Jump to content

SAMPSON: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ajaxrocks (talk | contribs)
Operation: not needed
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Whoop whoop pull up - 14512
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Multifunction, rotating AESA radar}}
{{otheruses|Sampson (disambiguation)}}
{{other uses|Sampson (disambiguation)}}
{{Infobox Radar
{{Infobox Radar
|name = SAMPSON
|name = SAMPSON
|image = SAMPSON-rotation-composite-3.jpg|200px
|image = SAMPSON-rotation-composite-3.jpg
|caption = 2012 composite photographed at less than one second interval showing SAMPSON antenna rotation.
|caption = 2012 composite photographed at less than one second interval showing SAMPSON antenna rotation.
|country = [[United Kingdom]]
|country = [[United Kingdom]]
Line 9: Line 10:
|type = Solid-state [[Active electronically scanned array|AESA]] radar
|type = Solid-state [[Active electronically scanned array|AESA]] radar
|frequency = 2–4 GHz ([[S band]])
|frequency = 2–4 GHz ([[S band]])
|range = 400&nbsp;km<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dranidis |first=Dimitris V. |date=May 2003 |title=Backboards of the fleet: shipboard phased-array radars; a survey of requirements, technologies, and operational systems |journal=Journal of Electronic Defense |volume=26 |issue=5 |pages=55 |accessdate= 2007-08-18 |quote=}}</ref>
|range = 400&nbsp;km<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dranidis |first=Dimitris V. |date=May 2003 |title=Backboards of the fleet: shipboard phased-array radars; a survey of requirements, technologies, and operational systems |journal=Journal of Electronic Defense |volume=26 |issue=5 |pages=55 }}</ref>
|altitude =
|altitude =
|diameter =
|diameter =
Line 15: Line 16:
|elevation =
|elevation =
|precision =
|precision =
|weight = 45 tonnes
|power = 25&nbsp;kW
|power = 25&nbsp;kW
}}
}}


The '''SAMPSON''' is a multi-function dual-face [[active electronically scanned array]] [[radar]] produced by [[BAE Systems Maritime – Naval Ships|BAE Systems Maritime]]. It is made out high-carbon steel and is covered with an anti-radar paint. Its the fire control radar component of the Sea Viper naval air defence system. It was previously designated PAAMS(S) to distinguish it from the [[PAAMS]] system on the Franco-Italian Horizon Class.
The '''SAMPSON''' is a multi-function dual-face [[active electronically scanned array]] [[radar]] produced by [[BAE Systems Maritime – Naval Ships|BAE Systems Maritime]]. It is the fire control radar component of the Sea Viper naval air defence system. The Sea Viper system is also known as PAAMS(S) to denote the use of the SAMPSON radar and to distinguish it from the [[PAAMS]] system on the Franco-Italian [[Horizon-class frigate]].


The SAMPSON multi function radar can detect all types of targets out to a distance of 400 km, and is capable of tracking hundreds of targets at any one time. Sea Viper uses this information to assess and command target priorities, and calculate the optimum launch time for its Aster missiles.
The SAMPSON multifunction radar can detect air and surface targets out to a distance of {{cvt|400|km}}, and it is capable of tracking hundreds of targets at any one time. Sea Viper uses this information to assess and command target priorities and calculate the optimum launch time for its Aster missiles.


