Debt snowball method: Difference between revisions
changed "states" to "speculates" because there is no supported evidence that what he says is true; if Dave Ramsey can back up this claim, then "states" is the appropriate verb here, otherwise, he's speculating (regardless of his "experience"). |
SimLibrarian (talk | contribs) |
||
(110 intermediate revisions by 55 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Personal finance strategy}} |
|||
The '''debt-snowball method''' is a [[debt]] reduction strategy, whereby one who owes on more than one [[Account (accountancy)|account]] pays off the accounts starting with the smallest [[Balance (accounting)|balances]] first, while paying the minimum payment on larger debts. Once the smallest debt is paid off, one proceeds to the next slightly larger small debt above that, so on and so forth, gradually proceeding to the larger ones later.<ref>[http://financialplan.about.com.education2020.us/od/creditdebtmanagement/a/Get-Out-Of-Debt-With-A-Debt-Snowball.htm] - Get Out of Debt With a Debt Snowball</ref> This method is sometimes contrasted with the debt stacking method, also called the "debt avalanche method", where one pays off accounts on the highest [[interest rate]] first.<ref>{{cite web|title=Debt Snowball Vs. Debt Stacking|url=http://budgeting.about.com/od/Debt/a/Debt-Snowball-Vs-Debt-Stacking.htm|website=About.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=How Does Debt Stacking Work?|url=http://classroom.synonym.com/debt-stacking-work-12644.html|website=Synonym.com}}</ref> |
|||
The '''debt snowball method''' is a [[debt]]-reduction strategy, whereby one who owes on more than one [[Account (accountancy)|account]] pays off the accounts starting with the smallest [[Balance (accounting)|balances]] first, while paying the minimum payment on larger debts. Once the smallest debt is paid off, one proceeds to the next larger debt, and so forth, proceeding to the largest ones last.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ramseysolutions.com/debt/get-out-of-debt-with-the-debt-snowball-plan|title=How to Get Out of Debt With the Debt Snowball Plan|website=Ramsey Solutions}}</ref> This method is sometimes contrasted with the '''debt stacking method''', also called the '''debt avalanche method''', where one pays off accounts on the highest [[interest rate]] first.<ref>{{cite web|title=Debt Snowball Vs. Debt Stacking|url=http://budgeting.about.com/od/Debt/a/Debt-Snowball-Vs-Debt-Stacking.htm|website=About.com|access-date=2015-06-28|archive-date=2015-06-30|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150630225639/http://budgeting.about.com/od/Debt/a/Debt-Snowball-Vs-Debt-Stacking.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=How Does Debt Stacking Work?|url=http://classroom.synonym.com/debt-stacking-work-12644.html|website=Synonym.com}}</ref> |
|||
The debt |
The debt snowball method is most often applied to repaying [[revolving credit]]{{snd}} such as [[credit card]]s. Under the method, extra cash is dedicated to paying debts with the smallest amount owed.<ref>[http://www.allaboutmoney.com/debt-advice/debt-snowball-0-2646.htm "How a `debt snowball` plan works"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222055100/http://www.allaboutmoney.com/debt-advice/debt-snowball-0-2646.htm |date=2014-02-22 }}, All About Money</ref> |
||
==Methodology== |
==Methodology== |
||
The basic steps in the debt snowball method are |
The basic steps in the debt snowball method are: |
||
# List all debts in ascending order from smallest balance to largest. This is the method's most distinctive feature, in that the order is determined by amount owed, not the rate of interest charged. However, if two debts are very close in amount owed, then the debt with the higher interest rate would be moved above in the list. |
# List all debts in ascending order from smallest balance to largest. This is the method's most distinctive feature, in that the order is determined by amount owed, not the rate of interest charged. However, if two debts are very close in amount owed, then the debt with the higher interest rate would be moved above in the list. |
||
# Commit to pay the minimum payment on every debt. |
# Commit to pay the minimum payment on every debt. |
||
# Determine how much extra can be applied towards the smallest debt. |
# Determine how much extra can be applied towards the smallest debt. |
||
