have combatted black money,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/demonetisation-atrociously-planned-and-executed-nyt-954288-2017-01-10|title=Demonetisation atrociously planned, little evidence it combatted black money: New York Times|website=India Today|date=10 January 2017 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/indians-suffering-after-atrociously-planned-note-ban-nyt-4468403/|title=Little evidence that demonetisation has succeeded in combating corruption: New York Times|date=10 January 2017}}</ref> while an article in ''[[The Guardian]]'' stated that "Modi has brought havoc to India".<ref name="Reckless Blunder" /> The ''[[Harvard Business Review]]'' called it "a case study in poor policy and even poorer execution".<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://hbr.org/2016/12/indias-botched-war-on-cash|title=India's Botched War on Cash|journal=Harvard Business Review|date=14 December 2016|last1=Chakravorti |first1=Bhaskar }}</ref> The frequent change in the narrative on objectives of the demonetisation to its visible impact on the poorest of the poor made other critiques calling the government's narrative as spins in view of the "pointless suffering on India's poorest."<ref>{{cite web | url =https://theconversation.com/modis-bank-note-ban-has-inflicted-pointless-suffering-on-indias-poorest-69157| title= Modi's bank note ban has inflicted pointless suffering on India's poorest| first=Ranjit | last=Goswami | date = 25 November 2016 | access-date = 25 January 2017|work=The Conversation}}</ref> |
|||
===Income tax raids and cash seizures=== |
|||
==Political impact== |
|||
The [[Ministry of Finance (India)|Finance Ministry]] instructed all revenue intelligence agencies to join the crackdown on forex traders, hawala operators and jewellers besides tracking movement of demonetised currency notes.<ref name="ED-fema-notices">{{cite news|title=Enforcement Directorate issues FEMA notices to forex, gold traders|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/enforcement-directorate-issues-fema-notices-to-forex-gold-traders/articleshow/55445560.cms|accessdate=16 November 2016|work=The Economic Times}}</ref> |
|||
Akshay Mangala, an assistant professor at [[Harvard Business School]], called the move "the politics of visible disruption". He noted that the people might attribute the implementation shortcomings to institutional weakness while the government could take credit for its attempt to curb the black money. He also noted that it may result in the public opinion in favour of the government which is led by the [[Bharatiya Janta Party|BJP]] if the opposition parties, led by the [[Indian National Congress|INC]], fail to form the countervailing narrative.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/iit/amangla|title=Demonetization: The Politics of Visible Disruption|last=Mangala|first=Akshay|date=30 January 2017|work=Center for the Advanced Study of India (CASI), University of Pennsylvania|access-date=3 November 2018|language=en}}</ref> [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] associated academics [[Abhijit Banerjee]] and Namrata Kala also opined the same.<ref name="voxdev"/> |
|||
The BJP and [[National Democratic Alliance (India)|its allies]] formed the government in six out of seven state legislative assemblies which went to the [[2017 elections in India|elections in 2017]], including the most populous state, [[2017 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|Uttar Pradesh]].<ref name="voxdev"/><ref name="htele17">{{Cite news|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/assembly-elections-2017-demonetisation-pays-rich-dividends-to-modi/story-WrAyZ648Va8jTl9aDSFsZJ.html|title=Assembly elections 2017: Modi loses no money in demonetisation gamble|last=Murty|first=B Vijay|date=11 March 2017|work=Hindustan Times|access-date=3 November 2018|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/9GDh3bof2x0wASY1avlbAK/The-BJPs-UP-surge-Didnt-demonetisation-matter.html|title=The BJP's UP surge: Didn't demonetisation matter?|last=Sukumar|first=R.|date=11 March 2017|work=Live Mint|access-date=3 November 2018}}</ref><ref name="idiatvnewsele" /> BJP improved its performance in [[2017 Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly election|Uttarakhand]]<ref name="htele17" /><ref name="idiatvnewsele"/><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/assembly-elections/assembly-elections-how-the-bjp-won-uttarakhand/story-9SSfVHcgDQvUx3GlLEvbkI.html|title=Assembly elections: How the BJP won Uttarakhand|date=11 March 2017|work=Hindustan Times|access-date=3 November 2018|language=en}}</ref> and [[2017 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election|Himachal Pradesh]].<ref name="elegujhp"/><ref>{{Cite news | url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/bjp-juggernaut-rolls-on-in-gujarat-tramples-congress-in-himachal-pradesh/articleshow/62118782.cms | title=BJP juggernaut rolls on in Gujarat, tramples Congress in Himachal Pradesh| newspaper=The Economic Times| date=18 December 2017}}</ref> In [[2017 Manipur Legislative Assembly election|Manipur]] and [[2017 Goa Legislative Assembly election|Goa]], INC secured the plurality while BJP came second and formed the government with the help of its allies.<ref name="idiatvnewsele"/><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/post-poll-alliances-were-preferred-by-governor-in-goa-manipur-and-meghalaya/articleshow/64193358.cms|title=Post-poll alliances were preferred by governor in Goa, Manipur and Meghalaya|date=16 May 2018|work=The Times of India|access-date=3 November 2018|agency=PTI}}</ref> In [[2017 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election|Gujarat]], BJP worsened its performance but retained the majority.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.firstpost.com/politics/bjps-gujarat-win-proves-gst-demonetisation-arent-potent-weapons-congress-needs-new-strategy-to-fight-modi-4265889.html|title=BJP's Gujarat win proves GST, demonetisation aren't potent weapons; Congress needs new strategy to fight Modi|last=Unnikrishnan|first=Dinesh|date=19 December 2017|website=FirstPost|access-date=3 November 2018}}</ref><ref name="elegujhp">{{cite news | url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/bjp-retains-gujarat-tramples-congress-in-himachal-pradesh/articleshow/62121182.cms | title=BJP retains Gujarat, ousts Congress from Himachal Pradesh – Times of India| website=[[The Times of India]]| date=18 December 2017}}</ref> The BJP and its allies lost to the INC in [[2017 Punjab Legislative Assembly election|Punjab]].<ref name="idiatvnewsele">{{Cite news|url=https://www.indiatvnews.com/business/news-demonetisation-litmus-test-for-bjp-one-year-on-can-modi-hold-his-sway-on-the-electorate-410739|title=Demonetisation a litmus test for BJP: One year on, can Modi hold his sway on the electorate?|last=Peeyush|first=Parimal|date=7 November 2017|access-date=3 November 2018|language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
Income Tax departments raided various illegal tax-evasive businesses in Delhi, Mumbai, Chandigarh, Ludhiana and other cities that traded with demonetised currency.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/income-tax-department-raids-chandni-chowk-shops-shut/1/807996.html |title=Income tax dept conducts raids across India as illegal financial institutions crop up; shops call it a day |work=India Today |date=11 November 2016 |author=Rai, Arpan |accessdate=12 November 2016}}</ref> The [[Enforcement Directorate]] issued several [[Foreign Exchange Management Act|FEMA]] notices to forex and gold traders.<ref name="ED-fema-notices"/> Large sum of cash in defunct notes were seized in different parts of the country.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/rs-1322-lakh-in-cash-seized/article9331654.ece?css=print|title=Rs. 13.22 lakh in cash seized|date=11 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/rs-4-crore-worth-scrapped-notes-seized-from-maharashtra-trader-1624663|title=Rs 4 Crore-Worth Scrapped Notes Seized From Maharashtra Trader}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/shimla/76-lakh-cash-seized-from-vehicle-in-Mandi/articleshow/55379844.cms|title=Rs 76 lakh cash seized from vehicle in Mandi – Times of India}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/madhya-pradesh-rs-4-crore-worth-scrapped-bank-notes-seized-from-maharashtra-trader-4371753/|title=Madhya Pradesh: Rs 4 crore-worth scrapped bank notes seized from trader|date=12 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/cash-seized-from-two-cars-near-nashik/article9356909.ece?homepage=true|title=Rs. 73 lakh cash seized from two cars near Nashik|publisher=|accessdate=2 December 2016}}</ref> In [[Chhattisgarh]] liquid cash worth of {{INRConvert|4.4|m}} was seized.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-chhattisgarh-cash-worth-rs-44-lakhs-in-rs-500-rs-1000-notes-seized-from-a-man-2272478|title=Chhattisgarh: Cash worth Rs 44 lakhs in Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes seized from a man |work=Daily News & Analysis|date=11 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
==Long term impact== |
|||
====Seizures of new Rs. 2000 notes==== |
|||
{{update section|date=June 2022}} |
|||
In December 2016, over 4 crore in new Rs. 2000 notes were seized from four persons in Bangalore,<ref>http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/Over-Rs-4-crore-in-new-notes-seized-in-IT-raids-in-Bengaluru/articleshow/55728247.cms</ref><ref>http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/bengaluru-cash-seizure-new-rs-2000-notes-demonetisation-black-money/1/825199.html</ref><ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/bengaluru-income-tax-raid-rs-4-crore-seized-4405135/</ref> Rs 33 lakh in Rs. 2000 notes were recovered from Manish Sharma, a BJP leader in West Bengal,<ref>http://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/after-bjp-leader-manish-kumars-arrest-babul-supriyo-washes-hands-off-all-linkages-calls-it-wasted-time/467387/</ref><ref>http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/several-bjp-men-caught-with-crores-karnataka-biggest-hotspot-for-illegal-cash-transactions-116120700330_1.html</ref> and Rs. 1.5 crore was seized in Goa.<ref>http://www.abplive.in/india-news/demonetisation-rs-1-5-crore-in-new-rs-2000-notes-seized-in-goa-two-held-459472</ref> |
|||
In 2019, India experienced an [[economic slowdown]] which was attributed to demonetisation and several other factors.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indias-economy-slows-stalling-once-thriving-manufacturing/growth-at-5/slideshow/71151545.cms |title=Growth at 5% - India's economy slows, stalling once thriving manufacturing | the Economic Times |access-date=4 January 2020 |archive-date=11 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191011030307/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indias-economy-slows-stalling-once-thriving-manufacturing/growth-at-5/slideshow/71151545.cms |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | url=https://apnews.com/624d7869488e47a39ba7522e464ef6e9 | title=India's economy slows, stalling once thriving manufacturing| website=[[Associated Press]]| date=16 September 2019}}</ref> |
|||
During the [[Coronavirus in India|COVID-19 pandemic]], there was an increase in digital payments.{{Citation needed|date= May 2023}} The general rise in digital payments and cashless transactions has been attributed to the demonetisation. Although data released by RBI in Nov 2021 showed that cash circulation in India has actually increased significantly since demonetization and demonetization has not necessarily converted cash users to digital users.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.financialexpress.com/money/how-demonetisation-is-helping-india-transact-under-the-shadow-of-covid-19-in-2020/2157129/|title=How demonetisation is helping India transact under the shadow of Covid-19 in 2020|date=24 December 2020|publisher=[[Financial Express (India)]]}}</ref> |
|||
===Insurgent groups === |
|||
As of November 2021, further increases in digital payments and bank notes in circulation have been seen.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/post-demonetisation-notes-in-circulation-on-rise-so-are-digital-payments-121110700404_1.html|title=Post demonetisation, notes in circulation on rise; so are digital payments|publisher=[[Business Standard]]|date=7 November 2021}}</ref> |
|||
