User talk:Kvng: Difference between revisions
VulcanSphere (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| algo = old(30d) |
|||
|maxarchivesize = 70K |
|||
| archive = User talk:Kvng/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
|counter = 7 |
|||
| counter = 13 |
|||
|algo = old(31d) |
|||
| maxarchivesize = 150K |
|||
|archive = User talk:Kvng/Archive %(counter)d |
|||
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|||
| minthreadsleft = 4 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archives |search=yes}} |
|||
{{Archives}} |
|||
==Moon Breath Beat== |
|||
Permission to remove my ''[[Moon Breath Beat]]'' page granted. |
|||
[[User:Espngeek|Espngeek]] ([[User talk:Espngeek|talk]]) |
|||
== |
== CED VHS revert == |
||
Hi. I noticed that you reverted my edit on the CED/VHS part. |
|||
Hey Kvng. Thanks for helping out at the Teahouse. Just... next time it might not be the best... ''public relations'' to use choice words in edit summaries there. Gotta keep in mind that the Teahouse has literally more page watchers than [[Canada]], and a lot of them are new folks, and especially young folks, or old folks. No hurt feelings over it. Just something to be aware of. [[User:GreenMeansGo|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 14:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||
I merely edited the text so it'd look more professional and encyclopedic. |
|||
What mistake did I made to warrant a revert and if you're okay with, suggest me an alternative if my edit didn't work? [[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]] ([[User talk:HarlambiDaabrev|talk]]) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:I assume we're talking about [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Phonograph_record&diff=1259514426&oldid=1258572580 this]. The original statement was {{tq|slightly better than [[VHS]]}}. Your revision made it say {{tq|slightly better than, or comparable to the [[VHS]]}}. The cited source says {{tq|The subjective evaluation of people familiar with all these formats is that CED is better than VHS}}. Your revised statment takes us further from what the source says. What were you attempting to accomplish with this edit? You left no [[WP:ES|edit summary]] that could help me. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 22:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Copyvios == |
|||
::Fixing the grammar to make it more encyclopedic. If that didn't work, what's the alternative? [[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]] ([[User talk:HarlambiDaabrev|talk]]) 12:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::@[[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]], what was wrong with the grammar? "Encyclopedic" means different things to different editors. What does it mean to you? ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 13:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::To me it sounds more professional. Correct me if I'm wrong. [[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]] ([[User talk:HarlambiDaabrev|talk]]) 14:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::@[[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]], I'm not getting that. It sounds more ambiguous. I guess if you're in marketing that could translate to more professional. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::If that's more ambiguous, then what's the alternative? [[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]] ([[User talk:HarlambiDaabrev|talk]]) 14:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Leaving it as it is is the obvious alternative. Adding the {{tq|whose picture quality is}} qualifier is arguably an improvement but I think this is already evident from context. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 21:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::Sorry for a very late reply. The thing is, it'd sound more neutral (per Wikipedia tone). [[User:HarlambiDaabrev|HarlambiDaabrev]] ([[User talk:HarlambiDaabrev|talk]]) 09:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::::The article, to my eye, has an accurate summary of what's in the cited source. Your change made the summary less accurate. Degrading accuracy is not good. If you think the source is inaccurate or does not tell the whole story, let's find a better or additional source so we can write a better summary of this comparison. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Women in Red December 2024 == |
|||
Hey, just wanted to give a small reminder about checking drafts for copyright violations before reviewing them. If you don't have it installed already, I suggest using [[User:The Earwig/copyvios.js]] to put a link to the copyvios search. Cheers, [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 16:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" |
|||
:Thanks for the reminder. I've made this mistake in the past and don't seem to have learned from it. I have the script installed. I just need to remember to use it especially after being away from AfC for a while. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | [[File:WiR Women who died in 2024.png|right|100px]]'''<big>[[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red|Women in Red]]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 </small> |
|||
<br /> |
|||
'''Online events:''' |
|||
:{{replyto|Primefac}} You may be amused to learn that I have done penance for my sin by doing a CV check on all submissions in [[:Category:AfC pending submissions by age/Very old]]. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 21:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