# Pay the minimum payment plus the extra amount towards that smallest debt until it is paid off. Note that some lenders (mortgage lenders, car companies) will apply extra amounts towards the next payment; in order for the method to work the lenders need to be contacted and told that extra payments are to go directly toward principal reduction. Credit cards usually apply the whole payment during the current cycle. |
# Pay the minimum payment plus the extra amount towards that smallest debt until it is paid off. Note that some lenders (mortgage lenders, car companies) will apply extra amounts towards the next payment; in order for the method to work the lenders need to be contacted and told that extra payments are to go directly toward principal reduction. Credit cards usually apply the whole payment during the current cycle. |
||
# Once a debt is paid in full, add the old minimum payment (plus any extra amount available) from the first debt to the minimum payment on the second smallest debt, and apply the new sum to repaying the second smallest debt. |
# Once a debt is paid in full, add the old minimum payment (plus any extra amount available) from the first debt to the minimum payment on the second smallest debt, and apply the new sum to repaying the second smallest debt. |
||
# Repeat until all debts are paid in full.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ramseysolutions.com/debt/how-the-debt-snowball-method-works|title=How the Debt Snowball Method Works|website=Ramsey Solutions}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/snowball.asp|title=Debt Snowball: Overview, Pros and Cons, Application|website=Investopedia}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bu.edu/questrom/2017/01/05/paying-back-those-swipes/|title=Paying Down Credit Card Debt | Questrom School of Business|website=www.bu.edu}}</ref> |
|||
# Repeat until all debts are paid in full. |
|||
In theory, by the time the final debts are reached, the extra amount paid toward the larger debts will grow quickly, similar to a snowball rolling downhill gathering more snow, hence the name. |
In theory, by the time the final debts are reached, the extra amount paid toward the larger debts will grow quickly, similar to a snowball rolling downhill gathering more snow, hence the name.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.usatoday.com/money/blueprint/debt/debt-snowball-method/|title=What’s the debt snowball method?|first=Erin|last=Gobler|date=August 10, 2023|website=USA TODAY Blueprint}}</ref> |
||
The theory |
The theory appeals to human psychology: by paying the smaller debts first, the individual, couple, or family sees fewer bills as more individual debts are paid off, thus giving ongoing positive feedback on their progress towards eliminating their debt. |
||
==Pro and cons== |
|||
A first home mortgage is not generally included in the debt snowball, but is instead paid off as part of one's larger financial plan. As an example, many financial plans pay off home mortgages in a later step, along with any other debt which is equal to or greater than half of one's annual take-home pay. |
|||
*Pro: |
|||
The debt snowball method goal is to motivate the person in debt to continue paying off the debt. There is a reward to seeing the first smaller debt go away. Feelings is how many get in debt, thus feelings is how one gets out of debt. The plan is easy and simple to follow.<ref name="auto"/> |
|||
The issue of whether one should make retirement contributions during the debt reduction process is a matter of dispute among proponents of this method: |
|||
<br> |
|||
*Some argue that all contributions are to be halted during the debt snowball, thus freeing up more money to pay down the debt snowball. |
|||
*Cons: |
|||
*Others dispute this practice, citing the cost of compounding interest to be greater than the gains of paying off debt. |
|||
The other method, Debt Avalanche, paying of highest interest rate first, will save the person in interest payment, if they stay motivated. The small debt, with lower interest rate will stay around longer. The debt snowball method has larger high-interest debts around longer, thus may take more time to pay off.<ref name="auto"/> |
|||
*Some compromise by arguing that retirement contributions should be reduced to only the minimum amount that the employer will match with an employee, but not eliminated completely. |
|||
<br> |
|||
*Many financial and wealth experts teach that this halting of retirement contributions should last no more than two years. |
|||
*In either method, fixing the cause of the debt (this does not include ones home loan) must addressed, that is balance of income vs spending.<ref name="auto1"/> |
|||
==Example== |
==Example== |
||
An example of the debt |
An example of the debt snowball method in action is shown below. In a real payoff scenario the different interest rates on debts will affect payoff times and might make the method less efficient than other plans. However, for the sake of illustrating the method, the example ignores accruing interest. |