==History==
==History==
SAMPSON is derived from the Multi-function Electronically Scanned Adaptive Radar ('''MESAR''') programme. MESAR 1 development commenced in 1982 as a partnership between [[Plessey]], [[Roke Manor Research Limited|Roke Manor Research]] and the [[Defence Evaluation and Research Agency]].<ref name="flighintmesar">{{cite news |first=Howard|last=Gethin|title=Early warning electronically scanned Radar promises anti-ballistic missile solutions |work=Flight International |publisher=Reed Business Information|date=1999-06-02|accessdate=2007-08-18}}</ref><ref name="bare_url">{{cite web |url=http://navy-matters.beedall.com/sampson.htm |title=SAMPSON Multi-Function Radar |accessdate=2007-08-18}}</ref> Plessey was acquired by Siemens in 1989 to become Siemens-Plessey, itself acquired by British Aerospace in 1998. British Aerospace became BAE Systems in November 1999. MESAR 1 trials occurred between 1989 and 1994.<ref name="flighintmesar"/> MESAR 2 development began in August 1995, of which SAMPSON is a derivative.<ref>{{cite news|title=Fallout from 'StarWars' failure could afflict UK |work=The Engineer|publisher=[[Centaur Communications]]|page=17|date=2000-06-21|accessdate=2007-08-18}}</ref>
SAMPSON is derived from the Multifunction Electronically Scanned Adaptive Radar ('''MESAR''') programme. MESAR 1 development commenced in 1982 as a partnership between [[Plessey]], [[Roke Manor Research Limited|Roke Manor Research]], and the [[Defence Evaluation and Research Agency]].<ref name="flighintmesar">{{cite news |first=Howard|last=Gethin|title=Early warning electronically scanned Radar promises anti-ballistic missile solutions |work=Flight International |publisher=Reed Business Information|date=1999-06-02}}</ref><ref name="bare_url">{{cite web |url=http://navy-matters.beedall.com/sampson.htm |title=SAMPSON Multi-Function Radar |access-date=2007-08-18 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070819200935/http://navy-matters.beedall.com/sampson.htm |archive-date=2007-08-19 }}</ref> Plessey was acquired by Siemens in 1989 to become Siemens-Plessey, itself acquired by British Aerospace in 1998. British Aerospace became BAE Systems in November 1999. MESAR 1 trials occurred between 1989 and 1994.<ref name="flighintmesar"/> MESAR 2 development began in August 1995, of which SAMPSON is a derivative.<ref>{{cite news|title=Fallout from 'StarWars' failure could afflict UK |work=The Engineer|publisher=[[Centaur Communications]]|page=17|date=2000-06-21}}</ref>


The [[Royal Navy]] intended to deploy the SAMPSON MFR on its version of the [[Horizon CNGF]] - a collaboration with France and Italy to produce anti-air warfare frigates. Following delays and complications the UK withdrew and started its own Type 45 programme. The [[Type 45 destroyer]]s use the SAMPSON radar with the [[PAAMS]] missile system, which was also developed for the Horizon frigates (French and Italian ships are to be fitted with the [[EMPAR]] MFR). The SAMPSON Radar is made in Cowes, Isle of Wight.
The [[Royal Navy]] intended to deploy the SAMPSON multifunction radar (MFR) on its version of the Horizon-class frigate (also known as Common New Generation Frigate or CNGF), a collaboration with France and Italy to produce anti-air warfare warships. Following delays and complications, the UK withdrew and started its own Type 45 programme. The [[Type 45 destroyer]] uses the SAMPSON radar with the [[PAAMS]] missile system, which was also developed for the Horizon frigates (French and Italian ships are to be fitted with the [[EMPAR]] MFR). The SAMPSON Radar is made in Cowes, Isle of Wight.

In September 2013, Type 45 destroyer [[HMS Daring (D32)|HMS ''Daring'']] was positioned near missile launch sites at US Army Kwajalein Atoll to take part in a trial assessing SAMPSON's ability to detect and track ballistic missiles, a capability it was not originally intended to have. During the trial, the system successfully detected two simulated [[medium-range ballistic missile]]s. Director of the UK Missile Defence Centre, Simon Pavitt, said, "This work has raised the profile of the Ballistic Missile Defence potential [...] and will support an ongoing Missile Defence Centre programme to further explore key issues."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2014-07-23 |title=Sampson radar - UK pursues at-sea missile defence capabilities |url=https://www.naval-technology.com/analysis/featuresampson-radar-uk-pursues-at-sea-missile-defence-capabilities-4323886/ |access-date=2022-09-26 |website=Naval Technology |language=en-US}}</ref>


==Operation==
==Operation==
[[File:HMS Daring SAMPSON is a multi-function AESA radar.jpg|thumb|HMS Daring SAMPSON multi-function AESA radar]]
[[File:HMS Daring SAMPSON is a multi-function AESA radar.jpg|thumb|The mainmast of {{HMS|Daring|D32|6}} showing the SAMPSON multi-function AESA radar]]
Conventional radars, consisting of a rotating transmitter and sensor, have limited power, are vulnerable to enemy jamming and perform only one function - with separate units therefore required for surveillance, tracking and targeting.
Conventional radars, consisting of a rotating transmitter and sensor, have limited power, are vulnerable to [[Radar jamming and deception|enemy jamming]], and perform only one function—with separate units therefore required for surveillance, tracking, and targeting.


