Jump to content

Talk:Catgirl: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Block evasion
 
(248 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}}
{{WikiProject Anime and manga|class=B}}
{{Template:WikiProject Cats|class=B}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Anime and manga|importance=Mid}}
{{AMCOTW candidate}}
{{WikiProject Furry|importance=Low}}
==Archive==
{{WikiProject Women}}
Archives of older discussions are found here: [[Talk:Catgirl/Archive 1|1]]
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}}
}}
{{notice|{{find}}}}
{{old prod full}}


{{archivebox|search=yes|auto=yes}}
<!-- For use later
&middot; [[Talk:Catgirl/Archive 2|2]]
-->


== Nei and Rika ==
== Possible new inclusions ==
Trying to clear up the Numan (newman) catgirl thing:
In the Nei's Adventure telemodem game, there is grass (catnip) that Nei feels a sense of happiness when she approaches it and picks it up. Also during this game she makes friends very easily with a bunch of cats which are also vital to finishing the game with. <small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:CatguyPaladin|CatguyPaladin]] ([[User talk:CatguyPaladin|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/CatguyPaladin|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->


==Article mergers of [[Kemonomimi]] and [[Catgirl]]==
In any case, the two articles have been suggested for merger. My opinion is that it probably should be merged together, whether one title or another (probably as Catgirl, since that's the more familiar term to laymen), but they need to be merged.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 19:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
:I also think they should be '''merge'''d. What about [Category:Kemonomimi], though? --[[User:Dogcow|moof]] 20:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
::Catgirl can be placed in there, and it can remain as is. Othewise, it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Categories for Deletion|CFD]] for renaming as needed.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 20:58, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
:I support merging the articles under [[Kemonomimi]], as a catgirl is a kemonomimi, but not vice versa. --[[User:Nihonjoe|日本穣]] 21:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)


# Information about furry vs nekomimi eg http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/File:FurryChart.jpg
::I would have to disagree, while it is true that Catgirls would fall under Kemonomimi, Catgirls make up an incredibly large group of the Kemonomimi, possibly over 95%, it is more than likely if somebody is searching for this information, they are searching for "Catgirls" and havent even heard the term Kemonomimi. Not to mention that this would confuse anyone that is unfamiliar with either terms and attempting to look up information on them. Finally, the words are highly different, "Catgirls" is the english way of saying Nekomimi (Literally "Cat Ears", Japan's equivelent of saying Catgirl (Nekomusume)) while "Kemonomimi" is a Japanese word for "Beast Ears", basically our equivelent of saying "Animalgirls", it dosent make sense to merge an English word under a Japanese word, nor would it make sense to change "Catgirl" to "Nekomimi" since it would make this information harder to locate for people that do not unow anything about Japanese.<small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:24.12.218.236|24.12.218.236]] ([[User talk:24.12.218.236|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/24.12.218.236|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->
# [[Imageboard]] culture and catgirls.
# Products related to catgirls, images of headbands possible cosplay images.
# A lot more about catgirls and their prevalence in Japanese culture.


I think the article as it stands misses a lot of interesting information. I believe the primary reason for this is that it is very hard to produce citations for this topic. Any suggestions of sources likely to be citeable would be appreciated. For example http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cat_girl actually is a far better article then what we have at this point - [[User:Bostwickenator|Bostwickenator]] ([[User talk:Bostwickenator|talk]]) 08:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
:The articles should remain separate, as said above. The catgirls have many supporters who aren't quite interested in other kemonomimi.<small>&mdash;''The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User:217.11.246.244|217.11.246.244]] ([[User talk:217.11.246.244|talk]]&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/217.11.246.244|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->


== Porting over information from ja.wikipedia ==
:I also agree articles should remain seperate. If you combine these, you may as well as combine in Kitsunes and such. Really, putting Kemonomimi as part of Catgirl is just making it harder for people to find something.[[User:Dragon Hilord|Dragon Hilord]] 22:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8C%AB%E8%80%B3 has a better article. Even when I read it through Google translate. Can we get someone who can translate Japanese to help bring it across? [[User:Bostwickenator|Bostwickenator]] ([[User talk:Bostwickenator|talk]]) 10:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
I agree, we should keep intact and separate this article under the "Catgirl" name. I leave kemonomimi as is, as I don't know what it really means however. :) But most people may search for catgirls or nekomimi, the latter is a redirection page, soo it's taking here. --[[User:Rev-san|Rev-san]] 20:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)


== Image change to Wikipe-tan ==
Well I admit that Kemonomimi is not in very common usage, but it is being used on some imageboards so I thought it was gaining ''enough'' usage to have a wikipedia article. - [[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 07:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
{{Multiple image| image1 = Hyou-chan.svg |caption1 = [[:File:Hyou-chan.svg ]] | image2 = Neko Wikipe-tan.svg| caption2 = [[:File:Neko Wikipe-tan.svg]] |total_width=300| footer=Which image?}}
[[User:Billhpike|Billhpike]] and [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjaminikuta]] - with regard to [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Catgirl&diff=next&oldid=903523779 this] reversion here - I see nothing wrong with the suggested change from a generic catgirl to that of Wikipe-tan. The Wikipe-tan image has a couple of advantages over the current image - it's higher resolution, has an article dedicated to the subject, and doesn't have a large blank area at the top, which is purely aesthetic, but still a waste of image space.


What reasons are there to ''not'' use the Wikipe-tan image? [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 07:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
If [[Kemonomimi]] is going to be kept, then the List of Catgirls needs to be thinned out and the kemonomimi need to be moved over there.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 13:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
:Ok--[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 14:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


: Thanks for the ping. I also think Wikipe-tan is simply better drawn. Furthermore, the Japanese version uses that image. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 07:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
:The topic of [[Kemonomimi]] is so wide, you can't really combine them and honestly think somebody wouldn't change it back eventually. For one thing, it means (and i quote) ''[[Kemonomimi]] is an [[anime]] and [[manga]] terminology that describes characters that possess animal like features''. If anything, other catagories like Kitsunes, Gryphon, Phoenix and so on. While minor, it's hardly a task to find information about characters. To thin out the list maybe a good idea, but I think it would be much easier for people looking for content with that context in mind. Adult-oriented show characters may be good to weed out for the younger audience, but overall, you're just removing from the information of wikipedia, information meant to be shared openly. [[User:Dragon Hilord|Dragon Hilord]] 23:26, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
: [[WP:Wikipe-tan]] {{tq|is not an encyclopedia article, but a page in the Wikipedia namespace.}}. — <b>[[User:Billhpike|BillHPike]]</b> <small>([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]], [[Special:contribs/Billhpike|contribs]])</small> 07:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


:: So? That doesn't mean we can't use the image. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 08:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
: I vote that the two articles should remain seperate, but with clearer links between them - Although Catgirls are a form of Kemonomimi, this term is not in common usage and may confuse casual anime fans. Catgirls are the most popular form of Kemonomimi and should get there own category.--[[User:Crais459|Crais459]] 07:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
:::Per [[WP:SELF]] {{tq|self-references within Wikipedia articles to the Wikipedia project should be avoided.}} We have a suitable alternative image, so there is no need to use Wikipe-tan. — <b>[[User:Billhpike|BillHPike]]</b> <small>([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]], [[Special:contribs/Billhpike|contribs]])</small> 09:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


:::: I don't think this sort of thing is what that's talking about. The image would work just fine in a non-Wikipedia format. As another example, [[Screenshot]] uses an image of Wikipedia. [[User:Benjaminikuta|Benjamin]] ([[User talk:Benjaminikuta|talk]]) 10:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
I don't especially think they should be merged. Catgirls are so popular that they need their own category, and yet Kemonomimi is the broader term. It can be argued that anyone looking for info is interested in catgirls, but I came looking to find out what the blanket term for characters with animal features was. My interest was sparked by InuYasha and Loveless. In both cases, the main character is a male Kemonomimi and not a catgirl at all.
{{ec}}
::::That's not what WP:Self is for. WP:Self is to prevent internal or recursive use of reference to Wikipedia so when it's taken out of context the subject still makes sense to somebody who may not be reading a Wikiepedia article. In this case (as an example of a catgirl,) the use of Wikipe-tan is still obvious without context or additional explanation.
::::Moreover, as pointed out - the alternative is not suitable in that Wikipe-tan is a superior quality image. Wikipedia should use the best material available, and on those grounds Wikipe-tan trumps Hyou-chan.
::::[[WP:OTHER|Precedent]] has already been set - the image was present in this article from at least [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Catgirl&diff=560832202&oldid=559043166 June 2013] up until [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Catgirl&diff=893540523&oldid=886730853 April 2019], and Wikipe-tan is the lead image in [[List of catgirls]], and although you tried to remove it [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_catgirls&diff=840572518&oldid=839944947 here] in May 2018, it was reverted [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_catgirls&diff=842601194&oldid=842597875 here] a couple of days later. As such it has been lead image in the article for well over 12 months, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_catgirls&diff=622451750&oldid=622394820 five years prior]] to the blip when you removed it. You may have an argument for removal, but it seems that you're the only one who thinks that way. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 11:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
::::: {{tq| It seems that you're the only one who thinks that way}}. That's not what the edit history indicates {{diff|893540523}}. — <b>[[User:Billhpike|BillHPike]]</b> <small>([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]], [[Special:contribs/Billhpike|contribs]])</small> 12:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
:::::: I am in favor of including Wikipe-tan, the image is free and high resolution. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 13:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
{{od}}That's a broken link, but I presume it shows a diff where Wikipe-tan was removed from an unidentified article. I'll modify my statement then - you're in the minority. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 19:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
: Wikipe-tan is superior, showing a more cat like pose. The image is also higher quality, and doesn't have a distracting, obscure background. Look at the hand placement as well. The hand proportions are too large, whereas Wikipe-tan's are more natural. Billhpike needs to try to gain [[WP:CONSENSUS]] before removing images that are longstanding in pages. [[User:Tutelary|Tutelary]] ([[User talk:Tutelary|talk]]) 21:35, 26 June 2019 (UTC)


I support the use of the Wikipe-tan image but I agree with {{ping|Billhpike}} that we should avoid [[WP:SELF]] references. We can use the image without calling attention to the fact it depicts a [[Moe anthropomorphism]] of Wikipedia (it is not relevant to the topic at hand, "catgirls"). I add that [[Moe anthropomorphism]] article mentions Wikipe-tan because she is relevant to the article's topic but still does not link to [[WP:TAN]] in accordance to [[WP:SELF]]. [[User:Underbar dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Underbar dk|talk]]) 17:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
:Ok I've removed the merge tags. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 00:06, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
: We can link to [[Criticism of Wikipedia#wikipe-tan]] — <b>[[User:Billhpike|BillHPike]]</b> <small>([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]], [[Special:contribs/Billhpike|contribs]])</small> 19:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
::Also an undue self reference and irrelevant to the topic. [[User:Underbar dk|_dk]] ([[User talk:Underbar dk|talk]]) 20:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
:{{reply|User:Underbar dk}} The problem is that I don't see how [[WP:SELF]] would apply as it doesn't address cross-space links. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 01:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:: [[MOS:LINKSTYLE]] states {{tq|Do not create links to user, WikiProject, essay or draft pages in articles, except in articles about Wikipedia itself}}. — <b>[[User:Billhpike|BillHPike]]</b> <small>([[User talk:Billhpike|talk]], [[Special:contribs/Billhpike|contribs]])</small> 01:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:::Yeah but its not a userpage or a Wikiproject, and its not an essay or draft page? - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 02:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
:::I's fine with not including the link on this article, but it should be placed at [[Moe anthropomorphism]]. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 02:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


