Jump to content

Liberal Party of Canada: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
they merged. im making it consistant with the two parties in was a merger of, they say they merged into liberal party.
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Federal political party}}
{{use mdy dates|date=May 2012}}<!-- per 2003-OCT-25 edit & [[WP:DATERET]]. Keep YYYY-MM-DD for accessdates per 2007-OCT-29 edit-->
{{For|other liberal political parties in Canada|Liberalism in Canada#Current parties}}
{{use Canadian English|date=August 2018}}
{{Use Canadian English|date=March 2020}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2021}}
{{Infobox political party
{{Infobox political party
| name = Liberal Party of Canada
| name = Liberal Party of Canada
| logo = Liberal Party of Canada Logo 2014.svg
| logo = Liberal Party of Canada Logo 2014.svg
| colorcode = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}
| logo_size = 175
| colorcode = {{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}
| abbreviation = LPC<br>PLC{{efn|French abbreviation}}
| president = [[Suzanne Cowan]]
| president = Sachit Mehra
| foundation = {{Date and age|1867}}
| foundation = {{nowrap|{{start date and age|1867|7|1}}}}
<!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->| ideology = <!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->
| membership = {{increase}} 300,000<ref>{{cite web |title=Liberal Party says membership numbers have skyrocketed under Trudeau |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/liberal-party-says-membership-numbers-have-skyrocketed-under-trudeau-1.2142400?cache=yes%3Fclipid%3D104056%3FclipId%3D375756 |website=[[CTV News]] |publisher=[[The Canadian Press]] |date=10 December 2014 |access-date=1 August 2023 |archive-date=August 1, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230801183659/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/liberal-party-says-membership-numbers-have-skyrocketed-under-trudeau-1.2142400?cache=yes%3Fclipid%3D104056%3FclipId%3D375756 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{Update inline|date=August 2023}}
[[Liberalism in Canada|Liberalism]]<br />[[Social&nbsp;liberalism]]<ref>The party became infused with social liberalism in the 1940s and 1950s. {{cite book|author=Law Commission of Canada|title=Law and Citizenship|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EK26Gbk1wjkC&pg=PA6|year=2011|publisher=UBC Press|page=6|isbn=9780774840798}}</ref><ref>Susan Prentice, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3654693? "Manitoba's childcare regime: Social liberalism in flux"]. ''Canadian Journal of Sociology'' 29.2 (2004): 193-207.</ref><ref>Michael J. Prince, [http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/16 "Canadian disability activism and political ideas: In and between neo-liberalism and social liberalism"]. ''Canadian Journal of Disability Studies'' 1.1 (2012): 1-34.</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1177/0032329205275193|title = Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada| journal=Politics & Society| volume=33| issue=2| pages=327–353|year = 2005|last1 = Smith|first1 = Miriam}}</ref><br />
| membership_year = 2014
<!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->| headquarters = Constitution Square, [[Ottawa]], [[Ontario]]
| ideology = <!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. --> [[Liberalism]] ([[Liberalism in Canada|Canadian]])<br>[[Social liberalism]]<ref name="SocialLiberalism">{{bulleted list|
| international = [[Liberal International]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Liberal Party of Canada Welcomes Liberal International to 2009 Convention |url=http://www.liberal.ca/newsroom/news-release/liberal-party-of-canada-welcomes-liberal-international-to-2009-convention/ |publisher=Liberal Party of Canada |accessdate=2012-08-28 |date=March 6, 2009 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120805144043/http://www.liberal.ca/newsroom/news-release/liberal-party-of-canada-welcomes-liberal-international-to-2009-convention/ |archivedate=August 5, 2012 }}</ref>
|{{cite book|author=Law Commission of Canada|title=Law and Citizenship|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EK26Gbk1wjkC&pg=PA6|year=2011|publisher=UBC Press|page=6|isbn=9780774840798|quote=The party became infused with social liberalism in the 1940s and 1950s.}}
| website = {{URL|liberal.ca}}
|Susan Prentice, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3654693? "Manitoba's childcare regime: Social liberalism in flux"]. ''Canadian Journal of Sociology'' 29.2 (2004): 193-207.
| founder = [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]]
|Michael J. Prince, [http://cjds.uwaterloo.ca/index.php/cjds/article/view/16 "Canadian disability activism and political ideas: In and between neo-liberalism and social liberalism"]. ''Canadian Journal of Disability Studies'' 1.1 (2012): 1-34.
| country = Canada
|{{Cite journal | doi=10.1177/0032329205275193|title = Social Movements and Judicial Empowerment: Courts, Public Policy, and Lesbian and Gay Organizing in Canada| journal=Politics & Society| volume=33| issue=2| pages=327–353|year = 2005|last1 = Smith|first1 = Miriam|s2cid = 154613468}}}}</ref>
| native_name = Parti libéral du Canada
| headquarters = {{unbulleted list|[[Constitution Square (Ottawa)|Constitution Square]]|350 Albert Street|Suite 920|[[Ottawa]], [[Ontario]]|K1P 6M8}}
| leader = [[Justin Trudeau]]
| international = [[Liberal International]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Liberal Party of Canada Welcomes Liberal International to 2009 Convention |url=http://www.liberal.ca/newsroom/news-release/liberal-party-of-canada-welcomes-liberal-international-to-2009-convention/ |publisher=Liberal Party of Canada |access-date=August 28, 2012 |date=March 6, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120805144043/http://www.liberal.ca/newsroom/news-release/liberal-party-of-canada-welcomes-liberal-international-to-2009-convention/ |archive-date=August 5, 2012 }}</ref>
| leader1_title = Deputy Leader
| website = {{Official URL}}
| leader1_name = [[Ralph Goodale]]
| founder = [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]]
| predecessor = [[Clear Grits]],<br />[[Parti rouge]]
| youth_wing = [[Young Liberals of Canada]]
| country = Canada
| native_name = Parti libéral du Canada
<!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->| position = <!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->
| leader = [[Justin Trudeau]]
{{nowrap|[[Centre politics|Centre]]<ref name="BittnerKoop2013">{{cite book|author1=Amanda Bittner|author2=Royce Koop|title=Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TdFTCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA300|date=1 March 2013|publisher=UBC Press|isbn=978-0-7748-2411-8|pages=300–}}</ref><ref name="Olive2015">{{cite book|author=Andrea Olive|title=The Canadian Environment in Political Context|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bvw_CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA55|year=2015|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-0871-9|page=55}}</ref><ref name="Rayside2011">{{cite book |author = David Rayside |title = Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=oYXU_1WwNKUC&pg=PA22 |year = 2011 |publisher = UBC Press |isbn = 978-0-7748-2011-0 |page = 22 }}</ref> to
| leader1_title = House leader
[[Centre-left politics|centre-left]]<ref name="Rayside2011">{{cite book |author = David Rayside |title = Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=oYXU_1WwNKUC&pg=PA22 |year = 2011 |publisher = UBC Press |isbn = 978-0-7748-2011-0 |page = 22 }}</ref><ref name="CollinMartin2012">{{cite book |author1 = Richard Collin |author2 = Pamela L. Martin |title = An Introduction to World Politics: Conflict and Consensus on a Small Planet |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=-vSlx-_Z408C&pg=PA138 |year = 2012 |publisher = Rowman & Littlefield |isbn = 978-1-4422-1803-1 |page = 138 }}</ref>}}
| leader1_name = [[Karina Gould]]
<!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->| colours = {{Color box|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}|border=darkgray}} [[Red]]
| merger = {{Lang|fr|[[Parti rouge]]|italic=no}} (Canada East)<br />[[Clear Grits]] (Canada West)
| seats2_title = Seats in the [[House of Commons of Canada|House of Commons]]
| predecessor =
| seats1 = {{Infobox political party/seats|9|105|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|#6B6B6B}}}}
| youth_wing = [[Young Liberals of Canada]]
| seats1_title = [[Senate Liberal Caucus|Party members]] in the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]{{NoteTag|All Liberal senators were expelled from the party's parliamentary caucus in 2014. Remaining senators appointed by Liberal prime ministers sit as the [[Senate Liberal Caucus]], which is not affiliated to or recognized by the Liberal Party.<!--Justin Trudeau kicks all 32 Liberal senators out of caucus in bid for reform, see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada#Liberal senators' designation]] for discussion.--><ref name="LibSenate">{{cite web |url = http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/justin-trudeau-kicks-senators-out-of-liberal-caucus-in-bid-to-show-hes-serious-about-cleaning-up-red-chamber |title = Justin Trudeau kicks all 32 Liberal senators out of caucus in bid for reform |work = National Post |date = 29 January 2014 |accessdate = 18 October 2015 |last = Spencer |first = Christina }}</ref>}}
| position = <!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->[[Centrism|Centre]] to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]]
| seats2 = {{Infobox political party/seats|177|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
<!-- IMPORTANT: Do not change party ideology or position without bringing reliable sources to the Talk page and garnering consensus. -->| colours = {{Color box|{{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}|border=darkgray}} Red
| seats2_title = [[House of Commons of Canada|House of Commons]]
| seats1 = {{Composition bar|0|105|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|#6B6B6B}}}}
| seats1_title = [[Senate of Canada|Senate]]{{efn|All Liberal senators were expelled from the party's parliamentary caucus in 2014. Those senators, who had been appointed by Liberal prime ministers up to and including Paul Martin, sat from 2014 to 2019 as the [[Senate Liberal Caucus]], which was not affiliated to or recognized by the Liberal Party. The Senate Liberal Caucus was dissolved in 2019 and replaced by the [[Progressive Senate Group]].<ref>{{cite news |title=One-time Liberal senators rename themselves as Progressive Senate Group |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/one-time-liberal-senators-rename-themselves-as-progressive-senate-group-1.4685456 |access-date=November 25, 2020 |agency=The Canadian Press |publisher=CTV News |date=November 14, 2019 |archive-date=December 17, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191217231626/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/one-time-liberal-senators-rename-themselves-as-progressive-senate-group-1.4685456 |url-status=live }}</ref> Senators appointed since 2015 by Justin Trudeau have affiliated with an independent parliamentary group or sat as non-affiliated members.<!--Justin Trudeau kicks all 32 Liberal senators out of caucus in bid for reform, see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada#Liberal senators' designation]] for discussion.--><ref name="LibSenate">{{cite web |url = http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/justin-trudeau-kicks-senators-out-of-liberal-caucus-in-bid-to-show-hes-serious-about-cleaning-up-red-chamber |title = Justin Trudeau kicks all 32 Liberal senators out of caucus in bid for reform |work = National Post |date = January 29, 2014 |access-date = October 18, 2015 |last = Spencer |first = Christina |archive-date = October 30, 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151030042724/http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-politics/justin-trudeau-kicks-senators-out-of-liberal-caucus-in-bid-to-show-hes-serious-about-cleaning-up-red-chamber |url-status = live }}</ref>}}
| seats2 = {{Composition bar|153|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
}}
}}
The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' ('''LPC'''; {{langx|fr-CA|Parti libéral du Canada}}, '''PLC''') is a federal [[political party in Canada]]. The party espouses the principles of [[liberalism]],<ref name="BittnerKoop2013" /><ref name="Liberal Party">McCall, Christina; Stephen Clarkson. [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/liberal-party "Liberal Party".] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005085850/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/liberal-party |date=October 5, 2013 }} ''The Canadian Encyclopedia''.</ref><ref name="Dyck">{{cite book |last=Dyck |first=Rand |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BUOoN8e5Ps0C |title=Canadian Politics: Concise Fifth Edition |publisher=Nelson Education |year=2012 |isbn=978-0176503437 |pages=217, 229}}</ref> and generally sits at the [[Centrism|centre]]<ref name="BittnerKoop2013">{{cite book|author1=Amanda Bittner|author2=Royce Koop|title=Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TdFTCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA300|date=March 1, 2013|publisher=UBC Press|isbn=978-0-7748-2411-8|pages=300–|access-date=August 3, 2018|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331005406/https://books.google.com/books?id=TdFTCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA300|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Olive2015">{{cite book|author=Andrea Olive|title=The Canadian Environment in Political Context|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bvw_CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA55|year=2015|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-0871-9|page=55}}</ref><ref name="Rayside2011">{{cite book |author = David Rayside |title = Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=oYXU_1WwNKUC&pg=PA22 |year = 2011 |publisher = UBC Press |isbn = 978-0-7748-2011-0 |page = 22 }}</ref> to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]]<ref name="Rayside2011"/><ref name="CollinMartin2012">{{cite book |author1 = Richard Collin |author2 = Pamela L. Martin |title = An Introduction to World Politics: Conflict and Consensus on a Small Planet |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=-vSlx-_Z408C&pg=PA138 |year = 2012 |publisher = Rowman & Littlefield |isbn = 978-1-4422-1803-1 |page = 138 }}</ref> of the [[Politics of Canada|Canadian political spectrum]], with their main rival, the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]], positioned to their [[Right-wing politics|right]] and the [[New Democratic Party]] positioned to their [[Left-wing politics|left]].<ref name="BittnerKoop2013" /><ref name="BaumerGold2015">{{cite book |author1=Donald C. Baumer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uBbvCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT152 |title=Parties, Polarization and Democracy in the United States |author2=Howard J. Gold |date=2015 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-317-25478-2 |pages=152– |access-date=October 28, 2018 |archive-date=March 31, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331010054/https://books.google.com/books?id=uBbvCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT152 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/liberal-party |title=Liberal Party |encyclopedia=The Canadian Encyclopedia |year=2015 |access-date=October 28, 2018 |archive-date=August 13, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190813191213/https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/liberal-party |url-status=live }}</ref> The party is described as "[[big tent]]",<ref name="CartyTent">{{cite book |author=R. Kenneth Carty |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D-c0CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA16 |title=Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party's Long Mastery of Canada's Public Life |date=2015 |publisher=UBC Press |isbn=978-0-7748-3002-7 |pages=16–17 |access-date=November 7, 2018 |archive-date=March 31, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331005406/https://books.google.com/books?id=D-c0CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA16 |url-status=live }} [https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9447/1/9780774829991.pdf PDF copy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210306234413/https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9447/1/9780774829991.pdf |date=March 6, 2021 }} at UBC Press.</ref> practising "brokerage politics",{{efn|name=politics|Brokerage politics is "a Canadian term for successful [[big tent]] parties that embody a [[Pluralism (political philosophy)|pluralistic]] catch-all approach to appeal to the median Canadian voter ... adopting centrist policies and [[electoral coalitions]] to satisfy the short-term preferences of a majority of electors who are not located on the ideological fringe."<ref name="MarlandGiasson2012">{{cite book|author1=Alex Marland|author2=Thierry Giasson|author3=Jennifer Lees-Marshment|title=Political Marketing in Canada|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GSeSaYPa2A4C&pg=PA257|year=2012|publisher=UBC Press|isbn=978-0-7748-2231-2|page=257|access-date=December 13, 2020|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331010034/https://books.google.com/books?id=GSeSaYPa2A4C&pg=PA257|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="CourtneySmith2010">{{cite book|author1=John Courtney|author2=David Smith|title=The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5KomEXgxvMcC&pg=PA195|year=2010|publisher=OUP USA|isbn=978-0-19-533535-4|page=195|access-date=December 13, 2020|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331010040/https://books.google.com/books?id=5KomEXgxvMcC&pg=PA195|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Brooks2004">{{cite book|author=Stephen Brooks|title=Canadian Democracy: An Introduction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DeQnPIXV5CEC|year=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-541806-4|page=265|quote=Two historically dominant political parties have avoided ideological appeals in favour of a flexible centrist style of politics that is often labelled brokerage politics.|access-date=December 13, 2020|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331010051/https://books.google.com/books?id=DeQnPIXV5CEC|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Johnson2016c">{{cite book|author=David Johnson|title=Thinking Government: Public Administration and Politics in Canada, Fourth Edition|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I_HzDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA13|year=2016|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-3521-0|pages=13–23|quote=... most Canadian governments, especially at the federal level, have taken a moderate, centrist approach to decision making, seeking to balance growth, stability, and governmental efficiency and economy ... .|access-date=December 13, 2020|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331010046/https://books.google.com/books?id=I_HzDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA13|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Smith2014">{{cite book|author=Miriam Smith|title=Group Politics and Social Movements in Canada: Second Edition|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iG4rAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA17|year=2014|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-0695-1|page=17|quote=Canada's party system has long been described as a "brokerage system" in which the leading parties (Liberal and Conservative) follow strategies that appeal across major [[Cleavage (politics)|social cleavages]] in an effort to defuse potential tensions.|access-date=December 13, 2020|archive-date=March 31, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331010047/https://books.google.com/books?id=iG4rAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA17|url-status=live}}</ref>}} attracting support from a broad spectrum of voters.<ref name="Olive2015c">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bvw_CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA55|title=The Canadian Environment in Political Context|author=Andrea Olive|date=2015|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-0871-9|page=55}}</ref> The Liberal Party is the longest-serving and oldest active federal political party in the country, and has dominated federal [[politics of Canada]] for much of its history, holding power for almost 70 years of the 20th century.<ref name="Carlisle2005">{{cite book |author=Rodney P. Carlisle |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bpx2AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA274 |title=Encyclopedia of Politics: The Left and the Right |publisher=SAGE Publications |year=2005 |isbn=978-1-4522-6531-5 |page=274 |access-date=November 11, 2018 |archive-date=November 10, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231110011730/https://books.google.com/books?id=Bpx2AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA274#v=onepage&q&f=false |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="BaumerGold2015" /> As a result, it has sometimes been referred to as Canada's "natural governing party".<ref name="JamesKasoff2007">{{cite book |author1=Patrick James |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1bs3Zktu4PkC&pg=PT70 |title=Canadian Studies in the New Millennium |author2=Mark J. Kasoff |publisher=University of Toronto Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-4426-9211-4 |page=70}}</ref><ref name="CartyTent" /><ref name="o894">{{cite book | last=Carty | first=R. Kenneth | title=The Government Party | chapter=A Century of Dominance: The Liberal Party of Canada | publisher=Oxford University Press | date=2022-03-30 | isbn=978-0-19-285848-1 | doi=10.1093/oso/9780192858481.003.0002 | pages=16–31}}</ref>
The '''Liberal Party of Canada''' ({{lang-fr|Parti libéral du Canada|region=CA}}) is the oldest and longest-serving [[Politics of Canada|political party]] in Canada. The party has dominated federal politics for much of Canada's history,<ref name="Carlisle2005">{{cite book|author=Rodney P. Carlisle|title=Encyclopedia of Politics: The Left and the Right|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bpx2AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA274|year=2005|publisher=SAGE Publications|isbn=978-1-4522-6531-5|page=274}}</ref><ref name="BaumerGold2015">{{cite book|author1=Donald C. Baumer|author2=Howard J. Gold|title=Parties, Polarization and Democracy in the United States|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uBbvCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT152|date= 2015|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-1-317-25478-2|pages=152–}}</ref> holding power for almost 69 years in the 20th century—more than any other party in a [[developed country]]—and as a result, it is sometimes referred to as Canada's "[[natural governing party]]".<ref name="JamesKasoff2007">{{cite book|author1=Patrick James|author2=Mark J. Kasoff|title=Canadian Studies in the New Millennium|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1bs3Zktu4PkC&pg=PT70|year=2007|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-9211-4|page=70}}</ref><ref name="CartyTent">{{cite book|author=R. Kenneth Carty|title=Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party's Long Mastery of Canada's Public Life|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D-c0CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA16|date= 2015|publisher=UBC Press|isbn=978-0-7748-3002-7|pages=16–17}} - ([https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9447/1/9780774829991.pdf PDF copy] - UBC Press, 2015)</ref>


The party first came into power in 1873 under [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]], but were voted out [[1878 Canadian federal election|five years later]] due to the economic conditions at the time. They would not come back to office until 1896; [[Wilfrid Laurier]] was [[Prime Minister of Canada|prime minister]] from that year until the party's [[1911 Canadian federal election|defeat in 1911]] and his tenure was marked by several compromises between [[English Canada|English]] and [[French Canada|French]] Canada. From the early 1920s until the mid-1950s,{{efn|Party was briefly out of power from 1930 to 1935.}} the Liberal Party under Prime Ministers [[William Lyon Mackenzie King]] and [[Louis St. Laurent]] gradually built a Canadian [[welfare state]].
The party espouses the principles of [[liberalism]],<ref name="BittnerKoop2013" /><ref name="Liberal Party">McCall, Christina; Stephen Clarkson. [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/liberal-party "Liberal Party".] ''The Canadian Encyclopedia''.</ref><ref name="Dyck" /> and generally sits at the centre to [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]] of the Canadian political spectrum, with the [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] positioned to the [[right-wing|right]] and the [[New Democratic Party]] (who at times aligned itself with the Liberals during minority governments), occupying the [[Centre-left politics|centre-left]] to [[left-wing|left]].<ref name="BittnerKoop2013" /><ref name="BaumerGold2015"/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url = https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/liberal-party|title=Liberal Party |encyclopedia = The Canadian Encyclopedia |year=2015 }}</ref> Like their federal Conservative Party rivals, the party is often described as a "[[big tent]]",<ref name="CartyTent" /> attracting support from a broad spectrum of voters.<ref name="Olive2015c">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Bvw_CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA55|title=The Canadian Environment in Political Context|author=Andrea Olive|date=2015|publisher=University of Toronto Press|isbn=978-1-4426-0871-9|pages=55–}}</ref> In the late 1970s, Prime Minister [[Pierre Trudeau|Pierre Elliott Trudeau]] claimed that his Liberal Party adhered to the "[[Radical centrism|radical centre]]".<ref name=Graham>Graham, Ron, ed. (1998). ''The Essential Trudeau''. McClelland & Stewart, p.&nbsp;71. {{ISBN|978-0-7710-8591-8}}.</ref><ref>Thompson, Wayne C. (2017). ''Canada''. Rowman & Littlefield, p.&nbsp;135. {{ISBN|978-1-4758-3510-6}}.</ref>


The Liberals' signature policies and legislative decisions include [[universal health care]], the [[Canada Pension Plan]], [[Student loans in Canada|Canada Student Loans]], [[peacekeeping]], [[multilateralism]], [[official bilingualism]], official [[multiculturalism]], [[Patriation|patriating]] the [[Constitution of Canada|Canadian constitution]] and the entrenchment of Canada's [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms|Charter of Rights and Freedoms]], the [[Clarity Act]], legalizing [[same-sex marriage]], [[Euthanasia in Canada|euthanasia]], and [[Cannabis Act|cannabis]], national [[Carbon price|carbon pricing]], and reproductive choice.<ref name="Liberal Party" /><ref>{{cite web |title = Liberal Party of Canada |url = http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339142/Liberal-Party-of-Canada/230901/History |work=Encyclopædia Britannica |accessdate = 2013-04-19 }}</ref><ref>https://www.lapresse.ca/elections-federales/201909/13/01-5241048-justin-trudeau-revient-sur-lavortement-a-montreal.php</ref>
The Liberals' signature policies and legislative decisions include [[universal health care]], the [[Canada Pension Plan]], [[Student loans in Canada|Canada Student Loans]], the establishment of the [[Royal Canadian Navy]], [[multilateralism]], [[official bilingualism]], official [[multiculturalism]], [[gun control]], the [[patriating|patriation]] of the [[Constitution of Canada]] and the establishment of the ''[[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]'', the ''[[Clarity Act]]'', legalizing [[same-sex marriage]], [[Euthanasia in Canada|euthanasia]], and [[Cannabis Act|cannabis]], national [[Carbon price|carbon pricing]], and expanded access to [[Abortion in Canada|abortion]].<ref name="Liberal Party"/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title = Liberal Party of Canada |url = https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339142/Liberal-Party-of-Canada/230901/History |encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date = April 19, 2013 |archive-date = December 19, 2013 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131219015812/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/339142/Liberal-Party-of-Canada/230901/History |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Lévesque |first=Catherine |title=Justin Trudeau revient sur l'avortement à Montréal |url=https://www.lapresse.ca/elections-federales/201909/13/01-5241048-justin-trudeau-revient-sur-lavortement-a-montreal.php |website=La Presse |language=fr |date=September 13, 2019 |access-date=September 14, 2019 |archive-date=September 15, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190915000600/https://www.lapresse.ca/elections-federales/201909/13/01-5241048-justin-trudeau-revient-sur-lavortement-a-montreal.php |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Gun Control — Our Platform|url=https://www2.liberal.ca/our-platform/gun-control/|access-date=August 3, 2020|website=2.liberal.ca|language=en-CA|archive-date=July 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200722115819/https://www2.liberal.ca/our-platform/gun-control/|url-status=dead}}</ref>


In the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 federal election]], the Liberal Party under [[Justin Trudeau]] had its best result since the [[2000 Canadian federal election|2000 election]], winning 39.5 percent of the popular vote and 184 seats, gaining a [[majority government|majority of seats]] in the [[42nd Canadian Parliament|House of Commons]].
The Liberal Party, led by [[Justin Trudeau]] since 2013, won a [[majority government]] in the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 federal election]]. In both the federal elections of [[2019 Canadian federal election|2019]] and [[2021 Canadian federal election|2021]], the party was re-elected with a minority government.


==History==
==History==
Line 44: Line 52:
====Origins====
====Origins====
{{See also|Rebellions of 1837}}
{{See also|Rebellions of 1837}}
The Liberals are descended from the mid-19th century [[Reform Party (pre-Confederation)|Reformers]] who agitated for [[responsible government]] throughout [[British North America]].<ref name="hist">{{cite web|title=Liberal Party of Canada – History |url=http://www.nafla.ca/images/clientupload/Liberal%20Party%20History.pdf |publisher=Newmarket-Aurora Federal Liberal Association |accessdate=2012-04-26 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426000952/http://www.nafla.ca/images/clientupload/Liberal%20Party%20History.pdf |archivedate=April 26, 2012 }}</ref> These included [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]], [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]], [[Robert Baldwin]], [[William Lyon Mackenzie]] and the [[Clear Grits]] in [[Upper Canada]], [[Joseph Howe]] in Nova Scotia, and the [[Parti canadien|Patriotes]] and [[Parti rouge|Rouges]] in [[Lower Canada]] led by figures such as [[Louis-Joseph Papineau]]. The [[Clear Grits]] and ''[[Parti rouge]]'' sometimes functioned as a united bloc in the legislature of the [[Province of Canada]] beginning in [[List of elections in the Province of Canada#1854|1854]], and a united Liberal Party combining both English and [[French Canadian]] members was formed in [[List of elections in the Province of Canada#1861|1861]].<ref name="hist"/>
The Liberals are descended from the mid-19th century [[Reform Party (pre-Confederation)|Reformers]] who advocated for [[responsible government]] throughout [[British North America]].<ref name="hist">{{cite web|title=Liberal Party of Canada – History |url=http://www.nafla.ca/images/clientupload/Liberal%20Party%20History.pdf |publisher=Newmarket-Aurora Federal Liberal Association |access-date=April 26, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426000952/http://www.nafla.ca/images/clientupload/Liberal%20Party%20History.pdf |archive-date=April 26, 2012 }}</ref> These included [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]], [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]], [[Robert Baldwin]], [[William Lyon Mackenzie]] and the [[Clear Grits]] in [[Upper Canada]], [[Joseph Howe]] in Nova Scotia, and the [[Parti canadien|Patriotes]] and [[Parti rouge|Rouges]] in [[Lower Canada]] led by figures such as [[Louis-Joseph Papineau]]. The [[Clear Grits]] and {{Lang|fr|[[Parti rouge]]|italic=no}} sometimes functioned as a united bloc in the legislature of the [[Province of Canada]] beginning in [[List of elections in the Province of Canada#1854|1854]], but a united Liberal Party combining both English and [[French Canadian]] members was not formed until 1867.<ref name="hist"/>


====Confederation====
====Confederation====
At the time of confederation of the former British colonies of Canada (now [[Ontario]] and [[Quebec]]), [[New Brunswick]] and [[Nova Scotia]], the radical Liberals were marginalized by the more pragmatic [[Conservative Party of Canada (historical)|Conservative]] coalition assembled under Sir [[John A. Macdonald]]. In the 29 years after [[Canadian confederation]], the Liberals were consigned to opposition, with the exception of one stint in government.<ref name="hist"/> [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]] was the de facto leader of the Official Opposition after Confederation and finally agreed to become the first official leader of the Liberal Party in 1873. He was able to lead the party to power for the first time in 1873, after the MacDonald government lost a [[vote of no confidence]] in the House of Commons due to the [[Pacific Scandal]]. Mackenzie subsequently won the [[1874 Canadian federal election|1874 election]], and served as Prime Minister for an additional four years. During the five years the Liberal government brought in many reforms, which include the replacement of open voting by [[secret ballot]], confining elections to one day and the creation of the [[Supreme Court of Canada]], the [[Royal Military College of Canada]], and the [[Auditor General of Canada|Office of the Auditor General]]. However the party was only able to build a solid support base in Ontario, and in [[1878 Canadian federal election|1878]] lost the government to MacDonald.<ref name="hist"/> The Liberals would spend the next 18 years in opposition.
At the time of [[Canadian Confederation|Confederation]] of the former British colonies of Canada (now [[Ontario]] and [[Quebec]]), [[New Brunswick]], and [[Nova Scotia]], the radical Liberals were marginalized by the more pragmatic [[Conservative Party of Canada (historical)|Conservative]] coalition assembled under Sir [[John A. Macdonald]]. In the 29 years after Confederation, the Liberals were consigned to opposition, with the exception of one stint in government.<ref name="hist"/> [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]] was the ''de facto'' leader of the Official Opposition after Confederation and finally agreed to become the first official leader of the Liberal Party in 1873. He was able to lead the party to power for the first time in 1873, after the Macdonald government resigned over the [[Pacific Scandal]]. Mackenzie subsequently won the [[1874 Canadian federal election|1874 election]] and served as prime minister for an additional four years. During the five years the Liberal government brought in many reforms, including the replacement of open voting by [[secret ballot]], confining elections to one day and the creation of the [[Supreme Court of Canada]], the [[Royal Military College of Canada]], and the [[Auditor General of Canada|Office of the Auditor General]]; however, the party was only able to build a solid support base in Ontario and in [[1878 Canadian federal election|1878]] lost the government to Macdonald.<ref name="hist"/> The Liberals would spend the next 18 years in opposition.


====Laurier era====
====Wilfrid Laurier====
[[File:The Honourable Sir Wilfrid Laurier Photo C (HS85-10-16873) - medium crop.jpg|right|165px|thumb|Sir [[Wilfrid Laurier]], Prime Minister of Canada (1896–1911)]]
[[File:The Honourable Sir Wilfrid Laurier Photo C (HS85-10-16873) - medium crop.jpg|right|165px|thumb|Sir [[Wilfrid Laurier]], Prime Minister of Canada (1896–1911)]]
In their early history, the Liberals were the party of [[continentalism]] and opposition to [[imperialism]]. The Liberals also became identified with the aspirations of Quebecers as a result of the growing hostility of French Canadians to the Conservatives. The Conservatives lost the support of French Canadians because of the role of Conservative governments in the execution of [[Louis Riel]] and their role in the [[Conscription Crisis of 1917]], and especially their [[Manitoba Schools Question|opposition to French schools]] in provinces besides Quebec.
In their early history, the Liberals were the party of [[continentalism]] and opposition to [[imperialism]]. The Liberals also became identified with the aspirations of Quebecers as a result of the growing hostility of French Canadians to the Conservatives. The Conservatives lost the support of French Canadians because of the role of Conservative governments in the execution of [[Louis Riel]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Duffy |first1=John |title=Fights of our Lives Elections, Leadership, and the Making of Canada |date=2002 |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |isbn=9780002000895 |page=41}}</ref> and their role in the [[Conscription Crisis of 1917]], and especially their [[Manitoba Schools Question|opposition to French schools]] in provinces besides Quebec.


It was not until [[Wilfrid Laurier]] became leader that the Liberal Party emerged as a modern party. Laurier was able to capitalize on the [[Tories]]' alienation of French Canada by offering the Liberals as a credible alternative. Laurier was able to overcome the party's reputation for [[anti-clericalism]] that offended the still-powerful [[Catholicism in Canada|Quebec Roman Catholic Church]]. In English-speaking Canada, the Liberal Party's support for [[Reciprocity (Canadian politics)|reciprocity]] made it popular among farmers, and helped cement the party's hold in the growing [[prairie provinces]].<ref name="Laurier">{{cite web |title = Sir Wilfrid Laurier Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3181-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-24 }}</ref>
It was not until [[Wilfrid Laurier]] became leader that the Liberal Party emerged as a modern party. Laurier was able to capitalize on the [[Conservative Party of Canada (1867–1942)|Conservatives]]' alienation of French Canada by offering the Liberals as a credible alternative. Laurier was able to overcome the party's reputation for [[anti-clericalism]] that offended the still-powerful [[Catholicism in Canada|Quebec Roman Catholic Church]]. In English-speaking Canada, the Liberal Party's support for [[Reciprocity (Canadian politics)|reciprocity]] made it popular among farmers, and helped cement the party's hold in the growing [[prairie provinces]].<ref name="Laurier">{{cite web |title = Sir Wilfrid Laurier Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3181-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |access-date = November 24, 2011 |archive-date = December 26, 2011 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111226010623/http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3181-e.html |url-status = live }}</ref>


Laurier led the Liberals to power in the [[1896 Canadian federal election|1896 election]] (in which he became the first Francophone Prime Minister), and oversaw a government that increased [[immigration]] in order to settle [[Western Canada]]. Laurier's government created the provinces of [[Saskatchewan]] and [[Alberta]] out of the [[North-West Territories]], and promoted the development of Canadian industry.<ref name="Laurier"/>
Laurier led the Liberals to power in the [[1896 Canadian federal election|1896 election]] (in which he became the first Francophone Prime Minister) and oversaw a government that increased [[immigration]] to settle [[Western Canada]]. Laurier's government created the provinces of [[Saskatchewan]] and [[Alberta]] out of the [[North-West Territories]] and promoted the development of Canadian industry.<ref name="Laurier"/>


===20th century===
===20th century===


====Party organization====
====Organization====
[[File:Wm Lyon Mackenzie King.jpg|left|150px|thumb|[[William Lyon Mackenzie King]], Prime Minister of Canada (1921–1926, 1926–1930, 1935–1948)]]
[[File:Wm Lyon Mackenzie King.jpg|left|150px|thumb|[[William Lyon Mackenzie King]], Prime Minister of Canada (1921–1926, 1926–1930, 1935–1948)]]
Until the early part of the century, the Liberal Party was a loose, informal coalition of local, provincial and regional bodies with a strong national party leader and caucus (and when in power, the national cabinet) but with an informal and regionalized extra-parliamentary organizational structure. There was no national membership of the party, an individual became a member by joining a provincial Liberal party. Laurier called the party's first national convention in 1893 in order to unite Liberal supporters behind a programme and build the campaign that successfully brought the party to power in 1896; however, once in power, no efforts were made to create a formal national organization outside of parliament.
Until the early part of the century, the Liberal Party was a loose coalition of local, provincial, and regional bodies with a strong national party leader and caucus, but with an informal and regionalized extra-parliamentary organizational structure. There was no national membership of the party. An individual became a member by joining a provincial Liberal party. Laurier called the party's first national convention in 1893 to unite Liberal supporters behind a programme and build the campaign that successfully brought the party to power in 1896, but no efforts were made to create a formal national organization outside Parliament.


