Sam Harris: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Repair CS1 error(s), replaced: website=https://www. → website=www., typo(s) fixed: ically- → ically |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|American philosopher and neuroscientist (born 1967)}} |
|||
{{other people||Sam Harris (disambiguation)}} |
|||
{{Other people||Sam Harris (disambiguation)}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2018}} |
|||
{{Use American English|date=April 2021}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2018}} |
|||
{{Infobox writer |
{{Infobox writer |
||
| honorific_prefix = |
|||
| honorific_suffix = |
|||
| name = Sam Harris |
| name = Sam Harris |
||
| image = Sam Harris 2016 (cropped).jpg |
| image = Sam Harris 2016 (cropped).jpg |
||
| |
| caption = Harris in 2016 |
||
| |
| birth_name = Samuel Benjamin Harris |
||
| pseudonym = |
|||
| birth_name = Samuel Benjamin Harris<ref>http://www.warner.theater/events/sam-harris-3265235/</ref> |
|||
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1967|4|9}} |
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1967|4|9}} |
||
| birth_place = [[Los Angeles |
| birth_place = [[Los Angeles]], California, U.S. |
||
| death_date = |
| death_date = |
||
| death_place = |
| death_place = |
||
| occupation = {{Flatlist| |
|||
| occupation = Author, [[Cognitive neuroscience|cognitive neuroscientist]], [[philosopher]]<!--Discuss before removing!--> |
|||
* Author |
|||
| citizenship = United States |
|||
* podcaster}} |
|||
| education = Philosophy ([[Bachelor of Arts|B.A.]] 2000), Neuroscience ([[Ph.D.]] 2009) |
|||
| education = {{Plainlist| |
|||
| alma_mater = [[Stanford University]]<br />[[University of California, Los Angeles|UCLA]] |
|||
* [[Stanford University]] ([[Bachelor of Arts|BA]]) |
|||
| period = |
|||
* [[University of California, Los Angeles]] ([[Doctor of Philosophy|PhD]])}} |
|||
| genre = Non-fiction |
|||
| genre = [[Nonfiction]] |
|||
| subject = [[Neuroscience]], [[philosophy]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2012/05/15/An-Analysis-of-Sam-Harris-Free-Will.aspx|title=An Analysis of Sam Harris’ Free Will|author=Paul Pardi|website=Philosophy News|date=May 15, 2012|access-date=April 17, 2016}}</ref> [[religion]], [[ethics]], [[spirituality]] |
|||
| subject = [[Neuroscience]], [[philosophy]],<ref name="pardi"/> religion, [[spirituality]], [[ethics]], [[politics]] |
|||
| spouse = {{Marriage|Annaka Harris|2004}} |
|||
| |
| parents = {{Plainlist| |
||
* Berkeley Harris |
|||
* [[Susan Harris|Susan Spivak]]}} |
|||
| spouse = {{Marriage|[[Annaka Harris|Annaka Gorton]]|2004}} |
|||
| children = 2 |
| children = 2 |
||
| awards = {{ubl|[[PEN American Center inactive awards#Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction (1989–2006)|PEN/Martha Albrand Award]] | [[Webby Award]]}} |
|||
| relatives = |
|||
| |
| website = {{URL|samharris.org}} |
||
| module = {{Infobox philosopher|embed = yes |
|||
| signature = Sam_Harris_signature.svg |
|||
| |
| era = [[Contemporary philosophy]] |
||
| region = {{Hlist|[[Western philosophy]]}} |
|||
| module = {{infobox philosopher |
|||
| |
| school_tradition = |
||
| influences = [[Bertrand Russell]], [[Daniel Dennett]], [[David Chalmers]], [[Derek Parfit]], [[Douglas Harding]], [[The Buddha]], [[Nick Bostrom]], [[Richard Dawkins]] |
|||
| era = [[Contemporary philosophy|Contemporary]] |
|||
| influenced = [[Andrew Yang]], [[Coleman Hughes]], [[Douglas Murray (author)|Douglas Murray]], [[Maajid Nawaz]] |
|||
| region = [[Western philosophy|Western]] |
|||
| thesis_year = 2009 |
|||
| school_tradition = [[New Atheism]] |
|||
| thesis_title = The moral landscape: How science could determine human values |
|||
| main_interests = [[Neuroscience]], [[religion]], [[ethics]], [[free will]], [[spirituality]], [[philosophy of mind]] |
|||
| thesis_url = https://www.proquest.com/docview/366925574/ |
|||
| influences = [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Derek Parfit]], [[Steven Pinker]], [[David Chalmers]], [[Daniel Dennett]], [[Thomas Nagel]], [[David Deutsch]], [[Christopher Hitchens]] |
|||
| doctoral_advisor = [[Mark S. Cohen|Mark Cohen]] |
|||
| influenced = |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
| signature = Sam Harris signature.svg |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
'''Samuel Benjamin Harris''' (born April 9, 1967) is an American |
'''Samuel Benjamin Harris''' (born April 9, 1967) is an American philosopher,<!--Discussed in the talk page and reached consensus. See the discussion titled "Neuroscientist, Philosopher".--> neuroscientist, <!--Also discussed in the talk page--> author, and podcast host. His work touches on a range of topics, including [[rationality]], religion, ethics, free will, [[neuroscience]], meditation, psychedelics, [[philosophy of mind]], politics, terrorism, and artificial intelligence. Harris came to prominence for his [[criticism of religion]], and he is known as one of the [[New Atheism#"Four Horsemen"|"Four Horsemen" of New Atheism]], along with [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], and [[Daniel Dennett]].<ref name="phil-now">{{cite magazine |last1=Madigan |first1=Tim |title=Meet the New Atheism / Same as the Old Atheism? |url=https://philosophynow.org/issues/78/Meet_the_New_Atheism_Same_as_the_Old_Atheism |magazine=Philosophy Now |access-date=August 15, 2018 |date=2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] (OUP)|editor1-last=Bullivant |editor1-first=Stephen |editor2-last=Ruse |editor2-first=Michael |title=The Oxford Handbook of Atheism |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-19-964465-0 |page=246 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jbIVAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA246 |access-date=22 May 2019}}</ref><ref name="BJJ" /> |
||
Harris's first book, ''[[The End of Faith]]'' (2004), won the PEN |
Harris's first book, ''[[The End of Faith]]'' (2004), won the [[PEN American Center inactive awards#Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction (1989–2006)|PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction]] and remained on ''The New York Times'' Best Seller list for 33 weeks. Harris has since written six additional books: ''[[Letter to a Christian Nation]]'' in 2006, ''[[The Moral Landscape|The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values]]'' in 2010, the long-form essay ''[[Lying (Harris book)|Lying]]'' in 2011, the short book ''[[Free Will (book)|Free Will]]'' in 2012, ''[[Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion]]'' in 2014, and (with British writer [[Maajid Nawaz]]) ''[[Islam and the Future of Tolerance|Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue]]'' in 2015. Harris's work has been translated into over 20 languages. Some critics have argued that Harris's writings are [[Islamophobia|Islamophobic]].<ref>Greenwald, Glen (April 3, 2013). [http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/03/sam-harris-muslim-animus "Sam Harris, the New Atheists, and anti-Muslim animus"], ''The Guardian''.</ref> Harris and his supporters, however, reject this characterization,<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQqxlzHJrU0 Religion, Politics, Free Speech | Sam Harris | ACADEMIA | Rubin Report] from the [[YouTube]] channel ''The Rubin Report'', September 11, 2015.</ref> adding that such a labeling is an attempt to silence criticism.<ref name="Indi1">[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/atheists-richard-dawkins-christopher-hitchens-and-sam-harris-face-islamophobia-backlash-8570580.html "Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash"], ''The Independent'', April 13, 2013.</ref> |
||
Harris has debated with many prominent figures on the topics of God or religion, including [[William Lane Craig]], [[Jordan Peterson]], [[Rick Warren]], [[Robert Wright (journalist)|Robert Wright]], [[Andrew Sullivan]], [[Cenk Uygur]], [[Reza Aslan]], [[David Wolpe]], [[Deepak Chopra]], [[Ben Shapiro]], and [[Peter Singer]]. Since September 2013, Harris has hosted the ''Making Sense'' podcast (originally titled ''Waking Up''), which has a large listenership. Around 2018, he was described as one of the marginalized "renegade" intellectuals,<ref>{{cite news |last= Weiss |first= Bari |date= 2018-05-08 |title= Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web |url= https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/5/10/17338290/intellectual-dark-web-rogan-peterson-harris-times-weiss |work= The New York Times |location= New York City |access-date= 2022-07-30}}</ref> though Harris disagreed with that characterization.<ref name=":1">{{cite news |last1=Nguyen |first1=Tina |last2=Goldenberg |first2=Sally |date=March 15, 2021 |title=How Yang charmed the right on his road to political stardom |language=en |work=[[Politico]] |url=https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2021/03/15/how-yang-charmed-the-right-on-his-road-to-political-stardom-1368366}}</ref><ref name="republic">{{Cite web |title=#225 – Republic of Lies |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmcdu6B_YUU&t=833s |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211030/lmcdu6B_YUU |archive-date=2021-10-30 |website=YouTube| date=November 18, 2020 }}{{cbignore}}</ref> In September 2018, Harris released a [[meditation]] [[Application software|app]], ''Waking Up with Sam Harris''{{efn|Now named ''Waking Up: Guided Meditation''}}. He is also considered a prominent figure in the [[Mindfulness]] movement, promoting meditation practices without the need for any religious beliefs.<ref name="Salon-Sam"/> |
|||
== Early life and education == |
== Early life and education == |
||
Harris was born |
Samuel Benjamin Harris was born in [[Los Angeles]], California, on April 9, 1967.<ref>''[[Current Biography]]'', January 2012, Vol. 73, Issue 1, p. 37</ref><ref name="Playboy Interview">{{cite magazine|title=Playboy Interview: Sam Harris |magazine=[[Playboy]] |date=Winter 2019 |volume=66 |issue=1 |page=44 |url=https://archive.org/details/Playboy_USA_Winter_2019/page/n45/mode/2up}}</ref> He is the son of the late actor Berkeley Harris, who appeared mainly in [[Western (genre)|Western]] films, and television writer and producer [[Susan Harris]] (née Spivak), who created ''[[Soap (TV series)|Soap]]'' and ''[[The Golden Girls]]'', among other series.<ref name="guardian-spiritual"/><ref name="SusanHarris">{{cite news |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/10/20/girls-series-is-solid-gold-for-harris/ |title='Girls' Series is solid gold for Harris |work=[[Chicago Tribune]] TV Week |date=October 20, 1985 |access-date=September 18, 2013 |author=Anderson, Jon}}</ref> His father, born in North Carolina, came from a [[Quakers|Quaker]] background, and his mother is [[Jews|Jewish]] but not religious.<ref name="Tablet1">{{cite magazine |url=https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/belief/articles/qa-sam-harris |title=Q&A: Sam Harris |first=David |last=Samuels |magazine=[[Tablet (magazine)|Tablet]] |date=2012-05-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230127023653/https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/belief/articles/qa-sam-harris |archive-date=2023-01-27 |url-status=live |access-date=2014-10-06}}</ref> He was raised by his mother following his parents' divorce when he was age two.<ref group=SH>{{cite web |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/im-not-the-sexist-pig-youre-looking-for |title=I'm Not the Sexist Pig You're Looking For |website=www.samharris.org |access-date=2016-04-23 |date=2014-09-15 |archive-date=2016-04-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160418202514/https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/im-not-the-sexist-pig-youre-looking-for}}</ref> Harris has stated that his upbringing was entirely secular and that his parents rarely discussed religion, though he also stated that he was not raised as an [[atheist]].<ref>[https://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/2007/01/05/january-5-2007-sam-harris-extended-interview/3736/ Sam Harris – Extended Interview]; [[PBS]]: ''[[Religion & Ethics Newsweekly]]''; January 5, 2007</ref> |
||
While his original major was in English, Harris became interested in philosophical questions while at [[Stanford University]] after an experience with [[empathogen–entactogen|MDMA]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWEbGsXTWR0&t=7m36s "Sam Harris."] (2008). ''The Science Studio''. Science Network. October 3, 2008. [http://thesciencenetwork.org/media/videos/295/Transcript.pdf Transcript.]</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Harris |first=Sam |title=MDMA Caution with Sam Harris |website=[[YouTube]] |date=June 28, 2011 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgUd0Xv5skk}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |via=Youtube |website=Cogent Canine |title=First Time Sam Harris Took E |date=2017-12-06 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFyg4blzlDM |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200602232651/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFyg4blzlDM&gl=US&hl=en |archive-date=2020-06-02 |access-date=December 8, 2017}}</ref> The experience interested him in the idea he might be able to achieve spiritual insights without the use of drugs.<ref name="newsweek.com" /> Leaving Stanford in his second year, a quarter after his psychoactive experience, he visited [[India]] and [[Nepal]], where he studied [[meditation]] with teachers of [[Buddhism|Buddhist]] and [[Hinduism|Hindu]] religions,<ref name="newsweek.com">{{Cite news |last=Miller |first=Lisa |year=2010 |url=http://europe.newsweek.com/rationalist-sam-harris-believes-god-73859?rm=eu |title=Sam Harris Believes in God |work=Newsweek}}</ref><ref name="Segal2006"/> including [[Dilgo Khyentse]].<ref group="SH" name="Science on the Brink of Death">{{cite web |url=http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/science-on-the-brink-of-death |title=Science on the Brink of Death |date=2012-11-11 |access-date=2012-11-14 |author=Harris, Sam |archive-date=2017-09-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170909005157/http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/science-on-the-brink-of-death }}</ref> For a few weeks in the early 1990s, he was a volunteer guard in the security detail of [[14th Dalai Lama|the Dalai Lama]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Morrison |first=Patt |date=2014-09-24 |title=No God? No problem, says god-free thinker Sam Harris |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-morrison-sam-harris-spirituality-without-religion-20140924-column.html |access-date=2023-05-04 |work=Los Angeles Times |language=en-US|department=[Opinion]}}</ref><ref name="Segal2006">{{Cite news |last=Segal |first=David |date=October 26, 2006 |title=Atheist Evangelist |language=en-US |newspaper=Washington Post |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/25/AR2006102501998_pf.html |
|||
|access-date=2023-05-04 |issn=0190-8286}} [https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2006/10/26/atheist-evangelist-span-classbankheadin-his-bully-pulpit-sam-harris-devoutly-believes-that-religion-is-the-root-of-all-evilspan/a82d61ff-28c0-4f22-af83-4e714f10c4c8/ Alternative link]</ref> |
|||
In 1997, after eleven years overseas, Harris returned to Stanford, completing a [[Bachelor of Arts|B.A.]] degree in [[philosophy]] in 2000.<ref name="Segal2006"/><ref>{{cite magazine|title=The Iconoclast: Sam Harris wants believers to stop believing |first=Lewis I. |last=Rice |date=2005 |magazine=[[Stanford Magazine]] |publisher=Stanford Alumni Association |url=http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2005/julaug/show/books.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091016012306/http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2005/julaug/show/books.html |archive-date=2009-10-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/harris/ |title=Sam Harris |website=The Information Philosopher |access-date=April 30, 2016}}</ref> Harris began writing his first book, ''[[The End of Faith]]'', immediately after the [[September 11 attacks]].<ref name="Segal2006" /> |
|||
He received a [[Doctor of Philosophy|Ph.D.]] degree in [[cognitive neuroscience]] in 2009 from the [[University of California, Los Angeles]],<ref name="Segal2006" /><ref name = Greenberg>{{Cite news |last=Greenberg |first=Brad A. |title=Making Belief |publisher=UCLA Magazine |date=April 1, 2008 |accessdate=October 28, 2009 |url=http://www.magazine.ucla.edu/depts/quicktakes/making-belief/}}</ref><ref name="HealyLATimes">{{Cite news |last=Healy |first=Melissa |title=Religion: The heart believes what it will, but the brain behaves the same either way |work=Los Angeles Times |date=September 30, 2009 |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/09/religion-the-heart-believes-what-it-will-but-the-brain-behaves-the-same-either-way.html |accessdate=October 17, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140124025949/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/09/religion-the-heart-believes-what-it-will-but-the-brain-behaves-the-same-either-way.html |archivedate=January 24, 2014}}</ref> using [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] to conduct research into the neural basis of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty.<ref name="Segal2006" /><ref name="HealyLATimes" /> His thesis was titled "The moral landscape: How science could determine human values", and his advisor was [[Mark S. Cohen]].<ref name="thesis">{{cite web |url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/366925574/ |title=The moral landscape How science could determine human values |publisher=[[ProQuest]] |date=2009 |accessdate=June 5, 2014 |author=Harris, Sam}}</ref> |
|||
He received a [[Doctor of Philosophy|Ph.D.]] in [[cognitive neuroscience]] in 2009 from the [[University of California, Los Angeles]],<ref name="Segal2006" /><ref name = Greenberg>{{Cite magazine |last=Greenberg |first=Brad A. |title=Making Belief |magazine=UCLA Magazine |date=April 1, 2008 |access-date=October 28, 2009 |url=http://www.magazine.ucla.edu/depts/quicktakes/making-belief/}}</ref><ref name="HealyLATimes">{{Cite news |last=Healy |first=Melissa |title=Religion: The heart believes what it will, but the brain behaves the same either way |work=Los Angeles Times |date=September 30, 2009 |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/09/religion-the-heart-believes-what-it-will-but-the-brain-behaves-the-same-either-way.html |access-date=October 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140124025949/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/09/religion-the-heart-believes-what-it-will-but-the-brain-behaves-the-same-either-way.html |archive-date=January 24, 2014}}</ref> using [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] to conduct research into the neural basis of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty.<ref name="Segal2006" /><ref name="HealyLATimes" /> His thesis was titled ''The Moral Landscape: How Science Could Determine Human Values''. His advisor was [[Mark S. Cohen]].<ref name="thesis">{{cite thesis |url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/366925574/ |title=The Moral Landscape: How Science Could Determine Human Values |via=[[ProQuest]]|publisher=UCLA |type=PhD dissertation |date=2009 |access-date=June 5, 2014 |last=Harris|first=Sam|isbn=978-1-124-01190-5}}</ref> |
|||
==Views== |
|||
===Criticism of Abrahamic religions=== |
|||
Harris states that religion contains bad ideas, calling it "one of the most perverse misuses of intelligence we have ever devised".<ref name=prob>{{Cite news |author=Sam Harris |work=[[The Washington Post]] |url=http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris/2007/10/the_problem_with_atheism.html |title=The Problem with Atheism |date=September 28, 2007 |accessdate=December 6, 2007}}</ref> He compares modern religious beliefs to the myths of the [[Ancient Greeks]], which were once accepted as fact but which are obsolete today. In a January 2007 interview with [[Public Broadcasting Service|PBS]], Harris said, "We don't have a word for not believing in [[Zeus]], which is to say we are all atheists in respect to Zeus. And we don't have a word for not being an [[astrologer]]." He goes on to say that the term atheist will be retired only when "we all just achieve a level of intellectual honesty where we are no longer going to pretend to be certain about things we are not certain about".<ref name=PBS>{{cite web |first=Sam |last=Harris |year=2005 |url=https://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week1019/interview2.html |title=Interview: Sam Harris |publisher=[[PBS]]}}</ref> |
|||
==Career== |
|||
Harris advocates a benign, noncoercive, corrective form of intolerance, distinguishing it from historic [[religious persecution]]. He promotes a conversational intolerance, in which personal convictions are scaled against evidence, and where intellectual honesty is demanded equally in religious views and non-religious views.<ref>{{cite video|people=Harris, Sam |date= |time=1:00:00 |title=Does God Exist? A debate between bestselling authors Rabbi David Wolpe and Sam Harris |url=http://www.jewishtvnetwork.com/?bcpid=533363107&bctid=1329234778 |publisher=Jewish Television Network |accessdate=May 20, 2011 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090520014732/http://www.jewishtvnetwork.com/?bcpid=533363107&bctid=1329234778 |archivedate=May 20, 2009 |df= }}</ref> He also believes there is a need to counter inhibitions that prevent the open critique of religious ideas, beliefs, and practices under the auspices of "tolerance".<ref name=TGWWT>[[Brian Flemming]] & Sam Harris, 2005. ''The God Who Wasn't There'', extended interviews. Beyond Belief Media.</ref> He has stated that he has received death threats for some of his views on religion.<ref>Harris, Sam (January 2, 2013). [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-riddle-of-the-gun "The Riddle of the Gun"]. Sam Harris.</ref> |
|||
===Writing=== |
|||
Harris's writing concerns [[philosophy]], [[neuroscience]], and [[criticism of religion]]. He came to prominence for his criticism of religion ([[Islam]] in particular) and he is described as one of the [[New Atheism#"Four Horsemen"|Four Horsemen of Atheism]], along with [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], and [[Daniel Dennett]].<ref name="bowles_2019">{{cite news|last1=Bowles|first1=Nellie|date=December 14, 2018|title=Patreon Bars Anti-Feminist for Racist Speech, Inciting Revolt|work=[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/technology/patreon-hate-speech-bans.html|access-date=30 August 2019|quote=On Dec. 6, Patreon kicked the anti-feminist polemic Carl Benjamin, who works under the name Sargon of Akkad, off its site for using racist language on YouTube. That same week, it removed the right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos a day after he opened an account.{{pb}}"The moves prompted a revolt. Mr. Harris, citing worries about censorship, announced that he would leave Patreon.{{nbsp}}...{{pb}}[...]{{pb}}"...{{nbsp}}Mr. Harris, who gathered his fan base as a pugnacious atheist and fierce critic of Islam{{nbsp}}...|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181224213124/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/technology/patreon-hate-speech-bans.html |archive-date=24 December 2018}}</ref><ref name="phil-now"/> He has written for publications such as ''[[The New York Times]]'', the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', ''[[The Economist]]'', ''[[The Times]]'' (of London), ''[[The Boston Globe]]'', and ''[[The Atlantic]]''.<ref name="edge-bio">{{cite web |title=Sam Harris |url=https://www.edge.org/memberbio/sam_harris |website=Edge.org |access-date=August 26, 2018}}</ref> Five of Harris's books have been [[The New York Times Best Seller list|''New York Times'' bestsellers]], and his writing has been translated into over 20 languages.<ref name="edge-bio"/> ''[[The End of Faith]]'' (2004) remained on ''The New York Times'' Best Seller list for 33 weeks.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last1=Van Biema |first1=David |title=What Your Brain Looks Like on Faith |magazine=Time |url=http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1694723,00.html |access-date=August 16, 2018|date=2007-12-14}}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Podcast=== |
