Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Uncontroversial technical requests: Difference |
→Contested technical requests: done 1 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Shortcuts|WP:RMT|WP:RMTR|WP:RM/TR}}</noinclude><includeonly>{{Shortcut|WP:RM/TR}}</includeonly> |
|||
__NOTOC__ |
|||
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude> |
||
===Technical requests=== |
=== Technical requests === |
||
⚫ | |||
<!-- This header makes it easier to get in to move from one subsection to another. --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
==== Uncontroversial technical requests ==== |
==== Uncontroversial technical requests ==== |
||
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Most requests should be placed below this heading.}}</noinclude> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
---- and enter on a new line, directly below --> |
|||
⚫ | |||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Count on My Love | 2 = Count On My Love | discuss = yes | reason = A technical move request is necessary in this case because the move is blocked by an existing redirect. The reason for moving is to be consistent with [[Talk:Count On Me#Move request|the move]] of [[Count on Me]] to [[Count On Me]], and other "count on" examples. | sig = — '''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]''' ([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 20:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Jaydiem}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
and paste on a new line after this instruction, at the bottom of the existing list; do not delete this instruction; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = |
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Rudolf Wanderone | 2 = Minnesota Fats | discuss = | reason = Per consensus at [[Special:Permalink/1259235480#Requested move 16 October 2024]]. | sig = [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 13:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Feeglgeef}} |
||
::In the Talk page discussion, there appears to be consensus that the main "Minnesota Fats" namespace should go to Mr. Wanderone, and I agree. However there is not so much consensus on what to do with the remaining redirects to the fictional character and whether there should be a DAB page. ---<span style="font-family: Calibri">[[User:doomsdayer520|<b style="color:#9932CC"><small>DOOMSDAYER</small>520</b>]]<small> ([[User talk:Doomsdayer520|TALK]]|[[Special:Contributions/Doomsdayer520|CONTRIBS]]) </small></span> 15:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::The discussion has been closed. If you believe it was closed improperly, then [[WP:MRV]] is the next step. In the meantime, this is indeed uncontroversial and should be carried out. [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 20:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Prison escape of Daniel Khalife | 2 = Daniel Khalife | discuss = | reason = Per consensus at [[Special:Permalink/1261632921#Article title]]. | sig = [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Feeglgeef}} |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Tajiks of Xinjiang | 2 = Tajiks in China | discuss = | reason = Per consensus at [[Special:Permalink/1262135492#Requested_move_28_October_2024]] | sig = [[User:Cyberdog958|<span style="color:navy;">''cyberdog''</span><span style="color:orange;">'''958'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cyberdog958|<span style="color:teal;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 20:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Cyberdog958}} |
|||
==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ==== |
|||
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.}}</noinclude> <!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | previous title to revert to | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|||
==== Contested technical requests ==== |
==== Contested technical requests ==== |
||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = |
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Hunter Fracture Zone | 2 = Hunter fracture zone | discuss = | reason = The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid, and to align with others in the series | sig = [[User:Dawnseeker2000|<span style="font-variant: small-caps">''Dawnseeker2000''</span>]] 03:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Dawnseeker2000}} |
||
*: This move was previously carried out and reverted, so is controversial, and the mass RM did not cover it. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 04:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::This is not an uncontroversial technical request: redirected [[Star Suvarna]] has an edit history back to 2017 including sockpuppetry. I've tagged the draft for a history merge, though it might not be eligible. [[User:Flapjacktastic|Flapjacktastic]] ([[User talk:Flapjacktastic|talk]]) 21:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*::This was lowercase when the RM was opened on the rest, so it was not included there, except by implication, and it was moved back to caps during the RM. The result of the RM applies to it, obviously, so the controversy is resolved. [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 04:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Fan death | 2 = Fan death theory | discuss = yes | reason = The original Korean name for the subject of the page is "선풍기 사망설", literally meaning "Fan Death Theory". Changing the page name to "Fan death theory" would more accurately reflect what the subject is actually known in South Korea. | sig = [[User:Aceus0shrifter|Aceus0shrifter]] ([[User talk:Aceus0shrifter|talk]]) 14:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Aceus0shrifter}} |
|||
*::: If another admin or page mover sees things your way they are welcome to carry out this move. I'm not willing to wheel war without a formal discussion that explicitly applies to the page in question. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 04:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::The term "fan death" is quite common in English, with an estimated 210,000 Google hits, and the majority of top hits pertain to this topic, while "fan death theory" gets 51 Ghits. Ghits aren't always a good indicator, especially with historical topics ignored by popular culture, such as ancient Estonian gods (see [[WP:AADP#Google test]]), but for something in current popular culture, Google's a good deal more reliable for determining what's the most common name. In other words, I oppose moving, since "fan death" is the normal name in English. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
*::::{{ping|Frost}} since you moved it to caps, would you be willing to move it back now that the RM is done with consensus for lowercase "fracture zone" on all the others? Or would you prefer to see a separate RM discussion first? [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 06:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::::A new RM discussion should probably be initiated per [[WP:NOTOTHERPAGES]], as it's not an uncontroversial situation. [[User talk:Frost|<span style="color: #9cbfe8; font-family: Bahnschrift">Frost</span>]] 07:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus | 2 = Nun galilaeus | discuss = | reason = Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes places this species in the genus ''Nun'' | sig = [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 19:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Quetzal1964}} |
|||
::IUCN Red List calls it "''Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus''". What gives Eschmeyer priority? The article doesn't even mention ''Nun galilaeus'' (except in an infobox and as one of several names in a navbox). — [[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 05:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy]] [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{u|BarrelProof}} See also the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes]]. This issue has been discussed. [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 11:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Yunnanilus nigromaculatus | 2 = Eonemachilus nigromaculatus | discuss = | reason = Eonemachilus is the genus name used in ''Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes'' | sig = [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 08:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Quetzal1964}} |
|||
:: @[[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::See https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes uses Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes for its taxonomy below the level of order. See[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy]] [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{u|Bensci54}} See also the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes]]. This issue has been discussed. [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 11:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::::[[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] and [[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]], do you still object to these moves? They appear to be backed by recent consensus at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry_proposal_to_change_the_Taxonomy_used_by_Wikiproject:Fishes]] that I wasn't aware of. <span style="padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:-1px">[[User:CFA|<span style=color:#00c>C</span>]] <span style=color:red>F</span> [[User talk:CFA|<span style=color:#5ac18e>A</span>]]</span> 16:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::::I asked a skeptical question, but I did not object (and I did not move this to the contested category). — [[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 01:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = CD El Ejido | 2 = CP El Ejido | discuss = | reason = This team has had their name changed for some time, finally recovering the "Poli" moniker, so i think it's only fair that the team article starts to use the name that it goes by now. Alternatively the article could be named: Polideportivo El Ejido. Also, the old logo was restored, so that would have to be changed too. | sig = [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Bodeseven}} |
|||
*:@{{u|Bodeseven}} - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some [[WP:RS|sources]] to support that the proposed new name is [[WP:COMMONNAME|more common]]? [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I do. There's an article talking about the name change in detail. The club's page has algo updated the name, and it's also on it's X (twitter) account. |
|||
*::I assume the new name is also present on the RFEF official tables. |
|||
*::https://www.diariodealmeria.es/deportes/vuelve-poli-ejido-cambia-oficialmente-nombre_0_1630637482.html |
|||
*::https://polideportivoejido.com |
|||
*::https://x.com/Poli_ElEjido [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:::@[[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]], a full RM might be the best option. They are definitely Polideportivo now, but it's hard to see the abbreviation CP used anywhere. It's not in the news article, and the new website has a few different forms. The badge this year uses C. Pvo. Ejido, and in the text "Poli Ejido" is the short form used. It's also confusing that both websites are still active, and if the full name were used, the page for the former club would need to move or merged (if they finally actually did merge given the adoption of the old badge?). -[[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 09:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::::They didn't merged. AFAIK Poli El Ejido 1969 (previously named El Ejido 2012) is a different club to Poli Ejido, which dissapeared in 2012; They bought the rights to use the old badge, even though it's not indicative of the name it currently has. |
|||
