Talk:Du Fu: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2024-12-24. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
|||
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People|class=FA}} |
|||
{{Article history |
{{Article history |
||
|action1=FAC |
|action1=FAC |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|maindate=September 25, 2004 |
|maindate=September 25, 2004 |
||
|currentstatus=FA |
|currentstatus=FA |
||
|otd1date=2013-12-24|otd1oldid=587476006 |
|||
|otd2date=2016-12-24|otd2oldid=756469314 |
|||
|otd3date=2018-12-24|otd3oldid=875216654 |
|||
|otd4date=2020-12-24|otd4oldid=996058750 |
|||
|otd5date=2022-12-24|otd5oldid=1129235789 |
|||
|otd6date=2024-12-24|otd6oldid=1264948603 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Du Fu|1= |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject China|importance=top|history=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Middle Ages |
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|importance=mid|}} |
||
{{WikiProject Poetry |
{{WikiProject Poetry|importance=top}} |
||
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}} |
|||
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=FA|category=Langlit}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{On this day|date1=2013-12-24|oldid1=587476006|date2=2016-12-24|oldid2=756469314}} |
|||
== Epithets for Du Fu == |
|||
==name== |
|||
See [http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Tu+Fu&q2=Du+Fu&B1=Make+a+fight%21&compare=1&langue=us]. Tu Fu wins. --[[User:Jiang|Jiang]] |
|||
From the History section: ''Since the Song dynasty, critics have called Du Fu the "poet saint" (詩聖 shī shèng)''. This sentence has an error because it talks about the historical aspects of Du Fu's works; he is called 诗史, shī shǐ, the "historian-poet". The section on Moral Engagement talks about his epithet 詩聖, the "saint-poet".--[[User:Mirrordor|Mirrordor]] ([[User talk:Mirrordor|talk]]) 19:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
I've added a substantial article; I haven't finished cross-linking yet, but any problems with the content are real problems, so leaping in and correcting would be nice. My first try. |
|||
[[User:Markalexander100|Markalexander100]] 05:53, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC) |
|||
== Naming, again == |
|||
I would really, really like to move this page to [[Du Fu]]. ''Du'' is now more common in western academic writing- Stephen Owen uses it, and Burton Watson uses it in his later books. Pinyin's being adopted in Taiwan. It's phonologically more accurate. And the text of the article uses ''Du''. (FWIW, Googlefights are now about equal- ''Du'' is slightly ahead without quote marks, ''Tu'' is slightly ahead with, but the majority is small in each case). |
|||
Would any really mind if I changed it? [[User:Markalexander100|Markalexander100]] 04:17, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Done. [[User:Markalexander100|Markalexander100]] 05:33, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC) |
|||
== Li Po/Li Bai == |
|||
I don't know anything about Chinese names, but I was confused when I clicked on the link [[Li Po|Li Bai]], which as you can tell says "Li Bai" but links directly to the page "Li Po" without any redirect. The first few paragraphs didn't mention the name, and it wasn't until I saw "Lǐ Bái" in the infobox that I was sure I was in the right place. If you're going to link to a page where the official name is Li Po, why not use it in the text (i.e. [[Li Po]])? - [[User:Biggins|biggins]] | [[User talk:biggins|talk]] 03:31, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|||
I think it is important to keep a consistency style. Either we should use the term Li Po or Li Bai and stick with it throughout. Otherwise, many readers may be confused and thought that they are two seperate persons (given many Chinese name sound/spell similarly) when it is the same person. |
|||
--[[User:Hurricane111|Hurricane111]] 05:32, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|||
Changes were made to use "Li Po" instead of "Li Bai" |
|||
--[[User:Hurricane111|Hurricane111]] 04:47, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|||
== Reference? == |
|||
On another page, I was challenged for using the word "prominent" without citing any evidence. Yet here, in an article that was featured for being good, we start right off with the correct but totally unsupported statement that Tu Fu is not just prominent but considered one of the two greatest poets in all of the huge Chinese tradition. Hmm. (Or do the two titles with the word great in them serve as implicit refs.) [[User:Kdammers|Kdammers]] 10:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:The lead is actually an understatement. Du Fu is considered (by everyone who knows anything about Chinese lit) ''the'' greatest Chinese poet; the hedge is just to keep Li Bai fans happy. Statements do not need references if there is no dispute about their truth. If you really want one, any work on DF will provide ample citations (but please don't clutter the article by adding them to the text). [[User:Henry Flower|Henry]][[User talk:Henry Flower|<sup>Flower</sup>]] 10:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::I am not sure whether he was THE GREATEST Chinese poet, but I am pretty sure he and Li Bai are considered as EQUAL in terms of significance in Chinese lit. I think there can no dispute regarding the prominence about Du Fu as this is a common knowledge at least for the Chinese community [[User:Cheungie|cheungie]] 01:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
