Jump to content

Talk:Nazi Party: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Dsteakley (talk | contribs)
74 edits
Reverted 1 edit by 73.68.193.197 (talk): Obvious trolling
 
(860 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Skip to talk}}{{Nazism left wing}}
{{Warning RS and OR}}
{{Nazi common name}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Controversial}}
{{Not a forum|the [[Nazi Party]]}}
{{FAQ|collapsed=no}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{calm}}
{{calm}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Germany |importance=high |Munich=yes |MunichImp=High}}
{{WikiProject History |importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=high|political-parties=yes |political-parties-importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=High}}
{{WikiProject European history |importance=high}}
}}
{{On this day|date1=2014-02-24|oldid1=596812125|date2=2015-02-24|oldid2=648638646}}
{{On this day|date1=2014-02-24|oldid1=596812125|date2=2015-02-24|oldid2=648638646}}
{{Old move
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
|from1 = National Socialist German Workers Party
{{WikiProject Germany|class=C|importance=high|Munich=yes|MunichImp=High}}
|destination1 = Nazi Party
{{WikiProject History|class=C|importance=high}}
|result1 = not moved
{{WikiProject Politics|political-parties=yes|fascism=yes|class=C|importance=high}}
|date1 = [[Talk:Nazi Party/Archive 1#Requested move|6 March 2005]]
}}
|from2 = National Socialist German Workers Party
{{old moves|1=
|destination2 = Nazi Party
* [[Talk:Nazi Party/Archive 2#Name of article]], '''moved to Nazi Party'''
|result2 = moved
* [[Talk:Nazi Party#RFC]], support current title, "Nazi Party"
|date2 = [[Talk:Nazi Party/Archive 2#Requested move, 2007|13 November 2006]]
|from3 = National Socialist German Workers Party
|destination3 = Nazi Party
|result3 = moved
|date3 = [[Talk:Nazi Party/Archive 2#Name of article|29 April 2008]]
}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
|archiveheader = {{Talkarchive}}
| archive = Talk:Nazi Party/Archive %(counter)d
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 6
| counter = 8
| maxarchivesize = 150K
|minthreadsleft = 4
| archiveheader = {{Talkarchive}}
|algo = old(100d)
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
|archive = Talk:Nazi Party/Archive %(counter)d
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
}}


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 August 2024 ==
== The National Socialist German Workers' Party was leftist, not rightist ==

Sorry but this statement is inaccurate "The National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: About this sound Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (help·info), abbreviated NSDAP), commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party (/ˈnɑːtsi/), was a far-right political party in Germany that was active between 1920 and 1945 and practised the ideology of Nazism. Its precursor, the German Workers' Party (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei; DAP), existed from 1919 to 1920." The Nazi party is LEFT-WING ideology, as many of the posters on this 'talk page' point out.
The thesis that because this is a common mistake in common parlance and in literature does not mean that it is correct to reinforce the mistake with continued misrepresentation. The facts are that the leftist policies of the Nazi party are clear to those who care to read about it. Wikipedia does a disservice to understanding history to refer to the Nazi party as 'right-wing'. There were no right-wing policies of the Nazi's save two: patriotism and respect for tradition. These are not exclusively Right-Wing policies, only the ones Nazism and current right-wing adherents share. The policies the Nazi's shared with the left-wing adherents share are more numerous and salient.
These are:
Social equality and egalitarianism, an opposition to society inequalities - especially financial, and opposition to tiers in society such as castes. Nazis and Left-wingers are radicals, reformists, and revolutionary.

For sources try searching Wikipedia: Left wing <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/139.62.53.207|139.62.53.207]] ([[User talk:139.62.53.207#top|talk]]) 19:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Patriotism is not a right-wing policy. The word you're looking for is "nationalism". [[Special:Contributions/47.185.39.179|47.185.39.179]] ([[User talk:47.185.39.179|talk]]) 00:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Please fix this. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/139.62.53.207|139.62.53.207]] ([[User talk:139.62.53.207#top|talk]]) 19:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Content is based on what reliable sources say. While the opinion you suggest is found on many websites expressing fringe views, that is not how experts see it. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 20:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

:: Calling Nazis left-wing is close to mockery towards the thousands of communist/socialist victims of Nazism.

