User talk:JBKramer: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→ArbCom elections are now open!: new section |
|||
| (205 intermediate revisions by 69 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |
|||
After consultation with the local authorities and the TelCo, the series of hangup calls I received after getting what I believed were spurrious death threats were an unrelated automated phone calling system (Which was apparently deeply distressed about the entire event). I apologize for alarming anyone. Additionally, I claim this username as my own. [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] - [[User talk:Hipocrite|«<small>Talk</small>»]] 15:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
|- |
|||
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by Werdnabot. Any sections older than '''7''' days are automatically archived to '''[[User talk:JBKramer/Archive/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}}06]]'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
|||
|- |
|||
|}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-7 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:JBKramer/Archive/{{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}}06--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> |
|||
== This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein! == |
|||
==Your edits to Sexually transmitted disease== |
|||
Your change to the page [[:Sexually transmitted disease]] was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome page]] if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks.<!-- Template:Vw-n (first level warning) --> <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Qrc2006|Qrc2006]] ([[User talk:Qrc2006|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Qrc2006|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small> |
|||
{{MCB AID|current=Peripheral membrane protein|last=RNA interference}} – [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 18:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:LIVING]] == |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
I have reverted this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Eric_Lerner&diff=80724775&oldid=80722334] on [[Eric Lerner]]. It is very important for you to understand [[WP:LIVING]], also known as [[WP:BLP]], which mandates careful following of the main Wikipedia policies [[WP:V|verifiability]] and [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] especially with respect to articles on living people, like Eric Lerner. What you added is unsourced negative information that does not exist in sources: no one has written enough about Lerner to make claims like that. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 01:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing a motion to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to the case linked above. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict ("articles which relate to pseudoscience, broadly interpreted") if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. |
|||
:I'm surprised you bring up that paragraph because it specifically condemns the edit of yours that I reverted. Go look at that quote from Jimbo again. What he is saying there is that theories someone espouses shouldn't necessarily make it into the encyclopedia. The separation between ones that should and ones that shouldn't is whether or not they've been published. Right? Well, Lerner's theories are real and have received significant coverage. However, ''your'' theory that Lerner's work has been ignored by the mainstream community remains something that you conclude, based on no sources any one has presented. It may be true, but if you can't source it, your theory is just like the physics crankery Jimbo is talking about. It has no place on the encyclopedia without sourcing. And while we're at it, I advise you to reexamine your attitude about Lerner. You may think he's a "physics crank" but (1) he's well-published and his theories are notable, and (2) regardless of anything else, he is a public figure and deserves fair and careful treatment. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 03:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
The final text of the motions can be found at the case page linked above. |
|||
::And I didn't object to any edit other than the one I mention above. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 11:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
— [[User:Coren|Coren]] <sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> ''for the Arbitration Committee,'' 14:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Soliciting on Wikipedia? If so, show me and I'll be happy to get involved with his behavior as a Wikipedia user. Otherwise, I really don't care. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<font color="orange">'''juice'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 15:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Civility == |
|||
== Probable Roy Lopez Out Break on Deflation == |
|||
Hi, I noticed you have written material on and shown an interest in civility on wikipedia. I have created a poll page to gauge community feelings on how civility is managed in practice currently at [[Wikipedia:Civility/Poll]], so input from as many people as possible is welcomed. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
It's his style and favorite ISP. |
|||
== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] == |
|||
I got a threatening phone call from him again a few days ago stating he has more wikipedia accounts. Proceed carefully this troll or trolls also engages in harassing behavior IRL. |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
[[User:Stirling_Newberry |Stirling Newberry]] 12:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692039973 --> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Hello, |
|||
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience]]. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Evidence]]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience/Workshop]]. |
|||
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 11:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Thank you for supporting my RfA, and thank you for understanding my answers to the questions! |
|||
[[User:Atlant|Atlant]] 14:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Vandalism == |
|||
Knowlingly introducing incorrect information into articles is Vandalism. Please stop. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 17:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Your Personal Attack == |
|||
Personal attacks, such as calling someone a "liar" is against Wikipedia policy and generally uncivil and totally not cool. Stop. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 18:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==edit conflict== |
|||
There was a edit conflict regarding the talk derek smart page, and I have inadvertently deleted one of your comments I think in the process of trying to clear it up. My apologies and I would be gratefull if you could put your comment back. Sorry for the trouble.[[User:Kerr avon|Kerr avon]] 13:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Fixed. [[User:JBKramer|JBKramer]] 13:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== One more vote for the coordinator of the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject == |
|||
Since two of the three editors nominated for Coordinator of the MCB Wikiproject [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Votes/director nominations|declined their nominations]], one more vote has been posted: should the remaining nominee, ClockworkSoul, be named as the coordinator, or should nominations be reopened? Every opinion counts, so [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology/Votes/director final vote|please vote]]! – [[User:ClockworkSoul|Clockwork]][[User_talk:ClockworkSoul|<b>Soul</b>]] 17:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Personal Attacks == |
|||
Calling me a racist because I disagree with you on deflation is not cool. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 16:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: I have done no such thing. [[User:JBKramer|JBKramer]] 16:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Your Attention is invited to == |
|||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/RuyLopez] Stop accusing me of sockpuppetry. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 16:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:I will request whatever I decide to request. Please respond to my request for sources on the talk page of the article in question. [[User:JBKramer|JBKramer]] 16:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::So, you're saying that you will resort to slander, personal attacks, and outright dishonest activity to achieve your stated goals? You must be extremely immature to resort to such tactics. Stop accusing me of being a racist as well, or I will be forced to take further action. Furthermore, sources have been provided, perhaps you should actually look at the article instead of wasting your time requesting pointless check users. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 17:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::: I have made no such statements. [[User:JBKramer|JBKramer]] 17:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Yes, you have, and you just did. I'm watching you, don't harass me because we disagree. Your general character is well known throughout the community, as well as your lack of couth. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 17:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::::: Thank you for your concern. Please provide the requested sources. [[User:JBKramer|JBKramer]] 17:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:::::: Again, they are there right in front of you. Open your eyes, for you are being blind. Perhaps you're blind due to your own arrogance. [[User:81.117.200.27|81.117.200.27]] 17:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:05, 23 November 2015
Update
[edit]After consultation with the local authorities and the TelCo, the series of hangup calls I received after getting what I believed were spurrious death threats were an unrelated automated phone calling system (Which was apparently deeply distressed about the entire event). I apologize for alarming anyone. Additionally, I claim this username as my own. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!
[edit]| Peripheral membrane protein The Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject's current Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein. |
– ClockworkSoul 18:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing a motion to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to the case linked above. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict ("articles which relate to pseudoscience, broadly interpreted") if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
The final text of the motions can be found at the case page linked above.
— Coren (talk) for the Arbitration Committee, 14:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Civility
[edit]Hi, I noticed you have written material on and shown an interest in civility on wikipedia. I have created a poll page to gauge community feelings on how civility is managed in practice currently at Wikipedia:Civility/Poll, so input from as many people as possible is welcomed. Casliber (talk · contribs) 23:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)