User talk:TheNeerajGoswami

Welcome!

Hello, TheNeerajGoswami, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Hello, I'm Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 08:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Mean as custard (talk) 08:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

• traininfo.in: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://notspam.traininfo.in

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 08:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19349 was submitted on Sep 27, 2017 04:59:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's all by mistake, I didn't read rules of editing any articles and done it by mistake

Decline reason:

This was not an accident. You were warned and continued spamming Wikipedia. And you've still provided no reason to believe you understand what you did. Yamla (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sir, Trust me I didn't even checked any notifications or messeges that sent by Wikipedia. Because I don't know that I got notification from Wikipedia cause I did't have much knowledge about terms of Wikipedia, after I get blocked by wikipedia then I read everything and realized that I did it is totally wrong :( I'm assuring you that I won't do that again in future TheNeerajGoswami (talk) 13:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia; you are therefore expected to respond to (or at least read) messages sent by other editors. Given that new messages are clearly highlighted in the interface, failing to read them would require wilfully ignoring the (very obvious!) new message alerts. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was totally new at this interface, and didn't knew that I got any notification from wikipedia. therefore, I done that editing and was *not aware of any notificaion that I got from wikipedia, It's totally done by mistake TheNeerajGoswami (talk) 06:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not convinced me you have read and understood WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I read everything and understand, that has been done by mistake, I won't repeat that again in future

Decline reason:

Given your response below, it is clear that you are here to just promote/advertise. One jsut has to whois the site that you want to be removed from the blacklist. Given the multiple unblock declines and your inability to convince anyone that you're here to do anything more than just spam, I'm withdrawing talk page access also. —SpacemanSpiff 15:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• A check of a substantial sample of your edits suggests that 100% of your editing has consisted of adding spam links to one web site and removing links to other web sites. Since you won't again make what you call the "mistake" of doing those things again, what kinds of editing will you be doing? Clearly there is no point in unblocking you unless you are going to do some sort of constructive editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry for my editing

You need to actually answer JamesBWatson's question - what kinds of editing will you be doing? (And please don't keep adding new unblock requests when you already have one open - only a plain text answer is needed.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNeerajGoswami (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Am I eligible to edit articles on Wikipedia? Please let me know so I can edit articles for reviews TheNeerajGoswami (talk) 15:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You cannot edit any page except this one while you are blocked. And you will not be unblocked until you give a realistic answer to the answer posed by JamesBWatson. Do notopen another unblock request; just answer below in free text. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you have not answered the question below, despite the fact that you have twice edited this page since it was posted, I was intending to decline your unblock request, but in view of Anthony Bradbury's invitation to post an answer below, I am leaving the request open for now. However, it is likely to be declined if you don't answer soon. You are unlikely to be unblocked unless you respond to that question.

Please don't continue to post unblock requests that don't give any reason to be unblocked. Please don't continue to post new unblock requests while one is open, which you did again after Boing! said Zebedee asked you not to. If you carry on doing either of those two things it is likely that your talk page access will be removed to prevent waste of administrators' time. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi,I'm sorry for delay to giving Anthony Bradbury's answer. here is my answer, I will only add informative data in uncomplete articles and I'll try my best to make complete article. Please give me one chance, if I do anything wrong in future then block me without any notification. and also I wanna mention one more things here is, www.traininfo.in is not a spam website It is very useful for Train Travellers if I did mistake in editing articles then why this punishment will be given to this website?? Please remove this website from spam list. Thank You.