Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Uncontroversial technical requests: Difference |
→Uncontroversial technical requests: did Postage Stamps UK request |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Shortcuts|WP:RMT|WP:RMTR|WP:RM/TR}}</noinclude><includeonly>{{Shortcut|WP:RM/TR}}</includeonly> |
|||
__NOTOC__ |
|||
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude> |
||
===Technical requests=== |
=== Technical requests === |
||
⚫ | |||
<!-- This header makes it easier to get in to move from one subsection to another. --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Most requests should be placed below this heading.}}</noinclude> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | new page title | reason = reason for move}} |
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | new page title | reason = reason for move}} |
||
and paste on a nsubstew line after this instruction, at the bottom of the existing list; do not delete this instruction; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|||
---- and enter on a new line, directly below --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = CD El Ejido | 2 = CP El Ejido | discuss = | reason = This team has had their name changed for some time, finally recovering the "Poli" moniker, so i think it's only fair that the team article starts to use the name that it goes by now. Alternatively the article could be named: Polideportivo El Ejido. Also, the old logo was restored, so that would have to be changed too. | sig = [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Bodeseven}} |
|||
*:@{{u|Bodeseven}} - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some [[WP:RS|sources]] to support that the proposed new name is [[WP:COMMONNAME|more common]]? [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I do. There's an article talking about the name change in detail. The club's page has algo updated the name, and it's also on it's X (twitter) account. |
|||
*::I assume the new name is also present on the RFEF official tables. |
|||
*::https://www.diariodealmeria.es/deportes/vuelve-poli-ejido-cambia-oficialmente-nombre_0_1630637482.html |
|||
*::https://polideportivoejido.com |
|||
*::https://x.com/Poli_ElEjido [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = [[The New Six]] | 2 = TNX (band) | discuss = | reason = Group has officially reverted to their previous and more notable acronym name variant. | sig [[User:K-popguardian|K-popguardian]] |
|||
=([[User talk:K-popguardian|talk]]) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = K-popguardian}} - [[User:K-popguardian|K-popguardian]] ([[User talk:K-popguardian|talk]]) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:@[[User:K-popguardian|K-popguardian]], I’d say that a formal RM is needed for this to settle on an official consensus-based title. It has a pretty contentious move history, and actually got here via a RM that had no participation per [[WP:RMNOMIN]]. -[[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 18:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ==== |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Count on My Love | 2 = Count On My Love | discuss = yes | reason = A technical move request is necessary in this case because the move is blocked by an existing redirect. The reason for moving is to be consistent with [[Talk:Count On Me#Move request|the move]] of [[Count on Me]] to [[Count On Me]], and other "count on" examples. | sig = — '''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]''' ([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 20:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Jaydiem}} |
|||
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.}}</noinclude> <!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | previous title to revert to | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|||
: |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = You Can't Count on Me | 2 = You Can't Count On Me | discuss = yes | reason = A technical move request is necessary in this case because the move is blocked by an existing redirect. The reason for moving is to be consistent with [[Talk:Count On Me#Move request|the move]] of [[Count on Me]] to [[Count On Me]], and other "count on" examples. | sig = — '''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]''' ([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 20:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Jaydiem}} |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Brian Thompson (disambiguation) | 2 = Brian Thompson | discuss = | reason = Looks like something went sideways here with a move... there was an RM [[Talk:Brian Thompson (actor)#Requested move 4 December 2024|here]] that was speedy moved after being open for 8 hours (maybe a case of [[WP:RECENTISM]].) I'm not necessarily requesting that the speedy move be reverted (though there seems to be some pushback on it at the RM), but whatever happened with the botched move needs to be fixed. Whoever handles this can decide for themselves whether the whole thing should be reverted. | sig = |
|||
[[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 16:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = RachelTensions}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
: |
:Update: looks like the disambiguation move has been fixed by @[[User:CFA|CFA]] [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 16:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
==== Contested technical requests ==== |
==== Contested technical requests ==== |
||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = |
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Visakhapatnam railway station | 2 = Visakhapatnam Junction railway station | discuss = | reason = Visakhapatnam Junction is the common and official name of the railway station. Already there is a article existing with the latter name (Visakhapatnam Junction), so unable to move the page from Visakhapatnam railway station to Visakhapatnam Junction railway station | sig = [[User:Jayanthkumar123|Jayanthkumar123]] ([[User talk:Jayanthkumar123|talk]]) 16:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Jayanthkumar123}} |
||
:: |
::There are some sources that still mention the name as the former title, and there seems to ne by a recent rename. [[User:ToadetteEdit|ToadetteEdit]] ([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|talk]]) 19:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = |
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Lidia Gueiler | 2 = Lydia Gueiler | discuss = | reason = "Y" spelling seems to be the one used by Gueiler. It's reflected [http://www.gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscarFecha/1979-11-16/1980-06-30 in presidential decrees during her presidency], in [https://www.google.com/books/edition/La_mujer_y_la_revoluci%C3%B3n/tsZ8AAAAMAAJ authored works], and in [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Lydia/VADrJeDB0SQC her authorized biography]. [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | sig = [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Krisgabwoosh}} |
||
*:This would warrant a full discussion because it seems like "Lidia" is the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] in English-language sources: [https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/obituaries/luis-garcia-meza-bolivian-dictator-jailed-for-genocide-dies-at-88.html ''The New York Times''], [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-11447598 ''BBC''], [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/lidia-gueiler-tejada-politician-who-became-only-the-wests-second-female-president-2282573.html ''The Independent''], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/luis-garcia-meza-bolivian-dictator-convicted-of-human-rights-violations-dies-at-88/2018/04/30/3319086c-4bfa-11e8-84a0-458a1aa9ac0a_story.html ''The Washington Post''], [https://www.thetimes.com/article/lidia-gueiler-fjwv06krzcm ''The Times''], [https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/afterword/story/2011-05-09/lidia-gueiler-bolivian-president-between-coups-dies-at-89 ''Los Angeles Times''], [https://english.elpais.com/elpais/2011/05/11/inenglish/1305091251_850210.html ''El Pais''], [https://pictures.reuters.com/archive/BOLIVIA--GM1E75B00HO01.html ''Reuters''], [https://www.britannica.com/place/Bolivia/Bolivia-from-c-1980-to-2000 ''Encyclopædia Britannica''], [https://bolivianexpress.org/magazines/89 ''Bolivian Express''], [https://www.upi.com/Archives/1980/10/04/Ousted-woman-president-leaves-Bolivia/1145339480000/ ''United Press International''], etc., as well as [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Lidia+Gueiler%22&lr=lang_en&sca_esv=c802bcab525137d8&authuser=0&udm=36&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en&sxsrf=ADLYWIL5CN9UQAQ7erzb30iFbyU_wTCuuQ%3A1733203446843&ei=9pVOZ7uSM4Cv5NoPo9zf-QU&ved=0ahUKEwi75Zb-7YqKAxWAF1kFHSPuN18Q4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=%22Lidia+Gueiler%22&gs_lp=Eg1nd3Mtd2l6LWJvb2tzIg8iTGlkaWEgR3VlaWxlciJIgB5QmQJYmQJwAXgAkAEAmAE4oAFwqgEBMrgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAKACAJgDAIgGAZIHAKAHxQE numerous books and academic sources.] [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 05:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::The term "fan death" is quite common in English, with an estimated 210,000 Google hits, and the majority of top hits pertain to this topic, while "fan death theory" gets 51 Ghits. Ghits aren't always a good indicator, especially with historical topics ignored by popular culture, such as ancient Estonian gods (see [[WP:AADP#Google test]]), but for something in current popular culture, Google's a good deal more reliable for determining what's the most common name. In other words, I oppose moving, since "fan death" is the normal name in English. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*::Would [[WP:COMMONNAME]] really apply in this situation, though? That policy seems to be most applicable to people known by a name or nickname ''different'' from their birthname. In this case, the only difference is that one spelling is the more correct one. Should a misspelling be preferred simply because most sources use it? [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 18:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::That'd be up to the RM process to decide. Since most sources spell it "Lidia", it's likely that somebody searching for her article would also expect it to be at "Lidia". At most, IMO, we should include a [[WP:EXPLNOTE]] in the lead of her article explaining that it is sometimes spelled "Lydia". [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 03:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = e& | 2 = Etisalat | discuss = | reason = Per [[WP:COMMONNAME]], Etisalat is the most commonly used name, seen in[https://www.khaleejtimes.com/life-and-living/du-quick-pay-etisalat-autopay-explained-how-to-settle-uae-phone-bills this article title], [https://sharjah24.ae/en/Articles/2024/06/14/Etisalat-Childrens-Book-Award-enhances-writing-childrens-poetry this], and [https://www.khaleejtimes.com/uae/uae-etisalat-warns-of-scams-as-residents-lose-thousands-of-dirhams this]. They changed their name from Etisalat to e& in 2022 but Etisalat remainds the most commonly used name, like how [[Twitter]] remains so instead of being renamed to X. | sig = [[User:Jolielover|<b style="font-family:helvetica;color:#7C0A02">jolielover♥</b>]][[User talk:Jolielover|<b style="font-family:helvetica;border:transparent;padding:0 9px;background:linear-gradient(#8B0000,black);color:#ff8c8c;border-radius:6px">talk</b>]] 04:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Jolielover}} |