FYI, he is a major influence on poet Charles Wright. CW references the translation by David Hinton. |
|||
:::It's a bit like comparing Eliot and Pound. Du Fu admired Li Bo intensely, but temperamentally and stylistically they are quite different. Du Fu's verse are difficult to translate because he crafts it consummately; with Li Bo the writing is more effortless and spontaneous. [[User:219.74.75.203|219.74.75.203]] 20:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Inline citations== |
|||
I just fixed the inline citations with a "Notes" section and reflist, instead of having citations in parentheses at the end of sentences in the prose. I will also add some info and back up the prose in the war section from Ebrey's book.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 16:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks - good work. :) [[User:Henry Flower|Henry]][[User talk:Henry Flower|<sup>Flower</sup>]] 11:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::No problem. The article is very good, it just needs more proper citations.--[[User:PericlesofAthens|PericlesofAthens]] 03:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== loyalty to established order / country ? == |
|||
There's an important difference in meaning here. Loyalty to the country was pretty much universal in China for pretty much all its history, though of course one could be so loyal to the country that one felt the need to give it the benefit of one's wisdom as emperor. Loyalty to ''the established order'' -- in this case, loyalty to a thoroughly incompetent emperor and his bureaucracy, is another thing altogether, exactly what Du felt, and much more notable. As for rewording "so it is not too close to the original": firstly, given the difference in meaning between the two, closeness to the original is much to be preferred; secondly, I can't imagine any situation where two words could be the difference between a paraphrase being "too close" to the source or not. [[User:Henry Flower|Henry]][[User talk:Henry Flower|<sup>Flower</sup>]] 13:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Death? == |
|||
I wonder why there is no mention of the way he died, since it is a rather popular tale that he starved for many days and then overate. [[User:Hzh|Hzh]] ([[User talk:Hzh|talk]]) 10:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Assessment comment== |
|||
{{Substituted comment|length=78|lastedit=20060924214429|comment=needs inline citations --[[User:Plange|plange]] 21:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)}} |
|||
Substituted at 13:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Du Fu]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=755304115 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040817214247/http://afpc.asso.fr:80/wengu/wg/wengu.php?l=Tangshi&no=-1&auteur=Du_Fu to http://afpc.asso.fr/wengu/wg/wengu.php?l=Tangshi&no=-1&auteur=Du_Fu |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 07:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Du Fu as the first historically known diabetic in human history. == |
|||
Indeed, Du Fu suffered from diabetes and it could have been the root cause of his death. But the first diabetic, historically recorded as such, was the famous poet Sima Xiangru 司马相如 who lived during the Han. I can send you the article on this topic that my Chinese friend shared with me.[[User:Baruchim|Baruchim]] ([[User talk:Baruchim|talk]]) 06:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:02, 25 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Du Fu article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Du Fu is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 25, 2004. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 24, 2013, December 24, 2016, December 24, 2018, December 24, 2020, December 24, 2022, and December 24, 2024. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This level-4 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Epithets for Du Fu
[edit]From the History section: Since the Song dynasty, critics have called Du Fu the "poet saint" (詩聖 shī shèng). This sentence has an error because it talks about the historical aspects of Du Fu's works; he is called 诗史, shī shǐ, the "historian-poet". The section on Moral Engagement talks about his epithet 詩聖, the "saint-poet".--Mirrordor (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in People
- FA-Class vital articles in People
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Mid-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class China-related articles
- Top-importance China-related articles
- FA-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
- FA-Class Chinese history articles
- Top-importance Chinese history articles
- WikiProject Chinese history articles
- WikiProject China articles
- FA-Class Middle Ages articles
- Mid-importance Middle Ages articles
- FA-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- FA-Class Poetry articles
- Top-importance Poetry articles
- WikiProject Poetry articles
- FA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles