Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Handled 1 request: Moved Rolong to "Contested technical requests" (via script)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Shortcuts|WP:RMT|WP:RMTR|WP:RM/TR}}</noinclude><includeonly>{{Shortcut|WP:RM/TR}}</includeonly>
__NOTOC__
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Instructions}}</noinclude>


===Technical requests===
=== Technical requests ===
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Edit this section if you want to move a request between sections.}}</noinclude>
<!-- This header makes it easier to get in to move from one subsection to another. -->
==== Uncontroversial technical requests ====
<noinclude>''Edit this section if you want to move a request from Uncontroversial to Contested.''</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Most requests should be placed below this heading.}}</noinclude>


<!-- Copy the following code below, filling in page names and reason:
==== Uncontroversial technical requests ====
<!-- Insert the following code in the appropriate section, filling in page names and reason:
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | new page title | reason = reason for move}}
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | new page title | reason = reason for move}}
and paste on a nsubstew line after this instruction, at the bottom of the existing list; do not delete this instruction; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no -->
---- and enter on a new line, directly below -->
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Mulgi language | 2 = Mulgi dialect | discuss = | reason = rd holding up move | sig = [[User:Kwamikagami|— kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 23:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Kwamikagami}}
::Should [[Võro language]] also be moved? <span style="background-color: black">[[User:Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">Skarmory</span>]] [[User talk:Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">(talk •</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">contribs)</span>]]</span> 13:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)


==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Count on My Love | 2 = Count On My Love | discuss = yes | reason = A technical move request is necessary in this case because the move is blocked by an existing redirect. The reason for moving is to be consistent with [[Talk:Count On Me#Move request|the move]] of [[Count on Me]] to [[Count On Me]], and other "count on" examples. | sig = —&nbsp;'''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]'''&nbsp;([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 20:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Jaydiem}}
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.}}</noinclude> <!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | previous title to revert to | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no -->