*::::I proposed moving the page to "CP El Ejido" as a short, temporary solution to represent the name change somewhat accurately. |
|||
*::::I don't know either why the club has two websites now, it's confusing. [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 15:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Matacoan languages | 2 = Mataguayan languages | discuss = | reason = Mataguayan is the name of the family in non-English languages, and the vast majority in English as well. In addition, Mataco is seen as a pejorative term for the Wichí. | sig = [[User:Erobb639|Erobb639]] ([[User talk:Erobb639|talk]]) 21:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Erobb639}} |
|||
*:100% of the English-language sources cited in the article use the term "Mataco" and "Matacoan", and [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)]] says that we should "use the version of the name of the subject that is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources". [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 23:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::There are only three sources on the page, and two use Matacoan. The majority of papers out there are using Mataguayan however. The sourcing on the page isn't fantastic either, not that the sources are bad, but there are newer more accurate sources that better reflect the consensus. I can predict that this is going to come down to demonstrating the commonality of Mataguayan though. What would the actual bar for that be? Because the amount of citations used on the article itself is fairly arbitrary. [[User:Erobb639|Erobb639]] ([[User talk:Erobb639|talk]]) 01:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Mulgi language | 2 = Mulgi dialect | discuss = | reason = rd holding up move | sig = [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Kwamikagami}} |
|||
::Should [[Võro language]] also be moved? <span style="background-color: black">[[User:Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">Skarmory</span>]] [[User talk:Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">(talk •</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">contribs)</span>]]</span> 13:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::There is already an RM for [[Võro language]]. Meanwhile, {{no redirect|Mulgi dialect}} had a {{tl|db-move}} declined, saying that it may be [[WP:PCM|potentially controversial]] – such that an RM should be opened (a discussion, that is; not a technical request). If someone declines a bold move, the next step shouldn't be to ask again here, but rather to open an RM discussion. {{Reply|Kwamikagami}} You can open an RM by clicking "discuss" on your request. [[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]] 05:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Brazilian National Anthem | 2 = Hino Nacional Brasileiro | discuss = | reason = consistency. see article talk page (§ "[[Talk:Brazilian National Anthem#Article Title|Article Title]]") for more details. i couldn't move it myself because of a redirect. | sig = [[User:The G Wikian|The G Wikian]] ([[User talk:The G Wikian|talk]]) 06:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = The G Wikian}} |
|||
*:{{Reply|The G Wikian}} There are many articles in [[:Category:National anthems]] that don't use a national anthem's foreign-language name, so this wouldn't create greater consistency. Per the [[WP:UE|policy on foreign-language titles]], we follow the most [[WP:COMMONNAME|common name in English-language sources]]. Based on a [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Hino+Nacional+Brasileiro%2C+Brazilian+National+Anthem&year_start=1800&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3 Google Ngrams search], it does not appear that the proposed title would be more common. [[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]] 08:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Lakshmi Nivasa (Kannada TV Series) | 2 = Lakshmi Niwas (TV series) | discuss = | reason = Name correction and unnecessary disambiguation | sig = [[Special:Contributions/2409:40C0:44:54A0:8000:0:0:0|2409:40C0:44:54A0:8000:0:0:0]] ([[User talk:2409:40C0:44:54A0:8000:0:0:0|talk]]) 13:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = }} |
|||
:: The sources seem to call it "Lakshmi Niwas." Do you have a source supporting this change? <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>[[User:CanonNi]]<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]])</span> 13:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:::Actually, It can be written in both spellings as 'Lakshmi' or 'Laxmi' too, so you can change it to any one of the spelling. [[Special:Contributions/2409:40C0:7A:8ACD:8000:0:0:0|2409:40C0:7A:8ACD:8000:0:0:0]] ([[User talk:2409:40C0:7A:8ACD:8000:0:0:0|talk]]) 15:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Semi-presidential republic | 2 = Semi-presidential system | discuss = | reason = Consistency with [[presidential system]], [[semi-parliamentary system]], [[parliamentary system]], and [[directorial system]]. | sig = [[User:Closed Limelike Curves|– Closed Limelike Curves]] ([[User talk:Closed Limelike Curves|talk]]) 18:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Closed Limelike Curves}} |
|||
:: @[[User:Closed Limelike Curves|Closed Limelike Curves]] Doesn't seem to be universal, there are other articles such as [[Parliamentary republic]], [[ Assembly-independent republic]], [[Parliamentary republic with an executive president]]. Recommend full RM. [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 21:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = United States Virgin Islands's at-large congressional district | 2 = United States Virgin Islands' at-large congressional district | discuss = | reason = Normalize plural possessive like we at Marianas Islands's... | sig = [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 01:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Dicklyon}} |
|||