The move also reportedly crippled Communist guerrilla groups ([[Naxalite]]s) financing through money laundering.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Cops-look-for-Maoists-with-old-currency/articleshow/55377997.cms|title=Cops look for Maoists with old currency – Times of India}}</ref><ref name="indiatimes.com">{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/Modis-demonetization-set-to-cripple-Naxalites-financially/articleshow/55379177.cms|title=Modi's demonetization set to cripple Naxalites financially |work=Times of India}}</ref> On 10 November the police arrested a petrol pump owner at Ranchi when he reportedly tried to deposit ₹2.5 billion, belonging to a person affiliated with the banned [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Vijayawada/maoists-depend-on-sympathisers-to-tide-over-cash-crunch/article9340780.ece?homepage=true|title=Maoists depend on sympathisers to tide over cash crunch|first=Rajulapudi|last=Srinivas|date=13 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> According to [[Chhattisgarh Police]] demonetisation has affected the [[Naxalite]] activities. It is reported that insurgents have stashed more than ₹70 billion in the Bastar region.<ref name="indiatimes.com"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/this-is-how-big-note-ban-will-affect-maoist-activities-in-chhattisgarh-1624880|title=This Is How Big Note Ban Will Affect Maoist Activities in Chhattisgarh}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-to-hit-maoist-activities-in-chhattisgarh-police-4372900/|title=Demonetisation to hit Maoist activities in Chhattisgarh: Police|date=13 November 2016}}</ref> Mumbai Police reported a setback to [[Hawala|Hawala operations]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/demonetisation-cripples-hawala-operations-mumbai-police/articleshow/55337722.cms|title=Demonetisation cripples hawala operations: Mumbai Police |work=The Economic Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/demonetisation-effect-hawala-operations-stopped-in-mumbai/1/807544.html|title=Demonetisation effect: Hawala operations come to a grinding halt}}</ref> Hawala dealers in Kerala were also affected.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/kerala/hawala-dealers-in-kerala-hit-hard-by-demonetisation-kerala-demonetization-unaccounted-money--1.1493198|title=Hawala dealers in Kerala hit hard by demonetisation}}</ref> The [[Jammu and Kashmir Police]] reported the effect of demonetisation on hawala transactions of separatists.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/thesundaystandard/2016/nov/12/terror-hawala-in-kashmir-valley-rendered-trash-thanks-to-demonetisation-1537896--1.html|title=Terror hawala in Kashmir valley rendered trash, thanks to demonetisation}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://postcard.news/violence-jammu-kashmir-suddenly-stopped/|title=Why all the Violence in Jammu-Kashmir Has Suddenly Stopped???|first=Postcard|last=Team}}</ref> The move has also helped in reducing the incidents of stone-pelting in valley.<ref>{{citation |title=No stone pelting on forces in Kashmir after demonetisation move, says Manohar Parrikar |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Demonetisation-has-led-to-decline-in-separatist-instigated-violence-in-the-Valley-MHA-sources/articleshow/55419257.cms |work=[[The Times of India]] |date=14 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Kashmir sees sharp decline in stone-pelting cases |url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/581113/kashmir-sees-sharp-decline-stone.html |work=[[Deccan Herald]] |date=15 November 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{citation |title=Demonetization ended terror-funding, stone-pelting in Kashmir: Parrikar |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-demonetisation-ended-terror-funding-stone-pelting-parrikar-2273524 |work=[[Daily News and Analysis]] |date=15 November 2016 }}</ref> More than 300 Naxals have surrendered to the police voluntarily due to shortage of funds.{{Citation needed|reason=Reliable source needed for this |date=November 2016}} |
|||
== In popular culture == |
|||
===Railways=== |
|||
* ''[[Puthan Panam]]'', a 2017 film directed by [[Renjith]] based on the issue of black money and demonetisation. |
|||
As of November 2015, Indian Railways did not have the option to make payment with cards at the counters. After the demonetisation move, the government announced to make card payment options available at railway counters in the country.<ref>{{citation |title=Railways gives green light to go cashless |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/railways-gives-green-light-to-go-cashless/articleshow/55736794.cms |work=[[The Economic Times]] |date=2 December 2016 }}</ref> |
|||
*''[[Aadu 2]]'', a 2017 film revolves around demonetisation. |
|||
* ''[[Golak Bugni Bank Te Batua]]'', a 2018 Punjabi film also revolves around demonetisation. |
|||
==Evasion attempts== |
|||
* ''[[Chappad Phaad Ke]]'', a 2019 [[Disney+ Hotstar]] film revolves around demonetisation |
|||
[[File:Shop accepting 500 1000 rupee notes.jpg|thumb|A jewellery store in a shopping mall with a notice "We accept ₹500 and ₹1000 notes", even after they were no longer valid banknotes.]] |
|||
* ''[[Choked (film)|Choked]]'', a 2020 [[Netflix]] film directed by [[Anurag Kashyap]] is set in backdrop of demonetisation. |
|||
* [[Cash (2021 film)|''Cash'']], a 2021 [[Disney+ Hotstar]] film |
|||
===Gold purchases=== |
|||
* ''[[Avrodh: The Siege Within 2]]'', a 2022 web series on [[SonyLIV]] |
|||
In [[Gujarat]], [[Delhi]] and many other major cities, sales of gold increased on 9 November, with an increased 20 to 30% premium surging the price as much as {{INRConvert|45|k}} from the ruling price of {{INRConvert|31.9|k}} per {{Convert|10|g}}.<ref name="Gold Price">{{cite web|url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/business/2016/nov/10/gold-price-recovers-on-renewed-demand-1536940.html|title=Gold price recovers on renewed demand |date=10 November 2016 |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |accessdate=10 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/scramble-for-gold-in-gujarat-after-demonetisation/article9323127.ece?homepage=true | title=Scramble for gold in Gujarat after demonetisation | work=[[The Hindu]] | date=9 November 2016 | accessdate=9 November 2016 | author=Langa, Mahesh}}</ref> |
|||
===Donations=== |
|||
Authorities of Sri Jalakanteswarar temple at [[Vellore]] discovered cash worth {{INRConvert|4.4|m}} from the temple Hundi.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/bundles-of-cash-found-inside-a-temple-hundi/article9342666.ece?homepage=true|title=Defunct notes worth Rs. 44 lakh found in temple hundi|date=14 November 2016|work=The Hindu}}</ref> |
|||
===Multiple bank transactions=== |
|||
There have also been reports of people circumventing the restrictions imposed on exchange transactions and also attempting to convert black money into white by making multiple transactions at different bank branches.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Parmar|first1=Beena|title=Despite Rs 4000-cap on money exchange, loophole allows multiple transactions|url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/business-news/despite-rs-4000-cap-on-money-exchange-loophole-allows-multiple-transactions/story-lbw8xw5XCHvsS5DOawWB1O.html|accessdate=13 November 2016|work=Hindustan Times|date=13 November 2016}}</ref> People were also getting rid of large amounts of banned currency by sending people in groups to exchange their money at banks.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/demonetisation-in-chennai-to-beat-cash-limit-they-send-full-teams-to-bank-4375951/|title=Demonetisation: In Chennai, To beat cash limit, they send full teams to bank|date=15 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref> In response, the government announced that it would start marking customers with indelible ink. This was in addition to other measures proposed to ensure that the exchange transactions are carried out only once by each person.<ref name="TOI_ink">{{Cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Indelible-ink-to-mark-fingers-of-those-who-have-exchanged-cash/articleshow/55431492.cms|title=To reduce crowds at banks, ATMs, indelible ink to mark fingers of those who have exchanged old notes |newspaper=The Times of India|access-date=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/demonetisation-banks-to-use-indelible-ink-to-stop-multiple-transactions-curb-crowd-3106274.html|title=Demonetisation: Banks to use indelible ink to stop multiple transactions, curb crowd |date=15 November 2016|publisher=firstpost}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/web-edits/demonetisation-indelible-ink-mark-seems-like-the-govt-is-panicking-4376665/|title=Demonetisation: Indelible ink mark seems like the government is panicking?|date=15 November 2016|work=The Indian Express}}</ref> On 17 November, the government reduced the exchange amount to {{INRConvert|2|k}} to discourage attempts to convert black money into legitimate money.<ref name=":1" /> |
|||
===Railway bookings=== |
|||
As soon as the demonetisation was announced, it was observed by the [[Indian Railways]] authorities that a large number of people started booking tickets particularly in [[Indian Railways coaching stock|classes]] 1A and 2A for the longest distance possible, to get rid of unaccounted cash. A senior official said, "On November 13, 42.7 million passengers were nationally booked across all classes. Of these, only 1,209 were 1A and 16,999 for 2A. It is a sharp dip from the number of passengers booked on November 9, when 27,237 passengers had booked tickets in 1A and 69,950 in 2A."<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
The [[Ministry of Railways (India)|Railways Ministry]] and the Railway Board responded swiftly and decided that cancellation and refund of tickets of value ₹10,000 and above will not be allowed by any means involving cash. The payment can only be through cheque/electronic payment. Tickets above ₹10,000 can be refunded by filing ticket deposit receipt only on surrendering the original ticket. A copy of the [[PAN card]] must be submitted for any cash transaction above ₹50,000. The railway claimed that since the Railway Board on 10 November imposed a number of restrictions to book and cancel tickets, the number of people booking 1A and 2A tickets came down.<ref name=":0">{{cite news|title=Rlys sets 5000 as cash refund limit for tickets|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Rlys-sets-5000-as-cash-refund-limit-for-tickets/articleshow/55444673.cms|accessdate=15 November 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Railways say, no cash refund for tickets booked between Nov 9-11|url=http://zeenews.india.com/economy/railways-say-no-cash-refund-for-tickets-booked-between-nov-9-11_1949831.html|accessdate=15 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Municipal and local tax payments=== |
|||
As the use of the demonetised notes had been allowed by the government for the payment of municipal and local body taxes, it led to people using the demonetised ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes to pay large amounts of outstanding and advance taxes. As a result, revenue collections of the local civic bodies jumped. The [[Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation]] reported collecting about {{INRConvert|1.6|b}} in cash payments of outstanding and advance taxes, within 4 days.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/hyderabad/demonetisation-impact-greater-hyderabad-municipal-corporation-collects-over-rs-160-crore-in-just-four-days_1949989.html|title=Demonetisation impact: Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation collects over Rs 160 crore in just four days|date=15 November 2016|publisher=india.com}}</ref> |
|||
===Backdated accounting=== |
|||
The [[Enforcement Directorate]] raided several forex establishments making back dated entries.<ref>{{cite news|title=Enforcement Directorate raids forex shops making back date entries|url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/enforcement-directorate-raids-forex-shops-making-back-date-entries/articleshow/55373554.cms|work=The Economic Times|date=16 November 2016}}</ref> Money laundering using backdated accounting was carried out by co-operative banks,<ref>http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Netas-using-co-op-banks-for-backdated-FDs-DDs/articleshow/55467204.cms</ref> jewellers,<ref>http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/commodities/news/jewellers-issue-backdated-invoices-to-clients/articleshow/55349735.cms</ref> sellers of iPhones,<ref>http://www.ibtimes.co.in/back-dated-receipts-used-apple-iphone-sales-after-demonetisation-report-706095</ref> and several other businesses.<ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/india/demonetisation-tiffin-service-to-dental-implants-all-tried-to-beat-system-swap-old-notes-income-tax-department-raids-4410874/</ref> |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
{{Portal|Money|India|Numismatics}} |
|||
* [[Indian black money]] |
* [[Indian black money]] |
||
* [[Mahatma Gandhi New Series]] |
|||
* [[Income declaration scheme, 2016]] |
|||
* [[Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana]] |
|||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{reflist |
{{reflist}} |
||
==Further reading== |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Sanyal |first1=Meera |title=The Big Reverse: How Demonetization Knocked India Out |date=10 November 2018 |publisher=Harper Collins |isbn=978-93-5302-395-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=a5hyDwAAQBAJ |access-date=24 October 2023 |language=en |author1-link=Meera Sanyal }} |
|||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
{{commons category |
{{commons category}} |
||
{{wikinews|India discontinues ₹500, ₹1000 denominations; releases ₹2000 and new ₹500 bills}} |
{{wikinews|India discontinues ₹500, ₹1000 denominations; releases ₹2000 and new ₹500 bills}} |
||
{{wikiquote}} |
|||
* [http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/rupees-500-1000-currency-note-faq-narendra-modi/1/805954.html What the FAQ just happened! All your questions about Rs 500–1000 notes answered], ''India Today'', 8 November 2016 |
* [http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/rupees-500-1000-currency-note-faq-narendra-modi/1/805954.html What the FAQ just happened! All your questions about Rs 500–1000 notes answered], ''India Today'', 8 November 2016 |
||
* [https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/FAQView.aspx?Id=119 FAQ answers and Guidelines on Reserve Bank of India] |
* [https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/FAQView.aspx?Id=119 FAQ answers and Guidelines on Reserve Bank of India] |
||
* [http://www.finmin.nic.in/ Ministry of Finance, Government of India] |
* [http://www.finmin.nic.in/ Ministry of Finance, Government of India] |
||