Completely agree. Socialism in its very definition is left wing. Therefore this whole page is considered factually incorrect and has no merit. [[User:Flyingpenguin74|Flyingpenguin74]] ([[User talk:Flyingpenguin74|talk]]) 04:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

And furthermore it is NOT making a mockery towards the thousands of socialists as those that were victims ie sent to camps in 1933 I know personally were those that opposed Hitler and why he lost the national elections twice. Hitler used the Sturmabteilung to create chaos and violence towards opponents and as the Sturmabteilung were mainly ex soldiers from WW1 would then restore order as the Police were not as well organised or prepared for such circumstances. And as such once Hitler was chancellor in 1933 the camps were opened and his opposition imprisoned. [[User:Flyingpenguin74|Flyingpenguin74]] ([[User talk:Flyingpenguin74|talk]]) 05:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

== Right wing? ==

The last time i checked, socialism is a far left wing ideology. [[User:Rancoridge333|Rancoridge333]] ([[User talk:Rancoridge333|talk]]) 13:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
:Please read the FAQ found at the top of this very page for more information. (Or click [[/FAQ|here]]). —&nbsp;[[User:Nihlus Kryik|<span style="font-weight:bold; font-family:Segoe Script; color:red;">nihlus kryik</span>]]&nbsp;&nbsp;([[User talk:Nihlus Kryik|<span style="font-family:Segoe Script; color:silver;">talk</span>]]) 13:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

:Socialism is not considered a far left ideology. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 05:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Socialism, fascism, and to a specific notice, Nazism are all far left ideologies, as was the concept of pro-slavery by the confederacy during the American Civil War. Any claim of the Nazi party being "right wing" is false, as the Nazis were extremely left wing. Fascism itself is defined as a left wing ideology, not associated with the right wing. Right wing ideologies favor capitalism. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pietric Learning Stone|Pietric Learning Stone]] ([[User talk:Pietric Learning Stone#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pietric Learning Stone|contribs]]) 13:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)</small>
:Fascism was pro-capitalist and [[Ludwig von Mises]] was the chief economic adviser to the Austrian fascists. Slavery too was capitalist as it was defended by property rights. I agree though that socialists, who were the only ones who did not vote to give Hitler absolute power, were left wing. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 14:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
::Pietric Learning Stone - Please read the prior discussions on this subject on this talk page, including [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nazi_Party/Archive_6] Archive 6 and the "Frequently asked questions" section, as well. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek|talk]]) 15:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

== Overlinking ==

“anti-semitism” (and its variants- anti-semitic, etc.)is linked a lot in the article, which following the manual of style probably should be avoided, so should we change that? Also I assume other terms are probably overlinked as well. [[User:SimplicityWalrus|SimplicityWalrus]] ([[User talk:SimplicityWalrus|talk]]) 14:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
:Go ahead and check the article; it happens, usually when additions occur to sections and editors don't realize something has been already linked or it happens due to editors not knowing, there should be one link to something in the lead and one link at its first mention in the body of an article. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek|talk]]) 18:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2017 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Nazi Party|answered=yes}}
I was reading about left wing socialist policies recently and then decided to check the wiki.
Why does Nazi party is described as being right wing, even though there was almost nothing right wing in it, especially in terms of what they were advocating for?

That makes little sense and looks like someone tried to redifine the meaning.
By that logic, US republicans should be socialists or advocating for only one race, since they too are labeled “right-wing”. But that is incorrect, because their economic and racial policies are completely opposite of that. So, what gives? Who labebeled Nazi party of Germany left wing and where is the source that indicates that? [[User:Sunamer|Sunamer]] ([[User talk:Sunamer|talk]]) 22:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
* We have a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nazi_Party/FAQ FAQ] at the beginning of this page. {{emoji|1F602}} [[User:Dave Dial|Dave Dial]] ([[User talk:Dave Dial|talk]]) 22:54, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
:Because what articles say is based on reliable sources not uninformed people such as yourself. If you want to argue that Nazis were left-wing, the moon landing was faked and Barack Obama was born in Kenya, then go to a conspiracy theory website. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 00:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
::[[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] please remember WP:BITE, the response above yours was sufficient. [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 15:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
:::Not sure I agree, [[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]]. The amount of times people come to these articles just to complain Nazis were left-wing is disproportionally high. Most of them want to [[WP:SOAP|want to make a point]] without actually trying to build a Wiki and should be told in no unclear terms that [[WP:NOTHERE|that's not appropriate behaviour]] here. Besides, if they look one or two sections above theirs, they'll know why the article is the way it is. PS: I do think personal attacks should be avoided at all times, of course. [[User:Prinsgezinde|Prinsgezinde]] ([[User talk:Prinsgezinde|talk]]) 21:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
::::True, what is the solution? the previous post provided the faq. the mass of wikipedians are uninformed, as well as the readers, it is the very reason they are here, to become informed. belittling someone's perceived lack of information does not seem helpful to me.[[User:Darkstar1st|Darkstar1st]] ([[User talk:Darkstar1st|talk]]) 18:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