* ''New'': [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/324|Women who died in 2024]] <big>|</big> [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/325|Religion]] |
|||
::I noticed. Maybe a ''bit'' extreme, but I suppose ultimately useful. Thanks. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
* ''Continuing'': [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/293|#1day1woman]] <big>|</big> [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/294|Education]] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> |
|||
== 20:30:36, 4 November 2017 review of submission by Ungathering == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Ungathering|ts=20:30:36, 4 November 2017|declined=Draft:Ralph_Prator}} |
|||
'''Announcements from other communities''' |
|||
* [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Religion|Women in Religion]] have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is<br> December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact [[User:Dzingle1|Dzingle1]] or<br> [[User:RosPost|RosPost]]. [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red|Women in Red]] members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting [https://tulane.zoom.us/j/95434400202?pwd=N0lEQzFFTHZNRXk0NE44M3RxUWtkUT09 here] |
|||
'''Tip of the month:''' |
|||
* ''Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a [[:File:Women in Red Barnstar.jpg|barnstar]].'' |
|||
'''Other ways to participate:''' |
|||
<p>In terms of the multiple articles from the Los Angeles Times being considered "one source" or "multiple sources," see [[Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Multiple_sources_and_the_definition_of_organizations|Multiple Sources]] in Talk:Notability. The consensus seems to be that multiple newspaper articles over a period of years by different authors are considered multiple sources, not one source. However, I still see your point about not relying completely on the Los Angeles Times. Therefore I have added sources from other newspapers, from a book, and from two doctoral dissertations. I have also removed the reference to the book published by the Santa Susana Press because according to Wikipedia guidelines it is not considered a neutral source.</p> |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members|Become a member]]. You can always [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Outreach/List|opt-out of notifications]]. |
|||
* [[:en: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red|Join the conversations on our talkpage]]. |
|||
* [[:en:Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Ideas|Help us plan future events]] and add any general ideas on developing the project. |
|||
* Follow us on social media: |
|||
[[File:Instagram.svg|frameless|15px]] [https://instagram.com/wikiwomeninred Instagram] '''|''' |
|||
[[File:Pinterest Shiny Icon.svg|frameless|15px]] [https://www.pinterest.com/wikiwomeninred/boards/ Pinterest] '''|''' |
|||
[[File:Twitter icon.png|frameless|15px]] [https://twitter.com/WikiWomenInRed Twitter/X] |
|||
|} |
|||
--[[User:Lajmmoore|Lajmmoore]] ([[User talk:Lajmmoore|talk]] 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1258737489 --> |
|||
== Question from [[User:Jgibbons333|Jgibbons333]] (05:08, 1 December 2024) == |
|||
<p>I would also make the argument that Ralph Prator has inherent notability as the founding president of a major or significant university. San Fernando Valley State College, which is now California State University, Northridge (CSUN), is one of the largest universities in the United States as measured by number of students. After UCLA, it is the second largest university in Southern California, a region that encompasses a population of over 20 million people. It is distinguished in a number of different ways, including having one of the top film schools and one of the best music programs in the country (per The Hollywood Reporter), one of the best business schools (per the Princeton Review), ranks among the nation's Top 5 comprehensive universities in terms of the number of graduates who go on to earn doctorates in research and the sciences (per the National Science Foundation), ranks #11 in the United States in terms of the number of minority students, and ranks 5th in the United States for its impact on the improved earning power and economic prospects of its graduates (per CollegeNet's Social Mobility Index). In addition, CSUN contributes almost $2 billion to the local and state economy through the creation of jobs and the training of graduates who become new employees in the workforce.</p> |
|||
Is there a way to report something going on that’s unethical, like people holding a pay hostage? It looks like that’s what’s happening. --[[User:Jgibbons333|Jgibbons333]] ([[User talk:Jgibbons333|talk]]) 05:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Ungathering|Ungathering]] ([[User talk:Ungathering|talk]]) 20:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:@[[User:Jgibbons333|Jgibbons333]], I'm not sure what ''holding a pay hostage'' is but the ultimate place to deal with bad behavior is [[WP:ANI]]. Please read the suggestions listed there before posting because it is not a fun place to be if you can figure out a better way through the dispute. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
I'm wondering kvng, under criteria 6 of [[WP:NACADEMIC]], wouldn't he be notable? ("6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society.") [[User:Galobtter|Galobtter]] ([[User talk:Galobtter|talk]]) 08:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