* Litvack, L., & Vigne, S. (2017). ''Demonetisation in India and Emerging Challenges: A Report Delivered to the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland and the Government of India by Queen's University Belfast and O.P. Jindal Global University''. Belfast: Queen's University Belfast. http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/131517443/Final_report.pdf |
|||
{{Indian currency}} |
{{Indian currency}} |
Latest revision as of 09:19, 28 December 2024
Date | 8 November 2016 |
---|---|
Time | 20:00 IST (14:00 UTC) |
Deaths | 82[1] |
On 8 November 2016, the Government of India announced the demonetisation of all ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi Series. It also announced the issuance of new ₹500 and ₹2,000 banknotes in exchange for the demonetised banknotes.[2] Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that this decision would curtail the shadow economy, increase cashless transactions and reduce the use of illicit and counterfeit cash to fund illegal activity and terrorism.[3][4][5]
The announcement of demonetisation was followed by prolonged cash shortages in the weeks that followed, which created significant disruption throughout the economy.[6][7][8] People seeking to exchange their banknotes had to stand in lengthy queues, and several deaths were linked to the rush to exchange cash.[9][10]
According to a 2018 report from the Reserve Bank of India ₹15.3 lakh crore (15.3 trillion rupees on the short scale) of the ₹15.41 lakh crore in demonetised bank notes, or approximately 99.3%, were deposited in banks, leading analysts to state that the effort had failed to remove black money from the economy.[11][12] The BSE SENSEX and NIFTY 50 stock indices fell over 6% on the day after the announcement.[13] The move reduced the country's industrial production and its GDP growth rate.[14] It is estimated that 1.5 million jobs were lost.[15] The move also saw a significant increase in digital and cashless transactions throughout the country.[16]
Initially, the move received support from some central bankers as well as from some international commentators. The move was also criticised as poorly planned and unfair, and was met with protests, litigation, and strikes against the government in several places across India. Debates also took place concerning the move in both houses of Parliament.[17][18][19]
The consensus is that demonetisation was not the right move to target black money, and was unsuccessful.[20][21] Moreover, it was based on an incorrect understanding of what constitutes black money.[22]
Background
[edit]The Indian government had demonetised banknotes on two prior occasions—once in 1946 and once in 1978—and in both cases, the goal was to combat tax evasion via "black money" held outside the formal economic system.[23] In 1978, the Janata Party coalition government demonetised banknotes of ₹1,000, ₹5,000 and ₹10,000, again in the hopes of curbing counterfeit money and black money.[24]
In 2012, the Central Board of Direct Taxes recommended against demonetisation, saying in a report that "demonetisation may not be a solution for tackling black money or shadow economy, which is largely held in the form of benami properties, bullion and jewelry."[25][26] According to data from income tax probes, black money holders kept only 6% or less of their wealth as cash, suggesting that targeting this cash would not be a successful strategy.[27]
Demonetisation process
[edit]Preparation and announcement
[edit]The plan to demonetise the ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes was initiated between six and ten months before it was a report by the State Bank of India (SBI) analysed possible strategies and effects of demonetisation.[28] In May 2016, the Reserve Bank of India had started preparing for new banknotes and confirmed the design of ₹2,000 banknotes in August 2016. The printing of new banknotes started in October when the news stories of forthcoming new banknotes appeared in the media.[29][30][31] On 27 October 2016, the Hindi daily Dainik Jagran published a report quoting RBI sources speaking of the forthcoming of ₹2,000 banknotes alongside withdrawal of ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes.[32][33] On 21 October 2016, The Hindu Business Line had also covered a story on demands to withdraw the banknotes to prevent hoarding of black money.[34]
The Board of the Reserve Bank of India met on Nov 8th, 2016, 5:30 PM to consider a letter from the Ministry of Finance regarding demonetization. "Two key reasons for the proposal cited in the government letter were: (1) between 2011 and 2016, the supply of 500- and 1,000-rupee bills had grown by 76 and 108 percent, respectively, while India's economy had only grown by 30 percent during this period; and (2) cash typically facilitated "black money." The board was further told that the measure was also intended to encourage greater financial inclusion and to incentivize greater digitization of the economy. The board approved the proposal, but not before making a few trenchant comments. It noted that the measure may not have the desired effect on black money because most people do not hold undeclared wealth in cash. It further worried about the negative effects on growth that were likely to occur in the short run. Possibly the most damning observation was that the primary fact on which the government had based its proposal—that the supply of 500- and 1,000-rupee bills had far outstripped the growth rate of the economy—was simply wrong. The board pointed out the embarrassing fact that the government had compared GDP growth in real terms with the growth of currency supply in nominal terms. In fact, nominal GDP growth had summed to over 80 percent between 2011 and 2016 and hence was in line with the growth of the currency bills to be demonetized."[35][36][37]
The Union cabinet was apprised of the plan on 8 November 2016 in a meeting in the evening convened by Prime Minister Modi.[38] Soon after the meeting, Modi announced the demonetisation in an unscheduled live national televised address at 20:15 IST.[39][40] He declared circulation of all ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi Series as invalid effective from the midnight of the same day, and announced the issuance of new ₹500 and ₹2,000 banknotes of the Mahatma Gandhi New Series in exchange for the demonetised banknotes.[41]
Information leak rumours
[edit]After the announcement of demonetisation, a prominent businessman claimed to have received prior tip-offs and rumours warning of the move and after seeing leaked photos of new ₹2,000 notes "knew what was coming", allowing them to preserve their money by converting it into smaller denominations.[42] A Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) member from Rajasthan Legislative Assembly, Bhawani Singh Rajawat, claimed in a video that wealthy businessmen were informed about the demonetisation before it occurred. He later denied making the comments.[43][44]
Cash exchange and withdrawal
[edit]The Reserve Bank of India stipulated that the demonetised banknotes could be deposited with banks over a period of fifty days until 30 December 2016. The banknotes could also be exchanged for legal tender over the counter at all banks. The limit for such exchange was ₹4,000 per person from 8 to 13 November, was increased to ₹4,500 from 14 to 17 November, and reduced to ₹2,000 from 18 to 25 November.[45][46][47] The exchange of banknotes was stopped completely on 25 November, although the government had previously stated that the volume of exchange would be increased after that date.[48] International airports also facilitated an exchange of banknotes for foreign tourists and out-bound travellers, amounting to a total value of ₹5,000 per person.[49] Fuel pumps, government hospitals, railway and airline booking counters, state-government recognised dairies and ration stores, and crematoriums were allowed to accept the demonetised banknotes until 2 December 2016.[50]
Cash withdrawals from bank accounts were restricted to ₹10,000 per day and ₹20,000 per week per account from 10 to 13 November.[2] This limit was increased to ₹24,000 per week from 14 November 2016.[45][46] Limits on cash withdrawals from Current accounts/ Cash credit accounts/ Overdraft accounts were withdrawn later. RBI increased the withdrawal limit from Savings Bank account to ₹50,000 from the earlier ₹24,000 on 20 February 2017 and then on 13 March 2017, it removed all withdrawal limits from savings bank accounts.[51]
A daily limit on withdrawals from ATMs was also imposed varying from ₹2,000 per day until 14 November,[52] and ₹2,500 per day until 31 December.[45][46] This limit was increased to ₹4,500 per day from 1 January,[53] and again to ₹10,000 from 16 January 2017.[51] From 17 November, families were allowed to withdraw ₹250,000 for wedding expenses. Farmers were permitted to withdraw ₹25,000 per week against crop loans.[47][54]
Ordinance and Acts
[edit]The Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016 was issued on 28 December 2016, ending the liability of the government for the demonetised banknotes. The ordinance also imposed fines on people found carrying out transactions with them after 8 November 2016, or holding more than ten of them after 30 December 2016. It provided for the exchange of the banknotes after 30 December for people who had been outside India between 9 November and 30 December.[55][56] The Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017 was notified on 1 March 2017, replacing the ordinance.[57]
Objectives and outcomes
[edit]The government said that the main objective of the exercise was curbing black money, which included income which had not been reported and thus was untaxed; money gained through corruption, illegal goods sales and illegal activities such as human trafficking; and counterfeit currency. Other stated objectives included expanding the tax base and increasing the number of taxpayers; reducing the number of transactions carried out by cash; reducing the finances available to terrorists and radical groups such as the Naxalite Maoists; and integrating the formal and informal economies.[58][59][60]
Shifting of goalposts
[edit]The government was described as 'shifting the goalposts'[61][62][63] with respect to the goals of the demonetisation exercise. The initial stated goal was to curb black money, corruption, and terrorism, but as it became apparent that almost all the cash was being exchanged,[64] the goals were expanded to include making India a cashless economy, neutralisation of money held by Maoists, terrorists and human traffickers, among others.[65]
Black money
[edit]The government estimated that ₹5 trillion, or approximately 20%, of the demonetised banknotes would be permanently removed from circulation.[66] However, according to a 2018 report from the RBI, 99.3% of the demonetised banknotes, or ₹15.3 trillion of the ₹15.41 trillion that had been demonetised, were deposited with the banking system. The banknotes that were not deposited were worth ₹107.2 billion.[67] Commentators concluded that the government had failed in its aim of purging black money from the economy.[11]
Evasion
[edit]There were reports of people circumventing the restrictions imposed on exchange transactions by conducting multiple transactions at different bank branches, and by sending hired people, employees, and followers in groups to exchange large amounts of demonetised banknotes at banks.[68][69] In Gujarat, Delhi and many other major cities, sales of gold increased post-demonetisation, surging the price as much as ₹45,000 (US$530) from the ruling price of ₹31,900 (US$370) per 10 grams (0.35 oz).[70][71] The Enforcement Directorate raided several forex establishments making backdated entries.[72] Money laundering using backdated accounting was carried out by co-operative banks,[73] jewellers,[74] sellers of mobile phones,[75] and several other businesses.[76]
The cash deposited into hundis (cash collection boxes in temples and gurudwaras) are exempted from inquiry by the tax department; this is sometimes to launder money.[77][78] After the demonetisation, there was a spike in donations in the form of the demonetised banknotes in temples.[79][80][81] People booked large numbers of railway tickets to dispose of unaccounted cash. This came to the notice of the Indian Railways authorities, who imposed restrictions to check evasion.[82][83]
Counterfeit banknotes
[edit]Denomination | 2015–16 | 2016–17 | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
₹1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
₹2 and ₹5 | 2 | 80 | 1 | - | 22 |
₹10 | 134 | 523 | 287 | 345 | 844 |
₹20 | 96 | 324 | 437 | 818 | 510 |
₹50 | 6,453 | 9,222 | 23,447 | 36,875 | 47,454 |
₹100 | 221,447 | 177,195 | 239,182 | 2,21,218 | 1,68,739 |
₹200 | NA | NA | 79 | 12,728 | 31,969 |
₹500 (old) | 261,695 | 317,567 | 127,918 | 971 | 11 |
₹500 (new) | NA | 199 | 9,892 | 21,865 | 30,054 |
₹1000 | 143,099 | 256,324 | 103,611 | 717 | 72 |
₹2000 | NA | 638 | 17,929 | 21,847 | 17,020 |
Total | 632,926 | 762,027 | 522,783 | 3,17,384 | 2,96,695 |
After demonetisation, there was an increase in the number of counterfeit ₹100 and ₹50 banknotes. The number of counterfeit ₹500 and ₹1,000 (demonetised version) banknotes saw an increase in 2016–17 and subsequently a decline in 2017–18. But in 2017–18, there was an increase in counterfeit ₹500 and ₹2,000 (new version) banknotes than the previous year.[84] There has been no significant change in the number of counterfeit banknotes detected. In 2017–18, the number of detected counterfeit banknotes was close to the number before demonetisation.[86] Additionally, after demonetisation, only 0.0035% of the ₹1,000 banknotes were found to be counterfeit.[87] The number of counterfeit banknotes of ₹500 and ₹2,000 (new version) detected continue to increase while overall number declined in 2018-9 and 2019–20.[85]