||
A person has the following amounts of debt and additional funds available to pay debt (the debt is listed with the smallest balance first, as recommended by the method): |
A person has the following amounts of debt and additional funds available to pay debt (the debt is listed with the smallest balance first, as recommended by the method): |
||
* Credit Card A |
* Credit Card A – $250 balance – $25/month minimum |
||
* Credit Card B |
* Credit Card B – $500 balance – $26/month minimum |
||
* Car payment |
* Car payment – $2500 balance – $150/month minimum |
||
* |
* Personal loan – $5000 balance – $200/month minimum |
||
* The |
* The debtor has an additional $100/month which can be devoted to repayment of debt. |
||
The additional $100 is first directed toward Card A and, together with the $25 minimum payment, pays off the balance in two months. This is illustrated in the following table, with the prioritized debt indicated in bold. |
|||
First two months - under the debt-snowball method, payments would be made to the creditors as follows: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: auto;" |
|||
* Credit Card A - $125 ($25/month minimum + $100 additional available) |
|||
! scope="col" | Month |
|||
* Credit Card B - $26/month minimum |
|||
! scope="col" | Card A |
|||
* Car payment - $150/month minimum |
|||
! scope="col" | Card B |
|||
* Loan - $200/month minimum |
|||
! scope="col" | Car |
|||
! scope="col" | Personal |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 0 |
|||
| '''250''' || 500 || 2500 || 5000 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 1 |
|||
| '''125''' || 474 || 2350 || 4800 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 2 |
|||
| '''0''' || 448 || 2200 || 4600 |
|||
|} |
|||
Paying off Card A leaves $125 free for additional payment: the original $100, plus the $25 previously committed to minimum payments on Card A. This amount is added to Card B's $26 minimum payment, thereby paying it off in three more months. |
|||
Third month balance (presuming the person has not added to the balances, which would defeat the purpose of debt reduction) - Credit Card A would have been paid in full, and the remaining balances as follows: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: auto;" |
|||
* Credit Card B - $448 |
|||
! scope="col" | Month |
|||
* Car payment - $2200 |
|||
! scope="col" | Card B |
|||
* Loan - $4600 |
|||
! scope="col" | Car |
|||
! scope="col" | Personal |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 2 |
|||
| '''448''' || 2200 || 4600 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 3 |
|||
| '''297''' || 2050 || 4400 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 4 |
|||
| '''146''' || 1900 || 4200 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 5 |
|||
| '''0''' || 1750 || 4000 |
|||
|} |
|||
A total of $151 is then free for additional payment, and is applied to the car loan for a total monthly car payment of $301. This pays off the car loan in another six months. |
|||
Third month payments - the person would then take the $125 previously used to pay off Credit Card A and apply it as additional payment to the Credit Card B balance, which would make payments for the next three months as follows: |
|||
{| class="wikitable" style="margin: auto;" |
|||
* Credit Card B - $151 ($26/month minimum + $125 additional available) |
|||
! scope="col" | Month |
|||
* Car Payment - $150/month minimum |
|||
! scope="col" | Car |
|||
* Loan - $200/month minimum |
|||
! scope="col" | Personal |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 5 |
|||
| '''1750''' || 4000 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 6 |
|||
| '''1449''' || 3800 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 7 |
|||
| '''1148''' || 3600 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 8 |
|||
| '''847''' || 3400 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 9 |
|||
| '''546''' || 3200 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 10 |
|||
| '''245''' || 3000 |
|||
|- |
|||
! scope="row" | 11 |
|||
| '''0''' || 2800 |
|||
|} |
|||
The available $301 would then be added to the personal loan's minimum payment for a total payment of $501. This would pay off the personal loan in another six months, leaving the debtor debt-free after a total of 17 months. Since the example omits interest, any payment order could pay off the debts in the same amount of time, but the snowball method avoids long waits between successive payoffs. If the debtor had prioritized debts in the reverse order, the first payoff (Card A) would have taken ten months and the rest an additional seven. |