||
In September 2013, Harris began releasing the ''Waking Up'' podcast (since re-titled ''Making Sense''). Episodes vary in length but often last over two hours.<ref name="guardian-podcasts">{{cite news |last1=Davies |first1=Hannah J |last2=Verdier |first2=Hannah |last3=Sanderson |first3=Max |title=The con woman who scammed New York's elite – podcasts of the week |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jan/03/fake-heiress-anna-delvey-david-baddiel-podcasts-of-the-week |access-date=22 June 2020 |work=The Guardian |date=3 January 2020}}</ref> Releases do not follow a regular schedule.<ref name=":0" /> |
|||
[[File:Sam Harris-20100211.jpg|thumb|Harris speaking in 2010 at [[TED (conference)|TED]] ]] |
|||
Harris considers Islam to be "especially belligerent and inimical to the norms of civil discourse," relative to other world religions. He asserts that the "dogmatic commitment to ''using'' violence to defend one’s faith, both from within and without" to varying degrees, is a central Islamic doctrine that is found in few other religions to the same degree, and that "this difference has consequences in the real world."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/response-to-controversy |title=Response to Controversy |last=Harris |first=Sam |date=June 21, 2014 |accessdate=October 23, 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The podcast focuses on a wide array of topics related to science and spirituality, including philosophy, religion, morality, free will, neuroscience, meditation, psychedelics and artificial intelligence. Harris has interviewed a wide range of guests, including scientists, philosophers, spiritual teachers, and authors. Guests have included [[Jordan Peterson]], Dan Dennett, [[Janna Levin]], [[Peter Singer]], and [[David Chalmers]].<ref name=":0">{{cite web |date=September 13, 2022 |title=Waking Up with Sam Harris |url=https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/296-repairing-our-country/id733163012?i=1000579369510 |access-date=September 13, 2022 |website=iTunes – Podcasts |quote=I have been, traditionally, a liberal. I have never voted republican{{nbsp}}... certainly not for president.}}</ref><ref name="Weiss">{{cite news |last=Weiss |first=Bari |author-link=Bari Weiss |date=May 8, 2018 |title=Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/intellectual-dark-web.html |access-date=May 8, 2018}}</ref><ref name="guardian-spiritual">{{cite news |last1=Anthony |first1=Andrew |author-link1=Andrew Anthony |title=Sam Harris, the new atheist with a spiritual side |url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/feb/16/sam-harris-interview-new-atheism-four-horsemen-faith-science-religion-rationalism |access-date=22 June 2020|language=en-GB |work=The Observer |date=16 February 2019}}</ref><ref name="vox-thn">{{cite magazine |last1=Turkheimer |first1=Eric |author-link1=Eric Turkheimer |last2=Harden |first2=Kathryn Paige |last3=Nisbett |first3=Richard E. |author-link3=Richard E. Nisbett |date=18 May 2017 |title=Charles Murray is once again peddling junk science about race and IQ |magazine=[[Vox (website)|Vox]] |url=https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/5/18/15655638/charles-murray-race-iq-sam-harris-science-free-speech |access-date=16 October 2018}}</ref> |
|||
In 2006, after the [[Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy|''Jyllands-Posten'' Muhammad cartoons controversy]], Harris wrote, "The idea that Islam is a 'peaceful religion hijacked by extremists' is a dangerous fantasy—and it is now a particularly dangerous fantasy for Muslims to indulge. It is not at all clear how we should proceed in our dialogue with the Muslim world, but deluding ourselves with euphemisms is not the answer. It now appears to be a truism in foreign policy circles that real reform in the Muslim world cannot be imposed from the outside. But it is important to recognize why this is so—it is so because the Muslim world is utterly deranged by its religious tribalism. In confronting the religious literalism and ignorance of the Muslim world, we must appreciate how terrifyingly isolated Muslims have become in intellectual terms."<ref name="Indi1">Taylor, Jerome (April 12, 2013). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/atheists-richard-dawkins-christopher-hitchens-and-sam-harris-face-islamophobia-backlash-8570580.html "Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash"]. ''[[The Independent]]''.</ref><ref name="ChapelHill">Boorstein, Michelle (February 11, 2015). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2015/02/11/chapel-hill-killings-shine-light-on-particular-tensions-between-islam-and-atheism/ "Chapel Hill killings shine light on particular tensions between Islam and atheism"]. ''[[The Washington Post]]''.</ref><ref>Harris, Sam (February 7, 2006). [http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060207_reality_islam "Sam Harris on the Reality of Islam"]. [[Truthdig]].</ref><ref>Kaufman, Scott (January 22, 2015). [http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/sam-harris-liberals-like-greenwald-aslan-support-thuggish-ultimatum-of-islamic-terrorists/ "Sam Harris: Liberals like Greenwald and Aslan support the 'thuggish ultimatum' of radical Islam"]. [[The Raw Story]]</ref> He states that his criticism of the religion is aimed not at Muslims as people, but at the doctrine of [[Islam]]. |
|||
===Meditation app=== |
|||
Harris wrote a response to controversy over his criticism of Islam, which also aired on a debate hosted by ''[[The Huffington Post]]'' on whether critics of Islam are [[Islamophobia#Criticism of term and use|unfairly labeled]] as bigots: |
|||
In September 2018, Harris released a meditation course app, ''Waking Up with Sam Harris''. The app provides daily meditations; long guided meditations; daily "Moments" (brief meditations and reminders); conversations with thought leaders in psychology, meditation, philosophy, psychedelics, and other disciplines; a selection of lessons on various topics, such as ''Mind & Emotion'', ''Free Will'', and ''Doing Good''; and more. Users of the app are introduced to several types of meditation, such as [[mindfulness]] meditation, [[vipassanā]]-style meditation, [[Mettā#Mettā meditation|loving-kindness meditation]], and [[Dzogchen]].<ref name="app-review">{{cite magazine |last1=Freeland |first1=Ben |title=Sam Harris' Waking Up App, Reviewed |url=https://medium.com/@benfreeland/sam-harris-waking-up-app-reviewed-1d50e259e93d |magazine=Medium |access-date=30 May 2019 |date=29 March 2019}}</ref> |
|||
{{quote|Is it really true that the sins for which I hold Islam accountable are “committed at least to an equal extent by many other groups, especially [my] own”? ... The freedom to poke fun at Mormonism is guaranteed [not by the First Amendment but] by the fact that Mormons do not dispatch assassins to silence their critics or summon murderous hordes in response to satire. ... Can any reader of this page imagine the staging of a similar play [to ''[[The Book of Mormon (musical)|The Book of Mormon]]''] about Islam in the United States, or anywhere else, in the year 2013? ... At this moment in history, there is only one religion that systematically stifles free expression with credible threats of violence. The truth is, we have already lost our [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] rights with respect to Islam—and because they brand any observation of this fact a symptom of Islamophobia, Muslim apologists like Greenwald are largely to blame.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/islam-islamophobia-new-atheist-sam-harris-richard-dawkins/51658aac02a76018a30001ed|title=Huffington Post|publisher=}}</ref><ref>[http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/response-to-controversy2 Response to Controversy] Version 2.3 (April 7, 2013)</ref>}} |
|||
In September 2020, Harris announced his commitment to donate at least 10% of Waking Up's profits to highly [[effective altruism|effective]] charities,<ref name="wakingup-2">{{cite web | url=https://dynamic.wakingup.com/course/658 | title=Waking Up Turns 2 | access-date=September 28, 2020 | archive-date=January 18, 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220118033319/https://dynamic.wakingup.com/course/658 }}</ref> thus becoming the first company to sign the [[Giving What We Can]] pledge for companies.<ref name="gwwc-members">{{Cite web|title=Members|url=https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/about-us/members/|access-date=2020-09-25|website=www.givingwhatwecan.org}}</ref> The pledge was retroactive, taking into account the profits since the day the app launched two years previously.<ref name="wakingup-2" /> |
|||
Harris has criticized common usage of the term "[[Islamophobia]]". "My criticism of Islam is a criticism of beliefs and their consequences," he wrote following a controversial clash with [[Ben Affleck]] in October 2014 on the show ''[[Real Time with Bill Maher]]'', "but my fellow liberals reflexively view it as an expression of intolerance toward people." During an email exchange with [[Glenn Greenwald]], a critic of the New Atheists, Harris argued that "Islamophobia is a term of propaganda designed to protect Islam from the forces of secularism by conflating all criticism of it with racism and xenophobia. And it is doing its job, because people like you have been taken in by it."<ref name="Indi1" /><ref>{{citation |last=Harris |first=Sam |title=Can Liberalism Be Saved From Itself? |url=http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/can-liberalism-be-saved-from-itself |accessdate=December 26, 2014 |location=London}}</ref> |
|||
== Socio-religious Views== |
|||
=== Religion === |
|||
Harris has referred to [[Catholicism]] as "ghoulish machinery set to whirling through the ages by the opposing winds of shame and sadism", and asserts that the Catholic Church has spent "two millennia demonizing human sexuality to a degree unmatched by any other institution, declaring the most basic, healthy, mature, and consensual behaviors taboo." Harris has criticized the Catholic Church's structure and forced [[celibacy]] within its ranks for attracting pedophiles, and blames its opposition to the use of contraception for poverty, shorter lifespans, and the proliferation of [[HIV/AIDS]].<ref>[http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/brin Bringing the Vatican to Justice]; SamHarris.org; May 10, 2010</ref> |
|||
{{Atheism sidebar}} |
|||
Harris is generally a critic of religion, and is considered a leading figure in the [[New Atheist]] movement. Harris is particularly opposed to what he refers to as [[dogma]]tic belief, and says that "Pretending to know things one doesn't know is a betrayal of science – and yet it is the lifeblood of religion."<ref group=SH>{{Cite web|title=Meme #8|url=https://samharris.org/meme-8/|date=2017-05-03|website=Sam Harris|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-01}}</ref> While purportedly opposed to religion in general and the belief systems of them, Harris believes that all religions are not created equal.<ref name="guardian-spiritual"/> Often invoking the non-violent nature of [[Jainism]]<ref name ="Jains-Today">{{cite web |date=September 6, 2019 |title=Sam Harris Compares Islam with Jainism and Tells Which one of Them is the Religion of Peace |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRZrXM8J3wc |work=Jains Today| access-date=July 2, 2024|quote=Jainism is a religion of peace}}</ref> to contrast with [[Islam]],<ref name="Salon don">{{Cite magazine |last=Don |first=Katherine |date=2010-10-17 |title='The Moral Landscape': Why science should shape morality |url=https://www.salon.com/2010/10/17/sam_harris_interview/ |access-date=2024-07-28 |magazine=Salon |language=en}}</ref> Harris argues that the differences in religious doctrines and scriptures are the main indicators of a religion's value.<ref name="response-controversy">{{cite web |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/response-to-controversy |title=Response to Controversy |last=Harris |first=Sam |date=June 21, 2014 |access-date=October 23, 2016 |archive-date=October 24, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161024151823/https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/response-to-controversy }}</ref><ref name="Sun-Sam">{{cite magazine |date=September 1, 2006 |title=The Temple of Reason Sam Harris On How Religion Puts The World At Risk| quote=Jainism is the best example that I know of [a peaceful religion].{{nbsp}}... Nonviolence is its core doctrine |magazine=Sun Magazine| access-date=July 2, 2024 |
|||
|url=https://www.thesunmagazine.org/articles/22970-the-temple-of-reason}}</ref> |
|||
In September 2006 Harris debated [[Robert Wright (journalist)|Robert Wright]] on the rationality of religious belief.<ref>September 22, 2006 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dwD6XQ9Tsw] (a 90-minute debate).</ref> In 2007, he engaged in a lengthy debate with conservative commentator [[Andrew Sullivan]] on the Internet forum ''[[Beliefnet]]''.<ref name="harris-sullivan">Harris, Sam; Sullivan, Andrew (January 16, 2007). [http://www.beliefnet.com/story/209/story_20904.html "Is Religion 'Built Upon Lies'?"] [[Beliefnet]].</ref> In April 2007, Harris debated with evangelical pastor [[Rick Warren]] for ''[[Newsweek]]'' magazine.<ref name="harris-warren">Harris, Sam; Warren, Rick (April 8, 2007). [http://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-poll-90-believe-god-97611 "Newsweek Poll: 90% Believe in God"]. ''[[Newsweek]]''.</ref> Harris debated with Rabbi [[David Wolpe]] in 2007.<ref name="harris-wolpe-debate">{{cite news |last1=Padilla |first1=Steve |date=29 December 2007 |title=Rabbi, atheist debate with passion, humor |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-dec-29-me-beliefs29-story.html |access-date=20 June 2020 |agency=Los Angeles Times}}</ref> In 2010, Harris joined [[Michael Shermer]] to debate with [[Deepak Chopra]] and [[Jean Houston]] on the future of God in a debate hosted by ''[[Nightline|ABC News Nightline]]''.<ref name="nightline-debate">{{cite news |last1=Harris |first1=Dan |last2=Brown |first2=Ely |date=22 March 2010 |title='Nightline' 'Face-Off': Does God Have a Future? |url=https://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/FaceOff/nightline-face-off-god-future/story?id=10170505 |access-date=20 June 2020 |agency=ABC News}}</ref> Harris debated with Christian philosopher [[William Lane Craig]] in April 2011 on whether there can be an [[objectivity (philosophy)|objective]] [[morality]] without God.<ref name="craig-new-theist">{{cite news |author=Schneider, Nathan |date=July 1, 2013 |title=The New Theist |url=http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/ |work=[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]}}</ref> In June and July 2018, he met with Canadian psychologist [[Jordan Peterson]] for a series of debates on religion, particularly the relationship between religious values and scientific fact in defining truth.<ref name="observer-harris-peterson">{{Cite web |last=Ruffolo |first=Michael |date=June 26, 2018 |title=Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson waste a lot of time, then talk about God for 20 minutes |url=https://www.nationalobserver.com/2018/06/26/analysis/sam-harris-and-jordan-peterson-waste-lot-time-then-talk-about-god-20-minutes |access-date=April 23, 2019 |work=[[National Observer (Canada)|National Observer]]}}</ref><ref name="spectator-harris-peterson">{{Cite web |last=Murray |first=Douglas |date=September 16, 2018 |title=Arena talks in Dublin and London with Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris and Douglas Murray |url=https://spectator.us/jordan-peterson-sam-harris-douglas-murray/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190423002900/https://spectator.us/jordan-peterson-sam-harris-douglas-murray/ |archive-date=April 23, 2019 |access-date=April 23, 2019 |work=[[The Spectator]] USA}}</ref> Harris has debated with the scholar [[Reza Aslan]].<ref name="jennek-thesis">{{cite thesis |last1=Jennek |first1=Rafal |date=2017 |title=Sam Harris on Religion in Peace and Conflict |url=https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1110381/FULLTEXT01.pdf |access-date=20 June 2020 |publisher=Department of Theology, Uppsala Universitet}}</ref> |
|||
====Judaism==== |
|||
{{See also|Criticism of Judaism|Criticism of the Talmud|Criticism of Moses}} |
|||
In ''The End of Faith'', Harris is critical of the Jewish faith and its followers: |
|||
In 2006, Harris described [[Islam]] as "all fringe and no center",<ref group=SH>{{Cite web|title=The Reality of Islam|url=https://samharris.org/the-reality-of-islam/|date=2006-02-08|website=Sam Harris|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-30}}</ref> and wrote in ''[[The End of Faith]]'' that "the doctrine of Islam{{nbsp}}... represents a unique danger to all of us", arguing that the [[war on terror]] is really a war against Islam.<ref name="Adams-2016">{{Cite book|last=Adams|first=Alex|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XR9qDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA29|page=29|title=Political Torture in Popular Culture: The Role of Representations in the Post-9/11 Torture Debate |year=2016|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-317-28939-5|language=en}}</ref> In 2007, Harris in the famous “Four Horsemen” debate asked fellow atheists, Hitchens, Dawkins, and Dennett, “Do you feel there's any burden we have, as critics of religion, to be evenhanded in our criticism of religion, or is it fair to notice that there's a spectrum of religious ideas and commitments and Islam is on one end of it and the Amish and the Jains and others are on another end, and there are real differences here that we have to take seriously.”<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Four Horsemen by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett: 9780525511953 {{!}} PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books |url=https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/586726/the-four-horsemen-by-christopher-hitchens-richard-dawkins-sam-harris-and-daniel-dennett/ |access-date=2024-09-14 |website=PenguinRandomhouse.com |language=en-US}}</ref> In 2014, Harris said he considers Islam to be "especially belligerent and inimical to the norms of civil discourse", as it involves what Harris considers to be "bad ideas, held for bad reasons, leading to bad behavior."<ref name="response-controversy"/> In 2015 Harris and secular Islamic activist [[Maajid Nawaz]] cowrote'' [[Islam and the Future of Tolerance]]''.<ref>{{cite book |title=Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QgGnCgAAQBAJ |year=2015 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-08870-2 |first1=Sam |last1=Harris |first2=Nawaz |last2=Maajid |access-date=14 December 2020 |archive-date=7 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200507174420/https://books.google.com/books/about/Islam_and_the_Future_of_Tolerance.html?id=QgGnCgAAQBAJ |url-status=live}}</ref> In this book, Harris argues that the word [[Islamophobia]] is a "pernicious meme", a label which prevents discussion about the threat of Islam.<ref name="Adams-2016"/> Harris has been described in 2020 by Jonathan Matusitz, Associate Professor at the [[University of Central Florida College of Sciences|University of Central Florida]], as "a champion of the [[counter-jihad]] left".<ref>{{Cite book|last=Matusitz|first=Jonathan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Nx__DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1988|page=1988|title=Communication in Global Jihad|year=2020|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-000-22435-1|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
{{quote|The gravity of Jewish suffering over the ages, culminating in the Holocaust, makes it almost impossible to entertain any suggestion that Jews might have brought their troubles upon themselves. This is, however, in a rather narrow sense, the truth. […] the ideology of Judaism remains a lightning rod for intolerance to this day. […] Jews, insofar as they are religious, believe that they are bearers of a unique covenant with God. As a consequence, they have spent the last two thousand years collaborating with those who see them as different by seeing themselves as irretrievably so. Judaism is as intrinsically divisive, as ridiculous in its literalism, and as at odds with the civilizing insights of modernity as any other religion. Jewish settlers, by exercising their "freedom of belief" on contested land, are now one of the principal obstacles to peace in the Middle East.}} |
|||
Harris is also critical of the [[Christian right]] in politics in the United States, blaming them for the political focus on "pseudo-problems like gay marriage".<ref name="albert-mohler">{{cite news |last1=Mohler |first1=R. Albert Jr. |title=The End of Faith – Secularism with the Gloves Off |url=http://www.christianpost.com/article/20040819/6130.htm |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120629202825/http://www.christianpost.com/article/20040819/6130.htm |archive-date=29 June 2012 |access-date=19 February 2019 |work=The Christian Post |date=19 August 2004}}</ref> He is also critical of [[liberal Christianity]]{{snd}}as represented, for instance, by the theology of [[Paul Tillich]]{{snd}}which he argues claims to base its beliefs on the Bible despite actually being influenced by secular modernity. He further states that in so doing liberal Christianity provides rhetorical cover to fundamentalists.<ref name="albert-mohler"/> |
|||
Regarding Israel and Judaism, Harris has said, "I don't think Israel should exist as a Jewish state. I think it is obscene, irrational and unjustifiable to have a state organized around a religion. So I don't celebrate the idea that there's a Jewish homeland in the Middle East. I certainly don't support any Jewish claims to real estate based on the Bible. Though I just said that I don't think Israel should exist as a Jewish state, the justification for such a state is rather easy to find. We need look no further than the fact that the rest of the world has shown itself eager to murder the Jews at almost every opportunity. So, if there were going to be a state organized around protecting members of a single religion, it certainly should be a Jewish state. Now, friends of Israel might consider this a rather tepid defense, but it's the strongest one I've got. I think the idea of a religious state is ultimately untenable."<ref>Harris, Sam (July 27, 2014). [http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/why-dont-i-criticize-israel "Why Don’t I Criticize Israel?"]. Sam Harris.</ref> |
|||
Harris emphasizes that all religions are not the same and that if any religion can be considered a "religion of peace", it is not Islam, but rather [[Jainism]],<ref name="Salon don"/><ref name ="Jains-Today"/><ref name="Sun-Sam"/> which emerged in India around the same time as Buddhism, and has non-violence as its core doctrine.<ref name="Sun-Sam"/> He underscores that to be a practicing Jain, one has to be a vegetarian and a pacifist, while the Jain monks even wear masks in order to avoid breathing in any living thing.<ref name="Sun-Sam"/><ref name ="Jains-Today"/> But, he points out that even the Jain religion has its problems, as Jains believe certain things based on insufficient evidence, which leads to some religious dogmas.<ref name="Sun-Sam"/> |
|||
===On atheism=== |