== Adding Information About the History of Catgirls ==
==Catgirl pic on article==
I have two objections to it:
#It's clearly advertising a specific site, and we shouldn't be promoting any one site over any other
#I don't think it should be any larger than 250px on the main article. If someone wants a bigger version, they can click on the pic and get a full size copy. I can edit the pic to remove the reference to the site it's from. As long as it's still attributed, I don't think that should be a problem.
Thoughts on these items? --[[User:Nihonjoe|日本穣]] 22:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
:Well, I don't think it's that big viewed in 1280x960, but do as you wish. However it's a nice illustration, I don't mind if you leave it this way... About the advertising: perhaps it's almost clearly visible, but 1) if I want to search for such images, I check multiple webpages, not just this one, and 2) the site in question is in the Links section too, amongst others, and it's not the first in the list. And I think it's hard to find a quality image without advertising/copyright message on it. Hmmm, it is allowed to modificate a picture which is copyrighted, and represents a website? (Besides, that site is really worth advertising. ^^) --[[User:Rev-san|Rev-san]] 20:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
:I can probably come up with something, but it'd have to be after I finish with the Anime and manga barnstar. ^_^;;;--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 20:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
::Sounds good. (^_^) --[[User:Nihonjoe|日本穣]] 22:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
:I've reduced the size of the article pic. --[[User:Nihonjoe|日本穣]] 22:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
:I also think we could get a better picture, Nihon's reasons are already enough but that picture shows her underwear and some of my uploaded pictures were removed for that reason >_<
:As for a serious reason, I think it'd be better to use a much more common catgirl such as Ichigo, Dejiko, Koboshi or some other well known anime character. - [[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 07:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
::I changed it to the Darkstalkers catgirl (Felicia, IIRC), but someone changed it back. --[[User:Nihonjoe|日本穣]] 08:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
:::Changed the image to [[:Image:Dejiko.jpg|Dejiko]], and going to list the other one for IFD just in case.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 14:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
:::Well well, this new picture is kawaii, but I think it's not demonstrating the 'catgirl' idea clearly (I suppose former pic did), so I would put in a picture of Ichigo from TMM. Now she's kawaii, AND really shows how a catgirl looks like. ^_^ --[[User:Rev-san|Rev-san]] 19:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
:::Hmm, we can have more than one picture. As I suggested Dejiko is a well known catgirl and so is Ichigo. Add an Ichigo pic to the article as well if you like. The more examples the better the reader's understanding - [[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 08:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
::::And with that I've added a few more pics from existing uploaded images --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 23:52, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
:::::I have to say that im not exactly too happy with the current pictures right now either. At the moment we have Di GI Charat, Ichigo, Hazuki, and Koboshi on the catgirl page. While they all have catears, Ichigo is the only actual catgirl out of all of those four, the rest wear fake ears, half the time Hazuki dosent even wear them. While girls wearing fake catears does slightly fall into the "catgirl" category, I think it would be better if the larger majority of the pictures on the page were of actual catgirls instead of anime girls cosplaying as one, as with these images it almost makes it seem like a catgirl literally is a human girl with fake catears. <small>—This [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:24.12.218.236|24.12.218.236]] ([[User talk:24.12.218.236|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.12.218.236|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- [Template:Unsigned] -->
::::::Well ok. Who do you suggest should be on the page? --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 03:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


Hello! I'm planning on including more about the history of catgirls, since it seems their origins date back much further than the 1920s. I'll probably have to rewrite a bit of what is currently in the article, but [[User:Kasedori/Catgirl/Bibliography|this (link to my sandbox)]] is what I'm planning on adding.
== Trimming of External links ==


I'd like to include information about Nekomusume from GeGeGe no Kitaro, as it seems like she was an important precursor to modern catgirls (considering the JP catgirl article makes references to her). However, I'm having some trouble finding English sources. [[User:Kasedori|Kasedori]] ([[User talk:Kasedori|talk]]) 13:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Folks, this is not an advertising zone for your favorite (or your own) catgirl-oriented webcomics. While one or two may be exemplary, over half the links were nothing but, and that is hardly encyclopedic. Editors, we need to keep better control of what goes on the page, or else those who are so inclined (you know who they are) will put this thing on AFD fast enough to make your neko-ears pop.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 22:36, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


Edit: I added in the history information. Anyone is free to remove it, of course! [[User:Kasedori|Kasedori]] ([[User talk:Kasedori|talk]]) 13:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Do you think we might need some type of regulation? I mean, there are some webcomics that have their own wiki so I don't think its that haphazard to post links, however, I always felt that it would be a little too cluttered to post catgirls and kemonomimi from non-officially published works (Games, Anime, Manga, and the like that were actually published, not webcomics and dojunshi). Since there are possibly hundreds if not thousands of fan-creations with kemonomimi, it would be too difficult to attempt to list them all.


== Male Variants? ==
I disagree. Wikipedia is a place to share. In this case, links. Over 20 links may just be calling for Catgirls to have its own "link" page. Some things are redundant like thoes covered by the Webring, and should be removed. Obviously adversiting is not what this is meant for, but you have to cut slack. If you want an example of a links page, check out [[Free audio software]]. Offical works, and very well-known works should remain.[[User:Dragon Hilord|Dragon Hilord]] 22:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


Do we need a new article for catboys or just a new header?. I've noticed that they tend to symbolize very different things, especially in male gay and trans spaces. Can anyone look into this?[[User:Lurker no more|Lurker no more]] ([[User talk:Lurker no more|talk]]) 04:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
:Wikipedia policy on this can be found at [[WP:EL]]. The jist of it for fansites is this: ''Fan sites: On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite is appropriate, marking the link as such. In extreme cases, a link to a web directory of fansites can replace this link. (Note: fanlistings are generally not informative and should not ordinarily be included.)'' So if there is a webring or a website with a listing of catgirl fansites, the single external link that is allowed should be linked to that site according to our policy --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 01:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
:{{ping|Lurker no more}} I think it would be fine to reframe this article for cat people if there were sources, and then to discuss regional and cultural differences as appropriate. We do not have a category for catboys but we have [[:Category:Catgirls]]. I do not know many cat guys, but there is [[Cat (Red Dwarf)]] and [[Adrien Agreste]]. Do we have other sources? [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Bluerasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 02:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)