|||
*:@[[User:SafariScribe|SafariScribe]], FYA. [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 05:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I moved this article, although as an uncontested request per [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:E%26&oldid=1247237205#Requested_move_12_August_2024 this discussion], via RM. You may want to open a new RM. Cheers! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:SafariScribe|Safari Scribe]]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/SafariScribe|'''''Edits!''''']] [[User talk:SafariScribe|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 05:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I've opened a new one, thanks [[User:Jolielover|<b style="font-family:helvetica;color:#7C0A02">jolielover♥</b>]][[User talk:Jolielover|<b style="font-family:helvetica;border:transparent;padding:0 9px;background:linear-gradient(#8B0000,black);color:#ff8c8c;border-radius:6px">talk</b>]] 15:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:Per above, please open another move discussion concerning the titles. [[User:ToadetteEdit|ToadetteEdit]] ([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|talk]]) 08:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Yunnanilus nigromaculatus | 2 = Eonemachilus nigromaculatus | discuss = | reason = Eonemachilus is the genus name used in ''Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes'' | sig = [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 08:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Quetzal1964}} |
|||
:: @[[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Columbus metropolitan area, Ohio | 2 = Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area | discuss = | reason = To be consistent with the first sentence in the paragraph | sig = [[User:Assadzadeh|Assadzadeh]] ([[User talk:Assadzadeh|talk]]) 00:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Assadzadeh}} |
|||
:: @[[User:Assadzadeh|Assadzadeh]] The current name is consistent with [[Columbus metropolitan area, Georgia]], but also I feel that the Ohio page might deserve primary topic for [[Columbus metropolitan area]] as it has approximately 5x the views as the Georgia page. An RM would be the best place to discuss this. [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 17:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = 2024 impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol | 2 = Impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol | discuss = | reason = This is the only impeachment proceeding happened against Yoon Suk Yeol because there's no impeachment inquiry against him before. | sig = [[Special:Contributions/114.10.72.221|114.10.72.221]] ([[User talk:114.10.72.221|talk]]) 02:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = 114.10.72.221}} |
|||
:: Worth a discussion to see if [[WP:NOYEAR]] is met. <span style="padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:-1px">[[User:CFA|<span style=color:#00c>C</span>]] <span style=color:red>F</span> [[User talk:CFA|<span style=color:#5ac18e>A</span>]]</span> 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== Administrator needed ==== |
||
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been [[WP:FULL|fully protected]] or [[WP:MOVP|move protected]] (see [[Help:When to place technical requests in "Administrator needed"|this guide]] to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a [[WP:Page mover|page mover]].}}</noinclude> |
|||
<!-- Insert the following code in the appropriate section, filling in page names and reason: |
|||
<!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | new title | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|||
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | page title to revert to | reason = reason for move}} |
|||
---- and enter on a new line, directly below --> |
Latest revision as of 21:15, 5 December 2024
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
[edit]Uncontroversial technical requests
[edit]- Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus → Nun galilaeus (currently a redirect back to Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus) (move · discuss) – Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes places this species in the genus Nun Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- CD El Ejido → CP El Ejido (move · discuss) – This team has had their name changed for some time, finally recovering the "Poli" moniker, so i think it's only fair that the team article starts to use the name that it goes by now. Alternatively the article could be named: Polideportivo El Ejido. Also, the old logo was restored, so that would have to be changed too. Bodeseven (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bodeseven - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some sources to support that the proposed new name is more common? Raladic (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- I do. There's an article talking about the name change in detail. The club's page has algo updated the name, and it's also on it's X (twitter) account.
- I assume the new name is also present on the RFEF official tables.
