Jump to content

Memory transfer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Grammar + a piece from the related planarian page
Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m remove duplicate citation
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Historically proposed biological process}}
'''Memory RNA''' is a debunked form of [[RNA]] that was proposed by [[James V. McConnell]] and others in the 1960s as a means of explaining how long-term [[memory|memories]] are stored in the [[brain]]. The concept behind it was that since RNA encoded information, and since living cells could produce and modify RNA in reaction to external events, it might also be used in [[neuron]]s to record stimuli.<ref name="Kentridge">{{cite web |author=Bob Kentridge |title=Investigations of the cellular bases of memory |url=http://www.dur.ac.uk/robert.kentridge/bpp2mem1.html |accessdate=2011-03-03 |publisher=[[University of Durham]]}}</ref>
'''Memory transfer''' was a biological process proposed by [[James V. McConnell]] and others in the 1960s. Memory transfer proposes a chemical basis for [[memory]] termed '''memory [[RNA]]''' which can be [[Heredity|passed down]] through flesh instead of an intact nervous system. Since RNA encodes information<ref name="Reckoning"/> living cells produce and modify RNA in reaction to external events, it might also be used in [[neuron]]s to record stimuli.<ref name="Kentridge">{{cite web |author=Bob Kentridge |title=Investigations of the cellular bases of memory |url=http://www.dur.ac.uk/robert.kentridge/bpp2mem1.html |accessdate=2011-03-03 |publisher=[[University of Durham]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121015043719/http://www.dur.ac.uk/robert.kentridge/bpp2mem1.html |archive-date=2012-10-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/memory-transferred-between-snails-challenging-standard-theory-of-how-the-brain-remembers/|title=Memory Transferred between Snails, Challenging Standard Theory of How the Brain Remembers|last=McFarling,STAT|first=Usha Lee|website=Scientific American|language=en|access-date=2019-03-10}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-44111476|title='Memory transplant' achieved in snails|last=Dave|first=Shivani|date=2018-05-14|access-date=2019-03-10|language=en-GB}}</ref> This explained the results of McConnell's experiments in which [[planarian]]s retained memory of [[Learning|acquired information]] after [[Planarian#Regeneration|regeneration]]. Memory transfer through memory RNA is not currently a well-accepted explanation and McConnell's experiments proved to be largely [[irreproducible]].<ref name="TMTA"/>