|||
Three more months (six total) - Credit Card B would be paid in full (the final payment would be $146), and the remaining balances would be as follows: |
|||
==Effectiveness== |
|||
* Car Payment - $1750 |
|||
In situations where one debt has both a higher interest rate and higher balance than another debt, the debt snowball method prioritizes the smaller debt even though paying the larger, higher-interest debt would be more cost-effective. Several writers and researchers have considered this contradiction between the method and a strictly mathematical approach. In a 2012 study by Northwestern's [[Kellogg School of Management]], researchers found that "consumers who tackle small balances first are likelier to eliminate their overall debt" than trying to pay off high interest rate balances first.<ref name=Boyer2012>{{Cite web|url=http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/news_articles/2012/snowball-approach.aspx|title = The 'snowball approach' to debt - Kellogg School of Management}}</ref> A 2016 study in ''Harvard Business Review'' came to a similar conclusion: |
|||
* Loan - $4000 |
|||
{{block quote|We tested a variety of hypotheses and ultimately determined that it is not the size of the repayment or how little is left on a card after a payment that has the biggest impact on people's perception of progress; rather it's what ''portion'' of the balance they succeed in paying off. Thus focusing on paying down the account with the smallest balance tends to have the most powerful effect on people's sense of progress – and therefore their motivation to continue paying down their debts.<ref name=Trudel2016>{{Cite news|url=https://hbr.org/2016/12/research-the-best-strategy-for-paying-off-credit-card-debt|title=Research: The Best Strategy for Paying Off Credit Card Debt|work=Harvard Business Review|access-date=2017-03-17}}</ref>}} |
|||
Author and radio host [[Dave Ramsey]], a proponent of the debt snowball method, concedes that an analysis of math and interest leans toward paying the highest interest debt first. However, based on his experience, Ramsey states that personal finance is "20 percent head knowledge and 80 percent behavior" and he argues that people trying to reduce debt need "quick wins" (i.e., paying off the smallest debt) in order to remain motivated toward debt reduction. Ramsey Solutions has done studies that show motivation is more effective than interest rates.<ref name=Ramsey2009>Dave Ramsey (2009). The Total Money Makeover: A Proven Plan for Financial Fitness. Thomas Nelson Inc, {{ISBN|978-1595550781}}</ref> |
|||
Then the person would take the $151 previously used to pay off Credit Cards A & B and apply it as additional payment to the car loan balance, which would make payments as follows: |
|||
Research by Moty Amar and colleagues agreed that debtors are inclined to pay small debts first, which they attributed to "debt account aversion", the desire to reduce the number of outstanding debts regardless of balance or interest expense.<ref name=Amar>{{cite journal |doi=10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S38 |ssrn=1760528|title=Winning the Battle but Losing the War: The Psychology of Debt Management|year=2011|last1=Amar|first1=Moty|last2=Ariely|first2=Dan|last3=Ayal|first3=Shahar|last4=Cryder|first4=Cynthia E.|last5=Rick|first5=Scott I.|journal=Journal of Marketing Research|volume=48|pages=S38–S50|s2cid=55616109}}</ref> However, they also found that when debtors are restricted from fully paying debts and are shown the interest that will accrue as a result of their choice, they make the mathematically optimal decision.<ref name=Amar/> |
|||
* Car Payment - $301 ($150/month minimum + $151 additional available) |
|||
* Loan - $200/month minimum |
|||
It would take six months to pay the car loan (the final payment being $240), whereupon the person would then make payments of $501/month toward the loan (which would have a $2800 balance) for six months (with the last payment at $234). |
|||
Thus in 17 months the person has repaid four loans, with two of them being paid in a mere five months and three within one year. |
|||
==Benefits== |
|||
The primary benefit of the smallest-balance plan is the psychological benefit of seeing results sooner, in that the debtor sees reductions in both the number of creditors owed (and, thus, the number of bills received) and the amounts owed to each creditor. |
|||
