United Kingdom–United States relations: Difference between revisions
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Altered title. Add: newspaper, date. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | #UCB_webform 104/3850 |
|||
(754 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2023}} |
|||
{{Short description|1=Diplomatic relations between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America}} |
|||
{{Infobox bilateral relations|British–American|UK|USA|map=United Kingdom United States Locator.svg|envoytitle1 =[[List of Ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the United States|Ambassador]] |envoy1 = <br>[[Karen Pierce|Karen Elizabeth Pierce]] |envoytitle2 = [[List of ambassadors of the United States to the United Kingdom|Ambassador]]|envoy2 = <br>[[Jane D. Hartley]] |mission1 = [[British Embassy, Washington, D.C.|British Embassy,<br>Washington, D.C.]]|mission2 = [[Embassy of the United States, London|United States Embassy,<br>London]]}} |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2018}} |
|||
[[File:Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets US President Biden (53849011883) (cropped).jpg|thumb|[[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|UK Prime Minister]] [[Keir Starmer]] with [[President of the United States|US President]] [[Joe Biden]]]] |
|||
{{Infobox bilateral relations|United Kingdom–United States|UK|US|map=United Kingdom United States Locator.svg|envoytitle1 =[[List of Ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the United States|Designate]] |envoy1 = [[Karen Pierce]] |envoytitle2 = [[United States Ambassador to the United Kingdom|Ambassador]] |envoy2 = [[Woody Johnson]] |mission1 = [[Embassy of the United Kingdom, Washington, D.C.|United Kingdom Embassy, Washington, D.C.]]|mission2 = [[Embassy of the United States, London|United States Embassy, London]]}} |
|||
Relations between the [[United Kingdom]] and the [[United States]] have ranged from military opposition to close allyship since 1776. The [[Thirteen Colonies]] seceded from the [[Kingdom of Great Britain]] and [[United States Declaration of Independence|declared independence in 1776]], fighting a successful [[American Revolutionary War|revolutionary war]]. While Britain was fighting [[Napoleon]], the two nations fought the stalemated [[War of 1812]]. Relations were generally positive thereafter, save for [[Trent Affair|a short crisis]] in 1861 during the [[American Civil War]]. By the 1880s, the US economy had surpassed Britain's; in the 1920s, [[New York City]] surpassed [[London]] as the world's leading financial center. The two nations fought Germany together during the [[World war|two World Wars]]; since 1940, the two countries have been close military allies, enjoying the [[Special Relationship]] built as wartime allies and [[NATO]] and [[G7]] partners. |
|||
[[File:View of Leinster Bay from Annaberg (2877657538).jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|A view towards the [[British Virgin Islands]] from the [[US Virgin Islands]].]] |
|||
[[File:Johnson and Trump at the 45th G7 in Biarritz - 2019 (48616805327) (cropped).jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|U.K. Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] with U.S. President [[Donald Trump]] at the [[45th G7 summit|45th G7 in Biarritz]], August 2019.]] |
|||
'''British–American relations''', also referred to as '''Anglo-American relations''', encompass many complex relations ranging from two early wars to competition for world markets. Since 1940 both countries have been close military allies enjoying the [[Special Relationship]] built as wartime allies and [[NATO]] partners. |
|||
America and Britain are bound together by a shared history, a common language, an overlap in religious beliefs and legal principles, and kinship ties that reach back hundreds of years. Today, large numbers of expatriates live in the other country. |
|||
In the early 21st century, Britain affirmed its relationship with the United States as its "most important bilateral partnership" in current [[British foreign policy]],<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite web|last=Giles |first=Chris |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f845cfdc-3bd8-11dc-8002-0000779fd2ac.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221211/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f845cfdc-3bd8-11dc-8002-0000779fd2ac.html |archive-date=December 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |title=/ Home UK / UK – Ties that bind: Bush, Brown and a different relationship |work=Financial Times |date=July 27, 2007 |access-date=March 25, 2012}}</ref> and the [[Foreign policy of the United States|American foreign policy]] also affirms its relationship with Britain as its most important relationship,<ref>Alex Spillius, 'Special relationship Britain and America share fundamental values, Clinton tells Miliband', ''The Daily Telegraph'' (February 4, 2009), p. 12.</ref><ref>David Williamson, "U.S. envoy pays tribute to Welsh Guards' courage", ''The Western Mail'' (November 26, 2009), p. 16.</ref> as evidenced in aligned political affairs, mutual cooperation in the areas of trade, commerce, finance, technology, academics, as well as the arts and sciences; the sharing of government and military intelligence, and joint combat operations and [[peacekeeping]] missions carried out between the [[United States Armed Forces]] and the [[British Armed Forces]]. As of January 2015, the United Kingdom was the fifth largest US trading partner in terms of exports and seventh in terms of import of goods.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/toppartners.html |title=Foreign Trade - U.S. Trade with |publisher=Census.gov |access-date=January 4, 2017}}</ref> In long-term perspective, the historian [[Paul Johnson (writer)|Paul Johnson]] has called the United Kingdom–United States relations "the cornerstone of the modern, democratic [[Power (international)|world order]]".<ref>Paul Johnson, ''The Birth of the Modern: World Society 1815-1830'', (1991) Preface, p. xix.</ref> |
|||
Through times of war and rebellion, peace and estrangement, as well as becoming friends and allies, Britain and the US cemented these deeply rooted links during [[World War II]] into what is known as the "[[Special Relationship]]". In long-term perspective, the historian [[Paul Johnson (writer)|Paul Johnson]] has called it the "cornerstone of the modern, democratic [[Power (international)|world order]]".<ref>Paul Johnson, ''The Birth of the Modern: World Society 1815-1830'', (1991) Preface, p. xix.</ref> |
|||
The two countries also have had a significant impact on the cultures of many other countries, as well as each other. They are the two main nodes of the [[Anglosphere]], with a combined population of just under 400 million in 2019. Together, they have given the English language a dominant [[lingua franca]] role in many aspects of the modern world. |
|||
In the early 20th century, the United Kingdom affirmed its relationship with the United States as its "most important bilateral partnership" in the current [[British foreign policy]],<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite web|last=Giles |first=Chris |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/f845cfdc-3bd8-11dc-8002-0000779fd2ac.html |title=/ Home UK / UK – Ties that bind: Bush, Brown and a different relationship |work=Financial Times |date=July 27, 2007 |accessdate=March 25, 2012}}</ref> and the [[Foreign policy of the United States|American foreign policy]] also affirms its relationship with Britain as its most important relationship,<ref>Alex Spillius, 'Special relationship Britain and America share fundamental values, Clinton tells Miliband', ''The Daily Telegraph'' (February 4, 2009), p. 12.</ref><ref>David Williamson, "U.S. envoy pays tribute to Welsh Guards' courage", ''The Western Mail'' (November 26, 2009), p. 16.</ref> as evidenced in aligned political affairs, mutual cooperation in the areas of trade, commerce, finance, technology, academics, as well as the arts and sciences; the sharing of government and military intelligence, and joint combat operations and [[peacekeeping]] missions carried out between the [[United States Armed Forces]] and the [[British Armed Forces]]. Canada has historically been the largest importer of U.S. goods and the principal exporter of goods to the United States. As of January 2015 the UK was fifth in terms of exports and seventh in terms of import of goods.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/toppartners.html |title=Foreign Trade - U.S. Trade with |publisher=Census.gov |date= |accessdate=January 4, 2017}}</ref> |
|||
==Special Relationship== |
|||
The two countries also have had a significant impact of the cultures of many other countries. They are the two main nodes of the [[Anglosphere]], with a combined population of just under 400 million in 2019. Together, they have given the English language a dominant role in many sectors of the modern world. |
|||
{{Main|Special Relationship}} |
|||
[[File:President Roosevelt and Winston Churchill seated on the quarterdeck of HMS PRINCE OF WALES for a Sunday service during the Atlantic Conference, 10 August 1941. A4816.jpg|thumb|UK Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] and US President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] at [[Atlantic Conference]], August 1941]] |
|||
The [[Special Relationship]] characterises the exceptionally close political, diplomatic, cultural, economic, military, and historical relations between the two countries. It is specially used for relations since 1940.<ref>Derek E. Mix - [https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33105.pdf The United Kingdom: Background and Relations with the United States] - fas.org. Congressional Research Service. April 29, 2015. Retrieved April 13, 2017.</ref> |
|||
Ahead of a visit to the [[White House]] in 2023, [[Rishi Sunak]] stressed the need to forge "close and candid" relations with [[Joe Biden]] after years of turbulent US-UK relations.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Devlin |first=Kate |date=2023-06-03 |title=Sunak stresses need for 'close' relationship with Biden ahead of US trip |language=en |work=INDEPENDENT| url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rishi-sunak-joe-biden-us-trip-b2350914.html|access-date=2023-06-07}}</ref> |
|||
==Country comparison== |
|||
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" |
|||
|- |
|||
! |
|||
! {{flag|United Kingdom}} |
|||
! {{flag|United States}} |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Coat of Arms''' |
|||
| style="text-align:center" | [[File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom.svg|140px]] |
|||
| style="text-align:center" | [[File:Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg|145px]] |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''Flag''' |
|||
| style="text-align:center" | {{Flagicon|United Kingdom|size=135px|text=none}} |
|||
| style="text-align:center" | {{Flagicon|United States|size=135px|text=none}} |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[Population]]''' |
|||
|65,110,000 |
|||
|324,894,500 |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[Area]]''' |
|||
|{{convert|243610|km2|sqmi|abbr=on}} |
|||
|{{convert|9629091|km2|sqmi|abbr=on}} |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[Population density]]''' |
|||
|255.6/km<sup>2</sup> (98.7/sq mi) |
|||
|34.2/km<sup>2</sup> (13.2/sq mi) |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[Capital city]]''' |
|||
|[[London]] |
|||
|[[Washington, D.C.]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Largest city''' |
|||
|[[London]] – 8,630,000 (14,614,409 Metro) |
|||
|[[New York City]] – 8,491,079 (20,092,883 Metro) |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[Government]]''' |
|||
|[[Unitary state|Unitary]] [[parliamentary system|parliamentary]] [[constitutional monarchy]] |
|||
|[[Federalism|Federal]] [[Presidential system|presidential]] [[constitutional republic]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''First head of state''' |
|||
|[[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]] |
|||
|rowspan=2|[[George Washington]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''First head of government''' |
|||
|[[William Pitt the Younger]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Current head of state''' |
|||
|[[Elizabeth II]] |
|||
|rowspan=2|[[Donald Trump]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Current head of government''' |
|||
|[[Boris Johnson]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Governing political party''' |
|||
|[[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] |
|||
|[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Current chief justice''' |
|||
|[[Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir|Baron Reed of Allermuir]], [[President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom|President of the Supreme Court]] |
|||
|[[John Roberts]], [[Chief Justice of the United States]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Main [[language]]''' |
|||
|[[British English|English]] |
|||
|[[American English|English]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Main [[religion]]s''' |
|||
|60% [[Christians|Christian]]<br>30% Non-Religious<br>10% Other |
|||
|71% [[Christians|Christian]]<br>23% Non-Religious<br>6% Other |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Ethnic groups''' |
|||
|<small>As of '''2011'''</small><br>87.1% [[White British]]<br>7.0% [[British Asian]]<br>3.0% [[Black British]]<br>2.0% [[British Mixed-Race|Multiracial]]<br>0.9% [[Other ethnic group (United Kingdom Census)|Other]] |
|||
|<small>As of '''2010'''</small><br>77.1% [[White Americans|White American]]<br>13.3% [[African Americans|African American]]<br>2.6% [[Multiracial Americans|Multiracial American]]<br>5.6% [[Asian Americans|Asian American]]<br>1.4% [[Native Americans in the United States|Native]] or [[Pacific Islands Americans|Pacific Islander]] American<br><small>above including:</small> 17.6% [[Hispanic and Latino Americans]] |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[List of countries by GDP (nominal)|GDP (nominal)]]''' |
|||
|US$3.001 trillion |
|||
|$17.528 trillion |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita|GDP (nominal) per capita]]''' |
|||
|US$43,830 |
|||
|$54,980 |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[List of countries by GDP (PPP)|GDP (PPP)]]''' |
|||
|$2.897 trillion |
|||
|$17.528 trillion |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''[[List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita|GDP (PPP) per capita]]''' |
|||
|US$37,711 |
|||
|$54,980 |
|||
|- |
|||
| '''[[List of countries by real GDP growth rate|Real GDP growth rate]]''' |
|||
|2.5% |
|||
|1.9% |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[List of countries by Human Development Index|'''Human Development Index''']] |
|||
|0.909 (Very high) |
|||
|0.920 (Very high) |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Military expenditure''' |
|||
|$72.9 billion |
|||
|$640.0 billion |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Military personnel''' |
|||
|300,000 |
|||
|2,927,754 |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''English speakers''' |
|||
|60,895,000 |
|||
|294,469,560 |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Labor force''' |
|||
|30,643,000 |
|||
|156,080,000 |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Expatriates''' |
|||
|197,355 [[Americans in the United Kingdom|American Britons]] |
|||
|40,234,652 [[British Americans]] <ref>{{cite web|title=Table Services|url=https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk|website=American Fact Finder|publisher=United States Census Bureau|accessdate=17 December 2017}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
|'''Mobile phones''' |
|||
|75,750,000 |
|||
|327,577,529 |
|||
|} |
|||
Leaders of the United Kingdom and United States since 1940: |
|||
<timeline> |
|||
ImageSize = width:1600 height:auto barincrement:70 |
|||
PlotArea = left:100 right:100 bottom:80 top:0 |
|||
DateFormat = dd/mm/yyyy |
|||
Define $now = 31/12/2019 |
|||
Period = from:01/01/1940 till:$now |
|||
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal |
|||
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:01/01/1945 |
|||
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:01/01/1940 |
|||
Legend = orientation:horizontal position:bottom |
|||
Colors = |
|||
id:lab value:coral legend:Labour_Party_(UK) |
|||
id:con value:powderblue legend:Conservative_Party_(UK) |
|||
id:dem value:skyblue legend:Democratic_Party_(US) |
|||
id:gop value:pink legend:Republican_Party_(US) |
|||
BarData = |
|||
bar:uk text:[[United Kingdom]] |
|||
bar:us text:[[United States]] |
|||
PlotData= |
|||
align:center mark:(line,black) |
|||
bar:uk |
|||
from: 24/07/2019 till: $now color:con text:"[[Boris Johnson|J.]]" |
|||
from: 13/07/2016 till: 24/07/2019 color:con text:"[[Theresa May|May]]" |
|||
from: 11/05/2010 till: 13/07/2016 color:con text:"[[David Cameron|Cameron]]" |
|||
from: 27/06/2007 till: 11/05/2010 color:lab text:"[[Gordon Brown|Brown]]" |
|||
from: 02/05/1997 till: 27/06/2007 color:lab text:"[[Tony Blair|Blair]]" |
|||
from: 28/11/1990 till: 02/05/1997 color:con text:"[[John Major|Major]]" |
|||
from: 04/05/1979 till: 28/11/1990 color:con text:"[[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]]" |
|||
from: 05/04/1976 till: 04/05/1979 color:lab text:"[[James Callaghan|Callaghan]]" |
|||
from: 04/03/1974 till: 05/04/1976 color:lab text:"[[Harold Wilson|Wilson]]" |
|||
from: 19/06/1970 till: 04/03/1974 color:con text:"[[Edward Heath|Heath]]" |
|||
from: 16/10/1964 till: 19/06/1970 color:lab text:"[[Harold Wilson|Wilson]]" |
|||
from: 17/10/1963 till: 16/10/1964 color:con text:"[[Alec Douglas-Home|Home]]" |
|||
from: 10/01/1957 till: 17/10/1963 color:con text:"[[Harold Macmillan|Macmillan]]" |
|||
from: 06/04/1955 till: 10/01/1957 color:con text:"[[Anthony Eden|Eden]]" |
|||
from: 26/10/1951 till: 06/04/1955 color:con text:"[[Winston Churchill|Churchill]]" |
|||
from: 26/07/1945 till: 26/10/1951 color:lab text:"[[Clement Attlee|Attlee]]" |
|||
from: 10/05/1940 till: 26/07/1945 color:con text:"[[Winston Churchill|Churchill]]" |
|||
from: 01/01/1940 till: 10/05/1940 color:con text:"[[Neville Chamberlain|C.]] |
|||
bar:us |
|||
from: 20/01/2017 till: $now color:gop text:"[[Donald Trump|Trump]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/2009 till: 20/01/2017 color:dem text:"[[Barack Obama|Obama]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/2001 till: 20/01/2009 color:gop text:"[[George W. Bush|G.W. Bush]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/1993 till: 20/01/2001 color:dem text:"[[Bill Clinton|Clinton]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/1989 till: 20/01/1993 color:gop text:"[[George H. W. Bush|G.H.W. Bush]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/1981 till: 20/01/1989 color:gop text:"[[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/1977 till: 20/01/1981 color:dem text:"[[Jimmy Carter|Carter]]" |
|||
from: 09/08/1974 till: 20/01/1977 color:gop text:"[[Gerald Ford|Ford]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/1969 till: 09/08/1974 color:gop text:"[[Richard Nixon|Nixon]]" |
|||
from: 22/11/1963 till: 20/01/1969 color:dem text:"[[Lyndon B. Johnson|Johnson]]" |
|||
from: 20/01/1961 till: 22/11/1963 color:dem text:"[[John F. Kennedy|Kennedy]]" |
|||
from: 01/01/1953 till: 20/01/1961 color:gop text:"[[Dwight D. Eisenhower|Eisenhower]]" |
|||
from: 12/04/1945 till: 20/01/1953 color:dem text:"[[harry S. Truman|Truman]]" |
|||
from: 01/01/1940 till: 12/04/1945 color:dem text:"[[Franklin D. Roosevelt|FDR]]" |
|||
</timeline> |
|||
==Special Relationship== |
|||
{{See also|Special Relationship}} |
|||
[[File:President Roosevelt and Winston Churchill seated on the quarterdeck of HMS PRINCE OF WALES for a Sunday service during the Atlantic Conference, 10 August 1941. A4816.jpg|thumb|upright=1.2|U.K. Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] and U.S. President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] at [[Atlantic Conference]], August 1941.]] |
|||
The [[Special Relationship]] characterises the exceptionally close political, diplomatic, cultural, economic, military, and historical relations between the two countries. It is specially used for relations since 1940.<ref>Derek E. Mix - [https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33105.pdf The United Kingdom: Background and Relations with the United States] - fas.org. Congressional Research Service. April 29, 2015. Retrieved April 13, 2017.</ref> |
|||
==History== |
==History== |
||
===Origins=== |
===Origins=== |
||
[[File:MayflowerHarbor.jpg|thumb |
[[File:MayflowerHarbor.jpg|thumb|The ''[[Mayflower]]'' transported the [[Pilgrims (Plymouth Colony)|Pilgrims]] to the New World in 1620, as depicted in [[William Halsall]]'s ''The Mayflower in Plymouth Sound'', 1882.]] |
||
{{See also|Thirteen Colonies|Colonial history of the United States|British colonization of the Americas}} |
{{See also|Thirteen Colonies|Colonial history of the United States|British colonization of the Americas}} |
||
After several failed attempts, the first permanent English settlement in mainland North America was established in 1607 at [[Jamestown, Virginia|Jamestown]] in the [[Colony and Dominion of Virginia]]. By 1624, the Colony and Dominion of Virginia ceased to be a [[charter colony]] administered by the [[Virginia Company of London]] and became a [[crown colony]]. The [[Pilgrim (Plymouth Colony)|Pilgrims]] were a small Protestant sect based in [[Kingdom of England|England]] and [[Amsterdam]]; they sent a group of settlers on the ''[[Mayflower]]''. After drawing up the [[Mayflower Compact]] by which they gave themselves broad powers of self-governance, they established the small [[Plymouth Colony]] in 1620. In 1630 the [[Puritans]] established the much larger [[Massachusetts Bay Colony]]; they sought to reform the [[Church of England]] by creating a new and "more pure" church in the New World. |
|||
After several failed attempts, the first permanent English settlement in mainland North America was established in 1607 at [[Jamestown, Virginia|Jamestown]] in the [[Colony and Dominion of Virginia|Virginia]]. In 1630 the [[Puritans]] established the [[Massachusetts Bay Colony]]; they emphasised not only pure religiosity, but also education and entrepreneurship.<ref>James Ciment, ed. ''Colonial America: An Encyclopedia of Social, Political, Cultural, and Economic History'' (2005) [https://archive.org/details/colonialamerica00jame online]</ref> |
|||
Other colonies followed in [[Province of Maine]] (1622), [[Province of Maryland]] (1632), [[Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations]] (1636) and [[Connecticut Colony]] (1636). Later came the founding of [[Province of Carolina]] (1663) (divided in 1729 into the [[Province of North Carolina]] and the [[Province of South Carolina]]). The [[Province of New Hampshire]] was founded in 1691. Next came the [[Province of Georgia]] in 1732. |
|||
The [[Province of New |
Smaller colonies followed in [[Province of Maine]] (1622), [[Province of Maryland]] (1632), [[Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations]] (1636) and [[Connecticut Colony]] (1636). Later came the founding of [[Province of Carolina]] (1663) (divided in 1729 into the [[Province of North Carolina]] and the [[Province of South Carolina]]). The [[Province of New Hampshire]] was founded in 1691. Finally came the [[Province of Georgia]] in 1732 founded by [[James Oglethorpe]]. The British created the [[Province of New York]] from the conquered Dutch colony of New Netherland. In 1674, the [[Province of New Jersey]] was split off from New York. In 1681 [[William Penn]] founded the Quaker colony [[Province of Pennsylvania]]. Each colony reported separately to London. |
||
The colonies each reported separately to London. There was a failed effort to group the colonies into the [[Dominion of New England]], 1686–89. |
|||
===Migration=== |
===Migration=== |
||
{{Main|History of immigration to the United States|English Americans|Welsh Americans|Scottish Americans|British Americans}} |
{{Main|History of immigration to the United States|English Americans|Welsh Americans|Scottish Americans|British Americans}} |
||
During the 17th century, an estimated 350,000 English and [[Welsh people|Welsh]] migrants arrived as permanent residents in the Thirteen Colonies. In the century after the [[Acts of Union 1707]] this was surpassed in rate and number by Scottish and Irish migrants.<ref name="BritDis49">{{Harvnb|Ember et al|2004|p=49}}.{{citation not found}}</ref> |
|||
All the colonies had slavery. Most of the slaves were purchased from British colonies in the Caribbean. The colonies attracted British and German immigrants seeking to own a farm. During the 17th century, about 350,000 English and Welsh migrants arrived. After 1700 came even larger numbers of Scots and Scots-Irish migrants.<ref>* {{citation | title = Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures Around the World | first1 = Carol R. | last1 = Ember | first2 = Melvin | last2 = Ember | first3 = Ian A. | last3 = Skoggard | publisher = Springer | year = 2004 | isbn = 978-0-306-48321-9|page=49}}</ref> |
|||
During British settler colonization, liberal administrative, juridical, and market institutions were introduced, positively associated with socioeconomic development.<ref name=Lange>Matthew Lange, James Mahoney, and Matthias vom Hau, "Colonialism and Development: A Comparative Analysis of Spanish and British Colonies", ''The American Journal of Sociology'', Vol. 111, No. 5 (March 2006), pp. 1412–1462.</ref> At the same time, colonial policy was also [[mercantilism|quasi-mercantilist]], encouraging trade within the Empire, discouraging trade with other powers, and discouraging the rise of manufacturing in the colonies, which had been established to increase the trade and wealth of the mother country. Britain made much greater profits from the sugar trade of its commercial colonies in the Caribbean. |
|||
During British colonization, liberal administrative, juridical, and market institutions were introduced, positively associated with socioeconomic development.<ref name=Lange>Matthew Lange, James Mahoney, and Matthias vom Hau, "Colonialism and Development: A Comparative Analysis of Spanish and British Colonies", ''The American Journal of Sociology'', Vol. 111, No. 5 (March 2006), pp. 1412–1462.</ref> At the same time, colonial policy was also [[Mercantilism|quasi-mercantilist]], encouraging trade within the Empire, discouraging trade with other powers, and discouraging the rise of manufacturing in the colonies, which had been established to increase the trade and wealth of the mother country. Britain made much greater profits from the sugar trade of its commercial colonies in the Caribbean.{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}} |
|||
The introduction of coercive labor institutions was another feature of the colonial period.<ref name=Lange/> All of the Thirteen Colonies were involved in the [[slave trade]]. Slaves in the [[Middle Colonies]] and [[New England Colonies]] typically worked as house servants, artisans, laborers and craftsmen. Early on, slaves in the [[Southern Colonies]] worked primarily in agriculture, on farms and plantations growing indigo, rice, cotton, and tobacco for export. |
|||
The colonial period also saw the introduction of [[indentured servitude]] and [[Slavery in the colonial United States|slavery]].<ref name=Lange/> All of the Thirteen Colonies were involved in the [[Atlantic slave trade|slave trade]]. Slaves in the [[Middle Colonies]] and [[New England Colonies]] typically worked as house servants, artisans, laborers and craftsmen. Early on, slaves in the [[Southern Colonies]] worked primarily in agriculture, on farms and plantations growing indigo, rice, cotton, and tobacco for export.<ref name=Lange/> |
|||
The [[French and Indian War]], fought between 1754 and 1763, was the North American theatre of the [[Seven Years' War]]. The conflict, the [[French and Indian Wars|fourth such colonial war]] between France and Britain in North America, resulted in the British acquisition of [[New France]], with its French Catholic population. Under the [[Treaty of Paris (1763)|Treaty of Paris]] signed in 1763, the French ceded control of [[Louisiana (New France)|French Louisiana]] east of the [[Mississippi River]] to the British, which became known as the [[Indian Reserve (1763)|Indian Reserve]]. |
|||
The [[French and Indian War]], fought between 1754 and 1763, was the North American theatre of the [[Seven Years' War]]. The conflict, the [[French and Indian Wars|fourth such colonial war]] between France and Britain in North America, resulted in the British acquisition of [[New France]] from the French. Under the [[Treaty of Paris (1763)|Treaty of Paris]] signed in 1763, the French ceded control of [[Louisiana (New France)|French Louisiana]] east of the [[Mississippi River]] to the British, which became known as the [[Indian Reserve (1763)|Indian Reserve]] in the [[Royal Proclamation of 1763]].{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}} |
|||
===Religion=== |
===Religion=== |
||
The religious ties between the homeland and the colonies were pronounced. Most of the churches were transplants from Europe. The [[Puritans]] of New England seldom kept in touch with [[Nonconformist (Protestantism)|nonconformist]]s in England. Much closer were the transatlantic relationships maintained by the [[Quakers]], especially in [[History of Pennsylvania|Pennsylvania]]. The Methodists also maintained close ties.<ref>Patricia U. Bonomi, ''Under the Cope of Heaven: Religion, Society, and Politics in Colonial America'' (1986) [https://www.amazon.com/Under-Cope-Heaven-Religion-Politics-ebook/dp/B000S1L622/ excerpt and text search]</ref><ref>Sydney E. Ahlstrom, ''A Religious History of the American People'' (1972) pp. 121-384 [https://www.amazon.com/Religious-History-American-People/dp/0300100124/ excerpt and text search]</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Religion in early Virginia|History of the Religious Society of Friends|Pilgrims (Plymouth Colony)|Puritans}} |
|||
The religious ties between the homeland and the colonies were pronounced. Most of the churches were transplants from England. The [[Puritans]] of New England seldom kept in touch with [[Nonconformist (Protestantism)|nonconformist]]s in England. Much closer were the transatlantic relationships maintained by the [[Quakers]], especially in [[History of Pennsylvania|Pennsylvania]]. The Methodists also maintained close ties.<ref>Patricia U. Bonomi, ''Under the Cope of Heaven: Religion, Society, and Politics in Colonial America'' (1986) [https://www.amazon.com/Under-Cope-Heaven-Religion-Politics-ebook/dp/B000S1L622/ excerpt and text search]</ref><ref>Sydney E. Ahlstrom, ''A Religious History of the American People'' (1972) pp. 121-384 [https://www.amazon.com/Religious-History-American-People/dp/0300100124/ excerpt and text search]</ref> |
|||
The Anglican Church was officially established in the Southern colonies, which meant that local taxes paid the salary of the minister, the parish had civic responsibilities such as poor relief, and the local gentry controlled the parish. The church was [[Disestablishment|disestablished]] during the American Revolution. The Anglican churches in America were under the authority of the [[Bishop of London]], and there was a long debate over whether to establish an Anglican bishop in America. The other Protestants blocked any such appointment. After the Revolution the newly formed [[Episcopal Church (United States)|Episcopal Church]] selected its own bishop and kept its distance from London.<ref>John Nelson, ''A Blessed Company: Parishes, Parsons, and Parishioners in Anglican Virginia, 1690–1776'' (2001)</ref> |
The Anglican Church was officially established in the Southern colonies, which meant that local taxes paid the salary of the minister, the parish had civic responsibilities such as poor relief, and the local gentry controlled the parish. The church was [[Disestablishment|disestablished]] during the American Revolution. The Anglican churches in America were under the authority of the [[Bishop of London]], and there was a long debate over whether to establish an Anglican bishop in America. The other Protestants blocked any such appointment. After the Revolution the newly formed [[Episcopal Church (United States)|Episcopal Church]] selected its own bishop and kept its distance from London.<ref>John Nelson, ''A Blessed Company: Parishes, Parsons, and Parishioners in Anglican Virginia, 1690–1776'' (2001)</ref> |
||
{{center|'''Data from the US Census in 2000'''}} |
|||
<gallery class="center"> |
<gallery class="center"> |
||
File: |
File:Census Bureau English Ancestry in the United States.gif|Proportions of English ancestry |
||
File:Census Bureau Scottish Americans in the United States.gif|Proportions of Scots ancestry |
File:Census Bureau Scottish Americans in the United States.gif|Proportions of Scots ancestry |
||
File:Scotch |
File:Census Bureau Scotch-Irish Ancestry in the United States.gif|Proportions of Scots-Irish ancestry |
||
File: |
File:Census Bureau Welsh Ancestry in the United States.gif|Proportions of Welsh ancestry |
||
</gallery> |
</gallery> |
||
===American Revolution=== |
===American Revolution=== |
||
[[File:The death of general warren at the battle of bunker hill.jpg|thumb|right|[[John Trumbull|John Trumbull's]] painting depicting ''[[The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill]]'', 1775.]] |
|||
{{See also|American Revolution|American Revolutionary War}} |
{{See also|American Revolution|American Revolutionary War}} |
||
[[File:The death of general warren at the battle of bunker hill.jpg|thumb|[[John Trumbull]]'s portrait depicting ''[[The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill]]'' in 1775]] |
|||
The [[Thirteen Colonies]] gradually obtained more, albeit limited, self-government.<ref>A useful survey is Francis D. Cogliano, ''Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/Revolutionary-America-1763-1815-Political-History/dp/0415964865/ excerpt and text search]; the author is an American based at a British university.</ref> British [[mercantilist]] policies became more stringent, benefiting the mother country which resulted in trade restrictions, thereby limiting the growth of the colonial economy and artificially constraining colonial merchants' earning potential. The American Colonies were expected to help repay debt that had accrued during the [[French and Indian War]]. Tensions escalated from 1765 to 1775 over issues of taxation without representation and control by [[George III of the United Kingdom|King George III]]. Stemming from the [[Boston Massacre]] of 1770 when [[Red coat (British army)|British Redcoats]] opened fire on civilians, rebellion consumed the outraged colonists. The [[British Parliament]] had imposed a series of taxes such as the [[Stamp Act of 1765]], and later the [[Tea Act|Tea Act of 1773]], against which an angry mob of colonists protested in the [[Boston Tea Party]] by dumping chests of tea into Boston Harbor. The British Parliament responded to the defiance of the colonists by passing what the colonials called the [[Intolerable Acts]] in 1774. This course of events ultimately triggered the first shots fired in the [[Battles of Lexington and Concord]] in 1775 and the beginning of the [[American War of Independence]]. A British victory at the [[Battle of Bunker Hill]] in June 1775 agitated tensions even further. While the goal of attaining independence was sought by a majority known as [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]], a minority known as [[Loyalist (American Revolution)|Loyalists]] wished to remain as [[British subject|British subjects]] indefinitely. When the [[Second Continental Congress]] convened in Philadelphia in May 1775, deliberations conducted by notable figures such as [[Benjamin Franklin]], [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[John Hancock]], [[Samuel Adams]], and [[John Adams]] eventually resulted in seeking full independence from the mother country. Thus, the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]], unanimously ratified on 4 July 1776, was a radical and decisive break. The United States of America became the first colony in the world to successfully achieve independence in the modern era.{{citation needed|date=July 2016}} |
|||
The [[Thirteen Colonies]] gradually obtained more self-government.<ref>A useful survey is Francis D. Cogliano, ''Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/Revolutionary-America-1763-1815-Political-History/dp/0415964865/ excerpt and text search]; the author is an American based at a British university.</ref> British [[Mercantilism|mercantilist]] policies became more stringent, benefiting the mother country which resulted in trade restrictions, thereby limiting the growth of the colonial economy and artificially constraining colonial merchants' earning potential. The sums were small but [[Parliament of Great Britain|Parliament]] insisted that it was in final command and could impose taxes at any time. Tensions escalated from 1765 to 1775 over issues of taxation without any American representation in Parliament. Parliament imposed a series of taxes especially the [[Stamp Act of 1765|Stamp Act]], and the [[Tea Act|Tea Act of 1773]], against which an angry mob of colonists protested in the [[Boston Tea Party]] by dumping chests of tea into Boston Harbor. |
|||
In early 1775 the Patriots forced all the British officials and soldiers out of the new nation, and established the [[Continental Army]] as a defense force. The [[British Army]] returned in force in August 1776, and [[New York and New Jersey campaign|captured New York City]], which became their base until the war ended in 1783. The British, using their [[Royal Navy|powerful navy]], could capture major ports, but 90% of the Americans lived in rural areas where they had full control. After the captured a British invasion force moving down from Canada in the [[Saratoga campaign]] of 1777, [[Kingdom of France|France]] entered the war as an ally of the US, and added [[Dutch Republic|the Netherlands]] and [[Spain]] as French allies. Britain lost naval superiority and had no major allies and few friends in Europe. The British strategy was then refocused on the South, where they expected large numbers of Loyalists would fight alongside the redcoats. Far fewer Loyalists took up arms than Britain needed; royal efforts to control the countryside in the South failed. When the British army tried to return to New York, its rescue fleet was turned back by the [[French Navy]] and its army was captured by combined French-American forces under General [[George Washington]] at the [[Siege of Yorktown]] in October 1781. That effectively ended the fighting. |
|||
Parliament punished Massachusetts with the [[Intolerable Acts]] in 1774, which were designed to strip away self-government. The other twelve colonies stood together with Massachusetts. They sent militia to Boston and expelled nearly all the Royal officials in all 13 colonies by 1775. The [[Battles of Lexington and Concord]] in 1775 began the [[American Revolutionary War|American War of Independence]]. While the goal of attaining independence was sought by a powerful majority known as [[Patriot (American Revolution)|Patriots]], a weaker minority known as the [[Loyalist (American Revolution)|Loyalists]] remained loyal to the king. |
|||
Congress unanimously [[United States Declaration of Independence|declared independence]] in July 1776. The British managed to control New York City and parts of the South, but 90 per cent of the American population was controlled by Patriots. The entry of the French and Spanish decisively hurt British efforts. After two invasion armies were captured in 1777 and 1781, King George III lost control of Parliament and independence was negotiated on terms favorable to expanded bilateral trade. The United States of America became the first colony in the world to successfully achieve independence in the modern era.<ref>George Athan Billias, ''American constitutionalism heard round the world, 1776-1989: a global perspective'' (NYU Press, 2009) p. 5.</ref> According to [[Robert Roswell Palmer|R. R. Palmer]] the new American nation: |
|||
: inspired the sense of a new era. It added a new content to the concept of progress. It gave a whole new dimension to ideas of liberty and equality made familiar in the Enlightenment. It got people into the habit of thinking more concretely about political questions, and made them more readily critical of their own governments and society. It dethroned England and set up America as a model for those seeking a better world.<ref>Robert R. Palmer, ''The Age of the Democratic Revolution'' (1959) 1:282.</ref> |
|||
===Peace treaty=== |
===Peace treaty=== |
||
{{Main|Treaty of Paris (1783)}} |
{{Main|Treaty of Paris (1783)}} |
||
The [[Treaty of Paris (1783)|Treaty of Paris]] ended the war in 1783 on terms quite favourable to the new nation.<ref>Jonathan R. Dull, ''A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution'' (1987); H. M. Scott, ''British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution'' (Oxford University Press, 1990).</ref> |
The [[Treaty of Paris (1783)|Treaty of Paris]] ended the war in 1783 on terms quite favourable to the new nation.<ref>Jonathan R. Dull, ''A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution'' (1987); H. M. Scott, ''British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution'' (Oxford University Press, 1990).</ref> |
||
The Americans realised they could get a better deal directly from London, ignoring their French ally. The British Prime Minister [[William Petty, 2nd Earl of Shelburne|Lord Shelburne]] now saw a chance to split the United States away from France and make the new country a valuable economic partner.<ref>Charles R. Ritcheson, "The Earl of Shelbourne and Peace with America, 1782–1783: Vision and Reality." ''International History Review'' 5#3 (1983): 322-345.</ref> |
|||
The |
The United States would gain all of the area east of the [[Mississippi River]], north of [[Spanish Florida|Florida]], and south of Canada. The northern boundary would be almost the same as today. The United States would gain fishing rights off the [[Atlantic Canada|Atlantic coast of Canada]], and agreed to allow British merchants and Loyalists to try to recover their property. It was a highly favourable treaty for the United States, and deliberately so from the British point of view. Shelburne foresaw a highly profitable two-way trade between Britain and the rapidly growing United States, which indeed came to pass.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jonathan R. Dull|title=A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W86WS9Z0ycYC&pg=PA144|year=1987|publisher=Yale up|pages=144–151|isbn=978-0300038866}}</ref> |
||
===End of the Revolution=== |
===End of the Revolution=== |
||
The treaty was finally ratified in 1784. The British evacuated their soldiers and civilians in [[New York City]], [[Charleston, South Carolina|Charleston]] and [[Savannah, Georgia|Savannah]] in late 1783. Over 80 percent of the half-million Loyalists remained in the United States and became American citizens. The others mostly went to Canada, and referred to themselves as the [[United Empire Loyalists]]. Merchants and men of affairs often went to Britain to reestablish their business connections.<ref>Maya Jasanoff, ''The Other Side of Revolution: Loyalists in the British Empire'' ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (2008) 65#2 pp. 205-232 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25096784 in JSTOR]</ref><ref>Maya Jasanoff, ''Liberty's Exiles: American Loyalists in the Revolutionary World'' (2011)</ref> Rich southern Loyalists, taking their slaves with them, typically headed to plantations in the [[British West Indies|West Indies]]. The British also |
The treaty was finally ratified in 1784. The British evacuated their soldiers and civilians in [[New York City]], [[Charleston, South Carolina|Charleston]] and [[Savannah, Georgia|Savannah]] in late 1783. Over 80 percent of the half-million Loyalists remained in the United States and became American citizens. The others mostly went to Canada, and referred to themselves as the [[United Empire Loyalists]]. Merchants and men of affairs often went to Britain to reestablish their business connections.<ref>Maya Jasanoff, ''The Other Side of Revolution: Loyalists in the British Empire'' ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (2008) 65#2 pp. 205-232 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25096784 in JSTOR]</ref><ref>Maya Jasanoff, ''Liberty's Exiles: American Loyalists in the Revolutionary World'' (2011)</ref> Rich southern Loyalists, taking their slaves with them, typically headed to plantations in the [[British West Indies|West Indies]]. The British also evacuated about 3,000 [[Black Loyalist]]s, former slaves who had escaped from their American masters and joined the British; they went to [[Nova Scotia]]. Many found it inhospitable and went to [[Sierra Leone Colony and Protectorate|Sierra Leone]], a newly established British colony in Africa.<ref>Simon Schama, ''Rough Crossings: The Slaves, the British, and the American Revolution'' (2007)</ref> |
||
The new nation gained control of nearly all the land east of the Mississippi and south of the [[Saint Lawrence River|St. Lawrence River]] and the [[Great Lakes]]. The British colonies of [[East Florida|East]] and [[West Florida]] were given to Spain as its reward. The [[Native Americans in the United States|Native American]] tribes allied with Britain struggled in the aftermath; the British ignored them at the Peace conference, and most came under American control unless they moved to Canada or to Spanish territory. The British kept forts in the [[Northwest Territory]] (what is today the [[Midwestern United States|American Midwest]], especially in [[Michigan]] and [[Wisconsin]]), where they supplied weapons to Indian tribes.<ref>Richard B. Morris, ''The Peacemakers; the Great Powers and American Independence'' (1965), the standard scholarly history; Morris, "The Great Peace of 1783," ''Massachusetts Historical Society Proceedings'' (1983) Vol. 95, pp 29–51, a summary of his long book [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25080922 in JSTOR]</ref> |
The new nation gained control of nearly all the land east of the Mississippi and south of the [[Saint Lawrence River|St. Lawrence River]] and the [[Great Lakes]]. The British colonies of [[East Florida|East]] and [[West Florida]] were given to Spain as its reward. The [[Native Americans in the United States|Native American]] tribes allied with Britain struggled in the aftermath; the British ignored them at the Peace conference, and most came under American control unless they moved to Canada or to Spanish territory. The British kept forts in the [[Northwest Territory]] (what is today the [[Midwestern United States|American Midwest]], especially in [[Michigan]] and [[Wisconsin]]), where they supplied weapons to Indian tribes.<ref>Richard B. Morris, ''The Peacemakers; the Great Powers and American Independence'' (1965), the standard scholarly history; Morris, "The Great Peace of 1783," ''Massachusetts Historical Society Proceedings'' (1983) Vol. 95, pp 29–51, a summary of his long book [https://www.jstor.org/stable/25080922 in JSTOR]</ref> |
||
Line 261: | Line 76: | ||
===1783–1807: Role of Jay Treaty=== |
===1783–1807: Role of Jay Treaty=== |
||
{{Main|Jay Treaty|Coalition Wars}} |
{{Main|Jay Treaty|Coalition Wars}} |
||
[[File:Jay's-treaty.jpg|thumb|Privately printed pamphlet containing the text of the Jay Treaty]] |
[[File:Jay's-treaty.jpg|thumb|Privately printed pamphlet containing the text of the [[Jay Treaty]]]] |
||
Trade resumed between the two nations when the war ended. The British allowed all exports to America but forbade some American food exports to its colonies in the West Indies. British exports reached £3.7 million, compared with imports of only £750,000. The imbalance caused a shortage of gold in the US. |
Trade resumed between the two nations when the war ended. The British allowed all exports to America but forbade some American food exports to its colonies in the West Indies. British exports reached £3.7 million, compared with imports of only £750,000. The imbalance caused a shortage of gold in the US. |
||
In 1785, [[John Adams]] became the first American plenipotentiary minister |
In 1785, [[John Adams]] became the first American plenipotentiary minister, to the [[Court of St James's]].<ref>The term "ambassador" came a century later.</ref> King George III received him graciously. In 1791, Great Britain sent its first diplomatic envoy, [[George Hammond (diplomat)|George Hammond]], to the United States. |
||
When Great Britain and France went to war in 1793, relations between the United States and Great Britain also verged on war. Tensions were subdued when the [[Jay Treaty]] was signed in 1794, which established a decade of peace and prosperous trade relations.<ref>Perkins (1955)</ref> The historian Marshall Smelser argues that the treaty effectively postponed war with Britain, or at least postponed it until the United States was strong enough to handle it.<ref>Marshall Smelser, ''The Democratic Republic, 1801–1815'' (1968).</ref> |
|||
When Great Britain and France went to war in 1793, relations between the United States and Great Britain also verged on war. Tensions were resolved when the [[Jay Treaty]] was approved in 1795. It established a decade of peace and prosperous trade relations.<ref>Perkins (1955)</ref> The historian Marshall Smelser argues that the treaty effectively postponed war with Britain, or at least postponed it until the United States was strong enough to handle it.<ref>Marshall Smelser, ''The Democratic Republic, 1801–1815'' (1968).</ref> The Americans had a list of outstanding issues regarding British control of border areas and British support of Indian tribes hostile to the United States, as well as British efforts to stop trade with France.<ref>Samuel Flagg Bemis, ''Jay's Treaty: A Study in Commerce and Diplomacy'' (1923) ch 2</ref> The final treaty settled most of the issues. |
|||
According to American historian [[Samuel Flagg Bemis]], the U.S. had a list of outstanding issues:<ref>Samuel Flagg Bemis, ''Jay's Treaty: A Study in Commerce and Diplomacy'' (1923) ch 2</ref> |
|||
* The British Army operated five forts in territory assigned to the U.S. in [[Treaty of Paris (1783)|the 1783 peace treaty]] in modern-day Michigan, Ohio and New York. |
|||
* The British were funding American Indian attacks on settlers in the [[Northwest Territory|Northwest]] (Ohio and Michigan). |
|||
* The British were continuing to [[impressment|impress]] sailors into British service who were U.S. citizens. |
|||
* American merchants wanted compensation for 250 merchant ships which the British had confiscated in 1793 and 1794. |
|||
* Southern interests wanted monetary compensation for the holders of slaves taken by the British to the West Indies in 1783. |
|||
* American merchants wanted the [[British West Indies]] to be reopened to American trade. |
|||
* The boundary with Canada was vague in many places, and needed to be more sharply delineated. |
|||
The |
The [[Federalist Party]] led by [[Alexander Hamilton]] was pro-British and it worked hard to ratify the Jay treaty. The new [[Democratic-Republican Party|Republican Party]] was vehemently opposed. Led by [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[James Madison]], the Republicans strongly favored Revolutionary France and deeply distrusted reactionary Britain as a threat to American values of republicanism. President George Washington made the decisive intervention so the Treaty was ratified by exactly a 2/3 vote, and the necessary money was appropriated. The result was two decades of peace in a time of world war. The peace lasted until the Republicans came to power and Jefferson rejected a new treaty and began an economic attack on Britain.<ref>Stanley M. Elkins and Eric McKitrick, ''The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800'' (1994), ch. 9</ref> |
||
[[Bradford Perkins (historian)|Bradford Perkins]] argues that the treaty was the first to establish a [[special relationship]] between Britain and the United States, with a second installment under [[Lord Salisbury]]. In his view, the treaty worked for ten years to secure peace between Britain and America: "The decade may be characterised as the period of "The First Rapprochement." As Perkins concludes, <blockquote>"For about ten years there was peace on the frontier, joint recognition of the value of commercial intercourse, and even, by comparison with both preceding and succeeding epochs, a muting of strife over ship seizures and impressment. Two controversies with France… pushed the English-speaking powers even more closely together."<ref>Perkins p. vii</ref></blockquote> Starting at swords' point in 1794, the Jay treaty reversed the tensions, Perkins concludes: "Through a decade of world war and peace, successive governments on both sides of the Atlantic were able to bring about and preserve a cordiality which often approached genuine friendship."<ref>Bradford Perkins, ''The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805'' (1955) p. 1.</ref> |
[[Bradford Perkins (historian)|Bradford Perkins]] argues that the treaty was the first to establish a [[Special Relationship|special relationship]] between Britain and the United States, with a second installment under [[Lord Salisbury]]. In his view, the treaty worked for ten years to secure peace between Britain and America: "The decade may be characterised as the period of "The First Rapprochement." As Perkins concludes, <blockquote>"For about ten years there was peace on the frontier, joint recognition of the value of commercial intercourse, and even, by comparison with both preceding and succeeding epochs, a muting of strife over ship seizures and impressment. Two controversies with France… pushed the English-speaking powers even more closely together."<ref>Perkins p. vii</ref></blockquote> Starting at swords' point in 1794, the Jay treaty reversed the tensions, Perkins concludes: "Through a decade of world war and peace, successive governments on both sides of the Atlantic were able to bring about and preserve a cordiality which often approached genuine friendship."<ref>Bradford Perkins, ''The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805'' (1955) p. 1.</ref> |
||
Historian [[Joseph Ellis]] finds the terms of the treaty "one-sided in Britain's favor", but asserts a consensus of historians agrees that it was |
Historian [[Joseph Ellis]] finds the terms of the treaty "one-sided in Britain's favor", but asserts a consensus of historians agrees that it was |
||
Line 288: | Line 94: | ||
The US proclaimed its neutrality in the wars between Britain and France (1793–1815), and profited greatly by selling food, timber and other supplies to both sides. |
The US proclaimed its neutrality in the wars between Britain and France (1793–1815), and profited greatly by selling food, timber and other supplies to both sides. |
||
Jefferson as president moved slowly to undermine the Jay Treaty and block its renewal. Amity collapsed in 1805, as a prelude to the War of 1812. |
|||
[[Thomas Jefferson]] had bitterly opposed the Jay Treaty because he feared it would strengthen anti-[[Republicanism in the United States|republican political enemies]]. When Jefferson became president in 1801, he did not repudiate the treaty. He kept the Federalist minister, [[Rufus King]] in London to negotiate a successful resolution to outstanding issues regarding cash payments and boundaries. The amity broke down in 1805, as relations turned increasingly hostile as a prelude to the War of 1812. Jefferson rejected a renewal of the Jay Treaty in the [[Monroe–Pinkney Treaty]] of 1806 as negotiated by his diplomats and agreed to by London; he never sent it to the Senate. |
|||
The |
The [[Atlantic slave trade|transatlantic slave trade]] was largely suppressed after Great Britain passed the [[Slave Trade Act 1807|Abolition of the Slave Trade Act]] in 1807. At the urging of President Jefferson, the United States passed the [[Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves]] in 1807, to take effect January 1, 1808. |
||
===War of 1812=== |
===War of 1812=== |
||
{{See also|War of 1812|Origins of the War of 1812}} |
{{See also|War of 1812|Origins of the War of 1812}} |
||
[[File:Ft. Henry bombardement 1814.jpg|thumb|An artist's rendering of the bombardment at the [[Battle of Baltimore]] in 1814, which inspired [[Francis Scott Key]] to write the lyrics |
[[File:Ft. Henry bombardement 1814.jpg|thumb|An artist's rendering of the bombardment at the [[Battle of Baltimore]] in 1814, which inspired [[Francis Scott Key]] to write the lyrics to "[[The Star-Spangled Banner]]", the national anthem of the United States]] |
||
The United States imposed a [[trade embargo]], namely the [[Embargo Act of 1807]], in retaliation for Britain's blockade of France, which involved the visit and search of neutral merchantmen, and resulted in the suppression of Franco-United States trade for the duration of the [[Napoleonic Wars]].<ref>Bradford Perkins, ''Prologue to war: England and the United States, 1805-1812'' (1961) [http://www.ucpress.edu/op.php?isbn=9780520009967 full text online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121203215517/http://www.ucpress.edu/op.php?isbn=9780520009967 |date=December 3, 2012 }}</ref> The Royal Navy also boarded American ships and [[impressment|impressed]] sailors suspected of being British deserters.<ref>Donald R Hickey, ''The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict'' (1989), pp. 11, 107–110.</ref> Expansion into the Midwest (i.e. Ohio to Wisconsin) was hindered by Native American tribes given munitions and support by British agents. Indeed, Britain's goal was the creation of an independent Indian state to block expansion westward by the US.<ref>{{cite book|author=Francis M. Carroll|title=A Good and Wise Measure: The Search for the Canadian-American Boundary, 1783–1842|url=https://archive.org/details/goodwisemeasures0000carr|url-access=registration|year=2001|publisher=U. of Toronto Press|page=[https://archive.org/details/goodwisemeasures0000carr/page/24 24]|isbn=9780802083586}}</ref> |
The United States imposed a [[trade embargo]], namely the [[Embargo Act of 1807]], in retaliation for Britain's blockade of France, which involved the visit and search of neutral merchantmen, and resulted in the suppression of Franco-United States trade for the duration of the [[Napoleonic Wars]].<ref>Bradford Perkins, ''Prologue to war: England and the United States, 1805-1812'' (1961) [http://www.ucpress.edu/op.php?isbn=9780520009967 full text online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121203215517/http://www.ucpress.edu/op.php?isbn=9780520009967 |date=December 3, 2012 }}</ref> The Royal Navy also boarded American ships and [[impressment|impressed]] sailors suspected of being British deserters.<ref>Donald R Hickey, ''The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict'' (1989), pp. 11, 107–110.</ref> Expansion into the Midwest (i.e. Ohio to Wisconsin) was hindered by Native American tribes given munitions and support by British agents. Indeed, Britain's goal was the creation of an independent Indian state to block [[Territorial evolution of the United States|expansion westward]] by the US.<ref>{{cite book|author=Francis M. Carroll|title=A Good and Wise Measure: The Search for the Canadian-American Boundary, 1783–1842|url=https://archive.org/details/goodwisemeasures0000carr|url-access=registration|year=2001|publisher=U. of Toronto Press|page=[https://archive.org/details/goodwisemeasures0000carr/page/24 24]|isbn=9780802083586}}</ref> |
||
After diplomacy and the boycott had failed, the issue of national honour and independence came to the fore.<ref>Norman K. Risjord, "1812: Conservatives, War Hawks, and the Nation's Honor," ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (1961) 18#2 pp. 196–210 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/19185 in JSTOR]</ref> Brands says, "The other war hawks spoke of the struggle with Britain as a second war of independence; [Andrew] Jackson, who still bore scars from the first war of independence held that view with special conviction. The approaching conflict was about violations of American rights, but it was also vindication of American identity."<ref>{{cite book|author=H.W. Brands|title=Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I4a7hMqBKFMC&pg=PA163|year=2006|publisher=Random House Digital|page=163|isbn=9780307278548}}</ref> |
After diplomacy and the boycott had failed, the issue of national honour and independence came to the fore.<ref>Norman K. Risjord, "1812: Conservatives, War Hawks, and the Nation's Honor," ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (1961) 18#2 pp. 196–210 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/19185 in JSTOR]</ref> Brands says, "The other war hawks spoke of the struggle with Britain as a second war of independence; [Andrew] Jackson, who still bore scars from the first war of independence held that view with special conviction. The approaching conflict was about violations of American rights, but it was also vindication of American identity."<ref>{{cite book|author=H.W. Brands|title=Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=I4a7hMqBKFMC&pg=PA163|year=2006|publisher=Random House Digital|page=163|isbn=9780307278548}}</ref> |
||
Finally in June 1812 President [[James Madison]] called for war, and overcame the opposition of business interests in the [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]. The US strategy called for a war against British shipping and especially cutting off food shipments to the British sugar plantations in the West Indies. Conquest of the northern colonies that later became Canada was a tactic designed to give the US a strong bargaining position.<ref>J.C.A. Stagg, "James Madison and the Coercion of Great Britain: Canada, the West Indies, and the War of 1812," ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (1981) 38#1 pp. 3–34 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1916855 in JSTOR]</ref> The main British goal was to defeat France, so until that happened in 1814 the war was primarily defensive. To enlist allies among Native Americans, led by [[Tecumseh]], the British promised an [[Indian barrier state|independent Native American state]] would be created in territory claimed by the United States. British and [[British North America|Canadian]] forces repeatedly repulsed invasions by US forces, which were inadequately prepared, poorly led, and undermined by the unavailability of militia units, whose commanders refused to place them temporarily under federal control. |
Finally in June 1812 President [[James Madison]] called for war, and overcame the opposition of business interests in the [[Northeastern United States|Northeast]]. The US strategy called for a war against British shipping and especially cutting off food shipments to the British sugar plantations in the West Indies. Conquest of the northern colonies that later became Canada was a tactic designed to give the US a strong bargaining position.<ref>J.C.A. Stagg, "James Madison and the Coercion of Great Britain: Canada, the West Indies, and the War of 1812," ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (1981) 38#1 pp. 3–34 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1916855 in JSTOR]</ref> The main British goal was to defeat France, so until that happened in 1814 the war was primarily defensive. To enlist allies among Native Americans, led by [[Tecumseh]], the British promised an [[Indian barrier state|independent Native American state]] would be created in territory claimed by the United States. British and [[British North America|Canadian]] forces repeatedly repulsed invasions by US forces, which were inadequately prepared, poorly led, and undermined by the unavailability of militia units, whose commanders refused to place them temporarily under federal control. Nevertheless, US forces took control of Lake Erie in 1813, and destroyed the offensive abilities of Native American forces, allied to the British, in the Northwest and South. The British invasion of the Chesapeake Bay in 1814 culminated in the "[[Burning of Washington]]", but the subsequent British [[Battle of Baltimore|attack on Baltimore]] was repelled. A British incursion into [[New York (state)|New York]] during 1814 was defeated at the [[Battle of Plattsburgh]], and the invasion of [[Louisiana Territory|Louisiana]] that launched before word of a ceasefire had reached General [[Andrew Jackson]] was decisively defeated at the [[Battle of New Orleans]] in 1815. Negotiations began in 1814 and produced the [[Treaty of Ghent]], which restored the ''[[status quo ante bellum]]'': there were no territorial gains by either side, and the British strategy of creating an independent Native American state was abandoned after strong American pressure. The United Kingdom retained the theoretical right of impressment, but stopped impressing any sailors, while the United States dropped the issue for good.<ref>Kate Caffrey: ''The Lion and the Union'', (1978), p. 270.</ref> The US celebrated the outcome as a victorious "second war of independence". The British, having finally defeated Napoleon at the [[Battle of Waterloo]], celebrated that triumph and largely forgot their second war with the US. Tensions between the US and Canada were resolved through diplomacy. The War of 1812 marked the end of a long period of conflict (1775–1815) and ushered in a new era of peace between the two nations. |
||
===Disputes 1815–60=== |
===Disputes 1815–60=== |
||
{{Main|Monroe Doctrine|Caroline affair|Oregon boundary dispute|Pig War (1859)|Aroostook War}} |
{{Main|Monroe Doctrine|Caroline affair|Oregon boundary dispute|Pig War (1859)|Aroostook War}} |
||
[[File:Astor Place riots handbill (1849).jpg|thumb |
[[File:Astor Place riots handbill (1849).jpg|thumb|A strongly worded anti-British [[handbill]] handed out in [[New York City]], which was prior to and complicit in instigating the 1849 [[Astor Place riot]]]] |
||
[[File:Oregoncountry.png|thumb|The Oregon Country/Columbia District stretched from 42N to 54 40'N; the most heavily disputed portion is highlighted.]] |
|||
In 1817 [[Rush–Bagot Treaty]] between the United States and Great Britain limited naval armaments on the [[Great Lakes]] and [[Lake Champlain]]. |
|||
The [[Monroe Doctrine]], a unilateral response in 1823 to a British suggestion of a joint declaration, expressed American hostility to further European encroachment in the Western hemisphere. Nevertheless, the United States benefited from the common outlook in British policy and its enforcement by the Royal Navy. In the 1840s several states defaulted on bonds owned by British investors. London bankers avoided state bonds afterwards, but invested heavily in American railroad bonds.<ref>Ralph W. Hidy and Muriel E. Hidy, "Anglo-American Merchant Bankers and the Railroads of the Old Northwest, 1848–1860," ''Business History Review'' (1960) 34#2 pp. 150–169 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3111545 in JSTOR]</ref> |
The [[Monroe Doctrine]], a unilateral response in 1823 to a British suggestion of a joint declaration, expressed American hostility to further European encroachment in the Western hemisphere. Nevertheless, the United States benefited from the common outlook in British policy and its enforcement by the Royal Navy. In the 1840s several states defaulted on bonds owned by British investors. London bankers avoided state bonds afterwards, but invested heavily in American railroad bonds.<ref>Ralph W. Hidy and Muriel E. Hidy, "Anglo-American Merchant Bankers and the Railroads of the Old Northwest, 1848–1860," ''Business History Review'' (1960) 34#2 pp. 150–169 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3111545 in JSTOR]</ref> |
||
In several episodes the American general [[Winfield Scott]] proved a sagacious diplomat by tamping down emotions and reaching acceptable compromises.<ref>Scott Kaufman, and John A. Soares, "'Sagacious Beyond Praise'? Winfield Scott and Anglo-American-Canadian Border Diplomacy, 1837–1860," ''Diplomatic History,'' (2006) 30#1 pp p57-82</ref> Scott handled the [[Caroline affair|''Caroline'' affair]] in 1837. Rebels from [[British North America]] (now Ontario) fled to New York and used a small American ship called the ''Caroline'' to smuggle supplies into Canada after their rebellion was suppressed. In late 1837, Canadian militia crossed the border into the US and burned the ship, leading to diplomatic protests, a flare-up of [[Anglophobia]], and other incidents. |
