User talk:PadmashreeGhangale

Welcome!

Hello, PadmashreeGhangale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Wikipedia:Notability (people) may be of interest. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, PadmashreeGhangale. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Vijay Kumbhar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello C.Fred. My request is on behalf of Vijay Kumbhar to undelete his page. I will not make any edits to his page as I fully understand the conflict of interest policy. His notability is established through several reliable sources. His area of work is instrumental to the citizens of India to access their fundamental right to information. The reasons for undeletion are substantial vs the reasons for deletion. Please review the page and the sources. I do not intend to advertise, publicize, or promote him or his work.

On the one hand, as far as undeleting the page, my answer is no. The community discussed Kumbhar's notability two years ago and found that there was not substantial coverage of him in reliable sources. I do not see any flaws in the deletion discussion.

On the other hand, if Kumbhar has done something to make him a notable person in the past two years, then it may be time to (re)start an article on him. However, rather than create the article outright, I would suggest it start at Draft:Vijay Kumbhar. When/if his notability is demonstrated through coverage in reliable sources, then we could move the page back to the main encyclopedia. However, I don't see anything that tells me an article would be ready for mainspace right now. —C.Fred (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

C.Fred, this one (not enough in itself of course) [1] seems decent to me, what do you think? It's independent of the subject, seems reliable and is more than a passing mention/quote by subject. If we have a few more like that (or better), I think it could work. This Attacks on RTI activists in India may be related. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

This [2] seems ok too. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you C.Fred. May I please request the link to see what reasons and which sources were unreliable or outdated for mainspace? (Sole coverage is trivial and is limited to a few mentions of name in different RS.) RTI activists have been mainspace for decades and are as relevant in society now as they were in the past. This RTI activist has successfully brought a number of companies to justice and has also been harassed for his resolve. The coverage he has received [3] is a full article describing his instrumental role in the incident (by no means trivial). Every article I have submitted for review describes his work as a successful RTI activist in the concerned case. Without his involvment, none of these scams would have been exposed as they were all based on the information he procured. Vijay Kumbhar's recent involvement in activism can be verified through [4] [5] His past achievements are significant as they assisted justice in the Supreme Court of India against [[6]] a Political Leader of Maharashtra [7][8]PadmashreeGhangale (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank youGråbergs Gråa Sång

Dear Vijay Kumbhar has been active as a renowned RTI activist in Pune. Every Sunday there is an informal meet led by Vijay Kumbhar and information about that can also be found in the sources provided. DSK fraud [9]is a recent event in Pune and affects thousands of poor investors who have lost all their money. Vijay Kumbhar and his ongoing work has been covered extensively by news media. His work has brought influential leaders like [10] to justice in the Supreme court. His page on Wikipedia facilitated many citizens in accessing their rights. Since there are very weak reasons to delete this page, I request to undelete the page and edit what may not be relevant. Thank you PadmashreeGhangale (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm NitinMlk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Manohar Joshi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NitinMlk (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Padmashree. My concern was regarding the reference removed by you with this edit, which was later reinstated by me with this edit. That reference is there to show that he self-identifies as a Brahman: this project requires self-identification for caste-related details in BLPs. And, of course, you should give edit summaries, as they are helpful. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijay Kumbhar (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vijay Kumbhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vijay Kumbhar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, PadmashreeGhangale! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi PadmashreeGhangale! You created a thread called Vijay Kumbhar Article for creation at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vijay Kumbhar has been accepted

Vijay Kumbhar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 04:55, 28 August 2019 (UTC)