Master Quality Authenticated: Difference between revisions
→List of vendors publicly criticising MQA: Repetition of information in preceding section Tag: section blanking |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Articles containing pro and con lists | #UCB_Category 6/42 |
||
(290 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Audiophile audio processing technology}} |
|||
[[File:MQA_logo_stacked_black200.png|100px|thumbnail|MQA logo]] |
|||
{{Use British English|date=February 2023}} |
|||
'''Master Quality Authenticated''' ('''MQA''') is an [[audio codec]] using [[lossy compression]]<ref name= "benchmark">{{cite web|title=Is MQA DOA?|url= http://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/163302855-is-mqa-doa|accessdate=3 February 2017 |quote= 'MQA is not lossless.'}}</ref> and a form of [[Cryptographic hash function |file fingerprinting]], intended for [[high fidelity]]{{cn|date=July 2019}} [[digital audio]] [[internet streaming]] and file [[download]].<ref name= "radding">{{cite web|last1= Radding |first1=Ben |title= Studio-Quality Music Streaming Coming Soon From MQA |url= https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2497612,00.asp |website= PC Mag |publisher=Ziff Davis |accessdate= 15 April 2016 |quote= 'MQA is a digital encoding and playback service, standing for Master Quality Authenticated, which aims to deliver master studio quality sound in a file that's small enough to stream or download.'}}</ref> Launched in 2014 by [[Meridian Audio]], it is now owned and licensed by MQA Ltd, which was founded by Bob Stuart, co-founder of Meridian Audio. |
|||
{{Infobox file format |
|||
| icon = File:MQA logo stacked black200.png |
|||
| extension = |
|||
| developer = MQA Ltd. |
|||
| type = Audio file format |
|||
| url = https://mqa.co.uk/ |
|||
}} |
|||
'''Master Quality Authenticated''' ('''MQA''') is a [[Proprietary software|proprietary]] system for delivering high-quality [[digital audio]]. The system includes [[audio signal processing]], [[audio compression (data)|lossy audio compression]] and [[authentication]]. MQA requires licensing fees to use. The system was launched in 2014 by [[Meridian Audio]], and is now owned by Lenbrook. |
|||
The MQA system is a three-part process applied to digital audio music recordings consisting of: 1) modifying and controlling the [[Master Quality Authenticated#Audio signal processing description|end-to-end digital filter response]];<ref name="MQA: Questions and Answers Some Real-World Comparisons">{{cite web|title= MQA: Questions and Answers Some Real-World Comparisons|url=https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-questions-and-answers-some-real-world-comparisons|website=Stereophile.com|date=11 August 2016|publisher=Stereophile|access-date=11 August 2016|archive-date=14 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160814182806/http://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-questions-and-answers-some-real-world-comparisons|url-status=live}}</ref> 2) preparing the audio for transfer to a smartphone or audio device using a [[Master Quality Authenticated#Codec description|lossy audio compression]] format with [[Master Quality Authenticated#Authentication description|authentication]]; and 3) [[Master Quality Authenticated#Codec description|decompressing]] the recording for playback.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-06-15 |title=What is MQA? The digital audio format explained |url=https://www.trustedreviews.com/explainer/what-is-mqa-2932975 |access-date=2022-07-01 |website=Trusted Reviews |language=en |archive-date=2022-08-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220831152410/https://www.trustedreviews.com/explainer/what-is-mqa-2932975 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
There has been controversy regarding several aspects of MQA. These aspects include but are not limited to: whether the audio signal processing improves or degrades the sound quality, whether the lossy audio compression degrades the sound quality, the utility of the authentication function, and the effect of licensing fees on music recording and playback businesses. |
|||
== History == |
== History == |
||
The press launch of MQA was held in December 2014 in London,<ref name="hificritic_mqa_shard_dec2014">{{cite news|title=Meridian Launch MQA 'Master Quality Authenticated' Audio Format|url=http://www.hificritic.com/blog/-meridian-launch-mqa-master-quality-authenticated-audio-format|access-date=11 May 2016|publisher=HiFiCritic.com|date=7 December 2014|archive-date=5 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160605132403/http://www.hificritic.com/blog/-meridian-launch-mqa-master-quality-authenticated-audio-format|url-status=live}}</ref> followed by the company hosting a demonstration room at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January 2015.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Waldrep|first1=Mark|title=MQA at CES 2015: Part II Listening|url=http://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=4036|website=Real HD Audio|date=12 January 2015 |access-date=11 May 2016|ref=Waldrep|archive-date=5 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160605092553/http://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=4036|url-status=live}}</ref> The initial hardware manufacturers which offered MQA decoding were Pioneer, Onkyo, and Mytek.<ref name="audioxpress4jan16">{{cite web|last1=audioXpress Staff|title=Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) Launches Major Partnerships and New Development Platforms at CES 2016|url=http://www.audioxpress.com/article/Master-Quality-Authenticated-MQA-Launches-Major-Partnerships-and-New-Development-Platforms-at-CES-2016|website=audioXpress|access-date=13 May 2016|archive-date=10 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160610222825/http://www.audioxpress.com/article/Master-Quality-Authenticated-MQA-Launches-Major-Partnerships-and-New-Development-Platforms-at-CES-2016|url-status=live}}</ref> In May 2016, Warner Music Group signed a long-term licensing deal with MQA.<ref name="mbw-warner-becomes-first-major-sign-deal-hd-music-firm-mqa">{{cite web|title=Warner becomes first major to sign deal with HD music firm MQA|url=http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-becomes-first-major-sign-deal-hd-music-firm-mqa/|website=Music Business Worldwide|date=8 May 2016|access-date=11 May 2016|archive-date=12 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160512184513/http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-becomes-first-major-sign-deal-hd-music-firm-mqa|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="MQA confirms Sony Music and Merlin as hi-res audio partners">{{cite web|title=MQA confirms Sony Music and Merlin as hi-res audio partners|url=https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-confirms-sony-music-and-merlin-hi-res-audio-partners|website=whathifi.com|date=16 May 2017|publisher=Stereophile|access-date=16 May 2017|archive-date=17 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170517060657/https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-confirms-sony-music-and-merlin-hi-res-audio-partners|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
Announcement of MQA was made on 4 December 2014 at a launch held at [[The Shard]] in London,<ref name="hificritic_mqa_shard_dec2014">{{cite news|title=Meridian Launch MQA 'Master Quality Authenticated' Audio Format|url= http://www.hificritic.com/blog/-meridian-launch-mqa-master-quality-authenticated-audio-format|accessdate=11 May 2016|publisher=HiFiCritic.com|date=7 December 2014}}</ref> although the concepts underpinning the development had previously been the subject of a presentation to the Audio Engineering Society British Section (10 June 2014)<ref name="stuart_craven_aesuk2014">{{cite web|last1=Stuart, Craven|first1=J Robert, Peter|title=High Resolution: Capturing the Moment|url= http://www.aes-uk.org/forthcoming-meetings/high-resolution-capturing-the-moment/|website=Audio Engineering Society UK|publisher=AES British Section|accessdate=11 May 2016}}</ref> and a paper (published 8 October 2014) presented at the Audio Engineering Society 137th Convention in Los Angeles, CA in October 2014.<ref name="stuart&craven_aes2014">{{cite web|last1=Stuart, Craven|first1=J Robert, Peter|title=A Hierarchical Approach to Archiving and Distribution|url= http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17501 |website=Audio Engineering Society|publisher=Audio Engineering Society Inc|accessdate=11 May 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The [[RIAA]] announced in May 2016 that [[MPEG-4 SLS]] and MQA were eligible to use the ''Hi-Res MUSIC'' logo on their products;<ref name="riaa-hires-mqa">{{cite web|last1=RIAA News|title=HI-RES MUSIC INITIATIVE EXPANDS TO INCLUDE MUSIC STREAMING SERVICES|url=https://www.riaa.com/hi-res-music-initiative-expands-to-include-music-streaming-services/|website=Recording Industry Association of America|date=11 May 2016|publisher=RIAA|access-date=19 May 2016|archive-date=18 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160518150123/http://www.riaa.com/hi-res-music-initiative-expands-to-include-music-streaming-services/|url-status=live}}</ref> the latter despite the logo being intended for ''lossless audio'' recordings.<ref>{{cite web |title=High Resolution Audio Initiative Gets Major Boost with New "Hi-Res MUSIC" Logo and Branding Materials for Digital Retailers |url=https://www.riaa.com/high-resolution-audio-initiative-gets-major-boost-with-new-hi-res-music-logo-and-branding-materials-for-digital-retailers/ |website=RIAA |access-date=8 January 2022 |date=23 June 2015 |archive-date=4 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190504122117/https://www.riaa.com/high-resolution-audio-initiative-gets-major-boost-with-new-hi-res-music-logo-and-branding-materials-for-digital-retailers/ |url-status=live }}</ref> By 2017, music distribution companies Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group, Sony Music and Merlin Network had agreed to make some of their recordings in MQA format.<ref>{{cite news |last1=May 2017 |first1=Joe Cox 16 |title=Home |url=https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-confirms-sony-music-and-merlin-hi-res-audio-partners |work=whathifi |date=16 May 2017 |language=en |access-date=17 September 2021 |archive-date=17 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210917224608/https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-confirms-sony-music-and-merlin-hi-res-audio-partners |url-status=live }}</ref> Xiami Music began offering MQA streaming via its SVIP pricing tier in July 2019; however, the music service was discontinued in February 2021.<ref>{{cite news |title=Alibaba-owned Xiami Music partners with HD audio firm MQA |url=https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/alibaba-owned-xiami-music-partners-with-hd-audio-firm-mqa/ |work=[[Music Business Worldwide]] |date=16 July 2019 |access-date=17 September 2021 |archive-date=17 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210917230110/https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/alibaba-owned-xiami-music-partners-with-hd-audio-firm-mqa/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
