Jump to content

Inglorious Empire: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
(61 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|2017 non-fiction book by Shashi Tharoor}}
{{refimprove|date=May 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2023}}
{{Use Indian English|date=May 2023}}
{{Infobox book
{{Infobox book
| italic title = <!--(see above)-->
| italic title = <!--(see above)-->
Line 5: Line 7:
| image = Inglorious Empire.jpg
| image = Inglorious Empire.jpg
| image_size =
| image_size =
| alt =
| alt = gaefwrgrtgwrhryu46j
| caption =
| caption = Indian edition
| author = [[Shashi Tharoor]]
| author = [[Shashi Tharoor]]
| audio_read_by =
| audio_read_by =
Line 17: Line 19:
| genre = [[History]]
| genre = [[History]]
| set_in =
| set_in =
| publisher = C Hurst & Co
| publisher = [[Aleph Book Company|Aleph]] (India)<br>[[C. Hurst & Co.]] (UK)
| publisher2 =
| publisher2 =
| pub_date = March 2017
| pub_date = March 2017
Line 38: Line 40:
| website =
| website =
}}
}}
'''''Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India''''', first published in India as '''''An Era of Darkness: The British Empire in India''''', is a work of non-fiction by [[Shashi Tharoor]], an Indian politician and diplomat, on the effects of [[British Raj|British colonial rule]] on India. The book has received mixed reviews. In 2017, Tharoor won the 2017 [[Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards|Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Vice-President Venkaiah Naidu presents 12th edition of Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards |url=https://www.firstpost.com/photos/vice-president-venkaiah-naidu-presents-12th-edition-of-ramnath-goenka-excellence-in-journalism-awards-4269183.html |access-date=2020-04-14 |website=Firstpost}}</ref> and the 2019 [[Sahitya Akademi Award]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 December 2019 |title=Shashi Tharoor wins Sahitya Akademi Award 2019 for An Era Of Darkness |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/lifestyle/people/story/shashi-tharoor-wins-sahitya-akademi-award-2019-for-an-era-of-darkness-1629374-2019-12-18 |access-date=2020-04-14 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref> for this work.

'''''Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India''''' is a book by the Indian historian and author [[Shashi Tharoor]]. The book depicts the atrocities and wrongdoings that were committed in the Indian sub-continent during the [[British raj|British Raj]].

It was published in India under the title '''''An Era of Darkness: The British Empire in India'''''.


== Background ==
== Background ==
The event that led the author to write this book was a 2015 [[Oxford Union]] speech he delivered on the topic "Does Britain owe reparations to its former colonies?" The speech went viral on the internet leading to some million views on [[YouTube|Youtube]]. According to [[Shashi Tharoor]], his publisher called him and gave him the idea to transform this into a book. He replied that everyone knows about it. The publisher insisted that if everyone had known this, then the speech would not have gone viral to such an extent. This inspired him to convert his 15 minute speech into a 330 page book.<ref>{{Citation|last=Bangalore Literature Festival|title=Inglorious Empire, The reality of the British Raj {{!}} Shashi Tharoor with Sanjeev Sanyal|date=2017-01-15|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9uyFiwHPJA&t=1865s|accessdate=2017-09-09}}</ref>


Tharoor made a [[Shashi Tharoor's Oxford Union speech|speech]] at a 2015 [[Oxford Union]] debate on the topic "''Does Britain owe reparations to its former colonies''?", which went viral over the web. Subsequently, his publisher floated the idea to transform the speech into a book; despite being initially skeptical, he went on to write a 330 page book.<ref>{{Citation|last=Bangalore Literature Festival|title=Inglorious Empire, The reality of the British Raj {{!}} Shashi Tharoor with Sanjeev Sanyal|date=2017-01-15|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9uyFiwHPJA&t=1865s|access-date=2017-09-09}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite journal|author=Tabish Khair|year=2018|title=Inglorious Empire: What the British did to India|journal=Journal of Postcolonial Writing|volume=54|issue=3|pages=432–433|doi=10.1080/17449855.2017.1330759|s2cid=164354004 }}</ref>
== Synopsis ==
{{unreferenced section|date=July 2018}}
{{OriginalResearch|date=July 2018}}
Shashi Tharoor has written a number of books and articles on the [[British Empire]]'s colonial activities in [[India]]. He has demanded an open apology from the British government for the atrocities he claims they carried out in India during British rule. Tharoor believes that the best time for this apologetic act would be 13 April 2019, the centenary of the [[Jallianwala Bagh massacre]] in [[Amritsar]] on 13 April 1919.<ref>{{Citation|last=NDTV|title=British PM Must Sink To Knees And Say Sorry: Shashi Tharoor On Colonial Rule|date=2016-10-27|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHx9okRaXOc|accessdate=2017-09-09}}</ref>


==The Book==
In ''Inglorious Empire'', he presents his research on various events that took place in India during British rule. He openly criticises [[Winston Churchill]] and his policies in India, and contends that they were inhumane and led to a millions of deaths. He particularly cites the 1943 [[Bengal famine of 1943|Bengal famine]], which he calls a "British induced famine".