One experiment that was purported to show a chemical basis for memory involved training [[planarians|planaria]] (flatworms) to solve an extremely simple "maze", then grinding them up and feeding them to untrained planaria to see if they would be able to learn more quickly. The experiment seemed to show such an effect, but it was later suggested that only sensitization was transferred,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://uwf.edu/wmikulas/Webpage/concept/chaptertwo.htm|title=Physiology of Learning|author=William L. Mikulas|accessdate=2011-03-03|publisher=[[University of West Florida]]}}</ref> or that no transfer occurred and the effect was due to stress hormones in the donor or pheromone trails left on dirty lab glass.<ref name="Kentridge"/> Other experiments seem to support the original findings in that some memories may be stored outside the brain.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Duhaime-Ross|first1=Arielle|title=Flatworms Recall Familiar Environs, Even after Losing Their Heads|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flatworms-recall-familiar-environs-even-after-losing-their-heads/|accessdate=18 March 2015|work=[[Scientific American]]|date=17 September 2013}}</ref><ref name="Shomrat2013">{{cite journal |vauthors=Shomrat T, Levin M|title=An automated training paradigm reveals long-term memory in planaria and its persistence through head regeneration |journal=The Journal of Experimental Biology |volume=216 |issue=20|pages=3799–3810 |date=2013-07-02 |pmid=23821717 |doi=10.1242/jeb.087809}}</ref>
In McConnell's experiments, he [[Classical conditioning|classically conditioned]] planarians to contract their bodies upon exposure to light by pairing it with an electric shock.<ref name="POLCT"/><ref name="TMTA">{{Cite web|url=https://www.apa.org/monitor/2010/06/memory-transfer|access-date=2021-02-05|website=www.apa.org|title=The memory-transfer episode}}</ref> The planarians retained this acquired information after being sliced and [[Planarian#Regeneration|regenerated]], even after multiple slicings to produce a planarian where none of the original trained planarian was present.<ref name="TMTA"/> The same held true after the planarians were ground up and fed untrained [[cannibalistic]] planarians, usually ''[[Dugesia dorotocephala]]''.<ref name="TMTA"/><ref>{{Cite journal|last=James|first=McConnell|date=1965|title=A Manual of Psychological Experimentation on Planarians|url=https://ase.tufts.edu/biology/labs/levin/resources/documents/PlanarianManual.pdf|journal=[[The Worm Runner's Digest]]|volume=|pages=5, 7|via=https://www.tufts.edu/}}</ref> As the nervous system was fragmented but the nucleic acids were not, this seemed to indicate the existence of memory RNA<ref name="TMTA"/> but it was later suggested that only sensitization was transferred,<ref name="POLCT">{{cite web|url=http://uwf.edu/wmikulas/Webpage/concept/chaptertwo.htm|title=Physiology of Learning|author=William L. Mikulas|accessdate=2011-03-03|publisher=[[University of West Florida]]|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20171127051125/http://uwf.edu/wmikulas/Webpage/concept/chaptertwo.htm|archivedate=2017-11-27}}</ref> or that no transfer occurred and the effect was due to [[stress hormones]] in the donor or [[pheromone]] trails left on dirty lab glass.<ref name="Kentridge"/> However, other experiments seem to support the original findings in that some memories may be stored outside the brain.<ref name="Reckoning"/><ref>{{cite news|last1=Duhaime-Ross|first1=Arielle|title=Flatworms Recall Familiar Environs, Even after Losing Their Heads|url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/flatworms-recall-familiar-environs-even-after-losing-their-heads/|accessdate=18 March 2015|work=[[Scientific American]]|date=17 September 2013}}</ref><ref name="Shomrat2013">{{cite journal |vauthors=Shomrat T, Levin M|title=An automated training paradigm reveals long-term memory in planaria and its persistence through head regeneration |journal=The Journal of Experimental Biology |volume=216 |issue=20|pages=3799–3810 |date=2013-07-02 |pmid=23821717 |doi=10.1242/jeb.087809|doi-access=free }}</ref>


== In fiction ==
==See also==
*[[Scotophobin]]
{{Unreferenced section|date=March 2011}}

Memory RNA made some appearances in the [[science fiction]] of the time, often in the form of "skill pills" containing memory RNA that provided the consumer with new skills, or in the context of [[mind transfer]]. This concept shows up in several of [[Larry Niven]]'s short stories and various episodes of ''[[The Invisible Man (2000 TV series)|The Invisible Man]]'' (2000 TV series).

A few ''[[Star Trek]]'' novels during the 1980s employed memory RNA as a plot device to allow a character to rapidly learn an alien language, in the form of an "RNA drip". The novel "Mighty Good Road" by [[Melissa Scott (writer)|Melissa Scott]] and a sequel also use it. Further, in the ''[[Star Trek: The Next Generation]]'' episode [[Violations (Star Trek: The Next Generation)|"Violations]]", Data claims that memory is stored in RNA sequences, analogous to his memory circuits.

The basic principle of the memory RNA was also used by comic book writer [[Alan Moore]] to explain the origin of [[DC Comics]]' character the [[Swamp Thing]] in ''Saga of the Swamp Thing #21''. In the story, believing the creature to be dead, a scientist super-villain performs an autopsy on the Swamp Thing and discovers that it is not scientist Alec Holland turned into a plant mutant, but swamp vegetation that after digesting the mortal remains of Holland, had absorbed his mind, knowledge, memories, and skills and created a new sentient being that believed itself to be Alec Holland. The planaria experiment is used in the story to back this theory.


== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist|refs=

<ref name="Reckoning">{{Cite journal|doi=10.36877/pddbs.a0000105|title=Reckoning the Unresolved Scientific Question on Memory Transfer|year=2020|last1=Tan|first1=Loh Teng-Hern|last2=Ser|first2=Hooi-Leng|last3=Ong|first3=Yong Sze|last4=Khaw|first4=Kooi Yeong|last5=Pusparajah|first5=Priyia|last6=Chan|first6=Kok-Gan|last7=Lee|first7=Learn-Han|last8=Goh|first8=Bey-Hing|journal=Progress in Drug Discovery & Biomedical Science|volume=3|doi-access=free}}</ref>
{{reflist}}
}}


{{Biochem-stub}}
{{Biochem-stub}}

Latest revision as of 23:38, 13 April 2024

Memory transfer was a biological process proposed by James V. McConnell and others in the 1960s. Memory transfer proposes a chemical basis for memory termed memory RNA which can be passed down through flesh instead of an intact nervous system. Since RNA encodes information[1] living cells produce and modify RNA in reaction to external events, it might also be used in neurons to record stimuli.[2][3][4] This explained the results of McConnell's experiments in which planarians retained memory of acquired information after regeneration. Memory transfer through memory RNA is not currently a well-accepted explanation and McConnell's experiments proved to be largely irreproducible.[5]

In McConnell's experiments, he classically conditioned planarians to contract their bodies upon exposure to light by pairing it with an electric shock.[6][5] The planarians retained this acquired information after being sliced and regenerated, even after multiple slicings to produce a planarian where none of the original trained planarian was present.[5] The same held true after the planarians were ground up and fed untrained cannibalistic planarians, usually Dugesia dorotocephala.[5][7] As the nervous system was fragmented but the nucleic acids were not, this seemed to indicate the existence of memory RNA[5] but it was later suggested that only sensitization was transferred,[6] or that no transfer occurred and the effect was due to stress hormones in the donor or pheromone trails left on dirty lab glass.[2] However, other experiments seem to support the original findings in that some memories may be stored outside the brain.[1][8][9]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Tan, Loh Teng-Hern; Ser, Hooi-Leng; Ong, Yong Sze; Khaw, Kooi Yeong; Pusparajah, Priyia; Chan, Kok-Gan; Lee, Learn-Han; Goh, Bey-Hing (2020). "Reckoning the Unresolved Scientific Question on Memory Transfer". Progress in Drug Discovery & Biomedical Science. 3. doi:10.36877/pddbs.a0000105.
  2. ^ a b Bob Kentridge. "Investigations of the cellular bases of memory". University of Durham. Archived from the original on 2012-10-15. Retrieved 2011-03-03.
  3. ^ McFarling,STAT, Usha Lee. "Memory Transferred between Snails, Challenging Standard Theory of How the Brain Remembers". Scientific American. Retrieved 2019-03-10.
  4. ^ Dave, Shivani (2018-05-14). "'Memory transplant' achieved in snails". Retrieved 2019-03-10.
  5. ^ a b c d e "The memory-transfer episode". www.apa.org. Retrieved 2021-02-05.
  6. ^ a b William L. Mikulas. "Physiology of Learning". University of West Florida. Archived from the original on 2017-11-27. Retrieved 2011-03-03.
  7. ^ James, McConnell (1965). "A Manual of Psychological Experimentation on Planarians" (PDF). The Worm Runner's Digest: 5, 7 – via https://www.tufts.edu/. {{cite journal}}: External link in |via= (help)
  8. ^ Duhaime-Ross, Arielle (17 September 2013). "Flatworms Recall Familiar Environs, Even after Losing Their Heads". Scientific American. Retrieved 18 March 2015.
  9. ^ Shomrat T, Levin M (2013-07-02). "An automated training paradigm reveals long-term memory in planaria and its persistence through head regeneration". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 216 (20): 3799–3810. doi:10.1242/jeb.087809. PMID 23821717.