Weierstrass preparation theorem: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Several complex variables | #UCB_Category 11/42 |
|||
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use American English|date = March 2019}} |
|||
⚫ | In [[mathematics]], the '''Weierstrass preparation theorem''' is a tool for dealing with [[analytic function]]s of [[several complex variables]], at a given point P. It states that such a function is, [[up to]] multiplication by a function not zero at P, a [[polynomial]] in one fixed variable ''z'', which is [[monic polynomial|monic]], and whose [[coefficient]]s of lower degree terms are analytic functions in the remaining variables and zero at P. |
||
{{Short description|Local theory of several complex variables}} |
|||
⚫ | In [[mathematics]], the '''Weierstrass preparation theorem''' is a tool for dealing with [[analytic function]]s of [[Function of several complex variables|several complex variables]], at a given point ''P''. It states that such a function is, [[up to]] multiplication by a function not zero at ''P'', a [[polynomial]] in one fixed variable ''z'', which is [[monic polynomial|monic]], and whose [[coefficient]]s of lower degree terms are analytic functions in the remaining variables and zero at ''P''. |
||
There are also a number of variants of the theorem, that extend the idea of factorization in some [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] R as ''u''·''w'', where ''u'' is a [[Unit (ring theory)|unit]] and ''w'' is some sort of distinguished '''Weierstrass polynomial'''. [[ |
There are also a number of variants of the theorem, that extend the idea of factorization in some [[ring (mathematics)|ring]] ''R'' as ''u''·''w'', where ''u'' is a [[Unit (ring theory)|unit]] and ''w'' is some sort of distinguished '''Weierstrass polynomial'''. [[Carl Siegel]] has disputed the attribution of the theorem to [[Weierstrass]], saying that it occurred under the current name in some of late nineteenth century ''Traités d'analyse'' without justification. |
||
==Complex analytic functions== |
==Complex analytic functions== |
||
For one variable, the local form of an analytic function ''f''(''z'') near 0 is ''z''<sup>''k''</sup>''h''(''z'') where ''h''(0) is not 0, and ''k'' is the order of zero of ''f'' at 0. This is the result the preparation theorem generalises. |
For one variable, the local form of an analytic function ''f''(''z'') near 0 is ''z''<sup>''k''</sup>''h''(''z'') where ''h''(0) is not 0, and ''k'' is the order of the zero of ''f'' at 0. This is the result that the preparation theorem generalises. |
||
We pick out one variable ''z'', which we may assume is first, and write our complex variables as (''z'', ''z''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''z<sub>n</sub>''). A Weierstrass polynomial ''W''(''z'') is |
We pick out one variable ''z'', which we may assume is first, and write our complex variables as (''z'', ''z''<sub>2</sub>, ..., ''z<sub>n</sub>''). A Weierstrass polynomial ''W''(''z'') is |
||
Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
===Division theorem=== |
===Division theorem=== |
||
A related result is the '''Weierstrass division theorem''', which states that if ''f'' and ''g'' are analytic functions, and ''g'' is a Weierstrass polynomial of degree ''N'', then there exists a unique pair ''h'' and ''j'' such that ''f'' = ''gh'' + ''j'', where ''j'' is a polynomial of degree less than ''N''. In fact, many authors prove the Weierstrass preparation as a corollary of the division theorem. It is also possible to prove the |
