Jump to content

Flat Earth: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: possible vandalism
More helpful for those navigating the pages
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Archaic conception of Earth's shape}}
{{About|cosmologies in which Earth was held to be flat|the modern misconception about medieval European cosmology|Myth of the flat Earth|other uses|Flat Earth (disambiguation)}}
{{About|the archaic conception of Earth's shape|modern-day beliefs that the Earth is flat|Modern flat Earth beliefs|the historical misconception that people during the Middle Ages believed that the Earth was flat|Myth of the flat Earth|other uses}}
[[File:Flammarion.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Flammarion engraving]] (1888) depicts a traveler who arrives at the edge of a flat Earth and sticks his head through the [[firmament]].]]
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{Use American English|date=July 2022}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2023}}
[[File:Orlando-Ferguson-flat-earth-map edit.jpg|thumb|Flat Earth map drawn by [[Orlando Ferguson]] in 1893. The map contains several references to biblical passages as well as various supposed refutations of the "Globe Theory".]]
'''Flat Earth''' is an archaic<!--Please DO NOT REMOVE archaic, discuss on the talk page.--> and scientifically disproven conception of the [[Figure of the Earth|Earth's shape]] as a [[Plane (geometry)|plane]] or [[Disk (mathematics)|disk]]. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat-Earth [[cosmography]], notably including the [[cosmology in the ancient Near East]]. The model has undergone a [[modern flat Earth beliefs|recent resurgence]] as a [[conspiracy theory]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Dunning |first1=Brian |title=The Flat Earth Theory |url=https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4338 |website=Skeptoid |access-date=17 June 2023}}</ref>


The idea of a [[spherical Earth]] appeared in [[ancient Greek philosophy]] with [[Pythagoras]] (6th century BC). However, the [[Early Greek cosmology|early Greek cosmological]] view of a flat Earth persisted among most [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratics]] (6th–5th century BC). In the early 4th century BC, [[Plato]] wrote about a spherical Earth. By about 330&nbsp;BC, his former student [[Aristotle]] had provided strong [[empirical evidence]] for a spherical Earth. Knowledge of the Earth's global shape gradually began to spread beyond the [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic world]].<ref name=Stuttgart>{{Cite web |date=n.d. |title=Romanische Literaturen I |url=https://www.ilw.uni-stuttgart.de/abteilungen/romanische-literaturen-i-galloromanistik/ |access-date=April 4, 2022 |website=Institut für Literaturwissenschaft |publisher=Universität Stuttgart |language=de}}</ref><ref name=Ragep>{{Cite journal |last=Ragep |first=F. Jamil |year=2009 |title=Astronomy |url=https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/astronomy-COM_22652?s.num=0&s.f.s2_parent=s.f.book.encyclopaedia-of-islam-3&s.q=Astronomy |journal=Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE |doi=10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_22652 |url-access=registration |access-date=30 July 2022}}</ref><ref name=Glick>{{Cite book |last1=Glick |first1=Thomas F. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/61228669 |title=Medieval science, technology, and medicine : an encyclopedia |last2=Livesey |first2=Steven J. |last3=Wallis |first3=Faith |publisher=New York: [[Routledge]] |year=2005 |isbn=0-415-96930-1 |series=Routledge encyclopedias of the Middle Ages, 11. |location=New York |oclc=61228669 |access-date=April 4, 2022}}</ref><ref name=HuaiNanTzu>{{Cite journal |last=Cullen |first=C. |date=February 1976 |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in ''Huai Nan Tzu'' <small>淮南子</small> |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bulletin-of-the-school-of-oriental-and-african-studies/article/abs/chinese-eratosthenes-of-the-flat-earth-a-study-of-a-fragment-of-cosmology-in-huai-nan-tzu/42DB4C927104714A18409D224DC7D704 |journal=[[Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |publication-date=24 December 2009 |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=106–127 |doi=10.1017/s0041977x00052137 |issn=0041-977X |url-access=limited |access-date=April 4, 2022 |s2cid=171017315}}</ref> By the early period of the Christian Church, the spherical view was widely held, with some notable exceptions. In contrast, ancient Chinese scholars consistently describe the Earth as flat, and this perception remained unchanged until their encounters with [[Jesuit missionaries]] in the 17th century.<ref name="Cullen"/> It is a historical myth that medieval Europeans generally thought the Earth was flat.<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth" /> [[Myth of the flat Earth|This myth]] was created in the 17th century by [[Protestant]]s to argue against [[Catholic]] teachings.<ref>{{Cite web |author=Dr. James Hannam |date=May 18, 2010 |title=Science Versus Christianity? |url=http://www.patheos.com/resources/additional-resources/2010/05/science-versus-christianity |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231202174945/http://www.patheos.com/resources/additional-resources/2010/05/science-versus-christianity |archive-date=2023-12-02 |website=Patheos |quote=The myth that people in the Middle Ages thought the earth is flat appears to date from the 17th century as part of the campaign by Protestants against Catholic teaching.}}</ref> Traditionalist Muslim scholars have maintained that the earth is flat, though, since the 9th century, Muslim scholars tended to believe in a spherical Earth.<ref name=":0"/>
The '''flat Earth''' model is an [[wikt:archaic|archaic]]<!-- Please DO NOT REMOVE archaic, discuss on talk page. --> conception of [[Earth]]'s shape as a [[plane (geometry)|plane]] or [[disk (mathematics)|disk]]. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat Earth [[cosmography]], including Greece until the classical period, the Bronze Age and Iron Age civilizations of the Near East until the Hellenistic period, India until the Gupta period (early centuries AD), and China until the 17th century. That paradigm was also typically held in the aboriginal cultures of the Americas, and the notion of a flat Earth domed by the [[firmament]] in the shape of an inverted bowl was common in pre-scientific societies.<ref>"Their cosmography as far as we know anything about it was practically of one type up til the time of the white man's arrival upon the scene. That of the Borneo Dayaks may furnish us with some idea of it. 'They consider the Earth to be a flat surface, whilst the heavens are a dome, a kind of glass shade which covers the Earth and comes in contact with it at the horizon.'"
Lucien Levy-Bruhl, ''Primitive Mentality'' (repr. Boston: Beacon, 1966) 353; "The usual primitive conception of the world's form ... [is] flat and round below and surmounted above by a solid firmament in the shape of an inverted bowl." H. B. Alexander, ''[[The Mythology of All Races]]'' 10: North American (repr. New York: Cooper Square, 1964) 249.</ref>


Despite the [[Fact#In science|scientific facts]] and [[Empirical evidence for the spherical shape of Earth|obvious effects of Earth's sphericity]], [[Pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]]<ref>{{cite web |last=Foster |first=Craig |date=August 21, 2018 |title=Do People Really Think Earth Might Be Flat? |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/do-people-really-think-earth-might-be-flat/ |access-date=February 8, 2024 }}</ref> flat-Earth conspiracy theories persist, and from the 2010s at latest, believers in a flat earth have increased, both as membership in [[modern flat Earth societies]], and as unaffiliated individuals using [[social media]].<ref name="Ambrose" /><ref name="Dure" /> In a 2018 study reported on by ''Scientific American'', only 82% of 18 to 24 year old American respondents agreed with the statement "I have always believed the world is round". However, a firm belief in a flat Earth is rare, with less than 2% acceptance in all age groups.<ref name="Foster">{{Cite web |author1=Craig A. Foster |author2=Glenn Branch |date=August 21, 2018 |title=Do People Really Think Earth Might Be Flat? |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/do-people-really-think-earth-might-be-flat/ |website=Scientific American}}</ref>{{TOC limit|4}}
The idea of a [[spherical Earth]] appeared in [[Greek philosophy]] with [[Pythagoras]] (6th century BC), although most [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratics]] (6th – 5th century BC) retained the flat Earth model. [[Aristotle]] provided evidence for the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds by around 330 BC. Knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the [[Hellenistic period|Hellenistic world]] from then on.<ref>Continuation of Greek concept into Roman and medieval Christian thought: Reinhard Krüger: ''[http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/lettres/krueger/forschungsvorhaben_erdkugeltheorie_biblio.html Materialien und Dokumente zur mittelalterlichen Erdkugeltheorie von der Spätantike bis zur Kolumbusfahrt (1492)]''</ref><ref>Direct adoption of the Greek concept by Islam: Ragep, F. Jamil: "Astronomy", in: Krämer, Gudrun (ed.) et al.: ''Encyclopaedia of Islam'', THREE, Brill 2010, without page numbers</ref><ref>Direct adoption by India: [[David Pingree|D. Pingree]]: "History of Mathematical Astronomy in India", ''Dictionary of Scientific Biography'', Vol. 15 (1978), pp. 533−633 (554f.); Glick, Thomas F., Livesey, Steven John, Wallis, Faith (eds.): "Medieval Science, Technology, and Medicine: An Encyclopedia", Routledge, New York 2005, {{ISBN|0-415-96930-1}}, p. 463</ref><ref>Adoption by China via European science: Jean-Claude Martzloff, [http://coaca.ihns.ac.cn/documents/shuli/Space.pdf "Space and Time in Chinese Texts of Astronomy and of Mathematical Astronomy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries"], ''Chinese Science'' 11 (1993-94): 66-92 (69) and Christopher Cullen, "A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子", ''Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies'', Vol. 39, No. 1 (1976), pp. 106-127 (107)</ref>

In the modern era, [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-3.4/macdougall.html|title=Strange enthusiasms: a brief history of American pseudoscience|first=Robert|last=MacDougall|accessdate=July 5, 2016|publisher=[[Columbia University]]}}</ref> flat Earth theories have been espoused by [[modern flat Earth societies]] and, increasingly by unaffiliated individuals using social media.<ref name=Ambrose/><ref name=Dure/>

{{TOC limit|4}}


==History==
==History==
===Belief in flat Earth===
===Rising support=== People who believe in this theory also tend to believe in Fairies!
====Ancient West Asia====
====Near East====
{{further|Ancient near eastern cosmology|Egyptian mythology|Biblical cosmology}}
[[Image:Baylonianmaps.JPG|right|thumb|''[[Babylonian Map of the World|Imago Mundi]]'' Babylonian map, the oldest known world map, 6th century BC [[Babylonia]]]]
[[File:Baylonianmaps.JPG|right|thumb|''[[Babylonian Map of the World|Imago Mundi]]'' Babylonian map, the oldest known world map, 6th century BC [[Babylonia]].]]
In early [[Egyptian mythology|Egyptian]]<ref>H. and H. A. Frankfort, J. A. Wilson, and T. Jacobsen, Before Philosophy (Baltimore: Penguin, 1949) 54.</ref> and [[Mesopotamian mythology|Mesopotamian thought]], the world was portrayed as a disk floating in the ocean. A similar model is found in the [[Homeric]] account from the 8th century BC in which "Okeanos, the personified body of water surrounding the circular surface of the Earth, is the begetter of all life and possibly of all gods."<ref>
In early [[Egyptian mythology|Egyptian]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Frankfort |first1=H. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WoQIAQAAIAAJ |title=Before Philosophy: The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man; an Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East |last2=Wilson |first2=J. A. |last3=Jacobsen |first3=T. |publisher=Penguin Books |year=1951 |isbn=978-0-14-020198-7 |series=An Oriental Institute essay |page=54 |issue=v. 1}}</ref> and [[Mesopotamian myths|Mesopotamian thought]], the world was portrayed as a disk floating in the ocean. A similar model is found in the [[Homeric]] account from the 8th century BC in which "Okeanos, the personified body of water surrounding the circular surface of the Earth, is the begetter of all life and possibly of all gods."<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Dream of Reason|last=Gottlieb|first=Anthony|date=2000|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0-393-04951-0|page=[https://archive.org/details/dreamofreasonhis00anth/page/6 6]|url=https://archive.org/details/dreamofreasonhis00anth/page/6}}</ref>
{{Cite book|author=Anthony Gottlieb|title=The Dream of Reason|date=2000|page=6|publisher=Penguin|isbn=0-393-04951-5}}</ref>


The [[Pyramid Texts]] and [[Coffin Texts]] of ancient Egypt show a similar cosmography; [[Nu (mythology)|Nun]] (the Ocean) encircled ''nbwt'' ("dry lands" or "Islands").<ref>''Pyramid Texts'', Utterance 366, 629a–29c: "Behold, thou art great and round like the Great Round; Behold, thou are bent around, and art round like the Circle which encircles the nbwt; Behold, thou art round and great like the Great Circle which sets." ''(Faulkner 1969, 120)''</ref><ref>''Ancient Near Eastern Texts'', Pritchard, 1969, p. 374.</ref><ref>''Coffin Texts'', Spell 714.</ref>{{full citation needed|date=October 2017}}
The Israelites imagined the Earth as a flat disc that floated on water; an arched firmament separated the Earth from the heavens.<ref name="Berlin 2011 189">{{cite book
| last1 = Berlin
| first1 = Adele
| authorlink =
| title = The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion
| chapter = Cosmology and creation
| editor1-last = Berlin
| editor1-first = Adele
| editor2-last = Grossman
| editor2-first = Maxine
| date = 2011
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| isbn =
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=hKAaJXvUaUoC&pg=PA189
| ref = harv
}}</ref> Like most ancient peoples, the Hebrews believed the sky was a solid dome with the [[Sun]], [[Moon]], [[planets]] and [[stars]] embedded in it.<ref>{{cite journal |journal=Westminster Theological Journal |volume= 53 |year= 1991 |pages= 227–40 |title= The Firmament and the Water Above |author= Seely, Paul H.
|url= http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Text/Articles-Books/Seely-Firmament-WTJ.pdf |format= PDF |accessdate= 2010-02-02}}</ref> According to The ''[[Jewish Encyclopedia]]'':
<blockquote>
The Hebrews regarded the earth as a plain or a hill figured like a hemisphere, swimming on water. Over this is arched the solid vault of heaven. To this vault are fastened the lights, the stars. So slight is this elevation that birds may rise to it and fly along its expanse.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=807&letter=C#2736 |title=Cosmogony |publisher=JewishEncyclopedia.com |date= |accessdate=2014-05-15}}</ref></blockquote>


The Israelites also imagined the Earth to be a disc floating on water with an arched [[firmament]] above it that separated the Earth from the heavens.<ref name="Berlin 2011 189">{{cite book |last1=Berlin |first1=Adele |title=The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion |date=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199730049 |editor1-last=Berlin |editor1-first=Adele |chapter=Cosmology and Creation |editor2-last=Grossman |editor2-first=Maxine |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hKAaJXvUaUoC&pg=PA189}}</ref> The sky was a solid dome with the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars embedded in it.<ref>{{cite journal |journal= Westminster Theological Journal |volume= 53 |year= 1991 |pages= 227–40 |title= The Firmament and the Water Above |author= Seely, Paul H. |url= http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Text/Articles-Books/Seely-Firmament-WTJ.pdf |access-date= 2010-02-02 |archive-date= 2009-03-05 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090305132849/http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/OTeSources/01-Genesis/Text/Articles-Books/Seely-Firmament-WTJ.pdf |url-status= dead }}</ref>
The [[Pyramid Texts]] and [[Coffin Texts]] of ancient Egypt show a similar cosmography; [[Nu (mythology)|Nun]] (the Ocean) encircled ''nbwt'' ("dry lands" or "Islands").<ref>''Pyramid Texts'', Utterance 366, 629a-629c: "Behold, thou art great and round like the Great Round; Behold, thou are bent around, and art round like the Circle which encircles the nbwt; Behold, thou art round and great like the Great Circle which sets."''(Faulkner 1969, 120)''</ref><ref>''Ancient Near Eastern Texts'', Pritchard, 1969, p.374.</ref><ref>''Coffin Texts'', Spell 714.</ref>


====Ancient Mediterranean====
====Greece====
=====Poets=====
=====Poets=====
Both [[Homer]]<ref>''Iliad'', 28. 606.</ref> and [[Hesiod]]<ref>''The Shield of Heracles'', 314-316, transl. Hugh G. Evelyn-White, 1914.</ref> described a flat disc cosmography on the [[Shield of Achilles]].<ref>''The shield of Achilles and the poetics of ekphrasis'', Andrew Sprague Becker, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, p.148.</ref><ref>Professor of Classics (Emeritus) Mark W. Edwards in his ''The Iliad. A commentary'' (1991, p.231) has noted of Homer's usage of the flat earth disc in the ''Iliad'': "Okeanos...surrounds the pictures on the shield and he surrounds the flat disc of the earth on which men and women work out their lives". Quoted in ''The shield of Achilles and the poetics of ekphrasis'', Andrew Sprague Becker, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, p.148</ref>
Both [[Homer]]<ref>''Iliad'', 28. 606.</ref> and [[Hesiod]]<ref>''The Shield of Heracles'', pp. 314–6, transl. Hugh G. Evelyn-White, 1914.</ref> described a disc cosmography on the [[Shield of Achilles]].<ref>''The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis'', Andrew Sprague Becker, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, p. 148.</ref><ref>Professor of Classics (Emeritus) Mark W. Edwards in his ''The Iliad. A Commentary'' (1991, p. 231) has noted of Homer's usage of the flat Earth disc in the ''Iliad'': "Okeanos...surrounds the pictures on the shield and he surrounds the disc of the Earth on which men and women work out their lives." Quoted in ''The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis'', Andrew Sprague Becker, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, p. 148.</ref> This poetic tradition of an Earth-encircling (''gaiaokhos'') sea ([[Oceanus]]) and a disc also appears in [[Stasinus]] of Cyprus,<ref>Stasinus of Cyprus wrote in his Cypria (lost, only preserved in fragment) that Oceanus surrounded the entire Earth: ''deep eddying Oceanus'' and that the Earth was flat with ''furthest bounds'', these quotes are found preserved in Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, VIII. 334B.</ref> [[Mimnermus]],<ref>Mimnermus of Colophon (630BC) details a flat Earth model, with the sun (Helios) bathing at the edges of Oceanus that surround the Earth (Mimnermus, frg. 11).</ref> [[Aeschylus]],<ref>''Seven against Thebes'', verse 305; ''Prometheus Bound'', 1, 136; 530; 665 (which also describe the 'edges' of the Earth).</ref> and [[Apollonius Rhodius]].<ref>Apollonius Rhodius, in his ''Argonautica'' (3rd century BC) included numerous flat Earth references (IV. 590 ff): "Now that river, rising from the ends of the Earth, where are the portals and mansions of Nyx (Night), on one side bursts forth upon the beach of Okeanos."</ref>
This poetic tradition of an earth-encircling (''gaiaokhos'') sea ([[Oceanus]]) and a flat disc also appears in [[Stasinus]] of Cyprus,<ref>Stasinus of Cyprus wrote in his Cypria (lost, only preserved in fragment) that Oceanus surrounded the entire earth: ''deep eddying Oceanus'' and that the earth was flat with ''furthest bounds', these quotes are found preserved in Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, VIII. 334B.</ref> [[Mimnermus]],<ref>Mimnermus of Colophon (630BC) details a flat earth model, with the sun (Helios) bathing at the edges of Oceanus that surround the earth (Mimnermus, frg. 11)</ref> [[Aeschylus]],<ref>''Seven against Thebes'', verse 305; ''Prometheus Bound'', 1, 136; 530; 665 (which also describe the 'edges' of the earth).</ref> and [[Apollonius Rhodius]].<ref>Apollonius Rhodius, in his ''Argonautica'' (3rd century BC) included numerous flat earth references (IV. 590 ff): "Now that river, rising from the ends of the earth, where are the portals and mansions of Nyx (Night), on one side bursts forth upon the beach of Okeanos."</ref>


Homer's description of the flat disc cosmography on the shield of Achilles with the encircling ocean is repeated far later in [[Quintus Smyrnaeus]]' [[Posthomerica]] (4th century AD), which continues the narration of the Trojan War.<ref>''Posthomerica'' (V. 14) - "Here [on the shield of Achilles] Tethys' all-embracing arms were wrought, and Okeanos fathomless flow. The outrushing flood of Rivers crying to the echoing hills all round, to right, to left, rolled o'er the land." - Translation by Way. A. S, 1913.</ref>
Homer's description of the disc cosmography on the shield of Achilles with the encircling ocean is repeated far later in [[Quintus Smyrnaeus]]' ''[[Posthomerica]]'' (4th century AD), which continues the narration of the Trojan War.<ref>''Posthomerica'' (V. 14). "Here [on the shield of Achilles] Tethys' all-embracing arms were wrought, and Okeanos fathomless flow. The outrushing flood of Rivers crying to the echoing hills all round, to right, to left, rolled o'er the land." Translation by Way, A.S. 1913.</ref>


=====Philosophers=====
=====Philosophers=====
[[Image:Anaximander world map-en.svg|thumb|right|Possible rendering of Anaximander's world map<ref>According to John Mansley Robinson, ''An Introduction to Early Greek Philosophy'', Houghton and Mifflin, 1968.</ref>]]
[[Image:Anaximander world map-en.svg|thumb|right|Possible rendering of Anaximander's world map<ref>According to John Mansley Robinson, ''An Introduction to Early Greek Philosophy'', Houghton and Mifflin, 1968.</ref>]]
Several [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic philosophers]] believed that the world was flat: [[Thales of Miletus|Thales]] (c. 550&nbsp;BC) according to several sources,<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Physical World of the Greeks |last=Sambursky |first=Samuel |publisher=[[Princeton University Press]] |isbn=9780691024110 |date=August 1987|pages=12}}</ref> and [[Leucippus]] (c. 440&nbsp;BC) and [[Democritus]] (c. 460–370&nbsp;BC) according to Aristotle.<ref name=Burch>{{Cite journal |last= Burch |first= George Bosworth |title= The Counter-Earth |journal= Osiris |volume= 11 |publisher= Saint Catherines Press |issue= 1 |date= 1954 |pages= 267–94 |doi= 10.1086/368583 |s2cid= 144330867 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |first= Didier |last= De Fontaine |title= Flat worlds: Today and in antiquity |journal= Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana |volume= 1 |issue= 3 |pages= 257–62 |date= 2002 |url= http://www.mse.berkeley.edu/faculty/deFontaine/flatworlds.html |access-date= August 3, 2007 |bibcode= 2002MmSAI..73S.257D |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070825010821/http://www.mse.berkeley.edu/faculty/deFontaine/flatworlds.html |archive-date= August 25, 2007 |url-status= dead }}</ref><ref>Aristotle, ''De Caelo'', 294b13–21</ref>
Several [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic philosophers]] believed that the world was flat: [[Thales]] (c. 550 BC) according to several sources,<ref>''The Physical World of the Greeks'', Samuel Sambursky, Princeton University Press (August 1987), p. 12</ref>
and [[Leucippus]] (c. 440 BC) and [[Democritus]] (c. 460 – 370 BC) according to Aristotle.<ref name=Burch>{{Cite journal |last= Burch |first= George Bosworth |title= The Counter-Earth |journal= Osiris |volume= 11 |publisher= Saint Catherines Press |issue= 1 |date= 1954 |pages= 267–294 |doi= 10.1086/368583 |ref= harv}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |first= Didier |last=De Fontaine |title= Flat worlds: Today and in antiquity |journal= Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana, special issue |volume= 1 |issue= 3 |pages= 257–62 |date= 2002 |url= http://www.mse.berkeley.edu/faculty/deFontaine/flatworlds.html |accessdate= August 3, 2007 |ref= harv}}</ref><ref>Aristotle, ''De Caelo'', 294b13-21</ref>


Thales thought the earth floated in water like a log.<ref>Aristotle, ''De Caelo'', II. 13. 3; 294a 28: "Many others say the earth rests upon water. This... is the oldest theory that has been preserved, and is attributed to Thales of Miletus"</ref> It has been argued, however, that Thales actually believed in a round Earth.<ref>{{cite book|last=O'Grady|first=Patricia F.|title=Thales of Miletus : the beginnings of Western science and philosophy|date=2002|publisher=Ashgate|location=Aldershot|pages=87–107|isbn=9780754605331}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Pseudo-Plutarch |title=Placita Philosophorum |at=V.3, Ch.10 |url=http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0404%3Abook%3D3%3Achapter%3D10 |publisher=Perseus Digital Library |accessdate=December 24, 2014 }}</ref> [[Anaximander]] (c. 550 BC) believed the Earth was a short cylinder with a flat, circular top that remained stable because it was the same distance from all things.<ref>[[Hippolytus of Rome|Hippolytus]], ''Refutation of all Heresies'', i. 6</ref><ref>[[Anaximander]]; {{Cite journal| last = Fairbanks (editor and translator)| first = Arthur | title = Fragments and Commentary | journal = The Hanover Historical Texts Project | url = http://history.hanover.edu/texts/presoc/anaximan.html | ref = harv }} (Plut., ''Strom.'' 2 ; ''Dox''. 579).</ref> [[Anaximenes of Miletus]] believed that "the earth is flat and rides on air; in the same way the sun and the moon and the other heavenly bodies, which are all fiery, ride the air because of their flatness."<ref>Hippolytus, ''Refutation of all Heresies'', i. 7; Cf. Aristotle, ''De Caelo'', 294b13-21</ref> [[Xenophanes of Colophon]] (c. 500 BC) thought that the Earth was flat, with its upper side touching the air, and the lower side extending without limit.<ref>Xenophanes [[Diels-Kranz|DK]] 21B28, quoted in Achilles, ''Introduction to Aratus'' 4</ref>
Thales thought that the Earth floated in water like a log.<ref>Aristotle, ''De Caelo'', II. 13. 3; 294a 28: "Many others say the Earth rests upon water. This... is the oldest theory that has been preserved, and is attributed to Thales of Miletus."</ref> It has been argued, however, that Thales actually believed in a spherical Earth.<ref>{{cite book |title=Thales of Miletus: the beginnings of Western science and philosophy |last=O'Grady |first=Patricia F. |author-link=Patricia O'Grady|date=2002 |publisher=[[Ashgate Publishing]] |isbn=9780754605331 |location=[[Aldershot]] |pages=87–107}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Pseudo-Plutarch |title=Placita Philosophorum |at=V.&nbsp;3, Ch.&nbsp;10 |url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0404%3Abook%3D3%3Achapter%3D10 |publisher=Perseus Digital Library |access-date=December 24, 2014 }}</ref> [[Anaximander]] (c. 550&nbsp;BC) believed that the Earth was a short cylinder with a flat, circular top that remained stable because it was the same distance from all things.<ref>[[Hippolytus of Rome|Hippolytus]], ''Refutation of all Heresies'', i. 6.</ref><ref>{{Cite journal| author = [[Anaximander]] | editor-last = Fairbanks | editor-first = Arthur | translator-last = Fairbanks | translator-first = Arthur | title = Fragments and Commentary | journal = The Hanover Historical Texts Project | url = http://history.hanover.edu/texts/presoc/anaximan.html }} (Plut., ''Strom.'' 2; ''Dox''. 579).</ref> [[Anaximenes of Miletus]] believed that "the Earth is flat and rides on air; in the same way the Sun and the Moon and the other heavenly bodies, which are all fiery, ride the air because of their flatness".<ref>Hippolytus, ''Refutation of all Heresies'', i. 7; Cf. Aristotle, ''De Caelo'', 294b13–21.</ref> [[Xenophanes]] (c. 500&nbsp;BC) thought that the Earth was flat, with its upper side touching the air, and the lower side extending without limit.<ref>Xenophanes [[Diels-Kranz|DK]] 21B28, quoted in Achilles, ''Introduction to Aratus'' 4.</ref>