MQA was demonstrated to visitors to the [[Consumer Electronics Show]] in Las Vegas in January 2015.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Waldrep|first1=Mark|title=MQA at CES 2015: Part II Listening|url= http://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=4036 |website=Real HD Audio|publisher=Real HD Audio|accessdate=11 May 2016|ref=Waldrep}}</ref> Several download/streaming services, playback system manufacturers and record labels have subsequently announced support for the technology, including [[Pioneer Corporation]], [[Onkyo]], [[Meridian Audio]], [[7digital]], Norwegian label Lindberg Lyd (2L), Mytek and others,<ref name="audioxpress4jan16">{{cite web|last1=audioXpress Staff|title=Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) Launches Major Partnerships and New Development Platforms at CES 2016|url= http://www.audioxpress.com/article/Master-Quality-Authenticated-MQA-Launches-Major-Partnerships-and-New-Development-Platforms-at-CES-2016|website=audioXpress|publisher=audioXpress|accessdate=13 May 2016}}</ref> with [[Warner Music Group]] announcing the signing of a "long-term licensing deal" with MQA at the Munich High End show in May 2016.<ref name="mbw">{{cite web|last1=Music Business Worldwide|title=Warner becomes first major to sign deal with HD music firm MQA|url= http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/warner-becomes-first-major-sign-deal-hd-music-firm-mqa/ |website=Music Business Worldwide|publisher=Music Business Worldwide|accessdate=11 May 2016}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In March 2018, an MQA Live encoder box was released, which is intended for live music concerts to be streamed using the MQA compression algorithm.<ref name=promises>{{cite web |url=https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-live-promises-original-quality-real-time-concert-streams |title=MQA Live promises "original quality" real-time concert streams |last=Roberts |first=Becky |date=Mar 19, 2018 |website=What Hi Fi? |access-date=December 18, 2018 |archive-date=December 19, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181219043950/https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-live-promises-original-quality-real-time-concert-streams |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
In May 2016, the Recording Industry Association of America ([[RIAA]]), in cooperation with the [[Recording Academy]] Producers & Engineers Wing, the American Association of Independent Music ([[A2IM]]), and DEG: The Digital Entertainment Group, announced that services providing music encoded in MQA are eligible to carry the industry's official logo mark for "Hi-Res MUSIC".<ref name="riaa-hires-mqa">{{cite web|last1=RIAA News|title=HI-RES MUSIC INITIATIVE EXPANDS TO INCLUDE MUSIC STREAMING SERVICES|url= https://www.riaa.com/hi-res-music-initiative-expands-to-include-music-streaming-services/ |website=Recording Industry Association of America|publisher=RIAA|accessdate=19 May 2016}}</ref> |
|||
In April 2021, internet radio station [[Radio Paradise]] began offering MQA on its channels.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stone |first1=Mary |title=MQA, BluOS and Radio Paradise bring hi-res audio to internet radio |url=https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-bluos-and-radio-paradise-bring-hi-res-audio-to-internet-radio |work=[[What Hi-Fi?]] |date=31 March 2021 |language=en |access-date=17 September 2021 |archive-date=17 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210917225019/https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-bluos-and-radio-paradise-bring-hi-res-audio-to-internet-radio |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In March 2018, |
||
In May 2021, the [[Apple Music]] streaming service announced a ''Lossless Audio'' pricing tier, which was described as a "death knell" for MQA.<ref>{{cite web |title=Apple Lossless Audio is Death Knell for MQA – Real HD-Audio |url=https://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=7274 |website=www.realhd-audio.com | date=18 June 2021 |access-date=8 January 2022 |archive-date=11 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111091706/https://www.realhd-audio.com/?p=7274 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
In September 2022, online mastering service Masterchannel added MQA encoding to its suite of tools. The automated mastering is based on machine learning, and the MQA encoding process is applied after mastering.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-09-12 |title=Masterchannel Blog - Partnership Announcement – Masterchannel Adds MQA Encoding to Mastering Tool |url=https://blog.masterchannel.ai/press-release-partner-announcement-mqa/ |access-date=2022-11-28 |website=Masterchannel Blog |language=en-US |archive-date=2022-11-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221128140419/https://blog.masterchannel.ai/press-release-partner-announcement-mqa/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In the same month, Alpine Alps became the first aftermarket car audio company with full TIDAL integration. Head units are capable of MQA Core decoding when playing TIDAL Masters.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mitchell |first=Brian |date=2022-09-13 |title=TIDAL Music Streaming Comes to Alpine Car Audio |url=https://www.ecoustics.com/news/alpine-tidal/ |access-date=2022-11-28 |website=ecoustics.com |language=en-US |archive-date=2022-11-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221128140420/https://www.ecoustics.com/news/alpine-tidal/ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
<p id="SCL6">On November 9, 2022, MQA announced a new product called MQair,<ref>{{cite web |title=Introducing a new technology from MQA |url=https://www.mqa.co.uk/newsroom/news/MQair |access-date=9 November 2022 |url-status=live |archive-date=24 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724134955/https://www.mqa.co.uk/newsroom/news/scl6 }}</ref> which is a hi-res wireless audio codec. Coinciding with the announcement, the Japan Audio Society (JAS) also released a statement certifying MQair with the "Hi-Res AUDIO WIRELESS" logo.<ref>{{cite web |title="Hi-Res AUDIO WIRELESS" Two new codecs added to "Hi-Res AUDIO WIRELESS" logo's certified codecs. |url=https://www.jas-audio.or.jp/news/post17967 |access-date=9 November 2022 |url-status=live |archive-date=24 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724134956/https://www.jas-audio.or.jp/news/post17967 }}</ref> MQair is the fourth codec to receive this, alongside [[LC3 (codec)|LC3plus]], [[LHDC (codec)|LHDC]] and [[LDAC (codec)|LDAC]]. MQAir is also known by the technical name [[SCL6 (codec)|SCL6]] which stands for the sixth generation of scalable codec developed by MQA. MQair is agnostic and can handle files from almost any music streaming service. It can unfold regular MQA files and regular PCM music files. The technology supports both MQA and PCM audio up to stereo 384 kHz, with the encoded data rate able to be scaled seamlessly from {{nowrap|20 Mbit/s}} to below {{nowrap|200 kbit/s}}. This makes MQair suitable for use over Bluetooth, Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and Wi-Fi.<ref>{{cite web |title=MQA Says It's Cracked The Streaming Of Hi-Res Audio Over Bluetooth |website=[[Forbes]] |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/marksparrow/2022/11/09/mqa-says-its-cracked-the-streaming-of-hi-res-audio-over-bluetooth/?sh=61133220114e |access-date=9 November 2022 |url-status=live |archive-date=24 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135011/https://gum.criteo.com/syncframe?origin=publishertag&topUrl=www.forbes.com }}</ref> MQair can be enabled via a firmware update on existing headphones, scales in realtime and works up to 10 meters.<ref>{{cite web |title=MQA Introduces MQair for Wireless Hi-Res Audio Music Streaming |date=9 November 2022 |url=https://www.ecoustics.com/news/mqair-introduced/ |access-date=9 November 2022 |url-status=live |archive-date=24 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135002/https://www.ecoustics.com/news/mqair-introduced/ }}</ref> MQAir was subsequently renamed AIRIA.</p> |
|||
On 3 April 2023, MQA Limited, the company behind MQA had gone into [[Administration (law)|administration]]. The primary streaming service providing MQA format music, Tidal, subsequently began offering high-resolution PCM in addition to MQA in their HiFi Plus tier.<ref>{{cite web|date=April 2023|url=https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-is-going-into-administration|title=MQA is going into administration|access-date=2023-04-07|archive-date=2023-04-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230407150620/https://www.whathifi.com/news/mqa-is-going-into-administration|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=April 2023|url=https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4324214|title=MQA LIMITED - Appointment of Administrators|access-date=2023-04-07|archive-date=2023-07-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135004/https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4324214|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
On 19 September 2023, Lenbrook acquired MQA Limited's assets.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Walker |first=Kevin |date=2023-09-19 |title=Lenbrook Extends Leadership in Hi-Res Audio with MQA Acquisition |url=https://lenbrook.com/lenbrook-extends-leadership-in-hi-res-audio-with-mqa-acquisition/ |access-date=2023-09-19 |website=The Lenbrook Group of Companies |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
On 13 June 2024, Lenbrook announced a partnership with HDTracks to create a music streaming service that will give customers a choice of MQA or PCM formats.<ref>{{cite press release |date=2024-06-13 |title= LENBROOK MEDIA GROUP PARTNERS WITH HDTRACKS TO CREATE STREAMING SERVICE FOR MUSIC ENTHUSIASTS AND AUDIOPHILES |url=https://lenbrookmediagroup.com/lenbrook-media-group-partners-with-hdtracks-to-create-streaming-service-for-music-enthusiasts-and-audiophiles/ |access-date=2024-06-16 |website=The Lenbrook Group of Companies |language=en-US}}</ref> |
|||
As of July 24, 2024, [[Tidal (service)|Tidal]] streaming service dropped support of MQA in favor of [[FLAC]], a [[Lossless Audio|lossless]] and [[open source]] format.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-08-15 |title=Audio Format Updates – TIDAL Support |url=https://support.tidal.com/hc/en-us/articles/25876825185425-Audio-Format-Updates |access-date=2024-10-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240815173808/https://support.tidal.com/hc/en-us/articles/25876825185425-Audio-Format-Updates |archive-date=2024-08-15 }}</ref> |
|||
== Codec description == |
== Codec description == |
||
{{missing information|section|how metadata such as the fingerprint and the source sample rate is stored in the LPCM output|date=November 2021}} |