::So I meant holding a “page” hostage. The “Palmer report” wiki page has had multiple complaints about the way it’s written, but doesn’t seem like they are taking it seriously. I agree that it’s inaccurate to call the org. a “fake news” website. It comes off like it’s written to hurt their (palmer report’s) reputation. [[Special:Contributions/173.72.130.162|173.72.130.162]] ([[User talk:173.72.130.162|talk]]) 23:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Question from [[User:EditAboutIt|EditAboutIt]] (23:16, 2 December 2024) == |
|||
:Promising thought. I have copied this suggestion and responded in more detail at [[Draft talk:Ralph Prator#WP:NACADEMIC]]. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, |
|||
== What kind of source should I look for? == |
|||
I am attempting to write an article for submission called "virtual organizing" and per Wiki instructions I need to disclose my possible COI as I work in the industry as a certified professional. |
|||
Hello,I'm Omega68537.Thanks for your advices for my article.I want to show the notability better in my article,and improve the other parts of my article.What kinds of sources(I know which sources are reliable and which are not) should I look for to show the notability better?And more advices about the other parts of my article [[Draft:Xu Geyang]],please!Thanks. |
|||
How do I do this? |
|||
Omega68537 13:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Omega68537|Omega68537]] ([[User talk:Omega68537#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Omega68537|contribs]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Thank you --[[User:EditAboutIt|EditAboutIt]] ([[User talk:EditAboutIt|talk]]) 23:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
: |
:@[[User:EditAboutIt|EditAboutIt]], have a look at [[WP:DISCLOSE]] ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 03:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
::Thank you, for your help. |
|||
::I am not a paid contributor but I do work in the industry. |
|||
::I saw this link you sent me before but, due to my inexperience with Wikipedia, do not understand how to: |
|||
::# <nowiki>add "{{</nowiki>[[Template:Connected contributor|connected contributor]]<nowiki>}}" to the page or my edit which I already edited: "professional organizing" or how to</nowiki> |
|||
::# add the same required notation of COI in an article I want to add for "virtual organizing" for submission to educate the public about this new technique in professional organizing, or |
|||
::# where to add this first submission and new article of "virtual organizing" in my user account for peer review. |
|||
::Kind Regards, @EditAboutIt [[User:EditAboutIt|EditAboutIt]] ([[User talk:EditAboutIt|talk]]) 04:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination == |
|||
:{{replyto|Kvng}}I deleted some "unreliable" sources of my article.These sources are from website"''Toutiao today''".Are they unreliable indeed?I am not very sure.Sources with [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] will show the notability naturally,right?Which sources have [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]]? |
|||
But after I read [[WP:MUSICBIO]],I doubt that Xu Geyang might not meet the standard of notability of Wikipedia.Really?If Xu Geyang doesn't meet [[WP:MUSICBIO]] indeed,what should I do?Should I give up for this article until Xu Geyang meets it? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Omega68537|Omega68537]] ([[User talk:Omega68537#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Omega68537|contribs]]) 13:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Omega68537 13:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Internet-group-chat.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]Your feedback is requested  at [[Talk:Yao's principle|'''Talk:Yao's principle'''  on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination]]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of [[WP:FRS|Feedback Request Service]] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by [[WP:FRS|removing your name]].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 08:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|Omega68537}} You can set up a Google alert for yourself to notify you when any new sources appear and improve the article and resubmit when they do. You can create or improve the article on the Chinese Wikipedia. You can skip the AfC process and create the article yourself. The risk here is that it is promptly deleted which makes it more difficult to get approved later. You can keep resubmitting to AfC hoping or requesting you find a reviewer who is able to evaluate the Chinese sources. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:13, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== A point of form == |
|||
:{{replyto|Kvng}}I'm a Chinese,so that some thing you said is difficult for me.For example,I can't set Google alert because Google is now completely unavailable in China.I know it's more sensible to create my article on Chinese Wikipedia,but I can't entry Chinese Wikipedia.And what should I do now to increace the probability of being accepted?It may be too late to resubmit my article when Xu Geyang meets [[WP:MUSICBIO]] definitely. |
|||
~[[User:Omega68537|Omega68537]]([[User talk:Omega68537|talk]]) 11:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
[[WP:MERGECLOSE]] seems to be quite nonchalant on who can close the merge: '''''Any user, including the user who first proposed the merge''', may close the discussion and move forward with the merge if enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed and there has been no discussion or if there is unanimous consent to merge.'' (italics is mine, but the boldface is original). So, personally, I do not see anything wrong with my closing. [[User:Викидим|Викидим]] ([[User talk:Викидим|talk]]) 21:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Draft:Zeta India]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Draft:Zeta India]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G11|section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read [[Wikipedia:Spam|the guidelines on spam]] and [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations]] for more information. |