Tax collection
[edit]Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
The number of income tax returns filing increased from 43.3 million to 52.9 million between the financial year of 2016 and 2017, which was not a significant increase compared to the increase between 2015 and 2016. The tax compliance had increased with a number of income tax returns filing increased but the majority of them were from salaried and non-business class. The income tax collections increased in the financial year of 2017 due to Income Disclosure Scheme 2016. If adjusted for it, the increase in tax collection was modest. The tax-to-GDP ratio has increased due to expanding tax base.[88][86] An analysis of the economic data shows that there has been no substantial increase in the number of new tax payers or direct tax collection due to demonetisation.[89][88][90] Indirect tax/GDP ratio also remained on the trend path and had no visible impact.[35]
The use of demonetised banknotes was allowed for the payment of municipal and local civic body taxes, leading to a jump in their revenue collections. For example, the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation reported collecting about ₹1.6 billion in cash payments of outstanding and advance taxes within the first four days of demonetisation.[91]
Digital payments
[edit]The push for digital payments was one of the stated intentions of demonetisation.[92][93][94][95] There was an immediate and sharp jump in digital payments in November–December 2016 owing to shortages of cash. The debit card point of sales transactions was twice the size of value suggested by trends before demonetisation. The value of credit cards increased but no sharp growth was seen. The mobile wallet transactions picked up immediately after demonetisation, followed by a dip in mid-2017 due to easing cash shortages. There was again sharp rise thereafter. By April 2018, the volume of the digital payments had doubled.[92] After return of the cash, the growth in digital payment had been modest.[86][92]
The currency-to-GDP ratio was 12.1% in 2015–16. It declined to 8.8% in 2016–17 due to demonetisation but increased again to 10.9% in 2017–18.[84] The currency-to-GDP ratio was only marginally lower compared to levels before demonetisation.[86]
Banknotes in circulation
[edit]Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
On 28 October 2016, the total banknotes in circulation in India were valued at ₹17.77 trillion; what proportion of this derived from ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes was unknown. In its annual report of March 2016, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) stated that total banknotes in circulation valued ₹16.42 trillion, of which nearly 86% (around ₹14.18 trillion) derived from ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes. In terms of volume, the report stated that 24% (around 22.03 billion) of the total 90.26 billion (9026.6 crore) banknotes in circulation were ₹500 and ₹1,000 banknotes.[97]
Before demonetisation (November 2016), there were banknotes worth ₹17.97 trillion in the market. The demonetised banknotes constituted 86.4% of it.[67] The banknotes in circulation had reached to the level before demonetisation in March 2018.[86] By March 2018, there were banknotes worth ₹18.03 trillion in the market; an increase of 9.9%. New banknotes of ₹2,000 and ₹500 constitute 80.6% of it. Thus, small domination banknotes increased by only 5.8%.[67] The volume of banknotes in the market increased by 2.1%.[84] The banknotes in circulation had further increased to ₹19.5 trillion in September 2018[98] and ₹21.41 trillion in March 2019, 19.14% higher than the level before demonetisation.[99] Five years after demonetisation, the currency in circulation was at a record high of ₹29.17 trillion on 29 October 2021.[100][101]
Terrorism and internal security
[edit]Initially following demonetization, activities and attacks by the Maoist Naxalite radical groups decreased, which was attributed to lack of finance following demonetisation. The surrender rate had reached its highest.[102][103][104][105][106] The activities returned within few months.[107][108] There was a decrease in the terror activities in Jammu and Kashmir.[109][110]
Other effects
[edit]Shortage of cash
[edit]The scarcity of cash due to demonetisation led to chaos, and people faced difficulties in depositing or exchanging the demonetised banknotes due to long queues outside banks and ATMs across India.[111][112][113] The ATMs were short of cash for months after demonetisation.[114][115][116]
During the demonetisation, police and tax officials across India seized ₹6.1 billion in unaccounted money, including ₹1.1 billion in new banknotes.[117] Reports in the media noted that although the general public faced a severe cash shortage, some individuals were able to amass tens of millions of rupees in new banknotes; they thus described the demonetisation exercise as being futile.[118][119][120]
Transport
[edit]The All India Motor Transport Congress claimed that about 800,000 truck drivers and conductors were affected with the shortage of cash, with around 400,000 trucks stranded on major highways across India.[121] Major toll plazas in Gujarat and on the Delhi-Mumbai highways also saw long queues as toll plaza operators refused the demonetised banknotes.[122] The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways subsequently announced a suspension of toll collections on all national highways across the country until 2 December as well as acceptance of demonetised ₹500 banknotes as a toll from 2 to 15 December.[123]
Stock market
[edit]As a combined effect of demonetisation and the US presidential election, the stock market indices dropped to an around six-month low in the week following the announcement. The day after the demonetisation announcement, BSE SENSEX crashed nearly 1,689 points and NIFTY 50 plunged by over 541 points.[13] By the end of the intraday trading section on 15 November 2016, the BSE SENSEX index was lower by 565 points and the NIFTY 50 index was below 8100 intraday.[124] There were marginal effects on the stock market during November–December 2016.[125] A data study (July 2016 – February 2017) of 54 companies across 13 sectors listed with the NSE showed that companies in cement, cotton and rubber sectors showed an increase in total trades while companies in automotive, clothing, foods, paper, real estate, retail, steel, sugar, tea and textiles sectors showed a decrease in total trades after demonetisation.[126] Demonetisation had a negative impact on stock market returns evidenced from NIFTY 50 and other NIFTY sectoral indices.[127]
Industrial output
[edit]There was a reduction in industrial output as industries were hit by the cash shortage.[128] The Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) fell to 46.7 in November 2016 from 54.5 in October 2016, recording its sharpest reduction in three years.[129] A reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below shows contraction. This indicates a slowdown in both manufacturing and services industries.[130] The PMI report also showed that the reduction in inflation in November 2016 was due to a shortage in money supply.[129]
The growth in eight core sectors such as cement, steel and refinery products, which constitute 38% of the Index of industrial production (IIP), was only to 4.9 percent in November 2016, as compared with 6.6 percent a month prior.[130][131]
Agriculture
[edit]Demonetisation adversely affected transactions in the agriculture sector, which are heavily dependent on cash.[132] Due to scarcity of the new banknotes, many farmers had insufficient cash to purchase seeds, fertilisers and pesticides needed for the plantation of rabi crops usually sown around mid-November.[133] Farmers and their unions conducted protest rallies in Gujarat, Amritsar and Muzaffarnagar against the demonetisation as well as against restrictions imposed by the Reserve Bank of India on district cooperative central banks which were ordered not to accept or exchange the demonetised banknotes.[134][135][136]
The shortage of cash led to plunge in demand which in turn led to a crash in the prices of crops. Farmers were unable to recover even the costs of transportation from their fields to the market from the low prices offered.[137][138] Some farmers dumped their produce in protest against the government.[139][140]
Demonetisation resulted in the relative erosion of agricultural wages and weak bargaining power of farmers for their produce.[141]
Real GDP growth rate
[edit]Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Financial Year | Quarter | Quarterly | Yearly |
---|---|---|---|
2015–16 | Q1 (April–June) | 7% | 8%[146] |
Q2 (July–September) | 7.4% | ||
Q3 (October–December) | 7.2% | ||
Q4 (January–March) | 9.1% | ||
2016–17 | Q1 (April–June) | 7.9% | 7.1%[146] |
Q2 (July–September) | 7.5% | ||
Q3 (October–December) | 7% | ||
Q4 (January–March) | 6.1% | ||
2017–18 | Q1 (April–June) | 5.7% | 6.5% |
Q2 (July–September) | 6.3% | ||
Q3 (October–December) | 7.2% | ||
Q4 (January–March) | 7.6% | ||
2018–19 | Q1 (April–June) | 7.7% | |
Q2 (July–September) | 8.2% | ||
Q3 (October–December) | |||
Q4 (January–March) |
Global analysts cut their forecasts of India's real GDP growth rate for the financial year 2016–17 by 0.5 to 3% due to demonetisation.[147][148] India's GDP in 2016 is estimated to be US$2.25 trillion, hence, each 1 per cent reduction in growth rate represents a shortfall of US$22.5 billion (₹1.54 trillion) for the Indian economy.[149] According to Societe Generale, quarterly GDP growth rates would drop below 7% for an entire year at a stretch for the first time since June 2011.[150]
The Q4'16–17 rate was 6.1% as against a forecast of 7.1% by economists.[151] The rate for the financial year 2016–17 was 7.1%, a reduction from the 8% in 2015–16.[152] This drop was attributed to demonetisation by economists.[153]
The GDP growth rate for Q1'17–18 dropped to 5.7%, compared to 7.9% a year prior,[154] the lowest since March 2014. This drop was attributed to demonetisation as well as inventory drawdown by companies due to the forthcoming implementation of the Goods and Service Tax.[155][142] The GDP started to recover from 2017–18 and clocked 8.2% growth in 2018–19.[143][145][156] The Hindustan Times in November 2021 reviewed GDP trends in the years following the demonetization, and concluded that due to unpredented GDP contraction amid the COVID-19 pandemic and strong base effects, “the waters are now far too muddied to make any scientific assessment about demonetisation’s impact” on GDP.[157]
Employment
[edit]Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Demonetisation caused a loss of jobs and a decline in wages, particularly in the unorganised and informal sector and as well as in small enterprises.[162][163][164] Migrant workers were adversely affected by demonetisation.[165][166]
According to the report prepared by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), the number of employed people was 401 million in January–April 2016, 403 million during May–August 2016, and 406.5 million in September–December 2016. After demonetisation in November 2016, the number fell to 405 million in January–April 2017. So there was fall of 1.5 million in number of people employed.[159] CMIE also reported that the number of persons employed was 406.7 million in 2016–17 which fell by 0.1% to 406.2 million in 2017–18. So the employment had stagnated which resulted in employment rate decline. The employment rate fell from 42.59% in 2016–17 to 41.45% in 2016–17. The unemployment rate also declined from 7.51% in 2016–17 to 4.66% in 2017–18 because of the shrinking employed force. The number of the employed force fell from 439.7 million in 2016–17 to 426.1 million in 2017–18. CMIE attributed the impact to demonetisation as well as implementation of Goods and Services Tax in July 2017.[158][160]
It is estimated that 1.5 million jobs were lost, according to The Guardian.[15]
Cost to banks
[edit]Before demonetisation, the RBI had spent ₹34.21 billion to print banknotes in 2015–2016 (July to June). The cost of printing new banknotes rose to ₹79.65 billion in 2016–17 and ₹49.12 billion in 2017–18.[67] This resulted in a decline in the dividend paid to the government from ₹658.76 billion in 2015–16 to ₹306.59 billion in 2016–17 and ₹500 billion in 2017–18.[67][167][168] It was estimated that this decrease in income for the government could cause the fiscal deficit for the financial year 2016–17 to increase from the targeted 3.2% to 3.4%.[169] The Indian Air Force was paid ₹294.1 million to move banknotes after demonetisation.[170]
The banks incurred the cost in collection, storage, and movement of banknotes across the country, as well as the cost of re-calibrating ATMs for the new banknotes (as they differed in size from the old ones).[171]
Welfare schemes
[edit]Demonetisation negatively impacted the Midday Meal Scheme due to the shortage of funds.[172][173][174]
Deaths due to demonetisation
[edit]Several people were reported to have died from standing in queues for hours to exchange their demonetised banknotes.[175][176][177] Deaths were also attributed to lack of medical help due to refusal of demonetised banknotes by hospitals.[178][179][180] In one month after the demonetisation was announced, 82 people died according to a detailed list compiled by Catch News.[1] By the end of December 2016, political opposition leaders claimed that over 100 people had died due to demonetisation.[181][182][183] In March 2017, the government stated that they received no official report on deaths connected to demonetisation.[184] Later in December 2018, the then Finance Minister Arun Jaitley reported in parliament that four people, three bank personnel and one customer of the State Bank of India, died during demonetisation.[185]