*:Contesting: this has been moved back and forth several times over the years and needs a discussion. [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 07:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*::I agree that this needs at least a discussion, and would lean toward no move. If anything, the [[Northern Mariana Islands' at-large congressional district]] article should be moved. Of all the jurisdictions ending in "s" in that category, it is the only one not conforming to Strunk & White's ''Elements of Style'' and ''Chicago Manual of Style'' guidelines. You'd have to move [[Arkansas's at-large congressional district]], [[Texas's at-large congressional district]], [[Philippines's at-large congressional district]], [[Illinois's at-large congressional district]], and [[Massachusetts's at-large congressional district]] also. It's hard to see a rationale for those two particular territories being special cases. [[User:Starfishprimo|Starfishprimo]] ([[User talk:Starfishprimo|talk]]) 16:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = RTL (German TV channel) | 2 = RTL (Germany) | discuss = | reason = No further DAB needed here. | sig = [[User:Intrisit|Intrisit]] ([[User talk:Intrisit|talk]]) 15:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Intrisit}} |
|||
:: @[[User:Intrisit|Intrisit]] [[WP:NCBC]] says to use the country alone for disambiguation only when "all of the articles with the same base name will be of the same type". <span class="nowrap">--[[User:Ahecht|Ahecht]] ([[User talk:Ahecht|<b style="color:#FFF;background:#04A;display:inline-block;padding:1px;vertical-align:middle;font:bold 50%/1 sans-serif;text-align:center">TALK<br />PAGE</b>]])</span> 17:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
==== |
==== Administrator needed ==== |
||
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been [[WP:FULL|fully protected]] or [[WP:MOVP|move protected]] (see [[Help:When to place technical requests in "Administrator needed"|this guide]] to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a [[WP:Page mover|page mover]].}}</noinclude> |
|||
<!-- Insert the following code in the appropriate section, filling in page names and reason: |
|||
<!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | new title | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no --> |
|||
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | page title to revert to | reason = reason for move}} |
|||
---- and enter on a new line, directly below --> |
Latest revision as of 20:35, 9 December 2024
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
[edit]Uncontroversial technical requests
[edit]
- Rudolf Wanderone → Minnesota Fats (currently a redirect instead to Minnesota Fats (character)) (move · discuss) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1259235480#Requested move 16 October 2024. Feeglgeef (talk) 13:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- In the Talk page discussion, there appears to be consensus that the main "Minnesota Fats" namespace should go to Mr. Wanderone, and I agree. However there is not so much consensus on what to do with the remaining redirects to the fictional character and whether there should be a DAB page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- The discussion has been closed. If you believe it was closed improperly, then WP:MRV is the next step. In the meantime, this is indeed uncontroversial and should be carried out. 162 etc. (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- In the Talk page discussion, there appears to be consensus that the main "Minnesota Fats" namespace should go to Mr. Wanderone, and I agree. However there is not so much consensus on what to do with the remaining redirects to the fictional character and whether there should be a DAB page. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Prison escape of Daniel Khalife → Daniel Khalife (currently a redirect back to Prison escape of Daniel Khalife) (move · discuss) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1261632921#Article title. Feeglgeef (talk) 17:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tajiks of Xinjiang → Tajiks in China (currently a redirect back to Tajiks of Xinjiang) (move · discuss) – Per consensus at Special:Permalink/1262135492#Requested_move_28_October_2024 cyberdog958Talk 20:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
[edit]Contested technical requests
[edit]- Hunter Fracture Zone → Hunter fracture zone (currently a redirect back to Hunter Fracture Zone) (move · discuss) – The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid, and to align with others in the series Dawnseeker2000 03:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- This move was previously carried out and reverted, so is controversial, and the mass RM did not cover it. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- This was lowercase when the RM was opened on the rest, so it was not included there, except by implication, and it was moved back to caps during the RM. The result of the RM applies to it, obviously, so the controversy is resolved. Dicklyon (talk) 04:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If another admin or page mover sees things your way they are welcome to carry out this move. I'm not willing to wheel war without a formal discussion that explicitly applies to the page in question. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Frost: since you moved it to caps, would you be willing to move it back now that the RM is done with consensus for lowercase "fracture zone" on all the others? Or would you prefer to see a separate RM discussion first? Dicklyon (talk) 06:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- A new RM discussion should probably be initiated per WP:NOTOTHERPAGES, as it's not an uncontroversial situation. Frost 07:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Frost: since you moved it to caps, would you be willing to move it back now that the RM is done with consensus for lowercase "fracture zone" on all the others? Or would you prefer to see a separate RM discussion first? Dicklyon (talk) 06:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- If another admin or page mover sees things your way they are welcome to carry out this move. I'm not willing to wheel war without a formal discussion that explicitly applies to the page in question. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- This was lowercase when the RM was opened on the rest, so it was not included there, except by implication, and it was moved back to caps during the RM. The result of the RM applies to it, obviously, so the controversy is resolved. Dicklyon (talk) 04:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- This move was previously carried out and reverted, so is controversial, and the mass RM did not cover it. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus → Nun galilaeus (currently a redirect back to Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus) (move · discuss) – Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes places this species in the genus Nun Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- IUCN Red List calls it "Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus". What gives Eschmeyer priority? The article doesn't even mention Nun galilaeus (except in an infobox and as one of several names in a navbox). — BarrelProof (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- BarrelProof See also the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes. This issue has been discussed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- IUCN Red List calls it "Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus". What gives Eschmeyer priority? The article doesn't even mention Nun galilaeus (except in an infobox and as one of several names in a navbox). — BarrelProof (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yunnanilus nigromaculatus → Eonemachilus nigromaculatus (currently a redirect back to Yunnanilus nigromaculatus) (move · discuss) – Eonemachilus is the genus name used in Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Quetzal1964 The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. Bensci54 (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- See https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes uses Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes for its taxonomy below the level of order. SeeWikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bensci54 See also the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes. This issue has been discussed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bensci54 and BarrelProof, do you still object to these moves? They appear to be backed by recent consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry_proposal_to_change_the_Taxonomy_used_by_Wikiproject:Fishes that I wasn't aware of. C F A 16:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- I asked a skeptical question, but I did not object (and I did not move this to the contested category). — BarrelProof (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bensci54 and BarrelProof, do you still object to these moves? They appear to be backed by recent consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry_proposal_to_change_the_Taxonomy_used_by_Wikiproject:Fishes that I wasn't aware of. C F A 16:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Bensci54 See also the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes#Retry proposal to change the Taxonomy used by Wikiproject:Fishes. This issue has been discussed. Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- See https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes uses Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes for its taxonomy below the level of order. SeeWikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Quetzal1964 The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. Bensci54 (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- CD El Ejido → CP El Ejido (currently a redirect back to CD El Ejido) (move · discuss) – This team has had their name changed for some time, finally recovering the "Poli" moniker, so i think it's only fair that the team article starts to use the name that it goes by now. Alternatively the article could be named: Polideportivo El Ejido. Also, the old logo was restored, so that would have to be changed too. Bodeseven (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bodeseven - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some sources to support that the proposed new name is more common? Raladic (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- I do. There's an article talking about the name change in detail. The club's page has algo updated the name, and it's also on it's X (twitter) account.
- I assume the new name is also present on the RFEF official tables.
- https://www.diariodealmeria.es/deportes/vuelve-poli-ejido-cambia-oficialmente-nombre_0_1630637482.html
- https://polideportivoejido.com
- https://x.com/Poli_ElEjido Bodeseven (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bodeseven, a full RM might be the best option. They are definitely Polideportivo now, but it's hard to see the abbreviation CP used anywhere. It's not in the news article, and the new website has a few different forms. The badge this year uses C. Pvo. Ejido, and in the text "Poli Ejido" is the short form used. It's also confusing that both websites are still active, and if the full name were used, the page for the former club would need to move or merged (if they finally actually did merge given the adoption of the old badge?). -2pou (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- They didn't merged. AFAIK Poli El Ejido 1969 (previously named El Ejido 2012) is a different club to Poli Ejido, which dissapeared in 2012; They bought the rights to use the old badge, even though it's not indicative of the name it currently has.
- I proposed moving the page to "CP El Ejido" as a short, temporary solution to represent the name change somewhat accurately.