|||
MQA encoding is [[lossy]];<ref>{{cite web|last1=Darko|first1=John|title=An inconvenient truth: MQA sounds better!|url= http://www.digitalaudioreview.net/2016/06/an-inconvenient-truth-mqa-sounds-better/ |website=Digital Audio Review|publisher=DAR|accessdate=23 August 2016|quote=the MQA encoding process is lossy – it is no longer the studio master as archived by the record label}}</ref> it hierarchically compresses the relatively little energy in the higher frequency bands into data streams that are embedded in the lower frequency bands using proprietary dithering techniques. |
|||
MQA encoding is [[lossy]];<ref>{{cite web|last1=Darko|first1=John|title=An inconvenient truth: MQA sounds better!|date=June 2016|url=https://darko.audio/2016/06/an-inconvenient-truth-mqa-sounds-better/|access-date=27 May 2020|quote=the MQA encoding process is lossy – it is no longer the studio master as archived by the record label|archive-date=11 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811003404/https://darko.audio/2016/06/an-inconvenient-truth-mqa-sounds-better/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name= "benchmark">{{cite web|title= Is MQA DOA?|url= http://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/163302855-is-mqa-doa|access-date= 3 February 2017|quote= 'MQA is not lossless.'|archive-date= 30 June 2017|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170630150850/https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/163302855-is-mqa-doa|url-status= live}}</ref> it hierarchically compresses the relatively little energy in the higher frequency bands into data streams that are embedded in the lower frequency bands using proprietary [[Dither#Digital audio|dithering]] techniques, allowing for an apparent reduction in [[sample rate]] and hence file size. |
|||
After a series of such "origami" manipulations,<ref name="MQA: Questions and Answers Tutorial: Music Origami">{{cite web|title=MQA: Questions and Answers Tutorial: Music Origami|url=https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-questions-and-answers-tutorial-music-origami|website=Stereophile.com|date=11 August 2016|publisher=Stereophile|access-date=11 August 2016|archive-date=14 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160814182806/http://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-questions-and-answers-tutorial-music-origami|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=MQA 192k / 96k There and back again |url=http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/MQA/origami/ThereAndBack.html |website=www.audiomisc.co.uk |access-date=10 January 2022 |archive-date=15 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210515071657/http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/MQA/origami/ThereAndBack.html |url-status=live }}</ref> a dithered and shaped version of the original audio, together with a ''touchup'' stream (the compressed difference between the original and modified streams), are distributed as a single 24-bit stream, with the most significant bits occupied by [[PCM]] audio compatible with non-MQA playback equipment. Depending on the implementation, as few as 13 bits may be reserved for PCM audio, with the lower-order bits rendered as noise by equipment without an MQA decoder.<ref>{{cite web|last=Harrison|first=Andrew|title=MQA explained: Everything you need to know about high-res audio|date=2 May 2017|url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/05/mqa-explained-everything-you-need-to-know-about-high-res-audio/4/|access-date=26 May 2021|archive-date=26 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210526175436/https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/05/mqa-explained-everything-you-need-to-know-about-high-res-audio/4/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
After a series of such manipulations, the resulting 44 kHz data, the layered data streams, and a final "touchup" stream (compressed difference between the lossy signal from unpacking all layers and the original) are provided to the playback device. |
|||
Given the low amount of energy expected in higher frequencies, and using only 1 extra frequency band layer (upper 44 kHz band of 96/24 packed into dither of 48/16) and one touchup stream (compressed difference between original 96/24 and 48/16) are together distributed as a 48/24 stream, of which 48/16 bit-decimated part can be played by normal 48/16 playback equipment. |
|||
⚫ | MQA-encoded audio can be contained with file formats such as [[FLAC]], [[Apple Lossless|ALAC]] or [[CD-DA]]; hence, it can be played back on systems either with or without an MQA decoder. In the latter case, the resulting audio contains high-frequency noise occupying the three least-significant bits, thus limiting playback on non-MQA devices effectively to 13 bits. Despite this, MQA claims that the quality is higher than a conventional 16-bit recording, because of the novel sampling and convolution processes.<ref name="ccc">{{cite web|author=Christoph Engemann |author2=Anton Schlesinger |title=MQA - A clever stealth DRM-Trojan|publisher=[[Chaos Computer Club|media.ccc.de]]|work=34C3|type=video|date=2017-12-30|url=https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-9113-mqa_-_a_clever_stealth_drm-trojan|id=YouTube tGJ5eW-gBxA|access-date=2018-01-01|archive-date=2018-01-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180101082433/https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-9113-mqa_-_a_clever_stealth_drm-trojan|url-status=live}}</ref> Other than the sampling and convolution methods, which were not explained by MQA in detail, the encoding process is similar to that used in [[XRCD]] and [[HDCD]]. |
||
One more difference to standard formats is the sampling process. The audio stream is sampled and convolved with a [[triangle function]], and interpolated later during playback. The techniques employed, including the sampling of signals with a finite rate of innovation, were developed by a number of researchers over the preceding decade, including Pier Luigi Dragotti and others.<ref name="dragotti">{{cite web|last1=Dragotti|first1=Pier Luigi|title=Sparse Sampling: Theory and Applications|url= https://www.commsp.ee.ic.ac.uk/~pld/talks/ICMS09.pdf|publisher=Imperial College London|date=November 24, 2009|accessdate=11 March 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Oñativia|first1=J|last2=Dragotti|first2=PL|title=Sparse sampling: theory, methods and an application in neuroscience.|journal=Biological Cybernetics|date=February 2015|volume=109|issue=1|pages=125–39|doi=10.1007/s00422-014-0639-x|pmid=25452206|pmc=4315512}}</ref> |
|||
In addition to the compressed audio data, the codec also carries meta-data for [[Master Quality Authenticated#Authentication description|authentication]] and [[Master Quality Authenticated#Audio signal processing description|playback filter control]]. The authentication meta-data instructs the decoder that the file contains MQA format and identifies basic or "Studio" certification which may be indicated on the playback device. The playback filter control meta-data instructs the playback device on which filter to use for reconstruction of the analogue waveform. |
|||
⚫ | MQA-encoded |
||
Unlike popular lossy compression formats like [[MP3]], [[Advanced Audio Coding|AAC]] and [[Windows Media Audio|WMA]] that use perceptual encoding based on psychoacoustic models, the lossy encoding method of MQA is similar to [[aptX]], [[LDAC (codec)|LDAC]] and [[WavPack]] Hybrid Lossy, which uses time-domain [[ADPCM]] and bitrate reduction. Although MQA compression is lossy, it is claimed to be [[Transparency (data compression)|audibly transparent]].<ref name="sos">{{cite web|last1=Robjohns|first1=Hugh|title= MQA Time-domain Accuracy & Digital Audio Quality|url= https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/mqa-time-domain-accuracy-digital-audio-quality|website=soundonsound.com|date=August 2016|publisher= Sound On Sound|archive-date=10 March 2023|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230310175409/https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/mqa-time-domain-accuracy-digital-audio-quality|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/mqa-deep-dive-i-published-music-on-tidal-to-test-mqa.22549/page-123#post-798226 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210605231841/https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/mqa-deep-dive-i-published-music-on-tidal-to-test-mqa.22549/page-123#post-798226|title=MQA Deep Dive - I published music on tidal to test MQA|last=Majidimehr|first=Amir|year=2021|work=Audio Science Review|access-date=5 June 2021|archive-date=5 June 2021}}{{self-published inline|date=July 2023}}</ref> |
|||
Other than the sampling and convolution methods, which were not explained by MQA in detail, the encoding process is similar to that used in [[XRCD]] and [[HDCD]]. |
|||
== Audio signal processing description == |
|||
However, unlike other lossy compression formats like [[MP3]] and [[Windows Media Audio|WMA]], the lossy encoding method of MQA is similar to [[aptX]], [[LDAC_(codec)|LDAC]] and [[WavPack]] Hybrid Lossy, which uses time-domain [[ADPCM]] and bitrate reduction instead of perceptual encoding based on psychoacoustic models. |
|||
MQA processes the digital audio recording to alter the [[impulse response]] of the end-to-end filter chain from recording and production to playback. This is described as changing the [[time domain]] response similar to that of sound passing through less than 20 meters of air.<ref name="MQA: Questions and Answers Some Real-World Comparisons"/> The MQA filter response process starts with the [[Analog-to-digital converter|ADC]], either by a known make and model or by analyzing artifacts in the recording, and ends with control of the filter in the playback [[Digital-to-analog converter|DAC]].<ref>{{cite web|last1=Darko|first1=John|title=An inconvenient truth: MQA sounds better!|date=June 2016|url=https://darko.audio/2016/06/an-inconvenient-truth-mqa-sounds-better/|access-date=27 May 2020|archive-date=11 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200811003404/https://darko.audio/2016/06/an-inconvenient-truth-mqa-sounds-better/|url-status=live}}</ref> It is common for consumer DACs to include user selectable filters, including [[apodization filter]]s intended to improve time domain [[transient response]] without knowledge of the production filters, whereas MQA controls the DAC filter to complete the MQA designed end-to-end time domain filter response.<ref name="sos" /> |
|||
== Authentication description == |
|||