Legal issues
[edit]M. Seeni Ahamed, General Secretary of the Indian National League, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) to scrap the decision of demonetisation. The High Court dismissed the PIL, stating that it could not interfere in monetary policies of the government.[186] Similar PILs were also filed in the Supreme Court of India.[187] In November 2017, the Supreme Court of India referred all cases which have similarity to demonetisation to constitutional bench to review the legality of the demonetisation, implementation irregularities and violation of people's rights by limits on cash withdrawals.[188]
The government had initially announced that any person who was unable to deposit the demonetised banknotes by 31 December 2016 would be given an opportunity to do so until a later date.[2] However, the government allowed only Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) to deposit demonetised banknotes after 31 December 2016.[189] As a result, many people were left stranded with demonetised banknotes. People petitioned the courts to allow a deposit of the demonetised banknotes.[190] In November 2017, the Supreme Court dismissed 14 petitions related to demonetisation, and asked petitioners to file pleas with a constitutional bench which would deal with cases related to demonetisation.[191]
In a 4:1 majority judgement in January 2023, the Supreme Court of India refused to strike down the demonetisation decision of 2016 on the basis of proportionality, saying that the process followed by the government to take the action was not flawed, even if the move did not achieve its objectives.[192][193][194] The dissenting judgement said that the procedure of notification of demonetisation by the government was unlawful, while agreeing with the majority decision that the government has the authority to take such a decision, regardless of the validity of the reasons for the decision.[195]
Reactions
[edit]Reactions of economists
[edit]Most economists across the ideological spectrum, except those considered partisan, were broadly critical of the demonetisation as an economic policy.[196]
Nobel laureate Amartya Sen, called the demonetisation a "despotic action" and said that it "undermines notes, it undermines bank accounts, it undermines the entire economy of trust."[197][198][199] Former senior vice-president and chief economist of the World Bank Kaushik Basu, called it a "major mistake" and said that the "damage" is likely to be much greater than any possible benefits.[200][201][202] Pronab Sen, former Chief Statistician and Planning Commission of India member, called it a "hollow move" since it did not really address any of the purported goals of tackling black money or fake currency.[203] Prabhat Patnaik, a former professor of economics at the Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi called the move 'witless' and 'anti-people'. He criticised the assumption that black money was "a hoard of cash", saying that it would have little effect in eliminating "black activities" and would "caus[e] much hardship to common people."[204] Columbia University economist Jagdish Bhagwati, however, praised the demonetisation, calling it “a courageous and substantive economic reform that, despite the significant transition costs, has the potential to generate large future benefits.”[205]
Nobel laureate Richard Thaler, initially, praised the demonetisation of larger currency notes as "a policy I have long supported, First step towards cashless and good start on reducing corruption.", but was befuddled with the introduction of even bigger Rs.2000 banknote later on.[206] Economist and journalist T. N. Ninan wrote in the Business Standard that demonetisation 'looks like a bad idea, badly executed on the basis of some half-baked notions'.[207] Steve Forbes described the move as "sickening and immoral."[208] Forbes wrote that "[w]hat India has done is commit a massive theft of people's property without even the pretense of due process—a shocking move for a democratically elected government."[208] Nobel laureate Paul Krugman opined that it was difficult to see gains from demonetisation, while there might be significant costs to it.[209]
Economic analyst Vivek Kaul stated in a BBC article that "demonetisation had been a failure of epic proportions."[12] Jayati Ghosh, C. P. Chandrasekhar and Prabhat Patnaik wrote that demonetisation was unnecessary and unsuccessful, while it damaged the economy and adversely affected the lives and rights of the Indian people.[20]
Reactions of industrialists
[edit]The decision met with mixed initial reactions. Several bankers like Arundhati Bhattacharya (Former Chairperson of State Bank of India) and Chanda Kochhar (MD & CEO of ICICI Bank) favored the demonetization in order to curb black money.[210] Businessmen Anand Mahindra (Mahindra Group), Sajjan Jindal (JSW Group), Kunal Bahl (Snapdeal and FreeCharge) also supported the move, adding that it would also accelerate e-commerce.[210] Infosys founder N. R. Narayana Murthy praised the move.[211][212]
Deepak Parekh (Chairman of HDFC) had initially appreciated the decision of demonetisation, but later said that the move had derailed the economy, and expressed skepticism about its outcome.[213][214] Industrialist Rajiv Bajaj criticised demonetisation, saying that not just the execution, but the concept of demonetisation was wrong in itself.[215]
Political reactions
[edit]Indian National Congress spokesperson Randeep Surjewala welcomed the move but remained skeptical on the consequences that would follow.[216] Chief Minister of Bihar Nitish Kumar supported the move.[217] The demonetisation also got support from the then Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh Nara Chandrababu Naidu.[218][219][220] Former Chief Election Commissioner of India S. Y. Quraishi said demonetisation could lead to long term electoral reforms.[221] Indian social activist Anna Hazare hailed demonetisation as a "revolutionary step".[222] Former President of India Pranab Mukherjee welcomed the demonetisation move by calling it a "bold step".[223] Chief Ministers of several Indian states like Mamata Banerjee,[224] Arvind Kejriwal[225] and Pinarayi Vijayan[226] have criticised and led major protests against the decision in their states and in parliament. Initially, the move to demonetise and try to hinder black money was appreciated, but the manner in which it was carried out by causing hardships to common people was criticised.[227]
A Parliamentary panel report in April 2017 stated that rural households and "honest taxpayers" were the worst hit by demonetisation.[228] It said that it was not just the poor that suffered, but the manufacturing sector was impacted too.[229] According to the panel, demonetisation created significant disruption throughout economy, because it was carried out without prior study or research.[230][231] An Indian National Congress led opposition which includes 13 political parties, opposed the government on the issue of demonetisation in the Winter Session of the Indian Parliament.[232][233][234]
On 16 November 2016, Mamata Banerjee led a delegation comprising political parties of Trinamool Congress, Aam Aadmi Party, BJP ally Shiv Sena and National Conference to Rashtrapati Bhawan to protest against the demonetisation. A memorandum was submitted to the President of India Pranab Mukherjee demanding rollback of the decision.[235][9]
Prem Chand Gupta, a member of the Rashtriya Janata Dal, questioned a statement of Modi from the unscheduled TV broadcast on 8 November, "If it was planned 10 months ago, how did RBI Governor Urjit Patel sign on new note?". Praful Patel, a member of the Nationalist Congress Party, stated that "the government was not even prepared to recalibrate the ATMs while announcing the move. People's suffering are unimaginable. Nobody is questioning the government's intention, but you are unprepared to execute the move". Later, the former Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh Mayawati called the situation "a financial emergency", saying, "It looks as if Bharat has shut down." Also, Sitaram Yechury from the Communist Party of India, questioned the government on the demonetisation move by stating "only 6% of black money in India is in cash to drive his point that demonetisation won't curb illicit wealth."[236]
On 17 November 2016, Chief Minister of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal and his West Bengal counterpart Mamata Banerjee led a rally against demonetisation at Azadpur Mandi, the biggest vegetable and fruits wholesale market in New Delhi.[237]
On 24 November 2016, former prime minister Manmohan Singh said "this scheme will hurt small industries, the farming sector. The GDP can decline by about 3 percent due to this move". He called the demonetisation an "organised loot, legalised plunder of the common people".[238][239]
Strikes were organised across India. Opposition parties like the Indian National Congress, Bahujan Samaj Party, Trinamool Congress,[240] DMK, JD(U), AIADMK, Nationalist Congress Party, Left, Rashtriya Janata Dal and the Samajwadi Party[241] decided to observe 'Akrosh Diwas' as, a protest campaign day on 28 November [242][243] and launch protests in front of banks, demanding that money be returned to people.[244] In the state of Bihar, 15 trains were blocked and stranded, while the states of West Bengal, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh saw protest marches and rallies led by opposition parties.[245] In the state of Kerala, shops and business establishments were shut, with schools and colleges closed throughout the state, while movements of private vehicles were also disrupted in Northern Kerala.[245]
Former Indian Chief Election Commissioner, O. P. Rawat stated that 'the note ban had absolutely no impact on black money', and that record amounts of money had been seized in polls held after demonetisation.[246]
International reactions
[edit]By and large, initial international response was positive which saw the move as a bold crackdown on corruption.[247][248][249] The International Monetary Fund's spokesperson Gerry Rice told that it supported the efforts to fight corruption and illegal finances but cautioned about the disruptions.[247]
Chinese state media Global Times praised the move as a "fierce fight against black money and corruption."[248] Former Prime Minister of Finland and vice-president of European Commission Jyrki Katainen welcomed the demonetisation move stressing that bringing transparency will strengthen the Indian economy.[250][251] BBC's South Asia Correspondent Justin Rowlatt in his article praised the move for its secrecy.[252] Tim Worstall wrote in Forbes that demonetisation was having positive macroeconomic effects.[253] Swedish Minister of Enterprise Mikael Damberg supported the move by calling it a bold decision.[249]
The demonetisation also came in for sharp criticism from media outside India,[254][255] with The New York Times saying that the demonetisation was "atrociously planned" and that it did not appear to have combatted black money,[256][257] while an article in The Guardian stated that "Modi has brought havoc to India".[254] The Harvard Business Review called it "a case study in poor policy and even poorer execution".[258] The frequent change in the narrative on objectives of the demonetisation to its visible impact on the poorest of the poor made other critiques calling the government's narrative as spins in view of the "pointless suffering on India's poorest."[259]
Political impact
[edit]Akshay Mangala, an assistant professor at Harvard Business School, called the move "the politics of visible disruption". He noted that the people might attribute the implementation shortcomings to institutional weakness while the government could take credit for its attempt to curb the black money. He also noted that it may result in the public opinion in favour of the government which is led by the BJP if the opposition parties, led by the INC, fail to form the countervailing narrative.[260] Massachusetts Institute of Technology associated academics Abhijit Banerjee and Namrata Kala also opined the same.[196]
The BJP and its allies formed the government in six out of seven state legislative assemblies which went to the elections in 2017, including the most populous state, Uttar Pradesh.[196][261][262][263] BJP improved its performance in Uttarakhand[261][263][264] and Himachal Pradesh.[265][266] In Manipur and Goa, INC secured the plurality while BJP came second and formed the government with the help of its allies.[263][267] In Gujarat, BJP worsened its performance but retained the majority.[268][265] The BJP and its allies lost to the INC in Punjab.[263]
Long term impact
[edit]This section needs to be updated.(June 2022) |
In 2019, India experienced an economic slowdown which was attributed to demonetisation and several other factors.[269][270]
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in digital payments.[citation needed] The general rise in digital payments and cashless transactions has been attributed to the demonetisation. Although data released by RBI in Nov 2021 showed that cash circulation in India has actually increased significantly since demonetization and demonetization has not necessarily converted cash users to digital users.[271]
As of November 2021, further increases in digital payments and bank notes in circulation have been seen.[272]
In popular culture
[edit]- Puthan Panam, a 2017 film directed by Renjith based on the issue of black money and demonetisation.