|||
== Question from [[User:Changachireretatenda22|Changachireretatenda22]] (17:59, 8 December 2024) == |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Draft:Zeta India|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3AZeta+India|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 05:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Hello how do I edit an article here on Wikipedia --[[User:Changachireretatenda22|Changachireretatenda22]] ([[User talk:Changachireretatenda22|talk]]) 17:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== 09:46:23, 9 November 2017 review of submission by NG 1989 == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=NG 1989|ts=09:46:23, 9 November 2017|declined=Draft:Bart_Cassiman}} |
|||
:@[[User:Changachireretatenda22|Changachireretatenda22]] {{tpw}} I have just left you a more than helpful welcome message. I hope it gives you the information you need. [[WP:TEAHOUSE]] is an excellent venue to ask for extra help. 🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦 18:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Dear Kvng, |
|||
::Thanks a lot [[User:Changachireretatenda22|Changachireretatenda22]] ([[User talk:Changachireretatenda22|talk]]) 18:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Question from [[User:Adhikari Madan|Adhikari Madan]] (06:08, 19 December 2024) == |
|||
Thank you for reviewing the article. I have however a few questions concerning your remarks. |
|||
The first remark I would like to know how to handle is how to show the subject's notability trough the references. I can only point out that these are (as written in the article) very important exhibitions in the Belgian art history. |
|||
I understand the remark about avoiding references by the subject itself. However, it is quite common for the curator of an exhibition to also be the editor of the catalog/publication accompanying the said exhibition. |
|||
The last remark is that there are too few secondary sources. However, if you look into the 'Further Reading' section you can find a quite extensive list of secondary sources on the subject. (Mainly the exhibitions created by the subject). |
|||
Is Artificial Intellegence helps in human Civilization? --[[User:Adhikari Madan|Adhikari Madan]] ([[User talk:Adhikari Madan|talk]]) 06:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hoping to receive more guided directions with the following questions. |
|||
:Yes ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
All my very best. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:NG 1989|NG 1989]] ([[User talk:NG 1989#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/NG 1989|contribs]]) 09:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== Question from [[User:KCAT MAN DUE|KCAT MAN DUE]] on [[Pink Floyd discography]] (19:02, 22 December 2024) == |
|||
:{{replyto|NG 1989}} Thanks for contacting me. I appreciate that the subject was responsible for some notable projects. This, however, does not make the subject notable. See [[WP:INHERIT]]. Notability of the subject is established by coverage of the subject in [[WP:RELIABLE]], [[WP:INDEPENDENT]] [[WP:SECONDARY]] sources. As I recall, most of the sources you've provided are not independent. You don't necessarily need to remove these but you do need to cite enough others to satisfy the [[WP:GOLDENRULE]] for Wikipedia. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Does DavidEdwardFrancis Really BenchPress And LegPress 13000Pounds Inside 601EubankAve.Stihl13000SuperMax?GuinessWorldBookOfRecords And Ripleys Believe It Or Not Both Corporations Wrote About DavidEdwardFrancis"TheMystikalForbiddenPlanetURanus. --[[User:KCAT MAN DUE|KCAT MAN DUE]] ([[User talk:KCAT MAN DUE|talk]]) 19:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::{{replyto|Kvng}} Thank you for your response. Since we've done serious research preceding the article I was wondering if it could help if I re-arranged the references to better satisfy the [[WP:GOLDENRULE]] for Wikipedia. As you can see in our section 'Further Reading', 'Secondary sources' there are many [[WP:RELIABLE]], [[WP:INDEPENDENT]] [[WP:SECONDARY]] sources written about the subject and it's projects. We chose to put only the exhibition-catalog (if which he was most of the time the editor and or writer) in the section 'references'. However the 'further reading' section is as much a reference to the projects as the catalogs but satisfy maybe more the [[WP:GOLDENRULE]] for Wikipedia. --[[User:NG 1989|NG 1989]] ([[User talk:NG 1989|talk]]) 11:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:No ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 22:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{replyto|NG 1989}} I'm sorry if I did not notice those other sources. Please be aware that reviewers here at Wikipedia are [[WP:VOLUNTEERS]] and the number of sources you've cited and the difficulty accessing these sources due to being offline and not in english will make this review quite labor intensive. You can choose to resubmit as it is and wait for another reviewer to give this another look or you can have a look at advice given at [[WP:CITEKILL]] and try to trim it down to something more manageable for reviewers and readers. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== David J. Neff page fixes == |
|||
==Happy Christmas== |
