User talk:MemeLordMatt2019

Welcome!

Hello, MemeLordMatt2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See Template:Infobox film/doc starring attribute instructions about order of names in that attribute. Also reverting non-vandalism edits without giving a reason is not considered good editing practice. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at What Men Want. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 14:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Please follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain your changes with accurate and meaningful edit summaries. DO NOT make false claims in you edit summaries as you did when editing The Angry Birds Movie 2. -- 109.79.161.55 (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Misleading edit summaries

Hi MemeLordMatt2019, I see you have been warned multiple times in the past about using misleading edit summaries. So, please consider this a final warning. If you keep disrupting Wikipedia by using highly misleading edit summaries like this one, you may be blocked from editing. Edit summaries should be used to accurately describe the changes you are making. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trolls World Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at I Still Believe (film). The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:42, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Secret Garden (2020 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. BOVINEBOY2008 13:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DBigXray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chhapaak without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DBigXrayᗙ 13:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DBigXrayᗙ 13:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Red links

Hello, regarding A Quiet Place Part II, it is unnecessary to remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject. This is outlined at WP:REDLINK. A search engine test shows numerous sources writing about cinematographer Polly Morgan. The presence of a red link is to encourage growth, in this case to write an article about a figure that has coverage out there about her. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MemeLordMatt2019! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:57, Sunday, February 16, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MemeLordMatt2019! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:08, Sunday, February 16, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi MemeLordMatt2019! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:10, Sunday, February 16, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Deceptive edit summaries

Stop using deceptive edit summaries, where you claim to have added a citation. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

You've just done it again here at Scoob!. Your edit itself was fine (though unnecessary as you just rearranged the actors), but please do not use intentionally misleading edit summaries. Even if your edits are fine, this may lead to a block because it looks like you're vandalizing when you use a false edit summary. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 12:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MemeLordMatt2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm just trying to help people.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MemeLordMatt2019 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Then you are failing in your goals. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Because you've gone right back to using deceptive edit summaries, I've blocked you indefinitely. You can be unblocked by any admin without consulting me, as long as you promise to stop using deceptive edit summaries. You can't just ignore everyone who leaves messages on your talk page and asks you to stop doing something disruptive. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

MemeLordMatt2019 {{unblock|reason=I promise not to be deceptive with my edit summaries.}} MemeLordMatt2019 {{unblock|reason=I didn't know I was being disruptive.}}

MemeLordMatt2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MemeLordMatt2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't mean to be disruptive. I'm sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemeLordMatt2019 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I will give you another chance to show that you can give accurate edit summaries, given your statement above. Be advised that if the accuracy of your edit summaries does not improve, you may be reblocked. 331dot (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Dude, you need to follow the instructions above. I'll fix your unblock request this time, but this is the last time I do that for you. Eventually, you'll have to demonstrate that you can read and follow instructions. The instructions above say, "Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code." You included the tlx| code. I realize that this stuff is confusing for new users, but being able to read and follow instructions is a basic requirement for editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:54, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

deceptive edit summaries after being unblocked

Since you were unblocked you have twice used deceptive edit summaries despite one of the conditions of your unblock being to use accurate edit summaries. It appears as though you are not listening to what is being said. If this continues you will see yourself re-blocked. Tknifton (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

I have reblocked you as your edit summaries have not improved as you promised. 331dot (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

MemeLordMatt2019 {{unblock|2=reason=''I just wanted to help.''}} MemeLordMatt2019 {{unblock|2=reason=''I'm sorry that I was being disruptive.''}}

No one will see your requests unless they are properly formatted. Highlight and copy the template when viewing this page, then open the edit window and paste it. There should not be a "tlx|" in the request. I am starting to think that you lack the skills needed to participate here. 331dot (talk) 17:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

MemeLordMatt2019 {{unblock|2=reason=''I fixed it.''}}

You are missing a bracket on the end. 331dot (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

MemeLordMatt2019 {{unblock|2=reason=''I didn't mean to be disruptive. Sorry.''}}

You had four open, malformed unblock requests. We require a level of competency you are failing to demonstrate here. If your next unblock request is not properly formatted or does not properly address your disruptive editing, you will lose talk page access. Slow down, read WP:GAB, and preview your changes. You only get one more chance. --Yamla (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MemeLordMatt2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't mean to be disruptive. MemeLordMatt2019 (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MemeLordMatt2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I promise to avoid being disruptive with my edits. MemeLordMatt2019 (talk) 20:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 29491

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MemeLordMatt2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #29491 was submitted on 2020-03-16 20:44:46. This review is now closed.

--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 23:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)