As a result of the party's defeats in the [[1911 Canadian federal election|1911]] and [[1917 Canadian federal election|1917 federal elections]], Laurier attempted to organize the party on a national level by creating three bodies: the Central Liberal Information Office, the National Liberal Advisory Committee, and the National Liberal Organization Committee. However, the advisory committee became dominated by members of parliament and all three bodies were underfunded and competed with both local and provincial Liberal associations and the national caucus for authority. The party did organize the [[Liberal Party of Canada leadership elections|national party's second convention in 1919]] to elect [[William Lyon Mackenzie King]] as Laurier's successor (Canada's first ever [[leadership convention]]), yet following the party's return to power in the [[1921 Canadian federal election|1921 federal election]] the nascent national party organizations were eclipsed by powerful ministers and local party organizations largely driven by [[patronage]].
As a result of the party's defeats in the [[1911 Canadian federal election|1911]] and [[1917 Canadian federal election|1917]] federal elections, Laurier attempted to organize the party on a national level by creating three bodies: the Central Liberal Information Office, the National Liberal Advisory Committee, and the National Liberal Organization Committee. However, the advisory committee became dominated by members of Parliament and all three bodies were underfunded and competed with both local and provincial Liberal associations and the national caucus for authority. The party did organize the [[Liberal Party of Canada leadership elections|national party's second convention in 1919]] to elect [[William Lyon Mackenzie King]] as Laurier's successor (Canada's first [[leadership convention]]), yet following the party's return to power in the [[1921 Canadian federal election|1921 federal election]] the nascent national party organizations were eclipsed by powerful ministers and local party organizations largely driven by [[patronage]].


As a result of both the party's defeat in the [[1930 Canadian federal election|1930 federal election]], and the [[Beauharnois scandal|Beauharnois bribery scandal]] which highlighted the need for distance between the Liberal Party's political wing and campaign fundraising,<ref name="encyc">[http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0000604 Beauharnois Scandal] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070514003713/http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0000604 |date=May 14, 2007 }} at ''The Canadian Encyclopedia''</ref> a central coordinating organization, the National Liberal Federation, was created in 1932 with [[Vincent Massey]] as its first president. The new organization allowed individuals to directly join the national Liberal Party for the first time. With the Liberals return to power the national organization languished except for occasional national committee meetings, such as in 1943 when Mackenzie King called a meeting of the federation (consisting of the national caucus and up to seven voting delegates per province) to approve a new platform for the party in anticipation of the end of World War II and prepare for a post-war election.<ref>{{cite web |title = Federal Election Question May Be Settled Shortly |url = https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=G_guAAAAIBAJ&sjid=89sFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5119,3289151&dq=liberal-federation+canada&hl=en |newspaper = Ottawa Citizen |date = 20 Sep 1943 |accessdate = 18 Oct 2015 }}</ref> No national convention was held, however, until 1948; the Liberal Party held only three national conventions prior to the 1950s – in 1893, 1919 and 1948.<ref>John W. Lederle. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/137623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents "The Liberal Convention of 1893"]. ''The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science''. Vol. 16, No. 1 (Feb., 1950), pp. 42–52.</ref> The National Liberal Federation remained largely dependent on provincial Liberal parties and was often ignored and bypassed the parliamentary party in the organization of election campaigns and the development of policy. With the defeat of the Liberals in the [[1957 Canadian federal election|1957 federal election]] and in particular [[1958 Canadian federal election|1958]], reformers argued for the strengthening of the national party organization so it would not be dependent on provincial Liberal parties and patronage. A national executive and Council of presidents, consisting of the presidents of each Liberal riding association, were developed to give the party more co-ordination and national party conventions were regularly held in biennially where previously they had been held infrequently. Over time, provincial Liberal parties in most provinces were separated from provincial wings of the federal party and in a number of cases disaffiliated. By the 1980s, the National Liberal Federation was officially known as the Liberal Party of Canada.<ref>{{cite web |last = Koop |first = Ryan |title = The Elusive Nature of National Party Organization in Canada and Australia |url = https://sfu.academia.edu/RoyceKoop/Papers/414297/The_Elusive_Nature_of_National_Party_Organization_in_Canada_and_Australia |work = Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference. University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC. 4–6 June 2008 |accessdate = 2012-06-17 }}</ref>
As a result of both the party's defeat in the [[1930 Canadian federal election|1930 federal election]] and the [[Beauharnois scandal]], which highlighted the need for distance between the Liberal Party's parliamentary wing and campaign fundraising,<ref name="encyc">[http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0000604 Beauharnois Scandal] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070514003713/http://www.canadianencyclopedia.ca/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0000604 |date=May 14, 2007 }} at ''The Canadian Encyclopedia''</ref> a central coordinating organization, the National Liberal Federation, was created in 1932 with [[Vincent Massey]] as its first president. With the Liberal return to power, the national organization languished except for occasional national committee meetings, such as in 1943 when Mackenzie King called a meeting of the federation (consisting of the national caucus and up to seven voting delegates per province) to approve a new platform for the party in anticipation of the end of World War II and prepare for a post-war election.<ref>{{cite web |title = Federal Election Question May Be Settled Shortly |url = https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=G_guAAAAIBAJ&pg=5119,3289151&dq=liberal-federation+canada&hl=en |newspaper = Ottawa Citizen |date = September 20, 1943 |access-date = October 18, 2015 |archive-date = August 17, 2021 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210817003605/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=G_guAAAAIBAJ&pg=5119,3289151&dq=liberal-federation+canada&hl=en |url-status = live }}</ref> No national convention was held, however, until 1948; the Liberal Party held only three national conventions prior to the 1950s – in 1893, 1919 and 1948.<ref>John W. Lederle. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/137623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents "The Liberal Convention of 1893"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170202001814/http://www.jstor.org/stable/137623?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents |date=February 2, 2017 }}. ''The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science''. Vol. 16, No. 1 (Feb. 1950), pp. 42–52.</ref> The National Liberal Federation remained largely dependent on provincial Liberal parties and was often ignored and bypassed the parliamentary party in the organization of election campaigns and the development of policy. With the defeat of the Liberals in the [[1957 Canadian federal election|1957 federal election]] and in particular [[1958 Canadian federal election|1958]], reformers argued for the strengthening of the national party organization so it would not be dependent on provincial Liberal parties and patronage. A national executive and Council of presidents, consisting of the presidents of each Liberal riding association, were developed to give the party more co-ordination and national party conventions were regularly held in biennially where previously they had been held infrequently. Over time, provincial Liberal parties in most provinces were separated from provincial wings of the federal party and in a number of cases disaffiliated. By the 1980s, the National Liberal Federation was officially known as the Liberal Party of Canada.<ref>{{cite journal |last = Koop |first = Ryan |title = The Elusive Nature of National Party Organization in Canada and Australia |url = https://sfu.academia.edu/RoyceKoop/Papers/414297/The_Elusive_Nature_of_National_Party_Organization_in_Canada_and_Australia |journal = Paper Presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference. University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC. 4–6 June 2008 |access-date = June 17, 2012 |archive-date = July 8, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230708191422/https://sfu.academia.edu/RoyceKoop/Papers/414297/The_Elusive_Nature_of_National_Party_Organization_in_Canada_and_Australia |url-status = live }}</ref>


====Canadian sovereignty====
====Canadian sovereignty====
Line 74: Line 82:
The Liberals also promoted the idea of Canada being responsible for its own foreign and defence policy. Initially, it was Britain which determined external affairs for the dominion. In 1905, Laurier created the [[Department of External Affairs (Canada)|Department of External Affairs]], and in 1909 he advised [[Governor General of Canada|Governor General]] [[Albert Grey, 4th Earl Grey|Earl Grey]] to appoint the first [[Secretary of State for External Affairs (Canada)|Secretary of State for External Affairs]] to [[Cabinet of Canada|Cabinet]]. It was also Laurier who first proposed the creation of a [[Canadian Navy]] in 1910. Mackenzie King recommended the appointment by Governor General [[Julian Byng, 1st Viscount Byng of Vimy|Lord Byng]] of [[Vincent Massey]] as the first Canadian [[ambassador (diplomacy)|ambassador]] to Washington in 1926, marking the Liberal government's insistence on having direct relations with the United States, rather than having Britain act on Canada's behalf.
The Liberals also promoted the idea of Canada being responsible for its own foreign and defence policy. Initially, it was Britain which determined external affairs for the dominion. In 1905, Laurier created the [[Department of External Affairs (Canada)|Department of External Affairs]], and in 1909 he advised [[Governor General of Canada|Governor General]] [[Albert Grey, 4th Earl Grey|Earl Grey]] to appoint the first [[Secretary of State for External Affairs (Canada)|Secretary of State for External Affairs]] to [[Cabinet of Canada|Cabinet]]. It was also Laurier who first proposed the creation of a [[Canadian Navy]] in 1910. Mackenzie King recommended the appointment by Governor General [[Julian Byng, 1st Viscount Byng of Vimy|Lord Byng]] of [[Vincent Massey]] as the first Canadian [[ambassador (diplomacy)|ambassador]] to Washington in 1926, marking the Liberal government's insistence on having direct relations with the United States, rather than having Britain act on Canada's behalf.


====Liberals and the social safety net====
====Social safety net====
In the period just before and after the [[Second World War]], the party became a champion of 'progressive social policy'.<ref>{{cite book |author = David Johnson |title = Thinking Government: Public Sector Management in Canada |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=TcL80sSautgC&q=progressive+social+policy+mackenzie+king&pg=PA100 |year = 2006 |publisher = University of Toronto Press |isbn = 978-1-5511-1779-9 |pages = 99–103 |access-date = October 5, 2020 |archive-date = September 13, 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225355/https://books.google.com/books?id=TcL80sSautgC&q=progressive+social+policy+mackenzie+king&pg=PA100#v=snippet&q=progressive%20social%20policy%20mackenzie%20king&f=false |url-status = live }}</ref> As prime minister for most of the time between 1921 and 1948, King introduced several measures that led to the creation of Canada's [[social safety net]]. Bowing to popular pressure, he introduced the mother's allowance, a [[Baby bonus|monthly payment]] to all mothers with young children. He also reluctantly introduced [[old age pension]]s when [[J. S. Woodsworth]] required it in exchange for his [[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]] party's support of King's [[minority government]].
[[Image:Lester B. Pearson 1957.jpg|right|160px|thumb|[[Lester B. Pearson]], Prime Minister of Canada (1963–1968)]]
In the period just before and after the [[Second World War]], the party became a champion of 'progressive social policy'.<ref>{{cite book |author = David Johnson |title = Thinking Government: Public Sector Management in Canada |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=TcL80sSautgC&pg=PA100&lpg=PA100&dq=progressive+social+policy+mackenzie+king |year = 2006 |publisher = University of Toronto Press |isbn = 978-1-5511-1779-9 |pages = 99–103 }}</ref> As Prime Minister for most of the time between 1921 and 1948, King introduced several measures that led to the creation of Canada's [[social safety net]]. Bowing to popular pressure, he introduced the mother's allowance, a [[Baby bonus|monthly payment]] to all mothers with young children. He also reluctantly introduced [[old age pension]]s when [[J. S. Woodsworth]] required it in exchange for his [[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]] party's support of King's [[minority government]].


[[Louis St. Laurent]] succeeded King as Liberal leader and Prime Minister on November 15, 1948. In the [[1949 Canadian federal election|1949]] and [[1953 Canadian federal election|1953]] federal elections, St. Laurent led the Liberal Party to two large majority governments. As Prime Minister he oversaw the joining of [[Newfoundland and Labrador|Newfoundland]] in Confederation as Canada's tenth province, he established [[Equalization payments in Canada|equalization payments]] to the provinces, and continued with social reform with improvements in pensions and health insurance. In 1956, Canada played an important role in resolving the [[Suez Crisis]], and contributed to the United Nations force in the [[Korean War]]. Canada enjoyed economic prosperity during St. Laurent's premiership and wartime debts were paid off. The [[Pipeline Debate]] proved the Liberal Party's undoing. Their attempt to pass legislation to build a [[natural gas pipeline]] from [[Alberta]] to central Canada was met with fierce disagreement in the House of Commons. In 1957, [[John Diefenbaker]]'s [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|Progressive Conservatives]] won a minority government and St. Laurent resigned as Prime Minister and Liberal leader.<ref>{{cite web |title = Louis St. Laurent Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3306-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-23 }}</ref>
[[Louis St. Laurent]] succeeded King as Liberal leader and prime minister on November 15, 1948. In the [[1949 Canadian federal election|1949]] and [[1953 Canadian federal election|1953]] federal elections, St. Laurent led the Liberal Party to two large majority governments. As prime minister he oversaw the joining of [[Newfoundland and Labrador|Newfoundland]] in Confederation as Canada's tenth province, he established [[Equalization payments in Canada|equalization payments]] to the provinces, and continued with social reform with improvements in pensions and health insurance. In 1956, Canada played an important role in resolving the [[Suez Crisis]], and contributed to the United Nations force in the [[Korean War]]. Canada enjoyed economic prosperity during St. Laurent's premiership and wartime debts were paid off. The [[Pipeline Debate]] proved the Liberal Party's undoing. Their attempt to pass legislation to build a [[natural gas pipeline]] from [[Alberta]] to central Canada was met with fierce disagreement in the House of Commons. In 1957, [[John Diefenbaker]]'s [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|Progressive Conservatives]] won a minority government and St. Laurent resigned as prime minister and Liberal leader.<ref>{{cite web |title = Louis St. Laurent Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3306-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |access-date = November 23, 2011 }}</ref>


[[Lester B. Pearson]] was easily elected Liberal leader at the party's [[1958 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|1958 leadership convention]]. However, only months after becoming Liberal leader, Pearson led the party into the [[1958 Canadian federal election|1958 federal election]] that saw Diefenbaker's Progressive Conservatives win the largest majority government, by percentage of seats, in Canadian history.<ref>{{cite web |title = John Diefenbaker Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3331-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-23 }}</ref> The Progressive Conservatives won 206 of the 265 seats in the House of Commons, while the Liberals were reduced to just 48 seats. Pearson remained Liberal leader during this time and in the [[1962 Canadian federal election|1962 election]] managed to reduce Diefenbaker to a minority government. In the [[1963 Canadian federal election|1963 election]] Pearson led the Liberal Party back to victory, forming a minority government. Pearson served as Prime Minister for five years, winning a second election in [[1965 Canadian federal election|1965]]. While Pearson's leadership was considered poor and the Liberal Party never held a majority of the seats in parliament during his premiership, he left office in 1968 with an impressive legacy.<ref>{{cite web |title = Lester Pearson Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3356-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-23 }}</ref> Pearson's government introduced [[Medicare (Canada)|Medicare]], a new immigration act, the Canada Pension Plan, Canada Student Loans, the Canada Assistance Plan, and adopted the [[Flag of Canada|Maple Leaf]] as Canada's national flag.<ref>{{cite book |author = Andrew Cohen |title = Extraordinary Canadians: Lester B. Pearson |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=JyBrNgMJELIC&q=for+this%2C+little+credit#v=snippet&q=for%20this%2C%20little%20credit&f=false |year = 2008 |publisher = Penguin Canada |isbn = 978-0-1431-7269-7 }}</ref>
[[Lester B. Pearson]] was easily elected Liberal leader at the party's [[1958 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|1958 leadership convention]]. However, only months after becoming Liberal leader, Pearson led the party into the [[1958 Canadian federal election|1958 federal election]] that saw Diefenbaker's Progressive Conservatives win the largest majority government, by percentage of seats, in Canadian history.<ref>{{cite web |title = John Diefenbaker Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3331-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |access-date = November 23, 2011 |archive-date = November 7, 2011 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111107231549/http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3331-e.html |url-status = live }}</ref> The Progressive Conservatives won 206 of the 265 seats in the House of Commons, while the Liberals were reduced to just 48 seats. Pearson remained Liberal leader during this time and in the [[1962 Canadian federal election|1962 election]] managed to reduce Diefenbaker to a minority government. In the [[1963 Canadian federal election|1963 election]] Pearson led the Liberal Party back to victory, forming a minority government. Pearson served as prime minister for five years, winning a second election in [[1965 Canadian federal election|1965]]. While Pearson's leadership was considered poor and the Liberal Party never held a majority of the seats in parliament during his premiership, he left office in 1968 with an impressive legacy.<ref>{{cite web |title = Lester Pearson Biography |url = http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3356-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |access-date = November 23, 2011 |archive-date = January 24, 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120124114042/http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/2/4/h4-3356-e.html |url-status = live }}</ref> Pearson's government introduced [[Medicare (Canada)|Medicare]], a new immigration act, the Canada Pension Plan, Canada Student Loans, the [[Canada Assistance Plan]], and adopted the [[Flag of Canada|Maple Leaf]] as Canada's national flag.<ref>{{cite book |author = Andrew Cohen |title = Extraordinary Canadians: Lester B. Pearson |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=JyBrNgMJELIC&q=for+this%2C+little+credit |year = 2008 |publisher = Penguin Canada |isbn = 978-0-1431-7269-7 }}</ref>


====Pierre Trudeau era====
====Pierre Trudeau====
[[File:Pierre Trudeau (1975).jpg|thumb|left|140px|[[Pierre Elliott Trudeau]], Prime Minister of Canada (1968–1979, 1980–1984)]]
[[File:Pierre Trudeau (1975).jpg|thumb|left|140px|[[Pierre Elliott Trudeau]], Prime Minister of Canada (1968–1979, 1980–1984)]]
Under [[Pierre Trudeau]], the mission of a progressive social policy evolved into the goal of creating a "[[just society]]".<ref>{{cite web |first1= Allison|last1= Calwell |title= Former Canadian PM dies |url= http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s193185.htm|date= 29 September 2000|publisher= Australian Broadcasting Corporation|accessdate= 13 November 2015}}</ref>
Under [[Pierre Trudeau]], the mission of a progressive social policy evolved into the goal of creating a "[[just society]]".<ref>{{cite web|first1= Allison|last1= Calwell|title= Former Canadian PM dies|url= http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s193185.htm|date= September 29, 2000|publisher= Australian Broadcasting Corporation|access-date= November 13, 2015|archive-date= September 13, 2024|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225258/https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/worldtoday|url-status= live}}</ref> In the late 1970s, Trudeau stated that his Liberal Party adhered to the "[[Radical centrism|radical centre]]".<ref name=Graham>Graham, Ron, ed. (1998). ''The Essential Trudeau''. McClelland & Stewart, p.&nbsp;71. {{ISBN|978-0-7710-8591-8}}.</ref><ref>Thompson, Wayne C. (2017). ''Canada''. Rowman & Littlefield, p.&nbsp;135. {{ISBN|978-1-4758-3510-6}}.</ref>


The Liberal Party under Trudeau promoted [[Official bilingualism in Canada|official bilingualism]] and passed the ''[[Official Languages Act of Canada|Official Languages Act]]'', which gave French and English languages equal status in Canada.<ref name="hist"/> Trudeau hoped that the promotion of bilingualism would cement Quebec's place in Confederation, and counter growing calls for an independent Quebec. The party hoped the policy would transform Canada into a country where English and French Canadians could live together, and allow Canadians to move to any part of the country without having to lose their language. Although this vision has yet to fully materialize, official bilingualism has helped to halt the decline of the French language outside of Quebec, and to ensure that all federal government services (including radio and television services provided by the government-owned [[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]]/[[Radio-Canada]]) are available in both languages throughout the country.<ref>{{cite web |first1= Tamara|last1= Baluja|first2= James|last2= Bradshaw|title= Is bilingualism still relevant in Canada?|url= https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/is-bilingualism-still-relevant-in-canada/article4365620/?page=all|date= 22 June 2012|newspaper= The Globe and Mail|accessdate= 13 November 2015}}</ref>
The Liberal Party under Trudeau promoted [[Official bilingualism in Canada|official bilingualism]] and passed the ''[[Official Languages Act of Canada|Official Languages Act]]'', which gave French and English languages equal status in Canada.<ref name="hist"/> Trudeau hoped that the promotion of bilingualism would cement Quebec's place in Confederation, and counter growing calls for an independent Quebec. The party hoped the policy would transform Canada into a country where English and French Canadians could live together, and allow Canadians to move to any part of the country without having to lose their language. Although this vision has yet to fully materialize, official bilingualism has helped to halt the decline of the French language outside of Quebec, and to ensure that all federal government services (including radio and television services provided by the government-owned [[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]]/[[Radio-Canada]]) are available in both languages throughout the country.<ref>{{cite web|first1= Tamara|last1= Baluja|first2= James|last2= Bradshaw|title= Is bilingualism still relevant in Canada?|url= https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/is-bilingualism-still-relevant-in-canada/article4365620/?page=all|date= June 22, 2012|newspaper= The Globe and Mail|access-date= November 13, 2015|archive-date= September 13, 2024|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225326/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/is-bilingualism-still-relevant-in-canada/article4365620/?page=all|url-status= live}}</ref>


The Trudeau Liberals are also credited with support for [[Multiculturalism in Canada|state multiculturalism]] as a means of integrating immigrants into Canadian society without forcing them to shed their culture,<ref>{{cite book|author1= Stephen Tierney|author2= Hugh Donald Forbes|title= Multiculturalism and the Canadian Constitution|url= http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2007/multiculturalismandthecanadianconstitution.pdf|year= 2007|publisher= UBC Press|isbn= 978-0-7748-1445-4|pages= 27–41|url-status= dead|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20151117033156/http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2007/multiculturalismandthecanadianconstitution.pdf|archivedate= November 17, 2015|df= mdy-all}}</ref> leading the party to build a base of support among recent immigrants and their children.<ref>Blais, André. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=364576 "Accounting for the Electoral Success of the Liberal Party in Canada"]. ''Journal of Political Science,'' Dec 2005, Vol. 38#4. pp 821–840.</ref> This marked the culmination of a decades-long shift in Liberal immigration policy, a reversal of pre-war racial attitudes that spurred discriminatory policies such as the [[Chinese Immigration Act of 1923]]<ref>{{cite web |title = Chinese Immigration Act, 1923|url = http://www.pier21.ca/research/immigration-history/chinese-immigration-act-1923|publisher = Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21|accessdate = 2017-04-30}}</ref> and the [[MS St. Louis|MS St. Louis incident]].<ref>{{cite news|author=Stephanie Levitz|title = Liberals working on apology for 1939 decision to turn away Jewish refugees|url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-working-on-apology-for-1939-decision-to-turn-away-jewish-refugees/article36410599/|newspaper = The Globe and Mail|date = 2016-09-27|accessdate = 2017-09-28}}</ref>
The Trudeau Liberals are also credited with support for [[Multiculturalism in Canada|state multiculturalism]] as a means of integrating immigrants into Canadian society without forcing them to shed their culture,<ref>{{cite book|author1= Stephen Tierney|author2= Hugh Donald Forbes|title= Multiculturalism and the Canadian Constitution|url= http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2007/multiculturalismandthecanadianconstitution.pdf|year= 2007|publisher= UBC Press|isbn= 978-0-7748-1445-4|pages= 27–41|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151117033156/http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2007/multiculturalismandthecanadianconstitution.pdf|archive-date= November 17, 2015|df= mdy-all}}</ref> leading the party to build a base of support among recent immigrants and their children.<ref>Blais, André. [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=364576 "Accounting for the Electoral Success of the Liberal Party in Canada"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117052953/http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=364576 |date=November 17, 2015 }}. ''Journal of Political Science,'' Dec 2005, Vol. 38#4. pp 821–840.</ref> This marked the culmination of a decades-long shift in Liberal immigration policy, a reversal of pre-war racial attitudes that spurred discriminatory policies such as the [[Chinese Immigration Act of 1923]]<ref>{{cite web|title = Chinese Immigration Act, 1923|url = http://www.pier21.ca/research/immigration-history/chinese-immigration-act-1923|publisher = Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21|access-date = April 30, 2017|archive-date = May 2, 2017|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170502034523/http://www.pier21.ca/research/immigration-history/chinese-immigration-act-1923|url-status = live}}</ref> and the [[MS St. Louis|MS St. Louis incident]].<ref>{{cite news|author = Stephanie Levitz|title = Liberals working on apology for 1939 decision to turn away Jewish refugees|url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-working-on-apology-for-1939-decision-to-turn-away-jewish-refugees/article36410599/|newspaper = The Globe and Mail|date = September 27, 2016|access-date = September 28, 2017|archive-date = November 15, 2017|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171115172738/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-working-on-apology-for-1939-decision-to-turn-away-jewish-refugees/article36410599/|url-status = live}}</ref>[[File:Liberal Party logo 1968.svg|thumb|Trudeau-era wordmark and logo]]


The most lasting effect of the Trudeau years has been the patriation of the [[Constitution of Canada|Canadian constitution]] and the creation of Canada's [[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms|Charter of Rights and Freedoms]].<ref>{{cite book|author1= Lois Harder|author2= Steve Patten|title= Patriation and Its Consequences: Constitution Making in Canada|url= http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2015/PatriationAndItsConsequences.pdf|year= 2015|publisher= UBC Press|isbn= 978-0-7748-2861-1|pages= 3–23|url-status= dead|archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20151117032743/http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2015/PatriationAndItsConsequences.pdf|archivedate= November 17, 2015|df= mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first= Linda|last= McKay-Panos|title= The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: An Integral Part of our Constitution|url= http://www.lawnow.org/the-canadian-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-an-integral-part-of-our-constitution/|newspaper= LawNow|accessdate= 12 November 2015|date= 1 January 2013}}</ref> Trudeau's Liberals supported the concept of a strong, central government, and fought [[History of the Quebec sovereignist movement|Quebec separatism]], other forms of [[Quebec nationalism]], and the granting of "[[distinct society]]" status to Quebec. Such actions, however, served as rallying cries for sovereigntists and alienated many Francophone Quebeckers.
The most lasting effect of the Trudeau years has been the [[patriation]] of the [[Constitution of Canada]] and the creation of the ''[[Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]]''.<ref>{{cite book|author1= Lois Harder|author2= Steve Patten|title= Patriation and Its Consequences: Constitution Making in Canada|url= http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2015/PatriationAndItsConsequences.pdf|year= 2015|publisher= UBC Press|isbn= 978-0-7748-2861-1|pages= 3–23|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151117032743/http://www.ubcpress.ca/books/pdf/chapters/2015/PatriationAndItsConsequences.pdf|archive-date= November 17, 2015|df= mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first= Linda|last= McKay-Panos|title= The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: An Integral Part of our Constitution|url= http://www.lawnow.org/the-canadian-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-an-integral-part-of-our-constitution/|newspaper= LawNow|access-date= November 12, 2015|date= January 1, 2013|archive-date= September 13, 2024|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225258/http://www.lawnow.org/the-canadian-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-an-integral-part-of-our-constitution/|url-status= live}}</ref> Trudeau's Liberals supported the concept of a strong, central government, and fought [[History of the Quebec sovereignist movement|Quebec separatism]], other forms of [[Quebec nationalism]], and the granting of "[[distinct society]]" status to Quebec; however, such actions served as rallying cries for sovereigntists, and alienated many Francophone Quebeckers.


The other primary legacy of the Trudeau years has been financial. Net federal debt in fiscal 1968, just before Trudeau became Prime Minister, was about $18&nbsp;billion [[Canadian dollar|CAD]], or 26 percent of gross domestic product; by his final year in office, it had ballooned to over 200&nbsp;billion—at 46 percent of GDP, nearly twice as large relative to the economy.<ref>{{cite web |first1= Jean|last1= Soucy|first2= Marion G.|last2= Wrobel |title = Federal Deficit: Changing Trends|url = http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/CIR/887-e.htm|publisher= Parliamentary Research Branch, Economics Division, Library of Parliament|accessdate= 12 November 2015|date= 11 April 2000}}</ref>
The other primary legacy of the Trudeau years has been financial. Net federal debt in fiscal 1968, just before Trudeau became prime minister, was about $18&nbsp;billion [[Canadian dollar|CAD]], or 26 percent of gross domestic product; by his final year in office, it had ballooned to over 200&nbsp;billion—at 46 percent of GDP, nearly twice as large relative to the economy.<ref>{{cite web|first1= Jean|last1= Soucy|first2= Marion G.|last2= Wrobel|title= Federal Deficit: Changing Trends|url= http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/CIR/887-e.htm|publisher= Parliamentary Research Branch, Economics Division, Library of Parliament|access-date= November 12, 2015|date= April 11, 2000|archive-date= September 13, 2024|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225309/https://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/CIR/887-e.htm|url-status= live}}</ref>
[[File:Liberal Party logo 1968.svg|thumb|Trudeau-era wordmark and logo]]


====Post-Trudeau party in opposition====
====John Turner====
[[File:Liberal Party of Canada logo, 1984.svg|thumb|Liberal Party logo in 1984]]
After Trudeau's retirement in 1984, many Liberals, such as [[Jean Chrétien]] and [[Clyde K. Wells|Clyde Wells]], continued to adhere to Trudeau's concept of federalism. Others, such as [[John Turner]], supported the failed [[Meech Lake Accord|Meech Lake]] and [[Charlottetown Accord|Charlottetown Constitutional Accords]], which would have recognized Quebec as a "distinct society" and would have increased the powers of the provinces to the detriment of the federal government.
After Trudeau's retirement in 1984, many Liberals, such as [[Jean Chrétien]] and [[Clyde K. Wells|Clyde Wells]], continued to adhere to Trudeau's concept of federalism. Others, such as [[John Turner]], supported the failed [[Meech Lake Accord|Meech Lake]] and [[Charlottetown Accord|Charlottetown Constitutional Accords]], which would have recognized Quebec as a "distinct society" and would have increased the powers of the provinces to the detriment of the federal government.


Trudeau stepped down as Prime Minister and party leader in 1984, as the Liberals were slipping in polls. At that year's leadership convention, Turner defeated Chrétien on the second ballot to become Prime Minister.<ref>Terence McKenna. [http://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/jean-chretien-losing-the-liberal-leadership "Jean Chrétien: Losing the Liberal leadership"]. CBC's ''The Journal'', 27 February 1986. Retrieved 12 November 2015.</ref> Immediately, upon taking office, Turner called a snap election, citing favourable internal polls. However, the party was hurt by [[You had an option, sir|numerous patronage appointments]], many of which Turner had made supposedly in return for Trudeau retiring early. Also, they were unpopular in their traditional stronghold of Quebec because of the constitution repatriation which excluded that province. The Liberals lost power in the [[1984 Canadian federal election|1984 election]], and were reduced to only 40 seats in the House of Commons. The Progressive Conservatives won a majority of the seats in every province, including Quebec. The 95-seat loss was the worst defeat in the party's history, and the worst defeat at the time for a governing party at the federal level. What was more, the [[New Democratic Party (Canada)|New Democratic Party]], successor to the [[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]], won only ten fewer seats than the Liberals, and some thought that the NDP under [[Ed Broadbent]] would push the Liberals to third-party status.<ref>{{cite book |author = Brooke Jeffrey |title = Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=8dBHhzra5mQC&pg=PT20&lpg=PT20&dq=ed+broadbent+ten+seats+liberals+1984|year = 2010 |publisher = University of Toronto Press |isbn = 978-1-4426-6019-9 }}</ref>
Trudeau stepped down as prime minister and party leader in 1984, as the Liberals were slipping in polls. At that year's leadership convention, Turner defeated Chrétien on the second ballot to become prime minister.<ref>Terence McKenna. [http://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/jean-chretien-losing-the-liberal-leadership "Jean Chrétien: Losing the Liberal leadership"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151119191817/http://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/jean-chretien-losing-the-liberal-leadership |date=November 19, 2015 }}. CBC's ''The Journal'', February 27, 1986. Retrieved November 12, 2015.</ref> Immediately, upon taking office, Turner called a snap election, citing favourable internal polls. However, the party was hurt by [[You had an option, sir|numerous patronage appointments]], many of which Turner had made supposedly in return for Trudeau retiring early. Also, they were unpopular in their traditional stronghold of Quebec because of the constitution repatriation which excluded that province. The Liberals lost power in the [[1984 Canadian federal election|1984 election]], and were reduced to only 40 seats in the House of Commons. The Progressive Conservatives won a majority of the seats in every province, including Quebec. The 95-seat loss was the worst defeat in the party's history, and the worst defeat at the time for a governing party at the federal level. What was more, the [[New Democratic Party (Canada)|New Democratic Party]], successor to the [[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]], won only ten fewer seats than the Liberals, and some thought that the NDP under [[Ed Broadbent]] would push the Liberals to third-party status.<ref>{{cite book |author = Brooke Jeffrey |title = Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008 |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=8dBHhzra5mQC&q=ed+broadbent+ten+seats+liberals+1984&pg=PT20 |year = 2010 |publisher = University of Toronto Press |isbn = 978-1-4426-6019-9 |access-date = October 5, 2020 |archive-date = September 13, 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225333/https://books.google.com/books?id=8dBHhzra5mQC&q=ed+broadbent+ten+seats+liberals+1984&pg=PT20#v=snippet&q=ed%20broadbent%20ten%20seats%20liberals%201984&f=false |url-status = live }}</ref>


The party began a long process of reconstruction.<ref name="hist"/> A small group of young Liberal MPs, known as the [[Liberal Party of Canada Rat Pack|Rat Pack]], gained fame by criticizing the Tory government of [[Brian Mulroney]] at every turn. Also, despite public and backroom attempts to remove Turner as leader, he managed to consolidate his leadership at the 1986 review.
The party began a long process of reconstruction.<ref name="hist"/> A small group of young Liberal MPs, known as the [[Liberal Party of Canada Rat Pack|Rat Pack]], gained fame by criticizing the Progressive Conservative government of [[Brian Mulroney]] at every turn. Also, despite public and backroom attempts to remove Turner as leader, he managed to consolidate his leadership at the 1986 review.