Belief in a flat Earth continued into the 5th century BC. [[Anaxagoras]] (c. 450 BC) agreed that the Earth was flat,<ref>[[Diogenes Laertius]], ii. 8</ref> and his pupil [[Archelaus (philosopher)|Archelaus]] believed that the flat Earth was depressed in the middle like a saucer, to allow for the fact that the Sun does not rise and set at the same time for everyone.<ref>Hippolytus, ''Refutation of all Heresies'', i. 9</ref>
Belief in a flat Earth continued into the 5th century BC. [[Anaxagoras]] (c. 450&nbsp;BC) agreed that the Earth was flat,<ref>[[Diogenes Laërtius]], ii. 8.</ref> and his pupil [[Archelaus (philosopher)|Archelaus]] believed that the flat Earth was depressed in the middle like a saucer, to allow for the fact that the Sun does not rise and set at the same time for everyone.<ref>Hippolytus, ''Refutation of all Heresies'', i. 9.</ref>


=====Historians=====
=====Historians=====
[[Hecataeus of Miletus]] believed the earth was flat and surrounded by water.<ref>FGrH F 18a.</ref> [[Herodotus]] in his ''Histories'' ridiculed the belief that water encircled the world,<ref>Herodotus knew of the conventional view, according to which the river Ocean runs around a circular flat earth (4.8), and of the division of the world into three - Jacoby, RE Suppl. 2.352 ff yet rejected this personal belief (''Histories'', 2. 21; 4. 8; 4. 36)</ref> yet most classicists agree he still believed the earth was flat because of his descriptions of literal "ends" or "edges" of the earth.<ref>''The history of Herodotus'', George Rawlinson, Appleton and company, 1889, p. 409</ref>
[[Hecataeus of Miletus]] believed that the Earth was flat and surrounded by water.<ref>FGrH F 18a.</ref> [[Herodotus]] in his ''[[Histories (Herodotus)|Histories]]'' ridiculed the belief that water encircled the world,<ref>Herodotus knew of the conventional view, according to which the river Ocean runs around a circular flat Earth (4.8), and of the division of the world into three Jacoby, RE Suppl. 2.352 ff, yet rejected this personal belief (''Histories'', 2. 21; 4. 8; 4. 36).</ref> yet most classicists agree that he still believed Earth was flat because of his descriptions of literal "ends" or "edges" of the Earth.<ref>''The history of Herodotus'', George Rawlinson, Appleton and company, 1889, p. 409.</ref>


====Ancient South Asia====
====Northern Europe====
The ancient Norse and Germanic peoples believed in a flat-Earth cosmography with the Earth surrounded by an ocean, with the [[axis mundi]], a world tree ([[Yggdrasil]]), or pillar ([[Irminsul]]) in the centre.<ref name="Philpot">{{cite book | last=Philpot | first=J.H. | title=The Sacred Tree: Or, The Tree in Religion and Myth | publisher=Macmillan and Company, limited | year=1897 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U2oAAAAAMAAJ | page=113}}</ref><ref name="Lindow">{{cite book | last=Lindow | first=J. | title=Norse Mythology: A Guide to Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs | publisher=Oxford University Press, USA | year=2002 | isbn=978-0-19-515382-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y4gRDAAAQBAJ | page=253 |quote=The world was a flat disk, with the Earth in the center and the sea all around. Thus the serpent is about as far away from the center, where men and gods lived}}</ref> In the world-encircling ocean sat a snake called [[Jormungandr]].<ref>One of the earliest literary references to the world encircling water snake comes from Bragi Boddason who lived in the 9th century, in his ''Ragnarsdrápa'' (XIV).</ref> The Norse creation account preserved in [[Gylfaginning]] (VIII) states that during the creation of the Earth, an impassable sea was placed around it:<ref>{{cite web |title=Gylfaginning |url=https://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/pre/pre04.htm |access-date=February 9, 2013 |publisher=Sacred-texts.com}}</ref>
In ancient India, some theories described the Earth as a flat disc. Others described it as spherical.<ref>{{cite book|author=Richard L. Thompson|title=Vedic Cosmography and Astronomy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9oi64rTVwNMC&pg=PA71| year=2004|publisher= Motilal Banarsidass |isbn= 978-81-208-1954-2|pages= 25–26, 59}}, Quote: "the spherical nature of this earth planet was known in the Vedic times, and this, of course is incompatible with a flat earth interpretation of Vedic cosmology."</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Herman Wayne Tull|title=The Vedic Origins of Karma: Cosmos as Man in Ancient Indian Myth and Ritual|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=auqGWz2l9pYC&pg=PA47|year=1989|publisher=State University of New York Press|isbn=978-0-7914-0094-4|pages=47–52}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=Speyer | first=J. S. | title=A remarkable Vedic Theory about Sunrise and Sunset | journal=Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland | publisher=Cambridge University Press (CUP) | volume=38 | issue=03 | year=1906 | pages=723–727 | doi=10.1017/s0035869x00035000 | accessdate=2017-04-01}}</ref>
{{blockquote|
And Jafnhárr said: "Of the blood, which ran and welled forth freely out of his wounds, they made the sea, when they had formed and made firm the Earth together, and laid the sea in a ring round. about her; and it may well seem a hard thing to most men to cross over it."
}}


The late Norse [[Konungs skuggsjá]], on the other hand, explains Earth's shape as a sphere:<ref>{{cite web |title=The King's Mirror |url=https://www.mediumaevum.com/75years/mirror/sec1.html |access-date=November 6, 2013 |publisher=mediumaevum.com}}</ref>
Many of the early medieval era [[Puranas]] present a flat earth cosmology. Probably an influence of the Greeks, after the arrival of [[Alexander the Great]] in northwest Indian subcontinent, this [[Hindu]], [[Jain cosmology|Jain]], and [[Buddhist cosmology]] held that the earth is a flat-bottomed, circular disc consisting of seven continents and surrounded by concentric salt ocean.<ref name="Pingree (1978), 554f.">[[David Pingree|D. Pingree]]: "History of Mathematical Astronomy in India", ''Dictionary of Scientific Biography'', Vol. 15 (1978), pp.&nbsp;533−633 (554f.), Quote: "In the Purānas, the earth is a flat-bottomed, circular disk, in the center of which is a lofty mountain, Meru. Surrounding Meru is the circular continent Jambūdvīpa, which is in turn surrounded by a ring of water known as the Salt Ocean. There follow alternating rings of land and sea until there are seven continents and seven oceans. In the southern quarter of Jambūdvīpa lies India–Bhāratavarsa."</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Richard L. Thompson|title=Vedic Cosmography and Astronomy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9oi64rTVwNMC&pg=PA71|year=2004|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-1954-2|pages=57–62}}</ref> However, the flat disc shaped earth is not the only cosmology presented in these texts. The fifth canto of the historically popular text ''[[Bhagavata Purana]]'', for example, includes sections that describe the earth as a sphere, wherein the authors explain that the phenomenon of sunrise, sunset, the rise and setting of moon and planets from the spherical shape and the movement of astronomical bodies.<ref>{{cite book|author=Richard L. Thompson|title=Vedic Cosmography and Astronomy|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9oi64rTVwNMC&pg=PA71| year=2004|publisher= Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-1954-2|page=71}}</ref>
{{blockquote|If you take a lighted candle and set it in a room, you may expect it to light up the entire interior, unless something should hinder, though the room be quite large. But if you take an apple and hang it close to the flame, so near that it is heated, the apple will darken nearly half the room or even more. However, if you hang the apple near the wall, it will not get hot; the candle will light up the whole house; and the shadow on the wall where the apple hangs will be scarcely half as large as the apple itself. From this you may infer that the Earth-circle is round like a ball and not equally near the sun at every point. But where the curved surface lies nearest the sun's path, there will the greatest heat be; and some of the lands that lie continuously under the unbroken rays cannot be inhabited.}}


====Ancient Europe====
====East Asia====
{{Further|Chinese astronomy}}
The ancient Norse and Germanic peoples believed in a flat Earth cosmography with the Earth surrounded by an ocean, with the [[axis mundi]], a world tree ([[Yggdrasil]]), or pillar ([[Irminsul]]) in the centre.<ref>''The Sacred Tree in Religion and Myth'', Mrs. J. H. Philpot, Courier Dover Publications, 2004, p.113.</ref><ref>"The world was a flat disk, with the earth in the center and the sea all around. Thus the serpent is about as far away from the center, where men and gods lived" (''Norse mythology: a guide to the Gods, heroes, rituals, and beliefs'', John Lindow Oxford University Press, 2002) p.253.</ref> In the world-encircling ocean sat a snake called [[Jormungandr]].<ref>One of the earliest literary references to the world encircling water snake comes from Bragi Boddason who lived in the 9th century, in his ''Ragnarsdrápa'' (XIV)</ref> The Norse creation account preserved in [[Gylfaginning]] (VIII) states that during the creation of the earth, an impassable sea was placed around it:
In [[History of China#Ancient China|ancient China]], the prevailing belief was that the Earth was flat and square, while the heavens were round,<ref name="needham volume 3 498">{{cite book | last=Needham | first=J. | title=Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1959 | isbn=978-0-521-05801-8 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jfQ9E0u4pLAC | page=498}}</ref> an assumption virtually unquestioned until the introduction of European astronomy in the 17th century.<ref name="Jean-Claude Martzloff 69">{{cite journal |last=Martzloff |first=Jean-Claude |date=1993–1994 |title=Space and Time in Chinese Texts of Astronomy and of Mathematical Astronomy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries |url=https://www.eastm.org/index.php/journal/article/viewFile/526/457 |url-status=usurped |journal=Chinese Science |issue=11 |pages=66–92 [p. 69] |jstor=43290474 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190907183516/http://www.eastm.org/index.php/journal/article/viewFile/526/457 |archive-date=2019-09-07 |access-date=2018-01-23}}</ref><ref name="Cullen on Needham">{{cite journal |last=Cullen |first=Christopher |date=1980 |title=Joseph Needham on Chinese Astronomy |journal=[[Past & Present (journal)|Past & Present]] |issue=87 |pages=39–53 [pp. 42, 49] |doi=10.1093/past/87.1.39 |jstor=650565}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Cullen |first=Christopher |date=1976 |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子 |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies |volume=39 |issue=1 |pages=106–27 [pp. 107–09] |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00052137|s2cid=171017315 }}</ref> The English [[Sinology|sinologist]] Cullen emphasizes the point that there was no concept of a round Earth in ancient Chinese astronomy:<ref name="Cullen">{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子 |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies |volume=39 |issue=1 |date=1976 |pages=106–27 [p. 107] |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00052137 |s2cid=171017315 }}</ref>
{{blockquote|Chinese thought on the form of the Earth remained almost unchanged from early times until the first contacts with modern science through the medium of [[Jesuit]] missionaries in the seventeenth century. While the heavens were variously described as being like an umbrella covering the Earth (the Kai Tian theory), or like a sphere surrounding it (the Hun Tian theory), or as being without substance while the heavenly bodies float freely (the Hsüan yeh theory), the Earth was at all times flat, although perhaps bulging up slightly.}}


[[File:Illustration of the Earthdisc floating out of the Water.jpg|thumb|Illustration based on that of a {{nowrap|12th-century}} Asian [[Cosmography|cosmographer]]]]
{{quote|...And Jafnhárr said: "Of the blood, which ran and welled forth freely out of his wounds, they made the sea, when they had formed and made firm the earth together, and laid the sea in a ring round. about her; and it may well seem a hard thing to most men to cross over it."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/pre/pre04.htm |title=Gylfaginning |publisher=Sacred-texts.com |date= |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref>}}
The model of an [[Egg (biology)|egg]] was often used by Chinese astronomers such as [[Zhang Heng]] (78–139&nbsp;AD) to describe [[Celestial sphere|the heavens]] as spherical:<ref name="needham">{{cite book |title=Science and Civilisation in China |last=Needham |first=Joseph |date=1959 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-05801-8 |volume=3 |page=219 |author-link=Joseph Needham}}</ref>
{{blockquote|The heavens are like a hen's egg and as round as a [[crossbow]] bullet; the Earth is like the yolk of the egg, and lies in the centre.}}


This analogy with a curved egg led some modern historians, notably [[Joseph Needham]], to conjecture that Chinese astronomers were, after all, aware of the Earth's sphericity. The egg reference, however, was rather meant to clarify the relative position of the flat Earth to the heavens:<ref name="Cullen on Needham"/>
The late Norse [[Konungs skuggsjá]], on the other hand, infers a spherical Earth:
{{blockquote|In a passage of Zhang Heng's cosmogony not translated by Needham, Zhang himself says: "Heaven takes its body from the Yang, so it is round and in motion. Earth takes its body from the Yin, so it is flat and quiescent". The point of the egg analogy is simply to stress that the Earth is completely enclosed by Heaven, rather than merely covered from above as the Kai Tian describes. Chinese astronomers, many of them brilliant men by any standards, continued to think in flat-Earth terms until the seventeenth century; this surprising fact might be the starting-point for a re-examination of the apparent facility with which the idea of a spherical Earth found acceptance in fifth-century BC Greece.}}
{{quote|...If you take a lighted candle and set it in a room, you may expect it to light up the entire interior, unless something should hinder, though the room be quite large. But if you take an apple and hang it close to the flame, so near that it is heated, the apple will darken nearly half the room or even more. However, if you hang the apple near the wall, it will not get hot; the candle will light up the whole house; and the shadow on the wall where the apple hangs will be scarcely half as large as the apple itself. From this you may infer that the earth-circle is round like a ball and not equally near the sun at every point. But where the curved surface lies nearest the sun's path, there will the greatest heat be; and some of the lands that lie continuously under the unbroken rays cannot be inhabited."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mediumaevum.com/75years/mirror/sec1.html|title=The King's Mirror |publisher=mediumaevum.com |date= |accessdate=November 6, 2013}}</ref>}}


Further examples cited by Needham supposed to demonstrate dissenting voices from the ancient Chinese consensus actually refer without exception to the Earth being square, not to it being flat.<ref name="Cullen"/> Accordingly, the 13th-century scholar [[Li Zhi (mathematician)|Li Ye]], who argued that the movements of the round heaven would be hindered by a square Earth,<ref name="needham volume 3 498"/> did not advocate a spherical Earth, but rather that its edge should be rounded off so as to be circular.<ref name="Cullen"/> However, Needham disagrees, affirming that Li Ye believed the Earth to be spherical, similar in shape to the heavens but much smaller.<ref>Needham, Joseph; Wang, Ling. (1995) [1959]. ''Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth'', vol. 3, reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-05801-5}}, p. 498.</ref> This was preconceived by the 4th-century scholar [[Yu Xi]], who argued for [[Static universe|the infinity]] of [[outer space]] surrounding the Earth and that the latter could be either square or round, in accordance to the shape of the heavens.<ref>Needham, Joseph; Wang, Ling. (1995) [1959]. ''Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth'', vol. 3, reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-05801-5}}, pp. 220, 498.</ref> When Chinese geographers of the 17th century, influenced by European cartography and astronomy, showed the Earth as a sphere that could be [[Circumnavigation|circumnavigated]] by sailing around the globe, they did so with formulaic terminology previously used by Zhang Heng to describe the spherical shape of the Sun and Moon (i.e. that they were as round as a crossbow bullet).<ref>Needham, Joseph; Wang, Ling. (1995) [1959]. ''Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth'', vol. 3, reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|0-521-05801-5}}, pp. 227, 499.</ref>
====Ancient East Asia====
{{Further information|Chinese astronomy}}
In [[History of China#Ancient China|ancient China]], the prevailing belief was that the Earth was flat and square, while the heavens were round,<ref name="needham volume 3 498">Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. pp. 498.</ref> an assumption virtually unquestioned until the introduction of European astronomy in the 17th century.<ref name="Jean-Claude Martzloff 69">{{cite journal |url=http://coaca.ihns.ac.cn/documents/shuli/Space.pdf |first=Jean-Claude |last=Martzloff |title=Space and Time in Chinese Texts of Astronomy and of Mathematical Astronomy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries |journal=Chinese Science |volume=11 |date=1993–94 |issue= |pages=66–92 [p. 69] }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=Joseph Needham on Chinese Astronomy |journal=[[Past & Present (journal)|Past & Present]] |volume=87 |date=1980 |issue= |pages=39–53 [pp. 42 & 49] |jstor=650565 |doi=10.1093/past/87.1.39}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子 |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies |volume=39 |issue=1 |date=1976 |pages=106–127 [pp. 107–109] |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00052137 }}</ref> The English [[Sinology|sinologist]] Cullen emphasizes the point that there was no concept of a round Earth in ancient Chinese astronomy:
<blockquote>Chinese thought on the form of the earth remained almost unchanged from early times until the first contacts with modern science through the medium of [[Jesuit]] missionaries in the seventeenth century. While the heavens were variously described as being like an umbrella covering the earth (the Kai Tian theory), or like a sphere surrounding it (the Hun Tian theory), or as being without substance while the heavenly bodies float freely (the Hsüan yeh theory), the earth was at all times flat, although perhaps bulging up slightly.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子 |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies |volume=39 |issue=1 |date=1976 |pages=106–127 [p. 107] |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00052137 }}</ref>
</blockquote>


As noted in the book ''[[Huainanzi]]'',<ref>Joseph Needham, p. 225.</ref> in the 2nd century BC, Chinese astronomers effectively inverted [[Eratosthenes]]' calculation of the curvature of the Earth to calculate the height of the Sun above the Earth. By assuming the Earth was flat, they arrived at a distance of {{val|100,000|u=''[[Li (unit)|li]]''}} (approximately {{val|200,000|u=km}}). The ''[[Zhoubi Suanjing]]'' also discusses how to determine the distance of the Sun by measuring the length of noontime shadows at different latitudes, a method similar to Eratosthenes' measurement of the circumference of the Earth, but the ''Zhoubi Suanjing'' assumes that the Earth is flat.<ref>{{cite book |title=Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into ancient Greek and Chinese science |last=Lloyd |first=G. E. R. |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-521-55695-8 |place=Cambridge |pages=59–60 |author-link=G. E. R. Lloyd}}</ref>
The model of an [[Egg (biology)|egg]] was often used by Chinese astronomers such as [[Zhang Heng]] (78–139 AD) to describe the heavens as spherical:
<blockquote> The heavens are like a hen's egg and as round as a crossbow bullet; the earth is like the yolk of the egg, and lies in the centre.<ref name=needham>{{citation|title=Science and Civilisation in China|first=Joseph |last=Needham|volume=3|page=219| date=1959|publisher=C.U.P.|isbn=0-521-63262-5}}</ref>
</blockquote>


===Alternate or mixed theories===
This analogy with a curved egg led some modern historians, notably [[Joseph Needham]], to conjecture that Chinese astronomers were, after all, aware of the Earth's sphericity. The egg reference, however, was rather meant to clarify the relative position of the flat earth to the heavens:
{{Further|Spherical Earth|History of geodesy}}


====Greece: spherical Earth====
<blockquote>In a passage of Zhang Heng's cosmogony not translated by Needham, Zhang himself says: "Heaven takes its body from the Yang, so it is round and in motion. Earth takes its body from the Yin, so it is flat and quiescent". The point of the egg analogy is simply to stress that the earth is completely enclosed by heaven, rather than merely covered from above as the Kai Tian describes. Chinese astronomers, many of them brilliant men by any standards, continued to think in flat-earth terms until the seventeenth century; this surprising fact might be the starting-point for a re-examination of the apparent facility with which the idea of a spherical earth found acceptance in fifth-century BC Greece.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=Joseph Needham on Chinese Astronomy |journal=[[Past & Present (journal)|Past & Present]] |volume=87 |date=1980 |issue= |pages=39–53 [p. 42] |jstor=650565 |doi=10.1093/past/87.1.39}}</ref>
[[File:Partial Lunar Eclipse 2019-07-16.jpg|thumb|Semi-circular shadow of Earth on the [[Moon]] during a partial [[lunar eclipse]]]]
</blockquote>
[[Pythagoras]] in the 6th century BC and [[Parmenides]] in the 5th century BC stated that the [[spherical Earth|Earth is spherical]],<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofplaneta00dreyuoft |title=A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler |last=Dreyer |first=John Louis Emil |date=1953 |publisher=[[Dover Publications]] |isbn=978-0-486-60079-6 |location=New York, NY |pages=[https://archive.org/stream/historyofplaneta00dreyuoft#page/20/mode/1up 20], [https://archive.org/stream/historyofplaneta00dreyuoft#page/37/mode/1up 37–38] |ref=Reference-Dreyer-1953 |author-link=J. L. E. Dreyer |orig-year=1905}}</ref> and this view spread rapidly in the Greek world. Around 330&nbsp;BC, [[Aristotle]] maintained on the basis of physical theory and observational evidence that the Earth was spherical, and reported an estimate of [[Earth's circumference|its circumference]].<ref>''On the Heavens'', Book ii Chapter 14. {{Cite book |last=Lloyd |first=G. E. R. |author-link=G. E. R. Lloyd |url=https://www.archive.org/details/aristotlegrowths0000lloy/page/162 |title=Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought |date=1968 |publisher=Cambridge Univ. Press |isbn=978-0-521-07049-2 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/aristotlegrowths0000lloy/page/162 162–64]}}</ref> The Earth's [[circumference]] was first determined around 240&nbsp;BC by [[Eratosthenes]].<ref>{{Cite book |first= Albert |last= Van Helden |title= Measuring the Universe: Cosmic Dimensions from Aristarchus to Halley |publisher= University of Chicago Press |date= 1985 |pages= 4–5 |isbn= 978-0-226-84882-2}}</ref> By the 2nd century AD, [[Ptolemy]] had derived [[Geography (Ptolemy)|his maps]] from a globe and developed the system of [[latitude]], [[longitude]], and [[clime]]s. His ''[[Almagest]]'' was written in Greek and only translated into Latin in the 11th century from Arabic translations.


