Jump to content

Exoskeleton: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source
 
(101 intermediate revisions by 64 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|External skeleton of an organism}}
{{Short description|External skeleton of an organism}}
{{redirect|Robot exoskeleton|the type of machine|powered exoskeleton}}
{{Redirect|Robot exoskeleton|the type of machine|powered exoskeleton}}
[[File:Dragonfly-nymph-exoskeleton.jpg|thumb|The discarded exoskeleton ([[exuviae]]) of [[dragonfly]] [[nymph (biology)|nymph]]]]
[[File:Dragonfly-nymph-exoskeleton.jpg|thumb|Discarded exoskeleton ([[exuviae]]) of [[dragonfly]] [[nymph (biology)|nymph]]]]
[[File:Exoskeleton fly 1.jpg|thumb|Exoskeleton of [[cicada]] attached to a ''[[Tridax procumbens]]'']]
[[File:Exoskeleton fly 1.jpg|thumb|Exoskeleton of [[cicada]] attached to a ''[[Tridax procumbens]]'' (colloquially known as the [[Tridax procumbens|tridax daisy]])]]
An '''exoskeleton''' (from Greek έξω, ''éxō'' "outer" and σκελετός, ''skeletós'' "skeleton"<ref name=OnlineEtDict>{{cite dictionary|title=exoskeleton|url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=exoskeleton&allowed_in_frame=0|dictionary=[[Online Etymology Dictionary]]|url-status=live|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130420181120/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=exoskeleton&allowed_in_frame=0|archivedate=2013-04-20}}</ref>) is the external [[skeleton]] that supports and protects an animal's body, in contrast to the internal skeleton ([[endoskeleton]]) of, for example, a [[Human skeleton|human]]. In usage, some of the larger kinds of exoskeletons are known as "'''[[Armour (anatomy)|shells]]'''". Examples of animals with exoskeletons include [[insect]]s such as [[grasshopper]]s and [[cockroach]]es, and [[crustacean]]s such as [[crab]]s and [[lobster]]s, as well as the shells of certain [[sponges]] and the various groups of [[Mollusc shell |shelled molluscs]], including those of [[snail]]s, [[clam]]s, [[tusk shell]]s, [[chiton]]s and [[nautilus]]. Some animals, such endocrine rheumatid arthritic corrosive as the [[tortoise]], have both an endoskeleton and an exoskeleton.
An '''exoskeleton''' (from Greek {{lang|el|έξω}} ''éxō'' "outer"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=e)/cw |title=ἔξω |last1=Liddell |first1=Henry George |last2=Scott |first2=Robert |work=A Greek-English Lexicon |publisher=Perseus Digital Library |date= 1940 }}</ref> and {{lang|el|σκελετός}} ''skeletós'' "skeleton"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=skeleto/s |title=σκελετός |last1=Liddell |first1=Henry George |last2=Scott |first2=Robert |work=A Greek-English Lexicon |publisher=Perseus Digital Library |date= 1940 }}</ref><ref name=OnlineEtDict>{{cite dictionary |title=exoskeleton |year=2001 |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=exoskeleton&allowed_in_frame=0 |last1=Douglas |first1= Harper |dictionary=[[Online Etymology Dictionary]] |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130420181120/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=exoskeleton&allowed_in_frame=0 |archive-date=20 April 2013}}</ref>) is a [[skeleton]] that is on the exterior of an [[animal]] in the form of hardened [[integument]], which both supports the body's shape and protects the [[internal organ]]s, in contrast to an internal [[endoskeleton]] (e.g. [[human skeleton|that of a human]]) which is enclosed underneath other [[soft tissue]]s. Some large, hard and non-flexible protective exoskeletons are known as '''[[mollusc shell|shell]]''' or '''[[armour (anatomy)|armour]]'''.


Examples of exoskeletons in animals include the [[arthropod exoskeleton|cuticle skeleton]]s shared by [[arthropod]]s ([[insect]]s, [[chelicerate]]s, [[myriapod]]s and [[crustacean]]s) and [[tardigrade]]s, as well as the [[corallite|skeletal cup]]s formed by hardened secretion of [[stony coral]]s, the [[test (biology)|test]]/tunic of [[sea squirt]]s and [[sea urchin]]s, and the prominent [[mollusc shell]] shared by [[snail]]s, [[bivalvia|clam]]s, [[tusk shell]]s, [[chiton]]s and [[nautilus]]. Some [[vertebrate]] animals, such as the [[turtle]], have both an endoskeleton and a [[turtle shell|protective exoskeleton]].
==Role==
Exoskeletons contain rigid and resistant components that fulfill a set of functional roles in many animals including protection, excretion, sensing, support, feeding and acting as a barrier against [[desiccation]] in terrestrial organisms. Exoskeletons have a role in defense from pests and predators, support and in providing an attachment framework for [[muscle|musculature]].<ref name="Bengtson2004">{{Cite conference |title=Early skeletal fossils | author = S. Bengtson |editor1=J. H. Lipps |editor2=B. M. Waggoner |book-title=Neoproterozoic–Cambrian Biological Revolutions |year=2004 |journal=Paleontological Society Papers |volume=10 |pages=67–78 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081003122817/http://www.nrm.se/download/18.4e32c81078a8d9249800021554/Bengtson2004ESF.pdf |archive-date=2008-10-03|url=http://www.nrm.se/download/18.4e32c81078a8d9249800021554/Bengtson2004ESF.pdf}}</ref>