== National Socialism or Nazism? ==

{{ping|Carptrash}} {{ping|Helper201}}
Take the discussion here.
[[User:GaiusoftheJulii|GaiusoftheJulii]] ([[User talk:GaiusoftheJulii|talk]]) 23:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
:If you wish to use "National Socialism" instead of "Nazism", then the more appropriate action would be to request a move of the [[Nazism]] article. [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 00:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
::That has been tried before (more than once) but it always falls foul of [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. Nazism is almost always called Nazism in English speaking countries. This is the term used in most English language books on the subject. Generally the term "National Socialism" is not widely understood. (This is the reverse of the way it runs in German speaking countries which is why the German language Wikipeda articles are different.) In the past we have had people wanting to change it in order to further a bizarre political agenda that seeks to conflate Nazism with unrelated left wing ideologies, either in a ham fisted attempt to rehabilitate Nazism in some way, or else to taint the left by association with it. I do not think that renaming the article would aid anybody's understanding of the subject.
::So, I think the long-standing consensus is that it is fine as it is. Anybody following the link to [[Nazism]] will be told that "National Socialism", "Nationalsozialismus" and "Nazism" are all names for the same thing in the very first sentence. Anybody searching for [[National Socialism]] will be redirected to the [[Nazism]] article. Anybody looking for other stuff with similar names will find a link to [[National Socialism (disambiguation)]] which lists a depressing number of Nazi influenced organisations as well as a few other unfortunate organisations that just happen to have similar names. In short: I think that we have the correct articles with the correct names in order to provide our readers with the information they want under the titles they most expect to find it. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 02:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
:::[[WP:COMMONNAME]] applies. Also clearly given the English Wikipedia article name it is the appropriate one to use. No consensus to change it. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek|talk]]) 04:34, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2018 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Nazi Party|answered=yes}}
nazis were socialist work party, they were leftist.
I know the modern left hate that, but it does not change the fact [[Special:Contributions/81.234.198.202|81.234.198.202]] ([[User talk:81.234.198.202|talk]]) 23:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
:{{not done}} You know, you could've just took a glance at this page before posting the request. The [[Talk:Nazi_Party/FAQ|FAQ]] is also helpful. [[User:Byteflush|<b style="font-family:courier;box-shadow:2px 1px 4px #aaa;border:1px solid #ccc;padding:0 6px;background:linear-gradient(#fff,#ddd);color:#476;border-radius:6px">byteflush</b>]] <sub style="margin:0 2px">[[User talk:Byteflush|Talk]]</sub> 00:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


{{Edit extended-protected|Nazi Party|answered=yes}}
== Nazi Party was a party of the far right? ==


<!--Don't remove anything above this line.-->
In the context of the political spectrum in Germany at the time the Nazi Party's rise and dominance, the parties of the right favored rule by the old establised elites, with a significant group at the far right of the spectrum favoring a return to monarchy. The views of the true far right in Germany at this time are millions of miles away from the views of the Nazi party. At the end of the day, however, lableing the Nazi Party as a party of the far right comes down to one's definition of the term "far right." Upon examination, it will emerge that people who want this article to say that the Nazi Party was of the far right are engaged in a circular defition of the term.