The [[1988 Canadian federal election|1988 election]] was notable for Turner's strong opposition to the [[Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement]] negotiated by [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|Progressive Conservative]] Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Although most Canadians voted for parties opposed to [[free trade]], the Tories were returned with a majority government, and implemented the deal. The Liberals recovered from their near-meltdown of 1984, however, winning 83 seats and ending much of the talk of being eclipsed by the NDP, who won 43 seats.<ref name="hist"/>
The [[1988 Canadian federal election|1988 election]] was notable for Turner's strong opposition to the [[Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement]] negotiated by [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|Progressive Conservative]] Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Although most Canadians voted for parties opposed to [[free trade]], the Tories were returned with a majority government, and implemented the deal. The Liberals recovered from their near-meltdown of 1984, however, winning 83 seats and ending much of the talk of being eclipsed by the NDP, who won 43 seats.<ref name="hist"/>


====Liberals under Chrétien====
====Jean Chrétien====
[[File:Jean Chrétien 2010.jpg|thumb|right|190px|[[Jean Chrétien]], Prime Minister of Canada (1993–2003)]]
[[File:Jean Chrétien 2010.jpg|thumb|left|[[Jean Chrétien]], Prime Minister of Canada (1993–2003)]]
Turner announced that he would resign as leader of the Liberal Party on May 3, 1989. The Liberal Party set a [[1990 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|leadership convention]] for June 23, 1990, in [[Calgary]]. Five candidates contested the leadership of the party and former [[Deputy Prime Minister of Canada|Deputy Prime Minister]] [[Jean Chrétien]], who had served in every Liberal cabinet since 1965, won on the first ballot.<ref name="Chrétien">{{cite web |title = Jean Chrétien Bio |url = http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/primeministers/h4-3506-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-09 }}</ref> Chrétien's Liberals campaigned in the [[1993 Canadian federal election|1993 election]] on the promise of renegotiating the [[North American Free Trade Agreement]] (NAFTA), and eliminating the [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax]] (GST). Just after the [[drop the writ|writ was dropped]] for the election, they issued the [[Red Book (Liberal Party of Canada)|Red Book]], an integrated and coherent approach to economic, social, environmental and foreign policy. This was unprecedented for a Canadian party.<ref name="hist"/> Taking full advantage of the inability of Mulroney's successor, [[Kim Campbell]], to overcome a large amount of antipathy toward Mulroney, they won a strong majority government with 177 seats—the third-best performance in party history, and their best since 1949. The Progressive Conservatives were cut down to only two seats, suffering a defeat even more severe than the one they had handed the Liberals nine years earlier. The Liberals were re-elected with a considerably reduced majority in [[1997 Canadian federal election|1997]], but nearly tied their 1993 total in [[2000 Canadian federal election|2000]].
Turner announced that he would resign as leader of the Liberal Party on May 3, 1989. The Liberal Party set a [[1990 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|leadership convention for June 23, 1990]], in [[Calgary]]. Five candidates contested the leadership of the party, with former [[Deputy Prime Minister of Canada|Deputy Prime Minister]] [[Jean Chrétien]], who had served in every Liberal cabinet since 1965, and [[Paul Martin]], MP and former CEO of [[Canada Steamship Lines]], as the frontrunners. A key moment in that race took place at an all-candidates debate in Montreal, where the discussion quickly turned to the Meech Lake Accord. Martin, favouring Meech, attempted to force Chrétien to abandon his nuanced position on the deal and declare for or against it. When Chrétien refused to endorse the deal, young Liberal delegates crowding the hall began to chant "vendu" ("sellout" in French) and "Judas" at Chrétien. The incident damaged Chrétien's reputation in Quebec, and lead to a lasting animosity between Chrétien and Martin. Chrétien won on the first ballot.<ref name="Chrétien">{{cite web |title = Jean Chrétien Bio |url = http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/primeministers/h4-3506-e.html |publisher = Library and Archives Canada |access-date = November 9, 2011 |archive-date = October 18, 2017 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171018070844/http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/primeministers/h4-3506-e.html |url-status = dead }}</ref>


Chrétien's Liberals campaigned in the [[1993 Canadian federal election|1993 election]] on the promise of renegotiating the [[North American Free Trade Agreement]] (NAFTA), and eliminating the [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax]] (GST). Just after the [[drop the writ|writ was dropped]] for the election, they issued the [[Red Book (Liberal Party of Canada)|Red Book]], an integrated and coherent approach to economic, social, environmental and foreign policy. This was unprecedented for a Canadian party.<ref name="hist" /> Taking full advantage of the inability of Mulroney's successor, [[Kim Campbell]], to overcome a large amount of antipathy toward Mulroney, they won a strong majority government with 177 seats—the third-best performance in party history, and their best since 1949. The Progressive Conservatives were cut down to only two seats, suffering a defeat even more severe than the one they had handed the Liberals nine years earlier. The Liberals were re-elected with a considerably reduced majority in [[1997 Canadian federal election|1997]], but nearly tied their 1993 total in [[2000 Canadian federal election|2000]].
For the next decade, the Liberals dominated Canadian politics in a fashion not seen since the early years of Confederation. This was because of the destruction of the "grand coalition" of Western socially conservative populists, Quebec nationalists, and fiscal conservatives from Ontario that had supported the Progressive Conservatives in 1984 and 1988. The Progressive Conservatives Western support, for all practical purposes, transferred en masse to the Western-based [[Reform Party of Canada|Reform Party]], which replaced the PCs as the major right-wing party in Canada. However, the new party's agenda was seen as too conservative for most Canadians. It only won one seat east of Manitoba in an election (but gained another in a floor-crossing). Even when Reform restructured into the [[Canadian Alliance]], the party was virtually non-existent east of Manitoba, winning only 66 seats in 2000. Reform/Alliance was the [[Official Opposition (Canada)|official opposition]] from 1997 to 2003, but was never able to overcome wide perceptions that it was merely a Western [[protest party]]. The Quebec nationalists who had once supported the Tories largely switched their support to the sovereigntist [[Bloc Québécois]], while the Tories' Ontario support largely moved to the Liberals. The PCs would never be a major force in Canadian politics again; while they rebounded to 20 seats in the next election, they won only two seats west of Quebec in the next decade.


For the next decade, the Liberals dominated Canadian politics in a fashion not seen since the early years of Confederation. This was because of the splintering of the Progressive Conservative's electoral coalition. The PCs' Western support, for all practical purposes, transferred ''en masse'' to the Western-based [[Reform Party of Canada|Reform Party]], which replaced the PCs as the largest right-wing party in Canada; however, the party was unable to overcome perceptions of extremism and that it was merely a Western [[protest party]], and was virtually non-existent east of Manitoba. Meanwhile, the Quebec nationalists who had once supported the Tories largely switched their support to the sovereigntist [[Bloc Québécois]], while the Tories' Ontario support largely moved to the Liberals. With a divided opposition, the Liberals were able to reap large majorities—especially in Ontario, where the party won all but one seat in 1993, all but two in 1997 and all but three in 2000. However, there was some disappointment as Liberals were not able to recover their traditional dominant position in Quebec, despite being led by a Quebecer.
Ontario and Quebec combine for a majority of seats in the House of Commons by virtue of Ontario's current population and Quebec's historic population (59 percent of the seats {{As of|2006|lc=on}}). As a result, it is very difficult to form even a minority government without substantial support in Ontario and/or Quebec. No party has ever formed a majority government without winning the most seats in either Ontario or Quebec. It is mathematically possible to form a minority government without a strong base in either province, but such an undertaking is politically difficult. The Liberals were the only party with a strong base in both provinces, thus making them the only party capable of forming a government.


[[File:Liberal Party of Canada L logo-Parti Liberal du Canada logo de L (1990s-2004).svg|thumb|Liberal Party logo, 1992–2004]]
There was some disappointment as Liberals were not able to recover their traditional dominant position in Quebec, despite being led by a Quebecer from a strongly nationalist region of Quebec. The Bloc capitalized on discontent with the failure of the 1990 [[Meech Lake Accord]] and Chrétien's uncompromising stance on federalism (see below) to win the most seats in Quebec in every election from 1993, onward, even serving as the official opposition from 1993 to 1997. Chrétien's reputation in his home province never recovered after the 1990 leadership convention when rival [[Paul Martin]] forced him to declare his opposition to the Meech Lake Accord. However, the Liberals did increase their support in the next two elections because of infighting within the Bloc. In the 1997 election, although the Liberals finished with a thin majority, it was their gains in Quebec which were credited with offsetting their losses in the Maritime provinces. In particular, the 2000 election was a breakthrough for the Liberals after the PQ government's unpopular initiatives regarding consolidation of several Quebec urban areas into "megacities". Many federal Liberals also took credit for Charest's provincial election victory over the PQ in spring 2003. A series of by-elections allowed the Liberals to gain a majority of Quebec ridings for the first time since 1984.
While the Chrétien Liberals campaigned from the left, their time in power is most marked by the cuts made to many social programs, including health transfers, in order to balance the federal budget.<ref>{{cite news |title = Chrétien rejects health-care pleas from provinces |newspaper = Globe and Mail |date = April 2000 |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/chretien-rejects-health-care-pleas-from-provinces/article1038283/ |access-date = October 30, 2019 |last1 = Scoffield |first1 = Heather |archive-date = August 3, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200803032602/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/chretien-rejects-health-care-pleas-from-provinces/article1038283/ |url-status = live }}</ref> Although Chrétien had supported the Charlottetown Accord while in opposition, in government he opposed major concessions to Quebec and other provincialist factions. In contrast to their promises during the 1993 campaign, they implemented only minor changes to NAFTA, embraced the free trade concept and—with the exception of the replacement of the GST with the [[Harmonized Sales Tax]] in some Atlantic provinces—broke their promise to replace the GST.
[[File:Liberal Party of Canada L logo-Parti Liberal du Canada logo de L (1990s-2004).svg|thumb|right|250px|Liberal Party logo, 1992–2004]]
The Chrétien Liberals more than made up for their shortfall in Quebec by building a strong base in Ontario. They reaped a substantial windfall from the votes of fiscally conservative and socially liberal voters who had previously voted Tory, as well as rapid growth in the [[Greater Toronto Area]]. They were also able to take advantage of massive [[vote splitting]] between the Tories and Reform/Alliance in rural areas of the province that had traditionally formed the backbone of provincial Tory governments. Combined with their historic dominance of [[Metro Toronto]] and [[northern Ontario]], the Liberals dominated the province's federal politics even as the Tories won landslide majorities at the provincial level. In 1993, for example, the Liberals won all but one seat in Ontario, and came within 123 votes in [[Simcoe Centre]] of pulling off the first clean sweep of Canada's most populated province. They were able to retain their position as the largest party in the House by winning all but two seats in Ontario in the 1997 election. The Liberals were assured of at least a minority government once the Ontario results came in, but it was not clear until later in the night that they would retain their majority. In 2000, the Liberals won all but three seats in Ontario.


After a proposal for Quebec independence was narrowly defeated in the [[1995 Quebec referendum]], the Liberals passed the "[[Clarity Act]]", which outlines the federal government's preconditions for negotiating provincial independence.<ref>{{cite web |title = Clarity Act |publisher = Government of Canada Privy Council Office |url = http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/aia/index.asp?lang=eng&page=federal&doc=constitution/clarityact/ClarityAct_e.htm |access-date = November 9, 2011 |archive-date = December 7, 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081207062905/http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/aia/index.asp?lang=eng&page=federal&doc=constitution%2Fclarityact%2FClarityAct_e.htm |url-status = dead }}</ref> In Chrétien's final term, he supported [[same-sex marriage in Canada|same-sex marriage]],<ref>{{cite news |author = Melissa Cheung |url = https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-will-legalize-gay-marriage/ |title = Canada Will Legalize Gay Marriage |publisher = CBS News |date = June 18, 2003 |access-date = November 9, 2011 |archive-date = October 29, 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141029034027/http://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-will-legalize-gay-marriage/ |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/18/world/canadian-leaders-agree-to-propose-gay-marriage-law.html?pagewanted=1 |title = Canadian leaders agree to propose gay marriage law |work = The New York Times |date = June 18, 2003 |access-date = November 9, 2011 |first = Clifford |last = Krauss |archive-date = March 31, 2019 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190331193002/https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/18/world/canadian-leaders-agree-to-propose-gay-marriage-law.html?pagewanted=1 |url-status = live }}</ref> [[Decriminalization|decriminalizing]] the possession of small quantities of marijuana,<ref>{{Cite news |date=2003-10-03 |title=Chrétien jokes about trying pot once it's decriminalized |language=en-CA |work=The Globe and Mail |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/chretien-jokes-about-trying-pot-once-its-decriminalized/article20451387/ |access-date=2023-06-15 |archive-date=June 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230615205943/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/chretien-jokes-about-trying-pot-once-its-decriminalized/article20451387/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and ratified the [[Kyoto Protocol]].<ref name="CBC_2002_12">{{cite news |date=December 16, 2002 |title=Kyoto ratification 'important for future generations' |work=CBC News |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kyoto-ratification-important-for-future-generations-1.325123 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061205224931/http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2002/12/16/kyotosign021216.html |url-status=live |archive-date=December 5, 2006 |access-date=January 9, 2013}}</ref> On March 17, 2003, Chrétien announced that [[Canada and the Iraq War|Canada would not support the invasion of Iraq]],<ref>{{cite news |title = Chrétien restates opposition to Iraq war |url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/chrtien-restates-opposition-to-iraq-war-1.405182 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071030095455/http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2003/03/18/chretieniraq030318.html |url-status = live |archive-date = October 30, 2007 |access-date = November 9, 2011 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = March 18, 2003 }}</ref> which caused friction with the United States.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sayle |first=Timothy A. |date=2015 |title="But he has nothing on at all!" Canada and the Iraq War, 2003 |journal=Canadian Military History |volume=19 |issue=4 |pages=18–19}}</ref> However, a poll conducted by [[EKOS Research Associates|EKOS]] for the ''[[Toronto Star]]'' and ''[[La Presse (Canada)|La Presse]]'' shortly afterwards showed widespread approval of Chrétien's decision by the Canadian public: 71 percent of those questioned approved of the government's decision to not enter the United States-led invasion, with 27 percent expressing disapproval.<ref name="Harper">{{Cite news |last = Harper |first = Tim |title = Canadians back Chrétien on war, poll finds |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = March 22, 2003 |url = http://25461.vws.magma.ca/admin/articles/torstar-24-03-2003c.html |access-date = November 9, 2011 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110706184537/http://25461.vws.magma.ca/admin/articles/torstar-24-03-2003c.html |archive-date = July 6, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref>
While the Chrétien Liberals campaigned from the left, their time in power is most marked by the cuts made to many programs in order to balance the federal budget. Chrétien had supported the Charlottetown Accord while in opposition, but in power opposed major concessions to Quebec and other provincialist factions. In contrast to their promises during the 1993 campaign, they implemented only minor changes to NAFTA, embraced the free trade concept and—with the exception of the replacement of the GST with the [[Harmonized Sales Tax]] in some Atlantic provinces—broke their promise to replace the GST.


In Chrétien's final weeks as prime minister, he introduced legislation to reduce the maximum allowable donation to a political party or candidate to $5,000. The move came as a surprise even to Liberal supporters, as Chrétien had not done anything about election financing at any other point in his ten years in office. Political observers suggested that the move allowed Chrétien to retire on a positive note while saddling Martin, his longstanding rival and successor, with the burden of having to fight an election under the strict new rules.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/realitycheck/gray/20060613.html |author=Gray, John |publisher=CBC News |title=Realists and idealists and a bag of hammers |access-date=January 1, 2016 |date=June 13, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101008121550/http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/realitycheck/gray/20060613.html |archive-date=October 8, 2010 }}</ref>
After a proposal for Quebec independence was narrowly defeated in the [[1995 Quebec referendum]], the Liberals passed the "[[Clarity Act]]", which outlines the federal government's preconditions for negotiating provincial independence.<ref>{{cite web |title = Clarity Act |publisher = Government of Canada Privy Council Office |url = http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/aia/index.asp?lang=eng&page=federal&doc=constitution/clarityact/ClarityAct_e.htm |accessdate = 2011-11-09 }}</ref> In Chrétien's final days, he supported [[same-sex marriage in Canada|same-sex marriage]] and decriminalizing the possession of small quantities of marijuana.<ref>{{cite news |author = Melissa Cheung |url = http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/06/18/world/main559147.shtml |title = Canada Will Legalize Gay Marriage |publisher = CBS News |date = June 18, 2003 |accessdate = 2011-11-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/18/world/canadian-leaders-agree-to-propose-gay-marriage-law.html?pagewanted=1 |title = Canadian leaders agree to propose gay marriage law |work = The New York Times |date = June 18, 2003 |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |first = Clifford |last = Krauss }}</ref> Chrétien displeased the United States government when he pledged on March 17, 2003, that Canada would not support the [[2003 invasion of Iraq]].<ref>{{cite news |title = Chrétien restates opposition to Iraq war |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/2003/03/18/chretieniraq030318.html |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = March 18, 2003 }}</ref> A poll released shortly after showed widespread approval of Chrétien's decision by the Canadian public. The poll, which was conducted by [[EKOS Research Associates|EKOS]] for the ''[[Toronto Star]]'' and ''[[La Presse (Canada)|La Presse]]'', found 71 percent of those questioned approved of the government's decision to not enter the United States-led invasion, with 27 percent expressing disapproval.<ref name=Harper>{{Cite news |last = Harper |first = Tim |title = Canadians back Chrétien on war, poll finds |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = March 22, 2003 |url = http://25461.vws.magma.ca/admin/articles/torstar-24-03-2003c.html |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20110706184537/http://25461.vws.magma.ca/admin/articles/torstar-24-03-2003c.html |archivedate = July 6, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref>


===Into the 21st century===
===21st century===
====Paul Martin====
{{Split|date=November 2018}}
[[File:Paul martin 2004.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Paul Martin]], Prime minister of Canada (2003–2006)]]
Several trends started in 2003 which suggested the end of the Liberal Party's political dominance. Notably, there would be a high turnover of permanent party leaders, in contrast to their predecessors who usually served over two or more elections, particularly Trudeau and Chrétien who each led for over a decade.<ref name="www2.macleans.ca">{{cite news |last = Wells |first = Paul |title = The untold story of the 2011 election: Introduction and Chapter 1 |url = http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/politics-turned-over/ |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = Maclean's |date = May 4, 2011 }}</ref> The Liberals were also hampered by their inability to raise campaign money competitively after Chrétien passed a bill in 2003 which banned [[Corporate donations#Political donations|corporate donations]], even though the Liberals had enjoyed by far the lion's share of this funding because of the then-divided opposition parties. It has been suggested that Chrétien, who had done nothing about election financing for his 10 years in office, could be seen as the idealist as he retired, while his rival and successor Paul Martin would have the burden of having to fight an election under the strict new rules.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/realitycheck/gray/20060613.html |author=Gray, John |publisher=CBC News |title=Realists and idealists and a bag of hammers |accessdate=1 Jan 2016 |date=13 June 2006 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101008121550/http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/realitycheck/gray/20060613.html |archivedate=October 8, 2010 }}</ref> [[Simon Fraser University]] professor Doug McArthur has noted that Martin's leadership campaign used aggressive tactics for the 2003 leadership convention, in attempting to end the contest before it could start by giving the impression that his bid was too strong for any other candidate to beat. McArthur blamed Martin's tactics for the ongoing sag in Liberal fortunes, as it discouraged activists who were not on side.<ref>{{cite news |last = Mickleburgh |first = Rod |title = Topp's NDP campaign tactics border on bullying, professor warns |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/topps-ndp-campaign-tactics-border-on-bullying-professor-warns/article2179865/ |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = September 26, 2011}}</ref>
Martin succeeded Chrétien as party leader and prime minister in 2003. Despite the personal rivalry between the two, Martin was [[Minister of Finance (Canada)|Minister of Finance]] during the 1990s and was the architect of the Liberals' economic policies. Chrétien left office with a high approval rating and Martin was expected to make inroads into Quebec and Western Canada, two regions of Canada where the Liberals had not attracted much support since the 1980s and 1990s, respectively.


The political situation changed with the revelation of the [[sponsorship scandal]], in which advertising agencies supporting the Liberal Party received grossly inflated commissions for their services. Having faced a divided conservative opposition for the past three elections, Liberals were seriously challenged by competition from the newly united [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] led by [[Stephen Harper]]. The [[2003–2004 Liberal Party of Canada infighting|infighting between Martin and Chrétien's supporters]] also dogged the party. Nonetheless, by criticizing the Conservatives' social policies, the Liberals were able to [[strategic voting|draw progressive votes]] from the NDP, which made the difference in several close races. In the [[2004 Canadian federal election|2004 election]], the Liberals retained enough support to continue as the government, though they were reduced to a minority.
====Martin succeeds Chrétien====
[[Paul Martin]] succeeded Chrétien as party leader and prime minister in 2003. Despite the [[2004 Liberal Party of Canada infighting|personal rivalry]] between the two, Martin was the architect of the Liberals' economic policies as [[Minister of Finance (Canada)|Minister of Finance]] during the 1990s. Chrétien left office with a high approval rating and Martin was expected to make inroads into Quebec and Western Canada, two regions of Canada where the Liberals had not attracted much support since the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. While his cabinet choices provoked some controversy over excluding many Chrétien supporters, it at first did little to hurt his popularity.


In the midst of various court rulings in 2003 and 2004 that allowed for the legalization of [[same-sex marriage]] in seven provinces and one territory, the Martin government proposed a bill to legalize [[Same-sex marriage in Canada|same-sex marriage across Canada]]. The House of Commons passed the ''[[Civil Marriage Act]]'' in late June 2005 in a late-night, last-minute vote before Parliament closed down, the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]] passed it in July 2005, and it received [[Royal Assent]] on July 20. This made Canada the fourth country in the world to allow same-sex marriages.<ref>{{cite news |author=CBC News |date=June 29, 2005 |title=The Supreme Court and same-sex marriage |publisher=CBC |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news2/background/samesexrights/ |access-date=April 26, 2014 |archive-date=April 27, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140427000106/http://www.cbc.ca/news2/background/samesexrights/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2009-05-29 |title=Same-sex marriage around the world |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/same-sex-marriage-around-the-world-1.799137 |access-date=2023-06-15 |website=[[CBC News]] |archive-date=November 25, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101125125134/http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/05/26/f-same-sex-timeline.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In November 2005, the Martin government brokered a deal between first ministers and aboriginal leaders known as the [[Kelowna Accord]], which sought to improve the education, skills training, housing and health care of aboriginal peoples by providing $5 billion in funding over five years.<ref>{{cite web |date=2007-03-04 |title=Charest calls on Harper to honour Kelowna aboriginal accord |url=http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=01b6e6af-f4dd-4baa-84b1-7cfc317d5699 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131013094942/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=01b6e6af-f4dd-4baa-84b1-7cfc317d5699 |archive-date=2013-10-13 |access-date=2012-07-24 |publisher=Canada.com}}</ref>
However, the political situation changed with the revelation of the [[sponsorship scandal]], in which advertising agencies supporting the Liberal Party received grossly inflated commissions for their services. Having faced a divided conservative opposition for the past three elections, Liberals were seriously challenged by competition from the newly united [[Conservative Party of Canada|Conservative Party]] led by [[Stephen Harper]]. The infighting between Martin and Chrétien's supporters also dogged the party. Nonetheless, by criticizing the Conservatives' social policies, the Liberals were able to [[strategic voting|draw progressive votes]] from the NDP which made the difference in several close races. On June 28, 2004 [[2004 Canadian federal election|federal election]], the Martin Liberals retained enough support to continue as the government, though they were reduced to a minority.


Following the release of the first [[Gomery Report]], the Liberals dropped in polls. Nonetheless, Martin turned down the NDP's conditions for continued support, as well as rejecting an opposition proposal which would schedule a February 2006 election in return for passing several pieces of legislation. The Liberals thus lost a confidence vote on November 28, and Martin advised Governor General [[Michaëlle Jean]] to dissolve Parliament and call an election for [[2006 Canadian federal election|January 2006]].
In the ensuing months, testimony from the [[Gomery Commission]] caused public opinion to turn sharply against the Liberals for the first time in over a decade. Despite the devastating revelations, only two Liberal MPs—[[David Kilgour]] (who had [[crossing the floor|crossed the floor]] from the [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|PC Party]] in 1990) and [[Pat O'Brien (Canadian politician)|Pat O'Brien]]—left the party for reasons other than the scandal. [[Belinda Stronach]], who crossed the floor from the Conservatives to the Liberals, gave Martin the number of votes needed, although barely, to hold onto power when an NDP-sponsored amendment to his budget was passed only by the Speaker's tiebreaking vote on May 19, 2005.


The Liberal campaign was dogged from start to finish by the sponsorship scandal, which was brought up by a [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] (RCMP) criminal investigation into the leak of the income trust announcement. Numerous gaffes, contrasting with a smoothly run Conservative campaign, put Liberals as many as ten points behind the Conservatives in opinion polling. They managed to recover some of their momentum by election night, but not enough to retain power. They won 103 seats, a net loss of 30 from when the writs were dropped, compared to 123 for the Tories. Martin resigned as Liberal leader on March 18.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2006-03-16 |title=Martin to officially resign as party leader |work=[[CBC News]] |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/martin-to-officially-resign-as-party-leader-1.603650 |access-date=2023-06-15 |archive-date=June 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230615201146/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/martin-to-officially-resign-as-party-leader-1.603650 |url-status=live }}</ref>
In November, the Liberals dropped in polls following the release of the first Gomery Report. Nonetheless, Martin turned down the NDP's conditions for continued support, as well as rejected an opposition proposal which would schedule a February 2006 election in return for passing several pieces of legislation. The Liberals thus lost the no-confidence vote on November 28; Martin thus became only the fifth prime minister to lose the confidence of the House, but the first to lose on a straight no-confidence motion. Because of the Christmas holiday, Martin advised Governor General [[Michaëlle Jean]] to dissolve Parliament and call an election for [[2006 Canadian federal election|January 2006]].


====Struggles in opposition====
The Liberal campaign was dogged from start to finish by the sponsorship scandal, which was brought up by a [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] (RCMP) criminal investigation into the leak of the income trust announcement. Numerous gaffes, contrasting with a smoothly run Conservative campaign, put Liberals as many as ten points behind the Conservatives in opinion polling. They managed to recover some of their momentum by election night, but not enough to retain power. They won 103 seats, a net loss of 30 from when the writs were dropped, losing a similar number of seats in Ontario and Quebec to the Tories. However, the Liberals managed to capture the most seats in Ontario for the fifth straight election (54 to the Tories' 40), holding the Conservatives to a minority government. While the Conservatives captured many of Ontario's rural ridings, the Liberals retained most of the population-rich [[Greater Toronto Area]]. Many of these ridings, particularly the [[Area code 905|905 region]], had historically been bellwethers (the Liberals were nearly shut out of this region in 1979 and 1984), but demographic changes have resulted in high Liberal returns in recent years.
[[File:Liberal rally Brampton 2008 election 82.jpg|thumb|[[Stéphane Dion]] makes a speech on October 10, 2008, in [[Brampton West (federal electoral district)|Brampton West]]. Former Prime Minister [[Jean Chrétien]] was among notable Liberals at this rally; this was his first time campaigning for anyone since retirement.]]


The [[2006 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|ensuing leadership election]] was set for December 2, 2006, in [[Montreal]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Rock says no to Liberal leadership |url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/story.html?id=c50b0f26-e061-46d1-a559-e4f63bdd7f69&k=1732 |access-date=November 12, 2011 |newspaper=Ottawa Citizen |date=February 3, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214202931/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/story.html?id=c50b0f26-e061-46d1-a559-e4f63bdd7f69&k=1732 |archive-date=February 14, 2012 }}</ref> Eight candidates entered the contest, but only [[Michael Ignatieff]], [[Bob Rae]], [[Stéphane Dion]] and [[Gerard Kennedy]] were considered to be the capable of garnering enough support to be able to win the leadership, with Ignatieff and Rae being considered the [[front-runner]]s.<ref>{{cite news |title = Canadians Place Rae as Best Liberal Leader |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7107/canadians_place_rae_as_best_liberal_leader/ |publisher = Angus Reid |access-date = November 12, 2011 |date = October 20, 2006 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121130424/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7107/canadians_place_rae_as_best_liberal_leader/ |archive-date = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Rae Seen as Best Future Liberal PM in Canada |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7050/rae_seen_as_best_future_liberal_pm_in_canada/ |access-date = November 12, 2011 |publisher = Angus Reid |date = October 23, 2006 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121143357/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7050/rae_seen_as_best_future_liberal_pm_in_canada/ |archive-date = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Although Ignatieff lead on the first two ballots, on the third ballot Dion picked up enough support from the eliminated Kennedy to leapfrog both Rae and Ignatieff, eliminating Rae. On the fourth and final ballot, Dion defeated Ignatieff to become leader of the Liberal Party.<ref>{{cite news |title = The Liberal Leadership Race |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/interactives/who-librecap/ |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |access-date = November 12, 2011 |archive-date = January 19, 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120119143626/http://www.cbc.ca/news/interactives/who-librecap/ |url-status = live }}</ref>
Martin resigned as parliamentary leader after the election and stepped down as Liberal leader on March 18, having previously promised to step down if he did not win a plurality.


Dion campaigned on environmental sustainability during the leadership race, which later evolved into the "Green Shift": a proposal for a national [[carbon tax]] that would be offset by reductions to income tax rates.<ref>{{cite news |title = The Green Shift |url = http://www.cbc.ca/newsatsixns/pdf/liberalgreenplan.pdf |publisher = Liberal Party of Canada |access-date = November 13, 2011 |archive-date = December 21, 2011 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111221073942/http://www.cbc.ca/newsatsixns/pdf/liberalgreenplan.pdf |url-status = live }}</ref> The plan was a key policy for the party in the [[2008 Canadian federal election|2008 federal election]], but it was not well received and was continuously attacked by both the Conservatives and NDP.<ref>{{cite news |last = Morris |first = Chris |title = Liberal Green Shift is 'green shaft,' says Harper |url = https://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/478887 |access-date = November 13, 2011 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = August 14, 2008 |archive-date = August 18, 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080818041819/http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/478887 |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Harper hopes Green Shift will turn Liberal voters Tory blue |url = http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=b593fd8c-22bd-4805-97d8-a66dee44e5de |access-date = November 13, 2011 |newspaper = Canwest News Service |date = October 5, 2008 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120214195835/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=b593fd8c-22bd-4805-97d8-a66dee44e5de |archive-date = February 14, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Galloway |first = Gloria |title = Layton lays into Green Shift |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article708340.ece |access-date = November 13, 2011 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = September 11, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Green Shift touted as both saviour and damnation |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/green-shift-touted-as-both-saviour-and-damnation/article1061161/ |access-date=November 13, 2011 |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |date=September 11, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151127044738/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/green-shift-touted-as-both-saviour-and-damnation/article1061161/ |archive-date=November 27, 2015 }}</ref> On election night, the Liberal Party won 26.26 percent of the popular vote and 77 of the 308 seats in the House of Commons. At that time, their popular support was the lowest in the party's history, and weeks later Dion announced he would step down as Liberal leader once his successor was chosen.<ref>{{cite news |title = Dion resigns but will remain as leader for now |url = https://www.thestar.com/federalelection/article/520583 |access-date = November 13, 2011 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = October 20, 2008 |first1 = Bruce |last1 = Campion-Smith |first2 = Les |last2 = Whittington |archive-date = March 13, 2011 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110313094318/http://www.thestar.com/federalelection/article/520583 |url-status = live }}</ref>
On May 11, 2006, ''[[La Presse (Canada)|La Presse]]'' reported that the [[Government of Canada]] would file a lawsuit against the Liberal Party to recover all the money missing in the sponsorship program. Scott Brison told reporters that same day that the Liberals has already paid back the $1.14&nbsp;million into the public purse; however, the Conservatives believed that there was as much as $40&nbsp;million unaccounted for in the sponsorship program.<ref>{{cite web |last = St. Martin |first = Romeo |url = http://www.politicswatch.com/adscam-may11-2006.htm |title = Possible lawsuit resurrects Adscam for the Liberals |publisher = PoliticsWatch |date = May 11, 2006 |accessdate = 2010-04-28 }}</ref>

====2006 Convention and Dion====
{{Main|2006 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election}}

[[Image:Liberal rally Brampton 2008 election 82.jpg|300px|right|thumb|[[Stéphane Dion]] makes a speech on October 10, 2008 in [[Brampton West]]. Former Prime Minister [[Jean Chrétien]] was among notable Liberals at this rally; this was his first time campaigning for anyone since retirement.]]

After their election defeat Martin chose not to take on the office of [[Leader of the Opposition (Canada)|Leader of the Opposition]]. He stepped down as [[parliamentary leader]] of his party on February 1, and the Liberal caucus appointed [[Bill Graham (Canadian politician)|Bill Graham]], MP for [[Toronto Centre]] and outgoing [[Minister of National Defence (Canada)|Defence Minister]], as his interim successor.<ref>{{cite news |title = Martin to split duties with interim leader Bill Graham |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2006/02/01/martin-liberal060201.html |accessdate = 2011-11-12 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = February 1, 2006 }}</ref> Martin officially resigned as leader in March, with Graham taking over on an interim basis.

The leadership election was set for December 2, 2006, in [[Montreal]]; however, a number of prominent members such as [[John Manley]], [[Frank McKenna]], [[Brian Tobin]], and [[Allan Rock]] had already announced they would not enter the race to succeed Martin.<ref>{{cite news|title=Rock says no to Liberal leadership |url=http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/story.html?id=c50b0f26-e061-46d1-a559-e4f63bdd7f69&k=1732 |accessdate=2011-11-12 |newspaper=Ottawa Citizen |date=February 3, 2006 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214202931/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/story.html?id=c50b0f26-e061-46d1-a559-e4f63bdd7f69&k=1732 |archivedate=February 14, 2012 }}</ref> Throughout the campaign 12 candidates came forward to lead the party, but by the time of the leadership convention only eight people remained in the race; [[Martha Hall Findlay]], [[Stéphane Dion]], [[Michael Ignatieff]], [[Gerard Kennedy]], [[Bob Rae]], [[Scott Brison]], [[Ken Dryden]], [[Joe Volpe]].

Throughout the campaign Ignatieff, Rae, Dion and Kennedy were considered to be the only candidates with enough support to be able to win the leadership, with Ignatieff and Rae being considered the two [[front-runner]]s.<ref>{{cite news |title = Canadians Place Rae as Best Liberal Leader |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7107/canadians_place_rae_as_best_liberal_leader/ |publisher = Angus Reid |accessdate = 2011-11-12 |date = October 20, 2006 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121130424/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7107/canadians_place_rae_as_best_liberal_leader/ |archivedate = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Rae Seen as Best Future Liberal PM in Canada |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7050/rae_seen_as_best_future_liberal_pm_in_canada/ |accessdate = 2011-11-12 |publisher = Angus Reid |date = October 23, 2006 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121143357/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/7050/rae_seen_as_best_future_liberal_pm_in_canada/ |archivedate = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> However polling showed Ignatieff had little room to grow his support, while Dion was the second and third choice among a plurality of delegates.<ref>{{cite web |title = LPC Delegates Poll |url = http://www.ekos.com/admin/articles/4nov2006background.pdf |publisher = EKOS |accessdate = 2011-11-12 |date = November 4, 2006 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120404113516/http://www.ekos.com/admin/articles/4nov2006background.pdf |archivedate = April 4, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> At the leadership convention Ignatieff came out on top on the first ballot with 29.3 percent,<ref>{{cite news |title = Kennedy, Dion meet behind closed doors |url = https://www.thestar.com/wheels/article/125513 |accessdate = 2011-11-12 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = November 30, 2006 }}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> With Kennedy's support Dion was able to leapfrog both Rae and Ignatieff on the third ballot, eliminating Rae. On the fourth and final ballot Dion defeated Ignatieff to become leader of the Liberal Party.<ref>{{cite news |title = The Liberal Leadership Race |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/interactives/who-librecap/ |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |accessdate = 2011-11-12 }}</ref>

Following the leadership race the Liberal Party saw a bounce in support and surpassed the Conservative Party as the most popular party in Canada.<ref>{{cite news |title = Liberal popularity peaking with Dion: poll |url = http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=95c9d866-89ac-46fa-83ba-d1bc0fab6195&k=18732 |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |newspaper = Canwest News Service |date = December 8, 2006 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20111121230611/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=95c9d866-89ac-46fa-83ba-d1bc0fab6195&k=18732 |archivedate = November 21, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> However, in the months and years to come the party's support gradually fell.<ref name="neutral">{{cite news |title = Political parties stuck in neutral |url = http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=2b17feac-a048-45c9-9a14-93669dd7c06e |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |newspaper = Montreal Gazette |date = 14 February 2008 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120214195821/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=2b17feac-a048-45c9-9a14-93669dd7c06e |archivedate = February 14, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Dion's own popularity lagged considerably behind that of Prime Minister Harper's, and he often trailed NDP leader Jack Layton in opinion polls when Canadians were asked who would make the best Prime Minister.<ref name="neutral"/><ref>{{cite web |title = Harper Advantage Continues |url = http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-W08-T278.pdf |publisher = Nanos Research |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |date = February 7, 2008 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20111004094827/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-W08-T278.pdf |archivedate = October 4, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref>

Dion campaigned on environmental sustainability during the leadership race, and created the "Green Shift" plan following his election as leader. The Green Shift proposed creating a [[carbon tax]] that would be coupled with reductions to income tax rates. The proposal was to tax greenhouse gas emissions, starting at $10 per tonne of CO2 and reaching $40 per tonne within four years.<ref>{{cite news |title = The Green Shift |url = http://www.cbc.ca/newsatsixns/pdf/liberalgreenplan.pdf |publisher = Liberal Party of Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-13 }}</ref> The plan was a key policy for the party in the [[2008 Canadian federal election|2008 federal election]], but it was not well received and was continuously attacked by both the Conservatives and NDP.<ref>{{cite news |last = Morris |first = Chris |title = Liberal Green Shift is 'green shaft,' says Harper |url = https://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/478887 |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = August 14, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Harper hopes Green Shift will turn Liberal voters Tory blue |url = http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=b593fd8c-22bd-4805-97d8-a66dee44e5de |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |newspaper = Canwest News Service |date = October 5, 2008 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120214195835/http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=b593fd8c-22bd-4805-97d8-a66dee44e5de |archivedate = February 14, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Galloway |first = Gloria |title = Layton lays into Green Shift |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article708340.ece |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = September 11, 2008 }}{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Green Shift touted as both saviour and damnation |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/green-shift-touted-as-both-saviour-and-damnation/article1061161/ |accessdate=2011-11-13 |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |date=September 11, 2008 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20151127044738/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/green-shift-touted-as-both-saviour-and-damnation/article1061161/ |archivedate=November 27, 2015 }}</ref> On election night the Liberal Party won 26.26 percent of the popular vote and 77 of the 308 seats in the House of Commons. At that time their popular support was the lowest in the party's history, and weeks later Dion announced he would step down as Liberal leader once his successor was chosen.<ref>{{cite news |title = Dion resigns but will remain as leader for now |url = https://www.thestar.com/federalelection/article/520583 |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = October 20, 2008 |first1 = Bruce |last1 = Campion-Smith |first2 = Les |last2 = Whittington }}</ref>

====Leadership campaign and coalition====
{{See also|2009 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary dispute}}
[[New Brunswick]] Member of Parliament [[Dominic LeBlanc]] was the first candidate to announce he would seek the leadership of the Liberal Party on October 27, 2008. Days later Bob Rae, who had finished third in 2006, announced he would also be a candidate for the leadership. The party executive met in early November and chose May 2, 2009, as the date to elect the next leader.<ref>{{cite news|title=Federal Liberals to pick new leader May 2 in Vancouver |url=http://www.canada.com/theprovince/story.html?id=4cad73a9-ca29-4e0e-8fd4-ebff99025cff |accessdate=2011-11-13 |newspaper=The Vancouver Province |date=November 8, 2008 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214185615/http://www.canada.com/theprovince/story.html?id=4cad73a9-ca29-4e0e-8fd4-ebff99025cff |archivedate=February 14, 2012 }}</ref> On November 13 Michael Ignatieff, who finished second in 2006, announced he would also be a candidate.
[[File:Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff speaks during a news conference in Toronto.jpg|thumb|left|[[Michael Ignatieff]] speaks during a news conference in Toronto]]
On November 27, 2008, [[Minister of Finance (Canada)|Minister of Finance]] [[Jim Flaherty]] provided the House of Commons with a fiscal update, within which were plans to cut government spending, suspend the ability of [[Public Service of Canada|civil servants]] to strike until 2011, sell off some [[Public property|Crown assets]] to raise capital, and eliminate the existing $1.95 per vote subsidy parties garner in an election.<ref>{{cite news |title = The Economic and Fiscal Statement 2008 |url = http://www.fin.gc.ca/ec2008/speech/speech-eng.html |accessdate = 2011-11-13 |publisher = Department of Finance Canada |date = November 27, 2008 }}</ref><ref name=slash>{{cite news |url = http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20081126/party_budgets_081126/20081126?hub=CTVNewsAt11 |title = Flaherty to slash public funding for federal parties |publisher = CTV News |date = November 26, 2008 }}</ref> The opposition parties criticized the fiscal update, and announced they would not support it because it contained no stimulus money to spur Canada's economy and protect workers during the economic crisis.<ref name="opposition">{{cite news |title = Opposition parties won't support Tory economic update |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/11/27/question-period.html |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = November 27, 2008 }}</ref> With the Conservative Party only holding a minority of the seats in the House of Commons the government would be defeated if the opposition parties voted against the fiscal update.<ref name="opposition"/> With the Conservatives unwilling to budge on the proposals outlined in the fiscal update the Liberals and NDP signed an agreement to form a [[coalition government]], with a written pledge of support from the Bloc Québécois.<ref name="coalition">{{cite news |title = Liberals, NDP, Bloc sign deal on proposed coalition |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/12/01/coalition-talks.html |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = December 1, 2011 }}</ref> Under the terms of the agreement Dion would be sworn in as Prime Minister, however he would only serve in the position until the next Liberal leader was chosen. Dion contacted Governor General [[Michaëlle Jean]] and advised her that he had the confidence of the House of Commons if Prime Minister Harper's government was to fall.<ref name="coalition"/> However, before the fiscal update could be voted on in the House of Commons Prime Minister Harper requested the Governor General to [[Prorogation in Canada|prorogue]] parliament till January 26, 2009, which she accepted.<ref>{{cite news |title = GG agrees to suspend Parliament until January |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/12/04/harper-jean.html |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = December 4, 2011 }}</ref>

While polls showed Canadians were split on the idea of having either a coalition government or having the Conservatives continue to govern, it was clear that because of Dion's personal popularity they were not comfortable with him becoming Prime Minister.<ref>{{cite news|title=Results of CBC News Survey |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/1069-cbc-results-dec4-final.pdf |publisher=EKOS Research |accessdate=2011-11-14 |date=December 4, 2008 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209235541/http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/1069-cbc-results-dec4-final.pdf |archivedate=December 9, 2008 }}</ref> Members of the Liberal Party therefore called on Dion to resign as leader immediately and for an interim leader to be chosen, this person would become the Prime Minister in the event that the Conservatives were defeated when parliament resumed in January.<ref name="Ignatieffmove">{{cite news |title = Ignatieff makes his move |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article726402.ece |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = December 8, 2008 |first1 = Michael |last1 = Valpy |first2 = Daniel |last2 = Leblanc |first3 = Jane |last3 = Taber |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120413205249/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article726402.ece |archivedate = April 13, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> With an estimated 70 percent of the Liberal caucus wanting Ignatieff to be named interim leader, Dion resigned the post on December 8, 2008 (effective December 10, upon Ignatieff's becoming interim leader).<ref name="Ignatieffmove"/><ref>{{cite news |title = Dion out; Ignatieff and Rae vie for leadership |url = https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/550266 |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = December 8, 2009 |first = Joanna |last = Smith }}</ref> LeBlanc announced on the same day that he was abandoning the Liberal leadership race and endorsing Ignatieff as the next leader.<ref>{{cite news |title = LeBlanc drops out of Liberal leadership race |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/12/08/leblanc.html |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = December 8, 2008 }}</ref> The following day Rae announced he was also dropping out of the race and was placing his "full and unqualified" support to Ignatieff.<ref>{{cite news |title = Rae bows out, offers 'unqualified' support for Ignatieff as Liberal leader |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/12/09/rae-liberals.html |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = December 9, 2009 }}</ref>

====Ignatieff and the 2011 election====
With Ignatieff named interim leader of the party (on December 10), the Liberal's poll numbers saw significant gains, after they plummeted with the signing of the coalition agreement.<ref>{{cite web |title = Leadership Change Would Benefit Liberals in the Next Federal Election |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/wp-content/uploads/archived-pdf/2008.12.07_FederalScene.pdf |publisher = Angus Reid |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |date = December 7, 2008 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121153238/http://www.angus-reid.com/wp-content/uploads/archived-pdf/2008.12.07_FederalScene.pdf |archivedate = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title = Conservative Lead Dwindles After Liberals Settle on New Leader |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/wp-content/uploads/archived-pdf/2008.12.13_FederalScene.pdf |publisher = Angus Reid |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |date = December 13, 2008 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121101830/http://www.angus-reid.com/wp-content/uploads/archived-pdf/2008.12.13_FederalScene.pdf |archivedate = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> When parliament resumed on January 28, 2009, the Ignatieff Liberals agreed to support the budget as long as it included regular accountability reports, which the Conservatives accepted. This ended the possibility of the coalition government with the New Democrats.<ref>{{cite news |title = Ignatieff okays budget, with conditions |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article968692.ece |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = January 28, 2009 |first1 = Campbell |last1 = Clark |first2 = Jane |last2 = Taber |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20110126185559/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article968692.ece |archivedate = January 26, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref>
[[File:41stElectionPollingResults.png|thumb|Graph of opinion polls conducted between the 2008 and 2011 elections]]
[[File:41stElectionPollingResults.png|thumb|Graph of opinion polls conducted between the 2008 and 2011 elections]]
However, the [[2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary dispute]] made Dion's continued leadership untenable: an agreement to form a [[coalition government]] between the with NDP faced public opposition if it meant Dion was to be become prime minister, even if only until the leadership election.<ref>{{cite news|title=Results of CBC News Survey |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/1069-cbc-results-dec4-final.pdf |publisher=EKOS Research |access-date=November 14, 2011 |date=December 4, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081209235541/http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/1069-cbc-results-dec4-final.pdf |archive-date=December 9, 2008 }}</ref> Dion thus resigned as leader on December 8, with caucus selecting Ignatieff as interim leader.<ref name="interim2">{{cite news |date=December 10, 2008 |title=Ignatieff named interim Liberal leader |publisher=CBC News |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newly-named-liberal-leader-ignatieff-ready-to-form-coalition-1.698452 |access-date=10 December 2008 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081216061905/http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/12/10/ignatieff-caucus.html |archive-date=2008-12-16}}</ref> However, Harper [[Prorogation in Canada|prorogued]] Parliament before a [[Motion of no confidence|confidence vote]] could be scheduled. When parliament resumed on January 28, 2009, the Ignatieff Liberals agreed to support the budget as long as it included regular accountability reports, which the Conservatives accepted. This ended the possibility of the coalition government with the New Democrats.<ref>{{cite news |title = Ignatieff okays budget, with conditions |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article968692.ece |access-date = November 14, 2011 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = January 28, 2009 |first1 = Campbell |last1 = Clark |first2 = Jane |last2 = Taber |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110126185559/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/article968692.ece |archive-date = January 26, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Ignatieff was [[2009 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|formally named leader on May 2, 2009]].<ref>{{cite news |date=May 2, 2009 |title=Ignatieff slams Harper for 'failure to unite Canada' |publisher=CBC News |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ignatieff-slams-harper-for-failure-to-unite-canada-1.775666 |access-date=16 May 2018 |archive-date=June 16, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230616082756/https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ignatieff-slams-harper-for-failure-to-unite-canada-1.775666 |url-status=live }}</ref>[[File:Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff speaks during a news conference in Toronto.jpg|thumb|left|[[Michael Ignatieff]] speaks during a news conference in Toronto on March 28, 2011]]
Throughout the Winter of 2008–09, [[Opinion polling in the Canadian federal election, 2011|opinion polls]] showed that while the Ignatieff led Liberals still trailed the Conservatives their support had stabilized in the low 30 percent range. However, by the time Ignatieff was confirmed as party leader on May 2, 2009, the Liberal Party had a comfortable lead over the governing Conservatives.<ref>{{cite news |url = http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/05/02/liberal-convention.html |title = Ignatieff slams Harper for 'failure to unite Canada' |date = May 2, 2009 |publisher = CBC News |accessdate = 2011-11-09 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Close Federal Race Continues – Tories Down in Quebec Up in Ontario |url = http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T369E.pdf |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = Nanos Research |date = May 2, 2009 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20111016121527/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T369E.pdf |archivedate = October 16, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title = Close federal race continues |url = http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T380E.pdf |publisher = Nanos Research |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |date = June 27, 2009 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20111016113948/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T380E.pdf |archivedate = October 16, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> After a summer where he was accused of being missing in action, Ignatieff announced on August 31, 2009, that the Liberals would not support the minority Conservative government.<ref>{{cite news |last = Siddiqui |first = Haroon |title = If Harper is Bush, then Ignatieff is John Kerry |url = https://www.thestar.com/opinion/article/690191 |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = September 3, 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Hebert |first = Chantal |title = Absent opposition gives the PM a holiday |url = https://www.thestar.com/canada/columnist/article/686513 |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = August 26, 2009 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Liberals won't raise taxes: Ignatieff |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2009/09/02/opposition-election.html |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = September 2, 2009 }}</ref> After this announcement the Liberal Party's poll numbers, which had already declined over the summer, started to fall further behind the Conservatives.<ref>{{cite news |title = Conservative lead widens in poll |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2009/09/16/ekos-poll.html |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = September 2009 }}</ref> On October 1, 2009, the Liberals put forth a non-confidence motion with the hope of defeating the government. However, the NDP abstained from voting and the Conservatives survived the confidence motion.<ref>{{cite news |url = http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE58T4BE20091001 |title = Canada's government survives non-confidence motion &#124; Canada |agency = Reuters |date = October 1, 2009 |accessdate = 2010-04-28 }}</ref>
By the time Ignatieff was confirmed as party leader, the Liberal Party had a comfortable lead over the governing Conservatives.<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ignatieff-slams-harper-for-failure-to-unite-canada-1.775666 |title = Ignatieff slams Harper for 'failure to unite Canada' |date = May 2, 2009 |publisher = CBC News |access-date = November 9, 2011 |archive-date = January 7, 2014 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140107204643/http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ignatieff-slams-harper-for-failure-to-unite-canada-1.775666 |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Close Federal Race Continues – Tories Down in Quebec Up in Ontario |url = http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T369E.pdf |access-date = November 14, 2011 |newspaper = Nanos Research |date = May 2, 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111016121527/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T369E.pdf |archive-date = October 16, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title = Close federal race continues |url = http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T380E.pdf |publisher = Nanos Research |access-date = November 14, 2011 |date = June 27, 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111016113948/http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/POLNAT-S09-T380E.pdf |archive-date = October 16, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Support fell over the summer as Ignatieff was characterized of "missing in action", and Ignatieff announced on August 31, 2009, that the Liberals would not support the minority Conservative government when Parliament resumed.<ref>{{cite news |last = Siddiqui |first = Haroon |title = If Harper is Bush, then Ignatieff is John Kerry |url = https://www.thestar.com/opinion/article/690191 |access-date = November 14, 2011 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = September 3, 2009 |archive-date = September 13, 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225305/https://www.thestar.com/ |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Hebert |first = Chantal |title = Absent opposition gives the PM a holiday |url = https://www.thestar.com/canada/columnist/article/686513 |access-date = November 14, 2011 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = August 26, 2009 |archive-date = September 13, 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225305/https://www.thestar.com/ |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Liberals won't raise taxes: Ignatieff |url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/liberals-won-t-raise-taxes-ignatieff-1.815328 |access-date = November 9, 2011 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = September 2, 2009 |archive-date = October 16, 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151016201454/http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/liberals-won-t-raise-taxes-ignatieff-1.815328 |url-status = live }}</ref> A month later, on October 1, the Liberals put forth a non-confidence motion; however, the NDP abstained from voting and the Conservative government survived.<ref>{{cite news |url = http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE58T4BE20091001 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110715175324/http://ca.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idCATRE58T4BE20091001 |url-status = dead |archive-date = July 15, 2011 |title = Canada's government survives non-confidence motion |work = Reuters |date = October 1, 2009 |access-date = April 28, 2010 }}</ref> The attempt to force an election, just a year after the previous one, was viewed as a miscalculation, as polls showed that most Canadians did not want another election.<ref>{{cite web |title = Parties Virtually Tied as Election Nears in Canada |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37078/parties_virtually_tied_as_election_nears_in_canada/ |publisher = Angus Reid |access-date = November 14, 2011 |date = September 4, 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121181708/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37078/parties_virtually_tied_as_election_nears_in_canada/ |archive-date = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Afterwards, popularity for Ignatieff and his party continued to fall.<ref>{{cite news |last = MacDonald |first = Ian |title = Harper tickles while Ignatieff burns |url = http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/features/viewpoints/story.html?id=0e1cf966-d164-43b2-873a-76b828a82999 |access-date = November 9, 2011 |newspaper = Montreal Gazette |date = October 9, 2009 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130314151902/http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/features/viewpoints/story.html?id=0e1cf966-d164-43b2-873a-76b828a82999 |archive-date = March 14, 2013 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Over the next year and a half, with the exception of a brief period in early 2010, support for the Liberals remained below 30 percent, and behind the Conservatives.<ref>{{cite web |title = Conservatives retain 7-point lead as parties enter election campaign |url = http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_march_25_2011.pdf |publisher = EKOS Politics |access-date = November 15, 2011 |date = March 25, 2011 |archive-date = May 16, 2011 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110516035013/http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_march_25_2011.pdf |url-status = live }}</ref>[[File:Liberale Partei Kanadas Logo.svg|thumb|The Liberal Party logo used from 2010 to 2014. In this and the subsequent logo, the stem of the maple leaf forms an [[acute accent]], used in the word ''Libéral'' in French|left]]
[[File:Liberale Partei Kanadas Logo.svg|thumb|Liberal Party logo, 2010–2014]]
Shortly after the Harper government was found to be in [[Contempt of Parliament]] over the [[Canadian Afghan detainee issue]], Ignatieff successfully introduced a motion of no confidence against the government, beginning the [[2011 Canadian federal election|2011 election]].<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/world/americas/26canada.html |title = Canadian Government, Beset by Scandal, Collapses |date = March 25, 2011 |access-date = October 18, 2015 |work = The New York Times |first = Ian |last = Austen |archive-date = September 24, 2018 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180924215516/https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/world/americas/26canada.html |url-status = live }}</ref> The Liberals had considerable momentum when the writ was dropped, and Ignatieff successfully squeezed NDP leader [[Jack Layton]] out of media attention by issuing challenges to Harper for one-on-one debates.<ref>{{cite news |title = Chance of Harper vs. Ignatieff debate fades |url = https://www.ctvnews.ca/chance-of-harper-vs-ignatieff-debate-fades-1.626022 |access-date = November 14, 2011 |publisher = CTV News |date = March 31, 2011 |archive-date = June 22, 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150622093939/http://www.ctvnews.ca/chance-of-harper-vs-ignatieff-debate-fades-1.626022 |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Whittington |first = Les |title = Ignatieff's appeal improving but Harper still leads, poll says |url = https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/970557--ignatieff-s-appeal-improving-but-harper-still-leads-poll-says |access-date = November 14, 2011 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = April 7, 2011 |archive-date = April 10, 2011 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110410204307/http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/970557--ignatieff-s-appeal-improving-but-harper-still-leads-poll-says |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Galloway |first = Gloria |title = Layton remains game despite polls showing he's the odd man out |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/layton-shows-strain-as-polls-suggest-hes-the-odd-man-out/article1978060/ |access-date = November 14, 2011 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = April 8, 2011 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110412213210/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/layton-shows-strain-as-polls-suggest-hes-the-odd-man-out/article1978060/ |archive-date = April 12, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> However, opponents frequently criticized Ignatieff's perceived political opportunism, particularly during the [[Leaders' debate]]s when Layton criticized Ignatieff for having a poor attendance record for Commons votes: "You know, most Canadians, if they don't show up for work, they don't get a promotion." Ignatieff failed to defend himself against these charges, and the debates were said to be a turning point in the campaign.<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ignatieff-s-liberals-lose-official-opposition-status-1.1055540 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |title = Ignatieff's Liberals lose Official Opposition status |date = May 3, 2011 |access-date = September 3, 2024 |archive-date = June 4, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230604143311/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ignatieff-s-liberals-lose-official-opposition-status-1.1055540 |url-status = live }}</ref>
The Liberal Party's attempt to force an election, just a year after the previous one, was reported as a miscalculation, as polls showed that most Canadians did not want another election.<ref>{{cite web |title = Parties Virtually Tied as Election Nears in Canada |url = http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37078/parties_virtually_tied_as_election_nears_in_canada/ |publisher = Angus Reid |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |date = September 4, 2009 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120121181708/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37078/parties_virtually_tied_as_election_nears_in_canada/ |archivedate = January 21, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Even after the government survived the confidence motion popularity for Ignatieff and his party continued to fall.<ref>{{cite news |last = MacDonald |first = Ian |title = Harper tickles while Ignatieff burns |url = http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/features/viewpoints/story.html?id=0e1cf966-d164-43b2-873a-76b828a82999 |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = Montreal Gazette |date = October 9, 2009 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20130314151902/http://www2.canada.com/montrealgazette/features/viewpoints/story.html?id=0e1cf966-d164-43b2-873a-76b828a82999 |archivedate = March 14, 2013 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> Over the next year and a half, with the exception of a brief period in early 2010, support for the Liberals remained below 30 percent, and behind the Conservatives.<ref>{{cite web |title = Conservatives retain 7-point lead as parties enter election campaign |url = http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/full_report_march_25_2011.pdf |publisher = EKOS Politics |accessdate = 2011-11-15 |date = March 25, 2011 }}</ref> While his predecessor Dion was criticized by the Conservatives as a "weak leader", Ignatieff was attacked as a "political opportunist".<ref name="www2.macleans.ca"/>


On election day, the Liberals took the biggest loss in their history. The result was a third-place finish, with only 19 percent of the vote and returning 34 seats in the House of Commons. Notably, their support in Toronto and Montreal, their power bases for the last two decades, all but vanished. The Conservatives won 40 percent of the vote and formed a majority government, while the NDP won 31 percent of the vote and formed the Official Opposition.<ref>{{cite web |title = Official Voting Results – Forty-First General Election 2011 |url = http://elections.ca/scripts/ovr2011/default.html |publisher = Elections Canada |access-date = May 21, 2012 |archive-date = May 21, 2012 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120521211804/http://www.elections.ca/scripts/ovr2011/default.html |url-status = live }}</ref> It marked the first time the Liberals were unable to form either government or the official opposition. Ignatieff was defeated in his own riding, and announced his resignation as Liberal leader shortly after. Bob Rae was chosen as the [[Interim leader (Canada)|interim leader]] on May 25, 2011.<ref name="twoyears">{{cite news |title = Federal Liberals won't pick new leader for full two years |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/federal-liberals-wont-pick-new-leader-for-full-two-years/article2066673/ |access-date = June 19, 2011 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = June 19, 2011|first = Joan |last = Bryden }}</ref>
On March 25, 2011, Ignatieff introduced a motion of [[Motion of no confidence|non-confidence]] against the Harper government to attempt to force a [[2011 Canadian federal election|May 2011, federal election]] after the government was found to be in [[Contempt of Parliament]], the first such occurrence in [[Contempt of Parliament#Contempt citation cases for governments|Commonwealth history]]. The House of Commons passed the motion by 156–145.<ref>{{cite news |url = https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/26/world/americas/26canada.html |title = Canadian Government, Beset by Scandal, Collapses |date = 25 March 2011 |accessdate = 18 Oct 2015 |work = The New York Times |first = Ian |last = Austen }}</ref>


Pundits widely viewed the 2011 election as a [[political realignment]] and questioned the Liberal Party's viability.''[[The Economist]]'' said, "the election represents the biggest realignment of Canadian politics since 1993";<ref>''Economist'' May 3, 2011</ref> ''[[Maclean's]]'' writer [[Andrew Coyne]] wrote that "the Conservatives are now in a position to replace the Liberals as the [[natural governing party]] in Canada."<ref>Andrew Coyne, "The West is in and Ontario has joined it: How the election led to an unprecedented realignment of Canadian politics", [http://www.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/a-new-power-couple/ ''Maclean's'' May 6, 2011] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130601091534/http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/a-new-power-couple/ |date=June 1, 2013 }}</ref> Books such as ''The Big Shift'' by [[John Ibbitson]] and [[Darrell Bricker]], and [[Peter C. Newman]]'s ''When the Gods Changed: The Death of Liberal Canada'', asserted that the Liberals had become an "endangered species".<ref>{{cite news |last=McLeod |first=Paul |date=October 22, 2015 |title=Book Review: The Big Shift Explains Why Stephen Harper Will Keep Winning |publisher=Buzzfeed |url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/book-review-the-big-shift-why-stephen-harper-will-keep-winni#.kk8WgyWkW |access-date=October 22, 2015 |archive-date=October 23, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151023222156/http://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/book-review-the-big-shift-why-stephen-harper-will-keep-winni#.kk8WgyWkW |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Valpy |first=Michael |date=November 25, 2011 |title=Is a Liberal comeback mission impossible? |newspaper=The Globe and Mail |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/is-a-liberal-comeback-mission-impossible/article4246976/ |access-date=October 22, 2015 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304223625/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/is-a-liberal-comeback-mission-impossible/article4246976/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The Liberals had considerable momentum when the writ was dropped, and Ignatieff successfully squeezed NDP leader [[Jack Layton]] out of media attention, by issuing challenges to Harper for one-on-one debates.<ref>{{cite news |title = Chance of Harper vs. Ignatieff debate fades |url = http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20110331/harper-vs-ignatieff-debate-fades-110331/20110331?s_name=election2011 |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |publisher = CTV News |date = March 31, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Whittington |first = Les |title = Ignatieff's appeal improving but Harper still leads, poll says |url = https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/970557--ignatieff-s-appeal-improving-but-harper-still-leads-poll-says |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = Toronto Star |date = April 7, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Galloway |first = Gloria |title = Layton remains game despite polls showing he's the odd man out |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/layton-shows-strain-as-polls-suggest-hes-the-odd-man-out/article1978060/ |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = April 8, 2011 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20110412213210/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/layton-shows-strain-as-polls-suggest-hes-the-odd-man-out/article1978060/ |archivedate = April 12, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> In the first couple weeks of the campaign, Ignatieff kept his party in second place in the polls, and his personal ratings exceeded that of Layton for the first time.<ref>{{cite web |title = Layton score jumps, Harper score drops, Ignatieff flat |url = http://www.nanosresearch.com/election2011/20110426-LeadershipE.pdf |publisher = Nanos Research |accessdate = 2011-11-14 |date = April 27, 2011 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120404131833/http://www.nanosresearch.com/election2011/20110426-LeadershipE.pdf |archivedate = April 4, 2012 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> However opponents frequently criticized Ignatieff's perceived political opportunism, particularly during the [[leaders debate]]s when Layton criticized Ignatieff for having a poor attendance record for Commons votes saying "You know, most Canadians, if they don't show up for work, they don't get a promotion". Ignatieff failed to defend himself against these charges, and the debates were said to be a turning point for his party's campaign.<ref>{{cite news |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/05/02/cv-election-liberals.html |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |title = Ignatieff's Liberals lose Official Opposition status |date = May 3, 2011 }}</ref> Near the end of the campaign, a late surge in support for Layton and the NDP relegated Ignatieff and the Liberals to third in opinion polls.<ref>{{cite news |title = NDP surge overtakes Liberals, poll finds |url = http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=c09c79f6-38bd-4026-9019-4fe20f1dcf42 |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = Edmonton Journal |date = April 26, 2011 |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20130314152122/http://www2.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=c09c79f6-38bd-4026-9019-4fe20f1dcf42 |archivedate = March 14, 2013 |df = mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Fowlie |first = Jonathan |title = NDP overtake Liberals for second place: poll |url = http://www.globaltvbc.com/ndp+overtake+liberals+for+second+place+poll/268347/story.html |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = The Vancouver Sun }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = NDP surge dominates talk on federal campaign trail |url = https://vancouversun.com/news/surge+dominates+talk+federal+campaign+trail/4685960/story.html |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = The Vancouver Sun |date = April 27, 2011 }}</ref>


====Justin Trudeau====
The Liberals suffered their worst defeat in history in the May 2, 2011, federal election. The result was a third-place finish, with only 19 percent of the vote and returning 34 seats in the House of Commons. Notably, their support in Toronto and Montreal, their power bases for the last two decades, all but vanished. All told, the Liberals won only 11 seats in Ontario (seven of which were in Toronto) and seven in Quebec (all in Montreal)—their fewest totals in either province. [[Newfoundland and Labrador]] was the only province with majority Liberal seats at 4 out of 7. They also won only four seats west of Ontario. The Conservatives won 40 percent of the vote and formed a majority government, while the NDP formed the Official Opposition winning 31 percent of the vote.<ref>{{cite web |title = Official Voting Results – Forty-First General Election 2011 |url = http://elections.ca/scripts/ovr2011/default.html |publisher = Elections Canada |accessdate = 2012-05-21 }}</ref>
[[File:Justin Trudeau (2023).jpg|thumb|[[Justin Trudeau]], Prime Minister of Canada (2015–present)]]
On April 14, 2013, [[Justin Trudeau]], son of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, was [[2013 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|elected leader]] of the Liberal Party on the first ballot, winning 80% of the vote.<ref>{{cite news |title = Justin Trudeau sweeps Liberal leadership with 80% support |url = https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-to-face-off-against-harper-in-question-period-today-1.1317124 |access-date = April 15, 2013 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = April 14, 2013 |archive-date = September 29, 2013 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130929153612/http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-to-face-off-against-harper-in-question-period-today-1.1317124 |url-status = live }}</ref> Following his win, support for the Liberal Party increased considerably, and the party moved into first place in public opinion polls.<ref>{{cite news |last = Berthiaume |first = Lee |title = Tory attack ads may be backfiring in favour of Trudeau's Liberals as support rises, new poll shows |url = http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/05/07/tory-attack-ads-may-be-backfiring-in-favour-of-trudeaus-liberals-as-support-rises-new-poll-shows/ |access-date = June 7, 2013 |newspaper = National Post |date = May 7, 2013 |archive-date = September 13, 2024 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225306/https://nationalpost.com/category/news/ |url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Visser |first = Josh |title = Trudeau's Liberals hit historic highs as senate scandal has 'drastic effect' on Tories: poll |url = http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/05/23/trudeaus-liberals-hit-historic-highs-as-senate-scandal-has-drastic-effect-on-tories-poll/ |access-date = June 7, 2013 |newspaper = National Post |date = May 23, 2013 |archive-date = June 7, 2013 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130607130721/http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/05/23/trudeaus-liberals-hit-historic-highs-as-senate-scandal-has-drastic-effect-on-tories-poll/ |url-status = live }}</ref> In response, the Conservatives ran a series of ads attempting to "[paint] him as a silly dilettante unfit for public office" and the surge levelled off in the following year.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Warnica |first1=Richard |date=October 23, 2015 |title=The Liberal Resurrection: How a Liberal 'lightweight' faced with the longest election campaign in history beat down a Tory majority |url=http://news.nationalpost.com/features/the-liberal-resurrection |access-date=October 25, 2015 |work=National Post |archive-date=November 30, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130131312/https://nationalpost.com/category/news/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>


In 2014, Trudeau removed all Liberal senators from the Liberal Party caucus. In announcing this, Trudeau said the purpose of the unelected upper chamber is to act as a check on the power of the prime minister, but the party structure interferes with that purpose.<ref name="LibSenate" /> Following this move, Liberal senators chose to keep the designation "Liberal" and sit together as a caucus, albeit not one supported by the Liberal Party of Canada. This independent group continued to refer to itself in publications as the [[Senate Liberal Caucus]] until 2019.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Crawford|first1=Allison|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-liberals-caucus-speaker-1.3347265|title=Senate Liberals unsure how to work with Trudeau government|access-date=January 1, 2016|publisher=CBC News|date=December 3, 2015|archive-date=September 13, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240913225350/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-liberals-caucus-speaker-1.3347265|url-status=live}}</ref>
This election marked the first time the Liberals were unable to form either government or the official opposition. Ignatieff was defeated in his own riding, and announced his resignation as Liberal leader shortly after. [[Bob Rae]] was chosen as the [[Interim leader (Canada)|interim leader]] on May 25, 2011.<ref name="twoyears">{{cite news |title = Federal Liberals won't pick new leader for full two years |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/federal-liberals-wont-pick-new-leader-for-full-two-years/article2066673/ |accessdate = 2011-06-19 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = June 19, 2011|first = Joan |last = Bryden }}</ref>


By the time the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 federal election]] was called, the Liberals had fallen back to third place. Trudeau and his advisors mounted a campaign based on economic stimulus in the hopes of regaining the mantle of being the party that best represented change from the New Democrats.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Raj|first1=Althia|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/10/25/justin-trudeau_n_8382304.html|title=Justin Trudeau's Liberals: 'We Had A Plan And We Stuck To It.' And They Won|access-date = October 31, 2015 |work = Huffington Post|date = October 25, 2015}}</ref> The campaign was successful, and the Liberals won the election in a dramatic fashion: with 39.5 percent of the popular vote and 184 seats, it was the first time a party had won a parliamentary majority after placing third in a previous general election.<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34578213|title = Canada election: Liberals sweep to power|access-date = October 20, 2015|work = BBC News|date = October 20, 2015|archive-date = October 20, 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151020035211/http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34578213|url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/canada/11941852/Canada-election-Liberals-poised-to-win-sweeping-victory-over-Conservatives.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/canada/11941852/Canada-election-Liberals-poised-to-win-sweeping-victory-over-Conservatives.html |archive-date=January 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title = Canada election: Liberals win sweeping victory over Conservatives|access-date = October 20, 2015 |newspaper = The Daily Telegraph|date = October 20, 2015}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|publisher=CBC News|date=October 19, 2015|access-date=October 20, 2015|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-results-federal-election-2015-1.3278830|title=Stunning Liberal gains in Quebec as Trudeau wins majority government|archive-date=October 20, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151020024320/http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-results-federal-election-2015-1.3278830|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Chantal Hébert]] deemed the result "a Liberal comeback that is headed straight for the history books",<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.thestar.com/news/federal-election/2015/10/20/liberal-comeback-headed-for-history-books-hbert.html|title = Liberal comeback headed for history books|access-date = October 25, 2015|work = Toronto Star|date = October 20, 2015|archive-date = October 24, 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151024000551/http://www.thestar.com/news/federal-election/2015/10/20/liberal-comeback-headed-for-history-books-hbert.html|url-status = live}}</ref> while [[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]'s Josh Wingrove and Theophilos Argitis similarly described it as "capping the biggest political comeback in the country’s history."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Argitis |first1=Theophilos |last2=Wingrove |first2=Josh |publisher=Bloomberg News |date=October 19, 2015 |access-date=October 27, 2015 |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/trudeau-s-liberals-projected-to-win-canada-vote-networks-say |title=Trudeau's Liberals Oust Harper With Surprise Canada Majority |archive-date=October 27, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151027135308/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/trudeau-s-liberals-projected-to-win-canada-vote-networks-say |url-status=live }}</ref> Spencer McKay, writing for the ''[[National Post]]'', suggested that "maybe we've witnessed a revival of Canada's 'natural governing party'".<ref>Spencer McKay, "The Great Liberal Comeback" [http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/spencer-mckay-the-great-liberal-comeback ''National Post'' Oct 29 2015] {{Webarchive|url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20151119074616/http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/spencer-mckay-the-great-liberal-comeback|date=2015-11-19}}</ref>
====Justin Trudeau====
[[File:Justin Trudeau in Lima, Peru - 2018 (41507133581) (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|160px|[[Justin Trudeau]], Prime Minister of Canada (2015–present)]]
On April 14, 2013 [[Justin Trudeau]], son of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, was [[2013 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|elected leader]] of the Liberal Party on the first ballot, winning 80% of the vote.<ref>{{cite news |title = Justin Trudeau sweeps Liberal leadership with 80% support |url = http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2013/04/14/pol-liberal-leadership-results.html |accessdate = 2013-04-15 |publisher = Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date = April 14, 2013 }}</ref> Following his win, support for the Liberal Party increased considerably, and the party moved into first place in public opinion polls.<ref>{{cite news |last = Berthiaume |first = Lee |title = Tory attack ads may be backfiring in favour of Trudeau's Liberals as support rises, new poll shows |url = http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/05/07/tory-attack-ads-may-be-backfiring-in-favour-of-trudeaus-liberals-as-support-rises-new-poll-shows/ |accessdate = 7 June 2013 |newspaper = National Post |date = 7 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Visser |first = Josh |title = Trudeau's Liberals hit historic highs as senate scandal has 'drastic effect' on Tories: poll |url = http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/05/23/trudeaus-liberals-hit-historic-highs-as-senate-scandal-has-drastic-effect-on-tories-poll/ |accessdate = 7 June 2013 |newspaper = National Post |date = 23 May 2013 }}</ref>


At the [[2019 Canadian federal election|2019 federal election]], Trudeau's Liberal Party lost 20 seats in the House of Commons (lowering its total from 177 to 157) from the time of dissolution, they still won the most seats of any party—enough seats to allow Trudeau to form a minority government.<ref>{{cite web |last=Da Silva |first=Chantal |author-link=Chantal Da Silva |date=October 22, 2019 |title=Justin Trudeau wins minority government—what does this mean for America? |url=https://www.newsweek.com/justin-trudeau-canadian-election-minority-government-donald-trump-1466845 |website=Newsweek |access-date=March 23, 2022 |archive-date=April 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406174906/https://www.newsweek.com/justin-trudeau-canadian-election-minority-government-donald-trump-1466845 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Trudeau says no plans to form a coalition, will push ahead on Trans Mountain|url=https://globalnews.ca/news/6071193/justin-trudeau-minority-government-plan/|website=Global News|access-date=March 23, 2022|archive-date=April 6, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406173403/https://globalnews.ca/news/6071193/justin-trudeau-minority-government-plan/|url-status=live}}</ref> For the first time since 1979, the party that garnered the largest share of the national popular vote did not win the most seats; the Liberals under Trudeau had 33.1 per cent of the popular vote, while the Conservatives under [[Andrew Scheer]] had 34.4 per cent.<ref name="toronto">{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-election-results-1.5330105|title=Ontario and Quebec keep Liberals in power and Conservatives out|publisher=cbc.ca|date=October 22, 2019|access-date=March 23, 2022|archive-date=April 6, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230406194923/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-election-results-1.5330105|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://election.ctvnews.ca/historic-opportunity-opposition-leaders-take-stock-after-liberal-minority-win-1.4649796|title='Historic opportunity': Opposition leaders take stock after Liberal minority win|first=Rachel|last=Aiello|date=October 22, 2019|website=Federal Election 2019|access-date=March 23, 2022|archive-date=July 31, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210731183032/https://election.ctvnews.ca/historic-opportunity-opposition-leaders-take-stock-after-liberal-minority-win-1.4649796|url-status=live}}</ref> It was also the first time a government took power with less than 35 per cent of the national popular vote since the Conservatives of [[John A. Macdonald]], in 1867, who had 34.8 per cent of the votes.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/election-2019/canadian-federal-election-2019-liberals-justin-trudeau-win|title=All-time low share of popular vote is enough for Liberals to win power &#124; National Post|newspaper=National Post|date=October 22, 2019|last1=Brean|first1=Joseph|access-date=March 23, 2022|archive-date=July 6, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210706201852/https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/election-2019/canadian-federal-election-2019-liberals-justin-trudeau-win|url-status=live}}</ref>
An initial surge in support in the polls following Trudeau's election wore off in the following year, in the face of Conservative [[campaign advertising|ad campaign]] after Trudeau's win attempting to "[paint] him as a silly dilettante unfit for public office."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Warnica|first1=Richard|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/features/the-liberal-resurrection|title = The Liberal Resurrection: How a Liberal 'lightweight' faced with the longest election campaign in history beat down a Tory majority|accessdate = 25 Oct 2015 |work = National Post|date = 23 Oct 2015}}</ref>


In the [[2021 Canadian federal election|2021 federal election]], Trudeau and the Liberals secured a third mandate and his second minority government after winning 160 seats. However, the Liberals again came in second in the national popular vote, behind the Conservatives.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-votes-2021-election-night-highlights-1.6177106 |title=Federal election latest updates", CBC, September 20, 2021. |access-date=March 23, 2022 |archive-date=March 3, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220303012643/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-votes-2021-election-night-highlights-1.6177106 |url-status=live }}</ref> They received 32.6 percent of the popular vote, the lowest percentage of the national popular vote for a governing party in Canadian history.<ref name="Hopper2">{{cite news|last=Hopper|first=Tristan|date=September 22, 2021|title=First Reading: The Least Popular Canadian Government Ever Elected|work=National Post|url=https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/election-2021/first-reading-the-least-popular-canadian-government-ever-elected}}</ref>
In 2014, Trudeau removed all Liberal senators from the Liberal Party caucus. In announcing this, Trudeau said the purpose of the unelected upper chamber is to act as a check on the power of the prime minister, but the party structure interferes with that purpose.<ref name="LibSenate"/> Following this move, Liberal senators chose to keep the designation "Liberal" and sit together as a caucus, albeit not one supported by the Liberal Party of Canada. This independent group still refers to itself in publications as the [[Senate Liberal Caucus]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Crawford|first1=Allison|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-liberals-caucus-speaker-1.3347265|title=Senate Liberals unsure how to work with Trudeau government|accessdate = 1 Jan 2016 |publisher= CBC News|date = 3 Dec 2015}}</ref>


In March 2022, Trudeau's Liberal Party agreed to a [[confidence and supply]] deal with the [[New Democratic Party]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Liberals, NDP agree to confidence deal seeing Trudeau government maintain power until 2025 |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/liberals-ndp-agree-to-confidence-deal-seeing-trudeau-government-maintain-power-until-2025-1.5829116 |website=[[CTV News]] |date=March 22, 2022 |access-date=March 23, 2022 |archive-date=March 22, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220322132559/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/liberals-ndp-agree-to-confidence-deal-seeing-trudeau-government-maintain-power-until-2025-1.5829116 |url-status=live }}</ref> In September 2024, [[Jagmeet Singh]] announced that he was ending the confidence-and-supply agreement, with NDP sources saying they had "achieved all they could from the agreement."<ref>{{cite web |last1=McKenna |first1=Kate |last2=Zimonjic |first2=Peter |title=How the NDP's deal with the Liberals died |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp-liberal-confidence-and-supply-parliament-1.7316227 |publisher=CBC News |access-date=12 September 2024 |date=4 September 2024 |archive-date=September 12, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240912064558/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp-liberal-confidence-and-supply-parliament-1.7316227 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Yousif |first1=Nadine |date=September 5, 2024 |title=Why Canadian politics just got more unpredictable |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y3vpp1z91o |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240905235537/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y3vpp1z91o |archive-date=September 5, 2024 |access-date=September 6, 2024 |work=[[BBC News]]}}</ref> Throughout the year, the Liberals have faced declining poll numbers and disappointing results in [[List of federal by-elections in Canada|by-elections]], including losses in [[safe seat]]s such as [[2024 Toronto—St. Paul's federal by-election|Toronto—St. Paul's]] in [[Toronto]] and [[2024 LaSalle—Émard—Verdun federal by-election|LaSalle—Émard—Verdun]] in [[Montreal]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Major |first=Darren |date=September 10, 2024 |title=Upcoming federal byelections will put Singh and the NDP brand to the test - NDP looking to both hold a Winnipeg seat and pull another away from the Liberals in Montreal |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp-byelections-test-singh-leadership-1.7317935 |website=CBC News |access-date=September 11, 2024 |archive-date=September 11, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240911151244/https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp-byelections-test-singh-leadership-1.7317935 |url-status=live }}</ref> The months following these losses saw frequent media stories about internal frustration and discontent with Trudeau's leadership. This appeared to culminate in a caucus meeting where multiple members called on Trudeau to resign. Trudeau emerged from this meeting stating that the party remained "strong and united."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-23 |title=Trudeau says Liberals 'strong and united' despite caucus dissent |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-says-liberals-strong-and-united-despite-caucus-dissent-1.7083855 |access-date=2024-11-20 |website=CTVNews |language=en}}</ref>
By the time the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 federal election]] was called, the Liberals had been knocked back into third place. Trudeau and his advisors planned to mount a campaign based on economic stimulus in the hopes of regaining the mantle of being the party that best represented change from the New Democrats.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Raj|first1=Althia|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/10/25/justin-trudeau_n_8382304.html|title=Justin Trudeau's Liberals: 'We Had A Plan And We Stuck To It.' And They Won|accessdate = 31 Oct 2015 |work = Huffington Post|date = 25 Oct 2015}}</ref>
[[File:Canadian federal election, 2015 results by riding - Liberal Party strength.svg|thumb|Results of the [[2015 Canadian federal election]] showing support for Liberal candidates by riding]]
Justin Trudeau's Liberals would win the 2015 election in dramatic fashion: becoming the first party to win a parliamentary majority after being reduced to third party status in a previous general election, besting Brian Mulroney's record for the largest seat increase by a party in a single election (111 in 1984), and winning the most seats in Quebec for the first time since 1980.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34578213|title = Canada election: Liberals sweep to power|accessdate = 20 Oct 2015 |work = BBC News|date = 20 Oct 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/canada/11941852/Canada-election-Liberals-poised-to-win-sweeping-victory-over-Conservatives.html|title = Canada election: Liberals win sweeping victory over Conservatives|accessdate = 20 Oct 2015 |newspaper = The Daily Telegraph|date = 20 Oct 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|publisher=CBC News|date=19 Oct 2015|accessdate=20 Oct 2015|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-results-federal-election-2015-1.3278830|title = Stunning Liberal gains in Quebec as Trudeau wins majority government}}</ref> [[Chantal Hébert]] deemed the result "a Liberal comeback that is headed straight for the history books",<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.com/news/federal-election/2015/10/20/liberal-comeback-headed-for-history-books-hbert.html|title = Liberal comeback headed for history books|accessdate = 25 Oct 2015 |work = Toronto Star|date = 20 Oct 2015}}</ref> while [[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]'s Josh Wingrove and Theophilos Argitis similarly described it as "capping the biggest political comeback in the country’s history."<ref>{{cite news|last1=Argitis |first1=Theophilos |last2=Wingrove |first2= Josh |publisher=Bloomberg News|date=19 Oct 2015 |accessdate=27 Oct 2015 |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-20/trudeau-s-liberals-projected-to-win-canada-vote-networks-say |title=Trudeau's Liberals Oust Harper With Surprise Canada Majority}}</ref>


===Party systems and realignment model===
===Systems and realignment model===
Scholars and political experts have recently used a [[realigning election|realignment model]] to explain what was considered a collapse of a dominant party, and put its condition in long-term perspective. According to recent scholarship, there have been four [[party systems]] in Canada at the federal level since Confederation, each with its own distinctive pattern of social support, patronage relationships, leadership styles, and electoral strategies. Steve Patten identifies four party systems in Canada's political history:<ref>Steve Patten, [https://books.google.com/books?id=CxQpqRY5WcEC&dq=Canadian+Parties+in+Transition%2C+Third+Edition&q=steve+patten#v=snippet&q=steve%20patten&f=false "The Evolution of the Canadian Party System"]. in Gagnon, and Tanguay, eds. ''Canadian Parties in Transition'' pp. 57–58</ref>
Scholars and political experts have recently used a [[political realignment]] model to explain what was considered a collapse of a dominant party, and put its condition in long-term perspective. According to recent scholarship, there have been four [[party systems]] in Canada at the federal level since Confederation, each with its own distinctive pattern of social support, patronage relationships, leadership styles, and electoral strategies. Steve Patten identifies four party systems in Canada's political history:<ref>Steve Patten, [https://books.google.com/books?id=CxQpqRY5WcEC&q=steve+patten "The Evolution of the Canadian Party System"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230708191424/https://books.google.com/books?id=CxQpqRY5WcEC&q=steve+patten |date=July 8, 2023 }}. in Gagnon, and Tanguay, eds. ''Canadian Parties in Transition'' pp. 57–58</ref>
* The first party system emerged from pre-Confederation colonial politics, had its "heyday" from 1896 to 1911 and lasted until the [[Conscription Crisis of 1917]], and was characterized by local patronage administered by the two largest parties, the Liberals and the Conservatives.
* The first party system emerged from pre-Confederation colonial politics, had its "heyday" from 1896 to 1911 and lasted until the [[Conscription Crisis of 1917]], and was characterized by local patronage administered by the two largest parties, the Liberals and the Conservatives.
* The second system emerged following the First World War, and had its heyday from 1935 and 1957, was characterized by [[Regionalism (politics)|regionalism]] and saw the emergence of several protest parties, such as the [[Progressives (Canada)|Progressives]], the [[Social Credit Party (Canada)|Social Credit Party]], and the [[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]].
* The second system emerged following the First World War, and had its heyday from 1935 and 1957, was characterized by [[Regionalism (politics)|regionalism]] and saw the emergence of several protest parties, such as the [[Progressives (Canada)|Progressives]], the [[Social Credit Party (Canada)|Social Credit Party]], and the [[Co-operative Commonwealth Federation]].
* The third system emerged in 1963 and had its heyday from 1968 to 1983 and began to unravel thereafter. The two largest parties were challenged by a strong third party, the [[New Democratic Party]] (successor to the CCF). Campaigns during this era became more national in scope because of [[electronic media]], and involved a greater focus on leadership. The dominant policy of the era was [[Keynesian]] economics.
* The third system emerged in 1963 and had its heyday from 1968 to 1983 and began to unravel thereafter. The two largest parties were challenged by a strong third party, the [[New Democratic Party]] (successor to the CCF). Campaigns during this era became more national in scope because of [[electronic media]], and involved a greater focus on leadership. The dominant policy of the era was [[Keynesian]] economics.
* The fourth party system has involved the rise of the [[Reform Party of Canada|Reform Party]], the [[Bloc Québécois]], and the merger of the [[Canadian Alliance]] with the [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|Progressive Conservatives]]. Most parties moved to [[One member, one vote|one-member-one-vote]] leadership contests, and [[Federal political financing in Canada|campaign finance laws]] were reformed in 2004. The fourth party system has been characterized by market-oriented policies that generally abandoned Keynesian policies, but maintained the [[welfare state]].
* The fourth party system has involved the rise of the [[Reform Party of Canada|Reform Party]], the [[Bloc Québécois]], and the merger of the [[Canadian Alliance]] with the [[Progressive Conservative Party of Canada|Progressive Conservatives]]. Most parties moved to [[One member, one vote|one-member-one-vote]] leadership contests, and [[Federal political financing in Canada|campaign finance laws]] were reformed in 2004. The fourth party system has been characterized by market-oriented policies that generally abandoned Keynesian policies, but maintained the [[welfare state]].


Stephen Clarkson (2005) shows how the Liberal Party has dominated all the party systems, using different approaches. It began with a "clientelistic approach" under [[Sir Wilfrid Laurier|Laurier]], which evolved into a "brokerage" system of the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s under [[William Lyon Mackenzie King|Mackenzie King]]. The 1950s saw the emergence of a "pan-Canadian system", which lasted until the 1990s. The 1993 election – categorized by Clarkson as an electoral "earthquake" which "fragmented" the party system, saw the emergence of regional politics within a four party-system, whereby various groups championed regional issues and concerns. Clarkson concludes that the inherent bias built into the first-past-the-post system, has chiefly benefited the Liberals.<ref>Stephen Clarkson, [http://www.ubcpress.ca/search/title_book.asp?BookID=4502 ''The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160103144519/http://www.ubcpress.ca/search/title_book.asp?BookID=4502 |date=January 3, 2016 }} (2005).</ref>
Stephen Clarkson (2005) shows how the Liberal Party has dominated all the party systems, using different approaches. It began with a "clientelistic approach" under [[Sir Wilfrid Laurier|Laurier]], which evolved into a "brokerage" system of the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s under [[William Lyon Mackenzie King|Mackenzie King]]. The 1950s saw the emergence of a "pan-Canadian system", which lasted until the 1990s. The 1993 election – categorized by Clarkson as an electoral "earthquake" which "fragmented" the party system, saw the emergence of regional politics within a four party-system, whereby various groups championed regional issues and concerns. Clarkson concludes that the inherent bias built into the first-past-the-post system, has chiefly benefited the Liberals.<ref>Stephen Clarkson, [http://www.ubcpress.ca/search/title_book.asp?BookID=4502 ''The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160103144519/http://www.ubcpress.ca/search/title_book.asp?BookID=4502 |date=January 3, 2016 }} (2005).</ref>


==Principles and policies==
Pundits in the wake of the 2011 election widely believed in a theme of major realignment. [[Lawrence Martin (journalist)|Lawrence Martin]], commentator for ''[[The Globe and Mail]]'', claimed that "Harper has completed a remarkable reconstruction of a Canadian political landscape that endured for more than a century. The realignment sees both old parties of the moderate middle, the Progressive Conservatives and the Liberals, either eliminated or marginalized."<ref>{{cite news |last = Martin |first = Lawrence |title = Harper's triumph: a realignment of historic proportion |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/harpers-triumph-a-realignment-of-historic-proportions/article2008719/ |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = May 4, 2011 }}</ref> ''[[Maclean's]]'' said that the election marked "an unprecedented realignment of Canadian politics" as "the Conservatives are now in a position to replace the Liberals as the natural governing party in Canada"; [[Andrew Coyne]] proclaimed "The West is in and Ontario has joined it," noting that the Conservatives accomplished the rare feat of putting together a majority by winning in both Ontario and the western provinces (difficult because of traditionally conflicting interests), while having little representation in Quebec.<!--<ref>{{cite news |last = Stinson |first = Scott |title = Redefining the Liberals not a quick process |url = http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/05/06/scott-stinson-liberals-begin-process-of-redefinition/ |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = National Post |date = May 6, 2011 }}</ref>--><ref>{{cite news |last = Coyne |first = Andrew |title = The West is in and Ontario has joined it |url = http://www.macleans.ca/general/a-new-power-couple/ |accessdate = 2011-11-09 |newspaper = Maclean's |date = May 6, 2011 }}</ref> Books such as ''The Big Shift'' by [[John Ibbitson]] and [[Darrell Bricker]], and [[Peter C. Newman]]'s ''When the Gods Changed: The Death of Liberal Canada'', provocatively asserted that the Liberals had become an "endangered species" and that an NDP-led opposition would mean that "fortune favours the Harper government" in subsequent campaigns.<ref>{{cite news |last = McLeod |first = Paul |title = Book Review: The Big Shift Explains Why Stephen Harper Will Keep Winning |url = https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/book-review-the-big-shift-why-stephen-harper-will-keep-winni#.kk8WgyWkW |accessdate = 22 Oct 2015 |publisher = Buzzfeed|date = 22 Oct 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Valpy |first = Michael |title = Is a Liberal comeback mission impossible?
The principles of the party are based on [[liberalism]] as defined by various [[List of liberal theorists|liberal theorists]] and include individual freedom for present and future generations, responsibility, human dignity, a just society, political freedom, religious freedom, national unity, equality of opportunity, cultural diversity, bilingualism, and multilateralism.<ref>{{cite web |last = Apps |first = Alfred |title = Building a Modern Liberal Party |url = http://www.liberal.ca/files/2011/11/BuildingaModernLiberalParty.pdf |publisher = Liberal Party of Canada |access-date = November 24, 2011 |pages = 5–9 |archive-date = July 17, 2016 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160717212353/http://www.liberal.ca/files/2011/11/BuildingaModernLiberalParty.pdf |url-status = dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title = 2009 Constitution |url = http://www.liberal.ca/files/2010/05/lpc-2009-constitution-en.pdf |publisher = Liberal Party of Canada |access-date = November 24, 2011 |archive-date = November 5, 2015 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151105071119/http://www.liberal.ca/files/2010/05/lpc-2009-constitution-en.pdf |url-status = dead }}</ref> From the early twentieth century, the Liberal party has favoured a variety of "[[big tent]]" policies from both [[Right-wing politics|right]] and [[Left-wing politics|left]] of the [[political spectrum]].<ref name="CartyTent"/> When it formed the government from 1993 to 2006, it championed [[balanced budget]]s, and eliminated the budget deficit completely from the federal budget in 1995 by reducing spending on [[Social programs in Canada|social programs]] or delegating them to the provinces, and promised to replace the [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax]] in the party's famous [[Red Book (Liberal Party of Canada)|Red Book]].<ref>{{cite news |title = The lesson from Canada on cutting deficits |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/the-lesson-from-canada-on-cutting-deficits/article2243702/singlepage/#articlecontent |access-date = November 24, 2011 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = November 21, 2011 |first1 = Louise |last1 = Egan |first2 = Randall |last2 = Palmer |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111126082138/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/the-lesson-from-canada-on-cutting-deficits/article2243702/singlepage/#articlecontent |archive-date = November 26, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> It also legalized same-sex marriage.
|url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/is-a-liberal-comeback-mission-impossible/article4246976/ |accessdate = 22 Oct 2015 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail|date = 25 Nov 2011}}</ref>


===2021 party platform===
The Liberal victory in 2015, leaving Alberta and Saskatchewan as the only provinces represented by a majority of Conservative MPs, has now challenged that narrative.<ref>{{cite news |last1= Nadelli |first1= Alberto | last2=Swann |first2=Glenn |title = Three maps that explain the Liberals' great comeback in Canada's election |url = https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2015/oct/20/canada-election-liberal-comeback-three-maps-justin-trudeau |accessdate = 21 Oct 2015 |newspaper = The Guardian |date = 20 Oct 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last = Paikin |first = Steve |title = Who says Canadian politics are boring? |url = http://tvo.org/blog/current-affairs/who-says-canadian-politics-are-boring |accessdate = 21 Oct 2011 |publisher = TVO|date = 19 Oct 2015}}</ref>
During the [[2021 Canadian federal election|2021 federal election]], the Liberal Party of Canada introduced their platform, which included a "Gender and Diversity Impact Summary" for each chapter,<ref name="Forward. For Everyone">{{cite web |title=Forward. For Everyone |url=https://liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/292/2021/09/Platform-Forward-For-Everyone.pdf |publisher=Liberal Party of Canada |access-date=12 May 2022 |archive-date=June 5, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605150609/https://liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/292/2021/09/Platform-Forward-For-Everyone.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> as well as six key categories. These included: the pandemic, housing, health care, the economy, climate change, and reconciliation.<ref name="CTV News 2021 Liberal">{{cite news |last1=Aiello |first1=Rachel |title=Liberals unveil 2021 election platform, promising total of $78 billion for post-pandemic rebuild |url=https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/federal-election-2021/liberals-unveil-2021-election-platform-promising-total-of-78-billion-for-post-pandemic-rebuild-1.5569268?cache=%3FclipId%3D89950 |access-date=12 May 2022 |agency=CTV News |date=1 September 2021 |archive-date=April 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230422015537/https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/federal-election-2021/liberals-unveil-2021-election-platform-promising-total-of-78-billion-for-post-pandemic-rebuild-1.5569268?cache=%3FclipId%3D89950 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Liberals unveil 2021 election platform |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/1/canadas-liberals-unveil-massive-investment-plan-ahead-of-vote |agency=Al Jazeera |date=1 September 2021 |access-date=May 12, 2022 |archive-date=May 26, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230526003746/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/1/canadas-liberals-unveil-massive-investment-plan-ahead-of-vote |url-status=live }}</ref>


Key Liberal policies of the 2021 platform included:
==Principles and policies==
{{Liberalism sidebar}}
The principles of the party are based on [[liberalism]] as defined by various [[List of liberal theorists|liberal theorists]] and include individual freedom for [[Social liberalism|present and future generations]], responsibility, human dignity, a just society, political freedom, religious freedom, national unity, equality of opportunity, cultural diversity, bilingualism, and multilateralism.<ref>{{cite web |last = Apps |first = Alfred |title = Building a Modern Liberal Party |url = http://www.liberal.ca/files/2011/11/BuildingaModernLiberalParty.pdf |publisher = Liberal Party of Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-24 |pages = 5–9 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title = 2009 Constitution |url = http://www.liberal.ca/files/2010/05/lpc-2009-constitution-en.pdf |publisher = Liberal Party of Canada |accessdate = 2011-11-24 }}</ref> In the present times, the Liberal party has favoured a variety of "[[big tent]]" policies from both [[Right-wing politics|right]] and [[Left-wing politics|left]] of the [[political spectrum]].<ref name="CartyTent"/> When it formed the government from 1993 to 2006, it championed [[balanced budget]]s, and eliminated the budget deficit completely from the federal budget in 1995 by reducing spending on [[Social programs in Canada|social programs]] or delegating them to the provinces, and promised to replace the [[Goods and Services Tax (Canada)|Goods and Services Tax]] in the party's famous [[Red Book (Liberal Party of Canada)|Red Book]].<ref>{{cite news |title = The lesson from Canada on cutting deficits |url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/the-lesson-from-canada-on-cutting-deficits/article2243702/singlepage/#articlecontent |accessdate = 2011-11-24 |newspaper = The Globe and Mail |date = November 21, 2011 |first1 = Louise |last1 = Egan |first2 = Randall |last2 = Palmer |url-status = dead |archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20111126082138/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/the-lesson-from-canada-on-cutting-deficits/article2243702/singlepage/#articlecontent |archivedate = November 26, 2011 |df = mdy-all }}</ref> It also legalized same-sex marriage.