[[Lucretius]] (1st century BC) opposed the concept of a spherical Earth, because he considered that an infinite universe had no center towards which heavy bodies would tend. Thus, he thought the idea of animals walking around topsy-turvy under the Earth was absurd.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom |last=Sedley |first=David N. |date=2003 |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |isbn=978-0-521-54214-2 |place=Cambridge |pages=78–82 }}</ref><ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'', 1.1052–82.</ref> By the 1st century AD, [[Pliny the Elder]] was in a position to say that everyone agreed on the spherical shape of Earth,<ref>''[[Natural History (Pliny)|Natural History]]'', 2.64.</ref> though disputes continued regarding the nature of the [[antipodes]], and how it is possible to keep the [[ocean]] in a curved shape.
Further examples cited by Needham supposed to demonstrate dissenting voices from the ancient Chinese consensus actually refer without exception to the Earth being square, not to it being flat.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子 |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies |volume=39 |issue=1 |date=1976 |pages=106–127 [p. 108] |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00052137 }}</ref> Accordingly, the 13th-century scholar [[Li Zhi (mathematician)|Li Ye]], who argued that the movements of the round heaven would be hindered by a square Earth,<ref name="needham volume 3 498"/> did not advocate a spherical Earth, but rather that its edge should be rounded off so as to be circular.<ref name="Cullen 1976, 109">{{cite journal |first=Christopher |last=Cullen |title=A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子 |journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies |volume=39 |issue=1 |date=1976 |pages=106–127 [p. 109] |doi=10.1017/S0041977X00052137 }}</ref>


====South Asia====
As noted in the book ''[[Huainanzi]]'',<ref>Joseph Needham, p.225</ref> in the 2nd century BC Chinese astronomers effectively inverted [[Eratosthenes]]' calculation of the curvature of the Earth to calculate the height of the sun above the earth. By assuming the earth was flat, they arrived at a distance of 100,000 ''[[Li (unit)|li]]'' (approximately 200,000&nbsp;km). The ''[[Zhoubi Suanjing]]'' also discusses how to determine the distance of the Sun by measuring the length of noontime shadows at different latitudes, a method similar to Eratosthenes' measurement of the circumference of the Earth, but the ''Zhoubi Suanjing'' assumes that the Earth is flat.<ref>{{ Citation | last = Lloyd | first = G. E. R. | author-link = G. E. R. Lloyd | date = 1996 | title = Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into ancient Greek and Chinese science | publisher = Cambridge University Press | place = Cambridge | pages = 59–60 | isbn = 0-521-55695-3 }}</ref>
[[Image:Offshore windpark Thorntonbank.jpg|thumb|An image of [[Thorntonbank Wind Farm]] (near the Belgian coast) with the lower parts of the more distant towers increasingly hidden by the horizon, demonstrating the curvature of the Earth]]
The [[Vedas|Vedic]] texts depict the cosmos in many ways.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=auqGWz2l9pYC&pg=PA47 |title=The Vedic Origins of Karma: Cosmos as Man in Ancient Indian Myth and Ritual |last=Tull |first=Herman Wayne |publisher=[[State University of New York Press]] |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-7914-0094-4 |pages=47–49 |quote=The Vedic texts contain several depictions of the shape of the cosmos. The Rigveda alone contains two basic images of the cosmos: a bipartite cosmos, consisting of the two spheres of heavens and Earth, and a tripartite cosmos consisting of the three spheres of heavens and Earth (...)}}</ref><ref name="Selin2013p114">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GzjpCAAAQBAJ |title=Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures |last=Sarma |first=K. V. |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |year=2013 |isbn=978-94-017-1416-7 |editor=Selin |editor-first=Helaine |pages=114–15}}</ref> One of the earliest Indian cosmological texts pictures the Earth as one of a stack of flat disks.{{sfn|Plofker|2009|p=52}}


In the Vedic texts, [[Dyaus Pita|Dyaus]] (heaven) and [[Prithvi]] (Earth) are compared to wheels on an [[axle]], yielding a flat model. They are also described as bowls or leather bags, yielding a concave model.<ref name="Gombrich">{{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/ancientcosmologi0000unse/page/110 |title=Ancient Cosmologies |last=Gombrich |first=R. F. |publisher=George Allen & Unwin |year=1975 |isbn=9780041000382 |editor1=Blacker |editor-first=Carmen |pages=[https://archive.org/details/ancientcosmologi0000unse/page/110 110–39] |editor2=Loewe |editor-first2=Michael }}</ref> According to Macdonell: "the conception of the Earth being a disc surrounded by an ocean does not appear in the [[Samhita]]s. But it was naturally regarded as circular, being compared with a wheel (10.89) and expressly called circular (parimandala) in the ''[[Shatapatha Brahmana]]''."<ref>{{cite book |author=A. A. Macdonell |title=Vedic Mythology |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=b7Meabtj8mcC&pg=PA9 |year=1986 |publisher=Motilal Banarsidass |isbn=978-81-208-1113-3 |page=9}}</ref>
===Declining support===
{{Further information|Spherical Earth|History of geodesy}}


By about the 5th century AD, the ''[[siddhanta]]'' astronomy texts of South Asia, particularly of [[Aryabhata]], assume a spherical Earth as they develop mathematical methods for quantitative astronomy for calendar and time keeping.<ref name="Plofker2009p50">Plofker ([[#CITEREFPlofker2009|2009]], pp.&nbsp;[https://books.google.com/books?id=DHvThPNp9yMC&pg=PA50 50–53]).</ref>
====Ancient Mediterranean====
[[Image:shiphorp.jpg|thumb|When a ship is at the horizon, its lower part is obscured due to the curvature of the Earth.]]
[[File:LunarEclipse.gif|thumb|left|Semi-circular shadow of Earth on the [[Moon]] during the phases of a [[lunar eclipse]]]]
[[Pythagoras]] in the 6th-century BC and [[Parmenides]] in the 5th-century stated that the [[spherical Earth|Earth is spherical]],<ref>
{{Cite book| title= A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler |last= Dreyer |first= John Louis Emil |authorlink= J. L. E. Dreyer |publisher= Dover Publications |date= 1953 |origyear= 1905 |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofplaneta00dreyuoft |location= New York, NY |pages=[https://archive.org/stream/historyofplaneta00dreyuoft#page/20/mode/1up 20], [https://archive.org/stream/historyofplaneta00dreyuoft#page/37/mode/1up 37–38] |ref=Reference-Dreyer-1953 |isbn= 0-486-60079-3}}</ref> the spherical view spread rapidly in the Greek world. Around 330 BC, [[Aristotle]] maintained on the basis of physical theory and observational evidence that the Earth was spherical, and reported on an estimate on the circumference.<ref>''On the Heavens'', Book ii Chapter 14. {{Cite book |last= Lloyd |first= G.E.R. |authorlink= G. E. R. Lloyd |title= Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought |publisher= Cambridge Univ. Press |date= 1968 |pages= 162–164 |isbn= 0-521-07049-X}}</ref> The Earth's [[circumference]] was first determined around 240 BC by [[Eratosthenes]].<ref>{{Cite book |first= Albert |last= Van Helden |title= Measuring the Universe: Cosmic Dimensions from Aristarchus to Halley |publisher= University of Chicago Press |date= 1985 |pages= 4–5 |isbn= 0-226-84882-5}}</ref> By the second century [[Anno Domini|AD]], [[Ptolemy]] had derived [[Geography (Ptolemy)|his maps]] from a globe and developed the system of [[latitude]], [[longitude]], and [[clime]]s. His [[Almagest]] was written in Greek and only translated into Latin in the 11th century from Arabic translations.


The medieval Indian texts called the [[Puranas]] describe the Earth as a flat-bottomed, circular disk with concentric oceans and continents.<ref name="Gombrich"/><ref name="Pingree (1978), 554f.">[[David Pingree|D. Pingree]]: "History of Mathematical Astronomy in India", ''Dictionary of Scientific Biography'', Vol. 15 (1978), pp.&nbsp;533–633 (554ff.), Quote: "In the Purānas, the Earth is a flat-bottomed, circular disk, in the center of which is a lofty mountain, Meru. Surrounding Meru is the circular continent Jambūdvīpa, which is in turn surrounded by a ring of water known as the Salt Ocean. There follow alternating rings of land and sea until there are seven continents and seven oceans. In the southern quarter of Jambūdvīpa lies India–Bhāratavarsa."</ref> This general scheme is present not only in the Hindu cosmologies, but also in [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and [[Jainism|Jain]] cosmologies of South Asia.<ref name="Gombrich"/> However, some Puranas include other models. The fifth canto of the ''[[Bhagavata Purana]]'', for example, includes sections that describe the Earth both as flat and spherical.<ref name="Edelmann2013p58">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eEPfrzAwO0sC&pg=PA58 |title=The Bhagavata Purana: Sacred Text and Living Tradition |last=Edelmann |first=Jonathan |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |year=2013 |isbn=978-0-231-53147-4 |editor=Gupta |editor-first=Ravi M. |pages=58–59 |editor-last2=Valpey |editor-first2=Kenneth R.}}</ref><ref name=dimmitt4>{{cite book | last1 = Dimmitt | first1 = Cornelia | first2 = J. A. B. |last2 = van Buitenen | title = Classical Hindu Mythology: A Reader in the Sanskrit Puranas | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=re7CR2jKn3QC| publisher = Temple University Press (1st Edition: 1977) | year = 2012 | isbn =978-1-4399-0464-0 |pages=4–5, 17–25, 46–47}}</ref>
[[File:Crates Terrestrial Sphere.png|thumb|right|The Terrestrial Sphere of [[Crates of Mallus]] (c. 150 BC)]] In the 2nd century BC, [[Crates of Mallus]] devised a terrestrial sphere that divided the Earth into four continents, separated by great rivers or oceans, with people presumed living in each of the four regions.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi= 10.1086/352464 |last= Stevens |first= Wesley M. |title= The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's "De natura rerum" |journal= Isis |volume= 71 |issue= 2 |pages= 268–77 |date= 1980 |jstor= 230175 |ref= harv |postscript= , page 269}}</ref> Opposite the [[oikumene]], the inhabited world, were the ''[[antipodes]]'', considered unreachable both because of an intervening ''[[tropics|torrid zone]]'' (equator) and the ocean. This took a strong hold on the medieval mind.


====Early Christian Church====
[[Lucretius]] (1st. c. BC) opposed the concept of a spherical Earth, because he considered that an infinite universe had no center towards which heavy bodies would tend. Thus, he thought the idea of animals walking around topsy-turvy under the Earth was absurd.<ref>{{Cite book |last= Sedley |first= David N. |title= Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom |place= Cambridge |publisher= Cambridge University Press |date= 2003 |pages= 78–82 |isbn= 978-0-521-54214-2 |ref= harv}}</ref><ref>Lucretius, ''De rerum natura'', 1.1052-82.</ref> By the 1st century [[AD]], [[Pliny the Elder]] was in a position to claim that everyone agreed on the spherical shape of Earth,<ref name = Pliny>[[Natural History (Pliny)|Natural History]]'', 2.64</ref> though disputes continued regarding the nature of the antipodes, and how it is possible to keep the [[ocean]] in a curved shape. Pliny also considered the possibility of an imperfect sphere, "...shaped like a [[pinecone]]."<ref name = Pliny/>
During the early period of the Christian Church, the spherical view continued to be widely held, with some notable exceptions.<ref name=":1">{{cite book |title=Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religion |last=Cormack |first=Lesley|author-link= Lesley Cormack |date=2009 |publisher=[[Harvard University Press]] |isbn=9780674057418 |editor=Ronald Numbers |pages=30–31 |chapter=Myth 3: That Medieval Christians Taught that he Earth was Flat}}</ref>
[[Athenagoras of Athens|Athenagoras]], an eastern Christian writing around the year 175&nbsp;AD, said that the Earth was spherical.<ref name="Hendrickson Publishers">{{cite book |last1=Bercot |first1=David |title=A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs |date=1998 |publisher=Hendrickson Publishers |location=Massachusetts |isbn=978-1565633575 |page=222 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jF_tPQAACAAJ |quote=The world, being made spherical, is confined within the circles of heaven.}}</ref> [[Methodius of Olympus|Methodius]] (c.&nbsp;290&nbsp;AD), an eastern Christian writing against "the theory of the Chaldeans and the Egyptians" said: "Let us first lay bare&nbsp;... the theory of the Chaldeans and the Egyptians. They say that the circumference of the universe is likened to the turnings of a well-rounded globe, the Earth being a central point. They say that since its outline is spherical,&nbsp;... the Earth should be the center of the universe, around which the heaven is whirling."<ref name="Hendrickson Publishers" /> [[Lactantius]], a western Christian writer and advisor to the first Christian Roman Emperor, [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]], writing sometime between 304 and 313&nbsp;AD, ridiculed the notion of ''[[antipodes]]'' and the philosophers who fancied that "the universe is round like a ball. They also thought that heaven revolves in accordance with the motion of the heavenly bodies.&nbsp;... For that reason, they constructed brass globes, as though after the figure of the universe."<ref>Lactantius, [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf07.iii.ii.iii.xxiv.html ''The Divine Institutes'', Book III, Chapter XXIV], ''The Ante-Nicene Fathers'', Vol VII, ed. Rev. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1979), [[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.]], Grand Rapids, MI, pp. 94–95.</ref><ref name="Hendrickson Publishers"/> [[Arnobius]], another eastern Christian writing sometime around 305&nbsp;AD, described the round Earth: "In the first place, indeed, the world itself is neither right nor left. It has neither upper nor lower regions, nor front nor back. For whatever is round and bounded on every side by the circumference of a solid sphere, has no beginning or end&nbsp;..."<ref name="Hendrickson Publishers"/>


The influential theologian and philosopher [[Saint Augustine]], one of the four [[Church Fathers#Great Fathers|Great Church Fathers]] of the [[Western Church]], similarly objected to the "fable" of antipodes:<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.XVI.9.html ''De Civitate Dei'', Book XVI, Chapter 9 – ''Whether We are to Believe in the Antipodes''], translated by [[Marcus Dods (theologian)|Rev. Marcus Dods]]; from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library at Calvin College.</ref>
In late antiquity such widely read encyclopedists as [[Macrobius]] and [[Martianus Capella]] (both 5th century AD) discussed the circumference of the sphere of the Earth, its central position in the universe, the difference of the [[season]]s in [[Northern hemisphere|northern]] and [[southern hemisphere]]s, and many other geographical details.<ref name = Macrobius>{{Cite book |last= Macrobius |authorlink= Macrobius |title= Commentary on the ''Dream of Scipio, V.9-VI.7, XX. |pages= 18–24}}, translated in {{Cite book |first= W. H. |last= Stahl |publisher= Columbia University Press |date= 1952 |title= Martianus Capella, The ''Marriage of Philology and Mercury}}</ref> In his commentary on [[Cicero]]'s ''[[Dream of Scipio]]'', Macrobius described the Earth as a globe of insignificant size in comparison to the remainder of the cosmos.<ref name = Macrobius/>
{{blockquote|
But as to the fable that there are Antipodes, that is to say, men on the opposite side of the Earth, where the sun rises when it sets to us, men who walk with their feet opposite ours that is on no ground credible. And, indeed, it is not affirmed that this has been learned by historical knowledge, but by scientific conjecture, on the ground that the Earth is suspended within the concavity of the sky, and that it has as much room on the one side of it as on the other: hence they say that the part that is beneath must also be inhabited. But they do not remark that, although it be supposed or scientifically demonstrated that the world is of a round and spherical form, yet it does not follow that the other side of the Earth is bare of water; nor even, though it be bare, does it immediately follow that it is peopled. For Scripture, which proves the truth of its historical statements by the accomplishment of its prophecies, gives no false information; and it is too absurd to say, that some men might have taken ship and traversed the whole wide ocean, and crossed from this side of the world to the other, and that thus even the inhabitants of that distant region are descended from that one first man.
}}


Some historians do not view Augustine's scriptural commentaries as endorsing any particular cosmological model, endorsing instead the view that Augustine shared the common view of his contemporaries that the Earth is spherical, in line with his endorsement of science in ''[[De Genesi ad litteram]]''.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Nothaft |first=C. P. E. |year=2011 |title=Augustine and the Shape of the Earth: A Critique of Leo Ferrari |journal=[[Augustinian Studies]] |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=33–48 |doi=10.5840/augstudies20114213}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=God & Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science |last=Lindberg |first=David C. |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |isbn=978-0-520-05692-3 |editor-last=Lindberg |editor-first=David C. |location=Berkeley and Los Angeles |date=1986 |chapter=Science and the Early Church|author-link=David C. Lindberg |editor2-last=Numbers |editor2-first=Ronald L. |editor2-link=Ronald L. Numbers}}</ref> C. P. E. Nothaft, responding to writers like Leo Ferrari who described Augustine as endorsing a flat Earth, says that "...other recent writers on the subject treat Augustine’s acceptance of the earth’s spherical shape as a well-established fact".<ref>{{Citation | last = Nothaft | first = C. P. E. | year = 2011 | title = Augustine and the Shape of the Earth: A Critique of Leo Ferrari | journal = Augustinian Studies | volume = 42 | issue = 1 | page = 35 | doi = 10.5840/augstudies20114213}}</ref><ref name=Ferrari>Leo Ferrari, "Rethinking Augustine's Confessions, Thirty Years of Discoveries", Religious Studies and Theology (2000).</ref>
====Early Christian Church====
During the early Church period, the spherical view continued to be widely held, with some notable exceptions.<ref>{{cite book|last=Cormack|first=Lesley|title=Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religion|chapter=Myth 3: That Medieval Christians Taught that he Earth was Flat|date=2009|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=9780674057418|pages=30–31|editor=Ronald Numbers}}</ref>


[[Image:Cosmas Indicopleustes - Topographia Christiana 1.jpg|thumb|right|Cosmas Indicopleustes' world view – flat Earth in a [[Tabernacle]]]]
[[Lactantius]], Christian writer and advisor to the first Christian Roman Emperor, [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]], ridiculed the notion of the Antipodes, inhabited by people "whose footsteps are higher than their heads". After presenting some arguments he attributes to advocates for a spherical heaven and Earth, he writes:
[[Diodorus of Tarsus]], a leading figure in the [[School of Antioch]] and mentor of [[John Chrysostom]], may have argued for a flat Earth; however, Diodorus' opinion on the matter is known only from a later criticism.<ref>[[J. L. E. Dreyer]], ''A History of Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler''. (1906); unabridged republication as ''A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler'' (New York: Dover Publications, 1953).</ref> Chrysostom, one of the four Great Church Fathers of the [[Eastern Church]] and [[Archbishop of Constantinople]], explicitly espoused the idea, based on scripture, that the Earth floats miraculously on the water beneath the [[firmament]].<ref>St. John Chrysostom, ''Homilies Concerning the Statues'', Homily IX, paras. 7–8, in ''A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church'', Series I, Vol IX, ed. Philip Schaff, American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1978), Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI, [https://archive.org/stream/aselectlibrary09unknuoft#page/403/mode/1up p. 403]:
{{quote|But if you inquire from those who defend these marvellous fictions, why all things do not fall into that lower part of the heaven, they reply that such is the nature of things, that heavy bodies are borne to the middle, and that they are all joined together towards the middle, as we see spokes in a wheel; but that the bodies that are light, as mist, smoke, and fire, are borne away from the middle, so as to seek the heaven. I am at a loss what to say respecting those who, when they have once erred, consistently persevere in their folly, and defend one vain thing by another.<ref>Lactantius, [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf07.iii.ii.iii.xxiv.html ''The Divine Institutes'', Book III, Chapter XXIV], ''THE ANTE-NICENE FATHERS'', Vol VII, ed. Rev. Alexander Roberts, D.D., and James Donaldson, LL.D., American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1979), [[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.]],Grand Rapids, MI, pp.94-95.</ref>}}
"When therefore thou beholdest not a small pebble, but the whole earth borne upon the waters, and not submerged, admire the power of Him who wrought these marvellous things in a supernatural manner! And whence does this appear, that the earth is borne upon the waters? The prophet declares this when he says, 'He hath founded it upon the seas, and prepared it upon the floods.' And again: 'To him who hath founded the earth upon the waters.' What sayest thou? The water is not able to support a small pebble on its surface, and yet bears up the earth, great as it is; and mountains, and hills, and cities, and plants, and men, and brutes; and it is not submerged!"</ref>


''[[Christian Topography]]'' (547) by the Alexandrian monk [[Cosmas Indicopleustes]], who had traveled as far as [[Sri Lanka]] and the source of the [[Blue Nile]], is now widely considered the most valuable geographical document of the early medieval age, although it received relatively little attention from contemporaries. In it, the author repeatedly expounds the doctrine that the universe consists of only two places, the Earth below the firmament and heaven above it. Carefully drawing on arguments from scripture, he describes the Earth as a rectangle, 400 days' journey long by 200 wide, surrounded by four oceans and enclosed by four massive walls which support the firmament. The spherical Earth theory is contemptuously dismissed as "pagan".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/pearse/morefathers/files/cosmas_00_0_eintro.htm |title=Cosmas Indicopleustes, Christian Topography. Preface to the online edition |website=www.ccel.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cosmas_00_2_intro.htm |title=Cosmas Indicopleustes, Christian Topography (1897) Introduction |website=www.tertullian.org}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |chapter-url=http://www.gutenberg.org/files/505/505-h/505-h.htm#link2H_4_0014 |title=History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom |last=White |first=Andrew Dickson |date=1896 |chapter=Ch.&nbsp;2, part&nbsp;1 |access-date=25 August 2015}}</ref>
The influential theologian and philosopher [[Saint Augustine]], one of the four [[Church Fathers#Great Fathers|Great Church Fathers]] of the [[Western Church]], similarly objected to the "fable" of an inhabited Antipodes:
{{quote|But as to the fable that there are Antipodes, that is to say, men on the opposite side of the earth, where the sun rises when it sets to us, men who walk with their feet opposite ours that is on no ground credible. And, indeed, it is not affirmed that this has been learned by historical knowledge, but by scientific conjecture, on the ground that the earth is suspended within the concavity of the sky, and that it has as much room on the one side of it as on the other: hence they say that the part that is beneath must also be inhabited. But they do not remark that, although it be supposed or scientifically demonstrated that the world is of a round and spherical form, yet it does not follow that the other side of the earth is bare of water; nor even, though it be bare, does it immediately follow that it is peopled. For Scripture, which proves the truth of its historical statements by the accomplishment of its prophecies, gives no false information; and it is too absurd to say, that some men might have taken ship and traversed the whole wide ocean, and crossed from this side of the world to the other, and that thus even the inhabitants of that distant region are descended from that one first man.<ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.XVI.9.html ''De Civitate Dei'', Book XVI, Chapter 9 — ''Whether We are to Believe in the Antipodes''], translated by [[Marcus Dods (theologian)|Rev. Marcus Dods]], D.D.; from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library at Calvin College</ref>}}


[[Severian of Gabala|Severian]], Bishop of Gabala ({{abbr|d.|died}} 408), wrote that the Earth is flat and the Sun does not pass under it in the night, but "travels through the northern parts as if hidden by a wall".<ref>J.&nbsp;L.&nbsp;E. Dreyer (1906), [https://books.google.com/books?id=BTI9AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA211 ''A History of Planetary Systems''], (1906), [http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=3921 pp.&nbsp;211–212].</ref> [[Basil of Caesarea]] (329–379) argued that the matter was theologically irrelevant.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.reu.org/public/basil/bas011.txt |title=Saint Basil the Great, ''Hexaemeron'' 9 – Homily IX – "The creation of terrestrial animals" Holy Innocents Orthodox Church |access-date=9 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121030154740/http://www.reu.org/public/basil/bas011.txt |archive-date=30 October 2012 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
The view generally accepted by scholars of Augustine's work is that he shared the common view of his contemporaries that the Earth is spherical,<ref>{{Citation | last = Nothaft | first = C.P.E. | year = 2011 | title = Augustine and the Shape of the Earth: A Critique of Leo Ferrari | journal = Augustinian Studies | volume = 42 | issue = 1 | page = 35 | doi = 10.5840/augstudies20114213}}</ref> in line with his endorsement of science in ''De Genesi ad litteram''.<ref>{{Citation | last = Lindberg | first = David C. | author-link = David C. Lindberg | editor-last = Lindberg | editor-first = David C. | editor2-last = Numbers | editor2-first = Ronald L. | editor2-link = Ronald L. Numbers | publication-date = 1986 | title = God & Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science | chapter = Science and the Early Church | publisher = University of California Press | publication-place = Berkeley and Los Angeles | isbn = 0-520-05692-2}}</ref> That view was challenged by noted Augustine scholar [[Leo Ferrari]], who concluded that {{quote|he was familiar with the Greek theory of a spherical earth, nevertheless, (following in the footsteps of his fellow North African, Lactantius), he was firmly convinced that the earth was flat, was one of the two biggest bodies in existence and that it lay at the bottom of the universe. Apparently Augustine saw this picture as more useful for scriptural exegesis than the global earth at the centre of an immense universe.<ref name=Ferrari>Leo Ferrari, "Rethinking Augustine's Confessions, Thirty Years of Discoveries", Religious Studies and Theology (2000)</ref>}}
Ferrari's interpretation was questioned by the historian of science, Phillip Nothaft, who considers that in his scriptural commentaries Augustine was not endorsing any particular cosmological model.<ref>{{Citation | last = Nothaft | first = C.P.E. | year = 2011 | title = Augustine and the Shape of the Earth: A Critique of Leo Ferrari | journal = Augustinian Studies | volume = 42 | issue = 1 | pages = 33–48 | doi = 10.5840/augstudies20114213}}</ref>


====Europe: Early Middle Ages====
[[Image:Cosmas Indicopleustes - Topographia Christiana 1.jpg|thumb|right|Cosmas Indicopleustes' world view – flat earth in a [[Tabernacle]]]]
Early medieval Christian writers felt little urge to assume flatness of the Earth, though they had fuzzy impressions of the writings of Ptolemy and Aristotle, relying more on Pliny.<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth" />
[[Diodorus of Tarsus]], a leading figure in the [[School of Antioch]] and mentor of [[John Chrysostom]], may have argued for a flat Earth; however, Diodorus' opinion on the matter is known only from a later criticism.<ref>[[J. L. E. Dreyer]], ''A History of Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler''. (1906); unabridged republication as ''A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler'' (New York: Dover Publications, 1953).</ref> Chrysostom, one of the four Great Church Fathers of the [[Eastern Church]] and [[Archbishop of Constantinople]], explicitly espoused the idea, based on scripture, that the Earth floats miraculously on the water beneath the [[firmament]].<ref>St. John Chrysostom, ''Homilies Concerning the Statues'', Homily IX, paras.7-8, in ''A SELECT LIBRARY OF THE NICENE AND POST-NICENE FATHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH'', Series I, Vol IX, ed. Philip Schaff, D.D.,LL.D., American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1978), W. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.,Grand Rapids, MI, [https://archive.org/stream/aselectlibrary09unknuoft#page/403/mode/1up pp.403-404].
"When therefore thou beholdest not a small pebble, but the whole earth borne upon the waters, and not submerged, admire the power of Him who wrought these marvellous things in a supernatural manner! And whence does this appear, that the earth is borne upon the waters? The prophet declares this when he says, "He hath founded it upon the seas, and prepared it upon the floods."1416 And again: "To him who hath founded the earth upon the waters."1417 What sayest thou? The water is not able to support a small pebble on its surface, and yet bears up the earth, great as it is; and mountains, and hills, and cities, and plants, and men, and brutes; and it is not submerged!"</ref> [[Athanasius the Great]], Church Father and [[Patriarch of Alexandria]], expressed a similar view in ''Against the Heathen''.<ref>St.Athanasius, ''Against the Heathen'', Ch.27 [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.vi.ii.i.xxvii.html], Ch 36 [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.vi.ii.iii.ii.html], in ''A SELECT LIBRARY OF THE NICENE AND POST-NICENE FATHERS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH'', Series II, Vol IV, ed. Philip Schaff, D.D.,LL.D., American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1978), W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.,Grand Rapids, MI.</ref>


[[File:Macrobian Planetary Diagram.jpg|thumb|9th-century Macrobian cosmic diagram showing the ''sphere of the Earth'' at the center ({{lang|la|globus terrae}})]]
''[[Christian Topography]]'' (547) by the Alexandrian monk [[Cosmas Indicopleustes]], who had travelled as far as [[Sri Lanka]] and the source of the [[Blue Nile]], is now widely considered the most valuable geographical document of the early medieval age, although it received relatively little attention from contemporaries. In it, the author repeatedly expounds the doctrine that the universe consists of only two places, the Earth below the firmament and heaven above it. Carefully drawing on arguments from scripture, he describes the Earth as a rectangle, 400 day's journey long by 200 wide, surrounded by four oceans and enclosed by four massive walls which support the firmament. The spherical Earth theory is contemptuously dismissed as "pagan".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/pearse/morefathers/files/cosmas_00_0_eintro.htm|title=Cosmas Indicopleustes, Christian Topography. Preface to the onlineedition.|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cosmas_00_2_intro.htm|title=Cosmas Indicopleustes, Christian Topography (1897) Introduction.|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gutenberg.org/files/505/505-h/505-h.htm#link2H_4_0014|title=HISTORY OF THE WARFARE OF SCIENCE WITH THEOLOGY IN CHRISTENDOM Chapter2 part1|author=Andrew Dickson White|date=1896|accessdate=25 August 2015}}</ref>


With the end of the [[Western Roman Empire]], [[Western Europe]] entered the [[Middle Ages]] with great difficulties that affected the continent's intellectual production. Most scientific treatises of [[classical antiquity]] (in [[Greek language|Greek]]) were unavailable, leaving only simplified summaries and compilations. In contrast, the [[Eastern Roman Empire]] did not fall, and it preserved the learning.<ref>Lindberg, David. (1992) ''The Beginnings of Western Science''. University of Chicago Press. Page 363.</ref> Still, many textbooks of the Early Middle Ages supported the sphericity of the Earth in the western part of Europe.<ref>B. Eastwood and G. Graßhoff, ''Planetary Diagrams for Roman Astronomy in Medieval Europe, ca. 800–1500'', ''Transactions of the American Philosophical Society'', 94, 3 (Philadelphia, 2004), pp. 49–50.</ref>
[[Severian of Gabala|Severian]], Bishop of Gabala (d. 408), wrote that the Earth is flat and the sun does not pass under it in the night, but "travels through the northern parts as if hidden by a wall".<ref>J.L.E. Dreyer, [https://books.google.com/books?id=BTI9AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA211 ''A History of Planetary Systems'], (1906), [http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=3921 p.211-12].</ref> [[Basil of Caesarea]] (329–379) argued that the matter was theologically irrelevant.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reu.org/public/basil/bas011.txt |title=Saint Basil the Great, ''Hexaemeron'' 9 - HOMILY IX - "The creation of terrestrial animals" Holy Innocents Orthodox Church |date= |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref>


[[File:Diagrammatic T-O world map - 12th century.jpg|thumb|left|12th-century [[T and O map]] representing the inhabited world as described by [[Isidore of Seville]] in his ''[[Etymologiae]]'' (chapter 14, {{lang|la|de terra et partibus}})]]
====Early Middle Ages====
Early medieval Christian writers in the early Middle Ages felt little urge to assume flatness of the earth, though they had fuzzy impressions of the writings of Ptolemy, Aristotle, and relied more on Pliny.<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth" />
[[Image:Macrobian Planetary Diagram.jpg|thumb|9th-century Macrobian cosmic diagram showing the ''sphere of the Earth'' at the center (''globus terrae'')]]
With the end of Roman civilization, [[Western Europe]] entered the [[Middle Ages]] with great difficulties that affected the continent's intellectual production. Most scientific treatises of [[classical antiquity]] (in [[Greek language|Greek]]) were unavailable, leaving only simplified summaries and compilations. Still, many textbooks of the Early Middle Ages supported the sphericity of the Earth. For example: some early medieval manuscripts of [[Macrobius]] include maps of the Earth, including the antipodes, [[mappa mundi#Zonal maps|zonal maps]] showing the Ptolemaic climates derived from the concept of a spherical Earth and a diagram showing the Earth (labeled as ''globus terrae'', the sphere of the Earth) at the center of the hierarchically ordered planetary spheres.<ref>B. Eastwood and G. Graßhoff, ''Planetary Diagrams for Roman Astronomy in Medieval Europe, ca. 800-1500'', ''Transactions of the American Philosophical Society'', 94, 3 (Philadelphia, 2004), pp. 49-50.</ref> Further examples of such medieval diagrams can be found in medieval manuscripts of the [[Somnium Scipionis#Gallery|Dream of Scipio]]. In the [[Carolingian Renaissance|Carolingian era]], scholars discussed Macrobius's view of the antipodes. One of them, the Irish monk [[Saint Dungal|Dungal]], asserted that the tropical gap between our habitable region and the other habitable region to the south was smaller than Macrobius had believed.<ref>Bruce S. Eastwood, ''Ordering the Heavens: Roman Astronomy and Cosmology in the Carolingian Renaissance'', (Leiden: Brill, 2007), pp. 62-3.</ref>
[[Image:Diagrammatic T-O world map - 12th century.jpg|thumb|12th-century [[T and O map]] representing the inhabited world as described by [[Isidore of Seville]] in his ''[[Etymologiae]]'' (chapter 14, ''de terra et partibus'')]]


Europe's view of the shape of the Earth in [[Late Antiquity]] and the [[Early Middle Ages]] may be best expressed by the writings of early Christian scholars:
Europe's view of the shape of the Earth in [[Late Antiquity]] and the [[Early Middle Ages]] may be best expressed by the writings of early Christian scholars:
* [[Boethius]] (c. 480–524), who also wrote a theological treatise ''On the Trinity'', repeated the Macrobian model of the Earth in the center of a spherical cosmos in his influential, and widely translated, ''[[Consolation of Philosophy]]''.<ref>S. C. McCluskey, ''Astronomies and Cultures in Early Medieval Europe'', (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1998), pp. 114, 123.</ref>
* [[Isidore of Seville|Bishop Isidore of Seville]] (560–636) taught in his widely read encyclopedia, the ''[[Etymologiae|Etymologies]]'', diverse views such as that the Earth "resembles a wheel"<ref>
{{Cite book|title=The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville|author=Stephen A. Barney, W. J. Lewis, J. A. Beach, Oliver Berghof (translators)|publisher=Cambridge University Press|date=2010|chapter=XIV ii 1|url=https://books.google.com/?id=3ep502syZv8C&printsec=frontcover|isbn=978-0-521-83749-1}}
</ref> resembling Anaximander in language and the map that he provided. This was widely interpreted as referring to a flat disc-shaped Earth.<ref>" In other passages of the ''Etymologies'', he writes of an''orbis''"
{{cite book|title=Geography, Cartography and Nautical Science in the Renaissance|author=W.G.Randles|date=2000|publisher=UK, Ashgate Variorum|page=15|isbn=0-86078-836-9}} ''also in''
{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC|title=The Classical tradition and the Americas, vol 1|page=15|editor1=Wolfgang Haase |editor2=Meyer Reinhold |accessdate=November 28, 2010|isbn=978-3-11-011572-7|date=1994}}</ref><ref>
{{Cite book|title=The House of Wisdom|last=Lyons|first=Jonathan|publisher=Bloomsbury|date=2009|pages=34–35|isbn=1-58574-036-5}}
</ref> An illustration from Isidore's ''De Natura Rerum'' shows the five zones of the earth as adjacent circles. Some have concluded that he thought the [[Arctic]] and [[Antarctic]] zones were adjacent to each other.<ref>
{{cite book|author=Ernest Brehaut|title=An Encyclopedist of the Dark Ages|date=1912|publisher=Columbia University|url=http://bestiary.ca/etexts/brehaut1912/brehaut1912.htm}}</ref> He did not admit the possibility of antipodes, which he took to mean people dwelling on the opposite side of the Earth, considering them legendary<ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', XIV.v.17 [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/isidore/14.shtml].</ref> and noting that there was no evidence for their existence.<ref>
Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', IX.ii.133 [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/isidore/9.shtml].</ref> Isidore's [[T and O map]], which was seen as representing a small part of a spherical Earth, continued to be used by authors through the Middle Ages, e.g. the 9th-century bishop [[Rabanus Maurus]] who compared the habitable part of the northern hemisphere ([[Aristotle]]'s northern temperate clime) with a wheel. At the same time, Isidore's works also gave the views of sphericity, for example, in chapter 28 of ''De Natura Rerum'', Isidore claims that the sun orbits the earth and illuminates the other side when it is night on this side. See French translation of ''De Natura Rerum''.<ref name=Fontaine>{{cite book|last=Fontaine|first=Jacques|title=Isidore de Seville: Traité de la Nature|date=1960|publisher=Bordeaux}}</ref> In his other work ''[[Etymologiae|Etymologies]]'', there are also affirmations that the sphere of the sky has earth in its center and the sky being equally distant on all sides.<ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', III. XXXII [https://books.google.com/books?id=igxC93_A-fIC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false].</ref><ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', XIV. I [https://books.google.com/books?id=6jjsJ9NP6hYC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false].</ref> Other researchers have argued these points as well.<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth">{{cite book|last=Russell|first=Jefrey Burton|title=Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians|date=1991|publisher=Praeger|isbn=0-275-95904-X|pages=86–87}}</ref><ref>Wesley M. Stevens, "The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's De natura rerum", ''Isis'', 71(1980): 268-277.{{Cite journal |doi= 10.1086/352464 |last= Stevens |first= Wesley M. |title= The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's "De natura rerum" |journal= Isis |volume= 71 |issue= 2 |pages= 268–77 |date= 1980 |jstor= 230175 |ref= harv |postscript= , page 274}}</ref><ref name="Sourcebook in Medieval Science">{{cite book|last=Grant|first=Edward|title=A Sourcebook in Medieval Science (Source Books in the History of the Sciences)|date=1974|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-82360-0}}</ref> "The work remained unsurpassed until the thirteenth century and was regarded as the summit of all knowledge. It became an essential part of European medieval culture. Soon after the invention of typography it appeared many times in print."<ref>{{cite book|author1=Thomas Glick |author2=Stephen John Livesley |author3=Faith Wallis |title=Medieval Science Technology and Medicine, an Encyclopedia|date=2005|publisher=Taylor & Francis, NY}}</ref> However, "The Scholastics - later medieval philosophers, theologians, and scientists - were helped by the Arabic translators and commentaries, but they hardly needed to struggle against a flat-earth legacy from the early middle ages (500-1050). Early medieval writers often had fuzzy and imprecise impressions of both Ptolemy and Aristotle and relied more on Pliny, but they felt (with one exception), little urge to assume flatness."<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth" />


[[Isidore of Seville|Bishop Isidore of Seville]] (560–636) taught in his widely read encyclopedia, the ''[[Etymologiae|Etymologies]]'', diverse views such as that the Earth "resembles a wheel"<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville |author=Isidore of Seville |translator1=Stephen A. Barney |translator2=W. J. Lewis |translator3=J. A. Beach |translator4=Oliver Berghof |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2010 |chapter=XIV ii 1 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3ep502syZv8C |isbn=978-0-521-83749-1}}</ref> resembling Anaximander in language and the map that he provided. This was widely interpreted as referring to a disc-shaped Earth.<ref>{{cite book |title=Geography, Cartography and Nautical Science in the Renaissance |author=W. G. Randles |date=2000 |publisher=UK, Ashgate Variorum |page=15 |isbn=978-0-86078-836-2 |quote=In other passages of the ''Etymologies'', he writes of an ''orbis''}}. Also in: {{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC |title=The Classical tradition and the Americas, vol.&nbsp;1 |page=15 |editor1=Wolfgang Haase |editor2=Meyer Reinhold |access-date=November 28, 2010 |isbn=978-3-11-011572-7 |date=1994|publisher=Walter de Gruyter }}</ref><ref>
[[File:Isidore-wheels.jpg|thumb|right|Isidore's portrayal of the five zones of the earth]]
{{Cite book |title=The House of Wisdom |last=Lyons |first=Jonathan |publisher=Bloomsbury |date=2009 |pages=34–35 |isbn=978-1-58574-036-9}}</ref> An illustration from Isidore's ''De Natura Rerum'' shows the five zones of the Earth as adjacent circles. Some have concluded that he thought the [[Arctic]] and [[Antarctic]] zones were adjacent to each other.<ref>{{cite book |author=Ernest Brehaut |title=An Encyclopedist of the Dark Ages |date=1912 |publisher=Columbia University |url=http://bestiary.ca/etexts/brehaut1912/brehaut1912.htm |access-date=December 3, 2010 |archive-date=December 13, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101213143040/http://bestiary.ca//etexts/brehaut1912/brehaut1912.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> He did not admit the possibility of antipodes, which he took to mean people dwelling on the opposite side of the Earth, considering them legendary<ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/isidore/14.shtml XIV.v.17].</ref> and noting that there was no evidence for their existence.<ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', [http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/isidore/9.shtml IX.ii.133].</ref> Isidore's [[T and O map]], which was seen as representing a small part of a spherical Earth, continued to be used by authors through the Middle Ages, e.g. the 9th-century bishop [[Rabanus Maurus]], who compared the habitable part of the northern hemisphere ([[Aristotle]]'s northern temperate clime) with a wheel. At the same time, Isidore's works also gave the views of sphericity, for example, in chapter&nbsp;28 of ''De Natura Rerum'', Isidore claims that the Sun orbits the Earth and illuminates the other side when it is night on this side. See French translation of ''De Natura Rerum''.<ref name=Fontaine>{{cite book |last=Fontaine |first=Jacques |title=Isidore de Seville: Traité de la Nature |date=1960 |publisher=Bordeaux |language=fr}}</ref> In his other work ''[[Etymologiae|Etymologies]]'', there are also affirmations that the sphere of the sky has Earth in its center and the sky being equally distant on all sides.<ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=igxC93_A-fIC III. XXXII].</ref><ref>Isidore, ''Etymologiae'', [https://books.google.com/books?id=6jjsJ9NP6hYC XIV. I].</ref> Other researchers have argued these points as well.<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth">{{cite book |last=Russell |first=Jefrey Burton |title=Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians |url=https://archive.org/details/inventingflatear00russ |url-access=registration |date=1991 |publisher=Praeger |isbn=978-0-275-95904-3 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/inventingflatear00russ/page/86 86–87]}}</ref><ref>Wesley M. Stevens, "The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's De natura rerum", ''Isis'', 71 (1980): 268–77. {{Cite journal |doi= 10.1086/352464 |last= Stevens |first= Wesley M. |title= The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's "De natura rerum" |journal= Isis |volume= 71 |issue= 2 |pages= 268–77 |date= 1980 |jstor= 230175 |s2cid= 133430429}}, page 274</ref><ref name="Sourcebook in Medieval Science">{{cite book |last=Grant |first=Edward |title=A Sourcebook in Medieval Science (Source Books in the History of the Sciences) |date=1974 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-82360-0}}</ref> "The work remained unsurpassed until the thirteenth century and was regarded as the summit of all knowledge. It became an essential part of European medieval culture. Soon after the invention of typography it appeared many times in print."<ref>{{cite book |author1=Thomas Glick |author2=Stephen John Livesley |author3=Faith Wallis |title=Medieval Science Technology and Medicine, an Encyclopedia |date=2005 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |location= NY}}</ref> However, "The Scholastics&nbsp;– later medieval philosophers, theologians, and scientists&nbsp;– were helped by the Arabic translators and commentaries, but they hardly needed to struggle against a flat-Earth legacy from the early middle ages (500–1050). Early medieval writers often had fuzzy and imprecise impressions of both Ptolemy and Aristotle and relied more on Pliny, but they felt (with one exception), little urge to assume flatness."<ref name="Inventing Flat Earth" />
* The monk [[Bede]] (c. 672–735) wrote in his influential treatise on [[computus]], ''The Reckoning of Time'', that the Earth was round ('not merely circular like a shield [or] spread out like a wheel, but resembl[ing] more a ball'), explaining the unequal length of daylight from "the roundness of the Earth, for not without reason is it called 'the orb of the world' on the pages of Holy Scripture and of ordinary literature. It is, in fact, set like a sphere in the middle of the whole universe." (''[[De temporum ratione]]'', 32). The large number of surviving manuscripts of ''The Reckoning of Time'', copied to meet the [[Carolingian]] requirement that all priests should study the computus, indicates that many, if not most, priests were exposed to the idea of the sphericity of the Earth.<ref>Faith Wallis, trans., ''Bede: The Reckoning of Time'', (Liverpool: Liverpool Univ. Pr., 2004), pp. lxxxv-lxxxix.</ref> [[Ælfric of Eynsham]] paraphrased Bede into [[Old English]], saying "Now the Earth's roundness and the Sun's orbit constitute the obstacle to the day's being equally long in every land."<ref>[http://www.engl.virginia.edu/OE/aelfric/detemp.html#ch06 Ælfric of Eynsham, ''On the Seasons of the Year'', Peter Baker, trans] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070808160624/http://www.engl.virginia.edu/OE/aelfric/detemp.html#ch06 |date=August 8, 2007 }}</ref>
* [[Vergilius of Salzburg|St Vergilius of Salzburg]] (c. 700–784), in the middle of the 8th century, discussed or taught some geographical or cosmographical ideas that [[St Boniface]] found sufficiently objectionable that he complained about them to [[Pope Zachary]]. The only surviving record of the incident is contained in Zachary's reply, dated 748, where he wrote:
{{quote|As for the perverse and sinful doctrine which he (Virgil) against God and his own soul has uttered—if it shall be clearly established that he professes belief in another world and other men existing beneath the earth, or in (another) sun and moon there, thou art to hold a council, deprive him of his sacerdotal rank, and expel him from the Church.<ref>English translation by {{Cite journal |title=Thought and Letters in Western Europe: A.D. 500 to 900 |last= Laistner |first=M.L.W. |edition=2nd |date=1966 |origyear=1931 |pages= [https://books.google.com/books?id=sI0OAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA184 184–5]. |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca, NY |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sI0OAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover |ref=harv}} The original Latin reads: "De perversa autem et iniqua doctrina, quae contra Deum et animam suam locutus est, si clarificatum fuerit ita eum confiteri, quod alius mundus et alii homines sub terra seu sol et luna, hunc habito concilio ab ęcclesia pelle sacerdotii honore privatum." (''[[Monumenta Germaniae Historica|MGH]]'', [http://www.dmgh.de/de/fs1/object/goToPage/bsb00000525.html?pageNo=178&sortIndex=040%3A040%3A0001%3A010%3A00%3A00 1, 80, pp.178–9])</ref>}}
:Some authorities have suggested that the sphericity of the Earth was among the aspects of Vergilius's teachings that Boniface and Zachary considered objectionable.<ref>[[#CITEREFLaistner1966|Laistner]], (1966, [https://books.google.com/books?id=sI0OAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA184 p.184])</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Heaven and Earth in the Middle Ages |last= Simek |first=Rudolf |edition=English |others=Angela Hall |date=1996 |origyear=1993 |page= [https://books.google.com/books?id=_XCuYcq_bv4C&pg=53 53] |publisher=The Boydell Press |location=Woodbridge, UK |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_XCuYcq_bv4C&printsec=frontcover |ref=simek-1996 |isbn=0-85115-608-8}}</ref> Others have considered this unlikely, and take the wording of Zachary's response to indicate at most an objection to belief in the existence of humans living in the antipodes.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi= 10.2307/2852184 |last= Carey |first= John |authorlink= John Carey (Celticist) |title= Ireland and the Antipodes: The Heterodoxy of Virgil of Salzburg |journal= Speculum |volume= 64 |issue= 1 |pages= 1–10 |date= 1989 |ref= harv |postscript= <!--None--> |jstor= 2852184 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Creational Theology and the History of Physical Science: the Creationist Tradition from Basil to Bohr |first= Christopher B. |last= Kaiser |date=1997 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BBgXuy_D8WEC&pg=PA48 48] |publisher=Koninklijke Brill |location=Leiden |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BBgXuy_D8WEC&printsec=frontcover |ref=harv |isbn= 90-04-10669-3 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=The Classical Tradition and the Americas |editor1-first=Wolfgang |editor1-last=Hasse |editor2-first=Meyer |editor2-last=Reinhold |location=Berlin |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |date=1993 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC&printsec=frontcover |isbn=3-11-011572-7 |ref=harv}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title= The Other World and the 'Antipodes'. The Myth of Unknown Countries between Antiquity and the Renaissance |last= Moretti |first= Gabriella |postscript=. In [[#CITEREFHasseReinhold1993|Hasse & Reinhold]] (1993, pp.241–84). |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC&pg=265 265] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC&pg=241 |date=1993 |isbn= 978-3-11-011572-7 |ref=harv}}</ref><ref>*{{Cite book |title=The Irish Tradition in Old English Literature |first= Charles Darwin |last= Wright |date=1993 |page= [https://books.google.com/books?id=0ROrL2luVQYC&pg=PA41 41] |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0ROrL2luVQYC&printsec=frontcover |ref=wright-1993 |isbn= 0-521-41909-3}}</ref> In any case, there is no record of any further action having been taken against Vergilius. He was later appointed [[Archbishopric of Salzburg|bishop of Salzburg]], and was [[canonised]] in the 13th century.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15353d.htm |title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: St. Vergilius of Salzburg |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=October 1, 1912 |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref>
[[Image:Hildegard von Bingen- 'Werk Gottes', 12. Jh..jpg|thumb|12th-century depiction of a spherical Earth with the four seasons (book ''Liber Divinorum Operum'' by [[Hildegard of Bingen]])]]


[[File:Isidore-wheels.jpg|thumb|Isidore's portrayal of the five zones of the Earth]]
A possible non-literary but graphic indication that people in the Middle Ages believed that the Earth (or perhaps the world) was a sphere is the use of the ''orb'' ([[globus cruciger]]) in the regalia of many kingdoms and of the Holy Roman Empire. It is attested from the time of the Christian late-Roman emperor [[Theodosius II]] (423) throughout the Middle Ages; the ''Reichsapfel'' was used in 1191 at the coronation of [[Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor|emperor Henry VI]]. However the word 'orbis' means 'circle' and there is no record of a globe as a representation of the Earth since ancient times in the west till that of [[Martin Behaim]] in 1492. Additionally it could well be a representation of the entire 'world' or [[cosmos]].