As an active array, SAMPSON uses software to shape and direct its beam allowing several functions to be carried out at once and, through adaptive waveform control, is virtually immune to [[countermeasures|enemy jamming]]. Active arrays have both longer range and higher accuracy than conventional radars. The beam-directing software uses sophisticated algorithms to schedule looks so that the potentially hundreds of active tracks are maintained with maximum accuracy.<ref name="Tessella Case Study">{{cite web |url=http://tessella.com/case-studies/sampson-radar-tracking-algorithms/ |title=Tessella Case Study |accessdate=2013-11-29}}</ref>
As an active array, SAMPSON uses software to shape and direct its beam, allowing several functions to be carried out at once and, through adaptive waveform control, is virtually immune to enemy jamming. Active arrays have both longer range and higher accuracy than conventional radars. The beam-directing software uses sophisticated algorithms to schedule searches so that the potentially hundreds of active tracks are maintained with maximum accuracy.<ref name="Tessella Case Study">{{cite web |url=http://tessella.com/case-studies/sampson-radar-tracking-algorithms/ |title=Tessella Case Study |access-date=2013-11-29 |archive-date=2013-12-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203084149/http://tessella.com/case-studies/sampson-radar-tracking-algorithms/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>


The SAMPSON uses two planar arrays to provide coverage over only part of the sky; complete coverage is provided by rotating the arrays, essentially similar to the way conventional radar systems operate. This is in contrast to the US [[AN/SPY-1]] system (as used on the [[Ticonderoga class cruiser|''Ticonderoga'' class cruiser]] and [[Arleigh Burke class destroyer|''Arleigh Burke'' class destroyer]]) or the Dutch/German/Canadian [[Active Phased Array Radar|APAR]] system (as used on the Royal Dutch Navy's [[De Zeven Provinciën class frigate|''De Zeven Provinciën'' class frigate]]s, the German Navy's [[Sachsen class frigate|''Sachsen'' class frigate]]s, and the Royal Danish Navy's [[Ivar Huitfeldt class frigate|''Ivar Huitfeldt'' class frigate]]s), which use multiple arrays fixed in place to provide continuous coverage of the entire sky. Whilst this may seem to be a disadvantage, the SAMPSON radar rotates at 30 revolutions per minute, with two back-to-back arrays, meaning no part of the sky lacks coverage for more than one half second on average - the precise time varies as the beams can also be swept back and forth electronically. In addition, the use of a smaller number of arrays allows the system to be much lighter, allowing placement of the arrays at the top of a prominent mast rather than on the side of the superstructure as in the US ships. Placing any radar emitter at higher altitude extends the horizon distance, improving performance against low level targets (see [[Sea skimming]]); SAMPSON is at approximately double the height above the waterline than the arrays of its US equivalents. Although precise details of the SAMPSON's performance in this regard are unlikely to enter the public domain, such factors may mitigate the disadvantages of fewer arrays.
The SAMPSON uses two planar arrays to provide coverage over only part of the sky; complete coverage is provided by rotating the arrays, similar to the way conventional radar systems operate. This is in contrast to the US [[AN/SPY-1]] (as used on the {{sclass|Ticonderoga|cruiser|1}} and Flight I–IIA {{sclass|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|1}}) and [[AN/SPY-6]] (as used on the Flight III ''Arleigh Burke''-class destroyer) or the Dutch [[Active Phased Array Radar|APAR]] system (as used on the Royal Netherlands Navy's {{sclass|De Zeven Provinciën|frigate|1}}, the German Navy's {{sclass|Sachsen|frigate|1}}, and the Royal Danish Navy's {{sclass|Iver Huitfeldt|frigate|1}}), which use multiple arrays fixed in place to provide continuous coverage of the entire sky.


Although the SAMPSON radar does not provide continuous 360-degree coverage, it rotates at 30 revolutions per minute, and with two back-to-back arrays, no part of the sky lacks coverage for more than half a second on average (the precise time varies as the beams can also be swept back and forth electronically). In addition, the use of a smaller number of arrays allows the system to be much lighter, allowing placement of the arrays at the top of a prominent mast rather than on the side of the superstructure as in the Dutch or US ships. Placing any radar emitter at a higher altitude extends the horizon distance, improving performance against low-level or [[sea-skimming]] targets; SAMPSON is at approximately double the height above the waterline than the arrays of equivalent ships in foreign navies. Although precise details of the SAMPSON's performance in this regard are unlikely to enter the public domain, such factors may mitigate the disadvantages of fewer arrays.
Some tasks are difficult to combine, for example (long range) volume search takes a lot of radar resources, leaving little room for other tasks such as targeting. Combining volume search with other tasks also results either in slow search rates or in low overall quality per task. Driving parameters in radar performance is time-on-target or observation time per beam. This is perhaps a the [sic] key reason why the Royal Navy selected the S1850M Long Range Radar to complement Sampson on the Type 45 destroyers. It is also a reason why NATO in its NATO Anti-Air Warfare System study (NAAWS) defined the preferred AAW system as consisting of a complementary Volume Search Radar and MFR. This - as NATO points out - gives the added advantage that the two systems can use two different radar frequencies; one being a good choice for long range search, the other a good choice for an MFR (which is especially nice as physics makes both tasks difficult to combine).<ref name="bare_url" />