:[[TV Tropes]] uses the term [https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CatFolk Cat Folk] for this concept. [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 09:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
:I see your point. Well presented ^_^. I must say though that if you remove a link, you should trace around to see if it is covered by a webring. If not, leaving it be would be the best course of action until it turns up in a ring (members of webrings ''usually'' show a webring access bar somewhere on the main page, or on parts of all).[[User:Dragon Hilord|Dragon Hilord]] 23:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


::A good gender-neutral alternative would be {{transl|ja|nekomimi}} {{lit|cat ears}}, already mentioned in the lead here, but used for the title at [[ja:猫耳]]. It can refer either to the characters or to their ears. –[[User:SmallJarsWithGreenLabels|small jars]] <small><code>[[User talk:SmallJarsWithGreenLabels|<b style="color:#270">t</b>]][[special:contributions/SmallJarsWithGreenLabels|<b style="color:#270">c</b>]]</code></small> 23:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
I've added a description to the "Sky Lounge Garden" external link because it points directly to softcore pornography... is this the kind of catgirl content we want this article to link to? [[User:Fruitofwisdom|fruitofwisdom]] 23:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
:::Problem is it's very much not [[WP:COMMONNAME]] in English. [[User:CharredShorthand|CharredShorthand]] ([[User talk:CharredShorthand|talk]]) 00:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


== I am tired of this popping up whenever i type “cat” ==
== Neko-jin ==


it gets annoying [[Special:Contributions/107.127.53.51|107.127.53.51]] ([[User talk:107.127.53.51|talk]]) 00:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
I always thought the Japanese word for cat people was neko jin.
Why is this not implimented or what does that really mean or whatever -anon <small>—This [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:84.12.200.138|84.12.200.138]] ([[User talk:84.12.200.138|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/84.12.200.138|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!-- [Template:Unsigned] -->


:Regretfully, search functions work by trying to find similar words in order to predict a search query ahead of time.
: Yes, <i>neko</i> (ねこ or 猫) means cat and <i>jin</i> (じん or 人) means person, however, I don't know if Japanese-speakers actually use this particular term. Maybe someone else can verify. [[User:Fruitofwisdom|fruitofwisdom]] 23:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
:There is nothing we can do. [[User:Schrano|Schrano]] ([[User talk:Schrano|talk]]) 22:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
: Can't say I've ever heard of this term either.--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 15:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
: Technically nekojin means cat-person, but the term used is nekomimi. [[User:Dee man 45|Dee man45]] 19:18, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


== Paring down Examples list ==
== Adding a full list of Catgirls ==


I've sorted through anime from the 1980 all the way to the 2000 and figured it'd be nice if we got a full list of every catgirl. (Included other things I've found)
Is anyone else concerned that a: the examples section is getting a tad bit long and b: there are quite a bit of webcomic references there?


1700s - The first known appearance of nekosume in plays
I propose that we pare the list down to notable examples, and leave webcomics off it unless the webcomic itself has an article on WP. Any thoughts?--<font color="#4b0082">'''[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]''' </font>'''''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''''' 15:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
:I agree. Webcomics with their own article deserve a spot, and most anime and manga '''that have articles'''. Also, if a character only ''briefly'' appears as a catgirl, as in one moment in a single espisode, I don't think that merits putting it down.[[User:Dee man 45|Dee man45]] 15:56, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


1924 - Suisenzuki no Yokka
:Sounds good to me --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 01:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
:I've made a webcomics section, see if they're notable or not. '''A lot''' of the examples are in the '''other''' section when they should not be. Anyone who has seen the anime/manga these characters are in, please move them to their correct section. I've moved all the girls that I know of to their correct sections. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 05:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


1936 - Kamishibai Plays
== Catgirl/Catboy ==


1940 - Catwoman (First comic catgirl)
Shouldn't this article be titled [[Catgirl/Catboy]]?
:No that's what redirects are for. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 23:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
::It is now done [[User:Dragon Hilord|Ben Rogers]] 04:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Aren't Eluruu and Aruruu DOG-girls rather than catgirls?
:They appear to be dog girls, so they've been moved to the Others list
::If they are doggirls then they should be on the [[Kemonomimi]] page. It's only a catgirl/catboy list. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 23:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