The MQA processed file contains an authentication function that indicates if the file is in the MQA format or not. There are two defined categories of MQA authentication: "MQA" (which may be indicated with a green light) meaning that the file has not been altered since creation, and "MQA Studio" (which may be indicated with a blue light) additionally means that someone representing the studio or artist validated that the file is an approved version. One claimed intent of the MQA authentication feature is to assure that the recording is genuine and unadulterated from the MQA processed [[Mastering (audio)|studio master recording]],<ref>{{Cite web |title=MQA Authentication |url=https://bobtalks.co.uk/blog/mqa-philosophy/mqa-authentication-and-quality/ |access-date=2023-09-12 |website=bobtalks.co.uk |date=28 January 2017 |language=en |archive-date=2023-02-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230220190921/https://bobtalks.co.uk/blog/mqa-philosophy/mqa-authentication-and-quality/ |url-status=live}}</ref> though the veracity of this authentication has been called into question.<ref name="Wilson">{{Cite web|last=Wilson|first=Trav|title=The Roiling MQA Debate: A Sound Quality Test on TIDAL That Leaves More Questions than Answers - Headphonesty|date=10 May 2021 |url=https://www.headphonesty.com/2021/05/tidal-mqa-golden-sound-debate/|access-date=2021-05-12|language=en-US|archive-date=2021-05-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512164841/https://www.headphonesty.com/2021/05/tidal-mqa-golden-sound-debate/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
== Reception == |
== Reception == |
||
{{pro and con list|section|date=February 2024}} |
|||
While the technology has received little comment in the general and mainstream press, it has been exalted by the audiophile and hi-fi press. Robert Harley, editor of [[The Absolute Sound]] has referred to it as "The most significant audio technology of my lifetime".<ref name="harley_tas_may2016">{{cite web|last1=Harley|first1=Robert|title=Master Quality Authenticated (MQA): The View From 30,000 Feet|url= http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/master-quality-authenticated-mqa-the-view-from-30000-feet/ |website=The Absolute Sound|publisher=The Absolute Sound|accessdate=11 May 2016}}</ref> Editor John Atkinson writing in [[Stereophile]] magazine following the UK launch in December 2014 wrote "In almost 40 years of attending audio press events, only rarely have I come away feeling that I was present at the birth of a new world."<ref name="atkinson_stereophile_dec2014">{{cite web|last1=Atkinson|first1=John|title=I've Heard the Future of Streaming: Meridian's MQA|url= http://www.stereophile.com/content/ive-heard-future-streaming-meridians-mqa#EMBiCMyqVh6oQPBg.97 |website=Stereophile|publisher=Stereophile|accessdate=11 May 2016}}</ref> |
|||
== |
=== Positive === |
||
Robert Harley, editor of ''[[The Absolute Sound]]'' stated in March 2016 that MQA "will forever change the way we and future generations consider digital audio".<ref name="harley_tas_may2016">{{cite web|last1=Harley|first1=Robert|title=Master Quality Authenticated (MQA): The View From 30,000 Feet|url=http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/master-quality-authenticated-mqa-the-view-from-30000-feet/|website=The Absolute Sound|access-date=11 May 2016|archive-date=27 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160427124520/http://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/master-quality-authenticated-mqa-the-view-from-30000-feet/|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
MQA has received criticism from various sources within the music industry. |
|||
John Atkinson, editor of ''[[Stereophile]]'' stated the following about the launch of MQA in December 2014 "In almost 40 years of attending audio press events, only rarely have I come away feeling that I was present at the birth of a new world."<ref name="atkinson_stereophile_dec2014">{{cite web|last1=Atkinson|first1=John|title=I've Heard the Future of Streaming: Meridian's MQA|url=http://www.stereophile.com/content/ive-heard-future-streaming-meridians-mqa#EMBiCMyqVh6oQPBg.97|website=Stereophile|date=21 December 2014|access-date=11 May 2016|archive-date=29 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160529193400/http://www.stereophile.com/content/ive-heard-future-streaming-meridians-mqa#EMBiCMyqVh6oQPBg.97|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | Audio product manufacturer Schiit Audio announced that it will not be supporting MQA due |
||
In the 2L Records 2015 announcement of an MQA remastered release of piano recordings, company owner [[Morten Lindberg (sound engineer)|Morten Lindberg]] stated "I have spent many hours with Bob listening to original recordings and being constantly amazed by the incredible sense of space and clarity brought by MQA", in comparison to the drawbacks and weaknesses of the early digital technology originally used for the recordings.<ref name="Morten Lindberg speaks about MQA">{{cite web|title=Morten Lindberg speaks about MQA|url=https://www.monoandstereo.com/2016/01/morten-lindberg-speaks-about-mqa.html|website=monoandstereo.com|date=January 2016|access-date=2022-01-21|archive-date=2022-01-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220121150547/https://www.monoandstereo.com/2016/01/morten-lindberg-speaks-about-mqa.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In a blog post |
||
In the [[Atlantic Records]] announcement that it would sell records using the MQA format, CEO Craig Kallman stated in May 2016 that "MQA makes high-resolution music easy to stream or download to any device. Music fans will love it when they hear it, and WMG is thrilled to be partnering with MQA to take the next step in bringing hi-res music to consumers around the globe".<ref name="Warner Music Group becomes the first big label to adopt MQA">{{cite web|title=Warner Music Group becomes the first big label to adopt MQA|url=https://www.whathifi.com/news/warner-music-group-becomes-first-big-label-to-adopt-mqa|website=whathifi.com|date=6 May 2016|publisher=What Hi-Fi?|access-date=6 May 2016|archive-date=7 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160507120853/http://www.whathifi.com/news/warner-music-group-becomes-first-big-label-to-adopt-mqa|url-status=live}}</ref> Similarly, when [[Universal Music Group]] announced in February 2017 that they would be selling songs in MQA format, company executive Michael Nash stated "with MQA, we are working with a partner whose technology is among the best solutions for streaming high-res audio, and one that doesn't ask music fans to compromise on sound quality for convenience".<ref name="Universal second major to sign licensing deal with HD music firm MQA">{{cite web|title=Universal second major to sign licensing deal with HD music firm MQA|url=https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/universal-second-major-sign-deal-hd-music-firm-mqa/|website=musicbusinessworldwide.com|date=16 February 2017|publisher=Music Business Worldwide|access-date=16 February 2017|archive-date=21 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170221142206/http://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/universal-second-major-sign-deal-hd-music-firm-mqa|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In an interview for online publication Positive Feedback, engineer Andreas Koch is critical of MQA due to its lossy algorithms and compression, along with its licensing requirements; also saying that a format such as this "does not solve any problem that the world currently has."<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Koch|first1=Andreas|url= |
||
=== Negative === |
|||
An article titled Digital Done Wrong |
An article titled "Digital Done Wrong" on the International Audio/Video Review website concluded that MQA is founded on a fundamentally unsound understanding of correct digital audio processing and found that playback of a sample MQA encoding demonstrated gross distortion and reconstruction failure. It did, however, comment that some listeners may find the technical defects of MQA encoding subjectively pleasing.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iar-80.com/page170.html|title=Digital Done Wrong|website=International Audio/Video Review|access-date=18 April 2018|archive-date=19 April 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180419053559/http://www.iar-80.com/page170.html|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
Singer and musician [[Neil Young]] has expressed dislike for the MQA format, saying the masters are "degraded and manipulated" when encoded to MQA and has consequently removed his music from [[Tidal (service)|Tidal]], after finding out that his catalogue on the service was encoded in MQA without his permission, criticizing Warner Music Group (which owns [[Reprise Records]] that Young has released most of his catalogue through) for encoding music whose masters are no better than CD-quality in MQA. He also characterizes the format as a way to collect royalties.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Tidal Misleading Listeners|url=https://neilyoungarchives.com/news/1/article?id=Tidal-Misleading-Listeners|website=Neil Young Archives|language=en-US|access-date=2021-09-01|archive-date=2021-09-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210901045442/https://neilyoungarchives.com/news/1/article?id=Tidal-Misleading-Listeners|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | Some critical comments have been made in online forums such as the Audiophile Style forum<ref>{{cite web|url= |
||
⚫ | Some critical comments have been made in online forums such as the Audiophile Style forum<ref>{{cite web|url=https://audiophilestyle.com/blogs/entry/466-some-analysis-and-comparison-of-mqa-encoded-flac-vs-normal-optimized-hires-flac/|title=Some analysis and comparison of MQA encoded FLAC vs normal optimized hires FLAC|website=Audiophile Style|last1=Miska|date=11 January 2016 |access-date=11 May 2016|archive-date=2 April 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402221642/https://audiophilestyle.com/blogs/entry/466-some-analysis-and-comparison-of-mqa-encoded-flac-vs-normal-optimized-hires-flac/|url-status=live}}</ref> and in audio magazine website comments, and a few writers have expressed concern in some areas. Over 80 detailed questions, some of which voiced these concerns, were submitted to the editors of the Audiophile Style forum and subsequently addressed in detail by the creator of MQA, Bob Stuart, in an extended question-and-answer article.<ref name="computer_audiophile_QA">{{cite web|url=https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/ca-academy/A-Comprehensive-Q-A-With-MQA-s-Bob-Stuart/|title=A Comprehensive Q&A With MQA's Bob Stuart|website=Audiophile Style|last1=Stuart|first1=Bob|date=8 April 2016 |access-date=11 May 2016|archive-date=30 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330204757/https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/ca-academy/A-Comprehensive-Q-A-With-MQA-s-Bob-Stuart/|url-status=live}}</ref> The editors of Audiophile Style forum subsequently updated the article with a disclaimer that "Most of Bob Stuart's answers have been debunked and the MQA technology is now seen as lacking any benefit for anyone other than record labels and MQA Ltd."<ref name="computer_audiophile_QA" /> |
||
== Hardware and software decoders == |
|||