- Aadu 2, a 2017 film revolves around demonetisation.
- Golak Bugni Bank Te Batua, a 2018 Punjabi film also revolves around demonetisation.
- Chappad Phaad Ke, a 2019 Disney+ Hotstar film revolves around demonetisation
- Choked, a 2020 Netflix film directed by Anurag Kashyap is set in backdrop of demonetisation.
- Cash, a 2021 Disney+ Hotstar film
- Avrodh: The Siege Within 2, a 2022 web series on SonyLIV
See also
[edit]- Indian black money
- Mahatma Gandhi New Series
- Income declaration scheme, 2016
- Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana
References
[edit]- ^ a b Staff, The Wire (2 December 2016). "The Costs of Demonetisation: Death Toll Rises to 82, Eight Million Workers Remain Unpaid". The Wire (India). Retrieved 2 January 2023.
- ^ a b c "Withdrawal of Legal Tender Status for ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 Notes: RBI Notice (Revised)". Reserve Bank of India. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Modi urges country to become a cashless society". The Hindu. 27 November 2016.
- ^ "Here is what PM Modi said about the new Rs 500, Rs 2000 notes and black money". India Today. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Notes out of circulation". The Times of India. 8 November 2016.
- ^ Saikia, Bijoy Sankar (18 November 2016). "Demonetisation may drag India behind China in GDP growth, rob fastest-growing economy tag". The Economic Times. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
- ^ "The dire consequences of India's demonetisation initiative". The Economist. 3 December 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
- ^ "Demonetization Announcement Anniversary 2017 | Onmanorama". OnManorama. Retrieved 7 November 2017.
- ^ a b "India: Demonetisation takes its toll on the poor". Al Jazeera. 16 November 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation Death Toll Rises To 25 And It's Only Been 6 Days". huffingtonpost. Archived from the original on 16 November 2016. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
- ^ a b Mundy, Simon; Kazmin, Amy; Stacey, Kiran (31 August 2017). "India demonetisation failed to purge black money". Financial Times. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ a b "India rupee: Illegal cash crackdown failed – bank report". BBC News. 30 August 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ a b Rukhaiyar, Ashish (9 November 2016). "Sensex crashes 1,689 points on black money crackdown, U.S. election". The Hindu. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Thanks to Demonetisation and GST, India's GDP growth hit a 4-year low at 6.5 per cent". India Today. 6 January 2018. Retrieved 2 October 2018.
- ^ a b "Demonetisation drive that cost India 1.5m jobs fails to uncover 'black money'". the Guardian. 30 August 2018. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
- ^ "Moving from Cash to Cashless Economy: Toward Digital India". Korea Distribution Science Association.
- ^ "Demonetisation debate in Parliament: Disaster, says Chidambaram; high cash economy corrupt, counters Jaitley : India, News – India Today". Indiatoday.intoday.in. 9 February 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Opposition calls for countrywide protest on November 28". The Indian Express. 23 November 2016. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
- ^ "'Demonetisation protest sure to succeed with people's support'". The Economic Times. 24 November 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ a b Ghosh, Jayati; Chandrasekhar, C. P.; Patnaik, Prabhat (16 March 2017). Demonetisation Decoded: A Critique of India's Currency Experiment. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-351-66401-1. Retrieved 24 October 2023.
- ^ Kumar, Arun (20 December 2017). Demonetization and Black Economy. Penguin Random House India Private Limited. ISBN 978-93-87326-41-5. Retrieved 24 October 2023.
- ^ Ramakumar, R. (16 February 2018). Note-Bandi: Demonetisation and India's Elusive Chase for Black Money. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-909272-7. Retrieved 24 October 2023.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Three times India faced the big move". The Indian Express. 16 November 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2018.
- ^ Gopika Gopakumar, Vishwanath Nair (9 November 2016). "Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes may be back, if history is a guide". Live Mint. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "At least 4 months needed to replace demonetised notes, not 50 days: Here's why". The Indian Express. 14 November 2016.
- ^ "Measures to Tackle Black Money in India and Abroad" (PDF).
- ^ Appu Esthose Suresh (12 November 2016). "Why govt's demonetisation move may fail to win the war against black money". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ "Rs 500, Rs 1,000 note rumours, not polls, behind cash surge: SBI". The Times of India. 8 April 2016. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ "India demonetization news: Modi's black money move kept a closely guarded secret". CNBC. 9 December 2016.
- ^ Roychoudhury, Arup (10 November 2016). "Demonetisation: In the works for 6 months, 10 people in the loop, including Raghuram Rajan". Business Standard India. Retrieved 23 January 2017.
- ^ "Move was in the pipeline for months". The Hindu. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ Dube, Brajesh (27 October 2016). "अब आएगा दो हजार का नोट" (PDF). Dainik Jagran. p. 14. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 November 2016. Retrieved 18 March 2024.
- ^ "Journalist broke story about currency demonetisation a fortnight back". Hindustan Times. 11 November 2016. Archived from the original on 7 October 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ G Naga, Sridhar; Vageesh, NS (21 October 2016). "Coming soon to your wallet: ₹2,000 notes". The Hindu Business Line. Archived from the original on 25 February 2017. Retrieved 18 March 2024.
- ^ a b Lahiri, Amartya (1 February 2020). "The Great Indian Demonetization". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 34 (1): 63, 55–74. doi:10.1257/jep.34.1.55. ISSN 0895-3309.
- ^ Patel, Urjit R. "The Minutes of the 561st meeting of the Central Board of Directors of the Reserve Bank of India" (PDF). humanrightsinitiative.org. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
- ^ ENS Economic Bureau (12 March 2019). "Govt, RBI discussed note ban for six months; Directors warned against short-term negative effect". Indian Express. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
- ^ Sinha, Smita (7 November 2017). "One year of note ban: The ultra-secret move that no one came to know for several months". The Economic Times.
- ^ Bhatt, Abhinav (8 November 2016). "Watch PM Modi's Entire Speech on Discontinuing 500, 1000 Rupee Notes". NDTV India. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes: RBI explains". The Hindu. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation anniversary: Full text of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech from 8 November, 2016 – Firstpost". First Post. 8 November 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2018.
- ^ Sethi, Aman (6 November 2016). "Before PM's Announcement, Rumours of Demonetisation Abounded". The Quint. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Ambani, Adani were informed and thus made arrangements, says BJP MLA". 17 November 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ "Adanis, Ambanis already knew about currency ban: BJP MLA caught on camera". Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ a b c "Finance Ministry has reviewed the position regarding availability and distribution of all denominations of bank notes" (PDF). Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- ^ a b c "Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of existing ₹ 500/- and ₹ 1000/- Bank Notes – Revision in limits". Reserve Bank of India. Retrieved 17 March 2017.
- ^ a b "17 November Government press release" (PDF). Ministry of Finance, Government of India. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 November 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ "All note exchange stopped from today, PM Modi goes back on promise of hike after November 24". 25 November 2016.
- ^ "Outlets that will accept Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes in next 72 hours". The Economic Times. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "With effect from the midnight of 2nd December, 2016, old Rs. 500 bank notes will not be accepted at petrol, diesel and gas outlets of Public Sector Oil and Gas Marketing Companies as well as for purchase of Air Tickets at Airports; However, supply of LPG continues to be in the exempted category for the purpose of payment through old Rs. 500 bank notes" (PDF). Ministry of Finance, Government of India. 1 December 2016. Retrieved 11 January 2017.
- ^ a b "RBI removes limit on cash withdrawal, banks go back to pre-demonetisation era". The Financial Express. 13 March 2017. Retrieved 26 May 2017.
- ^ "ATMs –Non-dispensing of Old High Denomination Notes – Closure of operations". Reserve Bank of India. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
- ^ "Cash withdrawal from ATMs – Enhancement of daily limits". Reserve Bank of India. 30 December 2016. Retrieved 17 March 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation rule modified, families can withdraw Rs 2.5 lakh for weddings from one a count". India Today. 17 November 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ "The Specified Banknotes Ordinance, 2016" (PDF).
- ^ "Cabinet clears ordinance to punish people holding banned notes beyond deadline". hindustantimes.com/. 28 December 2016. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
- ^ "Govt notifies law to make possession of old Rs500, Rs1000 notes punishable". Live Mint. 1 March 2017. Retrieved 18 October 2018.
- ^ "Demonetisation and the fight against black money". 7 November 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation Was Not Designed Only to Fight Black Money, Says Finance Minister Jaitley". 30 August 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation achieved objectives quite substantially: Govt – Times of India". The Times of India. 29 August 2018.
- ^ Sabnavis, Madan (6 November 2017). "One year of demonetisation: Changing goal posts and limited impact". Business Standard India. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "RBI report on demonetisation: How Centre, BJP kept moving the goalposts". The Financial Express. 31 August 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "'PM Modi Shifting Goalposts on Demonetisation': On 4th Anniversary Congress Asks What Was Achieved". News18. 8 November 2020. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "Demonetisation: As money flowed back in, how goalposts were shifted". The Indian Express. 31 August 2017. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "Instant Recall: How Modi Government Kept Changing Demonetisation's Goalposts". The Wire. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Rs 14 lakh crore in old notes are back, only Rs 75,000 crore out". The Indian Express. 9 January 2017. Retrieved 22 January 2017.
- ^ a b c d e Dutta, Prabash K. (30 August 2018). "Demonetisation: What India gained, and lost". India Today. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
- ^ Parmar, Beena (13 November 2016). "Despite Rs 4000-cap on money exchange, loophole allows multiple transactions". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: In Chennai, To beat cash limit, they send full teams to bank". The Indian Express. 15 November 2016.
- ^ "Gold price recovers on renewed demand". Hindustan Times. 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
- ^ Langa, Mahesh (9 November 2016). "Scramble for gold in Gujarat after demonetisation". The Hindu. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Enforcement Directorate raids forex shops making back date entries". The Economic Times. 16 November 2016.
- ^ "Netas using co-op banks for backdated FDs, DDs – Times of India". The Times of India. 17 November 2016.
- ^ Sahgal, Ram (10 November 2016). "Jewellers issue backdated invoices to clients – The Economic Times". The Economic Times.
- ^ Rathi, Pranshu (29 November 2016). "Back-dated receipts used for Apple iPhone sales after demonetisation: Report". International Business Times.
- ^ "Tiffin service to dental implants: All tried to beat system, swap old notes". 5 December 2016.
- ^ "Rs 500/Rs 1000 demonetisation: Temple money from hundis not to come under scanner". 10 November 2016.
- ^ "13 Ways In Which Indians Will Convert Their Black Money Into White Even After Demonetisation".
- ^ "Demonetisation: Temples across India receive high currency notes as donations". 18 November 2016.