Some tasks are difficult to combine: for example, (long-range) volume search consumes substantial radar resources, leaving little room for other tasks like targeting. Combining volume search with other tasks also results either in slow search rates or in low overall quality per task. Driving parameters in radar performance is time-on-target or observation time per beam. This led to the Royal Navy selecting the [[S1850M|S1850M long-range radar]] to complement SAMPSON on the Type 45 destroyers. This also resulted in the NATO Anti-Air Warfare System study (NAAWS) defining the preferred AAW system as consisting of a complementary Volume Search Radar and MFR. This gives the added advantage that the two systems can use two different radar frequencies; one being a good choice for long-range search, the other a good choice for an MFR (physics makes both tasks difficult to combine).<ref name="bare_url" />{{dead link|date=August 2017}}
The first Type 45, [[HMS Daring (D32)|HMS ''Daring'']] was launched on February 1 2006. The ship was fitted with SAMPSON and [[S1850M]] radars in 2007. She underwent trials before being commissioned 23 July 2009.

The first Type 45, {{HMS|Daring|D32|6}}, was launched on February 1, 2006. The ship was fitted with SAMPSON and S1850M radars in 2007 and was commissioned on 23 July 2009.


=== Modes ===
=== Modes ===
Line 45: Line 49:
*High-speed horizon search
*High-speed horizon search
*High-angle search and track
*High-angle search and track
*Multiple target tracking and multiple channel fire control.
*Multiple target tracking and multiple channel fire control; 1000 targets can be tracked


==See also==
==See also==
Line 54: Line 58:
*[[AN/SPY-6]]
*[[AN/SPY-6]]
*[[EL/M-2248 MF-STAR]]
*[[EL/M-2248 MF-STAR]]
*[[EMPAR]]
*[[OPS-24]]
*[[OPS-24]]
*[[FCS-3|OPS-50]]
*[[FCS-3|OPS-50]]
Line 61: Line 66:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
*[https://www.baesystems.com/en/sampson-multi-function-radar BAE Sampson Radar]

[[Category:Naval radars]]
[[Category:Naval radars]]
[[Category:Royal Navy Radar]]
[[Category:Royal Navy Radar]]
[[Category:Military radars of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Military radars of the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Phased array radar]]

Latest revision as of 16:09, 13 August 2023

SAMPSON
2012 composite photographed at less than one second interval showing SAMPSON antenna rotation.
Country of originUnited Kingdom
No. built7
TypeSolid-state AESA radar
Frequency2–4 GHz (S band)
Range400 km[1]
Power25 kW

The SAMPSON is a multi-function dual-face active electronically scanned array radar produced by BAE Systems Maritime. It is the fire control radar component of the Sea Viper naval air defence system. The Sea Viper system is also known as PAAMS(S) to denote the use of the SAMPSON radar and to distinguish it from the PAAMS system on the Franco-Italian Horizon-class frigate.

The SAMPSON multifunction radar can detect air and surface targets out to a distance of 400 km (250 mi), and it is capable of tracking hundreds of targets at any one time. Sea Viper uses this information to assess and command target priorities and calculate the optimum launch time for its Aster missiles.

History

[edit]

SAMPSON is derived from the Multifunction Electronically Scanned Adaptive Radar (MESAR) programme. MESAR 1 development commenced in 1982 as a partnership between Plessey, Roke Manor Research, and the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency.[2][3] Plessey was acquired by Siemens in 1989 to become Siemens-Plessey, itself acquired by British Aerospace in 1998. British Aerospace became BAE Systems in November 1999. MESAR 1 trials occurred between 1989 and 1994.[2] MESAR 2 development began in August 1995, of which SAMPSON is a derivative.[4]

The Royal Navy intended to deploy the SAMPSON multifunction radar (MFR) on its version of the Horizon-class frigate (also known as Common New Generation Frigate or CNGF), a collaboration with France and Italy to produce anti-air warfare warships. Following delays and complications, the UK withdrew and started its own Type 45 programme. The Type 45 destroyer uses the SAMPSON radar with the PAAMS missile system, which was also developed for the Horizon frigates (French and Italian ships are to be fitted with the EMPAR MFR). The SAMPSON Radar is made in Cowes, Isle of Wight.

