Talk:Opinion poll: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2019; 2021;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:41, 15 October 2024

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Mark Blumenthal (27 May 2011). "Daily Kos vs. Research 2000 Lawsuit Settled". Daily Kos. After sending that statement, Ali disappeared from public view. Attempts to contact his email account temporarily bounced, his Twitter account went silent and the Research 2000 website started redirecting to a Wikipedia entry on opinion polls.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
-{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=C}}
+{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}}
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
-{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=mid}}
+{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=mid}}
-{{WikiProject Psychology|class=C|importance=mid}}
+{{WikiProject Statistics|importance=mid}}
+}}
-{{WikiProject Statistics|class=C|importance=mid}}
+{{Press
+ | subject     = article
+ | author      = Mark Blumenthal
+ | title       = Daily Kos vs. Research 2000 Lawsuit Settled
+ | org         = [[Daily Kos]]
+ | url         = https://www.huffpost.com/entry/daily-kos-research-2000-lawsuit_n_867775
+ | date        = 27 May 2011
+ | quote       = After sending that statement, Ali disappeared from public view. Attempts to contact his email account temporarily bounced, his Twitter account went silent and the [[Research 2000]] website started redirecting to a Wikipedia entry on opinion polls.
 }}
 {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Opinion poll/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}
-== External links modified ==
-Hello fellow Wikipedians,
-I have just modified one external link on [[Opinion poll]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/814524027|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
-*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151010133249/http://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPOR_Social_Media_Report_FNL.pdf to https://www.aapor.org/AAPORKentico/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPOR_Social_Media_Report_FNL.pdf
-When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
-{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
-Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 09:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
-== Removing Source Content under 'Social media as a source of opinion on candidates' ==
-=== Greetings all. ===
-I have removed the following text under the section Social media as a source of opinion on candidates to keep the page unbiased and neutral:
-''"This fact makes the issue of fake news being spread throughout it more influential. Other evidence surrounding fake news shows that: the most popular fake news stories were more widely shared on Facebook than the most popular mainstream news stories; many people who see fake news stories report that they believe them; and the most discussed fake news stories tended to favor Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. As a result of these facts, some have concluded that if not for these stories, Donald Trump may not have won the election over Hillary Clinton."''
-The current source links to https://web.stanford.edu/~gentzkow/research/fakenews.pdf
-On page 212 of that source we can see the quote that has been added to the Wikipedia page. This source cites Craig Silverman as the source and comes from '''BuzzFeed.''' Please see [[BuzzFeed|WP:Buzzfeeds Reputation]] and note "a Pew Research Center surveyfound that in the United States, BuzzFeed was viewed as an unreliable source by the majority of people, regardless of political affiliation."
-As a result I have removed this source content to strengthen the articles neutral point of view, as well as uphold Wikipedia's goal for facts to take precedence over opinions. (See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Facts_precede_opinions|WP: Facts Precede Opinions])
-Thank you.
---[[User:StanTheMan0131|StanTheMan0131]] ([[User talk:StanTheMan0131|talk]]) 22:43, 24 December 2019 (UTC)