- ^ "Religious places getting over the 'demon' of note ban – Times of India". The Times of India. 18 December 2016.
- ^ Mohapatra, Debabrata (10 November 2016). "Rush to offer Rs 500, Rs 1000 donations at Puri Temple". The Times of India.
- ^ "Rlys sets 5000 as cash refund limit for tickets". Retrieved 15 November 2016.
- ^ "Railways say, no cash refund for tickets booked between Nov 9-11". Retrieved 15 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d "How Successful was Demonetisation? Four Takeaways From the RBI's Annual Report". The Wire. 30 August 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2018.
- ^ a b Reserve Bank of India Annual Report 2019-20 (PDF). Reserve Bank of India. p. 183.
- ^ a b c d e f Padmanabhan, Vishnu (3 September 2018). "From GDP growth to black money, costs outweigh benefits of demonetisation". Mint. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
- ^ "Only 1.2% of ₹1,000 notes not returned to banks: RBI report". The Hindu. 30 August 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2018 – via www.thehindu.com.
- ^ a b "Has demonetisation really boosted income tax collections?". 23 May 2017.
- ^ "Did Demonetisation Increase Tax Base? Not Really".
- ^ Sharma, Tanisha (25 September 2018). "Did cash ban help raise tax base? ITRs rising, but not tax collection". The Economic Times.
- ^ "Demonetisation impact: Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation collects over Rs 160 crore in just four days". india.com. 15 November 2016.
- ^ a b c "Was the boost in digital payments after demonetization temporary?". 26 April 2018.
- ^ Heller, Nathan. "India Takes a Big Step Back from Cash". The New Yorker.
- ^ Dwivedi, Yogesh (20 December 2016). "India taking a step on the road to cashless economy". The Conversation.
- ^ Wade, Shepard. "A Cashless Future Is The Real Goal Of India's Demonetization Move". Forbes.
- ^ "Reserve Bank of India - Press Releases". rbi.org.in. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ Damodaran, Harish (9 November 2016). "Are banks equipped to replace 2,300 crore pieces of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes?". The Indian Express. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Currency in circulation slows down since May". 24 September 2018.
- ^ "Cash in circulation jumps 19.1 per cent from pre-demonetisation level". The Indian Express. 22 March 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
- ^ "Five Years Since Demonetisation, Value Of Cash In Circulation Up 64%". NDTV.com. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "Nearly 5 years since note ban: Cash with public rising, at all-time high". The Indian Express. 5 November 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
- ^ "Demonetisation leads to highest ever surrender of Maoists in a month – Times of India". The Times of India. 29 November 2016.
- ^ "Cops look for Maoists with old currency". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 28 November 2016.
- ^ "Modi's demonetization set to cripple Naxalites financially". The Times of India. 12 November 2016.
- ^ "This Is How Big Note Ban Will Affect Maoist Activities In Chhattisgarh". NDTV.com.
- ^ "Demonetisation to hit Maoist activities in Chhattisgarh: Police". 13 November 2016.
- ^ "Congress says demonetisation didn't affect Maoism, says 17 Naxal attacks took place since note ban". 18 November 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation caused little disruption to Maoist economy in Bastar, extortion major source of funding". 27 July 2018.
- ^ Jain, Bharti (13 July 2018). "Demonetisation effect: Funds tap turns dry for terror and Maoist groups". The Economic Times.
- ^ "Did demonetisation impact terrorism?". 23 November 2017.
- ^ "India demonetisation: Chaos as ATMs run dry". Al Jazeera. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Chaos grows, queues get longer at banks, ATMs on weekend". Indian Express. 12 November 2016.
- ^ Ganapatye, Mayuresh (8 December 2016). "Demonetisation: Month later, long queues still outside banks and ATMs in Mumbai". India Today.
- ^ "Demonetisation pain returns: One-fourth of ATMs across India running dry again". Hindustan Times. 7 February 2017.
- ^ "As ATMs dry up, bankers say normalcy will return soon". The Indian Express. 11 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- ^ Gopal, B. Madhu (19 April 2017). "ATMs run out of cash in many areas". The Hindu. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- ^ "17% of cash seized in raids during demonetisation were in new notes – Times of India". The Times of India. 9 July 2017.
- ^ "Cash crunch? Rs 242 crore in new currency seized after demonetisation". Hindustan Times. 9 December 2016.
- ^ "Over Rs 164 crore black money seized in new notes. Has note ban failed?". CatchNews.com.
- ^ "As India struggles for its next Rs 2,000, new currency seized across country can fill gunny bags". 9 December 2016.
- ^ "Demonetization: With no cash on hand, 4 lakh trucks stranded on highways". 14 November 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
- ^ "Toll tax suspended on national highways till Nov 11, banks open this weekend". Hindustan Times. 9 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
- ^ "Toll collection on all national highways suspended till December 2". Business Today. 24 November 2016. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
- ^ "Sensex sinks 514pts, Midcap down 4% on demonetisation & earnings". moneycontrol.com. 15 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
- ^ Chakravarty, Manas (3 January 2017). "How much has demonetisation affected the stock market?". LiveMint. Retrieved 17 October 2018.
- ^ Mukundan, Anagha (1 June 2017). Impact of Demonetisation on Indian Stock Market. A P J Abdul Kalam Technological University. doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.24870.63042.
- ^ Anoop, Patil; Parab, Narayan; Reddy, Y. V (2018). "Analyzing the Impact of Demonetization on the Indian Stock Market: Sectoral Evidence using GARCH Model". Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 12 (2): 104–116. doi:10.14453/aabfj.v12i2.7. ISSN 1834-2000.
- ^ "Demonetisation hit economy: Jamir". The Hindu. 23 February 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2017.
- ^ a b Seth, Dilasha (6 December 2016). "Slowdown due to demonetisation: PMI services shrinks in November after 17 months". Business Standard India – via Business Standard.
- ^ a b "5 Bleak Numbers That Show Demonetisation Impact On The Economy".
- ^ "Demonetisation impact: Three sets of numbers tell us how Modi's gamble has slowed the economy". 3 January 2017.
- ^ "How Demonetisation Has Affected India's Agricultural And Food Markets". Huffington Post India. Archived from the original on 25 November 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Farmers fear loss of crops and income after currency ban". Firstpost. 18 November 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Farmers protest in Muzaffarnagar over cash shortage". Press Trust of India. 22 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: At Gujarat protests, farmers dump milk, vegetables on road". The Indian Express. 20 November 2016. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ "Farmers in Amritsar stage protest against demonetisation, burn PM Modi's effigy". Hindustan Times. 19 November 2016.
- ^ "Farmers forced to dump their produce as note ban turns bumper crop worthless". Hindustan Times. 26 December 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
- ^ "Oh-nion: Farmers in crisis dump produce in markets instead of selling at 50 paise a kilo". India Today. 23 December 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation protest: Farmers throw vegetables on road". 7 January 2017. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation: At Gujarat protests, farmers dump milk, vegetables on road". 20 November 2016. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
- ^ Kishore, Roshan (7 November 2018). "Two years after demonetisation, farmers and rural workers are unhappy". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- ^ a b c "GDP growth slips to 5.7% in April–June". The Hindu. 31 August 2017. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
- ^ a b c "GDP grows at 5-quarter high of 7.2% in Oct–Dec". The Times of India. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
- ^ a b "GDP Growth Recovers to 6.3% in September Quarter". The Wire. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
- ^ a b c Raghavan, Tca Sharad (30 November 2015). "GDP growth accelerates to 7.4 % in July–Sept. manufacturing rebounds significantly". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
- ^ a b c "Demonetisation impact: GDP dips sharply in Jan–Mar to 6.1%; India loses fastest growing tag". Firstpost.com. 31 May 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ Livemint (24 November 2016). "Cash crunch: Analysts cut India GDP growth forecast".
- ^ "Demonetisation a big blow! GDP growth may dip below 6% in FY17". 26 December 2016.
- ^ "World Economic Outlook Database". International Monetary Fund. October 2016.
- ^ Choudhury, Saheli Roy (17 January 2017). "India set for slowest growth period as demonetization dents economy". CNBC.
- ^ "Demonetisation effect: GDP growth slows down to 6.1% in March quarter". Businesstoday.in. 1 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation impact: GDP dips sharply in Jan–Mar to 6.1%; India loses fastest growing tag". Firstpost.com. 31 May 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation brings GDP down to 6.1 per cent: Top economists stand vindicated". In.news.yahoo.com. 1 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "GDP growth rate down to 5.7% in April–June, demonetisation pain lingers | business news". Hindustan Times. 31 August 2017. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
- ^ Press Trust of India (1 September 2017). "India paid hefty price for note ban, 5.7% GDP growth worrying: Kaushik Basu | Business Standard News". Business Standard India. Business-standard.com. Retrieved 25 February 2018.
- ^ "India's GDP grows at 8.2 per cent in 2018–19 Q1". The Economic Times. 31 August 2018.
- ^ Roshan Kishore (8 November 2021). "Five years since demonetisation: What has changed?". The Hindustan Times.
- ^ a b Vyas, Mahesh (17 July 2018). "Employment stagnates in 2017–18". CMIE. Archived from the original on 19 October 2018. Retrieved 19 October 2018.
- ^ a b "Demonetisation effect: 1.5 million jobs lost in first 4 months of the year". Retrieved 3 July 2018.
- ^ a b "Unemployment". Archived from the original on 20 October 2018.
- ^ "India Unemployment Rate 1991-2021".
- ^ Yadav, Anumeha (29 January 2017). "Cashless and demonetised: Meet three Indians who once had jobs".
- ^ "Now, Demonetisation set to cost 400,000 jobs". 24 November 2016.
- ^ "Unprecedented Job Losses, Wage Decline in Unorganised Sector Post Demonetisation". The Wire.
- ^ Maganti, Rahul (18 November 2016). "How Demonetisation Is Affecting Migrant Labourers In Kerala". The Caravan. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
- ^ Dave, Sohini Das & Vimukt (10 December 2016). "Demonetisation impact: Migrant workers head back home". Business Standard India. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
- ^ "RBI dividend halves to Rs 30,659 cr: Demonetisation hero turns out to be villain for Narendra Modi govt". 11 August 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ "Script gone wrong: RBI takes demonetisation hit and government gets a cut". 11 August 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ "Half dividend, full fallacy: RBI implies Modi & Urjit Patel got demonetisation wrong". Archived from the original on 22 August 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ "IAF charged Rs 29.41cr to ferry currency notes post-demonetisation".
- ^ "About false promises". 14 September 2018.
- ^ Dayashankar, K. m (2 December 2016). "Midday meal workers hit by demonetisation". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
- ^ "Demonetisation hits mid-day meal scheme too". Deccan Herald. 3 January 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2018.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "The Costs of Demonetisation: Farm Economy Takes a Hit, Mid-Day Meal Scheme in Peril". The Wire. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
- ^ "Demonetisation: Rush for cash kills 2 in Kerala, 1 in Maharashtra; Congress blames Modi government". India Today. 11 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: 96 year-old died while standing in queue". United News of India. 12 November 2016.
- ^ "Three People Die While Waiting in Queue To Exchange Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 Currency Notes". Huffington Post India. 11 November 2016. Archived from the original on 13 November 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- ^ "Mumbai: Baby dies waiting for medical help as hospital refuses Rs 500 & 1000 currency notes". India.com. 12 November 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- ^ "Doc says no to deposit in Rs 500 notes, baby dies awaiting help". Mumbai Mirror.
- ^ Sadaguru Pandit (12 November 2016). "Infant's death: Doc booked over claims of refusing treatment in Mumbai". Hindustan Times.
