Jump to content

Talk:Nicki Minaj: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
There as to be more than one genre 3 at least
Tag: review edit
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Nicki Minaj/Archive 8) (bot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}
{{talk header|search=yes}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{RecurringThemes
{{AutoArchivingNotice
|Minaj's birthdate has been discussed [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj#Birthdate|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj#She_is_27|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_2#Edit_request_on_1_April_2012|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_2#Major_BLP_concern|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_2#Edit_request_on_13_March_2012|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_1#Edit_Request:_Nicki_Minaj_born_in_1982_not_1984_PLEASE_FIXXXX_2|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_1#Edit_Request:_Nicki_Minaj_born_in_1982_not_1984_PLEASE_FIXXXX|here]] and [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_1#Edit_Request:_Nicki_Minaj_DOB_12.2F82_proof_-_Lexis_public_records|here]]. The current consensus is to list 1982 as her year of birth. Please establish consensus before changing this information.
|small=no
|archives=no
|age=30
|bot=MiszaBot I}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 3
|minthreadsleft = 5
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Nicki Minaj/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}
{{Article history
{{ArticleHistory
|action1 = AFD
|action1 = AFD
|action1date = 7 July 2008
|action1date = 7 July 2008
Line 22: Line 14:
|action2 = GAN
|action2 = GAN
|action2date = 08:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
|action2date = 08:20, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
|action2link = Talk:Nicki Minaj/GA2
|action2link = Talk:Nicki Minaj/GA1
|action2result = listed
|action2result = listed
|action2oldid = 508899558
|action2oldid = 508899558


|currentstatus = GA
|topic = music
|otd1date=2023-12-08
|topic = music}}
|otd1oldid=1188761453
{{not a forum}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|1=
|action3 = GAR
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=GA|musician-priority=Mid|musician-work-group=yes|listas=Minaj, Nicki}}
|action3date = 14:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Electronic music|class=GA|importance=Mid}}
|action3link = Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Nicki Minaj/1
{{GOCE|user=Miniapolis|date=September 6, 2014}}
|action3result = delisted
{{WikiProject Hip hop|class=GA|importance=High}}
|action3oldid = 1253748499
{{WikiProject New York City|class=GA|importance=Low}}
|currentstatus = DGA
{{WikiProject Pop music|class=GA|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject R&B and Soul Music|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago|class=GA|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women|class=GA}}
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|vital=yes|listas=Minaj, Nicki|1=
{{RecurringThemes
{{WikiProject Biography|musician-priority=Mid|musician-work-group=yes}}
|Minaj's birthdate has been discussed [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj#Birthdate|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj#She_is_27|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_2#Edit_request_on_1_April_2012|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_2#Major_BLP_concern|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_2#Edit_request_on_13_March_2012|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_1#Edit_Request:_Nicki_Minaj_born_in_1982_not_1984_PLEASE_FIXXXX_2|here]], [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_1#Edit_Request:_Nicki_Minaj_born_in_1982_not_1984_PLEASE_FIXXXX|here]] and [[Talk:Nicki_Minaj/Archive_1#Edit_Request:_Nicki_Minaj_DOB_12.2F82_proof_-_Lexis_public_records|here]]. The current consensus is to list 1982 as her birthday. Please establish consensus before changing this information.
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Miniapolis|date=September 6, 2014}}
{{WikiProject Hip hop|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Pop music|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject R&B and Soul Music|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=mid |AsianAmericans=yes |AsianAmericans-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Women in hip hop music|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Women in Music|importance=High }}
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = Talk:Nicki Minaj/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Banner holder|collapsed=yes|
{{Copied
|from1 = Nicki Minaj
|from_oldid1 =
|to1 = Roman's Revenge
|date1 = 2022-02-04
|diff1 =
|to_diff1 =
|to_oldid1 =


|from2 = Nicki Minaj
==Feuds==
|from_oldid2 =
|to2 = No Frauds
|date2 = 2022-02-04
|diff2 =
|to_diff2 =
|to_oldid2 =
}}
{{Annual readership}}
{{All time pageviews|75}}
{{Annual report|[[Wikipedia:2011 Top 50 Report|2011]], [[Wikipedia:2012 Top 50 Report|2012]], and [[Wikipedia:2013 Top 50 Report|2013]]}}
{{Top 25 Report|January 13, 2013|January 20, 2013|February 24, 2013|March 3, 2013|Sep 12 2021}}
}}
__TOC__