The following quote summarises the core theme of the book.
The [[Dadabhai_Naoroji#Naoroji's_drain_theory_and_poverty|Drain Theory]] represents the idea that India was a prosperous society, which British repression made poor. This theory has circulated through academic and political circles since 1900, especially within the Indian National Congress, the political party to which Tharoor belongs. A large part of the book restates this idea.

{{Blockquote
|text= "Company official [[John Sullivan (colonial administrator)|John Sullivan]] observed in the 1840s: ''<nowiki>'</nowiki>The little court disappears - the capital decays - trade languishes - the capital decays - the people are impoverished - the Englishman flourishes, and acts like a sponge, drawing up riches from the banks of the Ganges, and squeezing them down upon the banks of the Thames<nowiki>'</nowiki>''. India that the British East India Company conquered was no primitive or barren land, but the glittering jewel of the medieval world. Its accomplishments and prosperity - ''<nowiki>'</nowiki>the wealth created by vast and varied industries<nowiki>'</nowiki>'' - were succinctly described by a [[Yorkshire]]-born American [[Unitarianism|Unitarian]] minister, [[Jabez T. Sunderland|J. T. Sunderland]]. At the beginning of eighteenth century, as the British economic historian [[Angus Maddison]] has demonstrated, [[List_of_regions_by_past_GDP_(PPP)#India|India's share of world economy was 23 per cent]], as large as all of Europe put together. By the time the British departed India, it had dropped to just over 3 per cent. The reason was simple: India was governed for the benefit of Britain. Britain's rise for 200 years was financed by its depredation in India."
|author=[[Shashi Tharoor]]
|title=''The Looting of India''
|source=''Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India'' (2017)<ref name=shas1>[[Shashi Tharoor]], March 2017, [https://books.google.com/books?id=ZWwwDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT22 Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India], [[Hurst Publishers|C. Hurst & Co.]], UK.</ref>
}}


== Reception ==
== Reception ==
{{unreferenced section|date=July 2018}}
Tharoor's book has been challenged by a number of historians, both Indian and British. In a review published in the ''Cambridge Review of International Affairs'' in 2018 the economic historian, Professor Tirthankar Roy, who teaches South Asia and Global History at the London School of Economics and whose recent publications include ''India in the World Economy from Antiquity to the Present'', has described Tharoor's grasp of economic history as "ill-informed" and his political history "naïve". He praised ''Inglorious Empire'' for its "passion and plain good writing" while adding that "none one of these qualities makes the interpretation right, however". Roy challenges the central thesis of Tharoor's argument in support of the so-called Drain Theory.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Tirthankar Roy |title=Book Review Shashi Tharoor, Inglorious empire: what the British did to India |journal=Cambridge Review of International Affairs |volume=31 |issue=1 |year=2018 |pages=134-138 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2018.1439321}}</ref>


''The [[Hindu Business Line]]'' called the book "one breathless read".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/books/the-bald-truth-is-the-raj-ruined-us/article9391768.ece|title=The bald truth is — the Raj ruined us|last=Balakrishnan|first=Uday|website=@businessline|language=en|access-date=2020-04-14}}</ref> ''[[The Guardian]]'' called it a "passionately argued book [which] provides a crushing rebuttal of such ideas with regard to India".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Smith|first=P. D.|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/feb/23/inglorious-empire-what-british-did-to-india-shashi-tharoor-review|title=Inglorious Empire by Shashi Tharoor review – what the British did to India|date=2018-02-23|work=The Guardian|access-date=2020-04-14|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>
Another review of ''Inglorious Empire'', published in the ''Literary Review'', by historian John Keay, whose many writings on India include ''India: A History'', applauds Tharoor for "tackling an impossibly contentious subject". However, he deplores the fact that "moral venom sometimes clouds his judgment" and notes that many of Tharoor's statistics are seriously out of date, many coming from the polemics contained in the American Will Durant's ''Story of Civilisation'' written in the 1930s, which itself drew on the even earlier work of the crusading American missionary Jabej T. Sutherland, author of ''India in Bondage''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://literaryreview.co.uk/bristling-with-raj |title=Bristling with Raj |last=Keay |first=John |date=March 2017 |website=Literary Review |access-date=10 February 2018}}</ref>