In September 2013, Type 45 destroyer HMS Daring was positioned near missile launch sites at US Army Kwajalein Atoll to take part in a trial assessing SAMPSON's ability to detect and track ballistic missiles, a capability it was not originally intended to have. During the trial, the system successfully detected two simulated medium-range ballistic missiles. Director of the UK Missile Defence Centre, Simon Pavitt, said, "This work has raised the profile of the Ballistic Missile Defence potential [...] and will support an ongoing Missile Defence Centre programme to further explore key issues."[5]

Operation

[edit]
The mainmast of HMS Daring showing the SAMPSON multi-function AESA radar

Conventional radars, consisting of a rotating transmitter and sensor, have limited power, are vulnerable to enemy jamming, and perform only one function—with separate units therefore required for surveillance, tracking, and targeting.

As an active array, SAMPSON uses software to shape and direct its beam, allowing several functions to be carried out at once and, through adaptive waveform control, is virtually immune to enemy jamming. Active arrays have both longer range and higher accuracy than conventional radars. The beam-directing software uses sophisticated algorithms to schedule searches so that the potentially hundreds of active tracks are maintained with maximum accuracy.[6]

The SAMPSON uses two planar arrays to provide coverage over only part of the sky; complete coverage is provided by rotating the arrays, similar to the way conventional radar systems operate. This is in contrast to the US AN/SPY-1 (as used on the Ticonderoga-class cruiser and Flight I–IIA Arleigh Burke-class destroyer) and AN/SPY-6 (as used on the Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyer) or the Dutch APAR system (as used on the Royal Netherlands Navy's De Zeven Provinciën-class frigate, the German Navy's Sachsen-class frigate, and the Royal Danish Navy's Iver Huitfeldt-class frigate), which use multiple arrays fixed in place to provide continuous coverage of the entire sky.

Although the SAMPSON radar does not provide continuous 360-degree coverage, it rotates at 30 revolutions per minute, and with two back-to-back arrays, no part of the sky lacks coverage for more than half a second on average (the precise time varies as the beams can also be swept back and forth electronically). In addition, the use of a smaller number of arrays allows the system to be much lighter, allowing placement of the arrays at the top of a prominent mast rather than on the side of the superstructure as in the Dutch or US ships. Placing any radar emitter at a higher altitude extends the horizon distance, improving performance against low-level or sea-skimming targets; SAMPSON is at approximately double the height above the waterline than the arrays of equivalent ships in foreign navies. Although precise details of the SAMPSON's performance in this regard are unlikely to enter the public domain, such factors may mitigate the disadvantages of fewer arrays.

Some tasks are difficult to combine: for example, (long-range) volume search consumes substantial radar resources, leaving little room for other tasks like targeting. Combining volume search with other tasks also results either in slow search rates or in low overall quality per task. Driving parameters in radar performance is time-on-target or observation time per beam. This led to the Royal Navy selecting the S1850M long-range radar to complement SAMPSON on the Type 45 destroyers. This also resulted in the NATO Anti-Air Warfare System study (NAAWS) defining the preferred AAW system as consisting of a complementary Volume Search Radar and MFR. This gives the added advantage that the two systems can use two different radar frequencies; one being a good choice for long-range search, the other a good choice for an MFR (physics makes both tasks difficult to combine).[3][dead link]

The first Type 45, HMS Daring, was launched on February 1, 2006. The ship was fitted with SAMPSON and S1850M radars in 2007 and was commissioned on 23 July 2009.

Modes

[edit]
  • Long and medium-range search
  • Surface picture search
  • High-speed horizon search
  • High-angle search and track
  • Multiple target tracking and multiple channel fire control; 1000 targets can be tracked

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Dranidis, Dimitris V. (May 2003). "Backboards of the fleet: shipboard phased-array radars; a survey of requirements, technologies, and operational systems". Journal of Electronic Defense. 26 (5): 55.
  2. ^ a b Gethin, Howard (1999-06-02). "Early warning electronically scanned Radar promises anti-ballistic missile solutions". Flight International. Reed Business Information.
  3. ^ a b "SAMPSON Multi-Function Radar". Archived from the original on 2007-08-19. Retrieved 2007-08-18.
  4. ^ "Fallout from 'StarWars' failure could afflict UK". The Engineer. Centaur Communications. 2000-06-21. p. 17.
  5. ^ "Sampson radar - UK pursues at-sea missile defence capabilities". Naval Technology. 2014-07-23. Retrieved 2022-09-26.
  6. ^ "Tessella Case Study". Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2013-11-29.
[edit]