A related result is the '''Weierstrass division theorem''', which states that if ''f'' and ''g'' are analytic functions, and ''g'' is a Weierstrass polynomial of degree ''N'', then there exists a unique pair ''h'' and ''j'' such that ''f'' = ''gh'' + ''j'', where ''j'' is a polynomial of degree less than ''N''. In fact, many authors prove the Weierstrass preparation as a corollary of the division theorem. It is also possible to prove the division theorem from the preparation theorem so that the two theorems are actually equivalent.<ref>{{citation|title=Analytische Stellenalgebren|author1=Grauert, Hans|author1-link=Hans Grauert|author2=Remmert, Reinhold|author2-link=Reinhold Remmert|publisher=Springer|language=German|page=43|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-65033-8|year=1971|isbn=978-3-642-65034-5}}</ref> |
||
===Applications=== |
===Applications=== |
||
Line 45: | Line 47: | ||
An application of the Weierstrass preparation and division theorem for the ring <math>\mathbf Z_p[[t]]</math> (also called [[Iwasawa algebra]]) occurs in [[Iwasawa theory]] in the description of finitely generated modules over this ring.<ref>{{citation|author=Lawrence Washington|author-link=Lawrence C. Washington|title=Introduction to cyclotomic fields|publisher=Springer|year=1982|location=Theorem 13.12}}</ref> |
An application of the Weierstrass preparation and division theorem for the ring <math>\mathbf Z_p[[t]]</math> (also called [[Iwasawa algebra]]) occurs in [[Iwasawa theory]] in the description of finitely generated modules over this ring.<ref>{{citation|author=Lawrence Washington|author-link=Lawrence C. Washington|title=Introduction to cyclotomic fields|publisher=Springer|year=1982|location=Theorem 13.12}}</ref> |
||
There exists a non-commutative version of Weierstrass division and preparation, with ''A'' being a not necessarily commutative ring, and with formal skew power series in place of formal power series.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Otmar Venjakob |title=A noncommutative Weierstrass preparation theorem and applications to Iwasawa theory |journal=J. Reine Angew. Math. |year=2003 |volume=2003 |issue=559 |pages=153–191 |doi=10.1515/crll.2003.047 |s2cid=14265629 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crll.2003.047/pdf |accessdate=2022-01-27|arxiv=math/0204358 }} Theorem 3.1, Corollary 3.2</ref> |
|||
==Tate algebras== |
==Tate algebras== |
||
There is also a |
There is also a Weierstrass preparation theorem for [[Tate algebra]]s |
||
:<math>T_n(k) = \left \{ \sum_{\nu_1, \dots, \nu_n \ge 0} a_{\nu_1, \dots, \nu_n} X_1^{\nu_1} \cdots X_n^{\nu_n}, |a_{\nu_1, \dots, \nu_n}| \to 0 \text{ for } \nu_1 + \dots +\nu_n \to \infty \right \}</math> |
:<math>T_n(k) = \left \{ \sum_{\nu_1, \dots, \nu_n \ge 0} a_{\nu_1, \dots, \nu_n} X_1^{\nu_1} \cdots X_n^{\nu_n}, |a_{\nu_1, \dots, \nu_n}| \to 0 \text{ for } \nu_1 + \dots +\nu_n \to \infty \right \}</math> |
||
over a complete [[non-archimedean field]] ''k''.<ref>{{citation|author1=Bosch, Siegfried|author-link=Siegfried Bosch|author2=Güntzer, Ulrich|author3=Remmert, Reinhold|author3-link=Reinhold Remmert|title=Non-archimedean analysis|location=Chapters 5.2.1, 5.2.2|publisher=Springer|year=1984}}</ref> |
over a complete [[non-archimedean field]] ''k''.<ref>{{citation|author1=Bosch, Siegfried|author-link=Siegfried Bosch|author2=Güntzer, Ulrich|author3=Remmert, Reinhold|author3-link=Reinhold Remmert|title=Non-archimedean analysis|location=Chapters 5.2.1, 5.2.2|publisher=Springer|year=1984}}</ref> |
||
These algebras are the basic building blocks of [[rigid geometry]]. One application of this form of the Weierstrass preparation theorem is the fact that the rings <math>T_n(k)</math> are [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian]]. |
These algebras are the basic building blocks of [[rigid geometry]]. One application of this form of the Weierstrass preparation theorem is the fact that the rings <math>T_n(k)</math> are [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian]]. |
||
== See also == |
|||
* [[Oka coherence theorem]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
