User talk:Justinedowns/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Justinedowns (talk | contribs) Replying to peer review |
reply to peer review |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{reply to|Jmphillip}} Thanks for the feedback! I was wondering if you could specify which areas you think could be refined/have citations added to them? |
{{reply to|Jmphillip}} Thanks for the feedback! I was wondering if you could specify which areas you think could be refined/have citations added to them? |
||
[[User:Justinedowns|Justinedowns]] ([[User talk:Justinedowns|talk]]) 02:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Justinedowns |
[[User:Justinedowns|Justinedowns]] ([[User talk:Justinedowns|talk]]) 02:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Justinedowns |
||
{{reply to|Justinedowns}} The section after the long list of needs you wrote that you were unsure. I think that part could be looked at and refined. As for citations, just anything that you mentioned that can be cited to a reliable source should be. Hope that helps. [[User:Jmphillip|Jmphillip]] ([[User talk:Jmphillip|talk]]) 15:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Great Article, really fits well together. I would recommend overlooking the "list of needs section" and trying to find reliable sources for that if you can. Also try to add more for the criticism and the explanation section. Great work! [[User:Bethpallen|Bethpallen]] ([[User talk:Bethpallen|talk]]) 02:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:35, 17 March 2018
I think the edits you have made so far, to the article you chose, make the information flow together much more smoothly. The information you have added also provides more detail and understanding to your topic. It is easy to read and I think you have done a great job so far. There are just a few areas that could be refined and citations added. Jmphillip (talk) 14:36, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
@Jmphillip: Thanks for the feedback! I was wondering if you could specify which areas you think could be refined/have citations added to them? Justinedowns (talk) 02:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Justinedowns
@Justinedowns: The section after the long list of needs you wrote that you were unsure. I think that part could be looked at and refined. As for citations, just anything that you mentioned that can be cited to a reliable source should be. Hope that helps. Jmphillip (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Great Article, really fits well together. I would recommend overlooking the "list of needs section" and trying to find reliable sources for that if you can. Also try to add more for the criticism and the explanation section. Great work! Bethpallen (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)