Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Vinayak: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
delete
m Fix Linter errors.
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===[[:Deepak Vinayak]]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
:{{la|Deepak Vinayak}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Vinayak|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 13#{{anchorencode:Deepak Vinayak}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deepak_Vinayak Stats]</span>)

The result was '''keep'''. <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD|(non-admin closure)]]</small> - '''[[User:Champion|<big>C</big><small>HAMPION</small>]]''' <sup>([[User_talk:Champion#Top|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Champion|contributions]]) ([[Special:Logs/Champion|logs]]) </sup> 23:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
===[[:Deepak Vinayak]]===
:{{la|Deepak Vinayak}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Vinayak|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 20#{{anchorencode:Deepak Vinayak}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Deepak_Vinayak Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Deepak Vinayak}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Deepak Vinayak}})
Article/subject is non-notable [[User:Glrm88|Glrm88]] ([[User talk:Glrm88|talk]]) 05:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Article/subject is non-notable [[User:Glrm88|Glrm88]] ([[User talk:Glrm88|talk]]) 05:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Line 15: Line 20:


*'''Delete''' unless I am missing something? There is a lot of sources but this is just promotion [[WO:BOMBARD|bombarded]] with primary sources (such as the Gove sites) and passing mentions. The article listed as herald sun but is actually local press is also another primary. It's news Corp writing about a news Corp award/promotion. Saying he is a JP in the lead is major puffery, nothing remotely notable there. Not of the awards mentioned are major. [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 12:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' unless I am missing something? There is a lot of sources but this is just promotion [[WO:BOMBARD|bombarded]] with primary sources (such as the Gove sites) and passing mentions. The article listed as herald sun but is actually local press is also another primary. It's news Corp writing about a news Corp award/promotion. Saying he is a JP in the lead is major puffery, nothing remotely notable there. Not of the awards mentioned are major. [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 12:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' The profile is definitely notable, no doubt about it. The question can be on the content and its structure or the tone. [[User:Leostamp|Leostamp]] ([[User talk:Leostamp|talk]])

*'''Keep''' This is a good enough profile to be on Wikipedia. No need to delete. The profile does not represent a business interest. Like artists and educators, community workers are also equally important contributors to society. [[User:Raj_vin|Raj_vin]] ([[User talk:Raj_vin|talk]]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 02:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Given your ownership issues demostrated [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:223.225.143.246&oldid=810893772 here] can I ask, are you paying someone to create this page, who authorises changes? [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 11:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
:::I don't have any ownership issues. I am just concerned that some people are keen to attack a community leader's profile. I believe the profile is notable and has been created by his fans and followers. I am not connected to the profile neither to the profile editors. No personal interest whatsoever. [[User:Raj_vin|Raj_vin]] ([[User talk:Raj_vin|talk]]) 17:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
::::No personal interest yet you created the first version of the page that was deleted as pure promotion and for well over a year here have edited about very little else? Just want to promote mr vin for what? I note that you didn't answer the question, who authorises changes to this profile? [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 12:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' <s>Keep</s> -The profile should be edited as per the concerns/questions raised. No need to Delete. The Prime Minister's Award for two times and the Victorian Government's multiple Awards are equally important. These are not conferred on everyone unless the person has contributed something extraordinary/special to the community. World's leading newspaper Times of India (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com), Australia's Leading News Organization (news.com.au), Victorian Multicultural Commission (www.multicultural.vic.gov.au), Australia Day (australiaday.org.au), Victoria University (www.vu.edu.au) and SBS (www.sbs.com.au) et al have carried his stories/stories on him. There is an increasing need to feature community workers and highlight their work on Wikipedia to achieve its objective of inclusion and social justice along with adhering to its [[five pillars|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars]]. [[User:Resilpra|Resilpra]] ([[User talk:Resilpra|talk]]) 17 May 2018 <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 01:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Given that two keeps are from low-editcount accounts.<br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<span style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</span>]]</span></small> 06:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->

*'''Keep''' The profile is notable and is backed by credible evidence from government and respectable media sources. [[User:Hariayu]] ([[User talk:Hariayu|talk]]) 21 May 2018 <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 09:28, 21 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

*'''Keep''' Hopefully I am not missing anything. Seems like intentional targeting.The complain has shifted away from notability. May I request to Wikipedia Admin to close the discussion? [[User:Debadattaindia]] ([[User talk:Debadattaindia|talk]]) 23 May 2018 <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 08:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 17:05, 29 December 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:33, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Vinayak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article/subject is non-notable Glrm88 (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would be much better if you explained why. Not just making the assertion. Aoziwe (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unless I am missing something? There seems to be multiple non trivial reporting in independent reliable sources, and including government level recognition of the subject, from my own searches, let alone what is in the article already. Aoziwe (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Unless the proposer decides to be a little less vague then WP:GNG and WP:BASIC are the only categories we can use to assess the subject. There certainly seem sufficient sourcing (hidden though they are amongst the OR), with either medium or substantive coverage. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -The profile is notable. Has been a Prime Ministerial People's Ambassador for two times and has been recognized and awarded by the Victorian State Government for his community work. Several media platforms including SBS have interviewed him for his accomplishments and ground-level work. As a migrant to Australia, his work and contribution highlight Australia's success in multiculturalism. He inspires Australian young people of Indian/South Asian origin to take up community work both as a hobby and a responsibility. Resilpra (talk) 3:34 AM (GMT) 15 May 2018
  • Delete unless I am missing something? There is a lot of sources but this is just promotion with primary sources (such as the Gove sites) and passing mentions. The article listed as herald sun but is actually local press is also another primary. It's news Corp writing about a news Corp award/promotion. Saying he is a JP in the lead is major puffery, nothing remotely notable there. Not of the awards mentioned are major. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The profile is definitely notable, no doubt about it. The question can be on the content and its structure or the tone. Leostamp (talk)
  • Keep This is a good enough profile to be on Wikipedia. No need to delete. The profile does not represent a business interest. Like artists and educators, community workers are also equally important contributors to society. Raj_vin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Given your ownership issues demostrated here can I ask, are you paying someone to create this page, who authorises changes? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any ownership issues. I am just concerned that some people are keen to attack a community leader's profile. I believe the profile is notable and has been created by his fans and followers. I am not connected to the profile neither to the profile editors. No personal interest whatsoever. Raj_vin (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No personal interest yet you created the first version of the page that was deleted as pure promotion and for well over a year here have edited about very little else? Just want to promote mr vin for what? I note that you didn't answer the question, who authorises changes to this profile? duffbeerforme (talk) 12:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Keep -The profile should be edited as per the concerns/questions raised. No need to Delete. The Prime Minister's Award for two times and the Victorian Government's multiple Awards are equally important. These are not conferred on everyone unless the person has contributed something extraordinary/special to the community. World's leading newspaper Times of India (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com), Australia's Leading News Organization (news.com.au), Victorian Multicultural Commission (www.multicultural.vic.gov.au), Australia Day (australiaday.org.au), Victoria University (www.vu.edu.au) and SBS (www.sbs.com.au) et al have carried his stories/stories on him. There is an increasing need to feature community workers and highlight their work on Wikipedia to achieve its objective of inclusion and social justice along with adhering to its https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars. Resilpra (talk) 17 May 2018 —Preceding undated comment added 01:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given that two keeps are from low-editcount accounts.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.