Kofun period: Difference between revisions
(281 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Period of Japanese history from 300 to 538}} |
|||
{{Multiple issues| |
|||
{{History of Japan |periods|image=NintokuTomb Aerial photograph 2007.jpg|caption=[[Daisen Kofun|Daisen-Kofun]], the tomb of [[Emperor Nintoku]] in [[Osaka]], one of the [[Mozu kofungun]]}} |
|||
{{POV|date=September 2012}} |
|||
{{Cleanup|date=January 2014|reason=The quality of the text does not follow Wikipedia's expectations compared with other articles.}} |
|||
}} |
|||
The {{nihongo|'''Kofun period'''|古墳時代|Kofun jidai}} is an era in the [[history of Japan]] from about 300 to 538 AD (the date of the introduction of [[Buddhism]]), following the [[Yayoi period]]. The Kofun and the subsequent [[Asuka period]]s are sometimes collectively called the [[Yamato period]]. This period is the earliest era of [[recorded history]] in Japan, but studies depend heavily on archaeology since the chronology of historical sources tends to be distorted. The word ''[[kofun]]'' is Japanese for the type of [[tumulus|burial mound]] dating from this era. |
|||
{{History of Japan |periods |image=HaniwaHorse.JPG |caption=[[Haniwa]] horse statuette}} |
|||
It was a period of cultural import. Continuing from the Yayoi period, the Kofun period is characterized by influence from [[China]] and the [[Korean Peninsula]]; archaeologists consider it a shared culture across the southern Korean Peninsula, [[Kyūshū]] and [[Honshū]].<ref>Barnes, Gina L. The Archaeology of East Asia: The Rise of Civilization in China, Korea and Japan (Oxford: Oxbow books, 2015), 271-275; 331-360</ref> On the other hand, the most prosperous keyhole-shaped burial mounds in Japan during this period were approximately 5,000 in Japan from the middle of the 3rd century in the Yayoi period to the 7th century in the Asuka period, and many of them had huge tombs,<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005836992/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220208011845/https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005836992/|title=A consideration of reconstructing our image of the Kofun period: does the period of keyhole tombs predate the Ritsuryo state?|author=Kazuo Hirose|journal=国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告 = Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History |publisher=[[Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History]]|date=March 2009|volume=150 |doi=10.15024/00001685 |archive-date=8 February 2022}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|author=Kazuo Yanagisawa|year=2007|chapter=前方後円墳|title=東アジア考古学辞典|publisher=Tokyodo Shuppan|isbn=978-4490107128}}</ref> but in the southern Korean Peninsula there were only 13 from the 5th century to the 6th century, and the tombs were small. Wall decorations and Japanese-style armor, which are characteristic of older Japanese burial mounds, were excavated from 5th century burial mounds in the southern Korean Peninsula. This shows that Japan and the southern Korean Peninsula influenced each other.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://rekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=2422&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220404051242/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3APN5bUQ1G2VAJ%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Frekihaku.repo.nii.ac.jp%2F%3Faction%3Drepository_action_common_download%26item_id%3D2422%26item_no%3D1%26attribute_id%3D22%26file_no%3D1+&cd=9&hl=ja&ct=clnk&gl=jp|title=An Analysis of the Background of Japanese-style Tombs Builtin the Southwestern Korean Peninsula in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries|author=Kanta Takata|publisher=[[Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History]]|url-status=live|archive-date=4 April 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://kiu.repo.nii.ac.jp/index.php?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=262&item_no=1&attribute_id=18&file_no=1&page_id=25&block_id=33|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220404081032/https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:2nPSNI6g2cgJ:https://kiu.repo.nii.ac.jp/index.php%3Faction%3Dpages_view_main%26active_action%3Drepository_action_common_download%26item_id%3D262%26item_no%3D1%26attribute_id%3D18%26file_no%3D1%26page_id%3D25%26block_id%3D33+&cd=10&hl=ja&ct=clnk&gl=jp|script-title=ja:朝鮮半島南部に倭人が造った前方後円墳 : 古代九州との国際交流|author=Park Cheon-Soo|date=March 2010|archive-date=4 April 2022}}</ref> |
|||
The {{nihongo|'''Kofun period'''|古墳時代|Kofun jidai}} is an era in the [[history of Japan]] from around 250 to 538 AD. It follows the [[Yayoi period]]. The word ''[[kofun]]'' is Japanese for the type of [[tumulus|burial mound]]s dating from this era. The Kofun and the subsequent [[Asuka period]]s are sometimes referred to collectively as the [[Yamato period]]. The Kofun period is the earliest era of [[recorded history]] in Japan; as the chronology of its historical sources tends to be very distorted, studies of this period require deliberate criticism and the aid of archaeology. |
|||
According to the ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'', [[Buddhism]] and the [[Chinese characters|Chinese writing system]] were introduced near the end of the period from [[Baekje]]. The Kofun period recorded Japan's earliest political centralization, when the [[Yamato no Fuhito clan|Yamato clan]] rose to power in southwestern Japan, established the [[Imperial House of Japan|Imperial House]], and helped control trade routes across the region.<ref name=":0">Denoon, Donald ''et al.'' (2001). {{Google books|XUw6kiX9LQ0C|''Multicultural Japan: Palaeolithic to Postmodern,'' p. 107.|page=107}}</ref> |
|||
==Kofun tombs== |
==Kofun tombs== |
||
[[File:CG 360d Nakatsuyama kofun BW.gif|thumb|alt=Animated kofun|Keyhole-shaped kofun drawn in [[3DCG]] ({{ill|Nakatsuyama Kofun|ja|仲ツ山古墳}} in [[Fujiidera, Osaka]], 5th century)]] |
|||
{{Main article|Kofun}} |
|||
[[File:KofunTombJewelry.jpg|thumb|alt=Brown jewelry against a light background|Kofun-period jewelry ([[British Museum]])]] |
|||
[[Image:NintokuTomb.jpg|thumb|left|Daisenryō Kofun, [[Osaka Prefecture|Osaka]], 5th century.]] |
|||
Kofun (from [[Middle Chinese]] ''kú'' 古 "ancient" + ''bjun'' 墳 "burial mound")<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://jisho.org/search/%23kanji%20%E5%8F%A4|title=古|website=Jisho.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://jisho.org/search/%E5%A2%B3%20%23kanji|title=墳|website=Jisho.org}}</ref> are [[burial mounds]] built for members of the ruling class from the 3rd to the 7th centuries in Japan,<ref name="keally">{{cite web|url=http://www.t-net.ne.jp/~keally/kofun.html|title=Kofun Culture|first=Charles T.|last=Keally|date=2009-04-29|access-date=2009-05-30}}</ref> and the Kofun period takes its name from the distinctive earthen mounds. The mounds contained large stone burial chambers, and some are surrounded by [[moat]]s. |
|||
[[Image:KofunTombJewelry.jpg|thumb|200px|Kofun period jewelry. [[British Museum]].]] |
|||
Kofun have four basic shapes: round and square are the most common, followed by 'scallop-shell' and 'keyhole.' The keyhole tomb is a distinct style found only in Japan, with a square front and round back. Kofun range in size from several meters to over 400 meters long, and unglazed pottery figures (''[[Haniwa]]'') were often buried under a kofun's circumference. |
|||
''Kofun'' (from [[Middle Chinese]] ''kú'' 古 "ancient" + ''bjun'' 墳 "burial mound") are defined as the burial mounds built for the people of the ruling class during the 3rd to 7th centuries in [[Japan]],<ref name="keally">{{cite web|url=http://www.t-net.ne.jp/~keally/kofun.html|title=Kofun Culture|first=Charles T.|last=Keally|date=2009-04-29|accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> and the Kofun period takes its name from these distinctive earthen mounds. The mounds contained large stone burial chambers. Some are surrounded by [[moat]]s. |
|||
Kofun come in many shapes, with round and square being the most common. A distinct style is the keyhole-shaped kofun, with its square front and round back. Kofun range in size from several meters to over 400 meters in length and unglazed pottery figures called [[Haniwa]] were often buried under the circumference of the kofun. |
|||
===Development=== |
===Development=== |
||
[[ |
[[File:KofunCuirass.jpg|thumb|alt=See caption|Iron ''[[tankō]]'' armour and helmet, with gilt bronze decoration, 5th century CE ([[Tokyo National Museum]])]] |
||
The oldest Japanese kofun is |
The oldest Japanese kofun is reportedly [[Hokenoyama Kofun]] in [[Sakurai, Nara]], which dates to the late 3rd century. In the Makimuku district of Sakurai, later keyhole kofuns ([[Hashihaka Kofun]], Shibuya Mukaiyama Kofun) were built during the early 4th century. The keyhole kofun spread from [[Yamato Province|Yamato]] to [[Kawachi Province|Kawachi]]—with giant kofun, such as Daisenryō Kofun—and then throughout the country during the 5th century. Keyhole kofun disappeared later in the 6th century, probably because of the drastic reformation of the Yamato court; ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'' records the introduction of Buddhism at this time. The last two great kofun are the {{convert|190|m|ft|adj=mid|-long}} [[Imashirozuka Kofun|Imashirozuka kofun]] in Osaka (currently believed by scholars to be the tomb of [[Emperor Keitai]]) and the {{convert|135|m|ft|adj=mid|long}} Iwatoyama kofun in Fukuoka, recorded in ''Fudoki of Chikugo'' as the tomb of Iwai (political archrival of [[Emperor Keitai]]). Kofun burial mounds on the island of [[Tanegashima]] and two very old [[Shinto shrine|Shinto shrines]] on the island of [[Yakushima]] suggest that these islands were the southern boundary of the [[Yamato Kingship|Yamato state]];<ref name=":0" /> it extended north to [[Tainai]] in the present-day [[Niigata Prefecture]], where excavated mounds have been associated with a person closely linked to the Yamato kingdom.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T120916001832.htm|title=Yamato kingdom traces found in Niigata Pref.|date=September 17, 2012|newspaper=Daily Yomiuri Online|access-date=September 23, 2012}}</ref> |
||
==Yamato court== |
==Yamato court== |
||
{{Unreferenced|section|date=May 2024}}{{Main|Yamato Kingship}} |
|||
Due to the controversy over [[Yamataikoku]] the actual start of Yamato rule is disputed.{{citation needed|date=April 2016}} However, it is usually believed to have been created around 250 CE. Regardless, it is generally agreed that Yamato rulers possessed keyhole kofun culture and held hegemony in Yamato up to the 4th century. The regional autonomy of local powers remained throughout the period, particularly in places such as Kibi (current [[Okayama Prefecture]]), Izumo (current [[Shimane Prefecture]]), Koshi (current [[Fukui Prefecture|Fukui]] and [[Niigata Prefecture]]), Kenu (northern [[Kantō]]), Chikushi (northern [[Kyūshū]]), and Hi (central Kyūshū); it was only in the 6th century that the Yamato clans began to assert dominance over the entire southern half of Japan. Yamato's relationships with China are likely to have begun in the late 4th century, according to the [[Book of Song]]. |
|||
[[Yamato Kingship|Yamato rule]] is usually believed to have begun about 250 AD, and it is generally agreed that Yamato rulers had keyhole-kofun culture and [[hegemony]] in Yamato until the [[4th century]]. Autonomy of local powers remained throughout the period, particularly in Kibi (the present-day [[Okayama Prefecture]]), Izumo (current [[Shimane Prefecture]]), Koshi (current [[Fukui Prefecture|Fukui]] and [[Niigata Prefecture]]), Kenu (northern [[Kantō]]), Chikushi (northern [[Kyūshū]]), and Hi (central Kyūshū). During the 6th century, the Yamato clans began to dominate the southern half of Japan. According to the ''[[Book of Song]]'', Yamato relationships with China probably began in the late 4th century. |
|||
The Yamato [[polity]], which emerged by the late 5th century, was distinguished by powerful [[clan]]s (豪族 |
The Yamato [[polity]], which emerged by the late 5th century, was distinguished by powerful [[clan]]s (豪族, ''[[gōzoku]]''). Each clan was headed by a patriarch (氏上, ''Uji-no-kami''), who performed sacred rituals to the clan's ''[[kami]]'' (objects of worship) to ensure its long-term welfare. Clan members were the aristocracy, and the royal line which controlled the Yamato court was at its zenith. Clan leaders were awarded ''[[kabane]]'', inherited titles denoting rank and political standing which replaced family names. |
||
The Kofun period |
The Kofun period is called the Yamato period by some Western scholars, since this local chieftainship became the imperial dynasty at the end of the period. However, the Yamato clan ruled just one polity among others during the Kofun era. Japanese archaeologists emphasise that other regional chieftainships (such as [[Kingdom of Kibi|Kibi]]) were in close contention for dominance in the first half of the Kofun period; Kibi's Tsukuriyama Kofun is Japan's fourth-largest. |
||
[[ |
[[File:KofunSwordHilts.jpg|thumb|left|alt=Three sword hilts|Gilded sword hilts, late Kofun period, 6th century]] |
||
The [[Yamato period|Yamato court]] |
The [[Yamato period|Yamato court]] exercised power over clans in [[Kyūshū]] and [[Honshū]], bestowing titles (some hereditary) on clan chieftains. The Yamato name became synonymous with Japan as Yamato rulers suppressed other clans and acquired agricultural land. Based on [[China|Chinese]] models (including the adoption of the [[Chinese written language]]), they began to develop a central administration and an imperial court attended by subordinate clan chieftains with no permanent capital. Powerful clans were the [[Soga clan|Soga]], [[Katsuragi clan|Katsuragi]], [[:ja:平群氏|Heguri]] and [[:ja:巨勢氏|Koze]] clans in the [[Yamato Province|Yamato]] and [[Bizen Province]]s and the [[:ja:吉備氏|Kibi]] clans in the [[Izumo Province]]. The [[Ōtomo clan|Ōtomo]] and [[Mononobe clan]]s were military leaders, and the [[Nakatomi clan|Nakatomi]] and [[:ja:忌部氏|Inbe]] clans handled rituals. The Soga clan provided the government's chief minister, the Ōtomo and Mononobe clans provided secondary ministers, and provincial leaders were called ''[[kuni no miyatsuko]]''. Craftsmen were organized into guilds. |
||
===Territorial expansion of Yamato=== |
==={{anchor|Territorial expansion of Yamato}}Territorial expansion=== |
||
[[ |
[[File:Warehouse (Kofun era) Osaka JPN 001.jpg|thumb|alt=Brown building with an angular roof|Reconstructed Kofun-era warehouse]] |
||
In addition to archaeological findings indicating a local monarchy in [[Kibi Province]] as an important rival, the legend of the 4th-century Prince [[Yamato Takeru]] alludes to the borders of the [[Yamato Province|Yamato]] and battlegrounds in the region; a frontier was near the later [[Izumo Province]] (eastern present-day [[Shimane Prefecture]]). Another frontier, in [[Kyūshū]], was apparently north of present-day [[Kumamoto Prefecture]]. According to the legend, there was an eastern land in [[Honshu|Honshū]] "whose people disobeyed the imperial court" and against whom [[Yamato Takeru]] was sent to fight.{{citation needed|date=September 2018}} It is unclear if the rival country was near the Yamato nucleus or further away. [[Kai Province]] is mentioned as a location where prince Yamato Takeru traveled on his military expedition. |
|||
The period's northern frontier was explained in ''[[Kojiki]]'' as the legend of [[Shido shogun|Shido Shōgun's]] (四道将軍, "Shōguns to four ways") expedition. One of four ''[[shōgun]]s'', Ōbiko set out northward to Koshi and his son Take Nunakawawake left for the eastern states. The father moved east from northern Koshi, and the son moved north;{{contradict-inline|date=September 2018|reason=See previous sentence.}} they met at Aizu, in present-day western [[Fukushima Prefecture]]. Although the legend is probably not factual, Aizu is near southern Tōhoku (the northern extent of late-4th-century keyhole-kofun culture). |
|||
In addition to archaeological findings indicating a local monarchy in the [[Kibi Province]] as an important rival, the legend of the 4th century Prince [[Yamato Takeru]] alludes to the borders of the [[Yamato Province|Yamato]] and battlegrounds in the area. A frontier was obviously somewhere close to the later [[Izumo Province]] (the eastern part of today's [[Shimane Prefecture]]). Another frontier, in [[Kyūshū]], was apparently somewhere north of today's [[Kumamoto Prefecture]]. The legend specifically states that there was an eastern land in Honshū "whose people disobeyed the imperial court", against whom Yamato Takeru was sent to fight. It's not clear whether the rivalling country was located rather close to the Yamato nucleus area itself, or relatively far away. The modern-day [[Kai Province]] is mentioned as one of the locations where prince Yamato Takeru sojourned in his said military expedition. |
|||
The northern frontier of this age was also explained in ''[[Kojiki]]'' as the legend of Shido Shogun's (四道将軍: Shoguns to four ways) expedition. Out of four shoguns, Ōbiko set northward to Koshi and his son Take Nunakawawake set to eastern states. The father moved east from northern Koshi while the son moved north on his way, and they finally met at Aizu (current western [[Fukushima Prefecture|Fukushima]]). Although the legend itself is not likely to be a historical fact, Aizu is rather close to southern Tōhoku, where the north end of keyhole kofun culture as of the late 4th century is located. |
|||
===Ōkimi=== |
===Ōkimi=== |
||
[[ |
[[File:IshibutaiWithFigureSmallVersion2.jpg|thumb|alt=Open tomb, with a person inside for scale|[[Ishibutai Kofun]], a late kofun in [[Nara Prefecture]]]] |
||
During the Kofun period, |
During the Kofun period, an aristocratic society with [[militarism|militaristic]] rulers developed. The period was a critical stage in Japan's evolution into a cohesive, recognized state. The society was most developed in the [[Kinai region]] and the eastern [[Setouchi region]]. Japan's rulers petitioned the Chinese court for confirmation of royal titles. |
||
The Kofun period was a critical stage in Japan's evolution toward a more cohesive and recognized state. This society was most developed in the [[Kinai region]] and the easternmost part of the [[Seto Inland Sea|Inland Sea]]. Japan's rulers of the time even petitioned the Chinese court for confirmation of royal titles. |
|||
While the rulers' titles are diplomatically ''King'', they locally titled themselves as ''Ōkimi'' (Great King) during this period. Inscriptions in two swords, [[Inariyama Sword]] and [[Eta Funayama Sword]] had records of ''Amenoshita Shiroshimesu'' (治天下; "ruling of Heaven and Earth") and ''Ōkimi'' (大王) in common, to be a ruler that the bearers of these swords were subjected to. It reveals that rulers of this age also grasped religious authorities to justify their thrones through heavenly dignities. The title of ''Amenoshita Shiroshimesu Ōkimi'' was used up to the 7th century, until being replaced by ''Tennō''. |
|||
While the rulers' title was officially "King", they called themselves ''"[[Okimi|Ōkimi]]"'' (大王, "Great King") during this period. Inscriptions on two swords (the [[Inariyama Sword|Inariyama]] and [[Eta Funayama Sword]]s) read ''Amenoshita Shiroshimesu'' (治天下; "ruling Heaven and Earth") and ''Ōkimi'', indicating that the rulers invoked the [[Mandate of Heaven]]. The title ''Amenoshita Shiroshimesu Ōkimi'' was used until the 7th century, when it was replaced by ''[[Tennō]]''. |
|||
===Clans of the Yamato Court=== |
|||
Many of the clans and local chieftains that made up the Yamato polity claimed descent from the imperial family or other [[Kami|tribal Gods]]. The archeological evidence for such clans is found in the Inariyama sword, on which the bearer recorded the names of his ancestors to claim its origin to ''Ōbiko'' (大彦) who was recorded in ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'' as a son of [[Emperor Kōgen]]. On the other hand, there are also a number of clans claiming origins in China or the Korean peninsula. |
|||
==={{anchor|Clans of the Yamato Court}}Clans=== |
|||
In the 5th century, the ''Kazuraki clan'' (葛城氏), descending from the legendary grandson of Emperor Kōgen, was the most prominent power in the court and intermarried with the imperial family. After Kazuraki declined in the late 5th century, the [[Ōtomo clan]] temporarily took its place. When Emperor Buretsu died with no apparent heir, it was [[Ōtomo no Kanamura]] who recommended [[Emperor Keitai]], a very distant imperial relative who resided in [[Koshi Province]], as the new monarch. However, Kanamura resigned due to the failure of his diplomatic policies, and the court was eventually controlled by the [[Mononobe clan|Mononobe]] and [[Soga clan]]s at the beginning of the Asuka period. |
|||
Many of the clans and local chieftains who made up the Yamato polity claimed descent from the imperial family or ''[[kami]]''. Archaeological evidence for the clans is found on the Inariyama Sword, on which the bearer recorded the names of his ancestors to claim descent from ''Ōbiko'' (大彦, recorded in the ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'' as a son of [[Emperor Kōgen]]). A number of clans claimed origin in China or the Korean Peninsula. |
|||
During the 5th century, the [[Katsuragi clan]] (葛城氏, descended from the legendary grandson of [[Emperor Kōgen]]) was the most prominent power in the court and intermarried with the imperial family. After the clan declined, late in the century, it was replaced by the [[Ōtomo clan (ancient)|Ōtomo clan]]. When Emperor Buretsu died with no apparent heir, [[Ōtomo no Kanamura]] recommended [[Emperor Keitai]] (a distant imperial relative in [[Koshi Province (Japan)|Koshi Province]]) as the new monarch. Kanamura resigned due to the failure of his diplomatic policies, and the court was controlled by the [[Mononobe clan|Mononobe]] and [[Soga clan]]s at the beginning of the [[Asuka period]]. |
|||
==Kofun society== |
|||
[[Image:KofunHorseCharriots.JPG|thumb|left|230px|Detail of horse chariots on a Chinese bronze mirror sent to Japan during the Kofun period (5th-6th century). Eta-Funayama Tumulus, Kumamoto. [[Tokyo National Museum]].]] |
|||
=={{anchor|Kofun society}}Society== |
|||
===Toraijin=== |
===Toraijin=== |
||
{{main|Toraijin}} |
|||
''[[wiktionary:渡来人|Toraijin]]'' refers to people who came to Japan from abroad in a broad sense, but it also refers to people who became naturalized citizens of [[ancient Japan]] from the Chinese continent via the [[Ryukyu Islands]] or the Korean Peninsula in ancient times in a limited sense. They introduced many aspects of [[Chinese culture]] to Japan. Valuing their knowledge and culture, the Yamato government gave preferential treatment to toraijin. The elements of Chinese culture introduced to the Yamato Imperial Court are very important.<ref name="Kōzō311">{{cite book |
|||
[[File:KofunHorseCharriots.JPG|thumb|alt=See caption|Detail of chariots on a Chinese bronze mirror sent to Japan during the Kofun period. From the Eta-Funayama Tumulus, [[Kumamoto]] ([[Tokyo National Museum]])]] |
|||
''[[wiktionary:渡来人|Toraijin]]'' refers to people who immigrated to Japan from abroad via the [[Ryukyu Islands]] or the Korean Peninsula. They introduced numerous, significant aspects of [[Chinese culture]] to Japan such as Chinese writing system and [[Buddhism]] from India. Valuing their knowledge and culture, the Yamato government gave preferential treatment to ''toraijin''.<ref name="Kōzō311">{{cite book |
|||
| last = Kōzō |
| last = Kōzō |
||
| first = Yamamura |
| first = Yamamura |
||
Line 66: | Line 60: | ||
| isbn = 0-521-22354-7 |
| isbn = 0-521-22354-7 |
||
|page=311 |
|page=311 |
||
}}</ref> According to the book ''[[Shinsen Shōjiroku]]'' |
}}</ref> According to the 815 book, ''[[Shinsen Shōjiroku]]'', 317 of 1,182 clans in the [[Kinai]] region of Honshū were considered to have foreign ancestry. 163 were of Chinese origin (written as "Kan"), 104 from [[Baekje]] ("Paekche" in the older romanization), 41 from [[Goguryeo]], 6 from [[Silla]], and 3 from [[Gaya confederacy|Gaya]].<ref name="Saeki">Saeki (1981)</ref> They may have immigrated to Japan between 356 and 645. |
||
=== |
===Influential immigrants=== |
||
Some of the many immigrants that had significant influence in Kofun period Japan included [[Wani (scholar)|Wani]], [[Yuzuki no Kimi]] and [[Achi no omi|Achi no Omi]], the founders of [[Kawachinofumi clan]]/[[Kawachinoaya clan]],<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last1=Takaoka |first1=Nobuyuki |last2=片岡 |first2=伸行 |date=2023-07-31 |title=神々のルーツ 明日香の地と「今木神」 – 全日本民医連 |url=https://www.min-iren.gr.jp/?p=48205 |website=www.min-iren.gr.jp |publisher=Japan Federation of Democratic Medical Institutions (全日本民主医療機関連合会) |language=Japanese}}</ref> [[Hata clan]]<ref name=":02">{{Cite web |title=都市史01 ~秦氏~ |trans-title=History of the City 01 ~Hata clan~ |url=https://www2.city.kyoto.lg.jp/somu/rekishi/fm/nenpyou/htmlsheet/toshi01.html |website=[[Kyoto City]] |language=Japanese |format=}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |title=「伊奈利社創祀前史」 ~伏見稲荷大社~ |url=https://inari.jp/about/history/num11/ |access-date= |website=inari.jp}}</ref> and [[Yamatonoaya clan]],<ref name="森.門脇1977">{{Cite book |author=森浩一, 門脇禎二 |url=https://iss.ndl.go.jp/books/R100000002-I000002692424-00 |title=渡来人 : 尾張・美濃と渡来文化 |publisher=大巧社 |year=1997 |isbn=4924899232 |series=春日井シンポジウム |language=Japanese |id={{JPNO|99011294}}}}</ref><ref name=":03">『古代国家と天皇』創元社、1957年</ref> respectively. Despite being ethnically similar, many immigrants from [[Baekje]] and [[Silla]] had arrived in Japan during [[Emperor Ōjin]]'s reign carrying separate identities and foreign deities such as the ''[[kami]]'' [[Inari Ōkami|Inari]].<ref name="Higo">Higo, Kazuo. "Inari Shinkō no Hajime". ''Inari Shinkō'' (ed. Hiroji Naoe). Tokyo: Yūzankaku Shuppan, 1983.</ref><ref name=":12">{{Cite web |title=「おいなりさん物語」 ~伏見稲荷大社~ |url=https://inari.jp/about/story/ |website=Fushimi Inari Taisha |language=Japanese}}</ref> |
|||
Many important figures were also immigrants from [[China]]. Chinese immigrants also had considerable influence according to the ''[[Shinsen Shōjiroku]]'',<ref name="Saeki">Saeki (1981)</ref> which was used as a directory of aristocrats. Yamato Imperial Court had officially edited the directory in 815, and 163 Chinese clans were registered. |
|||
Other immigrants who settled in Japan beginning in the 4th century were the progenitors of Japanese clans. According to ''[[Kojiki]]'' and ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'', the oldest record of a Silla immigrant is [[Amenohiboko]]: a legendary prince of [[Silla]] who settled in Japan at the era of [[Emperor Suinin]], possibly during the 3rd or 4th centuries. |
|||
According to ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'', the [[Hata tribe|Hata clan]], which was composed of descendants of [[Qin Shi Huang]],<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.myj7000.jp-biz.net/clan/03/03001.htm| title=Nihon no myōji 7000 ketsu seishi ruibetsu taikan Hata uji 日本の苗字7000傑 姓氏類別大観 秦氏| accessdate=2006-05-31}}</ref> arrived at Yamato in 403 (the fourteenth year of Ōjin) leading the people of 120 provinces. According to the ''Shinsen Shōjiroku'', the Hata clan were dispersed in various provinces during the reign of [[Emperor Nintoku]] and were made to undertake sericulture and the manufacturing of silk for the court. When the [[finance ministry]] was set up in Yamato Court, Hata no Otsuchichi became {{illm|Tomo no miyatsuko|ja|伴造}} (the chief of various departments of the Yamato Court) and was appointed [[Ministry of the Treasury|Okura no jo (Ministry of the Treasury)]], and the heads of family seem to have served as financial officials of the Yamato Court. |
|||
Baekje and Silla sent their princes as hostages to the Yamato court in exchange for military support.<ref>{{cite book |last=Brown, Delmer M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A3_6lp8IOK8C&pg=PA141 |title=The Cambridge History of Japan: Ancient Japan |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1993 |isbn=0-521-22352-0 |page=141 |quote=Faced with this comeback by Koguryo, Paekche leaders turned to Yamato for military support, even sending its crown prince to Yamato as a hostage in 397 – just as Silla had dispatched princely hostage to Koguryo in 392 when that kingdom was in dire need of military support. |author-link=Delmer Brown}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Pratt |first=Keith |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1Gui8CdUfVoC&q=Baekje+prince+hostage+yamato&pg=PA42 |title=Everlasting Flower: A History of Korea |publisher=Reaktion Books |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-86189-335-2 |page=42 |quote=We can only guess, for example, what it felt like for the girls periodically sent as brides to foreign courts, for the crown prince of Paekche when he was dispatched to the Yamato court as a hostage in AD 397, or for a Silla prince who experienced the same fate in 402.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cZ0xAQAAIAAJ&q=hostage |title=The New Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica |year=2003 |isbn=0-85229-961-3 |page=279 |quote=Paekche was frequently attacked by Koguryo during the century, prompting continued requests for assistance from Yamato; it is recorded that Paekche even sent a crown prince to Yamato as a hostage on one occasion and the mother of the king on another. Yet, probably because of internal dissension, Yamato did not dispatch any troops to the peninsula. Yamato's interest in Korea was apparently a desire for access to improved continental technology and resources, especially iron.}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Henthorn |first=William E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E_5xAAAAMAAJ&q=Misahun |title=A history of Korea |publisher=Free Press |year=1971 |isbn=9780029144602 |page=37 |quote=In 402, Silla concluded a peace with the Wa. Prince Misahun was then sent to Japan as a hostage. This may have been an act of revenge by the Silla monarch, who, as Prince Silsong, had been sent as hostage to Koguryo by Prince Misahun's father. Despite the peace, Silla–Wa relations were never friendly, due no doubt in part to the Wa–Kaya alliance.}}</ref> King [[Muryeong of Baekje]] was born in [[Kyushu]] ([[Chikuzen Province|筑紫]]) of Japan as the child of a hostage in 462,<ref>[[Nihon Shoki]] Vol.14 "Chronicle of [[Emperor Yūryaku]]" 六月丙戌朔 孕婦果如加須利君言 於[[Chikuzen Province]] (筑紫) 各羅嶋産兒 仍名此兒曰嶋君 於是 軍君即以一船 送嶋君於國 是爲[[King Muryeong of Baekje]] (武寧王) 百濟人呼此嶋曰主嶋也</ref> and left a son in Japan who was an ancestor of the minor-noble {{Nihongo|Yamato no Fubito|和史|"Scribes of Yamato"}} clan. According to the {{Nihongo|[[Shoku Nihongi]]|続日本紀}}, Yamato no Fubito's relative ([[Takano no Niigasa]]) was a 10th-generation descendant of King Muryeong of Baekje who was chosen as a [[concubine]] for [[Emperor Kōnin]] and was the mother of [[Emperor Kanmu]]. In 2001, Emperor [[Akihito]] confirmed his ancient royal Korean heritage through Emperor Kanmu.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2001-12-28 |title=The emperor's new roots |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/dec/28/japan.worlddispatch |access-date=2022-12-02 |website=the Guardian |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
In 409 (the twentieth year of Ōjin), [[Achi no omi]] (阿知使主), the ancestor of the {{illm|Yamato-Aya clan|ja|東漢氏}}, which was also composed of Chinese immigrants, arrived with people from 17 districts. According to the ''Shinsen Shōjiroku'', Achi obtained the permission to establish the Province of Imaki. The Kawachi-no-Fumi clan, descendants of [[Gaozu of Han]], introduced aspects of Chinese writing to the Yamato court. |
|||
=={{anchor|Kofun Culture}}Culture== |
|||
The {{ill|Takamuko clan|ja|高向氏|vertical-align=sup}} is a descendant of [[Cao Cao]]. [[Takamuko no Kuromaro]] was a center member of [[Taika Reform]].<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.myj7000.jp-biz.net/clan/03/03008.htm| title=Nihon no myōji 7000 ketsu seishi ruibetsu taikan Takamuko uji 日本の苗字7000傑 姓氏類別大観 高向氏| accessdate=2006-10-15}}</ref> |
|||
===Korean migration=== |
|||
Among the many Korean immigrants who settled in Japan beginning in the 4th century, some came to be the progenitors of Japanese clans. According to ''Kojiki'' and ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'', the oldest record of a [[Silla]] immigrant is [[Amenohiboko]], a legendary prince of [[Silla]] who settled to Japan at the era of [[Emperor Suinin]], perhaps around the 3rd or 4th century. |
|||
Baekje and Silla sent their princes as hostages to the Yamato court in exchange for military support.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A3_6lp8IOK8C&pg=PA141 |quote=''Faced with this comeback by Koguryo, Paekche leaders turned to Yamato for military support, even sending its crown prince to Yamato as a hostage in 397 - just as Silla had dispatched princely hostage to Koguryo in 392 when that kingdom was in dire need of military support.''|title=The Cambridge History of Japan: Ancient Japan|first= |last= [[Delmer Brown|Brown, Delmer M.]] |publisher=Cambridge University Press|year= 1993|isbn=0-521-22352-0|page=141}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1Gui8CdUfVoC&pg=PA42&dq=Baekje+prince+hostage+yamato&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tW_UT-n5BMP9mAWJncWlBg&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Baekje%20prince%20hostage%20yamato&f=false|quote=''We can only guess, for example, what it felt like for the girls periodically sent as brides to foreign courts, for the crown prince of Paekche when he was dispatched to the Yamato court as a hostage in AD 397, or for a Silla prince who experienced the same fate in 402.''|title=Everlasting Flower: A History of Korea|first=Keith |last=Pratt|publisher=Reaktion Books|year= 2007|isbn=1-86189-335-3|page=42}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cZ0xAQAAIAAJ&q=hostage&dq=hostage&hl=en&sa=X|quote=''Paekche was frequently attacked by Koguryo during the century, prompting continued requests for assistance from Yamato; it is recorded that Paekche even sent a crown prince to Yamato as a hostage on one occasion and the mother of the king on another. Yet, probably because of internal dissension, Yamato did not dispatch any troops to the peninsula. Yamato's interest in Korea was apparently a desire for access to improved continental technology and resources, especially iron.''|title=The New Encyclopædia Britannica|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica|year= 2003|isbn=0-85229-961-3|page=279}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E_5xAAAAMAAJ&q=Misahun&dq=Misahun&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-4rUT-3yEOuOmQWz4oyGAw&redir_esc=y|quote=''In 402, Silla concluded a peace with the Wa. Prince Misahun was then sent to Japan as a hostage. This may have been an act of revenge by the Silla monarch, who, as Prince Silsong, had been sent as hostage to Koguryo by Prince Misahun's father. Despite the peace, Silla-Wa relations were never friendly, due no doubt in part to the Wa-Kaya alliance.''|title=A history of Korea|first=William E. |last=Henthorn|publisher=Free Press|year= 1971|page=37}}</ref> For example, King [[Muryeong of Baekje]] was born in [[Kyushu]] ([[Chikuzen Province|筑紫]]) of Japan as a child of hostage in 462,<ref>[[Nihon Shoki]] Vol.14 "Chronicle of [[Emperor Yūryaku]]" 六月丙戌朔 孕婦果如加須利君言 於[[Chikuzen Province]] (筑紫) 各羅嶋産兒 仍名此兒曰嶋君 於是 軍君即以一船 送嶋君於國 是爲[[King Muryeong of Baekje]] (武寧王) 百濟人呼此嶋曰主嶋也</ref> and left a son in Japan who settled there and became an ancestor of the {{Nihongo|Yamato no Fubito|和史|"Scribes of Yamato"}} [[clan]] of minor [[nobility]]. According to the {{Nihongo|[[Shoku Nihongi]]|続日本紀}}, [[Takano no Niigasa]], background of the naturalized clansmen {{Nihongo|[[Yamato no Fumito]]|和史}}, was a 10th-generation descendant of King Muryeong of Baekje who was chosen as a [[concubine]] for [[Emperor Kōnin]] and subsequently became the mother of [[Emperor Kanmu]]. |
|||
==Kofun Culture== |
|||
===Language=== |
===Language=== |
||
{{Main |
{{Main|Japanese language}} |
||
[[File:Warrior in Keiko Armor, National Treasure, Kofun period, 6th century, haniwa (terracotta tomb figurine) from Iizuka-machi, Ota-shi, Gunma - Tokyo National Museum - DSC06425.JPG|thumb|alt=Terra-cotta soldier|''[[Haniwa]]'' [[Haniwa Warrior in Keiko Armor|soldier in ''keiko'' armor]]]] |
|||
[[File:Caballo Haniwa Guimet 01.JPG|thumb|alt=Terra-cotta horse, with saddle and bridle|''Haniwa'' horse statuette]] |
|||
[[Chinese people|Chinese]], [[Korean people|Korean]] and [[Japanese people|Japanese]] wrote accounts of history mostly in [[Chinese characters]], making original pronunciations difficult to trace. |
|||
[[Han Chinese|Chinese]], [[Yamato people|Japanese]], and [[Koreans]] wrote historical accounts primarily in [[Chinese characters]], making original pronunciation difficult to trace. Although writing was largely unknown to the indigenous Japanese of the period, the literary skills of foreigners seem to have been increasingly appreciated by the Japanese elite. The [[Inariyama Sword]], tentatively dated to 471 or 531, contains a Chinese-character inscription in a style used in China at the time.<ref name="Seeley">Seeley (2000:19-23)</ref> |
|||
While writing was largely unknown to the indigenous Japanese of this period, the literary skills of foreigners seem to have become increasingly appreciated by the Japanese elite in many regions. The [[Inariyama Sword]], tentatively dated 471 or 531, contains Chinese-character inscriptions in styles used in China at the time.<ref name="Seeley">Seeley (2000:19-23)</ref> |
|||
===Haniwa=== |
===''Haniwa''=== |
||
The [[cavalry]] wore armour, carried [[sword]]s and other weapons, and used advanced military methods similar to those of [[Northeast Asia]]. Evidence of the advances is seen in {{Nihongo|''[[haniwa]]''|埴輪|extra="clay ring"}}, clay offerings placed in a ring on and around the tomb mounds of the ruling elite. The most important of these ''haniwa'' were found in southern [[Honshū]] (especially the [[Kansai|Kinai region]] around [[Nara Prefecture]]) and northern [[Kyūshū]]. ''Haniwa'' grave offerings were sculpted as horses, chickens, birds, fans, fish, houses, weapons, shields, sunshades, pillows, and male and female humans. Another funerary piece, the {{Nihongo|''[[magatama]]''|勾玉|extra="curved jewel"}}, became symbolic of imperial power. |
|||
[[Image:HaniwaChieftainIbaraki500CE.jpg|thumb|upright|left|Kofun period [[haniwa]] chieftain, [[Ibaraki, Ibaraki|Ibaraki]], circa 500 CE. [[British Museum]].]] |
|||
[[Image:KofunSoldier.jpg|thumb|upright|Kofun [[haniwa]] soldier.]] |
|||
The [[cavalry]] wore armour, carried [[sword]]s and other weapons, and used advanced military methods like those of northeast Asia. Evidence of these advances is seen in {{Nihongo|''[[haniwa]]''|埴輪|extra="clay ring"}}, the clay offerings placed in a ring on and around the tomb mounds of the ruling elite. The most important of these ''haniwa'' were found in southern [[Honshū]]—especially the [[Kansai|Kinai region]] around [[Nara Prefecture]]—and northern [[Kyūshū]]. ''Haniwa'' grave offerings were made in numerous forms, such as horses, chickens, birds, fans, fish, houses, weapons, shields, sunshades, pillows, and male and female humans. Another funerary piece, the {{Nihongo|''[[magatama]]''|勾玉|extra="curved jewel"}}, became one of the symbols of the power of the imperial house. |
|||
===Introduction of material culture to Japan=== |
==={{anchor|Introduction of material culture to Japan}}Introduction of material culture=== |
||
Much of the [[material culture]] of the Kofun period demonstrates that Japan |
Much of the [[material culture]] of the Kofun period demonstrates that Japan was in close political and economic contact with continental Asia (especially with the southern dynasties of China) via the Korean Peninsula; bronze mirrors cast from the same mould have been found on both sides of the [[Tsushima Strait]]. [[Irrigation]], [[sericulture]], and [[weaving]] were brought to Japan by immigrants, who are mentioned in ancient Japanese histories; the [[Hata clan]] introduced sericulture and certain types of weaving.<ref name="Shogakukan">{{Citation |
||
| year = 1988 |
| year = 1988 |
||
| title = 国語大辞典 (Kokugo Dai Jiten Dictionary) |
| title = 国語大辞典 (Kokugo Dai Jiten Dictionary) |
||
Line 102: | Line 86: | ||
| publisher = Shogakukan |
| publisher = Shogakukan |
||
| place = Tokyo |
| place = Tokyo |
||
| language = |
| language = ja |
||
| quote = 姓氏。古代の有力帰化系氏族。出自は諸説あるが、おそらく五世紀に渡来した中国人の子孫で、養蚕・機織の技術をもって朝廷に仕え、伴造(とものみやつこ)の一員として秦造(はたのみやつこ)を称したと思われる。<br/> Surname. Influential immigrant clan in ancient times. Various theories about origins, but most likely descendants of Chinese immigrants who came to Japan in the fifth century, who are thought to have brought sericulture and weaving technologies and served in the imperial court, and to have been granted the title ''Hata no Miyatsuko'' as members of the ''Tomo no Miyatsuko'' [an imperial rank responsible for overseeing technically skilled artisans]. |
| quote = 姓氏。古代の有力帰化系氏族。出自は諸説あるが、おそらく五世紀に渡来した中国人の子孫で、養蚕・機織の技術をもって朝廷に仕え、伴造(とものみやつこ)の一員として秦造(はたのみやつこ)を称したと思われる。<br /> Surname. Influential immigrant clan in ancient times. Various theories about origins, but most likely descendants of Chinese immigrants who came to Japan in the fifth century, who are thought to have brought sericulture and weaving technologies and served in the imperial court, and to have been granted the title ''Hata no Miyatsuko'' as members of the ''Tomo no Miyatsuko'' [an imperial rank responsible for overseeing technically skilled artisans]. |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
==Towards Asuka period== |
=={{anchor|Towards Asuka period}}Asuka period== |
||
The |
The introduction of [[Buddhism]] in 538 marked the transition from the Kofun to the [[Asuka period]], which coincided with the reunification of China under the [[Sui dynasty]] later in the century. Japan became deeply influenced by Chinese culture, adding a cultural context to the religious distinction between the periods. |
||
==Relations between the Yamato court and |
=={{anchor|Relations between the Yamato court and other East Asian kingdoms}}Relations with other East Asian kingdoms== |
||
===Chinese records=== |
===Chinese records=== |
||
According to the ''[[Book of Sui]]'', [[Silla]] and [[Baekje]] greatly valued relations with the Kofun-period [[Wa (Japan)|Wa]] and the Korean kingdoms made diplomatic efforts to maintain their good standing with the Japanese.<ref name="sui">Chinese History Record [[Book of Sui]], Vol. 81, ''Liezhuan'' 46 : 隋書 東夷伝 第81巻列伝46 : 新羅、百濟皆以倭為大國,多珍物,並敬仰之,恆通使往來 "Silla and Baekje both take Wa to be a great country, with many rare and precious things; also [Silla and Baekje] respect and look up to them, and regularly send embassies there." [http://www.guoxue.com/shibu/24shi/suisu/sui_081.htm]{{cite web |title=Archived copy |url=http://www.chinakyl.com/rbbook/big5/25/suishu/suis81.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041221184200/http://www.chinakyl.com/rbbook/big5/25/suishu/suis81.html |archive-date=2004-12-21 |access-date=2006-04-29}}</ref> The ''[[Book of Song]]'' reported that a Chinese emperor appointed the [[five kings of Wa]] in 451 to supervise military affairs of Wa, Silla, [[Gaya confederacy|Imna]], Gara, [[Jinhan confederacy|Jinhan]] and Mahan.<ref name="song">Chinese History Record [[Book of Song]] : 宋書 列傳第五十七 夷蠻 : 詔除武使持節、都督倭新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓六國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭王。興死,弟武立,自稱使持節、都督倭百濟新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓七國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭國王 [http://www.hoolulu.com/zh/25shi/06songshu/t-097.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151013072650/http://www.hoolulu.com/zh/25shi/06songshu/t-097.htm|date=2015-10-13}}[http://www.xysa.net/a200/h350/06songshu/t-097.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303184326/http://www.xysa.net/a200/h350/06songshu/t-097.htm|date=2016-03-03}}</ref> |
|||
*According to the ''[[Book of Song]]'', a Chinese emperor appointed [[five kings of Wa]] to Supervisor of All Military Affairs of the Six Countries of Wa, Silla, [[Gaya confederacy|Imna]], [[Gara]], [[Jinhan confederacy|Jinhan]], and Mahan in 451<ref name="song">Chinese History Record [[Book of Song]] : 宋書 列傳第五十七 夷蠻 : 詔除武使持節、都督倭新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓六國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭王。興死,弟武立,自稱使持節、都督倭百濟新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓七國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭國王 [http://www.hoolulu.com/zh/25shi/06songshu/t-097.htm][http://www.xysa.net/a200/h350/06songshu/t-097.htm]</ref> |
|||
*According to the [[Gwanggaeto Stele]], Silla and Baekje were [[client state]]s of [[Japan]]. However Korea claims that part of the stele can be translated in 4 different ways depending on how you fill in the missing characters and where you punctuate the sentence.<ref>百残新羅舊是属民由来朝貢而倭以辛卯年来渡海破百残XX新羅以為臣民</ref> [[Chinese Academy of Social Sciences]] investigated this epitaph and reported that it was written as "Silla and Baekje were client states of Japan".<ref>{{Cite book|author=徐建新|date=2006-02-07|title=好太王碑拓本の研究|publisher=東京堂出版|isbn=4-490-20569-4|url=http://www.tokyodoshuppan.com/book/b80208.html}}</ref> |
|||
*According to the [[Portraits of Periodical Offering]], Silla was a tributary of the Japan, could not be tribute to China until AD 521.<ref>[[Portraits of Periodical Offering]] 斯羅国 : 斯羅國,本東夷辰韓之小國也。魏時曰新羅,宋時曰斯羅,其實一也。或屬韓或屬倭,國王不能自通使聘。普通二年,其王姓募名泰,始使隨百濟奉表献方物。其國有城,號曰健年。其俗與高麗相類。無文字,刻木為範,言語待百濟而後通焉</ref> |
|||
===Korean records=== |
|||
*According to the ''[[Samguk Sagi]]'' (Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms), Baekje and Silla sent their princes as [[hostage#Historical hostage practices|hostage]]s to the Yamato court in exchange for military support to continue their already-begun military campaigns; King [[Asin of Baekje]] sent his son [[Jeonji of Baekje|Jeonji]] in 397<ref name="shiragi">Korean History Record [[Samguk Sagi]] : 三國史記 新羅本紀 : 元年 三月 與倭國通好 以奈勿王子未斯欣爲質 [http://www.koreandb.net/Sam/bon/samkuk/04_030_2000277.htm]</ref> and King [[Silseong of Silla]] sent his son [[Misaheun]] in 402.<ref name="kudara">Korean History Record [[Samguk Sagi]] : 三國史記 百済本紀 : 六年夏五月 王與倭國結好 以太子腆支爲質 秋七月大閱於漢水之南 [http://www.koreandb.net/Sam/bon/samkuk/04_250_2001365.htm]</ref> |
|||
* [[Hogong]] from Japan helped the founding of Silla.<ref>Korean History Record [[Samguk Sagi]] :三國史記 卷第一 新羅本紀第一 始祖赫居世, 瓠公者 未詳其族姓 本倭人</ref> |
|||
===Japanese records=== |
===Japanese records=== |
||
According to the ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'', Silla was conquered by the [[Empress Jingū|Japanese Empress-consort Jingū]] in the third century.<ref>Sakamoto (1967:336-340)</ref> |
According to the ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'', Silla was conquered by the [[Empress Jingū|Japanese Empress-consort Jingū]] in the third century.<ref>Sakamoto (1967:336-340)</ref> However, due to lack of evidence,<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O6W6uQEACAAJ&q=Historia+Korei|title=Historia Korei|author=Joanna Rurarz|publisher=Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog|language=pl|year=2014|page=89|isbn=9788363778866}}</ref> this story is considered to be mythological in nature. It reported that the prince of [[Silla]] came to Japan to serve the [[emperor of Japan]],<ref>''Nihon Shoki'', Vol.6 "天日槍對曰 僕新羅國主之子也 然聞日本國有聖皇 則以己國授弟知古而化歸(to serve)之"</ref> and lived in [[Tajima Province]]. Known as Amenohiboko, his descendant is [[Tajima Mori]].<ref>''Nihon Shoki'', Vol.6 "故天日槍娶但馬出嶋人 太耳女麻多烏 生但馬諸助也 諸助生但馬日楢杵 日楢杵生清彦 清彦生田道間守也"</ref> According to ''Kojiki''<ref>百濟國主照古王遣阿知吉師獻雄馬雌馬各壹以貢上此阿知吉師者 阿直史等之祖</ref> and ''Nihon Shoki'',<ref>十五年秋八月 壬戌朔丁卯 百濟王遣阿直岐 貢良馬二匹 即養於輕阪上廄 因以阿直岐令掌飼 故號其養馬之處曰 廄阪</ref> [[Geunchogo of Baekje]] presented stallions, [[broodmares]] and [[horse trainer|trainers]] to the Japanese emperor during [[Emperor Ōjin]]'s reign.<ref name="KUrano">Kurano (1958:248-249)</ref> |
||
According to ''Kojiki'' and ''Nihon Shoki'', Baekje had also sent a scholar by the name of [[Wani (scholar)|Wani]] during the reign of [[Emperor Ōjin]]. He is said to be the pioneer of the introduction of the [[Chinese writing system]] to Japan. |
|||
==Controversy== |
|||
{{See also|History of Japan–Korea relations}} |
|||
===Korean records=== |
|||
{{Cleanup rewrite|date=March 2017}} |
|||
The ''[[Samguk sagi]]'' (''Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms'') reported that Baekje and Silla sent their princes as [[hostage#Historical hostage practices|hostage]]s to the Yamato court in exchange for military support to continue their military campaigns; King [[Asin of Baekje]] sent his son ([[Jeonji of Baekje|Jeonji]]) in 397,<ref name="shiragi">Korean History Record [[Samguk Sagi]] : 三國史記 新羅本紀 : 元年 三月 與倭國通好 以奈勿王子未斯欣爲質 [http://www.koreandb.net/Sam/bon/samkuk/04_030_2000277.htm]</ref> and King [[Silseong of Silla]] sent his son [[Misaheun]] in 402.<ref name="kudara">Korean History Record [[Samguk Sagi]] : 三國史記 百済本紀 : 六年夏五月 王與倭國結好 以太子腆支爲質 秋七月大閱於漢水之南 {{cite web |url=http://www.koreandb.net/Sam/bon/samkuk/04_250_2001365.htm |title=아신왕 - 삼국사기 백제본기- 디지털한국학 |access-date=2008-05-12 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080512000405/http://www.koreandb.net/Sam/bon/samkuk/04_250_2001365.htm |archive-date=2008-05-12 }}</ref> [[Hogong]], from Japan, helped to found Silla.<ref>Korean History Record [[Samguk Sagi]] :三國史記 卷第一 新羅本紀第一 始祖赫居世, 瓠公者 未詳其族姓 本倭人</ref> |
|||
Japan and South Korea have revisited previous interpretations of the history of this period, voiding many erroneous quotes and interpretations after several studies over the past decade. The first joint history project between Japan and South Korea was halted in 2005 due to disagreements between the two countries,<ref name="english.hani.co.kr">{{cite web|url=http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/205534.html |title=S.K.-Japan joint history project to be revived : International : Home |publisher=English.hani.co.kr |date=2007-04-26 |accessdate=2014-03-12}}</ref> but later resumed.<ref name="koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com">{{cite web|url=http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2918261 |title=Japan office never existed in 4th century-INSIDE Korea JoongAng Daily |publisher=Koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com |date=2010-03-24 |accessdate=2014-03-12}}</ref> |
|||
The archaeological record, and ancient [[Twenty-Four Histories|Chinese sources]], indicate that the various tribes and chiefdoms of Japan did not begin to coalesce into states until 300 AD, when large tombs began to appear. Some describe the "mysterious century" as a time of internecine warfare as various chiefdoms competed for hegemony on [[Kyūshū]] and [[Honshū]].<ref name="Farris">Farris (1998:7)</ref> Even more complicating is the ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'' referencing the Japanese king who is Korean rulers sovereign.<ref name="Coval 1984">Coval, Dr John Carter and Alan, 1984, "Korean impact on Japanese culture: Japan's hidden History" Hollym International Corp., Elizabeth, New Jersey</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">{{cite book |last=Hong |first=Wontack |year=1994 |title=Paekche of Korea and the Origin of Yamato Japan |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070205053536/http://gias.snu.ac.kr/wthong/publication/paekche/eng/paekch_e.html |archivedate=2007-02-05 |url=http://gias.snu.ac.kr/wthong/publication/paekche/eng/paekch_e.html |location=Seoul |publisher=Kudara International |isbn=978-89-85567-02-2}}</ref><ref>Nihon Shoki Vol.6</ref> Due to this conflicting information, nothing can be concluded for the book of Song or ''Nihon Shoki''. |
|||
According to the history records in Japan (''[[Nihon Shoki]]'') and Korea (''[[Samguk Sagi]]''), Korean princes were sent to Japan as [[hostage#Historical hostage practices|hostages]].<ref name="ReferenceB"/> Due to the confusion on the exact nature of this relationship of whether Japanese is the founder of Silla<ref>[[Samguk Sagi]] Silla bongi Vol1 (三國史記 卷第一 新羅本紀第一 脱解尼師今) "脱解本多婆那國所生也 其國在倭國東北一千里"</ref> or hostages and the fact that the Nihon Shoki is a compilation of myths make it difficult to evaluate. In Japan the hostage interpretation is dominant. Other historians{{who|date=November 2010}} like the ones who collaborated in the works for "Paekche of Korea and the origin of Yamato Japan" and [[Jonathan W. Best]] who helped translate what was left of the Baekjae annals<ref>Best JW 2007 A History of the Early Korean Kingdom of Paekche, together with an annotated translation of The Paekche Annals of the Samguk sagi (Harvard East Asian Monographs) Massachusetts, Harvard University, Asia studies</ref> have noted Silla King served as horse keeper for the Japanese Emperor<ref>Nihon shoki Vol.9 "降於王船之前。因以叩頭之曰。従今以後。長与乾坤。伏為飼部。其不乾船柁。而春秋献馬梳及馬鞭。"</ref> and were the vanguard of the Japanese Navy during the war with Koguryeo as evidence of them being diplomats with some kind of familial tie to the Japanese imperial family and not hostages. In addition, the translation of these documents are difficult because in the past the term "Wa" was derogatory meaning "midget pirate" or "dwarf pirate" in Chinese. It is difficult to assess what is truly being stated; this could have been a derogatory statement between 2 warring nations. |
|||
Part of the reason the Joint history project finds these Japanese views questionable: There is no evidence of Japan ever having been sophisticated enough to control any part of Korea during the time of Jingū.<ref name="Kōzō">Kōzō (1997:308–310)</ref><ref name="Kenneth B. Lee">{{cite book|title=Korea and East Asia: The Story of a Phoenix |author=Kenneth B. Lee |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |pages=31 ~ 35p |chapter=4. Korea and Early Japan, 200 B.C. – 700 A.D. |year=1997 |isbn=0-275-95823-X}}</ref> However, there is archaeological evidence of Koreans going to Japan during this time, According to the book "''Korea and Japan in East Asian History''",<ref name="ReferenceA">"[[Hong Wontack]] 2005, KOREA AND JAPAN IN EAST ASIAN HISTORY Seoul, Kadura International"</ref> and "''Paekche of Korea and the Origin of Yamato Japan''"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hongwontack.pe.kr/homepage4/data/45011.pdf |title=Peakche of Korea and the Origin of Yamato Japan |publisher= |accessdate=2014-03-12}}</ref> such findings as horse sculptures, [[Shinju-kyo]], painting and iron-ware made in [[Northern Wei|Northern Wei China]] which do not match the dates of Emperor Ojin's reign.<ref>[[Tenri University]] : Harness of the ancient Fujinoki burial mound exhumation (藤ノ木古墳出土の馬具 - 畏獣図像からその来歴を探る) <br/> "藤ノ木古墳の「鬼面」の手指は2体とも3本であり、足指については左畏獣が2本、右畏獣は3本あるように見える。この観察が正しければ、これらは中国の伝統的な畏獣であり、原則が崩れかける前段階すなわち北魏末期から東魏(Northern Wei) にかけて、北朝の領域で製作されたと考えられる。北斉までは下らず、6世紀前半の製作とみなのが妥当であろう。" [http://www.tenri-u.ac.jp/lifelng/dv457k0000007gvr.html]</ref> The question that always comes up within the Korean community is, 'Why would a Japanese culture that doesn't have Korean ceramic ability or horses yet have horse sculptures in their tombs?'. Also significant is [[Emperor Ōjin]]'s reign is off by more than a century with [[Geunchogo of Baekje]] in other words these people did not exist in the same time period. According to the book "''Paekchae of Korea and the origin of Yamato Japan''", "The prince of [[Silla]] was the ancestor to the Japanese Emperor. The translation of "Nihon Shoki Vol.6" was added and Amenohiboko is described in ''[[Nihon Shoki]]'' as a maternal predecessor of {{Nihongo|Tajima-no-morosuku|但馬諸助|}},<ref>"Nihon Shoki Vol.6" "昔有一人 乘艇而泊于但馬國 因問曰 汝何國人也 對曰 新羅王子 名曰 天日槍 則留于但馬 娶其國前津耳女 一云 前津見 一云 太耳 麻拖能烏 生 '''但馬諸助''' 是清彥之祖父也"</ref> whose controversial legend says that she defeated Silla in the 5th century. This is highly inconsistent, as Jingū is said to have lived in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, and she is supposed to have died in 269 AD which would make her 300 to 400 years old. This conflicting information makes it difficult to understand these records. |
|||
According to the book ''Paekchae of Korea and the origin of Yamato Japan'', "The prince of Silla was the ancestor to the Japanese Emperor." The translation of "Nihon Shoki Vol.6" was added and Amenohiboko is described in ''Nihon Shoki'' as a maternal predecessor of [[Empress Jingū]]{{Citation needed|date=June 2009}}, whose controversial legend says that she defeated Silla in the 5th Century. This is highly inconsistent, as Jingū is said to have lived in the 2nd and 3rd centuries, and she is supposed to have died in 269 AD which would make her 300 to 400 years old. This conflicting information makes it difficult to understand these records. "天日槍對曰 僕新羅國主之子也 然聞日本國有聖皇 則以己國授弟知古而化歸之" Amehiboko was said to have stated 2 possible translations depending on how you punctuate the sentence and how you evaluate the syntax. 1. "I am a prince in Korea. I heard that there was saint's king in Japan. To become a vassal of the king in Japan, I transferred the country to younger brother." Again in the past the ''original text'' and not modern Japanese or Korean translations, lacking past tense/present tense and words like transferring or transferred or transfer would be impossible to interpret. This same sentence can be 2. "I am a prince in Korea. I heard that there was a saint's King in Japan to become a vassal. The king in Japan I transfer the country to my younger brother." It is impossible to tell whether the sentence is stating that a Korean prince loves his younger brother, calling him a saint and ordaining his younger brother to be his vassal (and to rule as the King of Japan), or simply the other way around. |
|||
According to the ''[[Book of Song]]'', a Chinese emperor appointed [[five kings of Wa]] to the position of ruler of Silla in 421,<ref>[http://www.hoolulu.com/zh/25shi/06songshu/t-097.htm ''Book of Song'']</ref> but what is confusing is that Japan wielded influence over the southern part of the Korean peninsula through the remote region according to the ''Nihon Shoki''.<ref>''Nihon Shoki'' Vol.19 Emperor Kimmei April, 2 "与任那日本府吉備臣"</ref> In addition, the book of Song and the book of Sui can not be possible because many of the states considered to be Japan's vassal such as Chinhan and Mahan did not exist in the same time period as the vassal king of Yamato. In addition, the ''Book of Song'' was incomplete with missing volumes and filled in centuries later in a biased manner for political reasons. Also, Silla did not have official contact with the Song/Sui until the 6th century making this 4th to 5th century statement impossible. "As Egami (1964) notes, it may look very strange that the names of six or seven states listed in the self-claimed titles included Chin-han and Ma-han which had preceded, respectively, the states of Silla and Paekche. Perhaps the King of Wa had included the names of six or seven south Korean states in his title merely to boast of the extent of his rule. But Wa Kings could not have included the names of nonexistent states." Other historians{{who|date=November 2010}} also dispute Japan's theory, claiming there is no evidence of Japanese rule in Gaya or any other part of Korea.<ref name="Kōzō" /><ref name="Lee">Lee (1997:31-35)</ref> Another problem with the book of Song and book of Sui is that many of the volumes of the books were missing and re-written later in a biased manner. It is difficult to make any sense of what the relationship was like in the past. |
|||
Japan of the Kofun period was very receptive to the [[Chinese culture]] and [[Korean culture]].<ref name="Imamura">Imamura (1996)</ref> Chinese and Korean immigrants played an important role in introducing elements of both to early Japan.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> |
|||
<ref>Stearns (2001:56)</ref> |
|||
The special burial customs of the Goguryeo culture had an important influence on other cultures in Japan.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1091| title= Complex of Koguryo Tombs| publisher=UNESCO World Heritage Centre| accessdate=2006-05-31}}</ref> Decorated tombs and painted tumuli which date from the fifth century and later found in Japan are generally accepted as Northeast of China and Northern part of Korean peninsula exports to Japan.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1091| title= Complex of Koguryo Tombs| publisher=UNESCO World Heritage Centre| accessdate=2006-05-31}} "totalling about 30 individual graves, from the later period of the Koguryo Kingdom, one of the strongest kingdoms in north-eastern China and half of the Korean peninsula between the 3rd century BC and 7th century AD."</ref> The [[Takamatsuzuka Tomb]] even has paintings of a woman dressed in distinctive clothes, similar to wall paintings from Goguryeo and [[Tang dynasty|Tang-dynasty]] China.<ref>Farris (1998:95)</ref><ref>MSN Encarta {{cite web|url=http://jp.encarta.msn.com/media_262538992_761577854_-1_1/content.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2009-11-01 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091029194413/http://jp.encarta.msn.com/media_262538992_761577854_-1_1/content.html |archivedate=2009-10-29 |df= }}. [https://www.webcitation.org/5kwsLzC3W?url=http://jp.encarta.msn.com/media_262538992_761577854_-1_1/content.html Archived] 2009-10-31.</ref> In addition, [[Chinese astrology]] was being introduced during this time. |
|||
According to the ''Book of Song'', of the [[Liu Song dynasty]], the Emperor of China bestowed military sovereignty over Silla, [[Gaya confederacy|Imna]], [[Gaya confederacy|Gaya]], [[Chinhan]], and [[Mahan confederacy|Mahan]] on [[Five kings of Wa|King Sai of Wa]]. However, this theory is widely rejected even in Japan as there is no evidence of Japanese rule in Gaya or any other part of Korea.<ref name="Kōzō" /><ref name="Lee" /> After the death of King Kō of Wa, his younger brother [[Five kings of Wa|Bu]] acceded to the throne; King Bu requested to have Baekje added to the list of protectorates included in the official title bestowed upon the King of Wa by mandate of the Emperor of China, but his title was only renewed as "Supervisor of All Military Affairs of the Six Countries of Wa, Silla, Imna, Gara, Chinhan, and Mahan, Great General Who Keeps Peace in the East, King of the Country of Wa."<ref name="song" /> This entire statement is impossible because Chinhan and Mahan did not exist in the same time period as Silla, Baekje when the vassal Kings of Yamato were supposed to rule. As Egami wrote in 1964 "But Wa Kings could not have included the names of nonexistent states." In addition, Silla did not have official contact with the Song/Sui until the 6th century making this 4th to 5th century claim not possible. Due to the lack of evidence, and the confusion of whether the Wa were the descendants of Koreans, again no certain information is discernible. |
|||
== Genetics == |
|||
Chinese chronicles note that horses were absent from the islands of Japan; they are first noted in the chronicles during the reign of [[Nintoku]], most likely imported by Chinese and Korean immigrants.<ref name="Coval 1984"/><ref name="ReferenceB"/> According to some accounts, the horse was one of the treasures presented when the king of Silla surrendered to Empress Jingū in the ''Nihon Shoki''.<ref name="Sakamoto">Sakamoto (1967:338-339)</ref> Other accounts contend that there is no evidence of this from Silla, and the king who supposedly surrendered dates to the 5th century, thus making Empress Jingū 200 years old. The ''Nihon Shoki'' states that the father of Empress Jingū was [[Emperor Kaika]]'s grandchild, and her mother was from the {{ill|Katuragi clan|ja|葛城氏|vertical-align=sup}}.<ref>''Nihon Shoki'' Vol.9 "[[Empress Jingū]] (気長足姫尊). [[Emperor Kaika]] (稚日本根子彦大日日天皇) 之曾孫。気長宿禰王之女也。母曰葛城高顙媛。"</ref> In addition, the ''Nihon Shoki'' states that a Korean from Silla, Amenohiboko, was an ancestor of Jingū so both the ''Nihon Shoki'' and the Chinese chronicles relating to Japan are difficult to interpret. In addition, there is no evidence of Japanese war with Korea or any Japanese presence in Korea at this time<ref name="Kōzō" /><ref name="Lee" /> and the Japanese did not have actual knowledge about horses until well after this time.<ref name="Kōzō" /><ref name="Lee" /> |
|||
{{Main article|Genetic and anthropometric studies on Japanese people}} |
|||
In 2021, a research paper proposed a new theory as to the origins of the Japanese people. It suggested that the people of Japan bore genetic signatures from three ancient populations rather than just two as previously thought.<ref name="Cooke21">{{cite journal |display-authors=6 |vauthors=Cooke NP, Mattiangeli V, Cassidy LM, Okazaki K, Stokes CA, Onbe S, Hatakeyama S, Machida K, Kasai K, Tomioka N, Matsumoto A, Ito M, Kojima Y, Bradley DG, Gakuhari T, Nakagome S |date=September 2021 |title=Ancient genomics reveals tripartite origins of Japanese populations |journal=Science Advances |volume=7 |issue=38 |pages=eabh2419 |bibcode=2021SciA....7.2419C |doi=10.1126/sciadv.abh2419 |pmc=8448447 |pmid=34533991 |ref={{harvid|Cooke|2021}}}}</ref> The paper called this strand the "Kofun strand" based on the samples found in the period, and separated it from the pre-existing "Jōmon" and "Yayoi strand" forming the "Tripartite ancestry theory".<ref name="Cooke21" /> |
|||
===Restricted access to Gosashi tomb=== |
|||
In 1976 Japan stopped all foreign archaeologists from studying the [[Gosashi tomb]], which is supposedly the resting place of Emperor Jingū. In 2008, Japan allowed controlled, limited access to foreign archaeologists, but the international community still has many unanswered questions. [[National Geographic Society|National Geographic News]] reported that Japan "''the agency has kept access to the tombs restricted, prompting rumors that officials fear excavation would reveal bloodline links between the "pure" imperial family and Korea—or that some tombs hold no royal remains at all.''"<ref name="news.nationalgeographic.com">{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080428-ancient-tomb.html |title=Japanese Royal Tomb Opened to Scholars for First Time |publisher=News.nationalgeographic.com |date=2010-10-28 |accessdate=2014-03-12}}</ref> |
|||
However recently, the tripartite ancestry theory is being met with criticism since its introduction in 2021. In essence, Japanese researchers claim that a tripartite theory is redundant as the genetical difference between Yayoi and Kofun groups is not significant enough and that the temporal discrepancy of the periods is minuscule. See [[Genetic and anthropometric studies on Japanese people#Tripartite ancestry theory|Japanese people's Tripartite ancestry theory]]. |
|||
The Yamato court had ties to the [[Gaya confederacy]], called ''Mimana'' in Japanese. This region of the Korean peninsula has burial mounds similar to kofun. This has caused scholars to begin examining the shared relationship between the Yamato and Baekje during the 3rd and the 7th centuries AD, including the method of tomb construction. While a variety of theories exist, most have come to the conclusion that there was sharing of culture and construction methods both directions.<ref name="yoshii">{{cite web|url=http://www.international.ucla.edu/korea/pdfs/YoshiiPaperFinal.pdf|title=Keyhole-shaped tombs in Korean Peninsula|first=Hideo|last=Yoshii|format=PDF|accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> For example, earrings discovered in Silla and Kaya tombs are very similar to Japanese earrings dated to the Kofun period, "The ultimate source of such elaborate techniques as granulation is probably the Greek and Etruscan goldsmiths of western Asia and Europe, whose skills were transmitted to northern China and later to Korea. The resemblance of ''earrings'' found in Japan in the Kofun period (ca. 3rd century—538 A.D.) to those from Silla and Kaya tombs suggests that such articles are imported from Korea."<ref name="metmoa">{{cite web|url=http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ht/05/eak/ht05eak.htm|title=Korea, 1-500 A.D. in ''Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History''|publisher=[[Metropolitan Museum of Art]]|year=2000|accessdate=2009-05-30}}</ref> Spread of [[Culture of China|Chinese civilisation]], Han styles of tomb construction were gradually adopted in all [[three kingdoms of Korea]], mainly from the 4th century onwards.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e7pyBEWioLsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Korea:+a+historical+and+cultural+dictionary&as_brr=3#PPA474,M1|title=Korea: a historical and cultural dictionary (474 page) |author=Richard Rutt, James Hoare |publisher= Routledge |isbn=978-0-7007-0464-4}}</ref> The tombs in the southern part of Korea and Japan appear to have a relationship.<ref name="yoshii"/> However, all the kofun-style tombs discovered in Korea have been dated as younger than those found in Japan. Leading Japanese scholars{{Who|date=March 2012}} to insist that those found in Korea were either built by Japanese immigrants or influenced by culture brought by them, but the advanced artifacts found in Korean's huge tombs are Japanese Haniwa,<ref name=hani>[[The Hankyoreh]] 2001.9.6 [http://www.hani.co.kr/section-009000000/2001/09/009000000200109062248001.html](in korean) "일본식 닮은 영산강가 5~6세기 고분" [[Yeongsan River|Yeongsan River (영산강)]] kofuns were made in 5th and 6th centuries are similar to the Japanese style Kofun</ref> and Japan's tombs are [[Mongol people]] who came from Korea like the pottery,<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Pottery - MSN Encarta |url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568150_4/Pottery.html |work= |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/5kwPni5fJ?url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568150_4/Pottery.html |archivedate=2009-10-31 |deadurl=yes |df= }} ""made by a Mongol people who came from Korea to Kyūshū, has been found throughout Japan.""</ref> horse sculptures and earrings.<ref name="news.nationalgeographic.com"/><ref>[[Choson Sinbo]] "Kitora Tomb Originates in Koguryo Murals" By Chon Ho Chon [http://www1.korea-np.co.jp/pk/035th_issue/98032502.htm]</ref><ref>[http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/japan/yayoi/yayoi.html ] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110226121349/http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/japan/yayoi/yayoi.html |date=February 26, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2131.html |title=Japanese history: Jomon, Yayoi, Kofun |publisher=Japan-guide.com |date=2002-06-09 |accessdate=2014-03-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asiasocietymuseum.com/ |title=Asia Society: The Collection In Context |publisher=Asiasocietymuseum.com |accessdate=2014-03-12 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090919042244/http://www.asiasocietymuseum.com/ |archivedate=2009-09-19 |df= }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN4-7700-2978-0&id=hhOj8JrLQBMC&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&q=korean&vq=korean&dq=japanese+pottery+sue&sig=qwA36UHFscvAvtia-F0_-RYycW8#PPA219,M1 |title=The Arts of Japan: Late medieval to modern - 清六ˇ野間 - Google Boeken |publisher=Books.google.com |accessdate=2014-03-12}}</ref> |
|||
== Results of the Japan-South Korea Joint Historical Research == |
|||
Important note regarding these records is Japan and South Korea had revisited many of these interpretations in history and came to void many erroneous quotes and interpretations after a three-year study. Both countries agreed in a joint Japan and South Korea history project that Japan's interpretation of the 4th century was incorrect but the Japanese government did not agree with the historians of both countries.<ref name="koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com"/> "After conducting research for three years since 2002, scholars of the two countries announced their first report on three categories - the ancient, medieval, and modern times. At that time, Seoul demanded that the research institute’s findings be reflected in the textbooks of the two nations, but Japan rejected this request"<ref name="english.hani.co.kr"/> |
|||
Under an agreement reached at the 2001 Japan-South Korea summit, Japanese and South Korean historians conducted joint historical research in two phases, including the relationship between Japan and the Korean Peninsula during the Kofun period. The point at issue was the "Mimana Nihon-fu" (任那日本府) which was said to be the governing institution Japan established in Korea at that time. After the controversy, Japanese and South Korean historians agreed that there were Japanese in the south of Korea and that the term "Mimana Nihon-fu" was not used at the time and should not be used as it was misleading. However, they could not agree on the position of the Japanese people in Korea at that time. The Japanese side claimed that the institutions established in Korea by the Japanese people were not under the control of Koreans, but were operated independently by the Japanese people and conducted diplomatic negotiations with the [[Gaya confederacy]]. On the other hand, the South Korean side claimed that the agency was the diplomatic office of Gaya, which employed the Japanese as bureaucrats of Gaya. The collaboration ended in 2010 with the publication of a final report describing the above. The full text of the minutes concerning the joint research is disclosed by the Japanese side.<ref>[https://www.jkcf.or.jp/projects/2005/18003/ Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Committee, Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Report (first period)] The Japan Korea Cultural Foundation</ref><ref>[https://www.jkcf.or.jp/projects/2010/17283/ Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Committee, Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Report (second period)] The Japan Korea Cultural Foundation</ref><ref>[https://megalodon.jp/ref/2020-0715-0054-56/https://www.jkcf.or.jp:443/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/1-08j.pdf Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Committee, Discussion meeting of the first subcommittee, pp.479-484, August 19, 2009] The Japan Korea Cultural Foundation</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150907145414/http://www.47news.jp/CN/201003/CN2010032301000547.html Summary of the Japan-Korea Historical Research Report] 47news, March 23, 2010</ref><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20170724181248/http://www.shikoku-np.co.jp/national/detailed_report/article.aspx?id=20100323000314 Summary of the Japan-Korea Historical Research Report] Shikoku News , March 23, 2010</ref> |
|||
==Gallery== |
|||
<gallery> |
|||
<gallery mode="packed"> |
|||
Image:KofunHelmetIronAndGiltCopper5thCenturyIseProvince.jpg|Kofun helmet, iron and gilt copper. |
|||
File:Helmet MET DT305558.jpg|alt=See caption|Kofun helmet, iron and gilt copper |
|||
File:Tanko Armor Kofun period 5th century iron plates sewn with leather strings Tokyo National Museum - DSC06388.jpg|alt=see caption|Kofun Tankō (short armor) |
|||
Image:KofunCuirass2.jpg|Kofun Keikō (Hanging armor). |
|||
File:Iron Tanko Armor, Kofun period, 5th century, from Tsukando Tumulus, Yoshii-machi, Ukiha-shi, Fukuoka, sewn with leather strings - Tokyo National Museum - DSC06395.JPG|alt=Armor covering the torso|Kofun Keikō ([[cuirass]]) |
|||
Image:KofunHelmet.jpg|Kofun helmet. |
|||
File:KofunHelmet.jpg|alt=See caption|Helmet |
|||
Image:KofunShield.jpg|Kofun shield. |
|||
File:KofunShield.jpg|alt=See caption|Shield |
|||
Image:KofunCrown.jpg|Kofun royal crown |
|||
File:KofunCrown.jpg|alt=See caption|Crown |
|||
File:Asuka Museum Keikô.jpg|Restored Kofun period [[lamellar armour]] |
|||
</gallery> |
</gallery> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
{{Portal|Ancient Japan}} |
{{Portal|Ancient Japan}} |
||
{{Commons category|Kofun}} |
|||
*[[Japanese clans]] |
*[[Japanese clans]] |
||
*[[Kuni no miyatsuko]] |
*[[Kuni no miyatsuko]] |
||
*[[Kumaso]] |
*[[Kumaso]] |
||
*[[Kofun]] |
*[[Kofun]] |
||
*[[Kofun system]] |
|||
*[[Zenpokoenfun]] |
|||
{{Clear}} |
{{Clear}} |
||
==Notes== |
|||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Commons category|Kofun period}} |
|||
* {{cite book |
* {{cite book |
||
| last = Bogucki |
| last = Bogucki |
||
Line 223: | Line 189: | ||
| publisher = Yoshikawa Kōbunkan |
| publisher = Yoshikawa Kōbunkan |
||
| year = 1981 |
| year = 1981 |
||
| language = |
| language = ja |
||
| isbn = 4-642-02109-4 |
| isbn = 4-642-02109-4 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
* {{cite book |
* {{cite book |
||
| last = Sakamoto |
| last = Sakamoto |
||
| first = Tarō |author2=Ienaga Saburō |author3=Inoue Mitsusada |author4= |
| first = Tarō |author2=Ienaga Saburō |author3=Inoue Mitsusada |author4=Ōno Susumu |author4-link=Ōno Susumu | title = Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei 67: [[Nihon Shoki]] |
||
| title = Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei 67: [[Nihon Shoki]] |
|||
| volume = 1 |
| volume = 1 |
||
| publisher = [[Iwanami Shoten Publishing|Iwanami Shoten]] |
| publisher = [[Iwanami Shoten Publishing|Iwanami Shoten]] |
||
Line 267: | Line 232: | ||
| publisher = Iwanami Shoten |
| publisher = Iwanami Shoten |
||
| year = 1997 |
| year = 1997 |
||
| language = |
| language = ja |
||
| isbn = 4-00-430510-1}} |
| isbn = 4-00-430510-1}} |
||
* {{ |
* {{Country study}} |
||
* [http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/jptoc.html Japan] |
* [http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/jptoc.html Japan] |
||
== |
==Further reading== |
||
* {{cite book |
|||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} |
|||
| last = Mizoguchi |
|||
| first = Kaoji |
|||
| title = The Archaeology of Japan: From the Earliest Rice Farming Villages to the Rise of the State |
|||
| publisher = Cambridge University Press |
|||
| year = 2013}} |
|||
<div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"> |
<div style="clear: both; text-align: center;"> |
||
<hr noshade |
<hr noshade style="font-size:1.4em; width:100%;" /> |
||
''This period is part of the [[Yamato period]] of [[History of Japan|Japanese History]].'' |
''This period is part of the [[Yamato period]] of [[History of Japan|Japanese History]].'' |
||
Latest revision as of 20:54, 18 December 2024
Part of a series on the |
History of Japan |
---|
The Kofun period (古墳時代, Kofun jidai) is an era in the history of Japan from about 300 to 538 AD (the date of the introduction of Buddhism), following the Yayoi period. The Kofun and the subsequent Asuka periods are sometimes collectively called the Yamato period. This period is the earliest era of recorded history in Japan, but studies depend heavily on archaeology since the chronology of historical sources tends to be distorted. The word kofun is Japanese for the type of burial mound dating from this era.
It was a period of cultural import. Continuing from the Yayoi period, the Kofun period is characterized by influence from China and the Korean Peninsula; archaeologists consider it a shared culture across the southern Korean Peninsula, Kyūshū and Honshū.[1] On the other hand, the most prosperous keyhole-shaped burial mounds in Japan during this period were approximately 5,000 in Japan from the middle of the 3rd century in the Yayoi period to the 7th century in the Asuka period, and many of them had huge tombs,[2][3] but in the southern Korean Peninsula there were only 13 from the 5th century to the 6th century, and the tombs were small. Wall decorations and Japanese-style armor, which are characteristic of older Japanese burial mounds, were excavated from 5th century burial mounds in the southern Korean Peninsula. This shows that Japan and the southern Korean Peninsula influenced each other.[4][5]
According to the Nihon Shoki, Buddhism and the Chinese writing system were introduced near the end of the period from Baekje. The Kofun period recorded Japan's earliest political centralization, when the Yamato clan rose to power in southwestern Japan, established the Imperial House, and helped control trade routes across the region.[6]
Kofun tombs
[edit]Kofun (from Middle Chinese kú 古 "ancient" + bjun 墳 "burial mound")[7][8] are burial mounds built for members of the ruling class from the 3rd to the 7th centuries in Japan,[9] and the Kofun period takes its name from the distinctive earthen mounds. The mounds contained large stone burial chambers, and some are surrounded by moats.
Kofun have four basic shapes: round and square are the most common, followed by 'scallop-shell' and 'keyhole.' The keyhole tomb is a distinct style found only in Japan, with a square front and round back. Kofun range in size from several meters to over 400 meters long, and unglazed pottery figures (Haniwa) were often buried under a kofun's circumference.
Development
[edit]The oldest Japanese kofun is reportedly Hokenoyama Kofun in Sakurai, Nara, which dates to the late 3rd century. In the Makimuku district of Sakurai, later keyhole kofuns (Hashihaka Kofun, Shibuya Mukaiyama Kofun) were built during the early 4th century. The keyhole kofun spread from Yamato to Kawachi—with giant kofun, such as Daisenryō Kofun—and then throughout the country during the 5th century. Keyhole kofun disappeared later in the 6th century, probably because of the drastic reformation of the Yamato court; Nihon Shoki records the introduction of Buddhism at this time. The last two great kofun are the 190-metre-long (620 ft) Imashirozuka kofun in Osaka (currently believed by scholars to be the tomb of Emperor Keitai) and the 135-metre long (443 ft) Iwatoyama kofun in Fukuoka, recorded in Fudoki of Chikugo as the tomb of Iwai (political archrival of Emperor Keitai). Kofun burial mounds on the island of Tanegashima and two very old Shinto shrines on the island of Yakushima suggest that these islands were the southern boundary of the Yamato state;[6] it extended north to Tainai in the present-day Niigata Prefecture, where excavated mounds have been associated with a person closely linked to the Yamato kingdom.[10]
Yamato court
[edit]Yamato rule is usually believed to have begun about 250 AD, and it is generally agreed that Yamato rulers had keyhole-kofun culture and hegemony in Yamato until the 4th century. Autonomy of local powers remained throughout the period, particularly in Kibi (the present-day Okayama Prefecture), Izumo (current Shimane Prefecture), Koshi (current Fukui and Niigata Prefecture), Kenu (northern Kantō), Chikushi (northern Kyūshū), and Hi (central Kyūshū). During the 6th century, the Yamato clans began to dominate the southern half of Japan. According to the Book of Song, Yamato relationships with China probably began in the late 4th century.
The Yamato polity, which emerged by the late 5th century, was distinguished by powerful clans (豪族, gōzoku). Each clan was headed by a patriarch (氏上, Uji-no-kami), who performed sacred rituals to the clan's kami (objects of worship) to ensure its long-term welfare. Clan members were the aristocracy, and the royal line which controlled the Yamato court was at its zenith. Clan leaders were awarded kabane, inherited titles denoting rank and political standing which replaced family names.
The Kofun period is called the Yamato period by some Western scholars, since this local chieftainship became the imperial dynasty at the end of the period. However, the Yamato clan ruled just one polity among others during the Kofun era. Japanese archaeologists emphasise that other regional chieftainships (such as Kibi) were in close contention for dominance in the first half of the Kofun period; Kibi's Tsukuriyama Kofun is Japan's fourth-largest.
The Yamato court exercised power over clans in Kyūshū and Honshū, bestowing titles (some hereditary) on clan chieftains. The Yamato name became synonymous with Japan as Yamato rulers suppressed other clans and acquired agricultural land. Based on Chinese models (including the adoption of the Chinese written language), they began to develop a central administration and an imperial court attended by subordinate clan chieftains with no permanent capital. Powerful clans were the Soga, Katsuragi, Heguri and Koze clans in the Yamato and Bizen Provinces and the Kibi clans in the Izumo Province. The Ōtomo and Mononobe clans were military leaders, and the Nakatomi and Inbe clans handled rituals. The Soga clan provided the government's chief minister, the Ōtomo and Mononobe clans provided secondary ministers, and provincial leaders were called kuni no miyatsuko. Craftsmen were organized into guilds.
Territorial expansion
[edit]In addition to archaeological findings indicating a local monarchy in Kibi Province as an important rival, the legend of the 4th-century Prince Yamato Takeru alludes to the borders of the Yamato and battlegrounds in the region; a frontier was near the later Izumo Province (eastern present-day Shimane Prefecture). Another frontier, in Kyūshū, was apparently north of present-day Kumamoto Prefecture. According to the legend, there was an eastern land in Honshū "whose people disobeyed the imperial court" and against whom Yamato Takeru was sent to fight.[citation needed] It is unclear if the rival country was near the Yamato nucleus or further away. Kai Province is mentioned as a location where prince Yamato Takeru traveled on his military expedition.
The period's northern frontier was explained in Kojiki as the legend of Shido Shōgun's (四道将軍, "Shōguns to four ways") expedition. One of four shōguns, Ōbiko set out northward to Koshi and his son Take Nunakawawake left for the eastern states. The father moved east from northern Koshi, and the son moved north;[contradictory] they met at Aizu, in present-day western Fukushima Prefecture. Although the legend is probably not factual, Aizu is near southern Tōhoku (the northern extent of late-4th-century keyhole-kofun culture).
Ōkimi
[edit]During the Kofun period, an aristocratic society with militaristic rulers developed. The period was a critical stage in Japan's evolution into a cohesive, recognized state. The society was most developed in the Kinai region and the eastern Setouchi region. Japan's rulers petitioned the Chinese court for confirmation of royal titles.
While the rulers' title was officially "King", they called themselves "Ōkimi" (大王, "Great King") during this period. Inscriptions on two swords (the Inariyama and Eta Funayama Swords) read Amenoshita Shiroshimesu (治天下; "ruling Heaven and Earth") and Ōkimi, indicating that the rulers invoked the Mandate of Heaven. The title Amenoshita Shiroshimesu Ōkimi was used until the 7th century, when it was replaced by Tennō.
Clans
[edit]Many of the clans and local chieftains who made up the Yamato polity claimed descent from the imperial family or kami. Archaeological evidence for the clans is found on the Inariyama Sword, on which the bearer recorded the names of his ancestors to claim descent from Ōbiko (大彦, recorded in the Nihon Shoki as a son of Emperor Kōgen). A number of clans claimed origin in China or the Korean Peninsula.
During the 5th century, the Katsuragi clan (葛城氏, descended from the legendary grandson of Emperor Kōgen) was the most prominent power in the court and intermarried with the imperial family. After the clan declined, late in the century, it was replaced by the Ōtomo clan. When Emperor Buretsu died with no apparent heir, Ōtomo no Kanamura recommended Emperor Keitai (a distant imperial relative in Koshi Province) as the new monarch. Kanamura resigned due to the failure of his diplomatic policies, and the court was controlled by the Mononobe and Soga clans at the beginning of the Asuka period.
Society
[edit]Toraijin
[edit]Toraijin refers to people who immigrated to Japan from abroad via the Ryukyu Islands or the Korean Peninsula. They introduced numerous, significant aspects of Chinese culture to Japan such as Chinese writing system and Buddhism from India. Valuing their knowledge and culture, the Yamato government gave preferential treatment to toraijin.[11] According to the 815 book, Shinsen Shōjiroku, 317 of 1,182 clans in the Kinai region of Honshū were considered to have foreign ancestry. 163 were of Chinese origin (written as "Kan"), 104 from Baekje ("Paekche" in the older romanization), 41 from Goguryeo, 6 from Silla, and 3 from Gaya.[12] They may have immigrated to Japan between 356 and 645.
Influential immigrants
[edit]Some of the many immigrants that had significant influence in Kofun period Japan included Wani, Yuzuki no Kimi and Achi no Omi, the founders of Kawachinofumi clan/Kawachinoaya clan,[13] Hata clan[14][15] and Yamatonoaya clan,[16][17] respectively. Despite being ethnically similar, many immigrants from Baekje and Silla had arrived in Japan during Emperor Ōjin's reign carrying separate identities and foreign deities such as the kami Inari.[18][19]
Other immigrants who settled in Japan beginning in the 4th century were the progenitors of Japanese clans. According to Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, the oldest record of a Silla immigrant is Amenohiboko: a legendary prince of Silla who settled in Japan at the era of Emperor Suinin, possibly during the 3rd or 4th centuries.
Baekje and Silla sent their princes as hostages to the Yamato court in exchange for military support.[20][21][22][23] King Muryeong of Baekje was born in Kyushu (筑紫) of Japan as the child of a hostage in 462,[24] and left a son in Japan who was an ancestor of the minor-noble Yamato no Fubito (和史, "Scribes of Yamato") clan. According to the Shoku Nihongi (続日本紀), Yamato no Fubito's relative (Takano no Niigasa) was a 10th-generation descendant of King Muryeong of Baekje who was chosen as a concubine for Emperor Kōnin and was the mother of Emperor Kanmu. In 2001, Emperor Akihito confirmed his ancient royal Korean heritage through Emperor Kanmu.[25]
Culture
[edit]Language
[edit]Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans wrote historical accounts primarily in Chinese characters, making original pronunciation difficult to trace. Although writing was largely unknown to the indigenous Japanese of the period, the literary skills of foreigners seem to have been increasingly appreciated by the Japanese elite. The Inariyama Sword, tentatively dated to 471 or 531, contains a Chinese-character inscription in a style used in China at the time.[26]
Haniwa
[edit]The cavalry wore armour, carried swords and other weapons, and used advanced military methods similar to those of Northeast Asia. Evidence of the advances is seen in haniwa (埴輪, "clay ring"), clay offerings placed in a ring on and around the tomb mounds of the ruling elite. The most important of these haniwa were found in southern Honshū (especially the Kinai region around Nara Prefecture) and northern Kyūshū. Haniwa grave offerings were sculpted as horses, chickens, birds, fans, fish, houses, weapons, shields, sunshades, pillows, and male and female humans. Another funerary piece, the magatama (勾玉, "curved jewel"), became symbolic of imperial power.
Introduction of material culture
[edit]Much of the material culture of the Kofun period demonstrates that Japan was in close political and economic contact with continental Asia (especially with the southern dynasties of China) via the Korean Peninsula; bronze mirrors cast from the same mould have been found on both sides of the Tsushima Strait. Irrigation, sericulture, and weaving were brought to Japan by immigrants, who are mentioned in ancient Japanese histories; the Hata clan introduced sericulture and certain types of weaving.[27]
Asuka period
[edit]The introduction of Buddhism in 538 marked the transition from the Kofun to the Asuka period, which coincided with the reunification of China under the Sui dynasty later in the century. Japan became deeply influenced by Chinese culture, adding a cultural context to the religious distinction between the periods.
Relations with other East Asian kingdoms
[edit]Chinese records
[edit]According to the Book of Sui, Silla and Baekje greatly valued relations with the Kofun-period Wa and the Korean kingdoms made diplomatic efforts to maintain their good standing with the Japanese.[28] The Book of Song reported that a Chinese emperor appointed the five kings of Wa in 451 to supervise military affairs of Wa, Silla, Imna, Gara, Jinhan and Mahan.[29]
Japanese records
[edit]According to the Nihon Shoki, Silla was conquered by the Japanese Empress-consort Jingū in the third century.[30] However, due to lack of evidence,[31] this story is considered to be mythological in nature. It reported that the prince of Silla came to Japan to serve the emperor of Japan,[32] and lived in Tajima Province. Known as Amenohiboko, his descendant is Tajima Mori.[33] According to Kojiki[34] and Nihon Shoki,[35] Geunchogo of Baekje presented stallions, broodmares and trainers to the Japanese emperor during Emperor Ōjin's reign.[36]
According to Kojiki and Nihon Shoki, Baekje had also sent a scholar by the name of Wani during the reign of Emperor Ōjin. He is said to be the pioneer of the introduction of the Chinese writing system to Japan.
Korean records
[edit]The Samguk sagi (Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms) reported that Baekje and Silla sent their princes as hostages to the Yamato court in exchange for military support to continue their military campaigns; King Asin of Baekje sent his son (Jeonji) in 397,[37] and King Silseong of Silla sent his son Misaheun in 402.[38] Hogong, from Japan, helped to found Silla.[39]
Genetics
[edit]In 2021, a research paper proposed a new theory as to the origins of the Japanese people. It suggested that the people of Japan bore genetic signatures from three ancient populations rather than just two as previously thought.[40] The paper called this strand the "Kofun strand" based on the samples found in the period, and separated it from the pre-existing "Jōmon" and "Yayoi strand" forming the "Tripartite ancestry theory".[40]
However recently, the tripartite ancestry theory is being met with criticism since its introduction in 2021. In essence, Japanese researchers claim that a tripartite theory is redundant as the genetical difference between Yayoi and Kofun groups is not significant enough and that the temporal discrepancy of the periods is minuscule. See Japanese people's Tripartite ancestry theory.
Results of the Japan-South Korea Joint Historical Research
[edit]Under an agreement reached at the 2001 Japan-South Korea summit, Japanese and South Korean historians conducted joint historical research in two phases, including the relationship between Japan and the Korean Peninsula during the Kofun period. The point at issue was the "Mimana Nihon-fu" (任那日本府) which was said to be the governing institution Japan established in Korea at that time. After the controversy, Japanese and South Korean historians agreed that there were Japanese in the south of Korea and that the term "Mimana Nihon-fu" was not used at the time and should not be used as it was misleading. However, they could not agree on the position of the Japanese people in Korea at that time. The Japanese side claimed that the institutions established in Korea by the Japanese people were not under the control of Koreans, but were operated independently by the Japanese people and conducted diplomatic negotiations with the Gaya confederacy. On the other hand, the South Korean side claimed that the agency was the diplomatic office of Gaya, which employed the Japanese as bureaucrats of Gaya. The collaboration ended in 2010 with the publication of a final report describing the above. The full text of the minutes concerning the joint research is disclosed by the Japanese side.[41][42][43][44][45]
Gallery
[edit]-
Kofun helmet, iron and gilt copper
-
Kofun Tankō (short armor)
-
Kofun Keikō (cuirass)
-
Helmet
-
Shield
-
Crown
-
Restored Kofun period lamellar armour
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Barnes, Gina L. The Archaeology of East Asia: The Rise of Civilization in China, Korea and Japan (Oxford: Oxbow books, 2015), 271-275; 331-360
- ^ Kazuo Hirose (March 2009). "A consideration of reconstructing our image of the Kofun period: does the period of keyhole tombs predate the Ritsuryo state?". 国立歴史民俗博物館研究報告 = Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History. 150. Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History. doi:10.15024/00001685. Archived from the original on 8 February 2022.
- ^ Kazuo Yanagisawa (2007). "前方後円墳". 東アジア考古学辞典. Tokyodo Shuppan. ISBN 978-4490107128.
- ^ Kanta Takata. "An Analysis of the Background of Japanese-style Tombs Builtin the Southwestern Korean Peninsula in the Fifth and Sixth Centuries". Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022.
- ^ Park Cheon-Soo (March 2010). 朝鮮半島南部に倭人が造った前方後円墳 : 古代九州との国際交流. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022.
- ^ a b Denoon, Donald et al. (2001). Multicultural Japan: Palaeolithic to Postmodern, p. 107., p. 107, at Google Books
- ^ "古". Jisho.org.
- ^ "墳". Jisho.org.
- ^ Keally, Charles T. (2009-04-29). "Kofun Culture". Retrieved 2009-05-30.
- ^ "Yamato kingdom traces found in Niigata Pref". Daily Yomiuri Online. September 17, 2012. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- ^ Kōzō, Yamamura; John Whitney Hall (1997). The Cambridge history of Japan. Cambridge University Press. p. 311. ISBN 0-521-22354-7.
- ^ Saeki (1981)
- ^ Takaoka, Nobuyuki; 片岡, 伸行 (2023-07-31). "神々のルーツ 明日香の地と「今木神」 – 全日本民医連". www.min-iren.gr.jp (in Japanese). Japan Federation of Democratic Medical Institutions (全日本民主医療機関連合会).
- ^ "都市史01 ~秦氏~" [History of the City 01 ~Hata clan~]. Kyoto City (in Japanese).
- ^ "「伊奈利社創祀前史」 ~伏見稲荷大社~". inari.jp.
- ^ 森浩一, 門脇禎二 (1997). 渡来人 : 尾張・美濃と渡来文化. 春日井シンポジウム (in Japanese). 大巧社. ISBN 4924899232. JPNO 99011294.
- ^ 『古代国家と天皇』創元社、1957年
- ^ Higo, Kazuo. "Inari Shinkō no Hajime". Inari Shinkō (ed. Hiroji Naoe). Tokyo: Yūzankaku Shuppan, 1983.
- ^ "「おいなりさん物語」 ~伏見稲荷大社~". Fushimi Inari Taisha (in Japanese).
- ^ Brown, Delmer M. (1993). The Cambridge History of Japan: Ancient Japan. Cambridge University Press. p. 141. ISBN 0-521-22352-0.
Faced with this comeback by Koguryo, Paekche leaders turned to Yamato for military support, even sending its crown prince to Yamato as a hostage in 397 – just as Silla had dispatched princely hostage to Koguryo in 392 when that kingdom was in dire need of military support.
- ^ Pratt, Keith (2007). Everlasting Flower: A History of Korea. Reaktion Books. p. 42. ISBN 978-1-86189-335-2.
We can only guess, for example, what it felt like for the girls periodically sent as brides to foreign courts, for the crown prince of Paekche when he was dispatched to the Yamato court as a hostage in AD 397, or for a Silla prince who experienced the same fate in 402.
- ^ The New Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica. 2003. p. 279. ISBN 0-85229-961-3.
Paekche was frequently attacked by Koguryo during the century, prompting continued requests for assistance from Yamato; it is recorded that Paekche even sent a crown prince to Yamato as a hostage on one occasion and the mother of the king on another. Yet, probably because of internal dissension, Yamato did not dispatch any troops to the peninsula. Yamato's interest in Korea was apparently a desire for access to improved continental technology and resources, especially iron.
- ^ Henthorn, William E. (1971). A history of Korea. Free Press. p. 37. ISBN 9780029144602.
In 402, Silla concluded a peace with the Wa. Prince Misahun was then sent to Japan as a hostage. This may have been an act of revenge by the Silla monarch, who, as Prince Silsong, had been sent as hostage to Koguryo by Prince Misahun's father. Despite the peace, Silla–Wa relations were never friendly, due no doubt in part to the Wa–Kaya alliance.
- ^ Nihon Shoki Vol.14 "Chronicle of Emperor Yūryaku" 六月丙戌朔 孕婦果如加須利君言 於Chikuzen Province (筑紫) 各羅嶋産兒 仍名此兒曰嶋君 於是 軍君即以一船 送嶋君於國 是爲King Muryeong of Baekje (武寧王) 百濟人呼此嶋曰主嶋也
- ^ "The emperor's new roots". the Guardian. 2001-12-28. Retrieved 2022-12-02.
- ^ Seeley (2000:19-23)
- ^ 国語大辞典 (Kokugo Dai Jiten Dictionary) (in Japanese) (新装版 (Revised Edition) ed.), Tokyo: Shogakukan, 1988,
姓氏。古代の有力帰化系氏族。出自は諸説あるが、おそらく五世紀に渡来した中国人の子孫で、養蚕・機織の技術をもって朝廷に仕え、伴造(とものみやつこ)の一員として秦造(はたのみやつこ)を称したと思われる。
Surname. Influential immigrant clan in ancient times. Various theories about origins, but most likely descendants of Chinese immigrants who came to Japan in the fifth century, who are thought to have brought sericulture and weaving technologies and served in the imperial court, and to have been granted the title Hata no Miyatsuko as members of the Tomo no Miyatsuko [an imperial rank responsible for overseeing technically skilled artisans]. - ^ Chinese History Record Book of Sui, Vol. 81, Liezhuan 46 : 隋書 東夷伝 第81巻列伝46 : 新羅、百濟皆以倭為大國,多珍物,並敬仰之,恆通使往來 "Silla and Baekje both take Wa to be a great country, with many rare and precious things; also [Silla and Baekje] respect and look up to them, and regularly send embassies there." [1]"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2004-12-21. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Chinese History Record Book of Song : 宋書 列傳第五十七 夷蠻 : 詔除武使持節、都督倭新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓六國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭王。興死,弟武立,自稱使持節、都督倭百濟新羅任那加羅秦韓慕韓七國諸軍事、安東大將軍、倭國王 [2] Archived 2015-10-13 at the Wayback Machine[3] Archived 2016-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Sakamoto (1967:336-340)
- ^ Joanna Rurarz (2014). Historia Korei (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog. p. 89. ISBN 9788363778866.
- ^ Nihon Shoki, Vol.6 "天日槍對曰 僕新羅國主之子也 然聞日本國有聖皇 則以己國授弟知古而化歸(to serve)之"
- ^ Nihon Shoki, Vol.6 "故天日槍娶但馬出嶋人 太耳女麻多烏 生但馬諸助也 諸助生但馬日楢杵 日楢杵生清彦 清彦生田道間守也"
- ^ 百濟國主照古王遣阿知吉師獻雄馬雌馬各壹以貢上此阿知吉師者 阿直史等之祖
- ^ 十五年秋八月 壬戌朔丁卯 百濟王遣阿直岐 貢良馬二匹 即養於輕阪上廄 因以阿直岐令掌飼 故號其養馬之處曰 廄阪
- ^ Kurano (1958:248-249)
- ^ Korean History Record Samguk Sagi : 三國史記 新羅本紀 : 元年 三月 與倭國通好 以奈勿王子未斯欣爲質 [4]
- ^ Korean History Record Samguk Sagi : 三國史記 百済本紀 : 六年夏五月 王與倭國結好 以太子腆支爲質 秋七月大閱於漢水之南 "아신왕 - 삼국사기 백제본기- 디지털한국학". Archived from the original on 2008-05-12. Retrieved 2008-05-12.
- ^ Korean History Record Samguk Sagi :三國史記 卷第一 新羅本紀第一 始祖赫居世, 瓠公者 未詳其族姓 本倭人
- ^ a b Cooke NP, Mattiangeli V, Cassidy LM, Okazaki K, Stokes CA, Onbe S, et al. (September 2021). "Ancient genomics reveals tripartite origins of Japanese populations". Science Advances. 7 (38): eabh2419. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.2419C. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abh2419. PMC 8448447. PMID 34533991.
- ^ Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Committee, Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Report (first period) The Japan Korea Cultural Foundation
- ^ Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Committee, Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Report (second period) The Japan Korea Cultural Foundation
- ^ Japan-Korea Joint Historical Research Committee, Discussion meeting of the first subcommittee, pp.479-484, August 19, 2009 The Japan Korea Cultural Foundation
- ^ Summary of the Japan-Korea Historical Research Report 47news, March 23, 2010
- ^ Summary of the Japan-Korea Historical Research Report Shikoku News , March 23, 2010
References
[edit]- Bogucki, Peter (1999). The Origins of Human Society. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 1-57718-112-3.
- Farris, William Wayne (1998). Sacred Texts and Buried Treasures: Issues in the Historical Archaeology of Ancient Japan. University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN 0-8248-1966-7.
- Imamura, Keiji (1996). Prehistoric Japan: New Perspectives on Insular East Asia. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0-8248-1852-0.
- Kōzō, Yamamura; John Whitney Hall (1997). The Cambridge history of Japan. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-22354-7.
- Kurano, Kenji; Yūkichi Takeda (1958). Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei 1: Kojiki, Norito. Iwanami Shoten. ISBN 4-00-060001-X.
- Saeki, Arikiyo (1981). Shinsen Shōjiroku no Kenkyū (Honbun hen) (in Japanese). Yoshikawa Kōbunkan. ISBN 4-642-02109-4.
- Sakamoto, Tarō; Ienaga Saburō; Inoue Mitsusada; Ōno Susumu (1967). Nihon Koten Bungaku Taikei 67: Nihon Shoki. Vol. 1. Iwanami Shoten. ISBN 4-00-060067-2.
- Seeley, Christopher (2000). A history of writing in Japan. University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN 0-8248-2217-X.
- Stearns, Peter N.; William Leonard Langer (2001). The Encyclopedia of World History. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 0-395-65237-5.
- Yamaguchi, Yoshinori; Kōnoshi Takamitsu (1997). Shinpen Nihon Koten Bungaku Zenshū 1: Kojiki. Shōgakukan. ISBN 4-09-658001-5.
- Yoshida, Takashi (1997). Nihon no tanjō (in Japanese). Iwanami Shoten. ISBN 4-00-430510-1.
- This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. Country Studies. Federal Research Division.
- Japan
Further reading
[edit]- Mizoguchi, Kaoji (2013). The Archaeology of Japan: From the Earliest Rice Farming Villages to the Rise of the State. Cambridge University Press.
This period is part of the Yamato period of Japanese History.
< Yayoi | History of Japan | Asuka period >