[[Tabish Khair]] praised the book for presenting an "intricate mixture of fact and anecdotes" that served as an effective counter to the view of "colonial apologists" but at the same time, did praise the British, when it merited.<ref name=":0" />
A more detailed criticism of Tharoor's book and his use of statistics was set out by the writer of South Asian history Charles Allen in a lecture entitled ''Quis custodiet ipsos custodes: who owns Indian history?'' read to the [[Royal Society for Asian Affairs]] in London on 25{{nbs}}April 2018. A revised version was published in ''Asian Affairs'' under the revised title ''Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire''.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Charles Allen |title=Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire |journal=Asian Affairs |volume=49 |issue=3 |year=2018 |pages=355-369}}</ref>

Eminent Scottish historian [[William Dalrymple (historian)|William Dalrymple]] criticised the book, saying it "was written in 12 days, involved no personal archive research and contains some serious factual errors" however he maintained that the book was, nevertheless, "persuasive".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Dalrymple|first=William|date=27 September 2018|title=The British in India by David Gilmour review – three centuries of ambition and experience|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/sep/27/the-british-in-india-by-david-gilmour-review}}</ref>

In a review published in the ''[[Cambridge Review of International Affairs]]'', economic historian, [[Tirthankar Roy]], a faculty at the London School of Economics criticized the book. He noted that "Tharoor makes his case with passion and plain good writing. The story is meant to be "blood-curdling and colourful language" — including liberal use of "depredation," "loot," "rapaciousness," "vicious," "brutality," "plunder" and "extraction" — produces that effect. Like a religious text, it tells a straight and narrow story with the zeal of a holy warrior. Yet "none of these qualities makes the interpretation right, however".

Another review of ''Inglorious Empire'', published in the ''Literary Review'', by historian [[John Keay]], whose many writings on India include ''India: A History'', applauds Tharoor for "tackling an impossibly contentious subject". However, he deplores the fact that "his moral venom sometimes clouds his own judgement" and notes that many of Tharoor's statistics are very seriously out of date, many coming from the polemics contained in the American [[Will Durant|Will Durant's]] ''[[The Story of Civilization|Story of Civilisation]]'' written in the 1930s, which itself drew on the even earlier work of the crusading American missionary [[Jabej T. Sutherland]], author of ''India in Bondage''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://literaryreview.co.uk/bristling-with-raj |title=Bristling with Raj |last=Keay |first=John |date=March 2017 |website=Literary Review |access-date=10 February 2018}}</ref>

A more detailed criticism of Tharoor's book and his use of statistics was set out by the writer of South Asian history [[Charles Allen (writer)|Charles Allen]] in a lecture entitled ''Quis custodiet ipsos custodes: who owns Indian history?'' delivered to the [[Royal Society for Asian Affairs]] in London on 25{{nbs}}April 2018. A revised version was published in ''Asian Affairs'' under the revised title ''Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Allen|first=Charles|date=2018-07-03|title=Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2018.1487685|journal=Asian Affairs|volume=49|issue=3|pages=355–369|doi=10.1080/03068374.2018.1487685|s2cid=158949586 |issn=0306-8374}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
{{Sahitya Akademi Award for English}}

[[Category:2017 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:2017 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Indian non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Indian non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Books about India]]
[[Category:Books about India]]
[[Category:Books by Shashi Tharoor]]
[[Category:Sahitya Akademi Award–winning works]]
[[Category:Aleph Book Company books]]
[[Category:C. Hurst & Co. books]]

Latest revision as of 19:43, 2 November 2024

Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India
gaefwrgrtgwrhryu46j
Indian edition
AuthorShashi Tharoor
LanguageEnglish
GenreHistory
PublisherAleph (India)
C. Hurst & Co. (UK)
Publication date
March 2017
ISBN978-1-84904-808-8 (hardcover)

Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India, first published in India as An Era of Darkness: The British Empire in India, is a work of non-fiction by Shashi Tharoor, an Indian politician and diplomat, on the effects of British colonial rule on India. The book has received mixed reviews. In 2017, Tharoor won the 2017 Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award[1] and the 2019 Sahitya Akademi Award[2] for this work.

Background

[edit]

Tharoor made a speech at a 2015 Oxford Union debate on the topic "Does Britain owe reparations to its former colonies?", which went viral over the web. Subsequently, his publisher floated the idea to transform the speech into a book; despite being initially skeptical, he went on to write a 330 page book.[3][4]

The Book

[edit]

The following quote summarises the core theme of the book.