|||
== Request on 20:23:06, 9 November 2017 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Austinable == |
|||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 6px solid #FF4646; background-color:#46CB18;" |
|||
{{anchor|20:23:06, 9 November 2017 review of submission by Austinable}} |
|||
|align="left"|[[File:Rockefeller Center christmas tree cropped.jpg|225px]] |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Austinable|ts=20:23:06, 9 November 2017|declinedtalk=User_talk:Austinable}} |
|||
|align="center"|<b style="color:red"><i style="font-size:large">Merry Christmas, {{BASEPAGENAME}}!</i><br /> Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 16:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)</b> |
|||
|align="right"|[[File:Welsh Christmas (31768276526).jpg|225px]] |
|||
<!-- Start of message -->Thank you for your review, Kvng. I made immediate changes to the portion of David J. Neff's page that you found to have been copied from its referenced source. Please let me know if this fixes the problem (it's in the careers section where the source in question is referenced): Early in his career, he served as director of web and interactive strategy for the [[American Cancer Society]] High Plains Division, where he led a team in developing SharingHope.TV, the American Cancer Society’s first user-generated website for those affected by cancer. The program was first created to support ACS’s [[Relay For Life]] in 2008 and allowed posting of pictures and videos for early adopters of the technology. |
|||
<!-- End of message -->[[User:Austinable|Austinable]] ([[User talk:Austinable|talk]]) 20:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|Austinable}} Thank you for improving your draft. The next step is to resubmit it and wait for another reviewer to look at it. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 20:27, 9 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== 13:05:51, 12 November 2017 review of submission by Jasonperillo == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Jasonperillo|ts=13:05:51, 12 November 2017|declined=Draft:High_Watch_Recovery_Center}} |
|||
Hello and thank you for reviewing my submission on High Watch Recovery Center. |
|||
Your comment references my use of a NY Times article and close paraphrasing. The article is used as a source for one sentence which can only be stated in so many ways and includes a citation. The remainder of the content comes from other sources and is cited. |
|||
I am not clear on what I need to do to improve this and I am looking for any help you can offer. |
|||
Many thanks! |
|||
Jason |
|||
[[User:Jasonperillo|Jasonperillo]] ([[User talk:Jasonperillo|talk]]) 13:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|Jasonperillo}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Draft%3AHigh_Watch_Recovery_Center this report] shows similarities between your draft and sources. |
|||
:Your draft says, "Folson wanted to deed them the property to be used as a retreat but since Wilson did not believe that A.A. should own property, a separate governing board comprised of A.A. members was established to oversee the operation of the farm." |
|||
:The source says, "She wanted to deed them the property to be used as a retreat, Mr. Steele said. But since Mr. Wilson did not believe that A.A. should own property, a separate governing board was set up to oversee the operation of the farm," |
|||
:While there are some minor wording changes, the structure of these two statements is substantially the same and so appears to be close paraphrasing. This is possibly a coincidence but we take potential copyright violations seriously so the appearance of paraphrasing is a problem. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|Kvng}} |
|||
Thank you! When I see it in writing it makes perfect sense. I have changed that paragraph to read as follows below. Please let me know if you think it is sufficient. |
|||
Folson wanted to give the property to Alcoholics Anonymous so that Wilson and Mann could use the farm as a retreat center for alcoholics. Wilson, though, was opposed to the idea of A.A. owning property. As a result, a separate board of directors comprised of A.A. members was established to oversee management of the retreat. |
|||
[[User:Jasonperillo|Jasonperillo]] ([[User talk:Jasonperillo|talk]]) 15:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== 09:00:22, 14 November 2017 review of submission by Lina.Fidlerova == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Lina.Fidlerova|ts=09:00:22, 14 November 2017|declined=Draft:Martin_Šolc}} |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I'm the author of the article about Martin Solc, which was declined for it appeared to be taken from the profile of Mr. Solc on the websites of International Bar Association. I honestly cannot see the reason for it, I went through the article and the profile on the websites and I didn't copy and paste the content and didn't use the same wording, there are only the same information about Mr. Solc's education, career and functions within the IBA and I cannot change them, they are facts. I used links and citations everywhere I could so I really do not know how to change the article for it to be approved. |
|||
Thank you for your advice. |
|||
Lina <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Lina.Fidlerova|Lina.Fidlerova]] ([[User talk:Lina.Fidlerova#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Lina.Fidlerova|contribs]]) </small> |
|||