[[Vergilius of Salzburg|St Vergilius of Salzburg]] (c. 700–784), in the middle of the 8th century, discussed or taught some geographical or cosmographical ideas that [[St Boniface]] found sufficiently objectionable that he complained about them to [[Pope Zachary]]. The only surviving record of the incident is contained in Zachary's reply, dated 748, where he wrote:<ref>English translation by {{Cite book |title=Thought and Letters in Western Europe: A.D. 500 to 900 |last= Laistner |first=M. L. W. |edition=2nd |date=1966 |orig-year=1931 |pages= [https://books.google.com/books?id=sI0OAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA184 184–185] |publisher=Cornell University Press |location=Ithaca, NY |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sI0OAAAAQAAJ }} The original Latin reads: {{lang|la|De perversa autem et iniqua doctrina, quae contra Deum et animam suam locutus est, si clarificatum fuerit ita eum confiteri, quod alius mundus et alii homines sub terra seu sol et luna, hunc habito concilio ab ęcclesia pelle sacerdotii honore privatum.}} (''[[Monumenta Germaniae Historica|MGH]]'', [http://www.dmgh.de/de/fs1/object/goToPage/bsb00000525.html?pageNo=178&sortIndex=040%3A040%3A0001%3A010%3A00%3A00 1, 80, pp. 178–79]).</ref>
A recent study of medieval concepts of the sphericity of the Earth noted that "since the eighth century, no cosmographer worthy of note has called into question the sphericity of the Earth."<ref>{{cite book |first=Klaus Anselm |last=Vogel |title=''Sphaera terrae'' - das mittelalterliche Bild der Erde und die kosmographische Revolution |publisher=PhD dissertation Georg-August-Universität Göttingen |date=1995 |page=19 |url=http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2000/vogel/index.htm#inhalt }}</ref> However, the work of these intellectuals may not have had significant influence on public opinion, and it is difficult to tell what the wider population may have thought of the shape of the Earth, if they considered the question at all.
{{blockquote|
As for the perverse and sinful doctrine which he (Virgil) against God and his own soul has uttered&nbsp;– if it shall be clearly established that he professes belief in another world and other men existing beneath the Earth, or in (another) sun and moon there, thou art to hold a council, deprive him of his sacerdotal rank, and expel him from the Church.
}}


Some authorities have suggested that the sphericity of the Earth was among the aspects of Vergilius's teachings that Boniface and Zachary considered objectionable.<ref>[[#CITEREFLaistner1966|Laistner]], (1966, [https://books.google.com/books?id=sI0OAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA184 p. 184]).</ref><ref>Simek ([[#CITEREFSimek1996|1996]], [https://books.google.com/books?id=gXBSKZAlAdMC&pg=PA53 p.&nbsp;53]).</ref> Others have considered this unlikely, and take the wording of Zachary's response to indicate at most an objection to belief in the existence of humans living in the antipodes.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi= 10.2307/2852184 |last= Carey |first= John |author-link= John Carey (Celticist) |title= Ireland and the Antipodes: The Heterodoxy of Virgil of Salzburg |journal= Speculum |volume= 64 |issue= 1 |pages= 1–10 |date= 1989 |jstor= 2852184 |s2cid= 162378383 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Creational Theology and the History of Physical Science: the Creationist Tradition from Basil to Bohr |first= Christopher B. |last= Kaiser |date=1997 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=BBgXuy_D8WEC&pg=PA48 48] |publisher=Koninklijke Brill |location=Leiden |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BBgXuy_D8WEC |isbn= 978-90-04-10669-7 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=The Classical Tradition and the Americas |editor1-first=Wolfgang |editor1-last=Hasse |editor2-first=Meyer |editor2-last=Reinhold |location=Berlin |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |date=1993 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC |isbn=978-3-11-011572-7 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title= The Other World and the 'Antipodes'. The Myth of Unknown Countries between Antiquity and the Renaissance |last= Moretti |first= Gabriella |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC&pg=265 265] |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I1LEmKPgJ8MC&pg=241 |date=1993 |publisher= Walter de Gruyter |isbn= 978-3-11-011572-7 }} In [[#CITEREFHasseReinhold1993|Hasse & Reinhold]] (1993, pp. 241–284).</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=The Irish Tradition in Old English Literature |first= Charles Darwin |last= Wright |date=1993 |page= [https://books.google.com/books?id=0ROrL2luVQYC&pg=PA41 41] |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, UK |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0ROrL2luVQYC |ref=wright-1993 |isbn= 978-0-521-41909-3}}</ref> In any case, there is no record of any further action having been taken against Vergilius. He was later appointed [[Archbishopric of Salzburg|bishop of Salzburg]] and was [[canonised]] in the 13th century.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15353d.htm |title=Catholic Encyclopedia: St. Vergilius of Salzburg |publisher=Newadvent.org |date=October 1, 1912 |access-date=February 9, 2013}}</ref>
====High and Late European Middle Ages====
[[Image:Hildegard von Bingen- 'Werk Gottes', 12. Jh..jpg|thumb|12th-century depiction of a spherical Earth with the four seasons (book ''Liber Divinorum Operum'' by [[Hildegard of Bingen]])]]
{{Further information|Spherical Earth#Medieval Europe}}
[[Image:Sacrobosco-1550-B3r-detail01.jpg|thumb|left|Picture from a 1550 edition of ''[[De sphaera mundi|On the Sphere of the World]]'', the most influential [[astronomy]] textbook of 13th-century Europe]]
By the 11th century, [[Europe]] had learned of [[Islamic astronomy]]. The [[Renaissance of the 12th century]] from about 1070 started an intellectual revitalization of Europe with strong [[philosophical]] and [[scientific]] roots, and increased interest in [[natural philosophy]].
[[Image:Gossuin de Metz - L'image du monde - BNF Fr. 574 fo42 - miniature.jpg|thumb|upright|Illustration of the [[spherical Earth]] in a 14th-century copy of ''[[Gautier de Metz|L'Image du monde]]'' (c. 1246)]]


A possible non-literary but graphic indication that people in the Middle Ages believed that the Earth (or perhaps the world) was a sphere is the use of the ''orb'' ([[globus cruciger]]) in the regalia of many kingdoms and of the Holy Roman Empire. It is attested from the time of the Christian late-Roman emperor [[Theodosius II]] (423) throughout the Middle Ages; the ''Reichsapfel'' was used in 1191 at the coronation of [[Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor|emperor Henry VI]]. However the word {{lang|la|orbis}} means "circle", and there is no record of a globe as a representation of the Earth since ancient times in the west until that of [[Martin Behaim]] in 1492. Additionally it could well be a representation of the entire "world" or [[cosmos]].<ref>
[[Hermannus Contractus]] (1013–1054) was among the earliest Christian scholars to estimate the circumference of Earth with [[Eratosthenes]]' method. [[Thomas Aquinas]] (1225–1274), the most important and widely taught theologian of the Middle Ages, believed in a spherical Earth; and he even took for granted his readers also knew the Earth is round. In his [[Summa Theologica]] he wrote, "The physicist proves the earth to be round by one means, the astronomer by another: for the latter proves this by means of mathematics, e.g. by the shapes of eclipses, or something of the sort; while the former proves it by means of physics, e.g. by the movement of heavy bodies towards the center, and so forth."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/summa/2054.htm#2|title=''Summa Theologica'' IIa Iae, q. 54, a. 2}}</ref> Lectures in the [[medieval universities]] commonly advanced evidence in favor of the idea that the Earth was a sphere.<ref>{{Citation | last = Grant | first = Edward | author-link = Edward Grant | date = 1994 | title = Planets. Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | publication-place = Cambridge | pages = 626–630 | isbn = 0-521-56509-X}}</ref> Also, "''[[De sphaera mundi|On the Sphere of the World]]''", the most influential [[astronomy]] textbook of the 13th century and required reading by students in all Western European universities, described the world as a sphere.
{{citation
| title=Manoscritto Voynich e Castel del Monte: Nuova chiave interpretativa del documento per inediti percorsi di ricerca
| language=it
| trans-title=The [[Voynich manuscript|Voynich Manuscript]] and [[Castel del Monte, Apulia|Castel del Monte]]: A new interpretive key to the document through unpublished courses of research
| first1=Giuseppe
| last1=Fallacara
| first2=Ubaldo
| last2=Occhinegro
| publisher=Gangemi Editore
| page= [https://books.google.com/books?id=MiNOAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT128 127]
| year= 2013
| url= https://books.google.com/books?id=MiNOAgAAQBAJ
| isbn= 9788849277494
}}
</ref>


A recent study of medieval concepts of the sphericity of the Earth noted that "since the eighth century, no cosmographer worthy of note has called into question the sphericity of the Earth".<ref>{{cite thesis |first=Klaus Anselm |last=Vogel |title=''Sphaera terrae'' – das mittelalterliche Bild der Erde und die kosmographische Revolution |language=de |publisher=PhD dissertation Georg-August-Universität Göttingen |date=1995 |page=19 |doi=10.53846/goediss-4247 |s2cid=247015048 |url=http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2000/vogel/index.htm#inhalt |type=doctoralThesis |doi-access=free }}</ref> However, the work of these intellectuals may not have had significant influence on public opinion, and it is difficult to tell what the wider population may have thought of the shape of the Earth if they considered the question at all.
The shape of the Earth was not only discussed in scholarly works written in [[Latin]]; it was also treated in works written in [[vernacular]] languages or dialects and intended for wider audiences. The Norwegian book [[Konungs Skuggsjá]], from around 1250, states clearly that the Earth is spherical—and that there is night on the opposite side of the Earth when there is daytime in Norway. The author also discusses the existence of antipodes—and he notes that (if they exist) they see the Sun in the north of the middle of the day, and that they experience seasons opposite those of people in the Northern Hemisphere.


====Europe: High and Late Middle Ages====
However Tattersall shows that in many vernacular works in 12th- and 13th-century French texts the Earth was considered "round like a table" rather than "round like an apple". "In virtually all the examples quoted...from epics and from non-'historical' romances (that is, works of a less learned character) the actual form of words used suggests strongly a circle rather than a sphere, though notes that even in these works the language is ambiguous.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=The Earth, Sphere or Disc?|author=Jill Tattersall|date=1981|journal=Modern Language Review|pages=31–46|volume=76|doi=10.2307/3727009}}</ref>
{{Further|Spherical Earth#Medieval Europe}}
[[Image:Sacrobosco-1550-B3r-detail01.jpg|thumb|left|Picture from a 1550 edition of ''[[De sphaera mundi|On the Sphere of the World]]'', the most influential [[astronomy]] textbook of 13th-century Europe]]
[[Hermann of Reichenau]] (1013–1054) was among the earliest Christian scholars to estimate the circumference of Earth with [[Eratosthenes]]' method. [[Thomas Aquinas]] (1225–1274), the most widely taught theologian of the Middle Ages, believed in a spherical Earth and took for granted that his readers also knew the Earth is round.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.newadvent.org/summa/2054.htm |title=SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: The distinction of habits (Prima Secundae Partis, Q.&nbsp;54) |website=www.newadvent.org}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> Lectures in the [[medieval universities]] commonly advanced evidence in favor of the idea that the Earth was a sphere.<ref>{{Citation | last = Grant | first = Edward | author-link = Edward Grant | date = 1994 | title = Planets. Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | location = Cambridge | pages = 626–30 | isbn = 978-0-521-56509-7}}</ref>


[[Image:Gossuin de Metz - L'image du monde - BNF Fr. 574 fo42 - miniature.jpg|thumb|upright|Illustration of the [[spherical Earth]] in a 14th-century copy of ''[[Gautier de Metz|L'Image du monde]]'' (c.&nbsp;1246)]]
[[Portuguese discoveries#Atlantic exploration (1415–1488)|Portuguese navigation]] down and around the coast of [[Africa]] in the latter half of the 1400s gave wide-scale observational evidence for Earth's sphericity. In these explorations, the sun's position moved more northward the further south the explorers travel. Its position directly overhead at noon gave evidence for crossing the equator. These apparent solar motions in detail were more consistent with north-south curvature and a distant sun, than with any flat-earth explanation. The ultimate demonstration came when [[Magellan–Elcano circumnavigation|Ferdinand Magellan's expedition]] completed the first global circumnavigation in 1521. [[Antonio Pigafetta]], one of the few survivors of the voyage, recorded the loss of a day in the course of the voyage, giving evidence for east-west curvature. No flat-earth theory could reconcile the daily apparent motions of the sun with the ability to sail around the world, and the loss of a day could make no sense, either.
Jill Tattersall shows that in many [[vernacular]] works in 12th- and 13th-century French texts the Earth was considered "round like a table" rather than "round like an apple". She writes, "[I]n virtually all the examples quoted&nbsp;... from epics and from non-'historical' romances (that is, works of a less learned character) the actual form of words used suggests strongly a circle rather than a sphere", though she notes that even in these works the language is ambiguous.<ref>{{Cite journal |title=The Earth, Sphere or Disc? |author=Jill Tattersall |date=1981 |journal=Modern Language Review |pages=31–46 <!--quote pp 45–46-->|volume=76 |issue=1 |doi=10.2307/3727009 |jstor=3727009}}</ref>


[[Portuguese discoveries#Atlantic exploration (1415–1488)|Portuguese navigation]] down and around the coast of [[Africa]] in the latter half of the 1400s gave wide-scale observational evidence for Earth's sphericity. In these explorations, the Sun's position moved more northward the further south the explorers travelled. Its position directly overhead at noon gave evidence for crossing the equator. These apparent solar motions in detail were more consistent with north–south curvature and a distant Sun, than with any flat-Earth explanation. The ultimate demonstration came when [[Magellan's circumnavigation|Ferdinand Magellan's expedition]] completed the first global circumnavigation in 1521. [[Antonio Pigafetta]], one of the few survivors of the voyage, recorded the loss of a day in the course of the voyage, giving evidence for east–west curvature.
====Post-classical Islamic World====
{{Further information|Spherical Earth#Medieval Islamic scholars}}
The [[Abbasid Caliphate]] saw a great flowering of [[Astronomy in medieval Islam|astronomy]] and [[Mathematics in medieval Islam|mathematics]] in the 9th century AD, in which Muslim scholars translated Ptolemy's work, which became the [[Almagest]], and extended and updated his work based on spherical ideas. Since then, these have generally been respected.


====Middle East: Islamic scholars====
The Quran mentions that the Earth was "spread out".<ref>There are several verses of the Qu'ran which have been translated into English as having Allah state that he had "spread [the Earth] out". These include verses [http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=15&verse=19 15:19], [http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=20&verse=53 20:53], [http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=50&verse=7 50:7], and [http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=51&verse=48 51:48].</ref> To this a classic [[Persian people|Persian]] commentary, the [[Tafsir al-Kabir (al-Razi)]] written in the late 12th century says "If it is said: Do the words “And the earth We spread out” indicate that it is flat? We would respond: Yes, because the earth, even though it is round, is an enormous sphere, and each little part of this enormous sphere, when it is looked at, appears to be flat. As that is the case, this will dispel what they mentioned of confusion. The evidence for that is the verse in which Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And the mountains as pegs” [an-Naba’ 78:7]. He called them awtaad (pegs) even though these mountains may have large flat surfaces. And the same is true in this case."<ref>
{{Further|Spherical Earth#Medieval Islamic scholars}}
{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/altafsiralkabir19rzfauoft|author1=Imam Al-Razi|chapter= 19/131|accessdate=February 13, 2013}}</ref>
Prior to the introduction of Greek cosmology into the Islamic world, Muslims tended to view the Earth as flat, and Muslim traditionalists who rejected Greek philosophy continued to hold to this view later on while various theologians held opposing opinions.<ref>Damien Janos, "Qur'ānic cosmography in its historical perspective: some notes on the formation of a religious worldview", Religion 2012, pp217-8</ref><ref name=":0" /> Beginning in the 10th century onwards, some Muslim traditionalists began to adopt the notion of a spherical Earth with the influence of Greek and Ptolemaic cosmology.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hannam |first=James |title=The Globe: How the Earth Became Round |publisher=Reaktion Books |year=2023 |isbn=978-1789147582 |pages=178–193}}</ref>


In [[Quranic cosmology]], the Earth (''al-arḍ'') was "spread out."<ref>For example, see verses [[Q15:19]] {{Citequran|15|19|s=y|b=yl}}, [[Q20:53]] {{Citequran|20|53|s=y|b=yl}}, [[Q50:7]] {{Citequran|50|7|s=y|b=yl}}, and [[Q51:48]] {{Citequran|51|48|s=y|b=yl}}.</ref> Whether or not this implies a flat earth was debated by Muslims.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Anchassi |first=Omar |date=2022-12-14 |title=Against Ptolemy? : Cosmography in Early Kalām omar anchassi |url=https://lockwoodonlinejournals.com/ |journal=Journal of the American Oriental Society |language=en |volume=142 |issue=4 |pages=861, n. 72 |doi=10.7817/jaos.142.4.2022.ar033 |issn=2169-2289}}</ref> Some modern historians believe the Quran saw the world as flat.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Tabatabaʾi |first1=Mohammad Ali |last2=Mirsadri |first2=Saida |date=2016-05-26 |title=The Qurʾānic Cosmology, as an Identity in Itself |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/arab/63/3-4/article-p201_1.xml |journal=Arabica |language=en |volume=63 |issue=3–4 |pages=211 |doi=10.1163/15700585-12341398 |issn=1570-0585}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Reynolds |first1=Gabriel Said |title=The Qur'an and the Bible: text and commentary |last2=Qarāʿī |first2=ʿAlī Qūlī |date=2018 |publisher=Yale university press |isbn=978-0-300-18132-6 |location=New Haven (Conn.) |pages=405, 464}}</ref> On the other hand, the 12th-century [[tafsir|commentary]], the [[Tafsir al-Razi|Tafsir al-Kabir (al-Razi)]] by [[Fakhr al-Din al-Razi]] argues that though this verse does describe a flat surface, it is limited in its application to local regions of the Earth which are roughly flat as opposed to the Earth as a whole. Others who would support a ball-shaped Earth included [[Ibn Hazm]].<ref name=":0" />
[[Ibn Hazm]] states in his in [[fatwa]]s ''Al-Fasl fi’l-Milal wa’l-Ahwa’ wa’l-Nihal'' that there is sound evidence in the [[Quran]] and [[hadith]]s that the [[earth]] is round, but the common folk say otherwise. He further states: "Our response – is that none of the leading Muslim scholars who deserve to be called [[imams]] or leaders in knowledge (may Allah be pleased with them) denied that the earth is round, and there is no narration from them to deny that. Rather the evidence in the [[Quran]] and [[Sunnah]] stated that it is round."<ref>{{cite web|title=Consensus that the Earth is round|url=https://islamqa.info/en/118698|website=IslamQA|accessdate=18 August 2016}}</ref>

A later classic [[Sunni]] commentary, the [[Tafsir al-Jalalayn]] written in the early 16th century, says "As for His words sutihat, ‘laid out flat’, this on a literal reading suggests that the earth is flat, which is the opinion of most of the scholars of the [revealed] Law, and not a sphere as astronomers (ahl al-hay’a) have it, even if this [latter] does not contradict any of the pillars of the Law."<ref>
{{cite book|url=http://www.islamicdoctrines.com/documents/Tafsir-al-Jalalayn.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304102105/http://www.islamicdoctrines.com/documents/Tafsir-al-Jalalayn.pdf|dead-url=yes|archive-date=March 4, 2016|title=Tafsir al-Jalalayn͕|author1=Jalal al-Din al-Mahalli|author2=Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti|chapter= from Juza '20 to Juza '30|others=Translated by Feras Hamza|accessdate=August 8, 2013}}</ref>{{dubious|date=August 2016}} Other translations render "made flat" as "spread out".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://quran.com/88|title=Surat Al-Ghāshiyah|accessdate=December 3, 2010}}</ref>


====Ming Dynasty in China====
====Ming Dynasty in China====
A spherical terrestrial globe was introduced to Beijing in 1267 by the Persian astronomer [[Jamal ad-Din (astronomer)|Jamal ad-Din]], but it is not known to have made an impact on the traditional Chinese conception of the shape of the Earth.<ref>(cf. Joseph Needham et al.: "Heavenly clockwork: the great astronomical clocks of medieval China", Antiquarian Horological Society, 2nd. ed., Vol. 1, 1986, {{ISBN|0-521-32276-6}}, p. 138)</ref> As late as 1595, an early [[Jesuit]] missionary to China, [[Matteo Ricci]], recorded that the Chinese say: "The earth is flat and square, and the sky is a round canopy; they did not succeed in conceiving the possibility of the antipodes."<ref name="Cullen 1976, 109"/> The universal belief in a flat Earth is confirmed by a contemporary Chinese encyclopedia from 1609 illustrating a flat Earth extending over the horizontal diametral plane of a spherical heaven.<ref name="Cullen 1976, 109"/>
A spherical terrestrial globe was introduced to [[Yuan dynasty|Yuan-era]] [[Khanbaliq]] (i.e. [[Beijing]]) in 1267 by the Persian astronomer [[Jamal ad-Din (astronomer)|Jamal ad-Din]], but it is not known to have made an impact on the traditional Chinese conception of the shape of the Earth.<ref>Joseph Needham et al.: "Heavenly clockwork: the great astronomical clocks of medieval China", Antiquarian Horological Society, 2nd. ed., Vol. 1, 1986, {{ISBN|0-521-32276-6}}, p. 138.</ref> As late as 1595, an early [[Jesuit]] missionary to China, [[Matteo Ricci]], recorded that the [[Ming dynasty|Ming-dynasty]] Chinese say: "The Earth is flat and square, and the sky is a round canopy; they did not succeed in conceiving the possibility of the antipodes."<ref name="Cullen"/>


In the 17th century, the idea of a spherical Earth spread in China due to the influence of the Jesuits, who held high positions as astronomers at the imperial court.<ref name="needham volume 3 499">Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. pp. 499.</ref>
In the 17th century, the idea of a spherical Earth spread in China due to the influence of the Jesuits, who held high positions as astronomers at the imperial court.<ref name="needham volume 3 499">Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. p.&nbsp;499.</ref> Matteo Ricci, in collaboration with [[Chinese cartography|Chinese cartographers]] and translator [[Li Zhizao]], published the ''[[Kunyu Wanguo Quantu]]'' in 1602, the first Chinese [[world map]] based on [[Age of Discovery|European discoveries]].<ref name="Baran">{{cite news |url=http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/12/16/tulip-map/ |title=Historic map coming to Minnesota |last=Baran |first=Madeleine |date=December 16, 2009 |publisher=Minnesota Public Radio |access-date=19 February 2018 |location=St. Paul, Minn. }}</ref> The astronomical and geographical treatise ''Gezhicao'' ({{lang|zh|格致草}}) written in 1648 by Xiong Mingyu ({{lang|zh|熊明遇}}) explained that the Earth was spherical, not flat or square, and could be circumnavigated.<ref name="needham volume 3 499"/>


=== Myth of the flat Earth ===
=== Myth of flat-Earth prevalence ===
{{Main article|Myth of the Flat Earth}}
{{Main|Myth of the flat Earth}}
Beginning in the 19th century, a historical myth arose which held that the predominant cosmological doctrine during the Middle Ages was that the Earth was flat. An early proponent of this myth was the American writer [[Washington Irving]], who maintained that Christopher Columbus had to overcome the opposition of churchmen to gain sponsorship for his voyage of exploration. Later significant advocates of this view were [[John William Draper]] and [[Andrew Dickson White]], who used it as a major element in their advocacy of the thesis<ref>{{Citation | last = Russell | first = Jeffrey Burton | author-link = Jeffrey Burton Russell | year = 1991 | title = Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians | publisher = Praeger | publication-place = New York | pages = 37–45 | isbn = 0275939561}}</ref> that there was a long lasting and essential [[conflict thesis|conflict between science and religion]].<ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Lindberg | editor-first = David C. | editor-link = David C. Lindberg | editor2-last = Numbers | editor2-first = Ronald L. | editor2-link = Ronald L. Numbers | year = 1986 | title = God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science | chapter = Introduction | publisher = University of California Press | publication-place = Berkeley and Los Angeles | pages = 1–3 | isbn = 0-520-05692-2}}</ref> Subsequent studies of medieval science have shown that most scholars in the Middle Ages, including those read by Christopher Columbus, maintained that the Earth was spherical.<ref>{{Citation | last = Grant | first = Edward | author-link = Edward Grant | date = 1994 | title = Planets. Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | publication-place = Cambridge | pages = 620–622, 626–630 | isbn = 0-521-56509-X}}</ref> Studies of the historical connections between science and religion have demonstrated that theories of their mutual antagonism ignore examples of their mutual support.<ref>{{Citation | last = Lindberg | first = David C. | author-link = David C. Lindberg | editor-last = Shank | editor-first = Michael H. | date = 2000 | title = The Scientific Enterprise in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Readings from ''[[Isis (journal)|Isis]]'' | chapter = Science and the Early Christian Church | publisher = University of Chicago Press | publication-place = Chicago and London | pages = 125–146 | isbn = 0-226-74951-7}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Ferngren | editor-first = Gary | year = 2002 | title = Science & Religion: A Historical Introduction | chapter = Introduction | publisher = Johns Hopkins University Press | place = Baltimore | page = ix | isbn = 0-8018-7038-0}}</ref>
In the 19th century, a historical myth arose which held that the predominant cosmological doctrine during the Middle Ages was that the Earth was flat. An early proponent of this myth was the American writer [[Washington Irving]], who maintained that Christopher Columbus had to overcome the opposition of churchmen to gain sponsorship for his voyage of exploration. Later significant advocates of this view were [[John William Draper]] and [[Andrew Dickson White]], who used it as a major element in their advocacy of the thesis<ref>{{Citation | last = Russell | first = Jeffrey Burton | author-link = Jeffrey Burton Russell | year = 1991 | title = Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians | publisher = Praeger | location = New York | pages = [https://archive.org/details/inventingflatear00russ/page/37 37–45] | isbn = 978-0275939564 | url = https://archive.org/details/inventingflatear00russ/page/37 }}</ref> that there was a long-lasting and essential [[Relationship between religion and science|conflict between science and religion]].<ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Lindberg | editor-first = David C. | editor-link = David C. Lindberg | editor2-last = Numbers | editor2-first = Ronald L. | editor2-link = Ronald L. Numbers | year = 1986 | title = God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science | chapter = Introduction | publisher = University of California Press | location = Berkeley and Los Angeles | pages = 1–3 | isbn = 978-0-520-05692-3}}</ref> Some studies of the historical connections between science and religion have demonstrated that theories of their mutual antagonism ignore examples of their mutual support.<ref>{{Citation | last = Lindberg | first = David C. | author-link = David C. Lindberg | editor-last = Shank | editor-first = Michael H. | date = 2000 | title = The Scientific Enterprise in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Readings from ''Isis'' | chapter = Science and the Early Christian Church | publisher = University of Chicago Press | location = Chicago and London | pages = 125–146 | isbn = 978-0-226-74951-8 }}</ref><ref>{{Citation | editor-last = Ferngren | editor-first = Gary | year = 2002 | title = Science & Religion: A Historical Introduction | chapter = Introduction | publisher = Johns Hopkins University Press | place = Baltimore | page = ix | isbn = 978-0-8018-7038-5}}</ref>