== Based in the US in lead sentence ==
There seems to be a bit of a dispute regarding the "Feuds" section. Over the number of years the section has been brought back then reverted due to false allegations of "controversial matters being integrated within the main article of Nicki Minaj". The questions that continue to be brought up regarding the section's lack of presence center on the disputable notion that other artists like [[Drake (entertainer)|Drake]], [[50 Cent]] and [[Rick Ross]] have their feuds section available, yet the artist under review (Nicki Minaj) is "specially exempted" from such documentation even if referenced sources are reliable and neutral. Those of a neutral nature may wish to weigh in on why "feuds" has no place, despite the removal of gossip and staple of adequately-sourced references. [[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 20:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
::After going back to the discussion about the "Feud" section in the talk page archives I've realized that you were one of the users who participated in that discussion and it was mentioned the reasons why this section should be removed (it violates multiple rules). Based on that discussion, this section violates [[WP:BALASPS]] "{{xt|[an article] should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to the weight of that aspect in the body of reliable sources on the subject}}", [[WP:STRUCTURE]]'s guideline to {{xt|achieve a more neutral text by folding debates into the narrative, rather than isolating them into sections that ignore or fight against each other}} and [[WP:UNDUE]]'s requirement for coverage that reflects prevalence in ''reliable sources''. Also, this is a duplicate of information that is already mentioned in the main body. Her fueds with Mariah, Kim, Flex, etc. are already mentioned there so this is excessive. Just include any other further feuds in the main body like the rest of them. Making comparisons to another artist's page seems pointless, especially considering the significant difference in the situation (and content) and explained above. [[User:Annvarie|Annvarie]] ([[User talk:Annvarie|talk]]) 21:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
:::Correct, I see the inference of Kim and Mariah being featured throughout the page and it is quite understandable why their incorporation within the "feuds" page should be omitted. However, for the sake of neutrality and complimenting one of the main guidelines: there is still an ongoing dispute between the parties of Remy Ma and Minaj, alongside Kim and Minaj. All other trivial nonsense regarding the Cher mention and indie female rappers have been removed.[[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 21:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
::::So add it to the main body instead of creating a whole entire section with the same content. [[User:Annvarie|Annvarie]] ([[User talk:Annvarie|talk]]) 21:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
:::::I've reviewed the entire page and it appears that although the same content regarding Mariah Carey and Flex have been reiterated, a separate section is still in order in reference to the ongoing disputes among the parties of Kim, Remy and Minaj. This supports the guidelines as addressed per other wiki pages like [[50 Cent]], [[Rick Ross]], [[Ja Rule]], [[Drake (entertainer)|Drake]] whose respective ongoing controversies are recorded under their feuds listing. All other trivial information has now been removed, while remaining verified matters have been integrated within main article page per guideline request. [[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 21:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
:::::::[[File:Pictogram voting comment.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Note:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> I have reviewed your recent edit and noticed the reiteration of Rece Steele was strangely made. Also remaining edit matter does not compliment what was discussed earlier. In accordance to the "WP guideline" that enforces feuds to be made separate if feud is ongoing, it should be fairly considered that the parties among Remy, Kim and Minaj be made within a separate section. [[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 22:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
In what way is the feud between Kim and Minaj ongoing? It's been years since they addressed that beef? [[User:Annvarie|Annvarie]] ([[User talk:Annvarie|talk]]) 22:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
::Same applies to the long heated history between other rappers like [[Ja Rule]] and [[50 Cent]] yet their expansive history among one another, especially breakdowns of their dispute is made public in a separate section on both their wiki pages. I am not understanding thoroughly what makes Minaj the immediate exception with her dispute with Kim? If a reconciliation has indeed been reached between the pair, then it would be neutral and ethical to insert the nod with a reliable documented source. The other case that is currently being reported with an expansive array of legitimate media outlets is the ongoing dispute between Minaj and Remy Ma. Their dispute as news sources record is in fact still ongoing and a current topic, and references of its coverage have already been integrated. Both scenarios compliment well within the "WP guideline" that was addressed earlier in our discussion, and any other trivial nonsense such as the indie female rappers and "Vinny" allegation has been removed for sake of neutrality and non-one-sided reporting. [[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 22:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
:::I understand the Remy thing but the Kim one makes no sense. Where exactly did you see that rule? Or are you just making stuff up? And why are you adding rumors to the article that were already debunked.[[User:Annvarie|Annvarie]] ([[User talk:Annvarie|talk]]) 22:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
::::Again no need to jump to conclusions. Rumored reports have been subtracted and the placement of verified, reliable sources have been intact. There is only recount to what was discussed in reference to the WP guidelines (BALASPS, STRUCTURE) which were noted earlier in our discussion. In reference to the Kim dispute, it is clear that the pair have had a series of conflicts that was uncovered in ''reliable'' sources, which spans for several years. Though it remains uncertain what the immediate nature of their relationship stands now, it would be indisputable in leaving their feud out of Minaj's wiki page especially if it were to be expanded in a separate section given the nature of the many conflicts the two endured. Again reaffirming the neutral stance, their history and the guidelines supporting their feature on Wikipedia is evident in other pages like [[Rick Ross]], [[DMX (rapper)|DMX]], [[50 Cent]], [[Ja Rule]], [[Drake (entertainer)|Drake]], whom have respectively have had their share of conflicts as well and have their feuds made public on their wiki pages in separate sections. I am still not understanding thoroughly from your perspective why Minaj is an exception to this; it clearly defies neutrality status on the coverage of "feuds", especially if it's ''ongoing'' AND/OR ''expansive''. [[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 22:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
:::::::Fair call on the recent edits that have been made towards subsections of the feuds breakdown. After careful consideration it is best to opt out the Kendrick mention since it fell under the pattern of the trivial nonsense as the indie female rappers and Vinny reference. The feuds section is now under fair neutral standing, may it be noted to any contributor that in future time to refrain from adding any form of gossip or rumored content that could misrepresent the fair circumstances of the feuds section. [[User:ChocoLantern88|ChocoLantern88]] ([[User talk:ChocoLantern88|talk]]) 23:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