==== Contested technical requests ====
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = You Can't Count on Me | 2 = You Can't Count On Me | discuss = yes | reason = A technical move request is necessary in this case because the move is blocked by an existing redirect. The reason for moving is to be consistent with [[Talk:Count On Me#Move request|the move]] of [[Count on Me]] to [[Count On Me]], and other "count on" examples. | sig = —&nbsp;'''[[User:Jaydiem|Jaydiem]]'''&nbsp;([[User talk:Jaydiem|talk]]) 20:19, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Jaydiem}}
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Visakhapatnam railway station | 2 = Visakhapatnam Junction railway station | discuss = | reason = Visakhapatnam Junction is the common and official name of the railway station. Already there is a article existing with the latter name (Visakhapatnam Junction), so unable to move the page from Visakhapatnam railway station to Visakhapatnam Junction railway station | sig = [[User:Jayanthkumar123|Jayanthkumar123]] ([[User talk:Jayanthkumar123|talk]]) 16:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Jayanthkumar123}}
::There are some sources that still mention the name as the former title, and there seems to ne by a recent rename. [[User:ToadetteEdit|ToadetteEdit]] ([[User talk:ToadetteEdit|talk]]) 19:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Lidia Gueiler | 2 = Lydia Gueiler | discuss = | reason = "Y" spelling seems to be the one used by Gueiler. It's reflected [http://www.gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/normas/buscarFecha/1979-11-16/1980-06-30 in presidential decrees during her presidency], in [https://www.google.com/books/edition/La_mujer_y_la_revoluci%C3%B3n/tsZ8AAAAMAAJ authored works], and in [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Lydia/VADrJeDB0SQC her authorized biography]. [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | sig = [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Krisgabwoosh}}
*:This would warrant a full discussion because it seems like "Lidia" is the [[WP:COMMONNAME]] in English-language sources: [https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/obituaries/luis-garcia-meza-bolivian-dictator-jailed-for-genocide-dies-at-88.html ''The New York Times''], [https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-11447598 ''BBC''], [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/lidia-gueiler-tejada-politician-who-became-only-the-wests-second-female-president-2282573.html ''The Independent''], [https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/luis-garcia-meza-bolivian-dictator-convicted-of-human-rights-violations-dies-at-88/2018/04/30/3319086c-4bfa-11e8-84a0-458a1aa9ac0a_story.html ''The Washington Post''], [https://www.thetimes.com/article/lidia-gueiler-fjwv06krzcm ''The Times''], [https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/afterword/story/2011-05-09/lidia-gueiler-bolivian-president-between-coups-dies-at-89 ''Los Angeles Times''], [https://english.elpais.com/elpais/2011/05/11/inenglish/1305091251_850210.html ''El Pais''], [https://pictures.reuters.com/archive/BOLIVIA--GM1E75B00HO01.html ''Reuters''], [https://www.britannica.com/place/Bolivia/Bolivia-from-c-1980-to-2000 ''Encyclopædia Britannica''], [https://bolivianexpress.org/magazines/89 ''Bolivian Express''], [https://www.upi.com/Archives/1980/10/04/Ousted-woman-president-leaves-Bolivia/1145339480000/ ''United Press International''], etc., as well as [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Lidia+Gueiler%22&lr=lang_en&sca_esv=c802bcab525137d8&authuser=0&udm=36&tbs=lr%3Alang_1en&sxsrf=ADLYWIL5CN9UQAQ7erzb30iFbyU_wTCuuQ%3A1733203446843&ei=9pVOZ7uSM4Cv5NoPo9zf-QU&ved=0ahUKEwi75Zb-7YqKAxWAF1kFHSPuN18Q4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=%22Lidia+Gueiler%22&gs_lp=Eg1nd3Mtd2l6LWJvb2tzIg8iTGlkaWEgR3VlaWxlciJIgB5QmQJYmQJwAXgAkAEAmAE4oAFwqgEBMrgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAKACAJgDAIgGAZIHAKAHxQE numerous books and academic sources.] [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 05:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Would [[WP:COMMONNAME]] really apply in this situation, though? That policy seems to be most applicable to people known by a name or nickname ''different'' from their birthname. In this case, the only difference is that one spelling is the more correct one. Should a misspelling be preferred simply because most sources use it? [[User:Krisgabwoosh|Krisgabwoosh]] ([[User talk:Krisgabwoosh|talk]]) 18:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::That'd be up to the RM process to decide. Since most sources spell it "Lidia", it's likely that somebody searching for her article would also expect it to be at "Lidia". At most, IMO, we should include a [[WP:EXPLNOTE]] in the lead of her article explaining that it is sometimes spelled "Lydia". [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 03:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Yunnanilus nigromaculatus | 2 = Eonemachilus nigromaculatus | discuss = | reason = Eonemachilus is the genus name used in ''Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes'' | sig = [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 08:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Quetzal1964}}
:: @[[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
:::See https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes uses Eschmeyer's Catalig of Fishes for its taxonomy below the level of order. See[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy]] [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Columbus metropolitan area, Ohio | 2 = Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area | discuss = | reason = To be consistent with the first sentence in the paragraph | sig = [[User:Assadzadeh|Assadzadeh]] ([[User talk:Assadzadeh|talk]]) 00:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Assadzadeh}}
:: @[[User:Assadzadeh|Assadzadeh]] The current name is consistent with [[Columbus metropolitan area, Georgia]], but also I feel that the Ohio page might deserve primary topic for [[Columbus metropolitan area]] as it has approximately 5x the views as the Georgia page. An RM would be the best place to discuss this. [[User:Bensci54|Bensci54]] ([[User talk:Bensci54|talk]]) 17:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
::This current name seems to be the result of some 2016 discussion that I am having a hard time finding. Either way, it would need a mass move request or RFC given there are many other articles in the same vein ([[Rochester metropolitan area, New York]] among others). <span style="background-color: black">[[User:Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">Skarmory</span>]] [[User talk:Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">(talk •</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Skarmory|<span style="color: yellow">contribs)</span>]]</span> 10:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = 2024 impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol | 2 = Impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol | discuss = | reason = This is the only impeachment proceeding happened against Yoon Suk Yeol because there's no impeachment inquiry against him before. | sig = [[Special:Contributions/114.10.72.221|114.10.72.221]] ([[User talk:114.10.72.221|talk]]) 02:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = 114.10.72.221}}
:: Worth a discussion to see if [[WP:NOYEAR]] is met. <span style="padding:2px 5px;border-radius:5px;font-family:Arial black;white-space:nowrap;vertical-align:-1px">[[User:CFA|<span style=color:#00c>C</span>]] <span style=color:red>F</span> [[User talk:CFA|<span style=color:#5ac18e>A</span>]]</span> 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
:::(note that the motion will be voted on in roughly 2 days, after which it will either be moved to "Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol" or "Attempted impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol") [[User:Queen of Hearts|<span style="color: darkred;">charlotte</span>]] [[User talk:Queen of Hearts|<sup style="color: darkred;">👸♥</sup>]] 21:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus | 2 = Nun galilaeus | discuss = | reason = Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes places this species in the genus ''Nun'' | sig = [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 19:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Quetzal1964}}
::IUCN Red List calls it "''Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus''". What gives Eschmeyer priority? The article doesn't even mention ''Nun galilaeus'' (except in an infobox and as one of several names in a navbox). —⁠ ⁠[[User:BarrelProof|BarrelProof]] ([[User talk:BarrelProof|talk]]) 05:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
:::See [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy]] [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = CD El Ejido | 2 = CP El Ejido | discuss = | reason = This team has had their name changed for some time, finally recovering the "Poli" moniker, so i think it's only fair that the team article starts to use the name that it goes by now. Alternatively the article could be named: Polideportivo El Ejido. Also, the old logo was restored, so that would have to be changed too. | sig = [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Bodeseven}}
*:@{{u|Bodeseven}} - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some [[WP:RS|sources]] to support that the proposed new name is [[WP:COMMONNAME|more common]]? [[User:Raladic|Raladic]] ([[User talk:Raladic|talk]]) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
*::I do. There's an article talking about the name change in detail. The club's page has algo updated the name, and it's also on it's X (twitter) account.
*::I assume the new name is also present on the RFEF official tables.
*::https://www.diariodealmeria.es/deportes/vuelve-poli-ejido-cambia-oficialmente-nombre_0_1630637482.html
*::https://polideportivoejido.com
*::https://x.com/Poli_ElEjido [[User:Bodeseven|Bodeseven]] ([[User talk:Bodeseven|talk]]) 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = [[The New Six]] | 2 = TNX (band) | discuss = | reason = Group has officially reverted to their previous and more notable acronym name variant. | sig [[User:K-popguardian|K-popguardian]]
=([[User talk:K-popguardian|talk]]) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = K-popguardian}} - [[User:K-popguardian|K-popguardian]] ([[User talk:K-popguardian|talk]]) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
*:@[[User:K-popguardian|K-popguardian]], I’d say that a formal RM is needed for this to settle on an official consensus-based title. It has a pretty contentious move history, and actually got here via a RM that had no participation per [[WP:RMNOMIN]]. -[[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 18:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu Administrative Service | 2 = Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) Services | discuss = | reason = Correct name. See https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-08/DANICS_270314%5B1%5D.PDF. | sig = [[Special:Contributions/117.230.80.188|117.230.80.188]] ([[User talk:117.230.80.188|talk]]) 13:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = 117.230.80.188}}
*:Is there a shorter [[WP:COMMONNAME]] for this civil service? Probably "DANICS"? Surely nobody commonly refers to it as "Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) Services"{{pb}}I'm not contesting this move (both the original and proposed move are similarly lengthy), just curious because that title is ''a lot''. [[User:RachelTensions|RachelTensions]] ([[User talk:RachelTensions|talk]]) 14:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
*:'''Change to another title''' Both the current title and the new one suggested by [[User:117.230.80.188|117.230.80.188]] seem to be too long as per [[Wikipedia:Concise]]. DANICS meets [[WP:UCRN]] since it is the most common one found in sources and is much shorter than the current title and should be used instead. [[User:Sangsangaplaz|<span style="color: green">Sangsangaplaz</span>]] ([[User talk:Sangsangaplaz|<span style="color: orange">Talk to me! I'm willing to help</span>]]) 14:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
*:<small>(Disclaimer: Saw this on [[Wikipedia:Discord|Discord]])</small> Based all of the sources in the article, including the one linked by this IP editor, [[DANICS]] is the current abbreviation of this subject. I see no evidence that it is no longer used, as the lead claims. This title is ridiculously long and obviously violates [[WP:CONCISE|CONCISE]], so I will [[Wikipedia:BOLD|boldly]] move to [[DANICS]]. Any editor may request that I revert the move by asking on [[User talk:Toadspike|my talk page]]. [[User:Toadspike|<span style="color:#21a81e;font-variant: small-caps;font-weight:bold;">'''Toadspike'''</span>]] [[User talk:Toadspike|<span style="color:#21a81e;font-variant: small-caps;font-weight:bold;">[Talk]</span>]] 14:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Rolong | 2 = Barolong | discuss = | reason = Rolong is one of the many dialects of the [[Tswana language|Setswana language]]. Barolong is the name of the Sotho-Tswana ethnic group discussed in this article. | sig = <span style="font-family: Arial; background-color:#f7eef1; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">[[User:Sentimental Boulevard|<span style="color: #b04f76">Sentimental Boulevard</span>]] [[User talk:Sentimental Boulevard|<span style="color:#b04f76">✿</span>]]</span> 23:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = Sentimental Boulevard}}
*:@[[User:Sentimental Boulevard|Sentimental Boulevard]] While I am inclined to believe you, this isn't obvious from the article. Could you please provide a source that confirms your claim? [[User:Toadspike|<span style="color:#21a81e;font-variant: small-caps;font-weight:bold;">'''Toadspike'''</span>]] [[User talk:Toadspike|<span style="color:#21a81e;font-variant: small-caps;font-weight:bold;">[Talk]</span>]] 14:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Thank you for your response. Admittedly, I may have been mistaken, as I just came across a conflicting source. While the [https://www.langcen.cam.ac.uk/resources/langt/tswana.html#:~:text=Tswana%20(Setswana)&text=The%20language%20is%20spoken%20in,%2C%20Ngwaketse%2C%20Thlato%2C%20etc. University of Cambridge Language Centre] defines ''Rolong'' as a dialect of Setswana, [https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA10162275_837 an article from Sabinet African Journals] asserts that ''Barolong'' is the plural form of ''Marolong'', both terms referring to the ethnic group. ''Rolong'' appears to be an encompassing term. This article is the only source I have found that states this, though. Nonetheless, thank you for your skepticisim; I am happy to have come across this, and I mean that genuinely. I wonder if the name should be left alone. Or should the plural form be used? <span style="font-family: Arial; background-color:#f7eef1; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">[[User:Sentimental Boulevard|<span style="color: #b04f76">Sentimental Boulevard</span>]] [[User talk:Sentimental Boulevard|<span style="color:#b04f76">✿</span>]]</span> 16:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
:: @[[User:Sentimental Boulevard|Sentimental Boulevard]] Moved to contested due to uncertainty - if you change your mind let us know, or if you're still unsure, a move discussion may bring in enough input to clarify the matter. [[User_talk:Asukite|<span style="color:Purple;font-size:medium;font-family:Bradley Hand ITC"> ASUKITE</span>]] 17:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)