This statement has no place in this article. The motivation of those who want it in the article is to denigrate the modern political right. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 20:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
*The motivations of those that are reverting you are that they understand that the overwhelming consensus of scholars/sources label the Nazi Party as right-wing. Read the [[Talk:Nazi_Party/FAQ|FAQ]]. [[User:Dave Dial|Dave Dial]] ([[User talk:Dave Dial|talk]]) 20:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


* '''What I think should be changed (format using {{tl|textdiff}})''': {{TextDiff|beginning to adopt elements of the Fascist's and Mussolini for the Nazi Party|beginning to adopt elements of (Italian?) Fascism and Mussolini's program (?)}}
Please cite this alleged overwhelming consensus. I have read the FAQ. This claim is complete nonsense. No one in Germany in the 20s, 30s and 40s would have described the Nazis as a party of the right. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 20:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
* '''Why it should be changed''': Just a grammatical/clarity issue in this sentence, under the "Adoption of Italian fascism" section. "Mussolini's program" could also be "Mussolini's public persona" or something else that better fits the source content.


I mean, seriously. Next you'll be claiming that the Soviet Union was far right. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 20:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


[[Special:Contributions/72.198.204.223|72.198.204.223]] ([[User talk:72.198.204.223|talk]]) 18:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
There are two key defining characteristics of the far right in Germany during this period: a desire to restore the monarchy, and a reverence for the church. Hitler and the Nazis embraced neither of these positions, and in fact were violently opposed to these positions. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 21:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
<!--Don't remove anything below this line-->
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 00:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
::{{Fixed}}. I'm not surew hat M.Bitton found unclear. My fix was more concise [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Nazi_Party&diff=1258762619&oldid=1257493776] than that proposed above, but the grammar problems were pretty obvious. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 14:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)


== Changing the title ==
:We are not making this stuff up ourselves or promoting a fringe view here. This really is what the post 1945 mainstream academic consensus is. Even most right wing historians agree with it. If you doubt this then go to a library and checkout some reliable mainstream history books, such as the ones we use as references.
:You make a partially correct point when you talk about how Nazism was viewed before 1939. The Nazis sought to confuse people as to their real nature and pretended to be left, right and "third way" when they thought this would suit their purposes. The key point here is that Nazis lie. Nothing they say can be taken at face value. If Hitler says that the sky is blue you stick your head out the window to check.
:Finally, please don't worry that anybody is calling normal right wing people Nazis. Nobody is doing that! Nazis are an extreme, weird and pathological case. Normal right wing people are not Nazis. Normal left wing people are not Stalinists. Most fish are not sharks.
:(Oh, and I did once know a few socialists who were very adamant that the Soviet Union was really right wing from Stalin onwards. They were wrong too.) --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 21:06, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


I think instead of the term "Nazi Party", the title should be changed to the official name "National Socialist German Workers' Party". [[User:Lumofe|Lumofe]] ([[User talk:Lumofe|talk]]) 20:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
No serious scholar would engage in the extremely pointless discussion of whether the nazis were right wing or left wing. If you can cite a serious scholar who actually takes up this point in writing, please cite it, or stop claiming that you can do so. Note that I am not arguing that the article should say that the Nazis were a party of the left. That would be as false and inappropriate as what this article currently says. And what on earth could be the basis for a claim that, in the context of Germany at the time, the Nazis were viewed as right wing?? And if that's not the point of having this in the article, if the point is that modern left wing chuckleheads cast the Nazis as a part of the right, that is totally inappropriate. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 21:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


:Look at the third box at the top of this page. [[User:AntiDionysius|<span style="color:green">AntiDionysius</span>]] (<span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:AntiDionysius|talk]]</span>) 20:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I enjoy a good debate as much as the next man. And this is my first ride on this wikpedia editing dispute train. I cannot imagine how what we are doing right now is going to resolve this situation. How is this process supposed to resolve this dispute? [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 21:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


== Can you edit the Nazi Party page ==
:Dude! Are you really convinced that this is something we just made up? That it is something that just dropped from the sky? I can assure you that you have it completely backwards. The bizarre idea that the Nazis were left wing has only really started making noise in the last few years. 10 years ago almost nobody had heard of it. Just a few people thought otherwise and were regarded as pretty out there. Even now, if I mention the idea to people here in the UK they look at me blankly and assume that anybody trying to recast the Nazis must themselves be Nazis trying to rehabilitate their ideology.
:Anyway, you want sources. The best thing is to check out the sources used on the [[Nazism]] article which covers this in more depth. --[[User:DanielRigal|DanielRigal]] ([[User talk:DanielRigal|talk]]) 21:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