⚫ | Audio product manufacturer [[Schiit Audio]] announced that it will not be supporting MQA due, amongst other reasons, to the understanding that "…supporting MQA means handing over the entire recording industry to an external standards organization."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://schiit.com/news/news/why-we-wont-be-supporting-mqa|title=Schiit Audio, Headphone amps and DACs made in USA.|website=schiit.com|language=en|access-date=2017-03-22|archive-date=2017-03-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170322203919/http://schiit.com/news/news/why-we-wont-be-supporting-mqa|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
Hardware decoders manufactured by Pioneer, iFi Audio, Onkyo, Mytek, Meridian, Cocktailaudio and Bluesound. Selected Meridian products will support MQA thanks to a firmware update. On software side, the desktop application by [[Tidal (service)|Tidal]] supports MQA.<ref name="MQA audio: What is it? How can you get it?">{{cite web|last1=Cox|first1=Joe|date=31 January 2017|title=MQA audio: What is it? How can you get it?|url= http://www.whathifi.com/advice/mqa-audio-what-it-how-can-you-get-it |website=What Hifi|accessdate=11 February 2017}}</ref> |
|||
⚫ | In a blog post titled "MQA is Bad for Music. Here's Why", hi-fi manufacturer [[Linn Products]] criticises MQA's licensing requirements, asserting that MQA is "...an attempt to control and extract revenue from every part of the supply chain, and not just over content that they hold the rights for."<ref name=":0" /> After having discussed several disadvantages for both the artist and the consumer Linn concludes that a consumer will "…pay a higher price for the same music, and you'll pay more for your hi-fi system too. And even if you don't buy into MQA, everyone will get less innovation, creativity and poorer music as a result."<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.linn.co.uk/blog/mqa-is-bad-for-music-heres-why|title=MQA is Bad For Music. Here's Why.|access-date=2017-03-22|language=en|archive-date=2021-04-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210419162218/https://www.linn.co.uk/blog/mqa-is-bad-for-music-heres-why|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
Commercial MQA-capable playback devices require payment of a royalty to MQA Ltd per unit sold. Based on information from Auralic, a manufacturer of Audiophile Wireless Audio Streamers, [[Meridian Audio]] prohibits digital output of unpacked MQA in any digital format, only allowing the unpacked data to be fed to an on-board MQA-compatible DAC and output in analog form. Some claim this to be a part of [[Digital rights management|DRM]] process<ref name="ccc" />, which allows a proper MQA file to be authenticated and the full quality of the signal decoded only on commercially licensed equipment. |
|||
⚫ | In an interview for online publication ''Positive Feedback'', engineer Andreas Koch is critical of MQA due to its lossy algorithms and compression, along with its licensing requirements; also saying that a format such as this "does not solve any problem that the world currently has."<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Koch|first1=Andreas|url=http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/questions-answers-mqa-interview-andreas-koch/|title=My Questions and Answers (MQA): An Interview with Andreas Koch|date=2017-03-16|work=Positive Feedback|access-date=2017-03-23|language=en-US|archive-date=2017-03-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170323005340/http://positive-feedback.com/audio-discourse/questions-answers-mqa-interview-andreas-koch/|url-status=live}}</ref> Koch was involved in the creation of the [[Super Audio CD]], the development of the [[Direct Stream Digital]] codec, and is co-founder of audio product manufacturer Playback Designs. |
||
== Streaming services == |
|||
While the encoding system remains proprietary, work by Måns Rullgård was able to examine the control stream after the first decoding step through analysis of the Bluesound "rendering" firmware in early 2017 with published code.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mans Rullgard / mqa · GitLab |url=https://code.videolan.org/mansr/mqa |access-date=2023-04-09 |website=GitLab |language=en |archive-date=2023-07-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135016/https://code.videolan.org/mansr/mqa |url-status=live }}</ref> Using the reverse-engineered code, audio blogger Archimago published results of the MQA dithering, noise shaping, and resampling options in the MQA "rendering" step.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Archimago |date=2017-06-24 |title=Archimago's Musings: MEASUREMENTS: AudioQuest Dragonfly Black 1.5 - PART 2 (On "MQA Rendering") |url=http://archimago.blogspot.com/2017/06/measurements-audioquest-dragonfly-black_24.html |access-date=2023-04-09 |website=Archimago's Musings |archive-date=2023-07-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135516/http://archimago.blogspot.com/2017/06/measurements-audioquest-dragonfly-black_24.html |url-status=live }}</ref> MQA's upsampling filter impulse responses were published by July 2017.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Archimago |date=2017-07-22 |title=Archimago's Musings: MEASUREMENTS: The AudioQuest Dragonfly Black MQA filter set... |url=http://archimago.blogspot.com/2017/07/measurements-audioquest-dragonfly-black.html |access-date=2023-04-09 |website=Archimago's Musings |archive-date=2023-07-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135548/http://archimago.blogspot.com/2017/07/measurements-audioquest-dragonfly-black.html |url-status=live }}</ref> A critical review of MQA titled "MQA: A Review of Controversies, Concerns, and Cautions" was published in ''Audiophile Style'' in early 2018.<ref>{{Cite web |title=MQA: A Review of controversies, concerns, and cautions |url=https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/ |access-date=2023-04-09 |website=Audiophile Style |date=2 March 2018 |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-07-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135548/https://audiophilestyle.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/ |url-status=live }}</ref> MQA declined a request for formal response to the contents of the article. |
|||
Starting in January 2017, [[Tidal (service)|Tidal]] provides MQA audio to subscribers of the Tidal "HiFi" package.<ref name="Tidal adds hi-res audio streams with 'Tidal Masters'">{{cite web|last1=Smith|first1=Adam|date=5 January 2017|title=Tidal adds hi-res audio streams with 'Tidal Masters'|url= http://www.whathifi.com/news/tidal-adds-hi-res-audio-streams-tidal-masters |website=What Hifi|accessdate=11 February 2017}}</ref> |
|||
The ''GoldenSound'' audio equipment review website examined MQA through the use of author-created audio tracks released on Tidal.<ref name=":1" /> Through analysis of tracks before and after MQA conversion, it was found that encoding a file in MQA alters the sound encapsulated in the file to its detriment.<ref>{{cite web |title=Tidal 'HiFi' is NOT lossless |url=https://goldensound.audio/2021/11/29/tidal-hifi-is-not-lossless/ |website=www.GoldenSound.com |access-date=10 January 2022 |date=29 November 2021 |archive-date=10 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220110093139/https://goldensound.audio/2021/11/29/tidal-hifi-is-not-lossless/ |url-status=live }}</ref> GoldenSound deduced that this method of encoding shows MQA has been providing unfounded information on how their encoding and format work. Shortly after contacting MQA for clarification about the issues, the files in question were deleted from Tidal. (Bob Stuart wrote on his blog that "MQA did not delete his files; that accusation is false"<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://bobtalks.co.uk/a-deeper-look/all-that-glitters-is-not-golden/|title=All that glitters is not gold(en)|date=May 19, 2021|website=Bob Talks|access-date=November 20, 2022|archive-date=July 24, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135523/https://bobtalks.co.uk/a-deeper-look/all-that-glitters-is-not-golden/|url-status=live}}</ref>) MQA stated that the files supplied were not dithered but truncated 16-bit files (meaning they were of higher bit rate originally) leading to the issues in encoding.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://pastebin.com/2YfT6vfZ|title=MQA Response|website=Pastebin.com|access-date=2021-05-09|archive-date=2021-05-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210508023129/https://pastebin.com/2YfT6vfZ|url-status=live}}</ref> GoldenSound disputes this, saying they have tested the track both dithered and undithered. GoldenSound also reports ineffectiveness of the fingerprinting technique,<ref name=":1">{{cite web |title=I published music on Tidal to test MQA - MQA Review |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRjsu9-Vznc |website=YouTube | date=15 April 2021 |access-date=2021-04-17 |archive-date=2021-04-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210417082840/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRjsu9-Vznc |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=By|date=2021-04-21|title=Mythbusting Tidal's MQA Format – How Does It Measure Up?|url=https://hackaday.com/2021/04/21/mythbusting-tidals-mqa-format-how-does-it-measure-up/|access-date=2021-05-12|website=Hackaday|language=en-US|archive-date=2021-05-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512164840/https://hackaday.com/2021/04/21/mythbusting-tidals-mqa-format-how-does-it-measure-up/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Wilson"/> which was also experienced by Neil Young and FredericV.<ref>{{cite web |title=Frequently Asked Questions |url=https://digital-audio-systems.com/frequently-asked-questions-faq/?lang=en |website=www.DigitalAudioSystems.com |access-date=10 January 2022 |archive-date=11 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111093327/https://digital-audio-systems.com/frequently-asked-questions-faq/?lang=en |url-status=live }}</ref> To counter the points made by Goldensounds, Jim Austin of [[Stereophile]] published an article which included criticism of the use of test signals which violated the MQA encoder parameters that are designed for music, and stating that the "GoldenSound's tests are a missed opportunity" and that the "critique is unfair".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-again|title=MQA again|date=June 6, 2021|website=Stereophile.com|access-date=November 20, 2022|archive-date=July 24, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230724135546/https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-again|url-status=live}}</ref><!--[[User:Kvng/RTH]]--> |
|||
== Playback devices == |
|||