:{{replyto|Lina.Fidlerova}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Draft%3AMartin_%C5%A0olc this report] shows that the phrases, "a leading Czech expert in corporate law, M&A and restructuring" and "elected Lawyer of the Year in Commercial Law in 2007 and 2011 by the Lawyer of the Year competition organised by the Czech Bar Association and epravo.cz" appear in the draft and the source. This is possibly a coincidence but we take potential copyright violations seriously so the appearance of copying is a problem. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 13:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Request on 14:16:18, 14 November 2017 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Roccopx == |
|||
{{anchor|14:16:18, 14 November 2017 review of submission by Roccopx}} |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Roccopx|ts=14:16:18, 14 November 2017|declinedtalk=User_talk:Roccopx}} |
|||
<!-- Start of message --> |
|||
Thank you for your review. I edited the article. It is difficult to find a structure for the history of a company. |
|||
I also added the reference to the history page. |
|||
<!-- End of message -->[[User:Roccopx|Roccopx]] ([[User talk:Roccopx|talk]]) 14:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== opinion required == |
|||
Hi Kvng, thank you for your revision of [[Draft:Marco_Alverà|Marco Alverà’s bio]]. Do you think it could be ready for the main namespace? Please also consider the discussion that is currently idle [[User_talk:Anna_Sai#Conversations_about_Marco_Alver.C3.A0.27s_biography|in my talk page]]. Do you think that at this point we might resort to the {{Tlx|Help me}} template? |
|||
[[User:Anna Sai|Anna Sai]] ([[User talk:Anna Sai|talk]]) 15:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|Anna Sai}} I'm afraid the only review I did on this draft was a mechanical check for copyright violations and I found no problems there. Reviewers are [[WP:VOLUNTEERS]] and the Wikipedia community is currently not giving a lot of love to paid submissions and other situations with potential [[WP:COI]]s. It may take some additional time for a reviewer to gather up the courage to review this. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For doing copyvio checks on AfC submissions. [[User:ProgrammingGeek|'''<span style="color:Green">Programming</span><span style="color:Orange">Geek</span>''']][[User talk:ProgrammingGeek|<sup><span style="color:Green"> talk</span><span style="color:Orange">to</span>me</sup>]] 15:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
{{clear}} |
|||
== Parser function time errors == |
|||
Thanks {{u|ProgrammingGeek}}! ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
==Merger discussion for [[Draft:Deepak Singh]]== |
|||
[[File:Merge-arrows.svg|50px|frameless|left]] An article that you have been involved in editing—[[Draft:Deepak Singh]]—has been '''proposed for [[Wikipedia:Merging|merging]]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in [[Talk:Deepak Singh (politician)#Merger proposal |the merger discussion]]. Thank you. <font color="#e74c3c">#</font><b>[[User:1997kB|<font color="#2ECC71">1997</font>]][[User talk:1997kB|<font color="#F1C40F">kB</font>]]</b> 05:00, 18 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== 18:07:58, 18 November 2017 review of submission by Russellanderson == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Russellanderson|ts=18:07:58, 18 November 2017|declined=Draft:Samuel_Boateng}} |
|||
Good evening, |
|||
I hope all is well and that you have had a good week. |
|||
From your review I understand why the article was declined. The material that was copied has now been deleted. I hope this resolves the problem and aids in the approval of this submission. |
|||
I hope you have a good evening. |
|||
Kind regards, |
|||
Russell <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Russellanderson|Russellanderson]] ([[User talk:Russellanderson#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Russellanderson|contribs]]) 18:07, 18 November 2017 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== 08:08:36, 19 November 2017 review of submission by Arun G Nair == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=Arun G Nair|ts=08:08:36, 19 November 2017|declined=Draft:Balakrishnan_Suresh}} |
|||
Submission declined on 18 November 2017 by Kvng because of the reason "This submission appears to be taken from http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/thiruvananthapuram/2016/aug/04/Air-Marshal-hailing-from-Thiruvananthapuram-takes-over-as-AOP-1503514.html." |
|||
1. This was not a copyrighted content of "New Indian Express". They copied it from "http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=148067"anyway I have removed the content. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Arun G Nair|Arun G Nair]] ([[User talk:Arun G Nair#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Arun G Nair|contribs]]) 08:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== Draft:I Fall In Love Too Easily (Album) == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I saw that the following text now appears in ''I Fall In Love Too Easily'''s page: "Comment: Copyvio check passed ~Kvng (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)." Can you tell me what does it mean? Are you one of the administrators that has to accept the submission? |
|||
Thank you. [[User:Keewii|Keewii]] ([[User talk:Keewii|talk]]) 23:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{u|Keewii}}, it just means that Kvng has checked to make sure that your draft does not have any copyrighted material on it. They ''are'' a draft reviewer, but there's no guarantee that they specifically will be the one reviewing the page (we have over 150 reviewers total). [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 00:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC) {{tps}} |
|||