In several episodes the American general [[Winfield Scott]] proved a sagacious diplomat by tamping down emotions and reaching acceptable compromises.<ref>Scott Kaufman, and John A. Soares, "'Sagacious Beyond Praise'? Winfield Scott and Anglo-American-Canadian Border Diplomacy, 1837–1860," ''Diplomatic History,'' (2006) 30#1 pp p57-82</ref> Scott handled the [[Caroline affair|''Caroline'' affair]] in 1837. Rebels from [[British North America]] (now Ontario) fled to New York and used a small American ship called the ''Caroline'' to smuggle supplies into Canada after their rebellion was suppressed. In late 1837, Canadian militia crossed the border into the US and burned the ship, leading to diplomatic protests, a flare-up of [[Anglophobia]], and other incidents. |
||
[[File:Oregoncountry.png|thumb|upright|The Oregon Country/Columbia District<br> stretched from 42N to 54 40'N. The most heavily disputed portion is highlighted]] |
|||
Tensions on the vague Maine–New Brunswick boundary involved rival teams of lumberjacks in the bloodless [[Aroostook War]] of 1839. There was no shooting but both sides tried to uphold national honor and gain a few more miles of timber land. Each side had an old secret map that apparently showed the other side had the better legal case, so compromise was easily reached in the [[Webster–Ashburton Treaty]] of 1842, which settled the border in Maine and Minnesota.<ref>Howard Jones, "Anglophobia and the Aroostook War," ''New England Quarterly'' (1975) 48#4 pp. 519–539 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/364636 in JSTOR]</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=William E. Lass|title=Minnesota's Boundary with Canada: Its Evolution Since 1783|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wXAu-xA3y3gC&pg=PA63|year=1980|publisher=Minnesota Historical Society|pages=63–70|isbn=9780873511537}}</ref> In 1859, the bloodless [[Pig War (1859)|Pig War]] determined the position of the border in relation to the [[San Juan Islands]] and [[Gulf Islands]]. |
Tensions on the vague Maine–New Brunswick boundary involved rival teams of lumberjacks in the bloodless [[Aroostook War]] of 1839. There was no shooting but both sides tried to uphold national honor and gain a few more miles of timber land. Each side had an old secret map that apparently showed the other side had the better legal case, so compromise was easily reached in the [[Webster–Ashburton Treaty]] of 1842, which settled the border in Maine and Minnesota.<ref>Howard Jones, "Anglophobia and the Aroostook War," ''New England Quarterly'' (1975) 48#4 pp. 519–539 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/364636 in JSTOR]</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=William E. Lass|title=Minnesota's Boundary with Canada: Its Evolution Since 1783|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wXAu-xA3y3gC&pg=PA63|year=1980|publisher=Minnesota Historical Society|pages=63–70|isbn=9780873511537}}</ref> In 1859, the bloodless [[Pig War (1859)|Pig War]] determined the position of the border in relation to the [[San Juan Islands]] and [[Gulf Islands]]. |
||
British leaders were constantly annoyed from the 1840s to the 1860s by what they saw as Washington's pandering to the democratic mob, as in the [[Oregon boundary dispute]] in 1844–46. However British middle-class public opinion sensed a "[[special relationship]]" between the two peoples based on language, migration, evangelical Protestantism, liberal traditions, and extensive trade. This constituency rejected war, forcing London to appease the Americans. During the [[Trent affair]] of late 1861, London drew the line and Washington retreated.<ref>George L. Bernstein, "Special Relationship and Appeasement: Liberal policy towards America in the age of Palmerston." ''Historical Journal'' 41#3 (1998): 725-750.</ref><ref>Howard Jones and Donald A. Rakestraw, ''Prologue to Manifest Destiny: Anglo-American Relations in the 1840s'' (Scholarly Resources, 1997).</ref> |
British leaders were constantly annoyed from the 1840s to the 1860s by what they saw as Washington's pandering to the democratic mob, as in the [[Oregon boundary dispute]] in 1844–46. However, British middle-class public opinion sensed a "[[Special Relationship|special relationship]]" between the two peoples based on language, migration, evangelical Protestantism, liberal traditions, and extensive trade. This constituency rejected war, forcing London to appease the Americans. During the [[Trent affair]] of late 1861, London drew the line and Washington retreated.<ref>George L. Bernstein, "Special Relationship and Appeasement: Liberal policy towards America in the age of Palmerston." ''Historical Journal'' 41#3 (1998): 725-750.</ref><ref>Howard Jones and Donald A. Rakestraw, ''Prologue to Manifest Destiny: Anglo-American Relations in the 1840s'' (Scholarly Resources, 1997).</ref> |
||
In |
In 1844–48 the two nations had [[Oregon boundary dispute|overlapping claims to Oregon]]. The area was largely unsettled, making it easy to end the crisis in 1848 by a compromise that split the region evenly, with [[British Columbia]] to Great Britain, and [[Washington (state)|Washington]], [[Idaho]], and [[Oregon]] to America. The US then turned its attention to [[Mexico]], which threatened war over the [[Texas annexation|annexation of Texas]]. Britain tried without success to moderate the Mexicans, but when the war began it remained neutral. The US gained [[California]], in which the British had shown only passing interest.<ref>David M. Pletcher, ''The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War'' (1973).</ref> |
||
===Nicaraguan canal=== |
===Nicaraguan canal=== |
||
{{main| Nicaragua Canal}} |
{{main| Nicaragua Canal|Clayton–Bulwer Treaty}} |
||
The [[California Gold Rush|discovery of gold in California in 1848]] brought a heavy demand for passage to the gold fields, with the main routes crossing disease-ridden Panama to avoid a very long slow sailing voyage around all of South America. A railroad was built that carried 600,000 passengers but the disease threat remained. A canal in [[Nicaragua]] was a much more healthy and attractive possibility, and American businessmen gained the necessary permissions, along with a US treaty with Nicaragua. However the British were determined to block an American canal, and seized key locations on the [[Mosquito Coast]] on the Atlantic that blocked it. The [[Whig Party (United States)|Whig Party]] was in charge in Washington and were unlike the bellicose [[History of the United States Democratic Party|Democrats]] who wanted a businesslike, peaceful solution. The United States decided that a canal should be open and neutral to all the world's traffic, and not be militarized. Tensions escalated locally, with small-scale physical confrontations in the field. Washington and London found a diplomatic solution.<ref>Richard W. Van Alstyne, "Anglo-American Relations, 1853–1857." ''American Historical Review'' 42.3 (1937): 491-500 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1838850 online].</ref> The [[Clayton–Bulwer Treaty]] of 1850 guaranteed equal canal rights to both the US and Britain. Each agreed not to colonize Central America. However, no Nicaragua canal was ever started.<ref>Kenneth Bourne, "The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty and the Decline of British Opposition to the Territorial Expansion of the United States, 1857-60." ''Journal of Modern History'' 33.3 (1961): 287-291. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1876138 online]</ref> |
|||
By the late 1890s Britain saw the need for much improved relations with the United States, and agreed to allow the US to build a canal through either Nicaragua or Panama. The choice was Panama. The [[Hay–Pauncefote Treaty]] of 1901 replaced the Clayton–Bulwer Treaty, and adopted the rule of neutralization for the [[Panama Canal]] which the US built; it opened in 1914.<ref>Mary Wilhelmine Williams, ''Anglo-American isthmian diplomacy, 1815-1915''. (1916) [https://archive.org/details/angloamericanist00willuoft/page/n5 online free]</ref><ref>Richard W. Van Alstyne, "British Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, 1850–60." ''Journal of Modern History'' 11.2 (1939): 149–183. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1872500 online]</ref> |
|||
===American Civil War=== |
===American Civil War=== |
||
{{ |
{{Main article|United Kingdom in the American Civil War}} |
||
{{See also|Trent Affair}} |
|||
In the [[American Civil War]] a major [[Confederate States of America|Confederate]] goal was to win recognition from Britain and France, which it expected would lead them to war with the US and enable the Confederacy to win independence.<ref>Paul Poast, "Lincoln's Gamble: Fear of Intervention and the Onset of the American Civil War." ''Security Studies'' 24.3 (2015): 502-527. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1070621 online]</ref> Because of astute American diplomacy, no nation ever recognised the Confederacy and war with Britain was averted. Nevertheless, there was considerable British sentiment in favour of weakening the US by helping the South win.<ref>Amanda Foreman, ''A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War'' (2012)</ref> At the beginning of the war Britain issued [[s:British proclamation of neutrality in the American Civil War|a proclamation of neutrality]]. The [[Confederate States of America]] had assumed all along that Britain would surely enter the war to protect its vital supply of cotton. This "[[King Cotton]]" argument was one reason the Confederates felt confident in the first place about going to war, but the Southerners had never consulted the Europeans and were tardy in sending diplomats. Even before the fighting began in April 1861 Confederate citizens (acting without government authority) cut off cotton shipments in an effort to exert [[cotton diplomacy]]. It failed because Britain had warehouses filled with cotton, whose value was soaring; not until 1862 did shortages become acute.<ref>Howard Jones, ''Union in Peril: The Crisis over British Intervention in the Civil War'' (1992)</ref> |
In the [[American Civil War]] a major [[Confederate States of America|Confederate]] goal was to win recognition from Britain and France, which it expected would lead them to war with the US and enable the Confederacy to win independence.<ref>Paul Poast, "Lincoln's Gamble: Fear of Intervention and the Onset of the American Civil War." ''Security Studies'' 24.3 (2015): 502-527. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2015.1070621 online]</ref> Because of astute American diplomacy, no nation ever recognised the Confederacy and war with Britain was averted. Nevertheless, there was considerable British sentiment in favour of weakening the US by helping the South win.<ref>Amanda Foreman, ''A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War'' (2012)</ref> At the beginning of the war Britain issued [[s:British proclamation of neutrality in the American Civil War|a proclamation of neutrality]]. The [[Confederate States of America]] had assumed all along that Britain would surely enter the war to protect its vital supply of cotton. This "[[King Cotton]]" argument was one reason the Confederates felt confident in the first place about going to war, but the Southerners had never consulted the Europeans and were tardy in sending diplomats. Even before the fighting began in April 1861 Confederate citizens (acting without government authority) cut off cotton shipments in an effort to exert [[cotton diplomacy]]. It failed because Britain had warehouses filled with cotton, whose value was soaring; not until 1862 did shortages become acute.<ref>Howard Jones, ''Union in Peril: The Crisis over British Intervention in the Civil War'' (1992)</ref> |
||
The [[Trent Affair|''Trent'' Affair]] in late 1861 nearly caused a war. A warship of the |
The [[Trent Affair|''Trent'' Affair]] in late 1861 nearly caused a war. A warship of the US Navy stopped the British civilian vessel [[RMS Trent|RMS ''Trent'']] and took off two Confederate diplomats, [[James Murray Mason]] and [[John Slidell]]. Britain prepared for war and demanded their immediate release. President Lincoln released the diplomats and the episode ended quietly.<ref>Charles Francis Adams, "The Trent Affair," ''American Historical Review'' (1912) 17#3 pp. 540–562 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1834388 in JSTOR]</ref> |
||
Britain realised that any recognition of an independent Confederacy would be treated as an act of war against the United States. The [[British economy]] was heavily reliant on trade with the United States, most notably cheap grain imports which in the event of war, would be cut off by the Americans. Indeed, the Americans would launch all-out naval war against the entire British merchant fleet.<ref>Niels Eichhorn, "The Intervention Crisis of 1862: A British Diplomatic Dilemma?." ''American Nineteenth Century History'' 15.3 (2014): 287-310.</ref> |
Britain realised that any recognition of an independent Confederacy would be treated as an act of war against the United States. The [[British economy]] was heavily reliant on trade with the United States, most notably cheap grain imports which in the event of war, would be cut off by the Americans. Indeed, the Americans would launch an all-out naval war against the entire British merchant fleet.<ref>Niels Eichhorn, "The Intervention Crisis of 1862: A British Diplomatic Dilemma?." ''American Nineteenth Century History'' 15.3 (2014): 287-310.</ref> |
||
Despite outrage and intense American protests, London allowed the British-built [[CSS Alabama|CSS ''Alabama'']] to leave port and become a commerce raider under the naval flag of the Confederacy. The war ended in 1865; arbitration settled the issue in 1871, with a payment of $15.5 million in gold for the damages caused.<ref>Adams (1925)</ref> |
Despite outrage and intense American protests, London turned blind eye to [[Blockade runners of the American Civil War|its blockade runners smuggling in money and weapons to the Confederacy]] (which actually lengthened the war by two years and killed 400,000 additional Americans)<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aNaFDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT62|title=Lincoln, Seward, and U.S. Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era|page=162|date=April 5, 2019|publisher=[[University Press of Kentucky]]|isbn=9-7808-1317-7151}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3LEq7RBH_0AC&pg=RA2-PA114|title=Civil War Chronology, 1861-1865|page=114|publisher=Naval Operations Office|date=1966}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/archaeology/historians-reveal-secrets-of-uk-gunrunning-which-lengthened-the-american-civil-war-by-two-years-9557937.html|title=Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years|author=David Keys|date=June 24, 2014|work=[[The Independent]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The Confederate Blockade Runners|url=https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1933/april/confederate-blockade-runners|author=Paul Hendren|date=April 1933|publisher=[[United States Naval Institute]]}}</ref> and allowed the British-built [[CSS Alabama|CSS ''Alabama'']] to leave port and become a commerce raider under the naval flag of the Confederacy. The war ended in 1865; arbitration partially settled the issue in 1871, with a payment of $15.5 million in gold only for the damages caused by British-built Confederate commerce raiders.<ref>Adams (1925)</ref> |
||
In January 1863 Lincoln issued the [[Emancipation Proclamation]], which was strongly supported by liberal elements in Britain. The British government predicted that emancipation of the slaves would create a race war, and that intervention might be required on humanitarian grounds. |
In January 1863 Lincoln issued the [[Emancipation Proclamation]], which was strongly supported by liberal elements in Britain. The British government predicted that emancipation of the slaves in America would create a race war in the country, and that intervention might be required on humanitarian grounds. This prediction turned out to be unfounded, and the declining capabilities of the Confederacy—such as loss of major ports and rivers—made its likelihood of success smaller and smaller.<ref>{{cite book|author=Howard Jones|title=Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom: The Union and Slavery in the Diplomacy of the Civil War|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sK8HE1xY5cgC&pg=PA83|year=2002|publisher=U of Nebraska Press|pages=83–84|isbn=9780803275652}}</ref> |
||
===Late 19th century=== |
===Late 19th century=== |
||
====Canada==== |
====Canada==== |
||
{{Main|Fenian raids|Alabama Claims|Canadian Confederation}} |
{{Main|Fenian raids|Alabama Claims|Canadian Confederation}} |
||
Relations were chilly during the 1860s as Americans resented British and Canadian roles during the Civil War. After the war American authorities looked the other way as [[Irish Catholics|Irish Catholic]] "[[Fenian |
Relations were chilly during the 1860s as Americans resented British and Canadian roles during the Civil War. Both sides worked to make sure tensions did not escalate toward war.<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2017.1406965 | doi=10.1080/02722011.2017.1406965 | title=But There Was No War: The Impossibility of a United States Invasion of Canada after the Civil War | year=2017 | last1=MacKenzie | first1=Scott A. | journal=American Review of Canadian Studies | volume=47 | issue=4 | pages=357–371 | s2cid=148776615 | url-access=subscription }}</ref> After the war American authorities looked the other way as [[Irish Catholics|Irish Catholic]] "[[Fenian]]s" plotted and even attempted a tiny invasion of Canada to create pressure for an independent Ireland.<ref>C.P. Stacey, "Fenianism and the Rise of National Feeling in Canada at the Time of Confederation" ''Canadian Historical Review'', 12#3, 238-261.</ref><ref>Niall Whelehan, ''The Dynamiters: Irish Nationalism and Political Violence in the Wider World, 1867–1900'' (2012)</ref> [[Irish American]] politicians, a growing power in the [[History of the Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]] demanded more independence for Ireland and made anti-British rhetoric—called "twisting the lion's tail"—a staple of election campaign appeals to the Irish vote.<ref>{{cite book|author=Michael J. Hogan|title=Paths to Power: The Historiography of American Foreign Relations to 1941|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rcKEwnVi_IYC&pg=PA76|year=2000|publisher=Cambridge U.P.|page=76|isbn=9780521664134}}</ref> |
||
The arbitration of the Alabama Claims in 1872 provided a satisfactory reconciliation; The British paid the United States $15.5 million for the economic damage caused by [[Confederate States Navy|Confederate Navy]] warships purchased from it.<ref>Maureen M. Robson, "The Alabama Claims and the Anglo‐American Reconciliation, 1865–71." ''Canadian Historical Review'' (1961) 42#1 pp: 1–22.</ref> |
The arbitration of the Alabama Claims in 1872 provided a satisfactory reconciliation; The British paid the United States $15.5 million for the economic damage caused by [[Confederate States Navy|Confederate Navy]] warships purchased from it.<ref>Maureen M. Robson, "The Alabama Claims and the Anglo‐American Reconciliation, 1865–71." ''Canadian Historical Review'' (1961) 42#1 pp: 1–22.</ref> Canada could never be defended so the British decided to cut their losses and eliminate the risk of a conflict with the US. The first ministry of [[William Ewart Gladstone|William Gladstone]] withdrew from all its historic military and political responsibilities in North America. It brought home its troops (keeping [[Halifax, Nova Scotia|Halifax]] as an Atlantic naval base), and turned responsibility over to the locals. That made it wise in 1867 to unify the separate Canadian colonies into a self-governing confederation named the "[[Canada|Dominion of Canada]]".<ref>C. P. Stacey, "Britain's Withdrawal from North America, 1864–1871." ''Canadian Historical Review'' 36.3 (1955): 185-198.</ref> |
||
====Free trade==== |
====Free trade==== |
||
Britain persisted in its free trade policy even as its major rivals, the US and Germany, turned to high tariffs (as did Canada). American heavy industry grew faster than Britain, and by the 1890s was crowding British machinery and other products out of the world market.<ref>Marc-William Palen, "Protection, Federation and Union: The Global Impact of the McKinley Tariff upon the British Empire, 1890-94," ''Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History'' (2010) 38#3 pp 395-418, online</ref> |
Britain persisted in its free trade policy even as its major rivals, the US and Germany, turned to high tariffs (as did Canada). American heavy industry grew faster than Britain, and by the 1890s was crowding British machinery and other products out of the world market.<ref>Marc-William Palen, "Protection, Federation and Union: The Global Impact of the McKinley Tariff upon the British Empire, 1890-94," ''Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History'' (2010) 38#3 pp 395-418, online</ref> London, however, remained the world's financial center, even as much of its investment was directed toward American railways. The Americans remained far behind the British in international shipping and insurance.<ref>Simon Mollan, and Ranald Michie, "The City of London as an International Commercial and Financial Center since 1900," ''Enterprise & Society'' (2012) 13#3 pp 538-587 [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/enterprise_and_society/v013/13.3.mollan.htm online]</ref> |
||
The American economic "invasion" of the British home market demanded a response.<ref>Matthew Simon and David E. Novack, "Some Dimensions of the American Commercial Invasion of Europe, 1871-1914: An Introductory Essay," ''Journal of Economic History'' (1964) 24#4 pp. 591-605 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2115764 in JSTOR]</ref> |
The American economic "invasion" of the British home market demanded a response.<ref>Matthew Simon and David E. Novack, "Some Dimensions of the American Commercial Invasion of Europe, 1871-1914: An Introductory Essay," ''Journal of Economic History'' (1964) 24#4 pp. 591-605 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2115764 in JSTOR]</ref> British conservatives promoted what they called "tariff reform", which consisted of raising the tariff, especially from countries outside the British Empire. Liberals counterattacked by portraying tariff reform as unpatriotic.<ref>Paul Readman, "The Liberal party and patriotism in early twentieth century Britain." ''Twentieth Century British History'' 12.3 (2001): 269-302.</ref> Tariffs were finally imposed in the 1930s. Without tariffs to protect them, British businessmen were obliged to lose their market or else rethink and modernise their operations. For example, the boot and shoe industry faced increasing imports of American footwear; Americans took over the market for shoe machinery. British companies realised they had to meet the competition so they re-examined their traditional methods of work, labour utilisation, and industrial relations, and to rethink how to market footwear in terms of the demand for fashion.<ref>R. A. Church, "The Effect of the American Export Invasion on the British Boot and Shoe Industry 1885-1914," ''Journal of Economic History'' (1968) 28#2 pp. 223-254 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2115773 in JSTOR]</ref> |
||
===Venezuelan and Alaska border disputes=== |
===Venezuelan and Alaska border disputes=== |
||
{{Main|Venezuelan crisis of 1895|Alaska boundary dispute}} |
{{Main|Venezuelan crisis of 1895|Alaska boundary dispute}} |
||
[[File:Twist-British-Tail.jpg|thumb| |
[[File:Twist-British-Tail.jpg|thumb|[[Grover Cleveland|President Cleveland]] twists the tail of the British Lion regarding [[Venezuela]], a policy hailed by Irish Catholics in the United States, as depicted in a cartoon published in ''Puck'' by J.S. Pughe in 1895]] |
||
In 1895 |
In 1895 [[Venezuelan crisis of 1895|a new crisis erupted in South America]]. A border dispute between [[British Guiana]] and [[History of Venezuela|Venezuela]] caused a crisis when Washington spoke out to take Venezuela's side. Propaganda sponsored by Venezuela convinced American public opinion that the British were infringing on Venezuelan territory. [[Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury|Prime Minister Salisbury]] stood firm. The crisis escalated when President [[Grover Cleveland]], citing the [[Monroe Doctrine]], issued an ultimatum in late 1895. Salisbury's cabinet convinced him he had to go to arbitration. Both sides calmed down and the issue was quickly resolved through arbitration which largely upheld the British position on the legal boundary line. Salisbury remained angry but a consensus was reached in London, led by [[Henry Petty-Fitzmaurice, 5th Marquess of Lansdowne|Lord Landsdowne]], to seek much friendlier relations with the United States.<ref>J. A. S. Grenville, ''Lord Salisbury, and Foreign Policy: The Close of the Nineteenth Century'' (1964) pp 54-73.</ref><ref>R.A. Humphreys, "Anglo-American Rivalries and the Venezuela Crisis of 1895" ''Transactions of the Royal Historical Society'' (1967) 17: 131-164 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/3678723 in JSTOR]</ref> By standing with a Latin American nation against the encroachment of the British, the US improved relations with the Latin Americans, and the cordial manner of the procedure improved diplomatic relations with Britain.<ref>Nevins, 550, 647–648</ref> |
||
The [[Olney-Pauncefote Treaty]] of 1897 was a proposed treaty between the |
The [[Olney-Pauncefote Treaty]] of 1897 was a proposed treaty between the US and Britain in 1897 that required arbitration of major disputes. Despite wide public and elite support, the treaty was rejected by the US Senate, which was jealous of its prerogatives, and never went into effect.<ref>Nelson M. Blake, "The Olney-Pauncefote Treaty of 1897," ''American Historical Review,'' (1945) 50#2 pp. 228-243 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1842352 in JSTOR]</ref> |
||
American Historical Review, (1945) 50#2 pp. 228-243 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1842352 in JSTOR]</ref> |
|||
Arbitration was used to settle the dispute over the boundary between Alaska and Canada, but the Canadians felt betrayed by the result. |
Arbitration was used to settle the dispute over the boundary between Alaska and Canada, but the Canadians felt betrayed by the result. American and Russian diplomats drawing up the treaty for the [[Alaska Purchase]] of 1867 drew the boundary between Canada and Alaska in ambiguous fashion. With the gold rush into the Canadian Yukon in 1898, miners had to enter through Alaska. Canada wanted the boundary redrawn to obtain its own seaport. Canada rejected the American offer of a long-term lease on an American port. The issue went to arbitration and the [[Alaska boundary dispute]] was finally resolved by an arbitration in 1903. The decision favoured the US when the British judge sided with the three American judges against the two Canadian judges on the arbitration panel. Canadian public opinion was outraged that their interests were sacrificed by London for the benefit of British-American harmony.<ref>David G. Haglund, and Tudor Onea, "Victory without Triumph: Theodore Roosevelt, Honour, and the Alaska Panhandle Boundary Dispute," ''Diplomacy and Statecraft'' (March 2008) 19#1 pp 20–41.</ref> |
||
===The Great Rapprochement=== |
===The Great Rapprochement=== |
||
{{Main|The Great Rapprochement}} |
{{Main|The Great Rapprochement}} |
||
[[File:The Great Rapprochement.jpg|thumb |
[[File:The Great Rapprochement.jpg|thumb|This 1898 depiction of the Great Rapprochement shows [[Uncle Sam]] embracing [[John Bull]] while [[Columbia (name)|Columbia]] and [[Britannia]] sit together and hold hands.]] |
||
[[The Great Rapprochement]] is the convergence of social and political objectives between |
[[The Great Rapprochement]] is the convergence of social and political objectives between London and Washington from 1895 until World War I began in 1914. This was despite a large Irish Catholic element in the United States, which provided a major base for demands of Irish independence.<ref>William C. Reuter, "The Anatomy of Political Anglophobia in the United States, 1865–1900," ''Mid America'' (1979) 61#2 pp. 117-132.</ref> |
||
The most notable sign of improving relations during the Great Rapprochement was Britain's actions during the [[Spanish–American War]] |
The most notable sign of improving relations during the Great Rapprochement was Britain's actions during the [[Spanish–American War]] of 1898. Initially London supported Madrid and its [[Captaincy General of Cuba|colonial rule]] over Cuba, since the perceived threat of American occupation and a territorial acquisition of Cuba by the United States might harm British trade and commercial interests within its own possessions in the [[West Indies]]. However, after the United States made genuine assurances that it would grant Cuba's independence (which eventually occurred in 1902), the British abandoned this policy and ultimately sided with the United States, unlike most other European powers who supported Spain. In return Washington supported Britain during the [[Second Boer War|Boer War]], although many Americans favored the Boers.<ref>{{cite book|author=John Dumbrell|title=America's Special Relationships: Allies and Clients|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2IYKEMB9eIUC&pg=PA31|year=2009|publisher=Taylor & Francis|page=31|isbn=9780415483766}}</ref> |
||
Victory in the Spanish–American War had given the United States |
Victory in the Spanish–American War had given the United States an [[American imperialism|imperialistic influence overseas]]. The US and Britain supported the [[Open Door Policy]] in China, blocking the expansion of other empires. Both nations contributed soldiers to the [[Eight-Nation Alliance]] which suppressed the [[Boxer Rebellion]] in China in 1900.<ref>Eric Ouellet, "Multinational counterinsurgency: the Western intervention in the Boxer Rebellion 1900–1901." ''Small Wars & Insurgencies'' 20.3-4 (2009): 507-527.</ref> |
||
The [[Venezuela Crisis of 1902–03|naval blockade]] of several months |
The [[Venezuela Crisis of 1902–03|naval blockade]] of several months (1902-1903) imposed against Venezuela by Britain, Germany and Italy over President [[Cipriano Castro]]'s refusal to pay foreign debts and damages suffered by European citizens in a recent failed [[Liberating Revolution (Venezuela)|civil war]]. Castro assumed that the [[Monroe Doctrine]] would see the US prevent European military intervention, but at the time President Theodore Roosevelt saw the Doctrine as concerning European seizure of territory, rather than intervention per se. Roosevelt also was concerned with the threat of penetration into the region by Germany and Britain. With Castro failing to back down under US pressure and increasingly negative British and American press reactions to the affair, President Roosevelt persuaded the blockading nations to agree to a compromise, but maintained the blockade during negotiations over the details of refinancing the debt on Washington Protocols. This incident was a major driver of the [[Roosevelt Corollary]] and the subsequent US [[Big Stick ideology|Big Stick policy]] and [[Dollar Diplomacy]] in Latin America.<ref>Matthias Maass, "Catalyst for the Roosevelt Corollary: Arbitrating the 1902–1903 Venezuela Crisis and Its Impact on the Development of the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine." ''Diplomacy & Statecraft'' 20.3 (2009): 383-402.</ref> |
||
In 1907–09, President |
In 1907–09, President Roosevelt sent the "[[Great White Fleet]]" on an international tour, to demonstrate the [[power projection]] of the United States' [[blue-water navy]], which had become second only to the Royal Navy in size and firepower.<ref>Henry J. Hendrix, ''Theodore Roosevelt's Naval Diplomacy: The U.S. Navy and the Birth of the American Century'' (2009)</ref><ref>Mark Albertson, ''They'll Have to Follow You!: The Triumph of the Great White Fleet'' (2008) [https://www.amazon.com/Theyll-Have-Follow-You-Triumph/dp/1604621451/ excerpt and text search]</ref> |
||
===World War I=== |
===World War I=== |
||
{{See also|American entry into World War I|Diplomatic history of World War I}} |
{{See also|American entry into World War I|Diplomatic history of World War I}} |
||
[[File:Pvt Harry Shelley receives British Distinguished Conduct Medal from King George V.jpg|thumb |
[[File:Pvt Harry Shelley receives British Distinguished Conduct Medal from King George V.jpg|thumb|An [[Doughboy|American doughboy]] receiving an award from [[George V|King George V]]]] |
||
The United States had a policy of strict neutrality and was willing to export any product to any country. Germany could not import anything due to the [[Blockade of Germany (1939–1945)|British blockade]] and British control over exports to neutral countries neighboring Germany. American trade escalated to the [[Allies of World War I|Allied Powers]], especially in farm products. British purchases were financed by the sale of American assets owned by the British. When that was exhausted the British borrowed heavily from New York banks. When that credit ran dry in late 1916, a financial crisis was at hand for Britain.<ref>Stephen Broadberry and Peter Howlett. "The United Kingdom During World War I: Business as Usual?." in ''The Economics of World War I'' (2005): 206-234.</ref> |
|||
American public opinion moved steadily against Germany, especially in the wake of the [[Rape of Belgium|Belgian atrocities]] in 1914 and the sinking of the [[RMS Lusitania|RMS ''Lusitania'']] in 1915. The large [[German American]] and [[Irish American|Irish Catholic]] element called for staying out of the war, but the German Americans were increasingly marginalised. Berlin renewed [[unrestricted submarine warfare]] in 1917 knowing it would lead to war with the US. Germany's invitation to Mexico to join in war against the US in the [[Zimmermann Telegram]] was the last straw, and the US declared war in April 1917. The [[Balfour Mission]] in April and May tried to promote cooperation between the UK and US. The Americans planned to send money, food and munitions, but it soon became clear that millions of soldiers would be needed to decide the war on the [[Western Front (World War I)|Western Front]].<ref>[[Ronald Spector]], "'You're Not Going to Send Soldiers Over There Are You!': The American Search for an Alternative to the Western Front 1916–1917," ''Military Affairs'' (1972) 36#1 pp. 1–4 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1983836 in JSTOR]</ref> |
|||
The United States had a policy of strict neutrality and was willing to export any product to any country. [[German Empire|Germany]] could not import anything due to the [[Blockade of Germany|British blockade]], so the American trade was with the [[Allies of World War I|Allied Powers]]. It was financed by the sale of American bonds and stocks owned by the British. When that was exhausted the British borrowed heavily from New York banks. When that credit ran dry in late 1916, a financial crisis was at hand for Britain.<ref>May, Ernest R. The World War and American Isolation, 1914–1917 (1959)</ref> |
|||
American public opinion moved steadily against Germany, especially in the wake of the [[Rape of Belgium|Belgian atrocities]] in 1914 and the sinking of the [[RMS Lusitania|RMS ''Lusitania'']] in 1915. The large [[German American]] and [[Irish American|Irish Catholic]] element called for staying out of the war, but the German Americans were increasingly marginalised. The Germans renewed [[unrestricted submarine warfare]] in 1917 knowing it would lead to war with the US. Germany's invitation to Mexico to join together in war against the US in the [[Zimmermann Telegram]] was the last straw, and the US declared war in April 1917. The [[Balfour Mission]] in April and May tried to promote cooperation between the UK and US. The Americans planned to send money, food and munitions, but it soon became clear that millions of soldiers would be needed to decide the war on the [[Western Front (World War I)|Western Front]].<ref>[[Ronald Spector]], "'You're Not Going to Send Soldiers Over There Are You!': The American Search for an Alternative to the Western Front 1916–1917," ''Military Affairs'' (1972) 36#1 pp. 1–4 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1983836 in JSTOR]</ref> |
|||
The US sent two million soldiers to Europe under the command of General [[John J. Pershing]], with more on the way as the war ended.<ref>J Ellis & M Cox, ''The WW1 Databook'' (Aurum press 2001) p. 245</ref> Many of the Allied forces were skeptical of the competence of the [[American Expeditionary Force]], which in 1917 was severely lacking in training and experience. By summer 1918, the American [[doughboys]] were arriving at 10,000 a day, as the German forces were shrinking because they had run out of manpower. |
The US sent two million soldiers to Europe under the command of General [[John J. Pershing]], with more on the way as the war ended.<ref>J Ellis & M Cox, ''The WW1 Databook'' (Aurum press 2001) p. 245</ref> Many of the Allied forces were skeptical of the competence of the [[American Expeditionary Force]], which in 1917 was severely lacking in training and experience. By summer 1918, the American [[doughboys]] were arriving at 10,000 a day, as the German forces were shrinking because they had run out of manpower. |
||
The first summit conference took place in London in late 1918, between Wilson and Prime Minister [[David Lloyd George]]. It went poorly, as Wilson distrusted Lloyd George as a schemer, and Lloyd George grumbled that the president was excessively moralistic. The two did work together at the [[Paris Peace Conference, 1919]], as part of the [[Big Four (World War I)|Big Four]]. They moderated the demands of French Prime Minister [[Georges Clemenceau]] to permanently weaken |
In December 1918 after victory in the World War, President Wilson told a British official in London: “You must not speak of us who come over here as cousins, still less as brothers; we are neither. Neither must you think of us as Anglo-Saxons, for that term can no longer be rightly applied to the people of the United States....There are only two things which can establish and maintain closer relations between your country and mine: they are community of ideals and of interests."<ref>Arthur S. Link, ed., ''The Papers of Woodrow Wilson: vol. 53 1918-1919'' (1986) p. 574.</ref> The first summit conference took place in London in late 1918, between Wilson and Prime Minister [[David Lloyd George]]. It went poorly, as Wilson distrusted Lloyd George as a schemer, and Lloyd George grumbled that the president was excessively moralistic. The two did work together at the [[Paris Peace Conference, 1919]], as part of the [[Big Four (World War I)|Big Four]]. They moderated the demands of French Prime Minister [[Georges Clemenceau]] to permanently weaken Germany's new [[Weimar Republic]]. Lloyd George later quipped that sitting between them was like "being seated between Jesus Christ and Napoleon".<ref>{{cite book|author=Bilyana Martinovsky|title=Emotion in Group Decision and Negotiation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=crQYCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA83|year=2015|page=83|publisher=Springer |isbn=9789401799638}}</ref> |
||
[[John W. Davis]] (1873-1955) served as Wilson's ambassador from 1918 to 1921. A Southerner from West Virginia, he reflected deep Southern support for [[Wilsonianism]], based on a reborn patriotism, a distrust of the Republican Party, and a resurgence of Anglophilism. Davis proselytized in London for the League of Nations based on his paternalistic belief that peace depended primarily on Anglo-American friendship and leadership. He was disappointed by Wilson's mismanagement of the treaty ratification and by Republican isolationism and distrust of the League.<ref>Tennant S. Mcwilliams, "John W. Davis and Southern Wilsonianism." ''Virginia Quarterly Review'' 64.3 (1988): 398-416 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/26437693 online].</ref> |
|||
===Inter-war years=== |
===Inter-war years=== |
||
{{Further|International relations (1919–1939)}} |
{{Further|International relations (1919–1939)|Interwar Britain|History of the United States (1918–1945)}} |
||
[[File:English speaking peoples.jpg|thumb|300px|To the Friendship of [[Anglophones|English speaking people's]] monument on [[Bush House]] in [[London]]. The two men holding a torch represent the United Kingdom (left) and the United States (right).]] |
|||
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the level of mutual hostility was moderately high. The British diplomatic establishment largely distrusted the United States for a series of reasons. They included British suspicion of America's power, intentions and reliability. Specific frictions included the American rejection of the [[League of Nations]], Roosevelt's sudden devastating withdrawal from the [[London Economic Conference|1933 London economic conference]], the unwillingness to soften the war debts owed by Britain to the US treasury, the failure to join in a denunciation of [[Japanese invasion of Manchuria|Japan regarding Manchuria]] in 1933, and the [[Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act|1930 high American tariffs]]. In both countries, isolationism was deeply rooted, and the other side was not popular. On the American side, there was widespread distrust of [[British Empire|British imperialism]], its trade restrictions on the United States, and the cruel treatment of India. The Irish-American community still had bitter resentments. Roosevelt himself was quietly hostile to British imperialism in the 1930s <ref>Kevin Smith, "Reassessing Roosevelt's View of Chamberlain after Munich: Ideological Affinity in the Geoffrey Thompson-Claude Bowers Correspondence." ''Diplomatic History'' 33.5 (2009): 839-864.</ref> |
|||
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the level of mutual hostility was moderately high. The British diplomatic establishment largely distrusted the United States for a series of reasons. They included British suspicion of America's newfound global power, intentions and reliability. Specific frictions included the American rejection of the [[League of Nations]], the refusal to cancel the war debts owed by Britain to the US treasury, the [[Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act|high American tariff of 1930]], and especially Franklin Roosevelt's sudden devastating withdrawal from the [[London Economic Conference|1933 London economic conference]], In both countries, the other side lost popularity. Americans disliked the [[British Empire]], particularly its rule [[British Raj|in India]]. Though Irish independence removed the main source of Anglo-American tensions, the Irish-American community was nevertheless slow to drop its historic antagonism. Roosevelt himself publicly stated his support for the self-determination of colonized countries.<ref>Kevin Smith, "Reassessing Roosevelt's View of Chamberlain after Munich: Ideological Affinity in the Geoffrey Thompson-Claude Bowers Correspondence." ''Diplomatic History'' 33.5 (2009): 839-864.</ref> |
|||
Despite the |
Despite the frictions, London realized the United States was now the strongest power, and made it a cardinal principle of British foreign-policy to "cultivate the closest relations with the United States". As a result, Britain decided not to renew its [[Anglo-Japanese Alliance|military alliance with Japan]], which was becoming a major rival to the United States in the Pacific.<ref>C. J. Low and M. L. Dockrill, eds. ''The Mirage of Power: volume 3: The documents: British Foreign Policy 1902-22'' (1972) p. 647</ref> |
||
[[Presidency of Warren G. Harding|President Warren Harding]] sponsored a successful [[Washington Naval Conference]] in 1922 that largely ended the naval arms race for a decade. The rise of American naval power in 1916-1918 marked the end of the [[Royal Navy]]'s superiority, an eclipse acknowledged in the [[Washington Naval Treaty]] of 1922, when the United States and Britain agreed to equal tonnage quotas on warships. By 1932, the 1922 treaty was not renewed and Britain, Japan and the US were again in a naval race.<ref>Carolyn J. Kitching, ''Britain and the Problem of International Disarmament, 1919–1934'' [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=108212804 Rutledge, 1999 online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605031111/http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=108212804 |date=June 5, 2011 }}</ref> |
|||
In 1924 the aristocratic diplomat [[Esmé Howard, 1st Baron Howard of Penrith|Esmé Howard]] returned to Washington as ambassador. Puzzled at first by the provincial background and eccentric style of President [[Calvin Coolidge]], Howard came to like and trust the president, realizing that he was conciliatory and eager to find solutions to mutual problems, such as the Liquor Treaty of 1924 which diminished friction over smuggling. Washington was greatly pleased when Britain ended its alliance with Japan.<ref>Benjamin D. Rhodes, "British diplomacy and the silent oracle of Vermont, 1923-1929'." ''Vermont History'' 50 (1982): 69-79.</ref> Both nations were pleased when in 1923 the wartime debt problem was compromised on satisfactory terms. London renegotiated its £978 million debt to the |
In 1924, the aristocratic diplomat [[Esmé Howard, 1st Baron Howard of Penrith|Esmé Howard]] returned to Washington as ambassador. Puzzled at first by the provincial background and eccentric style of President [[Calvin Coolidge]], Howard came to like and trust the president, realizing that he was conciliatory and eager to find solutions to mutual problems, such as the Liquor Treaty of 1924 which diminished friction over smuggling. Washington was greatly pleased when Britain ended its alliance with Japan.<ref>Benjamin D. Rhodes, "British diplomacy and the silent oracle of Vermont, 1923-1929'." ''Vermont History'' 50 (1982): 69-79.</ref> Both nations were pleased when in 1923 the wartime debt problem was compromised on satisfactory terms. London renegotiated its £978 million debt to the US Treasury by promising regular payments of £34 million for ten years then £40 million for 52 years. The idea was for the US to loan money to Germany, which in turn paid reparations to Britain, which in turn paid off its loans from the US government. In 1931 all German payments ended, and in 1932 Britain suspended its payments to the US, which angered American public opinion. The British debt was finally repaid after 1945.<ref>[[A.J.P. Taylor]], ''[[English History, 1914–1945]]'' (1965) pp 202-3, 335</ref> |
||
The [[League of Nations]] was established, but Wilson refused to negotiate with Republican supporters of the League. They objected to the provision that allowed the League to force the United States to join in a war declared by the League without the approval of Congress or the president. The [[Treaty of Versailles]] was defeated in the Senate. The United States never joined the League, leaving Britain and France to dominate the organization. In any case, it had very little effect on major issues and was replaced in |
The [[League of Nations]] was established, but Wilson refused to negotiate with Republican supporters of the League. They objected to the provision that allowed the League to force the United States to join in a war declared by the League without the approval of Congress or the president. The [[Treaty of Versailles]] was defeated in the Senate. The United States never joined the League, leaving Britain and France to dominate the organization. In any case, it had very little effect on major issues and was replaced in 1946 with a United Nations, Largely designed by Roosevelt and his staff, in which both Britain and the United States had veto power.<ref>{{cite book|author=Allan Todd|title=The Modern World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vlw30T44PS0C&pg=PA53|year=2001|page=53|publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199134250}}</ref> Major conferences, especially the Washington Conference of 1922 occurred outside League auspices. The US refused to send official delegates to League committees, instead sending unofficial "observers". |
||
Coolidge was impressed with the success of the [[Washington Naval Conference]] of 1921–22, and called the second international conference in 1927 to deal with related naval issues, especially putting limits on the number of warships under 10,000 tons. The conference met in Geneva. It failed because France refused to participate, and most of the delegates were admirals who did not want to limit their fleets.<ref>Norman Gibbs, |
Coolidge was impressed with the success of the [[Washington Naval Conference]] of 1921–22, and called the second international conference in 1927 to deal with related naval issues, especially putting limits on the number of warships under 10,000 tons. The conference met in Geneva. It failed because France refused to participate, and most of the delegates were admirals who did not want to limit their fleets.<ref>Norman Gibbs, "The Naval Conferences of the Interwar Years: A study in Anglo-American Relations" ''Naval War College Review'' 30#1 (Special issue Summer 1977), pp. 50-63 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/44641788 Online]</ref> Coolidge listened to his own admirals, but President Hoover did not, and in 1930 did achieve a naval agreement with Britain.<ref>B. J. C. McKercher, "'A Certain Irritation': The White House, the State Department, and the Desire for a Naval Settlement with Great Britain, 1927–1930." ''Diplomatic History'' 31.5 (2007): 829-863.</ref> A second summit took place between President [[Herbert Hoover]] and Prime Minister [[Ramsay MacDonald]] in the United States in 1929. Both men were seriously devoted to peace, and the meeting went smoothly in discussions regarding naval arms limitations, and the application of the [[Kellogg–Briand Pact]] peace pact of 1928. One result was the successful [[London Naval Treaty]] of 1930, which continued the warship limitations among the major powers first set out in 1922.<ref>{{cite book|author=Ronald E. Powaski|title=Toward an Entangling Alliance: American Isolationism, Internationalism, and Europe, 1901-1950|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZDAoVZqHwocC&pg=PA53|year=1991|pages=53–54|publisher=Bloomsbury Academic |isbn=9780313272745}}</ref> |
||
During the [[Great Depression]], starting in late 1929, the |
During the [[Great Depression]], starting in late 1929, the US was preoccupied with its own internal affairs and economic recovery, espousing an [[isolationism|isolationist]] policy. When the US [[Smoot-Hawley|raised tariffs in 1930]], the British retaliated by raising their tariffs against outside countries (such as the US) while giving special trade preferences inside the Commonwealth. The US demanded these special trade preferences be ended in 1946 in exchange for a large loan.<ref>{{cite book|author=Richard Pomfret|title=The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=R81n-kj_sk4C&pg=PA58|year=1997|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=58|isbn=9780198233350}}</ref> |
||
From 1929 to 1932, the overall world total of all trade plunged by over two-thirds, while trade between the US and Britain shrank from $848 million to $288 million, a decline of two-thirds (66%). Proponents of the high 1930 tariff it never expected this, and support for high tariffs rapidly eroded.<ref>Frederick W. Jones, ed. ''The Economic Almanac 1956'' (1956) p 486</ref> |
|||
When Britain in 1933 called a worldwide [[London Economic Conference]] to help resolve the depression, President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] |
When Britain in 1933 called a worldwide [[London Economic Conference]] to help resolve the depression, President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] stunned the world by suddenly refusing to cooperate, ending Conference usefulness overnight.<ref>Jeannette P. Nichols, "Roosevelt's Monetary Diplomacy in 1933," ''American Historical Review'', (1951) 56#2 pp. 295-317 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1840444 in JSTOR]</ref> |
||
Tensions over the [[Irish question]] faded with the independence of the [[Irish Free State]] in 1922. The American Irish had achieved their goal, and in 1938 |
Tensions over the [[Irish question]] faded with the independence of the [[Irish Free State]] in 1922. The American Irish had achieved their goal, and in 1938 their most outstanding spokesmen [[Joseph P. Kennedy]], a Democrat close to Roosevelt, became ambassador to the [[Court of St. James's]]. He moved in high London society and his daughter married into the aristocracy. Kennedy supported the [[Neville Chamberlain]] policy of appeasement toward Germany, and when the war began he advised Washington that prospects for Britain's survival were bleak. When [[Winston Churchill]] came to power in 1940, Kennedy lost all his influence in London and Washington.<ref>Hollowell; ''Twentieth-Century Anglo-American Relations'' (2001)</ref><ref>David Nasaw, ''The Patriarch: The Remarkable Life and Turbulent Times of Joseph P. Kennedy'' (2012) pp 281-486</ref> Washington analysts paid more attention to the measured optimism of Lieutenant Colonel [[Bradford G. Chynoweth]], the War Department's military attache in London.<ref>Martin S. Alexander, "'[…] the best security for London is the nine Kennedy children.' Perceptions by US Officials in Washington, DC and London of Britain's Readiness for War in 1939." ''Contemporary British History'' 25#1 (2011): 101-123.</ref> |
||
===World War II=== |
===World War II=== |
||
{{See also|United Kingdom-United States relations in World War II|Diplomatic history of World War II}} |
{{See also|United Kingdom-United States relations in World War II|Diplomatic history of World War II}} |
||
[[File:Prince of Wales-5.jpg|thumb|[[Franklin Roosevelt|Roosevelt]] and [[Winston Churchill|Churchill]] drafted the [[Atlantic Charter]] in August 1941.]] |
|||
Although many of the American people were sympathetic to Britain during the war with [[Nazi Germany]], there was widespread opposition to American intervention in European affairs. This was reflected in a series of [[Neutrality Acts of 1930s|Neutrality Acts]] ratified by the United States Congress in 1935, 1936, and 1937. However, President Roosevelt's policy of [[Cash and carry (World War II)|cash-and-carry]] still allowed Britain and France to order munitions from the United States and carry them home. |
|||
Although many of the American people were sympathetic to Britain during the [[World War II|war]] with [[Nazi Germany]], there was widespread opposition to American intervention in European affairs. This was reflected in a series of [[Neutrality Acts of 1930s|Neutrality Acts]] ratified by the United States Congress in 1935, 1936, and 1937. However, President Roosevelt's policy of [[Cash and carry (World War II)|cash-and-carry]] still allowed Britain and France to order munitions from the United States and carry them home. As ambassador to the United States in 1939–40, [[Philip Kerr, 11th Marquess of Lothian|Lord Lothian]] supported [[Lend-Lease]] and urged Prime Minister Winston Churchill to work more closely with President Franklin Roosevelt. His success can be attributed to his understanding of American politics and culture, his skills in traditional diplomacy, his role as intermediary between Churchill and Roosevelt, and the efficiency of Britain's wartime propaganda agencies.<ref>Priscilla Roberts, "Lord Lothian and the Atlantic world." ''The Historian'' 66.1 (2004): 97-127 [https://www.academia.edu/download/51978988/Roberts-2004-Historian.pdf online]{{dead link|date=July 2022|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}.</ref><ref>Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones, "Lord Lothian and American Democracy: An Illusion in Pursuit of an Illusion." ''Canadian Review of American Studies'' 17.4 (1986): 411-422.</ref> |
|||
[[Winston Churchill]], who had long warned against [[Nazi Germany]] and demanded rearmament, became prime minister after his predecessor [[Neville Chamberlain]]'s policy of [[appeasement]] had totally collapsed and Britain was unable to reverse the [[German invasion of Norway]] in April 1940. After the [[fall of France]] in June 1940, Roosevelt gave Britain and (after June 1941) the Soviet Union all aid short of war. The [[Destroyers for Bases Agreement]] which was signed in September 1940, gave the United States a 99-year rent-free lease of numerous land and air bases throughout the British Empire in exchange for the Royal Navy receiving 50 old destroyers from the United States Navy. Beginning in March 1941, the United States enacted [[Lend-Lease]] in the form of tanks, fighter airplanes, munitions, bullets, food, and medical supplies. Britain received $31.4 billion out of a total of $50.1 billion sent to the Allies. Roosevelt insisted on avoiding the blunder that Wilson had made in the First World War of setting up the financing as loans that had to be repaid by the recipients. Lend lease aid was freely given, with no payments. There were also cash loans were repaid at low rates over a half-century.<ref>Leo T. Crowley, "Lend Lease" in Walter Yust, ed. ''10 Eventful Years'' (1947)1:520, 2, pp. 858–860.</ref><ref>William Hardy McNeill, ''America, Britain and Russia: Their Cooperation and Conflict 1941–1946'' (1953) pp. 137-50, 772-90</ref> |
|||
[[File:Prince of Wales-5.jpg|thumb|right|Roosevelt and Churchill drafted the Atlantic Charter in August 1941]] |
|||
[[Winston Churchill]], who had long warned against [[Nazi Germany]] and demanded rearmament, became prime minister after his predecessor [[Neville Chamberlain]]'s policy of [[appeasement]] had totally collapsed and Britain was unable to reverse the [[German invasion of Norway]] in April 1940. After the [[fall of France]] in June 1940, Roosevelt gave Britain and (after June 1941) the [[Soviet Union]] all aid short of war. The [[Destroyers for Bases Agreement]] which was signed in September 1940, gave the United States a 99-year rent-free lease of numerous land and air bases throughout the British Empire in exchange for the Royal Navy receiving 50 old destroyers from the United States Navy. Beginning in March 1941, the United States enacted [[Lend-Lease]] in the form of tanks, fighter airplanes, munitions, bullets, food, and medical supplies. Britain received $31.4 billion out of a total of $50.1 billion sent to the Allies. Roosevelt insisted on avoiding the blunder that Wilson had made in the First World War of setting up the financing as loans that had to be repaid by the recipients. Lend lease aid was freely given, with no payments. Also there were also cash loans were repaid at low rates over a half-century.<ref>Leo T. Crowley, "Lend Lease" in Walter Yust, ed. ''10 Eventful Years'' (1947)1:520, 2, pp. 858–860.</ref><ref>William Hardy McNeill, ''America, Britain and Russia: Their Cooperation and Conflict 1941–1946'' (1953) pp. 137-50, 772-90</ref> |
|||
Summit meetings became a standard practice starting with August 1941, when Churchill and Roosevelt met |
Summit meetings became a standard practice starting with August 1941, when Churchill and Roosevelt met in Newfoundland, and announced the [[Atlantic Charter]]. It became a fundamental document—All the Allies had to sign it—and it led to the formation of the [[United Nations]]. Shortly after the [[Attack on Pearl Harbor|Pearl Harbor attack]], Churchill spent several weeks in Washington with the senior staff hammering out wartime strategy with the American counterparts at the [[Arcadia Conference]]. They set up the [[Combined Chiefs of Staff]] to plot and coordinate strategy and operations. Military cooperation was close and successful.<ref>McNeill, ''America, Britain and Russia: Their Cooperation and Conflict 1941–1946'' (1953) pp 90-118, 129-37</ref> |
||
Technical collaboration was even closer, as the two nations shared secrets and weapons regarding the [[proximity fuze]] (fuse) and radar, as well as airplane engines, Nazi codes, and the atomic bomb.<ref>Paul Kennedy, ''Engineers of Victory: The Problem Solvers Who Turned The Tide in the Second World War'' (2013)</ref><ref>James W. Brennan, "The Proximity Fuze: Whose Brainchild?," ''U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings'' (1968) 94#9 pp 72–78.</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Septimus H. Paul|title=Nuclear Rivals: Anglo-American Atomic Relations, 1941–1952|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fSZpgW-N628C&pg=PA1|year=2000|publisher=Ohio State U.P.|pages=1–5|isbn=9780814208526}}</ref> |
Technical collaboration was even closer, as the two nations shared secrets and weapons regarding the [[proximity fuze]] (fuse) and radar, as well as airplane engines, Nazi codes, and the atomic bomb.<ref>Paul Kennedy, ''Engineers of Victory: The Problem Solvers Who Turned The Tide in the Second World War'' (2013)</ref><ref>James W. Brennan, "The Proximity Fuze: Whose Brainchild?," ''U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings'' (1968) 94#9 pp 72–78.</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Septimus H. Paul|title=Nuclear Rivals: Anglo-American Atomic Relations, 1941–1952|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fSZpgW-N628C&pg=PA1|year=2000|publisher=Ohio State U.P.|pages=1–5|isbn=9780814208526}}</ref> |
||
Line 418: | Line 227: | ||
In 1945 Britain sent a portion of the British fleet to assist the [[Operation Downfall|planned October invasion of Japan]] by the United States, but this was cancelled when Japan was forced to surrender unconditionally in August. |
In 1945 Britain sent a portion of the British fleet to assist the [[Operation Downfall|planned October invasion of Japan]] by the United States, but this was cancelled when Japan was forced to surrender unconditionally in August. |
||
====India==== |
====Pre-Independence India==== |
||
Serious tension erupted over American demands that [[British Raj|India]] be given independence, a proposition Churchill vehemently rejected. For years Roosevelt had encouraged Britain's disengagement from India. The American position was based on principled opposition to colonialism, practical concern for the outcome of the war, and the expectation of a large American role in a post-colonial era. In 1942 when the [[Indian National Congress|Congress Party]] launched a [[Quit India]] movement, the |
Serious tension erupted over American demands that [[British Raj|India]] be given independence, a proposition Churchill vehemently rejected. For years Roosevelt had encouraged Britain's disengagement from India. The American position was based on principled opposition to colonialism, practical concern for the outcome of the war, and the expectation of a large American role in a post-colonial era. In 1942 when the [[Indian National Congress|Congress Party]] launched a [[Quit India]] movement, the colonial authorities arrested tens of thousands of activists (including [[Mahatma Gandhi]]). Meanwhile, India became the main American staging base for aid to [[Republic of China (1912–1949)|China]]. Churchill threatened to resign if Roosevelt continued to push his demands, and Roosevelt backed down.<ref>Eric S. Rubin, "America, Britain, and Swaraj: Anglo-American Relations and Indian Independence, 1939–1945," ''India Review'' (Jan–March 2011) 10#1 pp 40–80</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Arthur Herman|title=Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry That Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hdPmzLtU5G4C|year=2008|publisher=Random House Digital, Inc.|pages=472–539|isbn=9780553804638}}</ref> Churchill was a believer in the integrity of the British Empire, but he was voted out of office in the summer of 1945. Attlee's new Labour government was much more favorable toward Indian aspirations. The process of [[Decolonization|de-colonization]] was highlighted by the independence Britain granted to India, Pakistan and Ceylon (now [[Sri Lanka]]) in 1947. The United States approved, but provided no financial or diplomatic support.<ref>Nicholas Owen, "Attlee governments: The end of empire 1945–51." ''Contemporary British History'' 3.4 (1990): 12-16.</ref><ref>R. J. Moore, "Decolonisation in India: Towards partition and independence in India." ''Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics'' 20.2 (1982): 189-199.</ref> |
||
===The Marshall Plan ( |
=== Postwar financial troubles and The Marshall Plan (1945-1952) === |
||
{{Further| Marshall Plan}} |
|||
In Spring 1949 the [[Bank of England]] issued instructions to British banks restricting the [[gold standard|conversion of sterling]] for any oil that was purchased outside the [[sterling area]]. This was particularly damaging to the [[Arabian American Oil Company]] (ARAMCO) — [[Exxon|Standard Oil of New Jersey]] and [[Socony]] had been invited to join the Saudi concession because of their extensive overseas contacts who were now subject to London's embargo. Britain also began [[barter]]ing oil for payment in kind in defiance of international agreements with the US. Britain [[devalued]] its currency in September 1949 and promptly reduced exchanges-for-dollars by restricting American-affiliated oil companies from selling dollar oil within the sterling area until all the sterling oil had been sold. The disagreement was especially dire because Americans wanted to sell the oil they purchased from Saudi Arabia under the new [[concession (contract)|concession arrangement]]. Eventually the British and the Americans reached an agreement that allowed American companies to sell Saudi oil in the sterling area.<ref>{{Cite book| publisher = Greenwood Publishing Group| isbn = 978-0-275-94562-6| last = Pelletiere| first = Stephen C.| title = Iraq and the International Oil System: Why America Went to War in the Gulf| chapter=3. The Fall of Mosadeq and the Triumph of the Oil Cartel in the United States | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EQ1cpB65KR4C |date = 2001}}</ref> |
|||
In the aftermath of the war Britain faced a deep financial crisis, whereas the United States enjoyed an economic boom. The United States continued to finance the British treasury after the war. Much of this aid was designed to restore infrastructure and help refugees. Britain received an [[Anglo-American loan|emergency loan]] of $3.75 billion in 1946; it was a 50-year loan with a low 2% interest rate.<ref>''Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1949'' p. 846 [http://www2.census.gov/prod2/statcomp/documents/1949-12.pdf online]</ref> A more permanent solution was the [[Marshall Plan]] of 1948–51, which poured $13 billion into western Europe, of which $3.3 billion went to Britain to help modernise its infrastructure and business practices. The aid was a gift and carried requirements that Britain balance its budget, control tariffs and maintain adequate currency reserves.<ref>C. C. S. Newton, "The Sterling Crisis of 1947 and the British Response to the Marshall Plan," ''Economic History Review'' (1984) 37#3 pp. 391–408 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2597288 in JSTOR]</ref> The American goals for the Marshall plan were to help rebuild the postwar economy in Europe, help modernize the economies, and minimize trade barriers. When the Soviet Union refused to participate or allow its satellites to participate, the Marshall plan became an element of the emerging Cold War. The British Labour government was an enthusiastic participant.<ref>William C. Cromwell, "The Marshall Plan, Britain and the Cold War." ''Review of International Studies'' 8.4 (1982): 233-249 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20096957 online].</ref><ref>Michael J. Hogan, ''The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952'' (Cambridge UP, 1987).</ref><ref>Henry Pelling, ''Britain and the Marshall Plan'' (1988).</ref> |
|||
There were political tensions between the two nations regarding Marshall plan requirements.<ref>Charles S. Maier, "American Visions and British Interests: Hogan's Marshall Plan." ''Reviews in American History'' 18#1 (1990), pp. 102-111 |
|||
===Cold War=== |
|||