Hardware decoders are sold by Pioneer, Onkyo, Astell & Kern, Sony and others.<ref name="MQA audio: What is it? How can you get it?">{{cite web|last1=Cox|first1=Joe|date=31 January 2017|title=MQA audio: What is it? How can you get it?|url=http://www.whathifi.com/advice/mqa-audio-what-it-how-can-you-get-it|website=What Hifi|access-date=11 February 2017|archive-date=12 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170212091438/http://www.whathifi.com/advice/mqa-audio-what-it-how-can-you-get-it|url-status=live}}</ref> Software decoders are sold by [[Tidal (service)|Tidal]],<ref name="Tidal adds hi-res audio streams with 'Tidal Masters'">{{cite web|last1=Smith|first1=Adam|date=5 January 2017|title=Tidal adds hi-res audio streams with 'Tidal Masters'|url=http://www.whathifi.com/news/tidal-adds-hi-res-audio-streams-tidal-masters|website=What Hifi|access-date=11 February 2017|archive-date=12 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170212091347/http://www.whathifi.com/news/tidal-adds-hi-res-audio-streams-tidal-masters|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Sparrow |first1=Mark |title=Tidal Announces Support For Hi-Res MQA Technology With Immediate Effect |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/marksparrow/2017/01/05/tidal-announces-support-for-hi-res-mqa-technology-with-immediate-effect/?sh=51a2064218cd |work=[[Forbes]] |date=January 5, 2017 |language=en |access-date=November 18, 2021 |archive-date=November 18, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211118170010/https://www.forbes.com/sites/marksparrow/2017/01/05/tidal-announces-support-for-hi-res-mqa-technology-with-immediate-effect/?sh=51a2064218cd |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Strauss |first1=Matthew |title=Tidal Becomes First Service to Offer "Master-Quality" Streaming |url=https://pitchfork.com/news/70703-tidal-becomes-first-service-to-offer-master-quality-streaming/ |work=[[Pitchfork (website)|Pitchfork]] |date=5 January 2017 |access-date=18 November 2021 |archive-date=18 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211118170010/https://pitchfork.com/news/70703-tidal-becomes-first-service-to-offer-master-quality-streaming/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and Roon.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://help.roonlabs.com/portal/en/kb/articles/roon-x-mqa#How_does_Roon_handle_MQA_content|title=POPUP|website=Help.roonlabs.com|access-date=29 December 2021|archive-date=3 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210603020051/https://help.roonlabs.com/portal/en/kb/articles/roon-x-mqa#How_does_Roon_handle_MQA_content|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Dulai |first1=Danny |title=COO |url=https://community.roonlabs.com/t/why-do-manufacturers-support-mqa/155965/294 |website=Roonlabs.com |date=28 April 2021 |access-date=31 May 2021 |archive-date=2 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210602214350/https://community.roonlabs.com/t/why-do-manufacturers-support-mqa/155965/294 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
[[Compact disc]]s encoded with MQA (''MQA-CD'') were first released in 2017, beginning with the publisher Ottava.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.soundandvision.com/content/mqa-comes-cd|title=MQA Comes to CD|date=6 July 2017|website=Soundandvision.com|access-date=29 December 2021|archive-date=29 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210829084818/https://www.soundandvision.com/content/mqa-comes-cd|url-status=live}}</ref> The MQA decoding will occur if an MQA decoder is connected.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-encoded-cds-yes|title=MQA-Encoded CDs? Yes!|date=16 March 2017|website=Stereophile.com|access-date=29 December 2021|archive-date=29 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210829084818/https://www.stereophile.com/content/mqa-encoded-cds-yes|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://online.stereosound.co.jp/_ct/17192545|title=CDでハイレゾを楽しめる!? MQA-CDってどんなもの?【橋爪徹のMQA-CD徹底解説1】 - Stereo Sound ONLINE|website=Online.stereosound.co.jp|access-date=29 December 2021|archive-date=29 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210829085203/https://online.stereosound.co.jp/_ct/17192545|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>Archived at [https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211205/m31r1GHPPdA Ghostarchive]{{cbignore}} and the [https://web.archive.org/web/20181204093637/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m31r1GHPPdA&gl=US&hl=en Wayback Machine]{{cbignore}}: {{cite web| url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m31r1GHPPdA| title = MQA-CD: New Hi-Res CDs from Japan (2018) | website=[[YouTube]]}}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
MQA Ltd collects a royalty for every commercial MQA-capable playback unit sold. MQA Ltd prohibits digital output of unpacked MQA in any digital format, only allowing the unpacked data to be fed to an on-board MQA-compatible DAC and output in analogue form. |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
== Further reading == |
|||
* [http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/MQA/origami/ThereAndBack.html Treatise on technical aspects of MQA] |
|||
{{Compression formats}} |
{{Compression formats}} |
Latest revision as of 19:38, 4 January 2025
Developed by | MQA Ltd. |
---|---|
Type of format | Audio file format |
Website | https://mqa.co.uk/ |
Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) is a proprietary system for delivering high-quality digital audio. The system includes audio signal processing, lossy audio compression and authentication. MQA requires licensing fees to use. The system was launched in 2014 by Meridian Audio, and is now owned by Lenbrook.
The MQA system is a three-part process applied to digital audio music recordings consisting of: 1) modifying and controlling the end-to-end digital filter response;[1] 2) preparing the audio for transfer to a smartphone or audio device using a lossy audio compression format with authentication; and 3) decompressing the recording for playback.[2]
There has been controversy regarding several aspects of MQA. These aspects include but are not limited to: whether the audio signal processing improves or degrades the sound quality, whether the lossy audio compression degrades the sound quality, the utility of the authentication function, and the effect of licensing fees on music recording and playback businesses.
History
[edit]The press launch of MQA was held in December 2014 in London,[3] followed by the company hosting a demonstration room at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas in January 2015.[4] The initial hardware manufacturers which offered MQA decoding were Pioneer, Onkyo, and Mytek.[5] In May 2016, Warner Music Group signed a long-term licensing deal with MQA.[6][7]
The RIAA announced in May 2016 that MPEG-4 SLS and MQA were eligible to use the Hi-Res MUSIC logo on their products;[8] the latter despite the logo being intended for lossless audio recordings.[9] By 2017, music distribution companies Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group, Sony Music and Merlin Network had agreed to make some of their recordings in MQA format.[10] Xiami Music began offering MQA streaming via its SVIP pricing tier in July 2019; however, the music service was discontinued in February 2021.[11]
In March 2018, an MQA Live encoder box was released, which is intended for live music concerts to be streamed using the MQA compression algorithm.[12]
In April 2021, internet radio station Radio Paradise began offering MQA on its channels.[13]
In May 2021, the Apple Music streaming service announced a Lossless Audio pricing tier, which was described as a "death knell" for MQA.[14]
In September 2022, online mastering service Masterchannel added MQA encoding to its suite of tools. The automated mastering is based on machine learning, and the MQA encoding process is applied after mastering.[15] In the same month, Alpine Alps became the first aftermarket car audio company with full TIDAL integration. Head units are capable of MQA Core decoding when playing TIDAL Masters.[16]
On November 9, 2022, MQA announced a new product called MQair,[17] which is a hi-res wireless audio codec. Coinciding with the announcement, the Japan Audio Society (JAS) also released a statement certifying MQair with the "Hi-Res AUDIO WIRELESS" logo.[18] MQair is the fourth codec to receive this, alongside LC3plus, LHDC and LDAC. MQAir is also known by the technical name SCL6 which stands for the sixth generation of scalable codec developed by MQA. MQair is agnostic and can handle files from almost any music streaming service. It can unfold regular MQA files and regular PCM music files. The technology supports both MQA and PCM audio up to stereo 384 kHz, with the encoded data rate able to be scaled seamlessly from 20 Mbit/s to below 200 kbit/s. This makes MQair suitable for use over Bluetooth, Ultra-Wideband (UWB) and Wi-Fi.[19] MQair can be enabled via a firmware update on existing headphones, scales in realtime and works up to 10 meters.[20] MQAir was subsequently renamed AIRIA.
On 3 April 2023, MQA Limited, the company behind MQA had gone into administration. The primary streaming service providing MQA format music, Tidal, subsequently began offering high-resolution PCM in addition to MQA in their HiFi Plus tier.[21][22]
On 19 September 2023, Lenbrook acquired MQA Limited's assets.[23]
On 13 June 2024, Lenbrook announced a partnership with HDTracks to create a music streaming service that will give customers a choice of MQA or PCM formats.[24]
As of July 24, 2024, Tidal streaming service dropped support of MQA in favor of FLAC, a lossless and open source format.[25]
Codec description
[edit]This section is missing information about how metadata such as the fingerprint and the source sample rate is stored in the LPCM output.(November 2021) |
MQA encoding is lossy;[26][27] it hierarchically compresses the relatively little energy in the higher frequency bands into data streams that are embedded in the lower frequency bands using proprietary dithering techniques, allowing for an apparent reduction in sample rate and hence file size.
After a series of such "origami" manipulations,[28][29] a dithered and shaped version of the original audio, together with a touchup stream (the compressed difference between the original and modified streams), are distributed as a single 24-bit stream, with the most significant bits occupied by PCM audio compatible with non-MQA playback equipment. Depending on the implementation, as few as 13 bits may be reserved for PCM audio, with the lower-order bits rendered as noise by equipment without an MQA decoder.[30]
MQA-encoded audio can be contained with file formats such as FLAC, ALAC or CD-DA; hence, it can be played back on systems either with or without an MQA decoder. In the latter case, the resulting audio contains high-frequency noise occupying the three least-significant bits, thus limiting playback on non-MQA devices effectively to 13 bits. Despite this, MQA claims that the quality is higher than a conventional 16-bit recording, because of the novel sampling and convolution processes.[31] Other than the sampling and convolution methods, which were not explained by MQA in detail, the encoding process is similar to that used in XRCD and HDCD.