::{{u|Primefac}}, Thank you. I just got notice that the submission has been accepted, so it's all good. [[User:Keewii|Keewii]] ([[User talk:Keewii|talk]]) 15:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== 00:57:00, 22 November 2017 review of submission by ErinD22 == |
|||
{{Lafc|username=ErinD22|ts=00:57:00, 22 November 2017|declined=Draft:Kevin_M._Nagle}} |
|||
Hello, |
|||
While there are similarities between the bio on the Select Sacramento website and the submitted content, they are both pulled from the subject's overall biography, rather than content produced by the Select Sacramento website. I would like to know what would need to be edited to get page approval, or barring that, what type of permission I would need from the Select Sacramento website. I feel like to read and understand the copyright guidelines is a little complicated for a layperson and I'm not sure I could communicate it to the group that runs the Select Sacramento website, but I am confident they would have no issue with some of the same biographical details appearing on their site and the Wikipedia page. I would like to know which options (content edits and what exact content was the issue vs. copyright permission) would be most expedient to get this posted. |
|||
Thank you. [[User:ErinD22|ErinD22]] ([[User talk:ErinD22|talk]]) 00:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:{{replyto|ErinD22}} Although we do have processes for licensing material from others for use here, the easiest way through is to remove from your draft any material that appears elsewhere. If this is not feasible, let me know and I'll try and help you through alternatives. |
|||
:As to what's required to get this draft approved, please be aware that there are several reasons material can be found unsuitable for Wikipedia. Copyright violations are definitely one of the reasons but I did not originally review your draft in enough detail to tell you whether there are others. Now I see that your draft is a [[WP:BLP|biography of a living person]]. Typical other problems we have with these types of submissions are [[WP:PROMOTIONAL]] content (i.e. [[WP:RESUME|resume-like]]), unreferenced material and [[WP:N|notability concerns]]. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 23:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
I started making edits to clear pages from [[:Category:Pages with parser function time errors]], and found several <code>{{tl|merged-from}}</code> that you had tagged {{para|date}} with <code><nowiki><span class="bday dtstart updated"></nowiki></code>, and removing that cleared the error ([[special:diff/1264981266|DIFF]], [[special:diff/1264979445|DIFF]]). The errors happened after [[special:diff/1236992970|this 27 July 2024 template coding change]], as requested at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Merged-from#{Merged-to}_date_usage Template talk:Merged-from]. Just checking to make sure it's OK to mass-remove the <code><nowiki><span class="bday dtstart updated"></nowiki></code> since I don't know the reason why you put that there. [[User:Wbm1058|wbm1058]] ([[User talk:Wbm1058|talk]]) 14:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I have made updates so the biographical content is similar but not identical. Could you please let me know if this will work? If not, I'd love to know what some alternatives are. |
|||
Thank you, |
|||
Erin [[User:ErinD22|ErinD22]] ([[User talk:ErinD22|talk]]) 01:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, OK to remove. Thanks for checking. That was due to some template subst quirk. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency)#rfc_BD9A8AD|Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency)]] == |
|||
== Happy Holidays and Best Wishes for 2025 from VulcanSphere == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency)#rfc_BD9A8AD|this request for comment on '''Talk:Monero (cryptocurrency)''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 77843 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
{{User:VulcanSphere/HappyHolidays/2024|Kvng|– [[User:VulcanSphere|VulcanSphere]] ([[User talk:VulcanSphere|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 03:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Generalised beam theory]] has been accepted == |
|||
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">[[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] '''[[Generalised beam theory]], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on the article's [[Talk:Generalised beam theory|talk page]]. You may like to take a look at the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme|grading scheme]] to see how you can improve the article. |
|||
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to [[Wikipedia]]. {{#if: |
|||
|You may wish to consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|registering an account]] so you can create articles yourself |
|||
|Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can [[Wikipedia:Starting an article|create articles yourself]], and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] if you prefer |
|||
}}. |
|||
* If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Generalised_beam_theory help desk]</span>'''. |
|||
* If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. |
|||
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! |
|||
~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 21:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> |
Latest revision as of 03:42, 26 December 2024
|
|||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
CED VHS revert
[edit]Hi. I noticed that you reverted my edit on the CED/VHS part. I merely edited the text so it'd look more professional and encyclopedic.