|||
Harris has been referred to, along with Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens, as one of the "new atheists", but he considers the term "atheist" to be problematic. He said, "while I am now one of the public voices of atheism, I never thought of myself as an atheist before being inducted to speak as one [...] I think that 'atheist' is a term that we do not need, in the same way that we don't need a word for someone who rejects astrology."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Harris |first1=Sam |title=The Problem with Atheism |url=http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-problem-with-atheism |website=Sam Harris Blog |publisher=The Washington Post |accessdate=October 2, 2007}}</ref> |
|||
Harris has often noted some positive aspects of [[Buddhist]] thought, especially in relation to meditation, such as [[Buddhism]]'s emphasis that one's behavior and intentions impact the mind, and in order to achieve happiness, one needs to strive towards "overcoming fear and hatred" while "maximizing love and compassion".<ref name="Sun-Sam"/> In 2019, while discussing his book ''Waking Up: Searching for Spirituality Without Religion,'' Harris noted that the West could learn a lot from the East about the traditions of meditation found in [[Hinduism]] and [[Buddhism]],<ref name="guardian-spiritual"/> though he considers that meditation can be practiced without any traditional religious beliefs.<ref name="Salon-Sam">{{cite magazine |date=December 6, 2014 |title=Mindfulness' 'truthiness' problem: Sam Harris, science and the truth about Buddhist tradition |last1=Purser |first1=Ronald |last2=Cooper |first2=Andrew | url=https://www.salon.com/2014/12/06/mindfulness_truthiness_problem_sam_harris_science_and_the_truth_about_buddhist_tradition/|magazine=Salon| access-date=July 2, 2024 }}</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Spirituality=== |
||
Harris holds that there is "nothing irrational about seeking the states of mind that lie at the core of many religions. Compassion, awe, devotion, and feelings of oneness are surely among the most valuable experiences a person can have."<ref name="newsweek.com" /> |
|||
Harris holds that there is "nothing irrational about seeking the states of mind that lie at the core of many religions. Compassion, awe, devotion, and feelings of oneness are surely among the most valuable experiences a person can have", <ref name="newsweek.com" /> saying:<ref group=SH>{{cite web |last1=Harris |first1=Sam |title=God's Dupes |url=https://samharris.org/gods-dupes/ |website=SamHarris.org |access-date=10 April 2021 |date=15 March 2007}}</ref> |
|||
Harris rejects the dichotomy between religious spirituality on the one hand and scientific rationality on the other, and favors a middle path that preserves spirituality and science, but does not involve religion.<ref name="clothier">{{cite web|last1=Clothier|first1=Peter|title='Waking Up', by Sam Harris: A Book Review|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/waking-up-by-sam-harris-a_b_8079028.html|publisher=Huffington Post|accessdate=October 1, 2017|date=September 2, 2016}}</ref> He writes that spirituality should be understood in light of scientific disciplines like [[neuroscience]] and [[psychology]].<ref name="clothier"/> Science, he contends, can show how to maximize human well-being, but may fail to answer certain questions about the nature of being, answers to some of which he says are discoverable directly through our experience.<ref name="clothier"/> His conception of spirituality does not involve a belief in God.<ref name="h-smith">{{cite web|last1=Smith|first1=Holly|title=Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion|url=http://www.washingtonindependentreviewofbooks.com/bookreview/executive-director-at-the-common-good|publisher=Washington Independent Review of Books|accessdate=October 2, 2017|date=September 17, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
{{Blockquote |
|||
| text =Everything of value that people get from religion can be had more honestly, without presuming anything on insufficient evidence. The rest is self-deception, set to music. |
|||
| author = Sam Harris (15 March 2007) |
|||
| source = ''SamHarris.org''}} |
|||
Harris rejects the dichotomy between [[spirituality]] and [[rationality]], favoring a middle path that preserves spirituality and science but does not involve religion.<ref name="clothier">{{cite web|last1=Clothier|first1=Peter|title=''Waking Up'', by Sam Harris: A Book Review|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/waking-up-by-sam-harris-a_b_8079028.html|work=Huffington Post|access-date=October 1, 2017|date=September 2, 2016}}</ref> He writes that spirituality should be understood in light of scientific disciplines like [[neuroscience]] and [[psychology]].<ref name="clothier"/> Science, he contends, can show how to maximize human well-being, but may fail to answer certain questions about the nature of being, answers to some of which he says are discoverable directly through our experience.<ref name="clothier"/> His conception of spirituality does not involve a belief in any god.<ref name="h-smith">{{cite magazine|last1=Smith|first1=Holly|title=''Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion''|url=http://www.washingtonindependentreviewofbooks.com/bookreview/executive-director-at-the-common-good|magazine=[[Washington Independent Review of Books]]|access-date=October 2, 2017|date=September 17, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
In ''[[Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion]]'' (2014), Harris describes his experience with [[Dzogchen]], a [[Tibetan Buddhist]] meditation practice, and recommends it to his readers.<ref name="clothier"/> He writes that the purpose of spirituality (as he defines it – he concedes that the term's uses are diverse and sometimes indefensible) is to become aware that our sense of self is illusory, and says this realization brings both happiness and insight into the nature of [[consciousness]].<ref name="clothier"/><ref name="kirkus">{{cite journal |title=Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion |work=[[Kirkus Reviews]] |date=August 29, 2014 |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sam-harris/waking-up-guide-to-spirituality/ |accessdate=August 12, 2016}}</ref> This process of realization, he argues, is based on experience and is not contingent on [[faith]].<ref name="clothier"/> |
|||
In ''[[Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion]]'' (2014), Harris describes his experience with [[Dzogchen]], a [[Tibetan Buddhist]] meditation practice, and recommends it to his readers.<ref name="clothier"/> He writes that the purpose of spirituality (as he defines it – he concedes that the term's uses are diverse and sometimes indefensible) is to become aware that our sense of self is illusory, and says this realization brings both happiness and insight into the nature of [[consciousness]], mirroring core Buddhist beliefs.<ref name="clothier"/><ref name="kirkus">{{cite journal |title=''Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion'' |journal=[[Kirkus Reviews]] |date=August 29, 2014 |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sam-harris/waking-up-guide-to-spirituality/ |access-date=August 12, 2016}}</ref> This process of realization, he argues, is based on experience and is not contingent on [[faith]].<ref name="clothier"/><ref name="guardian-spiritual"/> |
|||
{{Blockquote |
|||
| text = When you learn how to meditate, you recognize that there is another possibility, which is to be vividly aware of your experience in each moment in a way that frees you from routine misery. |
|||
| author = Sam Harris (February 2019) |
|||
| source = ''The Guardian''}} |
|||
===Science and morality=== |
===Science and morality=== |
||
{{See also|Science of morality}} |
|||
In his third book, ''[[The Moral Landscape]]: How Science Can Determine Human Values'', Harris says that "Human well-being is not a random phenomenon. It depends on many factors—ranging from genetics and neurobiology to sociology and economics." Harris says that it is time to promote a [[science of morality|scientific approach to normative morality]], rejecting the idea that religion determines what is good. He believes that once scientists begin proposing moral norms in papers, supernatural moral systems will join "[[astrology]], [[witchcraft]] and [[Greek mythology]] on the scrapheap".<ref name="newscientist.com">{{cite web |author=Harris, Sam |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827822.100-morality-we-can-send-religion-to-the-scrapheap.html |title=Morality: 'We can send religion to the scrap heap.' |work=[[New Scientist]] |date=October 20, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
Harris considers that the [[well-being]] of conscious creatures forms the basis of morality. In ''[[The Moral Landscape]]'', he argues that science can in principle answer moral questions and help maximize well-being.<ref name="Salon don"/> |
|||
Harris rejects the moral authority of religion, and points to what he sees as failures or misplaced priorities, for example saying that "The Catholic Church is more concerned about preventing contraception than preventing child rape".<ref name="Salon don" /> |
|||
Harris also criticizes [[Cultural relativism|cultural]] and [[moral relativism]], arguing that it prevents people from making objective moral judgments about practices that clearly harm human well-being, such as [[female genital mutilation]]. Harris contends that we can make scientifically based claims about the negative impacts of such practices on human welfare, and that withholding judgment in these cases is tantamount to claiming complete ignorance about what contributes to human well-being.<ref name="Salon don" /> |
|||
===Free will=== |
===Free will=== |
||
{{See also|Neuroscience of free will}} |
|||
Harris says the idea of free will "cannot be mapped on to any conceivable reality" and is incoherent.<ref>Pardi, Paul (May 15, 2012). [http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2012/05/15/An-Analysis-of-Sam-Harris-Free-Will.aspx "An Analysis of Sam Harris' Free Will"]. Philosophy News.</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Harris|first1=Sam|title=Free Will and "Free Will"|url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/free-will-and-free-will|publisher=SamHarris.Org|accessdate=December 18, 2016|quote=[...] I believe that popular confusion on this point is worth lingering over, because certain moral impulses -- for vengeance, say -- depend upon a view of human agency that is both conceptually incoherent and empirically false. I also believe that the conventional illusion of free will can be dispelled -- not merely ignored, tinkered with, or set on new foundations.}}</ref> According to Harris, science "reveals you to be a biochemical puppet."<ref>Nahmias, Eddy (August 13, 2012). [https://www.bigquestionsonline.com/content/does-contemporary-neuroscience-support-or-challenge-reality-free-will "Does Contemporary Neuroscience Support or Challenge the Reality of Free Will?"] Big Questions Online.</ref> People's thoughts and intentions, Harris says, "emerge from background causes of which we are unaware and over which we exert no conscious control." Every choice we make is made as a result of preceding causes. These choices we make are determined by those causes, and are therefore not really choices at all. Nevertheless Harris maintains that the absence of freewill doesn't erode the distinction between voluntary and involuntary actions, arguing that intentions tell a lot about the global attributes of a person's brain. Harris argues that this realization about the human mind does not undermine morality or diminish the importance of social and political freedom, but it can and should change the way we think about some of the most important questions in life. |
|||
Harris says that the idea of [[free will]] "cannot be mapped on to any conceivable reality" and is incoherent.<ref name=pardi>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2012/05/15/An-Analysis-of-Sam-Harris-Free-Will.aspx|title=An Analysis of Sam Harris' ''Free Will''|author=Paul Pardi|magazine=Philosophy News|date=May 15, 2012|access-date=April 17, 2016}}</ref> Harris writes in ''[[Free Will (book)|Free Will]]'' that neuroscience "reveals you to be a biochemical puppet."<ref>Nahmias, Eddy (August 13, 2012). [https://www.bigquestionsonline.com/content/does-contemporary-neuroscience-support-or-challenge-reality-free-will "Does Contemporary Neuroscience Support or Challenge the Reality of Free Will?"] Big Questions Online.</ref> |
|||
Philosopher [[Daniel Dennett]] argued that Harris's book ''Free Will'' successfully refuted the common understanding of free will, but that he failed to respond adequately to the [[compatibilist]] understanding of free will. Dennett said the book was valuable because it expressed the views of many eminent scientists, but that it nonetheless contained a "veritable museum of mistakes" and that "Harris and others need to do their homework if they want to engage with the best thought on the topic."<ref name="dennett-review">{{cite journal |last1=Dennett |first1=Daniel |date=2017 |title=Reflections on Sam Harris' ''Free Will'' |journal=Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia |volume=8 |issue=3 |pages=214–230 |doi=10.4453/rifp.2017.0018 |issn=2039-4667}}</ref> |
|||
===Social and economic politics=== |
|||
Harris describes himself as a liberal, and states that he supports raising [[graduated income tax|taxes]] on the very wealthy, the [[Drug liberalization|decriminalizing of drugs]] and [[same-sex marriage]]. He was critical of the [[Presidency of George W. Bush|Bush administration]]'s [[war in Iraq]], fiscal policy, and treatment of science.<ref>Harris, Sam (September 18, 2006). [https://web.archive.org/web/20061101084519/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-harris18sep18%2C0%2C1897169.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail "Head-in-the-Sand Liberals: Western civilization really is at risk from Muslim extremists."] ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. Archived at the [[Wayback Machine]].</ref> |
|||
===Artificial intelligence=== |
|||
During the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 United States presidential election]], Harris supported [[Hillary Clinton]] in the Democratic Party presidential primaries against [[Bernie Sanders]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Sam Harris Q&A: "Why I'm Voting For Hillary Clinton", Feb 18, 2016|publisher=YouTube|accessdate=January 10, 2018}}</ref> and despite calling her "a terribly flawed candidate for the presidency," he favored her in the general election and came out strongly in opposition to [[Donald Trump]]'s candidacy.<ref>Harris, Sam. [https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/trump-in-exile2 Trump in Exile]. samharris.org, October 13, 2016. Retrieved April 22, 2017</ref> |
|||
Harris is particularly concerned with [[Existential risk from artificial general intelligence|existential risks from artificial general intelligence]], a topic he has discussed in depth.<ref name="edge-ai">{{cite web |last1=Harris |first1=Sam |date=2015 |title=Can We Avoid a Digital Apocalypse? |url=https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26177 |access-date=14 June 2019 |website=Edge.org}}</ref><ref group=SH>{{Cite web |date=March 7, 2023 |title=#312 – The Trouble with AI |url=https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/312-the-trouble-with-ai |access-date=2023-08-12 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref><ref group=SH>{{Cite web |date=February 6, 2018 |title=#116 – AI: Racing Toward the Brink |url=https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/116-ai-racing-toward-brink |access-date=2023-08-12 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref> In a 2016 [[TED talk]], he argued that it will be a major threat in the future, and criticized the lack of human interest on the subject.<ref name="aitedtalk-davey">{{cite web |last1=Davey |first1=Tucker |date=October 7, 2016 |title=Sam Harris TED Talk: Can We Build AI Without Losing Control Over It? |url=https://futureoflife.org/2016/10/07/sam-harris-ted-talk/?cn-reloaded=1 |access-date=14 June 2019 |website=Future of Life Institute}}</ref> He said that [[artificial superintelligence]] will inevitably be developed if three assumptions hold true: intelligence is a product of information processing in physical systems, humans will continue to improve intelligent machines, and human intelligence is far from the peak of possible intelligence.<ref name="aitedtalk-davey" /> He described making [[AI alignment|artificial superintelligence safe]] as "one of the greatest challenges our species will ever face", indicating that it would warrant immediate consideration.<ref name="aitedtalk-davey" /> |
|||
== Political views == |
|||
==Neuroscience== |
|||
Harris describes himself as a liberal, even though he criticizes some aspects of both right and left. He is a registered [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democrat]]<ref>{{cite episode |series=[[The David Pakman Show]]|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCKKCglmQAw| archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211030/PCKKCglmQAw| archive-date=2021-10-30|title=Sam Harris: Trump, Reparations, Manifestos, Fox News|date=September 9, 2019|access-date=November 21, 2019 |time=03:50 |quote=I'm a registered Democrat}}{{cbignore}}</ref> and has never voted [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] in presidential elections.<ref name=":0" /> He supports [[same-sex marriage]] and [[Drug liberalization|decriminalizing drugs]].<ref name="laharris" /> |
|||
Building on his interests in belief and religion, Harris completed a PhD in [[cognitive neuroscience]] at [[UCLA]].<ref name=Segal /><ref name="HealyLATimes" /> He used [[fMRI]] to explore whether the brain responses differ between sentences that subjects judged as true, false, or undecidable, across a wide range of categories including autobiographical, mathematical, geographical, religious, ethical, semantic, and factual statements.<ref name="HarrisAnnNeurol2008">{{Cite journal | last1 = Harris | first1 = S. | last2 = Sheth | first2 = S. A. | last3 = Cohen | first3 = M. S. | doi = 10.1002/ana.21301 | title = Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty | journal = Annals of Neurology | volume = 63 | issue = 2 | pages = 141–147 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18072236| pmc = }}</ref> |
|||
=== Criticism of the Bush Administration === |
|||
In another study, Harris and colleagues examined the neural basis of religious and [[non-religious]] belief using fMRI.<ref name="HarrisPLOSOne2009">{{Cite journal | last1 = Harris | first1 = S. | last2 = Kaplan | first2 = J. T. | last3 = Curiel | first3 = A. | last4 = Bookheimer | first4 = S. Y. | last5 = Iacoboni | first5 = M. | last6 = Cohen | first6 = M. S. | editor1-last = Sporns | editor1-first = Olaf | title = The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0007272 | journal = PLoS ONE | volume = 4 | issue = 10 | pages = e7272 | year = 2009 | pmid = 19794914| pmc = 2748718| bibcode = 2009PLoSO...4.7272H }}</ref> Fifteen committed Christians and fifteen nonbelievers were scanned as they evaluated the truth and falsity of religious and nonreligious propositions. For both groups, statements of belief (sentences judged as either true or false) were associated with increased activation of [[ventromedial prefrontal cortex]], a region of the brain involved in emotional judgment, processing uncertainty, assessing rewards and thinking about oneself.<ref name="HealyLATimes" /> A "comparison of all religious trials to all nonreligious trials produced a wide range of signal differences throughout the brain," and the processing of religious belief and empirical belief differed in significant ways. The regions associated with increased activation in response to religious stimuli included the [[anterior insula]], the [[ventral striatum]], the [[anterior cingulate cortex]], and the posterior medial cortex.<ref name="HarrisPLOSOne2009" /> |
|||
Harris frequently criticized [[George W. Bush]] over his support for [[intelligent design]] and his coziness with [[Christianity]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=comerj |date=2007-01-05 |title=January 5, 2007 ~ Sam Harris Extended Interview {{!}} January 5, 2007 {{!}} Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly {{!}} PBS |url=https://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/2007/01/05/january-5-2007-sam-harris-extended-interview/3736/ |access-date=2024-10-23 |website=Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Sam Harris {{!}} Home of the Making Sense Podcast |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/the-politics-of-ignorance |access-date=2024-10-23 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref> |
|||
In an op-ed for the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' in 2006, Harris said that he supported most of the criticism against the [[Presidency of George W. Bush|Bush administration]]'s [[war in Iraq]], and all criticism of fiscal policy and the administration's treatment of science. Harris also said that liberalism has grown "dangerously out of touch with the realities of our world" regarding threats posed by [[Islamic fundamentalism]].<ref name="laharris">Harris, Sam (September 18, 2006). [https://web.archive.org/web/20061101084519/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-harris18sep18%2C0%2C1897169.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail "Head-in-the-Sand Liberals: Western civilization really is at risk from Muslim extremists."] ''[[Los Angeles Times]]''. Archived at the [[Wayback Machine]].</ref> Harris criticized the Bush administration for its use of torture at [[Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse|Abu Ghraib]] and [[Guantanamo Bay detention camp|Guantánamo Bay]], but also argued that there can be a rational case for torture in rare circumstances.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2005-10-17 |title=In Defense of Torture |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/in-defense-of-torture_b_8993 |access-date=2024-10-23 |website=HuffPost |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Sam Harris {{!}} Home of the Making Sense Podcast |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/in-defense-of-torture |access-date=2024-10-23 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref> |
|||
In another study published in 2016, Harris and his team probed the neural systems involved in maintaining one's political beliefs in the face of opposing evidence.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39589#abstract|title=Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence|last=|first=|date=23 December 2016|website=Nature|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}</ref> |
|||
== |
=== Israel === |
||
Harris opposes religious claims to Israel's right to exist as a [[Jewish state]]. Nonetheless, Harris has said that due to the hostility towards Jews, if there is one religious group which needs protections in the form of a state, it is Jews and the state of Israel.<ref group="SH" name="#2 — Why Don't I Criticize Israel">{{Cite web |date=July 27, 2014 |title=#2 — Why Don't I Criticize Israel? |url=https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/why-dont-i-criticize-israel |access-date=2023-04-13 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |author=Salon Staff |date=2014-07-28 |title=Sam Harris: Why don't I criticize Israel? |url=https://www.salon.com/2014/07/28/sam_harris_why_dont_i_criticize_israel/ |access-date=2023-04-13 |magazine=Salon |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
===Writings and media appearances=== |
|||