1943 - Cheetah
== Images ==


1949 - The King’s Tail
I've struck off two images from the four which were serving to illustrate precisely the same thing. Would you expect to have four seperate images of David Beckham on his article? No, of course you wouldn't. There's two. Four seperate images of what a catgirl is makes for a poor encyclopedia. We can understand from one what a catgirl is. [[User:ShizuokaSensei|ShizuokaSensei]] 15:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


1968 - GeGeGe no Kitaro
:David Beckham nearly always looks like David Beckham. Catgirls do not all look the same; so having multiple illustrations to show the range of variation, is more useful with catgirls than with David Beckham. Better articles to compare to would be [[Cat]] or [[Girl]] - each of which contains far ''more'' illustrations than [[Catgirl]].[[User:216.59.228.13|216.59.228.13]] 17:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


1982 - Urusei Yatsura (Episode 43)
==Bagi==


1989 - Ranma ½ (Shampoo is introduced in Episode 16 and can turn into a cat)
Shouldn't the classic [[Bagi%2C_the_Monster_of_Mighty_Nature|Bagi]] by [[Osamu_Tezuka]] fit somewhere in there?
:Agreed. Bagi is now listed!


1990 - Kyatto Ninden Teyandee/Samurai Pizza Cats (Biggest maybe of my life, it’s a humanoid robot with cat features.), Magical Taruruto (Based and designed after a cat)
== Ortega a catboy? ==


1995 - Juuni Senshi Bakuretsu Eto Ranger
You have listed Ortega in your list of catboys. Ortega dosen't really seem catlike to me though...he just has a mane. Don't you think he should be deleted from the list?


1997 - Cutie Honey Flash (Panther Zora technically has cat ears)
== Asuka from [[Evangelion]]? ==


1998 - All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku (Do I need to explain this?)
How about [[Asuka Langley Sohryu]]?


1999 - Di Gi Charat (Magical Catgirls)
Her eva head things make me think catgirl whenever I see her, as does the sly wide-mouth thing she'll do. Thoughts?


1999 - I’m Gonna Be An Angel (Miruru is a catgirl)
:Catgirl-like, perhaps. But I wouldn't call her a catgirl. --[[User:Marudubshinki |maru]] [[User talk:Marudubshinki| (talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Marudubshinki | contribs]] 23:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


2000 - Inuyasha
== List in Separate Article ==


2002 - Tokyo Mew Mew
Should the list be separated out into a different article? I thought it was convention for extensive lists to be put in their articles (with titles starting with "List of"). --[[User:L33tminion|L33tminion]] <small>|</small> [[User talk:L33tminion|(talk)]] 06:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
:This article is just a list anyway with a good lead section. Maybe the article could be renamed? --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 23:36, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


If anyone would like to change or add onto this list I think it'd be nice to have this [[User:Kat Z Edition|Kat Z Edition]] ([[User talk:Kat Z Edition|talk]]) 23:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
== Catgirls outside of Anime ==

I was wonder if the list should mention Catgirls outside of Anime/Manga/Games. For example: In the works of Cordwainer Smith, Underpeople are animals who are genetically munipulated to look human and have human intellgence. One important character in Smith's works is C'mell, a cat-derived Underperson.--[[User:Eldarone|Eldarone]] 00:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

:Yeah, go ahead! This could be the start of a section of American versions of Catgirls, not merely the all-Japanese account we currently have. --[[User:Marudubshinki |maru]] [[User talk:Marudubshinki| (talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Marudubshinki | contribs]] 03:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

:Began writing a section. Still in progress:

'''Catgirls outside of Anime'''

Catgril characters are also found outside of anime, manga, and video games. Often, such catgirls often look more like humanoid cats than their Japanese counterparts. Fantasy games have catgirl characters, such as ''Magic: The Gathering''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s Mirri. Some live-action shows and movies, as well as western comics and animation, have featured various cat-like characters, in addition to their occasional appearance in classis of Western science-fiction, like [[Cordwainer Smith]]'s cat-derived Underperson C'Mell (who appears in ''[[Norstrilia]]'' and ''[[The Rediscovery of Man]]''). --[[User:Eldarone|Eldarone]] 15:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
:I'd say rename the '''Live action catgirls''' section to '''Catgirls outside of Anime''', include the small list at the bottom of your paragraph and include webcomic catgirls in it somehow. It's good content and will break up the list a bit. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 08:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