What mistake did I made to warrant a revert and if you're okay with, suggest me an alternative if my edit didn't work? HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- I assume we're talking about this. The original statement was
slightly better than VHS
. Your revision made it sayslightly better than, or comparable to the VHS
. The cited source saysThe subjective evaluation of people familiar with all these formats is that CED is better than VHS
. Your revised statment takes us further from what the source says. What were you attempting to accomplish with this edit? You left no edit summary that could help me. ~Kvng (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2024 (UTC)- Fixing the grammar to make it more encyclopedic. If that didn't work, what's the alternative? HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 12:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HarlambiDaabrev, what was wrong with the grammar? "Encyclopedic" means different things to different editors. What does it mean to you? ~Kvng (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- To me it sounds more professional. Correct me if I'm wrong. HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HarlambiDaabrev, I'm not getting that. It sounds more ambiguous. I guess if you're in marketing that could translate to more professional. ~Kvng (talk) 14:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- If that's more ambiguous, then what's the alternative? HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving it as it is is the obvious alternative. Adding the
whose picture quality is
qualifier is arguably an improvement but I think this is already evident from context. ~Kvng (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)- Sorry for a very late reply. The thing is, it'd sound more neutral (per Wikipedia tone). HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 09:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article, to my eye, has an accurate summary of what's in the cited source. Your change made the summary less accurate. Degrading accuracy is not good. If you think the source is inaccurate or does not tell the whole story, let's find a better or additional source so we can write a better summary of this comparison. ~Kvng (talk) 15:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry for a very late reply. The thing is, it'd sound more neutral (per Wikipedia tone). HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 09:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Leaving it as it is is the obvious alternative. Adding the
- If that's more ambiguous, then what's the alternative? HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 14:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HarlambiDaabrev, I'm not getting that. It sounds more ambiguous. I guess if you're in marketing that could translate to more professional. ~Kvng (talk) 14:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- To me it sounds more professional. Correct me if I'm wrong. HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @HarlambiDaabrev, what was wrong with the grammar? "Encyclopedic" means different things to different editors. What does it mean to you? ~Kvng (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Fixing the grammar to make it more encyclopedic. If that didn't work, what's the alternative? HarlambiDaabrev (talk) 12:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
[edit]Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Question from Jgibbons333 (05:08, 1 December 2024)
[edit]Is there a way to report something going on that’s unethical, like people holding a pay hostage? It looks like that’s what’s happening. --Jgibbons333 (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Jgibbons333, I'm not sure what holding a pay hostage is but the ultimate place to deal with bad behavior is WP:ANI. Please read the suggestions listed there before posting because it is not a fun place to be if you can figure out a better way through the dispute. ~Kvng (talk) 14:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- So I meant holding a “page” hostage. The “Palmer report” wiki page has had multiple complaints about the way it’s written, but doesn’t seem like they are taking it seriously. I agree that it’s inaccurate to call the org. a “fake news” website. It comes off like it’s written to hurt their (palmer report’s) reputation. 173.72.130.162 (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from EditAboutIt (23:16, 2 December 2024)
[edit]Hello, I am attempting to write an article for submission called "virtual organizing" and per Wiki instructions I need to disclose my possible COI as I work in the industry as a certified professional. How do I do this? Thank you --EditAboutIt (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- @EditAboutIt, have a look at WP:DISCLOSE ~Kvng (talk) 03:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, for your help.
- I am not a paid contributor but I do work in the industry.
- I saw this link you sent me before but, due to my inexperience with Wikipedia, do not understand how to:
- add "{{connected contributor}}" to the page or my edit which I already edited: "professional organizing" or how to
- add the same required notation of COI in an article I want to add for "virtual organizing" for submission to educate the public about this new technique in professional organizing, or
- where to add this first submission and new article of "virtual organizing" in my user account for peer review.
- Kind Regards, @EditAboutIt EditAboutIt (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Engineering and technology Good Article nomination
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Yao's principle on a "Engineering and technology" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
A point of form
[edit]WP:MERGECLOSE seems to be quite nonchalant on who can close the merge: Any user, including the user who first proposed the merge, may close the discussion and move forward with the merge if enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed and there has been no discussion or if there is unanimous consent to merge. (italics is mine, but the boldface is original). So, personally, I do not see anything wrong with my closing. Викидим (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Changachireretatenda22 (17:59, 8 December 2024)
[edit]Hello how do I edit an article here on Wikipedia --Changachireretatenda22 (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Changachireretatenda22 (talk page watcher) I have just left you a more than helpful welcome message. I hope it gives you the information you need. WP:TEAHOUSE is an excellent venue to ask for extra help. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:18, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Changachireretatenda22 (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Adhikari Madan (06:08, 19 December 2024)
[edit]Is Artificial Intellegence helps in human Civilization? --Adhikari Madan (talk) 06:08, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from KCAT MAN DUE on Pink Floyd discography (19:02, 22 December 2024)
[edit]Does DavidEdwardFrancis Really BenchPress And LegPress 13000Pounds Inside 601EubankAve.Stihl13000SuperMax?GuinessWorldBookOfRecords And Ripleys Believe It Or Not Both Corporations Wrote About DavidEdwardFrancis"TheMystikalForbiddenPlanetURanus. --KCAT MAN DUE (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Christmas
[edit]Parser function time errors
[edit]I started making edits to clear pages from Category:Pages with parser function time errors, and found several {{merged-from}}
that you had tagged |date=
with <span class="bday dtstart updated">
, and removing that cleared the error (DIFF, DIFF). The errors happened after this 27 July 2024 template coding change, as requested at Template talk:Merged-from. Just checking to make sure it's OK to mass-remove the <span class="bday dtstart updated">
since I don't know the reason why you put that there. wbm1058 (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, OK to remove. Thanks for checking. That was due to some template subst quirk. ~Kvng (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays and Best Wishes for 2025 from VulcanSphere
[edit]Happy Holidays
Kvng! Vulcan Wishes A Great 2025 For You! – VulcanSphere (talk) 03:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |