User talk:CodeEditor123

Percy Jackson Task Force

Hello, CodeEditor123! I'd like to invite you to join the Percy Jackson task force, which works to improve articles related to Rick Riordan and his books. Check out our page or contact me to learn more! 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief was changed by CodeEditor123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941505 on 2015-09-19T15:17:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Stonekeeper's Curse

The article The Stonekeeper's Curse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable comic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm Mike1901. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mike1901 (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peter and Wendy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peter and Wendy was changed by CodeEditor123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862799 on 2016-05-24T19:51:43+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 14:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your article The Sword of Summer (novel)

Hi there, CodeEditor123, I'm here from WP:RRTF. First off, I'd like to thank you for your ambitious creation of an article! Our offer of membership still stands, if you're interested.

Unfortunately, there are a few things I need to let you know. To begin with, in its current state your article is a candidate for speedy deletion because of its lack of references (particularly non-primary sources). References and a larger real-world reception section are needed to help establish notability, one of the most important qualities of a good Wikipedia article.

You also should be aware that RRTF has an article draft in progress, Draft:The Sword of Summer. This is why we have a redirect in place -- The Sword of Summer -- which I assume you noticed, as you named your article "The Sword of Summer (novel)". We are working to get our article through Wikipedia:Articles for creation review, because once it passes that it will (by definition) have no problems with content, or referencing, or notability.

The AFC's article wizard allows users to search for other articles on their topic (which can also be done using the everything option on Wikipedia's search bar), and also gives them the option of making a draft or using their sandbox to prep the article. Drafts are then reviewed by a team similarly to how Good-quality articles are selected. Right now your article is filled with redundant information already better covered by the draft and/or List of characters in mythology novels by Rick Riordan. This is why Wikipedia recommends all new articles be created through AFC: there are much fewer redundant or poor-quality articles that way.

I encourage you to see our forum post about your article, and to work to improve your own. Please be aware that we or other editors may edit or otherwise influence your article, and it is by no means a comment on you or your abilities. Thanks so much for taking the initiative! If you need to contact me, leave a message on either the RRTF forum or my personal talk page. Happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 22:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

green

June 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Galaxy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Galaxy, you may be blocked from editing. JimVC3 (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 20:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

November 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Indignant Flamingo (talk) 18:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Merivale High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Paisarepa (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Merivale High School, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned for vandalism multiple times by a number of editors. If you vandalize Wikipedia again you run the risk of being blocked from editing. Wham2001 (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Merivale High School. Wham2001 (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)