== Role ==
Exoskeletons contain [[chitin]]; the addition of [[calcium carbonate]] makes them harder and stronger.{{Citation needed|date=March 2009}} Ingrowths of the [[arthropod exoskeleton]] known as '''apodemes''' serve as attachment sites for muscles. These structures are composed of chitin and are approximately six times stronger and twice the stiffness of vertebrate [[tendon]]s. Similar to tendons, apodemes can stretch to store [[elastic energy]] for jumping, notably in [[locust]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |author=H. C. Bennet-Clark |year=1975 |title=The energetics of the jump of the locust, ''Schistocerca gregaria'' |journal=[[Journal of Experimental Biology]] |volume=63 |pages=53–83 |pmid=1159370 |url=http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/63/1/53.pdf |issue=1}}</ref> Calcium carbonates constitute the shells of molluscs, [[brachiopod]]s, and some tube-building [[polychaete]] worms. [[Silicon dioxide|Silica]] forms the exoskeleton in the microscopic [[diatom]]s and [[Radiolarian|radiolaria]]. One species of mollusc, the [[scaly-foot gastropod]], even makes use of the iron sulfides [[greigite]] and [[pyrite]].
Exoskeletons contain rigid and resistant components that fulfil a set of functional roles in addition to [[structural support]] in many animals, including protection, respiration, excretion, sensation, feeding and [[courtship display]], and as an osmotic barrier against [[desiccation]] in terrestrial organisms. Exoskeletons have roles in defence from parasites and predators and in providing attachment points for [[muscle|musculature]].<ref name="Bengtson2004">{{Cite conference |title=Early skeletal fossils | author=S. Bengtson |editor1=J. H. Lipps |editor2=B. M. Waggoner |book-title=Neoproterozoic–Cambrian Biological Revolutions |year=2004 |journal=Paleontological Society Papers |volume=10 |pages=67–78 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081003122817/http://www.nrm.se/download/18.4e32c81078a8d9249800021554/Bengtson2004ESF.pdf |archive-date=2008-10-03|url=http://www.nrm.se/download/18.4e32c81078a8d9249800021554/Bengtson2004ESF.pdf}}</ref>


[[Arthropod exoskeleton]]s contain [[chitin]]; the addition of [[calcium carbonate]] makes them harder and stronger, at the price of increased weight.<ref name="Nedin 1999">{{cite journal |author=Nedin, C. |year=1999 | title=''Anomalocaris'' predation on nonmineralized and mineralized trilobites |journal=Geology |volume=27 | issue=11 |pages=987–990 |doi=10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0987:APONAM>2.3.CO;2 |bibcode=1999Geo....27..987N}}</ref> Ingrowths of the [[arthropod exoskeleton]] known as '''apodemes''' serve as attachment sites for muscles. These structures are composed of chitin and are approximately six times stronger and twice the stiffness of vertebrate [[tendon]]s. Similar to tendons, apodemes can stretch to store [[elastic energy]] for jumping, notably in [[locust]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |author=H. C. Bennet-Clark |year=1975 |title=The energetics of the jump of the locust, ''Schistocerca gregaria'' |journal=[[Journal of Experimental Biology]] |volume=63 |pages=53–83 |pmid=1159370 |url=http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/63/1/53.pdf |issue=1|doi=10.1242/jeb.63.1.53 }}</ref> Calcium carbonates constitute the shells of molluscs, [[brachiopod]]s, and some tube-building [[polychaete]] worms. [[Silicon dioxide|Silica]] forms the exoskeleton in the microscopic [[diatom]]s and [[Radiolarian|radiolaria]]. One mollusc species, the [[scaly-foot gastropod]], even uses the iron sulfides [[greigite]] and [[pyrite]].{{cn|date=May 2023}}
Some organisms, such as some [[foraminifera]], [[agglutination (biology)|agglutinate]] exoskeletons by sticking grains of sand and shell to their exterior. Contrary to a common misconception, [[echinoderm]]s do not possess an exoskeleton, as their [[Test (biology)|test]] is always contained within a layer of living tissue.


Some organisms, such as some [[foraminifera]], [[agglutination (biology)|agglutinate]] exoskeletons by sticking grains of sand and shell to their exterior. Contrary to a common misconception, [[echinoderm]]s do not possess an exoskeleton and their [[Test (biology)|test]] is always contained within a layer of living tissue.{{cn|date=May 2023}}
Exoskeletons have evolved independently many times; 18 lineages evolved [[Calcification|calcified]] exoskeletons alone.<ref name=Porter2007>{{cite journal | author = Susannah M. Porter | year = 2007 | title = Seawater chemistry and early carbonate biomineralization | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]] | volume = 316 | issue = 5829 | page = 1302 | doi = 10.1126/science.1137284 | pmid = 17540895 | bibcode=2007Sci...316.1302P}}</ref> Further, other lineages have produced tough outer coatings analogous to an exoskeleton, such as some mammals. This coating is constructed from bone in the [[armadillo]], and hair in the [[pangolin]]. The armor of reptiles like turtles and dinosaurs like [[Ankylosauria|Ankylosaur]]s is constructed of bone; crocodiles have bony [[scute]]s and [[Horn (anatomy)|horn]]y scales.


Exoskeletons have evolved independently many times; 18 lineages evolved [[Calcification|calcified]] exoskeletons alone.<ref name=Porter2007>{{cite journal | author=Susannah M. Porter | year=2007 | title=Seawater chemistry and early carbonate biomineralization | journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]] | volume=316 | issue=5829 | page=1302 | doi=10.1126/science.1137284 | pmid=17540895 | bibcode=2007Sci...316.1302P| s2cid=27418253 }}</ref> Further, other lineages have produced tough outer coatings, such as some mammals, that are analogous to an exoskeleton. This coating is constructed from bone in the [[armadillo]], and hair in the [[pangolin]]. The armour of reptiles like turtles and dinosaurs like [[Ankylosauria|Ankylosaur]]s is constructed of bone; [[crocodile]]s have bony [[scute]]s and [[Horn (anatomy)|horn]]y scales.
==Growth==