*Requiring travellers on interprovincial trains, commercial flights, cruise ships, and other federally regulated vessels be vaccinated against COVID-19.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
===Current policies===
*Making an investment of $6 billion—on top of $4 billion already committed—to support the elimination of health system waitlists.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
During the [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015 election]], the Liberal party's proposed policies included:<ref name="2015Platform">{{cite web |url=https://www.liberal.ca/realchange/ |title=What does real change mean to you? |publisher=Liberal Party of Canada |date=5 October 2015 |accessdate=17 October 2015}}</ref>
*Providing various investments in order to build, preserve, or revitalize 1.4 million new homes by 2025–26.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Cut the middle class tax bracket ($45,000–$90,000) from 22% to 20.5% and create a new tax bracket for income above $200,000 taxed at 33%<ref name="GMPlatform">{{cite web |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/elections/party-platform-comparison/article26758784/ |title=Platform comparison: Where the parties stand on the top campaign issues |work=The Globe and Mail |date=13 October 2015 |accessdate=17 October 2015 |author=Quadri, Omair}}</ref>
*Allocating funds to spend $2 billion over the next five years on measures to address the legacy of residential schools with "truth, justice, and healing" initiatives.<ref name="CTV News 2021 Liberal" />
[[file:RealChange.png|290px|thumb|The Trudeau Liberals slogan during the 2015 campaign was "Real Change"]]
*Re-introducing legislation within the first 100 days in office to eliminate the practice of gay conversion therapy for everyone.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Set national targets to lower [[greenhouse gas]] emissions through cooperation with provinces, support [[Keystone XL]] with a stricter environmental review process, spend $20&nbsp;billion over 10 years on "greener infrastructure"<ref name="GMPlatform" />
*Achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Run 3 years of deficits that will not exceed $10&nbsp;billion to finance infrastructure projects and balance the budget in 2019<ref name="GMPlatform" />
*Presenting a National Action Plan on Combating Hate by 2022 as part of a renewed Anti-Racism Strategy, including the Black Canadians Justice Strategy.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Spend $60&nbsp;billion in new infrastructure spending, including $20&nbsp;billion in transit infrastructure and quadrupling federal funding for [[public transit]], all over three years<ref name="GMPlatform" />
* Invest $300&nbsp;million annually to fund a Youth Employment Strategy<ref name="GMPlatform" />
*Updating the committed number to receive 40,000 Afghan refugees.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
*Creating a minimum tax rule so that everyone who earns enough to qualify for the top bracket pays at least 15% each year (the tax rate paid by people earning less than $49,000), removing their ability to artificially pay no tax through excessive use of deductions and credits.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Reduce [[Unemployment benefits#Canada|employment insurance]] (EI) premiums from $1.88 per $100 to $1.65 per $100<ref name="GMPlatform" />
*Establishing a permanent Council of Economic Advisors to provide independent advice to government on long-term growth. The council will be gender- balanced and reflect Canada's diversity.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Replace the Universal Child Care Benefit with a Canada Child Benefit that would provide $2,500 more to an average family of four<ref name="GMPlatform" />
*Reform economic immigration programs to expand pathways to permanent residence for temporary foreign workers and former international students through the Express Entry points system.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Support training efforts in [[Ukraine]] and sanctions against [[Russia]]; end the bombing mission against [[Islamic State of Iraq and Syria|ISIS]] but increase humanitarian aid and training of local ground troops<ref name="GMPlatform" />
*Setting aside a minimum of $1 billion to support provinces or territories who implement a ban on handguns across their jurisdiction.<ref name="Forward. For Everyone" />
* Take in 25,000 [[Syrian refugee crisis|Syrian refugees]] and spend $100&nbsp;million for refugee processing and settlement<ref name="GMPlatform" />
* Negotiate a new health accord with the provinces to guarantee long-term funding, including a national plan for lower prescription drug prices<ref name="GMPlatform" />
* Invest $3&nbsp;billion over four years to improve [[home care]]<ref name="GMPlatform" />
* Set up an all-party committee to pass legislation implementation of [[physician assisted death]]<ref name="GMPlatform" />
* Full legalization of marijuana<ref name="Marijuana legalization">{{cite web |url=http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/election/liberals-committed-to-legalizing-marijuana-trudeau-1.2588260 |title=Liberals 'committed' to legalizing marijuana: Trudeau |publisher=CTV News |date=30 September 2015 |accessdate=17 October 2015 |author=Elliot, Josh}}</ref>
* Electoral reform, making 2015 the last election in Canada to be held under [[first-past-the-post]]<ref name="electoral reform">{{cite web |url=https://www.liberal.ca/realchange/electoral-reform/ |title=Liberal Party 2015 Platform: We will make every vote count |publisher=Liberal Party of Canada}}</ref>
* Implementing a non-partisan appointment process for the [[Senate of Canada|Senate]] modeled on that of the [[Order of Canada]], after having removed Liberal senators from the [[party caucus]] in 2014<ref name="Senate reform">{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/the-road-taken-by-justin-trudeau-to-his-senate-reform-decision-1.2516793 |title=The road taken by Justin Trudeau to his Senate reform decision |publisher=CBC News |date=30 January 2014 |accessdate=17 October 2015 |agency=The Canadian Press}}</ref>


==Regional Liberal parties==
==Provincial parties==
Each province and one territory in Canada has its own Liberal Party. However, only those in [[New Brunswick]], [[Newfoundland and Labrador]], [[Nova Scotia]], and [[Prince Edward Island]] are politically and organizationally affiliated with the federal Liberal Party. While other provincial Liberal parties may align ideologically with the federal party, they operate as completely separate entities. Those provincial parties have separate policies, finances, memberships, constituency associations, executives, conventions and offices.<ref name="Dyck">{{cite book |last = Dyck |first = Rand |title = Canadian Politics: Concise Fifth Edition |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=BUOoN8e5Ps0C |pages = 217, 229 |year = 2012 |publisher = Nelson Education |isbn = 978-0176503437 }}</ref>
Eight provinces and one territory in Canada have a Liberal Party in their legislatures. Neither [[Nunavut]] nor the [[Northwest Territories]] have party-based electoral and governing systems (both operate with [[consensus democracy]]). British Columbia had a Liberal Party whose name and ideology have shifted, [[BC United]]; Saskatchewan also had a Liberal Party whose name has changed, [[Saskatchewan Progress Party]]. [[Yukon Liberal Party|Yukon]], [[Alberta Liberal Party|Alberta]], [[Manitoba Liberal Party|Manitoba]], [[Ontario Liberal Party|Ontario]] and [[Quebec Liberal Party|Quebec]] each have a Liberal Party that may align ideologically with the federal party but operates as a completely separate entity (though at one time were affiliated): Those provincial parties have separate policies, finances, memberships, constituency associations, executives, conventions and offices. The [[New Brunswick Liberal Association|New Brunswick]], [[Liberal Party of Newfoundland and Labrador|Newfoundland and Labrador]], [[Nova Scotia Liberal Party|Nova Scotia]], and [[Prince Edward Island Liberal Party|Prince Edward Island]] provincial Liberals are each politically and organizationally affiliated with the federal Liberal Party.

<!--DON'T PUT THE BC, ALBERTA, SASKATCHEWAN, MANITOBA, ONTARIO, QUEBEC, OR YUKON LIBERAL PARTIES HERE; THEY ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA. Go to discussion page to make your case.-->
{| class="wikitable"
|+ '''Affiliated provincial parties, current seats, and leaders'''
|'''Party'''
!Seats/Total
!Leader
!Status
|-
| '''[[New Brunswick Liberal Association]]'''
| {{Composition bar|21|49|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| [[Kevin Vickers]]
| {{no|Official Opposition}}
|-
| '''[[Liberal Party of Newfoundland and Labrador]]'''
| {{Composition bar|20|40|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| [[Dwight Ball]]
| {{yes2|Minority government}}
|-
| '''[[Nova Scotia Liberal Party]]'''
| {{Composition bar|27|51|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| [[Stephen McNeil]]
| {{yes2|Majority government}}
|-
| '''[[Prince Edward Island Liberal Party]]'''
| {{Composition bar|6|27|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| [[Robert Mitchell (Prince Edward Island politician)|Robert Mitchell]]
| {{no|Third Party}}
|}
<!--DON'T PUT THE BC, ALBERTA, SASKATCHEWAN, MANITOBA, ONTARIO, OR QUEBEC LIBERAL PARTIES HERE; THEY ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA. Go to discussion page to make your case.-->


==Electoral performance==
==Electoral performance==
Line 274: Line 216:
| align="left" | [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]]
| align="left" | [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]]
| 60,818
| 60,818
| 22.6
| 22.70
| {{Composition bar|62|180|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|62|180|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 62
| {{increase}} 62
Line 283: Line 225:
| align="left" | [[Edward Blake]]
| align="left" | [[Edward Blake]]
| 110,556
| 110,556
| 34.7
| 34.70
| {{Composition bar|95|200|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|95|200|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 33
| {{increase}} 33
Line 292: Line 234:
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]]
| 128,455
| 128,455
| 39.4
| 39.50
| {{Composition bar|129|206|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|129|206|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 34
| {{increase}} 34
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1878 Canadian federal election|1878]]
! [[1878 Canadian federal election|1878]]
| 180,074
| 180,074
| 33.0
| 33.10
| {{Composition bar|63|206|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|63|206|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 66
| {{decrease}} 66
Line 309: Line 251:
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Edward Blake]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Edward Blake]]
| 160,547
| 160,547
| 31.1
| 31.10
| {{Composition bar|73|211|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|73|211|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 10
| {{increase}} 10
Line 317: Line 259:
! [[1887 Canadian federal election|1887]]
! [[1887 Canadian federal election|1887]]
| 312,736
| 312,736
| 43.1
| 43.10
| {{Composition bar|80|215|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|80|215|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 7
| {{increase}} 7
Line 326: Line 268:
| align="left" rowspan=7| [[Wilfrid Laurier]]
| align="left" rowspan=7| [[Wilfrid Laurier]]
| 350,512
| 350,512
| 45.2
| 45.20
| {{Composition bar|90|215|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|90|215|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 10
| {{increase}} 10
Line 333: Line 275:
|-
|-
! [[1896 Canadian federal election|1896]]
! [[1896 Canadian federal election|1896]]
| 350,512
| 401,425
| 45.2
| 41.40
| {{Composition bar|117|213|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|117|213|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 27
| {{increase}} 27
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1900 Canadian federal election|1900]]
! [[1900 Canadian federal election|1900]]
| 477,758
| 477,758
| 50.2
| 50.30
| {{Composition bar|128|213|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|128|213|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 11
| {{increase}} 11
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1904 Canadian federal election|1904]]
! [[1904 Canadian federal election|1904]]
| 521,041
| 521,041
| 50.8
| 50.90
| {{Composition bar|137|214|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|137|214|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 9
| {{increase}} 9
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1908 Canadian federal election|1908]]
! [[1908 Canadian federal election|1908]]
| 570,311
| 570,311
| 48.8
| 48.90
| {{Composition bar|133|221|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|133|221|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 4
| {{decrease}} 4
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1911 Canadian federal election|1911]]
! [[1911 Canadian federal election|1911]]
| 596,871
| 596,871
| 45.8
| 45.82
| {{Composition bar|85|221|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|85|221|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 48
| {{decrease}} 48
Line 374: Line 316:
! [[1917 Canadian federal election|1917]]
! [[1917 Canadian federal election|1917]]
| 729,756
| 729,756
| 38.8
| 38.80
| {{Composition bar|82|235|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|82|235|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 3
| {{decrease}} 3
Line 381: Line 323:
|-
|-
! [[1921 Canadian federal election|1921]]
! [[1921 Canadian federal election|1921]]
| align="left" rowspan=7| [[William Lyon Mackenzie King|Mackenzie King]]
| align="left" rowspan=8| [[William Lyon Mackenzie King|Mackenzie King]]
| 1,285,998
| 1,285,998
| 41.1
| 41.15
| {{Composition bar|118|235|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|118|235|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 36
| {{increase}} 36
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1925 Canadian federal election|1925]]
! rowspan=2| [[1925 Canadian federal election|1925]]
| 1,252,684
| rowspan=2| 1,252,684
| 39.7
| rowspan=2| 39.74
| {{Composition bar|100|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| rowspan=2| {{Composition bar|100|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 18
| rowspan=2| {{decrease}} 18
| {{decrease}} 2nd
| rowspan=2| {{decrease}} 2nd
| {{yes2|Minority}}
| {{yes2|Minority}}
|-
| {{no2|Opposition}}
|-
|-
! [[1926 Canadian federal election|1926]]
! [[1926 Canadian federal election|1926]]
| 1,397,031
| 1,397,031
| 42.9
| 42.90
| {{Composition bar|116|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|116|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 16
| {{increase}} 16
Line 407: Line 351:
! [[1930 Canadian federal election|1930]]
! [[1930 Canadian federal election|1930]]
| 1,716,798
| 1,716,798
| 44.0
| 45.50
| {{Composition bar|89|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|89|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 27
| {{decrease}} 27
Line 415: Line 359:
! [[1935 Canadian federal election|1935]]
! [[1935 Canadian federal election|1935]]
| 1,967,839
| 1,967,839
| 44.6
| 44.68
| {{Composition bar|173|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|173|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 84
| {{increase}} 84
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1940 Canadian federal election|1940]]
! [[1940 Canadian federal election|1940]]
| 2,365,979
| 2,365,979
| 51.3
| 51.32
| {{Composition bar|179|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|179|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 6
| {{increase}} 6
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1945 Canadian federal election|1945]]
! [[1945 Canadian federal election|1945]]
| 2,086,545
| 2,086,545
| 39.7
| 39.78
| {{Composition bar|118|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|118|245|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 61
| {{decrease}} 61
Line 440: Line 384:
| align="left" rowspan=3| [[Louis St. Laurent]]
| align="left" rowspan=3| [[Louis St. Laurent]]
| 2,874,813
| 2,874,813
| 49.1
| 49.15
| {{Composition bar|191|262|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|191|262|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 73
| {{increase}} 73
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1953 Canadian federal election|1953]]
! [[1953 Canadian federal election|1953]]
| 2,731,633
| 2,731,633
| 48.4
| 48.43
| {{Composition bar|169|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|169|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 22
| {{decrease}} 22
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1957 Canadian federal election|1957]]
! [[1957 Canadian federal election|1957]]
| 2,702,573
| 2,702,573
| 40.5
| 40.50
| {{Composition bar|105|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|105|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 64
| {{decrease}} 64
Line 465: Line 409:
| align="left" rowspan=4| [[Lester B. Pearson|Lester Pearson]]
| align="left" rowspan=4| [[Lester B. Pearson|Lester Pearson]]
| 2,432,953
| 2,432,953
| 33.4
| 33.40
| {{Composition bar|48|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|48|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 67
| {{decrease}} 67
Line 473: Line 417:
! [[1962 Canadian federal election|1962]]
! [[1962 Canadian federal election|1962]]
| 2,846,589
| 2,846,589
| 36.9
| 36.97
| {{Composition bar|99|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|99|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 51
| {{increase}} 51
Line 481: Line 425:
! [[1963 Canadian federal election|1963]]
! [[1963 Canadian federal election|1963]]
| 3,276,996
| 3,276,996
| 41.4
| 41.48
| {{Composition bar|128|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|128|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 29
| {{increase}} 29
Line 489: Line 433:
! [[1965 Canadian federal election|1965]]
! [[1965 Canadian federal election|1965]]
| 3,099,521
| 3,099,521
| 40.1
| 40.18
| {{Composition bar|131|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|131|265|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 3
| {{increase}} 3
Line 498: Line 442:
| align="left" rowspan=5| [[Pierre Trudeau]]
| align="left" rowspan=5| [[Pierre Trudeau]]
| 3,686,801
| 3,686,801
| 45.3
| 45.37
| {{Composition bar|154|264|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|154|264|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 23
| {{increase}} 23
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1972 Canadian federal election|1972]]
! [[1972 Canadian federal election|1972]]
| 3,717,804
| 3,717,804
| 38.4
| 38.42
| {{Composition bar|109|264|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|109|264|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 46
| {{decrease}} 46
Line 514: Line 458:
! [[1974 Canadian federal election|1974]]
! [[1974 Canadian federal election|1974]]
| 4,102,853
| 4,102,853
| 43.1
| 43.15
| {{Composition bar|141|264|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|141|264|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 32
| {{increase}} 32
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1979 Canadian federal election|1979]]
! [[1979 Canadian federal election|1979]]
| 4,595,319
| 4,595,319
| 40.1
| 40.11
| {{Composition bar|114|282|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|114|282|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 27
| {{decrease}} 27
Line 530: Line 474:
! [[1980 Canadian federal election|1980]]
! [[1980 Canadian federal election|1980]]
| 4,855,425
| 4,855,425
| 44.3
| 44.34
| {{Composition bar|147|282|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|147|282|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 33
| {{increase}} 33
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1984 Canadian federal election|1984]]
! [[1984 Canadian federal election|1984]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[John Turner]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[John Turner]]
| 3,516,486
| 3,516,486
| 28.0
| 28.02
| {{Composition bar|40|282|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|40|282|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 107
| {{decrease}} 107
Line 547: Line 491:
! [[1988 Canadian federal election|1988]]
! [[1988 Canadian federal election|1988]]
| 4,205,072
| 4,205,072
| 31.9
| 31.92
| {{Composition bar|83|295|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|83|295|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 43
| {{increase}} 43
Line 556: Line 500:
| align="left" rowspan=3| [[Jean Chrétien]]
| align="left" rowspan=3| [[Jean Chrétien]]
| 5,647,952
| 5,647,952
| 41.2
| 41.24
| {{Composition bar|177|295|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|177|295|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 94
| {{increase}} 94
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[1997 Canadian federal election|1997]]
! [[1997 Canadian federal election|1997]]
| 4,994,277
| 4,994,277
| 38.4
| 38.46
| {{Composition bar|155|301|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|155|301|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 22
| {{decrease}} 22
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[2000 Canadian federal election|2000]]
! [[2000 Canadian federal election|2000]]
| 5,252,031
| 5,252,031
| 40.8
| 40.85
| {{Composition bar|172|301|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|172|301|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 17
| {{increase}} 17
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[2004 Canadian federal election|2004]]
! [[2004 Canadian federal election|2004]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Paul Martin]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Paul Martin]]
| 4,982,220
| 4,982,220
| 36.7
| 36.73
| {{Composition bar|135|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|135|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 37
| {{decrease}} 37
Line 589: Line 533:
! [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006]]
! [[2006 Canadian federal election|2006]]
| 4,479,415
| 4,479,415
| 30.2
| 30.23
| {{Composition bar|103|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|103|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 32
| {{decrease}} 32
Line 598: Line 542:
| align="left" | [[Stéphane Dion]]
| align="left" | [[Stéphane Dion]]
| 3,633,185
| 3,633,185
| 26.2
| 26.26
| {{Composition bar|77|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|77|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 26
| {{decrease}} 26
Line 607: Line 551:
| align="left" | [[Michael Ignatieff]]
| align="left" | [[Michael Ignatieff]]
| 2,783,175
| 2,783,175
| 18.9
| 18.91
| {{Composition bar|34|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|34|308|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{decrease}} 43
| {{decrease}} 43
| {{decrease}} 3rd
| {{decrease}} 3rd
| {{no2|Third party}}
| {{no|Third party}}
|-
|-
! [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015]]
! [[2015 Canadian federal election|2015]]
| align="left" rowspan=2| [[Justin Trudeau]]
| align="left" rowspan=6| [[Justin Trudeau]]
| 6,928,055
| 6,928,055
| 39.5
| 39.47
| {{Composition bar|184|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|184|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{increase}} 150
| {{increase}} 150
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{increase}} 1st
| {{yes2|Majority}}
| {{yes|Majority}}
|-
|-
! [[2019 Canadian federal election|2019]]
! [[2019 Canadian federal election|2019]]
| 6,018,728
| TBD
| TBD
| 33.12
| {{Composition bar|0|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{Composition bar|157|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| {{steady}}
| {{decrease}} 27
| {{steady}}
| {{steady}} 1st
| {{yes2|Minority}}
|
|-
! rowspan=4| [[2021 Canadian federal election|2021]]
| rowspan=4| 5,556,629
| rowspan=4| 32.62
| rowspan=4| {{Composition bar|160|338|hex={{Canadian party colour|CA|Liberal}}}}
| rowspan=4| {{increase}} 3
| rowspan=4| {{steady}} 1st
|-
|{{yes2|<small> Minority (2021–22)</small>}}
|-
|{{yes2|Minority}}<br>{{small|(with [[New Democratic Party|NDP]] [[confidence and supply]]) (2022–24)}}{{efn|The New Democratic Party provided [[confidence and supply]] for the Liberal Party government, from March 2022 to September 2024.}}
|-
|{{yes2|<small> Minority (2024–present)</small>}}
|}
|}


==History of leaders==
==Party leadership==
To date, only seven Liberal leaders never served as prime minister, three of whom were interim leaders.
{{split|List of Leaders of the Liberal Party of Canada|date=April 2018|section=list}}

Of the list of leaders only 7 never served as Prime Minister and most were interim leaders.


===Leaders===
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! style="width:120px;"| Picture
! style="width:60px;"| Portrait
! Name
! Name
! Term<br/>start
! Term start
! Term<br/>end
! Term end
! Date of birth
! Date of birth
! Date of death
! Date of death
!width=20%| Notes
!width=20%| Notes
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
| [[File:George Brown.jpg|120px]] || [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]] ||style="text-align:center;"| 1867 || style="text-align:center;"| 1867 || November 29, 1818 || May 9, 1880 || Unofficial<br /> (actually leader of the [[Clear Grits]], a forerunner of the federal Liberal Party)
| [[File:George Brown.jpg|60px]] || [[George Brown (Canadian politician)|George Brown]] ||style="text-align:center;"| 1867 || style="text-align:center;"| 1867 || November 29, 1818 || May 9, 1880 || Unofficial<br /> (The leader of the [[Clear Grits]], a forerunner of the federal Liberal Party)
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[Image:Edward Blake.jpg|120px]] || [[Edward Blake]] ||style="text-align:center;"| 1869 || style="text-align:center;"|1870 || October 13, 1833 || March 1, 1912 || Unofficial
|[[File:Portrait of Edward Blake.jpg|60px]] || [[Edward Blake]] ||style="text-align:center;"| 1869 || style="text-align:center;"|1870 || October 13, 1834 || March 1, 1912 || Unofficial
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Alexander MacKenzie - portrait.jpg|120px]] ||[[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]] || March 6, 1873 || April 27, 1880 || January 28, 1822 || April 17, 1892 || 2nd Prime Minister (1st Liberal Prime Minister)
|[[File:Alexander MacKenzie - portrait.jpg|60px]] ||[[Alexander Mackenzie (politician)|Alexander Mackenzie]] || March 6, 1873 || April 27, 1880 || January 28, 1822 || April 17, 1892 || 2nd Prime Minister (1st Liberal Prime Minister)
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[Image:Edward Blake.jpg|120px]] || [[Edward Blake]] || May 4, 1880 || June 2, 1887 || October 13, 1833 || March 1, 1912 ||
|[[File:Portrait of Edward Blake.jpg|60px]] || [[Edward Blake]] || May 4, 1880 || June 2, 1887 || October 13, 1833 || March 1, 1912 ||
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:The Honourable Sir Wilfrid Laurier Photo C (HS85-10-16873) - medium crop.jpg|120px]] || [[Wilfrid Laurier]] || June 23, 1887 || February 17, 1919 || November 20, 1841 || February 17, 1919 || 7th Prime Minister
|[[File:The Honourable Sir Wilfrid Laurier Photo C (HS85-10-16873) - medium crop.jpg|60px]] || [[Wilfrid Laurier]] || June 23, 1887 || February 17, 1919 || November 20, 1841 || February 17, 1919 || 7th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[Image:DanielDuncanMcKenzie.jpg|120px]]|| [[Daniel Duncan McKenzie]] || February 17, 1919 || August 7, 1919 || January 8, 1859 || June 8, 1927 ||(Interim)
|[[Image:DanielDuncanMcKenzie.jpg|60px]]|| [[Daniel Duncan McKenzie]] || February 17, 1919 || August 7, 1919 || January 8, 1859 || June 8, 1927 ||Interim leader
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[Image:Wm Lyon Mackenzie King.jpg|120px]] || [[William Lyon Mackenzie King|William Lyon<br/>Mackenzie King]] || August 7, 1919 || August 7, 1948 || December 17, 1874 || July 22, 1950 || 10th Prime Minister
|[[File:Wm Lyon Mackenzie King.jpg|60px]] || [[William Lyon Mackenzie King|William Lyon<br />Mackenzie King]] || [[1919 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|August 7, 1919]] || August 7, 1948 || December 17, 1874 || July 22, 1950 || 10th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[Image:Louisstlaurent.jpg|120px]] ||[[Louis St. Laurent]] || August 7, 1948 || January 16, 1958 || February 1, 1882 || July 25, 1973 || 12th Prime Minister
|[[File:Louis St. Laurent portrait.jpg|60px]] ||[[Louis St. Laurent]] || [[1948 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|August 7, 1948]] || January 16, 1958 || February 1, 1882 || July 25, 1973 || 12th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Lester B. Pearson 1957.jpg|120px]] || [[Lester B. Pearson]] || January 16, 1958 || April 6, 1968 || April 23, 1897 || December 27, 1972 || 14th Prime Minister
|[[File:Lester B. Pearson (1963 ABC press photo).jpg|60px]] || [[Lester B. Pearson]] || [[1958 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|January 16, 1958]] || April 6, 1968 || April 23, 1897 || December 27, 1972 || 14th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Pierre Trudeau (1975).jpg|120px]] || [[Pierre Trudeau]] || April 6, 1968 || June 16, 1984 || October 18, 1919 || [[Death and state funeral of Pierre Trudeau|September 28, 2000]] || 15th Prime Minister
|[[File:Pierre Trudeau (1975).jpg|60px]] || [[Pierre Trudeau]] || [[1968 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|April 6, 1968]] || June 16, 1984 || October 18, 1919 || [[Death and state funeral of Pierre Trudeau|September 28, 2000]] || 15th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Turner cropped.PNG|120px]] || [[John Turner]] || June 16, 1984 || June 23, 1990 || June 7, 1929 || living || 17th Prime Minister
|[[File:John Turner 1987 crop (cropped).jpg|60px]] || [[John Turner]] || [[1984 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|June 16, 1984]] || June 23, 1990 || June 7, 1929 || September 18, 2020 || 17th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[Image:Jean Chrétien 2010.jpg|120px]] || [[Jean Chrétien]] || June 23, 1990 || November 14, 2003 || January 11, 1934 || living || 20th Prime Minister
|[[File:Jean Chrétien 2010.jpg|60px]] || [[Jean Chrétien]] || [[1990 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|June 23, 1990]] || November 14, 2003 || January 11, 1934 || living || 20th Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Paul Martin in 2011 crop.jpg|120px]] || [[Paul Martin]] || November 14, 2003 || March 19, 2006 || August 28, 1938 || living || 21st Prime Minister
|[[File:Paul martin 2004.jpg|60px]] || [[Paul Martin]] || [[2003 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|November 14, 2003]] || March 19, 2006 || August 28, 1938 || living || 21st Prime Minister
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Bill Graham by Rod Brito.jpg|120px]]|| [[Bill Graham (Canadian politician)|Bill Graham]] || March 19, 2006 || December 2, 2006 || March 17, 1939 || living ||(Interim)
|[[File:Bill Graham by Rod Brito.jpg|60px]]|| [[Bill Graham (Canadian politician)|Bill Graham]] || March 19, 2006 || December 2, 2006 || March 17, 1939 || August 7, 2022 ||Interim leader
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Canadian Foreign Minister Stéphane Dion - 2016 (28405975206) (cropped).jpg|120px]] || [[Stéphane Dion]] || December 2, 2006 || December 10, 2008 || September 28, 1955 || living ||
|[[File:Stéphane Dion at Carleton (cropped).jpg|60px]] || [[Stéphane Dion]] || [[2006 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|December 2, 2006]] || December 10, 2008 || September 28, 1955 || living ||
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Victoria, BC Liberal Town Hall Forum public libéral.jpg|120px]] || [[Michael Ignatieff]] || December 10, 2008 || May 25, 2011 || May 12, 1947 || living ||Interim leader until May 2, 2009 (when ratified as permanent leader)
|[[File:Victoria, BC Liberal Town Hall Forum public libéral.jpg|60px]] || [[Michael Ignatieff]] || December 10, 2008 || May 25, 2011 || May 12, 1947 || living ||Interim leader until May 2, 2009 (when [[2009 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|ratified as permanent leader]])
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
|[[File:Bob Rae.jpg|120px]] || [[Bob Rae]] || May 25, 2011 || April 14, 2013 || August 2, 1948 || living || (Interim)
|[[File:Bob Rae Khalsa Day Celebration.jpg|60px]] || [[Bob Rae]] || May 25, 2011 || April 14, 2013 || August 2, 1948 || living ||Interim leader
|-
|- style="background:#ffd;"
| [[File:Trudeau visit White House for USMCA (cropped2).jpg|120px]] || [[Justin Trudeau]] || April 14, 2013 || ''Incumbent'' || December 25, 1971 || living || 23rd Prime Minister
| [[File:Trudeau visit White House for USMCA (cropped2).jpg|60px]] || [[Justin Trudeau]] || [[2013 Liberal Party of Canada leadership election|April 14, 2013]] || ''Incumbent'' || December 25, 1971 || living || 23rd Prime Minister
|}
|}


===Deputy Leaders===
==Federation and Party Presidents==
* [[Sheila Copps]] 1991–1993<ref>{{cite web |url=https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/Profile?personId=11520 |title=The Hon. Sheila Maureen Copps, P.C., O.C., M.P. |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=Parlinfo |publisher=Library of Parliament |access-date=2024-06-25 |archive-date=June 25, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240625222952/https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/Profile?personId=11520 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* Michael Ignatieff 2006–2008<ref>{{cite web |url=https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/Profile?personId=4927 |title=The Hon. Michael Ignatieff, P.C., M.P. |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=Parlinfo |publisher=Library of Parliament |access-date=2024-06-25 |archive-date=September 6, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190906223410/https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/Profile?personId=4927 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Ralph Goodale]] 2010–2015<ref>{{cite web |url=https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/Profile?personId=4487 |title=The Hon. Ralph Goodale, P.C., M.P. |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=Parlinfo |publisher=Library of Parliament |access-date=2024-06-25 |archive-date=December 14, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191214203616/https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/People/Profile?personId=4487 |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Presidents===
* [[Vincent Massey]] 1932–1935
* [[Vincent Massey]] 1932–1935
* [[Norman Platt Lambert]] 1936–1941
* [[Norman Platt Lambert]] 1936–1941
Line 709: Line 670:
* [[Mike Crawley]] 2012–2014
* [[Mike Crawley]] 2012–2014
* [[Anna Gainey]] 2014–2018
* [[Anna Gainey]] 2014–2018
* [[Suzanne Cowan]] 2018–present
* [[Suzanne Cowan]] 2018–2023
* [[Sachit Mehra]] 2023–present<ref>{{cite news |last1=Vigliotti |first1=Marco |title=Liberals elect Sachit Mehra as new party president |url=https://www.ipolitics.ca/news/liberals-elect-sachit-mehra-as-new-party-president |access-date=8 May 2023 |work=[[iPolitics]] |date=6 May 2023 |archive-date=May 9, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230509171338/https://www.ipolitics.ca/news/liberals-elect-sachit-mehra-as-new-party-president |url-status=live }}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 718: Line 680:
* [[Senate Liberal Caucus]]
* [[Senate Liberal Caucus]]
* [[Trudeauism]]
* [[Trudeauism]]
* [[List of major liberal parties considered centre-left]]


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
{{NoteFoot}}
{{Notelist}}


== References ==
== References ==
Line 726: Line 689:


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
{{refbegin}}
* Bickerton, James, and Alain G. Gagnon. ''Canadian Politics'' (5th ed. 2009), 415pp; university textbook
* Bickerton, James, and Alain G. Gagnon. ''Canadian Politics'' (5th ed. 2009), 415pp; university textbook
* Bliss, Michael. ''Right Honourable Men: The Descent of Canadian Politics from Macdonald to Mulroney'' (1994), essays on Prime Ministers
* Bliss, Michael. ''Right Honourable Men: The Descent of Canadian Politics from Macdonald to Mulroney'' (1994), essays on Prime Ministers
* Carty, R. Kenneth. ''Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party’s Long Mastery of Canada’s Public Life'' (2015)
* Clarkson, Stephen. ''The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics'' (2005)
* Clarkson, Stephen. ''The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics'' (2005)
* Cohen, Andrew, and J. L. Granatstein, eds. ''Trudeau's Shadow: the life and legacy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau'' (1999).
* Cohen, Andrew, and J. L. Granatstein, eds. ''Trudeau's Shadow: the life and legacy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau'' (1999).
* Gagnon, Alain G., and Brian Tanguay. ''Canadian Parties in Transition'' (3rd ed. 2007), 574pp; university textbook
* Gagnon, Alain G., and Brian Tanguay. ''Canadian Parties in Transition'' (3rd ed. 2007), 574pp; university textbook
* Granatstein, J.L. ''Mackenzie King: His Life and World'' (1977).
* Granatstein, J.L. ''Mackenzie King: His Life and World'' (1977).
* Hillmer, Norman, and Steven Azzi. "Canada's Best Prime Ministers", [http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/canadas-best-prime-ministers ''Maclean's'' June 20, 2011 online]
* Hillmer, Norman, and Steven Azzi. "Canada's Best Prime Ministers", [http://www.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/canadas-best-prime-ministers ''Maclean's'' June 20, 2011 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202234845/http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/06/10/canadas-best-prime-ministers/ |date=December 2, 2013 }}
* Jeffrey, Brooke. ''Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008'' (2010) [https://www.amazon.com/Divided-Loyalties-Liberal-Canada-1984-2008/dp/1442610654/ excerpt and text search]
* Jeffrey, Brooke. ''Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008'' (2010) [https://www.amazon.com/Divided-Loyalties-Liberal-Canada-1984-2008/dp/1442610654/ excerpt and text search] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160321212235/http://www.amazon.com/Divided-Loyalties-Liberal-Canada-1984-2008/dp/1442610654 |date=March 21, 2016 }}
* Jeffrey, Brooke. ''Road to Redemption: The Liberal Party of Canada, 2006-2019'' (2020)
* Koop, Royce. "Professionalism, Sociability and the Liberal Party in the Constituencies." ''Canadian Journal of Political Science'' (2010) 43#04 pp: 893–913.
* Koop, Royce. "Professionalism, Sociability and the Liberal Party in the Constituencies." ''Canadian Journal of Political Science'' (2010) 43#04 pp: 893–913.
* {{cite web |last = McCall |first = Christina |author2 = Stephen Clarkson |title = Liberal Party |work = The Canadian Encyclopedia |url = http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0004670 }}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last = McCall |first = Christina |author2 = Stephen Clarkson |title = Liberal Party |encyclopedia = The Canadian Encyclopedia |url = http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0004670 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20050326083244/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA0004670 |url-status = dead |archive-date = March 26, 2005 }}
* McCall, Christina. ''Grits: an intimate portrait of the Liberal Party'' (Macmillan of Canada, 1982)
* McCall, Christina. ''Grits: an intimate portrait of the Liberal Party'' (Macmillan of Canada, 1982)
* [[Neatby, H. Blair]]. ''Laurier and a Liberal Quebec: A Study in Political Management'' (1973)
* [[Neatby, H. Blair]]. ''Laurier and a Liberal Quebec: A Study in Political Management'' (1973)
* Whitaker, Reginald. ''The Government Party: Organizing and Financing the Liberal Party of Canada, 1930–1958'' (1977)
* Whitaker, Reginald. ''The Government Party: Organizing and Financing the Liberal Party of Canada, 1930–1958'' (1977)
* {{Cite encyclopedia |publisher = University Associates of Canada |volume = IV |pages = 75–76 |last = Wallace |first = W.S. |title = History of the Liberal Party of Canada |encyclopedia = The Encyclopedia of Canada |location = Toronto |year = 1948 |url = http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/encyclopedia/HistoryoftheLiberalPartyofCanada-CanadianHistory.htm }}
* {{Cite encyclopedia |publisher = University Associates of Canada |volume = IV |pages = 75–76 |last = Wallace |first = W.S. |title = History of the Liberal Party of Canada |encyclopedia = The Encyclopedia of Canada |location = Toronto |year = 1948 |url = http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/encyclopedia/HistoryoftheLiberalPartyofCanada-CanadianHistory.htm |access-date = November 25, 2008 |archive-date = March 3, 2016 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160303210702/http://faculty.marianopolis.edu/c.belanger/quebechistory/encyclopedia/HistoryoftheLiberalPartyofCanada-CanadianHistory.htm |url-status = live }}
* Wearing, Joseph. ''The L-Shaped Party: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1958–1980'' (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1981)
* Wearing, Joseph. ''The L-Shaped Party: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1958–1980'' (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1981)
{{refend}}

; Archival holdings
* [https://wayback.archive-it.org/277/*/http://liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada - Canadian Political Parties and Political Interest Groups] - Web Archive created by the University of Toronto Libraries


== External links ==
== External links ==
{{Commons category|Liberal Party of Canada}}
* {{Official website|https://www.liberal.ca}}
* {{Official website|https://www.liberal.ca}}
*[https://wayback.archive-it.org/227/*/http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada - Canadian Political Parties and Political Interest Groups] - Web Archive created by the University of Toronto Libraries
* [https://wayback.archive-it.org/227/*/http://www.liberal.ca/ Liberal Party of Canada - Canadian Political Parties and Political Interest Groups] - Web Archive created by the University of Toronto Libraries
*[https://www.liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/constitution-en.pdf The Liberal Party of Canada Constitution]
* [https://www.liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/constitution-en.pdf The Liberal Party of Canada Constitution] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190619191210/https://www.liberal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/constitution-en.pdf |date=June 19, 2019 }}
* [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/en/article/liberal-party/ Canadian Encyclopedia entry on the Liberal Party]
* [https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/liberal-party Canadian Encyclopedia entry on the Liberal Party] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151025144208/http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/en/article/liberal-party/ |date=October 25, 2015 }}
* [http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.redirect?app=fonandcol&id=105123&lang=eng Liberal Party of Canada fonds] at [[Library and Archives Canada]]
* {{commons category-inline|Liberal Party of Canada}}
* {{wikinews inline|Category:Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party of Canada}}
* {{wikisource-inline|Portal:Liberal_Party_of_Canada|Liberal Party of Canada}}
* {{Twitter|liberal_party}}


{{Liberal Party of Canada}}
{{Liberal Party of Canada}}
{{Canadian federal political parties}}
{{Canadian federal political parties}}
{{Authority control}}


<!-- Please respect alphabetical order. -->
<!-- Please respect alphabetical order. -->


{{DEFAULTSORT:Liberal Party Of Canada}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Liberal Party Of Canada}}
[[Category:Liberal Party of Canada| ]]
[[Category:1867 establishments in Canada]]
[[Category:1867 establishments in Canada]]
[[Category:Federal political parties in Canada]]
[[Category:Federal political parties in Canada]]
[[Category:Liberal Party of Canada| ]]
[[Category:Liberal International]]
[[Category:Liberal parties in Canada]]
[[Category:Liberal parties in Canada]]
[[Category:Political parties established in 1867]]
[[Category:Political parties established in 1867]]
[[Category:Centrist parties in Canada]]
[[Category:Centrist parties in Canada]]
[[Category:Centre-left parties]]
[[Category:Social liberal parties]]
[[Category:Social liberal parties]]
[[Category:Abortion-rights organizations in Canada]]
[[Category:Labour parties in Canada]]

Latest revision as of 17:17, 24 November 2024

Liberal Party of Canada
Parti libéral du Canada
AbbreviationLPC
PLC[a]
LeaderJustin Trudeau
PresidentSachit Mehra
House leaderKarina Gould
FounderGeorge Brown
FoundedJuly 1, 1867; 157 years ago (1867-07-01)
Merger ofParti rouge (Canada East)
Clear Grits (Canada West)
Headquarters
Youth wingYoung Liberals of Canada
Membership (2014)Increase 300,000[1][needs update]
IdeologyLiberalism (Canadian)
Social liberalism[2]
Political positionCentre to centre-left
International affiliationLiberal International[3]
Colours  Red
Senate[b]
0 / 105
House of Commons
153 / 338
Website
liberal.ca Edit this at Wikidata

The Liberal Party of Canada (LPC; Quebec French: Parti libéral du Canada, PLC) is a federal political party in Canada. The party espouses the principles of liberalism,[6][7][8] and generally sits at the centre[6][9][10] to centre-left[10][11] of the Canadian political spectrum, with their main rival, the Conservative Party, positioned to their right and the New Democratic Party positioned to their left.[6][12][13] The party is described as "big tent",[14] practising "brokerage politics",[c] attracting support from a broad spectrum of voters.[20] The Liberal Party is the longest-serving and oldest active federal political party in the country, and has dominated federal politics of Canada for much of its history, holding power for almost 70 years of the 20th century.[21][12] As a result, it has sometimes been referred to as Canada's "natural governing party".[22][14][23]

The party first came into power in 1873 under Alexander Mackenzie, but were voted out five years later due to the economic conditions at the time. They would not come back to office until 1896; Wilfrid Laurier was prime minister from that year until the party's defeat in 1911 and his tenure was marked by several compromises between English and French Canada. From the early 1920s until the mid-1950s,[d] the Liberal Party under Prime Ministers William Lyon Mackenzie King and Louis St. Laurent gradually built a Canadian welfare state.