- ^ "Demonetization: Government not mourning over 100 deaths due to cash-crunch, says Opposition". 8 December 2016.
- ^ IANS (31 December 2016). "Mamata attacks Modi over cash withdrawal limit, demonetisation deaths". Business Standard India – via Business Standard.
- ^ "Around 105 died, but 'Twitter king' Modi didn't mention it: Lalu on demonetisation". Indo-Asian News Service. 22 December 2016.
- ^ "No official report on deaths due to demonetisation: Government". The New Indian Express. 17 March 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ S, Deepika (19 December 2018). "After two years of denial, govt admits death due to demonetisation". One India.
- ^ "Govt's demonetisation move fit for country's security, development: HC". The Economic Times. 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
- ^ "PILs in Supreme Court against making Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes illegal". India Today. 10 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
- ^ "SC refers individual cases against demonetisation to constitution bench". 3 November 2017.
- ^ "RBI turns away people wanting to exchange old notes". Tribuneindia.com. 3 January 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ Nanjappa, Vicky (1 April 2017). "Unable to deposit demonetised currency in RBI, 1,000s to approach Supreme Court". Oneindia. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- ^ "SC disposes of petitions seeking fresh chance to deposit old notes". Indian Express. 4 November 2017.
- ^ Scroll Staff (2 January 2023). "Supreme Court upholds demonetisation by 4:1 majority". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2 January 2023.
- ^ "Demonetisation is valid, says SC in 4:1 majority judgment; Justice Nagarathna dissents". The Hindu. 2 January 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
- ^ "Supreme Court upholds demonetisation: What was the challenge about?". The Indian Express. 2 January 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
- ^ Mandhani, Apoorva (2 January 2023). "Justice Nagarathna's dissent in demonetisation case — 'well-intentioned but unlawful'". ThePrint. Retrieved 28 May 2023.
- ^ a b c Banerjee, Abhijit; Kala, Namrata (21 June 2017). "The economic and political consequences of India's demonetisation". VoxDev. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ "Demonetisation effects will last long". The Hindu. 26 February 2017. Retrieved 26 February 2017.
- ^ PTI (30 November 2016). "Amartya Sen terms demonetisation a despotic action". The Hindu.
- ^ "Amartya Sen criticises demonetisation drive, says Narendra Modi declared all Indians 'crook'". 26 November 2016.
- ^ Roychoudhury, Arup (12 November 2016). "Demonetisation damage greater than its benefits, says Kaushik Basu". Business Standard. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ PTI (11 November 2016). "GST good economics; demonetisation is not: Kaushik Basu". The Economic Times. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ Basu, Kaushik (27 November 2016). "In India, Black Money Makes for Bad Policy". The New York Times.
- ^ Sen, Pronab (14 November 2016). "Demonetization is a hollow move".
- ^ Patnaik, Prabhat (9 November 2016). "Demonetization: Witless and Anti-People". The Citizen. Archived from the original on 19 November 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- ^ "War on black money: Demonetisation is a courageous reform that will bring substantive benefits". The Indian Express. 14 December 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
- ^ "Nobel winner Richar Thaler applauded PM Narendra Modi's demonetisation; did not favour Rs 2000 note". Business Today. 10 October 2017.
- ^ Ninan, T. N. (2 December 2016). "T N Ninan: Four weeks later". Business Standard India – via Business Standard.
- ^ a b Forbes, Steve. "What India Has Done To Its Money Is Sickening And Immoral". Forbes.
- ^ "HTLS 2016: Demonetisation gains uncertain, says Nobel laureate Paul Krugman". 2 December 2016.
- ^ a b "Govt demonitises Rs 500, 1000 notes: Here is how India Inc reacted". The Indian Express. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation: We should all be celebrating, says Narayana Murthy". The Economic Times. 10 November 2016.
- ^ Narayana Murthy (9 November 2016). "Move to withdraw Rs 500, 1,000 notes masterstroke".
- ^ "HDFC Chairman Deepak Parekh hits out at demonetisation drive, says it derailed economy". 8 December 2016.
- ^ "HDFC's Deepak Parekh says economy has derailed in short term due to demonetisation". 8 December 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation idea wrong, don't blame its execution: Rajiv Bajaj". 17 February 2017.
- ^ "Rs 500 & 1000 currency notes banned: Congress raises questions against Narendra Modi govt's shocking move". India.com. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
- ^ "Nitish welcomes demonetisation move". The Hindu. 9 November 2016.
- ^ Venkateshwarlu, K. (9 November 2016). "Demonetisation of Rs. 500, Rs. 1000 notes: Naidu had inkling of the ban?". The Hindu.
- ^ Reporter, B. S. (9 November 2016). "Andhra CM Naidu asked for demonetisation of Rs 500, Rs 1,000 notes in October". Business Standard India – via Business Standard.
- ^ "Chandrababu Naidu welcomes demonetisation move". The New Indian Express. 8 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation could lead to long-pending electoral reforms". 11 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation a revolutionary step to fight corruption: Anna Hazare". 10 November 2016.
- ^ "A bold step, says Pranab Mukherjee". The Hindu. 9 November 2016.
- ^ "One Month Of Pain And Harassment, PM Must Clarify: Mamata Banerjee". NDTV.com.
- ^ ANI (12 November 2016). "Demonetization is nothing but a big BJP scam: Kejriwal". Business Standard India – via Business Standard.
- ^ "Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan, ministers stage dharna outside RBI office – Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis". 18 November 2016.
- ^ Raghav Bahl (8 November 2016). "Dear PM Modi, Demonetisation 'Brahmastra' Could Have Spared The Poor". Bloomberg Quint. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
- ^ "Honest taxpayers, rural household hardest hit due to demonetisation: Parliamentary Panel". Moneycontrol.com. 11 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- ^ Jjayesh shanrilal (11 April 2017). "Demonetisation: Rural household, honest taxpayers worst due to the step, says Parliamentary committee". The Financial Express. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation created significant disruption throughout economy: Panel". The New Indian Express. 10 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- ^ "Committee report" (PDF).
- ^ "Debate on demonetisation, in winter session". DNA India.com. 15 November 2016.
- ^ "Opposition to target government on demonetisation". Business Standard. 15 November 2016.
- ^ "Parties agree to raise notes issue in session". The Economic Times. 15 November 2016.
- ^ "Demonetisation of Rs 500, Rs 1000 notes: Mamata Banerjee leads protest march to Rashtrapati Bhavan". The Indian Express. 16 November 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ "As it happened: Parliament proceedings — November 16, 2016". The Hindu. 16 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
- ^ "Resolve cash crunch in 3 days or face rebellion: Mamata, Kejriwal to Govt". Hindustan Times. 17 November 2016. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ "Is Modi proving Manmohan Singh right with slew of U-turns on cash ban?". The Economic Times. 26 November 2016.
- ^ Vasudeva, Vikas; Pathak, Vikas (24 November 2016). "Parliament Proceedings – Both Houses adjourned; PM absent". The Hindu. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ "Oppositions will protest". ndtv.com. 23 November 2016.
- ^ "Akrosh Diwas". Hindustan times. 23 November 2016.
- ^ "Opposition stands together". Telegraph India, Calcutta. 23 November 2016. Archived from the original on 24 November 2016.
- ^ "CPI(M), 28 November as Akrosh Diwas". Indian Express. 23 November 2016.
- ^ "November 28, Akrosh Diwas by opposition". Hindustan Times. 23 November 2016.
- ^ a b "As it happened: Bharat Bandh affects some states, business as usual in others". Hindustan Times. 28 November 2016. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
- ^ "OP Rawat: 'Note ban had absolutely no impact on black money. During polls we seized a record amount'". 2 December 2018.
- ^ a b "Support by IMF". Business Standard. 11 November 2016.
- ^ a b Aneja, Atul (14 November 2016). "State media praises Modi, but says he can learn from China's crusade against corruption". The Hindu.
- ^ a b S, Arun (13 November 2016). "Swedish ICT sector wouldn't have been so successful without Indian help". The Hindu.
- ^ "European Union welcomes India's step on demonetisation". The Economic Times. 13 November 2016.
- ^ "India's Crackdown on Black Money Will Help Financial System: European Union". 13 November 2016.
- ^ Rowlatt, Justin (14 November 2016). "Why India wiped out 86% of its cash overnight". bbc.com.
- ^ Worstall, Tim. "India's Rs 500 And 1,000 Demonetization Is Lowering Interest Rates And Also Inflation". Forbes. Retrieved 24 November 2016.
- ^ a b "Modi's demonetisation move a reckless bungle: Foreign media". The Times of India. 28 December 2016.
- ^ Singh, Gayeti (23 November 2016). ""Worst Mistake of PM Modi's Career": World Media and Economists Decry Demonetisation "Havoc" in India". The Citizen. Archived from the original on 16 January 2017.
- ^ "Demonetisation atrociously planned, little evidence it combatted black money: New York Times". India Today. 10 January 2017.
- ^ "Little evidence that demonetisation has succeeded in combating corruption: New York Times". 10 January 2017.
- ^ Chakravorti, Bhaskar (14 December 2016). "India's Botched War on Cash". Harvard Business Review.
- ^ Goswami, Ranjit (25 November 2016). "Modi's bank note ban has inflicted pointless suffering on India's poorest". The Conversation. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
- ^ Mangala, Akshay (30 January 2017). "Demonetization: The Politics of Visible Disruption". Center for the Advanced Study of India (CASI), University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ a b Murty, B Vijay (11 March 2017). "Assembly elections 2017: Modi loses no money in demonetisation gamble". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ Sukumar, R. (11 March 2017). "The BJP's UP surge: Didn't demonetisation matter?". Live Mint. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ a b c d Peeyush, Parimal (7 November 2017). "Demonetisation a litmus test for BJP: One year on, can Modi hold his sway on the electorate?". Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ "Assembly elections: How the BJP won Uttarakhand". Hindustan Times. 11 March 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ a b "BJP retains Gujarat, ousts Congress from Himachal Pradesh – Times of India". The Times of India. 18 December 2017.
- ^ "BJP juggernaut rolls on in Gujarat, tramples Congress in Himachal Pradesh". The Economic Times. 18 December 2017.
- ^ "Post-poll alliances were preferred by governor in Goa, Manipur and Meghalaya". The Times of India. PTI. 16 May 2018. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ Unnikrishnan, Dinesh (19 December 2017). "BJP's Gujarat win proves GST, demonetisation aren't potent weapons; Congress needs new strategy to fight Modi". FirstPost. Retrieved 3 November 2018.
- ^ "Growth at 5% - India's economy slows, stalling once thriving manufacturing | the Economic Times". Archived from the original on 11 October 2019. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
- ^ "India's economy slows, stalling once thriving manufacturing". Associated Press. 16 September 2019.
- ^ "How demonetisation is helping India transact under the shadow of Covid-19 in 2020". Financial Express (India). 24 December 2020.
- ^ "Post demonetisation, notes in circulation on rise; so are digital payments". Business Standard. 7 November 2021.
Further reading
[edit]- Sanyal, Meera (10 November 2018). The Big Reverse: How Demonetization Knocked India Out. Harper Collins. ISBN 978-93-5302-395-9. Retrieved 24 October 2023.
External links
[edit]- What the FAQ just happened! All your questions about Rs 500–1000 notes answered, India Today, 8 November 2016
- FAQ answers and Guidelines on Reserve Bank of India
- Ministry of Finance, Government of India
- Litvack, L., & Vigne, S. (2017). Demonetisation in India and Emerging Challenges: A Report Delivered to the Department for the Economy, Northern Ireland and the Government of India by Queen's University Belfast and O.P. Jindal Global University. Belfast: Queen's University Belfast. http://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/files/131517443/Final_report.pdf