==== Administrator needed ====
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Sirimongkol Singwangcha | 2 = Sirimongkol Singwancha | discuss = yes | reason = Has always been referred to as Sirimongkol Singwancha | sig = [[User:綏靖天皇|綏靖天皇]] ([[User talk:綏靖天皇|talk]]) 14:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = 綏靖天皇}}
<noinclude>{{Hatnote|Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been [[WP:FULL|fully protected]] or [[WP:MOVP|move protected]] (see [[Help:When to place technical requests in "Administrator needed"|this guide]] to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a [[WP:Page mover|page mover]].}}</noinclude>
:*Maybe I'm half blind, but it took me a while to find the difference; the proposal is to change the end of the second word from "wangcha" to "wancha". [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Insert the following code below, filling in page names and reason: {{subst:RMassist| current page title | new title | reason = reason for move}} and enter on a new line, at the bottom of the existing list; do not add spare lines between entries; do not add a bullet point; if you do not wish the request to be converted into an RM if contested, then add |discuss=no -->
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation | 2 = Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation | discuss = | reason = RM closed as moved (uncontested, minimal participation). | sig = [[User:TryKid|TryKid]]&thinsp;<sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[''[[Special:Contributions/TryKid|dubious]] – [[User talk:TryKid|discuss]]'']</sup> 16:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | requester = TryKid}}