The Liberals' signature policies and legislative decisions include universal health care, the Canada Pension Plan, Canada Student Loans, the establishment of the Royal Canadian Navy, multilateralism, official bilingualism, official multiculturalism, gun control, the patriation of the Constitution of Canada and the establishment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Clarity Act, legalizing same-sex marriage, euthanasia, and cannabis, national carbon pricing, and expanded access to abortion.[7][24][25][26]

The Liberal Party, led by Justin Trudeau since 2013, won a majority government in the 2015 federal election. In both the federal elections of 2019 and 2021, the party was re-elected with a minority government.

History

[edit]

19th century

[edit]

Origins

[edit]

The Liberals are descended from the mid-19th century Reformers who advocated for responsible government throughout British North America.[27] These included George Brown, Alexander Mackenzie, Robert Baldwin, William Lyon Mackenzie and the Clear Grits in Upper Canada, Joseph Howe in Nova Scotia, and the Patriotes and Rouges in Lower Canada led by figures such as Louis-Joseph Papineau. The Clear Grits and Parti rouge sometimes functioned as a united bloc in the legislature of the Province of Canada beginning in 1854, but a united Liberal Party combining both English and French Canadian members was not formed until 1867.[27]

Confederation

[edit]

At the time of Confederation of the former British colonies of Canada (now Ontario and Quebec), New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia, the radical Liberals were marginalized by the more pragmatic Conservative coalition assembled under Sir John A. Macdonald. In the 29 years after Confederation, the Liberals were consigned to opposition, with the exception of one stint in government.[27] Alexander Mackenzie was the de facto leader of the Official Opposition after Confederation and finally agreed to become the first official leader of the Liberal Party in 1873. He was able to lead the party to power for the first time in 1873, after the Macdonald government resigned over the Pacific Scandal. Mackenzie subsequently won the 1874 election and served as prime minister for an additional four years. During the five years the Liberal government brought in many reforms, including the replacement of open voting by secret ballot, confining elections to one day and the creation of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Royal Military College of Canada, and the Office of the Auditor General; however, the party was only able to build a solid support base in Ontario and in 1878 lost the government to Macdonald.[27] The Liberals would spend the next 18 years in opposition.

Wilfrid Laurier

[edit]
Sir Wilfrid Laurier, Prime Minister of Canada (1896–1911)

In their early history, the Liberals were the party of continentalism and opposition to imperialism. The Liberals also became identified with the aspirations of Quebecers as a result of the growing hostility of French Canadians to the Conservatives. The Conservatives lost the support of French Canadians because of the role of Conservative governments in the execution of Louis Riel[28] and their role in the Conscription Crisis of 1917, and especially their opposition to French schools in provinces besides Quebec.

It was not until Wilfrid Laurier became leader that the Liberal Party emerged as a modern party. Laurier was able to capitalize on the Conservatives' alienation of French Canada by offering the Liberals as a credible alternative. Laurier was able to overcome the party's reputation for anti-clericalism that offended the still-powerful Quebec Roman Catholic Church. In English-speaking Canada, the Liberal Party's support for reciprocity made it popular among farmers, and helped cement the party's hold in the growing prairie provinces.[29]

Laurier led the Liberals to power in the 1896 election (in which he became the first Francophone Prime Minister) and oversaw a government that increased immigration to settle Western Canada. Laurier's government created the provinces of Saskatchewan and Alberta out of the North-West Territories and promoted the development of Canadian industry.[29]

20th century

[edit]

Organization

[edit]
William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada (1921–1926, 1926–1930, 1935–1948)

Until the early part of the century, the Liberal Party was a loose coalition of local, provincial, and regional bodies with a strong national party leader and caucus, but with an informal and regionalized extra-parliamentary organizational structure. There was no national membership of the party. An individual became a member by joining a provincial Liberal party. Laurier called the party's first national convention in 1893 to unite Liberal supporters behind a programme and build the campaign that successfully brought the party to power in 1896, but no efforts were made to create a formal national organization outside Parliament.

As a result of the party's defeats in the 1911 and 1917 federal elections, Laurier attempted to organize the party on a national level by creating three bodies: the Central Liberal Information Office, the National Liberal Advisory Committee, and the National Liberal Organization Committee. However, the advisory committee became dominated by members of Parliament and all three bodies were underfunded and competed with both local and provincial Liberal associations and the national caucus for authority. The party did organize the national party's second convention in 1919 to elect William Lyon Mackenzie King as Laurier's successor (Canada's first leadership convention), yet following the party's return to power in the 1921 federal election the nascent national party organizations were eclipsed by powerful ministers and local party organizations largely driven by patronage.

As a result of both the party's defeat in the 1930 federal election and the Beauharnois scandal, which highlighted the need for distance between the Liberal Party's parliamentary wing and campaign fundraising,[30] a central coordinating organization, the National Liberal Federation, was created in 1932 with Vincent Massey as its first president. With the Liberal return to power, the national organization languished except for occasional national committee meetings, such as in 1943 when Mackenzie King called a meeting of the federation (consisting of the national caucus and up to seven voting delegates per province) to approve a new platform for the party in anticipation of the end of World War II and prepare for a post-war election.[31] No national convention was held, however, until 1948; the Liberal Party held only three national conventions prior to the 1950s – in 1893, 1919 and 1948.[32] The National Liberal Federation remained largely dependent on provincial Liberal parties and was often ignored and bypassed the parliamentary party in the organization of election campaigns and the development of policy. With the defeat of the Liberals in the 1957 federal election and in particular 1958, reformers argued for the strengthening of the national party organization so it would not be dependent on provincial Liberal parties and patronage. A national executive and Council of presidents, consisting of the presidents of each Liberal riding association, were developed to give the party more co-ordination and national party conventions were regularly held in biennially where previously they had been held infrequently. Over time, provincial Liberal parties in most provinces were separated from provincial wings of the federal party and in a number of cases disaffiliated. By the 1980s, the National Liberal Federation was officially known as the Liberal Party of Canada.[33]

Canadian sovereignty

[edit]
Louis St. Laurent, Prime Minister of Canada (1948–1957)

Under Laurier, and his successor William Lyon Mackenzie King, the Liberals promoted Canadian sovereignty and greater independence within the British Commonwealth. In Imperial Conferences held throughout the 1920s, Canadian Liberal governments often took the lead in arguing that the United Kingdom and the dominions should have equal status, and against proposals for an 'imperial parliament' that would have subsumed Canadian independence. After the King–Byng Affair of 1926, the Liberals argued that the Governor General of Canada should no longer be appointed on the recommendation of the British government. The decisions of the Imperial Conferences were formalized in the Statute of Westminster, which was actually passed in 1931, the year after the Liberals lost power.

The Liberals also promoted the idea of Canada being responsible for its own foreign and defence policy. Initially, it was Britain which determined external affairs for the dominion. In 1905, Laurier created the Department of External Affairs, and in 1909 he advised Governor General Earl Grey to appoint the first Secretary of State for External Affairs to Cabinet. It was also Laurier who first proposed the creation of a Canadian Navy in 1910. Mackenzie King recommended the appointment by Governor General Lord Byng of Vincent Massey as the first Canadian ambassador to Washington in 1926, marking the Liberal government's insistence on having direct relations with the United States, rather than having Britain act on Canada's behalf.

Social safety net

[edit]

In the period just before and after the Second World War, the party became a champion of 'progressive social policy'.[34] As prime minister for most of the time between 1921 and 1948, King introduced several measures that led to the creation of Canada's social safety net. Bowing to popular pressure, he introduced the mother's allowance, a monthly payment to all mothers with young children. He also reluctantly introduced old age pensions when J. S. Woodsworth required it in exchange for his Co-operative Commonwealth Federation party's support of King's minority government.

Louis St. Laurent succeeded King as Liberal leader and prime minister on November 15, 1948. In the 1949 and 1953 federal elections, St. Laurent led the Liberal Party to two large majority governments. As prime minister he oversaw the joining of Newfoundland in Confederation as Canada's tenth province, he established equalization payments to the provinces, and continued with social reform with improvements in pensions and health insurance. In 1956, Canada played an important role in resolving the Suez Crisis, and contributed to the United Nations force in the Korean War. Canada enjoyed economic prosperity during St. Laurent's premiership and wartime debts were paid off. The Pipeline Debate proved the Liberal Party's undoing. Their attempt to pass legislation to build a natural gas pipeline from Alberta to central Canada was met with fierce disagreement in the House of Commons. In 1957, John Diefenbaker's Progressive Conservatives won a minority government and St. Laurent resigned as prime minister and Liberal leader.[35]

Lester B. Pearson was easily elected Liberal leader at the party's 1958 leadership convention. However, only months after becoming Liberal leader, Pearson led the party into the 1958 federal election that saw Diefenbaker's Progressive Conservatives win the largest majority government, by percentage of seats, in Canadian history.[36] The Progressive Conservatives won 206 of the 265 seats in the House of Commons, while the Liberals were reduced to just 48 seats. Pearson remained Liberal leader during this time and in the 1962 election managed to reduce Diefenbaker to a minority government. In the 1963 election Pearson led the Liberal Party back to victory, forming a minority government. Pearson served as prime minister for five years, winning a second election in 1965. While Pearson's leadership was considered poor and the Liberal Party never held a majority of the seats in parliament during his premiership, he left office in 1968 with an impressive legacy.[37] Pearson's government introduced Medicare, a new immigration act, the Canada Pension Plan, Canada Student Loans, the Canada Assistance Plan, and adopted the Maple Leaf as Canada's national flag.[38]

Pierre Trudeau

[edit]
Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada (1968–1979, 1980–1984)

Under Pierre Trudeau, the mission of a progressive social policy evolved into the goal of creating a "just society".[39] In the late 1970s, Trudeau stated that his Liberal Party adhered to the "radical centre".[40][41]

The Liberal Party under Trudeau promoted official bilingualism and passed the Official Languages Act, which gave French and English languages equal status in Canada.[27] Trudeau hoped that the promotion of bilingualism would cement Quebec's place in Confederation, and counter growing calls for an independent Quebec. The party hoped the policy would transform Canada into a country where English and French Canadians could live together, and allow Canadians to move to any part of the country without having to lose their language. Although this vision has yet to fully materialize, official bilingualism has helped to halt the decline of the French language outside of Quebec, and to ensure that all federal government services (including radio and television services provided by the government-owned Canadian Broadcasting Corporation/Radio-Canada) are available in both languages throughout the country.[42]

The Trudeau Liberals are also credited with support for state multiculturalism as a means of integrating immigrants into Canadian society without forcing them to shed their culture,[43] leading the party to build a base of support among recent immigrants and their children.[44] This marked the culmination of a decades-long shift in Liberal immigration policy, a reversal of pre-war racial attitudes that spurred discriminatory policies such as the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923[45] and the MS St. Louis incident.[46]

Trudeau-era wordmark and logo

The most lasting effect of the Trudeau years has been the patriation of the Constitution of Canada and the creation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[47][48] Trudeau's Liberals supported the concept of a strong, central government, and fought Quebec separatism, other forms of Quebec nationalism, and the granting of "distinct society" status to Quebec; however, such actions served as rallying cries for sovereigntists, and alienated many Francophone Quebeckers.

The other primary legacy of the Trudeau years has been financial. Net federal debt in fiscal 1968, just before Trudeau became prime minister, was about $18 billion CAD, or 26 percent of gross domestic product; by his final year in office, it had ballooned to over 200 billion—at 46 percent of GDP, nearly twice as large relative to the economy.[49]

John Turner

[edit]
Liberal Party logo in 1984

After Trudeau's retirement in 1984, many Liberals, such as Jean Chrétien and Clyde Wells, continued to adhere to Trudeau's concept of federalism. Others, such as John Turner, supported the failed Meech Lake and Charlottetown Constitutional Accords, which would have recognized Quebec as a "distinct society" and would have increased the powers of the provinces to the detriment of the federal government.

Trudeau stepped down as prime minister and party leader in 1984, as the Liberals were slipping in polls. At that year's leadership convention, Turner defeated Chrétien on the second ballot to become prime minister.[50] Immediately, upon taking office, Turner called a snap election, citing favourable internal polls. However, the party was hurt by numerous patronage appointments, many of which Turner had made supposedly in return for Trudeau retiring early. Also, they were unpopular in their traditional stronghold of Quebec because of the constitution repatriation which excluded that province. The Liberals lost power in the 1984 election, and were reduced to only 40 seats in the House of Commons. The Progressive Conservatives won a majority of the seats in every province, including Quebec. The 95-seat loss was the worst defeat in the party's history, and the worst defeat at the time for a governing party at the federal level. What was more, the New Democratic Party, successor to the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation, won only ten fewer seats than the Liberals, and some thought that the NDP under Ed Broadbent would push the Liberals to third-party status.[51]

The party began a long process of reconstruction.[27] A small group of young Liberal MPs, known as the Rat Pack, gained fame by criticizing the Progressive Conservative government of Brian Mulroney at every turn. Also, despite public and backroom attempts to remove Turner as leader, he managed to consolidate his leadership at the 1986 review.

The 1988 election was notable for Turner's strong opposition to the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement negotiated by Progressive Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Although most Canadians voted for parties opposed to free trade, the Tories were returned with a majority government, and implemented the deal. The Liberals recovered from their near-meltdown of 1984, however, winning 83 seats and ending much of the talk of being eclipsed by the NDP, who won 43 seats.[27]

Jean Chrétien

[edit]
Jean Chrétien, Prime Minister of Canada (1993–2003)

Turner announced that he would resign as leader of the Liberal Party on May 3, 1989. The Liberal Party set a leadership convention for June 23, 1990, in Calgary. Five candidates contested the leadership of the party, with former Deputy Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, who had served in every Liberal cabinet since 1965, and Paul Martin, MP and former CEO of Canada Steamship Lines, as the frontrunners. A key moment in that race took place at an all-candidates debate in Montreal, where the discussion quickly turned to the Meech Lake Accord. Martin, favouring Meech, attempted to force Chrétien to abandon his nuanced position on the deal and declare for or against it. When Chrétien refused to endorse the deal, young Liberal delegates crowding the hall began to chant "vendu" ("sellout" in French) and "Judas" at Chrétien. The incident damaged Chrétien's reputation in Quebec, and lead to a lasting animosity between Chrétien and Martin. Chrétien won on the first ballot.[52]

Chrétien's Liberals campaigned in the 1993 election on the promise of renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and eliminating the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Just after the writ was dropped for the election, they issued the Red Book, an integrated and coherent approach to economic, social, environmental and foreign policy. This was unprecedented for a Canadian party.[27] Taking full advantage of the inability of Mulroney's successor, Kim Campbell, to overcome a large amount of antipathy toward Mulroney, they won a strong majority government with 177 seats—the third-best performance in party history, and their best since 1949. The Progressive Conservatives were cut down to only two seats, suffering a defeat even more severe than the one they had handed the Liberals nine years earlier. The Liberals were re-elected with a considerably reduced majority in 1997, but nearly tied their 1993 total in 2000.

For the next decade, the Liberals dominated Canadian politics in a fashion not seen since the early years of Confederation. This was because of the splintering of the Progressive Conservative's electoral coalition. The PCs' Western support, for all practical purposes, transferred en masse to the Western-based Reform Party, which replaced the PCs as the largest right-wing party in Canada; however, the party was unable to overcome perceptions of extremism and that it was merely a Western protest party, and was virtually non-existent east of Manitoba. Meanwhile, the Quebec nationalists who had once supported the Tories largely switched their support to the sovereigntist Bloc Québécois, while the Tories' Ontario support largely moved to the Liberals. With a divided opposition, the Liberals were able to reap large majorities—especially in Ontario, where the party won all but one seat in 1993, all but two in 1997 and all but three in 2000. However, there was some disappointment as Liberals were not able to recover their traditional dominant position in Quebec, despite being led by a Quebecer.

Liberal Party logo, 1992–2004

While the Chrétien Liberals campaigned from the left, their time in power is most marked by the cuts made to many social programs, including health transfers, in order to balance the federal budget.[53] Although Chrétien had supported the Charlottetown Accord while in opposition, in government he opposed major concessions to Quebec and other provincialist factions. In contrast to their promises during the 1993 campaign, they implemented only minor changes to NAFTA, embraced the free trade concept and—with the exception of the replacement of the GST with the Harmonized Sales Tax in some Atlantic provinces—broke their promise to replace the GST.

After a proposal for Quebec independence was narrowly defeated in the 1995 Quebec referendum, the Liberals passed the "Clarity Act", which outlines the federal government's preconditions for negotiating provincial independence.[54] In Chrétien's final term, he supported same-sex marriage,[55][56] decriminalizing the possession of small quantities of marijuana,[57] and ratified the Kyoto Protocol.[58] On March 17, 2003, Chrétien announced that Canada would not support the invasion of Iraq,[59] which caused friction with the United States.[60] However, a poll conducted by EKOS for the Toronto Star and La Presse shortly afterwards showed widespread approval of Chrétien's decision by the Canadian public: 71 percent of those questioned approved of the government's decision to not enter the United States-led invasion, with 27 percent expressing disapproval.[61]

In Chrétien's final weeks as prime minister, he introduced legislation to reduce the maximum allowable donation to a political party or candidate to $5,000. The move came as a surprise even to Liberal supporters, as Chrétien had not done anything about election financing at any other point in his ten years in office. Political observers suggested that the move allowed Chrétien to retire on a positive note while saddling Martin, his longstanding rival and successor, with the burden of having to fight an election under the strict new rules.[62]

21st century

[edit]

Paul Martin

[edit]
Paul Martin, Prime minister of Canada (2003–2006)

Martin succeeded Chrétien as party leader and prime minister in 2003. Despite the personal rivalry between the two, Martin was Minister of Finance during the 1990s and was the architect of the Liberals' economic policies. Chrétien left office with a high approval rating and Martin was expected to make inroads into Quebec and Western Canada, two regions of Canada where the Liberals had not attracted much support since the 1980s and 1990s, respectively.

The political situation changed with the revelation of the sponsorship scandal, in which advertising agencies supporting the Liberal Party received grossly inflated commissions for their services. Having faced a divided conservative opposition for the past three elections, Liberals were seriously challenged by competition from the newly united Conservative Party led by Stephen Harper. The infighting between Martin and Chrétien's supporters also dogged the party. Nonetheless, by criticizing the Conservatives' social policies, the Liberals were able to draw progressive votes from the NDP, which made the difference in several close races. In the 2004 election, the Liberals retained enough support to continue as the government, though they were reduced to a minority.

In the midst of various court rulings in 2003 and 2004 that allowed for the legalization of same-sex marriage in seven provinces and one territory, the Martin government proposed a bill to legalize same-sex marriage across Canada. The House of Commons passed the Civil Marriage Act in late June 2005 in a late-night, last-minute vote before Parliament closed down, the Senate passed it in July 2005, and it received Royal Assent on July 20. This made Canada the fourth country in the world to allow same-sex marriages.[63][64] In November 2005, the Martin government brokered a deal between first ministers and aboriginal leaders known as the Kelowna Accord, which sought to improve the education, skills training, housing and health care of aboriginal peoples by providing $5 billion in funding over five years.[65]

Following the release of the first Gomery Report, the Liberals dropped in polls. Nonetheless, Martin turned down the NDP's conditions for continued support, as well as rejecting an opposition proposal which would schedule a February 2006 election in return for passing several pieces of legislation. The Liberals thus lost a confidence vote on November 28, and Martin advised Governor General Michaëlle Jean to dissolve Parliament and call an election for January 2006.

The Liberal campaign was dogged from start to finish by the sponsorship scandal, which was brought up by a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) criminal investigation into the leak of the income trust announcement. Numerous gaffes, contrasting with a smoothly run Conservative campaign, put Liberals as many as ten points behind the Conservatives in opinion polling. They managed to recover some of their momentum by election night, but not enough to retain power. They won 103 seats, a net loss of 30 from when the writs were dropped, compared to 123 for the Tories. Martin resigned as Liberal leader on March 18.[66]

Struggles in opposition

[edit]
Stéphane Dion makes a speech on October 10, 2008, in Brampton West. Former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien was among notable Liberals at this rally; this was his first time campaigning for anyone since retirement.

The ensuing leadership election was set for December 2, 2006, in Montreal.[67] Eight candidates entered the contest, but only Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae, Stéphane Dion and Gerard Kennedy were considered to be the capable of garnering enough support to be able to win the leadership, with Ignatieff and Rae being considered the front-runners.[68][69] Although Ignatieff lead on the first two ballots, on the third ballot Dion picked up enough support from the eliminated Kennedy to leapfrog both Rae and Ignatieff, eliminating Rae. On the fourth and final ballot, Dion defeated Ignatieff to become leader of the Liberal Party.[70]

Dion campaigned on environmental sustainability during the leadership race, which later evolved into the "Green Shift": a proposal for a national carbon tax that would be offset by reductions to income tax rates.[71] The plan was a key policy for the party in the 2008 federal election, but it was not well received and was continuously attacked by both the Conservatives and NDP.[72][73][74][75] On election night, the Liberal Party won 26.26 percent of the popular vote and 77 of the 308 seats in the House of Commons. At that time, their popular support was the lowest in the party's history, and weeks later Dion announced he would step down as Liberal leader once his successor was chosen.[76]

Graph of opinion polls conducted between the 2008 and 2011 elections

However, the 2008–2009 Canadian parliamentary dispute made Dion's continued leadership untenable: an agreement to form a coalition government between the with NDP faced public opposition if it meant Dion was to be become prime minister, even if only until the leadership election.[77] Dion thus resigned as leader on December 8, with caucus selecting Ignatieff as interim leader.[78] However, Harper prorogued Parliament before a confidence vote could be scheduled. When parliament resumed on January 28, 2009, the Ignatieff Liberals agreed to support the budget as long as it included regular accountability reports, which the Conservatives accepted. This ended the possibility of the coalition government with the New Democrats.[79] Ignatieff was formally named leader on May 2, 2009.[80]

Michael Ignatieff speaks during a news conference in Toronto on March 28, 2011

By the time Ignatieff was confirmed as party leader, the Liberal Party had a comfortable lead over the governing Conservatives.[81][82][83] Support fell over the summer as Ignatieff was characterized of "missing in action", and Ignatieff announced on August 31, 2009, that the Liberals would not support the minority Conservative government when Parliament resumed.[84][85][86] A month later, on October 1, the Liberals put forth a non-confidence motion; however, the NDP abstained from voting and the Conservative government survived.[87] The attempt to force an election, just a year after the previous one, was viewed as a miscalculation, as polls showed that most Canadians did not want another election.[88] Afterwards, popularity for Ignatieff and his party continued to fall.[89] Over the next year and a half, with the exception of a brief period in early 2010, support for the Liberals remained below 30 percent, and behind the Conservatives.[90]

The Liberal Party logo used from 2010 to 2014. In this and the subsequent logo, the stem of the maple leaf forms an acute accent, used in the word Libéral in French

Shortly after the Harper government was found to be in Contempt of Parliament over the Canadian Afghan detainee issue, Ignatieff successfully introduced a motion of no confidence against the government, beginning the 2011 election.[91] The Liberals had considerable momentum when the writ was dropped, and Ignatieff successfully squeezed NDP leader Jack Layton out of media attention by issuing challenges to Harper for one-on-one debates.[92][93][94] However, opponents frequently criticized Ignatieff's perceived political opportunism, particularly during the Leaders' debates when Layton criticized Ignatieff for having a poor attendance record for Commons votes: "You know, most Canadians, if they don't show up for work, they don't get a promotion." Ignatieff failed to defend himself against these charges, and the debates were said to be a turning point in the campaign.[95]

On election day, the Liberals took the biggest loss in their history. The result was a third-place finish, with only 19 percent of the vote and returning 34 seats in the House of Commons. Notably, their support in Toronto and Montreal, their power bases for the last two decades, all but vanished. The Conservatives won 40 percent of the vote and formed a majority government, while the NDP won 31 percent of the vote and formed the Official Opposition.[96] It marked the first time the Liberals were unable to form either government or the official opposition. Ignatieff was defeated in his own riding, and announced his resignation as Liberal leader shortly after. Bob Rae was chosen as the interim leader on May 25, 2011.[97]

Pundits widely viewed the 2011 election as a political realignment and questioned the Liberal Party's viability.The Economist said, "the election represents the biggest realignment of Canadian politics since 1993";[98] Maclean's writer Andrew Coyne wrote that "the Conservatives are now in a position to replace the Liberals as the natural governing party in Canada."[99] Books such as The Big Shift by John Ibbitson and Darrell Bricker, and Peter C. Newman's When the Gods Changed: The Death of Liberal Canada, asserted that the Liberals had become an "endangered species".[100][101]

Justin Trudeau

[edit]
Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada (2015–present)

On April 14, 2013, Justin Trudeau, son of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, was elected leader of the Liberal Party on the first ballot, winning 80% of the vote.[102] Following his win, support for the Liberal Party increased considerably, and the party moved into first place in public opinion polls.[103][104] In response, the Conservatives ran a series of ads attempting to "[paint] him as a silly dilettante unfit for public office" and the surge levelled off in the following year.[105]

In 2014, Trudeau removed all Liberal senators from the Liberal Party caucus. In announcing this, Trudeau said the purpose of the unelected upper chamber is to act as a check on the power of the prime minister, but the party structure interferes with that purpose.[5] Following this move, Liberal senators chose to keep the designation "Liberal" and sit together as a caucus, albeit not one supported by the Liberal Party of Canada. This independent group continued to refer to itself in publications as the Senate Liberal Caucus until 2019.[106]

By the time the 2015 federal election was called, the Liberals had fallen back to third place. Trudeau and his advisors mounted a campaign based on economic stimulus in the hopes of regaining the mantle of being the party that best represented change from the New Democrats.[107] The campaign was successful, and the Liberals won the election in a dramatic fashion: with 39.5 percent of the popular vote and 184 seats, it was the first time a party had won a parliamentary majority after placing third in a previous general election.[108][109][110] Chantal Hébert deemed the result "a Liberal comeback that is headed straight for the history books",[111] while Bloomberg's Josh Wingrove and Theophilos Argitis similarly described it as "capping the biggest political comeback in the country’s history."[112] Spencer McKay, writing for the National Post, suggested that "maybe we've witnessed a revival of Canada's 'natural governing party'".[113]

At the 2019 federal election, Trudeau's Liberal Party lost 20 seats in the House of Commons (lowering its total from 177 to 157) from the time of dissolution, they still won the most seats of any party—enough seats to allow Trudeau to form a minority government.[114][115] For the first time since 1979, the party that garnered the largest share of the national popular vote did not win the most seats; the Liberals under Trudeau had 33.1 per cent of the popular vote, while the Conservatives under Andrew Scheer had 34.4 per cent.[116][117] It was also the first time a government took power with less than 35 per cent of the national popular vote since the Conservatives of John A. Macdonald, in 1867, who had 34.8 per cent of the votes.[118]

In the 2021 federal election, Trudeau and the Liberals secured a third mandate and his second minority government after winning 160 seats. However, the Liberals again came in second in the national popular vote, behind the Conservatives.[119] They received 32.6 percent of the popular vote, the lowest percentage of the national popular vote for a governing party in Canadian history.[120]

In March 2022, Trudeau's Liberal Party agreed to a confidence and supply deal with the New Democratic Party.[121] In September 2024, Jagmeet Singh announced that he was ending the confidence-and-supply agreement, with NDP sources saying they had "achieved all they could from the agreement."[122][123] Throughout the year, the Liberals have faced declining poll numbers and disappointing results in by-elections, including losses in safe seats such as Toronto—St. Paul's in Toronto and LaSalle—Émard—Verdun in Montreal.[124] The months following these losses saw frequent media stories about internal frustration and discontent with Trudeau's leadership. This appeared to culminate in a caucus meeting where multiple members called on Trudeau to resign. Trudeau emerged from this meeting stating that the party remained "strong and united."[125]

Systems and realignment model

[edit]

Scholars and political experts have recently used a political realignment model to explain what was considered a collapse of a dominant party, and put its condition in long-term perspective. According to recent scholarship, there have been four party systems in Canada at the federal level since Confederation, each with its own distinctive pattern of social support, patronage relationships, leadership styles, and electoral strategies. Steve Patten identifies four party systems in Canada's political history:[126]

  • The first party system emerged from pre-Confederation colonial politics, had its "heyday" from 1896 to 1911 and lasted until the Conscription Crisis of 1917, and was characterized by local patronage administered by the two largest parties, the Liberals and the Conservatives.
  • The second system emerged following the First World War, and had its heyday from 1935 and 1957, was characterized by regionalism and saw the emergence of several protest parties, such as the Progressives, the Social Credit Party, and the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation.
  • The third system emerged in 1963 and had its heyday from 1968 to 1983 and began to unravel thereafter. The two largest parties were challenged by a strong third party, the New Democratic Party (successor to the CCF). Campaigns during this era became more national in scope because of electronic media, and involved a greater focus on leadership. The dominant policy of the era was Keynesian economics.
  • The fourth party system has involved the rise of the Reform Party, the Bloc Québécois, and the merger of the Canadian Alliance with the Progressive Conservatives. Most parties moved to one-member-one-vote leadership contests, and campaign finance laws were reformed in 2004. The fourth party system has been characterized by market-oriented policies that generally abandoned Keynesian policies, but maintained the welfare state.