::If you mean add the "Live-action Catgirls" section to the "Catgrils outside of anime" section, I don't really see a problem with that --[[User:Eldarone|Eldarone]] 18:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

:::Yes that's what I'm suggesting. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 23:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

== Catgirls and Furries ==

This section sounds alot like Orginal research. Should it be deleted or not?--[[User:Eldarone|Eldarone]] 21:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
:If it is original research then yes. The sentence about catgirl being a term to describe a stereotypical hyperactive and obnoxious fangirl seems to be uncited and OR as well. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 06:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
::I'm going to remove the stereotype refrence because it is 100% inaccurate [[User:Dragon Hilord|Ben Rogers]] 04:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

== Fansites ==
In line with Wikipedia policy on fansites, all but the webring has been moved from External links again. --[[User:Squilibob|Squilibob]] 06:57, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

== Can't think how to write this but it needs working in... ==

In anime/manga catgirls usually fit one of two different character types- either the 'cute one' or the 'sexy one'. I think this warrants mention but...This isn't my article and I can't think how to mention it decently.--[[User:Josquius|Josquius]] 12:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

:They may often be perceived by their fanbase as being cute or sexy, granted. But the adjectives ''cute'' and ''sexy'' are for some people not mutually exclusive, and I know that many people use the two words synonymously. Plus there are different opinions on what qualifies as ''cute'', and especially ''sexy''. It might come as a shock to some people, but most people don't find 'cartoons' sexy =P I'm almost certain that no source could be cited, and it'd all be opinion anyway. So yeah... I understand where you're coming from and agree that they do for the most part fall into those two categories, but I really don't think that it would make for good encyclopaedic content. -[[User:Masamunemaniac|Masamunemaniac]] 15:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:44, 8 November 2024

Possible new inclusions

[edit]
  1. Information about furry vs nekomimi eg http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/File:FurryChart.jpg
  2. Imageboard culture and catgirls.
  3. Products related to catgirls, images of headbands possible cosplay images.
  4. A lot more about catgirls and their prevalence in Japanese culture.

I think the article as it stands misses a lot of interesting information. I believe the primary reason for this is that it is very hard to produce citations for this topic. Any suggestions of sources likely to be citeable would be appreciated. For example http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cat_girl actually is a far better article then what we have at this point - Bostwickenator (talk) 08:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Porting over information from ja.wikipedia

[edit]

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8C%AB%E8%80%B3 has a better article. Even when I read it through Google translate. Can we get someone who can translate Japanese to help bring it across? Bostwickenator (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image change to Wikipe-tan

[edit]

Billhpike and Benjaminikuta - with regard to this reversion here - I see nothing wrong with the suggested change from a generic catgirl to that of Wikipe-tan. The Wikipe-tan image has a couple of advantages over the current image - it's higher resolution, has an article dedicated to the subject, and doesn't have a large blank area at the top, which is purely aesthetic, but still a waste of image space.

What reasons are there to not use the Wikipe-tan image? Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. I also think Wikipe-tan is simply better drawn. Furthermore, the Japanese version uses that image. Benjamin (talk) 07:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Wikipe-tan is not an encyclopedia article, but a page in the Wikipedia namespace.. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 07:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So? That doesn't mean we can't use the image. Benjamin (talk) 08:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:SELF self-references within Wikipedia articles to the Wikipedia project should be avoided. We have a suitable alternative image, so there is no need to use Wikipe-tan. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 09:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this sort of thing is what that's talking about. The image would work just fine in a non-Wikipedia format. As another example, Screenshot uses an image of Wikipedia. Benjamin (talk) 10:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

