Jump to content

Comparison of anti-plagiarism software: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted to revision 898849683 by Alexf (talk): Rm entry without article (TW)
stub diffuse
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|none}}

The following tables compare software used for [[plagiarism detection]].
The following tables compare software used for [[plagiarism detection]].


Line 19: Line 21:
|
|
| [[freemium]]<ref>[http://www.copyscape.com/faqs.php#prodiff Copyscape FAQ: "What is the difference between Copyscape Premium and the free Copyscape service?"]. Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| [[freemium]]<ref>[http://www.copyscape.com/faqs.php#prodiff Copyscape FAQ: "What is the difference between Copyscape Premium and the free Copyscape service?"]. Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
|
| Latin
| Latin
| Targeted at website managers.<ref>[http://www.copyscape.com/faqs.php#what Copyscape FAQ: "What is Copyscape used for?"]. Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| Targeted at website managers.<ref>[http://www.copyscape.com/faqs.php#what Copyscape FAQ: "What is Copyscape used for?"]. Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
Line 39: Line 41:
| (free of charge web service)
| (free of charge web service)
| Latin
| Latin
| Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed.<ref>[https://helioblast.heliotext.com/ HelioBlast website], Accessed 2019-02-02.</ref>
| Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed.<ref>[https://helioblast.heliotext.com/ HelioBlast website] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190126064623/https://helioblast.heliotext.com/ |date=2019-01-26 }}, Accessed 2019-02-02.</ref>
|-
|-
! [[iThenticate]]
! [[iThenticate]]
Line 46: Line 48:
| 2017
| 2017
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
|
| Latin
| Latin
|
|
Line 55: Line 57:
|
|
| limited
| limited
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]], On-Premises<ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/en/plagscan-box Plagiarism Detection Within your own Data Processing Center]</ref>
| Latin, Cyrillic & Arabic<ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/en/faqs/search?keys=arabic&faqCategories=All#language-compatibility PlagScan FAQ: "Is it possible to check text in any language?"] Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref><ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/de/pr?11 PlagScan : Kommentar zum Software-Test der HTW 2013] (in German). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| Latin, Cyrillic & Arabic<ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/en/faqs/search?keys=arabic&faqCategories=All#language-compatibility PlagScan FAQ: "Is it possible to check text in any language?"] Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref><ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/de/pr?11 PlagScan : Kommentar zum Software-Test der HTW 2013] (in German). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| Submissions are checked against (public) online documents, a (private) shared repository, and the user's own (private) repository.<ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/en/plagiarism-prevention-pool-ppp Plagiarism Prevention Pool (PPP) | PlagScan]. Accessed 2019-02-05.</ref>
| Submissions are checked against (public) online documents, a (private) shared repository, and the user's own (private) repository.<ref>[https://www.plagscan.com/en/plagiarism-prevention-pool-ppp Plagiarism Prevention Pool (PPP) | PlagScan]. Accessed 2019-02-05.</ref>
Line 64: Line 66:
|
|
| [[freemium]]
| [[freemium]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
|
| Latin, Cyrillic
| Latin, Cyrillic
| Rated as ''"Useless for academic purposes"'' by Plagiats Portal<ref>[http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/ Results of the Plagiarism Detection System Test 2013]; Plagiats Portal. See also [http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/s13-12-plagtracker/ detailed critique of PlagTracker] on Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| Rated as ''"Useless for academic purposes"'' by Plagiats Portal<ref>[http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/ Results of the Plagiarism Detection System Test 2013]; Plagiats Portal. See also [http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/s13-12-plagtracker/ detailed critique of PlagTracker] on Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
Line 73: Line 75:
|
|
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Proprietary software|proprietary]]
| [[Software as a service|SaaS]]
|
| Latin & multiple scripts through translation <ref>[https://help.turnitin.com/feedback-studio/canvas/plagiarism-framework/teacher/assignment-setup/turnitin-settings.htm - Enable Translated Matching]</ref>
| Latin
| Automatically stores uploaded texts (submitted for checking) in its own database.<ref>[http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/s13-not-tested-systems/ Plagiarism Detection Systems Not Tested in 2013], Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| Automatically stores uploaded texts (submitted for checking) in its own database.<ref>[http://plagiat.htw-berlin.de/software-en/test2013/s13-not-tested-systems/ Plagiarism Detection Systems Not Tested in 2013], Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
|-
|-
Line 85: Line 87:
| Latin, Cyrillic
| Latin, Cyrillic
| Pricing "per page" based on 137.5 words per nominal page.<ref>[https://unicheck.com/prices Strong plagiarism finder - Unicheck. Prices] Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
| Pricing "per page" based on 137.5 words per nominal page.<ref>[https://unicheck.com/prices Strong plagiarism finder - Unicheck. Prices] Accessed 2019-02-06.</ref>
|-
|}
|}


Line 96: Line 97:
[[Category:Software law]]
[[Category:Software law]]



{{software-stub}}
{{software-type-stub}}

Latest revision as of 22:11, 26 December 2023

The following tables compare software used for plagiarism detection.

General

[edit]
Software Developer First public release Latest stable version License Deployment options Scripts supported Notes
Copyscape Indigo Stream Technologies, Ltd. 2004 freemium[1] SaaS Latin Targeted at website managers.[2]
Grammarly Grammarly, Inc. 2016 freemium SaaS Latin Checks against ProQuest databases and (public) web pages.[3]
HelioBLAST Virginia Bioinformatics Institute ? (free of charge web service) Latin Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed.[4]
iThenticate iParadigms 2004 2017 proprietary SaaS Latin
PlagScan PlagScan GmbH 2008 limited SaaS, On-Premises[5] Latin, Cyrillic & Arabic[6][7] Submissions are checked against (public) online documents, a (private) shared repository, and the user's own (private) repository.[8]
PlagTracker Devellar 2011 freemium SaaS Latin, Cyrillic Rated as "Useless for academic purposes" by Plagiats Portal[9]
Turnitin iParadigms 1997 proprietary SaaS Latin & multiple scripts through translation [10] Automatically stores uploaded texts (submitted for checking) in its own database.[11]
Unicheck Unicheck 2014 SaaS proprietary SaaS Latin, Cyrillic Pricing "per page" based on 137.5 words per nominal page.[12]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Copyscape FAQ: "What is the difference between Copyscape Premium and the free Copyscape service?". Accessed 2019-02-06.
  2. ^ Copyscape FAQ: "What is Copyscape used for?". Accessed 2019-02-06.
  3. ^ Grammarly: Plagiarism Checker. Accessed 2019-02-08.
  4. ^ HelioBlast website Archived 2019-01-26 at the Wayback Machine, Accessed 2019-02-02.
  5. ^ Plagiarism Detection Within your own Data Processing Center
  6. ^ PlagScan FAQ: "Is it possible to check text in any language?" Accessed 2019-02-06.
  7. ^ PlagScan : Kommentar zum Software-Test der HTW 2013 (in German). Accessed 2019-02-06.
  8. ^ Plagiarism Prevention Pool (PPP) | PlagScan. Accessed 2019-02-05.
  9. ^ Results of the Plagiarism Detection System Test 2013; Plagiats Portal. See also detailed critique of PlagTracker on Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.
  10. ^ - Enable Translated Matching
  11. ^ Plagiarism Detection Systems Not Tested in 2013, Plagiats Portal. Analyses by Debora Weber-Wulff (HTW Berlin). Accessed 2019-02-06.
  12. ^ Strong plagiarism finder - Unicheck. Prices Accessed 2019-02-06.


Stub icon

This article related to a type of software is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_anti-plagiarism_software&oldid=1191971475"