In addition to the compressed audio data, the codec also carries meta-data for authentication and playback filter control. The authentication meta-data instructs the decoder that the file contains MQA format and identifies basic or "Studio" certification which may be indicated on the playback device. The playback filter control meta-data instructs the playback device on which filter to use for reconstruction of the analogue waveform.
Unlike popular lossy compression formats like MP3, AAC and WMA that use perceptual encoding based on psychoacoustic models, the lossy encoding method of MQA is similar to aptX, LDAC and WavPack Hybrid Lossy, which uses time-domain ADPCM and bitrate reduction. Although MQA compression is lossy, it is claimed to be audibly transparent.[32][33]
Audio signal processing description
[edit]MQA processes the digital audio recording to alter the impulse response of the end-to-end filter chain from recording and production to playback. This is described as changing the time domain response similar to that of sound passing through less than 20 meters of air.[1] The MQA filter response process starts with the ADC, either by a known make and model or by analyzing artifacts in the recording, and ends with control of the filter in the playback DAC.[34] It is common for consumer DACs to include user selectable filters, including apodization filters intended to improve time domain transient response without knowledge of the production filters, whereas MQA controls the DAC filter to complete the MQA designed end-to-end time domain filter response.[32]
Authentication description
[edit]The MQA processed file contains an authentication function that indicates if the file is in the MQA format or not. There are two defined categories of MQA authentication: "MQA" (which may be indicated with a green light) meaning that the file has not been altered since creation, and "MQA Studio" (which may be indicated with a blue light) additionally means that someone representing the studio or artist validated that the file is an approved version. One claimed intent of the MQA authentication feature is to assure that the recording is genuine and unadulterated from the MQA processed studio master recording,[35] though the veracity of this authentication has been called into question.[36]
Reception
[edit]This section contains a pro and con list. (February 2024) |
Positive
[edit]Robert Harley, editor of The Absolute Sound stated in March 2016 that MQA "will forever change the way we and future generations consider digital audio".[37]
John Atkinson, editor of Stereophile stated the following about the launch of MQA in December 2014 "In almost 40 years of attending audio press events, only rarely have I come away feeling that I was present at the birth of a new world."[38]
In the 2L Records 2015 announcement of an MQA remastered release of piano recordings, company owner Morten Lindberg stated "I have spent many hours with Bob listening to original recordings and being constantly amazed by the incredible sense of space and clarity brought by MQA", in comparison to the drawbacks and weaknesses of the early digital technology originally used for the recordings.[39]
In the Atlantic Records announcement that it would sell records using the MQA format, CEO Craig Kallman stated in May 2016 that "MQA makes high-resolution music easy to stream or download to any device. Music fans will love it when they hear it, and WMG is thrilled to be partnering with MQA to take the next step in bringing hi-res music to consumers around the globe".[40] Similarly, when Universal Music Group announced in February 2017 that they would be selling songs in MQA format, company executive Michael Nash stated "with MQA, we are working with a partner whose technology is among the best solutions for streaming high-res audio, and one that doesn't ask music fans to compromise on sound quality for convenience".[41]
Negative
[edit]An article titled "Digital Done Wrong" on the International Audio/Video Review website concluded that MQA is founded on a fundamentally unsound understanding of correct digital audio processing and found that playback of a sample MQA encoding demonstrated gross distortion and reconstruction failure. It did, however, comment that some listeners may find the technical defects of MQA encoding subjectively pleasing.[42]
Singer and musician Neil Young has expressed dislike for the MQA format, saying the masters are "degraded and manipulated" when encoded to MQA and has consequently removed his music from Tidal, after finding out that his catalogue on the service was encoded in MQA without his permission, criticizing Warner Music Group (which owns Reprise Records that Young has released most of his catalogue through) for encoding music whose masters are no better than CD-quality in MQA. He also characterizes the format as a way to collect royalties.[43]
Some critical comments have been made in online forums such as the Audiophile Style forum[44] and in audio magazine website comments, and a few writers have expressed concern in some areas. Over 80 detailed questions, some of which voiced these concerns, were submitted to the editors of the Audiophile Style forum and subsequently addressed in detail by the creator of MQA, Bob Stuart, in an extended question-and-answer article.[45] The editors of Audiophile Style forum subsequently updated the article with a disclaimer that "Most of Bob Stuart's answers have been debunked and the MQA technology is now seen as lacking any benefit for anyone other than record labels and MQA Ltd."[45]
Audio product manufacturer Schiit Audio announced that it will not be supporting MQA due, amongst other reasons, to the understanding that "…supporting MQA means handing over the entire recording industry to an external standards organization."[46]
In a blog post titled "MQA is Bad for Music. Here's Why", hi-fi manufacturer Linn Products criticises MQA's licensing requirements, asserting that MQA is "...an attempt to control and extract revenue from every part of the supply chain, and not just over content that they hold the rights for."[47] After having discussed several disadvantages for both the artist and the consumer Linn concludes that a consumer will "…pay a higher price for the same music, and you'll pay more for your hi-fi system too. And even if you don't buy into MQA, everyone will get less innovation, creativity and poorer music as a result."[47]
In an interview for online publication Positive Feedback, engineer Andreas Koch is critical of MQA due to its lossy algorithms and compression, along with its licensing requirements; also saying that a format such as this "does not solve any problem that the world currently has."[48] Koch was involved in the creation of the Super Audio CD, the development of the Direct Stream Digital codec, and is co-founder of audio product manufacturer Playback Designs.
While the encoding system remains proprietary, work by Måns Rullgård was able to examine the control stream after the first decoding step through analysis of the Bluesound "rendering" firmware in early 2017 with published code.[49] Using the reverse-engineered code, audio blogger Archimago published results of the MQA dithering, noise shaping, and resampling options in the MQA "rendering" step.[50] MQA's upsampling filter impulse responses were published by July 2017.[51] A critical review of MQA titled "MQA: A Review of Controversies, Concerns, and Cautions" was published in Audiophile Style in early 2018.[52] MQA declined a request for formal response to the contents of the article.
The GoldenSound audio equipment review website examined MQA through the use of author-created audio tracks released on Tidal.[53] Through analysis of tracks before and after MQA conversion, it was found that encoding a file in MQA alters the sound encapsulated in the file to its detriment.[54] GoldenSound deduced that this method of encoding shows MQA has been providing unfounded information on how their encoding and format work. Shortly after contacting MQA for clarification about the issues, the files in question were deleted from Tidal. (Bob Stuart wrote on his blog that "MQA did not delete his files; that accusation is false"[55]) MQA stated that the files supplied were not dithered but truncated 16-bit files (meaning they were of higher bit rate originally) leading to the issues in encoding.[56] GoldenSound disputes this, saying they have tested the track both dithered and undithered. GoldenSound also reports ineffectiveness of the fingerprinting technique,[53][57][36] which was also experienced by Neil Young and FredericV.[58] To counter the points made by Goldensounds, Jim Austin of Stereophile published an article which included criticism of the use of test signals which violated the MQA encoder parameters that are designed for music, and stating that the "GoldenSound's tests are a missed opportunity" and that the "critique is unfair".[59]
Playback devices
[edit]Hardware decoders are sold by Pioneer, Onkyo, Astell & Kern, Sony and others.[60] Software decoders are sold by Tidal,[61][62][63] and Roon.[64][65]
Compact discs encoded with MQA (MQA-CD) were first released in 2017, beginning with the publisher Ottava.[66] The MQA decoding will occur if an MQA decoder is connected.[67][68][69]
MQA Ltd collects a royalty for every commercial MQA-capable playback unit sold. MQA Ltd prohibits digital output of unpacked MQA in any digital format, only allowing the unpacked data to be fed to an on-board MQA-compatible DAC and output in analogue form.
References
[edit]- ^ a b "MQA: Questions and Answers Some Real-World Comparisons". Stereophile.com. Stereophile. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 14 August 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
- ^ "What is MQA? The digital audio format explained". Trusted Reviews. 2022-06-15. Archived from the original on 2022-08-31. Retrieved 2022-07-01.
- ^ "Meridian Launch MQA 'Master Quality Authenticated' Audio Format". HiFiCritic.com. 7 December 2014. Archived from the original on 5 June 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ Waldrep, Mark (12 January 2015). "MQA at CES 2015: Part II Listening". Real HD Audio. Archived from the original on 5 June 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ audioXpress Staff. "Master Quality Authenticated (MQA) Launches Major Partnerships and New Development Platforms at CES 2016". audioXpress. Archived from the original on 10 June 2016. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
- ^ "Warner becomes first major to sign deal with HD music firm MQA". Music Business Worldwide. 8 May 2016. Archived from the original on 12 May 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ "MQA confirms Sony Music and Merlin as hi-res audio partners". whathifi.com. Stereophile. 16 May 2017. Archived from the original on 17 May 2017. Retrieved 16 May 2017.
- ^ RIAA News (11 May 2016). "HI-RES MUSIC INITIATIVE EXPANDS TO INCLUDE MUSIC STREAMING SERVICES". Recording Industry Association of America. RIAA. Archived from the original on 18 May 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- ^ "High Resolution Audio Initiative Gets Major Boost with New "Hi-Res MUSIC" Logo and Branding Materials for Digital Retailers". RIAA. 23 June 2015. Archived from the original on 4 May 2019. Retrieved 8 January 2022.
