Jump to content

Talk:Phonotactics: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Coyne025 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Update Linguistics in the Digital Age assignment details
 
(60 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
== "kn-"? ==
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Linguistics|applied=|applied-importance=|theoretical=|theoretical-importance=|phonetics=yes|phonetics-importance=|attention=yes}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(180d)
| archive=Talk:Phonotactics/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=1
| maxarchivesize=20T
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadsleft=6
| minthreadstoarchive=3
}}


== No onset /ŋ/ or /ʒ/? ==
The claim that "kn" does not exist in English is a little unclear: what does it actually mean? Certainly the sequence of consonants kn appears ("knight", "knife") although not pronounced in a reasonable way. But the sounds appear: strychnine (pronounced strik-nine). So perhaps this is a more subtle issue than it appears?
What about pleasure and azure? Those are the classic examples of /ʒ/ and both have syllables that begin with /ʒ/.
[[Special:Contributions/63.247.160.139|63.247.160.139]] ([[User talk:63.247.160.139|talk]]) 23:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
:Maybe. Many phonologists believe that the /ʒ/ in those words is in the coda of the first syllable rather than the onset of the second. —[[User:Angr|Aɴɢʀ]] ([[User talk:Angr|''talk'']]) 19:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


::Who? Who are these "many phonologists" you refer to? The requirement for a syllable onset is the universally unmarked state, whereas syllables with codas are universally more marked than codaless ones - so much so that English ''entirely'' lacks onsetless syllables - any syllable that would otherwise begin with a vowel has an epenthetic glottal stop inserted to satisfy the onset requirement (if you're a native speaker, just try it out for yourself: say the word "Anna" a few times in a row and you'll feel it, and if you still don't believe me, record yourself speaking and plot it out in PRAAT or similar software and you'll see the acoustic "bump" in the waveform where the glottis closed and reopened, and a sudden transition to the vowel in the spectrogram). Using your logic, pleasure and azure should be pronounced *'plɛʒ.ʔɚ and *'æʒ.ʔɚ. Quite literally the only counterexample I can think of is Breen's analysis of Arrernte, and that's hardly an uncontroversial subject in and of itself. [[Special:Contributions/79.176.36.183|79.176.36.183]] ([[User talk:79.176.36.183|talk]]) 09:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
:I just corrected the "kn" issue to make it correct. The article speaks of [[phoneme]]s, not [[letters]]. [[User:Matt gies|Matt gies]] 01:59, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)


:Even if that were accepted, it would be hard to account for a word like <genre>. [[Special:Contributions/2001:18E8:2:11B5:F000:0:0:81B|2001:18E8:2:11B5:F000:0:0:81B]] ([[User talk:2001:18E8:2:11B5:F000:0:0:81B|talk]]) 06:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
:Would the words "canoe" or "canuck" not count as a "kn"? I know there is an a there but I personally don't even put a schwa between them (maybe that's just how it is in my parts, if you haven't already figured out where I'm from). - Chris, May 1st 2006


No onset /ŋ/ is English one of the main difficulties for English speakers learning the [[Māori_language]]. Māori does have onset /ŋ/,, e.g. ngā /ŋā/ = the (plural definite article). [[User:Nick Mulgan|Nick Mulgan]] ([[User talk:Nick Mulgan|talk]]) 02:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Another good example would be that in English, /vl/ is forbidden word-initial, but /fl/ is allowed. [[User:Sanxiyn|Sanxiyn]] 05:53, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)


== Theoretically permissible/foreign vs. outright impermissible? ==
There seem to be two basic kinds of phonotactic constraints:
* Sounds that do not occur in the language, but that native speakers have little trouble articulating when pressed, and that are readily pronounced if imported as a foreign word (e.g., English borrowings ''Tlingit'', ''sphere'', ''Sbarro''). An ending cluster such as "lzh" doesn't occur in English, and is forbidden by most lists of English phonotactics, but a native Anglophone could and probably would pronounce it if it formed part of a foreign loanword (**"dalzh," etc.).
* Sounds that native speakers cannot pronounce, or can pronounce only with great difficulty. In this latter case, native speakers substitute for the sound (vowel insertion, metathesis, etc.) or simplify it (e.g., /kn/ > /n/) if obliged to say the word. For this sort of phonotactic constraint, consider the initial clusters in foreign words such as ''xylem'' and ''Tbilisi''.
Point is, these two sorts of phonotactic constraint seem fundamentally different in ways that should be basic to any discussion of phonotactics, and phonotactic investigations that ignore that distinction seem fundamentally wrongfooted. Do the major academic sources bear this out? And if not, why not?


== Examples Needed ==
"slips" and "pusl" are is not very good examples since you get "wrestle", "nestle" etc.
/sl/ at the coda seems to be very English.
--[[User:217.86.19.94|217.86.19.94]] 06:41, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)


When listing consonant formations, examples of words that include those formations aren't just helpful, they're practically mandatory.[[Special:Contributions/2600:1702:3940:92D0:BD67:4531:9ABF:CA1D|2600:1702:3940:92D0:BD67:4531:9ABF:CA1D]] ([[User talk:2600:1702:3940:92D0:BD67:4531:9ABF:CA1D|talk]]) 08:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)


==Wiki Education assignment: Graduate Phonology==
[Edit: Kasapo@gmail.com]
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Pittsburgh/Graduate_Phonology_(Spring_2023) | assignments = [[User:Ashf1879|Ashf1879]] | start_date = 2023-01-11 | end_date = 2023-04-27 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Ashf1879|Ashf1879]] ([[User talk:Ashf1879|talk]]) 12:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)</span>
The sequence of consonants may occur, but who ever said that english pronunciation follows any rules? Well ok, maybe somebody, but anyway, the issue at heart here is phonetics. Phonetically, english knight and knife do knot begin with /k/ the voiceless velar stop. So, the claim that the english language phonotactically avoids the /kn/ consonant cluster (phonetically) is still true.


== Removal of entire section ==
By the way, in the word "wrestle", what "le" signifies is a syllabic "l", that is, /l=/ in X-SAMPA. This is not the same sort of "l" that was being spoken of in the case of "pusl", as it's acting effectively as a vowel, rather than as a consonant.
--[[User:146.151.47.17|146.151.47.17]] 13:49, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)


IMO [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Phonotactics&diff=prev&oldid=821688347 this edit], removing the entire "In other languages" section, ought to have been discussed first. No reason has been stated in the edit summary either. --[[User:Pegasovagante|Pegasovagante]] ([[User talk:Pegasovagante|talk]]) 06:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
(I edited this little discussion and put it in a subheading rather than just being on the page here)
Chris: I'm from Minnesota, and I've definitely heard canoe pronounced [knu]. Still, this is very localized and not at all generalizable to American English, so the statement that [kn] does not exist in "English" is still, in general, true.


== Affricates in Complex Onsets ==
What is not mentioned in the article and is extremely relevant to the discussion here is the issue of the sonority scale. This is a list of manners of articulation arranged from highest sonority to least:


Although /dʒɹ/ and /tʃɹ/ exist only in place of /dɹ/ and /tɹ/, it stills seems contradictory to state "no affricates or /h/ in complex onsets" while the "English phonotactics" section (correctly) lists the word stream as an example of an affricate within a complex onset. [[User:Robdawg344|Robdawg344]] ([[User talk:Robdawg344|talk]]) 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
oral stop > affricate > nasal > approximant


==Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age==
And depending on the language it may further break up the categories or have slight rearrangements depending on the sonority with which a particular class of sounds is produced. This scale is useful because rather than argue about what clusters are permissible, you can say that within an onset you may have a minimum separation of 3 in English: You can't have a stop+nasal onset ([kn-]) and this also means you can't have an affricate+approximant onset ([tʃɹ-] although this is sometimes phonetically realized, but this is a moot point). Someday this should be incorporated into the article, but I don't have time just yet.
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Arizona/Linguistics_in_the_Digital_Age_(Fall_2024) | assignments = [[User:Eiaohdsnkafpas|Eiaohdsnkafpas]] | start_date = 2024-08-26 | end_date = 2024-12-11 }}


<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:DnaCollector|DnaCollector]] ([[User talk:DnaCollector|talk]]) 01:27, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</span>
Additionally: phonotactics deals with the syllable, and thus using examples like strychnine, hackney, or acknowledge are irrelevant: the k and n in each do not occur within the same syllable, as predicted by the sonority sequencing in the previous paragraph. These words would be syllabified as [stɹɪk.naɪn], [hæk.ni], and [æk.nɔ.lɪdʒ], respectively.