There has been alot of discussion about he lead sentence and nationality. I would like to remove the "based in the US" from the LEAD sentence only. It can be add further into the introduction unless it is the reason for her notability. [[User:Malerooster|Malerooster]] ([[User talk:Malerooster|talk]]) 15:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2017 ==


== Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024 ==
{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=y}}
please change the current profile picture to a more recent picture. the current picture is from 5 years ago. the picture below is from a recent video shoot https://static.wonderfulunion.net/groundctrl/clients/nickiminaj/media/00/15/ckeditor/pictures/data/content.4t61udbust0jds4nvgn0fxnzlrkfjme1k59z6k_vdq.jpg [[User:Kvnniv|Kvnniv]] ([[User talk:Kvnniv|talk]]) 09:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
:{{Not done}} Unless they are clearly licenced as free-use, we have to assume that all images are copyright. Therefore, we cannot use them without breach of copyright, which we will not do - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 13:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2017 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=yes}}
{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=yes}}
I request removing "allegedly" in this section, as Cardi did cyberbully this caller. The proofs can still be found on X or a simple google search shows the screenshot.:
update profile picture to a more recent picture. Nicki Minaj on SNL in 2014:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rocor/15792392688/ [[User:Kvnniv|Kvnniv]] ([[User talk:Kvnniv|talk]]) 01:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