:{{ping|Reading Beans}} Is this article move protected? [[User:162 etc.|162 etc.]] ([[User talk:162 etc.|talk]]) 16:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
==== Contested technical requests ====
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Draft:Star Suvarna | 2 = Star Suvarna | discuss = yes | reason = | sig = [[User:Jpsorts|Jpsorts]] ([[User talk:Jpsorts|talk]]) 21:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Jpsorts}}
::This is not an uncontroversial technical request: redirected [[Star Suvarna]] has an edit history back to 2017 including sockpuppetry. I've tagged the draft for a history merge, though it might not be eligible. [[User:Flapjacktastic|Flapjacktastic]] ([[User talk:Flapjacktastic|talk]]) 21:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
* {{RMassist/core | 1 = Fan death | 2 = Fan death theory | discuss = yes | reason = The original Korean name for the subject of the page is "선풍기 사망설", literally meaning "Fan Death Theory". Changing the page name to "Fan death theory" would more accurately reflect what the subject is actually known in South Korea. | sig = [[User:Aceus0shrifter|Aceus0shrifter]] ([[User talk:Aceus0shrifter|talk]]) 14:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC) | requester = Aceus0shrifter}}
::The term "fan death" is quite common in English, with an estimated 210,000 Google hits, and the majority of top hits pertain to this topic, while "fan death theory" gets 51 Ghits. Ghits aren't always a good indicator, especially with historical topics ignored by popular culture, such as ancient Estonian gods (see [[WP:AADP#Google test]]), but for something in current popular culture, Google's a good deal more reliable for determining what's the most common name. In other words, I oppose moving, since "fan death" is the normal name in English. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 22:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