DOI: 10.2307/2702734 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2702734 online].</ref> London was dubious about Washington's emphasis on European economic integration as the solution to postwar recovery. Integration with Europe at this point would mean cutting close ties to the emerging Commonwealth. London tried to convince Washington that American economic aid, especially to the sterling currency area, was necessary to solve the dollar shortage. British economists argued that their position was validated by 1950 as European industrial production exceeded prewar levels. Washington demanded convertibility of sterling currency on July 15, 1947, which produced a severe financial crisis for Britain. Convertibility was suspended on August 20, 1947. However, by 1950, American rearmament and heavy spending on the Korean War and Cold War finally ended the dollar shortage.<ref>C. C. S. Newton, "The sterling crisis of 1947 and the British response to the Marshall plan." ''Economic History Review'' (1984): 391-408 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2597288 online].</ref> The balance of payment problems for the postwar government was caused less by economic decline and more by political overreach, according to Jim Tomlinson.<ref>Jim Tomlinson, "Balanced accounts? Constructing the balance of payments problem in post-war Britain." ''English Historical Review'' 124.509 (2009): 863-884.</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Cold War|Anglo-American loan|Truman Doctrine|Marshall Plan}} |
|||
In the aftermath of the war Britain faced a financial crisis, whereas the United States was in the midst of an economic boom. The process of de-colonization accelerated with the independence Britain granted to India, Pakistan and Ceylon (now [[Sri Lanka]]) in 1947. The [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] government, which was alarmed at the threat of Communism in the Balkans, implored the US to take over the British role in the [[Greek Civil War]], which led to the [[Truman Doctrine]] in 1947, with financial and military aid to Greece and Turkey as Britain withdrew from the region.<ref>George M. Alexander, ''The Prelude to the Truman Doctrine: British Policy in Greece, 1944–1947'' (1982); Lawrence S. Wittner, ''American Intervention in Greece, 1943–1949'' (1982)</ref> |
|||
=== Truman doctrine and emerging Cold War 1947–1953 === |
|||
The US provided financial aid in the form of the [[Anglo-American loan]] of 1946, a 50-year loan with a low 2% interest rate starting in 1950. A more permanent solution was the [[Marshall Plan]] of 1948–51, which poured $13 billion into western Europe, of which $3.3 billion went to Britain to help modernise its infrastructure and business practices. The aid was a gift and carried requirements that Britain balance its budget, control tariffs and maintain adequate currency reserves.<ref>C. C. S. Newton, "The Sterling Crisis of 1947 and the British Response to the Marshall Plan," ''Economic History Review'' (1984) 37#3 pp. 391–408 [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2597288 in JSTOR]</ref> |
|||
{{See also|Cold War|Anglo-American loan|Truman Doctrine|}}The [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]] government, which was alarmed at the threat of Communism in the Balkans, implored the US to take over the British role in the [[Greek Civil War]], which led to the [[Truman Doctrine]] in 1947, with financial and military aid to Greece and Turkey as Britain withdrew from the region.<ref>George M. Alexander, ''The Prelude to the Truman Doctrine: British Policy in Greece, 1944–1947'' (1982); Lawrence S. Wittner, ''American Intervention in Greece, 1943–1949'' (1982)</ref> |
|||
The need to form a united front against the Soviet threat compelled the US and Britain to cooperate in helping to form the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] with their European allies. NATO is a mutual defence alliance whereby an attack on one member country is deemed an attack on all members. |
The need to form a united front against the Soviet threat compelled the US and Britain to cooperate in helping to form the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] with their European allies. NATO is a mutual defence alliance whereby an attack on one member country is deemed an attack on all members. |
||
The United States had an anti-colonial and anti-communist stance in its foreign policy throughout the Cold War. Military forces from the United States and the United Kingdom were heavily involved in the [[Korean War]], fighting under a [[United Nations Command|United Nations mandate]]. |
The United States had an anti-colonial and anti-communist stance in its foreign policy throughout the Cold War. Military forces from the United States and the United Kingdom were heavily involved in the [[Korean War]], fighting under a [[United Nations Command|United Nations mandate]]. A military stalemate finally led to an armistice that ended the fighting in 1953. During the same year British and American intelligence agencies worked together and were instrumental in supporting the [[1953 Iranian coup d'état]] whereby the Iranian military restored the [[Mohammad Reza Pahlavi|Shah]] to power.<ref>Ervand Abrahamian, ''A History of Modern Iran'' (2008)</ref> |
||
In 1954 the US attempted to help the beleaguered [[French Army]] at the height of the [[Battle of Dien Bien Phu]]. They planned [[Operation Vulture]]; a planned aerial assault on the opposing communist [[Viet Minh]] siege positions. President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] made American participation reliant on British support, but Foreign Secretary Sir [[Anthony Eden]] was opposed and ''Vulture'' was reluctantly cancelled.<ref>{{Citation|last=Kowert|first=Paul |title=Groupthink or deadlock: when do leaders learn from their advisors?|edition=illustrated|publisher=SUNY Press|year=2002|isbn=978-0-7914-5249-3|pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=3kUWAycjBsMC&pg=PA67 67–68]|url=https://books.google.com/?id=3kUWAycjBsMC}}</ref><ref name=Tucker1999>{{Citation |last=Tucker|first=Spencer|title=Vietnam|edition=illustrated |publisher=Routledge |year=1999 |page=76 |isbn=978-1-85728-922-0|url=https://books.google.com/?id=FEpuVkgzFJYC}}</ref> With the fall of Dien Bien Phu the |
In 1954 the US attempted to help the beleaguered [[French Army]] at the height of the [[Battle of Dien Bien Phu]] in Vietnam. They planned [[Operation Vulture]]; a planned aerial assault on the opposing communist [[Viet Minh]] siege positions. President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] made American participation reliant on British support, but Foreign Secretary Sir [[Anthony Eden]] was opposed and ''Vulture'' was reluctantly cancelled.<ref>{{Citation|last=Kowert|first=Paul |title=Groupthink or deadlock: when do leaders learn from their advisors?|edition=illustrated|publisher=SUNY Press|year=2002|isbn=978-0-7914-5249-3|pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=3kUWAycjBsMC&pg=PA67 67–68]|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3kUWAycjBsMC}}</ref><ref name=Tucker1999>{{Citation |last=Tucker|first=Spencer|title=Vietnam|edition=illustrated |publisher=Routledge |year=1999 |page=76 |isbn=978-1-85728-922-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FEpuVkgzFJYC}}</ref> With the fall of Dien Bien Phu the US Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] fell out with Eden. He left the [[1954 Geneva Conference]], leaving the US to avoid direct association with the negotiations that led to the creation of the [[Democratic Republic of Vietnam]].<ref name=Logevall>{{cite book|last=Logevall|first=Fredrik|title=Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America's Vietnam|publisher=random House|year=2012| pages=550–51 |isbn=978-0-679-64519-1}}</ref> |
||
=== Angry denial: the Suez Crisis of 1956 === |
|||
When the [[Suez Crisis]] erupted in October 1956, the United States feared a wider war, after the Soviet Union threatened to intervene on the Egyptian side. Thus the United States applied sustained econo-financial{{clarify|date=November 2016}} pressure to encourage and ultimately force the United Kingdom, [[Israel]] and France to end their invasion of Egypt. British post-war debt was so large that economic sanctions could have caused a devaluation of sterling. This was something the UK government intended to avoid at all costs, and when it became clear that the international sanctions were serious, the British and their French allies withdrew their forces back to pre-war positions. The following year saw the resignation of Sir [[Anthony Eden]]. |
|||
The [[Suez Crisis]] erupted in October 1956 after Britain, France and Israel invaded Egypt to regain control of the Suez Canal. Eisenhower had repeatedly warned London against any such action, and feared a collapse of Western influence in the region. Furthermore, there was risk of a wider war, after the Soviet Union threatened to intervene on the Egyptian side and did invade Hungary to suppress a revolt. Washington responded with heavy financial and diplomatic pressure to force the invaders to withdraw. British post-war debt was so large that economic sanctions could have caused a devaluation of sterling. This would be a disaster and when it became clear that the international sanctions were serious, the invaders withdrew. [[Anthony Eden]] soon resigned as prime minister, leaving office with a ruined reputation. The world noted Britain's fall from status in the Middle East and worldwide. Anglo-American cooperation fell to the lowest point since the 1890s.<ref>Richard M. Filipink Jr, "'Force is the Last Method': Eisenhower, Dulles and American Intervention in the Suez Crisis." ''Critique'' 35.2 (2007): 173-188.</ref><ref>Cole C. Kingseed, "Eisenhower and Suez: An Appraisal of Presidential Leadership" (Naval War College, 1992) [https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA252749.pdf online].</ref><ref>{{cite journal|jstor=10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.1.0033|doi=10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.1.0033|title=Lion's Last Roar, Eagle's First Flight: Eisenhower and the Suez Crisis of 1956|year=2017|last1=Fowler|journal=Rhetoric and Public Affairs|volume=20|issue=1|pages=33–68|s2cid=149354373}}</ref> |
|||
However, the new prime minister [[Harold Macmillan]] (1957–1963) restored good terms with Eisenhower and President [[John F. Kennedy]] (1961–1963). Intimacy and warmth characterized his relationship with the latter who appointed [[David K. E. Bruce]] as ambassador.<ref>Andrew Priest, ''Kennedy, Johnson and NATO: Britain, America and the dynamics of alliance, 1962–68'' (Routledge, 2006) p. 2.</ref> |
|||
Anglo-American cooperation during Eisenhower's presidency was troubled, approaching in 1956 a complete breakdown that represented the lowest point in the relations between the two countries since the 1920s. |
|||
=== Lyndon Johnson and Harold Wilson: 1963–1969 === |
|||
===1960s=== |
|||
{{further|Foreign policy of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration}} |
|||
{{Main|1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement|Polaris Sales Agreement}} |
|||
After [[Assassination of John F. Kennedy|Kennedy's assassination]] [[Foreign policy of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration|President Lyndon B. Johnson]] (1963–1969) kept ambassador Bruce but ignored all his recommendations. Bruce sought closer ties with Britain and greater European unity. Bruce's reports regarding Britain's financial condition were pessimistic and alarmist. With regard to Vietnam, Bruce privately questioned US involvement and constantly urged the Johnson administration to allow Britain more of a role in bringing the conflict to an end.<ref>Jonathan Colman, "The London Ambassadorship of David K. E. Bruce During the Wilson-Johnson Years, 1964–68." ''Diplomacy and Statecraft'' 15.2 (2004): 327-352. [http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/1280/1/The_London_Ambassadorship_of_David_K._E._Bruce.pdf online]</ref> The British ambassador was Sir [[Patrick Dean (diplomat)|Patrick Dean]] (1965-1969). Dean was preoccupied with sharp difficulties over Vietnam and British military commitments east of Suez. He promoted mutual understanding but was largely ignored by Johnson because the traditional Anglo-American relationship was decaying and Johnson disliked diplomats.{{citation needed|date=May 2022}} London, furthermore, relied less and less on ambassadors and embassies.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Jonathan|last=Colman|title=Dealing with disillusioned men': the Washington Ambassadorship of Sir Patrick Dean, 1965–69|journal=Contemporary British History|volume=21|number=2|year=2007|pages=247–270|doi=10.1080/13619460600785358 |s2cid=143361772 }}</ref> |
|||
Through the [[1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement|US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement signed in 1958]], the United States assisted the United Kingdom in their own development of a [[Nuclear weapons and the United Kingdom|nuclear arsenal]]. The British, however, were financially unable to develop their own delivery systems for nuclear weapons. In April 1963, the [[Polaris Sales Agreement]] called for the U.S. to sell the [[UGM-27 Polaris]] ballistic missile for use in the Royal Navy's submarine fleet starting in 1968.<ref>{{cite book|author=Alasdair Blair|title=Britain and the World Since 1945|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aekABAAAQBAJ&pg=PA59|year=2014|publisher=Routledge|pages=59–60|isbn=9781317665748}}</ref> |
|||
Through the [[1958 US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement|US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement signed in 1958]], the UK and US resumed military technological cooperation on nuclear weapons, which had been prevented by the 1946 US [[Atomic Energy Act of 1946]] (otherwise known as the Mcmahon Act). Britain's independent nuclear programme was increasingly hampered by funding issues, and the cancellation of the British [[Blue Streak (missile)|Blue Streak]] ballistic missile in 1960 necessitated the purchase of the US [[Skybolt]] system. In April 1963, the [[Polaris Sales Agreement]] established a basis for the sale of the US [[UGM-27 Polaris]] ballistic missile for use in the Royal Navy's submarine fleet starting in 1968.<ref>{{cite book|author=Alasdair Blair|title=Britain and the World Since 1945|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aekABAAAQBAJ&pg=PA59|year=2014|publisher=Routledge|pages=59–60|isbn=9781317665748}}</ref> |
|||
The American containment policy called for military resistance to the expansion of communism, and the [[Vietnam War]] became the main battlefield in the 1950s down to the communist victory in 1975. [[Harold Wilson]], the Prime Minister (1964-1970) believed in a strong "[[Special Relationship]]" and wanted to highlight his dealings with the White House to strengthen his own prestige as a statesman. President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] disliked Wilson, and ignored any "special" relationship. He agreed to provide financial help but he strongly opposed British plans to devalue the pound and withdraw military units east of Suez. Vietnam was the sore point.<ref>Marc Tiley, "Britain, Vietnam and the Special Relationship." ''History Today'' 63.12 (2013).</ref> As the American military involvement deepened after 1964, Johnson repeatedly asked for British ground units to validate international support for American intervention. Wilson never sent troops, but he did provide help with intelligence, and training in jungle warfare, as well as verbal support. He also took the initiative in attempting numerous mediation schemes, typically involving Russian intervention, none of which gained traction.<ref>Pimlott, ''Wilson'' pp 388-94.</ref> Wilson's policy divided the Labour Party; the Conservative opposition generally supported the American position on Vietnam. Issues of foreign policy were rarely salient in general elections.<ref>Dominic Sandbrook, ''White Heat: A History of Britain in the Swinging Sixties 1964-1970'' (2009) p 361.</ref> Wilson and Johnson also differed sharply on British economic weakness and its declining status as a world power. Historian Jonathan Colman concludes it made for the most unsatisfactory "special" relationship in the 20th century.<ref>Jonathan Colman, ''A 'Special Relationship'? Harold Wilson, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Anglo-American Relations 'At the Summit', 1964-68'' (2004)</ref> |
|||
The American containment policy called for military resistance to the expansion of communism, and the [[Vietnam War]] became the main battlefield in the 1950s down to the communist victory in 1975. Prime Minister [[Harold Wilson]] (1964-1970) believed in a strong "[[Special Relationship]]" and wanted to highlight his dealings with the White House to strengthen his own prestige as a statesman. President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] disliked Wilson, and ignored any "special" relationship.{{citation needed|date=May 2022}} He agreed to provide financial help but he strongly opposed British plans to devalue the pound and withdraw military units east of Suez.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Marc|last=Tiley|title=Britain, Vietnam and the Special Relationship|journal=History Today|volume=63|number=12|year=2013}}</ref> As the American military involvement deepened after 1964, Johnson repeatedly asked for British ground units to validate international support for American intervention. Wilson never sent troops, but British intelligence, training in jungle warfare, and verbal support was provided. He also took the initiative in attempting numerous mediation schemes, typically involving Russian intervention, none of which gained traction.<ref>Pimlott, ''Wilson'' pp 388-94.</ref> Wilson's policy divided the Labour Party; the Conservative opposition generally supported the American position on Vietnam. Issues of foreign policy were rarely salient in general elections.{{disputed inline|date=May 2022}}<ref>{{cite book|first=Dominic|last=Sandbrook|title=White Heat: A History of Britain in the Swinging Sixties 1964-1970|year=2009|page=361}}</ref> Wilson and Johnson also differed sharply on British economic weakness and its declining status as a world power. Historian Jonathan Colman concludes it made for the most unsatisfactory "special" relationship in the 20th century.<ref>Jonathan Colman, ''A 'Special Relationship'? Harold Wilson, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Anglo-American Relations 'At the Summit', 1964-68'' (2004)</ref> |
|||
The tone of the relationship was set early on when Johnson sent Secretary of State [[Dean Rusk]] as head of the American delegation to the [[Death and state funeral of Winston Churchill|state funeral of Winston Churchill]] in January 1965, rather than the new vice president, [[Hubert Humphrey]]. Johnson himself had been hospitalized with influenza and advised by his doctors against attending the funeral.<ref name=LBJAndQueen>{{cite book|title=Elizabeth the Queen: inside the life of a modern monarch|last=Smith|first=Sally Bedell|year=2012|pages=[https://archive.org/details/elizabethqueenin0000smit/page/176/mode/2up 177]-[https://archive.org/details/elizabethqueenin0000smit/page/178/mode/2up 178]|location=New York|publisher=Random House|isbn=9781400067893 |author-link=Sally Bedell Smith|url=https://archive.org/details/elizabethqueenin0000smit}}</ref><ref name="LBJPhysicians"/> This perceived slight generated much criticism against the president, both in the UK and in the US.<ref>{{cite news|title=Humphrey's Absence At Funeral Criticized|first=Robert H.|last=Estabrook|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=February 1, 1965|page=A8}}</ref><ref name="Humphrey"/> Johnson said during a press conference that not sending Humphrey was a "mistake."<ref name="Humphrey">{{cite news|title=Johnson Suspects a 'Mistake' in Not Sending Humphrey to Churchill Rites|first=Joseph A.|last=Loftus|newspaper=The New York Times|date=February 5, 1965|page=14|author-link=Joseph A. Loftus}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/february-4-1965-press-conference|title=February 4, 1965: Press Conference|work=Miller Center|date=October 20, 2016 |publisher=University of Virginia|access-date=October 17, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
===1970s=== |
===1970s=== |
||
[[Edward Heath]] (Prime minister |
[[Edward Heath]] (Prime minister 1970–74) and [[Presidency of Richard Nixon|Richard Nixon]] (President 1969–74) maintained a close working relationship.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Heath|first1=Edward|title=The course of my life : my autobiography|date=1998|publisher=Hodder & Stoughton|location=London|isbn=978-0340708521|page=471}}</ref> Heath deviated from his predecessors by supporting Nixon's decision to [[Operation Linebacker|bomb Hanoi and Haiphong in Vietnam]] in April 1972.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Curtis|first1=Mark|title=Britain's Secret Support For US Aggression: The Vietnam War|url=http://markcurtis.wordpress.com/2007/02/01/britains-secret-support-for-us-aggression-the-vietnam-war/|website=Secret Affairs|access-date=November 3, 2014}}</ref> Nevertheless, relations deteriorated noticeably during the early 1970s. Throughout his premiership, Heath insisted on using the phrase "natural relationship" instead of "special relationship" to refer to Anglo-American relations, acknowledging the historical and cultural similarities but carefully denying anything special beyond that.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Peters|first1=Gerhard|last2=Woolley|first2=John|title=Remarks of Welcome to Prime Minister Edward Heath of Great Britain|url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=2855|website=The American Presidency Project|publisher=UCSB|access-date=November 3, 2014}}</ref> Heath was determined to restore a measure of equality to Anglo-American relations which the United States had increasingly dominated as the power and economy of the United Kingdom flagged in the post-colonial era.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Seitz|first1=Raymond|title=Over here|date=1999|publisher=Phoenix|location=London|isbn=978-0753805190|page=[https://archive.org/details/overhere00raym/page/317 317]|edition=4|url=https://archive.org/details/overhere00raym/page/317}}</ref> |
||
Heath's renewed push for British admittance to the [[European Economic Community]] (EEC) brought new tensions between the United Kingdom and the United States. French President [[Charles De Gaulle]], who believed that British entry would allow undue American influence on the organisation, had vetoed previous British attempts at entry. Heath's final bid benefited from the more moderate views of [[Georges Pompidou]], De Gaulle's successor as [[President of France]], and his own Eurocentric foreign policy schedule. The [[Presidency of Richard Nixon|Nixon administration]] viewed this bid as a pivot away from close ties with the United States in favour of continental Europe. After Britain's admission to the EEC in 1973, Heath confirmed this interpretation by notifying his American counterparts that the United Kingdom would henceforth be formulating European policies with other EEC members before discussing them with the United States. Furthermore, Heath indicated his potential willingness to consider a nuclear partnership with France and questioned what the United Kingdom got in return for American use of British military and intelligence facilities worldwide.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Rossbach|first1=Niklas H.|title=Heath, Nixon and the rebirth of the special relationship : Britain, the US and the EC, 1969-74|date=2009|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|location=Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire|isbn=978-0-230-57725-1|page=85}}</ref> In return, Nixon and his Secretary of State [[Henry Kissinger]] briefly cut off the Anglo-American intelligence tap in August 1973.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Aldrich|first1=Richard|title=Transcript of Nixon phone call reveals depth of collapse of the US UK special relationship in 1973|website=University of Warwick}}</ref> Kissinger then attempted to restore American influence in Europe with his abortive 1973 "Year of Europe" policy plan to update the NATO agreements. Members of the Heath administration, including Heath himself in later years, regarded this announcement with derision.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hughes|first1=R. G.|last2=Robb|first2=T.|title=Kissinger and the Diplomacy of Coercive Linkage in the "Special Relationship" between the United States and Great Britain, 1969-1977|journal=Diplomatic History|date=May 2, 2013|volume=37|issue=4|pages=872–879|doi=10.1093/dh/dht061}}</ref> |
Heath's renewed push for British admittance to the [[European Economic Community]] (EEC) brought new tensions between the United Kingdom and the United States. French President [[Charles De Gaulle]], who believed that British entry would allow undue American influence on the organisation, had vetoed previous British attempts at entry. Heath's final bid benefited from the more moderate views of [[Georges Pompidou]], De Gaulle's successor as [[President of France]], and his own Eurocentric foreign policy schedule. The [[Presidency of Richard Nixon|Nixon administration]] viewed this bid as a pivot away from close ties with the United States in favour of continental Europe. After Britain's admission to the EEC in 1973, Heath confirmed this interpretation by notifying his American counterparts that the United Kingdom would henceforth be formulating European policies with other EEC members before discussing them with the United States. Furthermore, Heath indicated his potential willingness to consider a nuclear partnership with France and questioned what the United Kingdom got in return for American use of British military and intelligence facilities worldwide.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Rossbach|first1=Niklas H.|title=Heath, Nixon and the rebirth of the special relationship : Britain, the US and the EC, 1969-74|date=2009|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|location=Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire|isbn=978-0-230-57725-1|page=85}}</ref> In return, Nixon and his Secretary of State [[Henry Kissinger]] briefly cut off the Anglo-American intelligence tap in August 1973.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Aldrich|first1=Richard|title=Transcript of Nixon phone call reveals depth of collapse of the US UK special relationship in 1973|website=University of Warwick}}</ref> Kissinger then attempted to restore American influence in Europe with his abortive 1973 "Year of Europe" policy plan to update the NATO agreements. Members of the Heath administration, including Heath himself in later years, regarded this announcement with derision.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hughes|first1=R. G.|last2=Robb|first2=T.|title=Kissinger and the Diplomacy of Coercive Linkage in the "Special Relationship" between the United States and Great Britain, 1969-1977|journal=Diplomatic History|date=May 2, 2013|volume=37|issue=4|pages=872–879|doi=10.1093/dh/dht061|doi-access=free}}</ref> |
||
In 1973, American and British officials disagreed in their handling of the Arab-Israeli [[Yom Kippur War]]. While the Nixon administration immediately increased military aid to Israel, Heath maintained British neutrality in the conflict and imposed a British arms embargo on all combatants, which mostly hindered the Israelis by preventing them obtaining spares for their [[Centurion tank]]s. Anglo-American disagreement intensified over Nixon's unilateral decision to elevate American forces, stationed at British bases, to [[DEFCON|DEFCON 3]] status on |
In 1973, American and British officials disagreed in their handling of the Arab-Israeli [[Yom Kippur War]]. While the Nixon administration immediately increased military aid to Israel, Heath maintained British neutrality in the conflict and imposed a British arms embargo on all combatants, which mostly hindered the Israelis by preventing them obtaining spares for their [[Centurion tank]]s. Anglo-American disagreement intensified over Nixon's unilateral decision to elevate American forces, stationed at British bases, to [[DEFCON|DEFCON 3]] status on October 25 in response to the breakdown of the United Nations ceasefire.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hughes|first1=Geraint|title=Britain, the Transatlantic Alliance, and the Arab-Israeli War of 1973|journal=Journal of Cold War Studies|date=2008|volume=10|issue=2|pages=3–40|url=http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_cold_war_studies/summary/v010/10.2.hughes.html|access-date=October 6, 2014|doi=10.1162/jcws.2008.10.2.3|s2cid=57566713|url-access=subscription}}</ref> Heath disallowed American intelligence gathering, resupplying, or refueling from [[Akrotiri and Dhekelia|British bases in Cyprus]], which greatly limited the effective range of American reconnaissance planes.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Dangerous Liaisons: Post-September 11 Intelligence Alliances|journal=Harvard International Review|date=September 2002|volume=24|issue=3|pages=49–54}}</ref> In return, Kissinger imposed a second intelligence cutoff over this disagreement and some in the administration even suggested that the United States should refuse to assist in the British missile upgrade to the Polaris system.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hughes|first1=R. G.|last2=Robb|first2=T.|title=Kissinger and the Diplomacy of Coercive Linkage in the "Special Relationship" between the United States and Great Britain, 1969-1977|journal=Diplomatic History|date=May 2, 2013|volume=37|issue=4|pages=884–886|doi=10.1093/dh/dht061|doi-access=free}}</ref> Tensions between the United States and United Kingdom relaxed as the second ceasefire took effect. Wilson's return to power in 1974 helped to return Anglo-American relations to normality. |
||
On |
On July 23, 1977, officials from the United Kingdom and the United States renegotiated the previous Bermuda I Agreement, and signed the [[Bermuda II Agreement]] under which only four airlines, two from the United Kingdom and two from the United States, were allowed to operate flights between [[London Heathrow Airport]] and specified "gateway cities" in the United States. The Bermuda II Agreement was in effect for nearly 30 years until it was eventually replaced by the [[EU-US Open Skies Agreement]], which was signed on April 30, 2007, and entered into effect on March 30, 2008. |
||
===1980s=== |
===1980s=== |
||
{{multiple image |
|||
[[File:President Ronald Reagan During An Oval Office Meeting and Working Visit of Prime Minister Thatcher of The United Kingdom.jpg|thumb|right|[[Ronald Reagan]] with close ally and personal friend [[Margaret Thatcher]] in February 1985]] |
|||
|direction=vertical |
|||
Throughout the 1980s, [[Margaret Thatcher]] was strongly supportive of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s unwavering stance towards the Soviet Union. Often described as "political soulmates" and a high point in the "[[Special Relationship]]", Reagan and Thatcher met many times throughout their political careers, speaking in concert when confronting Soviet Premier [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]. During the [[Soviet-Afghan War]], Britain supported US military and financial aid to the anti communist [[mujaheddin]] insurgents in [[Operation Cyclone]]. |
|||
|image1=President Ronald Reagan with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.jpg |
|||
|alt1=photograph of Thatcher and Reagan in 1981 |
|||
|image2=President Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of the United Kingdom.jpg |
|||
|alt2=photograph of Thatcher and Reagan in 1988 |
|||
|footer=Ronald Reagan with close ally and personal friend Margaret Thatcher during the 1980s |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Margaret Thatcher]] (Prime Minister, 1979–1990) and [[Ronald Reagan]] (President, 1981–1989) bonded quickly. According to [[David Cannadine]]: |
|||
: In many ways they were very different figures: he was sunny, genial, charming, relaxed, upbeat, and with little intellectual curiosity or command of policy detail; she was domineering, belligerent, confrontational, tireless, hyperactive, and with an unrivalled command of facts and figures. But the chemistry between them worked. Reagan had been grateful for her interest in him at a time when the British establishment refused to take him seriously; she agreed with him about the importance of creating wealth, cutting taxes, and building up stronger defences against Soviet Russia; and both believed in liberty and free-market freedom, and in the need to outface what Reagan would later call 'the evil empire'.<ref>David Cannadine, "Thatcher [née Roberts], Margaret Hilda, Baroness Thatcher (1925–2013)" ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography'' (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/106415</ref> |
|||
Throughout the 1980s, Thatcher was strongly supportive of Reagan's unwavering stance towards the Soviet Union. Often described as "political soulmates" and a high point in the "[[Special Relationship]]", Reagan and Thatcher met many times throughout their political careers, speaking in concert when confronting [[General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union|Soviet general secretary]] [[Mikhail Gorbachev]]. During the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], Britain was [[United Kingdom in the Soviet-Afghan War|covertly involved]] and helped support the US military and financial aid to the anti communist [[mujaheddin]] insurgents in [[Operation Cyclone]]. |
|||
In 1982, the British Government made a request to the United States, which the Americans agreed upon in principle, to sell the [[UGM-133 Trident II|Trident II D5 ballistic missile]], associated equipment, and related system support for use on four {{sclass |
In 1982, the British Government made a request to the United States, which the Americans agreed upon in principle, to sell the [[UGM-133 Trident II|Trident II D5 ballistic missile]], associated equipment, and related system support for use on four {{sclass|Vanguard|submarine|0}} nuclear submarines in the Royal Navy. The Trident II D5 ballistic missile replaced the United Kingdom's previous use of the UGM-27 Polaris ballistic missile, beginning in the mid-1990s.<ref name="lockheedmartin.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2000/LockheedMartinAwardedSupportContrac.html|title=Lockheed Martin Awarded Support Contract for United Kingdom's Fleet Ballistic Missile Program?|access-date=November 8, 2009|archive-date=August 13, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110813223218/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2000/LockheedMartinAwardedSupportContrac.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
In the [[Falklands War]] in 1982, the United States initially tried to mediate between the United Kingdom and [[Argentina]], but ended up supporting the United Kingdom's counter-invasion. The |
In the [[Falklands War]] in 1982, the United States initially tried to mediate between the United Kingdom and [[Argentina]], but ended up supporting the United Kingdom's counter-invasion. The US supplied the British Armed Forces with equipment as well as logistical support.<ref>Simon Jenkins, "American Involvement in the Falklands" ''The Economist,'' March 3, 1984</ref> |
||
In October 1983, the United States and an [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]] coalition undertook [[Operation Urgent Fury]], the invasion of the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] island nation of [[Grenada]] following a Marxist coup. Neighboring countries in the region asked the United States to intervene militarily, which it did successfully despite having made assurances to a deeply resentful British Government. |
In October 1983, the United States and an [[Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States]] coalition undertook [[Operation Urgent Fury]], the invasion of the [[Commonwealth of Nations|Commonwealth]] island nation of [[Grenada]] following a Marxist coup. Neighboring countries in the region asked the United States to intervene militarily, which it did successfully despite having made assurances to a deeply resentful British Government. |
||
On 15 |
On April 15, 1986, the US military under President Reagan launched [[Operation El Dorado Canyon]], a bombing of [[Tripoli, Libya|Tripoli]] and [[Benghazi]] in [[History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi|Libya]], from [[Royal Air Force station]]s in England with the permission of Prime Minister Thatcher. It was a counter-attack by the United States in response to Libyan state-sponsored terrorism directed towards civilians and American servicemen under Muammar Gaddafi, especially the 1986 [[West Berlin discotheque bombing]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Christopher Coker|title=United States, Western Europe and Military Intervention Overseas|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AOheCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA32|year=2016|page=32|publisher=Springer |isbn=9781349084067}}</ref> |
||
On |
On December 21, 1988, [[Pan Am Flight 103|Pan American Worldways' Flight 103]] from [[London Heathrow Airport]] to New York's [[John F. Kennedy International Airport]] exploded over the town of [[Lockerbie]], Scotland, killing 189 Americans and 40 Britons on board. The motive that is generally attributed to Libya can be traced back to a series of military confrontations with the [[United States Navy]] in the 1980s in the [[Gulf of Sidra]], the whole of which Libya claimed as its territorial waters. Despite a guilty verdict on January 31, 2001, by the [[High Court of Justiciary|Scottish High Court of Justiciary]] which ruled against [[Abdelbaset al-Megrahi]], the bomber, on charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, Libya never formally admitted carrying out the 1988 bombing over Scotland until 2003. |
||
During the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], the United States and the United Kingdom throughout the 1980s provided arms to the [[Mujahideen]] rebels in Afghanistan until the last troops from the [[Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan|Soviet Union left Afghanistan]] in February 1989.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jan Goldman|title=The Central Intelligence Agency: An Encyclopedia of Covert Ops, Intelligence Gathering, and Spies|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8DgVCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA254|year=2015|page=254|isbn=9781610690928}}</ref> |
During the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], the United States and the United Kingdom throughout the 1980s provided arms to the [[Mujahideen]] rebels in Afghanistan until the last troops from the [[Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan|Soviet Union left Afghanistan]] in February 1989.<ref>{{cite book|author=Jan Goldman|title=The Central Intelligence Agency: An Encyclopedia of Covert Ops, Intelligence Gathering, and Spies|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8DgVCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA254|year=2015|page=254|publisher=Abc-Clio |isbn=9781610690928}}</ref> |
||
===Post-Cold War=== |
===Post-Cold War=== |
||
Line 475: | Line 300: | ||
When the United States became the world's lone superpower after the [[dissolution of the Soviet Union]], new threats emerged which confronted the United States and its [[NATO]] allies. With military build-up beginning in August 1990 and the use of force beginning in January 1991, the United States, followed at a distance by Britain, provided the two largest forces respectively for the coalition army which liberated [[Kuwait]] from [[Saddam Hussein]]'s regime during the [[Gulf War|Persian Gulf War]]. |
When the United States became the world's lone superpower after the [[dissolution of the Soviet Union]], new threats emerged which confronted the United States and its [[NATO]] allies. With military build-up beginning in August 1990 and the use of force beginning in January 1991, the United States, followed at a distance by Britain, provided the two largest forces respectively for the coalition army which liberated [[Kuwait]] from [[Saddam Hussein]]'s regime during the [[Gulf War|Persian Gulf War]]. |
||
In the [[1997 United Kingdom general election|1997 general election]], the [[Labour Party (UK)|British Labour Party]] was elected to office for the first time in eighteen years. The new prime minister, [[Tony Blair]], and [[Bill Clinton]] both used the expression "[[Third Way]]" to describe their centre-left ideologies. In August 1997, the American people expressed solidarity with the British people, sharing in their grief and sense of shock on the [[death of Diana, Princess of Wales]], who perished in a car crash in |
In the [[1997 United Kingdom general election|1997 general election]], the [[Labour Party (UK)|British Labour Party]] was elected to office for the first time in eighteen years. The new prime minister, [[Tony Blair]], and [[Bill Clinton]] both used the expression "[[Third Way]]" to describe their centre-left ideologies. In August 1997, the American people expressed solidarity with the British people, sharing in their grief and sense of shock on the [[death of Diana, Princess of Wales]], who perished in a car crash in Paris. Throughout 1998 and 1999, the United States and Britain sent troops to impose peace during the [[Kosovo War]]. Tony Blair made it a point to develop very close relationships with the White House.<ref>James Naughtie, ''The Accidental American: Tony Blair and the Presidency'' (Pan Macmillan, 2005).</ref> |
||
Throughout 1998 and 1999, the United States and Britain sent troops to impose peace during the [[Kosovo War]]. |
|||
{{anchor|War on Terrorism|Iraq War}} |
{{anchor|War on Terrorism|Iraq War}} |
||
===War on Terror and Iraq War=== |
===War on Terror and Iraq War=== |
||
[[File:Blair Bush Whitehouse (2004-11-12).jpg|thumb|right|[[Tony Blair]] and [[George W. Bush]] seen shaking hands after a press conference in the [[East Room]] of the [[White House]] on 12 November 2004.]] |
|||
{{See also|War on Terror|11 September attacks|7 July 2005 London bombings|Iraq War}} |
{{See also|War on Terror|11 September attacks|7 July 2005 London bombings|Iraq War}} |
||
[[File:Blair Bush Whitehouse (2004-11-12).jpg|thumb|[[Tony Blair]] and [[George W. Bush]] at a press conference in the [[White House]] on November 12, 2004]] |
|||
67 Britons were among the 2,977 victims killed during the terrorist attacks on the [[World Trade Center (1973–2001)|World Trade Center]] in [[New York City]], [[the Pentagon]] in [[Arlington County, Virginia]], and in an open field near [[Shanksville, Pennsylvania]], on September 11, 2001, which were orchestrated by [[al-Qaeda]]. Following the [[September 11, 2001 attacks|11 September 2001 attacks]], there was an enormous outpouring of sympathy from the United Kingdom for the American people, and Tony Blair was one of [[George W. Bush|George W. Bush's]] strongest international supporters for bringing al-Qaeda and the [[Taliban]] to justice. Indeed, Blair became the most articulate spokesman. He was the only foreign leader to attend an emergency joint session of Congress called immediately after the attacks (and remains the only foreign leader ever to attend such a session), where he received two standing ovations from members of Congress. During this session of Congress, President George W. Bush stated matter-of-factly that "America has no truer friend than Great Britain".<ref>Anglo-American Relations: Contemporary Perspectives edited by Alan Dobson, Steve Marsh pg. 72</ref> |
|||
Sixty-seven Britons were among the [[List of fatal victims of the September 11 attacks|2,977 victims killed]] during the terrorist attacks on the [[World Trade Center (1973–2001)|World Trade Center]] and elsewhere on [[September 11 attacks|September 11, 2001]]. [[Al-Qaeda]] was the attacker. Following the attacks, there was an enormous outpouring of sympathy from the United Kingdom for the American people, and Blair was one of Bush's strongest international supporters for military action against [[Al-Qaeda]] and the Taliban. Indeed, Blair became the most articulate spokesman. President Bush told Congress that "America has no truer friend than Great Britain".<ref>Alan Dobson, and Steve Marsh, eds. ''Anglo-American Relations: Contemporary Perspectives'' (2013) p. 72</ref> |
|||
The United States declared a [[War on Terror]] following the attacks. British forces participated in NATO's [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|war in Afghanistan]]. Blair took the lead (against the opposition of France, Canada, Germany, China, and Russia) in advocating the [[2003 invasion of Iraq|invasion of Iraq]] in 2003. Again Britain was second only to the US in sending forces to Iraq. Both sides wound down after 2009, and withdrew their last troops in 2011. President Bush and Prime Minister Blair provided sustained mutual political and diplomatic support and won votes in Congress and parliament against their critics at home.<ref>Shawcross (2004) ch 2</ref> |
The United States declared a [[War on Terror]] following the attacks. British forces participated in NATO's [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|war in Afghanistan]]. Blair took the lead (against the opposition of France, Canada, Germany, China, and Russia) in advocating the [[2003 invasion of Iraq|invasion of Iraq]] in 2003. Again, Britain was second only to the US in sending forces to Iraq. Both sides wound down after 2009, and withdrew their last troops in 2011. President Bush and Prime Minister Blair provided sustained mutual political and diplomatic support and won votes in Congress and parliament against their critics at home.<ref>Shawcross (2004) ch 2</ref> During this period Secretary of Defense [[Donald Rumsfeld]] said that "America has no finer ally than the United Kingdom."<ref>Montgomery: Lessons in Leadership from the Soldier's General By Trevor Royle pg. 180</ref> |
||
The [[7 July 2005 London bombings]] emphasised the difference in the nature of the terrorist threat to both nations. The United States concentrated primarily on global enemies, like the [[al-Qaeda]] network and other Islamic extremists from the Middle East. The London bombings were carried out by homegrown extremist Muslims, and it emphasised the United Kingdom's threat from the radicalisation of its own people. |
The [[7 July 2005 London bombings]] emphasised the difference in the nature of the terrorist threat to both nations. The United States concentrated primarily on global enemies, like the [[al-Qaeda]] network and other Islamic extremists from the Middle East. The London bombings were carried out by homegrown extremist Muslims, and it emphasised the United Kingdom's threat from the radicalisation of its own people. |
||
After claims by [[Liberty (pressure group)|Liberty]] that British airports had been used by the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] for [[extraordinary rendition]] flights, the [[Association of Chief Police Officers]] launched an investigation in November 2005. The report was published in June 2007 and found no evidence to support the claim. This was on the same day the Council of Europe released its report with evidence that the UK had colluded in extraordinary rendition, thus directly contradicting ACPO's findings.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6736227.stm Police reject UK rendition claims], ''[[BBC News Online]]'', |
After claims by [[Liberty (pressure group)|Liberty]] that British airports had been used by the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] for [[extraordinary rendition]] flights, the [[Association of Chief Police Officers]] launched an investigation in November 2005. The report was published in June 2007 and found no evidence to support the claim. This was on the same day the Council of Europe released its report with evidence that the UK had colluded in extraordinary rendition, thus directly contradicting ACPO's findings.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6736227.stm Police reject UK rendition claims], ''[[BBC News Online]]'', June 9, 2007</ref> A 2018 report by the [[Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament]] found the United Kingdom, specifically the [[MI5]] and [[MI6]], to be complicit in many of the renditions done by the US, having helped fund them, supplying them with intelligence and knowingly allowing them to happen.<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/iraq-war-torture-rendition-jack-straw-tony-blair-us-intelligence-agencies-a8421636.html The findings that the UK intelligence agencies knew of torture during the Iraq War reveals the dark side of the special relationship], '' The Independent''</ref> |
||
By 2007, support amongst the British public for the Iraq war had plummeted.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2004/11/13/ftyank12.xml |title=Sometimes, I pretend I am Canadian | |
By 2007, support amongst the British public for the Iraq war had plummeted.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2004/11/13/ftyank12.xml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050323092218/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=%2Farts%2F2004%2F11%2F13%2Fftyank12.xml |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 23, 2005 |title=Sometimes, I pretend I am Canadian |access-date=July 13, 2007 |work=Helen Kirwan-Taylor |location=London |date=November 13, 2004 }}</ref> Despite Tony Blair's historically low approval ratings with the British people, mainly due to allegations of faulty government intelligence of Iraq possessing [[weapons of mass destruction]], his unapologetic and unwavering stance for the British alliance with the United States can be summed up in his own words. He said, "We should remain the closest ally of the US ... not because they are powerful, but because we share their values."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3264169.stm#btp|title=US and UK: A transatlantic love story?|access-date=September 6, 2009|work=BBC |date=November 17, 2003}}</ref> The alliance between [[George W. Bush]] and Tony Blair seriously damaged the prime minister's standing in the eyes of many [[British people|British citizens]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,,1828225,00.html |title=Stand up to US, voters tell Blair |author=Julian Glover and Ewen MacAskill |work=The Guardian |date=July 25, 2006 |access-date=November 22, 2007 |quote=Britain should take a much more robust and independent approach to the United States, according to a Guardian/ICM poll published today, which finds strong public opposition to Tony Blair's close working relationship with President Bush. |location=London}}</ref> Tony Blair argued it was in the United Kingdom's interest to "protect and strengthen the bond" with the United States regardless of who is in the White House.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page6526.asp |title=PM's speech on US Elections |access-date=May 29, 2007 |date=November 3, 2004 |work=number10.gov.uk |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070719002546/http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page6526.asp |archive-date=July 19, 2007 }}</ref> A perception that the relationship was unequal led to use of the term "Poodle-ism" in the British media, that Britain and its leaders were lapdogs to the Americans.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/14/iraq.foreignpolicy |work=The Guardian |location=London |title=Blair has not been a poodle, but poodleism still beckons |first=Hugo |last=Young |date=November 14, 2002 |access-date=May 26, 2010}}</ref><ref>James K. Wither, "British bulldog or Bush's poodle? Anglo-American relations and the Iraq War." ''Parameters'' 33.4 (2003): 67+ [https://press.armywarcollege.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2182&context=parameters online].</ref> |
||
On June 11, 2009, the [[British Overseas Territory]] of [[Bermuda]] accepted four [[Uyghurs|Chinese Uighurs]] from the American detainment facility at the [[Guantanamo Bay Naval Base]] in Cuba.<ref>They were [[Khaleel Mamut]], [[Hozaifa Parhat]], [[Salahidin Abdulahat]], and [[Abdullah Abdulqadirakhun]].</ref> All had been captured by during the [[United States invasion of Afghanistan|United States-led invasion of Afghanistan]] in October 2001. This decision angered London, as British officials felt they should have been consulted.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article6480320.ece|title=Foreign Office fury over settlement of Guantánamo Uighurs in Bermuda |work=The Times |location=London |first=Philippe |last=Naughton |date=June 11, 2009 |access-date=May 26, 2010}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> |
|||
All British servicemen were withdrawn with the exception of 400 who remained in Iraq until 31 July 2009.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/5084366/British-hand-over-Basra-command-to-US.html|title=British hand over Basra command to US|accessdate=July 20, 2009|work=The Telegraph |location=London |first=Thomas |last=Harding |date=March 31, 2009}}</ref> |
|||
=== Tension with Scotland === |
|||
On 11 June 2009, the [[British Overseas Territory]] of [[Bermuda]] accepted four [[Uyghurs|Chinese Uighurs]] from the United States' detainment facility known as [[Guantanamo Bay detention camp]] located on the [[Guantanamo Bay Naval Base]] in Cuba. At the request of the United States Government, Bermudan officials agreed to host [[Khaleel Mamut]], [[Hozaifa Parhat]], [[Salahidin Abdulahat]], and [[Abdullah Abdulqadirakhun]] as guest workers in Bermuda who seven years ago, were all captured by Pakistani bounty hunters during the [[United States invasion of Afghanistan|United States-led invasion of Afghanistan]] in October 2001. This decision agreed upon by American and Bermudan officials drew considerable consternation and contempt by the [[Foreign and Commonwealth Office]] as it was viewed by British officials in London that they should have been consulted on whether or not the decision to take in four Chinese Uighurs was a security and foreign issue of which the Bermudian government does not have delegated responsibility over.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article6480320.ece|title=Foreign Office fury over settlement of Guantánamo Uighurs in Bermuda |work=The Times |location=London |first=Philippe |last=Naughton |date=June 11, 2009 |accessdate=May 26, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
=== Release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi === |
|||
{{See also|Release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi}} |
{{See also|Release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi}} |
||
[[File:First Minister of Scotland and Mayor of Chicago.jpg|thumb|[[First Minister of Scotland]] [[Alex Salmond]] (left) was heavily criticised by Washington regarding the Scottish Government's decision to release [[Abdelbaset al-Megrahi]].]] |
|||
On |
On August 20, 2009, The [[Scottish Government]] headed by First Minister [[Alex Salmond]] announced that it would release [[Abdelbaset al-Megrahi]] on medical grounds. He was the only person convicted in the terrorist plot which killed 190 Americans and 43 Britons on [[Pan Am Flight 103|Pan American Worldways' Flight 103]] over the town of [[Lockerbie]], Scotland on December 21, 1988. He was sentenced to life in prison in 2001, but was now released after being diagnosed with terminal cancer, with around three months to live. Americans said the decision was uncompassionate and insensitive to the memory of the victims of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. President [[Barack Obama]] said that the decision was "highly objectionable".<ref>''Keesing's Contemporary Archives'' Volume 55, (August 2009) Page 49368</ref> US Ambassador [[Louis Susman]] said that although the decision made by Scotland was extremely regrettable, relations with the United Kingdom would remain fully intact and strong.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.enquirerherald.com/366/story/874656.html|title=Ambassador: US-UK ties intact despite Lockerbie|agency=Associated Press}}{{Dead link|date=July 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The British government led by Gordon Brown was not involved in the release and Prime Minister Brown stated at a press conference his government had played 'no role' in the Scottish decision.<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/25/gordon-brown-lockerbie-megrahi-release|title= Lockerbie bomber's Libya reception 'repulsed' Brown|work=The Guardian |location=UK |first= Sam|last= Jones|date= August 25, 2009}}</ref> Abdelbaset al-Megrahi died May 20, 2012, at the age of 60. |
||
===''Deepwater Horizon'' oil spill=== |
|||
{{Main|Deepwater Horizon oil spill}} |
|||
In April 2010, the explosion, sinking and resultant oil spill from the ''[[Deepwater Horizon]]'' drilling rig led to diplomatic friction and populist [[anti-British sentiment]], even though the rig was owned and operated by the Swiss company [[Transocean]] and the cement work carried out by the US company [[Halliburton]] . Commentators referred to "British Petroleum" even though the company had been known as "BP" since 1998.<ref>{{cite news|title=Across Atlantic, Much Ado About Oil Company's Name|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/us/politics/13bp.html |first=Sheryl Gay |last=Stolberg |date=June 12, 2010 |accessdate=June 12, 2010 |work=The New York Times}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=frills and spills |work=Financial Times|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e3a05fa-75bb-11df-86c4-00144feabdc0.html |location=London |first=Anna |last=Fifield |date=June 12–13, 2010 |accessdate=June 13, 2010}}</ref> UK politicians expressed concerns about anti-British rhetoric in the US.<ref>{{cite news|title=Frills and spills |work=Financial Times|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ec28419c-74f3-11df-aed7-00144feabdc0.html |location=London |first=Jean |last=Eaglesham |date=June 11, 2010 |accessdate=June 13, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Love and loathing across the ocean |work=Financial Times|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8974d0fe-77e8-11df-82c3-00144feabdc0.html |location=London |first=Gideon |last=Rachman|date=June 15, 2010 |accessdate=June 16, 2010}}</ref> BP's CEO [[Tony Hayward]] was called "the most hated man in America".<ref>{{cite news|title=BP's CEO Tony Hayward: The most hated – and most clueless – man in America|publisher=NY Daily News|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/06/03/2010-06-03_bp_boss_under_fire_some_are_now_calling_him_most_hated_man_in_america.html |location=New York |first=Helen |last=Kennedy |date=June 2, 2010 |accessdate=June 12, 2010}}</ref> Conversely, the widespread public demonisation of BP and the effects on the company and its image, coupled with Obama's statements with regard to BP caused a degree of [[anti-American sentiment]] in the UK. This was particularly evidenced by the comments of the [[Business Secretary]] [[Vince Cable]], who said that "It's clear that some of the rhetoric in the US is extreme and unhelpful",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article7147278.ece |location=London |work=The Times |first=Judith |last=Evans |title=Boris Johnson attacks Americas anti-British rhetoric on BP |date=June 10, 2010}}</ref> for reasons of British pension funds, loss of revenues for the [[HM Treasury|exchequer]] and the adverse effect such the rhetoric was having on the share price of one of the UK's largest companies. |
|||
The meeting between Barack Obama and David Cameron in July somewhat helped strained diplomatic relations, and President Obama stated that there lies a "truly special relations" between the two countries. The degree to which anti-British or anti-American hostilities continue to exist, remains to be seen. |
|||
===Present status=== |
===Present status=== |
||
[[File:Barack & Michelle Obama meet Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace 4-1-09.jpg|thumb |
[[File:Barack & Michelle Obama meet Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace 4-1-09.jpg|thumb|[[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] welcomed President [[Barack Obama]] and First Lady [[Michelle Obama]] to [[Buckingham Palace]] on April 1, 2009.]] |
||
British policy is that the relationship with the United States represents the United Kingdom's "most important bilateral relationship" in the world.<ref name=autogenerated1 /> United States Secretary of State [[Hillary Clinton]] paid tribute to the relationship in February 2009 by saying, "it stands the test of time".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7866859.stm |work=BBC News |title=U.S. hails 'special ties' with UK |date=February 3, 2009 | |
British policy is that the relationship with the United States represents the United Kingdom's "most important bilateral relationship" in the world.<ref name=autogenerated1 /> United States Secretary of State [[Hillary Clinton]] paid tribute to the relationship in February 2009 by saying, "it stands the test of time".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7866859.stm |work=BBC News |title=U.S. hails 'special ties' with UK |date=February 3, 2009 |access-date=May 26, 2010}}</ref> |
||
John Dumbrell wrote in 2006: |
|||
====Obama administration==== |
|||
{{Blockquote|Any confidence in the absence of British anti-Americanism is misplaced. British attitudes towards the US often exhibit cultural snobbery, envy, crude stereotyping and resentment at America's power in the world. Such attitudes do not, as we will see demonstrated in public opinion surveys, amount to a rabid hostility. In many ways, they are understandable expressions of group feeling towards an everpresent and powerful 'other'. Many of these attitudes – that, for example, the US is the land both of rampant, destructive individualism and of homogenized sameness – are inherently contradictory. It is absurd, however, to pretend that they do not exist.<ref>John Dumbrell, ''A Special Relationship: Anglo-American Relations from the Cold War to Iraq'' (2006) p. 33.</ref>}}{{explain|date=May 2022}} |
|||
On 3 March 2009, [[Gordon Brown]] made his first visit to the Obama White House. During his visit, he presented the president a gift in the form of a pen holder carved from [[HMS Gannet (1878)|HMS ''Gannet'']], which served anti-slavery missions off the coast of Africa. [[Barack Obama|Barack Obama's]] gift to the prime minister was a box of 25 DVDs with movies including ''[[Star Wars (film)|Star Wars]]'' and ''[[E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial|E.T.]]'' The wife of the prime minister, [[Sarah Jane Brown|Sarah Brown]], gave the Obama daughters, Sasha and Malia, two dresses from British clothing retailer [[Topshop]], and a few unpublished books that have not reached the United States. [[Michelle Obama]] gave the prime minister's sons two [[Marine One]] helicopter toys.<ref>{{cite news|title=Obama's Blockbuster Gift for Brown: 25 DVDs – |url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/obamas-blockbuster-gift-brown-dvds/100days/ |publisher=Fox News |date=March 6, 2009 |url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090310184941/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/obamas-blockbuster-gift-brown-dvds/100days/ |archivedate=March 10, 2009}}</ref> During this visit to the United States, Gordon Brown made an address to a joint session of the [[United States Congress]], a privilege rarely accorded to foreign heads of government. |
|||
====Obama administration 2009–2017==== |
|||
In March 2009, a [[Gallup poll]] of Americans showed 36% identified Britain as their country's "most valuable ally", followed by Canada, Japan, Israel, and Germany rounding out the top five.<ref name="CTVsurvey">{{cite news|url=http://www.ctvnews.ca/poll-ranks-canada-second-in-list-of-top-u-s-allies-1.375958|title=Poll ranks Canada second in list of top U.S. allies|date=March 4, 2009|work=CTV News|access-date=December 5, 2017|publisher=CTV.ca news staff}}</ref> The poll also indicated that 89% of Americans view the United Kingdom favourably, second only to Canada with 90%.<ref name="CTVsurvey"/> According to the [[Pew Research Center]], a global survey conducted in July 2009 revealed that 70% of Britons who responded had a favourable view of the United States.<ref name=autogenerated2>{{cite news|title=President Obama makes U.S. popular in Europe again, Pew poll says|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6725511.ece |work=The Times |location=London |first=Matt |last=Spence |date=July 24, 2009 |accessdate=May 26, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:President Barack Obama meets Prime Minister Gordon Brown.jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[Gordon Brown]] and President [[Barack Obama]] meet at the White House in March 2009]] |
|||
On March 3, 2009, [[Gordon Brown]] made his first visit to the [[White House]]. During his visit, he presented the president a gift in the form of a pen holder carved from [[HMS Gannet (1878)|HMS ''Gannet'']], which served anti-slavery missions off the coast of Africa. [[Barack Obama]]'s gift to the prime minister was a box of 25 DVDs with movies including ''[[Star Wars (film)|Star Wars]]'' and ''[[E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial|E.T.]]'' The wife of the prime minister, [[Sarah Jane Brown|Sarah Brown]], gave the Obama daughters, Sasha and Malia, two dresses from British clothing retailer [[Topshop]], and a few unpublished books that have not reached the United States. [[Michelle Obama]] gave the prime minister's sons two [[Marine One]] helicopter toys.<ref>{{cite news|title=Obama's Blockbuster Gift for Brown: 25 DVDs – |url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/obamas-blockbuster-gift-brown-dvds/100days/ |work=Fox News |date=March 6, 2009 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090310184941/http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/06/obamas-blockbuster-gift-brown-dvds/100days/ |archive-date=March 10, 2009}}</ref> During this visit to the United States, Gordon Brown made an address to a joint session of the [[United States Congress]], a privilege rarely accorded to foreign heads of government. |
|||
In March 2009, a [[Gallup poll]] of Americans showed 36% identified Britain as their country's "most valuable ally", followed by Canada, Japan, Israel, and Germany rounding out the top five.<ref name="CTVsurvey">{{cite news|url=http://www.ctvnews.ca/poll-ranks-canada-second-in-list-of-top-u-s-allies-1.375958|title=Poll ranks Canada second in list of top U.S. allies|date=March 4, 2009|work=CTV News|access-date=December 5, 2017|publisher=CTV.ca news staff}}</ref> The poll also indicated that 89% of Americans view the United Kingdom favourably, second only to Canada with 90%.<ref name="CTVsurvey"/> According to the [[Pew Research Center]], a global survey conducted in July 2009 revealed that 70% of Britons who responded had a favourable view of the United States.<ref name=autogenerated2>{{cite news|title=President Obama makes U.S. popular in Europe again, Pew poll says|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6725511.ece |work=The Times |location=London |first=Matt |last=Spence |date=July 24, 2009 |access-date=May 26, 2010}}{{dead link|date=September 2024|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:David Cameron and Barack Obama at G8 summit, 2013.jpg|left|thumb|245px|Prime Minister [[David Cameron]] and President Barack Obama talk during the [[39th G8 summit]] in June 2013]] |
|||
In 2010, Obama stated "the United States has no closer friend and ally than the United Kingdom, and I reiterated my deep and personal commitment to the special relationship between our two countries."<ref>{{ |
In 2010, Obama stated "the United States has no closer friend and ally than the United Kingdom, and I reiterated my deep and personal commitment to the special relationship between our two countries."<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/obama-the-united-states-has-no-closer-friend-and-ally-than-the-united-kingdom | title=Obama: "the United States has no closer friend and ally than the United Kingdom"| date=May 12, 2010}}</ref> |
||
In February 2011, ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', based on evidence from [[WikiLeaks]], reported that the United States had tendered sensitive information about the [[UK Trident programme|British Trident nuclear arsenal]] (whose missile delivery systems are manufactured and maintained in the United States) to the [[Russian Federation]] as part of a deal to encourage Russia to ratify the [[New START Treaty]]. Professor Malcolm Chalmers of the [[Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies]] speculated that serial numbers could undermine Britain's non-verification policy by providing Russia "with another data point to gauge the size of the British arsenal".<ref>{{cite news|title=WikiLeaks cables: U.S. agrees to tell Russia Britain's nuclear secrets |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html#disqus_thread |date=February 4, 2011 | |