- https://www.diariodealmeria.es/deportes/vuelve-poli-ejido-cambia-oficialmente-nombre_0_1630637482.html
- https://polideportivoejido.com
- https://x.com/Poli_ElEjido Bodeseven (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bodeseven - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some sources to support that the proposed new name is more common? Raladic (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- The New Six → TNX (band) (currently a redirect instead to The New Six) (move · discuss) – Group has officially reverted to their previous and more notable acronym name variant. {{{sig}}} - K-popguardian (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- @K-popguardian, I’d say that a formal RM is needed for this to settle on an official consensus-based title. It has a pretty contentious move history, and actually got here via a RM that had no participation per WP:RMNOMIN. -2pou (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
[edit]- Brian Thompson (disambiguation) (currently a redirect to Brian Thompson) → Brian Thompson (move · discuss) – Looks like something went sideways here with a move... there was an RM here that was speedy moved after being open for 8 hours (maybe a case of WP:RECENTISM.) I'm not necessarily requesting that the speedy move be reverted (though there seems to be some pushback on it at the RM), but whatever happened with the botched move needs to be fixed. Whoever handles this can decide for themselves whether the whole thing should be reverted. RachelTensions (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Update: looks like the disambiguation move has been fixed by @CFA RachelTensions (talk) 16:37, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Contested technical requests
[edit]- Visakhapatnam railway station → Visakhapatnam Junction railway station (currently a redirect back to Visakhapatnam railway station) (move · discuss) – Visakhapatnam Junction is the common and official name of the railway station. Already there is a article existing with the latter name (Visakhapatnam Junction), so unable to move the page from Visakhapatnam railway station to Visakhapatnam Junction railway station Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- There are some sources that still mention the name as the former title, and there seems to ne by a recent rename. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lidia Gueiler → Lydia Gueiler (currently a redirect back to Lidia Gueiler) (move · discuss) – "Y" spelling seems to be the one used by Gueiler. It's reflected in presidential decrees during her presidency, in authored works, and in her authorized biography. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC) Krisgabwoosh (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- This would warrant a full discussion because it seems like "Lidia" is the WP:COMMONNAME in English-language sources: The New York Times, BBC, The Independent, The Washington Post, The Times, Los Angeles Times, El Pais, Reuters, Encyclopædia Britannica, Bolivian Express, United Press International, etc., as well as numerous books and academic sources. RachelTensions (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Would WP:COMMONNAME really apply in this situation, though? That policy seems to be most applicable to people known by a name or nickname different from their birthname. In this case, the only difference is that one spelling is the more correct one. Should a misspelling be preferred simply because most sources use it? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- That'd be up to the RM process to decide. Since most sources spell it "Lidia", it's likely that somebody searching for her article would also expect it to be at "Lidia". At most, IMO, we should include a WP:EXPLNOTE in the lead of her article explaining that it is sometimes spelled "Lydia". RachelTensions (talk) 03:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Would WP:COMMONNAME really apply in this situation, though? That policy seems to be most applicable to people known by a name or nickname different from their birthname. In this case, the only difference is that one spelling is the more correct one. Should a misspelling be preferred simply because most sources use it? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- This would warrant a full discussion because it seems like "Lidia" is the WP:COMMONNAME in English-language sources: The New York Times, BBC, The Independent, The Washington Post, The Times, Los Angeles Times, El Pais, Reuters, Encyclopædia Britannica, Bolivian Express, United Press International, etc., as well as numerous books and academic sources. RachelTensions (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- e& → Etisalat (currently a redirect back to E&) (move · discuss) – Per WP:COMMONNAME, Etisalat is the most commonly used name, seen inthis article title, this, and this. They changed their name from Etisalat to e& in 2022 but Etisalat remainds the most commonly used name, like how Twitter remains so instead of being renamed to X. jolielover♥talk 04:14, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- @SafariScribe, FYA. – robertsky (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- I moved this article, although as an uncontested request per this discussion, via RM. You may want to open a new RM. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've opened a new one, thanks jolielover♥talk 15:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Per above, please open another move discussion concerning the titles. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yunnanilus nigromaculatus → Eonemachilus nigromaculatus (currently a redirect back to Yunnanilus nigromaculatus) (move · discuss) – Eonemachilus is the genus name used in Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Quetzal1964 The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. Bensci54 (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Columbus metropolitan area, Ohio → Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area (currently a redirect back to Columbus metropolitan area, Ohio) (move · discuss) – To be consistent with the first sentence in the paragraph Assadzadeh (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Assadzadeh The current name is consistent with Columbus metropolitan area, Georgia, but also I feel that the Ohio page might deserve primary topic for Columbus metropolitan area as it has approximately 5x the views as the Georgia page. An RM would be the best place to discuss this. Bensci54 (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2024 impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol → Impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol (move · discuss) – This is the only impeachment proceeding happened against Yoon Suk Yeol because there's no impeachment inquiry against him before. 114.10.72.221 (talk) 02:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Worth a discussion to see if WP:NOYEAR is met. C F A 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)