Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 February 10: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:29, 18 February 2020

< February 9	February 11 >

February 10

File:Hawaii prject.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:07, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion under criterion WP:CSD#F9 by Roy17 with the reason "I'm pretty sure this is one of the system photos of windows vista." FASTILY 00:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hawaii my ass. https://www.southerndestinations.com/namibias-incredible-desert-adapted-animals/ -- Whpq (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adapting to Climate Change, A landscape without and with EbA.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged OTRS received for over three months. After reviewing the associated ticket on OTRS, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed. FASTILY 00:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Turki AlMohsen.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged OTRS received for almost three months. After reviewing the associated ticket on OTRS, I believe it is unlikely that permission will be confirmed. FASTILY 00:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tony and Livia 46 Long.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Denial Anger Acceptance Sopranos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meadowlands Sopranos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep106.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep107.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep108.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep109.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep110.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep111.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep113.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep201.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 20:00, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sopranos ep202.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Toodle Fucking-Oo Sopranos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 because not used to increase understanding of the article, and not necessary at all to understand the article. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No significant sourced commentary about the image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rychkov.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

per this Tineye result, it looks like this photo belongs to the IHES and cannot be hosted here under a free license _signed,Rosguill ^talk 08:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The uploader gave the IHES site as a link in the upload comment with an unclear comment of copyrighted free use link. This is the page where the image came from. There is no free license on the page. See also the site legal page which indicates the site material is copyrighted. -- Whpq (talk) 23:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Face the Raven.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image does not conform with WP:NFCC#8 policy. For further discussion, see User talk:Sebastian James#Face the Raven. -- /Alex/₂₁ 12:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The stated purpose is a vague handwave and its actual usage in the article is decorative. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- Whpq (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Li Wen Liang.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Efforts do appear to have been made to meet WP:NFCC#1 and with the subjects death creating an image isn't a possibility. Nthep (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This person only died a few days ago. We cannot say an attempt has been made to obtain a free image so soon after his death. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 13:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is true, but I think English Wikipedia will be unlikely to be able to do this. A zh wiki user might be able to source one, perhaps, but this is the same photo zh wiki uses: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Li_Wen_Liang.jpg. We (admittedly just User:Andrew_Davidson and I) decided it was acceptable to add under fair use after a discussion here: Talk:Li_Wenliang#Photo_request. Mvolz (talk) 03:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject has died and their remains have been cremated and so it is no longer possible to take pictures of them. I conducted a search for free images and didn't find any. We have a valid fair use rationale and so we're good. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MangalamNewspaperCover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 01:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong source. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 21:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Source is updated to correct one. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.