"Company official John Sullivan observed in the 1840s: 'The little court disappears - the capital decays - trade languishes - the capital decays - the people are impoverished - the Englishman flourishes, and acts like a sponge, drawing up riches from the banks of the Ganges, and squeezing them down upon the banks of the Thames'. India that the British East India Company conquered was no primitive or barren land, but the glittering jewel of the medieval world. Its accomplishments and prosperity - 'the wealth created by vast and varied industries' - were succinctly described by a Yorkshire-born American Unitarian minister, J. T. Sunderland. At the beginning of eighteenth century, as the British economic historian Angus Maddison has demonstrated, India's share of world economy was 23 per cent, as large as all of Europe put together. By the time the British departed India, it had dropped to just over 3 per cent. The reason was simple: India was governed for the benefit of Britain. Britain's rise for 200 years was financed by its depredation in India."

— Shashi Tharoor, The Looting of India, Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India (2017)[5]

Reception

[edit]

The Hindu Business Line called the book "one breathless read".[6] The Guardian called it a "passionately argued book [which] provides a crushing rebuttal of such ideas with regard to India".[7]

Tabish Khair praised the book for presenting an "intricate mixture of fact and anecdotes" that served as an effective counter to the view of "colonial apologists" but at the same time, did praise the British, when it merited.[4]

Eminent Scottish historian William Dalrymple criticised the book, saying it "was written in 12 days, involved no personal archive research and contains some serious factual errors" however he maintained that the book was, nevertheless, "persuasive".[8]

In a review published in the Cambridge Review of International Affairs, economic historian, Tirthankar Roy, a faculty at the London School of Economics criticized the book. He noted that "Tharoor makes his case with passion and plain good writing. The story is meant to be "blood-curdling and colourful language" — including liberal use of "depredation," "loot," "rapaciousness," "vicious," "brutality," "plunder" and "extraction" — produces that effect. Like a religious text, it tells a straight and narrow story with the zeal of a holy warrior. Yet "none of these qualities makes the interpretation right, however".

Another review of Inglorious Empire, published in the Literary Review, by historian John Keay, whose many writings on India include India: A History, applauds Tharoor for "tackling an impossibly contentious subject". However, he deplores the fact that "his moral venom sometimes clouds his own judgement" and notes that many of Tharoor's statistics are very seriously out of date, many coming from the polemics contained in the American Will Durant's Story of Civilisation written in the 1930s, which itself drew on the even earlier work of the crusading American missionary Jabej T. Sutherland, author of India in Bondage.[9]

A more detailed criticism of Tharoor's book and his use of statistics was set out by the writer of South Asian history Charles Allen in a lecture entitled Quis custodiet ipsos custodes: who owns Indian history? delivered to the Royal Society for Asian Affairs in London on 25 April 2018. A revised version was published in Asian Affairs under the revised title Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire.[10]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Vice-President Venkaiah Naidu presents 12th edition of Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Awards". Firstpost. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  2. ^ "Shashi Tharoor wins Sahitya Akademi Award 2019 for An Era Of Darkness". India Today. 18 December 2019. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  3. ^ Bangalore Literature Festival (15 January 2017), Inglorious Empire, The reality of the British Raj | Shashi Tharoor with Sanjeev Sanyal, retrieved 9 September 2017
  4. ^ a b Tabish Khair (2018). "Inglorious Empire: What the British did to India". Journal of Postcolonial Writing. 54 (3): 432–433. doi:10.1080/17449855.2017.1330759. S2CID 164354004.
  5. ^ Shashi Tharoor, March 2017, Inglorious Empire: What the British Did to India, C. Hurst & Co., UK.
  6. ^ Balakrishnan, Uday. "The bald truth is — the Raj ruined us". @businessline. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  7. ^ Smith, P. D. (23 February 2018). "Inglorious Empire by Shashi Tharoor review – what the British did to India". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 14 April 2020.
  8. ^ Dalrymple, William (27 September 2018). "The British in India by David Gilmour review – three centuries of ambition and experience". The Guardian.
  9. ^ Keay, John (March 2017). "Bristling with Raj". Literary Review. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
  10. ^ Allen, Charles (3 July 2018). "Who Owns India's History? A Critique of Shashi Tharoor's Inglorious Empire". Asian Affairs. 49 (3): 355–369. doi:10.1080/03068374.2018.1487685. ISSN 0306-8374. S2CID 158949586.