- ^ May 2017, Joe Cox 16 (16 May 2017). "Home". whathifi. Archived from the original on 17 September 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2021.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Alibaba-owned Xiami Music partners with HD audio firm MQA". Music Business Worldwide. 16 July 2019. Archived from the original on 17 September 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2021.
- ^ Roberts, Becky (Mar 19, 2018). "MQA Live promises "original quality" real-time concert streams". What Hi Fi?. Archived from the original on December 19, 2018. Retrieved December 18, 2018.
- ^ Stone, Mary (31 March 2021). "MQA, BluOS and Radio Paradise bring hi-res audio to internet radio". What Hi-Fi?. Archived from the original on 17 September 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2021.
- ^ "Apple Lossless Audio is Death Knell for MQA – Real HD-Audio". www.realhd-audio.com. 18 June 2021. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 8 January 2022.
- ^ "Masterchannel Blog - Partnership Announcement – Masterchannel Adds MQA Encoding to Mastering Tool". Masterchannel Blog. 2022-09-12. Archived from the original on 2022-11-28. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
- ^ Mitchell, Brian (2022-09-13). "TIDAL Music Streaming Comes to Alpine Car Audio". ecoustics.com. Archived from the original on 2022-11-28. Retrieved 2022-11-28.
- ^ "Introducing a new technology from MQA". Archived from the original on 24 July 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
- ^ ""Hi-Res AUDIO WIRELESS" Two new codecs added to "Hi-Res AUDIO WIRELESS" logo's certified codecs". Archived from the original on 24 July 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
- ^ "MQA Says It's Cracked The Streaming Of Hi-Res Audio Over Bluetooth". Forbes. Archived from the original on 24 July 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
- ^ "MQA Introduces MQair for Wireless Hi-Res Audio Music Streaming". 9 November 2022. Archived from the original on 24 July 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
- ^ "MQA is going into administration". April 2023. Archived from the original on 2023-04-07. Retrieved 2023-04-07.
- ^ "MQA LIMITED - Appointment of Administrators". April 2023. Archived from the original on 2023-07-24. Retrieved 2023-04-07.
- ^ Walker, Kevin (2023-09-19). "Lenbrook Extends Leadership in Hi-Res Audio with MQA Acquisition". The Lenbrook Group of Companies. Retrieved 2023-09-19.
- ^ "LENBROOK MEDIA GROUP PARTNERS WITH HDTRACKS TO CREATE STREAMING SERVICE FOR MUSIC ENTHUSIASTS AND AUDIOPHILES". The Lenbrook Group of Companies (Press release). 2024-06-13. Retrieved 2024-06-16.
- ^ "Audio Format Updates – TIDAL Support". 2024-08-15. Archived from the original on 2024-08-15. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
- ^ Darko, John (June 2016). "An inconvenient truth: MQA sounds better!". Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
the MQA encoding process is lossy – it is no longer the studio master as archived by the record label
- ^ "Is MQA DOA?". Archived from the original on 30 June 2017. Retrieved 3 February 2017.
'MQA is not lossless.'
- ^ "MQA: Questions and Answers Tutorial: Music Origami". Stereophile.com. Stereophile. 11 August 2016. Archived from the original on 14 August 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
- ^ "MQA 192k / 96k There and back again". www.audiomisc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 15 May 2021. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ Harrison, Andrew (2 May 2017). "MQA explained: Everything you need to know about high-res audio". Archived from the original on 26 May 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
- ^ Christoph Engemann; Anton Schlesinger (2017-12-30). "MQA - A clever stealth DRM-Trojan". 34C3 (video). media.ccc.de. YouTube tGJ5eW-gBxA. Archived from the original on 2018-01-01. Retrieved 2018-01-01.
- ^ a b Robjohns, Hugh (August 2016). "MQA Time-domain Accuracy & Digital Audio Quality". soundonsound.com. Sound On Sound. Archived from the original on 10 March 2023.
- ^ Majidimehr, Amir (2021). "MQA Deep Dive - I published music on tidal to test MQA". Audio Science Review. Archived from the original on 5 June 2021. Retrieved 5 June 2021.[self-published source?]
- ^ Darko, John (June 2016). "An inconvenient truth: MQA sounds better!". Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 27 May 2020.
- ^ "MQA Authentication". bobtalks.co.uk. 28 January 2017. Archived from the original on 2023-02-20. Retrieved 2023-09-12.
- ^ a b Wilson, Trav (10 May 2021). "The Roiling MQA Debate: A Sound Quality Test on TIDAL That Leaves More Questions than Answers - Headphonesty". Archived from the original on 2021-05-12. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
- ^ Harley, Robert. "Master Quality Authenticated (MQA): The View From 30,000 Feet". The Absolute Sound. Archived from the original on 27 April 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ Atkinson, John (21 December 2014). "I've Heard the Future of Streaming: Meridian's MQA". Stereophile. Archived from the original on 29 May 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ "Morten Lindberg speaks about MQA". monoandstereo.com. January 2016. Archived from the original on 2022-01-21. Retrieved 2022-01-21.
- ^ "Warner Music Group becomes the first big label to adopt MQA". whathifi.com. What Hi-Fi?. 6 May 2016. Archived from the original on 7 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
- ^ "Universal second major to sign licensing deal with HD music firm MQA". musicbusinessworldwide.com. Music Business Worldwide. 16 February 2017. Archived from the original on 21 February 2017. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
- ^ "Digital Done Wrong". International Audio/Video Review. Archived from the original on 19 April 2018. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
- ^ "Tidal Misleading Listeners". Neil Young Archives. Archived from the original on 2021-09-01. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
- ^ Miska (11 January 2016). "Some analysis and comparison of MQA encoded FLAC vs normal optimized hires FLAC". Audiophile Style. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ a b Stuart, Bob (8 April 2016). "A Comprehensive Q&A With MQA's Bob Stuart". Audiophile Style. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 11 May 2016.
- ^ "Schiit Audio, Headphone amps and DACs made in USA". schiit.com. Archived from the original on 2017-03-22. Retrieved 2017-03-22.
- ^ a b "MQA is Bad For Music. Here's Why". Archived from the original on 2021-04-19. Retrieved 2017-03-22.
- ^ Koch, Andreas (2017-03-16). "My Questions and Answers (MQA): An Interview with Andreas Koch". Positive Feedback. Archived from the original on 2017-03-23. Retrieved 2017-03-23.
- ^ "Mans Rullgard / mqa · GitLab". GitLab. Archived from the original on 2023-07-24. Retrieved 2023-04-09.
- ^ Archimago (2017-06-24). "Archimago's Musings: MEASUREMENTS: AudioQuest Dragonfly Black 1.5 - PART 2 (On "MQA Rendering")". Archimago's Musings. Archived from the original on 2023-07-24. Retrieved 2023-04-09.
- ^ Archimago (2017-07-22). "Archimago's Musings: MEASUREMENTS: The AudioQuest Dragonfly Black MQA filter set..." Archimago's Musings. Archived from the original on 2023-07-24. Retrieved 2023-04-09.
- ^ "MQA: A Review of controversies, concerns, and cautions". Audiophile Style. 2 March 2018. Archived from the original on 2023-07-24. Retrieved 2023-04-09.
- ^ a b "I published music on Tidal to test MQA - MQA Review". YouTube. 15 April 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-04-17. Retrieved 2021-04-17.
- ^ "Tidal 'HiFi' is NOT lossless". www.GoldenSound.com. 29 November 2021. Archived from the original on 10 January 2022. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ "All that glitters is not gold(en)". Bob Talks. May 19, 2021. Archived from the original on July 24, 2023. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ "MQA Response". Pastebin.com. Archived from the original on 2021-05-08. Retrieved 2021-05-09.
- ^ By (2021-04-21). "Mythbusting Tidal's MQA Format – How Does It Measure Up?". Hackaday. Archived from the original on 2021-05-12. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
- ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". www.DigitalAudioSystems.com. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ "MQA again". Stereophile.com. June 6, 2021. Archived from the original on July 24, 2023. Retrieved November 20, 2022.
- ^ Cox, Joe (31 January 2017). "MQA audio: What is it? How can you get it?". What Hifi. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
- ^ Smith, Adam (5 January 2017). "Tidal adds hi-res audio streams with 'Tidal Masters'". What Hifi. Archived from the original on 12 February 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
- ^ Sparrow, Mark (January 5, 2017). "Tidal Announces Support For Hi-Res MQA Technology With Immediate Effect". Forbes. Archived from the original on November 18, 2021. Retrieved November 18, 2021.
- ^ Strauss, Matthew (5 January 2017). "Tidal Becomes First Service to Offer "Master-Quality" Streaming". Pitchfork. Archived from the original on 18 November 2021. Retrieved 18 November 2021.
- ^ "POPUP". Help.roonlabs.com. Archived from the original on 3 June 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
- ^ Dulai, Danny (28 April 2021). "COO". Roonlabs.com. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 31 May 2021.
- ^ "MQA Comes to CD". Soundandvision.com. 6 July 2017. Archived from the original on 29 August 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
- ^ "MQA-Encoded CDs? Yes!". Stereophile.com. 16 March 2017. Archived from the original on 29 August 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
- ^ "CDでハイレゾを楽しめる!? MQA-CDってどんなもの?【橋爪徹のMQA-CD徹底解説1】 - Stereo Sound ONLINE". Online.stereosound.co.jp. Archived from the original on 29 August 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
- ^ Archived at Ghostarchive and the Wayback Machine: "MQA-CD: New Hi-Res CDs from Japan (2018)". YouTube.