Harris's writing focuses on [[neuroscience]] and [[criticism of religion]], for which he is best known. He formerly blogged for the ''[[Washington Post]]'', the ''[[Huffington Post]]'', and ''[[Truthdig]]''. His articles have appeared in publications such as ''[[Newsweek]]'', ''[[The New York Times]]'', the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', the ''[[Boston Globe]]'', and the British national newspaper ''[[The Times]]''.<ref name=bio>[http://www.samharris.org/site/about/ "About Sam Harris"]. Sam Harris. Retrieved May 5, 2015.</ref> |
|||
Harris has criticized both Israel and Palestine for committing war crimes in the [[Israeli–Palestinian conflict]]. He said in 2014 that he believes Israel genuinely wants peace and that its neighbors are more devoted to the destruction of Israel. Harris has also said that Palestine is more guilty, citing [[Hamas]]' use of human shields and genocidal rhetoric towards the Jews.<ref group="SH" name="#2 — Why Don't I Criticize Israel"/> He names these as reasons that Israel has a right to defend itself against Palestine.<ref group=SH>{{Cite web |date=August 12, 2014 |title=Making Sense of Gaza {{!}} A Conversation Between Sam Harris and Andrew Sullivan |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/making-sense-of-gaza |access-date=2023-04-13 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref> |
|||
Harris has made numerous TV and radio appearances, including on ''[[The O'Reilly Factor]]'', ''[[ABC News]]'', ''[[Tucker (television program)|Tucker]]'', ''[[Book TV]]'', [[NPR]], ''[[Real Time with Bill Maher|Real Time]]'', ''[[The Colbert Report]]'', and ''[[The Daily Show]]''. In 2005, Harris appeared in the documentary film ''[[The God Who Wasn't There]]''. Harris was a featured speaker at the 2006 conference ''[[Beyond Belief: Science, Religion, Reason and Survival]]''. He made two presentations and participated in the ensuing panel discussions. Harris has also appeared a number of times on the ''[[Point of Inquiry]]'' radio podcast. Harris engaged in a lengthy debate with [[Andrew Sullivan]] on the internet forum ''[[Beliefnet]]''.<ref>Harris, Sam; Sullivan, Andrew (January 16, 2007). [http://www.beliefnet.com/story/209/story_20904.html "Is Religion 'Built Upon Lies'?"] [[Beliefnet]].</ref> In April 2007, Harris debated with the evangelical pastor [[Rick Warren]] for ''[[Newsweek]]'' magazine.<ref>Harris, Sam; Warren, Rick (April 8, 2007). [http://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-poll-90-believe-god-97611 "NEWSWEEK Poll: 90% Believe in God"]. ''[[Newsweek]]''.</ref> In April 2011, he debated [[William Lane Craig]] on whether there can be an [[objectivity (philosophy)|objective]] [[morality]] without [[God]].<ref>{{cite news |author=Schneider, Nathan |title=The New Theist |url=http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/ |date=July 1, 2013 |work=[[The Chronicle of Higher Education]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The God Debate |author=Harris, Sam |url=http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-god-debate |publisher=Sam Harris |date=August 15, 2011}}</ref> |
|||
During the [[Israel–Hamas war]] that began in October 2023, Harris expressed support for Israel and rejected arguments that Israel provoked Hamas by building [[Israeli settlement]]s in the West Bank, arguing that Gaza had not been occupied since 2005. He also condemned the [[2023 Hamas attack on Israel]], which led to the war.<ref group=SH>{{Cite web |title=The Sin of Moral Equivalence |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/the-sin-of-moral-equivalence |access-date=2023-11-04 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref> |
|||
===The ''Waking Up'' podcast=== |
|||
In September 2013, Harris began the ''Waking Up'' podcast, in which he discusses his views, responds to critics, and interviews guests. The podcasts vary greatly in length, anywhere from 8 minutes to over 4 hours. The podcast has no regular release schedule, although the frequency of releases has increased over time.<ref name=":0">{{cite web |title=Waking Up with Sam Harris |url=https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/waking-up-with-sam-harris/id733163012?mt=2 |website=iTunes – Podcasts |accessdate=July 17, 2015}}</ref> In 2017, the UK ''[[Business Insider]]'' included it in their list of "8 podcasts that will change how you think about human behavior" and ''[[PC Magazine]]'' included it in their list of "Podcasts You Should Download Now".<ref>{{cite web|title=8 podcasts that will change how you think about human behavior|url=http://uk.businessinsider.com/podcasts-change-how-you-understand-human-behavior-2017-1/#ted-radio-hour-1|website=uk.businessinsider.com|publisher=Business Insider Inc.|accessdate=April 23, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Podcasts You Should Download Now|url=https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2471753,00.asp|website=pcmag.com|publisher=Ziff Davis, LLC. PCMag Digital Group|accessdate=April 23, 2017}}</ref> The ''Waking Up'' podcast won the 2017 [[Webby Award]] for "People's Voice" in the category "Science & Education" under "Podcasts & Digital Audio".<ref>{{cite web|title=The 2017 Webby Awards for the best science and education podcasts|url=http://webbyawards.com/winners/2017/podcasts-digital-audio/general-podcasts/science-education/|website=webbyawards.com|publisher=The Webby Awards|accessdate=April 26, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
=== Presidential elections === |
|||
After discussing [[Peter Singer|Peter Singer's]] drowning child thought experiment and the philosophy of [[effective altruism]] with [[William MacAskill]] on the podcast, Harris pledged to donate several thousand dollars of the revenue generated by each new podcast episode to effective charitable organizations.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/being-good-and-doing-good|title=Being Good and Doing Good|last=Harris|first=Sam|access-date=June 10, 2017|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
In the [[2008 United States presidential election]], he supported the candidacy of [[Barack Obama]] and opposed Republican [[John McCain]]'s candidacy.<ref group=SH>{{Cite web |title=What Barack Obama Could Not (and Should Not) Say |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/what-barack-obama-could-not-and-should-not-say |access-date=2023-04-12 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2008-03-21 |title=What Barack Obama Could Not (and Should Not) Say |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-barack-obama-could-n_b_92771 |access-date=2023-04-12 |work=HuffPost |language=en}}</ref> During the [[2016 United States presidential election]], Harris supported [[Hillary Clinton]] in the Democratic Party presidential primaries against [[Bernie Sanders]],<ref>{{cite web |date=18 February 2016 |title=Sam Harris Q&A: 'Why I'm Voting For Hillary Clinton' |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZG0IRzmF7M |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211030/WZG0IRzmF7M |archive-date=2021-10-30 |website=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref> and despite calling her "a terribly flawed candidate for the presidency", he favored her in the general election and came out strongly in opposition to [[Donald Trump]]'s candidacy.<ref group="SH">Harris, Sam. [https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/trump-in-exile2 Trump in Exile] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170212091113/https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/trump-in-exile2|date=February 12, 2017}}. samharris.org, October 13, 2016. Retrieved April 22, 2017</ref><ref name="Weiss" /> Harris has criticized Trump for lying, stating in 2018 that Trump "has assaulted truth more than anyone in human history."<ref name="Weiss" /> |
|||
In the [[2020 United States presidential election]], Harris supported [[Andrew Yang]] in the Democratic primaries.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Harris |first=Sam |date=2020-11-06 |title=I sure hope Andrew Yang has a significant job in D.C. next year... |url=https://twitter.com/samharrisorg/status/1324540436329885698 |access-date=2021-05-21 |website=Twitter |language=en}}</ref> Harris also introduced Yang to podcaster [[Joe Rogan]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Weiss |first=Bari |date=2020-01-31 |title=Opinion {{!}} Did I Just Get Yanged? |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/30/opinion/sunday/andrew-yang-2020.html |access-date=2021-01-05 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> After the 2020 election, he said that he did not care what was on [[Hunter Biden]]'s [[Hunter Biden laptop controversy|laptop]], telling the [[Triggernometry (podcast)|Triggernometry]] podcast that "Hunter Biden literally could have had the corpses of children in his basement{{snd}}I would not have cared",<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chung |first=Frank |date=19 August 2022 |title=Author Sam Harris says he wouldn't care if Hunter Biden had 'corpses of children in his basement' |work=News.com.au |url=https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/author-sam-harris-says-he-wouldnt-care-if-hunter-biden-had-corpses-of-children-in-his-basement/news-story/99e322c554106a777740b211bbe1e3a2}}</ref> arguing more broadly that both Trump and Biden had been in the public eye for decades, and that Biden would have had to have engaged in an extraordinarily large scale of mendacity to come even close to the level of scandal Trump is known to have engaged in. |
|||
==Meditation== |
|||
Harris is a proponent of secular meditation practices.<ref name="Blog">{{cite web |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/item/how-to-meditate |title=How to Meditate |accessdate=June 19, 2017}}</ref> His practice developed from [[Vipassana]] and [[Dzogchen]]. He states that the key aim of [[meditation]] is to enable its practitioners to see that the feeling of self is an illusion. He is currently developing a meditation app for smartphones called the Waking Up app. |
|||
In the [[2024 United States presidential election]], Harris endorsed [[Kamala Harris]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-29 |title=Trump or Kamala? Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris Debate. |url=https://www.thefp.com/p/trump-or-kamala-ben-shapiro-and-sam-850 |access-date=2024-11-14 |website=The Free Press |language=en}}</ref> Just a few days before the elections, he joined in a debate on the ''Honestly'' podcast where he argued in favor of supporting Kamala Harris, while [[Ben Shapiro]] presented the case for [[Donald Trump]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-29 |title=Trump or Kamala? Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris Debate. |url=https://www.thefp.com/p/trump-or-kamala-ben-shapiro-and-sam-850 |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=www.thefp.com/ |language=en}}</ref> After the election Harris criticized the Democratic party over their embrace of [[identity politics]], their overemphasize on [[gender identity]], and the Biden administration's failure crack down on illegal immigration.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sam Harris {{!}} #391 - The Reckoning |url=https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/391-the-reckoning |access-date=2024-12-07 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref> |
|||
=== Economics === |
|||
Harris supports raising taxes on the wealthy and reducing government spending, and has criticized billionaires like [[Bill Gates]] and [[Warren Buffett]] for paying relatively little in tax. He has proposed taxing 10% for estates worth above 10 million, taxing 50% for estates worth over a billion dollars, and then using the money to fund an infrastructure bank.<ref group="SH" name="too-rich"/> |
|||
He has accused conservatives of perceiving raising taxes as a form of theft or punishment, and of believing that by being rich they create value for others.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2006-11-01 |title=Head-in-the-Sand Liberals |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-harris18sep18,0,1897169.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail |access-date=2023-03-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061101084519/http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-harris18sep18,0,1897169.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail |archive-date=November 1, 2006 }}</ref><ref group="SH" name="too-rich"/> He has described this view as ludicrous, saying that "[[Free market|markets]] aren't perfectly reflective of the value of goods and services, and many wealthy people don't create much in the way of value for others. In fact, as our recent financial crisis has shown, it is possible for a few people to become extraordinarily rich by wrecking the global economy".<ref group="SH" name="too-rich">{{Cite web |title= How Rich is Too Rich? |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/how-rich-is-too-rich |access-date=2023-03-15 |website=Sam Harris |date=August 17, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125163738/https://www.samharris.org/blog/how-rich-is-too-rich |archive-date=November 25, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
=== Gun rights === |
|||
Harris owns guns and wrote in 2015 that he understood people's hostility towards [[gun culture in the United States]] and the political influence of the [[National Rifle Association of America]]. However, he argued that there is a rational case for gun ownership due to the fact that the police cannot always be relied on and that guns are a good alternative.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Why I own guns |url=https://theweek.com/articles/468420/why-guns |access-date=2022-05-31 |work=The Week |language=en-US |date=January 9, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150514023734/https://theweek.com/articles/468420/why-guns |archive-date=May 14, 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref group="SH" name="riddle">{{Cite web |title=The Riddle of the Gun |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/the-riddle-of-the-gun |access-date=2023-03-14 |website=Sam Harris |date=2013-01-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211126024809/https://www.samharris.org/blog/the-riddle-of-the-gun |archive-date=2021-11-26 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Harris has stated that he disagrees with proposals by liberals and gun control advocates for restricting guns, such as the [[Assault weapons ban (USA)|assault weapons ban]], since more gun crimes are committed with handguns than the semi-automatic weapons which the ban would target. Harris has also said that the left-wing media gets many things wrong about guns. He has, however, offered support for certain regulations on gun ownership, such as mandatory training, licensure, and background checks before a gun can be legally purchased.<ref group="SH" name="riddle"/> |
|||
=== COVID-19 pandemic === |
|||
During the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], he criticized commentators for pushing views on COVID-19 that he considered to be "patently insane". Harris accused these commentators of believing that COVID-19 policies were a way of implementing social control and to crackdown on people's freedom politically.<ref>{{Cite magazine |date=2021-12-15 |title=Sam Harris Blasts Podcasters Pushing Covid Conspiracies |url=https://www.mediaite.com/podcasts/patently-insane-sam-harris-blasts-fellow-podcasters-pushing-covid-conspiracy-theories/ |access-date=2023-03-14 |magazine=Mediaite |language=en}}</ref> Harris has feuded with [[Bret Weinstein]] over his views on COVID-19.<ref>{{Cite news |title=I tried to talk about the hard issues America faces. Then the social media storm erupted. |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/02/02/podcast-debut-launched-social-media-storm-covid-elon-musk/11118952002/ |access-date=2023-07-22 |work=USA TODAY |language=en-US}}</ref> In 2023, he said that if COVID-19 had killed more children, there would be no patience for vaccine skepticism.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Silverstein |first=Joe |date=2023-01-16 |title=Podcaster Sam Harris: If COVID killed more children there'd be 'no f---ing patience' for vaccine skeptics |url=https://www.foxnews.com/media/podcaster-sam-harris-covid-killed-children-f-ing-patience-vaccine-skeptics |access-date=2023-03-14 |work=Fox News |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
In March 2023, he hosted [[Matt Ridley]] and [[Alina Chan]] on his podcast to discuss the [[origins of COVID-19]] and the potential that the [[COVID-19 lab leak theory|COVID-19 virus was made in a lab]].<ref group="SH">{{Cite web |url=https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/311-did-sars-co-v-2-escape-from-a-lab |access-date=2023-03-23 |website=www.samharris.org|title=Sam Harris | #311 – Did SARS-CoV-2 Escape from a Lab? }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Salzberg |first=Steven |title=The Scientific Error That Might Have Caused The Covid-19 Pandemic |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2023/02/27/the-scientific-error-that-might-have-caused-the-covid-19-pandemic/ |access-date=2023-03-23 |work=Forbes |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
=== Intellectual dark web === |
|||
Harris has been described, alongside others such as [[Joe Rogan]], [[Bret Weinstein]], and [[Jordan Peterson]], as a member of the [[intellectual dark web]], a group that opposes political correctness and identity politics.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2020-01-31 |title=Opinion {{!}} Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/intellectual-dark-web.html |access-date=2022-10-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200131000213/https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/intellectual-dark-web.html |archive-date=January 31, 2020 |last1=Weiss |first1=Bari |last2=Winter |first2=Damon}}</ref> ''New York Times'' book reviewer [[Bari Weiss]] described the group as "a collection of iconoclastic thinkers, academic renegades and media personalities who are having a rolling conversation – on podcasts, YouTube and Twitter, and in sold-out auditoriums – that sound unlike anything else happening, at least publicly, in the culture right now."<ref name="Weiss" /> |
|||
In November 2020, Harris stated that he does not identify as a part of that group.<ref name=":1" /><ref name="republic" /> In 2021 Harris stated that he had "turn[ed] in [his] imaginary membership card to this imaginary organization".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wakeling |first=Adam |date=2021-07-01 |title=What Happened to the Intellectual Dark Web?|url=https://www.realclearpolicy.com/2021/07/01/what_happened_to_the_intellectual_dark_web_783679.html |access-date=2022-05-08 |website=RealClearPolicy |language=en}}</ref> In 2023 during an interview with ''[[The Daily Beast]]'', Harris explained that he had broken away from the intellectual dark web due to disagreements with Bret Weinstein, and [[Maajid Nawaz]]'s "obsession" with COVID-19 conspiracy theories and criticism of COVID-19 policies. He also described becoming disenchanted with [[Dave Rubin]] for having been captured by his audience and said "Rubin became far more cynical than I would have thought possible. And it's very depressing. He was a friend, he's not a friend anymore".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Fisher |first=Anthony L. |date=2023-01-19 |title=The Intellectual Dark Web's Descent Into Paranoia and Trumpism |language=en |work=The Daily Beast |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/intellectual-dark-webs-descent-into-paranoia-and-trumpism |access-date=2023-10-31}}</ref> |
|||
==Controversies== |
|||
{{Criticism section|date=November 2023}} |
|||
=== Race and IQ controversy === |
|||
In April 2017, Harris hosted the social scientist [[Charles Murray (political scientist)|Charles Murray]] on his podcast, discussing topics including the [[heritability of IQ]] and [[race and intelligence]].<ref group="SH" name="harris-ekeal">{{cite web |last1=Harris |first1=Sam |date=27 March 2018 |title=Ezra Klein: Editor-at-Large |url=https://samharris.org/ezra-klein-editor-chief/ |access-date=16 October 2018 |website=SamHarris.org}}</ref> Harris stated the invitation was out of indignation at a violent protest against Murray at [[Middlebury College]] the month before and not out of particular interest in the material at hand.<ref group="SH" name="harris-ekeal"/> The podcast episode garnered significant criticism, most notably from ''[[Vox (website)|Vox]]''<ref name="vox-thn" /><ref name="vox-klein">{{cite news |last1=Klein |first1=Ezra |author-link=Ezra Klein |date=27 March 2018 |title=Sam Harris, Charles Murray, and the allure of race science |work=[[Vox (website)|Vox]] |url=https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/3/27/15695060/sam-harris-charles-murray-race-iq-forbidden-knowledge-podcast-bell-curve |access-date=16 October 2018}}</ref> and ''[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]''.<ref name="slate-iq">{{cite news |last1=Saletan |first1=William |author-link=William Saletan |date=27 April 2018 |title=Stop Talking About Race and IQ |agency=Slate |url=https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/04/stop-talking-about-race-and-iq-take-it-from-someone-who-did.html |access-date=17 October 2018}}</ref> In the ''Vox'' article, scientists, including [[Eric Turkheimer]], [[Kathryn Paige Harden]], and [[Richard E. Nisbett]], accused Harris of participating in "pseudoscientific racialist speculation" and peddling "junk science". Harris and Murray were defended by commentators [[Andrew Sullivan]]<ref name="sullivan-genetics">{{cite magazine |last1=Sullivan |first1=Andrew |author-link1=Andrew Sullivan |date=30 March 2018 |title=Denying Genetics Isn't Shutting Down Racism, It's Fueling It |magazine=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] – [[Intelligencer (website)|Intelligencer]] |url=http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/03/denying-genetics-isnt-shutting-down-racism-its-fueling-it.html |access-date=17 October 2018}}</ref> and [[Kyle Smith (critic)|Kyle Smith]].<ref name="smith-nr">{{cite news |last1=Smith |first1=Kyle |date=20 April 2018 |title=Ezra Klein's Intellectual Demagoguery |work=National Review |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/04/ezra-klein-vox-accuses-sam-harris-of-racism/ |access-date=11 August 2020}}</ref> Harris and ''Vox'' editor-at-large [[Ezra Klein]] later discussed the affair in a podcast interview in which Klein accused Harris of "thinking tribally" and Harris accused the ''Vox'' article of leading people to think he was racist.<ref>{{cite magazine |last1=Klein |first1=Ezra |date=9 April 2018 |title=The Sam Harris debate |url=https://www.vox.com/2018/4/9/17210248/sam-harris-ezra-klein-charles-murray-transcript-podcast |access-date=30 August 2019 |magazine=Vox}}</ref><ref name="wright-wired">{{cite magazine |last1=Wright |first1=Robert |date=17 May 2018 |title=Sam Harris and the Myth of Perfectly Rational Thought |url=https://www.wired.com/story/sam-harris-and-the-myth-of-perfectly-rational-thought/ |magazine=Wired |access-date=30 August 2019}}</ref> |
|||
=== Accusations of Islamophobia === |
|||
