Talk:NGT48: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Christian75 (talk | contribs) Assessment: +Japan (assisted) |
Tag: |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Japan|importance=low|music=y}} |
|||
{{WikiProject Women in Music|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== Split proposal == |
|||
{{archive top}} |
|||
I'm proposing Maho Yamaguchi's assault scandal to be split into a separate article due to how long the section is getting and how it currently overlaps NGT48's general history. [[User:Lullabying|lullabying]] ([[User talk:Lullabying|talk]]) 19:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:As long as it has at least 2-3 solid sources that would be considered reliable and third-party, I see no problem with it. That's the standard for any article. ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 22:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:{{reply|Nihonjoe}} Thanks for the input. Do you think the current section is sustainable enough for a separate article? I noticed JP Wikipedia tried creating its own article but it ended up being merged back to [[NGT48]]. [[User:Lullabying|lullabying]] ([[User talk:Lullabying|talk]]) 21:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{archive bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:00, 31 January 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Split proposal
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'm proposing Maho Yamaguchi's assault scandal to be split into a separate article due to how long the section is getting and how it currently overlaps NGT48's general history. lullabying (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- As long as it has at least 2-3 solid sources that would be considered reliable and third-party, I see no problem with it. That's the standard for any article. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Nihonjoe: Thanks for the input. Do you think the current section is sustainable enough for a separate article? I noticed JP Wikipedia tried creating its own article but it ended up being merged back to NGT48. lullabying (talk) 21:27, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.