And additionally, if you point out that the [s] at the beginning of "strychnine" would seem to violate the sonority sequencing principle, you would be right. Languages may have an "index," which refers to a sound ([s]) or type of sound ("liquid") which may violate the sonority sequencing and '''only occurs on a word boundary'''.

Okay, I think that's all I've got. Hopefully someone can come along to edit the article, since I don't think I'll be able to any time too soon. --[[User:Coyne025|Coyne025]] 05:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


== "pack a [[marble]]s" ==

convenience store much? people pronounce marlboro "marble" quite a bit. possibly 40% of the time. w/ "marlboro light" - you'r notably more likely to hear "marble light". someone incorporate ''that''. [[it doesn't mean force, necessarily|Kzz]]<font color="maroon">[[/izl|Rzz]][[user:kzzl|Knocker]]</font> 06:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC),,,

Latest revision as of 01:27, 3 December 2024

No onset /ŋ/ or /ʒ/?

[edit]

What about pleasure and azure? Those are the classic examples of /ʒ/ and both have syllables that begin with /ʒ/. 63.247.160.139 (talk) 23:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. Many phonologists believe that the /ʒ/ in those words is in the coda of the first syllable rather than the onset of the second. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Who? Who are these "many phonologists" you refer to? The requirement for a syllable onset is the universally unmarked state, whereas syllables with codas are universally more marked than codaless ones - so much so that English entirely lacks onsetless syllables - any syllable that would otherwise begin with a vowel has an epenthetic glottal stop inserted to satisfy the onset requirement (if you're a native speaker, just try it out for yourself: say the word "Anna" a few times in a row and you'll feel it, and if you still don't believe me, record yourself speaking and plot it out in PRAAT or similar software and you'll see the acoustic "bump" in the waveform where the glottis closed and reopened, and a sudden transition to the vowel in the spectrogram). Using your logic, pleasure and azure should be pronounced *'plɛʒ.ʔɚ and *'æʒ.ʔɚ. Quite literally the only counterexample I can think of is Breen's analysis of Arrernte, and that's hardly an uncontroversial subject in and of itself. 79.176.36.183 (talk) 09:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even if that were accepted, it would be hard to account for a word like <genre>. 2001:18E8:2:11B5:F000:0:0:81B (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No onset /ŋ/ is English one of the main difficulties for English speakers learning the Māori_language. Māori does have onset /ŋ/,, e.g. ngā /ŋā/ = the (plural definite article). Nick Mulgan (talk) 02:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically permissible/foreign vs. outright impermissible?

[edit]

There seem to be two basic kinds of phonotactic constraints:

  • Sounds that do not occur in the language, but that native speakers have little trouble articulating when pressed, and that are readily pronounced if imported as a foreign word (e.g., English borrowings Tlingit, sphere, Sbarro). An ending cluster such as "lzh" doesn't occur in English, and is forbidden by most lists of English phonotactics, but a native Anglophone could and probably would pronounce it if it formed part of a foreign loanword (**"dalzh," etc.).
  • Sounds that native speakers cannot pronounce, or can pronounce only with great difficulty. In this latter case, native speakers substitute for the sound (vowel insertion, metathesis, etc.) or simplify it (e.g., /kn/ > /n/) if obliged to say the word. For this sort of phonotactic constraint, consider the initial clusters in foreign words such as xylem and Tbilisi.

Point is, these two sorts of phonotactic constraint seem fundamentally different in ways that should be basic to any discussion of phonotactics, and phonotactic investigations that ignore that distinction seem fundamentally wrongfooted. Do the major academic sources bear this out? And if not, why not?

Examples Needed

[edit]

When listing consonant formations, examples of words that include those formations aren't just helpful, they're practically mandatory.2600:1702:3940:92D0:BD67:4531:9ABF:CA1D (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Graduate Phonology

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2023 and 27 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashf1879 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ashf1879 (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of entire section

[edit]

IMO this edit, removing the entire "In other languages" section, ought to have been discussed first. No reason has been stated in the edit summary either. --Pegasovagante (talk) 06:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Affricates in Complex Onsets

[edit]

Although /dʒɹ/ and /tʃɹ/ exist only in place of /dɹ/ and /tɹ/, it stills seems contradictory to state "no affricates or /h/ in complex onsets" while the "English phonotactics" section (correctly) lists the word stream as an example of an affricate within a complex onset. Robdawg344 (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 11 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eiaohdsnkafpas (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by DnaCollector (talk) 01:27, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]