Line 58: | Line 64: | ||
*{{citation|mr=0268402 |
*{{citation|mr=0268402 |
||
|last=Siegel|first= C. L. |
|last=Siegel|first= C. L. |
||
|chapter=Zu den Beweisen des Vorbereitungssatzes von Weierstrass |year=1969|title= Number Theory and Analysis (Papers in Honor of Edmund Landau) |pages= 297–306 |publisher=Plenum| |
|chapter=Zu den Beweisen des Vorbereitungssatzes von Weierstrass |year=1969|title= Number Theory and Analysis (Papers in Honor of Edmund Landau) |pages= 297–306 |publisher=Plenum|location= New York }}, reprinted in {{citation|mr=0543842|last= Siegel|first= Carl Ludwig |title=Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Band IV|editor-first= K. |editor-last=Chandrasekharan|editor2-first=H.|editor2-last= Maass.|publisher= Springer-Verlag|location=Berlin-New York|year= 1979|pages=1–8| isbn= 0-387-09374-5}} |
||
*{{springer|id=W/w097510|title=Weierstrass theorem|first=E.D.|last= Solomentsev}} |
*{{springer|id=W/w097510|title=Weierstrass theorem|first=E.D.|last= Solomentsev}} |
||
*{{citation|title= Ueber einen Satz des Herrn Noether |
*{{citation|title= Ueber einen Satz des Herrn Noether |
||
Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
|journal =Mathematische Annalen |
|journal =Mathematische Annalen |
||
|volume= 30|issue= 3 |year= 1887|pages=401–409 |
|volume= 30|issue= 3 |year= 1887|pages=401–409 |
||
|first=L.|last= Stickelberger |
|first=L.|last= Stickelberger|s2cid =121360367 |
||
|url =https://zenodo.org/record/1599614 |
|||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
== External links == |
|||
*{{cite web |last1=Lebl |first1=Jiří |title=Weierstrass Preparation and Division Theorems. (2021, September 5). |url=https://math.libretexts.org/@go/page/74245 |website=LibreTexts|date=6 July 2021 }} |
|||
[[Category:Several complex variables]] |
[[Category:Several complex variables]] |
||
[[Category:Commutative algebra]] |
[[Category:Commutative algebra]] |
Latest revision as of 20:44, 7 March 2024
In mathematics, the Weierstrass preparation theorem is a tool for dealing with analytic functions of several complex variables, at a given point P. It states that such a function is, up to multiplication by a function not zero at P, a polynomial in one fixed variable z, which is monic, and whose coefficients of lower degree terms are analytic functions in the remaining variables and zero at P.
There are also a number of variants of the theorem, that extend the idea of factorization in some ring R as u·w, where u is a unit and w is some sort of distinguished Weierstrass polynomial. Carl Siegel has disputed the attribution of the theorem to Weierstrass, saying that it occurred under the current name in some of late nineteenth century Traités d'analyse without justification.
Complex analytic functions
[edit]For one variable, the local form of an analytic function f(z) near 0 is zkh(z) where h(0) is not 0, and k is the order of the zero of f at 0. This is the result that the preparation theorem generalises. We pick out one variable z, which we may assume is first, and write our complex variables as (z, z2, ..., zn). A Weierstrass polynomial W(z) is
- zk + gk−1zk−1 + ... + g0
where gi(z2, ..., zn) is analytic and gi(0, ..., 0) = 0.
Then the theorem states that for analytic functions f, if
- f(0, ...,0) = 0,
and
- f(z, z2, ..., zn)
as a power series has some term only involving z, we can write (locally near (0, ..., 0))
- f(z, z2, ..., zn) = W(z)h(z, z2, ..., zn)
with h analytic and h(0, ..., 0) not 0, and W a Weierstrass polynomial.
This has the immediate consequence that the set of zeros of f, near (0, ..., 0), can be found by fixing any small values of z2, ..., zn and then solving the equation W(z)=0. The corresponding values of z form a number of continuously-varying branches, in number equal to the degree of W in z. In particular f cannot have an isolated zero.
