Talk:Trade diversion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jonpatterns (talk | contribs) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Economics}}, {{WikiProject Trade}}. Tag: |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi |date=21 November 2017 |result='''keep''' |page=Trade diversion}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
| ⚫ | |||
{{WikiProject Trade|importance=Mid}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== New Zealand Lamb Example == |
== New Zealand Lamb Example == |
||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
== Merge from Trade creation == |
== Merge from Trade creation == |
||
{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was '''no consensus to merge'''. [[User:Shhhnotsoloud|Shhhnotsoloud]] ([[User talk:Shhhnotsoloud|talk]]) 17:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
[[Trade creation]] and trade diversion are |
[[Trade creation]] and trade diversion are (EDIT) related effects of same concept. It makes sense to use one article to write about these effects in the same place. [[User:Jonpatterns|Jonpatterns]] ([[User talk:Jonpatterns|talk]]) 10:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
:'''Oppose''' on the grounds that diversion and creation are different independently notable concepts. I accept that they are linked because they both arise as consequences of the formation of some form of customs union. They are already appropriately linked in the text as part of the [[template:trade bloc]] series (in the 'Policies' section). [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 07:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{discussion bottom}} |
|||
== References from AfD == |
|||
Possibly useful reference from the ArticleForDeletion dicussion: |
|||
* [https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr11_forum_e/wtr11_12july11_bis_e.htm ''Preferential Trade Agreements, Trade Creation and Trade Diversion''] |
|||
* "The terms trade creation and trade diversion are closely associated with Chicago School economist Jacob Viner (The Customs Union Issue, 1950)." from [http://www.economicsonline.co.uk/Global_economics/Trade_creation.html ''Trade Creation''] |
|||
* [http://internationalecon.com/Trade/Tch110/T110-2A.php ''Trade Diversion and Trade Creation''] |
|||
* [http://www.nber.org/papers/w9614 ''Migration, Spillovers,and Trade Diversion: The Impact of Internationalization on Stock Market Liquidity''] |
|||
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3131890 ''Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the Canada - United States Free Trade Agreement''] |
|||
[[User:Jonpatterns|Jonpatterns]] ([[User talk:Jonpatterns|talk]]) 16:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:41, 10 February 2024
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
New Zealand Lamb Example
[edit]Are there any sources for any of this section? I've never seen French lamb in UK supermarkets, whereas New Zealand lamb is widespread when English or Welsh lamb is out of season, and France produces far less lamb than the UK or New Zealand do according to the lamb Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.152 (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
According to statistics from the UK's Agriculture and Horticulture Development board (http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk/markets/industry-reports/uk-statistics/), the UK currently imports 5 times as much lamb from outside the EU as it does from inside the EU, with the largest EU supplier of lamb (Ireland) being around 1/7th the size of New Zealand, a situation that has been the case for several years. In light of this, I think it's unlikely that New Zealand lamb imports being replaced with French lamb imports is an example of trade diversion.
Merge from Trade creation
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was no consensus to merge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Trade creation and trade diversion are (EDIT) related effects of same concept. It makes sense to use one article to write about these effects in the same place. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose on the grounds that diversion and creation are different independently notable concepts. I accept that they are linked because they both arise as consequences of the formation of some form of customs union. They are already appropriately linked in the text as part of the template:trade bloc series (in the 'Policies' section). Klbrain (talk) 07:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
References from AfD
[edit]Possibly useful reference from the ArticleForDeletion dicussion:
- Preferential Trade Agreements, Trade Creation and Trade Diversion
- "The terms trade creation and trade diversion are closely associated with Chicago School economist Jacob Viner (The Customs Union Issue, 1950)." from Trade Creation
- Trade Diversion and Trade Creation
- Migration, Spillovers,and Trade Diversion: The Impact of Internationalization on Stock Market Liquidity
- Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the Canada - United States Free Trade Agreement