In February 2011, ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', based on evidence from [[WikiLeaks]], reported that the United States had tendered sensitive information about the [[UK Trident programme|British Trident nuclear arsenal]] (whose missile delivery systems are manufactured and maintained in the United States) to the [[Russian Federation]] as part of a deal to encourage Russia to ratify the [[New START Treaty]]. Professor Malcolm Chalmers of the [[Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies]] speculated that serial numbers could undermine Britain's non-verification policy by providing Russia "with another data point to gauge the size of the British arsenal".<ref>{{cite news|title=WikiLeaks cables: U.S. agrees to tell Russia Britain's nuclear secrets |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html#disqus_thread |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110205043428/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8304654/WikiLeaks-cables-US-agrees-to-tell-Russia-Britains-nuclear-secrets.html |archive-date=February 5, 2011 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |date=February 4, 2011 |access-date=February 6, 2011 |location=London |work=The Daily Telegraph |first=Matthew |last=Moore}}</ref> |
||
On |
On May 25, 2011, during his official visit to the UK, Obama reaffirmed the relationship between the United Kingdom and the United States of America in an address to Parliament at [[Westminster Hall]]. Amongst other points, Obama stated: "I've come here today to reaffirm one of the oldest; one of the strongest alliances the World has ever known. It's long been said that the United States and the United Kingdom share a special relationship."<ref>Full video of the speech. {{cite web| url = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxDhUjM8D4Q| title = YouTube| website = [[YouTube]]| date = May 26, 2010}}</ref> |
||
In the final days before the [[Scottish independence referendum]] in September 2014, Obama announced in public the vested interest of the United States of America in enjoying the continued partnership with a 'strong and united' UK which he described as "one of the closest allies we will ever have".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-27713327 |title=Scottish independence: Barack Obama backs 'strong and united' UK | |
In the final days before the [[Scottish independence referendum]] in September 2014, Obama announced in public the vested interest of the United States of America in enjoying the continued partnership with a 'strong and united' UK which he described as "one of the closest allies we will ever have".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-27713327 |title=Scottish independence: Barack Obama backs 'strong and united' UK |work=BBC News |date=June 5, 2014 |access-date=January 4, 2017}}</ref> |
||
During a joint press conference with Prime Minister [[Theresa May]], Obama stated "The bottom line is, is that we don't have a stronger partner anywhere in the world than the United Kingdom."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?414781-1/president-obama-prime-minister-20-news-conference|title=President Obama-Prime Minister May G-20 News Conference - C-SPAN.org|website=www.c-span.org}}</ref> |
During a joint press conference with Prime Minister [[Theresa May]], Obama stated "The bottom line is, is that we don't have a stronger partner anywhere in the world than the United Kingdom."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?414781-1/president-obama-prime-minister-20-news-conference|title=President Obama-Prime Minister May G-20 News Conference - C-SPAN.org|website=www.c-span.org}}</ref> |
||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
====Trump administration==== |
====First Trump administration 2017–2021==== |
||
[[File:President Donald J. Trump shares a moment with United Kingdom Prime Minister Theresa May (cropped).jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] and President [[Donald Trump]] meet at the White House in January 2017]] |
|||
{{update|section|date=July 2019}} |
|||
[[File: |
[[File:President Trump & the First Lady's Trip to Europe (42484594145).jpg|thumb|The [[Guard of Honour]] at [[Windsor Castle]] for the arrival of [[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] and President Trump in July 2018]] |
||
President [[Donald Trump]] and British Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] aimed to continue the United Kingdom–United States special relationship. May was the first foreign leader Trump hosted in Washington after taking office<ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/britains-may-prepares-to-become-first-foreign-leader-to-meet-president-trump/2017/01/22/76f4e8b2-e0bc-11e6-a419-eefe8eff0835_story.html</ref> and [[UK Independence Party|UKIP]] leader [[Nigel Farage]] was the first foreign politician Trump met with after winning the [[2016 United States presidential election|presidential election]], when he was still [[ |
President [[Donald Trump]] and British Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] aimed to continue the United Kingdom–United States special relationship. May was the first foreign leader Trump hosted in Washington after taking office<ref>{{cite news| url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/britains-may-prepares-to-become-first-foreign-leader-to-meet-president-trump/2017/01/22/76f4e8b2-e0bc-11e6-a419-eefe8eff0835_story.html| title = Britain's May prepares to become first foreign leader to meet President Trump - The Washington Post| newspaper = [[The Washington Post]]}}</ref> and [[UK Independence Party|UKIP]] leader [[Nigel Farage]] was the first foreign politician Trump met with after winning the [[2016 United States presidential election|presidential election]], when he was still [[President-elect of the United States|President-elect]].<ref name="newy_Nige">{{cite magazine |title=Nigel Farage on the Story Behind His Friendship with Trump |last=Knight |first=Sam |magazine=The New Yorker |date=November 30, 2016 |access-date=July 4, 2017 |url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/nigel-farage-on-the-story-behind-his-friendship-with-trump }}</ref> However, Trump was the subject of popular protests in Britain even before he took office, particularly because of his [[Immigration policy of Donald Trump|anti-immigration proposals]], misogyny and [[Racial views of Donald Trump|racism]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/protests-against-donald-trumps-racist-9229052|title=Anti-Donald Trump protests erupt outside US embassy in London as placards compare him to Hitler|last=Campbell|first=Scott|date=November 9, 2016|work=The Mirror|access-date=January 12, 2018}}</ref> During his presidency there were protests when he was inaugurated,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/21/anti-donald-trump-protests-uk-us-president-inauguration|title=Anti-Donald Trump protests take place around UK during inauguration|last=Rawlinson|first=Kevin|date=January 20, 2017|work=The Guardian|access-date=January 12, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://time.com/4654816/donald-trump-uk-protests-british-signs/|title=12 of the Most British Signs at Anti-President Trump Protests in the U.K.|last=Rahim|first=Zamira|date=January 31, 2017|magazine=Time|access-date=January 12, 2018}}</ref> when he announced his first [[Executive Order 13769|immigration ban]] on citizens from certain Muslim countries,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-38800337|title=Trump travel ban: Thousands join protests across UK|date=January 30, 2017|work=BBC News|access-date=January 12, 2018}}</ref> and when he said he would [[United States recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel|recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20171209-thousands-protest-in-britain-against-trumps-jerusalem-announcement/|title=Thousands protest in Britain against Trump's Jerusalem announcement|date=December 9, 2017|work=Middle East Monitor|access-date=January 12, 2018}}</ref> |
||
On |
On June 4, 2017, Trump responded to a [[2017 London Bridge attack|terror attack on London Bridge]] by attacking London Mayor [[Sadiq Khan]] for saying that there "was no reason to be alarmed". The comments were condemned by Khan who stated that his remarks were deliberately taken out of context in that he was referring to an increased police presence in the days after the attack, which should not alarm the public. Trump also suggested that, "we must stop being politically correct and get down to the business of security for our people".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-40152637|title=London attacks: Mayor Sadiq Khan dismisses Trump criticism|date=June 4, 2017|website=BBC News|access-date=June 5, 2017}}</ref> |
||
On |
On November 29, 2017, Trump re-tweeted three videos posted by [[Jayda Fransen]], deputy leader of the far-right nationalist [[Britain First]] party. One of the videos, titled 'Muslim immigrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches', was subsequently discredited by the Dutch embassy in the United States. The spokesperson for the Prime Minister said that what the President had done was 'wrong' and Foreign Secretary [[Boris Johnson]] said that 'hate speech had no place in the UK'. In response, Trump tweeted at the Prime Minister suggesting that she worry about immigration in her own country rather than whom he chose to retweet. White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said that the President attempted to start a conversation about immigration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-30/donald-trump-hits-back-at-theresa-may-over-far-right-group/9210564|title=Donald Trump hits back at British PM Theresa May on Twitter over far-right retweets|date=November 30, 2017|publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation|access-date=November 30, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/29/donald-trump-theresa-may-tweet-uk-us|title=Donald Trump attacks Theresa May over her criticism of his far-right retweets|last=Smith|first=David|date=November 30, 2017|website=The Guardian|access-date=November 30, 2017}}</ref> |
||
May was the first foreign leader to visit Trump after his inauguration, and she invited him to make a return visit. More than 1.8 million UK citizens signed a petition to rescind the invitation, and Parliament debated a nonbinding resolution to that effect in February 2017.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/british-parliament-debates-trump-visit/2017/02/20/ff7e6920-f777-11e6-aa1e-5f735ee31334_story.html|title=British parliament debates Trump visit|last=Adam|first=Karla|date=February 20, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=January 12, 2018}}</ref> The visit was tentatively planned for late February 2018, and would include a ceremonial opening of the [[Embassy of the United States, London|new American embassy]] in [[Nine Elms]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42319018|title=US ambassador hopeful for Trump UK visit|date=December 12, 2017|work=BBC News|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/12/world/europe/trump-london-embassy-opening.html|title=Trump Won't Visit London to Open Embassy. His U.K. Critics Say He Got the Message.|last1=Castle|first1=Stephen|date=2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 12, 2018|last2=Ramzy|first2=Austin |language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> However, on January 11, 2018, he cancelled the visit and denounced the new embassy in a tweet saying: {{tweet |
|||
[[File:President Trump & the First Lady's Trip to Europe (42484594145).jpg|thumb|The [[Guard of Honour]] at Windsor Castle for the arrival of Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and President Trump, July 2018]] |
|||
| block = yes |
|||
May was the first foreign leader to visit Trump after his inauguration, and she invited him to make a return visit. More than 1.8 million U.K citizens signed a petition to rescind the invitation, and Parliament debated a nonbinding resolution to that effect in February 2017.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/british-parliament-debates-trump-visit/2017/02/20/ff7e6920-f777-11e6-aa1e-5f735ee31334_story.html|title=British parliament debates Trump visit|last=Adam|first=Karla|date=February 20, 2017|work=The Washington Post|accessdate=January 12, 2018}}</ref> The visit was tentatively planned for late February 2018, and would include a ceremonial opening of the [[Embassy of the United States, London|new American embassy]] in [[Nine Elms]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42319018|title=US ambassador hopeful for Trump UK visit|date=December 12, 2017|work=BBC News|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/12/world/europe/trump-london-embassy-opening.html|title=Trump Won't Visit London to Open Embassy. His U.K. Critics Say He Got the Message.|last=Castle|first=Stephen|date=2018|work=The New York Times|access-date=January 12, 2018|last2=Ramzy|first2=Austin |language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> However, on 11 January 2018, he cancelled the visit and denounced the new embassy in a [[Twitter|tweet]] saying {{tweet|block=yes|text=Reason I canceled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for "peanuts," only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars. Bad deal. Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO! |date=January 11, 2018 |name=Donald J. Trump |username=realDonaldTrump |id=951679619341737986| access-date=January 12, 2018}} This was despite the official reason for relocating the embassy due to the security, as the [[Grosvenor Square]] site couldn't accommodate the requirements for being 100 ft (30.5m) away from the street, and the fact that the move was decided by Obama's predecessor [[George W. Bush|Bush]], who approved the relocation in 2008.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/01/12/as-usual-hes-dead-wrong-former-u-s-ambassadors-explain-london-embassy-move-after-trump-criticism/|title='As usual, he's dead wrong': Former U.S. ambassadors explain London Embassy move after Trump criticism|last=Taylor|first=Adam|date=January 12, 2018|work=The Washington Post|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://uk.usembassy.gov/u-s-takes-first-steps-toward-embassy-relocation/|title=First Steps Toward Embassy Relocation|date=October 2, 2008|work=U.S. Embassy & Consulates in the United Kingdom|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/12/debunked-trump-reasons-for-cancelling-london-visit|title=Debunked: Trump reasons for cancelling London visit|last=Grierson|first=Jamie|date=January 12, 2018|work=The Guardian|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> It was speculated that the real reason for cancelling the visit was due to Trump's unpopularity and the possibility of large protests against him in London.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/12/donald-trump-visit-to-london-called-off-amid-fears-of-mass-protests|title=Donald Trump cancels London visit amid protest fears|last=editor|first=Heather Stewart Political|date=January 12, 2018|work=The Guardian|accessdate=January 12, 2018|last2=Smith|first2=and David|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> |
|||
| text = Reason I canceled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for "peanuts," only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars. Bad deal. Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO! |
|||
| date = January 11, 2018 |
|||
| name = Donald J. Trump |
|||
| username = realDonaldTrump |
|||
| id = 951679619341737986 |
|||
| access-date = January 12, 2018 |
|||
}} This was despite the official reason for relocating the embassy due to the security, as the [[Grosvenor Square]] site couldn't accommodate the requirements for being {{convert|100|ft|m|abbr=on|sigfig=3}} away from the street, and the fact that the move was decided by Obama's predecessor [[George W. Bush|Bush]], who approved the relocation in 2008.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/01/12/as-usual-hes-dead-wrong-former-u-s-ambassadors-explain-london-embassy-move-after-trump-criticism/|title='As usual, he's dead wrong': Former U.S. ambassadors explain London Embassy move after Trump criticism|last=Taylor|first=Adam|date=January 12, 2018|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://uk.usembassy.gov/u-s-takes-first-steps-toward-embassy-relocation/|title=First Steps Toward Embassy Relocation|date=October 2, 2008|work=U.S. Embassy & Consulates in the United Kingdom|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-US|archive-date=January 12, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180112053906/https://uk.usembassy.gov/u-s-takes-first-steps-toward-embassy-relocation/|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/12/debunked-trump-reasons-for-cancelling-london-visit|title=Debunked: Trump reasons for cancelling London visit|last=Grierson|first=Jamie|date=January 12, 2018|work=The Guardian|access-date=January 12, 2018|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> It was speculated that the real reason for cancelling the visit was due to Trump's unpopularity and the possibility of large protests against him in London.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/12/donald-trump-visit-to-london-called-off-amid-fears-of-mass-protests|title=Donald Trump cancels London visit amid protest fears|last1= Stewart|first1=Heather|date=January 12, 2018|work=The Guardian|access-date=January 12, 2018|last2=Smith|first2=David|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> |
|||
Trump made a second visit in June 2019, this time as guests of the Queen and to hold talks with May. Thousands protested his visit, just like they did when he made his first trip.<ref>{{cite news |last=Roache |first=Madeline |date=June 4, 2019 |title=While Thousands March, President Trump Dismisses London Protests as 'Fake News' |url=https://time.com/5600472/protest-trump-state-visit-uk/ |url-status=live |magazine=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200613132548/https://time.com/5600472/protest-trump-state-visit-uk/ |archive-date=June 13, 2020 |access-date=July 30, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Cranley |first=Ellen |date=June 4, 2019 |title=Photos show hundreds of people protesting Trump's visit in the UK, which the president called 'fake news' |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-protests-photos-england-visit-2019-6 |url-status=live |work=[[Business Insider]] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190608035731/https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-protests-photos-england-visit-2019-6 |archive-date=June 8, 2019 |access-date=July 30, 2020}}</ref> |
|||
Trump made a second visit in June 2019, this time as guests of the Queen and to hold talks with May. Thousands protested his visit, just like they did when he made his first trip.{{citation needed|date=July 2019}} |
|||
On 7 |
On July 7, 2019, secret diplomatic cables from Ambassador [[Kim Darroch]] to the British government, dating from 2017 to 2019, were leaked to ''[[The Mail on Sunday]]''. They included Darroch's unflattering assessments of the Trump administration, e.g. that it was "inept and insecure".<ref name=bbc-20190707>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48898231 |title=Trump administration is 'inept and insecure', says UK ambassador |work=[[BBC News]] |date=July 7, 2019 |access-date=July 7, 2019}}</ref> In response, Nigel Farage said Darroch was "totally unsuitable" for office,<ref name=cnn-20190707>{{cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/06/politics/uk-ambassador-cables-donald-trump/index.html |title=Cables from UK's ambassador to the US blast Trump as 'inept,' 'incompetent' |author1=Michelle Kosinski |author2=Schams Elwazer |author3=Stephen Collinson |work=CNN|date=July 7, 2019 |access-date=July 7, 2019}}</ref> and Trump tweeted that Darroch was "not liked or well thought of within the US" and that "we will no longer deal with him".<ref>{{cite news |title=Trump sharpens attack on UK ambassador Kim Darroch over emails |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48914294 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=July 8, 2019 |access-date=July 8, 2019}}</ref> The Prime Minister, Theresa May, expressed support for Darroch and ordered a leak inquiry.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mason |first1=Rowena |last2=Walker |first2=Peter |title=Theresa May has 'full faith' in Kim Darroch but rejects his view of Trump |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/08/pm-has-full-faith-in-kim-darroch-but-rejects-his-view-of-trump |access-date=July 10, 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=July 8, 2019}}</ref> On July 10, Darroch resigned as Ambassador to the United States. He wrote that "the current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like".<ref name="Guardian 10 July" /> Previously, [[Boris Johnson]], the frontrunner in the [[2019 Conservative Party leadership election|election]] to replace May, had declined to publicly back Darroch. Consensus among political commentators in the UK was that this made Darroch's position untenable.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |last2=Wintour |first2=Patrick |last3=Syal |first3=Rajeev |last4=Siddiqui |first4=Sabrina |title=Boris Johnson blamed after Kim Darroch quits as UK ambassador to US |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/10/kim-darroch-resigns-as-uk-ambassador-to-us-after-leaked-trump-comment |access-date=July 10, 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=July 10, 2019}}</ref> May and the leader of the opposition, [[Jeremy Corbyn]], praised Darroch's service in the House of Commons and deplored that he had to resign under pressure from the US.<ref name="Guardian 10 July">{{cite news |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |title=Kim Darroch resigns as UK ambassador to US after leaked Trump comment |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/10/kim-darroch-resigns-as-uk-ambassador-to-us-after-leaked-trump-comment |access-date=July 10, 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=July 10, 2019}}</ref> |
||
===== Controversy over American foods ===== |
|||
On 10 July, Darroch resigned as Ambassador to the United States. He wrote that "the current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like".<ref name="Guardian 10 July" /> Previously, [[Boris Johnson]], the frontrunner in the [[2019 Conservative Party leadership election|election]] to replace May, had declined to publicly back Darroch. Consensus among political commentators in the UK was that this made Darroch's position untenable.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |last2=Wintour |first2=Patrick |last3=Syal |first3=Rajeev |last4=Siddiqui |first4=Sabrina |title=Boris Johnson blamed after Kim Darroch quits as UK ambassador to US |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/10/kim-darroch-resigns-as-uk-ambassador-to-us-after-leaked-trump-comment |accessdate=10 July 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=10 July 2019}}</ref> May and the leader of the opposition, [[Jeremy Corbyn]], praised Darroch's service in the House of Commons and deplored that he had to resign under pressure from the U.S.<ref name="Guardian 10 July">{{cite news |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |title=Kim Darroch resigns as UK ambassador to US after leaked Trump comment |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/10/kim-darroch-resigns-as-uk-ambassador-to-us-after-leaked-trump-comment |accessdate=10 July 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=10 July 2019}}</ref> Darroch will remain in the post until a successor is appointed.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |last2=Wintour |first2=Patrick |last3=Syal |first3=Rajeev |last4=Siddiqui |first4=and Sabrina |title=Johnson has thrown US ambassador under the bus, say top Tories |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/10/kim-darroch-resigns-as-uk-ambassador-to-us-after-leaked-trump-comment |accessdate=11 July 2019 |work=The Guardian |date=10 July 2019}}</ref> |
|||
{{update|section|date=May 2023}} |
|||
In 2017, US President [[Donald Trump]] appointed pharmaceutical heir [[Woody Johnson]], a financial supporter of his campaign, as ambassador 2017–2021. Johnson advocated for more agricultural trade and the deregulation of US food exports to Britain.<ref>{{cite web |title=Trump's UK ambassador hits out at US farming 'smears' |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-agriculture-uk-ambassador-hits-out-at-us-farming-smears/ |website=politico.eu |date=March 2, 2019}}</ref> In March 2019, Johnson wrote an article in the ''Daily Telegraph'' promoting American chlorinated chicken as safe, and stating that health fears over hormone-fed beef were "myths".<ref>{{cite news |title=UK-US trade deal: Envoy attacks 'myths' about US farming |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-47426138 |work=BBC News |date=March 2, 2019}}</ref> This came after he urged the UK to open up to the US agriculture market after the British exit from the European Union and ignore the "smear campaign" of those with "their own protectionist agenda".<ref>Ian M. Sheldon, "Brexit: Why did the 'chlorinated chicken' cross the pond?." (paper presented at IATRC Symposium, 2019) [https://aede.osu.edu/sites/aede/files/imce/images/IATRCChlorinatedChickenSheldon.pdf online] p. 1.</ref> |
|||
Johnson was criticised by several British agriculture standard boards, such as the Red Tractor Assurance whose CEO, Jim Moseley stated the UK's food standards were "now under threat from ... the United States food lobby".<ref>{{cite web |title=US ambassador to UK under fire over defence of chlorinated chicken |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/mar/02/us-ambassador-to-uk-woody-johnson-under-fire-over-defence-of-chlorinated-chicken-post-brexit-jay-rayner |website=The Guardian |date=March 2, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=American chickens covered in chlorine have become a hot-button Brexit issue in Britain |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/90543095/american-chickens-covered-in-chlorine-have-become-a-hot-button-brexit-issue-in-britain |website=Fast Company |date=August 26, 2020}}</ref> Minette Batters, president of the UK National Farmers Union, agreed with Johnson's claims that chlorine-rinsed chicken was safe for consumption, but stated that factors such as animal welfare and environmental protection also had to be considered.<ref>{{cite news |title=US ambassador to UK slams critics of American agriculture |url=https://apnews.com/article/0aee60da878e472a91a9e52c4f617265 |work=AP News |publisher=AP News |date=March 2, 2019}}</ref> George Eustace, former British agriculture minister told the press:<blockquote>Agriculture in the US remains quite backward in many respects....Whereas we have a 'farm to fork' approach to managing disease and contamination risk throughout the supply chain through good husbandry, the US is more inclined to simply treat contamination of its meat at the end with a chlorine or similar wash.<ref>Sheldon, 2019, p. 2.</ref> </blockquote> |
|||
In the months during 2020, while the UK was planning to invest in new [[5G]] mobile telecommunications equipment. The U.S. was openly lobbying and pressuring the British government, to prevent allowing the Chinese telecommunications giant [[Huawei]] from installing its equipment in the UK’s telecoms infrastructure. <ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-02-06|title=No 10 says Johnson's row with Trump over Huawei was ‘overblown’|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/06/no-10-say-fallout-between-trump-and-johnson-overblown|access-date=2020-07-18|website=the Guardian|language=en}}</ref> This was over allegations it will allow the Chinese to espionage in the country, and this might be a break in the Five Eyes intelligence programme. Already since 2003 the UK did allow its telecoms operators such as incumbent [[BT Group|BT]] to install Huawei equipment in its infrastructure backbone, and to prevent any concerns about possible hacking, Huawei jointly created with [[GCHQ]] an equipment investigate centre in [[Banbury]] called "''the Cell''." <ref>{{Cite news|last=Garside|first=Juliette|date=2016-08-07|title=The Chinese firm taking threats to UK national security very seriously|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/07/china-huwaei-cell-uk-national-security-cyber-surveillance-hacking|access-date=2020-07-18|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> In July 2020, after US pressure the British government banned adding new Huawei telecoms equipment into the British fix-line and mobile system, and request that companies replace the existing equipment by 2027. <ref>{{Cite web|title=In Reversal, U.K. Will Ban Huawei Equipment From Its 5G Network|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/07/14/890812517/in-reversal-u-k-will-ban-huawei-equipment-from-its-5g-network|access-date=2020-07-30|website=NPR.org|language=en}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|title=Huawei to be removed from UK 5G networks by 2027|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/huawei-to-be-removed-from-uk-5g-networks-by-2027|access-date=2020-07-30|website=GOV.UK|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
===2020, difference in Justice systems=== |
|||
=====Blocking Chinese technology===== |
|||
In 2020, some differences exist in the way the justice works in both countries<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/jul/23/we-look-like-fools-uk-us-ties-threatened-by-corruption-case-row</ref>. |
|||
{{Main|Concerns over Chinese involvement in 5G wireless networks#United Kingdom}} |
|||
In 2020, while the UK was planning to invest in new [[5G]] mobile telecommunications equipment, Washington was openly lobbying and pressuring the British government, to prevent allowing the Chinese telecommunications giant [[Huawei]] from installing its equipment in the UK.<ref>{{cite web|date=February 6, 2020|title=No 10 says Johnson's row with Trump over Huawei was 'overblown'|url=http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/06/no-10-say-fallout-between-trump-and-johnson-overblown|access-date=July 18, 2020|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> This was over allegations it will allow the Chinese to espionage in the country, and this might be a break in the [[Five Eyes]] intelligence programme. Already since 2003 the UK did allow its telecoms operators such as the incumbent [[BT Group|BT]] to install Huawei equipment in its infrastructure backbone. To prevent any concerns about possible hacking after reports of unusual activity in the Huawei equipment, in 2010 Huawei jointly created with the British intelligence agency [[GCHQ]] an equipment investigate centre in the outskirts of [[Banbury]] called the ''Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre'' which is also known by its nickname ''"the Cell"''.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Katwala|first=Amit|date=February 22, 2019|title=Here's how GCHQ scours Huawei hardware for malicious code|language=en-GB|magazine=Wired UK|url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/huawei-gchq-security-evaluation-uk|access-date=July 31, 2020|issn=1357-0978}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Garside|first=Juliette|date=August 7, 2016|title=The Chinese firm taking threats to UK national security very seriously|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/aug/07/china-huwaei-cell-uk-national-security-cyber-surveillance-hacking|access-date=July 18, 2020|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> In July 2020 after American pressure, the British government announced that it has banned adding any new Huawei telecoms equipment into the British [[landline]] and [[Cellular network|mobile networks]], and request that all companies replace the existing equipment by 2027.<ref>{{Cite news|title=In Reversal, U.K. Will Ban Huawei Equipment From Its 5G Network|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/07/14/890812517/in-reversal-u-k-will-ban-huawei-equipment-from-its-5g-network|access-date=July 30, 2020|website=NPR|date=July 14, 2020|language=en|last1=Schwartz|first1=Matthew S.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Huawei to be removed from UK 5G networks by 2027|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/huawei-to-be-removed-from-uk-5g-networks-by-2027|access-date=July 30, 2020|website=GOV.UK|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
====Biden administration 2021–present==== |
|||
== Trade, investment and the economy == |
|||
[[File:Boris Johnson and Joe Biden in Oval Office 2021.jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] and President [[Joe Biden]] meet at the [[White House]] in September 2021]] |
|||
The United States accounts for the United Kingdom's largest single export market, buying $57 billion worth of British goods in 2007.<ref>{{cite news|title=Trade and Investment with the United States|publisher=UK Trade and Investment|url=https://www.uktradeinvest.gov.uk/ukti/appmanager/ukti/countries?_nfls=false&_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=CountryType1&navigationPageId=/usa/}}{{Dead link|date=July 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Total trade of imports and exports between the United Kingdom and the United States amounted to the sum of $107.2 billion in 2007.<ref>{{cite news|title=Top Trading Partners – Total Trade, Exports, Imports|publisher=U.S. Census Bureau|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top0712.html}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:President Joe Biden meets with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in the Oval Office.jpg|thumb|Prime Minister [[Rishi Sunak]] and President [[Joe Biden]] meet at the White House in June 2023]] |
|||
Biden's first overseas trip and first face-to-face meeting with a British Prime Minister was at the [[2021 G7 Summit]], hosted in [[Cornwall]], England in June.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Culbertson|first1=Alix|date=May 4, 2021|title=Boris Johnson meets US Secretary of State in attempt to build ties with Biden administration - as G7 foreign ministers meet|url=https://news.sky.com/story/boris-johnson-meets-us-secretary-of-state-in-attempt-to-build-ties-with-biden-administration-as-g7-foreign-ministers-meet-12296946|access-date=May 20, 2021|website=Sky News|language=en}}</ref> Johnson stated "there's so much that [the US] want to do together" with us. The first meeting between the two leaders included plans to re-establish travel links between the US and UK, which had been banned by the US since the start of the pandemic and to agree a deal (the [[New Atlantic Charter]]), which commits the countries to working together on "the key challenges of this century - cyber security, emerging technologies, global health and climate change". President Biden explicitly "affirmed the special relationship".<ref>{{Cite news|date=June 11, 2021|title=G7: Joe Biden is breath of fresh air, says Boris Johnson|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-57433296|access-date=June 11, 2021}}</ref> The revitalized Atlantic Charter would build "on the commitments and aspirations set out eighty years ago" and also "reaffirm" the "commitment to work together to realise our vision for a more peaceful and prosperous future."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/10/world/europe/biden-johnson-atlantic-charter.html|title=Eighty Years Later, Biden and Johnson Revise the Atlantic Charter for a New Era|first1=David E.|last1=Sanger|first2=Michael D.|last2=Shear|work=[[The New York Times]]|date=June 10, 2021|access-date=June 16, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/10/the-new-atlantic-charter/|title=The New Atlantic Charter|publisher=The White House|date=June 10, 2021|access-date=June 16, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
The chaotic [[Withdrawal of United States troops from Afghanistan (2020–2021)|withdrawal from Afghanistan]] and [[Fall of Kabul (2021)|fall of Kabul]] in August 2021 had a negative impact on United Kingdom–United States relations,<ref>{{cite news |title=UK struggles for influence as Afghan crisis strains US ties |url=https://apnews.com/article/europe-kabul-g-7-summit-a8967ceee9223ccc5915ed43a5527902 |work=Associated Press |date=August 23, 2021}}</ref> with the British government briefing media against the American government.<ref>{{cite web|date=August 22, 2021|title=Nosedive in UK-US relations is another casualty of Afghanistan's fall|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/aug/22/nosedive-in-uk-us-relations-is-another-casualty-of-afghanistans-fall|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> |
|||
=====AUKUS===== |
|||
{{Main|AUKUS}} |
|||
On September 15, 2021, the leaders of the US, the UK and Australia announced "AUKUS":<blockquote>a new security partnership in the Indo-Pacific, building on the longstanding alliance between the three to share intelligence, deepen cooperation and help Australia build a new nuclear-powered submarine to counter China.<ref>Gordon Lubold, "U.S. to Share Nuclear Submarine Technology With Australia in New Pact" [https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-forms-a-new-security-alliance-for-asia-with-the-u-k-and-australia-11631741734?mod=djemalertNEWS ''Wall Street Journal'' Sept 15, 2021]</ref></blockquote> |
|||
====Rejection of new trade agreement==== |
|||
On September 21, 2021, [[Boris Johnson]] stated that he would not commit to a new trade agreement by 2024, stating that President Biden has "a lot of fish to fry."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://news.sky.com/story/joe-biden-has-a-lot-of-fish-to-fry-boris-johnson-plays-down-prospect-of-us-uk-trade-deal-breakthrough-12413356|title=Boris Johnson refuses to commit to US-UK trade deal by 2024 - as he says Joe Biden has 'a lot of fish to fry'|first=Alan|last=McGuinness|publisher=Sky News|date=September 21, 2021|access-date=September 22, 2021}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Prime_Minister_Keir_Starmer_attends_NATO_Summit_(53847335642)_(cropped)_(cropped).jpg|thumb|[[Keir Starmer]] with Biden at the [[2024 Washington summit]]]] |
|||
== Trade, investment, and the economy == |
|||
The United States accounts for the United Kingdom's largest single export market, buying $57 billion worth of British goods in 2007.<ref>{{cite news|title=Trade and Investment with the United States|publisher=UK Trade and Investment|url=https://www.uktradeinvest.gov.uk/ukti/appmanager/ukti/countries?_nfls=false&_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=CountryType1&navigationPageId=/usa/}}{{Dead link|date=July 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Total trade of imports and exports between the United Kingdom and the United States amounted to the sum of $107.2 billion in 2007.<ref>{{cite news|title=Top Trading Partners – Total Trade, Exports, Imports|publisher=US Census Bureau|url=https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/highlights/top/top0712.html}}</ref> |
|||
The United States and the United Kingdom share the world's largest foreign direct investment partnership. In 2005, American direct investment in the United Kingdom totaled $324 billion while British direct investment in the United States totaled $282 billion.<ref>{{cite news|title=Trade and Investment with the United States|publisher=Foreign TradeX|url=http://www.foreigntradeexchange.com/countries/uk.html|access-date=September 27, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091001180016/http://www.foreigntradeexchange.com/countries/uk.html|archive-date=October 1, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
The United States and the United Kingdom share the world's largest foreign direct investment partnership. In 2005, American direct investment in the United Kingdom totaled $324 billion while British direct investment in the United States totaled $282 billion.<ref>{{cite news|title=Trade and Investment with the United States|publisher=Foreign TradeX|url=http://www.foreigntradeexchange.com/countries/uk.html|access-date=September 27, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091001180016/http://www.foreigntradeexchange.com/countries/uk.html|archive-date=October 1, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
In a press conference that made several references to the special relationship, US Secretary of State John Kerry, in London with UK Foreign Secretary [[William Hague]] on |
In a press conference that made several references to the special relationship, US Secretary of State [[John Kerry]], in London with UK Foreign Secretary [[William Hague]] on September 9, 2013, said: |
||
<blockquote> |
<blockquote>We are not only each other's largest investors in each of our countries, one to the other, but the fact is that every day almost one million people go to work in America for British companies that are in the United States, just as more than one million people go to work here in Great Britain for American companies that are here. So we are enormously tied together, obviously. And we are committed to making both the U.S.-UK and the U.S.-EU relationships even stronger drivers of our prosperity.<ref>{{cite web|title=Press Conference by Kerry, British Foreign Secretary Hague|url=http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2013/09/20130909282464.html|publisher=US Department of State|date=September 9, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131217074720/http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2013/09/20130909282464.html|archive-date=December 17, 2013}}</ref> |
||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
||
===Trade agreements=== |
|||
In 2020, the two countries opened negotiations for a [[United Kingdom–United States free trade agreement|free trade agreement]], however talks have been postponed until 2025 at the earliest.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Riley-Smith |first=Ben |date=2023-04-12 |title=Exclusive: US trade deal talks won't start until 2025 at the earliest |language=en-GB |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/04/12/us-trade-deal-talks-2025-biden-sunak/ |access-date=2023-06-28 |issn=0307-1235}}</ref> |
|||
In 2022, with the administration of President [[Joe Biden]] uninterested in further negotiations, the United Kingdom began negotiating economic agreements with individual states.<ref>{{cite web|title=Britain Eyes Trade Agreements With California, Utah|date=9 December 2022|work=US News|url=https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news/articles/2022-12-09/britain-eyes-trade-agreements-with-california-utah}}</ref> Regulation of international trade is a federal responsibility under the [[Commerce Clause]] of the US Constitution, preventing state agreements from changing customs rules; therefore, the UK has aimed at signing [[Memorandum of Understanding]] (MoU) agreements with the [[US state]]s. MoUs aim to remove market access barriers and increase trade and investment opportunities for UK and US companies. |
|||
Former [[Minister of State for Trade Policy|British trade minister]] [[Penny Mordaunt]] claimed that US state-level deals would pave the way for a full UK-US FTA.<ref>{{cite web|title=UK-US: What's happened to their free trade deal?|date=7 July 2023|work=Made for Minds|url=https://www.dw.com/en/uk-us-whats-happened-to-their-free-trade-deal/a-66122162}}</ref> |
|||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
|||
|+ UK-US State Memorandum of Understanding Agreements |
|||
|- |
|||
! No. !! Signed !! State !! Ref. |
|||
|- |
|||
| 1 || 27 May 2022 || {{flag|Indiana}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK and Indiana trade and economic memorandum of understanding|date=27 May 2022|work=GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-and-indiana-trade-and-economic-memorandum-of-understanding}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 2 || 20 July 2022 || {{flag|North Carolina}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK and North Carolina co-operation and trade memorandum of understanding|date=20 July 2022|work=GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-and-north-carolina-co-operation-and-trade-memorandum-of-understanding}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 3 || 7 December 2022 || {{flag|South Carolina}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK and South Carolina co-operation and trade memorandum of understanding|date=8 December 2022|work=GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-and-south-carolina-co-operation-and-trade-memorandum-of-understanding}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 4 || 18 April 2023 || {{flag|Oklahoma}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK and Oklahoma co-operation and trade memorandum of understanding|date=19 April 2023|work=GOV.UK |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-and-oklahoma-co-operation-and-trade-memorandum-of-understanding}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 5 || 22 June 2023 || {{flag|Utah}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK and Utah trade and economic cooperation memorandum of understanding|date=22 June 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-and-utah-trade-and-economic-cooperation-memorandum-of-understanding}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 6 || 25 September 2023 || {{flag|Washington}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK signs sixth US state deal with Washington State|date=25 September 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-signs-sixth-us-state-deal-with-washington-state}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 7 || 14 November 2023 || {{flag|Florida}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK and Florida sign pact to boost trade|date=15 November 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-florida-sign-pact-to-boost-trade|access-date=15 November 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=UK minister sees 'huge opportunities' from trade pact with Florida|date=14 November 2023|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/uk-minister-sign-trade-pact-with-florida-governor-desantis-2023-11-14/|access-date=15 November 2023}}</ref> |
|||
|- |
|||
| 8 || 13 March 2024 || {{flag|Texas}} || <ref>{{cite web |title=UK signs trade pact with second biggest US state – Texas|date=13 March 2024|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-signs-trade-pact-with-second-biggest-us-state-texas|access-date=13 March 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240313091532/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-signs-trade-pact-with-second-biggest-us-state-texas|archive-date=13 March 2024|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=UK Signs Trade Pact With Texas in Effort to Boost Green Industry|date=13 March 2024|work=Bloomberg|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-13/uk-signs-trade-pact-with-texas-in-effort-to-boost-green-industry|access-date=13 March 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240313113044/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-13/uk-signs-trade-pact-with-texas-in-effort-to-boost-green-industry|archive-date=13 March 2024|url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
|} |
|||
'''Trade negotiations ongoing:''' |
|||
* {{Flag|California}}<ref name="Financial Times">{{cite web |title=UK has no plans to strike US trade deal during Rishi Sunak visit to Washington|date=30 May 2023|work=Financial Times|url=https://www.ft.com/content/1fd173a6-8718-4798-b692-685801ec1604}}</ref><ref name="GOV.UK">{{cite web |title=UK puts pen to paper on fifth trade pact with a US state|date=22 June 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-puts-pen-to-paper-on-fifth-trade-pact-with-a-us-state}}</ref> |
|||
* {{Flag|Colorado}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Joint Statement on UK-Colorado Trade: Huddleston – Polis Meeting|date=31 May 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-on-uk-colorado-trade-huddleston-polis-meeting}}</ref><ref name="GOV.UK"/> |
|||
* {{Flag|Illinois}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Joint Statement on UK-Illinois Trade: Huddleston – Pritzker Meeting|date=18 July 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/joint-statement-on-uk-illinois-trade-huddleston-pritzker-meeting}}</ref> |
|||
* {{Flag|New York}}<ref>{{cite web |title=UK minister to sign trade pact with Florida Governor DeSantis|date=8 November 2023|work=The Strait Times|url=https://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/uk-minister-to-sign-trade-pact-with-florida-governor-desantis|access-date=20 November 2023}}</ref> |
|||
In June 2023, Biden and Sunak announced the 'Atlantic Declaration' to strengthen economic ties between the UK and the US.<ref>{{cite web|title=US and UK back new 'Atlantic Declaration' for economic cooperation|date=8 June 2023|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us-uk-back-new-atlantic-declaration-economic-cooperation-2023-06-08/}}</ref> The agreement included a limited trade pact covering critical minerals needed for [[Electric vehicle|EV]] [[Electric vehicle battery|batteries]] and a new data protection deal, in addition to easing trade barriers.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sunak and Biden agree 'Atlantic Declaration' to boost economic security|date=8 June 2023|work=Sky News|url=https://news.sky.com/story/uk-and-us-agree-new-partnership-to-boost-economic-security-as-sunak-and-biden-meet-at-white-house-12899035#}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=What Sunak's Atlantic Declaration is – and isn't|date=9 June 2023|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65852054}}</ref> The declaration commits both nations to increase research collaboration in future technologies, such as [[AI]], future [[5G]] and [[6G (network)|6G]] telecoms, [[quantum]], [[semiconductors]] and [[engineering biology]].<ref>{{cite web|title=UK and US launch first-of-its kind economic partnership|date=8 June 2023|work=GOV.UK|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-us-launch-first-of-its-kind-economic-partnership}}</ref> In addition to a commitment in principle to a new UK-US Data Bridge; that facilitates the transfer of data by UK businesses to certified US organisations.<ref>{{cite web|title=Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak unveil 'Atlantic declaration' to strengthen economic ties|date=8 June 2023|work=Financial Times|url=https://www.ft.com/content/8f1667f8-f17b-4a56-82af-97fd812c4fe6}}</ref> |
|||
During the signing of the [[accession of the United Kingdom to CPTPP]] on the 16 July 2023, [[Kemi Badenoch]] blamed the lack of progress on the UK-US FTA on the change of administration from Donald Trump to Joe Biden after the 2020 election.<ref>{{cite web|title=Kemi Badenoch signs treaty for UK to join Indo-Pacific trade bloc|date=16 July 2023|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jul/16/kemi-badenoch-signs-treaty-for-uk-to-join-indo-pacific-trade-bloc-cptpp-uk-economy}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=UK Joins Pacific Trade Deal, Sees 'Very Low' Chance of US Pact|date=16 July 2023|work=Bloomberg|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-16/uk-signs-pact-to-join-pacific-trade-deal-focus-turns-to-china}}</ref> |
|||
On 3 October 2023, Biden and Sunak were reported to be preparing a "foundational" trade agreement between the two countries which will be modelled on the [[Indo-Pacific Economic Framework]], however it will not constitute a [[free trade agreement]] under [[World Trade Organization]] rules as the proposals do not contain [[market access]] commitments.<ref>{{cite web|title=Revealed: Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak seek UK/US trade pact before 2024 elections|date=3 October 2023|access-date=3 October 2023|work=Politico|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/revealed-joe-biden-rishi-sunak-seek-uk-us-trade-pact-before-2024-elections/}}</ref> The proposed partnership aims to cover subjects such as digital trade, labour protections and [[agriculture]].<ref>{{cite web|title=US wants UK to open up its agriculture markets as part of new trade deal|date=3 October 2023|access-date=3 October 2023|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/oct/03/us-wants-uk-to-open-up-its-agriculture-markets-as-part-of-new-trade-deal}}</ref> On the same day, Badenoch reiterated that there was "zero" chance of a free trade agreement under President Biden's administration, citing his attitude to such deals.<ref>{{cite web|title=UK minister says "zero" chance of free trade deal with Biden|date=3 October 2023|access-date=3 October 2023|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-minister-says-zero-chance-free-trade-deal-with-biden-2023-10-03/}}</ref> |
|||
==Tourism== |
==Tourism== |
||
More than 4.5 million Britons visit the United States every year, spending |
More than 4.5 million Britons visit the United States every year, spending $14 billion. Around 3 million people from the United States visit the United Kingdom every year, spending $10 billion.<ref>{{cite news|title=UK & USA relations|publisher=UK in the USA Foreign and Commonwealth Office|url=http://ukinusa.fco.gov.uk/en/working-with-usa/us-uk-relations/|access-date=August 29, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090616144937/http://ukinusa.fco.gov.uk/en/working-with-usa/us-uk-relations/|archive-date=June 16, 2009|url-status=dead}}</ref> With the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, international tourism in both countries collapsed in 2020. |
||
==Transportation== |
==Transportation== |
||
All three major American airlines, [[American Airlines]], [[United Airlines]] and [[Delta |
All three major American airlines, [[American Airlines]], [[United Airlines]], and [[Delta Air Lines]] fly directly between the US and the UK, principally between London and New York, although all three fly to [[Heathrow Airport]] from a number of hubs, as well as to other major UK airports such as [[Manchester Airport]], [[Edinburgh Airport]] and [[Glasgow Airport]]. Additionally, Delta [[Codeshare agreement|codeshares]] with the UK's [[Virgin Atlantic]] which it owns a 49% stake in. Low-cost carriers [[JetBlue]] and [[Southwest Airlines]] fly between the eastern US and the British overseas territories of [[Bermuda]], [[British Virgin Islands]], [[Cayman Islands]] and the [[Turks & Caicos Islands]], with JetBlue also flying between London and New York. The British flag carrier [[British Airways]] flies to over twenty destinations in the US. Also the main British [[Air charter|charter airline]], [[TUI Airways]] fly to the US although principally to the holiday destinations of Florida and California. |
||
Both American Airlines and |
Both American Airlines and British Airways are founders of the [[airline alliance]], known as [[Oneworld]]. BA, TUI Airways and Virgin Atlantic are major purchasers of American-made [[Boeing]] aircraft. Flying between the US and UK is at the moment in 2019 supported by the [[EU-US Open Skies Agreement|US-EU Open Skies Agreement]] which came about in 2008, which allows any airline from both countries to fly between each other. |
||
[[John F. Kennedy International Airport]] in [[New York City]] is the most popular international destination for people flying out of [[Heathrow Airport]]. Over 2.8 million people on multiple daily non-stop flights flew from Heathrow to JFK in 2008.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=80&pagetype=88&sglid=3&fld=2007Annual/|title=UK Airport Statistics|publisher=BAA}}</ref> [[Concorde]], British Airways flagship supersonic airliner, began trans-Atlantic service to [[Washington Dulles International Airport]] in the United States on May 24, 1976. The trans-Atlantic route between London's Heathrow and New York's JFK in under 3½ hours, had its first operational flight between the two hubs on October 19, 1977, and the last being on October 23, 2003.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.super70s.com/super70s/Tech/Aviation/Aircraft/Concorde.asp|title=Concorde|publisher=Super 70s.com}}</ref> |
|||
The two main American [[Intercity bus service|intercity bus]] carriers; [[Greyhound Lines]] and during the period from 1999 to 2019 [[Coach USA]], plus their subsidiaries are each owned by a major British transportation company [[FirstGroup]] with Greyhound |
The two main American [[Intercity bus service|intercity bus]] carriers; [[Greyhound Lines]] and during the period from 1999 to 2019 [[Coach USA]], plus their subsidiaries are each owned by a major British transportation company [[FirstGroup]] with Greyhound<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.firstgroupplc.com/about-firstgroup/greyhound.aspx|title=Greyhound|website=FirstGroup PLC|language=en|access-date=August 2, 2019}}</ref> and [[Stagecoach Group|Stagecoach]] with Coach USA. Coach USA's budget brand [[Megabus (North America)|Megabus]] which started in 2006, itself is a copycat of [[Megabus (Europe)|the British version]] of the discount coach company that started in 2003.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Bargain-bus-company-riding-into-Bay-Area-next-week-2512541.php|title=Bargain bus company riding into Bay Area next week|last1=Raine|first1=George|date=August 2, 2007|website=SFGate|access-date=August 2, 2019}}</ref> |
||
==State and official visits== |
==State and official visits== |
||
{{ |
{{Main|United States presidential visits to the United Kingdom and Ireland}} |
||
[[File:President and Royal Family at National Presbyterian Church.jpg|thumb|[[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] and Prince Philip after attending a worship service at [[National Presbyterian Church]] with US President [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and First Lady [[Mamie Eisenhower]] in 1957.]] |
|||
In the 20th century, there were 78 formal and informal summits bringing together the president and the prime minister to deal with an agreed-upon agenda. The first was 1918, the second in 1929. The rest began in 1941, which marked the decline of ambassadors as the key transmitters of policy discussions. In three out of four of the summits, the British delegation traveled to America. Summits have become much less important in the 21st century, with its new communication modes.<ref>Jonathan Colman, "Summit Meetings" in Will Kaufman and Heidi Slettedahl Macpherson, eds. ''Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History'' (3 vol. 2005) 3: 941-45.</ref> |
|||
[[File:BettyFordNARA.jpg|thumb|President [[Gerald Ford]] and First Lady [[Betty Ford]] host a lunch for Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] in the [[President's Dining Room]] at the White House during Her Majesty’s state visit to Washington that coincided with the [[United States Bicentennial]] celebrations in 1976.]] |
|||
[[File:President Ronald Reagan riding horses with Queen Elizabeth II during visit to Windsor Castle.jpg|thumb|Queen Elizabeth II and US President [[Ronald Reagan]] in [[Windsor Great Park]] during President Reagan's 1982 official visit.]] |
|||
State visits involving the head of state have been made over the years by four presidents and two monarchs. [[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] has met all the presidents since Truman except Johnson.<ref>{{cite news|title=The Queen, Presidents And Protocol|publisher =CBS Evening News with Katie Couric|url= http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/31/eveningnews/main4908335.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody |work=CBS News |date=March 31, 2009}}</ref> In addition, the Queen made three private visits in 1984, 1985, and 1991 to see stallion stations and stud farms.<ref>{{cite web|title=HM The Queen - Interests|publisher =Crown Copyright|url= http://www.royal.gov.uk/HMTheQueen/Interests/Overview.aspx|work=The British Monarchy |date=February 27, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:President George W. Bush and Laura Bush are greeted by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, at Buckingham Palace in London.jpg|thumb|Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] greet President [[George W. Bush]] and First Lady [[Laura Bush]] at Buckingham Palace during the American state visit to London in 2003.]] |
|||
In the 20th century, there were 78 formal and informal summits bringing together the president and the prime minister to deal with an agreed-upon agenda. The first was 1918, the second in 1929. The rest began in 1941, which marked the decline of ambassadors as the key transmitters of policy discussions. In three out of four of the summits, the British delegation traveled to America. Summits have become much less important in the 21st century, with its new communication modes.<ref>{{cite journal|first=Jonathan|last=Colman|title=Summit Meetings|editor-first=Will|editor-last=Kaufman|editor-first2=Heidi Slettedahl|editor-last2=Macpherson|journal=Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History|year=2005|volume=3|pages=941–945}}</ref> |
|||
State visits involving the head of state have been made over the years by four presidents and two monarchs. [[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] has met all the presidents since Truman except Johnson (Queen Elizabeth II and Johnson had arranged for a private meeting at Buckingham Palace during Churchill's funeral, but it was taken away when his doctors advised him against leading the US delegation to the funeral.<ref name=LBJAndQueen/>).<ref>{{cite news|title=Queen Elizabeth met every US president since Truman – except one: See her visits with US leaders|url= https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2022/09/08/queen-elizabeth-us-presidents-england-dc/8025871001/|work=USA Today|date=September 8, 2022|first=Marina|last=Pitofsky}}</ref><ref name="LBJPhysicians">{{cite news|quote=Over the seven decades of her reign, she...met with 13 of the 14 presidents...starting with President Harry Truman. The odd one out was Lyndon Johnson, who was prohibited by his physicians from traveling to Britain for the funeral of Winston Churchill in 1965, when he would undoubtedly have met the queen.|title=Ahead of Platinum Jubilee, a look at Queen Elizabeth's diplomacy in US and Chicago|last=Cooper|first=Zaki|newspaper=The Chicago Tribune|date=February 6, 2022|page=16}}</ref> In addition, the Queen made three private visits in 1984, 1985, and 1991 to see stallion stations and stud farms.<ref>{{cite web|title=HM The Queen - Interests|publisher =Crown Copyright|url= http://www.royal.gov.uk/HMTheQueen/Interests/Overview.aspx|work=The British Monarchy |date=February 27, 2014}}</ref> |
|||
[[File:George W. Bush toasts Elizabeth II 2007.jpg|thumb|right|[[Queen Elizabeth II]] and the 43rd President of the United States, [[George W. Bush]], share a toast during a 2007 [[state dinner]] held at the [[White House]] in celebration of British-American relations.]] |
|||
[[File:President Reagan and Queen Elizabeth II 1982.jpg|thumb|right|Queen Elizabeth II and the 40th President of the United States, [[Ronald Reagan]], riding on horseback in [[Windsor Great Park]] during President Reagan's 1982 official visit to the United Kingdom.]] |
|||
[[File:President Ford and Queen Elizabeth dance - NARA - 6923701.jpg|thumb|right|Queen Elizabeth II and the 38th President of the United States, [[Gerald Ford]], dancing in the [[East Room]] at the White House during Her Majesty's state visit to commemorate the United States Bicentennial in 1976.]] |
|||
[[File:President and Royal Family at National Presbyterian Church.jpg|thumb|right|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh leaving [[National Presbyterian Church]] after attending a worship service with the 34th President of the United States, [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and First Lady [[Mamie Eisenhower]] during their state visit to the United States in 1957.]] |
|||
{|class="wikitable" style="margin:1em auto 1em auto |
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:1em auto 1em auto" |
||
|+ State and official visits to the United States by the British Monarch<ref name="The Royal Visit: 7–12th June 1939">{{cite news|title=The Royal Visit: 7–12th June 1939 |url=http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/royalv.html}}</ref |
|+ State and official visits to the United States by the British Monarch<ref name="The Royal Visit: 7–12th June 1939">{{cite news|title=The Royal Visit: 7–12th June 1939 |url=http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/royalv.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |
||
|title=State Visit |
|title=State Visit |
||
|publisher=Embassy of the |
|publisher=Embassy of the US London |
||
|url=http://www.usembassy.org.uk/state_visit/index.html |
|url=http://www.usembassy.org.uk/state_visit/index.html |
||
|access-date=October 18, 2009 |
|access-date=October 18, 2009 |
||
Line 595: | Line 477: | ||
|archive-date=April 28, 2009 |
|archive-date=April 28, 2009 |
||
|url-status=dead |
|url-status=dead |
||
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=The Queen Breezes In for an Afternoon|work =New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/nyregion/07queen.html | first=N. R.|last=Kleinfield|date=July 6, 2010}}</ref> |
}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=The Queen Breezes In for an Afternoon|work =[[The New York Times]]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/nyregion/07queen.html | first=N. R.|last=Kleinfield|date=July 6, 2010}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|Dates |
|Dates |
||
Line 602: | Line 484: | ||
|Itinerary |
|Itinerary |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|June 7–11, 1939 |
||
|[[George VI|King George VI]] and [[Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother|Queen Elizabeth]] |
|[[George VI|King George VI]] and [[Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother|Queen Elizabeth]] |
||
|Washington |
|[[Washington, DC]], [[New York City]], and [[Hyde Park, New York|Hyde Park]] |
||
|Paid a state visit to Washington |
|Paid a state visit to [[Washington, DC]], stayed at the [[White House]], laid a wreath at the [[Tomb of the Unknowns]] in [[Arlington National Cemetery]], visited [[George Washington]]'s former residence at [[Mount Vernon]], made an appearance at the [[1939 World's Fair]] in New York City, and made a private visit to [[Franklin Roosevelt]]'s [[Springwood Estate]] in [[New York (state)|New York state]]. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|October 17–20, 1957 |
||
|[[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] |
|[[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] |
||
|Jamestown and Williamsburg |
|[[Jamestown, Virginia|Jamestown]] and [[Williamsburg, Virginia|Williamsburg]], Washington, DC, and New York City |
||
|Paid a state visit to Washington |
|Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, attended the official ceremonies of the 350th anniversary of the settlement of [[Jamestown, Virginia]], and made a brief stop-over in New York City to address the [[United Nations General Assembly]] before sailing to the United Kingdom. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|July 6–9, 1976 |
||
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
||
|Philadelphia, Washington |
|[[Philadelphia]], Washington, DC, New York City, [[Charlottesville, Virginia]], [[Newport, Rhode Island]], [[Providence, Rhode Island]], and [[Boston]] |
||
|Paid a state visit to Washington |
|Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, and toured the [[United States East Coast]] in conjunction with the [[U.S. Bicentennial|United States Bicentennial]] celebrations aboard ''[[HMY Britannia]]''. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|February 26 – March 7, 1983 |
||
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
||
|San Diego, Palm Springs, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, San Francisco, Yosemite National Park |
|[[San Diego]], [[Palm Springs, California]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Santa Barbara, California]], [[San Francisco]], [[Yosemite National Park]] in [[California]], and [[Seattle]] |
||
|Made an official visit to the United States, toured the [[United States West Coast]] aboard ''HMY Britannia'', and made a private visit to Ronald Reagan's retreat |
|Made an official visit to the United States, toured the [[United States West Coast]] aboard ''HMY Britannia'', and made a private visit to [[Ronald Reagan]]'s retreat, [[Rancho del Cielo]], in the [[Santa Ynez Mountains]]. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|May 14–17, 1991 |
||
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
||
|Washington |
|Washington, DC, [[Baltimore]], [[Miami]], [[Tampa, Florida]], [[Austin, Texas]], [[San Antonio]], [[Houston]], and [[Lexington, Kentucky]] |
||
|Paid a state visit to Washington |
|Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, addressed a joint session of the [[United States Congress]], made a private visit to [[Kentucky]], and toured the [[Southern United States]] and visited the [[Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum]] and met [[Lady Bird Johnson]] and family. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|May 3–8, 2007 |