Harris has been accused of [[Islamophobia]] by linguist and political commentator [[Noam Chomsky]].<ref name="aj-chomsky">{{cite news|date=25 January 2016|title=Noam Chomsky tells 'UpFront' he would "absolutely" vote for Hillary Clinton|work=Al Jazeera|url=https://network.aljazeera.net/pressroom/noam-chomsky-tells-%E2%80%98upfront%E2%80%99-he-would-%E2%80%9Cabsolutely%E2%80%9D-vote-hillary-clinton|access-date=30 July 2020}}</ref> After Harris and Chomsky exchanged a series of emails on terrorism and U.S. foreign policy in 2015, Chomsky said Harris had not prepared adequately for the exchange and that this revealed his work as unserious.<ref name="salon-chomsky">{{Cite magazine|date=2015-05-08|title=Scoring the Noam Chomsky/Sam Harris debate: How the professor knocked out the atheist |url=https://www.salon.com/2015/05/07/scoring_the_noam_chomskysam_harris_debate_how_the_professor_knocked_out_the_atheist/|access-date=2020-07-24|magazine=Salon|language=en}}</ref> In a 2016 interview with ''[[Al Jazeera English]]''{{'s}} ''[[UpFront]]'', Chomsky further criticized Harris, saying he "specializes in hysterical, slanderous charges against people he doesn't like."<ref name="aj-chomsky" /> |
|||
Harris has countered that his views on this and other topics are frequently misrepresented by "unethical critics" who "deliberately" take his words out of context.<ref name="response-controversy"/> He has also criticized the validity of the term "Islamophobia".<ref name="Indi12">Taylor, Jerome (April 12, 2013). [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/atheists-richard-dawkins-christopher-hitchens-and-sam-harris-face-islamophobia-backlash-8570580.html "Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash"]. ''[[The Independent]]''.</ref> "My criticism of Islam is a criticism of beliefs and their consequences, but my fellow liberals reflexively view it as an expression of intolerance toward people,"<ref group="SH">{{citation|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=Can Liberalism Be Saved From Itself?|date=2014-10-07|url=http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/can-liberalism-be-saved-from-itself|year=2014b |website=Sam Harris |access-date=December 26, 2014|archive-date=December 26, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141226050007/http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/can-liberalism-be-saved-from-itself}}</ref> he wrote following a disagreement with actor [[Ben Affleck]] in October 2014 on the show ''[[Real Time with Bill Maher]]''. Affleck had described Harris's and host [[Bill Maher]]'s views on Muslims as "gross" and "racist", and Harris's statement that "Islam is the [[mother lode]] of bad ideas" as an "ugly thing to say". Affleck also compared Harris's and Maher's rhetoric to that of people who use [[antisemitic canard]]s or define African Americans in terms of intraracial crime.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Child|first1=Ben|date=7 October 2014|title=Ben Affleck: Sam Harris and Bill Maher 'racist' and 'gross' in views of Islam|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/oct/06/ben-affleck-bill-maher-sam-harris-islam-racist|access-date=30 August 2019}}</ref> Several [[Conservatism in the United States|conservative American]] media pundits in turn criticized Affleck and praised Harris and Maher for broaching the topic, saying that discussing it had become taboo.<ref name="hollywood-affleck">{{cite magazine|last1=Bond|first1=Paul|date=8 October 2014|title=Ben Affleck Targeted by Conservatives After Islamism Spat With Bill Maher|url=https://hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-targeted-by-conservatives-739408|access-date=3 April 2021|magazine=The Hollywood Reporter}}</ref> |
|||
Harris's dialogue on Islam with [[Maajid Nawaz]] received a combination of positive reviews<ref name="National Review">{{cite news|author=Brian Stewart|date=October 7, 2015|title=A Liberal Atheist and a Liberal Muslim Discuss the Problems of Contemporary Islam|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425169/sam-harris-maajid-nawaz-islam-book?target=author&tid=5037|work=[[National Review]]}}</ref><ref name="pw-harris-nawaz">{{cite news|title=Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue|url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-674-08870-2|access-date=24 October 2020|work=Publishers Weekly|date=October 2015}}</ref><ref name="sonenshine-harris-nawaz">{{cite web|last1=Sonenshine|first1=Tara|title=Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue|url=https://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/islam-and|access-date=24 October 2020|work=New York Journal of Books}}</ref> and mixed reviews.<ref name="kirkus-harris-nawaz">{{cite web|title=Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue|url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sam-harris/islam-and-the-future-of-tolerance/|access-date=24 October 2020|work=Kirkus Reviews}}</ref><ref name="manji-harris-nawaz">{{cite web|last=Manji|first=Irshad|author-link=Irshad Manji|date=3 November 2015|title='Islam and the Future of Tolerance' and 'Not in God's Name'|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/books/review/islam-and-the-future-of-tolerance-and-not-in-gods-name.html|access-date=13 August 2016|work=[[The New York Times]]}}</ref> [[Irshad Manji]] wrote: "Their back-and-forth clarifies multiple confusions that plague the public conversation about Islam." Of Harris specifically, she said "[he] is right that liberals must end their silence about the religious motives behind much Islamist terror. At the same time, he ought to call out another double standard that feeds the liberal reflex to excuse Islamists: Atheists do not make nearly enough noise about hatred toward Muslims."<ref name="manji-harris-nawaz" /> |
|||
Harris opposed [[Executive Order 13769]], which limited the entry of refugees from Muslim-majority countries to the United States, stating that it was “unethical with regard to the plight of refugees…and bound to be ineffective in stopping the spread of [[Islamism]].”<ref>{{Cite web |last=Harris |first=Sam |date=January 29, 2017 |title=A Few Thoughts On The Muslim Ban |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/a-few-thoughts-on-the-muslim-ban |access-date=August 15, 2024 |website=Sam Harris.org}}</ref> |
|||
''Hatewatch'' staff at the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] (SPLC) wrote that members of the "skeptics" movement, of which Harris is "one of the most public faces", help to "channel people into the [[alt-right]]."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hatewatch Staff |date=19 April 2018 |title=McInnes, Molyneux, and 4chan: Investigating pathways to the alt-right |url=https://www.splcenter.org/20180419/mcinnes-molyneux-and-4chan-investigating-pathways-alt-right |access-date=1 September 2019 |website=Southern Poverty Law Center}}</ref> [[Bari Weiss]] wrote that the SPLC had misrepresented Harris's views.<ref name="Weiss" /> |
|||
[[Nathan J. Robinson]] and [[Chris Hedges]] criticized Harris for discussing in an excerpt from ''[[The End of Faith]]'' the possibility of a nuclear first strike against an Islamist regime that acquired long-range nuclear weapons and that would be undeterred by the threat of mutual destruction due to beliefs in jihad and martyrdom.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Massey |first1=Eli |last2=Robinson |first2=Nathan J. |date=2018-10-12 |title=Being Mr. Reasonable |language=en |work=Current Affairs |url=https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/10/being-mr-reasonable |access-date=2023-04-24 |issn=2471-2647}}</ref><ref group="SH">{{Cite web |title=Sam Harris {{!}} Home of the ''Making Sense'' Podcast |url=https://www.samharris.org/blog/response-to-chris-hedges |access-date=2024-08-05 |website=Sam Harris}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Wilder |first=Charly |date=2008-03-13 |title=I don't believe in atheists |url=https://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/chris_hedges/ |access-date=2024-08-05 |magazine=Salon |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
== Reception and recognition == |
|||
Harris's first two books, in which he lays out his criticisms of religion, received negative reviews from Christian scholars.<ref name="albert-mohler" /><ref name="Simpson-ct">Matthew Simpson, 2005. "[http://www.christianitytoday.com/books/features/bookwk/050404.html Unbelievable: Religion is really, really bad for you]." ''Christianity Today''.</ref><ref name="novak-nr">{{cite magazine|first=Michael |last=Novak |date= March 19, 2007 |url= http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/national-review-lonely-atheists-of-the-global-village/ |magazine=[[National Review]] |title=Lonely Atheists of the Global Village |via= Sam Harris |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130516021022/http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/national-review-lonely-atheists-of-the-global-village/ |archive-date=May 16, 2013 |id=[Book reviews: ''Letter to a Christian Nation'', by Sam Harris; ''Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon'', by Daniel C. Dennett; and ''The God Delusion'', by Richard Dawkins.] }} [https://www.aei.org/articles/lonely-atheists-of-the-global-village/ Via – ''American Enterprise Institute AEI''] {{webarchive|date=February 27, 2020 |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227120645/https://www.aei.org/articles/lonely-atheists-of-the-global-village/}}</ref> From secular sources, the books received a mixture of negative reviews<ref name="a-saxton">{{Cite journal |last=Saxton |first=Alexander |date=October 2006 |title=The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason |journal=Science & Society |volume=70 |issue=4 |pages=572–574 |doi=10.1521/siso.2006.70.4.572 |issn=0036-8237}}</ref><ref>[[Thomas W. Flynn|Tom Flynn]], 2005. "Glimpses of Nirvana." ''Free Inquiry'', vol. 25 no. 2.</ref><ref>David Boulton, 2005. "[http://newhumanist.org.uk/855 Faith kills]." ''New Humanist'', volume 120 number 2.</ref> and positive reviews.<ref name="merritt-observer">[[Stephanie Merritt]] (February 6, 2005). [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,6903,1406746,00.html "Faith no more"]. ''The Observer''.</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Hari |first=Johann |author-link=Johann Hari |date=February 11, 2005 |title=BOOKS: The sea of faith and violence |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books-the-sea-of-faith-and-violence-1530032.html |access-date=February 3, 2022 |work=The Independent}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Dawkins |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Dawkins |date=August 4, 2005 |title=Coming Out Against Religious Mania |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-dawkins/coming-out-against-religi_b_5137.html |access-date=February 3, 2022 |work=The Huffington Post}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Pinker |first=Steven |author-link=Steven Pinker |date=June 1, 2008 |title=Survey: Truth to Power |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/books/review/Survey-t.html |access-date=March 10, 2014}}</ref> In his review of ''[[The End of Faith]]'', American historian [[Alexander Saxton]] criticized what he called Harris's "vitriolic and ''selective'' polemic against Islam", (emphasis in original) which he said "obscure[s] the obvious reality that the invasion of Iraq and the War against Terror are driven by religious irrationalities, cultivated and conceded to, at high policy levels in the U.S., and which are at least comparable to the irrationality of Islamic crusaders and Jihadists."<ref name="a-saxton" /> By contrast, [[Stephanie Merritt]] wrote of the same book that Harris's "central argument in ''The End of Faith'' is sound: religion is the only area of human knowledge in which it is still acceptable to hold beliefs dating from antiquity and a modern society should subject those beliefs to the same principles that govern scientific, medical or geographical inquiry – particularly if they are inherently hostile to those with different ideas."<ref name="merritt-observer" /> Harris's first book, ''The End of Faith'' (2004), won the PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction.<ref name="pen.org">PEN American Center, 2005. "[http://www.pen.org/page.php/prmID/836 The PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060521025523/http://www.pen.org/page.php/prmID/836 |date=May 21, 2006}}."</ref> |
|||
Harris's next two books, which discuss philosophical issues relating to ethics and free will, received several negative academic reviews.<ref>[http://bnreview.barnesandnoble.com/t5/Reviews-Essays/The-Moral-Landscape/ba-p/3477T. Jollimore, ''Barnes & Noble Review''], Oct. 22, 2010.</ref><ref name="appiah-nyt">{{cite web |last=Appiah |first=Kwame Anthony |author-link=Kwame Anthony Appiah |date=October 1, 2010 |title=Science Knows Best |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/03/books/review/Appiah-t.html |access-date=February 3, 2022 |work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref name="atran">{{cite web |last=Atran |first=Atran |author-link=Scott Atran |date=23 February 2011 |title=Sam Harris's Guide to Nearly Everything |url=http://nationalinterest.org/bookreview/sam-harriss-guide-nearly-everything-4893?page=show |access-date=24 September 2011 |work=The National Interest |archive-date=October 20, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020132226/http://nationalinterest.org/bookreview/sam-harriss-guide-nearly-everything-4893?page=show }}</ref><ref name="kmalik">{{Cite web |last=Malik |first=Kenan |author-link=Kenan Malik |title=Test-tube truths |url=https://newhumanist.org.uk/2538/test-tube-truths |access-date=2020-07-24 |website=newhumanist.org.uk |date=April 14, 2011 |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |date=2014-05-26 |title=Is Sam Harris Right About Free Will?: A Book Review |url=https://cct.biola.edu/sam-harris-free-will-book-review/ |access-date=2020-08-06 |publisher=Biola University Center for Christian Thought |magazine=The Table}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |title=Reflections on Sam Harris' ''Free Will'' |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/DENROS-7 |journal=Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia |volume=8 |issue=3 |date=2017 |pages=214–230 |doi=10.4453/rifp.2017.0018 |doi-access=free |access-date=2020-08-06}}</ref> In his review of ''The Moral Landscape'', neuroscientist [[Kenan Malik]] criticized Harris for not engaging adequately with philosophical literature: "Imagine a sociologist who wrote about evolutionary theory without discussing the work of Darwin, Fisher, Mayr, Hamilton, Trivers or Dawkins on the grounds that he did not come to his conclusions by reading about biology and because discussing concepts such as 'adaptation', 'speciation', 'homology', 'phylogenetics' or 'kin selection' would 'increase the amount of boredom in the universe'. How seriously would we, and should we, take his argument?"<ref name="kmalik" /> On the other hand, ''The Moral Landscape'' received a largely positive review from psychologists James Diller and Andrew Nuzzolilli.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Diller |first1=J. W. |last2=Nuzzolilli |first2=A. E. |year=2012 |title=The Science of Values: ''The Moral Landscape'' by Sam Harris |journal=The Behavior Analyst |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=265–273 |doi=10.1007/BF03392286 |pmc=3501430}}</ref> Additionally, ''Free Will'' received a mixed academic review from philosopher Paul Pardi, who said that while it suffers from some conceptual confusions and that the core argument is a bit too "breezy", it serves as a "good primer on key ideas in physicalist theories of freedom and the will".<ref name="Pardi">{{cite magazine |last=Pardi |first=Paul |date=2012-05-15 |title=An Analysis of Sam Harris's ''Free Will'' |url=http://www.philosophynews.com/post/2012/05/15/An-Analysis-of-Sam-Harris-Free-Will.aspx |access-date=2020-08-06 |magazine=Philosophy News}}</ref> |
|||
Harris's book on spirituality and meditation received mainly positive reviews<ref name="bruni">{{cite web |last=Bruni |first=Frank |author-link=Frank Bruni |date=August 30, 2014 |title=Between Godliness and Godlessness |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/31/opinion/sunday/frank-bruni-between-godliness-and-godlessness.html |access-date=October 18, 2015 |work=[[The New York Times]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Cave |first=Stephen |date=October 31, 2014 |title=''Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion'', by Sam Harris |url=https://www.ft.com/content/1d3edaaa-5df4-11e4-b7a2-00144feabdc0 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221211231204/https://www.ft.com/content/1d3edaaa-5df4-11e4-b7a2-00144feabdc0 |archive-date=December 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |access-date=August 12, 2016 |work=[[Financial Times]] }}</ref><ref name="clothier" /><ref name="kirkus" /> as well as some mixed reviews.<ref name="tquirk">{{cite magazine |last=Quirk |first=Trevor |date=September 10, 2014 |title=I Thought I Hated the New Atheists. Then I Read Sam Harris's New Book. |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/119397/sam-harriss-waking-review |magazine=[[The New Republic]] |access-date=August 12, 2016}}</ref><ref name="h-smith" /> It was praised by [[Frank Bruni]], for example, who described it as "so entirely of this moment, so keenly in touch with the growing number of Americans who are willing to say that they do not find the succor they crave, or a truth that makes sense to them, in organized religion."<ref name="bruni" /> |
|||
In 2018, [[Robert Wright (journalist)|Robert Wright]], a visiting professor of science and religion at [[Union Theological Seminary (New York City)|Union Theological Seminary]], published an article in ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' criticizing Harris, whom he described as "annoying" and "deluded". Wright wrote that Harris, despite claiming to be a champion of rationality, ignored his own [[cognitive bias]]es and engaged in faulty and inconsistent arguments in his book ''The End of Faith''. He wrote that "the famous proponent of New Atheism is on a crusade against tribalism but seems oblivious to his own version of it." Wright wrote that these biases are rooted in [[natural selection]] and impact everyone, but that they can be mitigated when acknowledged.<ref name="wright-wired" /> |
|||
The UK ''[[Business Insider]]'' included Harris's podcast in their list of "8 podcasts that will change how you think about human behavior" in 2017,<ref>{{cite web |title=8 podcasts that will change how you think about human behavior |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/podcasts-change-how-you-understand-human-behavior-2017-1 |access-date=April 23, 2017 |work=[[Business Insider]]}}</ref> and ''[[PC Magazine]]'' included it in their list of "The Best Podcasts of 2018".<ref name="pc-mag-podcasts">{{cite news |last1=Moore |first1=Ben |date=27 September 2018 |title=The Best Podcasts of 2018 |agency=PC Magazine |url=https://me.pcmag.com/cast/11729/the-best-podcasts-of-2018 |access-date=11 August 2020}}</ref> In January 2020, Max Sanderson included Harris's podcast as a "Producer pick" in a "podcasts of the week" section for ''[[The Guardian]]''.<ref name="guardian-podcasts" /> The ''Waking Up'' podcast won the 2017 [[Webby Award]] for "People's Voice" in the category "Science & Education" under "Podcasts & Digital Audio".<ref>{{cite web|title=The 2017 Webby Awards for the best science and education podcasts|url=http://webbyawards.com/winners/2017/podcasts-digital-audio/general-podcasts/science-education/|website=The Webby Awards|access-date=April 26, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
Harris was included on a list of the "100 Most Spiritually Influential Living People 2019" in the ''Watkins Review'', a publication of [[Watkins Books]], a London esoterica bookshop.<ref>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.watkinsmagazine.com/watkins-spiritual-100-list-for-2019|title=Watkins' Spiritual 100 List for 2019|date=April 2019|magazine=Watkins Magazine|access-date=7 May 2019}}</ref> |
|||
==Personal life== |
==Personal life== |
||
Harris is a student of the martial arts and practices [[Brazilian jiu-jitsu]].<ref name="Free Will">{{cite book |title=Free Will |publisher=Free Press |author=Harris, Sam |year=2012 |isbn=978-1451683400}}</ref><ref name="BJJ">{{cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/05/the-atheist-who-strangled-me/309292/ |title=The Atheist Who Strangled Me |work=[[The Atlantic]] |date=April 24, 2013 |accessdate=August 11, 2014 |author=Wood, Graeme}}</ref> Harris was at one point a vegetarian, but gave it up after six years, citing health concerns.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLFnJ8pWh8g|title=Can You Defend Eating Meat with Sam Harris|publisher=}}</ref> In 2015, he returned to vegetarianism for ethical reasons, with the intention of eventually going vegan,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/ask-me-anything-2|title=Ask Me Anything #2|first=Sam|last=Harris|publisher=}}</ref> and supported the idea of [[cultured meat]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Meat Without Misery A Conversation with Uma Valeti|url=https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/meat-without-murder|accessdate=January 10, 2018}}</ref> |
|||
Harris |
In 2004, Harris married [[Annaka Harris]] (née Gorton), an author and editor of nonfiction and scientific books, after engaging in a common interest about the nature of consciousness.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Project Reason Trustees / Advisory Board |url=https://www.project-reason.org/about/individual_member/2819/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20140112053144/http://www.project-reason.org/about/individual_member/2819/ |archive-date=2014-01-12 |website=www.project-reason.org}}</ref> They have two daughters{{sfn|Harris|2014a|loc=[https://books.google.com/books?id=dmhNAgAAQBAJ&q=sam+harris+emma+and+violet&pg=PP6 p. 6]: "Dedication: For Annaka, Emma, and Violet"}}<ref group="SH">{{cite web |last=Harris |first=Sam |title=Drugs and the Meaning of Life |website=Sam Harris |date=July 4, 2011 |url=http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/drugs-and-the-meaning-of-life |access-date=November 5, 2014 |archive-date=September 24, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924093857/http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/drugs-and-the-meaning-of-life/ }}</ref> and live in [[Los Angeles]].<ref>{{Cite news|date=2019-02-16|title=Sam Harris, the new atheist with a spiritual side|url=http://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/feb/16/sam-harris-interview-new-atheism-four-horsemen-faith-science-religion-rationalism|access-date=2021-02-12|work=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> |
||
In September 2020, Harris became a member of [[Giving What We Can]], an [[effective altruism]] organization whose members pledge to give at least 10% of their income to effective charities, both as an individual and as a company with Waking Up.<ref name="gwwc-members"/><ref name="wakingup-2" /> |
|||
==Bibliography== |
|||
* ''[[The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason]]'' (2004). {{ISBN|0-393-03515-8}}. |
|||
Harris practices [[Brazilian jiu-jitsu]].{{sfn|Harris|2012}}<ref name="BJJ">{{cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/05/the-atheist-who-strangled-me/309292/ |title=The Atheist Who Strangled Me |work=[[The Atlantic]] |date=April 24, 2013 |access-date=August 11, 2014 |author=Wood, Graeme}}</ref> |
|||
* ''[[Letter to a Christian Nation]]'' (2006). {{ISBN|0-307-26577-3}}. |
|||
* ''[[The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values]]'' (2010). {{ISBN|978-1-4391-7121-9}}. |
|||
==Works== |
|||
* ''[[Lying (book)|Lying]]'' (2011). {{ISBN|978-1940051000}}. |
|||
===Books=== |
|||
* ''[[Free Will (book)|Free Will]]'' (2012). {{ISBN|978-1451683400}}. |
|||
{{Refbegin|55em|indent=yes}} |
|||
* ''[[Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion]]'' (2014). {{ISBN|978-1451636017}}. |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason|publisher=W.W. Norton & Company|isbn=0-393-03515-8|oclc=62265386|year=2004|title-link=The End of Faith}} |
|||