Subsequent studies of medieval science have shown that most scholars in the Middle Ages, including those read by Christopher Columbus, maintained that the Earth was spherical.<ref>{{Citation | last = Grant | first = Edward | author-link = Edward Grant | date = 1994 | title = Planets. Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687 | publisher = Cambridge University Press | location = Cambridge | pages = 620–622, 626–630 | isbn = 978-0-521-56509-7}}</ref>
===Modern Flat-Earthers<!--usually capitalized in the literature-->===
[[File:Orlando-Ferguson-flat-earth-map edit.jpg|thumb|Flat Earth map drawn by Orlando Ferguson in 1893. The map contains several references to biblical passages as well as various jabs at the "Globe Theory".]]
{{Main article|Modern flat Earth societies}}


==Modern flat Earth beliefs==
In the modern era, the [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] belief in a flat Earth has been expressed by a variety of individuals and groups:
{{Main|Modern flat Earth beliefs}}
* English writer [[Samuel Rowbotham]] (1816–1885), writing under the pseudonym "Parallax," produced a pamphlet called ''Zetetic Astronomy'' in 1849 arguing for a flat Earth and published results of many experiments that tested the curvatures of water over a long drainage ditch, followed by another called ''The inconsistency of Modern Astronomy and its Opposition to the Scripture''. One of his supporters, John Hampden, lost a bet to [[Alfred Russel Wallace]] in the famous [[Bedford Level Experiment]], which attempted to prove it. In 1877 Hampden produced a book called "A New Manual of Biblical Cosmography".<ref>{{cite book|title=The Discovery of America|date=1892|first= John|last= Fiske|page=267|url=https://archive.org/details/discoveryameric13fiskgoog}}
[[File:Flat Earth Society Logo.png|thumb|Logo of the [[International Flat Earth Research Society|Flat Earth Society]]]]
</ref> Rowbotham also produced studies that purported to show that the effects of ships disappearing below the horizon could be explained by the laws of perspective in relation to the human eye.<ref>{{Cite book|author=Parallax (Samuel Birley Rowbotham)|title=Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe|edition=Third|publisher=London:Simpkin, Marshall, and Co.|date=1881|url=http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za32.htm}}</ref> In 1883 he founded Zetetic Societies in England and New York, to which he shipped a thousand copies of ''Zetetic Astronomy''.
In the modern era, the [[Pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] belief in a flat Earth originated with the English writer [[Samuel Rowbotham]] with the 1849 pamphlet ''Zetetic Astronomy''. [[Lady Elizabeth Blount]] established the Universal Zetetic Society in 1893, which published journals. In 1956, [[Samuel Shenton]] set up the [[International Flat Earth Research Society]], better known as the "Flat Earth Society" from Dover, England, as a direct descendant of the Universal Zetetic Society.
* [[William Carpenter (1830-1896)|William Carpenter]], a printer originally from [[Greenwich]], [[England]] (home of the [[Royal Observatory, Greenwich|Royal Observatory]] and central to the study of astronomy), was a supporter of Rowbotham. Carpenter published ''Theoretical Astronomy Examined and Exposed – Proving the Earth not a Globe'' in eight parts from 1864 under the name ''Common Sense''.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=oB1cxm_M-zUC|title=Theoretical astronomy examined and exposed, by 'Common sense'.|publisher=}}</ref> He later emigrated to Baltimore, where he published ''A hundred proofs the Earth is not a Globe'' in 1885.<ref>William Carpenter, ''One hundred proofs that the earth is not a globe'', (Baltimore: The author, 1885).[https://web.archive.org/web/20080308062134/http://www.geocities.com/lclane2/hundreda.html]</ref> He said "There are rivers that flow for hundreds of miles towards the level of the sea without falling more than a few feet — notably, the Nile, which, in a thousand miles, falls but a foot. A level expanse of this extent is quite incompatible with the idea of the Earth's convexity. It is, therefore, a reasonable proof that Earth is not a globe", as well as "If the Earth were a globe, a small model globe would be the very best — because the truest — thing for the navigator to take to sea with him. But such a thing as that is not known: with such a toy as a guide, the mariner would wreck his ship, of a certainty!, This is a proof that Earth is not a globe."
* [[John Jasper]], an American slave turned prolific preacher, echoed his friend Carpenter's sentiments in his most famous sermon "Der Sun do move and the Earth Am Square", preached over 250 times, always by invitation.<ref>'Low me ter ax ef de earth is roun', whar do it keep its corners? Er flat, squar thing has corners, but tell me where is de cornur uv er appul, ur a marbul, ur a cannun ball, ur a silver dollar.' {{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/stream/johnjasperunmatc00hatciala/johnjasperunmatc00hatciala_djvu.txt
|title=John Jasper|author=William E. Hatcher|publisher=Fleming Revell|date=1908}} See also Garwood, p165</ref>
* In [[Brockport, New York|Brockport]], New York, in 1887, M.C. Flanders argued the case of a flat Earth for three nights against two scientific gentlemen defending sphericity. Five townsmen chosen as judges voted unanimously for a flat Earth at the end. The case was reported in the ''Brockport Democrat''.<ref>The Earth: Scripturally, Rationally, and Practically Described. A Geographical, Philosophical, and Educational Review, Nautical Guide, and General Student's Manual, n. 17 (November 1, 1887), p. 7. cited in {{Cite news|author=Robert J. Schadewald|title=Scientific Creationism, Geocentricity, and the Flat Earth|date=1981|publisher=Skeptical Inquirer|url=http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/crea-fe.htm|accessdate=August 21, 2010}}</ref>
* Professor [[Joseph W. Holden]] of Maine, a former [[justice of the peace]], gave numerous lectures in New England and lectured on flat Earth theory at the [[Columbian Exposition]] in Chicago. His fame stretched to North Carolina where the [[Statesville, North Carolina|Statesville]] ''Semi-weekly Landmark'' recorded at his death in 1900: 'We hold to the doctrine that the earth is flat ourselves and we regret exceedingly to learn that one of our members is dead'.<ref name="garwood">{{Cite book|title=Flat Earth|author=Christine Garwood|publisher=Macmillan|date=2007|isbn=0-312-38208-1}}</ref>
* After Rowbotham's death, [[Lady Elizabeth Blount]] (Elizabeth de Sodington Blount, nee Elizabeth Anne Mould Williams) created the [[Universal Zetetic Society]] in 1893 in England and created a journal called ''Earth not a Globe Review,'' which sold for twopence, as well as one called ''Earth,'' which only lasted from 1901 to 1904. She held that the Bible was the unquestionable authority on the natural world and argued that one could not be a Christian and believe the Earth is a globe. Well-known members included [[E. W. Bullinger]] of the [[Trinitarian Bible Society]], Edward Haughton, senior moderator in natural science in [[Trinity College, Dublin]] and an archbishop. She repeated Rowbotham's experiments, generating some interesting counter-experiments, but interest declined after the First World War.<ref name="garwood" /> The movement gave rise to several books that argued for a flat, stationary earth, including ''Terra Firma'' by David Wardlaw Scott.<ref>{{cite book|author=David Wardlaw Scott|title=Terra Firma|date=1901|url=https://archive.org/details/cu31924031764594|accessdate=December 13, 2010}}</ref>
* In 1898, during his solo [[circumnavigation]] of the world, [[Joshua Slocum]] encountered a group of flat-Earthers in [[Durban, South Africa|Durban]], South Africa. Three [[Boers]], one of them a clergyman, presented Slocum with a pamphlet in which they set out to prove that the world was flat. [[Paul Kruger]], President of the [[South African Republic|Transvaal Republic]], advanced the same view: "You don't mean ''round'' the world, it is impossible! You mean ''in'' the world. Impossible!"<ref>Joshua Slocum, ''Sailing Alone Around the World'', (New York: The Century Company, 1900), chaps. 17-18.[http://www.ibiblio.org/eldritch/js/saaw.htm]</ref>
* [[Wilbur Glenn Voliva]], who in 1906 took over the [[Christian Catholic Apostolic Church|Christian Catholic Church]], a [[Pentecostal]] sect that established a utopian community at [[Zion, Illinois|Zion]], Illinois, preached flat Earth doctrine from 1915 onwards and used a photograph of a twelve-mile stretch of the shoreline at [[Lake Winnebago]], [[Wisconsin]] taken three feet above the waterline to prove his point. When the [[airship Italia|airship ''Italia'']] disappeared on an expedition to the [[North Pole]] in 1928 he warned the world's press that it had sailed over the edge of the world. He offered a $5,000 award for proving the Earth is not flat, under his own conditions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/05/19/5000-for-proving-the-earth-is-a-globe/ |title=$5,000 for Proving the Earth is a Globe &#124; Modern Mechanix |publisher=Blog.modernmechanix.com |date=May 19, 2006 |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref> Teaching a globular Earth was banned in the Zion schools and the message was transmitted on his [[WCBD]] radio station.<ref name="garwood" />


In the [[Internet era]], the availability of communications technology and [[social media]] like [[YouTube]], [[Facebook]]<ref>{{cite web|last1=Abbott|first1=Erica|title=Mark Zuckerberg Banning All Flat Earth Groups from Facebook Is A Hoax|url=http://www.business2community.com/facebook/mark-zuckerberg-banning-flat-earth-groups-facebook-hoax-01890594|website=Business2community.com|publisher=Business2community|access-date=19 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170819231354/http://www.business2community.com/facebook/mark-zuckerberg-banning-flat-earth-groups-facebook-hoax-01890594|archive-date=19 August 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref> and [[Twitter]] have made it easy for individuals, famous<ref>{{cite web|url=http://people.com/celebrity/flat-earth-celebrities-world-not-round/|last1=Heigl|first1=Alex|title=The Short List of Famous People Who Think the Earth Is Flat (Yes, Really)|work=People|access-date=19 August 2017}}</ref> or not, to spread disinformation and attract others to erroneous ideas, including that of the flat Earth.<ref name="Ambrose">{{cite web |last1=Ambrose |first1=Graham |date=July 7, 2017 |title=These Coloradans say Earth is flat. And gravity's a hoax. Now, they're being persecuted. |url=https://www.denverpost.com/2017/07/07/colorado-earth-flat-gravity-hoax/ |access-date=19 August 2017 |work=The Denver Post}}</ref><ref name= Dure>{{cite news|last1=Dure|first1=Beau|title=Flat-Earthers are back: 'It's almost like the beginning of a new religion'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/20/flat-earth-believers-youtube-videos-conspiracy-theorists|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=19 August 2017|date=20 January 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Herreria|first1=Carla|title=Neil deGrasse Tyson Cites Celebrity Flat-Earthers To Make A Point About Politics|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/neil-degrasse-tyson-flat-earth-pop-stars-flawed_us_58faa373e4b06b9cb91719ad|work=HuffPost|access-date=19 August 2017|date=22 April 2017}}</ref>
===Flat Earth Society===
[[File:Flat earth.png|thumb|[[Azimuthal equidistant projection|Azimuthal equidistant projections of the sphere]] like this one have also been co-opted as images of the flat Earth model depicting Antarctica as an ice wall<ref>Schadewald, Robert J "The Flat-out Truth:Earth Orbits? Moon Landings? A Fraud! Says This Prophet" ''Science Digest'' July 1980</ref><ref>Schick, Theodore; Lewis Vaughn ''How to think about weird things: critical thinking for a new age'' Houghton Mifflin (Mayfield) (October 31, 1995) {{ISBN|978-1-55934-254-4}} p.197</ref> surrounding a disk-shaped Earth.]]


Modern believers in a flat Earth face overwhelming publicly accessible evidence of Earth's sphericity. They also need to explain why governments, media outlets, schools, scientists, surveyors, airlines and other organizations accept that the world is spherical. To satisfy these tensions and maintain their beliefs, they generally embrace some form of [[conspiracy theory]]. In addition, believers tend to not trust observations they have not made themselves, and often distrust, disagree with or accuse each other of being in league with conspiracies.<ref name="takes">{{cite web |last=Humphries |first=Courtney |date=28 October 2017 |title=What does it take to believe the world is flat? |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2017/10/28/what-does-take-believe-world-flat/0gdgl2JMPhBpgJK5mGXPkI/story.html |access-date=April 4, 2022 |website=[[The Boston Globe]]}}</ref>
In 1956, [[Samuel Shenton]] set up the ''International Flat Earth Research Society'' (IFERS), better known as the [[Flat Earth Society]] from Dover, UK, as a direct descendant of the Universal Zetetic Society. This was just before the [[Soviet Union]] launched the first [[artificial satellite]], [[Sputnik]]; he responded, "Would sailing round the [[Isle of Wight]] prove that it were spherical? It is just the same for those satellites."


== Education ==
His primary aim was to reach children before they were convinced about a spherical Earth. Despite plenty of publicity, the space race eroded Shenton's support in Britain until 1967 when he started to become famous due to the [[Apollo program]].<ref name=garwood />
Before learning from their social environment, a child's perception of their physical environment often leads to a false concept about the shape of Earth and what happens beyond the horizon. Many children think that Earth ends there and that one can fall off the edge. Education helps them gradually change their belief into a realist one of a spherical Earth.<ref>Stella Vosniadu, William F. Brewer: ''[https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/001002859290018W Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood]''.</ref>

In 1972 Shenton's role was taken over by [[Charles K. Johnson]], a correspondent from California, US. He incorporated the IFERS and steadily built up the membership to about 3,000. He spent years examining the studies of flat and round Earth theories and proposed evidence of a [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy]] against flat-Earth: "The idea of a spinning globe is only a conspiracy of error that Moses, Columbus, and FDR all fought..." His article was published in the magazine ''[[Science Digest]]'', 1980. It goes on to state, "If it is a sphere, the surface of a large body of water must be curved. The Johnsons have checked the surfaces of [[Lake Tahoe]] and the [[Salton Sea]] without detecting any curvature."<ref>{{cite web|author=Robert J. Schadewald |url=http://www.lhup.edu/~DSIMANEK/fe-scidi.htm |title=The Flat-out Truth |publisher=Lhup.edu |date= |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref>

The Society declined in the 1990s following a fire at its headquarters in California and the death of Johnson in 2001.<ref>{{cite web|author=Donald E. Simanek |url=http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/flat/flateart.htm |title=The Flat Earth |publisher=Lhup.edu |date= |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref> It was revived as a website in 2004 by Daniel Shenton (no relation to Samuel Shenton). He believes that no one has provided proof that the world is not flat.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.livescience.com/14754-ingenious-flat-earth-theory-revealed-map.html |title=Ingenious 'Flat Earth' Theory Revealed In Old Map |publisher=LiveScience |date= |accessdate=February 9, 2013}}</ref>

===Resurgence in the era of celebrity and social media===
In the modern era, the availability of communications technology and social media like [[YouTube]], [[Facebook]]<ref>{{cite web|last1=Abbott|first1=Erica|title=Mark Zuckerberg Banning All Flat Earth Groups from Facebook Is A Hoax|url=http://www.business2community.com/facebook/mark-zuckerberg-banning-flat-earth-groups-facebook-hoax-01890594#WRFxzo1QOD9xCO2F.97|website=Business2community.com|publisher=Business2community|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref> and [[Twitter]] have made it easy for individuals, famous<ref>{{cite web|last1=HEIGL|first1=ALEX|title=The Short List of Famous People Who Think the Earth Is Flat (Yes, Really)|website=People.com|publisher=People|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref> and not, to spread disinformation and attract others to their erroneous ideas. One of the topics that has flourished in this environment is that of the Flat-Earth.<ref name=Ambrose>{{cite web|last1=AMBROSE|first1=GRAHAM|title=These Coloradans say Earth is flat. And gravity’s a hoax. Now, they’re being persecuted.|url=http://www.denverpost.com/2017/07/07/colorado-earth-flat-gravity-hoax/|website=Denverpost.com|publisher=Denver Post|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref><ref name=Dure>{{cite web|last1=Dure|first1=Beau|title=Flat-Earthers are back: 'It’s almost like the beginning of a new religion'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/20/flat-earth-believers-youtube-videos-conspiracy-theorists|website=Theguardian.com|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Herreria|first1=Carla|title=Neil deGrasse Tyson Cites Celebrity Flat-Earthers To Make A Point About Politics|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/neil-degrasse-tyson-flat-earth-pop-stars-flawed_us_58faa373e4b06b9cb91719ad|website=Huffingtonpost.com|publisher=Huffington Post|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref>

The [[solar eclipse of August 21, 2017]], gave rise to numerous YouTube videos purporting to show how the details of the eclipse prove the earth is flat.<ref>{{cite web|last1=MARTIN|first1=SEAN|title=‘The sun hologram needs updating’ THIS is how flat earthers explain the solar eclipse|url=http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/841400/solar-eclipse-flat-earth-conspiracy-theory-reddit|website=Express.co.uk|publisher=The Express|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=HICKEY|first1=BRIAN|title=What do flat Earthers think about Monday's solar eclipse?|url=http://www.phillyvoice.com/ask-hickey-what-are-flat-earthers-saying-about-mondays-eclipse/|website=Phillyvoice.com|publisher=Philly Voice|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref> Also in 2017, a scandal developed in Arab scientific and educational circles when a Tunisian PhD student submitted a thesis declaring Earth to be flat, unmoving, the center of the universe, and only 13,500 years of age.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Guessoum|first1=Nidhal|title=PhD thesis: The earth is flat|url=http://gulfnews.com/opinion/thinkers/phd-thesis-the-earth-is-flat-1.2009202|website=Gulfnews.com|publisher=Gulf News|accessdate=19 August 2017}}</ref>

==Cultural references==
The term ''flat-Earther'' is often used in a derogatory sense to mean anyone who holds ridiculously antiquated views. The first use of the term ''flat-earther'' recorded by the ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' is in 1934 in ''[[Punch (magazine)|Punch]]'': "Without being a bigoted flat-earther, [Mercator] perceived the nuisance […] of fiddling about with globes […] in order to discover the South Seas."<ref>
{{cite web|title=Flat-Earth|publisher=Oxford English Dictionary|url=http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/71171?redirectedFrom=flat-earther#eid118363999|accessdate=July 29, 2013}}
</ref> The term ''flat-earth-man'' was recorded in 1908: "Fewer votes than one would have thought possible for any human candidate, were he even a flat-earth-man."<ref>
{{cite book|first=George B. |last=Shaw|title=Fabian Essays on Socialism (new ed.)|page=xviii|date=1908|url=https://archive.org/stream/fabianessaysins00olivgoog#page/n25/mode/2up}}
</ref>

===Scientific satire===
In a satirical piece published 1996, [[Albert A. Bartlett]] uses arithmetic to show that sustainable growth on Earth is impossible in a spherical Earth since its resources are necessarily finite. He explains that only a model of a flat Earth, stretching infinitely in the two horizontal dimensions and also in the vertical downward direction, would be able to accommodate the needs of a permanently growing population.

Referring to [[Julian Simon]]'s book ''[[The Ultimate Resource]]'', Bartlett suggests "So, let us think of the 'We’re going to grow the limits!' people as the 'New Flat Earth Society.'"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://jclahr.com/bartlett/flat-earth.html |title=The New Flat Earth Society |publisher=Jclahr.com |accessdate=June 15, 2009}}</ref> The satiric nature of the piece is also made clear by a comparison to Bartlett's other publications, which mainly advocate the necessity of curbing population growth.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://jclahr.com/bartlett/ |title=Albert Bartlett On Growth |publisher=Jclahr.com |date=November 28, 2006 |accessdate=June 15, 2009}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
{{div col}}
* [[List of topics characterized as pseudoscience]]
* [[Biblical cosmology]]
* [[Alderson disk]]
* [[Denialism]]
* [[Denialism]]
* [[Earth's rotation]]
* [[Earth's rotation]]
* [[Geocentric model]]
* [[Geographical distance]]
* [[Geographical distance]]
* [[Hollow Earth]]
* [[Hollow Earth]]
* [[Scientific mythology]]
* [[Pseudoscience]]
* [[Skepticism]]
* [[Scientific myth]]
* [[Scientific skepticism]]
* [[World Turtle]]
* [[World Turtle]]
{{div col end}}


==Notes==
==References==
{{Reflist|group=nb}}
{{Reflist}}


==References==
===Bibliography===
* {{citation
{{Reflist|30em}}
| last = Garwood
| first = Christine
| title = Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea
| date = 2007
| publisher = Pan Books
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Gvm5Ou9B0FwC
| isbn = 978-1-4050-4702-9
}}
*{{citation | url= https://archive.org/details/johnjasperunmatc00hatciala
|title= John Jasper| first= William E. | last = Hatcher| publisher= Fleming Revell| location = New York, NY | date= 1908}}
* {{cite book |first= Rudolf| last=Simek |title=Heaven and Earth in the Middle Ages: The Physical World Before Columbus |publisher=The Boydell Press |date=1996 | orig-year=1992|others=Angela Hall (trans.) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gXBSKZAlAdMC&pg=PR7 |access-date=February 9, 2013 | isbn=9780851156088 }}
* {{cite book
| last = Plofker
| first = Kim
| title = Mathematics in India
| date = 2009
| publisher = Princeton University Press
| title-link = Mathematics in India (book)
| isbn = 978-0691120676
}}
*{{citation
| last = Randolph
| first = Edwin Archer
| author-link = Edwin Archer Randolph
| title = The Life of Rev. John Jasper, Pastor of Sixth Mt. Zion Baptist Church, Richmond, Va., from His Birth to the Present Time, with His Theory on the Rotation of the Sun
| date = 1884
| publisher = R.T. Hill & Co.
| location = Richmond, VA
| url = https://docsouth.unc.edu/neh/jasper/jasper.html
}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* [[Raymond Fraser|Fraser, Raymond]] (2007). ''When The Earth Was Flat: Remembering Leonard Cohen, Alden Nowlan, the Flat Earth Society, the King James monarchy hoax, the Montreal Story Tellers and other curious matters.'' Black Moss Press, {{ISBN|978-0-88753-439-3}}
* [[Raymond Fraser|Fraser, Raymond]] (2007). ''When The Earth Was Flat: Remembering Leonard Cohen, Alden Nowlan, the Flat Earth Society, the King James monarchy hoax, the Montreal Story Tellers and other curious matters.'' Black Moss Press, {{ISBN|978-0-88753-439-3}}
* Garwood, Christine (2007) ''Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea'', Pan Books, {{ISBN|1-4050-4702-X}}
* {{cite book |first= Rudolf| last=Simek |title=Heaven and Earth in the Middle Ages: The Physical World Before Columbus |publisher=The Boydell Press |date=1996 |others=Angela Hall (trans.) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gXBSKZAlAdMC&pg=PR7 |accessdate=February 9, 2013 }}


==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|Flat-earth theories}}
{{Commons category|Flat Earth}}
* {{cite web|url=http://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_033.php|last=Robbins|first=Stuart|title=Episode 33: Flat Earth|publisher=Exposing PseudoAstronomy Podcast|date=2012-05-01}}
* {{cite web|url=https://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_033.php|last=Robbins|first=Stuart|title=Episode 33: Flat Earth|publisher=Exposing PseudoAstronomy Podcast|date=2012-05-01}}
* {{cite web|url=http://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_145.php|last=Robbins|first=Stuart|title=Episode 145: Modern Flat Earth Theory, Part 1|publisher=Exposing PseudoAstronomy Podcast|date=2016-09-05}}
* {{cite web|url=https://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_145.php|last=Robbins|first=Stuart|title=Episode 145: Modern Flat Earth Theory, Part 1|publisher=Exposing PseudoAstronomy Podcast|date=2016-09-05}}
* {{cite web|url=http://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_149.php|last=Robbins|first=Stuart|title=Episode 149: Modern Flat Earth Thought, Part 2|publisher=Exposing PseudoAstronomy Podcast|date=2016-10-04}}
* {{cite web|url=https://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_149.php|last=Robbins|first=Stuart|title=Episode 149: Modern Flat Earth Thought, Part 2|publisher=Exposing PseudoAstronomy Podcast|date=2016-10-04}}
* {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2RDpPrKwl8|last1=Power|first1=Myles|last2=James|first2=James|title=Episode 146: The Lies of the Sun|publisher=League of Nerds (YouTube)|date=2016-10-31}} - Review of a pro-Flat Earth documentary.
* {{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2RDpPrKwl8&t=0| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/D2RDpPrKwl8| archive-date=2021-12-11 | last1=Power|first1=Myles|last2=James|first2=James|title=Episode 146: The Lies of the Sun|publisher=League of Nerds (YouTube)|date=2016-10-31}}{{cbignore}} Review of a pro-Flat Earth documentary.
* [http://www.veritas-ucsb.org/library/russell/FlatEarth.html The Myth of the Flat Earth]
* [https://www.veritas-ucsb.org/library/russell/FlatEarth.html The Myth of the Flat Earth]
* [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227084.500-flat-universe-may-be-the-new-flat-earth.html The Myth of the Flat Universe]
* [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20227084.500-flat-universe-may-be-the-new-flat-earth.html The Myth of the Flat Universe]
* [http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a2_087.html You say the earth is round? Prove it] (from [[The Straight Dope]])
* [https://www.straightdope.com/21341591/you-say-the-earth-is-round-prove-it You say the earth is round? Prove it] (from [[The Straight Dope]])
* [http://archives.math.utk.edu//hypermail/historia/feb00/0164.html Flat Earth Fallacy]
* [https://archives.math.utk.edu//hypermail/historia/feb00/0164.html Flat Earth Fallacy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010429093952/https://archives.math.utk.edu/hypermail/historia/feb00/0164.html |date=2001-04-29 }}
* [http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/index.htm Zetetic Astronomy, or Earth Not a Globe by Parallax (Samuel Birley Rowbotham (1816-1884))] at sacred-texts.com
* [https://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/index.htm Zetetic Astronomy, or Earth Not a Globe by Parallax (Samuel Birley Rowbotham (1816–1884))] at sacred-texts.com
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThPgMu2-ToM&feature=youtu.be&list=PLzL1qDngeVYU-9pNm1iRL8pTshEoAv363/ Flat Earth idea of the suns trajectory]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThPgMu2-ToM&t=0 Flat Earth idea of the Suns trajectory]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtHuTVXZGFw&feature=youtu.be/ Flat Earth Theory of the Moon & Sun's paths around the world]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtHuTVXZGFw&t=0 Flat Earth Theory of the Moon & Sun's paths around the world]


{{Conspiracy theories}}
{{pseudoscience}}
{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Flat Earth theory| ]]
[[Category:Flat Earth| ]]
[[Category:Early scientific cosmologies]]
[[Category:Early scientific cosmologies]]
[[Category:Obsolete scientific theories]]
[[Category:Religious cosmologies]]
[[Category:Pseudoscience]]
[[Category:Ancient near eastern cosmology]]

Latest revision as of 14:30, 28 December 2024

Flat Earth map drawn by Orlando Ferguson in 1893. The map contains several references to biblical passages as well as various supposed refutations of the "Globe Theory".