||
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
||
|Richmond, Jamestown, and Williamsburg (Virginia), Louisville |
|[[Richmond, Virginia]], Jamestown, and Williamsburg (Virginia), [[Louisville, Kentucky]], [[Greenbelt, Maryland]], and Washington, DC |
||
|Paid a state visit to Washington |
|Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, addressed the [[Virginia General Assembly]], attended the official ceremonies of the 400th anniversary of the establishment of Jamestown, toured NASA's [[Goddard Space Flight Center]], visited the [[National World War II Memorial]] on the [[National Mall]], and made a private visit to Kentucky to attend the 133rd [[Kentucky Derby]]. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|July 6, 2010 |
||
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
|Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip |
||
|New York City |
|New York City |
||
|Made a one-day official visit to the United States to address the United Nations General Assembly, visited the [[World Trade Center site]] to pay respects to the victims of the [[September 11 |
|Made a one-day official visit to the United States to address the [[United Nations General Assembly]], visited the [[World Trade Center site]] to pay respects to the victims of the [[September 11 attacks]], and paid homage to British victims of the terrorist attack at the [[Queen Elizabeth II September 11th Garden|Queen Elizabeth September 11 Garden]] in [[Hanover Square (Manhattan)|Hanover Square]]. |
||
|} |
|} |
||
{|class="wikitable" style="margin:1em auto 1em auto |
{| class="wikitable" style="margin:1em auto 1em auto" |
||
|+ State and official visits to the United Kingdom by the President of the United States<ref>{{cite news|title=Visit of President Bush to the United Kingdom 18–21 November 2003|url=http://london.usembassy.gov/potusnov03/1potusnov03.html|publisher=USEmbassy.gov|access-date=October 18, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527161411/http://london.usembassy.gov/potusnov03/1potusnov03.html|archive-date=May 27, 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|+ State and official visits to the United Kingdom by the President of the United States<ref>{{cite news|title=Visit of President Bush to the United Kingdom 18–21 November 2003|url=http://london.usembassy.gov/potusnov03/1potusnov03.html|publisher=USEmbassy.gov|access-date=October 18, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100527161411/http://london.usembassy.gov/potusnov03/1potusnov03.html|archive-date=May 27, 2010|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 646: | Line 528: | ||
|Itinerary |
|Itinerary |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|December 26–28, 1918 |
||
|[[Woodrow Wilson]] and [[Edith Bolling Galt Wilson|Edith Wilson]] |
|[[Woodrow Wilson]] and [[Edith Bolling Galt Wilson|Edith Wilson]] |
||
|London, Carlisle, and Manchester |
|London, Carlisle, and Manchester |
||
|Made an official visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at [[Buckingham Palace]], attended an official dinner, had an audience with [[George V of the United Kingdom|King George V]] and [[May of Teck|Queen Mary]], and made a private visit called the |
|Made an official visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at [[Buckingham Palace]], attended an official dinner, had an audience with [[George V of the United Kingdom|King George V]] and [[May of Teck|Queen Mary]], and made a private visit, called the pilgrimage of the heart, to the ancestral home of his British-born mother, Janet Woodrow. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|June 7–9, 1982 |
||
|[[Ronald Reagan]] and [[Nancy Reagan]] |
|[[Ronald Reagan]] and [[Nancy Reagan]] |
||
|London and Windsor |
|London and Windsor |
||
|Made an official visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at [[Windsor Castle]], attended a state banquet, and addressed |
|Made an official visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at [[Windsor Castle]], attended a state banquet, and addressed [[Parliament of Great Britain|Parliament]]. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|November 28 – December 1, 1995 |
||
|[[Bill Clinton]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] |
|[[Bill Clinton]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] |
||
|London, Belfast, and Derry |
|[[London]], [[Belfast]], and [[Derry]] |
||
|Paid |
|Paid an official visit to the United Kingdom, laid a wreath on the [[The Unknown Warrior|Tomb of the Unknown Warrior]] in [[Westminster Abbey]], and addressed Parliament. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|November 18–21, 2003 |
||
|[[George W. Bush]] and [[Laura Bush]] |
|[[George W. Bush]] and [[Laura Bush]] |
||
|London and [[Sedgefield]] |
|London and [[Sedgefield]] |
||
|Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Buckingham Palace, attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the [[The Unknown Warrior|Tomb of the Unknown Warrior]] in [[Westminster Abbey]], and made a private visit to [[Tony Blair]]'s |
|Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at [[Buckingham Palace]], attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the [[The Unknown Warrior|Tomb of the Unknown Warrior]] in [[Westminster Abbey]], and made a private visit to [[Tony Blair]]'s constituency in [[County Durham]]. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|May 24–26, 2011 |
||
|[[Barack Obama]] and [[Michelle Obama]] |
|[[Barack Obama]] and [[Michelle Obama]] |
||
|London |
|London |
||
|Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Buckingham Palace, welcomed during an arrival ceremony in [[Buckingham Palace Gardens]], attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the |
|Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Buckingham Palace, welcomed during an arrival ceremony in [[Buckingham Palace Gardens]], attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior, addressed Parliament, presented wedding gifts to [[Prince William, Duke of Cambridge]] and [[Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge]], donated a [[MacBook]] [[notebook computer]]s to [[Peace Players International]], met with [[Elizabeth II|Queen Elizabeth II]], Prince Philip, and Prime Minister [[David Cameron]]. |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| |
|June 3–5, 2019 |
||
|[[Donald Trump]] and [[Melania Trump]] |
|[[Donald Trump]] and [[Melania Trump]] |
||
|London and [[Portsmouth]] |
|London and [[Portsmouth]] |
||
|Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at the [[Winfield House]], welcomed during an arrival ceremony in [[Buckingham Palace Gardens]], attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the |
|Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at the [[Winfield House]], welcomed during an arrival ceremony in [[Buckingham Palace Gardens]], attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in [[Westminster Abbey]], met with Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister [[Theresa May]]. |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Line 690: | Line 572: | ||
{{col-2}} |
{{col-2}} |
||
;Of United Kingdom |
;Of United Kingdom |
||
* [[Washington, |
* [[Washington, DC]] (Embassy) |
||
* [[Atlanta]] (Consulate-General) |
* [[Atlanta]] (Consulate-General) |
||
* [[Boston]] (Consulate-General) |
* [[Boston]] (Consulate-General) |
||
* [[Chicago]] (Consulate-General) |
* [[Chicago]] (Consulate-General) |
||
* [[Denver]] (Consulate-General) |
|||
* [[Houston]] (Consulate-General) |
* [[Houston]] (Consulate-General) |
||
* [[Los Angeles]] (Consulate-General) |
* [[Los Angeles]] (Consulate-General) |
||
Line 705: | Line 586: | ||
{{col-begin}} |
{{col-begin}} |
||
{{col-2}} |
{{col-2}} |
||
* [[Asian Development Bank]] |
|||
* [[AUKUS]] |
|||
* [[Australia Group]] |
|||
* [[Bank for International Settlements]] |
* [[Bank for International Settlements]] |
||
* [[British-American Project]] |
* [[British-American Project]] |
||
* [[European Bank for Reconstruction and Development]] |
|||
* [[Five Eyes]] |
|||
* [[Food and Agriculture Organization]] |
* [[Food and Agriculture Organization]] |
||
* [[ |
* [[G7]] |
||
* [[Group of Ten (economic)| |
* [[Group of Ten (economic)|G10]] |
||
* [[G20]] |
|||
* [[G-20 major economies|Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors]] |
|||
* [[General Conference on Weights and Measures]] |
|||
* [[International Atomic Energy Agency]] |
|||
* [[Inter-American Development Bank]] |
|||
* [[International Chamber of Commerce]] |
* [[International Chamber of Commerce]] |
||
* [[International Court of Justice]] |
* [[International Court of Justice]] |
||
Line 720: | Line 608: | ||
* [[International Renewable Energy Agency]] |
* [[International Renewable Energy Agency]] |
||
* [[International Telecommunication Union]] |
* [[International Telecommunication Union]] |
||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* [[Interpol]] |
* [[Interpol]] |
||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] |
* [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] |
||
* [[Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty]] |
* [[Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty]] |
||
* [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]] |
* [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]] |
||
* [[Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]] |
* [[Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe]] |
||
* Partnership for Atlantic Cooperation<ref>{{cite news|date=19 September 2023|title=US unveils Atlantic co-operation pact|work=Financial Times|url=https://www.ft.com/content/56706df4-f39b-4ab5-8acf-b252176d172d}}</ref> |
|||
* [[Paris Club]] |
|||
* [[Pilgrims Society]] |
* [[Pilgrims Society]] |
||
* [[Rim of the Pacific Exercise]] |
* [[Rim of the Pacific Exercise]] |
||
* [[UKUSA |
* [[UKUSA Agreement]] |
||
* United Nations |
* [[United Nations]] |
||
* [[United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]] |
* [[United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]] |
||
* [[United Nations Security Council]] |
* [[United Nations Security Council]] |
||
Line 736: | Line 626: | ||
* [[World Health Organization]] |
* [[World Health Organization]] |
||
* [[World Trade Organization]] |
* [[World Trade Organization]] |
||
* [[Zangger Committee]] |
|||
{{col-end}} |
{{col-end}} |
||
===Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group=== |
===Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group=== |
||
[[File:Saccwg 500 031708.jpg|thumb |
[[File:Saccwg 500 031708.jpg|thumb|Map showing member countries of the Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group and their respective lead agencies. <small>''This map refers to [[Serious Organised Crime Agency]]; this body is now known as the [[National Crime Agency]]''.</small> |
||
<small>''(Note: This map refers to [[Serious Organised Crime Agency|SOCA]], this body is now the [[National Crime Agency]])''</small> |
|||
]] |
]] |
||
[[File:UKUSA Map.svg|thumb|Map of the [[UKUSA Agreement]] countries: [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], United Kingdom, and the United States]] |
|||
{{UKUSA}} |
|||
The ''Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group'' is an initiative by Australia, Canada, [[New Zealand]], the United Kingdom and headed by the United States as a "formal partnership between these nations dedicated to tackling larger global crime issues, particularly organised crime". The cooperation consists of "five countries from three continents banding together to fight cyber crime in a synergistic way by sharing intelligence, swapping tools and best practices, and strengthening and even synchronising their respective laws".<ref>{{cite news|title=International cyber-cop unit girds for uphill battles|publisher=NetworkWorld.com |url=http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26144}}</ref> |
The ''Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group'' is an initiative by [[Australia]], [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], the United Kingdom and headed by the United States as a "formal partnership between these nations dedicated to tackling larger global crime issues, particularly organised crime". The cooperation consists of "five countries from three continents banding together to fight cyber crime in a synergistic way by sharing intelligence, swapping tools and best practices, and strengthening and even synchronising their respective laws".<ref>{{cite news|title=International cyber-cop unit girds for uphill battles|publisher=NetworkWorld.com|url=http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26144|access-date=October 18, 2009|archive-date=May 26, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130526095849/http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26144|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
Within this initiative, there is increased information sharing between the United Kingdom's [[National Crime Agency]] and the United States' [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] on matters relating to serious fraud or cyber crime. |
Within this initiative, there is increased information sharing between the United Kingdom's [[National Crime Agency]] and the United States' [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] on matters relating to serious fraud or cyber crime. |
||
=== |
===UK–USA Security Agreement=== |
||
{{Main| |
{{Main|UKUSA Agreement}} |
||
The [[UKUSA Agreement| |
The [[UKUSA Agreement|UK–USA Security Agreement]] is an alliance of five English-speaking countries; Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, for the sole purpose of sharing intelligence. The precursor to this agreement is essentially an extension of the historic [[1943 BRUSA Agreement|BRUSA Agreement]] which was signed in 1943. In association with the [[ECHELON]] system, all five nations are assigned to intelligence collection and analysis from different parts of the world. For example, the United Kingdom hunts for communications in [[Europe]], [[Africa]], and [[European Russia]] whereas the United States has responsibility for gathering intelligence in [[Latin America]], [[Asia]], [[North Asia|Asiatic Russia]], and [[Northern China|northern mainland China]].<ref>{{cite news|title=The UKUSA Community|url=http://www.tscm.com/cseukusa.html}}</ref> |
||
==Sister-Twinning cities== |
|||
==Sister-twinning cities== |
|||
===England and the United States=== |
===England and the United States=== |
||
{{col |
{{div col|colwidth=35em}} |
||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Ashby-de-la-Zouch]] and {{flagicon|Colorado}} [[Evans, Colorado]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Ashby-de-la-Zouch]] and {{flagicon|Colorado}} [[Evans, Colorado]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Ashford, Kent|Ashford]] and {{flagicon|Virginia}} [[Hopewell, Virginia]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Ashford, Kent|Ashford]] and {{flagicon|Virginia}} [[Hopewell, Virginia]] |
||
Line 775: | Line 663: | ||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Cheltenham]] and {{flagicon|Pennsylvania}} [[Cheltenham Township, Pennsylvania|Cheltenham, Pennsylvania]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Cheltenham]] and {{flagicon|Pennsylvania}} [[Cheltenham Township, Pennsylvania|Cheltenham, Pennsylvania]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Chester]] and {{flagicon|Colorado}} [[Lakewood, Colorado]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Chester]] and {{flagicon|Colorado}} [[Lakewood, Colorado]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Cleveland, England|Cleveland |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Cleveland, England|Cleveland]] and {{flagicon|Ohio}} [[Cleveland|Cleveland, Ohio]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Cornwall]] and {{flagicon|New York}} [[Cornwall, New York]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Cornwall]] and {{flagicon|New York}} [[Cornwall, New York]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[County Durham, England|County Durham]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Durham County, North Carolina]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[County Durham, England|County Durham]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Durham County, North Carolina]] |
||
Line 786: | Line 674: | ||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Durham, England|Durham]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Durham, North Carolina]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Durham, England|Durham]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Durham, North Carolina]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Evesham]] and {{flagicon|New Jersey}} [[Evesham Township, New Jersey]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Evesham]] and {{flagicon|New Jersey}} [[Evesham Township, New Jersey]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Fleetwood]] and {{flagicon| |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Fleetwood]] and {{flagicon|Pennsylvania}} [[Fleetwood, Pennsylvania]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Gravesend, Kent|Gravesend]] and {{flagicon|Virginia}} [[Chesterfield, Virginia]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Gravesend, Kent|Gravesend]] and {{flagicon|Virginia}} [[Chesterfield, Virginia]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Hartlepool]] and {{flagicon|Michigan}} [[Muskegon, Michigan]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Hartlepool]] and {{flagicon|Michigan}} [[Muskegon, Michigan]] |
||
Line 803: | Line 691: | ||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Mansfield]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Mansfield, Massachusetts]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Mansfield]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Mansfield, Massachusetts]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Mansfield]] and {{flagicon|Ohio}} [[Mansfield, Ohio]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Mansfield]] and {{flagicon|Ohio}} [[Mansfield, Ohio]] |
||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Middlesbrough]] and {{flagicon|Kentucky}} [[Middlesborough, Kentucky]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Middlesbrough]] and {{flagicon|Kentucky}} [[Middlesborough, Kentucky]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Newcastle upon Tyne]] and {{flagicon|Georgia (U.S. state)}} [[Atlanta]], Georgia |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Newcastle upon Tyne]] and {{flagicon|Georgia (U.S. state)}} [[Atlanta]], Georgia |
||
Line 834: | Line 721: | ||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Stratford-upon-Avon]] and {{flagicon|Connecticut}} [[Stratford, Connecticut]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Stratford-upon-Avon]] and {{flagicon|Connecticut}} [[Stratford, Connecticut]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Stroud]] and {{flagicon|Oklahoma}} [[Stroud, Oklahoma]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Stroud]] and {{flagicon|Oklahoma}} [[Stroud, Oklahoma]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Sunderland, Tyne and Wear|Sunderland]] and {{flagicon|District of Columbia}} [[Washington, |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Sunderland, Tyne and Wear|Sunderland]] and {{flagicon|District of Columbia}} [[Washington, DC]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Taunton]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Taunton, Massachusetts]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Taunton]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Taunton, Massachusetts]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Truro]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Truro, Massachusetts]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Truro]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Truro, Massachusetts]] |
||
Line 846: | Line 733: | ||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Metropolitan Borough of Wirral|Wirral, Metropolitan Borough of]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Midland, Texas]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Metropolitan Borough of Wirral|Wirral, Metropolitan Borough of]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Midland, Texas]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Wolverhampton]] and {{flagicon|New York}} [[Buffalo, New York]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Wolverhampton]] and {{flagicon|New York}} [[Buffalo, New York]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Worcester]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Worcester, Massachusetts]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Worcester, England|Worcester]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Worcester, Massachusetts]] |
||
{{col |
{{div col end}} |
||
===Scotland and the United States=== |
===Scotland and the United States=== |
||
{{col |
{{div col|colwidth=35em}} |
||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Aberdeen]] and {{flagicon|Washington}} [[Aberdeen, Washington]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Aberdeen]] and {{flagicon|Washington}} [[Aberdeen, Washington]] |
||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Aberdeen]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Houston, Texas]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Aberdeen]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Houston, Texas]] |
||
Line 859: | Line 745: | ||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Edinburgh]] and {{flagicon|California}} [[San Diego, California]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Edinburgh]] and {{flagicon|California}} [[San Diego, California]] |
||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Inverness]] and {{flagicon|Florida}} [[Inverness, Florida]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Inverness]] and {{flagicon|Florida}} [[Inverness, Florida]] |
||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Livingston, West Lothian|Livingston]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Grapevine, Texas]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Livingston, West Lothian|Livingston]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Grapevine, Texas]] |
||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Midlothian]] and {{flagicon|Illinois}} [[Midlothian, Illinois|Midlothian]], [[Illinois]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Midlothian]] and {{flagicon|Illinois}} [[Midlothian, Illinois|Midlothian]], [[Illinois]] |
||
Line 866: | Line 751: | ||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Stornoway]] and {{flagicon|South Carolina}} [[Pendleton, South Carolina]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Stornoway]] and {{flagicon|South Carolina}} [[Pendleton, South Carolina]] |
||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Dull, Perth and Kinross]] and {{flagicon|Oregon}} [[Boring, Oregon]] |
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Dull, Perth and Kinross]] and {{flagicon|Oregon}} [[Boring, Oregon]] |
||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Birnam, Perth and Kinross|Birnam]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Asheville, North Carolina|Asheville]] |
|||
{{col-end}} |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Dumfries]] and {{flagicon|Maryland}} [[Annapolis, Maryland]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Dunbar]] and {{flagicon|California}} [[Martinez, California]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Dunkeld]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Asheville, North Carolina]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Falkirk]] and {{flagicon|California}} [[San Rafael, California]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Forres]] and {{flagicon|Florida}} [[Mount Dora, Florida]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Glasgow]] and {{flagicon|Pennsylvania}} [[Pittsburgh]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Grangemouth]] and {{flagicon|Indiana}} [[La Porte, Indiana]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Kelso, Scottish Borders]] and {{flagicon|Washington}} [[Kelso, Washington]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Oban]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Laurinburg, North Carolina]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[South Ayrshire]] and {{flagicon|Georgia (U.S. state)}} [[Newnan, Georgia]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Stonehaven]] and {{flagicon|Alabama}} [[Athens, Alabama]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Stornoway]] and {{flagicon|South Carolina}} [[Pendleton, South Carolina]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|Scotland}} [[Linlithgow]] and {{flagicon|Texas}} [[Grapevine, Texas]] |
|||
{{div col end}} |
|||
===Wales and the United States=== |
===Wales and the United States=== |
||
Line 875: | Line 774: | ||
===Northern Ireland and the United States=== |
===Northern Ireland and the United States=== |
||
{{col |
{{div col|colwidth=35em}} |
||
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Ballymena]] and {{flagicon|Kentucky}} [[Morehead, Kentucky]] |
|||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Bangor, County Down]] and {{flagicon|Virginia}} [[Virginia Beach, Virginia]] |
||
* |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Belfast]] and {{flagicon|Maine}} [[Belfast, Maine]] |
||
* [[Belfast]] and {{flagicon| |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Belfast]] and {{flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Boston, Massachusetts]] |
||
* [[Belfast]] and {{flagicon| |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Belfast]] and {{flagicon|Tennessee}} [[Nashville, Tennessee]] |
||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Carrickfergus]] and {{flagicon|South Carolina}} [[Anderson, South Carolina]] |
||
* [[Carrickfergus]] and {{flagicon| |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Carrickfergus]] and {{flagicon|Michigan}} [[Jackson, Michigan]] |
||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Castlereagh (borough)|Castlereagh]] and {{flagicon|Washington}} [[Kent, Washington]] |
||
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Craigavon, County Armagh|Craigavon]] and {{flagicon|Georgia (U.S. state)}} [[LaGrange, Georgia]] |
|||
{{col-2}} |
|||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Derry]] and {{flagicon|New York}} [[Buffalo, New York]] |
||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Killyleagh]] and {{flagicon|North Carolina}} [[Cleveland, North Carolina]] |
||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Larne]] and {{flagicon|South Carolina}} [[Clover, South Carolina]] |
||
* [[ |
* {{flagicon|Northern Ireland}} [[Newtownabbey]] and {{flagicon|Arizona}} [[Gilbert, Arizona]] |
||
{{div col end}} |
|||
* [[Larne]] and {{flagicon|South Carolina}} [[Clover, South Carolina]] |
|||
* [[Newtownabbey]] and {{flagicon|Arizona}} [[Gilbert, Arizona]] |
|||
{{col-end}} |
|||
=== British Crown Dependencies and the United States === |
=== British Crown Dependencies and the United States === |
||
* {{flagicon|Jersey}} [[Saint Helier|Saint Helier, Jersey]] and {{Flagicon|New Jersey}} [[Trenton, New Jersey]] |
* {{flagicon|Jersey}} [[Saint Helier|Saint Helier, Jersey]] and {{Flagicon|New Jersey}} [[Trenton, New Jersey]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2019/11/29/trenton-twinning-tourism-boost-for-jersey/|title=Trenton twinning tourism boost for Jersey?|date=November 29, 2019|website=Jersey Evening Post|language=en|access-date=November 29, 2019}}</ref> |
||
===Friendship links=== |
===Friendship links=== |
||
* {{Flagicon|England}} [[Cambridge]] and {{Flagicon|Massachusetts}} [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]] |
|||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Liverpool]] and {{flagicon|Tennessee}} [[Memphis, Tennessee]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Liverpool]] and {{flagicon|Tennessee}} [[Memphis, Tennessee]] |
||
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Liverpool]] and {{flagicon|Louisiana}} [[New Orleans, Louisiana]] |
* {{flagicon|England}} [[Liverpool]] and {{flagicon|Louisiana}} [[New Orleans, Louisiana]] |
||
Line 904: | Line 802: | ||
==Heritage== |
==Heritage== |
||
{{See also|Anglo-America|British-American}} |
{{See also|Anglo-America|British-American}} |
||
[[File:Resolute desk.jpg|thumb| |
[[File:Barack Obama sitting at the Resolute desk 2009.jpg|thumb|alt=A man sitting behind a desk|[[Barack Obama]] sitting at the [[Resolute desk]], which was handcrafted from [[barque]] timbers of the decommissioned [[HMS Resolute (1850)|HMS ''Resolute'']], and then presented by [[Queen Victoria]] as a gift to the United States on November 23, 1880]] |
||
The United States and Britain share many threads of cultural heritage. |
The United States and Britain share many threads of cultural heritage. |
||
Since English is the main language of both the British and the Americans, both nations belong to the [[English-speaking world]]. Their common language comes with (relatively minor) [[American and British English differences|differences in spelling, pronunciation, and the meaning of words]].<ref>{{cite news|title= Differences Between American and British English|url=http://esl.about.com/od/toeflieltscambridge/a/dif_ambrit.htm}}</ref> |
Since English is the main language of both the British and the Americans, both nations belong to the [[English-speaking world]]. Their common language comes with (relatively minor) [[American and British English differences|differences in spelling, pronunciation, and the meaning of words]].<ref>{{cite news|title= Differences Between American and British English|url= http://esl.about.com/od/toeflieltscambridge/a/dif_ambrit.htm|access-date= October 18, 2009|archive-date= March 5, 2012|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120305035434/http://esl.about.com/od/toeflieltscambridge/a/dif_ambrit.htm|url-status= dead}}</ref> |
||
The [[Law of the United States|American legal system]] is largely based on [[ |
The [[Law of the United States|American legal system]] is largely based on [[English law|English common law]]. The [[Local government in the United States|American system of local government]] is rooted in [[Local government in England|English precedents]], such as the offices of county courts and sheriffs. Although the US remains more highly religious than Britain,<ref>{{cite book|author1=Robert D. Putnam|author2=David E. Campbell|author3=Shaylyn Romney Garrett|title=American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us|url=https://archive.org/details/americangracehow0000putn|url-access=registration|year=2010|publisher=Simon and Schuster|page=[https://archive.org/details/americangracehow0000putn/page/316 316]|isbn=9781416566885}}</ref> the largest Protestant denominations emerged from British churches brought across the Atlantic, such as the [[Baptists]], [[Methodism|Methodists]], [[Congregational church|Congregationalists]] and Episcopalians. |
||
Britain and the United States practice what is commonly referred to as an [[Anglo-Saxon economy]] in which levels of regulation and taxes are relatively low, and government provides a low to medium level of social services in return.<ref>{{cite news|title=The Two Types of Capitalism|url=http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/10/19/the-two-types-of-capitalism/|date=October 19, 2006|publisher=innovationzen.com}}</ref> |
Britain and the United States practice what is commonly referred to as an [[Anglo-Saxon economy]] in which levels of regulation and taxes are relatively low, and government provides a low to medium level of social services in return.<ref>{{cite news|title=The Two Types of Capitalism|url=http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/10/19/the-two-types-of-capitalism/|date=October 19, 2006|publisher=innovationzen.com}}</ref> |
||
[[Independence Day (United States)|Independence Day]], July 4, is a national celebration which commemorates the July 4, 1776 adoption of the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]] from the British Empire. American defiance of Britain is expressed in the American national anthem, "[[The Star |
[[Independence Day (United States)|Independence Day]], July 4, is a national celebration which commemorates the July 4, 1776, adoption of the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]] from the British Empire. American defiance of Britain is expressed in the American national anthem, "[[The Star-Spangled Banner]]", written during the [[War of 1812]] to the tune of a British celebratory song as the Americans beat off a British attack on Baltimore. |
||
It is estimated that between 40.2 million and 72.1 million Americans today have British ancestry, i.e. between 13% and 23.3% of the |
It is estimated that between 40.2 million and 72.1 million Americans today have British ancestry, i.e. between 13% and 23.3% of the US population.<ref>[https://www.census.gov American Community Survey] Total British ancestry reported as a collective group [https://www.census.gov]</ref><ref name="British-American ancestry ACS 2009">[http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ADPTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_DP2&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-format= British-American ancestry ACS 2009.] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111124190312/http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ADPTable?_bm=y&-qr_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_DP2&-geo_id=01000US&-ds_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-format= |date=November 24, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ancestry.co.uk/cs/legal/AboutUs|title=About Ancestry.co.uk|website=www.ancestry.co.uk|access-date=May 9, 2019|archive-date=March 30, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120330235306/http://www.ancestry.co.uk/about/default.aspx?section=pr-2011-02-05|url-status=dead}}</ref> In the [[1980 US Census]], 61,311,449 Americans reported British ancestry{{clarify|reason=Not clear whether these statistics include people with mixed British and other ancestry|date=March 2017}} reaching 32.56% of the US population at the time which, even today, would make them the largest ancestry group in the United States.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.census.gov/population/censusdata/pc80-s1-10/tab02.pdf|title=United States 1980 Census}}</ref> |
||
Particular symbols of the close relationship between the two countries are the JFK Memorial and the [[American Bar Association]]'s Magna Carta Memorial, both at [[Runnymede]] in England. |
Particular symbols of the close relationship between the two countries are the JFK Memorial and the [[American Bar Association]]'s Magna Carta Memorial, both at [[Runnymede]] in England. |
||
==Justice== |
|||
In 2020, some differences exist in the way the justice works in both countries<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/jul/23/we-look-like-fools-uk-us-ties-threatened-by-corruption-case-row</ref>. |
|||
== Religion == |
== Religion == |
||
{{More citations needed|date=March 2022}} |
|||
[[File:Whitfield Memorial Church, Tottenham Court Road, London-8Feb2008.jpg|thumb|169x169px|The Whitfield Memorial Church in [[Camden Town|Camden]], London which home to the [[American International Church]].]] |
|||
{{See also|Religion in the United States|Religion in the United Kingdom}} |
{{See also|Religion in the United States|Religion in the United Kingdom}} |
||
[[File:Whitfield Memorial Church, Tottenham Court Road, London-8Feb2008.jpg|thumb|Whitfield Memorial Church in the [[Camden Town|Camden]] section of London, which is home to the [[American International Church]]]] |
|||
Both the United States and the United Kingdom share the similarity that a majority of their populations state that their belief is [[Christianity|Christian]], at [[Christianity in the United States|70.4% in the U.S]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/|title=America's Changing Religious Landscape|date=2015-05-12|website=Pew Research Center|language=en-US|access-date=2019-07-30}}</ref> and [[Religion in the United Kingdom|59.5% in the UK]]. Also, both countries share that a majority of these Christian followers are members of the [[Mainline Protestant|mainline Protestant group of churches]], rather than the [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic Church]], although the Catholic church is relatively sizeable in both countries. Many of these mainline Protestant churches in the United States have their origins in the United Kingdom or their founders were British. This includes [[Episcopal Church (United States)|Episcopal]] ([[Anglicanism|Anglican]]), [[Baptists|Baptist]], [[Methodism|Methodist]], [[Presbyterianism|Presbyterian]], [[Congregational church|Congregational]], and [[Quakers|Quaker.]] |
|||
Both the United States and the United Kingdom share the similarity that a majority of their populations state that their belief is [[Christianity|Christian]], at [[Christianity in the United States|70.4% in the US]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/|title=America's Changing Religious Landscape|date=May 12, 2015|website=Pew Research Center|language=en-US|access-date=July 30, 2019}}</ref> and [[Religion in the United Kingdom|59.5% in the UK]]. Also, in both countries the majority of Christian followers are members of the [[Mainline Protestant|mainline Protestant group of churches]], rather than the [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic Church]], although the Catholic church is relatively sizeable in both countries. Many of these mainline Protestant churches in the United States have their origins in the United Kingdom or their founders were British. This includes [[Episcopal Church (United States)|Episcopal]] ([[Anglicanism|Anglican]]), [[Baptists|Baptist]], [[Methodism|Methodist]], [[Presbyterianism|Presbyterian]], [[Congregational church|Congregational]], and [[Quakers|Quaker.]] |
|||
Nevertheless, there are some three big disparities between the two nations in the role of religion and faith. Firstly, the United Kingdom has [[Christian state|an established church]] in two of the four nations of the country; the Anglican [[Church of England]], |
Nevertheless, there are some three big disparities between the two nations in the role of religion and faith. Firstly, the United Kingdom has [[Christian state|an established church]] in two of the four nations of the country; the Anglican [[Church of England]], where [[Monarchy of the United Kingdom|the head of state]] is [[Supreme Governor of the Church of England|the head of the church]] in one, and the Presbyterian [[Church of Scotland]] which plays a notable role of the other. The United States on the other hand requires a strict [[separation of church and state]], as stated in [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|the First Amendment]]. |
||
Another sizable difference between the |
Another sizable difference between the US and the UK is the [[piety]] of followers, as the UK is much more [[Secularism|secular]] than the US. A Gallup poll in 2015 reported that 41% of Americans said they [[Church attendance|regularly attend religious services]],<ref name="RelTolRelRate">{{cite web|url=http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_rate.htm|title=How many people go regularly to weekly religious services?|publisher=Religious Tolerance website|access-date=July 30, 2019|archive-date=April 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200420161819/http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_rate.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> compared to just 10% of Britons.<ref name="bbc20070403">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6520463.stm|title='One in 10' attends church weekly|date=April 3, 2007|work=BBC News}}</ref> Thirdly, a preeminent distinction amidst the two countries is the declaration of faith. In the United Kingdom, religion, especially those that follow the mainstream Protestant churches, is rarely discussed and the country is a secular society. However, in the US, religion and faith are seen as a major part of the personal being and declarations are much more stronger.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}} |
||
The United Kingdom also has a large number of those possessing [[Atheism|no faith]] or are [[Agnosticism|agnostic]] with 25.7% saying they are [[Irreligion|irreligious]], compared with just [[Atheism in the United States|10% in the United States]] who say that they don't believe in a God. Many notable British atheists including [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Christopher Hitchens]] are known in the US. The [[Atheist Bus campaign]] which started in London in 2008 by [[Ariane Sherine]], was copied by local atheists in America and put on buses in Washington, DC,<ref name="foxnews-whydc">{{cite news|date=November 12, 2008|title='Why Believe in a God?' Ad Campaign Launches on D.C. Buses|publisher=[[Fox News]]|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450445,00.html|url-status=dead|access-date=January 19, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090208213051/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C450445%2C00.html|archive-date=February 8, 2009}}</ref> and [[Bloomington, Indiana|Bloomington]], Indiana. |
|||
The differing attitude about religion among the two nations has causes a large schism between the two nations, and much of the general attitude of the society as a whole on fundamental social issues including abortion, minority rights, blasphemy, the role of church and the state in society etc. |
|||
The differing attitudes towards the religion among the US and the UK causes a large schism between the two nations, and much of the general attitude of the society as a whole on fundamental social issues including abortion, minority rights, blasphemy, the role of church and the state in society, etc.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}} |
|||
Both the United States and the United Kingdom share a number of followers the other minority faiths that are practiced in both counties including [[Judaism]], [[Islam]], [[Hinduism]], [[Sikhism]], [[Paganism]] and [[Buddhism]]. Although the numbers and type of faith practice in both countries differ wildly due to the ethnic and cultural makeup of both countries. |
|||
Both the United States and the United Kingdom share a number of followers of other minority faiths, although the numbers and type of faith practice in both countries differ wildly due to the ethnic and cultural makeup of both countries.{{citation needed|date=March 2022}} The other minority faiths that are practiced in both countries include [[Judaism]], [[Islam]], [[Hinduism]], [[Sikhism]], [[Paganism]] and [[Buddhism]]. |
|||
The United Kingdom also has a large number of those possessing [[Atheism|no faith]] or are [[Agnosticism|agnostic]] with 25.7% saying they are [[Irreligion|irreligious]], compared with just [[Atheism in the United States|10% in the United States]] who say that they don't believe in a God. Many notable British atheists including [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Christopher Hitchens]] are known in the U.S. The [[Atheist Bus campaign]] which started in London in 2008 by [[Ariane Sherine]], was copied by local atheists in America and put on buses in Washington D.C.<ref name="foxnews-whydc">{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,450445,00.html|title='Why Believe in a God?' Ad Campaign Launches on D.C. Buses|date=2008-11-12|accessdate=2009-01-19|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090208213051/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0%2C2933%2C450445%2C00.html|archivedate=8 February 2009|url-status=dead|publisher=[[Fox News]]}}</ref> and the [[Bloomington, Indiana|Bloomington]], Indiana. |
|||
== Food and drink == |
== Food and drink == |
||
{{See also|American cuisine|British cuisine}} |
|||
{{See also|American cuisine|British cuisine}}Many classic dishes or foods from [[American cuisine]] such as [[hamburger]]s, [[hot dog]]s, [[barbecue chicken]], [[Fried chicken|southern fried chicken]], [[Chicago-style pizza|deep-pan pizza]], [[chewing gum]], [[tomato soup]], [[Chili con carne|chilli-con-carne]], [[chocolate chip cookie]]s, [[chocolate brownie]]s, [[Soft serve|soft-scoop ice cream]] and [[Doughnut|donuts]] are popular in the United Kingdom. Drinks like [[cola]], [[milkshake]]s and [[Bourbon whiskey|bourbon]] are also popular. A number of major American food trends and fads have also been popular and influential in the British palate, for example [[Weight management|weight management diets]] and [[Microbrewery|craft beer]]. |
|||
Many classic dishes or foods from [[American cuisine]] such as [[hamburger]]s, [[hot dog]]s, [[barbecue chicken]], [[Fried chicken|southern fried chicken]], [[Chicago-style pizza|deep-pan pizza]], [[chewing gum]], [[tomato soup]], [[Chili con carne|chilli-con-carne]], [[chocolate chip cookie]]s, [[chocolate brownie]]s, [[Soft serve|soft-scoop ice cream]] and [[Doughnut|donuts]] are popular in the United Kingdom. Drinks like [[cola]], [[milkshake]]s and [[Bourbon whiskey|bourbon]] are also popular. A number of major American food trends and fads have also been popular and influential in the British palate, for example [[Weight management|weight management diets]] and [[Microbrewery|craft beer]]. |
|||
Some American foods like [[Corn flakes|cornflakes]], [[baked beans]] |
Some American foods, like [[Corn flakes|cornflakes]], [[baked beans]] and [[Potato chip|crisps]] (known as potato chips in the United States), have become so entrenched in the UK's food culture that they have completely lost their American roots and are considered part of British cuisine. [[Breakfast cereal]]s like corn flakes, [[bran flakes]] and [[Rice Krispies|puffed rice]] came from the US to the UK in the beginning of twentieth century, and virtually changed the perception of [[Breakfast#United Kingdom and Ireland|breakfasts locally]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Lawrence|first=Felicity|date=November 23, 2010|title=Drop that spoon! The truth about breakfast cereals: an extract from Felicity Lawrence's book|language=en-GB|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2010/nov/23/food-book-extract-felicity-lawrence|access-date=August 4, 2019|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> |
||
Some British foods have been just as nativised in the US such as [[apple pie]], [[macaroni and cheese]] and [[sandwich]]es.<ref name="pastemagazine.com">{{cite web|date=August 28, 2016|title=The American Misconception of English Food|url=https://www.pastemagazine.com/food/the-american-misconception-of-english-food/|access-date=February 9, 2021|website=pastemagazine.com|language=en}}</ref> British cuisine was a major influence on the [[cuisine of the Southern United States]], including fried chicken.<ref>{{cite web|last=Jessie|date=December 22, 2015|title=Southern cooking that doesn't just whistle Dixie|url=https://www.backwoodshome.com/southern-cooking-that-doesnt-just-whistle-dixie/|access-date=February 9, 2021|website=Backwoods Home Magazine|language=en-US}}</ref> British foods like [[fish and chips]], [[shepherd's pie]], [[Sunday Roast]], [[Afternoon Tea]] and [[gingerbread]] are also entrenched in American food culture. Drinking culture in the US has been heavily influenced by Britain, especially the introduction of [[whisky]] and certain styles of beer in the colonial period.<ref>{{cite web|title=A Short History of 'a Beer and a Shot'|url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/j5aek4/a-short-history-of-a-beer-and-a-shot|access-date=February 9, 2021|website=www.vice.com|date=March 16, 2018 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Macdonald|first=Fiona|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d9u7BAAAQBAJ&q=whisky+history|title=Whisky, A Very Peculiar History|date=January 5, 2012|publisher=Andrews UK Limited|isbn=978-1-908759-24-5|language=en}}</ref> By the late 20th Century, British cuisine was sometimes stereotyped as being unappealing in the United States, although British cuisine is commonly eaten there.<ref>{{cite book|last=Collins|first=Spencer|title=British Food: An Extraordinary Thousand Years of History|publisher=Grub Street Publishers|year=2003}}</ref> This reputation has been attributed to the impact that WWII rationing had on British cuisine in the mid-20th Century.<ref name="pastemagazine.com"/> |
|||
Many major American food and [[Fast-moving consumer goods|fast moving consumer goods]] companies have British operations includes [[Molson Coors Brewing Company|Molson Coors]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.molsoncoors.com/en|title=Home|website=Molson Coors|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[McCormick & Company]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mccormickcorporation.com/en/company|title=Company {{!}} McCormick Corporation|website=McCormick Corporation|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[Kellogg's]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.kelloggs.co.uk/en_GB/home.html|title=Home {{!}} Kellogg's|website=Kellogg's United Kingdom|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[Campbell Soup Company|Campbell's]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.campbellsoup.co.uk/|title=Campbell's Soup UK {{!}} The World's Most Iconic Soup Brand|website=Campbell's Soup UK|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[Kraft Heinz|Kraft-Heinz]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.heinz.co.uk/en|title=Heinz {{!}} Home|website=Heinz UK|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[PepsiCo]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://pepsico.co.uk/company/about-us|title=About Us{{!}} PepsiCo.com|website=pepsico.co.uk|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[Coca-Cola]] <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cokecce.co.uk/|title=Coca-Cola European Partners|website=Coca-Cola European Partners|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> & [[Mondelez International|Mondelez]] <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://eu.mondelezinternational.com/|title=Home {{!}} Europe|website=Mondelēz International, Inc.|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> The major British food manufacturers that operate in the United States are [[Unilever]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.unileverusa.com/|title=Home|website=Unilever USA|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[Associated British Foods]] <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.abf.co.uk/about_us/global_manufacturing|title=About us - Global manufacturing|website=Associated British Foods plc|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> and [[Diageo]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.diageo.com/en/our-business/where-we-operate/north-america/|title=North America|website=Diageo|language=en-gb|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> The purchase of the British food company [[Cadbury|Cadbury's]] by then company Kraft Foods in 2010, caused a storm on whether the company would change the recipe for its [[Cadbury Dairy Milk|signature chocolate]] <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/thebirminghambrief/items/2010/03/Cadburys.aspx|title=The Cadbury Brand – does it matter if it is British or American?|website=www.birmingham.ac.uk|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> and the conditions at Cadbury's food factories.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/8367719.stm|title=Cadbury union bosses meet Kraft|last=|first=|date=2009-11-19|work=BBC News|access-date=2019-08-04|language=en-GB}}</ref> |
|||
Many major American food and [[Fast-moving consumer goods|fast moving consumer goods]] companies have British operations including [[Molson Coors Brewing Company|Molson Coors]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.molsoncoors.com/en|title=Home|website=Molson Coors|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019|archive-date=August 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190804032313/http://www.molsoncoors.com/en|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[McCormick & Company]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mccormickcorporation.com/en/company|title=Company {{!}} McCormick Corporation|website=McCormick Corporation|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> [[Kellogg's]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kelloggs.co.uk/en_GB/home.html|title=Home {{!}} Kellogg's|website=Kellogg's United Kingdom|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> [[Campbell Soup Company|Campbell's]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.campbellsoup.co.uk/|title=Campbell's Soup UK {{!}} The World's Most Iconic Soup Brand|website=Campbell's Soup UK|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> [[Kraft Heinz|Kraft-Heinz]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.heinz.co.uk/en|title=Heinz {{!}} Home|website=Heinz UK|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019|archive-date=August 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190804143647/https://www.heinz.co.uk/en|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[PepsiCo]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pepsico.co.uk/company/about-us|title=About Us{{!}} PepsiCo.com|website=pepsico.co.uk|access-date=August 4, 2019|archive-date=August 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190804143645/http://pepsico.co.uk/company/about-us|url-status=dead}}</ref> [[Coca-Cola]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cokecce.co.uk/|title=Coca-Cola European Partners|website=Coca-Cola European Partners|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019|archive-date=August 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190804143648/https://www.cokecce.co.uk/|url-status=dead}}</ref> & [[Mondelez International|Mondelez]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eu.mondelezinternational.com/|title=Home {{!}} Europe|website=Mondelēz International, Inc.|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> The major British food manufacturers that operate in the United States are [[Unilever]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.unileverusa.com/|title=Home|website=Unilever USA|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> [[Associated British Foods]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.abf.co.uk/about_us/global_manufacturing|title=About us - Global manufacturing|website=Associated British Foods plc|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> and [[Diageo]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.diageo.com/en/our-business/where-we-operate/north-america/|title=North America|website=Diageo|language=en-gb|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> The purchase of the British food company [[Cadbury]] by the American company [[Kraft Foods]] in 2010, caused a storm on whether the company would change the recipe for its [[Cadbury Dairy Milk|signature chocolate]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/thebirminghambrief/items/2010/03/Cadburys.aspx|title=The Cadbury Brand – does it matter if it is British or American?|website=www.birmingham.ac.uk|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> and the conditions at Cadbury's food factories.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/8367719.stm|title=Cadbury union bosses meet Kraft|date=November 19, 2009|work=BBC News|access-date=August 4, 2019|language=en-GB}}</ref> |
|||
Additionally, there are several American restaurant and café chains like [[McDonald's|McDonalds]], [[Burger King]], [[KFC]], [[Domino's Pizza]], [[Pizza Hut]], [[Krispy Kreme]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.krispykreme.co.uk/|title=Home|website=Krispy Kreme UK|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> and [[Starbucks]] that have enterprises on the other side of the Atlantic. A small number of British chains like [[Pret a Manger]],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pret.com/en-us/?country=us|title=Pret a Manger US|website=Pret a Manger|language=en-us|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> [[YO! Sushi]] and [[Itsu]] <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.itsu.com/us/|title=itsu New York|website=itsu us|language=en-US|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> have operations in the U.S., principally around New York City. The British catering company [[Compass Group]] has several catering contracts in the States, including for the federal government and US military.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.compass-usa.com/|title=Home Page - Compass Group USA|website=Compass USA|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> |
|||
Additionally, there are several American restaurant and café chains like [[McDonald's]], [[Burger King]], [[KFC]], [[Domino's Pizza]], [[Pizza Hut]], [[Krispy Kreme]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.krispykreme.co.uk/|title=Home|website=Krispy Kreme UK|language=en-GB|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> and [[Starbucks]] that have enterprises on the other side of the Atlantic. A small number of British chains like [[Pret a Manger]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.pret.com/en-us/?country=us|title=Pret a Manger US|website=Pret a Manger|language=en-us|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> [[YO! Sushi]] and [[Itsu]]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.itsu.com/us/|title=itsu New York|website=itsu us|language=en-US|access-date=August 4, 2019|archive-date=May 23, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190523222915/https://www.itsu.com/us/|url-status=dead}}</ref> have operations in the US, principally around New York City. The British catering company [[Compass Group]] has several catering contracts in the States, including for the federal government and US military.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.compass-usa.com/|title=Home Page - Compass Group USA|website=Compass USA|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> During the start of 2020, Youtube channel [[Insider Inc.|Insider]] asked their resident American and British journalists Joe Avella and Harry Kersh to compare various chain restaurant menus of both the US and UK, under the title of Food Wars. <ref>{{Cite web |title=US vs UK {{!}} Food Wars |url=https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLW1Mwtj8qAjlzkCHXFYsDwGnOFJY-Jk-X |website=Youtube}}</ref> |
|||
Since the [[2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum|2016 EU referendum]], there has been growing concern about whether in a possible UK-U.S. [[free trade agreement]] would lead to changes in food practices and laws in the UK.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/food-standards-brexit-uk-us-trade-deal-maggots-rat-hair-worms-insects-mould-products-a8575721.html|title=UK consumers could be forced to accept insects, mould and rat hair in food as part of post-Brexit trade deal|date=2018-10-09|website=The Independent|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> The concern is that American food standards laws are much more looser than the UK, such as rules governing cleanliness, the use of antibiotics and pesticides, [[Animal husbandry|animal welfare conditions]] and the use of [[genetically modified food]]. Much of these concerns have been symbolised by the production process of American poultry, often known as "[[Poultry farming in the United States|chlorinated chicken]]".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/on-demand/68769-001|title=Dispatches - The Truth About Chlorinated Chicken|website=Channel 4|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|title=Brexit: The Hidden Danger of Chlorinated Chicken. With Stephen Fry|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAMpJ9Yr56Y|work=Pindex|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> |
|||
Since the [[2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum|2016 EU referendum]], there has been growing concern about whether a possible UK–US [[free trade agreement]] would lead to changes in food practices and laws in the UK.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/food-standards-brexit-uk-us-trade-deal-maggots-rat-hair-worms-insects-mould-products-a8575721.html|title=UK consumers could be forced to accept insects, mould and rat hair in food as part of post-Brexit trade deal|date=October 9, 2018|website=The Independent|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019}}</ref> The concern is that American food standards laws are much looser than the UK's, such as rules governing cleanliness, the use of antibiotics and pesticides, [[Animal husbandry|animal welfare conditions]] and the use of [[genetically modified food]]. Many of these concerns have been symbolised by the production process of American poultry, often known as "[[Poultry farming in the United States|chlorinated chicken]]".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/on-demand/68769-001|title=Dispatches - The Truth About Chlorinated Chicken|website=Channel 4|language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019|archive-date=August 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190804161819/https://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/on-demand/68769-001|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|title=Brexit: The Hidden Danger of Chlorinated Chicken. With Stephen Fry|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAMpJ9Yr56Y |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211213/gAMpJ9Yr56Y |archive-date=December 13, 2021 |url-status=live|work=Pindex| date=March 26, 2019 |language=en|access-date=August 4, 2019}}{{cbignore}}</ref> |
|||
==Culture and media== |
|||
==Culture and media== |
|||
Both the U.S. and UK are considered "cultural [[superpower]]s", with both countries having a large scale influence around the world in film, music, literature, and television.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ft.com/content/c20d03e2-2fa6-11e6-bda0-04585c31b153|title=Subscribe to read|website=Financial Times}}</ref> |
|||
Both the US and UK are considered cultural [[superpower]]s; both countries having a large scale influence around the world in film, music, literature, and television.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/c20d03e2-2fa6-11e6-bda0-04585c31b153 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221211/https://www.ft.com/content/c20d03e2-2fa6-11e6-bda0-04585c31b153 |archive-date=December 11, 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|title=US overtakes Britain as world's top 'soft power'|website=Financial Times|date=June 14, 2016}}</ref> |
|||
===Literature=== |
===Literature=== |
||
{{Main|English-language literature|British literature|American literature}} |
{{Main|English-language literature|British literature|American literature}} |
||
Literature is transferred across the Atlantic Ocean, as evidenced by the appeal of British authors such as [[William Shakespeare]], [[Charles Dickens]], [[J. R. R. Tolkien]], [[Jackie Collins]], and [[J. |
Literature is transferred across the [[Atlantic Ocean]], as evidenced by the appeal of British authors such as [[William Shakespeare]], [[Charles Dickens]], [[J. R. R. Tolkien]], [[Jackie Collins]], and [[J. K. Rowling]] in the United States, and American authors including [[Harriet Beecher Stowe]], [[Mark Twain]], [[Ernest Hemingway]], [[Stephen King]] and [[Dan Brown]] in Britain. [[Henry James]] and [[T. S. Eliot]] both moved to Britain and were well known in both countries. Eliot moved to England in 1914 and became a British subject in 1927. He was a dominant figure in literary criticism and greatly influenced the [[Modernist poetry in English|Modern period]] of [[British literature]].<ref>{{cite book|first=John|last=Worthen|title=T. S. Eliot: A Short Biography|year=2011}}</ref> |
||
In the UK, many |
In the UK, many American novels including ''[[The Catcher in the Rye]]'', ''[[Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry]]'',<ref>{{cite book|title=Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry: York Notes for GCSE|last=Pilgrim|first=Imelda|date=July 4, 1997|publisher=Longman|isbn=9780582314559|edition= 2nd|location=Harlow|language=en}}</ref> ''[[Of Mice and Men]]'', <ref>{{Cite web |title=Of Mice and Men - GCSE English Literature |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/topics/z8q3dmn |access-date=2024-01-17 |website=BBC Bitesize |language=en-GB}}</ref> and ''[[The Color Purple]]'' <ref> {{cite book|title=The Color Purple: Advanced - York Notes for A Level Study Guide |publisher=York Notes |year=2003|isbn=9780582784345 |language=en-UK}} </ref> are frequently used texts for British secondary-level education English and English Literature exams as set by the main examination boards. |
||
=== |
===Media=== |
||
{{Main|Mass media in the United Kingdom|Mass media in the United States}} |
{{Main|Mass media in the United Kingdom|Mass media in the United States}} |
||
In |
In media, connections between the US and the UK in print media are minor but strong in online content. Until 2016, a condensed version of ''[[The New York Times]]'' was inside ''[[The Observer]]'' newspaper. In some [[Newsagent's shop|newsagents]] in the UK, people can find international editions of ''[[USA Today]]'', ''[[The New York Times International Edition]]'',<ref group="note">Although the paper is edited in Paris, it is effectively a version of the New York paper</ref> the Europe edition of ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'', ''[[Newsweek]]'', ''[[The New Yorker]]'', ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]'' magazine and ''[[Foreign Affairs]]''. While in the US you would be able to find the international edition of ''[[The Economist]]'' and in New York City, the ''[[Financial Times]]''. After [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s purchase of the ''[[New York Post]]'' in November 1976,<ref>{{cite news|last=Carmody|first=Deirdre|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1976/11/20/archives/new-jersey-pages-dorothy-schiff-agrees-to-sell-post-to-murdoch.html|title=Dorothy Schiff Agrees to Sell ''Post'' To Murdoch, Australian Publisher|work=The New York Times|date=November 20, 1976|access-date=December 30, 2017}}</ref> he redesigned the newspaper into a populist right-wing tabloid, likewise his earlier relaunch of the British ''[[The Sun (United Kingdom)|Sun]]'' newspaper as a down-market tabloid from 1969.<ref>{{cite news|last=Anderson|first=Clive|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/what-if-rupert-murdoch-hadnt-bought-the-sun-99965.html|title=What if Rupert Murdoch hadn't bought The Sun?|work=The Independent|location=London|date=August 11, 2003|access-date=December 30, 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Brogan|first=Patrick|url=https://newrepublic.com/article/92429/rupert-murdoch-international-newspaper-empire|title=Citizen Murdoch|magazine=The New Republic|date=October 11, 1982|access-date=December 30, 2017}}</ref> |
||
In magazine publishing, the two |
In magazine publishing, the two large American magazine publishing houses, [[Hearst Communications|Hearst]] and [[Condé Nast]], maintain operations in the UK, and British editions of the US magazines ''[[Good Housekeeping]]'', ''[[GQ]]'', ''[[Men's Health (British magazine)|Men's Health]]'', ''[[Cosmopolitan (magazine)|Cosmopolitan]]'', ''[[Vogue (magazine)|Vogue]]'', ''[[National Geographic (magazine)|National Geographic]]'', ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' and others are available in Britain. On occasion, some American editions are also available for purchase usually next to the local edition or in the international section. In British magazines in the US, [[Northern & Shell]] created an American version of ''[[OK!]]'' magazine in 2005. |
||
There are a number of Americans and British in each other countries' [[News media|press corp]], including [[Editing|editors]], [[correspondent]]s, [[journalist]]s and [[columnist]]s. Individuals born in the United States active in the British press corp include the ''FT''{{'}}s news editor Peter Spiegel, ''[[The Daily Telegraph|Daily Telegraph]]'' columnist [[Janet Daley]], and ''Guardian'' |
There are a number of Americans and British in each other countries' [[News media|press corp]], including [[Editing|editors]], [[correspondent]]s, [[journalist]]s and [[columnist]]s. Individuals born in the United States active in the British press corp include the ''FT''{{'}}s news editor Peter Spiegel, ''[[The Daily Telegraph|Daily Telegraph]]'' columnist [[Janet Daley]], [[The Times]] columnist [[Hadley Freeman]] and the ''Guardian'' columnist [[Tim Dowling]] and. Originally from the UK were [[Christopher Hitchens]] (1949–2011) and the current editor of [[Vogue (magazine)|Vogue]], [[Anna Wintour]]. The previous CEO of [[The New York Times Company]] between 2012 and 2020 was the former [[Director-General of the BBC]] (effectively a CEO), [[Mark Thompson (media executive)|Mark Thompson]]. The current editor-in-chief of the London-based ''[[The Guardian|Guardian]]'' since 2015,<ref>{{cite news|last=Sherwin|first=Adam|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/katharine-viner-appointed-editorinchief-of-the-guardian-10123851.html|title=Katharine Viner appointed editor-in-chief of The Guardian|work=The Independent|date=March 20, 2015}}</ref> [[Katharine Viner]] was previously the editor of ''The Guardian''{{'}}s American website between 2014 and 2015.<ref>{{cite news|last=Perlberg|first=Steven|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/stevenperlberg/how-the-guardian-lost-america|title=How The Guardian Lost America|work=Buzz Feed|date=June 21, 2017|access-date=June 21, 2017}}</ref> |
||
In terms of online content, three newspaper-online sites have American editions, [[TheGuardian.com]],<ref>{{ |
In terms of online content, three newspaper-online sites have American editions, [[TheGuardian.com]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us|title=The Guardian - US Edition|website=[[TheGuardian.com]]}}</ref> [[Mail Online]] and ''[[The Independent]]''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/us|title=The Independent - US Edition|website=[[Independent.co.uk]]}}</ref> [[BBC News Online]] is a frequently visited by Americans. The American online news sites [[BuzzFeed]],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/|title=BuzzFeed - UK Edition}}</ref> [[Breitbart News]] and ''[[HuffPost]]'' (formerly ''The Huffington Post'')<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/|title=HuffPost - United Kingdom}}</ref> all previously possess British-based editions before shutting them down. |
||
===Film=== |
===Film=== |
||
Line 976: | Line 874: | ||
===Theatre=== |
===Theatre=== |
||
[[Broadway theatre]] in New York City has toured London's [[West End theatre]] over the years, with notable performances such as ''[[The Lion King (musical)|The Lion King]]'', ''[[Grease (musical)|Grease]]'', ''[[Wicked (musical)|Wicked]]'', and ''[[Rent (musical)|Rent]]''. British productions, such as ''[[Mamma Mia!]]'' and several of [[Andrew Lloyd Webber |
[[Broadway theatre]] in New York City has toured London's [[West End theatre]] over the years, with notable performances such as ''[[The Lion King (musical)|The Lion King]]'', ''[[Grease (musical)|Grease]]'', ''[[Wicked (musical)|Wicked]]'', and ''[[Rent (musical)|Rent]]''. British productions, such as ''[[Mamma Mia! (musical)|Mamma Mia!]]'' and several of [[Andrew Lloyd Webber]]'s musicals, including ''[[Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat]]'', ''[[Cats (musical)|Cats]]'' and ''[[The Phantom of the Opera (1986 musical)|The Phantom of the Opera]]'' have found success on Broadway. For over 150 years, Shakespeare's plays have been overwhelmingly popular with upscale American audiences.<ref>{{cite book|author=Kim C. Sturgess|title=Shakespeare and the American Nation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h9NLkO9-5SsC&pg=SL20-PA89|year=2004|publisher=Cambridge University Press, ch 1.|isbn=9780521835855}}</ref> |
||
===Television=== |
===Television=== |
||
{{See also|Television in the United States|Television in the United Kingdom}} |
{{See also|Television in the United States|Television in the United Kingdom}} |
||
Both the United Kingdom and the United States have television shows which are similar, as they are either carried by the other nations' networks, or are re-created for distribution in their own nations. Some popular British television |
Both the United Kingdom and the United States have television shows which are similar, as they are either carried by the other nations' networks, or are re-created for distribution in their own nations. Some popular British television programmes that were re-created for the American market in more recent years include ''[[House of Cards (UK TV series)|House of Cards]]'', ''[[The Office (UK TV series)|The Office]]'', ''[[Pop Idol]]'' (''[[American Idol]]''), ''[[Strictly Come Dancing]]'' (''[[Dancing with the Stars]])'', ''[[Top Gear (2002 TV series)|Top Gear]]'', ''[[Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?]]'', ''[[The Weakest Link (UK game show)|Weakest Link]]'' and ''[[The X Factor]]''. Some American television shows re-created for the British market in more recent years include ''[[The Apprentice (TV series)|The Apprentice]]'' and ''[[Deal or No Deal (U.S. game show)|Deal or No Deal]]''. Many American television shows have been popular in the United Kingdom. |
||
The [[BBC]] airs two networks in the United States, [[BBC America]] and [[BBC World News]]. The American network [[PBS]] collaborates with the BBC and rebroadcasts British television shows in the United States such as ''[[Doctor Who]]'', ''[[Keeping Up Appearances]]'', ''[[Masterpiece Theatre]]'', ''[[Monty Python's Flying Circus]]'', ''[[Nova (American TV series)|Nova]]''. The BBC also frequently collaborates with American network [[HBO]], showing recent American mini-series in the United Kingdom such as ''[[Band of Brothers (TV miniseries)|Band of Brothers]]'', ''[[The Gathering Storm (2002 film)|The Gathering Storm]]'', ''[[John Adams (miniseries)|John Adams]]'', and ''[[Rome (TV series)|Rome]]''. Likewise, the American network [[Discovery Channel]] has partnered with the BBC by televising recent British mini-series in the United States such as ''[[Planet Earth (2006 TV series)|Planet Earth]]'' and ''[[The Blue Planet]]'', the latter popularly known as ''The Blue Planet: Seas of Life'' in the American format. The United States' public affairs channel [[C-SPAN]], broadcasts [[Prime Minister's Questions]] every Sunday.<ref>{{ |
The [[BBC]] airs two networks in the United States, [[BBC America]] and [[BBC World News]]. The American network [[PBS]] collaborates with the BBC and rebroadcasts British television shows in the United States such as ''[[Doctor Who]]'', ''[[Keeping Up Appearances]]'', ''[[Masterpiece Theatre]]'', ''[[Monty Python's Flying Circus]]'', ''[[Nova (American TV series)|Nova]]''. The BBC also frequently collaborates with American network [[HBO]], showing recent American mini-series in the United Kingdom such as ''[[Band of Brothers (TV miniseries)|Band of Brothers]]'', ''[[The Gathering Storm (2002 film)|The Gathering Storm]]'', ''[[John Adams (miniseries)|John Adams]]'', and ''[[Rome (TV series)|Rome]]''. Likewise, the American network [[Discovery Channel]] has partnered with the BBC by televising recent British mini-series in the United States such as ''[[Planet Earth (2006 TV series)|Planet Earth]]'' and ''[[The Blue Planet]]'', the latter popularly known as ''The Blue Planet: Seas of Life'' in the American format. The United States' public affairs channel [[C-SPAN]], broadcasts [[Prime Minister's Questions]] every Sunday.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/series/?PrimeMinisterQue|title=Prime Minister's Questions {{!}} Series {{!}} C-SPAN.org|website=www.c-span.org|access-date=July 31, 2019}}</ref> |
||
On some British digital television platforms, it is also possible to watch American television channels that are tailored for British audiences such as [[CNBC Europe]], [[CNN International]], [[ESPN Classic (UK)|ESPN Classic]], [[Comedy Central (UK and Ireland)|Comedy Central]], [[PBS America]] and [[Fox (UK and Ireland)|Fox]]. The [[Super Bowl]], the [[National Football League |
On some British digital television platforms, it is also possible to watch American television channels that are tailored for British audiences such as [[CNBC Europe]], [[CNN International]], [[ESPN Classic (UK)|ESPN Classic]], [[Comedy Central (UK and Ireland)|Comedy Central]], [[PBS America]] and [[Fox (UK and Ireland)|Fox]]. The [[Super Bowl]], the [[National Football League]]'s championship tournament of [[American football]] which occurs every February, has been broadcast in the United Kingdom since 1982.<ref>{{cite news|title=American Football: The whole nine yards: The NFL comes to Wembley|work=The Independent|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/general/others/american-football-the-whole-nine-yards-the-nfl-comes-to-wembley-972832.html |location=London |date=October 25, 2008 |access-date=May 26, 2010}}</ref> Conversely, the [[Premier League]] has been shown on [[NBC Sports Network]] in the United States.<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/11/sports/soccer/nbc-retains-rights-to-premier-league-in-six-year-deal.html?_r=0 | title=NBC Retains Rights to Premier League in Six-Year Deal| newspaper=The New York Times| date=August 10, 2015| last1=Sandomir| first1=Richard}}</ref> Until 2017, [[Formula One]] television coverage in the United States has used an American-based team but the announcers are British; from 2018 [[Sky Sports]] has taken over Formula One coverage through [[ESPN2]]. |
||
=== Radio === |
=== Radio === |
||
Line 992: | Line 890: | ||
Other factors include differing technical standards of radio broadcasting. This is influenced by their countries' broadcasting authorities which shapes over-the-air radio. In the UK, it is influenced by authorities of [[Ofcom]] and the [[European Broadcasting Union|EBU]] which are working towards [[Digital Audio Broadcasting|DAB]] and [[Digital Radio Mondiale|DRM]]. While in the United States, it influenced by [[Federal Communications Commission|FCC]] which is working towards [[HD Radio]]. |
Other factors include differing technical standards of radio broadcasting. This is influenced by their countries' broadcasting authorities which shapes over-the-air radio. In the UK, it is influenced by authorities of [[Ofcom]] and the [[European Broadcasting Union|EBU]] which are working towards [[Digital Audio Broadcasting|DAB]] and [[Digital Radio Mondiale|DRM]]. While in the United States, it influenced by [[Federal Communications Commission|FCC]] which is working towards [[HD Radio]]. |
||
The British [[international broadcasting]] station, the [[BBC World Service]] is syndicated on various major city public radio stations in the United States such as [[WNYC]], and on [[Sirius XM Satellite Radio|SiriusXM]] satellite radio,<ref>{{ |
The British [[international broadcasting]] station, the [[BBC World Service]] is syndicated on various major city public radio stations in the United States such as [[WNYC]], and on [[Sirius XM Satellite Radio|SiriusXM]] satellite radio,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/schedules/americas_audienceguidetolistening.pdf|title=BBC World Service - A GUIDE TO LISTENING IN ENGLISH MARCH – OCTOBER 2017|date=September 22, 2017|website=BBC World Service}}</ref> through the broadcaster [[American Public Media]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.americanpublicmedia.org/programs/|title=Programs|website=American Public Media|language=en-US|access-date=July 27, 2019}}</ref> The American international broadcaster, [[Voice of America]] has no remit in be needed to be heard in the UK, so it doesn't broadcast there and none of its programmes is relayed on domestic stations. In a resource-saving exercise between the two international broadcasters, Voice of America shares its [[transmission tower]]s with the BBC World Service to help of [[Shortwave radio|shortwave]] transmissions in remote areas. |
||
[[Internet radio]] and [[Streaming media|streaming services]] are growing in popularity in both countries, however listening to each other's feeds are hampered by the |
[[Internet radio]] and [[Streaming media|streaming services]] are growing in popularity in both countries, however listening to each other's feeds are hampered by the countries' [[broadcasting rights]]. This causes the internet radio feeds of American and British radio stations are sometimes [[Geo-blocking|blocked]] or on restricted bandwidth. For example, [[BBC Radio 2]] is on a 128 kbit/s [[Advanced Audio Coding|AAC]] domestic stream, while internationally it's on a 48 kbit/s [[High-Efficiency Advanced Audio Coding|AAC+]] stream. However both the American and the British international broadcasters Voice of America and the BBC World Service is fully accessible online in each other's countries. Streaming services that are popular in both countries include the American [[TuneIn]], [[Apple Music]] and Swedish-owned [[Spotify]]. The other major services in the US like [[Pandora Radio]] and [[Radio.com]] don't operate in the UK, and are inaccessible. |
||
In the past before the [[World War II|Second World War]], connections between the United States and the United Kingdom in the radio industry was virtually unheard of. Radio in the UK was not influenced by the |
In the past before the [[World War II|Second World War]], connections between the United States and the United Kingdom in the radio industry was virtually unheard of. Radio in the UK was not influenced by the US, due to the vast distance, and the only regular services that were heard was the BBC and the [[Pirate radio|"pirate" station]] [[Radio Luxembourg]]. |
||
When the Americans joined the war as part of the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]], some soldiers were billeted in the UK in which the BBC provided programming for these people. So the [[BBC Forces Programme|Forces Programme]], broadcast many popular American variety shows such as [[Edgar Bergen|''Charlie McCarthy'']], [[The Pepsodent Show|''The Bob Hope Show'']], and ''[[The Jack Benny Program]].'' As the Forces Programme, and the subsequent [[BBC General Forces Programme|General Forces Programme]], was easily available for civilians they were also heard by domestic audiences. |
When the Americans joined the war as part of the [[Allies of World War II|Allies]], some soldiers were billeted in the UK in which the BBC provided programming for these people. So the [[BBC Forces Programme|Forces Programme]], broadcast many popular American variety shows such as [[Edgar Bergen|''Charlie McCarthy'']], [[The Pepsodent Show|''The Bob Hope Show'']], and ''[[The Jack Benny Program]].'' As the Forces Programme, and the subsequent [[BBC General Forces Programme|General Forces Programme]], was easily available for civilians they were also heard by domestic audiences. |
||
After the War in 1946 on the [[BBC Home Service|Home Service]], the BBC started to broadcast the factual programme ''[[Letter from America]]'', which was presented by [[Alistair Cooke]], bring informing about the States to British audiences until Cook's death in 2004. |
After the War in 1946 on the [[BBC Home Service|Home Service]], the BBC started to broadcast the factual programme ''[[Letter from America]]'', which was presented by [[Alistair Cooke]], bring informing about the States to British audiences until Cook's death in 2004. It was one of the BBC's longest-running radio programmes, broadcasting on the Home Service, and continuing on [[BBC Radio 4]]. It was also relayed on the BBC World Service. The programme itself was based on a similar programme by Alistair Cooke in the 1930s for American listeners about life in the UK on the [[NBC Radio Network|NBC Red Network]]. After Letter from America, the BBC continued with a factual programme about the States in [[Americana (radio series)|''Americana'']] from 2009 to 2011, presented by the resident American correspondent. |
||
As of 2019, the BBC co-produced with [[Public Radio International]] and [[WGBH (FM)|WGBH Boston]], a weekly factual programme called ''[[The World (radio program)|The World]]'', which is broadcast on various American public radio stations. Parts of the show are put together for a shorter programme called ''Boston Calling'', which is available on Radio 4 and the domestic feed of the World Service.<ref>{{ |
As of 2019, the BBC co-produced with [[Public Radio International]] and [[WGBH (FM)|WGBH Boston]], a weekly factual programme called ''[[The World (radio program)|The World]]'', which is broadcast on various American public radio stations. Parts of the show are put together for a shorter programme called ''Boston Calling'', which is available on Radio 4 and the domestic feed of the World Service.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00y7fqz|title=Boston Calling - BBC World Service|website=BBC|access-date=September 22, 2017}}</ref> There have been attempts in the past to bring British formats to American audiences, such as [[The News Quiz|the News Quiz USA]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2012/mar/12/radio-4-news-quiz-us|title=Radio 4 pilots US version of News Quiz|last=Dowell|first=Ben|date=March 12, 2012|work=The Guardian|access-date=September 22, 2017|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> From 2005 to 2011, a time-shifted version of [[BBC Radio 1]] was available on Sirius satellite radio.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/bbcworldwide/worldwidestories/pressreleases/2005/06_june/sirius.shtml|title=BBC - Press Office - Sirius Satellite Radio to broadcast BBC's Radio 1|website=BBC|access-date=September 22, 2017}}</ref> While in the UK, ''[[A Prairie Home Companion]]'' (called Garrison Keillor's Radio Show) was available weekly from 2002 on [[BBC Radio 4 Extra|BBC7]] to 2016, on BBC Radio 4 Extra.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0072tt7|title=Garrison Keillor's Radio Show - BBC Radio 4 Extra|website=BBC|access-date=September 22, 2017}}</ref> |
||
There has been a number of American personalities that have been on British airwaves |
There has been a number of American personalities that have been on British airwaves including music journalist [[Paul Gambaccini]], disc jockey [[Suzi Quatro|Suzi Quattro]] and comedians [[Rich Hall]] and [[Greg Proops]]. While New Zealand-born disc jockey [[Zane Lowe]], who spent much of career in the UK was recruited to [[Apple Inc.|Apple's]] [[Beats 1]] station in the United States. |
||
===Music=== |
===Music=== |
||
<br />[[File:The Beatles in America.JPG|thumb|right|The arrival of [[The Beatles]] in the United States and subsequent appearance on ''[[The Ed Sullivan Show]]'' in 1964 marked the beginning of the "British Invasion".]] |
|||
{{See also|British Invasion|Anglo-American music}} |
{{See also|British Invasion|Anglo-American music}} |
||
[[File:The Beatles arrive at JFK Airport.jpg|thumb|The arrival of [[The Beatles]] in the United States and their subsequent appearance on ''[[The Ed Sullivan Show]]'' in 1964 marked the beginning of what was called the [[British Invasion]].]] |
|||
American artists such as [[Whitney Houston]], [[Madonna (entertainer)|Madonna]], [[Tina Turner]], [[Cher]], [[Michael Jackson]], [[Janet Jackson]], [[Mariah Carey]], [[Bing Crosby]], [[Elvis Presley]], [[Bob Dylan]], [[Jimi Hendrix]], [[Diana Ross]], [[Britney Spears]], [[Christina Aguilera]], [[Frank Sinatra]], [[Lady Gaga]], [[Taylor Swift]] and [[Beyoncé]], are popular in the United Kingdom. British artists such as [[The Beatles]], [[Led Zeppelin]], [[The Rolling Stones]], [[Sting (musician)|Sting]], [[The Who]], [[Queen (band)|Queen]], [[Shirley Bassey]], [[Tom Jones (singer)|Tom Jones]], [[David Bowie]], [[Pink Floyd]], the [[Spice Girls]], the [[Bee Gees]], [[Amy Winehouse]], [[KT Tunstall]], [[Leona Lewis]], [[Elton John]] (Elton John recorded "[[Candle in the Wind]]" which, to date, is the best ever selling single worldwide), [[Coldplay]] and [[Adele]] have achieved much success in the large American market. Undoubtedly, the popular music of both nations has had a strong sway on each other. |
|||
American artists, including [[Whitney Houston]], [[Madonna (entertainer)|Madonna]], [[Tina Turner]], [[Cher]], [[Michael Jackson]], [[Janet Jackson]], [[Mariah Carey]], [[Bing Crosby]], [[Elvis Presley]], [[Bob Dylan]], [[Jimi Hendrix]], [[Guns N' Roses]], [[Diana Ross]], [[Britney Spears]], [[Christina Aguilera]], [[Frank Sinatra]], [[Lady Gaga]], [[Taylor Swift]], and [[Beyoncé]], are popular in the United Kingdom. British artists, including [[The Beatles]], [[Led Zeppelin]], [[The Rolling Stones]], [[Sting (musician)|Sting]], [[The Who]], [[Queen (band)|Queen]], [[Shirley Bassey]], [[Tom Jones (singer)|Tom Jones]], [[David Bowie]], [[Pink Floyd]], [[Rod Stewart]], the [[Spice Girls]], the [[Bee Gees]], [[Katherine Jenkins]], [[KT Tunstall]], [[Leona Lewis]], [[Elton John]], [[Coldplay]], and [[Adele]] have achieved success in the large American market. |
|||
In the United Kingdom, many [[Hollywood films]] as well as Broadway musicals are closely associated and identified with the musical scores and soundtracks created by famous American composers such as [[George Gershwin]], [[Rodgers and Hammerstein]], [[Henry Mancini]], [[John Williams]], [[Alan Silvestri]], [[Jerry Goldsmith]], and [[James Horner]]. |
In the United Kingdom, many [[Hollywood films]] as well as Broadway musicals are closely associated and identified with the musical scores and soundtracks created by famous American composers such as [[George Gershwin]], [[Rodgers and Hammerstein]], [[Henry Mancini]], [[John Williams]], [[Alan Silvestri]], [[Jerry Goldsmith]], and [[James Horner]]. |
||
Line 1,018: | Line 916: | ||
== Sports == |
== Sports == |
||
{{See also|Sport in the United Kingdom|Sports in the United States}} |
{{See also|Sport in the United Kingdom|Sports in the United States}} |
||
Despite sports being a major cultural interest in both the United States and the United Kingdom |
Despite sports being a major cultural interest in both the United States and the United Kingdom, there is little overlap in their most popular sports. The most popular team sports in the UK are [[Association football|football (soccer)]], [[rugby union]], [[rugby league]] and [[cricket]], while the most popular sports in the US are [[American football|[American] football]], [[baseball]], [[ice hockey]] and [[basketball]]. The most popular sports in each country are considered minor sports in the other, with growing interest. Both nations are among the strongest in the world in all time sporting success, with the United States being the most successful sports nation in the world. |
||
=== |
=== Association football === |
||
{{See also|Football in the United Kingdom|Soccer in the United States}}[[File:FIFA World Cup 2010 England USA.jpg|thumb|right|220x220px|A picture of the last time England and USA played together, at 2010 FIFA World Cup]] |
|||
In the current [[2019–20 Premier League|2019-2020 season]], three Americans are in the [[The Football Association|FA]]'s top-tier [[Premier League]]: [[Cameron Carter-Vickers]] ([[Tottenham Hotspur F.C.|Tottenham Hotspur]]), [[Christian Pulisic]] ([[Chelsea F.C.|Chelsea]]), and [[DeAndre Yedlin]] ([[Newcastle United F.C.|Newcastle United]]). All three players play for [[United States men's national soccer team|the U. S. national team]], although only Pulisic is on the current team, while the others are in reserve. The current team also has two more players from the second tier [[EFL Championship]], [[Tim Ream]] ([[Fulham F.C.|Fulham]]) and [[Matt Miazga|Matt Miagza]] ([[Reading F.C.|Reading]]). |
|||
{{See also|Football in the United Kingdom|Soccer in the United States}} |
|||
In the current [[Major League Soccer]] [[2019 Major League Soccer season|2019 season]], there are nine English players playing; [[Mo Adams]] ([[Atlanta United FC|Atlanta]]), [[Jack Elliott (footballer)|Jack Elliott]] ([[Philadelphia Union|Philadelphia]]), [[Michael Mancienne]] ([[New England Revolution|New England]]), [[Luke Mulholland]] ([[Real Salt Lake]]), [[Nedum Onuoha]] (Real Salt Lake), [[Dion Pereira]] (Atlanta), [[Jack Price (footballer, born 1992)|Jack Price]] ([[Colorado Rapids|Colorado]]), [[Wayne Rooney]] ([[D.C. United]]) and [[Bradley Wright-Phillips]] ([[New York Red Bulls]]). There are also four Scottish players playing in the 2019 season; [[Gary Mackay-Steven]] ([[New York City FC]]), [[Sam Nicholson]] (Colorado), [[Johnny Russell (footballer)|Johnny Russell]] ([[Sporting Kansas City]]) & [[Danny Wilson (footballer, born 1991)|Danny Wilson]] (Colorado). Only Johnny Russell currently plays for the [[Scotland national football team|Scottish national team]], while none of the English players play for [[England national football team|their national team]]. The most noted Briton that is playing at the moment is Wayne Rooney who previously captained England, and the most noted former player is [[David Beckham]] who played from 2007 to 2012 for the [[LA Galaxy]]. |
|||
[[File:FIFA World Cup 2010 England USA.jpg|thumb|England and USA play each other at [[2010 FIFA World Cup]]]] |
|||
The [[United States men's national soccer team|United States men's team]] has played multiple [[exhibition game|friendlies]] against their [[Home Nations]] counterparts. Being members of separate [[List of football federations|confederations]] with the Home Nations being part of [[UEFA]] and the US being part of [[CONCACAF]], their only chance to play competitive games is during [[FIFA#FIFA_competitions|FIFA tournaments]]. |
|||
The last competitive match between the national teams of England and the U.S., was at the [[2010 FIFA World Cup|2010 World Cup]] in South Africa. The match ended in a 1–1 draw. The Premier League can be watched in the United States on [[NBC Sports]], while a few MLS games can be watched in the UK on [[Sky Sports]]. |
|||
The United States and [[England national football team|England]] have played thrice at the [[FIFA World Cup]] — in [[1950 FIFA World Cup|1950]], [[2010 FIFA World Cup|2010]] and [[2022 FIFA World Cup|2022]] — and remain unbeaten. The United States' [[United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup)|1–0 victory]] over England in 1950 is considered to be one of the biggest [[upset (competition)|upsets]] in World Cup history.<ref>{{cite web |title=When England-USA served up one of the World Cup's biggest upsets |url=https://inside.fifa.com/tournaments/mens/worldcup/qatar2022/news/the-miracle-belo-horizonte-1165849 |work=Inside FIFA |access-date=5 August 2024 |date=2 April 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Morse |first1=Ben |title='The greatest sporting upset of all time': When the US beat the 'giants' of England at the 1950 World Cup |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/24/football/england-usa-world-cup-1950-spt-intl/index.html |website=CNN |access-date=5 August 2024 |language=en |date=24 November 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The greatest FIFA World Cup upsets |url=https://www.fifa.com/en/member-associations/france/articles/world-cup-qatar-2022-surprises-that-shook-the-world |publisher=FIFA |access-date=5 August 2024 |date=22 November 2022}}</ref> The other two games have both ended in draws; 1–1 in 2010<ref>{{cite news |last1=McNulty |first1=Phil |title=England 1-1 USA |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/matches/match_05/default.stm |access-date=5 August 2024 |work=BBC Sport |date=13 June 2010}}</ref> and 0–0 in 2022.<ref>{{cite news |last1=McNulty |first1=Phil |title=World Cup 2022: England 0-0 USA - Three Lions labour to goalless draw |url=https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/63603425 |access-date=5 August 2024 |work=BBC Sport |date=24 November 2022}}</ref> Additionally, the two have played in nine friendlies, with England winning eight and United States one.<ref>{{cite web |title=USA national football team: record v England |url=https://www.11v11.com/teams/usa/tab/opposingTeams/opposition/England/ |website=11v11 |access-date=5 August 2024}}</ref> |
|||
=== [American] football === |
|||
[[File:NFL International Series 2010.jpg|thumb|250px|Opening ceremony at [[Wembley Stadium|Wembley]] before the [[Denver Broncos]] vs. [[San Francisco 49ers]] game in 2010]] |
|||
{{See also|American football in the United States|American football in the United Kingdom|NFL International Series}}[[Gridiron football]], which is known in the United Kingdom as American football, originated from two British sports, association football and rugby union football. It came about in the later part of the 19th century due to the development into a separate code and led to becoming a separate sport from the other codes of football. Gridiron was in the past only known and played in UK by visiting American servicemen; firstly in 1910, by navy crews from ''[[USS Georgia (BB-15)|USS Georgia]], [[Greek battleship Lemnos|USS Idaho]]'' and ''[[USS Vermont (BB-20)|USS Vermont]]'', and then in the Second World War by UK-based service personnel. (The other gridiron code, [[Canadian football]], is hardly known in UK.) |
|||
The United States and [[Wales national football team|Wales]] have played once at the World Cup — in [[2022 FIFA World Cup|2022]] — in addition to two friendlies. The game ended in a 1–1 draw.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Church |first1=Ben |title=Gareth Bale saves Wales to frustrate USMNT at Qatar 2022 |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2022/11/21/football/usmnt-wales-timothy-weah-gareth-bale-world-cup-2022-spt-intl/index.html |access-date=5 August 2024 |work=CNN |date=21 November 2022 |language=en}}</ref> The United States have yet to play competitive matches against [[Scotland national football team|Scotland]] and [[Northern Ireland national football team|Northern Ireland]].<ref>{{cite web |title=USA national football team: record v Scotland |url=https://www.11v11.com/teams/usa/tab/opposingTeams/opposition/Scotland/ |website=11v11 |access-date=5 August 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=USA national football team: record v Northern Ireland |url=https://www.11v11.com/teams/usa/tab/opposingTeams/opposition/Northern%20Ireland/ |website=11v11 |access-date=5 August 2024}}</ref> |
|||
It was not until the TV network [[Channel 4]] started showing the highlights of the American [[National Football League|NFL]] in 1982, that the sport became acknowledged the British sporting world. Due to unfamiliarity of the sport, television guides and newspapers had printed out guides explaining the sport.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/01/29/British-newspapers-and-television-presented-a-guide-to-Football/8292412664400/|title=British newspapers and television presented a guide to 'Football...|last=Butturini|first=Paula|date=1983-01-29|website=UPI|language=en|access-date=2019-07-27}}</ref> A year later, the first match between two British teams the London Ravens and the [[Manchester Spartans|Northwich Spartans]] was played, in that game the Ravens won. Later the in the 1980s, the sport grew and rival teams started to play, which was helped by support from various American players, coaches and sponsors like [[Coca-Cola]] & [[Budweiser]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://nottstv.com/is-american-football-about-to-take-nottingham-by-storm/|title=Is American Football about to take Nottingham by storm?|last=Matthews|first=Kieran|date=2015-12-30|website=Notts TV News {{!}} The heart of Nottingham news coverage for Notts TV|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-07-27}}</ref> In 1986, the first ever official NFL game to play at the home of English sport, [[Wembley Stadium (1923)|Wembley]] between the [[Chicago Bears]] and the [[Dallas Cowboys]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wembleystadium.com/Press/Press-Releases/2013/9/A-History-Of-American-Football-At-Wembley|title=A History Of American Football At Wembley|author=TheFA|date=|work=wembleystadium.com|access-date=14 April 2016}}</ref> |
|||
The [[Premier League]] has seen many American players since its inception in 1992. Some of the prominent ones include [[Tim Howard]], [[Christian Pulisic]], [[Clint Dempsey]] and [[Landon Donovan]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Reese |first1=Derek |title=Americans who played in the Premier League: The definitive list |url=https://worldsoccertalk.com/news/americans-who-played-in-the-premier-league-the-definitive-list-20231023-WST-464105.html |website=World Soccer Talk |access-date=5 August 2024 |language=en |date=28 January 2024}}</ref> Similarly, the [[Major League Soccer]] has seen English players, including [[David Beckham]], [[Frank Lampard]] and [[Steven Gerrard]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Rodriguez |first1=Alicia |title=Top 10 English players in MLS history |url=https://www.mlssoccer.com/news/top-10-english-players-mls-history |publisher=Major League Soccer |access-date=5 August 2024 |language=en |date=27 November 2016}}</ref> |
|||
However, by the early 1990s due to the recession, Channel 4 stopping regular showings of the NFL in 1997 and falling interest, it lost its popularity. Nevertheless, the [[Super Bowl LIII|Super Bowl]] has continued been regularly shown on British television and the NFL has been broadcast by other broadcasters including [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]], [[Channel 5 (UK)|Channel 5]], [[BT Sport ESPN|ESPN UK]], [[Eurosport 1|British Eurosport]] and the current broadcaster, [[Sky Sports]]. |
|||
=== American football === |
|||
In 2007 the NFL returned to Wembley with a regular season game between the [[Miami Dolphins]] and the [[New York Giants]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/oct/05/ussport|title=NFL: Mike Adamson on the Miami Dolphins' poor start to the season|last=Adamson|first=Mike|date=2007-10-05|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-07-27|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/gallery/2007/oct/29/americansports|title=The NFL comes to Wembley|date=2007-10-29|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-07-27|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> There has been a further games played at Wembley since with an average attendance of well over 80,000. Due to this, there has also been growing interest to set up [[Potential London NFL franchise|a resident NFL franchise in London]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/oct/12/nfl-london-2018-franchise-move-wembley|title=NFL ready for another London party and edging closer to permanent move {{!}} Sean Ingle|last=Ingle|first=Sean|date=2018-10-12|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-07-27|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> with [[Jacksonville Jaguars]] being the most likely team to relocate to the city.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2017/oct/23/jacksonville-jaguars-nfl-london|title='London's team' are finally threatening to become an NFL force|last=Carpenter|first=Les|date=2017-10-23|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-07-30|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> As of 2019, noted currently playing British gridiron players are [[Carolina Panthers]] [[defensive end]], Nigerian-born [[Efe Obada]] and [[Atlanta Falcons]] [[tight end]], [[Alex Gray (rugby union)|Alex Grey]]. |
|||
{{See also|American football in the United States|American football in the United Kingdom|NFL International Series}} |
|||
[[File:NFL International Series 2010.jpg|thumb|The opening ceremony at [[Wembley Stadium|Wembley]] before the [[Denver Broncos]] play the [[San Francisco 49ers]] in a 2010 [[National Football League]] game]] |
|||
[[Gridiron football]], which is known in the United Kingdom as American football, originated from two British sports, association football and rugby union football. It came about in the later part of the 19th century due to the development into a separate code and led to becoming a separate sport from the other codes of football. Gridiron was in the past only known and played in UK by visiting American servicemen; firstly in 1910, by navy crews from ''[[USS Georgia (BB-15)|USS Georgia]], [[Greek battleship Lemnos|USS Idaho]]'' and ''[[USS Vermont (BB-20)|USS Vermont]]'', and then in the Second World War by UK-based service personnel. (The other gridiron code, [[Canadian football]], is hardly known in UK.) |
|||
After [[Channel 4]] started showing the highlights of the American [[National Football League|NFL]] in 1982, the sport became acknowledged by the British sporting world. Due to Britons' unfamiliarity with American football, television guides and newspapers had printed articles explaining it.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/01/29/British-newspapers-and-television-presented-a-guide-to-Football/8292412664400/|title=British newspapers and television presented a guide to 'Football...|last=Butturini|first=Paula|date=January 29, 1983|website=UPI|language=en|access-date=July 27, 2019}}</ref> A year later, the first match between two British teams the London Ravens and the [[Manchester Spartans|Northwich Spartans]] was played; the Ravens won. Later in the 1980s, the sport grew and rival teams started to play, which was helped by support from various American players, coaches, and sponsors like [[Coca-Cola]] and [[Budweiser]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nottstv.com/is-american-football-about-to-take-nottingham-by-storm/|title=Is American Football about to take Nottingham by storm?|last=Matthews|first=Kieran|date=December 30, 2015|website=Notts TV News {{!}} The heart of Nottingham news coverage for Notts TV|language=en-GB|access-date=July 27, 2019}}</ref> In 1986, the [[American Bowl]] was the first preseason NFL game to be played at the original [[Wembley Stadium (1923)|Wembley Stadium]], between the [[Chicago Bears]] and the [[Dallas Cowboys]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wembleystadium.com/Press/Press-Releases/2013/9/A-History-Of-American-Football-At-Wembley|title=A History Of American Football At Wembley|author=TheFA|work=wembleystadium.com|access-date=April 14, 2016|archive-date=March 31, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160331032715/http://www.wembleystadium.com/Press/Press-Releases/2013/9/A-History-Of-American-Football-At-Wembley|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
|||
By the early 1990s, due in part to the recession, Channel 4 ceased regular broadcasts of the NFL, but the [[Super Bowl]] has continued to be broadcast regularly on British television. The NFL has been broadcast by other British networks, including [[ITV (TV network)|ITV]], [[Channel 5 (UK)|Channel 5]], [[BT Sport ESPN|ESPN UK]], [[Eurosport 1|British Eurosport]], and [[Sky Sports]]. |
|||
In 2007, the NFL returned to Wembley with a regular season game between the [[Miami Dolphins]] and the [[New York Giants]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/oct/05/ussport|title=NFL: Mike Adamson on the Miami Dolphins' poor start to the season|last=Adamson|first=Mike|date=October 5, 2007|work=The Guardian|access-date=July 27, 2019|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/gallery/2007/oct/29/americansports|title=The NFL comes to Wembley|date=October 29, 2007|work=The Guardian|access-date=July 27, 2019|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> Since then, the NFL has held [[NFL International Series#London Games|additional games]] at Wembley and at other British stadiums. The NFL is considering siting [[Potential London NFL franchise|a team in London permanently]],<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/oct/12/nfl-london-2018-franchise-move-wembley|title=NFL ready for another London party and edging closer to permanent move|last=Ingle|first=Sean|date=October 12, 2018|work=The Guardian|access-date=July 27, 2019|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> with the [[Jacksonville Jaguars]] being the most likely team to relocate to the city.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2017/oct/23/jacksonville-jaguars-nfl-london|title='London's team' are finally threatening to become an NFL force|last=Carpenter|first=Les|date=October 23, 2017|work=The Guardian|access-date=July 30, 2019|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> Noted British NFL players active during the [[2019 NFL season|2019 season]] are [[Carolina Panthers]] [[defensive end]], Nigerian-born [[Efe Obada]] and [[Atlanta Falcons]] [[tight end]], [[Alex Gray (rugby union)|Alex Grey]].{{cn|date=July 2024}} |
|||
=== Baseball === |
=== Baseball === |
||
[[File:190630-F-QP712-0092 U.S. Airmen present colors at MLB London Series.jpg|thumb|250x250px|A pre-game photo of second game of the 2019 season of [[2019 MLB London Series]], between the [[New York Yankees|Yankees]] and the [[Boston Red Sox|Red Sox]].]] |
|||
{{See also|Origins of baseball|Baseball in the United States|Baseball in the United Kingdom}} |
{{See also|Origins of baseball|Baseball in the United States|Baseball in the United Kingdom}} |
||
[[File:190630-F-QP712-0092 U.S. Airmen present colors at MLB London Series.jpg|thumb|A pre-game photo of second game of the 2019 season of [[2019 MLB London Series]] between the [[New York Yankees]] and the [[Boston Red Sox]]]] |
|||
The first recorded writings about a sport called ''"[[baseball|base-ball]]"'' came in the mid-18th century when a version of the sport played indoors in 1748 in London, where it was played by then Prince of Wales, [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]],<ref>{{cite news|title=Why isn't baseball more popular in the UK?|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23425907|accessdate=July 26, 2013|work=BBC News|date=July 26, 2013|last1=Sulat|first1=Nate}}</ref> and played outside in 1755 in the southern English town of [[Guildford]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/baseball/2799671/Major-League-Baseball-told-Your-sport-is-British-not-American.html |title=Major League Baseball Told: Your Sport Is British, Not American |date=September 11, 2008 |accessdate=February 3, 2009 |work=Telegraph |location=London |url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081016132738/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/baseball/2799671/Major-League-Baseball-told-Your-sport-is-British-not-American.html |archivedate=October 16, 2008}}</ref> It was later brought over to the United States by British immigrants, where it developed in the modern version of the sport in the early 19th century in the creation and fountain of the modern baseball rule book, the [[Knickerbocker Rules]] in 1845. Eventually, it suppressed the popularity of the other notable [[Bat-and-ball games|ball-and-bat]] sport which was played in the U.S. at the time which was [[Cricket in the United States|cricket]], by the end of the 19th century. |
|||
The first recorded writings about [[baseball]] came in the mid-18th century when a version of the sport played indoors in 1748 in London, where it was played by then Prince of Wales, [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]],<ref>{{cite news|title=Why isn't baseball more popular in the UK?|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23425907|access-date=July 26, 2013|work=BBC News|date=July 26, 2013|last1=Sulat|first1=Nate}}</ref> and played outside in 1755 in the southern English town of [[Guildford]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/baseball/2799671/Major-League-Baseball-told-Your-sport-is-British-not-American.html |title=Major League Baseball Told: Your Sport Is British, Not American |date=September 11, 2008 |access-date=February 3, 2009 |work=Telegraph |location=London |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081016132738/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/baseball/2799671/Major-League-Baseball-told-Your-sport-is-British-not-American.html |archive-date=October 16, 2008}}</ref> It was later brought over to the United States by British immigrants, where it developed in the modern version of the sport in the early 19th century in the creation and fountain of the modern baseball rule book, the [[Knickerbocker Rules]] in 1845. Eventually, it suppressed the popularity of the other notable [[Bat-and-ball games|ball-and-bat]] sport which was played in the US at the time which was [[Cricket in the United States|cricket]], by the end of the 19th century. |
|||
Sheffield born [[Harry Wright]] was instrumental in the development of professional baseball in the United States, and he brought his touring team to Britain to promote the sport. Later, at the end of the 19th century [[Francis Ley]], a [[Derby]] man claimed erroneously to have had 'discovered' the game on a trip to the [[United States]], and [[Albert Goodwill Spalding]], an American former star player and sporting goods businessman who saw opportunities to expand his business across the Atlantic, funded a second tour to the United Kingdom (Spalding had earlier toured under Wright’s leadership). This continued with the establishment of the [[1890 National League of Baseball of Great Britain]], the first professional league in Britain. Baseball clubs were formed from well-known [[association football]] clubs [[Aston Villa F.C.|Aston Villa]], [[Stoke City F.C.|Stoke City]] and [[Preston North End F.C.|Preston North End]], who were joined by Ley’s own [[Derby Baseball Club]]. |
|||
During [[World War I]], visiting U.S. service personnel from the [[United States Army|U.S. Army]] and [[United States Navy|Navy]] played a [[Demonstration sport|demonstration game]] at [[Chelsea F.C.|Chelsea]]'s [[Stamford Bridge (stadium)|Stamford Bridge]] in 1918. A crowd of 38,000 people, including King [[George V]], attended. This led to into a growing interest in the game across the Atlantic, and baseball teams were created during the inter-war period. This led to a peak in 1938 when there was a victory by [[Great Britain national baseball team|Great Britain]] over the [[United States national baseball team|United States]] in the [[1938 Amateur World Series]] which was held in England, which is considered the first [[Baseball World Cup|World Cup of Baseball]].{{cn|date=July 2024}} |
|||
The popularity of baseball in the United Kingdom diminished during and after the Second World War; today, baseball is not widely played among Britons. Notwithstanding, [[Major League Baseball]] coverage is available to watch in the United Kingdom on the [[TNT Sports 4]] channel, formerly [[BT Sport]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Miller |first1=Chris |title=Get TNT Sports on Virgin TV: BT Sport is now TNT Sports |url=https://www.virginmedia.com/virgin-tv-edit/sport/live-on-bt-sport-this-month |access-date=13 July 2024 |work=Virgin Media |date=12 September 2023 |language=en}}</ref> In 2018, [[Major League Baseball]] announced a two-year deal to start the [[MLB London Series]], a series of regular-season games at [[London Stadium]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/may/08/red-sox-and-yankees-confirmed-to-meet-in-london-mlb-double-header-baseball|title=Red Sox and Yankees confirmed to meet in London MLB games|agency=Associated Press|date=May 8, 2018|work=The Guardian|access-date=August 1, 2019|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The [[2019 MLB London Series|2019 series]] was contested between two [[Yankees–Red Sox rivalry|rival teams]], the [[New York Yankees]] and the [[Boston Red Sox]]. These games were broadcast on both BT Sport and the [[BBC]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/baseball/48741781|title=MLB London Series: All you need to know about New York Yankees v Boston Red Sox|date=June 29, 2019|work=BBC Sport|access-date=August 1, 2019|language=en-GB}}</ref> The 2020 series between the [[St. Louis Cardinals]] and the [[Chicago Cubs]] was cancelled due to the [[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on baseball|COVID-19 pandemic]].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.mlb.com/press-release/cardinals-cubs-mitel-mlb-london-series-2020 |title=St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago Cubs to play in Mitel & MLB London Series 2020 |website=MLB.com |date=June 7, 2019 |accessdate=May 10, 2022}}</ref> The [[Cardinals–Cubs rivalry]] series was played in London in 2023, as part of an extended agreement to resume the London Series.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cubshq.com/cubs-baseball/news/mlb-announces-that-cubs-will-play-cardinals-in-london-in-2023-30942 |title=MLB announces that Cubs will play Cardinals in London in 2023 |website=cubshq.com |date=August 4, 2022 |accessdate=August 6, 2022}}</ref> |
|||
Baseball was first brought over to the United Kingdom end of the 19th century, by [[Francis Ley]], a [[Derby]] man who had 'discovered' the game on a trip to the [[United States]], and [[Albert Goodwill Spalding]], an American former star player and sporting goods businessman who saw opportunities to expand his business across the Atlantic. This continued with the establishment of the National Baseball League of Great Britain and Ireland in 1890, with many of current famous football teams like [[Aston Villa F.C.|Aston Villa]], [[Nottingham Forest F.C.|Nottingham Forest]] and [[Derby County Baseball Club|Derby County]] were also baseball teams. |
|||
[[John Spinks (musician)|John Spinks]], leader of the English rock band [[The Outfield]], originally named the band "The Baseball Boys", in a reference to a gang in the film ''[[The Warriors (film)|The Warriors]]''. The band members said in 1986 that none of them were knowledgeable about baseball, but they were curious about the sport.<ref name="lat">{{cite news|url=http://articles.latimes.com/1986-06-01/entertainment/ca-8548_1_outfield-s-music|title=Hit Puts The Outfield Team in the Big Leagues|date=1 June 1986| first= Dennis |last= Hunt|access-date=13 July 2024|work=[[Los Angeles Times]]}}</ref> |
|||
Like the other noted American sport of gridiron, during the [[World War I|First World War]] visiting U.S. service personnel from the [[United States Army|U.S. Army]] and [[United States Navy|Navy]] did a [[Demonstration sport|demonstration game]] at [[Chelsea F.C.|Chelsea]]'s [[Stamford Bridge (stadium)|Stamford Bridge]] in 1918. This was received to a crowd of 38,000 people which even included the king [[George V]]. This led to into a growing interest in the game across the Atlantic, and baseball teams were created during the inter-wars. This led to a peak in 1938 when there was a victory by [[Great Britain national baseball team|Great Britain]] over the [[United States national baseball team|United States]] in the [[1938 Amateur World Series]] which was held in England, which is considered the first [[Baseball World Cup|World Cup of Baseball]]. |
|||
=== Cricket === |
|||
The popularity of baseball in the United Kingdom diminished during and after the Second World War by other sports and today, baseball isn't widely played among Britons. Notwithstanding, [[Major League Baseball]] and the show ''[[Baseball Tonight]] are'' available to watch the United Kingdom on the [[BT Sport ESPN]] channel.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.espn.co.uk/mlb/|title=MLB - Major League Baseball - ESPN|website=ESPN.co.uk|language=en|access-date=2019-08-04}}</ref> On a growing back of interest in American sports, in 2018 [[Major League Baseball]] agreed a two-year deal to field four games a year during the 2019 and 2020 seasons at the [[London Stadium]] under the name [[2019 MLB London Series]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/may/08/red-sox-and-yankees-confirmed-to-meet-in-london-mlb-double-header-baseball|title=Red Sox and Yankees confirmed to meet in London MLB games|agency=Associated Press|date=2018-05-08|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-08-01|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> The games are between the four big teams; the [[New York Yankees]], the [[Boston Red Sox]], the [[Chicago Cubs]] and the [[St. Louis Cardinals|St Louis Cardinals]]. These games are available to watch not just on BT Sport, but also the [[BBC]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/baseball/48741781|title=MLB London Series: All you need to know about New York Yankees v Boston Red Sox|last=|first=|date=2019-06-29|work=BBC Sport|access-date=2019-08-01|language=en-GB}}</ref> |
|||
{{Main|Cricket in the United States}} |
|||
[[File:Major League Cricket logo.svg|thumb|124x124px|The logo for the American [[Major League Cricket]]]] |
|||
Cricket was one of the major sports in the United States during its time as a British colony and for about a century afterward. Its major decline began with the 1860s Civil War, as it could not compete with the far shorter playing duration of baseball, among other factors. In the 21st century, [[Commonwealth diaspora|immigration from cricket-playing countries]] and the spread of the shortened [[T20 format]] have contributed to a minor revival of the game.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Why cricket and America are made for each other |url=https://www.economist.com/christmas-specials/2022/12/20/why-cricket-and-america-are-made-for-each-other |access-date=2024-12-15 |newspaper=The Economist |issn=0013-0613}}</ref> |
|||
==Gallery== |
==Gallery== |
||
{{Cleanup gallery|date=December 2017}} |
|||
<gallery class="center"> |
<gallery class="center"> |
||
P319 John Adams 1st American Ambassador to English Court, Presented to King George III.jpg|[[John Adams]], the first American Plenipotentiary Minister to Great Britain being presented at the [[Court of St James's]] to King [[George III]] in 1785, as depicted in John Cassell's Illustrated History of England, Volume 5, 1865 |
|||
File:Eleanor Roosevelt, King George VI, Queen Elizabeth in London, England - NARA - 195320.png|[[George VI|King George VI]] and [[Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother|Queen Elizabeth]] with First Lady [[Eleanor Roosevelt]] in London, 1942. |
|||
File:P319 John Adams 1st American Ambassador to English Court, Presented to King George III.jpg [[John Adams]], as the first American Minister Plenipotentiary to Great Britain, being presented at the [[Court of St James's]] to King [[George III]] in 1785, as depicted in John Cassell's ‘’’Illustrated History of England’’’, Volume 5, 1865 |
|||
File:Eleanor Roosevelt in Canada 1944.gif|First Lady [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], [[Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone]], and [[Clementine Churchill]] at the Second Quebec Conference, 1944. |
|||
Thomas P. Rossiter - Visit of the Prince of Wales, President Buchanan, and Dignitaries to the Tomb of Washington at Mount Vernon, October 1860 - 1906.9.18 - Smithsonian American Art Museum.jpg|A visit to the tomb of [[George Washington]] at [[Mount Vernon]] by [[Edward VII|Edward, Prince of Wales]], President [[James Buchanan]], and other dignitaries in 1860, as depicted in an 1861 painting by American artist [[Thomas Prichard Rossiter]] |
|||
File:Churchill and Roosevelt Yalta.jpg|Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] and President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] during the Yalta Conference, 1945. |
|||
President Wilson and King George V of England.jpg|President [[Woodrow Wilson]] and King [[George V]] at Buckingham Palace, 1918 |
|||
File:Greeted by the Vice President. Premier Ramsey MacDonald, today made his first call upon the Vice President of the United States. The group, made on the steps of the United States Capitol LCCN2016889442.jpg|Prime Minister [[Ramsay Macdonald]] and British Ambassador [[Esmé Howard, 1st Baron Howard of Penrith]] greeted at the United States Capitol in Washington by Vice President [[Charles Curtis]], 1929 |
|||
File:Richard and Pat Nixon with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg|President [[Richard Nixon]] and First Lady [[Pat Nixon]] with [[Queen Elizabeth II]] and Prime Minister [[Edward Heath]], 1970. |
|||
FDR-George-VI-Potomac-June-9-1939-2-detail-crop.jpg|First Lady [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], [[Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother|Queen Elizabeth]], King [[George VI]], President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] aboard the presidential yacht [[USS Potomac (AG-25)|USS Potomac]] during Their Majesties state visit to Washington, 1939 |
|||
File:Nixon and the Windsors.jpg|President [[Richard Nixon]] with [[Edward VIII|Prince Edward, Duke of Windsor]] and [[Wallis Simpson|Wallis, Duchess of Windsor]], 1970. |
|||
Roosevelt and Churchill.jpg|President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] aboard the [[USS Augusta (CA-31)|USS Augusta]] after signing the [[Atlantic Charter]], 1941 |
|||
File:Queen Elizabeth II and President Ford 1976.jpg|President [[Gerald Ford]] dancing with [[Queen Elizabeth II]] at the White House, 1976. |
|||
File: |
File:President Harry Truman and Winston Churchill shake hands on the steps of Truman's residence during the Potsdam conference, 16 July 1945. BU8944 (cropped).jpg| President [[Harry S. Truman]] and Prime Minister [[Winston Churchill]] shake hands during the [[Potsdam Conference]], 1945 |
||
File: |
File:Photograph of President Truman shaking hands with British Prime Minister Clement Attlee at Washington National... - NARA - 200256.jpg|President [[Harry S. Truman]] shaking hands with Prime Minister [[Clement Attlee]] upon his arrival at [[Washington National Airport]], 1950 |
||
Photograph of President Harry S. Truman and England's Princess Elizabeth in Limousine.jpg|President [[Harry S. Truman]] and [[Elizabeth II|Princess Elizabeth, Duchess of Edinburgh]] in the presidential limousine en route to Blair House in Washington, 1951 |
|||
File:Prince Charles, Princess Diana, Nancy Reagan, and Ronald Reagan (1985).jpg|President [[Ronald Reagan]] and First Lady [[Nancy Reagan]] with [[Charles, Prince of Wales]] and [[Diana, Princess of Wales]] at the White House during the Waleses' official visit to the United States, 1985. |
|||
International Diplomacy.jpg|Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan]] and President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] meet for talks in Bermuda during the aftermath of the [[Suez Crisis]], 1957 |
|||
File:Reagan's - Thatcher's c50515-16.jpg|President [[Ronald Reagan]] and First Lady [[Nancy Reagan]] with Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] and [[Denis Thatcher]] at the beginning of an official dinner at the White House, 1988. |
|||
Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip host Queen's Dinner for President and Mrs. Kennedy.jpg|Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] posing with President [[John F. Kennedy]] and First Lady [[Jacqueline Kennedy]] during a dinner held at Buckingham Palace for the visiting American delegation, 1961 |
|||
JFKWHP-ST-A22-1-61 President John F. Kennedy with Prime Minister Harold Macmillan of Great Britain in Bermuda.jpg|President [[John F. Kennedy]] and Prime Minister [[Harold Macmillan]] in Bermuda, 1961 |
|||
File: |
File:Princess Margaret and Lord Snowdon with Lyndon B. Johnson and Lady Bird Johnson.jpg|[[Antony Armstrong-Jones, 1st Earl of Snowdon]], [[Lady Bird Johnson]], [[Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon]] and President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] at the White House, 1965 |
||
File:Lyndon B. Johnson meets with Prime Minister Harold Wilson C2537-5.jpg|Prime Minister [[Harold Wilson]] and President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] conversing at the White House, 1966 |
|||
File:Clinton Blair.jpg|President [[Bill Clinton]] and Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] embracing each other at a conference in Florence, Italy, 1999. |
|||
Prime Minister Edward Heath, Queen Elizabeth II, President Richard Nixon, and Pat Nixon at Chequers.jpg|President [[Richard Nixon]] and First Lady [[Pat Nixon]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and Prime Minister [[Edward Heath]] at [[Chequers]], 1970 |
|||
File:Bush and Blair at Camp David.jpg|Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] and President [[George W. Bush]] conducting a press conference at Camp David, 2001. |
|||
File: |
File:Richard Nixon with Prince Charles (cropped).jpg|[[Charles, Prince of Wales]] meets with President [[Richard Nixon]] in the Oval Office, 1970 |
||
File: |
File:Nixon and the Windsors.jpg|President [[Richard Nixon]] with [[Edward VIII|Prince Edward, Duke of Windsor]] and [[Wallis Simpson|Wallis, Duchess of Windsor]], 1970 |
||
File: |
File:President Gerald Ford and British Prime Minister Harold Wilson.jpg|President [[Gerald Ford]] and Prime Minister [[Harold Wilson]] at the International Economic Summit in Rambouillet, France, 1975 |
||
File:President |
File:President Ford and Queen Elizabeth dance - NARA - 6923701.jpg|President [[Gerald Ford]] dancing with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] at the White House, 1976 |
||
File: |
File:President Jimmy Carter and Prime Minister James Callaghan.jpg|President [[Jimmy Carter]] and Prime Minister [[James Callaghan]] in the Oval Office, 1978 |
||
File: |
File:Thatcher at Oval Office desk with Carter.jpg|President [[Jimmy Carter]] and Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] at the [[Resolute desk]] in the Oval Office, 1979 |
||
File:President Ronald Reagan, Nancy Reagan, Queen Elizabeth II, and Prince Philip.jpg|[[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]], First Lady [[Nancy Reagan]], Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and President [[Ronald Reagan]] aboard HMY Britannia, 1983 |
|||
File:Obama and Duke Duchess of Cambridge.jpg|President [[Barack Obama]] and First Lady [[Michelle Obama]] with [[Prince William, Duke of Cambridge]] and [[Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge]] in the Buckingham Palace, 2011. |
|||
File:Prince Charles, Princess Diana, Nancy Reagan, and Ronald Reagan (1985).jpg|President [[Ronald Reagan]] and First Lady [[Nancy Reagan]] with [[Charles III|Charles, Prince of Wales]] and [[Diana, Princess of Wales]] at the White House during the Waleses' official visit to the United States, 1985 |
|||
File:Barack Obama and Theresa May deliver a joint press statement in Hangzhou, China.jpg|New Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] and Outgoing President [[Barack Obama]] having their first meeting during the G20 summit in Hangzhou, China, 2016. |
|||
File:President |
File:President Reagan and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher at Camp David 1986.jpg|Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] and President [[Ronald Reagan]] in discussion during a walk at Camp David, 1986 |
||
File:President George H. W. Bush and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in London.jpg|President [[George H.W. Bush]] and Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] in London, 1989 |
|||
File:Photo of the Day September 25, 2017 (24128023337).jpg|First Lady [[Melania Trump]] and [[Prince Harry]] at the Invictus Games in Toronto, Canada, 2017. |
|||
File:President and Mrs. Bush host a State Dinner for Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip of Great Britain at the White House - NARA - 186433.jpg|President [[George H. W. Bush]] and First Lady [[Barbara Bush]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] at the beginning of an official dinner at the White House, 1991 |
|||
File:Prince Harry and Ms Markel attend ‘Amazing The Space’ event (40927597342) (cropped).jpg|[[Prince Harry]] with his then-fiancée, American actress [[Meghan Markle]], Belfast, 2018. |
|||
File:President |
File:President George H. W. Bush and Prime Minister John Major.jpg|President [[George H. W. Bush]] and Prime Minister [[John Major]] conducting a press conference at Camp David, 1992 |
||
File: |
File:President Clinton and Prime Minister John Major of the United Kingdom deliver press statements.jpg|President [[Bill Clinton]] and Prime Minister [[John Major]] give remarks during at press conference at 10 Downing Street, 1995 |
||
File:U.S. First Lady Hillary Clinton met with Princess Diana.jpg|First Lady [[Hillary Clinton]] and [[Diana, Princess of Wales]] chatting in the White House Map Room, 1997 |
|||
File:President Bill Clinton meets with Prime Minister Tony Blair and Sandy Berger at Waterfront Hall in Belfast (01).jpg |Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] and President [[Bill Clinton]] in a meeting with US National Security Advisor [[Sandy Berger]] in Belfast, 1998 |
|||
File:President Bill Clinton, First Lady Hillary Clinton, and Chelsea Clinton with Queen Elizabeth.jpg|President [[Bill Clinton]], First Lady [[Hillary Clinton]] and [[Chelsea Clinton]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] at Buckingham Palace, 2000 |
|||
President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair at Camp David, 23 February 2001.jpg|Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]] and President [[George W. Bush]] walking at Camp David, 2001 |
|||
File:George W. Bush and the Prince of Wales with spouses.jpg|President [[George W. Bush]] and First Lady [[Laura Bush]] with [[Charles III|Charles, Prince of Wales]] and [[Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall]] at the White House during the Waleses' official visit to the United States, 2005 |
|||
File:First family and Elizabeth II 2007 (outside).jpg|President [[George W. Bush]] and First Lady [[Laura Bush]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] at the beginning of an official dinner at the White House, 2007 |
|||
File:20070730 Bush Brown Camp David shake.jpg|Prime Minister [[Gordon Brown]] and President [[George W. Bush]] having their first meeting at Camp David, 2007 |
|||
File:President Barack Obama meets Prime Minister Gordon Brown.jpg|Prime Minister [[Gordon Brown]] and President [[Barack Obama]] in the Oval Office, 2009 |
|||
File:David Cameron and Barack Obama at the G20 Summit in Toronto.jpg|Prime Minister [[David Cameron]] and President [[Barack Obama]] at a bilateral meeting during the G20 Summit in Toronto, 2010 |
|||
File:President Barack Obama meets with Prince Charles, Prince of Wales, in the Oval Office, May 4, 2011.jpg|[[Charles, Prince of Wales]] meets with President [[Barack Obama]] in the Oval Office, 2011 |
|||
File:Obama and Duke Duchess of Cambridge.jpg|President [[Barack Obama]] and First Lady [[Michelle Obama]] with [[William, Prince of Wales|Prince William, Duke of Cambridge]] and [[Catherine, Princess of Wales|Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge]] at Buckingham Palace, 2011 |
|||
File:P061615AL-0074 (18675198819).jpg|First Lady [[Michelle Obama]] and [[Prince Harry of Wales]] engaging in conversation at Kensington Palace, 2015 |
|||
File:Barack Obama's trip to the United Kingdom April 2016 (5).jpg|President [[Barack Obama]] and First Lady [[Michelle Obama]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] and [[Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh]] at Windsor Castle, 2016 |
|||
File:Barack Obama and Theresa May deliver a joint press statement in Hangzhou, China.jpg|Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] and President [[Barack Obama]] having their first meeting during the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, 2016 |
|||
File:President Donald Trump and PM Theresa May Joint Press Conference, January 27, 2017.jpg|Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] and President [[Donald Trump]] conducting a press conference in the [[East Room]] of the White House, 2017 |
|||
File:President Trump & the First Lady's Trip to Europe (43421688632).jpg|President [[Donald Trump]] and First Lady [[Melania Trump]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] at Windsor Castle, 2018 |
|||
File:-UNGA (48791446772).jpg|Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] and President [[Donald Trump]] conducting a bilateral meeting in New York City, 2019 |
|||
File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II (51269148664).jpg|President [[Joe Biden]] and First Lady [[Jill Biden]] with Queen [[Elizabeth II]] at Windsor Castle, 2021 |
|||
Boris Johnson and Joe Biden in Oval Office 2021.jpg|Prime Minister [[Boris Johnson]] and President [[Joe Biden]] during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office at the White House, 2021 |
|||
File:President Joe Biden meets with United Kingdom Prime Minister Liz Truss.jpg|Prime Minister [[Liz Truss]] and President [[Joe Biden]] conducting a bilateral meeting in New York City, 2022 |
|||
File:President Joe Biden meets with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in the Oval Office.jpg|Prime Minister [[Rishi Sunak]] and President [[Joe Biden]] during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office, 2023 |
|||
File:President Joe Biden and His Majesty King Charles III pose for a photograph.jpg|President [[Joe Biden]] meets with King [[Charles III]] at Windsor Castle, 2023 |
|||
File:President Joe Biden sits down with Prime Minister Keir Starmer for a bilateral engagement in the Oval Office.jpg|Prime Minister [[Keir Starmer]] and President [[Joe Biden]] during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office, 2024 |
|||
</gallery> |
</gallery> |
||
Line 1,093: | Line 1,024: | ||
* [[Foreign relations of the United Kingdom]] |
* [[Foreign relations of the United Kingdom]] |
||
* [[Foreign relations of the United States]] |
* [[Foreign relations of the United States]] |
||
* [[Great Rapprochement]] |
|||
* [[List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the United States]] |
|||
* [[List of ambassadors of the United States to the United Kingdom]] |
|||
* [[Special Relationship (United Kingdom–United States)]] |
|||
* [[Timeline of British diplomatic history]] |
* [[Timeline of British diplomatic history]] |
||
* [[Timeline of United States diplomatic history]] |
* [[Timeline of United States diplomatic history]] |
||
* [[Transatlantic relations]] |
* [[Transatlantic relations]] |
||
* [[UKUSA Agreement]] |
* [[UKUSA Agreement]], on sharing secret intelligence |
||
* [[United Kingdom–United States relations in World War II]] |
* [[United Kingdom–United States relations in World War II]] |
||
*[[United Kingdom - United States Free Trade Agreement |
* [[United Kingdom - United States Free Trade Agreement]] |
||
* [[CIA activities in the United Kingdom]] |
|||
* [[European Union–United Kingdom relations|UK–EU relations]] |
|||
* [[United States–European Union relations|US–EU relations]] |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
{{reflist|group=note}} |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist|30em}} |
{{reflist|30em}} |
||
{{reflist|group=note}} |
|||
== |
==Further reading== |
||
===General surveys and studies to 1921=== |
|||
===To 1945=== |
|||
{{refbegin|30em}} |
{{refbegin|30em}} |
||
* Allen, H. C. ''Great Britain and the United States: A History of Anglo-American Relations, 1783–1952'' (1954), 1032pp. [https://archive.org/details/greatbritainunit00alle online]; most thorough scholarly coverage |
* Allen, H. C. ''Great Britain and the United States: A History of Anglo-American Relations, 1783–1952'' (1954), 1032pp. [https://archive.org/details/greatbritainunit00alle online]; most thorough scholarly coverage |
||
* Bailey, Thomas A. ''A Diplomatic History of the American People'' (10th edition 1980) [https://archive.org/details/diplomatichisto100bail online |
* Bailey, Thomas A. ''A Diplomatic History of the American People'' (10th edition 1980) [https://archive.org/details/diplomatichisto100bail online] |
||
* Burk, Kathleen. ''The Lion and the Eagle. The Interaction of the British and American Empires 1783-1972'' (2018) [https://issforum.org/essays/PDF/E165.pdf online review] |
* Burk, Kathleen. ''The Lion and the Eagle. The Interaction of the British and American Empires 1783-1972'' (2018) [https://issforum.org/essays/PDF/E165.pdf online review] |
||
* Burk, Kathleen. ''Old World, New World. The Story of Britain and America'' (2009). |
* Burk, Kathleen. ''Old World, New World. The Story of Britain and America'' (2009) [https://oconnell.fas.harvard.edu/files/armitage/files/why_we_share_a_different_history__tls.pdf online review] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220118184542/https://oconnell.fas.harvard.edu/files/armitage/files/why_we_share_a_different_history__tls.pdf |date=January 18, 2022 }}. |
||
* Burk, Kathleen. ''Britain, America and the Sinews of War, 1914–1918'' (1985), Financial and material support. |
|||
* Burt, Alfred L. ''The United States, Great Britain, and British North America from the Revolution to the Establishment of Peace after the War of 1812''. [https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=750041 (1940), detailed history by Canadian scholar; online] |
|||
* [[Alfred Leroy Burt|Burt, Alfred L.]] ''The United States, Great Britain, and British North America from the Revolution to the Establishment of Peace after the War of 1812'' (1940), detailed history by Canadian scholar. |
|||
* Campbell, Charles S. ''Anglo-American Understanding 1898–1903'' (1957) |
* Campbell, Charles S. ''Anglo-American Understanding 1898–1903'' (1957) |
||
* Collier, Basil. ''The lion and the eagle; British and Anglo-American strategy, 1900-1950'' (1972) [https://archive.org/details/lioneaglebritish00coll online] |
|||
* [[John Charmley|Charmley, John]]. ''Churchill's Grand Alliance: The Anglo-American Special Relationship 1940–57'' (1996) |
|||
* |
* Cook, James Gwin. ''Anglophobia: An Analysis of Anti-British Prejudice in the United States'' (1919) [https://archive.org/details/anglophobiaanan00cookgoog/page/n8 online] |
||
* Cook, James Gwin. ''Anglophobia: An Analysis of Anti-British Prejudice in the United States'' (1919) [https://archive.org/details/anglophobiaanan00cookgoog/page/n8 online free] |
|||
* Crawford, Martin. ''The Anglo-American Crisis of the Mid-Nineteenth Century: The Times and America, 1850–1862'' (1987) |
* Crawford, Martin. ''The Anglo-American Crisis of the Mid-Nineteenth Century: The Times and America, 1850–1862'' (1987) |
||
* Cullinane, Michael Patrick. "100 Years of Peace among English‐Speaking People: Anglo‐American Cultural Diplomacy, 1909–1921." ''Peace & Change'' 46.1 (2021): 5-34. |
|||
* Dobson, Alan P. ''Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century'' (1995). |
|||
* |
* Dobson, Alan P. "The evolving study of Anglo-American relations: the last 50 years." ''Journal of Transatlantic Studies'' 18.4 (2020): 415–433. major review of historiography |
||
* Dunning, William Archibald. ''The British Empire and the United States'' (1914) [https://archive.org/details/britishempireuni0000dunn/page/n5/mode/2up online] celebratory study by leading American scholar, written before World War I began. |
|||
* Ellis, Sylvia. ''Historical Dictionary of Anglo-American Relations'' (2009) [https://www.amazon.com/Historical-Dictionary-Anglo-American-Relations-Dictionaries/dp/081085564X/Excerpt and text search] |
* Ellis, Sylvia. ''Historical Dictionary of Anglo-American Relations'' (2009) [https://www.amazon.com/Historical-Dictionary-Anglo-American-Relations-Dictionaries/dp/081085564X/Excerpt and text search] |
||
* Foreman, Amanda. ''A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War'' (Random House, 2011), 958 pp. |
* Foreman, Amanda. ''A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War'' (Random House, 2011), 958 pp. |
||
Line 1,127: | Line 1,064: | ||
* [[Christopher Hitchens|Hitchens, Christopher]]. ''Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship'' (2004) |
* [[Christopher Hitchens|Hitchens, Christopher]]. ''Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship'' (2004) |
||
* Kaufman, Will, and Heidi Slettedahl Macpherson, eds. ''Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History'' (3 vol 2005), 1157pp; encyclopedic coverage |
* Kaufman, Will, and Heidi Slettedahl Macpherson, eds. ''Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History'' (3 vol 2005), 1157pp; encyclopedic coverage |
||
* MacKenzie, Scott A. "But There Was No War: The Impossibility of a United States Invasion of Canada after the Civil War" ''American Review of Canadian Studies'' (2017) [https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2017.1406965 online] |
|||
* Lane, Ann. ''Strategy, Diplomacy and UK Foreign Policy'' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) |
|||
* Masterson, William H. ''Tories and Democrats : British diplomats in pre-Jacksonian America'' (1985) [https://archive.org/details/toriesdemocratsb00mast online] |
|||
* Louis, William Roger; ''Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire, 1941–1945'' (1978) |
|||
* Mowat, R. B. ''The diplomatic relations of Great Britain and the United States'' (1925).[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.189658 online]; scholarly survey; 350pp |
|||
* McKercher, B. J. C. ''Transition of Power: Britain’s Loss of Global Pre-eminence to the United States, 1930-1945'' (1999) 403pp |
|||
* Ovendale, Ritchie. ''Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century'' (1998) |
|||
* Mowat, Robert Balmain. ''The diplomatic relations of Great Britain and the United States'' (1925).[https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.189658 online free]; scholarly survey; 350pp |
|||
* Pederson, William D. ed. ''A Companion to Franklin D. Roosevelt'' (2011) |
* Pederson, William D. ed. ''A Companion to Franklin D. Roosevelt'' (2011) pp 493–516, covers FDR's policies to 1945 |
||
* Perkins |
* Perkins, Bradford. ''The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805'' (1955) |
||
* Perkins, Bradford. ''Prologue to war: England and the United States, 1805–1812 '' (1961) |
* Perkins, Bradford. ''Prologue to war: England and the United States, 1805–1812 '' (1961) [https://web.archive.org/web/20121203215517/http://www.ucpress.edu/op.php?isbn=9780520009967 online] |
||
* Perkins, Bradford. ''Castlereagh and Adams : England and the United States, 1812-1823'' (1964) [https://archive.org/details/castlereaghadams0000unse online] |
|||
* Perkins, Bradford. ''The great rapprochement; England and the United States, 1895-1914'' (1968) [https://archive.org/details/greatrapprocheme0000perk online] |
|||
* Perkins, Edwin J. ''Financing Anglo-American trade: The House of Brown, 1800–1880'' (1975) |
* Perkins, Edwin J. ''Financing Anglo-American trade: The House of Brown, 1800–1880'' (1975) |
||
* Peskin, Lawrence A. "Conspiratorial Anglophobia and the War of 1812." ''Journal of American History'' 98#3 (2011): 647–669. [http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/3/647.short online] |
* Peskin, Lawrence A. "Conspiratorial Anglophobia and the War of 1812." ''Journal of American History'' 98#3 (2011): 647–669. [https://web.archive.org/web/20160111035825/http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/3/647.short online] |
||
* Rakestraw, Donald A. ''For Honor or Destiny: The Anglo-American Crisis over the Oregon Territory'' (Peter Lang Publishing, 1995) |
* Rakestraw, Donald A. ''For Honor or Destiny: The Anglo-American Crisis over the Oregon Territory'' (Peter Lang Publishing, 1995) |
||
* Pletcher, David M. ''The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War'' (U of Missouri Press, 1973) |
* Pletcher, David M. ''The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War'' (U of Missouri Press, 1973) [https://archive.org/details/diplomacyofannex00davi online] |
||
* Reid, Brian Holden. "Power, Sovereignty, and the Great Republic: Anglo-American Diplomatic Relations in the Era of the Civil War" ''Diplomacy & Statecraft'' (2003) 14#2 pp 45–76. |
* Reid, Brian Holden. "Power, Sovereignty, and the Great Republic: Anglo-American Diplomatic Relations in the Era of the Civil War" ''Diplomacy & Statecraft'' (2003) 14#2 pp 45–76. |
||
* Reid, Brian Holden. "'A Signpost That Was Missed'? Reconsidering British Lessons from the American Civil War," ''Journal of Military History'' 70#2 (2006), pp. 385–414 |
* Reid, Brian Holden. "'A Signpost That Was Missed'? Reconsidering British Lessons from the American Civil War," ''Journal of Military History'' 70#2 (2006), pp. 385–414. |
||
* |
* Schake, Kori. ''Safe Passage: The Transition from British to American Hegemony'' (Harvar UP, 2017) [https://www.amazon.com/Safe-Passage-Transition-American-Hegemony/dp/0674975073/ excerpt], major study of military relations between the two from 1820s to 1940s. |
||
* Spender, Stephen. ''Love-Hate Relations: English and American Sensibilities'' (Hamish Hamilton, 1974) [https://archive.org/details/lovehaterelation0000unse online] focus on 19th century visitors and writers. |
|||
* Shawcross, William. ''Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe and the War in Iraq'' (2004) |
|||
* Tilchin, William N. ''Theodore Roosevelt and the British Empire: A Study in Presidential Statecraft'' (1997) |
|||
* Tuffnell, Stephen. ""Uncle Sam is to be Sacrificed": Anglophobia in Late Nineteenth-Century Politics and Culture." ''American Nineteenth Century History'' 12#1 (2011): 77-99. |
* Tuffnell, Stephen. ""Uncle Sam is to be Sacrificed": Anglophobia in Late Nineteenth-Century Politics and Culture." ''American Nineteenth Century History'' 12#1 (2011): 77-99. |
||
* Tulloch, Hugh A. "Changing British attitudes towards the United States in the 1880s." ''Historical Journal'' 20.4 (1977): 825–840. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2638410 online] |
|||
* Watt, D. Cameron. ''Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain's place 1900–1975: a study of the Anglo-American relationship and world politics in the context of British and American foreign-policy-making in the twentieth century'' (1984). 302pp. |
|||
* Watt, D. Cameron. ''Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain's place 1900–1975: a study of the Anglo-American relationship and world politics in the context of British and American foreign-policy-making in the twentieth century'' (1984). 302pp. [https://archive.org/details/succeedingjohnbu0000watt online] |
|||
* Williams, Andrew J. ''France, Britain and the United States in the Twentieth Century 1900–1940'' (2014). 133-171. |
|||
* Williams, Andrew J. ''France, Britain and the United States in the Twentieth Century 1900–1940'' (2014). 133–171. |
|||
* Woods, Randall Bennett. ''Changing of the Guard: Anglo-American Relations, 1941–1946'' (1990) |
* Woods, Randall Bennett. ''Changing of the Guard: Anglo-American Relations, 1941–1946'' (1990) |
||
* Woodward, |
* Woodward, David R. ''Anglo-American Relations. 1917-1918'' (1993) [https://muse.jhu.edu/book/37793 complete book online] |
||
{{refend}} |
{{refend}} |
||
===Special relationship=== |
===Since 1920, and "Special relationship"=== |
||
{{refbegin|30em}} |
{{refbegin|30em}} |
||
* Abrahamian, Ervand. ''A History of Modern Iran'' (2008). |
|||
* Bartlett, Christopher John. ''The Special Relationship: A Political History of Anglo-American Relations Since 1945'' (1992). |
* Bartlett, Christopher John. ''The Special Relationship: A Political History of Anglo-American Relations Since 1945'' (1992). |
||
* Baylis, John. ''Anglo-American Defence Relations 1939–1984: The Special Relationship'' (1984) |
|||
* Coker, Christopher. "Britain and the new world order: the special relationship in the 1990s," ''International Affairs'' (1992): 407–421. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2622963 in JSTOR] |
|||
* Baylis, John, and Steve Marsh. "The Anglo-American “Special Relationship”: the Lazarus of International Relations", ''Diplomacy and Statecraft'' 17#1 (2006): 173–211. |
|||
* Beloff, Max. "The Special Relationship: An Anglo-American Myth", in Martin Gilbert, ed. ''A Century of Conflict: Essays for A.J.P. Taylor'' (Hamish Hamilton, 1966) |
|||
* Brinton, Crane, ''The United States and Britain'' (1945) [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.6458 online] focus on World War II |
|||
* Bullock, Alan. ''Ernest Bevin: Foreign Secretary 1945-1951'' (1984) [https://archive.org/details/ernestbevinforei00bull online] |
|||
* [[John Charmley|Charmley, John]]. ''Churchill's Grand Alliance: The Anglo-American Special Relationship 1940–57'' (1996) |
|||
* Coker, Christopher. "Britain and the new world order: the special relationship in the 1990s," ''International Affairs'' (1992): 407–421. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2622963 in JSTOR] |
|||
* Colman, Jonathan. '' A 'Special Relationship'?: Harold Wilson, Lyndon B. Johnson and Anglo-American Relations' at the Summit, 1964-8'' (Manchester University Press, 2004) |
* Colman, Jonathan. '' A 'Special Relationship'?: Harold Wilson, Lyndon B. Johnson and Anglo-American Relations' at the Summit, 1964-8'' (Manchester University Press, 2004) |
||
* Dimbleby, David, and David Reynolds. ''An Ocean Apart: The Relationship Between Britain and America in the Twentieth Century'' (1988) |
* Dimbleby, David, and David Reynolds. ''An Ocean Apart: The Relationship Between Britain and America in the Twentieth Century'' (1988) |
||
* Dobson, Alan P. ''US Wartime Aid to Britain'' (Croom Helm, 1986); in World War II. |
|||
* Dobson, Alan and Steve Marsh. "Anglo-American Relations: End of a Special Relationship?" ''International History Review'' 36:4 (August 2014): 673–697. DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2013.836124. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2013.836124 online review] argues it is still in effect |
|||
* Dobson, Alan P. ''Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century'' (1995). |
|||
* Dobson, Alan and Steve Marsh, eds. ''Anglo-American Relations: Contemporary Perspectives'' (Routledge, 2013), 10 essays by experts |
|||
* Dobson, Alan and Steve Marsh. "Anglo-American Relations: End of a Special Relationship?" ''International History Review'' 36:4 (August 2014): 673–697. DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2013.836124. [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2013.836124 online review] argues it is still in effect |
|||
* Dobson, Alan J. ''The Politics of the Anglo-American Economic Special Relationship'' (1988) |
* Dobson, Alan J. ''The Politics of the Anglo-American Economic Special Relationship'' (1988) |
||
* Dobson, Alan. "The special relationship and European integration." ''Diplomacy and Statecraft'' (1991) 2#1 |
* Dobson, Alan. "The special relationship and European integration." ''Diplomacy and Statecraft'' (1991) 2#1 79–102. |
||
* Dumbrell, John. ''A |
* Dumbrell, John. ''A special relationship: Anglo-American relations from the cold war to Iraq'' (2nd ed. 2006) [https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relationship-Anglo-American-Relations-Cold/dp/1403987750/ excerpt] |
||
* Dumbrell, John. "The US–UK Special Relationship: Taking the 21st-Century Temperature." ''The British Journal of Politics & International Relations'' (2009) 11#1 pp: 64–78. [http://dro.dur.ac.uk/5601/1/5601.pdf online] |
* Dumbrell, John. "The US–UK Special Relationship: Taking the 21st-Century Temperature." ''The British Journal of Politics & International Relations'' (2009) 11#1 pp: 64–78. [http://dro.dur.ac.uk/5601/1/5601.pdf online] |
||
* Gardiner, Juliet. '' 'Over Here', the GI’s in Wartime Britain'' (Collins and Brown, 1992) |
|||
* Gibb, Philip. ''Bridging the Atlantic: Anglo-American Fellowship and the Way to World Peace'' (Hutchinson, 1943), compiles public opinion of how each viewed the other. |
|||
* Glancy, Mark. "Temporary American citizens? British audiences, Hollywood films and the threat of Americanisation in the 1920s." ''Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television'' (2006) 26#4 pp 461–484. |
* Glancy, Mark. "Temporary American citizens? British audiences, Hollywood films and the threat of Americanisation in the 1920s." ''Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television'' (2006) 26#4 pp 461–484. |
||
* Hendershot, Robert M. ''Family Spats: Perception, Illusion, and Sentimentality in the Anglo-American Special Relationship'' (2008) |
* Hendershot, Robert M. ''Family Spats: Perception, Illusion, and Sentimentality in the Anglo-American Special Relationship'' (2008). |
||
* Hollowell, Jonathan ed. ''Twentieth-Century Anglo-American Relations'' (Palgrave, 2001) |
|||
* Holmes, Alison R. and J. Rofe, eds. ''The Embassy in Grosvenor Square: American Ambassadors to the United Kingdom, 1938-2008'' (2012) |
|||
* Hopkins, Michael F. et al. eds. ''Cold War Britain, 1945–1964: New Perspectives'' (2003) |
|||
* {{cite book |last1=Jones |first1=Matthew |last2=Ruane |first2=Kevin |title=Anthony Eden, Anglo-American Relations and the 1954 Indochina Crisis |date=2019 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=9781350021167}} |
* {{cite book |last1=Jones |first1=Matthew |last2=Ruane |first2=Kevin |title=Anthony Eden, Anglo-American Relations and the 1954 Indochina Crisis |date=2019 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=9781350021167}} |
||
* Johnsen, William Thomas. ''The Origins of the Grand Alliance: Anglo-American Military Collaboration from the Panay Incident to Pearl Harbor'' (2016). 438 pp. [https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=50480 online review] |
* Johnsen, William Thomas. ''The Origins of the Grand Alliance: Anglo-American Military Collaboration from the Panay Incident to Pearl Harbor'' (2016). 438 pp. [https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=50480 online review] |
||
* Law, Michael John. ''Not Like Home: American Visitors to Britain in the 1950s'' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2019) [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.php?id=54657 Online book review] |
* Law, Michael John. ''Not Like Home: American Visitors to Britain in the 1950s'' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2019) [http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.php?id=54657 Online book review] |
||
* Louis, William Roger, and Hedley Bull |
* Louis, William Roger, and Hedley Bull, eds ''The "Special Relationship": Anglo-American Relations since 1945'' (1987), 25 scholarly essays by British and American experts. |
||
* Louis, William Roger. ''Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire, 1941–1945'' (1978) |
|||
* Lyons, John F. ''America in the British Imagination: 1945 to the Present'' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013). |
* Lyons, John F. ''America in the British Imagination: 1945 to the Present'' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013). |
||
* McKercher, B. J. C. ''Transition of Power: Britain's Loss of Global Pre-eminence to the United States, 1930-1945'' (1999) 403pp |
|||
* Malchow, H.L. ''Special Relations: The Americanization of Britain?'' (Stanford University Press; 2011) 400 pages; explores American influence on the culture and counterculture of metropolitan London from the 1950s to the 1970s, from "Swinging London" to black, feminist, and gay liberation. [https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relations-Americanization-Howard-Malchow/dp/0804773998/ excerpt and text search] |
* Malchow, H.L. ''Special Relations: The Americanization of Britain?'' (Stanford University Press; 2011) 400 pages; explores American influence on the culture and counterculture of metropolitan London from the 1950s to the 1970s, from "Swinging London" to black, feminist, and gay liberation. [https://www.amazon.com/Special-Relations-Americanization-Howard-Malchow/dp/0804773998/ excerpt and text search] |
||
* Pells, Richard. ''Not like Us: How Europeans Have Loved, Hated and Transformed American Culture since World War II'' (1997) [https://archive.org/details/notlikeushoweuro00pell online] |
|||
* Reynolds, David. ''Rich relations: the American occupation of Britain, 1942-1945'' (1995) |
|||
* Ratti, Luca. ''Not-So-Special Relationship: The US, The UK and German Unification, 1945-1990'' (Edinburgh UP, 2017). |
|||
* Reynolds, David. "A 'special relationship'? America, Britain and the international order since the Second World War." ''International Affairs'' (1985): 1-20. |
|||
* Reynolds, David. ''Rich relations: the American occupation of Britain, 1942-1945'' (1995) [https://archive.org/details/richrelations00davi online] |
|||
* Rofe, J. Simon and Alison R. Holmes, eds. ''The Embassy in Grosvenor Square: American Ambassadors to the United Kingdom, 1938-2008'' (2012), essays by scholars how the ambassadors promoted a special relationship |
|||
* Reynolds, David. "A 'special relationship'? America, Britain and the international order since the Second World War." ''International Affairs'' (1985): 1-20. |
|||
* Watry, David M. ''Diplomacy at the Brink: Eisenhower, Churchill, and Eden in the Cold War.'' Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2014. |
|||
* Reynolds, David. ''From World War to Cold War: Churchill, Roosevelt, and the International History of the 1940s'' (2007) [https://www.amazon.com/From-World-War-Cold-International/dp/0199237611/ excerpt and text search] |
|||
* Rofe, J. Simon and Alison R. Holmes, eds. ''The Embassy in Grosvenor Square: American Ambassadors to the United Kingdom, 1938-2008'' (2012), essays by scholars how the ambassadors promoted a special relationship. |
|||
* Scott, Andrew. ''Allies Apart: Heath, Nixon and the Anglo-American Relationship'' (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011) |
|||
* Shawcross, William. ''Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe and the War in Iraq'' (2004) |
|||
* Thorne, Christopher. ''Allies of a Kind: the United States, Britain and the War Against Japan, 1941–45 (Hamish Hamilton, 1978) |
|||
* Watry, David M. ''Diplomacy at the Brink: Eisenhower, Churchill, and Eden in the Cold War.'' (Louisiana State UP, 2014). |
|||
* Watt, D. Cameron. ''Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain's place, 1900-1975: a study of the Anglo-American relationship and world politics in the context of British and American foreign-policy-making in the twentieth century'' (1984) [https://archive.org/details/succeedingjohnbu0000watt/page/n7/mode/2up online] |
|||
* Williams, Paul. ''British Foreign Policy under New Labour'' (2005) |
* Williams, Paul. ''British Foreign Policy under New Labour'' (2005) |
||
* Wilson, T.A. ''The First Summit: Roosevelt and Churchill at Placentia Bay'' (Houghton Mifflin, 1969) in 1941 |
|||
* Woolner, David B. "The Frustrated Idealists: Cordell Hull, Anthony Eden and the Search for |
|||
Anglo-American Cooperation, |
* Woolner, David B. "The Frustrated Idealists: Cordell Hull, Anthony Eden and the Search for Anglo-American Cooperation, 1933–1938" (PhD dissertation, McGill University, 1996) [https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq30419.pdf online] bibliography pp 373–91. |
||
{{refend}} |
{{refend}} |
||
Line 1,182: | Line 1,147: | ||
* Blair, Tony. ''A Journey: My Political Life'' (2010), memoir by UK prime minister |
* Blair, Tony. ''A Journey: My Political Life'' (2010), memoir by UK prime minister |
||
* Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. ''The American Revolution through British Eyes'' 2v (2013) |
* Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. ''The American Revolution through British Eyes'' 2v (2013) |
||
* Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. ''The American Civil War through British Eyes: Dispatches from British Diplomats - Vol. 1'' (2003) [https://www.questia.com/library/117804699/the-american-civil-war-through-british-eyes-dispatches online] |
* Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. ''The American Civil War through British Eyes: Dispatches from British Diplomats - Vol. 1'' (2003) [https://www.questia.com/library/117804699/the-american-civil-war-through-british-eyes-dispatches online] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181023120048/https://www.questia.com/library/117804699/the-american-civil-war-through-british-eyes-dispatches |date=October 23, 2018 }} |
||
* Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. |
* Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. '' Private and Confidential: Letters from British Ministers in Washington to the Foreign Secretaries in London, 1844-1867'' (1993) |
||
* Frankel, Robert. ''Observing America : the commentary of British visitors to the United States, 1890-1950'' (2007) [https://archive.org/details/observingamerica0000fran/page/n9/mode/2up online] |
|||
* [[Loewenheim, Francis L.]] et al. eds. ''Roosevelt and Churchill, their secret wartime correspondence'' (1975) |
* [[Loewenheim, Francis L.]] et al. eds. ''Roosevelt and Churchill, their secret wartime correspondence'' (1975) |
||
{{refend}} |
{{refend}} |
||
== |
===Other sources=== |
||
{{refbegin}} |
|||
* [[Robert F. Worth]], "The End of the Show" (review of [[James Barr (author)|James Barr]], ''Lords of the Desert: The Battle Between the United States and Great Britain for Supremacy in the Modern Middle East'', Basic Books, 454 pp.; and [[Derek Leebaert]], ''Grand Improvisation: America Confronts the British Superpower, 1945–1957'', Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 612 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXVI, no. 16 (24 October 2019), pp. 44–46. |
|||
* W. N Medlicott. ''British foreign policy since Versailles, 1919-1963'' (1968) |
|||
* David Sanders and David Houghton. ''Losing an Empire, Finding a Role: British Foreign Policy Since 1945'' (2nd ed. 2017) |
|||
* [[Robert F. Worth]], "The End of the Show" (review of [[James Barr (author)|James Barr]], ''Lords of the Desert: The Battle Between the United States and Great Britain for Supremacy in the Modern Middle East'', Basic Books, 454 pp.; and [[Derek Leebaert]], ''Grand Improvisation: America Confronts the British Superpower, 1945–1957'', Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 612 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXVI, no. 16 (October 24, 2019), pp. 44–46. |
|||
{{Refend}} |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
{{Commons category|Relations of the United Kingdom and the United States}} |
{{Commons category|Relations of the United Kingdom and the United States}} |
||
{{Wikiquote}} |
{{Wikiquote}} |
||
* [https://history.state.gov/countries/united-kingdom History of United Kingdom – United States relations from |
* [https://history.state.gov/countries/united-kingdom "History of United Kingdom – United States relations"] from the [[United States Department of State|US State Department]] |
||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120624052931/http://americas.sas.ac.uk/digital-resources-for-researchers/atlantic-archive-uk-us-relations-in-an-age-of-global-war-1939-1945/ Atlantic Archive: UK-US Relations in an Age of Global War 1939–1945] |
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120624052931/http://americas.sas.ac.uk/digital-resources-for-researchers/atlantic-archive-uk-us-relations-in-an-age-of-global-war-1939-1945/ Atlantic Archive: UK-US Relations in an Age of Global War 1939–1945] |
||
* [https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/british/ John Bull and Uncle Sam: Four Centuries of British American Relations] |
* [https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/british/ John Bull and Uncle Sam: Four Centuries of British American Relations] |
||
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4794164.stm An analysis of the Special Relationship from a British perspective. From the Second World War to the latest global problems facing the United States.] |
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4794164.stm An analysis of the Special Relationship from a British perspective. From the Second World War to the latest global problems facing the United States.] |
||
* [http://www.dundee.ac.uk/iteas/lectures/2nd_ITEAS_lecture.doc Lecture: Anti-Americanism and American Exceptionalism] |
* [http://www.dundee.ac.uk/iteas/lectures/2nd_ITEAS_lecture.doc Lecture: Anti-Americanism and American Exceptionalism] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070614234021/http://www.dundee.ac.uk/iteas/lectures/2nd_ITEAS_lecture.doc |date=June 14, 2007 }} |
||
* [[:s:The hatred of England|Goldwin Smith, "The Hatred of England," (1890) essay by Canadian scholar]] |
* [[:s:The hatred of England|Goldwin Smith, "The Hatred of England," (1890) essay by Canadian scholar]] |
||
* [http://ukinusa.fco.gov.uk/en/ British Embassy in the United States of America] |
* [http://ukinusa.fco.gov.uk/en/ British Embassy in the United States of America] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130316082919/http://ukinusa.fco.gov.uk/en/ |date=March 16, 2013 }} |
||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120531020548/http://london.usembassy.gov/index.html Embassy of the United States of America in the United Kingdom] |
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120531020548/http://london.usembassy.gov/index.html Embassy of the United States of America in the United Kingdom] |
||
* [http://www.wilsoncenter.org/nuclear-history-documents/ The Woodrow Wilson Center's Nuclear Proliferation International History Project] or NPIHP is a global network of individuals and institutions engaged in the study of international nuclear history through archival documents, oral history interviews and other empirical sources. |
* [http://www.wilsoncenter.org/nuclear-history-documents/ The Woodrow Wilson Center's Nuclear Proliferation International History Project] or NPIHP is a global network of individuals and institutions engaged in the study of international nuclear history through archival documents, oral history interviews and other empirical sources. |
||
{{ |
{{United Kingdom–United States relations}} |
||
{{Foreign relations of the United |
{{Foreign relations of the United Kingdom}} |
||
{{ |
{{Foreign relations of the United States}} |
||
{{Authority control}} |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:United Kingdom-United States Relations}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:United Kingdom-United States Relations}} |
||
[[Category:United Kingdom–United States relations| ]] |
[[Category:United Kingdom–United States relations| ]] |
||
[[Category:Bilateral relations of the United States]] |
|||
[[Category:Bilateral relations of the United Kingdom|United States]] |
[[Category:Bilateral relations of the United Kingdom|United States]] |
||
[[Category:Bilateral relations of the United States]] |
|||
[[Category:Relations of colonizer and former colony]] |
[[Category:Relations of colonizer and former colony]] |
Latest revision as of 23:46, 25 December 2024
United Kingdom |
United States |
---|---|
Diplomatic mission | |
British Embassy, Washington, D.C. | United States Embassy, London |
Envoy | |
Ambassador Karen Elizabeth Pierce | Ambassador Jane D. Hartley |
Relations between the United Kingdom and the United States have ranged from military opposition to close allyship since 1776. The Thirteen Colonies seceded from the Kingdom of Great Britain and declared independence in 1776, fighting a successful revolutionary war. While Britain was fighting Napoleon, the two nations fought the stalemated War of 1812. Relations were generally positive thereafter, save for a short crisis in 1861 during the American Civil War. By the 1880s, the US economy had surpassed Britain's; in the 1920s, New York City surpassed London as the world's leading financial center. The two nations fought Germany together during the two World Wars; since 1940, the two countries have been close military allies, enjoying the Special Relationship built as wartime allies and NATO and G7 partners.
America and Britain are bound together by a shared history, a common language, an overlap in religious beliefs and legal principles, and kinship ties that reach back hundreds of years. Today, large numbers of expatriates live in the other country.
In the early 21st century, Britain affirmed its relationship with the United States as its "most important bilateral partnership" in current British foreign policy,[1] and the American foreign policy also affirms its relationship with Britain as its most important relationship,[2][3] as evidenced in aligned political affairs, mutual cooperation in the areas of trade, commerce, finance, technology, academics, as well as the arts and sciences; the sharing of government and military intelligence, and joint combat operations and peacekeeping missions carried out between the United States Armed Forces and the British Armed Forces. As of January 2015, the United Kingdom was the fifth largest US trading partner in terms of exports and seventh in terms of import of goods.[4] In long-term perspective, the historian Paul Johnson has called the United Kingdom–United States relations "the cornerstone of the modern, democratic world order".[5]
The two countries also have had a significant impact on the cultures of many other countries, as well as each other. They are the two main nodes of the Anglosphere, with a combined population of just under 400 million in 2019. Together, they have given the English language a dominant lingua franca role in many aspects of the modern world.
Special Relationship
[edit]The Special Relationship characterises the exceptionally close political, diplomatic, cultural, economic, military, and historical relations between the two countries. It is specially used for relations since 1940.[6]
Ahead of a visit to the White House in 2023, Rishi Sunak stressed the need to forge "close and candid" relations with Joe Biden after years of turbulent US-UK relations.[7]
History
[edit]Origins
[edit]After several failed attempts, the first permanent English settlement in mainland North America was established in 1607 at Jamestown in the Virginia. In 1630 the Puritans established the Massachusetts Bay Colony; they emphasised not only pure religiosity, but also education and entrepreneurship.[8]
Smaller colonies followed in Province of Maine (1622), Province of Maryland (1632), Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations (1636) and Connecticut Colony (1636). Later came the founding of Province of Carolina (1663) (divided in 1729 into the Province of North Carolina and the Province of South Carolina). The Province of New Hampshire was founded in 1691. Finally came the Province of Georgia in 1732 founded by James Oglethorpe. The British created the Province of New York from the conquered Dutch colony of New Netherland. In 1674, the Province of New Jersey was split off from New York. In 1681 William Penn founded the Quaker colony Province of Pennsylvania. Each colony reported separately to London.
Migration
[edit]All the colonies had slavery. Most of the slaves were purchased from British colonies in the Caribbean. The colonies attracted British and German immigrants seeking to own a farm. During the 17th century, about 350,000 English and Welsh migrants arrived. After 1700 came even larger numbers of Scots and Scots-Irish migrants.[9]
During British colonization, liberal administrative, juridical, and market institutions were introduced, positively associated with socioeconomic development.[10] At the same time, colonial policy was also quasi-mercantilist, encouraging trade within the Empire, discouraging trade with other powers, and discouraging the rise of manufacturing in the colonies, which had been established to increase the trade and wealth of the mother country. Britain made much greater profits from the sugar trade of its commercial colonies in the Caribbean.[citation needed]
The colonial period also saw the introduction of indentured servitude and slavery.[10] All of the Thirteen Colonies were involved in the slave trade. Slaves in the Middle Colonies and New England Colonies typically worked as house servants, artisans, laborers and craftsmen. Early on, slaves in the Southern Colonies worked primarily in agriculture, on farms and plantations growing indigo, rice, cotton, and tobacco for export.[10]
The French and Indian War, fought between 1754 and 1763, was the North American theatre of the Seven Years' War. The conflict, the fourth such colonial war between France and Britain in North America, resulted in the British acquisition of New France from the French. Under the Treaty of Paris signed in 1763, the French ceded control of French Louisiana east of the Mississippi River to the British, which became known as the Indian Reserve in the Royal Proclamation of 1763.[citation needed]
Religion
[edit]The religious ties between the homeland and the colonies were pronounced. Most of the churches were transplants from Europe. The Puritans of New England seldom kept in touch with nonconformists in England. Much closer were the transatlantic relationships maintained by the Quakers, especially in Pennsylvania. The Methodists also maintained close ties.[11][12]
The Anglican Church was officially established in the Southern colonies, which meant that local taxes paid the salary of the minister, the parish had civic responsibilities such as poor relief, and the local gentry controlled the parish. The church was disestablished during the American Revolution. The Anglican churches in America were under the authority of the Bishop of London, and there was a long debate over whether to establish an Anglican bishop in America. The other Protestants blocked any such appointment. After the Revolution the newly formed Episcopal Church selected its own bishop and kept its distance from London.[13]
-
Proportions of English ancestry
-
Proportions of Scots ancestry
-
Proportions of Scots-Irish ancestry
-
Proportions of Welsh ancestry
American Revolution
[edit]The Thirteen Colonies gradually obtained more self-government.[14] British mercantilist policies became more stringent, benefiting the mother country which resulted in trade restrictions, thereby limiting the growth of the colonial economy and artificially constraining colonial merchants' earning potential. The sums were small but Parliament insisted that it was in final command and could impose taxes at any time. Tensions escalated from 1765 to 1775 over issues of taxation without any American representation in Parliament. Parliament imposed a series of taxes especially the Stamp Act, and the Tea Act of 1773, against which an angry mob of colonists protested in the Boston Tea Party by dumping chests of tea into Boston Harbor.
Parliament punished Massachusetts with the Intolerable Acts in 1774, which were designed to strip away self-government. The other twelve colonies stood together with Massachusetts. They sent militia to Boston and expelled nearly all the Royal officials in all 13 colonies by 1775. The Battles of Lexington and Concord in 1775 began the American War of Independence. While the goal of attaining independence was sought by a powerful majority known as Patriots, a weaker minority known as the Loyalists remained loyal to the king.
Congress unanimously declared independence in July 1776. The British managed to control New York City and parts of the South, but 90 per cent of the American population was controlled by Patriots. The entry of the French and Spanish decisively hurt British efforts. After two invasion armies were captured in 1777 and 1781, King George III lost control of Parliament and independence was negotiated on terms favorable to expanded bilateral trade. The United States of America became the first colony in the world to successfully achieve independence in the modern era.[15] According to R. R. Palmer the new American nation:
- inspired the sense of a new era. It added a new content to the concept of progress. It gave a whole new dimension to ideas of liberty and equality made familiar in the Enlightenment. It got people into the habit of thinking more concretely about political questions, and made them more readily critical of their own governments and society. It dethroned England and set up America as a model for those seeking a better world.[16]
Peace treaty
[edit]The Treaty of Paris ended the war in 1783 on terms quite favourable to the new nation.[17] The Americans realised they could get a better deal directly from London, ignoring their French ally. The British Prime Minister Lord Shelburne now saw a chance to split the United States away from France and make the new country a valuable economic partner.[18]
The United States would gain all of the area east of the Mississippi River, north of Florida, and south of Canada. The northern boundary would be almost the same as today. The United States would gain fishing rights off the Atlantic coast of Canada, and agreed to allow British merchants and Loyalists to try to recover their property. It was a highly favourable treaty for the United States, and deliberately so from the British point of view. Shelburne foresaw a highly profitable two-way trade between Britain and the rapidly growing United States, which indeed came to pass.[19]
End of the Revolution
[edit]The treaty was finally ratified in 1784. The British evacuated their soldiers and civilians in New York City, Charleston and Savannah in late 1783. Over 80 percent of the half-million Loyalists remained in the United States and became American citizens. The others mostly went to Canada, and referred to themselves as the United Empire Loyalists. Merchants and men of affairs often went to Britain to reestablish their business connections.[20][21] Rich southern Loyalists, taking their slaves with them, typically headed to plantations in the West Indies. The British also evacuated about 3,000 Black Loyalists, former slaves who had escaped from their American masters and joined the British; they went to Nova Scotia. Many found it inhospitable and went to Sierra Leone, a newly established British colony in Africa.[22]
The new nation gained control of nearly all the land east of the Mississippi and south of the St. Lawrence River and the Great Lakes. The British colonies of East and West Florida were given to Spain as its reward. The Native American tribes allied with Britain struggled in the aftermath; the British ignored them at the Peace conference, and most came under American control unless they moved to Canada or to Spanish territory. The British kept forts in the Northwest Territory (what is today the American Midwest, especially in Michigan and Wisconsin), where they supplied weapons to Indian tribes.[23]
1783–1807: Role of Jay Treaty
[edit]Trade resumed between the two nations when the war ended. The British allowed all exports to America but forbade some American food exports to its colonies in the West Indies. British exports reached £3.7 million, compared with imports of only £750,000. The imbalance caused a shortage of gold in the US.
In 1785, John Adams became the first American plenipotentiary minister, to the Court of St James's.[24] King George III received him graciously. In 1791, Great Britain sent its first diplomatic envoy, George Hammond, to the United States.
When Great Britain and France went to war in 1793, relations between the United States and Great Britain also verged on war. Tensions were resolved when the Jay Treaty was approved in 1795. It established a decade of peace and prosperous trade relations.[25] The historian Marshall Smelser argues that the treaty effectively postponed war with Britain, or at least postponed it until the United States was strong enough to handle it.[26] The Americans had a list of outstanding issues regarding British control of border areas and British support of Indian tribes hostile to the United States, as well as British efforts to stop trade with France.[27] The final treaty settled most of the issues.
The Federalist Party led by Alexander Hamilton was pro-British and it worked hard to ratify the Jay treaty. The new Republican Party was vehemently opposed. Led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republicans strongly favored Revolutionary France and deeply distrusted reactionary Britain as a threat to American values of republicanism. President George Washington made the decisive intervention so the Treaty was ratified by exactly a 2/3 vote, and the necessary money was appropriated. The result was two decades of peace in a time of world war. The peace lasted until the Republicans came to power and Jefferson rejected a new treaty and began an economic attack on Britain.[28]
Bradford Perkins argues that the treaty was the first to establish a special relationship between Britain and the United States, with a second installment under Lord Salisbury. In his view, the treaty worked for ten years to secure peace between Britain and America: "The decade may be characterised as the period of "The First Rapprochement." As Perkins concludes,
"For about ten years there was peace on the frontier, joint recognition of the value of commercial intercourse, and even, by comparison with both preceding and succeeding epochs, a muting of strife over ship seizures and impressment. Two controversies with France… pushed the English-speaking powers even more closely together."[29]
Starting at swords' point in 1794, the Jay treaty reversed the tensions, Perkins concludes: "Through a decade of world war and peace, successive governments on both sides of the Atlantic were able to bring about and preserve a cordiality which often approached genuine friendship."[30]
Historian Joseph Ellis finds the terms of the treaty "one-sided in Britain's favor", but asserts a consensus of historians agrees that it was
"a shrewd bargain for the United States. It bet, in effect, on England rather than France as the hegemonic European power of the future, which proved prophetic. It recognised the massive dependence of the American economy on trade with England. In a sense it was a precocious preview of the Monroe Doctrine (1823), for it linked American security and economic development to the British fleet, which provided a protective shield of incalculable value throughout the nineteenth century. Mostly, it postponed war with England until America was economically and politically more capable of fighting one."[31]
The US proclaimed its neutrality in the wars between Britain and France (1793–1815), and profited greatly by selling food, timber and other supplies to both sides.
Jefferson as president moved slowly to undermine the Jay Treaty and block its renewal. Amity collapsed in 1805, as a prelude to the War of 1812.
The transatlantic slave trade was largely suppressed after Great Britain passed the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act in 1807. At the urging of President Jefferson, the United States passed the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves in 1807, to take effect January 1, 1808.
War of 1812
[edit]The United States imposed a trade embargo, namely the Embargo Act of 1807, in retaliation for Britain's blockade of France, which involved the visit and search of neutral merchantmen, and resulted in the suppression of Franco-United States trade for the duration of the Napoleonic Wars.[32] The Royal Navy also boarded American ships and impressed sailors suspected of being British deserters.[33] Expansion into the Midwest (i.e. Ohio to Wisconsin) was hindered by Native American tribes given munitions and support by British agents. Indeed, Britain's goal was the creation of an independent Indian state to block expansion westward by the US.[34]
After diplomacy and the boycott had failed, the issue of national honour and independence came to the fore.[35] Brands says, "The other war hawks spoke of the struggle with Britain as a second war of independence; [Andrew] Jackson, who still bore scars from the first war of independence held that view with special conviction. The approaching conflict was about violations of American rights, but it was also vindication of American identity."[36]
Finally in June 1812 President James Madison called for war, and overcame the opposition of business interests in the Northeast. The US strategy called for a war against British shipping and especially cutting off food shipments to the British sugar plantations in the West Indies. Conquest of the northern colonies that later became Canada was a tactic designed to give the US a strong bargaining position.[37] The main British goal was to defeat France, so until that happened in 1814 the war was primarily defensive. To enlist allies among Native Americans, led by Tecumseh, the British promised an independent Native American state would be created in territory claimed by the United States. British and Canadian forces repeatedly repulsed invasions by US forces, which were inadequately prepared, poorly led, and undermined by the unavailability of militia units, whose commanders refused to place them temporarily under federal control. Nevertheless, US forces took control of Lake Erie in 1813, and destroyed the offensive abilities of Native American forces, allied to the British, in the Northwest and South. The British invasion of the Chesapeake Bay in 1814 culminated in the "Burning of Washington", but the subsequent British attack on Baltimore was repelled. A British incursion into New York during 1814 was defeated at the Battle of Plattsburgh, and the invasion of Louisiana that launched before word of a ceasefire had reached General Andrew Jackson was decisively defeated at the Battle of New Orleans in 1815. Negotiations began in 1814 and produced the Treaty of Ghent, which restored the status quo ante bellum: there were no territorial gains by either side, and the British strategy of creating an independent Native American state was abandoned after strong American pressure. The United Kingdom retained the theoretical right of impressment, but stopped impressing any sailors, while the United States dropped the issue for good.[38] The US celebrated the outcome as a victorious "second war of independence". The British, having finally defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo, celebrated that triumph and largely forgot their second war with the US. Tensions between the US and Canada were resolved through diplomacy. The War of 1812 marked the end of a long period of conflict (1775–1815) and ushered in a new era of peace between the two nations.
Disputes 1815–60
[edit]In 1817 Rush–Bagot Treaty between the United States and Great Britain limited naval armaments on the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain.
The Monroe Doctrine, a unilateral response in 1823 to a British suggestion of a joint declaration, expressed American hostility to further European encroachment in the Western hemisphere. Nevertheless, the United States benefited from the common outlook in British policy and its enforcement by the Royal Navy. In the 1840s several states defaulted on bonds owned by British investors. London bankers avoided state bonds afterwards, but invested heavily in American railroad bonds.[39]
In several episodes the American general Winfield Scott proved a sagacious diplomat by tamping down emotions and reaching acceptable compromises.[40] Scott handled the Caroline affair in 1837. Rebels from British North America (now Ontario) fled to New York and used a small American ship called the Caroline to smuggle supplies into Canada after their rebellion was suppressed. In late 1837, Canadian militia crossed the border into the US and burned the ship, leading to diplomatic protests, a flare-up of Anglophobia, and other incidents.
Tensions on the vague Maine–New Brunswick boundary involved rival teams of lumberjacks in the bloodless Aroostook War of 1839. There was no shooting but both sides tried to uphold national honor and gain a few more miles of timber land. Each side had an old secret map that apparently showed the other side had the better legal case, so compromise was easily reached in the Webster–Ashburton Treaty of 1842, which settled the border in Maine and Minnesota.[41][42] In 1859, the bloodless Pig War determined the position of the border in relation to the San Juan Islands and Gulf Islands.
British leaders were constantly annoyed from the 1840s to the 1860s by what they saw as Washington's pandering to the democratic mob, as in the Oregon boundary dispute in 1844–46. However, British middle-class public opinion sensed a "special relationship" between the two peoples based on language, migration, evangelical Protestantism, liberal traditions, and extensive trade. This constituency rejected war, forcing London to appease the Americans. During the Trent affair of late 1861, London drew the line and Washington retreated.[43][44]
In 1844–48 the two nations had overlapping claims to Oregon. The area was largely unsettled, making it easy to end the crisis in 1848 by a compromise that split the region evenly, with British Columbia to Great Britain, and Washington, Idaho, and Oregon to America. The US then turned its attention to Mexico, which threatened war over the annexation of Texas. Britain tried without success to moderate the Mexicans, but when the war began it remained neutral. The US gained California, in which the British had shown only passing interest.[45]
Nicaraguan canal
[edit]The discovery of gold in California in 1848 brought a heavy demand for passage to the gold fields, with the main routes crossing disease-ridden Panama to avoid a very long slow sailing voyage around all of South America. A railroad was built that carried 600,000 passengers but the disease threat remained. A canal in Nicaragua was a much more healthy and attractive possibility, and American businessmen gained the necessary permissions, along with a US treaty with Nicaragua. However the British were determined to block an American canal, and seized key locations on the Mosquito Coast on the Atlantic that blocked it. The Whig Party was in charge in Washington and were unlike the bellicose Democrats who wanted a businesslike, peaceful solution. The United States decided that a canal should be open and neutral to all the world's traffic, and not be militarized. Tensions escalated locally, with small-scale physical confrontations in the field. Washington and London found a diplomatic solution.[46] The Clayton–Bulwer Treaty of 1850 guaranteed equal canal rights to both the US and Britain. Each agreed not to colonize Central America. However, no Nicaragua canal was ever started.[47]
By the late 1890s Britain saw the need for much improved relations with the United States, and agreed to allow the US to build a canal through either Nicaragua or Panama. The choice was Panama. The Hay–Pauncefote Treaty of 1901 replaced the Clayton–Bulwer Treaty, and adopted the rule of neutralization for the Panama Canal which the US built; it opened in 1914.[48][49]
American Civil War
[edit]In the American Civil War a major Confederate goal was to win recognition from Britain and France, which it expected would lead them to war with the US and enable the Confederacy to win independence.[50] Because of astute American diplomacy, no nation ever recognised the Confederacy and war with Britain was averted. Nevertheless, there was considerable British sentiment in favour of weakening the US by helping the South win.[51] At the beginning of the war Britain issued a proclamation of neutrality. The Confederate States of America had assumed all along that Britain would surely enter the war to protect its vital supply of cotton. This "King Cotton" argument was one reason the Confederates felt confident in the first place about going to war, but the Southerners had never consulted the Europeans and were tardy in sending diplomats. Even before the fighting began in April 1861 Confederate citizens (acting without government authority) cut off cotton shipments in an effort to exert cotton diplomacy. It failed because Britain had warehouses filled with cotton, whose value was soaring; not until 1862 did shortages become acute.[52]
The Trent Affair in late 1861 nearly caused a war. A warship of the US Navy stopped the British civilian vessel RMS Trent and took off two Confederate diplomats, James Murray Mason and John Slidell. Britain prepared for war and demanded their immediate release. President Lincoln released the diplomats and the episode ended quietly.[53]
Britain realised that any recognition of an independent Confederacy would be treated as an act of war against the United States. The British economy was heavily reliant on trade with the United States, most notably cheap grain imports which in the event of war, would be cut off by the Americans. Indeed, the Americans would launch an all-out naval war against the entire British merchant fleet.[54]
Despite outrage and intense American protests, London turned blind eye to its blockade runners smuggling in money and weapons to the Confederacy (which actually lengthened the war by two years and killed 400,000 additional Americans)[55][56][57][58] and allowed the British-built CSS Alabama to leave port and become a commerce raider under the naval flag of the Confederacy. The war ended in 1865; arbitration partially settled the issue in 1871, with a payment of $15.5 million in gold only for the damages caused by British-built Confederate commerce raiders.[59]
In January 1863 Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which was strongly supported by liberal elements in Britain. The British government predicted that emancipation of the slaves in America would create a race war in the country, and that intervention might be required on humanitarian grounds. This prediction turned out to be unfounded, and the declining capabilities of the Confederacy—such as loss of major ports and rivers—made its likelihood of success smaller and smaller.[60]
Late 19th century
[edit]Canada
[edit]Relations were chilly during the 1860s as Americans resented British and Canadian roles during the Civil War. Both sides worked to make sure tensions did not escalate toward war.[61] After the war American authorities looked the other way as Irish Catholic "Fenians" plotted and even attempted a tiny invasion of Canada to create pressure for an independent Ireland.[62][63] Irish American politicians, a growing power in the Democratic Party demanded more independence for Ireland and made anti-British rhetoric—called "twisting the lion's tail"—a staple of election campaign appeals to the Irish vote.[64]
The arbitration of the Alabama Claims in 1872 provided a satisfactory reconciliation; The British paid the United States $15.5 million for the economic damage caused by Confederate Navy warships purchased from it.[65] Canada could never be defended so the British decided to cut their losses and eliminate the risk of a conflict with the US. The first ministry of William Gladstone withdrew from all its historic military and political responsibilities in North America. It brought home its troops (keeping Halifax as an Atlantic naval base), and turned responsibility over to the locals. That made it wise in 1867 to unify the separate Canadian colonies into a self-governing confederation named the "Dominion of Canada".[66]
Free trade
[edit]Britain persisted in its free trade policy even as its major rivals, the US and Germany, turned to high tariffs (as did Canada). American heavy industry grew faster than Britain, and by the 1890s was crowding British machinery and other products out of the world market.[67] London, however, remained the world's financial center, even as much of its investment was directed toward American railways. The Americans remained far behind the British in international shipping and insurance.[68]
The American economic "invasion" of the British home market demanded a response.[69] British conservatives promoted what they called "tariff reform", which consisted of raising the tariff, especially from countries outside the British Empire. Liberals counterattacked by portraying tariff reform as unpatriotic.[70] Tariffs were finally imposed in the 1930s. Without tariffs to protect them, British businessmen were obliged to lose their market or else rethink and modernise their operations. For example, the boot and shoe industry faced increasing imports of American footwear; Americans took over the market for shoe machinery. British companies realised they had to meet the competition so they re-examined their traditional methods of work, labour utilisation, and industrial relations, and to rethink how to market footwear in terms of the demand for fashion.[71]
Venezuelan and Alaska border disputes
[edit]In 1895 a new crisis erupted in South America. A border dispute between British Guiana and Venezuela caused a crisis when Washington spoke out to take Venezuela's side. Propaganda sponsored by Venezuela convinced American public opinion that the British were infringing on Venezuelan territory. Prime Minister Salisbury stood firm. The crisis escalated when President Grover Cleveland, citing the Monroe Doctrine, issued an ultimatum in late 1895. Salisbury's cabinet convinced him he had to go to arbitration. Both sides calmed down and the issue was quickly resolved through arbitration which largely upheld the British position on the legal boundary line. Salisbury remained angry but a consensus was reached in London, led by Lord Landsdowne, to seek much friendlier relations with the United States.[72][73] By standing with a Latin American nation against the encroachment of the British, the US improved relations with the Latin Americans, and the cordial manner of the procedure improved diplomatic relations with Britain.[74]
The Olney-Pauncefote Treaty of 1897 was a proposed treaty between the US and Britain in 1897 that required arbitration of major disputes. Despite wide public and elite support, the treaty was rejected by the US Senate, which was jealous of its prerogatives, and never went into effect.[75]
Arbitration was used to settle the dispute over the boundary between Alaska and Canada, but the Canadians felt betrayed by the result. American and Russian diplomats drawing up the treaty for the Alaska Purchase of 1867 drew the boundary between Canada and Alaska in ambiguous fashion. With the gold rush into the Canadian Yukon in 1898, miners had to enter through Alaska. Canada wanted the boundary redrawn to obtain its own seaport. Canada rejected the American offer of a long-term lease on an American port. The issue went to arbitration and the Alaska boundary dispute was finally resolved by an arbitration in 1903. The decision favoured the US when the British judge sided with the three American judges against the two Canadian judges on the arbitration panel. Canadian public opinion was outraged that their interests were sacrificed by London for the benefit of British-American harmony.[76]
The Great Rapprochement
[edit]The Great Rapprochement is the convergence of social and political objectives between London and Washington from 1895 until World War I began in 1914. This was despite a large Irish Catholic element in the United States, which provided a major base for demands of Irish independence.[77]
The most notable sign of improving relations during the Great Rapprochement was Britain's actions during the Spanish–American War of 1898. Initially London supported Madrid and its colonial rule over Cuba, since the perceived threat of American occupation and a territorial acquisition of Cuba by the United States might harm British trade and commercial interests within its own possessions in the West Indies. However, after the United States made genuine assurances that it would grant Cuba's independence (which eventually occurred in 1902), the British abandoned this policy and ultimately sided with the United States, unlike most other European powers who supported Spain. In return Washington supported Britain during the Boer War, although many Americans favored the Boers.[78]
Victory in the Spanish–American War had given the United States an imperialistic influence overseas. The US and Britain supported the Open Door Policy in China, blocking the expansion of other empires. Both nations contributed soldiers to the Eight-Nation Alliance which suppressed the Boxer Rebellion in China in 1900.[79]
The naval blockade of several months (1902-1903) imposed against Venezuela by Britain, Germany and Italy over President Cipriano Castro's refusal to pay foreign debts and damages suffered by European citizens in a recent failed civil war. Castro assumed that the Monroe Doctrine would see the US prevent European military intervention, but at the time President Theodore Roosevelt saw the Doctrine as concerning European seizure of territory, rather than intervention per se. Roosevelt also was concerned with the threat of penetration into the region by Germany and Britain. With Castro failing to back down under US pressure and increasingly negative British and American press reactions to the affair, President Roosevelt persuaded the blockading nations to agree to a compromise, but maintained the blockade during negotiations over the details of refinancing the debt on Washington Protocols. This incident was a major driver of the Roosevelt Corollary and the subsequent US Big Stick policy and Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America.[80]
In 1907–09, President Roosevelt sent the "Great White Fleet" on an international tour, to demonstrate the power projection of the United States' blue-water navy, which had become second only to the Royal Navy in size and firepower.[81][82]
World War I
[edit]The United States had a policy of strict neutrality and was willing to export any product to any country. Germany could not import anything due to the British blockade and British control over exports to neutral countries neighboring Germany. American trade escalated to the Allied Powers, especially in farm products. British purchases were financed by the sale of American assets owned by the British. When that was exhausted the British borrowed heavily from New York banks. When that credit ran dry in late 1916, a financial crisis was at hand for Britain.[83]
American public opinion moved steadily against Germany, especially in the wake of the Belgian atrocities in 1914 and the sinking of the RMS Lusitania in 1915. The large German American and Irish Catholic element called for staying out of the war, but the German Americans were increasingly marginalised. Berlin renewed unrestricted submarine warfare in 1917 knowing it would lead to war with the US. Germany's invitation to Mexico to join in war against the US in the Zimmermann Telegram was the last straw, and the US declared war in April 1917. The Balfour Mission in April and May tried to promote cooperation between the UK and US. The Americans planned to send money, food and munitions, but it soon became clear that millions of soldiers would be needed to decide the war on the Western Front.[84]
The US sent two million soldiers to Europe under the command of General John J. Pershing, with more on the way as the war ended.[85] Many of the Allied forces were skeptical of the competence of the American Expeditionary Force, which in 1917 was severely lacking in training and experience. By summer 1918, the American doughboys were arriving at 10,000 a day, as the German forces were shrinking because they had run out of manpower.
