Talk:House of Slaves

Please

please in ghana we have no ewe but eve — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.87.88.10 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 17 August 2006

Rewrite and move

As important and controversial as this site is, I'm trying to expand and rewrite it into something that expresses both sides of the argument, and is about the whole memorial/museum not just the "door". More refs the better, especially on its importance as a tourist "pilgrimage" to both the Senegalese and the visitors. T L Miles (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

The scientific scrupulous statisticians and those who cite them without regard for the human race as one may go to hell. The African-American Slave Trade Museum should be built in every low crime neighborhood with a self-identified Caucasian majority. One nation? Welcome home Uncle Tom.Kylecrabtree (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Angola Fits In the House of Slaves Academic Controversy

Covering up the fact about Angola's prominence is not helpful and not in anyway neutral.2601:447:4101:41F9:AD9B:A39:8E5B:D05D (talk) 00:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• OK, there is no conspiracy. You just need to come up with a reliable source--easy. Drmies (talk) 00:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

And I have. As someone who does research for a living, don't give me nonsense about what is a reliable source. Politics is not neutral. Erasing even a Library of Congress source is not helpful either.2601:447:4101:41F9:AD9B:A39:8E5B:D05D (talk) 00:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• I don't know what kind of research you're doing, but if it's OK to cite some website with no clear editorial information, I'm not hiring you. Drmies (talk) 01:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
• I'm not blocking you--I'm just going to semi-protect the article. If you want to achieve something, you can try to do that on this talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)