* ''[[Islam and the Future of Tolerance]]'' (2015). {{ISBN|978-0674088702}}. |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=Letter to a Christian Nation|publisher=Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.|oclc=70158553|isbn=0-307-26577-3|year= 2006|title-link=Letter to a Christian Nation}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values|publisher=Free Press|isbn=978-1-4391-7121-9|oclc=535493357|year=2010|title-link=The Moral Landscape}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=Lying|publisher=Four Elephants Press|year=2011|isbn=978-1-940051-00-0|title-link=Lying (Harris book)}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=Free Will|publisher=Free Press|isbn=978-1-4516-8340-0|year=2012|title-link=Free Will (book)}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion|year=2014a|publisher=Simon & Schuster|isbn=978-1-4516-3601-7|title-link=Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last1=Harris|first1=Sam|last2=Nawaz|first2=Maajid|author-link2=Maajid Nawaz|title=Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue|year=2015|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-08870-2|title-link=Islam and the Future of Tolerance}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last1=Harris|first1=Sam|last2=Dawkins|first2=Richard|author-link2=Richard Dawkins|last3=Dennett|first3=Daniel|author-link3=Daniel Dennett|last4=Hitchens|first4=Christopher|author-link4=Christopher Hitchens|title=The Four Horsemen: The Discussion that Sparked an Atheist Revolution|publisher=Bantam Press|isbn=978-0-593-08039-9|year=2019}} |
|||
* {{cite book|last=Harris|first=Sam|title=Making Sense: Conversations on Consciousness, Morality, and the Future of Humanity|publisher=Ecco|isbn=978-0-06-285778-1|year=2020}} |
|||
{{Refend}} |
|||
===Documentary=== |
|||
{{Refbegin|55em|indent=yes}} |
|||
* Amila, D. & Shapiro, J. (2018). ''Islam and the Future of Tolerance''. United States: The Orchard.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.islamandthefutureoftolerance.com/|title=Islam and the Future of Tolerance|website=Islam and the Future of Tolerance|language=en-US|access-date=2019-06-26}}</ref> |
|||
{{Refend}} |
|||
===Peer-reviewed articles=== |
|||
{{Refbegin|55em|indent=yes}} |
|||
* {{Cite journal | last1 = Harris | first1 = S. | last2 = Sheth | first2 = S. A. | last3 = Cohen | first3 = M. S. |author-link3=Mark S. Cohen| doi = 10.1002/ana.21301 | title = Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty | journal = [[Annals of Neurology]] | volume = 63 | issue = 2 | pages = 141–147 | date = 27 February 2008| pmid = 18072236| s2cid = 17335600}} |
|||
* {{Cite journal | last1 = Harris | first1 = S. | last2 = Kaplan | first2 = J. T. | last3 = Curiel | first3 = A. | last4 = Bookheimer | first4 = S. Y. | last5 = Iacoboni | first5 = M. | last6 = Cohen | first6 = M. S. | editor1-last = Sporns | editor1-first = Olaf | title = The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0007272 | journal = [[PLOS One]] | volume = 4 | issue = 10 | pages = e7272 | date = 1 October 2009 | pmid =19794914| pmc = 2748718| bibcode = 2009PLoSO...4.7272H | doi-access = free}} |
|||
* {{Cite journal | last1=Douglas | first1=P. K. | last2 = Harris | first2 = S. | last3 = Yuille | first3 = A. | last4 = Cohen | first4 = M. S. | title = Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms and number of independent components used in fMRI decoding of belief vs. disbelief. | doi = 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.002 | journal = [[NeuroImage]] | volume = 56 | issue = 2 | pages = 544–553 | date = 15 May 2011 | pmid = 21073969 | pmc = 3099263}} |
|||
* {{Cite journal|title=Neural correlates of maintaining one's political beliefs in the face of counterevidence|date=23 December 2016|journal=[[Scientific Reports]]|volume=6|page=39589|doi=10.1038/srep39589|pmid=28008965|pmc=5180221|last1=Kaplan|first1=Jonas T.|last2=Gimbel|first2=Sarah I.|last3=Harris|first3=Sam|bibcode=2016NatSR...639589K}} |
|||
* {{cite journal | last1=Seitz | first1=Benjamin M. | last2=Aktipis | first2=Athena | last3=Buss | first3=David M. | last4=Alcock | first4=Joe | last5=Bloom | first5=Paul | last6=Gelfand | first6=Michele | last7=Harris | first7=Sam | last8=Lieberman | first8=Debra | last9=Horowitz | first9=Barbara N. | last10=Pinker | first10=Steven | last11=Wilson | first11=David Sloan | last12=Haselton | first12=Martie G. | title=The pandemic exposes human nature: 10 evolutionary insights | journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | volume=117 | issue=45 | date=2020-11-10 | issn=0027-8424 | pmid=33093198 | pmc=7668083 | doi=10.1073/pnas.2009787117 | pages=27767–27776| doi-access=free | bibcode=2020PNAS..11727767S }} |
|||
{{Refend}} |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
===Harris blog citations=== |
|||
{{Reflist|30em}} |
|||
{{reflist|group=SH}} |
|||
===General citations=== |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
Line 141: | Line 245: | ||
{{Wikiquote|Sam Harris}} |
{{Wikiquote|Sam Harris}} |
||
* {{Official website|http://www.samharris.org}} |
* {{Official website|http://www.samharris.org}} |
||
* [http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/sam_harris ''The Washington Post'' "On Faith" articles] |
|||
* [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-harris ''Huffington Post'' articles] |
|||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20051211124844/http://www.truthdig.com/about/staff/23 ''Truthdig'' articles] |
|||
* {{IMDb name|1890405|Sam Harris}} |
|||
* {{TED speaker}} |
* {{TED speaker}} |
||
* {{IMDb name|1890405}} |
|||
* {{Library resources by |viaf=97888651 |label=Sam Harris}} |
|||
{{Sam Harris}} |
{{Sam Harris|state=expanded}} |
||
{{Existential risk from artificial intelligence}} |
|||
{{Modern Buddhist writers}} |
|||
{{New Atheism}} |
|||
{{Authority control}} |
{{Authority control}} |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Harris, Sam}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Harris, Sam}} |
||
[[Category:1967 births]] |
[[Category:1967 births]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:21st-century American educators]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:21st-century American essayists]] |
||
[[Category:21st-century |
[[Category:21st-century American Jews]] |
||
[[Category:21st-century American male writers]] |
|||
[[Category:21st-century American non-fiction writers]] |
|||
[[Category:21st-century American philosophers]] |
[[Category:21st-century American philosophers]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:21st-century atheists]] |
||
[[Category:American |
[[Category:21st-century American social scientists]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Action theorists]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Activists from California]] |
||
[[Category:American neuroscientists]] |
[[Category:American cognitive neuroscientists]] |
||
[[Category:American |
[[Category:American consciousness researchers and theorists]] |
||
[[Category:American critics of Christianity]] |
|||
[[Category:American critics of Islam]] |
|||
[[Category:American critics of alternative medicine]] |
|||
[[Category:American critics of creationism]] |
|||
[[Category:American critics of postmodernism]] |
|||
[[Category:American epistemologists]] |
|||
[[Category:American ethicists]] |
|||
[[Category:American male essayists]] |
|||
[[Category:American male non-fiction writers]] |
|||
[[Category:American people of Jewish descent]] |
[[Category:American people of Jewish descent]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:American philosophers of mind]] |
||
[[Category:American |
[[Category:American philosophers of science]] |
||
[[Category:American philosophers of technology]] |
|||
[[Category:American interview podcasters]] |
|||
[[Category:American practitioners of Brazilian jiu-jitsu]] |
[[Category:American practitioners of Brazilian jiu-jitsu]] |
||
[[Category:American psychedelic drug advocates]] |
|||
[[Category:American science writers]] |
[[Category:American science writers]] |
||
[[Category:American skeptics]] |
[[Category:American skeptics]] |
||
[[Category:American social sciences writers]] |
[[Category:American social sciences writers]] |
||
[[Category:American social scientists]] |
|||
[[Category:American spiritual writers]] |
[[Category:American spiritual writers]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:American Zionists]] |
||
[[Category:Analytic philosophers]] |
[[Category:Analytic philosophers]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Artificial intelligence ethicists]] |
||
[[Category:American |
[[Category:American artificial intelligence researchers]] |
||
[[Category:Atheist philosophers]] |
[[Category:Atheist philosophers]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:California Democrats]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Criticism of religion]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Critics of conspiracy theories]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Critics of multiculturalism]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Freethought writers]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Jewish American atheism activists]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Living people]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Mindfulness movement]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:American metaphysics writers]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:Moral realists]] |
||
[[Category: |
[[Category:New Atheism]] |
||
[[Category:People associated with effective altruism]] |
|||
[[Category:Philosophers of love]] |
|||
[[Category:Philosophers of psychology]] |
|||
[[Category:People involved in race and intelligence controversies]] |
|||
[[Category:Rationalists]] |
|||
[[Category:Science activists]] |
[[Category:Science activists]] |
||
[[Category:Science bloggers]] |
|||
[[Category:Stanford University alumni]] |
[[Category:Stanford University alumni]] |
||
[[Category:Students of U Pandita]] |
|||
[[Category:University of California, Los Angeles alumni]] |
[[Category:University of California, Los Angeles alumni]] |
||
[[Category:Writers about activism and social change]] |
|||
[[Category:Writers about globalization]] |
|||
[[Category:Writers about religion and science]] |
|||
[[Category:Writers from Los Angeles]] |
[[Category:Writers from Los Angeles]] |
||
[[Category:21st-century essayists]] |
|||
[[Category:American secularists]] |
|||
[[Category:Activists from California]] |
|||
[[Category:Critics of religions]] |
Latest revision as of 15:11, 13 December 2024
Sam Harris | |
---|---|
Born | Samuel Benjamin Harris April 9, 1967 Los Angeles, California, U.S. |
Occupation |
|
Education | |
Genre | Nonfiction |
Subject | Neuroscience, philosophy,[1] religion, spirituality, ethics, politics |
Notable awards | |
Spouse | |
Children | 2 |
Parents |
|
Signature | |
Philosophy career | |
Era | Contemporary philosophy |
Region | |
Thesis | The moral landscape: How science could determine human values (2009) |
Doctoral advisor | Mark Cohen |
Website | |
samharris |
Samuel Benjamin Harris (born April 9, 1967) is an American philosopher, neuroscientist, author, and podcast host. His work touches on a range of topics, including rationality, religion, ethics, free will, neuroscience, meditation, psychedelics, philosophy of mind, politics, terrorism, and artificial intelligence. Harris came to prominence for his criticism of religion, and he is known as one of the "Four Horsemen" of New Atheism, along with Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Daniel Dennett.[2][3][4]
Harris's first book, The End of Faith (2004), won the PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction and remained on The New York Times Best Seller list for 33 weeks. Harris has since written six additional books: Letter to a Christian Nation in 2006, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values in 2010, the long-form essay Lying in 2011, the short book Free Will in 2012, Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion in 2014, and (with British writer Maajid Nawaz) Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue in 2015. Harris's work has been translated into over 20 languages. Some critics have argued that Harris's writings are Islamophobic.[5] Harris and his supporters, however, reject this characterization,[6] adding that such a labeling is an attempt to silence criticism.[7]
Harris has debated with many prominent figures on the topics of God or religion, including William Lane Craig, Jordan Peterson, Rick Warren, Robert Wright, Andrew Sullivan, Cenk Uygur, Reza Aslan, David Wolpe, Deepak Chopra, Ben Shapiro, and Peter Singer. Since September 2013, Harris has hosted the Making Sense podcast (originally titled Waking Up), which has a large listenership. Around 2018, he was described as one of the marginalized "renegade" intellectuals,[8] though Harris disagreed with that characterization.[9][10] In September 2018, Harris released a meditation app, Waking Up with Sam Harris[a]. He is also considered a prominent figure in the Mindfulness movement, promoting meditation practices without the need for any religious beliefs.[11]
Early life and education
[edit]Samuel Benjamin Harris was born in Los Angeles, California, on April 9, 1967.[12][13] He is the son of the late actor Berkeley Harris, who appeared mainly in Western films, and television writer and producer Susan Harris (née Spivak), who created Soap and The Golden Girls, among other series.[14][15] His father, born in North Carolina, came from a Quaker background, and his mother is Jewish but not religious.[16] He was raised by his mother following his parents' divorce when he was age two.[SH 1] Harris has stated that his upbringing was entirely secular and that his parents rarely discussed religion, though he also stated that he was not raised as an atheist.[17]
While his original major was in English, Harris became interested in philosophical questions while at Stanford University after an experience with MDMA.[18][19][20] The experience interested him in the idea he might be able to achieve spiritual insights without the use of drugs.[21] Leaving Stanford in his second year, a quarter after his psychoactive experience, he visited India and Nepal, where he studied meditation with teachers of Buddhist and Hindu religions,[21][22] including Dilgo Khyentse.[SH 2] For a few weeks in the early 1990s, he was a volunteer guard in the security detail of the Dalai Lama.[23][22]
In 1997, after eleven years overseas, Harris returned to Stanford, completing a B.A. degree in philosophy in 2000.[22][24][25] Harris began writing his first book, The End of Faith, immediately after the September 11 attacks.[22]
He received a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience in 2009 from the University of California, Los Angeles,[22][26][27] using functional magnetic resonance imaging to conduct research into the neural basis of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty.[22][27] His thesis was titled The Moral Landscape: How Science Could Determine Human Values. His advisor was Mark S. Cohen.[28]
Career
[edit]Writing
[edit]Harris's writing concerns philosophy, neuroscience, and criticism of religion. He came to prominence for his criticism of religion (Islam in particular) and he is described as one of the Four Horsemen of Atheism, along with Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Daniel Dennett.[29][2] He has written for publications such as The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Economist, The Times (of London), The Boston Globe, and The Atlantic.[30] Five of Harris's books have been New York Times bestsellers, and his writing has been translated into over 20 languages.[30] The End of Faith (2004) remained on The New York Times Best Seller list for 33 weeks.[31]
Podcast
[edit]In September 2013, Harris began releasing the Waking Up podcast (since re-titled Making Sense). Episodes vary in length but often last over two hours.[32] Releases do not follow a regular schedule.[33]
The podcast focuses on a wide array of topics related to science and spirituality, including philosophy, religion, morality, free will, neuroscience, meditation, psychedelics and artificial intelligence. Harris has interviewed a wide range of guests, including scientists, philosophers, spiritual teachers, and authors. Guests have included Jordan Peterson, Dan Dennett, Janna Levin, Peter Singer, and David Chalmers.[33][34][14][35]
Meditation app
[edit]In September 2018, Harris released a meditation course app, Waking Up with Sam Harris. The app provides daily meditations; long guided meditations; daily "Moments" (brief meditations and reminders); conversations with thought leaders in psychology, meditation, philosophy, psychedelics, and other disciplines; a selection of lessons on various topics, such as Mind & Emotion, Free Will, and Doing Good; and more. Users of the app are introduced to several types of meditation, such as mindfulness meditation, vipassanā-style meditation, loving-kindness meditation, and Dzogchen.[36]
In September 2020, Harris announced his commitment to donate at least 10% of Waking Up's profits to highly effective charities,[37] thus becoming the first company to sign the Giving What We Can pledge for companies.[38] The pledge was retroactive, taking into account the profits since the day the app launched two years previously.[37]
Socio-religious Views
[edit]Religion
[edit]Part of a series on |
Atheism |
---|
Harris is generally a critic of religion, and is considered a leading figure in the New Atheist movement. Harris is particularly opposed to what he refers to as dogmatic belief, and says that "Pretending to know things one doesn't know is a betrayal of science – and yet it is the lifeblood of religion."[SH 3] While purportedly opposed to religion in general and the belief systems of them, Harris believes that all religions are not created equal.[14] Often invoking the non-violent nature of Jainism[39] to contrast with Islam,[40] Harris argues that the differences in religious doctrines and scriptures are the main indicators of a religion's value.[41][42]
In September 2006 Harris debated Robert Wright on the rationality of religious belief.[43] In 2007, he engaged in a lengthy debate with conservative commentator Andrew Sullivan on the Internet forum Beliefnet.[44] In April 2007, Harris debated with evangelical pastor Rick Warren for Newsweek magazine.[45] Harris debated with Rabbi David Wolpe in 2007.[46] In 2010, Harris joined Michael Shermer to debate with Deepak Chopra and Jean Houston on the future of God in a debate hosted by ABC News Nightline.[47] Harris debated with Christian philosopher William Lane Craig in April 2011 on whether there can be an objective morality without God.[48] In June and July 2018, he met with Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson for a series of debates on religion, particularly the relationship between religious values and scientific fact in defining truth.[49][50] Harris has debated with the scholar Reza Aslan.[51]
In 2006, Harris described Islam as "all fringe and no center",[SH 4] and wrote in The End of Faith that "the doctrine of Islam ... represents a unique danger to all of us", arguing that the war on terror is really a war against Islam.[52] In 2007, Harris in the famous “Four Horsemen” debate asked fellow atheists, Hitchens, Dawkins, and Dennett, “Do you feel there's any burden we have, as critics of religion, to be evenhanded in our criticism of religion, or is it fair to notice that there's a spectrum of religious ideas and commitments and Islam is on one end of it and the Amish and the Jains and others are on another end, and there are real differences here that we have to take seriously.”[53] In 2014, Harris said he considers Islam to be "especially belligerent and inimical to the norms of civil discourse", as it involves what Harris considers to be "bad ideas, held for bad reasons, leading to bad behavior."[41] In 2015 Harris and secular Islamic activist Maajid Nawaz cowrote Islam and the Future of Tolerance.[54] In this book, Harris argues that the word Islamophobia is a "pernicious meme", a label which prevents discussion about the threat of Islam.[52] Harris has been described in 2020 by Jonathan Matusitz, Associate Professor at the University of Central Florida, as "a champion of the counter-jihad left".[55]
Harris is also critical of the Christian right in politics in the United States, blaming them for the political focus on "pseudo-problems like gay marriage".[56] He is also critical of liberal Christianity – as represented, for instance, by the theology of Paul Tillich – which he argues claims to base its beliefs on the Bible despite actually being influenced by secular modernity. He further states that in so doing liberal Christianity provides rhetorical cover to fundamentalists.[56]
Harris emphasizes that all religions are not the same and that if any religion can be considered a "religion of peace", it is not Islam, but rather Jainism,[40][39][42] which emerged in India around the same time as Buddhism, and has non-violence as its core doctrine.[42] He underscores that to be a practicing Jain, one has to be a vegetarian and a pacifist, while the Jain monks even wear masks in order to avoid breathing in any living thing.[42][39] But, he points out that even the Jain religion has its problems, as Jains believe certain things based on insufficient evidence, which leads to some religious dogmas.[42]
Harris has often noted some positive aspects of Buddhist thought, especially in relation to meditation, such as Buddhism's emphasis that one's behavior and intentions impact the mind, and in order to achieve happiness, one needs to strive towards "overcoming fear and hatred" while "maximizing love and compassion".[42] In 2019, while discussing his book Waking Up: Searching for Spirituality Without Religion, Harris noted that the West could learn a lot from the East about the traditions of meditation found in Hinduism and Buddhism,[14] though he considers that meditation can be practiced without any traditional religious beliefs.[11]
Spirituality
[edit]Harris holds that there is "nothing irrational about seeking the states of mind that lie at the core of many religions. Compassion, awe, devotion, and feelings of oneness are surely among the most valuable experiences a person can have", [21] saying:[SH 5]
Everything of value that people get from religion can be had more honestly, without presuming anything on insufficient evidence. The rest is self-deception, set to music.
— Sam Harris (15 March 2007), SamHarris.org
Harris rejects the dichotomy between spirituality and rationality, favoring a middle path that preserves spirituality and science but does not involve religion.[57] He writes that spirituality should be understood in light of scientific disciplines like neuroscience and psychology.[57] Science, he contends, can show how to maximize human well-being, but may fail to answer certain questions about the nature of being, answers to some of which he says are discoverable directly through our experience.[57] His conception of spirituality does not involve a belief in any god.[58]
In Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion (2014), Harris describes his experience with Dzogchen, a Tibetan Buddhist meditation practice, and recommends it to his readers.[57] He writes that the purpose of spirituality (as he defines it – he concedes that the term's uses are diverse and sometimes indefensible) is to become aware that our sense of self is illusory, and says this realization brings both happiness and insight into the nature of consciousness, mirroring core Buddhist beliefs.[57][59] This process of realization, he argues, is based on experience and is not contingent on faith.[57][14]
When you learn how to meditate, you recognize that there is another possibility, which is to be vividly aware of your experience in each moment in a way that frees you from routine misery.
— Sam Harris (February 2019), The Guardian
Science and morality
[edit]Harris considers that the well-being of conscious creatures forms the basis of morality. In The Moral Landscape, he argues that science can in principle answer moral questions and help maximize well-being.[40]
Harris rejects the moral authority of religion, and points to what he sees as failures or misplaced priorities, for example saying that "The Catholic Church is more concerned about preventing contraception than preventing child rape".[40]
Harris also criticizes cultural and moral relativism, arguing that it prevents people from making objective moral judgments about practices that clearly harm human well-being, such as female genital mutilation. Harris contends that we can make scientifically based claims about the negative impacts of such practices on human welfare, and that withholding judgment in these cases is tantamount to claiming complete ignorance about what contributes to human well-being.[40]
Free will
[edit]Harris says that the idea of free will "cannot be mapped on to any conceivable reality" and is incoherent.[1] Harris writes in Free Will that neuroscience "reveals you to be a biochemical puppet."[60]
Philosopher Daniel Dennett argued that Harris's book Free Will successfully refuted the common understanding of free will, but that he failed to respond adequately to the compatibilist understanding of free will. Dennett said the book was valuable because it expressed the views of many eminent scientists, but that it nonetheless contained a "veritable museum of mistakes" and that "Harris and others need to do their homework if they want to engage with the best thought on the topic."[61]
Artificial intelligence
[edit]Harris is particularly concerned with existential risks from artificial general intelligence, a topic he has discussed in depth.[62][SH 6][SH 7] In a 2016 TED talk, he argued that it will be a major threat in the future, and criticized the lack of human interest on the subject.[63] He said that artificial superintelligence will inevitably be developed if three assumptions hold true: intelligence is a product of information processing in physical systems, humans will continue to improve intelligent machines, and human intelligence is far from the peak of possible intelligence.[63] He described making artificial superintelligence safe as "one of the greatest challenges our species will ever face", indicating that it would warrant immediate consideration.[63]
Political views
[edit]Harris describes himself as a liberal, even though he criticizes some aspects of both right and left. He is a registered Democrat[64] and has never voted Republican in presidential elections.[33] He supports same-sex marriage and decriminalizing drugs.[65]
Criticism of the Bush Administration
[edit]Harris frequently criticized George W. Bush over his support for intelligent design and his coziness with Christianity.[66][67]
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times in 2006, Harris said that he supported most of the criticism against the Bush administration's war in Iraq, and all criticism of fiscal policy and the administration's treatment of science. Harris also said that liberalism has grown "dangerously out of touch with the realities of our world" regarding threats posed by Islamic fundamentalism.[65] Harris criticized the Bush administration for its use of torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay, but also argued that there can be a rational case for torture in rare circumstances.[68][69]
Israel
[edit]Harris opposes religious claims to Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state. Nonetheless, Harris has said that due to the hostility towards Jews, if there is one religious group which needs protections in the form of a state, it is Jews and the state of Israel.[SH 8][70]
Harris has criticized both Israel and Palestine for committing war crimes in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. He said in 2014 that he believes Israel genuinely wants peace and that its neighbors are more devoted to the destruction of Israel. Harris has also said that Palestine is more guilty, citing Hamas' use of human shields and genocidal rhetoric towards the Jews.[SH 8] He names these as reasons that Israel has a right to defend itself against Palestine.[SH 9]
During the Israel–Hamas war that began in October 2023, Harris expressed support for Israel and rejected arguments that Israel provoked Hamas by building Israeli settlements in the West Bank, arguing that Gaza had not been occupied since 2005. He also condemned the 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, which led to the war.[SH 10]
Presidential elections
[edit]In the 2008 United States presidential election, he supported the candidacy of Barack Obama and opposed Republican John McCain's candidacy.[SH 11][71] During the 2016 United States presidential election, Harris supported Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Party presidential primaries against Bernie Sanders,[72] and despite calling her "a terribly flawed candidate for the presidency", he favored her in the general election and came out strongly in opposition to Donald Trump's candidacy.[SH 12][34] Harris has criticized Trump for lying, stating in 2018 that Trump "has assaulted truth more than anyone in human history."[34]
In the 2020 United States presidential election, Harris supported Andrew Yang in the Democratic primaries.[73] Harris also introduced Yang to podcaster Joe Rogan.[74] After the 2020 election, he said that he did not care what was on Hunter Biden's laptop, telling the Triggernometry podcast that "Hunter Biden literally could have had the corpses of children in his basement – I would not have cared",[75] arguing more broadly that both Trump and Biden had been in the public eye for decades, and that Biden would have had to have engaged in an extraordinarily large scale of mendacity to come even close to the level of scandal Trump is known to have engaged in.
In the 2024 United States presidential election, Harris endorsed Kamala Harris.[76] Just a few days before the elections, he joined in a debate on the Honestly podcast where he argued in favor of supporting Kamala Harris, while Ben Shapiro presented the case for Donald Trump.[77] After the election Harris criticized the Democratic party over their embrace of identity politics, their overemphasize on gender identity, and the Biden administration's failure crack down on illegal immigration.[78]
Economics
[edit]Harris supports raising taxes on the wealthy and reducing government spending, and has criticized billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett for paying relatively little in tax. He has proposed taxing 10% for estates worth above 10 million, taxing 50% for estates worth over a billion dollars, and then using the money to fund an infrastructure bank.[SH 13]
He has accused conservatives of perceiving raising taxes as a form of theft or punishment, and of believing that by being rich they create value for others.[79][SH 13] He has described this view as ludicrous, saying that "markets aren't perfectly reflective of the value of goods and services, and many wealthy people don't create much in the way of value for others. In fact, as our recent financial crisis has shown, it is possible for a few people to become extraordinarily rich by wrecking the global economy".[SH 13]
Gun rights
[edit]Harris owns guns and wrote in 2015 that he understood people's hostility towards gun culture in the United States and the political influence of the National Rifle Association of America. However, he argued that there is a rational case for gun ownership due to the fact that the police cannot always be relied on and that guns are a good alternative.[80][SH 14]
Harris has stated that he disagrees with proposals by liberals and gun control advocates for restricting guns, such as the assault weapons ban, since more gun crimes are committed with handguns than the semi-automatic weapons which the ban would target. Harris has also said that the left-wing media gets many things wrong about guns. He has, however, offered support for certain regulations on gun ownership, such as mandatory training, licensure, and background checks before a gun can be legally purchased.[SH 14]
COVID-19 pandemic
[edit]During the COVID-19 pandemic, he criticized commentators for pushing views on COVID-19 that he considered to be "patently insane". Harris accused these commentators of believing that COVID-19 policies were a way of implementing social control and to crackdown on people's freedom politically.[81] Harris has feuded with Bret Weinstein over his views on COVID-19.[82] In 2023, he said that if COVID-19 had killed more children, there would be no patience for vaccine skepticism.[83]
In March 2023, he hosted Matt Ridley and Alina Chan on his podcast to discuss the origins of COVID-19 and the potential that the COVID-19 virus was made in a lab.[SH 15][84]
Intellectual dark web
[edit]Harris has been described, alongside others such as Joe Rogan, Bret Weinstein, and Jordan Peterson, as a member of the intellectual dark web, a group that opposes political correctness and identity politics.[85] New York Times book reviewer Bari Weiss described the group as "a collection of iconoclastic thinkers, academic renegades and media personalities who are having a rolling conversation – on podcasts, YouTube and Twitter, and in sold-out auditoriums – that sound unlike anything else happening, at least publicly, in the culture right now."[34]
In November 2020, Harris stated that he does not identify as a part of that group.[9][10] In 2021 Harris stated that he had "turn[ed] in [his] imaginary membership card to this imaginary organization".[86] In 2023 during an interview with The Daily Beast, Harris explained that he had broken away from the intellectual dark web due to disagreements with Bret Weinstein, and Maajid Nawaz's "obsession" with COVID-19 conspiracy theories and criticism of COVID-19 policies. He also described becoming disenchanted with Dave Rubin for having been captured by his audience and said "Rubin became far more cynical than I would have thought possible. And it's very depressing. He was a friend, he's not a friend anymore".[87]
Controversies
[edit]This article's "criticism" or "controversy" section may compromise the article's neutrality. (November 2023) |
Race and IQ controversy
[edit]In April 2017, Harris hosted the social scientist Charles Murray on his podcast, discussing topics including the heritability of IQ and race and intelligence.[SH 16] Harris stated the invitation was out of indignation at a violent protest against Murray at Middlebury College the month before and not out of particular interest in the material at hand.[SH 16] The podcast episode garnered significant criticism, most notably from Vox[35][88] and Slate.[89] In the Vox article, scientists, including Eric Turkheimer, Kathryn Paige Harden, and Richard E. Nisbett, accused Harris of participating in "pseudoscientific racialist speculation" and peddling "junk science". Harris and Murray were defended by commentators Andrew Sullivan[90] and Kyle Smith.[91] Harris and Vox editor-at-large Ezra Klein later discussed the affair in a podcast interview in which Klein accused Harris of "thinking tribally" and Harris accused the Vox article of leading people to think he was racist.[92][93]
Accusations of Islamophobia
[edit]Harris has been accused of Islamophobia by linguist and political commentator Noam Chomsky.[94] After Harris and Chomsky exchanged a series of emails on terrorism and U.S. foreign policy in 2015, Chomsky said Harris had not prepared adequately for the exchange and that this revealed his work as unserious.[95] In a 2016 interview with Al Jazeera English's UpFront, Chomsky further criticized Harris, saying he "specializes in hysterical, slanderous charges against people he doesn't like."[94]
Harris has countered that his views on this and other topics are frequently misrepresented by "unethical critics" who "deliberately" take his words out of context.[41] He has also criticized the validity of the term "Islamophobia".[96] "My criticism of Islam is a criticism of beliefs and their consequences, but my fellow liberals reflexively view it as an expression of intolerance toward people,"[SH 17] he wrote following a disagreement with actor Ben Affleck in October 2014 on the show Real Time with Bill Maher. Affleck had described Harris's and host Bill Maher's views on Muslims as "gross" and "racist", and Harris's statement that "Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas" as an "ugly thing to say". Affleck also compared Harris's and Maher's rhetoric to that of people who use antisemitic canards or define African Americans in terms of intraracial crime.[97] Several conservative American media pundits in turn criticized Affleck and praised Harris and Maher for broaching the topic, saying that discussing it had become taboo.[98]
Harris's dialogue on Islam with Maajid Nawaz received a combination of positive reviews[99][100][101] and mixed reviews.[102][103] Irshad Manji wrote: "Their back-and-forth clarifies multiple confusions that plague the public conversation about Islam." Of Harris specifically, she said "[he] is right that liberals must end their silence about the religious motives behind much Islamist terror. At the same time, he ought to call out another double standard that feeds the liberal reflex to excuse Islamists: Atheists do not make nearly enough noise about hatred toward Muslims."[103]
Harris opposed Executive Order 13769, which limited the entry of refugees from Muslim-majority countries to the United States, stating that it was “unethical with regard to the plight of refugees…and bound to be ineffective in stopping the spread of Islamism.”[104]
Hatewatch staff at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) wrote that members of the "skeptics" movement, of which Harris is "one of the most public faces", help to "channel people into the alt-right."[105] Bari Weiss wrote that the SPLC had misrepresented Harris's views.[34]
Nathan J. Robinson and Chris Hedges criticized Harris for discussing in an excerpt from The End of Faith the possibility of a nuclear first strike against an Islamist regime that acquired long-range nuclear weapons and that would be undeterred by the threat of mutual destruction due to beliefs in jihad and martyrdom.[106][SH 18][107]
Reception and recognition
[edit]Harris's first two books, in which he lays out his criticisms of religion, received negative reviews from Christian scholars.[56][108][109] From secular sources, the books received a mixture of negative reviews[110][111][112] and positive reviews.[113][114][115][116] In his review of The End of Faith, American historian Alexander Saxton criticized what he called Harris's "vitriolic and selective polemic against Islam", (emphasis in original) which he said "obscure[s] the obvious reality that the invasion of Iraq and the War against Terror are driven by religious irrationalities, cultivated and conceded to, at high policy levels in the U.S., and which are at least comparable to the irrationality of Islamic crusaders and Jihadists."[110] By contrast, Stephanie Merritt wrote of the same book that Harris's "central argument in The End of Faith is sound: religion is the only area of human knowledge in which it is still acceptable to hold beliefs dating from antiquity and a modern society should subject those beliefs to the same principles that govern scientific, medical or geographical inquiry – particularly if they are inherently hostile to those with different ideas."[113] Harris's first book, The End of Faith (2004), won the PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction.[117]
Harris's next two books, which discuss philosophical issues relating to ethics and free will, received several negative academic reviews.[118][119][120][121][122][123] In his review of The Moral Landscape, neuroscientist Kenan Malik criticized Harris for not engaging adequately with philosophical literature: "Imagine a sociologist who wrote about evolutionary theory without discussing the work of Darwin, Fisher, Mayr, Hamilton, Trivers or Dawkins on the grounds that he did not come to his conclusions by reading about biology and because discussing concepts such as 'adaptation', 'speciation', 'homology', 'phylogenetics' or 'kin selection' would 'increase the amount of boredom in the universe'. How seriously would we, and should we, take his argument?"[121] On the other hand, The Moral Landscape received a largely positive review from psychologists James Diller and Andrew Nuzzolilli.[124] Additionally, Free Will received a mixed academic review from philosopher Paul Pardi, who said that while it suffers from some conceptual confusions and that the core argument is a bit too "breezy", it serves as a "good primer on key ideas in physicalist theories of freedom and the will".[125]
Harris's book on spirituality and meditation received mainly positive reviews[126][127][57][59] as well as some mixed reviews.[128][58] It was praised by Frank Bruni, for example, who described it as "so entirely of this moment, so keenly in touch with the growing number of Americans who are willing to say that they do not find the succor they crave, or a truth that makes sense to them, in organized religion."[126]
In 2018, Robert Wright, a visiting professor of science and religion at Union Theological Seminary, published an article in Wired criticizing Harris, whom he described as "annoying" and "deluded". Wright wrote that Harris, despite claiming to be a champion of rationality, ignored his own cognitive biases and engaged in faulty and inconsistent arguments in his book The End of Faith. He wrote that "the famous proponent of New Atheism is on a crusade against tribalism but seems oblivious to his own version of it." Wright wrote that these biases are rooted in natural selection and impact everyone, but that they can be mitigated when acknowledged.[93]
The UK Business Insider included Harris's podcast in their list of "8 podcasts that will change how you think about human behavior" in 2017,[129] and PC Magazine included it in their list of "The Best Podcasts of 2018".[130] In January 2020, Max Sanderson included Harris's podcast as a "Producer pick" in a "podcasts of the week" section for The Guardian.[32] The Waking Up podcast won the 2017 Webby Award for "People's Voice" in the category "Science & Education" under "Podcasts & Digital Audio".[131]
Harris was included on a list of the "100 Most Spiritually Influential Living People 2019" in the Watkins Review, a publication of Watkins Books, a London esoterica bookshop.[132]
Personal life
[edit]In 2004, Harris married Annaka Harris (née Gorton), an author and editor of nonfiction and scientific books, after engaging in a common interest about the nature of consciousness.[133] They have two daughters[134][SH 19] and live in Los Angeles.[135]
In September 2020, Harris became a member of Giving What We Can, an effective altruism organization whose members pledge to give at least 10% of their income to effective charities, both as an individual and as a company with Waking Up.[38][37]
Harris practices Brazilian jiu-jitsu.[136][4]
Works
[edit]Books
[edit]- Harris, Sam (2004). The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-03515-8. OCLC 62265386.
- Harris, Sam (2006). Letter to a Christian Nation. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. ISBN 0-307-26577-3. OCLC 70158553.
- Harris, Sam (2010). The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. Free Press. ISBN 978-1-4391-7121-9. OCLC 535493357.
- Harris, Sam (2011). Lying. Four Elephants Press. ISBN 978-1-940051-00-0.
- Harris, Sam (2012). Free Will. Free Press. ISBN 978-1-4516-8340-0.
- Harris, Sam (2014a). Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4516-3601-7.
- Harris, Sam; Nawaz, Maajid (2015). Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-08870-2.
- Harris, Sam; Dawkins, Richard; Dennett, Daniel; Hitchens, Christopher (2019). The Four Horsemen: The Discussion that Sparked an Atheist Revolution. Bantam Press. ISBN 978-0-593-08039-9.
- Harris, Sam (2020). Making Sense: Conversations on Consciousness, Morality, and the Future of Humanity. Ecco. ISBN 978-0-06-285778-1.
Documentary
[edit]- Amila, D. & Shapiro, J. (2018). Islam and the Future of Tolerance. United States: The Orchard.[137]
Peer-reviewed articles
[edit]- Harris, S.; Sheth, S. A.; Cohen, M. S. (February 27, 2008). "Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty". Annals of Neurology. 63 (2): 141–147. doi:10.1002/ana.21301. PMID 18072236. S2CID 17335600.
- Harris, S.; Kaplan, J. T.; Curiel, A.; Bookheimer, S. Y.; Iacoboni, M.; Cohen, M. S. (October 1, 2009). Sporns, Olaf (ed.). "The Neural Correlates of Religious and Nonreligious Belief". PLOS One. 4 (10): e7272. Bibcode:2009PLoSO...4.7272H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007272. PMC 2748718. PMID 19794914.
- Douglas, P. K.; Harris, S.; Yuille, A.; Cohen, M. S. (May 15, 2011). "Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms and number of independent components used in fMRI decoding of belief vs. disbelief". NeuroImage. 56 (2): 544–553. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.002. PMC 3099263. PMID 21073969.
- Kaplan, Jonas T.; Gimbel, Sarah I.; Harris, Sam (December 23, 2016). "Neural correlates of maintaining one's political beliefs in the face of counterevidence". Scientific Reports. 6: 39589. Bibcode:2016NatSR...639589K. doi:10.1038/srep39589. PMC 5180221. PMID 28008965.
- Seitz, Benjamin M.; Aktipis, Athena; Buss, David M.; Alcock, Joe; Bloom, Paul; Gelfand, Michele; Harris, Sam; Lieberman, Debra; Horowitz, Barbara N.; Pinker, Steven; Wilson, David Sloan; Haselton, Martie G. (November 10, 2020). "The pandemic exposes human nature: 10 evolutionary insights". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (45): 27767–27776. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11727767S. doi:10.1073/pnas.2009787117. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 7668083. PMID 33093198.
Notes
[edit]- ^ Now named Waking Up: Guided Meditation
References
[edit]Harris blog citations
[edit]- ^ "I'm Not the Sexist Pig You're Looking For". www.samharris.org. September 15, 2014. Archived from the original on April 18, 2016. Retrieved April 23, 2016.
- ^ Harris, Sam (November 11, 2012). "Science on the Brink of Death". Archived from the original on September 9, 2017. Retrieved November 14, 2012.
- ^ "Meme #8". Sam Harris. May 3, 2017. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
- ^ "The Reality of Islam". Sam Harris. February 8, 2006. Retrieved April 30, 2020.
- ^ Harris, Sam (March 15, 2007). "God's Dupes". SamHarris.org. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
- ^ "#312 – The Trouble with AI". Sam Harris. March 7, 2023. Retrieved August 12, 2023.
- ^ "#116 – AI: Racing Toward the Brink". Sam Harris. February 6, 2018. Retrieved August 12, 2023.
- ^ a b "#2 — Why Don't I Criticize Israel?". Sam Harris. July 27, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
- ^ "Making Sense of Gaza | A Conversation Between Sam Harris and Andrew Sullivan". Sam Harris. August 12, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
- ^ "The Sin of Moral Equivalence". Sam Harris. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
- ^ "What Barack Obama Could Not (and Should Not) Say". Sam Harris. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
- ^ Harris, Sam. Trump in Exile Archived February 12, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. samharris.org, October 13, 2016. Retrieved April 22, 2017
- ^ a b c "How Rich is Too Rich?". Sam Harris. August 17, 2011. Archived from the original on November 25, 2021. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
- ^ a b "The Riddle of the Gun". Sam Harris. January 2, 2013. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
- ^ "Sam Harris | #311 – Did SARS-CoV-2 Escape from a Lab?". www.samharris.org. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
- ^ a b Harris, Sam (March 27, 2018). "Ezra Klein: Editor-at-Large". SamHarris.org. Retrieved October 16, 2018.
- ^ Harris, Sam (October 7, 2014), "Can Liberalism Be Saved From Itself?", Sam Harris, archived from the original on December 26, 2014, retrieved December 26, 2014
- ^ "Sam Harris | Home of the Making Sense Podcast". Sam Harris. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Harris, Sam (July 4, 2011). "Drugs and the Meaning of Life". Sam Harris. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved November 5, 2014.