- I don't know either why the club has two websites now, it's confusing. Bodeseven (talk) 15:06, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bodeseven, a full RM might be the best option. They are definitely Polideportivo now, but it's hard to see the abbreviation CP used anywhere. It's not in the news article, and the new website has a few different forms. The badge this year uses C. Pvo. Ejido, and in the text "Poli Ejido" is the short form used. It's also confusing that both websites are still active, and if the full name were used, the page for the former club would need to move or merged (if they finally actually did merge given the adoption of the old badge?). -2pou (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Bodeseven - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some sources to support that the proposed new name is more common? Raladic (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Matacoan languages → Mataguayan languages (currently a redirect back to Matacoan languages) (move · discuss) – Mataguayan is the name of the family in non-English languages, and the vast majority in English as well. In addition, Mataco is seen as a pejorative term for the Wichí. Erobb639 (talk) 21:15, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- 100% of the English-language sources cited in the article use the term "Mataco" and "Matacoan", and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) says that we should "use the version of the name of the subject that is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources". RachelTensions (talk) 23:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- There are only three sources on the page, and two use Matacoan. The majority of papers out there are using Mataguayan however. The sourcing on the page isn't fantastic either, not that the sources are bad, but there are newer more accurate sources that better reflect the consensus. I can predict that this is going to come down to demonstrating the commonality of Mataguayan though. What would the actual bar for that be? Because the amount of citations used on the article itself is fairly arbitrary. Erobb639 (talk) 01:47, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- 100% of the English-language sources cited in the article use the term "Mataco" and "Matacoan", and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) says that we should "use the version of the name of the subject that is most common in the English language, as you would find it in reliable sources". RachelTensions (talk) 23:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Mulgi language → Mulgi dialect (currently a redirect back to Mulgi language) (move · discuss) – rd holding up move — kwami (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Should Võro language also be moved? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- There is already an RM for Võro language. Meanwhile, Mulgi dialect had a {{db-move}} declined, saying that it may be potentially controversial – such that an RM should be opened (a discussion, that is; not a technical request). If someone declines a bold move, the next step shouldn't be to ask again here, but rather to open an RM discussion. @Kwamikagami: You can open an RM by clicking "discuss" on your request. SilverLocust 💬 05:04, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Should Võro language also be moved? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Brazilian National Anthem → Hino Nacional Brasileiro (currently a redirect back to Brazilian National Anthem) (move · discuss) – consistency. see article talk page (§ "Article Title") for more details. i couldn't move it myself because of a redirect. The G Wikian (talk) 06:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- @The G Wikian: There are many articles in Category:National anthems that don't use a national anthem's foreign-language name, so this wouldn't create greater consistency. Per the policy on foreign-language titles, we follow the most common name in English-language sources. Based on a Google Ngrams search, it does not appear that the proposed title would be more common. SilverLocust 💬 08:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lakshmi Nivasa (Kannada TV Series) → Lakshmi Niwas (TV series) (move · discuss) – Name correction and unnecessary disambiguation 2409:40C0:44:54A0:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 13:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The sources seem to call it "Lakshmi Niwas." Do you have a source supporting this change? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 13:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, It can be written in both spellings as 'Lakshmi' or 'Laxmi' too, so you can change it to any one of the spelling. 2409:40C0:7A:8ACD:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The sources seem to call it "Lakshmi Niwas." Do you have a source supporting this change? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 13:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-presidential republic → Semi-presidential system (currently a redirect back to Semi-presidential republic) (move · discuss) – Consistency with presidential system, semi-parliamentary system, parliamentary system, and directorial system. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Closed Limelike Curves Doesn't seem to be universal, there are other articles such as Parliamentary republic, Assembly-independent republic, Parliamentary republic with an executive president. Recommend full RM. Raladic (talk) 21:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- United States Virgin Islands's at-large congressional district → United States Virgin Islands' at-large congressional district (currently a redirect back to United States Virgin Islands's at-large congressional district) (move · discuss) – Normalize plural possessive like we at Marianas Islands's... Dicklyon (talk) 01:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Contesting: this has been moved back and forth several times over the years and needs a discussion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that this needs at least a discussion, and would lean toward no move. If anything, the Northern Mariana Islands' at-large congressional district article should be moved. Of all the jurisdictions ending in "s" in that category, it is the only one not conforming to Strunk & White's Elements of Style and Chicago Manual of Style guidelines. You'd have to move Arkansas's at-large congressional district, Texas's at-large congressional district, Philippines's at-large congressional district, Illinois's at-large congressional district, and Massachusetts's at-large congressional district also. It's hard to see a rationale for those two particular territories being special cases. Starfishprimo (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Contesting: this has been moved back and forth several times over the years and needs a discussion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- RTL (German TV channel) → RTL (Germany) (currently a redirect back to RTL (German TV channel)) (move · discuss) – No further DAB needed here. Intrisit (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Intrisit WP:NCBC says to use the country alone for disambiguation only when "all of the articles with the same base name will be of the same type". --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:48, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Intrisit WP:NCBC says to use the country alone for disambiguation only when "all of the articles with the same base name will be of the same type". --Ahecht (TALK