== Growth ==
{{main|Ecdysis}}
{{main|Ecdysis}}
Since exoskeletons are rigid, they present some limits to growth. Organisms with open shells can grow by adding new material to the aperture of their shell, as is the case in snails, [[bivalve]]s and other molluscans. A true exoskeleton, like that found in arthropods, must be shed ([[Ecdysis|moulted]]) when it is outgrown.<ref name=Ewer>{{Cite journal |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=3 |issue=10 |pages=e349 |title=How the Ecdysozoan Changed Its Coat |date=2005-10-11 |author=John Ewer |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030349 |pmid=16207077 |pmc=1250302 |df= }}</ref> A new exoskeleton is produced beneath the old one. As the old one is shed, the new skeleton is soft and pliable. The animal will pump itself up{{Ambiguous|date=October 2015}} to expand the new shell to maximal size, then let it harden. When the shell has set, the empty space inside the new skeleton can be filled up as the animal eats.<ref name=Ewer/> Failure to shed the exoskeleton once outgrown can result in the animal being suffocated within its own shell, and will stop subadults from reaching maturity, thus preventing them from reproducing. This is the mechanism behind some insect pesticides, such as [[Azadirachtin]].<ref>{{cite journal | title = Synthesis of Azadirachtin: A Long but Successful Journey |author1=Gemma E. Veitch |author2=Edith Beckmann |author3=Brenda J. Burke |author4=Alistair Boyer |author5=Sarah L. Maslen |author6=Steven V. Ley | doi = 10.1002/anie.200703027 | year = 2007 | journal = Angewandte Chemie International Edition | volume = 46 | pages = 7629–32 | pmid = 17665403 | issue = 40}}</ref>
Since exoskeletons are rigid, they present some limits to growth. Organisms with open shells can grow by adding new material to the aperture of their shell, as is the case in [[gastropod]]s, [[bivalve]]s, and other [[mollusca]]ns. A true exoskeleton, like that found in panarthropods, must be shed via [[moulting]] ([[ecdysis]]) when the animal starts to outgrow it.<ref name=Ewer>{{Cite journal |journal=PLOS Biology |volume=3 |issue=10 |pages=e349 |title=How the Ecdysozoan Changed Its Coat |date=2005-10-11 |author=John Ewer |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0030349 |pmid=16207077 |pmc=1250302 |doi-access=free }}</ref> A new exoskeleton is produced beneath the old one, and the new skeleton is soft and pliable before shedding the old one. The animal will typically stay in a den or burrow during moulting,{{citation needed|date=September 2020}} as it is quite vulnerable to trauma during this period. Once at least partially set, the organism will plump itself up to try to expand the exoskeleton.{{ambiguous|date=September 2020}} The new exoskeleton is still capable of growing to some degree before it is eventually hardened. {{citation needed|date=September 2020}} In contrast, moulting reptiles shed only the outer layer of skin and often exhibit indeterminate growth.<ref>{{cite journal | pmc=4743077 | year=2016 | last1=Hariharan | first1=I. K. | last2=Wake | first2=D. B. | last3=Wake | first3=M. H. | title=Indeterminate Growth: Could It Represent the Ancestral Condition? | journal=Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology | volume=8 | issue=2 | pages=a019174 | doi=10.1101/cshperspect.a019174 | pmid=26216720 }}</ref> These animals produce new skin and integuments throughout their life, replacing them according to growth. Arthropod growth, however, is limited by the space within its current exoskeleton. Failure to shed the exoskeleton once outgrown can result in the animal's death or prevent subadults from reaching maturity, thus preventing them from reproducing. This is the mechanism behind some insect pesticides, such as [[Azadirachtin]].<ref>{{cite journal | title = Synthesis of Azadirachtin: A Long but Successful Journey |author1=Gemma E. Veitch |author2=Edith Beckmann |author3=Brenda J. Burke |author4=Alistair Boyer |author5=Sarah L. Maslen |author6=Steven V. Ley | doi = 10.1002/anie.200703027 | year = 2007 | journal = Angewandte Chemie International Edition | volume = 46 | pages = 7629–32 | pmid = 17665403 | issue = 40}}</ref>

== Paleontological significance ==
[[File:BoredEncrustedShell.JPG|thumb|280px|Borings in exoskeletons can provide evidence of animal behaviour. In this case, boring [[sponge]]s attacked this [[hard clam]] shell after the death of the clam, producing the trace fossil ''[[Entobia]]''.]]
Exoskeletons, as hard parts of organisms, are greatly useful in assisting the preservation of organisms, whose soft parts usually rot before they can be fossilized. Mineralized exoskeletons can be preserved as shell fragments. The possession of an exoskeleton permits a couple of other routes to [[fossil]]ization. For instance, the strong layer can resist compaction, allowing a mould of the organism to be formed underneath the skeleton, which may later decay.<ref name=Fedonkin2007>{{cite book |author1=M. A. Fedonkin |author2=A. Simonetta |author3=A. Y. Ivantsov |year=2007 |chapter=New data on ''Kimberella'', the Vendian mollusk-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications |editor=Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia |title=The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota |series=Geological Society of London, Special Publications |volume=286 |issue=1 |location=London |publisher=[[Geological Society]] |pages=157–179 |doi=10.1144/SP286.12 |isbn=978-1-86239-233-5 |oclc=191881597 |bibcode = 2007GSLSP.286..157F |s2cid=331187 }}</ref> Alternatively, [[Lagerstätte|exceptional preservation]] may result in chitin being mineralised, as in the [[Burgess Shale]],<ref name=Butterfield2003>{{cite journal | title = Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian Explosion | year = 2003 | journal = [[Integrative and Comparative Biology]] | volume = 43 | issue = 1 | pages = 166–177 | doi = 10.1093/icb/43.1.166 | author = Nicholas J. Butterfield | pmid=21680421| doi-access = free }}</ref> or transformed to the resistant polymer [[keratin]], which can resist decay and be recovered.