"At a New York Fashion Week after-party in 2018, rapper Cardi B threw one of her high heel shoes in Minaj's direction and attempted to physically attack her; bodyguards intervened, leaving Cardi B with a bump on her forehead. She then alleged on Instagram that Minaj had "liked" negative social media comments about her ability to take care of her newborn daughter. Minaj denied the allegations on her Queen Radio show, stating that she would "would never...speak ill of anyone's child", and expressed embarrassment at the incident.[640][641] She accused Cardi of building "her career off of sympathy and payola", bribing DJs and radios with sex to play her records, and not writing her raps. Minaj also called Cardi a "disgusting pig" for allegedly cyberbullying a caller on Minaj's show by attacking her dead child, and posts calling dark-skinned black women "cockroaches"." [[Special:Contributions/89.23.224.135|89.23.224.135]] ([[User talk:89.23.224.135|talk]]) 22:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> <span class="template-ping">@[[:User:Kvnniv|Kvnniv]]:</span> The picture must have a free license. The one you linked to is under the CC BY-NC 2.0 license; the non-commercial clause of that license means that it is not free per Wikipedia's standards. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 02:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


{{Not done}}: please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:PianoDan|PianoDan]] ([[User talk:PianoDan|talk]]) 23:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2017 ==


== The Pinkprint Movie ==
{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=yes}}
Please change "Nicki Minaj falsely accused rock musician Steven Tyler and American journalist Barbara Walters as racists" to "Nicki Minaj accused rock musician Steven Tyler and American journalist Barbara Walters as racists". Using "accused" already implies that there is no evidence to back up her claim, so the "falsely" seems biased. Whether or not her claim is valid is entirely subjective. [[User:R13n3|R13n3]] ([[User talk:R13n3|talk]]) 06:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
: {{done}} Good call. Conforms with [[WP:POV]]. Thanks [[user:IVORK|<font face="Ariel" color="red" size="4px">'''IVORK'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:4DHS|<font face="Ariel" color="Green" size="1px">'''Discuss'''</font>]]</sub> 14:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


If any editor thinks it might make a viable article, please contribute to the abandoned [[Draft:The Pinkprint Movie]]. – [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User talk:Fayenatic london|'''<span style="color:#FF0000;">L</span>'''ondon]] 13:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2017 ==


== Is it "Hip hop" or "Hip-hop" ==
{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=yes}}
{{hat|Ban evasion by [[User:MariaJaydHicky]].}}
change the profile picture to a more recent one.
I've noticed that on many artists that record in the hip hop genre their pages (profile, singles, albums etc.) all call the genre '''hip hop''', yet just on Minaj's home page it calls her hip''-''hop, yet her albums:
Nicki Minaj in Turks and Caicos in 2016:
*''[[Pink Friday]]''
'''Copyvio image removed''' [[User:Kvnniv|Kvnniv]] ([[User talk:Kvnniv|talk]]) 07:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
*''[[Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded]]''
*''[[Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded - The Re-Up]]''
*''[[The Pinkprint]]''
*''[[Queen (Nicki Minaj album)|Queen]]''
*''[[Queen Radio: Volume 1]]''
and
*''[[Pink Friday 2]]'' along with her singles all are labeled as just '''hip hop''' which one is the correct spelling and which one should be used as a rule of thumb as some reviewers on different hip hop related pages write it with the hyphen in their review but then the infobox, it is written without the hyphen? Seems a bit odd?
[[User:Chav4lyfe|Chav4lyfe]] ([[User talk:Chav4lyfe|talk]]) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)


:That image is lifted from her Instagram account. Copyright violation. Tagged with a speedy delete. [[User:Karst|Karst]] ([[User talk:Karst|talk]]) 07:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
:Her article sources it w/o the hyphen [[Special:Contributions/151.230.148.34|151.230.148.34]] ([[User talk:151.230.148.34|talk]]) 04:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
::Changed it as it was <nowiki>[[hip hop]]</nowiki> and not <nowiki>[[Hip hop music]]</nowiki>, the other article is about the culture and not the music [[User:Chav4lyfe|<span style="color:black">'''Greg'''</span>]] (A.K.A.) [[User talk:Chav4lyfe|<span style="color:orange">'''сhαṿ4lÿƒε''' (talk)</span>]] 20:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