Stephen Clarkson (2005) shows how the Liberal Party has dominated all the party systems, using different approaches. It began with a "clientelistic approach" under Laurier, which evolved into a "brokerage" system of the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s under Mackenzie King. The 1950s saw the emergence of a "pan-Canadian system", which lasted until the 1990s. The 1993 election – categorized by Clarkson as an electoral "earthquake" which "fragmented" the party system, saw the emergence of regional politics within a four party-system, whereby various groups championed regional issues and concerns. Clarkson concludes that the inherent bias built into the first-past-the-post system, has chiefly benefited the Liberals.[127]

Principles and policies

[edit]

The principles of the party are based on liberalism as defined by various liberal theorists and include individual freedom for present and future generations, responsibility, human dignity, a just society, political freedom, religious freedom, national unity, equality of opportunity, cultural diversity, bilingualism, and multilateralism.[128][129] From the early twentieth century, the Liberal party has favoured a variety of "big tent" policies from both right and left of the political spectrum.[14] When it formed the government from 1993 to 2006, it championed balanced budgets, and eliminated the budget deficit completely from the federal budget in 1995 by reducing spending on social programs or delegating them to the provinces, and promised to replace the Goods and Services Tax in the party's famous Red Book.[130] It also legalized same-sex marriage.

2021 party platform

[edit]

During the 2021 federal election, the Liberal Party of Canada introduced their platform, which included a "Gender and Diversity Impact Summary" for each chapter,[131] as well as six key categories. These included: the pandemic, housing, health care, the economy, climate change, and reconciliation.[132][133]

Key Liberal policies of the 2021 platform included:

  • Requiring travellers on interprovincial trains, commercial flights, cruise ships, and other federally regulated vessels be vaccinated against COVID-19.[131]
  • Making an investment of $6 billion—on top of $4 billion already committed—to support the elimination of health system waitlists.[131]
  • Providing various investments in order to build, preserve, or revitalize 1.4 million new homes by 2025–26.[131]
  • Allocating funds to spend $2 billion over the next five years on measures to address the legacy of residential schools with "truth, justice, and healing" initiatives.[132]
  • Re-introducing legislation within the first 100 days in office to eliminate the practice of gay conversion therapy for everyone.[131]
  • Achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.[131]
  • Presenting a National Action Plan on Combating Hate by 2022 as part of a renewed Anti-Racism Strategy, including the Black Canadians Justice Strategy.[131]
  • Updating the committed number to receive 40,000 Afghan refugees.[131]
  • Creating a minimum tax rule so that everyone who earns enough to qualify for the top bracket pays at least 15% each year (the tax rate paid by people earning less than $49,000), removing their ability to artificially pay no tax through excessive use of deductions and credits.[131]
  • Establishing a permanent Council of Economic Advisors to provide independent advice to government on long-term growth. The council will be gender- balanced and reflect Canada's diversity.[131]
  • Reform economic immigration programs to expand pathways to permanent residence for temporary foreign workers and former international students through the Express Entry points system.[131]
  • Setting aside a minimum of $1 billion to support provinces or territories who implement a ban on handguns across their jurisdiction.[131]

Provincial parties

[edit]

Eight provinces and one territory in Canada have a Liberal Party in their legislatures. Neither Nunavut nor the Northwest Territories have party-based electoral and governing systems (both operate with consensus democracy). British Columbia had a Liberal Party whose name and ideology have shifted, BC United; Saskatchewan also had a Liberal Party whose name has changed, Saskatchewan Progress Party. Yukon, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec each have a Liberal Party that may align ideologically with the federal party but operates as a completely separate entity (though at one time were affiliated): Those provincial parties have separate policies, finances, memberships, constituency associations, executives, conventions and offices. The New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island provincial Liberals are each politically and organizationally affiliated with the federal Liberal Party.

Electoral performance

[edit]
Election Leader Votes % Seats +/– Position Government
1867 George Brown 60,818 22.70
62 / 180
Increase 62 Increase 2nd Opposition
1872 Edward Blake 110,556 34.70
95 / 200
Increase 33 Steady 2nd Opposition
1874 Alexander Mackenzie 128,455 39.50
129 / 206
Increase 34 Increase 1st Majority
1878 180,074 33.10
63 / 206
Decrease 66 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1882 Edward Blake 160,547 31.10
73 / 211
Increase 10 Steady 2nd Opposition
1887 312,736 43.10
80 / 215
Increase 7 Steady 2nd Opposition
1891 Wilfrid Laurier 350,512 45.20
90 / 215
Increase 10 Steady 2nd Opposition
1896 401,425 41.40
117 / 213
Increase 27 Increase 1st Majority
1900 477,758 50.30
128 / 213
Increase 11 Steady 1st Majority
1904 521,041 50.90
137 / 214
Increase 9 Steady 1st Majority
1908 570,311 48.90
133 / 221
Decrease 4 Steady 1st Majority
1911 596,871 45.82
85 / 221
Decrease 48 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1917 729,756 38.80
82 / 235
Decrease 3 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1921 Mackenzie King 1,285,998 41.15
118 / 235
Increase 36 Increase 1st Majority
1925 1,252,684 39.74
100 / 245
Decrease 18 Decrease 2nd Minority
Opposition
1926 1,397,031 42.90
116 / 245
Increase 16 Increase 1st Minority
1930 1,716,798 45.50
89 / 245
Decrease 27 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1935 1,967,839 44.68
173 / 245
Increase 84 Increase 1st Majority
1940 2,365,979 51.32
179 / 245
Increase 6 Steady 1st Majority
1945 2,086,545 39.78
118 / 245
Decrease 61 Steady 1st Minority
1949 Louis St. Laurent 2,874,813 49.15
191 / 262
Increase 73 Steady 1st Majority
1953 2,731,633 48.43
169 / 265
Decrease 22 Steady 1st Majority
1957 2,702,573 40.50
105 / 265
Decrease 64 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1958 Lester Pearson 2,432,953 33.40
48 / 265
Decrease 67 Steady 2nd Opposition
1962 2,846,589 36.97
99 / 265
Increase 51 Steady 2nd Opposition
1963 3,276,996 41.48
128 / 265
Increase 29 Increase 1st Minority
1965 3,099,521 40.18
131 / 265
Increase 3 Steady 1st Minority
1968 Pierre Trudeau 3,686,801 45.37
154 / 264
Increase 23 Steady 1st Majority
1972 3,717,804 38.42
109 / 264
Decrease 46 Steady 1st Minority
1974 4,102,853 43.15
141 / 264
Increase 32 Steady 1st Majority
1979 4,595,319 40.11
114 / 282
Decrease 27 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1980 4,855,425 44.34
147 / 282
Increase 33 Increase 1st Majority
1984 John Turner 3,516,486 28.02
40 / 282
Decrease 107 Decrease 2nd Opposition
1988 4,205,072 31.92
83 / 295
Increase 43 Steady 2nd Opposition
1993 Jean Chrétien 5,647,952 41.24
177 / 295
Increase 94 Increase 1st Majority
1997 4,994,277 38.46
155 / 301
Decrease 22 Steady 1st Majority
2000 5,252,031 40.85
172 / 301
Increase 17 Steady 1st Majority
2004 Paul Martin 4,982,220 36.73
135 / 308
Decrease 37 Steady 1st Minority
2006 4,479,415 30.23
103 / 308
Decrease 32 Decrease 2nd Opposition
2008 Stéphane Dion 3,633,185 26.26
77 / 308
Decrease 26 Steady 2nd Opposition
2011 Michael Ignatieff 2,783,175 18.91
34 / 308
Decrease 43 Decrease 3rd Third party
2015 Justin Trudeau 6,928,055 39.47
184 / 338
Increase 150 Increase 1st Majority
2019 6,018,728 33.12
157 / 338
Decrease 27 Steady 1st Minority
2021 5,556,629 32.62
160 / 338
Increase 3 Steady 1st
Minority (2021–22)
Minority
(with NDP confidence and supply) (2022–24)[e]
Minority (2024–present)

Party leadership

[edit]

To date, only seven Liberal leaders never served as prime minister, three of whom were interim leaders.

Leaders

[edit]
Portrait Name Term start Term end Date of birth Date of death Notes
George Brown 1867 1867 November 29, 1818 May 9, 1880 Unofficial
(The leader of the Clear Grits, a forerunner of the federal Liberal Party)
Edward Blake 1869 1870 October 13, 1834 March 1, 1912 Unofficial
Alexander Mackenzie March 6, 1873 April 27, 1880 January 28, 1822 April 17, 1892 2nd Prime Minister (1st Liberal Prime Minister)
Edward Blake May 4, 1880 June 2, 1887 October 13, 1833 March 1, 1912
Wilfrid Laurier June 23, 1887 February 17, 1919 November 20, 1841 February 17, 1919 7th Prime Minister
Daniel Duncan McKenzie February 17, 1919 August 7, 1919 January 8, 1859 June 8, 1927 Interim leader
William Lyon
Mackenzie King
August 7, 1919 August 7, 1948 December 17, 1874 July 22, 1950 10th Prime Minister
Louis St. Laurent August 7, 1948 January 16, 1958 February 1, 1882 July 25, 1973 12th Prime Minister
Lester B. Pearson January 16, 1958 April 6, 1968 April 23, 1897 December 27, 1972 14th Prime Minister
Pierre Trudeau April 6, 1968 June 16, 1984 October 18, 1919 September 28, 2000 15th Prime Minister
John Turner June 16, 1984 June 23, 1990 June 7, 1929 September 18, 2020 17th Prime Minister
Jean Chrétien June 23, 1990 November 14, 2003 January 11, 1934 living 20th Prime Minister
Paul Martin November 14, 2003 March 19, 2006 August 28, 1938 living 21st Prime Minister
Bill Graham March 19, 2006 December 2, 2006 March 17, 1939 August 7, 2022 Interim leader
Stéphane Dion December 2, 2006 December 10, 2008 September 28, 1955 living
Michael Ignatieff December 10, 2008 May 25, 2011 May 12, 1947 living Interim leader until May 2, 2009 (when ratified as permanent leader)
Bob Rae May 25, 2011 April 14, 2013 August 2, 1948 living Interim leader
Justin Trudeau April 14, 2013 Incumbent December 25, 1971 living 23rd Prime Minister

Deputy Leaders

[edit]

Presidents

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ French abbreviation
  2. ^ All Liberal senators were expelled from the party's parliamentary caucus in 2014. Those senators, who had been appointed by Liberal prime ministers up to and including Paul Martin, sat from 2014 to 2019 as the Senate Liberal Caucus, which was not affiliated to or recognized by the Liberal Party. The Senate Liberal Caucus was dissolved in 2019 and replaced by the Progressive Senate Group.[4] Senators appointed since 2015 by Justin Trudeau have affiliated with an independent parliamentary group or sat as non-affiliated members.[5]
  3. ^ Brokerage politics is "a Canadian term for successful big tent parties that embody a pluralistic catch-all approach to appeal to the median Canadian voter ... adopting centrist policies and electoral coalitions to satisfy the short-term preferences of a majority of electors who are not located on the ideological fringe."[15][16][17][18][19]
  4. ^ Party was briefly out of power from 1930 to 1935.
  5. ^ The New Democratic Party provided confidence and supply for the Liberal Party government, from March 2022 to September 2024.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Liberal Party says membership numbers have skyrocketed under Trudeau". CTV News. The Canadian Press. December 10, 2014. Archived from the original on August 1, 2023. Retrieved August 1, 2023.
  2. ^
  3. ^ "Liberal Party of Canada Welcomes Liberal International to 2009 Convention". Liberal Party of Canada. March 6, 2009. Archived from the original on August 5, 2012. Retrieved August 28, 2012.
  4. ^ "One-time Liberal senators rename themselves as Progressive Senate Group". CTV News. The Canadian Press. November 14, 2019. Archived from the original on December 17, 2019. Retrieved November 25, 2020.
  5. ^ a b Spencer, Christina (January 29, 2014). "Justin Trudeau kicks all 32 Liberal senators out of caucus in bid for reform". National Post. Archived from the original on October 30, 2015. Retrieved October 18, 2015.
  6. ^ a b c Amanda Bittner; Royce Koop (March 1, 2013). Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics. UBC Press. pp. 300–. ISBN 978-0-7748-2411-8. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
  7. ^ a b McCall, Christina; Stephen Clarkson. "Liberal Party". Archived October 5, 2013, at the Wayback Machine The Canadian Encyclopedia.
  8. ^ Dyck, Rand (2012). Canadian Politics: Concise Fifth Edition. Nelson Education. pp. 217, 229. ISBN 978-0176503437.
  9. ^ Andrea Olive (2015). The Canadian Environment in Political Context. University of Toronto Press. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-4426-0871-9.
  10. ^ a b David Rayside (2011). Faith, Politics, and Sexual Diversity in Canada and the United States. UBC Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0-7748-2011-0.
  11. ^ Richard Collin; Pamela L. Martin (2012). An Introduction to World Politics: Conflict and Consensus on a Small Planet. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 138. ISBN 978-1-4422-1803-1.
  12. ^ a b Donald C. Baumer; Howard J. Gold (2015). Parties, Polarization and Democracy in the United States. Taylor & Francis. pp. 152–. ISBN 978-1-317-25478-2. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
  13. ^ "Liberal Party". The Canadian Encyclopedia. 2015. Archived from the original on August 13, 2019. Retrieved October 28, 2018.
  14. ^ a b c R. Kenneth Carty (2015). Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party's Long Mastery of Canada's Public Life. UBC Press. pp. 16–17. ISBN 978-0-7748-3002-7. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved November 7, 2018. PDF copy Archived March 6, 2021, at the Wayback Machine at UBC Press.
  15. ^ Alex Marland; Thierry Giasson; Jennifer Lees-Marshment (2012). Political Marketing in Canada. UBC Press. p. 257. ISBN 978-0-7748-2231-2. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  16. ^ John Courtney; David Smith (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics. OUP USA. p. 195. ISBN 978-0-19-533535-4. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  17. ^ Stephen Brooks (2004). Canadian Democracy: An Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 265. ISBN 978-0-19-541806-4. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved December 13, 2020. Two historically dominant political parties have avoided ideological appeals in favour of a flexible centrist style of politics that is often labelled brokerage politics.
  18. ^ David Johnson (2016). Thinking Government: Public Administration and Politics in Canada, Fourth Edition. University of Toronto Press. pp. 13–23. ISBN 978-1-4426-3521-0. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved December 13, 2020. ... most Canadian governments, especially at the federal level, have taken a moderate, centrist approach to decision making, seeking to balance growth, stability, and governmental efficiency and economy ... .
  19. ^ Miriam Smith (2014). Group Politics and Social Movements in Canada: Second Edition. University of Toronto Press. p. 17. ISBN 978-1-4426-0695-1. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved December 13, 2020. Canada's party system has long been described as a "brokerage system" in which the leading parties (Liberal and Conservative) follow strategies that appeal across major social cleavages in an effort to defuse potential tensions.
  20. ^ Andrea Olive (2015). The Canadian Environment in Political Context. University of Toronto Press. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-4426-0871-9.
  21. ^ Rodney P. Carlisle (2005). Encyclopedia of Politics: The Left and the Right. SAGE Publications. p. 274. ISBN 978-1-4522-6531-5. Archived from the original on November 10, 2023. Retrieved November 11, 2018.
  22. ^ Patrick James; Mark J. Kasoff (2007). Canadian Studies in the New Millennium. University of Toronto Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-1-4426-9211-4.
  23. ^ Carty, R. Kenneth (March 30, 2022). "A Century of Dominance: The Liberal Party of Canada". The Government Party. Oxford University Press. pp. 16–31. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192858481.003.0002. ISBN 978-0-19-285848-1.
  24. ^ "Liberal Party of Canada". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on December 19, 2013. Retrieved April 19, 2013.
  25. ^ Lévesque, Catherine (September 13, 2019). "Justin Trudeau revient sur l'avortement à Montréal". La Presse (in French). Archived from the original on September 15, 2019. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  26. ^ "Gun Control — Our Platform". 2.liberal.ca. Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2020.
  27. ^ a b c d e f g h "Liberal Party of Canada – History" (PDF). Newmarket-Aurora Federal Liberal Association. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 26, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  28. ^ Duffy, John (2002). Fights of our Lives Elections, Leadership, and the Making of Canada. HarperCollins. p. 41. ISBN 9780002000895.
  29. ^ a b "Sir Wilfrid Laurier Biography". Library and Archives Canada. Archived from the original on December 26, 2011. Retrieved November 24, 2011.
  30. ^ Beauharnois Scandal Archived May 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine at The Canadian Encyclopedia
  31. ^ "Federal Election Question May Be Settled Shortly". Ottawa Citizen. September 20, 1943. Archived from the original on August 17, 2021. Retrieved October 18, 2015.
  32. ^ John W. Lederle. "The Liberal Convention of 1893" Archived February 2, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science. Vol. 16, No. 1 (Feb. 1950), pp. 42–52.
  33. ^ Koop, Ryan. "The Elusive Nature of National Party Organization in Canada and Australia". Paper Presented at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference. University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC. 4–6 June 2008. Archived from the original on July 8, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2012.
  34. ^ David Johnson (2006). Thinking Government: Public Sector Management in Canada. University of Toronto Press. pp. 99–103. ISBN 978-1-5511-1779-9. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved October 5, 2020.
  35. ^ "Louis St. Laurent Biography". Library and Archives Canada. Retrieved November 23, 2011.
  36. ^ "John Diefenbaker Biography". Library and Archives Canada. Archived from the original on November 7, 2011. Retrieved November 23, 2011.
  37. ^ "Lester Pearson Biography". Library and Archives Canada. Archived from the original on January 24, 2012. Retrieved November 23, 2011.
  38. ^ Andrew Cohen (2008). Extraordinary Canadians: Lester B. Pearson. Penguin Canada. ISBN 978-0-1431-7269-7.
  39. ^ Calwell, Allison (September 29, 2000). "Former Canadian PM dies". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved November 13, 2015.
  40. ^ Graham, Ron, ed. (1998). The Essential Trudeau. McClelland & Stewart, p. 71. ISBN 978-0-7710-8591-8.
  41. ^ Thompson, Wayne C. (2017). Canada. Rowman & Littlefield, p. 135. ISBN 978-1-4758-3510-6.
  42. ^ Baluja, Tamara; Bradshaw, James (June 22, 2012). "Is bilingualism still relevant in Canada?". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved November 13, 2015.
  43. ^ Stephen Tierney; Hugh Donald Forbes (2007). Multiculturalism and the Canadian Constitution (PDF). UBC Press. pp. 27–41. ISBN 978-0-7748-1445-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 17, 2015.
  44. ^ Blais, André. "Accounting for the Electoral Success of the Liberal Party in Canada" Archived November 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. Journal of Political Science, Dec 2005, Vol. 38#4. pp 821–840.
  45. ^ "Chinese Immigration Act, 1923". Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21. Archived from the original on May 2, 2017. Retrieved April 30, 2017.
  46. ^ Stephanie Levitz (September 27, 2016). "Liberals working on apology for 1939 decision to turn away Jewish refugees". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on November 15, 2017. Retrieved September 28, 2017.
  47. ^ Lois Harder; Steve Patten (2015). Patriation and Its Consequences: Constitution Making in Canada (PDF). UBC Press. pp. 3–23. ISBN 978-0-7748-2861-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 17, 2015.
  48. ^ McKay-Panos, Linda (January 1, 2013). "The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: An Integral Part of our Constitution". LawNow. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved November 12, 2015.
  49. ^ Soucy, Jean; Wrobel, Marion G. (April 11, 2000). "Federal Deficit: Changing Trends". Parliamentary Research Branch, Economics Division, Library of Parliament. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved November 12, 2015.
  50. ^ Terence McKenna. "Jean Chrétien: Losing the Liberal leadership" Archived November 19, 2015, at the Wayback Machine. CBC's The Journal, February 27, 1986. Retrieved November 12, 2015.
  51. ^ Brooke Jeffrey (2010). Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-1-4426-6019-9. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved October 5, 2020.
  52. ^ "Jean Chrétien Bio". Library and Archives Canada. Archived from the original on October 18, 2017. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  53. ^ Scoffield, Heather (April 2000). "Chrétien rejects health-care pleas from provinces". Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on August 3, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2019.
  54. ^ "Clarity Act". Government of Canada Privy Council Office. Archived from the original on December 7, 2008. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  55. ^ Melissa Cheung (June 18, 2003). "Canada Will Legalize Gay Marriage". CBS News. Archived from the original on October 29, 2014. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  56. ^ Krauss, Clifford (June 18, 2003). "Canadian leaders agree to propose gay marriage law". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 31, 2019. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  57. ^ "Chrétien jokes about trying pot once it's decriminalized". The Globe and Mail. October 3, 2003. Archived from the original on June 15, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  58. ^ "Kyoto ratification 'important for future generations'". CBC News. December 16, 2002. Archived from the original on December 5, 2006. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  59. ^ "Chrétien restates opposition to Iraq war". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. March 18, 2003. Archived from the original on October 30, 2007. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  60. ^ Sayle, Timothy A. (2015). ""But he has nothing on at all!" Canada and the Iraq War, 2003". Canadian Military History. 19 (4): 18–19.
  61. ^ Harper, Tim (March 22, 2003). "Canadians back Chrétien on war, poll finds". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on July 6, 2011. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  62. ^ Gray, John (June 13, 2006). "Realists and idealists and a bag of hammers". CBC News. Archived from the original on October 8, 2010. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  63. ^ CBC News (June 29, 2005). "The Supreme Court and same-sex marriage". CBC. Archived from the original on April 27, 2014. Retrieved April 26, 2014.
  64. ^ "Same-sex marriage around the world". CBC News. May 29, 2009. Archived from the original on November 25, 2010. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  65. ^ "Charest calls on Harper to honour Kelowna aboriginal accord". Canada.com. March 4, 2007. Archived from the original on October 13, 2013. Retrieved July 24, 2012.
  66. ^ "Martin to officially resign as party leader". CBC News. March 16, 2006. Archived from the original on June 15, 2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  67. ^ "Rock says no to Liberal leadership". Ottawa Citizen. February 3, 2006. Archived from the original on February 14, 2012. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
  68. ^ "Canadians Place Rae as Best Liberal Leader". Angus Reid. October 20, 2006. Archived from the original on January 21, 2012. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
  69. ^ "Rae Seen as Best Future Liberal PM in Canada". Angus Reid. October 23, 2006. Archived from the original on January 21, 2012. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
  70. ^ "The Liberal Leadership Race". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved November 12, 2011.
  71. ^ "The Green Shift" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 21, 2011. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  72. ^ Morris, Chris (August 14, 2008). "Liberal Green Shift is 'green shaft,' says Harper". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on August 18, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  73. ^ "Harper hopes Green Shift will turn Liberal voters Tory blue". Canwest News Service. October 5, 2008. Archived from the original on February 14, 2012. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  74. ^ Galloway, Gloria (September 11, 2008). "Layton lays into Green Shift". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved November 13, 2011.[permanent dead link]
  75. ^ "Green Shift touted as both saviour and damnation". The Globe and Mail. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on November 27, 2015. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  76. ^ Campion-Smith, Bruce; Whittington, Les (October 20, 2008). "Dion resigns but will remain as leader for now". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on March 13, 2011. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  77. ^ "Results of CBC News Survey" (PDF). EKOS Research. December 4, 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 9, 2008. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  78. ^ "Ignatieff named interim Liberal leader". CBC News. December 10, 2008. Archived from the original on December 16, 2008. Retrieved December 10, 2008.
  79. ^ Clark, Campbell; Taber, Jane (January 28, 2009). "Ignatieff okays budget, with conditions". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on January 26, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  80. ^ "Ignatieff slams Harper for 'failure to unite Canada'". CBC News. May 2, 2009. Archived from the original on June 16, 2023. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  81. ^ "Ignatieff slams Harper for 'failure to unite Canada'". CBC News. May 2, 2009. Archived from the original on January 7, 2014. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  82. ^ "Close Federal Race Continues – Tories Down in Quebec Up in Ontario" (PDF). Nanos Research. May 2, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  83. ^ "Close federal race continues" (PDF). Nanos Research. June 27, 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  84. ^ Siddiqui, Haroon (September 3, 2009). "If Harper is Bush, then Ignatieff is John Kerry". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  85. ^ Hebert, Chantal (August 26, 2009). "Absent opposition gives the PM a holiday". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  86. ^ "Liberals won't raise taxes: Ignatieff". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. September 2, 2009. Archived from the original on October 16, 2015. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  87. ^ "Canada's government survives non-confidence motion". Reuters. October 1, 2009. Archived from the original on July 15, 2011. Retrieved April 28, 2010.
  88. ^ "Parties Virtually Tied as Election Nears in Canada". Angus Reid. September 4, 2009. Archived from the original on January 21, 2012. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  89. ^ MacDonald, Ian (October 9, 2009). "Harper tickles while Ignatieff burns". Montreal Gazette. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013. Retrieved November 9, 2011.
  90. ^ "Conservatives retain 7-point lead as parties enter election campaign" (PDF). EKOS Politics. March 25, 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 16, 2011. Retrieved November 15, 2011.
  91. ^ Austen, Ian (March 25, 2011). "Canadian Government, Beset by Scandal, Collapses". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 24, 2018. Retrieved October 18, 2015.
  92. ^ "Chance of Harper vs. Ignatieff debate fades". CTV News. March 31, 2011. Archived from the original on June 22, 2015. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  93. ^ Whittington, Les (April 7, 2011). "Ignatieff's appeal improving but Harper still leads, poll says". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on April 10, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  94. ^ Galloway, Gloria (April 8, 2011). "Layton remains game despite polls showing he's the odd man out". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on April 12, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2011.
  95. ^ "Ignatieff's Liberals lose Official Opposition status". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. May 3, 2011. Archived from the original on June 4, 2023. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
  96. ^ "Official Voting Results – Forty-First General Election 2011". Elections Canada. Archived from the original on May 21, 2012. Retrieved May 21, 2012.
  97. ^ Bryden, Joan (June 19, 2011). "Federal Liberals won't pick new leader for full two years". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved June 19, 2011.
  98. ^ Economist May 3, 2011
  99. ^ Andrew Coyne, "The West is in and Ontario has joined it: How the election led to an unprecedented realignment of Canadian politics", Maclean's May 6, 2011 Archived June 1, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  100. ^ McLeod, Paul (October 22, 2015). "Book Review: The Big Shift Explains Why Stephen Harper Will Keep Winning". Buzzfeed. Archived from the original on October 23, 2015. Retrieved October 22, 2015.
  101. ^ Valpy, Michael (November 25, 2011). "Is a Liberal comeback mission impossible?". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2015.
  102. ^ "Justin Trudeau sweeps Liberal leadership with 80% support". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. April 14, 2013. Archived from the original on September 29, 2013. Retrieved April 15, 2013.
  103. ^ Berthiaume, Lee (May 7, 2013). "Tory attack ads may be backfiring in favour of Trudeau's Liberals as support rises, new poll shows". National Post. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2013.
  104. ^ Visser, Josh (May 23, 2013). "Trudeau's Liberals hit historic highs as senate scandal has 'drastic effect' on Tories: poll". National Post. Archived from the original on June 7, 2013. Retrieved June 7, 2013.
  105. ^ Warnica, Richard (October 23, 2015). "The Liberal Resurrection: How a Liberal 'lightweight' faced with the longest election campaign in history beat down a Tory majority". National Post. Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved October 25, 2015.
  106. ^ Crawford, Allison (December 3, 2015). "Senate Liberals unsure how to work with Trudeau government". CBC News. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved January 1, 2016.
  107. ^ Raj, Althia (October 25, 2015). "Justin Trudeau's Liberals: 'We Had A Plan And We Stuck To It.' And They Won". Huffington Post. Retrieved October 31, 2015.
  108. ^ "Canada election: Liberals sweep to power". BBC News. October 20, 2015. Archived from the original on October 20, 2015. Retrieved October 20, 2015.
  109. ^ "Canada election: Liberals win sweeping victory over Conservatives". The Daily Telegraph. October 20, 2015. Archived from the original on January 11, 2022. Retrieved October 20, 2015.
  110. ^ "Stunning Liberal gains in Quebec as Trudeau wins majority government". CBC News. October 19, 2015. Archived from the original on October 20, 2015. Retrieved October 20, 2015.
  111. ^ "Liberal comeback headed for history books". Toronto Star. October 20, 2015. Archived from the original on October 24, 2015. Retrieved October 25, 2015.
  112. ^ Argitis, Theophilos; Wingrove, Josh (October 19, 2015). "Trudeau's Liberals Oust Harper With Surprise Canada Majority". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on October 27, 2015. Retrieved October 27, 2015.
  113. ^ Spencer McKay, "The Great Liberal Comeback" National Post Oct 29 2015 Archived 2015-11-19 at Archive-It
  114. ^ Da Silva, Chantal (October 22, 2019). "Justin Trudeau wins minority government—what does this mean for America?". Newsweek. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  115. ^ "Trudeau says no plans to form a coalition, will push ahead on Trans Mountain". Global News. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  116. ^ "Ontario and Quebec keep Liberals in power and Conservatives out". cbc.ca. October 22, 2019. Archived from the original on April 6, 2023. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  117. ^ Aiello, Rachel (October 22, 2019). "'Historic opportunity': Opposition leaders take stock after Liberal minority win". Federal Election 2019. Archived from the original on July 31, 2021. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  118. ^ Brean, Joseph (October 22, 2019). "All-time low share of popular vote is enough for Liberals to win power | National Post". National Post. Archived from the original on July 6, 2021. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  119. ^ "Federal election latest updates", CBC, September 20, 2021". Archived from the original on March 3, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  120. ^ Hopper, Tristan (September 22, 2021). "First Reading: The Least Popular Canadian Government Ever Elected". National Post.
  121. ^ "Liberals, NDP agree to confidence deal seeing Trudeau government maintain power until 2025". CTV News. March 22, 2022. Archived from the original on March 22, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
  122. ^ McKenna, Kate; Zimonjic, Peter (September 4, 2024). "How the NDP's deal with the Liberals died". CBC News. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  123. ^ Yousif, Nadine (September 5, 2024). "Why Canadian politics just got more unpredictable". BBC News. Archived from the original on September 5, 2024. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
  124. ^ Major, Darren (September 10, 2024). "Upcoming federal byelections will put Singh and the NDP brand to the test - NDP looking to both hold a Winnipeg seat and pull another away from the Liberals in Montreal". CBC News. Archived from the original on September 11, 2024. Retrieved September 11, 2024.
  125. ^ "Trudeau says Liberals 'strong and united' despite caucus dissent". CTVNews. October 23, 2024. Retrieved November 20, 2024.
  126. ^ Steve Patten, "The Evolution of the Canadian Party System" Archived July 8, 2023, at the Wayback Machine. in Gagnon, and Tanguay, eds. Canadian Parties in Transition pp. 57–58
  127. ^ Stephen Clarkson, The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics Archived January 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine (2005).
  128. ^ Apps, Alfred. "Building a Modern Liberal Party" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada. pp. 5–9. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 17, 2016. Retrieved November 24, 2011.
  129. ^ "2009 Constitution" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 5, 2015. Retrieved November 24, 2011.
  130. ^ Egan, Louise; Palmer, Randall (November 21, 2011). "The lesson from Canada on cutting deficits". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on November 26, 2011. Retrieved November 24, 2011.
  131. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l "Forward. For Everyone" (PDF). Liberal Party of Canada. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2022.
  132. ^ a b Aiello, Rachel (September 1, 2021). "Liberals unveil 2021 election platform, promising total of $78 billion for post-pandemic rebuild". CTV News. Archived from the original on April 22, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2022.
  133. ^ "Liberals unveil 2021 election platform". Al Jazeera. September 1, 2021. Archived from the original on May 26, 2023. Retrieved May 12, 2022.
  134. ^ "The Hon. Sheila Maureen Copps, P.C., O.C., M.P." Parlinfo. Library of Parliament. Archived from the original on June 25, 2024. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  135. ^ "The Hon. Michael Ignatieff, P.C., M.P." Parlinfo. Library of Parliament. Archived from the original on September 6, 2019. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  136. ^ "The Hon. Ralph Goodale, P.C., M.P." Parlinfo. Library of Parliament. Archived from the original on December 14, 2019. Retrieved June 25, 2024.
  137. ^ Vigliotti, Marco (May 6, 2023). "Liberals elect Sachit Mehra as new party president". iPolitics. Archived from the original on May 9, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2023.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Bickerton, James, and Alain G. Gagnon. Canadian Politics (5th ed. 2009), 415pp; university textbook
  • Bliss, Michael. Right Honourable Men: The Descent of Canadian Politics from Macdonald to Mulroney (1994), essays on Prime Ministers
  • Carty, R. Kenneth. Big Tent Politics: The Liberal Party’s Long Mastery of Canada’s Public Life (2015)
  • Clarkson, Stephen. The Big Red Machine: How the Liberal Party Dominates Canadian Politics (2005)
  • Cohen, Andrew, and J. L. Granatstein, eds. Trudeau's Shadow: the life and legacy of Pierre Elliott Trudeau (1999).
  • Gagnon, Alain G., and Brian Tanguay. Canadian Parties in Transition (3rd ed. 2007), 574pp; university textbook
  • Granatstein, J.L. Mackenzie King: His Life and World (1977).
  • Hillmer, Norman, and Steven Azzi. "Canada's Best Prime Ministers", Maclean's June 20, 2011 online Archived December 2, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  • Jeffrey, Brooke. Divided Loyalties: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1984–2008 (2010) excerpt and text search Archived March 21, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  • Jeffrey, Brooke. Road to Redemption: The Liberal Party of Canada, 2006-2019 (2020)
  • Koop, Royce. "Professionalism, Sociability and the Liberal Party in the Constituencies." Canadian Journal of Political Science (2010) 43#04 pp: 893–913.
  • McCall, Christina; Stephen Clarkson. "Liberal Party". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on March 26, 2005.
  • McCall, Christina. Grits: an intimate portrait of the Liberal Party (Macmillan of Canada, 1982)
  • Neatby, H. Blair. Laurier and a Liberal Quebec: A Study in Political Management (1973)
  • Whitaker, Reginald. The Government Party: Organizing and Financing the Liberal Party of Canada, 1930–1958 (1977)
  • Wallace, W.S. (1948). "History of the Liberal Party of Canada". The Encyclopedia of Canada. Vol. IV. Toronto: University Associates of Canada. pp. 75–76. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved November 25, 2008.
  • Wearing, Joseph. The L-Shaped Party: The Liberal Party of Canada, 1958–1980 (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1981)
[edit]