However, our dependence on fossilised skeletons also significantly limits our understanding of evolution. Only the parts of organisms that were already [[Biomineralization|mineralised]] are usually preserved, such as the shells of molluscs. It helps that exoskeletons often contain "muscle scars", marks where muscles have been attached to the exoskeleton, which may allow the reconstruction of much of an organism's internal parts from its exoskeleton alone.<ref name=Fedonkin2007/> The most significant limitation is that, although there are 30-plus [[phylum|phyla]] of living animals, two-thirds of these phyla have never been found as fossils, because most animal species are soft-bodied and decay before they can become fossilised.<ref name="CowenHistLife">{{cite book | author=Richard Cowen |year=2004 |edition=4th | title=History of Life | publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |isbn=978-1-4051-1756-2}}</ref>


Mineralized skeletons first appear in the fossil record shortly before the base of the [[Cambrian period]], {{Ma|550}}. The evolution of a mineralised exoskeleton is considered a possible driving force of the [[Cambrian explosion]] of animal life, resulting in a diversification of predatory and defensive tactics. However, some Precambrian ([[Ediacaran]]) [[Ediacara biota|organisms]] produced tough outer shells<ref name=Fedonkin2007/> while others, such as ''[[Cloudinid|Cloudina]]'', had a calcified exoskeleton.<ref name=Hua2003/> Some ''Cloudina'' shells even show evidence of predation, in the form of borings.<ref name=Hua2003>{{Cite journal |author1=Hong Hua |author2=Brian R. Pratt |author3=Lu-yi Zhang | year = 2003 | journal = [[PALAIOS]] | title = Borings in ''Cloudina'' shells: complex predator-prey dynamics in the terminal Neoproterozoic | doi = 10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018<0454:BICSCP>2.0.CO;2 | volume = 18 | issue = 4–5 | pages = 454–459|bibcode=2003Palai..18..454H |s2cid=131590949 }}</ref>
==Paleontological significance==
[[File:BoredEncrustedShell.JPG|thumb|280px|Borings in exoskeletons can provide evidence of animal behavior. In this case, boring [[sponge]]s attacked this [[hard clam]] shell after the death of the clam, producing the trace fossil ''[[Entobia]]''.]]
Exoskeletons, as hard parts of organisms, are greatly useful in assisting preservation of organisms, whose soft parts usually rot before they can be fossilized. Mineralized exoskeletons can be preserved "as is", as shell fragments, for example. The possession of an exoskeleton also permits a couple of other routes to [[fossil]]ization. For instance, the tough layer can resist compaction, allowing a mold of the organism to be formed underneath the skeleton, which may later decay.<ref name=Fedonkin2007>{{cite book |author1=M. A. Fedonkin |author2=A. Simonetta |author3=A. Y. Ivantsov |year=2007 |chapter=New data on ''Kimberella'', the Vendian mollusk-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications |editor=Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia |title=The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota |journal=Geological Society of London Special Publications |volume=286 |issue=1 |location=London |publisher=[[Geological Society]] |pages=157–179 |doi=10.1144/SP286.12 |isbn=978-1-86239-233-5 |oclc=191881597 |bibcode = 2007GSLSP.286..157F }}</ref> Alternatively, [[Lagerstätte|exceptional preservation]] may result in chitin being mineralized, as in the [[Burgess Shale]],<ref name=Butterfield2003>{{cite journal | title = Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian Explosion | year = 2003 | journal = [[Integrative and Comparative Biology]] | volume = 43 | issue = 1 | pages = 166–177 | doi = 10.1093/icb/43.1.166 | author = Nicholas J. Butterfield | pmid=21680421| doi-access = free }}</ref> or transformed to the resistant polymer [[keratin]], which can resist decay and be recovered.


== Evolution ==
However, our dependence on fossilized skeletons also significantly limits our understanding of evolution. Only the parts of organisms that were already [[Mineralization (biology)|mineralized]] are usually preserved, such as the shells of molluscs. It helps that exoskeletons often contain "muscle scars", marks where muscles have been attached to the exoskeleton, which may allow the reconstruction of much of an organism's internal parts from its exoskeleton alone.<ref name=Fedonkin2007/> The most significant limitation is that, although there are 30-plus [[phylum|phyla]] of living animals, two-thirds of these phyla have never been found as fossils, because most animal species are soft-bodied and decay before they can become fossilized.<ref name="CowenHistLife">{{cite book | author=Richard Cowen |year=2004 |edition=4th | title=History of Life | publisher=[[Wiley-Blackwell]] |isbn=978-1-4051-1756-2}}</ref>
{{biomineralization sidebar|exoskeletons}}
{{Further|Small shelly fauna}}


The fossil record primarily contains mineralized exoskeletons, since these are by far the most durable. Since most lineages with exoskeletons are thought to have started with a non-mineralized exoskeleton which they later mineralized, it is difficult to comment on the very early evolution of each lineage's exoskeleton. It is known, however, that in a very short course of time, just before the Cambrian period, exoskeletons made of various materials – silica, [[calcium phosphate]], [[calcite]], [[aragonite]], and even glued-together mineral flakes – sprang up in a range of different environments.<ref name=Dzik2007>{{cite book |author=J. Dzik |year=2007 |chapter=The Verdun Syndrome: simultaneous origin of protective armor and infaunal shelters at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition |editor=Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia |title=The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota |journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications |volume=286 |issue=1 |location=London |publisher=[[Geological Society]] |pages=405–414 |doi=10.1144/SP286.30 |isbn=978-1-86239-233-5 |chapter-url=http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Publications/Verdun.pdf |oclc=191881597 |bibcode=2007GSLSP.286..405D |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081003122817/http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Publications/Verdun.pdf |archive-date=2008-10-03 |citeseerx=10.1.1.693.9187 |s2cid=33112819 }}</ref> Most lineages adopted the form of calcium carbonate which was stable in the ocean at the time they first mineralized, and did not change from this mineral morph - even when it became less favourable.<ref name="Porter2007"/>
Mineralized skeletons first appear in the fossil record shortly before the base of the [[Cambrian period]], {{Ma|550}}. The evolution of a mineralized exoskeleton is seen by some as a possible driving force of the [[Cambrian explosion]] of animal life, resulting in a diversification of predatory and defensive tactics. However, some Precambrian ([[Ediacaran]]) [[Ediacara biota|organisms]] produced tough outer shells<ref name=Fedonkin2007/> while others, such as ''[[Cloudinid|Cloudina]]'', had a calcified exoskeleton.<ref name=Hua2003/>
Some ''Cloudina'' shells even show evidence of predation, in the form of borings.<ref name=Hua2003>{{Cite journal |author1=Hong Hua |author2=Brian R. Pratt |author3=Lu-yi Zhang | year = 2003 | journal = [[PALAIOS]] | title = Borings in ''Cloudina'' shells: complex predator-prey dynamics in the terminal Neoproterozoic | doi = 10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018<0454:BICSCP>2.0.CO;2 | volume = 18 | issue = 4–5 | pages = 454–459|bibcode=2003Palai..18..454H }}</ref>


