Jump to content

User talk:Nomad3919: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nomad3919 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Unblock request: talk page access revoked
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Blocked for sockpuppetry ==
{{db-user|I no longer want this account}}
{{Tmbox
| style = background: #f8eaba
| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]
| text = '''''This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely''''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sock puppetry]]{{#if:[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nomad3919]]|&#32;per evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nomad3919]]}}. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;}} below. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 14:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)<!-- Template:SockBlock -->}}

==Unblock request==
{{unblock reviewed|It has been a couple of years since the block was instated, and I would like to take this time to personally apologize for the sockpuppetry and block evasion. I fully understand what I was blocked for. I take full responsibility for my actions and the accounts I created. I will not engage in such activity in the future if unblocked. I believe I have shown through my edits and pages created that I can be a constructive editor, and I do plan to be constructive if unblocked. I am not saying I deserve to be unblocked, I only ask for forgiveness and a second chance. [[User:Nomad3919|Nomad3919]] ([[User talk:Nomad3919#top|talk]]) 02:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)|decline={{confirmed}} to a {{noping|CalebHughes}} sockfarm. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate|talk]]) 02:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)}}

<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|left|45px|link=|alt=Stop hand]] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrator]] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.'''
<span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">([{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=block&page=User:{{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} block log] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=search&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} active blocks] • [{{fullurl:Special:GlobalBlockList|ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|contribs]]<span class="sysop-show"> • [[Special:DeletedContributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|deleted contribs]]</span> • [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} abuse filter log] • [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=newusers&user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} creation log]<span class="sysop-show"> • [[Special:BlockIP/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|change block settings]] • [{{fullurl:Special:BlockList|action=unblock&ip={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} unblock]</span><span class="checkuser-show"> • [{{fullurl:Special:CheckUser|user={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}&reason={{urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}]], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ([{{fullurl:Special:CheckUserLog|cuSearchType=target&cuSearch={{BASEPAGENAMEE}}}} log])</span>) </span>
{{clear}}
----
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the ''[[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|Unblock Ticket Request System]]''. If the block is a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#CheckUser blocks|CheckUser]] or [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Oversight blocks|Oversight]] block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]].<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the [[Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System|unblock ticket request system]] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice -->

Latest revision as of 07:14, 1 February 2020

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nomad3919 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been a couple of years since the block was instated, and I would like to take this time to personally apologize for the sockpuppetry and block evasion. I fully understand what I was blocked for. I take full responsibility for my actions and the accounts I created. I will not engage in such activity in the future if unblocked. I believe I have shown through my edits and pages created that I can be a constructive editor, and I do plan to be constructive if unblocked. I am not saying I deserve to be unblocked, I only ask for forgiveness and a second chance. Nomad3919 (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.