==== Requests to revert undiscussed moves ====
<!-- Insert the following code in the appropriate section, filling in page names and reason:
{{subst:RMassist| current page title | page title to revert to | reason = reason for move}}
---- and enter on a new line, directly below -->

Latest revision as of 17:52, 6 December 2024

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

[edit]

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit]
  • Mulgi language  Mulgi dialect (currently a redirect back to Mulgi language) (move · discuss) – rd holding up move — kwami (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should Võro language also be moved? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit]

Contested technical requests

[edit]
There are some sources that still mention the name as the former title, and there seems to ne by a recent rename. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Quetzal1964 The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. Bensci54 (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes uses Eschmeyer's Catalig of Fishes for its taxonomy below the level of order. SeeWikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Assadzadeh The current name is consistent with Columbus metropolitan area, Georgia, but also I feel that the Ohio page might deserve primary topic for Columbus metropolitan area as it has approximately 5x the views as the Georgia page. An RM would be the best place to discuss this. Bensci54 (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This current name seems to be the result of some 2016 discussion that I am having a hard time finding. Either way, it would need a mass move request or RFC given there are many other articles in the same vein (Rochester metropolitan area, New York among others). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Worth a discussion to see if WP:NOYEAR is met. C F A 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(note that the motion will be voted on in roughly 2 days, after which it will either be moved to "Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol" or "Attempted impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol") charlotte 👸♥ 21:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IUCN Red List calls it "Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus". What gives Eschmeyer priority? The article doesn't even mention Nun galilaeus (except in an infobox and as one of several names in a navbox). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sentimental Boulevard Moved to contested due to uncertainty - if you change your mind let us know, or if you're still unsure, a move discussion may bring in enough input to clarify the matter. ASUKITE 17:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

[edit]
@Reading Beans: Is this article move protected? 162 etc. (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]