General citations
[edit]- ^ a b Paul Pardi (May 15, 2012). "An Analysis of Sam Harris' Free Will". Philosophy News. Retrieved April 17, 2016.
- ^ a b Madigan, Tim (2010). "Meet the New Atheism / Same as the Old Atheism?". Philosophy Now. Retrieved August 15, 2018.
- ^ Bullivant, Stephen; Ruse, Michael, eds. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press (OUP). p. 246. ISBN 978-0-19-964465-0. Retrieved May 22, 2019.
- ^ a b Wood, Graeme (April 24, 2013). "The Atheist Who Strangled Me". The Atlantic. Retrieved August 11, 2014.
- ^ Greenwald, Glen (April 3, 2013). "Sam Harris, the New Atheists, and anti-Muslim animus", The Guardian.
- ^ Religion, Politics, Free Speech | Sam Harris | ACADEMIA | Rubin Report from the YouTube channel The Rubin Report, September 11, 2015.
- ^ "Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash", The Independent, April 13, 2013.
- ^ Weiss, Bari (May 8, 2018). "Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web". The New York Times. New York City. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- ^ a b Nguyen, Tina; Goldenberg, Sally (March 15, 2021). "How Yang charmed the right on his road to political stardom". Politico.
- ^ a b "#225 – Republic of Lies". YouTube. November 18, 2020. Archived from the original on October 30, 2021.
- ^ a b Purser, Ronald; Cooper, Andrew (December 6, 2014). "Mindfulness' 'truthiness' problem: Sam Harris, science and the truth about Buddhist tradition". Salon. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
- ^ Current Biography, January 2012, Vol. 73, Issue 1, p. 37
- ^ "Playboy Interview: Sam Harris". Playboy. Vol. 66, no. 1. Winter 2019. p. 44.
- ^ a b c d e Anthony, Andrew (February 16, 2019). "Sam Harris, the new atheist with a spiritual side". The Observer. Retrieved June 22, 2020.
- ^ Anderson, Jon (October 20, 1985). "'Girls' Series is solid gold for Harris". Chicago Tribune TV Week. Retrieved September 18, 2013.
- ^ Samuels, David (May 29, 2012). "Q&A: Sam Harris". Tablet. Archived from the original on January 27, 2023. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
- ^ Sam Harris – Extended Interview; PBS: Religion & Ethics Newsweekly; January 5, 2007
- ^ "Sam Harris." (2008). The Science Studio. Science Network. October 3, 2008. Transcript.
- ^ Harris, Sam (June 28, 2011). "MDMA Caution with Sam Harris". YouTube.
- ^ "First Time Sam Harris Took E", Cogent Canine, December 6, 2017, archived from the original on June 2, 2020, retrieved December 8, 2017 – via Youtube
- ^ a b c Miller, Lisa (2010). "Sam Harris Believes in God". Newsweek.
- ^ a b c d e f Segal, David (October 26, 2006). "Atheist Evangelist". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved May 4, 2023. Alternative link
- ^ Morrison, Patt (September 24, 2014). "No God? No problem, says god-free thinker Sam Harris". [Opinion]. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 4, 2023.
- ^ Rice, Lewis I. (2005). "The Iconoclast: Sam Harris wants believers to stop believing". Stanford Magazine. Stanford Alumni Association. Archived from the original on October 16, 2009.
- ^ "Sam Harris". The Information Philosopher. Retrieved April 30, 2016.
- ^ Greenberg, Brad A. (April 1, 2008). "Making Belief". UCLA Magazine. Retrieved October 28, 2009.
- ^ a b Healy, Melissa (September 30, 2009). "Religion: The heart believes what it will, but the brain behaves the same either way". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 24, 2014. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- ^ Harris, Sam (2009). The Moral Landscape: How Science Could Determine Human Values (PhD dissertation). UCLA. ISBN 978-1-124-01190-5. Retrieved June 5, 2014 – via ProQuest.
- ^ Bowles, Nellie (December 14, 2018). "Patreon Bars Anti-Feminist for Racist Speech, Inciting Revolt". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
On Dec. 6, Patreon kicked the anti-feminist polemic Carl Benjamin, who works under the name Sargon of Akkad, off its site for using racist language on YouTube. That same week, it removed the right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos a day after he opened an account."The moves prompted a revolt. Mr. Harris, citing worries about censorship, announced that he would leave Patreon. ...[...]"... Mr. Harris, who gathered his fan base as a pugnacious atheist and fierce critic of Islam ...
- ^ a b "Sam Harris". Edge.org. Retrieved August 26, 2018.
- ^ Van Biema, David (December 14, 2007). "What Your Brain Looks Like on Faith". Time. Retrieved August 16, 2018.
- ^ a b Davies, Hannah J; Verdier, Hannah; Sanderson, Max (January 3, 2020). "The con woman who scammed New York's elite – podcasts of the week". The Guardian. Retrieved June 22, 2020.
- ^ a b c "Waking Up with Sam Harris". iTunes – Podcasts. September 13, 2022. Retrieved September 13, 2022.
I have been, traditionally, a liberal. I have never voted republican ... certainly not for president.
- ^ a b c d e Weiss, Bari (May 8, 2018). "Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web". The New York Times. Retrieved May 8, 2018.
- ^ a b Turkheimer, Eric; Harden, Kathryn Paige; Nisbett, Richard E. (May 18, 2017). "Charles Murray is once again peddling junk science about race and IQ". Vox. Retrieved October 16, 2018.
- ^ Freeland, Ben (March 29, 2019). "Sam Harris' Waking Up App, Reviewed". Medium. Retrieved May 30, 2019.
- ^ a b c "Waking Up Turns 2". Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved September 28, 2020.
- ^ a b "Members". www.givingwhatwecan.org. Retrieved September 25, 2020.
- ^ a b c "Sam Harris Compares Islam with Jainism and Tells Which one of Them is the Religion of Peace". Jains Today. September 6, 2019. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
Jainism is a religion of peace
- ^ a b c d e Don, Katherine (October 17, 2010). "'The Moral Landscape': Why science should shape morality". Salon. Retrieved July 28, 2024.
- ^ a b c Harris, Sam (June 21, 2014). "Response to Controversy". Archived from the original on October 24, 2016. Retrieved October 23, 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f "The Temple of Reason Sam Harris On How Religion Puts The World At Risk". Sun Magazine. September 1, 2006. Retrieved July 2, 2024.
Jainism is the best example that I know of [a peaceful religion]. ... Nonviolence is its core doctrine
- ^ September 22, 2006 [1] (a 90-minute debate).
- ^ Harris, Sam; Sullivan, Andrew (January 16, 2007). "Is Religion 'Built Upon Lies'?" Beliefnet.
- ^ Harris, Sam; Warren, Rick (April 8, 2007). "Newsweek Poll: 90% Believe in God". Newsweek.
- ^ Padilla, Steve (December 29, 2007). "Rabbi, atheist debate with passion, humor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved June 20, 2020.
- ^ Harris, Dan; Brown, Ely (March 22, 2010). "'Nightline' 'Face-Off': Does God Have a Future?". ABC News. Retrieved June 20, 2020.
- ^ Schneider, Nathan (July 1, 2013). "The New Theist". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
- ^ Ruffolo, Michael (June 26, 2018). "Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson waste a lot of time, then talk about God for 20 minutes". National Observer. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
- ^ Murray, Douglas (September 16, 2018). "Arena talks in Dublin and London with Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris and Douglas Murray". The Spectator USA. Archived from the original on April 23, 2019. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
- ^ Jennek, Rafal (2017). Sam Harris on Religion in Peace and Conflict (PDF) (Thesis). Department of Theology, Uppsala Universitet. Retrieved June 20, 2020.
- ^ a b Adams, Alex (2016). Political Torture in Popular Culture: The Role of Representations in the Post-9/11 Torture Debate. Routledge. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-317-28939-5.
- ^ "The Four Horsemen by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett: 9780525511953 | PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books". PenguinRandomhouse.com. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
- ^ Harris, Sam; Maajid, Nawaz (2015). Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-08870-2. Archived from the original on May 7, 2020. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
- ^ Matusitz, Jonathan (2020). Communication in Global Jihad. Routledge. p. 1988. ISBN 978-1-000-22435-1.
- ^ a b c Mohler, R. Albert Jr. (August 19, 2004). "The End of Faith – Secularism with the Gloves Off". The Christian Post. Archived from the original on June 29, 2012. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
- ^ a b c d e f g Clothier, Peter (September 2, 2016). "Waking Up, by Sam Harris: A Book Review". Huffington Post. Retrieved October 1, 2017.
- ^ a b Smith, Holly (September 17, 2014). "Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion". Washington Independent Review of Books. Retrieved October 2, 2017.
- ^ a b "Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion". Kirkus Reviews. August 29, 2014. Retrieved August 12, 2016.
- ^ Nahmias, Eddy (August 13, 2012). "Does Contemporary Neuroscience Support or Challenge the Reality of Free Will?" Big Questions Online.
- ^ Dennett, Daniel (2017). "Reflections on Sam Harris' Free Will". Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia. 8 (3): 214–230. doi:10.4453/rifp.2017.0018. ISSN 2039-4667.
- ^ Harris, Sam (2015). "Can We Avoid a Digital Apocalypse?". Edge.org. Retrieved June 14, 2019.
- ^ a b c Davey, Tucker (October 7, 2016). "Sam Harris TED Talk: Can We Build AI Without Losing Control Over It?". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved June 14, 2019.
- ^ "Sam Harris: Trump, Reparations, Manifestos, Fox News". The David Pakman Show. September 9, 2019. Event occurs at 03:50. Archived from the original on October 30, 2021. Retrieved November 21, 2019.
I'm a registered Democrat
- ^ a b Harris, Sam (September 18, 2006). "Head-in-the-Sand Liberals: Western civilization really is at risk from Muslim extremists." Los Angeles Times. Archived at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ comerj (January 5, 2007). "January 5, 2007 ~ Sam Harris Extended Interview | January 5, 2007 | Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly | PBS". Religion & Ethics NewsWeekly. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
- ^ "Sam Harris | Home of the Making Sense Podcast". Sam Harris. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
- ^ "In Defense of Torture". HuffPost. October 17, 2005. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
- ^ "Sam Harris | Home of the Making Sense Podcast". Sam Harris. Retrieved October 23, 2024.
- ^ Salon Staff (July 28, 2014). "Sam Harris: Why don't I criticize Israel?". Salon. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
- ^ "What Barack Obama Could Not (and Should Not) Say". HuffPost. March 21, 2008. Retrieved April 12, 2023.
- ^ "Sam Harris Q&A: 'Why I'm Voting For Hillary Clinton'". YouTube. February 18, 2016. Archived from the original on October 30, 2021.
- ^ Harris, Sam (November 6, 2020). "I sure hope Andrew Yang has a significant job in D.C. next year..." Twitter. Retrieved May 21, 2021.
- ^ Weiss, Bari (January 31, 2020). "Opinion | Did I Just Get Yanged?". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
- ^ Chung, Frank (August 19, 2022). "Author Sam Harris says he wouldn't care if Hunter Biden had 'corpses of children in his basement'". News.com.au.
- ^ "Trump or Kamala? Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris Debate". The Free Press. October 29, 2024. Retrieved November 14, 2024.
- ^ "Trump or Kamala? Ben Shapiro and Sam Harris Debate". www.thefp.com/. October 29, 2024. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
- ^ "Sam Harris | #391 - The Reckoning". Sam Harris. Retrieved December 7, 2024.
- ^ "Head-in-the-Sand Liberals". Los Angeles Times. November 1, 2006. Archived from the original on November 1, 2006. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
- ^ "Why I own guns". The Week. January 9, 2015. Archived from the original on May 14, 2015. Retrieved May 31, 2022.
- ^ "Sam Harris Blasts Podcasters Pushing Covid Conspiracies". Mediaite. December 15, 2021. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
- ^ "I tried to talk about the hard issues America faces. Then the social media storm erupted". USA TODAY. Retrieved July 22, 2023.
- ^ Silverstein, Joe (January 16, 2023). "Podcaster Sam Harris: If COVID killed more children there'd be 'no f---ing patience' for vaccine skeptics". Fox News. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
- ^ Salzberg, Steven. "The Scientific Error That Might Have Caused The Covid-19 Pandemic". Forbes. Retrieved March 23, 2023.
- ^ Weiss, Bari; Winter, Damon (January 31, 2020). "Opinion | Meet the Renegades of the Intellectual Dark Web". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 31, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2022.
- ^ Wakeling, Adam (July 1, 2021). "What Happened to the Intellectual Dark Web?". RealClearPolicy. Retrieved May 8, 2022.
- ^ Fisher, Anthony L. (January 19, 2023). "The Intellectual Dark Web's Descent Into Paranoia and Trumpism". The Daily Beast. Retrieved October 31, 2023.
- ^ Klein, Ezra (March 27, 2018). "Sam Harris, Charles Murray, and the allure of race science". Vox. Retrieved October 16, 2018.
- ^ Saletan, William (April 27, 2018). "Stop Talking About Race and IQ". Slate. Retrieved October 17, 2018.
- ^ Sullivan, Andrew (March 30, 2018). "Denying Genetics Isn't Shutting Down Racism, It's Fueling It". New York – Intelligencer. Retrieved October 17, 2018.
- ^ Smith, Kyle (April 20, 2018). "Ezra Klein's Intellectual Demagoguery". National Review. Retrieved August 11, 2020.
- ^ Klein, Ezra (April 9, 2018). "The Sam Harris debate". Vox. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
- ^ a b Wright, Robert (May 17, 2018). "Sam Harris and the Myth of Perfectly Rational Thought". Wired. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
- ^ a b "Noam Chomsky tells 'UpFront' he would "absolutely" vote for Hillary Clinton". Al Jazeera. January 25, 2016. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
- ^ "Scoring the Noam Chomsky/Sam Harris debate: How the professor knocked out the atheist". Salon. May 8, 2015. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
- ^ Taylor, Jerome (April 12, 2013). "Atheists Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris face Islamophobia backlash". The Independent.
- ^ Child, Ben (October 7, 2014). "Ben Affleck: Sam Harris and Bill Maher 'racist' and 'gross' in views of Islam". The Guardian. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
- ^ Bond, Paul (October 8, 2014). "Ben Affleck Targeted by Conservatives After Islamism Spat With Bill Maher". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved April 3, 2021.
- ^ Brian Stewart (October 7, 2015). "A Liberal Atheist and a Liberal Muslim Discuss the Problems of Contemporary Islam". National Review.
- ^ "Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue". Publishers Weekly. October 2015. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
- ^ Sonenshine, Tara. "Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue". New York Journal of Books. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
- ^ "Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue". Kirkus Reviews. Retrieved October 24, 2020.
- ^ a b Manji, Irshad (November 3, 2015). "'Islam and the Future of Tolerance' and 'Not in God's Name'". The New York Times. Retrieved August 13, 2016.
- ^ Harris, Sam (January 29, 2017). "A Few Thoughts On The Muslim Ban". Sam Harris.org. Retrieved August 15, 2024.
- ^ Hatewatch Staff (April 19, 2018). "McInnes, Molyneux, and 4chan: Investigating pathways to the alt-right". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
- ^ Massey, Eli; Robinson, Nathan J. (October 12, 2018). "Being Mr. Reasonable". Current Affairs. ISSN 2471-2647. Retrieved April 24, 2023.
- ^ Wilder, Charly (March 13, 2008). "I don't believe in atheists". Salon. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Matthew Simpson, 2005. "Unbelievable: Religion is really, really bad for you." Christianity Today.
- ^ Novak, Michael (March 19, 2007). "Lonely Atheists of the Global Village". National Review. [Book reviews: Letter to a Christian Nation, by Sam Harris; Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, by Daniel C. Dennett; and The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins.] Archived from the original on May 16, 2013 – via Sam Harris. Via – American Enterprise Institute AEI Archived February 27, 2020, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b Saxton, Alexander (October 2006). "The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason". Science & Society. 70 (4): 572–574. doi:10.1521/siso.2006.70.4.572. ISSN 0036-8237.
- ^ Tom Flynn, 2005. "Glimpses of Nirvana." Free Inquiry, vol. 25 no. 2.
- ^ David Boulton, 2005. "Faith kills." New Humanist, volume 120 number 2.
- ^ a b Stephanie Merritt (February 6, 2005). "Faith no more". The Observer.
- ^ Hari, Johann (February 11, 2005). "BOOKS: The sea of faith and violence". The Independent. Retrieved February 3, 2022.
- ^ Dawkins, Richard (August 4, 2005). "Coming Out Against Religious Mania". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 3, 2022.
- ^ Pinker, Steven (June 1, 2008). "Survey: Truth to Power". The New York Times. Retrieved March 10, 2014.
- ^ PEN American Center, 2005. "The PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction Archived May 21, 2006, at the Wayback Machine."
- ^ Jollimore, Barnes & Noble Review, Oct. 22, 2010.
- ^ Appiah, Kwame Anthony (October 1, 2010). "Science Knows Best". The New York Times. Retrieved February 3, 2022.
- ^ Atran, Atran (February 23, 2011). "Sam Harris's Guide to Nearly Everything". The National Interest. Archived from the original on October 20, 2013. Retrieved September 24, 2011.
- ^ a b Malik, Kenan (April 14, 2011). "Test-tube truths". newhumanist.org.uk. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
- ^ "Is Sam Harris Right About Free Will?: A Book Review". The Table. Biola University Center for Christian Thought. May 26, 2014. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
- ^ Dennett, Daniel (2017). "Reflections on Sam Harris' Free Will". Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia. 8 (3): 214–230. doi:10.4453/rifp.2017.0018. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
- ^ Diller, J. W.; Nuzzolilli, A. E. (2012). "The Science of Values: The Moral Landscape by Sam Harris". The Behavior Analyst. 35 (2): 265–273. doi:10.1007/BF03392286. PMC 3501430.
- ^ Pardi, Paul (May 15, 2012). "An Analysis of Sam Harris's Free Will". Philosophy News. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
- ^ a b Bruni, Frank (August 30, 2014). "Between Godliness and Godlessness". The New York Times. Retrieved October 18, 2015.
- ^ Cave, Stephen (October 31, 2014). "Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion, by Sam Harris". Financial Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2022. Retrieved August 12, 2016.
- ^ Quirk, Trevor (September 10, 2014). "I Thought I Hated the New Atheists. Then I Read Sam Harris's New Book". The New Republic. Retrieved August 12, 2016.
- ^ "8 podcasts that will change how you think about human behavior". Business Insider. Retrieved April 23, 2017.
- ^ Moore, Ben (September 27, 2018). "The Best Podcasts of 2018". PC Magazine. Retrieved August 11, 2020.
- ^ "The 2017 Webby Awards for the best science and education podcasts". The Webby Awards. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
- ^ "Watkins' Spiritual 100 List for 2019". Watkins Magazine. April 2019. Retrieved May 7, 2019.
- ^ "Project Reason Trustees / Advisory Board". www.project-reason.org. Archived from the original on January 12, 2014.
- ^ Harris 2014a, p. 6: "Dedication: For Annaka, Emma, and Violet".
- ^ "Sam Harris, the new atheist with a spiritual side". The Guardian. February 16, 2019. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
- ^ Harris 2012.
- ^ "Islam and the Future of Tolerance". Islam and the Future of Tolerance. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- Sam Harris at TED
- Sam Harris at IMDb
- Library resources in your library and in other libraries by Sam Harris
- 1967 births
- 21st-century American educators
- 21st-century American essayists
- 21st-century American Jews
- 21st-century American male writers
- 21st-century American non-fiction writers
- 21st-century American philosophers
- 21st-century atheists
- 21st-century American social scientists
- Action theorists
- Activists from California
- American cognitive neuroscientists
- American consciousness researchers and theorists
- American critics of Christianity
- American critics of Islam
- American critics of alternative medicine
- American critics of creationism
- American critics of postmodernism
- American epistemologists
- American ethicists
- American male essayists
- American male non-fiction writers
- American people of Jewish descent
- American philosophers of mind
- American philosophers of science
- American philosophers of technology
- American interview podcasters
- American practitioners of Brazilian jiu-jitsu
- American psychedelic drug advocates
- American science writers
- American skeptics
- American social sciences writers
- American spiritual writers
- American Zionists
- Analytic philosophers
- Artificial intelligence ethicists
- American artificial intelligence researchers
- Atheist philosophers
- California Democrats
- Criticism of religion
- Critics of conspiracy theories
- Critics of multiculturalism
- Freethought writers
- Jewish American atheism activists
- Living people
- Mindfulness movement
- American metaphysics writers
- Moral realists
- New Atheism
- People associated with effective altruism
- Philosophers of love
- Philosophers of psychology
- People involved in race and intelligence controversies
- Rationalists
- Science activists
- Stanford University alumni
- Students of U Pandita
- University of California, Los Angeles alumni
- Writers about activism and social change
- Writers about globalization
- Writers about religion and science
- Writers from Los Angeles