Retirement contributions should start once your expected investment yield is higher than the next highest debt interest rate (generally 8% for a balanced portfolio).<ref>[http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/ManageDebt/WhichDebtShouldYouPayOffFirst.aspx Which debt should you pay off first? By The Simple Dollar (Published Aug. 8, 2007)]</ref> |
|||
In a 2012 study by Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management, researchers found that “consumers who tackle small balances first are likelier to eliminate their overall debt” than trying to pay off high interest rate balances first.<ref>http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/news_articles/2012/snowball-approach.aspx</ref> |
|||
A 2016 study in Harvard Business Review came to a similar conclusion.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://hbr.org/2016/12/research-the-best-strategy-for-paying-off-credit-card-debt|title=Research: The Best Strategy for Paying Off Credit Card Debt|work=Harvard Business Review|access-date=2017-03-17}}</ref> |
|||
==Criticism== |
|||
People with more financial discipline can get ahead more quickly by paying off the credit cards and loans with the higher interest rates first. This will minimize costs to become debt-free faster than the smallest-balance approach.<ref>https://www.alphafinancialist.com/avalanche-vs-snowball/</ref> |
|||
[[Dave Ramsey]], a proponent of the debt-snowball method, concedes that an analysis of math and interest leans toward paying the highest interest debt first; however, based on his experience, Ramsey speculates that personal finance is "20 percent head knowledge and 80 percent behavior" and that people trying to reduce debt need "quick wins" (i.e., paying off the smallest debt) in order to remain motivated toward debt reduction. |
|||
==Research== |
|||
Decision-making research has revealed that the debt-snowball method is a very common approach to managing multiple debts, even when larger debts have larger interest rates.<ref>[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1760528 Moty Amar, Dan Ariely, Shahar Ayal, Cynthia Cryder, and Scott Rick (2011), "Winning the Battle but Losing the War: The Psychology of Debt Management," Journal of Marketing Research.]</ref> Amar, Ariely, Ayal, Cryder, and Rick (2011) observed this tendency in surveys of indebted consumers and in incentive-compatible experiments. Amar et al. (2011) found that people naturally use the snowball method, by paying off small debts first, and this reflects negatively on their financial outcomes since they keep on paying off debts in an inefficient way. Moreover, Amar et al. (2011) found that restricting participants’ ability to completely pay off small debts actually helped them to reduce overall debt more quickly, by refocusing their attention on paying off high-interest debts. The natural tendency to pay off small debts first (which Amar et al. termed "debt account aversion") has been attributed to the appeal of achieving goals that are near completion and the tendency for multiple losses (e.g., debts) to be more distressing than a single loss of equivalent total value. |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
*[[Personal finance]] |
*[[Personal finance]] |
||
*[[Alternative financial service]] |
|||
*[[Consumer finance]] |
|||
*[[Debt consolidation]] |
|||
*[[Debt management plan]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist|refs=http://www. |
{{Reflist|refs=http://www.the-negotiators.com.au}} |
||
==External links== |
|||
http://penniesanddollars.com/no-snowball-method/ |
|||
{{Debt}} |
{{Debt}} |
||
[[Category:Debt]] |
[[Category:Debt]] |
||
[[Category:Personal finance]] |
Latest revision as of 01:50, 14 April 2024
The debt snowball method is a debt-reduction strategy, whereby one who owes on more than one account pays off the accounts starting with the smallest balances first, while paying the minimum payment on larger debts. Once the smallest debt is paid off, one proceeds to the next larger debt, and so forth, proceeding to the largest ones last.[1] This method is sometimes contrasted with the debt stacking method, also called the debt avalanche method, where one pays off accounts on the highest interest rate first.[2][3]
The debt snowball method is most often applied to repaying revolving credit – such as credit cards. Under the method, extra cash is dedicated to paying debts with the smallest amount owed.[4]
Methodology
[edit]The basic steps in the debt snowball method are:
- List all debts in ascending order from smallest balance to largest. This is the method's most distinctive feature, in that the order is determined by amount owed, not the rate of interest charged. However, if two debts are very close in amount owed, then the debt with the higher interest rate would be moved above in the list.