That's not what WP:Self is for. WP:Self is to prevent internal or recursive use of reference to Wikipedia so when it's taken out of context the subject still makes sense to somebody who may not be reading a Wikiepedia article. In this case (as an example of a catgirl,) the use of Wikipe-tan is still obvious without context or additional explanation.
Moreover, as pointed out - the alternative is not suitable in that Wikipe-tan is a superior quality image. Wikipedia should use the best material available, and on those grounds Wikipe-tan trumps Hyou-chan.
Precedent has already been set - the image was present in this article from at least June 2013 up until April 2019, and Wikipe-tan is the lead image in List of catgirls, and although you tried to remove it here in May 2018, it was reverted here a couple of days later. As such it has been lead image in the article for well over 12 months, and five years prior] to the blip when you removed it. You may have an argument for removal, but it seems that you're the only one who thinks that way. Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that you're the only one who thinks that way. That's not what the edit history indicates [1]. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 12:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am in favor of including Wikipe-tan, the image is free and high resolution. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's a broken link, but I presume it shows a diff where Wikipe-tan was removed from an unidentified article. I'll modify my statement then - you're in the minority. Chaheel Riens (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipe-tan is superior, showing a more cat like pose. The image is also higher quality, and doesn't have a distracting, obscure background. Look at the hand placement as well. The hand proportions are too large, whereas Wikipe-tan's are more natural. Billhpike needs to try to gain WP:CONSENSUS before removing images that are longstanding in pages. Tutelary (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I support the use of the Wikipe-tan image but I agree with @Billhpike: that we should avoid WP:SELF references. We can use the image without calling attention to the fact it depicts a Moe anthropomorphism of Wikipedia (it is not relevant to the topic at hand, "catgirls"). I add that Moe anthropomorphism article mentions Wikipe-tan because she is relevant to the article's topic but still does not link to WP:TAN in accordance to WP:SELF. _dk (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can link to Criticism of Wikipedia#wikipe-tanBillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also an undue self reference and irrelevant to the topic. _dk (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Underbar dk: The problem is that I don't see how WP:SELF would apply as it doesn't address cross-space links. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:LINKSTYLE states Do not create links to user, WikiProject, essay or draft pages in articles, except in articles about Wikipedia itself. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 01:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah but its not a userpage or a Wikiproject, and its not an essay or draft page? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I's fine with not including the link on this article, but it should be placed at Moe anthropomorphism. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Information About the History of Catgirls

[edit]

Hello! I'm planning on including more about the history of catgirls, since it seems their origins date back much further than the 1920s. I'll probably have to rewrite a bit of what is currently in the article, but this (link to my sandbox) is what I'm planning on adding.

I'd like to include information about Nekomusume from GeGeGe no Kitaro, as it seems like she was an important precursor to modern catgirls (considering the JP catgirl article makes references to her). However, I'm having some trouble finding English sources. Kasedori (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I added in the history information. Anyone is free to remove it, of course! Kasedori (talk) 13:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Male Variants?

[edit]

Do we need a new article for catboys or just a new header?. I've noticed that they tend to symbolize very different things, especially in male gay and trans spaces. Can anyone look into this?Lurker no more (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lurker no more: I think it would be fine to reframe this article for cat people if there were sources, and then to discuss regional and cultural differences as appropriate. We do not have a category for catboys but we have Category:Catgirls. I do not know many cat guys, but there is Cat (Red Dwarf) and Adrien Agreste. Do we have other sources? Bluerasberry (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
TV Tropes uses the term Cat Folk for this concept. Dimadick (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A good gender-neutral alternative would be nekomimi lit.'cat ears', already mentioned in the lead here, but used for the title at ja:猫耳. It can refer either to the characters or to their ears. –small jars tc 23:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is it's very much not WP:COMMONNAME in English. CharredShorthand (talk) 00:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am tired of this popping up whenever i type “cat”

[edit]

it gets annoying 107.127.53.51 (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regretfully, search functions work by trying to find similar words in order to predict a search query ahead of time.
There is nothing we can do. Schrano (talk) 22:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a full list of Catgirls

[edit]

I've sorted through anime from the 1980 all the way to the 2000 and figured it'd be nice if we got a full list of every catgirl. (Included other things I've found)

1700s - The first known appearance of nekosume in plays

1924 - Suisenzuki no Yokka

1936 - Kamishibai Plays

1940 - Catwoman (First comic catgirl)

1943 - Cheetah

1949 - The King’s Tail

1968 - GeGeGe no Kitaro

1982 - Urusei Yatsura (Episode 43)

1989 - Ranma ½ (Shampoo is introduced in Episode 16 and can turn into a cat)

1990 - Kyatto Ninden Teyandee/Samurai Pizza Cats (Biggest maybe of my life, it’s a humanoid robot with cat features.), Magical Taruruto (Based and designed after a cat)

1995 - Juuni Senshi Bakuretsu Eto Ranger

1997 - Cutie Honey Flash (Panther Zora technically has cat ears)

1998 - All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku (Do I need to explain this?)

1999 - Di Gi Charat (Magical Catgirls)

1999 - I’m Gonna Be An Angel (Miruru is a catgirl)

2000 - Inuyasha

2002 - Tokyo Mew Mew

If anyone would like to change or add onto this list I think it'd be nice to have this Kat Z Edition (talk) 23:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]