{{hab}}
::I have removed the copyvio image pending its deletion - [[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]] ([[User talk:Arjayay|talk]]) 11:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=yes}}
Update the current picture.
Nicki Minaj at a Halloween party in 2015
https://www.flickr.com/photos/135504457@N06/22526677430
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> Wikipedia articles cannot display externally hosted images. [[User:Rivertorch|<font color="#339933">'''Rivertorch'''</font>]]<small><small><sup>[[Special:Contributions/Rivertorch|<font color="#FF0066">FIRE</font>]]</sup><sub>[[User talk:Rivertorch|<font color="#0066FF">WATER</font>]]</sub></small></small> 06:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
::Further, I question whether "hotcelebwallpapers" really owns the image and has released it into the public domain. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 12:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Where did onika actually grow IP in ?
[[User:Roykuchy|Roykuchy]] ([[User talk:Roykuchy|talk]]) 18:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=no}}
Add "model" as occupation. Reference: <ref>{{cite web|title=Nicki Minaj Just Signed a Major Modeling Contract|url=http://www.vogue.com/article/nicki-minaj-signs-modeling-contract-wilhelmina|website=Vogue|accessdate=29 March 2017|language=en}}</ref> [[User:Gimleey2|Gimleey2]] ([[User talk:Gimleey2|talk]]) 19:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=Yes}}
There should be more than 1 genre
{{flatlist|
* [[Hip hop music|Hip hop]]
* [[Contemporary R&B|R&B]]
* [[Pop music|Pop]]
}}
Those 3 genres should be there [[Special:Contributions/2607:FB90:337:EF7D:E818:C4F4:6768:2EE2|2607:FB90:337:EF7D:E818:C4F4:6768:2EE2]] ([[User talk:2607:FB90:337:EF7D:E818:C4F4:6768:2EE2|talk]]) 20:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Nicki Minaj|answered=yes}}
The three genres are hip hop, r&b, pop. Please add those 3 genres [[Special:Contributions/2607:FB90:337:EF7D:E818:C4F4:6768:2EE2|2607:FB90:337:EF7D:E818:C4F4:6768:2EE2]] ([[User talk:2607:FB90:337:EF7D:E818:C4F4:6768:2EE2|talk]]) 22:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:47, 22 December 2024

Former good articleNicki Minaj was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2008Articles for deletionDeleted
August 24, 2012Good article nomineeListed
October 28, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 8, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

Based in the US in lead sentence

[edit]

There has been alot of discussion about he lead sentence and nationality. I would like to remove the "based in the US" from the LEAD sentence only. It can be add further into the introduction unless it is the reason for her notability. Malerooster (talk) 15:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2024

[edit]

I request removing "allegedly" in this section, as Cardi did cyberbully this caller. The proofs can still be found on X or a simple google search shows the screenshot.:

"At a New York Fashion Week after-party in 2018, rapper Cardi B threw one of her high heel shoes in Minaj's direction and attempted to physically attack her; bodyguards intervened, leaving Cardi B with a bump on her forehead. She then alleged on Instagram that Minaj had "liked" negative social media comments about her ability to take care of her newborn daughter. Minaj denied the allegations on her Queen Radio show, stating that she would "would never...speak ill of anyone's child", and expressed embarrassment at the incident.[640][641] She accused Cardi of building "her career off of sympathy and payola", bribing DJs and radios with sex to play her records, and not writing her raps. Minaj also called Cardi a "disgusting pig" for allegedly cyberbullying a caller on Minaj's show by attacking her dead child, and posts calling dark-skinned black women "cockroaches"." 89.23.224.135 (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. PianoDan (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Pinkprint Movie

[edit]

If any editor thinks it might make a viable article, please contribute to the abandoned Draft:The Pinkprint Movie. – Fayenatic London 13:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it "Hip hop" or "Hip-hop"

[edit]
Ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I've noticed that on many artists that record in the hip hop genre their pages (profile, singles, albums etc.) all call the genre hip hop, yet just on Minaj's home page it calls her hip-hop, yet her albums:

and

  • Pink Friday 2 along with her singles all are labeled as just hip hop which one is the correct spelling and which one should be used as a rule of thumb as some reviewers on different hip hop related pages write it with the hyphen in their review but then the infobox, it is written without the hyphen? Seems a bit odd?

Chav4lyfe (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her article sources it w/o the hyphen 151.230.148.34 (talk) 04:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Changed it as it was [[hip hop]] and not [[Hip hop music]], the other article is about the culture and not the music Greg (A.K.A.) сhαṿ4lÿƒε (talk) 20:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]