Some Precambrian (Ediacaran) organisms produced tough but non-mineralized outer shells,<ref name=Fedonkin2007/> while others, such as ''Cloudina'', had a calcified exoskeleton,<ref name=Hua2003/> but mineralized skeletons did not become common until the beginning of the Cambrian period, with the rise of the "[[small shelly fauna]]". Just after the base of the Cambrian, these miniature fossils become diverse and abundant – this abruptness may be an illusion since the chemical conditions which preserved the small shells appeared at the same time.<ref name=Dzik1994>{{cite journal| author = J. Dzik| title = Evolution of 'small shelly fossils' assemblages of the early Paleozoic| year = 1994| journal = [[Acta Palaeontologica Polonica]]| volume = 39| issue = 3| pages = 27–313| url = http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Dzik1994d.htm| url-status = live| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081205034112/http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Dzik1994d.htm| archive-date = 2008-12-05}}</ref> Most other shell-forming organisms appeared during the Cambrian period, with the [[Bryozoa]]ns being the only calcifying phylum to appear later, in the [[Ordovician]]. The sudden appearance of shells has been linked to a change in [[ocean chemistry]] which made the calcium compounds of which the shells are constructed stable enough to be precipitated into a shell. However, this is unlikely to be a sufficient cause, as the main construction cost of shells is in creating the [[protein]]s and [[polysaccharide]]s required for the shell's [[composite material|composite structure]], not in the precipitation of the mineral components.<ref name="Bengtson2004" /> Skeletonization also appeared at almost the same time that animals started [[burrow]]ing to avoid predation, and one of the earliest exoskeletons was made of glued-together mineral flakes, suggesting that skeletonization was likewise a response to increased pressure from predators.<ref name=Dzik2007 />
==Evolution==
{{further|Small shelly fauna}}
On the whole, the fossil record only contains mineralised exoskeletons, since these are by far the most durable. Since most lineages with exoskeletons are thought to have started out with a non-mineralised exoskeleton which they later mineralised, this makes it difficult to comment on the very early evolution of each lineage's exoskeleton. It is known, however, that in a very short course of time, just before the Cambrian period, exoskeletons made of various materials – silica, [[calcium phosphate]], [[calcite]], [[aragonite]], and even glued-together mineral flakes – sprang up in a range of different environments.<ref name=Dzik2007>{{cite book |author=J. Dzik |year=2007 |chapter=The Verdun Syndrome: simultaneous origin of protective armor and infaunal shelters at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition |editor=Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia |title=The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota |journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications |volume=286 |issue=1 |location=London |publisher=[[Geological Society]] |pages=405–414 |doi=10.1144/SP286.30 |isbn=978-1-86239-233-5 |chapter-url=http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Publications/Verdun.pdf |oclc=191881597 |bibcode=2007GSLSP.286..405D |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081003122817/http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Publications/Verdun.pdf |archive-date=2008-10-03 |citeseerx=10.1.1.693.9187 }}</ref> Most lineages adopted the form of calcium carbonate which was stable in the ocean at the time they first mineralised, and did not change from this mineral morph - even when it became the less favorable.<ref name="Porter2007"/>


Ocean chemistry may also control which mineral shells are constructed of. Calcium carbonate has two forms, the stable calcite and the [[Metastability|metastable]] aragonite, which is stable within a reasonable range of chemical environments but rapidly becomes unstable outside this range. When the oceans contain a relatively high proportion of magnesium compared to calcium, aragonite is more stable, but as the magnesium concentration drops, it becomes less stable, hence harder to incorporate into an exoskeleton, as it will tend to dissolve.{{cn|date=May 2023}}
Some Precambrian (Ediacaran) organisms produced tough but non-mineralized outer shells,<ref name=Fedonkin2007/> while others, such as ''Cloudina'', had a calcified exoskeleton,<ref name=Hua2003/> but mineralized skeletons did not become common until the beginning of the Cambrian period, with the rise of the "[[small shelly fauna]]". Just after the base of the Cambrian, these miniature fossils become diverse and abundant – this abruptness may be an illusion, since the chemical conditions which preserved the small shellies appeared at the same time.<ref name=Dzik1994>{{cite journal| author = J. Dzik| title = Evolution of 'small shelly fossils' assemblages of the early Paleozoic| year = 1994| journal = [[Acta Palaeontologica Polonica]]| volume = 39| issue = 3| pages = 27–313| url = http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Dzik1994d.htm| url-status = live| archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20081205034112/http://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Dzik1994d.htm| archivedate = 2008-12-05}}</ref> Most other shell-forming organisms appear during the Cambrian period, with the [[Bryozoa]]ns being the only calcifying phylum to appear later, in the [[Ordovician]]. The sudden appearance of shells has been linked to a change in [[ocean chemistry]] which made the calcium compounds of which the shells are constructed stable enough to be precipitated into a shell. However this is unlikely to be a sufficient cause, as the main construction cost of shells is in creating the [[protein]]s and [[polysaccharide]]s required for the shell's [[composite material|composite structure]], not in the precipitation of the mineral components.<ref name="Bengtson2004" /> Skeletonization also appeared at almost exactly the same time that animals started [[burrow]]ing to avoid predation, and one of the earliest exoskeletons was made of glued-together mineral flakes, suggesting that skeletonization was likewise a response to increased pressure from predators.<ref name=Dzik2007 />


Except for the molluscs, whose shells often comprise both forms, most lineages use just one form of the mineral. The form used appears to reflect the seawater chemistry – thus which form was more easily precipitated – at the time that the lineage first evolved a calcified skeleton, and does not change thereafter.<ref name=Porter2007/> However, the relative abundance of calcite- and aragonite-using lineages does not reflect subsequent seawater chemistry – the magnesium/calcium ratio of the oceans appears to have a negligible impact on organisms' success, which is instead controlled mainly by how well they recover from mass extinctions.<ref name=Kiessling2008>{{cite journal|author1=Wolfgang Kiessling |author2=Martin Aberhan |author3=Loïc Villier | year = 2008| title = Phanerozoic trends in skeletal mineralogy driven by mass extinctions| journal = [[Nature Geoscience]]| doi = 10.1038/ngeo251| volume = 1| pages = 527–530| issue=8|bibcode = 2008NatGe...1..527K }}</ref> A recently discovered<ref name=Waren2003>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1126/science.1087696 | pmid = 14605361 | year = 2003 |author1=Anders Warén |author2=Stefan Bengtson |author3=Shana K. Goffredi |author4=Cindy L. Van Dover | title = A hot-vent gastropod with iron sulfide dermal sclerites | volume = 302 | issue = 5647 | page = 1007 | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]]| s2cid = 38386600 }}</ref> modern [[gastropod]] ''[[Chrysomallon squamiferum]]'' that lives near deep-sea [[hydrothermal vent]]s illustrates the influence of both ancient and modern local chemical environments: its shell is made of aragonite, which is found in some of the earliest fossil molluscs; but it also has armour plates on the sides of its foot, and these are mineralised with the iron sulfides [[pyrite]] and [[greigite]], which had never previously been found in any [[Animal|metazoan]] but whose ingredients are emitted in large quantities by the vents.<ref name="Bengtson2004"/>
Ocean chemistry may also control which mineral shells are constructed of. Calcium carbonate has two forms, the stable calcite, and the [[Metastability|metastable]] aragonite, which is stable within a reasonable range of chemical environments but rapidly becomes unstable outside this range. When the oceans contain a relatively high proportion of magnesium compared to calcium, aragonite is more stable, but as the magnesium concentration drops, it becomes less stable, hence harder to incorporate into an exoskeleton, as it will tend to dissolve.


[[File:Cicada exoskeleton - tokyo area - aug 15 2021.webm|thumb|thumbtime=1|Exoskeleton of a cicada]]
With the exception of the molluscs, whose shells often comprise both forms, most lineages use just one form of the mineral. The form used appears to reflect the seawater chemistry – thus which form was more easily precipitated – at the time that the lineage first evolved a calcified skeleton, and does not change thereafter.<ref name=Porter2007/> However, the relative abundance of calcite- and aragonite-using lineages does not reflect subsequent seawater chemistry – the magnesium/calcium ratio of the oceans appears to have a negligible impact on organisms' success, which is instead controlled mainly by how well they recover from mass extinctions.<ref name=Kiessling2008>{{cite journal|author1=Wolfgang Kiessling |author2=Martin Aberhan |author3=Loïc Villier | year = 2008| title = Phanerozoic trends in skeletal mineralogy driven by mass extinctions| journal = [[Nature Geoscience]]| doi = 10.1038/ngeo251| volume = 1| pages = 527–530| issue=8|bibcode = 2008NatGe...1..527K }}</ref> A recently discovered<ref name=Waren2003>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1126/science.1087696 | pmid = 14605361 | year = 2003 |author1=Anders Warén |author2=Stefan Bengtson |author3=Shana K. Goffredi |author4=Cindy L. Van Dover | title = A hot-vent gastropod with iron sulfide dermal sclerites | volume = 302 | issue = 5647 | page = 1007 | journal = [[Science (journal)|Science]]}}</ref> modern [[gastropod]] ''[[Chrysomallon squamiferum]]'' that lives near deep-sea [[hydrothermal vent]]s illustrates the influence of both ancient and modern local chemical environments: its shell is made of aragonite, which is found in some of the earliest fossil mollusks; but it also has armor plates on the sides of its foot, and these are mineralized with the iron sulfides [[pyrite]] and [[greigite]], which had never previously been found in any [[Animal|metazoan]] but whose ingredients are emitted in large quantities by the vents.<ref name="Bengtson2004"/>


==See also==
== See also ==
* [[Spiracle (arthropods)|Spiracle]] – small openings in the exoskeleton that allow insects to breathe
* [[Spiracle (arthropods)|Spiracle]] – small openings in the exoskeleton that allow insects to breathe
* [[Hydrostatic skeleton]]
* [[Hydrostatic skeleton]]
* [[Endoskeleton]]
* [[Endoskeleton]]
* [[Powered exoskeleton]]
* [[Powered exoskeleton]]
* [[Osteoderm]]
* {{Anl|Scaly-foot gastropod}} known to incorporate iron into its exoskeleton


==References==
== References ==
{{reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist|30em}}{{wiktionary}}
{{Authority control}}


==External links==
{{wiktionary}}
[[Category:Animal anatomy]]
[[Category:Animal anatomy]]
[[Category:Biomechanics]]
[[Category:Biomechanics]]
[[Category:Skeletons]]
[[Category:Skeletons]]
[[Category:Armour (zoology)]]

Latest revision as of 00:44, 20 November 2024

Discarded exoskeleton (exuviae) of dragonfly nymph
Exoskeleton of cicada attached to a Tridax procumbens (colloquially known as the tridax daisy)

An exoskeleton (from Greek έξω éxō "outer"[1] and σκελετός skeletós "skeleton"[2][3]) is a skeleton that is on the exterior of an animal in the form of hardened integument, which both supports the body's shape and protects the internal organs, in contrast to an internal endoskeleton (e.g. that of a human) which is enclosed underneath other soft tissues. Some large, hard and non-flexible protective exoskeletons are known as shell or armour.

Examples of exoskeletons in animals include the cuticle skeletons shared by arthropods (insects, chelicerates, myriapods and crustaceans) and tardigrades, as well as the skeletal cups formed by hardened secretion of stony corals, the test/tunic of sea squirts and sea urchins, and the prominent mollusc shell shared by snails, clams, tusk shells, chitons and nautilus. Some vertebrate animals, such as the turtle, have both an endoskeleton and a protective exoskeleton.

Role

[edit]

Exoskeletons contain rigid and resistant components that fulfil a set of functional roles in addition to structural support in many animals, including protection, respiration, excretion, sensation, feeding and courtship display, and as an osmotic barrier against desiccation in terrestrial organisms. Exoskeletons have roles in defence from parasites and predators and in providing attachment points for musculature.[4]

Arthropod exoskeletons contain chitin; the addition of calcium carbonate makes them harder and stronger, at the price of increased weight.[5] Ingrowths of the arthropod exoskeleton known as apodemes serve as attachment sites for muscles. These structures are composed of chitin and are approximately six times stronger and twice the stiffness of vertebrate tendons. Similar to tendons, apodemes can stretch to store elastic energy for jumping, notably in locusts.[6] Calcium carbonates constitute the shells of molluscs, brachiopods, and some tube-building polychaete worms. Silica forms the exoskeleton in the microscopic diatoms and radiolaria. One mollusc species, the scaly-foot gastropod, even uses the iron sulfides greigite and pyrite.[citation needed]

Some organisms, such as some foraminifera, agglutinate exoskeletons by sticking grains of sand and shell to their exterior. Contrary to a common misconception, echinoderms do not possess an exoskeleton and their test is always contained within a layer of living tissue.[citation needed]

Exoskeletons have evolved independently many times; 18 lineages evolved calcified exoskeletons alone.[7] Further, other lineages have produced tough outer coatings, such as some mammals, that are analogous to an exoskeleton. This coating is constructed from bone in the armadillo, and hair in the pangolin. The armour of reptiles like turtles and dinosaurs like Ankylosaurs is constructed of bone; crocodiles have bony scutes and horny scales.

Growth

[edit]

Since exoskeletons are rigid, they present some limits to growth. Organisms with open shells can grow by adding new material to the aperture of their shell, as is the case in gastropods, bivalves, and other molluscans. A true exoskeleton, like that found in panarthropods, must be shed via moulting (ecdysis) when the animal starts to outgrow it.[8] A new exoskeleton is produced beneath the old one, and the new skeleton is soft and pliable before shedding the old one. The animal will typically stay in a den or burrow during moulting,[citation needed] as it is quite vulnerable to trauma during this period. Once at least partially set, the organism will plump itself up to try to expand the exoskeleton.[ambiguous] The new exoskeleton is still capable of growing to some degree before it is eventually hardened. [citation needed] In contrast, moulting reptiles shed only the outer layer of skin and often exhibit indeterminate growth.[9] These animals produce new skin and integuments throughout their life, replacing them according to growth. Arthropod growth, however, is limited by the space within its current exoskeleton. Failure to shed the exoskeleton once outgrown can result in the animal's death or prevent subadults from reaching maturity, thus preventing them from reproducing. This is the mechanism behind some insect pesticides, such as Azadirachtin.[10]

Paleontological significance

[edit]
Borings in exoskeletons can provide evidence of animal behaviour. In this case, boring sponges attacked this hard clam shell after the death of the clam, producing the trace fossil Entobia.

Exoskeletons, as hard parts of organisms, are greatly useful in assisting the preservation of organisms, whose soft parts usually rot before they can be fossilized. Mineralized exoskeletons can be preserved as shell fragments. The possession of an exoskeleton permits a couple of other routes to fossilization. For instance, the strong layer can resist compaction, allowing a mould of the organism to be formed underneath the skeleton, which may later decay.[11] Alternatively, exceptional preservation may result in chitin being mineralised, as in the Burgess Shale,[12] or transformed to the resistant polymer keratin, which can resist decay and be recovered.

However, our dependence on fossilised skeletons also significantly limits our understanding of evolution. Only the parts of organisms that were already mineralised are usually preserved, such as the shells of molluscs. It helps that exoskeletons often contain "muscle scars", marks where muscles have been attached to the exoskeleton, which may allow the reconstruction of much of an organism's internal parts from its exoskeleton alone.[11] The most significant limitation is that, although there are 30-plus phyla of living animals, two-thirds of these phyla have never been found as fossils, because most animal species are soft-bodied and decay before they can become fossilised.[13]

Mineralized skeletons first appear in the fossil record shortly before the base of the Cambrian period, 550 million years ago. The evolution of a mineralised exoskeleton is considered a possible driving force of the Cambrian explosion of animal life, resulting in a diversification of predatory and defensive tactics. However, some Precambrian (Ediacaran) organisms produced tough outer shells[11] while others, such as Cloudina, had a calcified exoskeleton.[14] Some Cloudina shells even show evidence of predation, in the form of borings.[14]

Evolution

[edit]

The fossil record primarily contains mineralized exoskeletons, since these are by far the most durable. Since most lineages with exoskeletons are thought to have started with a non-mineralized exoskeleton which they later mineralized, it is difficult to comment on the very early evolution of each lineage's exoskeleton. It is known, however, that in a very short course of time, just before the Cambrian period, exoskeletons made of various materials – silica, calcium phosphate, calcite, aragonite, and even glued-together mineral flakes – sprang up in a range of different environments.[15] Most lineages adopted the form of calcium carbonate which was stable in the ocean at the time they first mineralized, and did not change from this mineral morph - even when it became less favourable.[7]

Some Precambrian (Ediacaran) organisms produced tough but non-mineralized outer shells,[11] while others, such as Cloudina, had a calcified exoskeleton,[14] but mineralized skeletons did not become common until the beginning of the Cambrian period, with the rise of the "small shelly fauna". Just after the base of the Cambrian, these miniature fossils become diverse and abundant – this abruptness may be an illusion since the chemical conditions which preserved the small shells appeared at the same time.[16] Most other shell-forming organisms appeared during the Cambrian period, with the Bryozoans being the only calcifying phylum to appear later, in the Ordovician. The sudden appearance of shells has been linked to a change in ocean chemistry which made the calcium compounds of which the shells are constructed stable enough to be precipitated into a shell. However, this is unlikely to be a sufficient cause, as the main construction cost of shells is in creating the proteins and polysaccharides required for the shell's composite structure, not in the precipitation of the mineral components.[4] Skeletonization also appeared at almost the same time that animals started burrowing to avoid predation, and one of the earliest exoskeletons was made of glued-together mineral flakes, suggesting that skeletonization was likewise a response to increased pressure from predators.[15]