- Commit to pay the minimum payment on every debt.
- Determine how much extra can be applied towards the smallest debt.
- Pay the minimum payment plus the extra amount towards that smallest debt until it is paid off. Note that some lenders (mortgage lenders, car companies) will apply extra amounts towards the next payment; in order for the method to work the lenders need to be contacted and told that extra payments are to go directly toward principal reduction. Credit cards usually apply the whole payment during the current cycle.
- Once a debt is paid in full, add the old minimum payment (plus any extra amount available) from the first debt to the minimum payment on the second smallest debt, and apply the new sum to repaying the second smallest debt.
- Repeat until all debts are paid in full.[5][6][7]
In theory, by the time the final debts are reached, the extra amount paid toward the larger debts will grow quickly, similar to a snowball rolling downhill gathering more snow, hence the name.[8]
The theory appeals to human psychology: by paying the smaller debts first, the individual, couple, or family sees fewer bills as more individual debts are paid off, thus giving ongoing positive feedback on their progress towards eliminating their debt.
Pro and cons
[edit]- Pro:
The debt snowball method goal is to motivate the person in debt to continue paying off the debt. There is a reward to seeing the first smaller debt go away. Feelings is how many get in debt, thus feelings is how one gets out of debt. The plan is easy and simple to follow.[6]
- Cons:
The other method, Debt Avalanche, paying of highest interest rate first, will save the person in interest payment, if they stay motivated. The small debt, with lower interest rate will stay around longer. The debt snowball method has larger high-interest debts around longer, thus may take more time to pay off.[6]
- In either method, fixing the cause of the debt (this does not include ones home loan) must addressed, that is balance of income vs spending.[7]
Example
[edit]An example of the debt snowball method in action is shown below. In a real payoff scenario the different interest rates on debts will affect payoff times and might make the method less efficient than other plans. However, for the sake of illustrating the method, the example ignores accruing interest.
A person has the following amounts of debt and additional funds available to pay debt (the debt is listed with the smallest balance first, as recommended by the method):
- Credit Card A – $250 balance – $25/month minimum
- Credit Card B – $500 balance – $26/month minimum
- Car payment – $2500 balance – $150/month minimum
- Personal loan – $5000 balance – $200/month minimum
- The debtor has an additional $100/month which can be devoted to repayment of debt.
The additional $100 is first directed toward Card A and, together with the $25 minimum payment, pays off the balance in two months. This is illustrated in the following table, with the prioritized debt indicated in bold.
Month | Card A | Card B | Car | Personal |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 250 | 500 | 2500 | 5000 |
1 | 125 | 474 | 2350 | 4800 |
2 | 0 | 448 | 2200 | 4600 |
Paying off Card A leaves $125 free for additional payment: the original $100, plus the $25 previously committed to minimum payments on Card A. This amount is added to Card B's $26 minimum payment, thereby paying it off in three more months.
Month | Card B | Car | Personal |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 448 | 2200 | 4600 |
3 | 297 | 2050 | 4400 |
4 | 146 | 1900 | 4200 |
5 | 0 | 1750 | 4000 |
A total of $151 is then free for additional payment, and is applied to the car loan for a total monthly car payment of $301. This pays off the car loan in another six months.