Flat Earth is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of the Earth's shape as a plane or disk. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat-Earth cosmography, notably including the cosmology in the ancient Near East. The model has undergone a recent resurgence as a conspiracy theory.[1]

The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in ancient Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC). However, the early Greek cosmological view of a flat Earth persisted among most pre-Socratics (6th–5th century BC). In the early 4th century BC, Plato wrote about a spherical Earth. By about 330 BC, his former student Aristotle had provided strong empirical evidence for a spherical Earth. Knowledge of the Earth's global shape gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world.[2][3][4][5] By the early period of the Christian Church, the spherical view was widely held, with some notable exceptions. In contrast, ancient Chinese scholars consistently describe the Earth as flat, and this perception remained unchanged until their encounters with Jesuit missionaries in the 17th century.[6] It is a historical myth that medieval Europeans generally thought the Earth was flat.[7] This myth was created in the 17th century by Protestants to argue against Catholic teachings.[8] Traditionalist Muslim scholars have maintained that the earth is flat, though, since the 9th century, Muslim scholars tended to believe in a spherical Earth.[9]

Despite the scientific facts and obvious effects of Earth's sphericity, pseudoscientific[10] flat-Earth conspiracy theories persist, and from the 2010s at latest, believers in a flat earth have increased, both as membership in modern flat Earth societies, and as unaffiliated individuals using social media.[11][12] In a 2018 study reported on by Scientific American, only 82% of 18 to 24 year old American respondents agreed with the statement "I have always believed the world is round". However, a firm belief in a flat Earth is rare, with less than 2% acceptance in all age groups.[13]

History

Belief in flat Earth

Near East

Imago Mundi Babylonian map, the oldest known world map, 6th century BC Babylonia.

In early Egyptian[14] and Mesopotamian thought, the world was portrayed as a disk floating in the ocean. A similar model is found in the Homeric account from the 8th century BC in which "Okeanos, the personified body of water surrounding the circular surface of the Earth, is the begetter of all life and possibly of all gods."[15]

The Pyramid Texts and Coffin Texts of ancient Egypt show a similar cosmography; Nun (the Ocean) encircled nbwt ("dry lands" or "Islands").[16][17][18][full citation needed]

The Israelites also imagined the Earth to be a disc floating on water with an arched firmament above it that separated the Earth from the heavens.[19] The sky was a solid dome with the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars embedded in it.[20]

Greece

Poets

Both Homer[21] and Hesiod[22] described a disc cosmography on the Shield of Achilles.[23][24] This poetic tradition of an Earth-encircling (gaiaokhos) sea (Oceanus) and a disc also appears in Stasinus of Cyprus,[25] Mimnermus,[26] Aeschylus,[27] and Apollonius Rhodius.[28]

Homer's description of the disc cosmography on the shield of Achilles with the encircling ocean is repeated far later in Quintus Smyrnaeus' Posthomerica (4th century AD), which continues the narration of the Trojan War.[29]

Philosophers
Possible rendering of Anaximander's world map[30]

Several pre-Socratic philosophers believed that the world was flat: Thales (c. 550 BC) according to several sources,[31] and Leucippus (c. 440 BC) and Democritus (c. 460–370 BC) according to Aristotle.[32][33][34]

Thales thought that the Earth floated in water like a log.[35] It has been argued, however, that Thales actually believed in a spherical Earth.[36][37] Anaximander (c. 550 BC) believed that the Earth was a short cylinder with a flat, circular top that remained stable because it was the same distance from all things.[38][39] Anaximenes of Miletus believed that "the Earth is flat and rides on air; in the same way the Sun and the Moon and the other heavenly bodies, which are all fiery, ride the air because of their flatness".[40] Xenophanes (c. 500 BC) thought that the Earth was flat, with its upper side touching the air, and the lower side extending without limit.[41]

Belief in a flat Earth continued into the 5th century BC. Anaxagoras (c. 450 BC) agreed that the Earth was flat,[42] and his pupil Archelaus believed that the flat Earth was depressed in the middle like a saucer, to allow for the fact that the Sun does not rise and set at the same time for everyone.[43]

Historians

Hecataeus of Miletus believed that the Earth was flat and surrounded by water.[44] Herodotus in his Histories ridiculed the belief that water encircled the world,[45] yet most classicists agree that he still believed Earth was flat because of his descriptions of literal "ends" or "edges" of the Earth.[46]

Northern Europe

The ancient Norse and Germanic peoples believed in a flat-Earth cosmography with the Earth surrounded by an ocean, with the axis mundi, a world tree (Yggdrasil), or pillar (Irminsul) in the centre.[47][48] In the world-encircling ocean sat a snake called Jormungandr.[49] The Norse creation account preserved in Gylfaginning (VIII) states that during the creation of the Earth, an impassable sea was placed around it:[50]

And Jafnhárr said: "Of the blood, which ran and welled forth freely out of his wounds, they made the sea, when they had formed and made firm the Earth together, and laid the sea in a ring round. about her; and it may well seem a hard thing to most men to cross over it."

The late Norse Konungs skuggsjá, on the other hand, explains Earth's shape as a sphere:[51]

If you take a lighted candle and set it in a room, you may expect it to light up the entire interior, unless something should hinder, though the room be quite large. But if you take an apple and hang it close to the flame, so near that it is heated, the apple will darken nearly half the room or even more. However, if you hang the apple near the wall, it will not get hot; the candle will light up the whole house; and the shadow on the wall where the apple hangs will be scarcely half as large as the apple itself. From this you may infer that the Earth-circle is round like a ball and not equally near the sun at every point. But where the curved surface lies nearest the sun's path, there will the greatest heat be; and some of the lands that lie continuously under the unbroken rays cannot be inhabited.

East Asia

In ancient China, the prevailing belief was that the Earth was flat and square, while the heavens were round,[52] an assumption virtually unquestioned until the introduction of European astronomy in the 17th century.[53][54][55] The English sinologist Cullen emphasizes the point that there was no concept of a round Earth in ancient Chinese astronomy:[6]

Chinese thought on the form of the Earth remained almost unchanged from early times until the first contacts with modern science through the medium of Jesuit missionaries in the seventeenth century. While the heavens were variously described as being like an umbrella covering the Earth (the Kai Tian theory), or like a sphere surrounding it (the Hun Tian theory), or as being without substance while the heavenly bodies float freely (the Hsüan yeh theory), the Earth was at all times flat, although perhaps bulging up slightly.

Illustration based on that of a 12th-century Asian cosmographer

The model of an egg was often used by Chinese astronomers such as Zhang Heng (78–139 AD) to describe the heavens as spherical:[56]

The heavens are like a hen's egg and as round as a crossbow bullet; the Earth is like the yolk of the egg, and lies in the centre.

This analogy with a curved egg led some modern historians, notably Joseph Needham, to conjecture that Chinese astronomers were, after all, aware of the Earth's sphericity. The egg reference, however, was rather meant to clarify the relative position of the flat Earth to the heavens:[54]

In a passage of Zhang Heng's cosmogony not translated by Needham, Zhang himself says: "Heaven takes its body from the Yang, so it is round and in motion. Earth takes its body from the Yin, so it is flat and quiescent". The point of the egg analogy is simply to stress that the Earth is completely enclosed by Heaven, rather than merely covered from above as the Kai Tian describes. Chinese astronomers, many of them brilliant men by any standards, continued to think in flat-Earth terms until the seventeenth century; this surprising fact might be the starting-point for a re-examination of the apparent facility with which the idea of a spherical Earth found acceptance in fifth-century BC Greece.

Further examples cited by Needham supposed to demonstrate dissenting voices from the ancient Chinese consensus actually refer without exception to the Earth being square, not to it being flat.[6] Accordingly, the 13th-century scholar Li Ye, who argued that the movements of the round heaven would be hindered by a square Earth,[52] did not advocate a spherical Earth, but rather that its edge should be rounded off so as to be circular.[6] However, Needham disagrees, affirming that Li Ye believed the Earth to be spherical, similar in shape to the heavens but much smaller.[57] This was preconceived by the 4th-century scholar Yu Xi, who argued for the infinity of outer space surrounding the Earth and that the latter could be either square or round, in accordance to the shape of the heavens.[58] When Chinese geographers of the 17th century, influenced by European cartography and astronomy, showed the Earth as a sphere that could be circumnavigated by sailing around the globe, they did so with formulaic terminology previously used by Zhang Heng to describe the spherical shape of the Sun and Moon (i.e. that they were as round as a crossbow bullet).[59]

As noted in the book Huainanzi,[60] in the 2nd century BC, Chinese astronomers effectively inverted Eratosthenes' calculation of the curvature of the Earth to calculate the height of the Sun above the Earth. By assuming the Earth was flat, they arrived at a distance of 100000 li (approximately 200000 km). The Zhoubi Suanjing also discusses how to determine the distance of the Sun by measuring the length of noontime shadows at different latitudes, a method similar to Eratosthenes' measurement of the circumference of the Earth, but the Zhoubi Suanjing assumes that the Earth is flat.[61]

Alternate or mixed theories

Greece: spherical Earth

Semi-circular shadow of Earth on the Moon during a partial lunar eclipse

Pythagoras in the 6th century BC and Parmenides in the 5th century BC stated that the Earth is spherical,[62] and this view spread rapidly in the Greek world. Around 330 BC, Aristotle maintained on the basis of physical theory and observational evidence that the Earth was spherical, and reported an estimate of its circumference.[63] The Earth's circumference was first determined around 240 BC by Eratosthenes.[64] By the 2nd century AD, Ptolemy had derived his maps from a globe and developed the system of latitude, longitude, and climes. His Almagest was written in Greek and only translated into Latin in the 11th century from Arabic translations.

Lucretius (1st century BC) opposed the concept of a spherical Earth, because he considered that an infinite universe had no center towards which heavy bodies would tend. Thus, he thought the idea of animals walking around topsy-turvy under the Earth was absurd.[65][66] By the 1st century AD, Pliny the Elder was in a position to say that everyone agreed on the spherical shape of Earth,[67] though disputes continued regarding the nature of the antipodes, and how it is possible to keep the ocean in a curved shape.

South Asia

An image of Thorntonbank Wind Farm (near the Belgian coast) with the lower parts of the more distant towers increasingly hidden by the horizon, demonstrating the curvature of the Earth

The Vedic texts depict the cosmos in many ways.[68][69] One of the earliest Indian cosmological texts pictures the Earth as one of a stack of flat disks.[70]

In the Vedic texts, Dyaus (heaven) and Prithvi (Earth) are compared to wheels on an axle, yielding a flat model. They are also described as bowls or leather bags, yielding a concave model.[71] According to Macdonell: "the conception of the Earth being a disc surrounded by an ocean does not appear in the Samhitas. But it was naturally regarded as circular, being compared with a wheel (10.89) and expressly called circular (parimandala) in the Shatapatha Brahmana."[72]

By about the 5th century AD, the siddhanta astronomy texts of South Asia, particularly of Aryabhata, assume a spherical Earth as they develop mathematical methods for quantitative astronomy for calendar and time keeping.[73]

The medieval Indian texts called the Puranas describe the Earth as a flat-bottomed, circular disk with concentric oceans and continents.[71][74] This general scheme is present not only in the Hindu cosmologies, but also in Buddhist and Jain cosmologies of South Asia.[71] However, some Puranas include other models. The fifth canto of the Bhagavata Purana, for example, includes sections that describe the Earth both as flat and spherical.[75][76]

Early Christian Church

During the early period of the Christian Church, the spherical view continued to be widely held, with some notable exceptions.[77] Athenagoras, an eastern Christian writing around the year 175 AD, said that the Earth was spherical.[78] Methodius (c. 290 AD), an eastern Christian writing against "the theory of the Chaldeans and the Egyptians" said: "Let us first lay bare ... the theory of the Chaldeans and the Egyptians. They say that the circumference of the universe is likened to the turnings of a well-rounded globe, the Earth being a central point. They say that since its outline is spherical, ... the Earth should be the center of the universe, around which the heaven is whirling."[78] Lactantius, a western Christian writer and advisor to the first Christian Roman Emperor, Constantine, writing sometime between 304 and 313 AD, ridiculed the notion of antipodes and the philosophers who fancied that "the universe is round like a ball. They also thought that heaven revolves in accordance with the motion of the heavenly bodies. ... For that reason, they constructed brass globes, as though after the figure of the universe."[79][78] Arnobius, another eastern Christian writing sometime around 305 AD, described the round Earth: "In the first place, indeed, the world itself is neither right nor left. It has neither upper nor lower regions, nor front nor back. For whatever is round and bounded on every side by the circumference of a solid sphere, has no beginning or end ..."[78]

The influential theologian and philosopher Saint Augustine, one of the four Great Church Fathers of the Western Church, similarly objected to the "fable" of antipodes:[80]

But as to the fable that there are Antipodes, that is to say, men on the opposite side of the Earth, where the sun rises when it sets to us, men who walk with their feet opposite ours that is on no ground credible. And, indeed, it is not affirmed that this has been learned by historical knowledge, but by scientific conjecture, on the ground that the Earth is suspended within the concavity of the sky, and that it has as much room on the one side of it as on the other: hence they say that the part that is beneath must also be inhabited. But they do not remark that, although it be supposed or scientifically demonstrated that the world is of a round and spherical form, yet it does not follow that the other side of the Earth is bare of water; nor even, though it be bare, does it immediately follow that it is peopled. For Scripture, which proves the truth of its historical statements by the accomplishment of its prophecies, gives no false information; and it is too absurd to say, that some men might have taken ship and traversed the whole wide ocean, and crossed from this side of the world to the other, and that thus even the inhabitants of that distant region are descended from that one first man.

Some historians do not view Augustine's scriptural commentaries as endorsing any particular cosmological model, endorsing instead the view that Augustine shared the common view of his contemporaries that the Earth is spherical, in line with his endorsement of science in De Genesi ad litteram.[81][82] C. P. E. Nothaft, responding to writers like Leo Ferrari who described Augustine as endorsing a flat Earth, says that "...other recent writers on the subject treat Augustine’s acceptance of the earth’s spherical shape as a well-established fact".[83][84]

Cosmas Indicopleustes' world view – flat Earth in a Tabernacle

Diodorus of Tarsus, a leading figure in the School of Antioch and mentor of John Chrysostom, may have argued for a flat Earth; however, Diodorus' opinion on the matter is known only from a later criticism.[85] Chrysostom, one of the four Great Church Fathers of the Eastern Church and Archbishop of Constantinople, explicitly espoused the idea, based on scripture, that the Earth floats miraculously on the water beneath the firmament.[86]

Christian Topography (547) by the Alexandrian monk Cosmas Indicopleustes, who had traveled as far as Sri Lanka and the source of the Blue Nile, is now widely considered the most valuable geographical document of the early medieval age, although it received relatively little attention from contemporaries. In it, the author repeatedly expounds the doctrine that the universe consists of only two places, the Earth below the firmament and heaven above it. Carefully drawing on arguments from scripture, he describes the Earth as a rectangle, 400 days' journey long by 200 wide, surrounded by four oceans and enclosed by four massive walls which support the firmament. The spherical Earth theory is contemptuously dismissed as "pagan".[87][88][89]

Severian, Bishop of Gabala (d. 408), wrote that the Earth is flat and the Sun does not pass under it in the night, but "travels through the northern parts as if hidden by a wall".[90] Basil of Caesarea (329–379) argued that the matter was theologically irrelevant.[91]

Europe: Early Middle Ages

Early medieval Christian writers felt little urge to assume flatness of the Earth, though they had fuzzy impressions of the writings of Ptolemy and Aristotle, relying more on Pliny.[7]

9th-century Macrobian cosmic diagram showing the sphere of the Earth at the center (globus terrae)

With the end of the Western Roman Empire, Western Europe entered the Middle Ages with great difficulties that affected the continent's intellectual production. Most scientific treatises of classical antiquity (in Greek) were unavailable, leaving only simplified summaries and compilations. In contrast, the Eastern Roman Empire did not fall, and it preserved the learning.[92] Still, many textbooks of the Early Middle Ages supported the sphericity of the Earth in the western part of Europe.[93]

12th-century T and O map representing the inhabited world as described by Isidore of Seville in his Etymologiae (chapter 14, de terra et partibus)

Europe's view of the shape of the Earth in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages may be best expressed by the writings of early Christian scholars:

Bishop Isidore of Seville (560–636) taught in his widely read encyclopedia, the Etymologies, diverse views such as that the Earth "resembles a wheel"[94] resembling Anaximander in language and the map that he provided. This was widely interpreted as referring to a disc-shaped Earth.[95][96] An illustration from Isidore's De Natura Rerum shows the five zones of the Earth as adjacent circles. Some have concluded that he thought the Arctic and Antarctic zones were adjacent to each other.[97] He did not admit the possibility of antipodes, which he took to mean people dwelling on the opposite side of the Earth, considering them legendary[98] and noting that there was no evidence for their existence.[99] Isidore's T and O map, which was seen as representing a small part of a spherical Earth, continued to be used by authors through the Middle Ages, e.g. the 9th-century bishop Rabanus Maurus, who compared the habitable part of the northern hemisphere (Aristotle's northern temperate clime) with a wheel. At the same time, Isidore's works also gave the views of sphericity, for example, in chapter 28 of De Natura Rerum, Isidore claims that the Sun orbits the Earth and illuminates the other side when it is night on this side. See French translation of De Natura Rerum.[100] In his other work Etymologies, there are also affirmations that the sphere of the sky has Earth in its center and the sky being equally distant on all sides.[101][102] Other researchers have argued these points as well.[7][103][104] "The work remained unsurpassed until the thirteenth century and was regarded as the summit of all knowledge. It became an essential part of European medieval culture. Soon after the invention of typography it appeared many times in print."[105] However, "The Scholastics – later medieval philosophers, theologians, and scientists – were helped by the Arabic translators and commentaries, but they hardly needed to struggle against a flat-Earth legacy from the early middle ages (500–1050). Early medieval writers often had fuzzy and imprecise impressions of both Ptolemy and Aristotle and relied more on Pliny, but they felt (with one exception), little urge to assume flatness."[7]

Isidore's portrayal of the five zones of the Earth

St Vergilius of Salzburg (c. 700–784), in the middle of the 8th century, discussed or taught some geographical or cosmographical ideas that St Boniface found sufficiently objectionable that he complained about them to Pope Zachary. The only surviving record of the incident is contained in Zachary's reply, dated 748, where he wrote:[106]

As for the perverse and sinful doctrine which he (Virgil) against God and his own soul has uttered – if it shall be clearly established that he professes belief in another world and other men existing beneath the Earth, or in (another) sun and moon there, thou art to hold a council, deprive him of his sacerdotal rank, and expel him from the Church.

Some authorities have suggested that the sphericity of the Earth was among the aspects of Vergilius's teachings that Boniface and Zachary considered objectionable.[107][108] Others have considered this unlikely, and take the wording of Zachary's response to indicate at most an objection to belief in the existence of humans living in the antipodes.[109][110][111][112][113] In any case, there is no record of any further action having been taken against Vergilius. He was later appointed bishop of Salzburg and was canonised in the 13th century.[114]

12th-century depiction of a spherical Earth with the four seasons (book Liber Divinorum Operum by Hildegard of Bingen)

A possible non-literary but graphic indication that people in the Middle Ages believed that the Earth (or perhaps the world) was a sphere is the use of the orb (globus cruciger) in the regalia of many kingdoms and of the Holy Roman Empire. It is attested from the time of the Christian late-Roman emperor Theodosius II (423) throughout the Middle Ages; the Reichsapfel was used in 1191 at the coronation of emperor Henry VI. However the word orbis means "circle", and there is no record of a globe as a representation of the Earth since ancient times in the west until that of Martin Behaim in 1492. Additionally it could well be a representation of the entire "world" or cosmos.[115]

A recent study of medieval concepts of the sphericity of the Earth noted that "since the eighth century, no cosmographer worthy of note has called into question the sphericity of the Earth".[116] However, the work of these intellectuals may not have had significant influence on public opinion, and it is difficult to tell what the wider population may have thought of the shape of the Earth if they considered the question at all.

Europe: High and Late Middle Ages

Picture from a 1550 edition of On the Sphere of the World, the most influential astronomy textbook of 13th-century Europe

Hermann of Reichenau (1013–1054) was among the earliest Christian scholars to estimate the circumference of Earth with Eratosthenes' method. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), the most widely taught theologian of the Middle Ages, believed in a spherical Earth and took for granted that his readers also knew the Earth is round.[117][77] Lectures in the medieval universities commonly advanced evidence in favor of the idea that the Earth was a sphere.[118]

Illustration of the spherical Earth in a 14th-century copy of L'Image du monde (c. 1246)

Jill Tattersall shows that in many vernacular works in 12th- and 13th-century French texts the Earth was considered "round like a table" rather than "round like an apple". She writes, "[I]n virtually all the examples quoted ... from epics and from non-'historical' romances (that is, works of a less learned character) the actual form of words used suggests strongly a circle rather than a sphere", though she notes that even in these works the language is ambiguous.[119]

Portuguese navigation down and around the coast of Africa in the latter half of the 1400s gave wide-scale observational evidence for Earth's sphericity. In these explorations, the Sun's position moved more northward the further south the explorers travelled. Its position directly overhead at noon gave evidence for crossing the equator. These apparent solar motions in detail were more consistent with north–south curvature and a distant Sun, than with any flat-Earth explanation. The ultimate demonstration came when Ferdinand Magellan's expedition completed the first global circumnavigation in 1521. Antonio Pigafetta, one of the few survivors of the voyage, recorded the loss of a day in the course of the voyage, giving evidence for east–west curvature.

Middle East: Islamic scholars

Prior to the introduction of Greek cosmology into the Islamic world, Muslims tended to view the Earth as flat, and Muslim traditionalists who rejected Greek philosophy continued to hold to this view later on while various theologians held opposing opinions.[120][9] Beginning in the 10th century onwards, some Muslim traditionalists began to adopt the notion of a spherical Earth with the influence of Greek and Ptolemaic cosmology.[121]

In Quranic cosmology, the Earth (al-arḍ) was "spread out."[122] Whether or not this implies a flat earth was debated by Muslims.[9] Some modern historians believe the Quran saw the world as flat.[123][124] On the other hand, the 12th-century commentary, the Tafsir al-Kabir (al-Razi) by Fakhr al-Din al-Razi argues that though this verse does describe a flat surface, it is limited in its application to local regions of the Earth which are roughly flat as opposed to the Earth as a whole. Others who would support a ball-shaped Earth included Ibn Hazm.[9]

Ming Dynasty in China

A spherical terrestrial globe was introduced to Yuan-era Khanbaliq (i.e. Beijing) in 1267 by the Persian astronomer Jamal ad-Din, but it is not known to have made an impact on the traditional Chinese conception of the shape of the Earth.[125] As late as 1595, an early Jesuit missionary to China, Matteo Ricci, recorded that the Ming-dynasty Chinese say: "The Earth is flat and square, and the sky is a round canopy; they did not succeed in conceiving the possibility of the antipodes."[6]

In the 17th century, the idea of a spherical Earth spread in China due to the influence of the Jesuits, who held high positions as astronomers at the imperial court.[126] Matteo Ricci, in collaboration with Chinese cartographers and translator Li Zhizao, published the Kunyu Wanguo Quantu in 1602, the first Chinese world map based on European discoveries.[127] The astronomical and geographical treatise Gezhicao (格致草) written in 1648 by Xiong Mingyu (熊明遇) explained that the Earth was spherical, not flat or square, and could be circumnavigated.[126]

Myth of flat-Earth prevalence

In the 19th century, a historical myth arose which held that the predominant cosmological doctrine during the Middle Ages was that the Earth was flat. An early proponent of this myth was the American writer Washington Irving, who maintained that Christopher Columbus had to overcome the opposition of churchmen to gain sponsorship for his voyage of exploration. Later significant advocates of this view were John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White, who used it as a major element in their advocacy of the thesis[128] that there was a long-lasting and essential conflict between science and religion.[129] Some studies of the historical connections between science and religion have demonstrated that theories of their mutual antagonism ignore examples of their mutual support.[130][131]

Subsequent studies of medieval science have shown that most scholars in the Middle Ages, including those read by Christopher Columbus, maintained that the Earth was spherical.[132]

Modern flat Earth beliefs

Logo of the Flat Earth Society

In the modern era, the pseudoscientific belief in a flat Earth originated with the English writer Samuel Rowbotham with the 1849 pamphlet Zetetic Astronomy. Lady Elizabeth Blount established the Universal Zetetic Society in 1893, which published journals. In 1956, Samuel Shenton set up the International Flat Earth Research Society, better known as the "Flat Earth Society" from Dover, England, as a direct descendant of the Universal Zetetic Society.