because Germany didn't ban the public display Nazi symbols until 1953, despite the Nazi Party party being dissolved and abolished in 1945, so fix the date of it being banned to 1953, and add the Dissolved date and moved October 10, 1945 to the dissolved section. [[User:Djdjfjfjfnfn012|Djdjfjfjfnfn012]] ([[User talk:Djdjfjfjfnfn012|talk]]) 18:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Dude! just give me one source for this specific false claim, that the Nazis were a party of the far right. You keep claiming you can do it, but you keep failing to do so. I've read literally hundreds of books and articles about the Nazis. I don't need a general list of references about the Nazis. Just please give me your best, most credible source for this extremely specific point, or please stop claiming that you can do so. And, again, I am not arguing that the Nazis should be described as a party of the left. Surprising no one, there is no source cited for this false claim in the article. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 21:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


== Two conflicting FAQ pages ==
Here's an article <ref>https://mises.org/library/why-nazism-was-socialism-and-why-socialism-totalitarian</ref> from the Mises Institute which refutes the false claim made in this FAQ that the Nazi regime was a capitalist regime. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 21:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
:Dude. Here is one. A start. https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Nazism-considered-far-right-in-political-terms Also here is your institute https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mises-daily/ [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 21:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


This talk page has an embedded FAQ section transcluded from [[Talk:Nazi Party/FAQ]], and there is also [[Talk:Nazism/FAQ]], transcluded into its parent page and into some talkpage-notice templates. These should be merged, concisely, so there's just one maintenance spot addressing the same perennial questions. I would suggest that the proper location for this would be [[Talk:Nazi Party/FAQ]], and just transclude from there as needed (and redirect [[Talk:Nazism/FAQ]] to it). <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 13:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
with all due respect, i thought you promised me a scholar who would advocate for this baseless (and pointless) position. a chucklehead on Quora is not what I would describe as highly persuasive. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 22:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
:Please show me where I promised you anything. [[User:Carptrash|Carptrash]] ([[User talk:Carptrash|talk]]) 22:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


PS: Some of the content in the Nazism version is markedly better. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family:'Trebuchet MS'"> — [[User:SMcCandlish|'''SMcCandlish''']] [[User talk:SMcCandlish|☏]] [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|¢]] 😼 </span> 14:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
I apologize, I assumed incorrectly that your comment had been posted by DanielRigal. [[User:Dsteakley|Dsteakley]] ([[User talk:Dsteakley|talk]]) 22:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
:Agree. [[User:Kierzek|Kierzek]] ([[User talk:Kierzek|talk]]) 14:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:20, 27 December 2024

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 August 2024

[edit]


  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):
    −
    beginning to adopt elements of the Fascist's and Mussolini for the Nazi Party
    		+
    beginning to adopt elements of (Italian?) Fascism and Mussolini's program (?)
  • Why it should be changed: Just a grammatical/clarity issue in this sentence, under the "Adoption of Italian fascism" section. "Mussolini's program" could also be "Mussolini's public persona" or something else that better fits the source content.


72.198.204.223 (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 00:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed. I'm not surew hat M.Bitton found unclear. My fix was more concise [1] than that proposed above, but the grammar problems were pretty obvious.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the title

[edit]

I think instead of the term "Nazi Party", the title should be changed to the official name "National Socialist German Workers' Party". Lumofe (talk) 20:15, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the third box at the top of this page. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you edit the Nazi Party page

[edit]

because Germany didn't ban the public display Nazi symbols until 1953, despite the Nazi Party party being dissolved and abolished in 1945, so fix the date of it being banned to 1953, and add the Dissolved date and moved October 10, 1945 to the dissolved section. Djdjfjfjfnfn012 (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two conflicting FAQ pages

[edit]

This talk page has an embedded FAQ section transcluded from Talk:Nazi Party/FAQ, and there is also Talk:Nazism/FAQ, transcluded into its parent page and into some talkpage-notice templates. These should be merged, concisely, so there's just one maintenance spot addressing the same perennial questions. I would suggest that the proper location for this would be Talk:Nazi Party/FAQ, and just transclude from there as needed (and redirect Talk:Nazism/FAQ to it).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  13:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Some of the content in the Nazism version is markedly better.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Kierzek (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nazi_Party&oldid=1265472285"