Month | Car | Personal |
---|---|---|
5 | 1750 | 4000 |
6 | 1449 | 3800 |
7 | 1148 | 3600 |
8 | 847 | 3400 |
9 | 546 | 3200 |
10 | 245 | 3000 |
11 | 0 | 2800 |
The available $301 would then be added to the personal loan's minimum payment for a total payment of $501. This would pay off the personal loan in another six months, leaving the debtor debt-free after a total of 17 months. Since the example omits interest, any payment order could pay off the debts in the same amount of time, but the snowball method avoids long waits between successive payoffs. If the debtor had prioritized debts in the reverse order, the first payoff (Card A) would have taken ten months and the rest an additional seven.
Effectiveness
[edit]In situations where one debt has both a higher interest rate and higher balance than another debt, the debt snowball method prioritizes the smaller debt even though paying the larger, higher-interest debt would be more cost-effective. Several writers and researchers have considered this contradiction between the method and a strictly mathematical approach. In a 2012 study by Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management, researchers found that "consumers who tackle small balances first are likelier to eliminate their overall debt" than trying to pay off high interest rate balances first.[9] A 2016 study in Harvard Business Review came to a similar conclusion:
We tested a variety of hypotheses and ultimately determined that it is not the size of the repayment or how little is left on a card after a payment that has the biggest impact on people's perception of progress; rather it's what portion of the balance they succeed in paying off. Thus focusing on paying down the account with the smallest balance tends to have the most powerful effect on people's sense of progress – and therefore their motivation to continue paying down their debts.[10]
Author and radio host Dave Ramsey, a proponent of the debt snowball method, concedes that an analysis of math and interest leans toward paying the highest interest debt first. However, based on his experience, Ramsey states that personal finance is "20 percent head knowledge and 80 percent behavior" and he argues that people trying to reduce debt need "quick wins" (i.e., paying off the smallest debt) in order to remain motivated toward debt reduction. Ramsey Solutions has done studies that show motivation is more effective than interest rates.[11]
Research by Moty Amar and colleagues agreed that debtors are inclined to pay small debts first, which they attributed to "debt account aversion", the desire to reduce the number of outstanding debts regardless of balance or interest expense.[12] However, they also found that when debtors are restricted from fully paying debts and are shown the interest that will accrue as a result of their choice, they make the mathematically optimal decision.[12]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "How to Get Out of Debt With the Debt Snowball Plan". Ramsey Solutions.
- ^ "Debt Snowball Vs. Debt Stacking". About.com. Archived from the original on 2015-06-30. Retrieved 2015-06-28.
- ^ "How Does Debt Stacking Work?". Synonym.com.
- ^ "How a `debt snowball` plan works" Archived 2014-02-22 at the Wayback Machine, All About Money
- ^ "How the Debt Snowball Method Works". Ramsey Solutions.
- ^ a b c "Debt Snowball: Overview, Pros and Cons, Application". Investopedia.
- ^ a b "Paying Down Credit Card Debt | Questrom School of Business". www.bu.edu.
- ^ Gobler, Erin (August 10, 2023). "What's the debt snowball method?". USA TODAY Blueprint.
- ^ "The 'snowball approach' to debt - Kellogg School of Management".
- ^ "Research: The Best Strategy for Paying Off Credit Card Debt". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 2017-03-17.
- ^ Dave Ramsey (2009). The Total Money Makeover: A Proven Plan for Financial Fitness. Thomas Nelson Inc, ISBN 978-1595550781
- ^ a b Amar, Moty; Ariely, Dan; Ayal, Shahar; Cryder, Cynthia E.; Rick, Scott I. (2011). "Winning the Battle but Losing the War: The Psychology of Debt Management". Journal of Marketing Research. 48: S38 – S50. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.SPL.S38. S2CID 55616109. SSRN 1760528.