Division theorem
[edit]A related result is the Weierstrass division theorem, which states that if f and g are analytic functions, and g is a Weierstrass polynomial of degree N, then there exists a unique pair h and j such that f = gh + j, where j is a polynomial of degree less than N. In fact, many authors prove the Weierstrass preparation as a corollary of the division theorem. It is also possible to prove the division theorem from the preparation theorem so that the two theorems are actually equivalent.[1]
Applications
[edit]The Weierstrass preparation theorem can be used to show that the ring of germs of analytic functions in n variables is a Noetherian ring, which is also referred to as the Rückert basis theorem.[2]
Smooth functions
[edit]There is a deeper preparation theorem for smooth functions, due to Bernard Malgrange, called the Malgrange preparation theorem. It also has an associated division theorem, named after John Mather.
Formal power series in complete local rings
[edit]There is an analogous result, also referred to as the Weierstrass preparation theorem, for the ring of formal power series over complete local rings A:[3] for any power series such that not all are in the maximal ideal of A, there is a unique unit u in and a polynomial F of the form with (a so-called distinguished polynomial) such that
Since is again a complete local ring, the result can be iterated and therefore gives similar factorization results for formal power series in several variables.
For example, this applies to the ring of integers in a p-adic field. In this case the theorem says that a power series f(z) can always be uniquely factored as πn·u(z)·p(z), where u(z) is a unit in the ring of power series, p(z) is a distinguished polynomial (monic, with the coefficients of the non-leading terms each in the maximal ideal), and π is a fixed uniformizer.
An application of the Weierstrass preparation and division theorem for the ring (also called Iwasawa algebra) occurs in Iwasawa theory in the description of finitely generated modules over this ring.[4]
There exists a non-commutative version of Weierstrass division and preparation, with A being a not necessarily commutative ring, and with formal skew power series in place of formal power series.[5]
Tate algebras
[edit]There is also a Weierstrass preparation theorem for Tate algebras
over a complete non-archimedean field k.[6] These algebras are the basic building blocks of rigid geometry. One application of this form of the Weierstrass preparation theorem is the fact that the rings are Noetherian.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Grauert, Hans; Remmert, Reinhold (1971), Analytische Stellenalgebren (in German), Springer, p. 43, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-65033-8, ISBN 978-3-642-65034-5
- ^ Ebeling, Wolfgang (2007), Functions of Several Complex Variables and Their Singularities, Proposition 2.19: American Mathematical Society
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ Nicolas Bourbaki (1972), Commutative algebra, chapter VII, §3, no. 9, Proposition 6: Hermann
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ Lawrence Washington (1982), Introduction to cyclotomic fields, Theorem 13.12: Springer
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ Otmar Venjakob (2003). "A noncommutative Weierstrass preparation theorem and applications to Iwasawa theory". J. Reine Angew. Math. 2003 (559): 153–191. arXiv:math/0204358. doi:10.1515/crll.2003.047. S2CID 14265629. Retrieved 2022-01-27. Theorem 3.1, Corollary 3.2
- ^ Bosch, Siegfried; Güntzer, Ulrich; Remmert, Reinhold (1984), Non-archimedean analysis, Chapters 5.2.1, 5.2.2: Springer
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location (link)
- Lewis, Andrew, Notes on Global Analysis
- Siegel, C. L. (1969), "Zu den Beweisen des Vorbereitungssatzes von Weierstrass", Number Theory and Analysis (Papers in Honor of Edmund Landau), New York: Plenum, pp. 297–306, MR 0268402, reprinted in Siegel, Carl Ludwig (1979), Chandrasekharan, K.; Maass., H. (eds.), Gesammelte Abhandlungen. Band IV, Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–8, ISBN 0-387-09374-5, MR 0543842
- Solomentsev, E.D. (2001) [1994], "Weierstrass theorem", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press
- Stickelberger, L. (1887), "Ueber einen Satz des Herrn Noether", Mathematische Annalen, 30 (3): 401–409, doi:10.1007/BF01443952, S2CID 121360367
- Weierstrass, K. (1895), Mathematische Werke. II. Abhandlungen 2, Berlin: Mayer & Müller, pp. 135–142 reprinted by Johnson, New York, 1967.
External links
[edit]- Lebl, Jiří (6 July 2021). "Weierstrass Preparation and Division Theorems. (2021, September 5)". LibreTexts.