Ocean chemistry may also control which mineral shells are constructed of. Calcium carbonate has two forms, the stable calcite and the metastable aragonite, which is stable within a reasonable range of chemical environments but rapidly becomes unstable outside this range. When the oceans contain a relatively high proportion of magnesium compared to calcium, aragonite is more stable, but as the magnesium concentration drops, it becomes less stable, hence harder to incorporate into an exoskeleton, as it will tend to dissolve.[citation needed]

Except for the molluscs, whose shells often comprise both forms, most lineages use just one form of the mineral. The form used appears to reflect the seawater chemistry – thus which form was more easily precipitated – at the time that the lineage first evolved a calcified skeleton, and does not change thereafter.[7] However, the relative abundance of calcite- and aragonite-using lineages does not reflect subsequent seawater chemistry – the magnesium/calcium ratio of the oceans appears to have a negligible impact on organisms' success, which is instead controlled mainly by how well they recover from mass extinctions.[17] A recently discovered[18] modern gastropod Chrysomallon squamiferum that lives near deep-sea hydrothermal vents illustrates the influence of both ancient and modern local chemical environments: its shell is made of aragonite, which is found in some of the earliest fossil molluscs; but it also has armour plates on the sides of its foot, and these are mineralised with the iron sulfides pyrite and greigite, which had never previously been found in any metazoan but whose ingredients are emitted in large quantities by the vents.[4]

Exoskeleton of a cicada

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1940). "ἔξω". A Greek-English Lexicon. Perseus Digital Library.
  2. ^ Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1940). "σκελετός". A Greek-English Lexicon. Perseus Digital Library.
  3. ^ Douglas, Harper (2001). "exoskeleton". Online Etymology Dictionary. Archived from the original on 20 April 2013.
  4. ^ a b c S. Bengtson (2004). "Early skeletal fossils" (PDF). In J. H. Lipps; B. M. Waggoner (eds.). Neoproterozoic–Cambrian Biological Revolutions. Paleontological Society Papers. Vol. 10. pp. 67–78. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-03.
  5. ^ Nedin, C. (1999). "Anomalocaris predation on nonmineralized and mineralized trilobites". Geology. 27 (11): 987–990. Bibcode:1999Geo....27..987N. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0987:APONAM>2.3.CO;2.
  6. ^ H. C. Bennet-Clark (1975). "The energetics of the jump of the locust, Schistocerca gregaria" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 63 (1): 53–83. doi:10.1242/jeb.63.1.53. PMID 1159370.
  7. ^ a b c Susannah M. Porter (2007). "Seawater chemistry and early carbonate biomineralization". Science. 316 (5829): 1302. Bibcode:2007Sci...316.1302P. doi:10.1126/science.1137284. PMID 17540895. S2CID 27418253.
  8. ^ John Ewer (2005-10-11). "How the Ecdysozoan Changed Its Coat". PLOS Biology. 3 (10): e349. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030349. PMC 1250302. PMID 16207077.
  9. ^ Hariharan, I. K.; Wake, D. B.; Wake, M. H. (2016). "Indeterminate Growth: Could It Represent the Ancestral Condition?". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 8 (2): a019174. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019174. PMC 4743077. PMID 26216720.
  10. ^ Gemma E. Veitch; Edith Beckmann; Brenda J. Burke; Alistair Boyer; Sarah L. Maslen; Steven V. Ley (2007). "Synthesis of Azadirachtin: A Long but Successful Journey". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 46 (40): 7629–32. doi:10.1002/anie.200703027. PMID 17665403.
  11. ^ a b c d M. A. Fedonkin; A. Simonetta; A. Y. Ivantsov (2007). "New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusk-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications". In Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia (ed.). The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota. Geological Society of London, Special Publications. Vol. 286. London: Geological Society. pp. 157–179. Bibcode:2007GSLSP.286..157F. doi:10.1144/SP286.12. ISBN 978-1-86239-233-5. OCLC 191881597. S2CID 331187.
  12. ^ Nicholas J. Butterfield (2003). "Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian Explosion". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 43 (1): 166–177. doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.166. PMID 21680421.
  13. ^ Richard Cowen (2004). History of Life (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-1756-2.
  14. ^ a b c Hong Hua; Brian R. Pratt; Lu-yi Zhang (2003). "Borings in Cloudina shells: complex predator-prey dynamics in the terminal Neoproterozoic". PALAIOS. 18 (4–5): 454–459. Bibcode:2003Palai..18..454H. doi:10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018<0454:BICSCP>2.0.CO;2. S2CID 131590949.
  15. ^ a b J. Dzik (2007). "The Verdun Syndrome: simultaneous origin of protective armor and infaunal shelters at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition" (PDF). In Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia (ed.). The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota. Vol. 286. London: Geological Society. pp. 405–414. Bibcode:2007GSLSP.286..405D. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.693.9187. doi:10.1144/SP286.30. ISBN 978-1-86239-233-5. OCLC 191881597. S2CID 33112819. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-10-03. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
  16. ^ J. Dzik (1994). "Evolution of 'small shelly fossils' assemblages of the early Paleozoic". Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 39 (3): 27–313. Archived from the original on 2008-12-05.
  17. ^ Wolfgang Kiessling; Martin Aberhan; Loïc Villier (2008). "Phanerozoic trends in skeletal mineralogy driven by mass extinctions". Nature Geoscience. 1 (8): 527–530. Bibcode:2008NatGe...1..527K. doi:10.1038/ngeo251.
  18. ^ Anders Warén; Stefan Bengtson; Shana K. Goffredi; Cindy L. Van Dover (2003). "A hot-vent gastropod with iron sulfide dermal sclerites". Science. 302 (5647): 1007. doi:10.1126/science.1087696. PMID 14605361. S2CID 38386600.