In the Internet era, the availability of communications technology and social media like YouTube, Facebook[133] and Twitter have made it easy for individuals, famous[134] or not, to spread disinformation and attract others to erroneous ideas, including that of the flat Earth.[11][12][135]

Modern believers in a flat Earth face overwhelming publicly accessible evidence of Earth's sphericity. They also need to explain why governments, media outlets, schools, scientists, surveyors, airlines and other organizations accept that the world is spherical. To satisfy these tensions and maintain their beliefs, they generally embrace some form of conspiracy theory. In addition, believers tend to not trust observations they have not made themselves, and often distrust, disagree with or accuse each other of being in league with conspiracies.[136]

Education

Before learning from their social environment, a child's perception of their physical environment often leads to a false concept about the shape of Earth and what happens beyond the horizon. Many children think that Earth ends there and that one can fall off the edge. Education helps them gradually change their belief into a realist one of a spherical Earth.[137]

See also

References

  1. ^ Dunning, Brian. "The Flat Earth Theory". Skeptoid. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
  2. ^ "Romanische Literaturen I". Institut für Literaturwissenschaft (in German). Universität Stuttgart. n.d. Retrieved April 4, 2022.
  3. ^ Ragep, F. Jamil (2009). "Astronomy". Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_22652. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
  4. ^ Glick, Thomas F.; Livesey, Steven J.; Wallis, Faith (2005). Medieval science, technology, and medicine : an encyclopedia. Routledge encyclopedias of the Middle Ages, 11. New York: New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-96930-1. OCLC 61228669. Retrieved April 4, 2022.
  5. ^ Cullen, C. (February 1976). "A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan Tzu 淮南子". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 39 (1). Cambridge University Press (published December 24, 2009): 106–127. doi:10.1017/s0041977x00052137. ISSN 0041-977X. S2CID 171017315. Retrieved April 4, 2022.
  6. ^ a b c d e Cullen, Christopher (1976). "A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 39 (1): 106–27 [p. 107]. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00052137. S2CID 171017315.
  7. ^ a b c d Russell, Jefrey Burton (1991). Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians. Praeger. pp. 86–87. ISBN 978-0-275-95904-3.
  8. ^ Dr. James Hannam (May 18, 2010). "Science Versus Christianity?". Patheos. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. The myth that people in the Middle Ages thought the earth is flat appears to date from the 17th century as part of the campaign by Protestants against Catholic teaching.
  9. ^ a b c d Anchassi, Omar (December 14, 2022). "Against Ptolemy? : Cosmography in Early Kalām omar anchassi". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 142 (4): 861, n. 72. doi:10.7817/jaos.142.4.2022.ar033. ISSN 2169-2289.
  10. ^ Foster, Craig (August 21, 2018). "Do People Really Think Earth Might Be Flat?". Retrieved February 8, 2024.
  11. ^ a b Ambrose, Graham (July 7, 2017). "These Coloradans say Earth is flat. And gravity's a hoax. Now, they're being persecuted". The Denver Post. Retrieved August 19, 2017.
  12. ^ a b Dure, Beau (January 20, 2016). "Flat-Earthers are back: 'It's almost like the beginning of a new religion'". The Guardian. Retrieved August 19, 2017.
  13. ^ Craig A. Foster; Glenn Branch (August 21, 2018). "Do People Really Think Earth Might Be Flat?". Scientific American.
  14. ^ Frankfort, H.; Wilson, J. A.; Jacobsen, T. (1951). Before Philosophy: The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man; an Essay on Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East. An Oriental Institute essay. Penguin Books. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-14-020198-7.
  15. ^ Gottlieb, Anthony (2000). The Dream of Reason. Penguin. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-393-04951-0.
  16. ^ Pyramid Texts, Utterance 366, 629a–29c: "Behold, thou art great and round like the Great Round; Behold, thou are bent around, and art round like the Circle which encircles the nbwt; Behold, thou art round and great like the Great Circle which sets." (Faulkner 1969, 120)
  17. ^ Ancient Near Eastern Texts, Pritchard, 1969, p. 374.
  18. ^ Coffin Texts, Spell 714.
  19. ^ Berlin, Adele (2011). "Cosmology and Creation". In Berlin, Adele; Grossman, Maxine (eds.). The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199730049.
  20. ^ Seely, Paul H. (1991). "The Firmament and the Water Above" (PDF). Westminster Theological Journal. 53: 227–40. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 5, 2009. Retrieved February 2, 2010.
  21. ^ Iliad, 28. 606.
  22. ^ The Shield of Heracles, pp. 314–6, transl. Hugh G. Evelyn-White, 1914.
  23. ^ The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis, Andrew Sprague Becker, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, p. 148.
  24. ^ Professor of Classics (Emeritus) Mark W. Edwards in his The Iliad. A Commentary (1991, p. 231) has noted of Homer's usage of the flat Earth disc in the Iliad: "Okeanos...surrounds the pictures on the shield and he surrounds the disc of the Earth on which men and women work out their lives." Quoted in The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis, Andrew Sprague Becker, Rowman & Littlefield, 1995, p. 148.
  25. ^ Stasinus of Cyprus wrote in his Cypria (lost, only preserved in fragment) that Oceanus surrounded the entire Earth: deep eddying Oceanus and that the Earth was flat with furthest bounds, these quotes are found preserved in Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae, VIII. 334B.
  26. ^ Mimnermus of Colophon (630BC) details a flat Earth model, with the sun (Helios) bathing at the edges of Oceanus that surround the Earth (Mimnermus, frg. 11).
  27. ^ Seven against Thebes, verse 305; Prometheus Bound, 1, 136; 530; 665 (which also describe the 'edges' of the Earth).
  28. ^ Apollonius Rhodius, in his Argonautica (3rd century BC) included numerous flat Earth references (IV. 590 ff): "Now that river, rising from the ends of the Earth, where are the portals and mansions of Nyx (Night), on one side bursts forth upon the beach of Okeanos."
  29. ^ Posthomerica (V. 14). "Here [on the shield of Achilles] Tethys' all-embracing arms were wrought, and Okeanos fathomless flow. The outrushing flood of Rivers crying to the echoing hills all round, to right, to left, rolled o'er the land." Translation by Way, A.S. 1913.
  30. ^ According to John Mansley Robinson, An Introduction to Early Greek Philosophy, Houghton and Mifflin, 1968.
  31. ^ Sambursky, Samuel (August 1987). The Physical World of the Greeks. Princeton University Press. p. 12. ISBN 9780691024110.
  32. ^ Burch, George Bosworth (1954). "The Counter-Earth". Osiris. 11 (1). Saint Catherines Press: 267–94. doi:10.1086/368583. S2CID 144330867.
  33. ^ De Fontaine, Didier (2002). "Flat worlds: Today and in antiquity". Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana. 1 (3): 257–62. Bibcode:2002MmSAI..73S.257D. Archived from the original on August 25, 2007. Retrieved August 3, 2007.
  34. ^ Aristotle, De Caelo, 294b13–21
  35. ^ Aristotle, De Caelo, II. 13. 3; 294a 28: "Many others say the Earth rests upon water. This... is the oldest theory that has been preserved, and is attributed to Thales of Miletus."
  36. ^ O'Grady, Patricia F. (2002). Thales of Miletus: the beginnings of Western science and philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. pp. 87–107. ISBN 9780754605331.
  37. ^ Pseudo-Plutarch. Placita Philosophorum. Perseus Digital Library. V. 3, Ch. 10. Retrieved December 24, 2014.
  38. ^ Hippolytus, Refutation of all Heresies, i. 6.
  39. ^ Anaximander. Fairbanks, Arthur (ed.). "Fragments and Commentary". The Hanover Historical Texts Project. Translated by Fairbanks, Arthur. (Plut., Strom. 2; Dox. 579).
  40. ^ Hippolytus, Refutation of all Heresies, i. 7; Cf. Aristotle, De Caelo, 294b13–21.
  41. ^ Xenophanes DK 21B28, quoted in Achilles, Introduction to Aratus 4.
  42. ^ Diogenes Laërtius, ii. 8.
  43. ^ Hippolytus, Refutation of all Heresies, i. 9.
  44. ^ FGrH F 18a.
  45. ^ Herodotus knew of the conventional view, according to which the river Ocean runs around a circular flat Earth (4.8), and of the division of the world into three – Jacoby, RE Suppl. 2.352 ff, yet rejected this personal belief (Histories, 2. 21; 4. 8; 4. 36).
  46. ^ The history of Herodotus, George Rawlinson, Appleton and company, 1889, p. 409.
  47. ^ Philpot, J.H. (1897). The Sacred Tree: Or, The Tree in Religion and Myth. Macmillan and Company, limited. p. 113.
  48. ^ Lindow, J. (2002). Norse Mythology: A Guide to Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 253. ISBN 978-0-19-515382-8. The world was a flat disk, with the Earth in the center and the sea all around. Thus the serpent is about as far away from the center, where men and gods lived
  49. ^ One of the earliest literary references to the world encircling water snake comes from Bragi Boddason who lived in the 9th century, in his Ragnarsdrápa (XIV).
  50. ^ "Gylfaginning". Sacred-texts.com. Retrieved February 9, 2013.
  51. ^ "The King's Mirror". mediumaevum.com. Retrieved November 6, 2013.
  52. ^ a b Needham, J. (1959). Science and Civilisation in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Cambridge University Press. p. 498. ISBN 978-0-521-05801-8.
  53. ^ Martzloff, Jean-Claude (1993–1994). "Space and Time in Chinese Texts of Astronomy and of Mathematical Astronomy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries". Chinese Science (11): 66–92 [p. 69]. JSTOR 43290474. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved January 23, 2018.
  54. ^ a b Cullen, Christopher (1980). "Joseph Needham on Chinese Astronomy". Past & Present (87): 39–53 [pp. 42, 49]. doi:10.1093/past/87.1.39. JSTOR 650565.
  55. ^ Cullen, Christopher (1976). "A Chinese Eratosthenes of the Flat Earth: A Study of a Fragment of Cosmology in Huai Nan tzu 淮 南 子". Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 39 (1): 106–27 [pp. 107–09]. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00052137. S2CID 171017315.
  56. ^ Needham, Joseph (1959). Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press. p. 219. ISBN 978-0-521-05801-8.
  57. ^ Needham, Joseph; Wang, Ling. (1995) [1959]. Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth, vol. 3, reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-05801-5, p. 498.
  58. ^ Needham, Joseph; Wang, Ling. (1995) [1959]. Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth, vol. 3, reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-05801-5, pp. 220, 498.
  59. ^ Needham, Joseph; Wang, Ling. (1995) [1959]. Science and Civilization in China: Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth, vol. 3, reprint edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-05801-5, pp. 227, 499.
  60. ^ Joseph Needham, p. 225.
  61. ^ Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996). Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into ancient Greek and Chinese science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 59–60. ISBN 978-0-521-55695-8.
  62. ^ Dreyer, John Louis Emil (1953) [1905]. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler. New York, NY: Dover Publications. pp. 20, 37–38. ISBN 978-0-486-60079-6.
  63. ^ On the Heavens, Book ii Chapter 14. Lloyd, G. E. R. (1968). Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 162–64. ISBN 978-0-521-07049-2.
  64. ^ Van Helden, Albert (1985). Measuring the Universe: Cosmic Dimensions from Aristarchus to Halley. University of Chicago Press. pp. 4–5. ISBN 978-0-226-84882-2.
  65. ^ Sedley, David N. (2003). Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 78–82. ISBN 978-0-521-54214-2.
  66. ^ Lucretius, De rerum natura, 1.1052–82.
  67. ^ Natural History, 2.64.
  68. ^ Tull, Herman Wayne (1989). The Vedic Origins of Karma: Cosmos as Man in Ancient Indian Myth and Ritual. State University of New York Press. pp. 47–49. ISBN 978-0-7914-0094-4. The Vedic texts contain several depictions of the shape of the cosmos. The Rigveda alone contains two basic images of the cosmos: a bipartite cosmos, consisting of the two spheres of heavens and Earth, and a tripartite cosmos consisting of the three spheres of heavens and Earth (...)
  69. ^ Sarma, K. V. (2013). Selin, Helaine (ed.). Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 114–15. ISBN 978-94-017-1416-7.
  70. ^ Plofker 2009, p. 52.
  71. ^ a b c Gombrich, R. F. (1975). Blacker, Carmen; Loewe, Michael (eds.). Ancient Cosmologies. George Allen & Unwin. pp. 110–39. ISBN 9780041000382.
  72. ^ A. A. Macdonell (1986). Vedic Mythology. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 9. ISBN 978-81-208-1113-3.
  73. ^ Plofker (2009, pp. 50–53).
  74. ^ D. Pingree: "History of Mathematical Astronomy in India", Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 15 (1978), pp. 533–633 (554ff.), Quote: "In the Purānas, the Earth is a flat-bottomed, circular disk, in the center of which is a lofty mountain, Meru. Surrounding Meru is the circular continent Jambūdvīpa, which is in turn surrounded by a ring of water known as the Salt Ocean. There follow alternating rings of land and sea until there are seven continents and seven oceans. In the southern quarter of Jambūdvīpa lies India–Bhāratavarsa."
  75. ^ Edelmann, Jonathan (2013). Gupta, Ravi M.; Valpey, Kenneth R. (eds.). The Bhagavata Purana: Sacred Text and Living Tradition. Columbia University Press. pp. 58–59. ISBN 978-0-231-53147-4.
  76. ^ Dimmitt, Cornelia; van Buitenen, J. A. B. (2012). Classical Hindu Mythology: A Reader in the Sanskrit Puranas. Temple University Press (1st Edition: 1977). pp. 4–5, 17–25, 46–47. ISBN 978-1-4399-0464-0.
  77. ^ a b Cormack, Lesley (2009). "Myth 3: That Medieval Christians Taught that he Earth was Flat". In Ronald Numbers (ed.). Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths About Science and Religion. Harvard University Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 9780674057418.
  78. ^ a b c d Bercot, David (1998). A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs. Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers. p. 222. ISBN 978-1565633575. The world, being made spherical, is confined within the circles of heaven.
  79. ^ Lactantius, The Divine Institutes, Book III, Chapter XXIV, The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol VII, ed. Rev. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1979), William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI, pp. 94–95.
  80. ^ De Civitate Dei, Book XVI, Chapter 9 – Whether We are to Believe in the Antipodes, translated by Rev. Marcus Dods; from the Christian Classics Ethereal Library at Calvin College.
  81. ^ Nothaft, C. P. E. (2011). "Augustine and the Shape of the Earth: A Critique of Leo Ferrari". Augustinian Studies. 42 (1): 33–48. doi:10.5840/augstudies20114213.
  82. ^ Lindberg, David C. (1986). "Science and the Early Church". In Lindberg, David C.; Numbers, Ronald L. (eds.). God & Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-05692-3.
  83. ^ Nothaft, C. P. E. (2011), "Augustine and the Shape of the Earth: A Critique of Leo Ferrari", Augustinian Studies, 42 (1): 35, doi:10.5840/augstudies20114213
  84. ^ Leo Ferrari, "Rethinking Augustine's Confessions, Thirty Years of Discoveries", Religious Studies and Theology (2000).
  85. ^ J. L. E. Dreyer, A History of Planetary Systems from Thales to Kepler. (1906); unabridged republication as A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler (New York: Dover Publications, 1953).
  86. ^ St. John Chrysostom, Homilies Concerning the Statues, Homily IX, paras. 7–8, in A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Series I, Vol IX, ed. Philip Schaff, American reprint of the Edinburgh edition (1978), Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI, p. 403: "When therefore thou beholdest not a small pebble, but the whole earth borne upon the waters, and not submerged, admire the power of Him who wrought these marvellous things in a supernatural manner! And whence does this appear, that the earth is borne upon the waters? The prophet declares this when he says, 'He hath founded it upon the seas, and prepared it upon the floods.' And again: 'To him who hath founded the earth upon the waters.' What sayest thou? The water is not able to support a small pebble on its surface, and yet bears up the earth, great as it is; and mountains, and hills, and cities, and plants, and men, and brutes; and it is not submerged!"
  87. ^ "Cosmas Indicopleustes, Christian Topography. Preface to the online edition". www.ccel.org.
  88. ^ "Cosmas Indicopleustes, Christian Topography (1897) Introduction". www.tertullian.org.
  89. ^ White, Andrew Dickson (1896). "Ch. 2, part 1". History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  90. ^ J. L. E. Dreyer (1906), A History of Planetary Systems, (1906), pp. 211–212.
  91. ^ "Saint Basil the Great, Hexaemeron 9 – Homily IX – "The creation of terrestrial animals" Holy Innocents Orthodox Church". Archived from the original on October 30, 2012. Retrieved February 9, 2013.
  92. ^ Lindberg, David. (1992) The Beginnings of Western Science. University of Chicago Press. Page 363.
  93. ^ B. Eastwood and G. Graßhoff, Planetary Diagrams for Roman Astronomy in Medieval Europe, ca. 800–1500, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 94, 3 (Philadelphia, 2004), pp. 49–50.
  94. ^ Isidore of Seville (2010). "XIV ii 1". The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville. Translated by Stephen A. Barney; W. J. Lewis; J. A. Beach; Oliver Berghof. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83749-1.
  95. ^ W. G. Randles (2000). Geography, Cartography and Nautical Science in the Renaissance. UK, Ashgate Variorum. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-86078-836-2. In other passages of the Etymologies, he writes of an orbis. Also in: Wolfgang Haase; Meyer Reinhold, eds. (1994). The Classical tradition and the Americas, vol. 1. Walter de Gruyter. p. 15. ISBN 978-3-11-011572-7. Retrieved November 28, 2010.
  96. ^ Lyons, Jonathan (2009). The House of Wisdom. Bloomsbury. pp. 34–35. ISBN 978-1-58574-036-9.
  97. ^ Ernest Brehaut (1912). An Encyclopedist of the Dark Ages. Columbia University. Archived from the original on December 13, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  98. ^ Isidore, Etymologiae, XIV.v.17.
  99. ^ Isidore, Etymologiae, IX.ii.133.
  100. ^ Fontaine, Jacques (1960). Isidore de Seville: Traité de la Nature (in French). Bordeaux.
  101. ^ Isidore, Etymologiae, III. XXXII.
  102. ^ Isidore, Etymologiae, XIV. I.
  103. ^ Wesley M. Stevens, "The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's De natura rerum", Isis, 71 (1980): 268–77. Stevens, Wesley M. (1980). "The Figure of the Earth in Isidore's "De natura rerum"". Isis. 71 (2): 268–77. doi:10.1086/352464. JSTOR 230175. S2CID 133430429., page 274
  104. ^ Grant, Edward (1974). A Sourcebook in Medieval Science (Source Books in the History of the Sciences). Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-82360-0.
  105. ^ Thomas Glick; Stephen John Livesley; Faith Wallis (2005). Medieval Science Technology and Medicine, an Encyclopedia. NY: Taylor & Francis.
  106. ^ English translation by Laistner, M. L. W. (1966) [1931]. Thought and Letters in Western Europe: A.D. 500 to 900 (2nd ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. pp. 184–185. The original Latin reads: De perversa autem et iniqua doctrina, quae contra Deum et animam suam locutus est, si clarificatum fuerit ita eum confiteri, quod alius mundus et alii homines sub terra seu sol et luna, hunc habito concilio ab ęcclesia pelle sacerdotii honore privatum. (MGH, 1, 80, pp. 178–79).
  107. ^ Laistner, (1966, p. 184).
  108. ^ Simek (1996, p. 53).
  109. ^ Carey, John (1989). "Ireland and the Antipodes: The Heterodoxy of Virgil of Salzburg". Speculum. 64 (1): 1–10. doi:10.2307/2852184. JSTOR 2852184. S2CID 162378383.
  110. ^ Kaiser, Christopher B. (1997). Creational Theology and the History of Physical Science: the Creationist Tradition from Basil to Bohr. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. p. 48. ISBN 978-90-04-10669-7.
  111. ^ Hasse, Wolfgang; Reinhold, Meyer, eds. (1993). The Classical Tradition and the Americas. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-011572-7.
  112. ^ Moretti, Gabriella (1993). The Other World and the 'Antipodes'. The Myth of Unknown Countries between Antiquity and the Renaissance. Walter de Gruyter. p. 265. ISBN 978-3-11-011572-7. In Hasse & Reinhold (1993, pp. 241–284).
  113. ^ Wright, Charles Darwin (1993). The Irish Tradition in Old English Literature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-521-41909-3.
  114. ^ "Catholic Encyclopedia: St. Vergilius of Salzburg". Newadvent.org. October 1, 1912. Retrieved February 9, 2013.
  115. ^ Fallacara, Giuseppe; Occhinegro, Ubaldo (2013), Manoscritto Voynich e Castel del Monte: Nuova chiave interpretativa del documento per inediti percorsi di ricerca [The Voynich Manuscript and Castel del Monte: A new interpretive key to the document through unpublished courses of research] (in Italian), Gangemi Editore, p. 127, ISBN 9788849277494
  116. ^ Vogel, Klaus Anselm (1995). Sphaera terrae – das mittelalterliche Bild der Erde und die kosmographische Revolution (doctoralThesis) (in German). PhD dissertation Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. p. 19. doi:10.53846/goediss-4247. S2CID 247015048.
  117. ^ "SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: The distinction of habits (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. 54)". www.newadvent.org.
  118. ^ Grant, Edward (1994), Planets. Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 626–30, ISBN 978-0-521-56509-7
  119. ^ Jill Tattersall (1981). "The Earth, Sphere or Disc?". Modern Language Review. 76 (1): 31–46. doi:10.2307/3727009. JSTOR 3727009.
  120. ^ Damien Janos, "Qur'ānic cosmography in its historical perspective: some notes on the formation of a religious worldview", Religion 2012, pp217-8
  121. ^ Hannam, James (2023). The Globe: How the Earth Became Round. Reaktion Books. pp. 178–193. ISBN 978-1789147582.
  122. ^ For example, see verses Q15:19 [Quran 15:19], Q20:53 [Quran 20:53], Q50:7 [Quran 50:7], and Q51:48 [Quran 51:48].
  123. ^ Tabatabaʾi, Mohammad Ali; Mirsadri, Saida (May 26, 2016). "The Qurʾānic Cosmology, as an Identity in Itself". Arabica. 63 (3–4): 211. doi:10.1163/15700585-12341398. ISSN 1570-0585.
  124. ^ Reynolds, Gabriel Said; Qarāʿī, ʿAlī Qūlī (2018). The Qur'an and the Bible: text and commentary. New Haven (Conn.): Yale university press. pp. 405, 464. ISBN 978-0-300-18132-6.
  125. ^ Joseph Needham et al.: "Heavenly clockwork: the great astronomical clocks of medieval China", Antiquarian Horological Society, 2nd. ed., Vol. 1, 1986, ISBN 0-521-32276-6, p. 138.
  126. ^ a b Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd. p. 499.
  127. ^ Baran, Madeleine (December 16, 2009). "Historic map coming to Minnesota". St. Paul, Minn.: Minnesota Public Radio. Retrieved February 19, 2018.
  128. ^ Russell, Jeffrey Burton (1991), Inventing the Flat Earth: Columbus and Modern Historians, New York: Praeger, pp. 37–45, ISBN 978-0275939564
  129. ^ Lindberg, David C.; Numbers, Ronald L., eds. (1986), "Introduction", God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 1–3, ISBN 978-0-520-05692-3
  130. ^ Lindberg, David C. (2000), "Science and the Early Christian Church", in Shank, Michael H. (ed.), The Scientific Enterprise in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Readings from Isis, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 125–146, ISBN 978-0-226-74951-8
  131. ^ Ferngren, Gary, ed. (2002), "Introduction", Science & Religion: A Historical Introduction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, p. ix, ISBN 978-0-8018-7038-5
  132. ^ Grant, Edward (1994), Planets. Stars, & Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 620–622, 626–630, ISBN 978-0-521-56509-7
  133. ^ Abbott, Erica. "Mark Zuckerberg Banning All Flat Earth Groups from Facebook Is A Hoax". Business2community.com. Business2community. Archived from the original on August 19, 2017. Retrieved August 19, 2017.
  134. ^ Heigl, Alex. "The Short List of Famous People Who Think the Earth Is Flat (Yes, Really)". People. Retrieved August 19, 2017.
  135. ^ Herreria, Carla (April 22, 2017). "Neil deGrasse Tyson Cites Celebrity Flat-Earthers To Make A Point About Politics". HuffPost. Retrieved August 19, 2017.
  136. ^ Humphries, Courtney (October 28, 2017). "What does it take to believe the world is flat?". The Boston Globe. Retrieved April 4, 2022.
  137. ^ Stella Vosniadu, William F. Brewer: Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood.

Bibliography

Further reading

  • Fraser, Raymond (2007). When The Earth Was Flat: Remembering Leonard Cohen, Alden Nowlan, the Flat Earth Society, the King James monarchy hoax, the Montreal Story Tellers and other curious matters. Black Moss Press, ISBN 978-0-88753-439-3