In December 1918 after victory in the World War, President Wilson told a British official in London: “You must not speak of us who come over here as cousins, still less as brothers; we are neither. Neither must you think of us as Anglo-Saxons, for that term can no longer be rightly applied to the people of the United States....There are only two things which can establish and maintain closer relations between your country and mine: they are community of ideals and of interests."[86] The first summit conference took place in London in late 1918, between Wilson and Prime Minister David Lloyd George. It went poorly, as Wilson distrusted Lloyd George as a schemer, and Lloyd George grumbled that the president was excessively moralistic. The two did work together at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919, as part of the Big Four. They moderated the demands of French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau to permanently weaken Germany's new Weimar Republic. Lloyd George later quipped that sitting between them was like "being seated between Jesus Christ and Napoleon".[87]
John W. Davis (1873-1955) served as Wilson's ambassador from 1918 to 1921. A Southerner from West Virginia, he reflected deep Southern support for Wilsonianism, based on a reborn patriotism, a distrust of the Republican Party, and a resurgence of Anglophilism. Davis proselytized in London for the League of Nations based on his paternalistic belief that peace depended primarily on Anglo-American friendship and leadership. He was disappointed by Wilson's mismanagement of the treaty ratification and by Republican isolationism and distrust of the League.[88]
Inter-war years
[edit]Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the level of mutual hostility was moderately high. The British diplomatic establishment largely distrusted the United States for a series of reasons. They included British suspicion of America's newfound global power, intentions and reliability. Specific frictions included the American rejection of the League of Nations, the refusal to cancel the war debts owed by Britain to the US treasury, the high American tariff of 1930, and especially Franklin Roosevelt's sudden devastating withdrawal from the 1933 London economic conference, In both countries, the other side lost popularity. Americans disliked the British Empire, particularly its rule in India. Though Irish independence removed the main source of Anglo-American tensions, the Irish-American community was nevertheless slow to drop its historic antagonism. Roosevelt himself publicly stated his support for the self-determination of colonized countries.[89]
Despite the frictions, London realized the United States was now the strongest power, and made it a cardinal principle of British foreign-policy to "cultivate the closest relations with the United States". As a result, Britain decided not to renew its military alliance with Japan, which was becoming a major rival to the United States in the Pacific.[90]
President Warren Harding sponsored a successful Washington Naval Conference in 1922 that largely ended the naval arms race for a decade. The rise of American naval power in 1916-1918 marked the end of the Royal Navy's superiority, an eclipse acknowledged in the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922, when the United States and Britain agreed to equal tonnage quotas on warships. By 1932, the 1922 treaty was not renewed and Britain, Japan and the US were again in a naval race.[91]
In 1924, the aristocratic diplomat Esmé Howard returned to Washington as ambassador. Puzzled at first by the provincial background and eccentric style of President Calvin Coolidge, Howard came to like and trust the president, realizing that he was conciliatory and eager to find solutions to mutual problems, such as the Liquor Treaty of 1924 which diminished friction over smuggling. Washington was greatly pleased when Britain ended its alliance with Japan.[92] Both nations were pleased when in 1923 the wartime debt problem was compromised on satisfactory terms. London renegotiated its £978 million debt to the US Treasury by promising regular payments of £34 million for ten years then £40 million for 52 years. The idea was for the US to loan money to Germany, which in turn paid reparations to Britain, which in turn paid off its loans from the US government. In 1931 all German payments ended, and in 1932 Britain suspended its payments to the US, which angered American public opinion. The British debt was finally repaid after 1945.[93]
The League of Nations was established, but Wilson refused to negotiate with Republican supporters of the League. They objected to the provision that allowed the League to force the United States to join in a war declared by the League without the approval of Congress or the president. The Treaty of Versailles was defeated in the Senate. The United States never joined the League, leaving Britain and France to dominate the organization. In any case, it had very little effect on major issues and was replaced in 1946 with a United Nations, Largely designed by Roosevelt and his staff, in which both Britain and the United States had veto power.[94] Major conferences, especially the Washington Conference of 1922 occurred outside League auspices. The US refused to send official delegates to League committees, instead sending unofficial "observers".
Coolidge was impressed with the success of the Washington Naval Conference of 1921–22, and called the second international conference in 1927 to deal with related naval issues, especially putting limits on the number of warships under 10,000 tons. The conference met in Geneva. It failed because France refused to participate, and most of the delegates were admirals who did not want to limit their fleets.[95] Coolidge listened to his own admirals, but President Hoover did not, and in 1930 did achieve a naval agreement with Britain.[96] A second summit took place between President Herbert Hoover and Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald in the United States in 1929. Both men were seriously devoted to peace, and the meeting went smoothly in discussions regarding naval arms limitations, and the application of the Kellogg–Briand Pact peace pact of 1928. One result was the successful London Naval Treaty of 1930, which continued the warship limitations among the major powers first set out in 1922.[97]
During the Great Depression, starting in late 1929, the US was preoccupied with its own internal affairs and economic recovery, espousing an isolationist policy. When the US raised tariffs in 1930, the British retaliated by raising their tariffs against outside countries (such as the US) while giving special trade preferences inside the Commonwealth. The US demanded these special trade preferences be ended in 1946 in exchange for a large loan.[98]
From 1929 to 1932, the overall world total of all trade plunged by over two-thirds, while trade between the US and Britain shrank from $848 million to $288 million, a decline of two-thirds (66%). Proponents of the high 1930 tariff it never expected this, and support for high tariffs rapidly eroded.[99]
When Britain in 1933 called a worldwide London Economic Conference to help resolve the depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt stunned the world by suddenly refusing to cooperate, ending Conference usefulness overnight.[100]
Tensions over the Irish question faded with the independence of the Irish Free State in 1922. The American Irish had achieved their goal, and in 1938 their most outstanding spokesmen Joseph P. Kennedy, a Democrat close to Roosevelt, became ambassador to the Court of St. James's. He moved in high London society and his daughter married into the aristocracy. Kennedy supported the Neville Chamberlain policy of appeasement toward Germany, and when the war began he advised Washington that prospects for Britain's survival were bleak. When Winston Churchill came to power in 1940, Kennedy lost all his influence in London and Washington.[101][102] Washington analysts paid more attention to the measured optimism of Lieutenant Colonel Bradford G. Chynoweth, the War Department's military attache in London.[103]
World War II
[edit]Although many of the American people were sympathetic to Britain during the war with Nazi Germany, there was widespread opposition to American intervention in European affairs. This was reflected in a series of Neutrality Acts ratified by the United States Congress in 1935, 1936, and 1937. However, President Roosevelt's policy of cash-and-carry still allowed Britain and France to order munitions from the United States and carry them home. As ambassador to the United States in 1939–40, Lord Lothian supported Lend-Lease and urged Prime Minister Winston Churchill to work more closely with President Franklin Roosevelt. His success can be attributed to his understanding of American politics and culture, his skills in traditional diplomacy, his role as intermediary between Churchill and Roosevelt, and the efficiency of Britain's wartime propaganda agencies.[104][105]
Winston Churchill, who had long warned against Nazi Germany and demanded rearmament, became prime minister after his predecessor Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasement had totally collapsed and Britain was unable to reverse the German invasion of Norway in April 1940. After the fall of France in June 1940, Roosevelt gave Britain and (after June 1941) the Soviet Union all aid short of war. The Destroyers for Bases Agreement which was signed in September 1940, gave the United States a 99-year rent-free lease of numerous land and air bases throughout the British Empire in exchange for the Royal Navy receiving 50 old destroyers from the United States Navy. Beginning in March 1941, the United States enacted Lend-Lease in the form of tanks, fighter airplanes, munitions, bullets, food, and medical supplies. Britain received $31.4 billion out of a total of $50.1 billion sent to the Allies. Roosevelt insisted on avoiding the blunder that Wilson had made in the First World War of setting up the financing as loans that had to be repaid by the recipients. Lend lease aid was freely given, with no payments. There were also cash loans were repaid at low rates over a half-century.[106][107]
Summit meetings became a standard practice starting with August 1941, when Churchill and Roosevelt met in Newfoundland, and announced the Atlantic Charter. It became a fundamental document—All the Allies had to sign it—and it led to the formation of the United Nations. Shortly after the Pearl Harbor attack, Churchill spent several weeks in Washington with the senior staff hammering out wartime strategy with the American counterparts at the Arcadia Conference. They set up the Combined Chiefs of Staff to plot and coordinate strategy and operations. Military cooperation was close and successful.[108]
Technical collaboration was even closer, as the two nations shared secrets and weapons regarding the proximity fuze (fuse) and radar, as well as airplane engines, Nazi codes, and the atomic bomb.[109][110][111]
Millions of American servicemen were based in Britain during the war. Americans were paid five times more than comparable British servicemen, which led to a certain amount of friction with British men and intermarriage with British women.[112]
In 1945 Britain sent a portion of the British fleet to assist the planned October invasion of Japan by the United States, but this was cancelled when Japan was forced to surrender unconditionally in August.
Pre-Independence India
[edit]Serious tension erupted over American demands that India be given independence, a proposition Churchill vehemently rejected. For years Roosevelt had encouraged Britain's disengagement from India. The American position was based on principled opposition to colonialism, practical concern for the outcome of the war, and the expectation of a large American role in a post-colonial era. In 1942 when the Congress Party launched a Quit India movement, the colonial authorities arrested tens of thousands of activists (including Mahatma Gandhi). Meanwhile, India became the main American staging base for aid to China. Churchill threatened to resign if Roosevelt continued to push his demands, and Roosevelt backed down.[113][114] Churchill was a believer in the integrity of the British Empire, but he was voted out of office in the summer of 1945. Attlee's new Labour government was much more favorable toward Indian aspirations. The process of de-colonization was highlighted by the independence Britain granted to India, Pakistan and Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) in 1947. The United States approved, but provided no financial or diplomatic support.[115][116]
Postwar financial troubles and The Marshall Plan (1945-1952)
[edit]In the aftermath of the war Britain faced a deep financial crisis, whereas the United States enjoyed an economic boom. The United States continued to finance the British treasury after the war. Much of this aid was designed to restore infrastructure and help refugees. Britain received an emergency loan of $3.75 billion in 1946; it was a 50-year loan with a low 2% interest rate.[117] A more permanent solution was the Marshall Plan of 1948–51, which poured $13 billion into western Europe, of which $3.3 billion went to Britain to help modernise its infrastructure and business practices. The aid was a gift and carried requirements that Britain balance its budget, control tariffs and maintain adequate currency reserves.[118] The American goals for the Marshall plan were to help rebuild the postwar economy in Europe, help modernize the economies, and minimize trade barriers. When the Soviet Union refused to participate or allow its satellites to participate, the Marshall plan became an element of the emerging Cold War. The British Labour government was an enthusiastic participant.[119][120][121]
There were political tensions between the two nations regarding Marshall plan requirements.[122] London was dubious about Washington's emphasis on European economic integration as the solution to postwar recovery. Integration with Europe at this point would mean cutting close ties to the emerging Commonwealth. London tried to convince Washington that American economic aid, especially to the sterling currency area, was necessary to solve the dollar shortage. British economists argued that their position was validated by 1950 as European industrial production exceeded prewar levels. Washington demanded convertibility of sterling currency on July 15, 1947, which produced a severe financial crisis for Britain. Convertibility was suspended on August 20, 1947. However, by 1950, American rearmament and heavy spending on the Korean War and Cold War finally ended the dollar shortage.[123] The balance of payment problems for the postwar government was caused less by economic decline and more by political overreach, according to Jim Tomlinson.[124]
Truman doctrine and emerging Cold War 1947–1953
[edit]The Labour government, which was alarmed at the threat of Communism in the Balkans, implored the US to take over the British role in the Greek Civil War, which led to the Truman Doctrine in 1947, with financial and military aid to Greece and Turkey as Britain withdrew from the region.[125]
The need to form a united front against the Soviet threat compelled the US and Britain to cooperate in helping to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organization with their European allies. NATO is a mutual defence alliance whereby an attack on one member country is deemed an attack on all members.
The United States had an anti-colonial and anti-communist stance in its foreign policy throughout the Cold War. Military forces from the United States and the United Kingdom were heavily involved in the Korean War, fighting under a United Nations mandate. A military stalemate finally led to an armistice that ended the fighting in 1953. During the same year British and American intelligence agencies worked together and were instrumental in supporting the 1953 Iranian coup d'état whereby the Iranian military restored the Shah to power.[126]
In 1954 the US attempted to help the beleaguered French Army at the height of the Battle of Dien Bien Phu in Vietnam. They planned Operation Vulture; a planned aerial assault on the opposing communist Viet Minh siege positions. President Dwight D. Eisenhower made American participation reliant on British support, but Foreign Secretary Sir Anthony Eden was opposed and Vulture was reluctantly cancelled.[127][128] With the fall of Dien Bien Phu the US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles fell out with Eden. He left the 1954 Geneva Conference, leaving the US to avoid direct association with the negotiations that led to the creation of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam.[129]
Angry denial: the Suez Crisis of 1956
[edit]The Suez Crisis erupted in October 1956 after Britain, France and Israel invaded Egypt to regain control of the Suez Canal. Eisenhower had repeatedly warned London against any such action, and feared a collapse of Western influence in the region. Furthermore, there was risk of a wider war, after the Soviet Union threatened to intervene on the Egyptian side and did invade Hungary to suppress a revolt. Washington responded with heavy financial and diplomatic pressure to force the invaders to withdraw. British post-war debt was so large that economic sanctions could have caused a devaluation of sterling. This would be a disaster and when it became clear that the international sanctions were serious, the invaders withdrew. Anthony Eden soon resigned as prime minister, leaving office with a ruined reputation. The world noted Britain's fall from status in the Middle East and worldwide. Anglo-American cooperation fell to the lowest point since the 1890s.[130][131][132]
However, the new prime minister Harold Macmillan (1957–1963) restored good terms with Eisenhower and President John F. Kennedy (1961–1963). Intimacy and warmth characterized his relationship with the latter who appointed David K. E. Bruce as ambassador.[133]
Lyndon Johnson and Harold Wilson: 1963–1969
[edit]After Kennedy's assassination President Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969) kept ambassador Bruce but ignored all his recommendations. Bruce sought closer ties with Britain and greater European unity. Bruce's reports regarding Britain's financial condition were pessimistic and alarmist. With regard to Vietnam, Bruce privately questioned US involvement and constantly urged the Johnson administration to allow Britain more of a role in bringing the conflict to an end.[134] The British ambassador was Sir Patrick Dean (1965-1969). Dean was preoccupied with sharp difficulties over Vietnam and British military commitments east of Suez. He promoted mutual understanding but was largely ignored by Johnson because the traditional Anglo-American relationship was decaying and Johnson disliked diplomats.[citation needed] London, furthermore, relied less and less on ambassadors and embassies.[135]
Through the US-UK Mutual Defence Agreement signed in 1958, the UK and US resumed military technological cooperation on nuclear weapons, which had been prevented by the 1946 US Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (otherwise known as the Mcmahon Act). Britain's independent nuclear programme was increasingly hampered by funding issues, and the cancellation of the British Blue Streak ballistic missile in 1960 necessitated the purchase of the US Skybolt system. In April 1963, the Polaris Sales Agreement established a basis for the sale of the US UGM-27 Polaris ballistic missile for use in the Royal Navy's submarine fleet starting in 1968.[136]
The American containment policy called for military resistance to the expansion of communism, and the Vietnam War became the main battlefield in the 1950s down to the communist victory in 1975. Prime Minister Harold Wilson (1964-1970) believed in a strong "Special Relationship" and wanted to highlight his dealings with the White House to strengthen his own prestige as a statesman. President Lyndon B. Johnson disliked Wilson, and ignored any "special" relationship.[citation needed] He agreed to provide financial help but he strongly opposed British plans to devalue the pound and withdraw military units east of Suez.[137] As the American military involvement deepened after 1964, Johnson repeatedly asked for British ground units to validate international support for American intervention. Wilson never sent troops, but British intelligence, training in jungle warfare, and verbal support was provided. He also took the initiative in attempting numerous mediation schemes, typically involving Russian intervention, none of which gained traction.[138] Wilson's policy divided the Labour Party; the Conservative opposition generally supported the American position on Vietnam. Issues of foreign policy were rarely salient in general elections.[disputed – discuss][139] Wilson and Johnson also differed sharply on British economic weakness and its declining status as a world power. Historian Jonathan Colman concludes it made for the most unsatisfactory "special" relationship in the 20th century.[140]
The tone of the relationship was set early on when Johnson sent Secretary of State Dean Rusk as head of the American delegation to the state funeral of Winston Churchill in January 1965, rather than the new vice president, Hubert Humphrey. Johnson himself had been hospitalized with influenza and advised by his doctors against attending the funeral.[141][142] This perceived slight generated much criticism against the president, both in the UK and in the US.[143][144] Johnson said during a press conference that not sending Humphrey was a "mistake."[144][145]
1970s
[edit]Edward Heath (Prime minister 1970–74) and Richard Nixon (President 1969–74) maintained a close working relationship.[146] Heath deviated from his predecessors by supporting Nixon's decision to bomb Hanoi and Haiphong in Vietnam in April 1972.[147] Nevertheless, relations deteriorated noticeably during the early 1970s. Throughout his premiership, Heath insisted on using the phrase "natural relationship" instead of "special relationship" to refer to Anglo-American relations, acknowledging the historical and cultural similarities but carefully denying anything special beyond that.[148] Heath was determined to restore a measure of equality to Anglo-American relations which the United States had increasingly dominated as the power and economy of the United Kingdom flagged in the post-colonial era.[149]
Heath's renewed push for British admittance to the European Economic Community (EEC) brought new tensions between the United Kingdom and the United States. French President Charles De Gaulle, who believed that British entry would allow undue American influence on the organisation, had vetoed previous British attempts at entry. Heath's final bid benefited from the more moderate views of Georges Pompidou, De Gaulle's successor as President of France, and his own Eurocentric foreign policy schedule. The Nixon administration viewed this bid as a pivot away from close ties with the United States in favour of continental Europe. After Britain's admission to the EEC in 1973, Heath confirmed this interpretation by notifying his American counterparts that the United Kingdom would henceforth be formulating European policies with other EEC members before discussing them with the United States. Furthermore, Heath indicated his potential willingness to consider a nuclear partnership with France and questioned what the United Kingdom got in return for American use of British military and intelligence facilities worldwide.[150] In return, Nixon and his Secretary of State Henry Kissinger briefly cut off the Anglo-American intelligence tap in August 1973.[151] Kissinger then attempted to restore American influence in Europe with his abortive 1973 "Year of Europe" policy plan to update the NATO agreements. Members of the Heath administration, including Heath himself in later years, regarded this announcement with derision.[152]
In 1973, American and British officials disagreed in their handling of the Arab-Israeli Yom Kippur War. While the Nixon administration immediately increased military aid to Israel, Heath maintained British neutrality in the conflict and imposed a British arms embargo on all combatants, which mostly hindered the Israelis by preventing them obtaining spares for their Centurion tanks. Anglo-American disagreement intensified over Nixon's unilateral decision to elevate American forces, stationed at British bases, to DEFCON 3 status on October 25 in response to the breakdown of the United Nations ceasefire.[153] Heath disallowed American intelligence gathering, resupplying, or refueling from British bases in Cyprus, which greatly limited the effective range of American reconnaissance planes.[154] In return, Kissinger imposed a second intelligence cutoff over this disagreement and some in the administration even suggested that the United States should refuse to assist in the British missile upgrade to the Polaris system.[155] Tensions between the United States and United Kingdom relaxed as the second ceasefire took effect. Wilson's return to power in 1974 helped to return Anglo-American relations to normality.
On July 23, 1977, officials from the United Kingdom and the United States renegotiated the previous Bermuda I Agreement, and signed the Bermuda II Agreement under which only four airlines, two from the United Kingdom and two from the United States, were allowed to operate flights between London Heathrow Airport and specified "gateway cities" in the United States. The Bermuda II Agreement was in effect for nearly 30 years until it was eventually replaced by the EU-US Open Skies Agreement, which was signed on April 30, 2007, and entered into effect on March 30, 2008.
1980s
[edit]Margaret Thatcher (Prime Minister, 1979–1990) and Ronald Reagan (President, 1981–1989) bonded quickly. According to David Cannadine:
- In many ways they were very different figures: he was sunny, genial, charming, relaxed, upbeat, and with little intellectual curiosity or command of policy detail; she was domineering, belligerent, confrontational, tireless, hyperactive, and with an unrivalled command of facts and figures. But the chemistry between them worked. Reagan had been grateful for her interest in him at a time when the British establishment refused to take him seriously; she agreed with him about the importance of creating wealth, cutting taxes, and building up stronger defences against Soviet Russia; and both believed in liberty and free-market freedom, and in the need to outface what Reagan would later call 'the evil empire'.[156]
Throughout the 1980s, Thatcher was strongly supportive of Reagan's unwavering stance towards the Soviet Union. Often described as "political soulmates" and a high point in the "Special Relationship", Reagan and Thatcher met many times throughout their political careers, speaking in concert when confronting Soviet general secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. During the Soviet–Afghan War, Britain was covertly involved and helped support the US military and financial aid to the anti communist mujaheddin insurgents in Operation Cyclone.
In 1982, the British Government made a request to the United States, which the Americans agreed upon in principle, to sell the Trident II D5 ballistic missile, associated equipment, and related system support for use on four Vanguard-class nuclear submarines in the Royal Navy. The Trident II D5 ballistic missile replaced the United Kingdom's previous use of the UGM-27 Polaris ballistic missile, beginning in the mid-1990s.[157]
In the Falklands War in 1982, the United States initially tried to mediate between the United Kingdom and Argentina, but ended up supporting the United Kingdom's counter-invasion. The US supplied the British Armed Forces with equipment as well as logistical support.[158]
In October 1983, the United States and an Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States coalition undertook Operation Urgent Fury, the invasion of the Commonwealth island nation of Grenada following a Marxist coup. Neighboring countries in the region asked the United States to intervene militarily, which it did successfully despite having made assurances to a deeply resentful British Government.
On April 15, 1986, the US military under President Reagan launched Operation El Dorado Canyon, a bombing of Tripoli and Benghazi in Libya, from Royal Air Force stations in England with the permission of Prime Minister Thatcher. It was a counter-attack by the United States in response to Libyan state-sponsored terrorism directed towards civilians and American servicemen under Muammar Gaddafi, especially the 1986 West Berlin discotheque bombing.[159]
On December 21, 1988, Pan American Worldways' Flight 103 from London Heathrow Airport to New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport exploded over the town of Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 189 Americans and 40 Britons on board. The motive that is generally attributed to Libya can be traced back to a series of military confrontations with the United States Navy in the 1980s in the Gulf of Sidra, the whole of which Libya claimed as its territorial waters. Despite a guilty verdict on January 31, 2001, by the Scottish High Court of Justiciary which ruled against Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the bomber, on charges of murder and conspiracy to commit murder, Libya never formally admitted carrying out the 1988 bombing over Scotland until 2003.
During the Soviet–Afghan War, the United States and the United Kingdom throughout the 1980s provided arms to the Mujahideen rebels in Afghanistan until the last troops from the Soviet Union left Afghanistan in February 1989.[160]
Post-Cold War
[edit]When the United States became the world's lone superpower after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, new threats emerged which confronted the United States and its NATO allies. With military build-up beginning in August 1990 and the use of force beginning in January 1991, the United States, followed at a distance by Britain, provided the two largest forces respectively for the coalition army which liberated Kuwait from Saddam Hussein's regime during the Persian Gulf War.
In the 1997 general election, the British Labour Party was elected to office for the first time in eighteen years. The new prime minister, Tony Blair, and Bill Clinton both used the expression "Third Way" to describe their centre-left ideologies. In August 1997, the American people expressed solidarity with the British people, sharing in their grief and sense of shock on the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, who perished in a car crash in Paris. Throughout 1998 and 1999, the United States and Britain sent troops to impose peace during the Kosovo War. Tony Blair made it a point to develop very close relationships with the White House.[161]
War on Terror and Iraq War
[edit]Sixty-seven Britons were among the 2,977 victims killed during the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and elsewhere on September 11, 2001. Al-Qaeda was the attacker. Following the attacks, there was an enormous outpouring of sympathy from the United Kingdom for the American people, and Blair was one of Bush's strongest international supporters for military action against Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Indeed, Blair became the most articulate spokesman. President Bush told Congress that "America has no truer friend than Great Britain".[162]
The United States declared a War on Terror following the attacks. British forces participated in NATO's war in Afghanistan. Blair took the lead (against the opposition of France, Canada, Germany, China, and Russia) in advocating the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Again, Britain was second only to the US in sending forces to Iraq. Both sides wound down after 2009, and withdrew their last troops in 2011. President Bush and Prime Minister Blair provided sustained mutual political and diplomatic support and won votes in Congress and parliament against their critics at home.[163] During this period Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said that "America has no finer ally than the United Kingdom."[164]
The 7 July 2005 London bombings emphasised the difference in the nature of the terrorist threat to both nations. The United States concentrated primarily on global enemies, like the al-Qaeda network and other Islamic extremists from the Middle East. The London bombings were carried out by homegrown extremist Muslims, and it emphasised the United Kingdom's threat from the radicalisation of its own people.
After claims by Liberty that British airports had been used by the CIA for extraordinary rendition flights, the Association of Chief Police Officers launched an investigation in November 2005. The report was published in June 2007 and found no evidence to support the claim. This was on the same day the Council of Europe released its report with evidence that the UK had colluded in extraordinary rendition, thus directly contradicting ACPO's findings.[165] A 2018 report by the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament found the United Kingdom, specifically the MI5 and MI6, to be complicit in many of the renditions done by the US, having helped fund them, supplying them with intelligence and knowingly allowing them to happen.[166]
By 2007, support amongst the British public for the Iraq war had plummeted.[167] Despite Tony Blair's historically low approval ratings with the British people, mainly due to allegations of faulty government intelligence of Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction, his unapologetic and unwavering stance for the British alliance with the United States can be summed up in his own words. He said, "We should remain the closest ally of the US ... not because they are powerful, but because we share their values."[168] The alliance between George W. Bush and Tony Blair seriously damaged the prime minister's standing in the eyes of many British citizens.[169] Tony Blair argued it was in the United Kingdom's interest to "protect and strengthen the bond" with the United States regardless of who is in the White House.[170] A perception that the relationship was unequal led to use of the term "Poodle-ism" in the British media, that Britain and its leaders were lapdogs to the Americans.[171][172]
On June 11, 2009, the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda accepted four Chinese Uighurs from the American detainment facility at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba.[173] All had been captured by during the United States-led invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001. This decision angered London, as British officials felt they should have been consulted.[174]
Tension with Scotland
[edit]On August 20, 2009, The Scottish Government headed by First Minister Alex Salmond announced that it would release Abdelbaset al-Megrahi on medical grounds. He was the only person convicted in the terrorist plot which killed 190 Americans and 43 Britons on Pan American Worldways' Flight 103 over the town of Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988. He was sentenced to life in prison in 2001, but was now released after being diagnosed with terminal cancer, with around three months to live. Americans said the decision was uncompassionate and insensitive to the memory of the victims of the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. President Barack Obama said that the decision was "highly objectionable".[175] US Ambassador Louis Susman said that although the decision made by Scotland was extremely regrettable, relations with the United Kingdom would remain fully intact and strong.[176] The British government led by Gordon Brown was not involved in the release and Prime Minister Brown stated at a press conference his government had played 'no role' in the Scottish decision.[177] Abdelbaset al-Megrahi died May 20, 2012, at the age of 60.
Present status
[edit]British policy is that the relationship with the United States represents the United Kingdom's "most important bilateral relationship" in the world.[1] United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton paid tribute to the relationship in February 2009 by saying, "it stands the test of time".[178]
John Dumbrell wrote in 2006:
Any confidence in the absence of British anti-Americanism is misplaced. British attitudes towards the US often exhibit cultural snobbery, envy, crude stereotyping and resentment at America's power in the world. Such attitudes do not, as we will see demonstrated in public opinion surveys, amount to a rabid hostility. In many ways, they are understandable expressions of group feeling towards an everpresent and powerful 'other'. Many of these attitudes – that, for example, the US is the land both of rampant, destructive individualism and of homogenized sameness – are inherently contradictory. It is absurd, however, to pretend that they do not exist.[179]
Obama administration 2009–2017
[edit]On March 3, 2009, Gordon Brown made his first visit to the White House. During his visit, he presented the president a gift in the form of a pen holder carved from HMS Gannet, which served anti-slavery missions off the coast of Africa. Barack Obama's gift to the prime minister was a box of 25 DVDs with movies including Star Wars and E.T. The wife of the prime minister, Sarah Brown, gave the Obama daughters, Sasha and Malia, two dresses from British clothing retailer Topshop, and a few unpublished books that have not reached the United States. Michelle Obama gave the prime minister's sons two Marine One helicopter toys.[180] During this visit to the United States, Gordon Brown made an address to a joint session of the United States Congress, a privilege rarely accorded to foreign heads of government.
In March 2009, a Gallup poll of Americans showed 36% identified Britain as their country's "most valuable ally", followed by Canada, Japan, Israel, and Germany rounding out the top five.[181] The poll also indicated that 89% of Americans view the United Kingdom favourably, second only to Canada with 90%.[181] According to the Pew Research Center, a global survey conducted in July 2009 revealed that 70% of Britons who responded had a favourable view of the United States.[182]
In 2010, Obama stated "the United States has no closer friend and ally than the United Kingdom, and I reiterated my deep and personal commitment to the special relationship between our two countries."[183]
In February 2011, The Daily Telegraph, based on evidence from WikiLeaks, reported that the United States had tendered sensitive information about the British Trident nuclear arsenal (whose missile delivery systems are manufactured and maintained in the United States) to the Russian Federation as part of a deal to encourage Russia to ratify the New START Treaty. Professor Malcolm Chalmers of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies speculated that serial numbers could undermine Britain's non-verification policy by providing Russia "with another data point to gauge the size of the British arsenal".[184]
On May 25, 2011, during his official visit to the UK, Obama reaffirmed the relationship between the United Kingdom and the United States of America in an address to Parliament at Westminster Hall. Amongst other points, Obama stated: "I've come here today to reaffirm one of the oldest; one of the strongest alliances the World has ever known. It's long been said that the United States and the United Kingdom share a special relationship."[185]
In the final days before the Scottish independence referendum in September 2014, Obama announced in public the vested interest of the United States of America in enjoying the continued partnership with a 'strong and united' UK which he described as "one of the closest allies we will ever have".[186]
During a joint press conference with Prime Minister Theresa May, Obama stated "The bottom line is, is that we don't have a stronger partner anywhere in the world than the United Kingdom."[187]
First Trump administration 2017–2021
[edit]President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May aimed to continue the United Kingdom–United States special relationship. May was the first foreign leader Trump hosted in Washington after taking office[188] and UKIP leader Nigel Farage was the first foreign politician Trump met with after winning the presidential election, when he was still President-elect.[189] However, Trump was the subject of popular protests in Britain even before he took office, particularly because of his anti-immigration proposals, misogyny and racism.[190] During his presidency there were protests when he was inaugurated,[191][192] when he announced his first immigration ban on citizens from certain Muslim countries,[193] and when he said he would recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.[194]
On June 4, 2017, Trump responded to a terror attack on London Bridge by attacking London Mayor Sadiq Khan for saying that there "was no reason to be alarmed". The comments were condemned by Khan who stated that his remarks were deliberately taken out of context in that he was referring to an increased police presence in the days after the attack, which should not alarm the public. Trump also suggested that, "we must stop being politically correct and get down to the business of security for our people".[195]
On November 29, 2017, Trump re-tweeted three videos posted by Jayda Fransen, deputy leader of the far-right nationalist Britain First party. One of the videos, titled 'Muslim immigrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches', was subsequently discredited by the Dutch embassy in the United States. The spokesperson for the Prime Minister said that what the President had done was 'wrong' and Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said that 'hate speech had no place in the UK'. In response, Trump tweeted at the Prime Minister suggesting that she worry about immigration in her own country rather than whom he chose to retweet. White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said that the President attempted to start a conversation about immigration.[196][197]
May was the first foreign leader to visit Trump after his inauguration, and she invited him to make a return visit. More than 1.8 million UK citizens signed a petition to rescind the invitation, and Parliament debated a nonbinding resolution to that effect in February 2017.[198] The visit was tentatively planned for late February 2018, and would include a ceremonial opening of the new American embassy in Nine Elms.[199][200] However, on January 11, 2018, he cancelled the visit and denounced the new embassy in a tweet saying:
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrumpReason I canceled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for "peanuts," only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars. Bad deal. Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO!
January 11, 2018[201]
This was despite the official reason for relocating the embassy due to the security, as the Grosvenor Square site couldn't accommodate the requirements for being 100 ft (30.5 m) away from the street, and the fact that the move was decided by Obama's predecessor Bush, who approved the relocation in 2008.[202][203][204] It was speculated that the real reason for cancelling the visit was due to Trump's unpopularity and the possibility of large protests against him in London.[205]
Trump made a second visit in June 2019, this time as guests of the Queen and to hold talks with May. Thousands protested his visit, just like they did when he made his first trip.[206][207]
On July 7, 2019, secret diplomatic cables from Ambassador Kim Darroch to the British government, dating from 2017 to 2019, were leaked to The Mail on Sunday. They included Darroch's unflattering assessments of the Trump administration, e.g. that it was "inept and insecure".[208] In response, Nigel Farage said Darroch was "totally unsuitable" for office,[209] and Trump tweeted that Darroch was "not liked or well thought of within the US" and that "we will no longer deal with him".[210] The Prime Minister, Theresa May, expressed support for Darroch and ordered a leak inquiry.[211] On July 10, Darroch resigned as Ambassador to the United States. He wrote that "the current situation is making it impossible for me to carry out my role as I would like".[212] Previously, Boris Johnson, the frontrunner in the election to replace May, had declined to publicly back Darroch. Consensus among political commentators in the UK was that this made Darroch's position untenable.[213] May and the leader of the opposition, Jeremy Corbyn, praised Darroch's service in the House of Commons and deplored that he had to resign under pressure from the US.[212]
Controversy over American foods
[edit]This section needs to be updated.(May 2023) |
In 2017, US President Donald Trump appointed pharmaceutical heir Woody Johnson, a financial supporter of his campaign, as ambassador 2017–2021. Johnson advocated for more agricultural trade and the deregulation of US food exports to Britain.[214] In March 2019, Johnson wrote an article in the Daily Telegraph promoting American chlorinated chicken as safe, and stating that health fears over hormone-fed beef were "myths".[215] This came after he urged the UK to open up to the US agriculture market after the British exit from the European Union and ignore the "smear campaign" of those with "their own protectionist agenda".[216]
Johnson was criticised by several British agriculture standard boards, such as the Red Tractor Assurance whose CEO, Jim Moseley stated the UK's food standards were "now under threat from ... the United States food lobby".[217][218] Minette Batters, president of the UK National Farmers Union, agreed with Johnson's claims that chlorine-rinsed chicken was safe for consumption, but stated that factors such as animal welfare and environmental protection also had to be considered.[219] George Eustace, former British agriculture minister told the press:
Agriculture in the US remains quite backward in many respects....Whereas we have a 'farm to fork' approach to managing disease and contamination risk throughout the supply chain through good husbandry, the US is more inclined to simply treat contamination of its meat at the end with a chlorine or similar wash.[220]
Blocking Chinese technology
[edit]In 2020, while the UK was planning to invest in new 5G mobile telecommunications equipment, Washington was openly lobbying and pressuring the British government, to prevent allowing the Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei from installing its equipment in the UK.[221] This was over allegations it will allow the Chinese to espionage in the country, and this might be a break in the Five Eyes intelligence programme. Already since 2003 the UK did allow its telecoms operators such as the incumbent BT to install Huawei equipment in its infrastructure backbone. To prevent any concerns about possible hacking after reports of unusual activity in the Huawei equipment, in 2010 Huawei jointly created with the British intelligence agency GCHQ an equipment investigate centre in the outskirts of Banbury called the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre which is also known by its nickname "the Cell".[222][223] In July 2020 after American pressure, the British government announced that it has banned adding any new Huawei telecoms equipment into the British landline and mobile networks, and request that all companies replace the existing equipment by 2027.[224][225]
Biden administration 2021–present
[edit]Biden's first overseas trip and first face-to-face meeting with a British Prime Minister was at the 2021 G7 Summit, hosted in Cornwall, England in June.[226] Johnson stated "there's so much that [the US] want to do together" with us. The first meeting between the two leaders included plans to re-establish travel links between the US and UK, which had been banned by the US since the start of the pandemic and to agree a deal (the New Atlantic Charter), which commits the countries to working together on "the key challenges of this century - cyber security, emerging technologies, global health and climate change". President Biden explicitly "affirmed the special relationship".[227] The revitalized Atlantic Charter would build "on the commitments and aspirations set out eighty years ago" and also "reaffirm" the "commitment to work together to realise our vision for a more peaceful and prosperous future."[228][229]
The chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan and fall of Kabul in August 2021 had a negative impact on United Kingdom–United States relations,[230] with the British government briefing media against the American government.[231]
AUKUS
[edit]On September 15, 2021, the leaders of the US, the UK and Australia announced "AUKUS":
a new security partnership in the Indo-Pacific, building on the longstanding alliance between the three to share intelligence, deepen cooperation and help Australia build a new nuclear-powered submarine to counter China.[232]
Rejection of new trade agreement
[edit]On September 21, 2021, Boris Johnson stated that he would not commit to a new trade agreement by 2024, stating that President Biden has "a lot of fish to fry."[233]
Trade, investment, and the economy
[edit]The United States accounts for the United Kingdom's largest single export market, buying $57 billion worth of British goods in 2007.[234] Total trade of imports and exports between the United Kingdom and the United States amounted to the sum of $107.2 billion in 2007.[235]
The United States and the United Kingdom share the world's largest foreign direct investment partnership. In 2005, American direct investment in the United Kingdom totaled $324 billion while British direct investment in the United States totaled $282 billion.[236]
In a press conference that made several references to the special relationship, US Secretary of State John Kerry, in London with UK Foreign Secretary William Hague on September 9, 2013, said:
We are not only each other's largest investors in each of our countries, one to the other, but the fact is that every day almost one million people go to work in America for British companies that are in the United States, just as more than one million people go to work here in Great Britain for American companies that are here. So we are enormously tied together, obviously. And we are committed to making both the U.S.-UK and the U.S.-EU relationships even stronger drivers of our prosperity.[237]
Trade agreements
[edit]In 2020, the two countries opened negotiations for a free trade agreement, however talks have been postponed until 2025 at the earliest.[238]
In 2022, with the administration of President Joe Biden uninterested in further negotiations, the United Kingdom began negotiating economic agreements with individual states.[239] Regulation of international trade is a federal responsibility under the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution, preventing state agreements from changing customs rules; therefore, the UK has aimed at signing Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) agreements with the US states. MoUs aim to remove market access barriers and increase trade and investment opportunities for UK and US companies. Former British trade minister Penny Mordaunt claimed that US state-level deals would pave the way for a full UK-US FTA.[240]
No. | Signed | State | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 27 May 2022 | Indiana | [241] |
2 | 20 July 2022 | North Carolina | [242] |
3 | 7 December 2022 | South Carolina | [243] |
4 | 18 April 2023 | Oklahoma | [244] |
5 | 22 June 2023 | Utah | [245] |
6 | 25 September 2023 | Washington | [246] |
7 | 14 November 2023 | Florida | [247][248] |
8 | 13 March 2024 | Texas | [249][250] |
Trade negotiations ongoing:
In June 2023, Biden and Sunak announced the 'Atlantic Declaration' to strengthen economic ties between the UK and the US.[256] The agreement included a limited trade pact covering critical minerals needed for EV batteries and a new data protection deal, in addition to easing trade barriers.[257][258] The declaration commits both nations to increase research collaboration in future technologies, such as AI, future 5G and 6G telecoms, quantum, semiconductors and engineering biology.[259] In addition to a commitment in principle to a new UK-US Data Bridge; that facilitates the transfer of data by UK businesses to certified US organisations.[260]
During the signing of the accession of the United Kingdom to CPTPP on the 16 July 2023, Kemi Badenoch blamed the lack of progress on the UK-US FTA on the change of administration from Donald Trump to Joe Biden after the 2020 election.[261][262]
On 3 October 2023, Biden and Sunak were reported to be preparing a "foundational" trade agreement between the two countries which will be modelled on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, however it will not constitute a free trade agreement under World Trade Organization rules as the proposals do not contain market access commitments.[263] The proposed partnership aims to cover subjects such as digital trade, labour protections and agriculture.[264] On the same day, Badenoch reiterated that there was "zero" chance of a free trade agreement under President Biden's administration, citing his attitude to such deals.[265]
Tourism
[edit]More than 4.5 million Britons visit the United States every year, spending $14 billion. Around 3 million people from the United States visit the United Kingdom every year, spending $10 billion.[266] With the worldwide pandemic of COVID-19, international tourism in both countries collapsed in 2020.
Transportation
[edit]All three major American airlines, American Airlines, United Airlines, and Delta Air Lines fly directly between the US and the UK, principally between London and New York, although all three fly to Heathrow Airport from a number of hubs, as well as to other major UK airports such as Manchester Airport, Edinburgh Airport and Glasgow Airport. Additionally, Delta codeshares with the UK's Virgin Atlantic which it owns a 49% stake in. Low-cost carriers JetBlue and Southwest Airlines fly between the eastern US and the British overseas territories of Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands and the Turks & Caicos Islands, with JetBlue also flying between London and New York. The British flag carrier British Airways flies to over twenty destinations in the US. Also the main British charter airline, TUI Airways fly to the US although principally to the holiday destinations of Florida and California.
Both American Airlines and British Airways are founders of the airline alliance, known as Oneworld. BA, TUI Airways and Virgin Atlantic are major purchasers of American-made Boeing aircraft. Flying between the US and UK is at the moment in 2019 supported by the US-EU Open Skies Agreement which came about in 2008, which allows any airline from both countries to fly between each other.
John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City is the most popular international destination for people flying out of Heathrow Airport. Over 2.8 million people on multiple daily non-stop flights flew from Heathrow to JFK in 2008.[267] Concorde, British Airways flagship supersonic airliner, began trans-Atlantic service to Washington Dulles International Airport in the United States on May 24, 1976. The trans-Atlantic route between London's Heathrow and New York's JFK in under 3½ hours, had its first operational flight between the two hubs on October 19, 1977, and the last being on October 23, 2003.[268]
The two main American intercity bus carriers; Greyhound Lines and during the period from 1999 to 2019 Coach USA, plus their subsidiaries are each owned by a major British transportation company FirstGroup with Greyhound[269] and Stagecoach with Coach USA. Coach USA's budget brand Megabus which started in 2006, itself is a copycat of the British version of the discount coach company that started in 2003.[270]
State and official visits
[edit]In the 20th century, there were 78 formal and informal summits bringing together the president and the prime minister to deal with an agreed-upon agenda. The first was 1918, the second in 1929. The rest began in 1941, which marked the decline of ambassadors as the key transmitters of policy discussions. In three out of four of the summits, the British delegation traveled to America. Summits have become much less important in the 21st century, with its new communication modes.[271]
State visits involving the head of state have been made over the years by four presidents and two monarchs. Queen Elizabeth II has met all the presidents since Truman except Johnson (Queen Elizabeth II and Johnson had arranged for a private meeting at Buckingham Palace during Churchill's funeral, but it was taken away when his doctors advised him against leading the US delegation to the funeral.[141]).[272][142] In addition, the Queen made three private visits in 1984, 1985, and 1991 to see stallion stations and stud farms.[273]
Dates | Monarch and Consort | Locations | Itinerary |
June 7–11, 1939 | King George VI and Queen Elizabeth | Washington, DC, New York City, and Hyde Park | Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, stayed at the White House, laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns in Arlington National Cemetery, visited George Washington's former residence at Mount Vernon, made an appearance at the 1939 World's Fair in New York City, and made a private visit to Franklin Roosevelt's Springwood Estate in New York state. |
October 17–20, 1957 | Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh | Jamestown and Williamsburg, Washington, DC, and New York City | Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, attended the official ceremonies of the 350th anniversary of the settlement of Jamestown, Virginia, and made a brief stop-over in New York City to address the United Nations General Assembly before sailing to the United Kingdom. |
July 6–9, 1976 | Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip | Philadelphia, Washington, DC, New York City, Charlottesville, Virginia, Newport, Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, and Boston | Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, and toured the United States East Coast in conjunction with the United States Bicentennial celebrations aboard HMY Britannia. |
February 26 – March 7, 1983 | Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip | San Diego, Palm Springs, California, Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, California, San Francisco, Yosemite National Park in California, and Seattle | Made an official visit to the United States, toured the United States West Coast aboard HMY Britannia, and made a private visit to Ronald Reagan's retreat, Rancho del Cielo, in the Santa Ynez Mountains. |
May 14–17, 1991 | Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip | Washington, DC, Baltimore, Miami, Tampa, Florida, Austin, Texas, San Antonio, Houston, and Lexington, Kentucky | Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, addressed a joint session of the United States Congress, made a private visit to Kentucky, and toured the Southern United States and visited the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum and met Lady Bird Johnson and family. |
May 3–8, 2007 | Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip | Richmond, Virginia, Jamestown, and Williamsburg (Virginia), Louisville, Kentucky, Greenbelt, Maryland, and Washington, DC | Paid a state visit to Washington, DC, addressed the Virginia General Assembly, attended the official ceremonies of the 400th anniversary of the establishment of Jamestown, toured NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, visited the National World War II Memorial on the National Mall, and made a private visit to Kentucky to attend the 133rd Kentucky Derby. |
July 6, 2010 | Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip | New York City | Made a one-day official visit to the United States to address the United Nations General Assembly, visited the World Trade Center site to pay respects to the victims of the September 11 attacks, and paid homage to British victims of the terrorist attack at the Queen Elizabeth September 11 Garden in Hanover Square. |
Dates | Administration | Locations | Itinerary |
December 26–28, 1918 | Woodrow Wilson and Edith Wilson | London, Carlisle, and Manchester | Made an official visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Buckingham Palace, attended an official dinner, had an audience with King George V and Queen Mary, and made a private visit, called the pilgrimage of the heart, to the ancestral home of his British-born mother, Janet Woodrow. |
June 7–9, 1982 | Ronald Reagan and Nancy Reagan | London and Windsor | Made an official visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Windsor Castle, attended a state banquet, and addressed Parliament. |
November 28 – December 1, 1995 | Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton | London, Belfast, and Derry | Paid an official visit to the United Kingdom, laid a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in Westminster Abbey, and addressed Parliament. |
November 18–21, 2003 | George W. Bush and Laura Bush | London and Sedgefield | Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Buckingham Palace, attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in Westminster Abbey, and made a private visit to Tony Blair's constituency in County Durham. |
May 24–26, 2011 | Barack Obama and Michelle Obama | London | Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at Buckingham Palace, welcomed during an arrival ceremony in Buckingham Palace Gardens, attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior, addressed Parliament, presented wedding gifts to Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, donated a MacBook notebook computers to Peace Players International, met with Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, and Prime Minister David Cameron. |
June 3–5, 2019 | Donald Trump and Melania Trump | London and Portsmouth | Paid a state visit to the United Kingdom, stayed at the Winfield House, welcomed during an arrival ceremony in Buckingham Palace Gardens, attended a state banquet, laid a wreath on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in Westminster Abbey, met with Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister Theresa May. |
Diplomacy
[edit]
|
|
Common memberships
[edit]Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group
[edit]The Strategic Alliance Cyber Crime Working Group is an initiative by Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and headed by the United States as a "formal partnership between these nations dedicated to tackling larger global crime issues, particularly organised crime". The cooperation consists of "five countries from three continents banding together to fight cyber crime in a synergistic way by sharing intelligence, swapping tools and best practices, and strengthening and even synchronising their respective laws".[281]
Within this initiative, there is increased information sharing between the United Kingdom's National Crime Agency and the United States' Federal Bureau of Investigation on matters relating to serious fraud or cyber crime.
UK–USA Security Agreement
[edit]The UK–USA Security Agreement is an alliance of five English-speaking countries; Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, for the sole purpose of sharing intelligence. The precursor to this agreement is essentially an extension of the historic BRUSA Agreement which was signed in 1943. In association with the ECHELON system, all five nations are assigned to intelligence collection and analysis from different parts of the world. For example, the United Kingdom hunts for communications in Europe, Africa, and European Russia whereas the United States has responsibility for gathering intelligence in Latin America, Asia, Asiatic Russia, and northern mainland China.[282]
Sister-twinning cities
[edit]England and the United States
[edit]- Ashby-de-la-Zouch and Evans, Colorado
- Ashford and Hopewell, Virginia
- Barnet, London and Barnet, Vermont
- Barnet, London and Montclair, New Jersey
- Barnstaple and Barnstable, Massachusetts
- Belper and Pawtucket, Rhode Island
- Berwick-upon-Tweed and Berwick, Pennsylvania
- Billericay and Billerica, Massachusetts
- Billericay and Fishers, Indiana
- Birmingham and Chicago, Illinois
- Bodmin and Grass Valley, California
- Boston, Lincolnshire and Boston, Massachusetts
- Brentwood and Brentwood, Tennessee
- Burton upon Trent and Elkhart, Indiana
- Bury and Woodbury, New Jersey
- Calne and Caln Township, Pennsylvania
- Canterbury and Bloomington, Illinois
- Cheltenham and Cheltenham, Pennsylvania
- Chester and Lakewood, Colorado
- Cleveland and Cleveland, Ohio
- Cornwall and Cornwall, New York
- County Durham and Durham County, North Carolina
- Coventry and Coventry, Connecticut
- Coventry and Coventry, New York
- Coventry and Coventry, Rhode Island
- Dalton-in-Furness and Dalton, Pennsylvania
- Doncaster and Wilmington, North Carolina
- Dover and Huber Heights, Ohio
- Durham and Durham, North Carolina
- Evesham and Evesham Township, New Jersey
- Fleetwood and Fleetwood, Pennsylvania
- Gravesend and Chesterfield, Virginia
- Hartlepool and Muskegon, Michigan
- Haverhill and Haverhill, Massachusetts
- Haworth and Haworth, New Jersey
- Hertford and Hartford, Connecticut
- Hinckley and Midland, Ohio
- Keighley and Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
- Kettering and Kettering, Ohio
- Kingston upon Hull and Raleigh, North Carolina
- Leeds, City of and Louisville, Kentucky
- Lincoln and Lincoln, Nebraska
- Lambeth, London and Brooklyn, New York
- London and New York City, New York
- Manchester and Los Angeles, California
- Mansfield and Mansfield, Massachusetts
- Mansfield and Mansfield, Ohio
- Middlesbrough and Middlesborough, Kentucky
- Newcastle upon Tyne and Atlanta, Georgia
- Newmarket and Lexington, Kentucky
- Norfolk and Norfolk, Virginia
- Northampton and Easton, Pennsylvania
- Northampton and Northampton, Pennsylvania
- Oakham and Dodgeville, Wisconsin
- Oxford and Oxford, Michigan
- Penzance and Nevada City, California
- Plymouth and Plymouth, Massachusetts
- Portsmouth and Portsmouth, New Hampshire
- Reading and Reading, Pennsylvania
- Redruth and Mineral Point, Wisconsin
- Richmond, London and Richmond, Virginia
- Rochester and Rochester, New York
- Rugeley and Western Springs, Illinois
- Runnymede and Herndon, Virginia
- Rye and Rye, New Hampshire
- Salisbury and Salisbury, Maryland
- Salisbury and Salisbury, North Carolina
- Sefton, Metropolitan Borough of and Fort Lauderdale, Florida
- Sheffield and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Shrewsbury and Shrewsbury, Massachusetts
- Southampton and Hampton, Virginia
- Stafford and Stafford County, Virginia
- Swindon and Chattanooga, Tennessee
- Southwark, London and Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Stourbridge and Sturbridge, Massachusetts
- Stratford-upon-Avon and Stratford, Connecticut
- Stroud and Stroud, Oklahoma
- Sunderland and Washington, DC
- Taunton and Taunton, Massachusetts
- Truro and Truro, Massachusetts
- Warrington and Lake County, Illinois
- Warwick and Warwick, New York
- Warwick and Warwick, Rhode Island
- Watford and Wilmington, Delaware
- Whitby and Anchorage, Alaska
- Whitby and Waimea, Hawaii
- Winchester and Winchester, Virginia
- Wirral, Metropolitan Borough of and Midland, Texas
- Wolverhampton and Buffalo, New York
- Worcester and Worcester, Massachusetts
Scotland and the United States
[edit]- Aberdeen and Aberdeen, Washington
- Aberdeen and Houston, Texas
- Blairgowrie and Pleasanton, California
- Dundee and Alexandria, Virginia
- Dunfermline and Sarasota, Florida
- Edinburgh and San Diego, California
- Inverness and Inverness, Florida
- Livingston and Grapevine, Texas
- Midlothian and Midlothian, Illinois
- Prestwick and Vandalia, Ohio
- Stirling and Dunedin, Florida
- Stornoway and Pendleton, South Carolina
- Dull, Perth and Kinross and Boring, Oregon
- Birnam and Asheville
- Dumfries and Annapolis, Maryland
- Dunbar and Martinez, California
- Dunkeld and Asheville, North Carolina
- Falkirk and San Rafael, California
- Forres and Mount Dora, Florida
- Glasgow and Pittsburgh
- Grangemouth and La Porte, Indiana
- Kelso, Scottish Borders and Kelso, Washington
- Oban and Laurinburg, North Carolina
- South Ayrshire and Newnan, Georgia
- Stonehaven and Athens, Alabama
- Stornoway and Pendleton, South Carolina
- Linlithgow and Grapevine, Texas
Wales and the United States
[edit]- Brecon and Saline, Michigan
- Machynlleth and Belleville, Michigan
- Nantyglo and Nanty Glo, Pennsylvania
- Newport, Pembrokeshire, and Annapolis, Maryland
Northern Ireland and the United States
[edit]- Ballymena and Morehead, Kentucky
- Bangor, County Down and Virginia Beach, Virginia
- Belfast and Belfast, Maine
- Belfast and Boston, Massachusetts
- Belfast and Nashville, Tennessee
- Carrickfergus and Anderson, South Carolina
- Carrickfergus and Jackson, Michigan
- Castlereagh and Kent, Washington
- Craigavon and LaGrange, Georgia
- Derry and Buffalo, New York
- Killyleagh and Cleveland, North Carolina
- Larne and Clover, South Carolina
- Newtownabbey and Gilbert, Arizona
British Crown Dependencies and the United States
[edit]Friendship links
[edit]- Cambridge and Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Liverpool and Memphis, Tennessee
- Liverpool and New Orleans, Louisiana
- Newcastle upon Tyne and Little Rock, Arkansas
- Wellingborough and Willingboro, New Jersey
Heritage
[edit]The United States and Britain share many threads of cultural heritage.
Since English is the main language of both the British and the Americans, both nations belong to the English-speaking world. Their common language comes with (relatively minor) differences in spelling, pronunciation, and the meaning of words.[284]
The American legal system is largely based on English common law. The American system of local government is rooted in English precedents, such as the offices of county courts and sheriffs. Although the US remains more highly religious than Britain,[285] the largest Protestant denominations emerged from British churches brought across the Atlantic, such as the Baptists, Methodists, Congregationalists and Episcopalians.
Britain and the United States practice what is commonly referred to as an Anglo-Saxon economy in which levels of regulation and taxes are relatively low, and government provides a low to medium level of social services in return.[286]
Independence Day, July 4, is a national celebration which commemorates the July 4, 1776, adoption of the Declaration of Independence from the British Empire. American defiance of Britain is expressed in the American national anthem, "The Star-Spangled Banner", written during the War of 1812 to the tune of a British celebratory song as the Americans beat off a British attack on Baltimore.
It is estimated that between 40.2 million and 72.1 million Americans today have British ancestry, i.e. between 13% and 23.3% of the US population.[287][288][289] In the 1980 US Census, 61,311,449 Americans reported British ancestry[clarification needed] reaching 32.56% of the US population at the time which, even today, would make them the largest ancestry group in the United States.[290]
Particular symbols of the close relationship between the two countries are the JFK Memorial and the American Bar Association's Magna Carta Memorial, both at Runnymede in England.
Religion
[edit]This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2022) |
Both the United States and the United Kingdom share the similarity that a majority of their populations state that their belief is Christian, at 70.4% in the US[291] and 59.5% in the UK. Also, in both countries the majority of Christian followers are members of the mainline Protestant group of churches, rather than the Roman Catholic Church, although the Catholic church is relatively sizeable in both countries. Many of these mainline Protestant churches in the United States have their origins in the United Kingdom or their founders were British. This includes Episcopal (Anglican), Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Congregational, and Quaker.
Nevertheless, there are some three big disparities between the two nations in the role of religion and faith. Firstly, the United Kingdom has an established church in two of the four nations of the country; the Anglican Church of England, where the head of state is the head of the church in one, and the Presbyterian Church of Scotland which plays a notable role of the other. The United States on the other hand requires a strict separation of church and state, as stated in the First Amendment.
Another sizable difference between the US and the UK is the piety of followers, as the UK is much more secular than the US. A Gallup poll in 2015 reported that 41% of Americans said they regularly attend religious services,[292] compared to just 10% of Britons.[293] Thirdly, a preeminent distinction amidst the two countries is the declaration of faith. In the United Kingdom, religion, especially those that follow the mainstream Protestant churches, is rarely discussed and the country is a secular society. However, in the US, religion and faith are seen as a major part of the personal being and declarations are much more stronger.[citation needed]
The United Kingdom also has a large number of those possessing no faith or are agnostic with 25.7% saying they are irreligious, compared with just 10% in the United States who say that they don't believe in a God. Many notable British atheists including Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are known in the US. The Atheist Bus campaign which started in London in 2008 by Ariane Sherine, was copied by local atheists in America and put on buses in Washington, DC,[294] and Bloomington, Indiana.
The differing attitudes towards the religion among the US and the UK causes a large schism between the two nations, and much of the general attitude of the society as a whole on fundamental social issues including abortion, minority rights, blasphemy, the role of church and the state in society, etc.[citation needed]
Both the United States and the United Kingdom share a number of followers of other minority faiths, although the numbers and type of faith practice in both countries differ wildly due to the ethnic and cultural makeup of both countries.[citation needed] The other minority faiths that are practiced in both countries include Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism, Paganism and Buddhism.
Food and drink
[edit]Many classic dishes or foods from American cuisine such as hamburgers, hot dogs, barbecue chicken, southern fried chicken, deep-pan pizza, chewing gum, tomato soup, chilli-con-carne, chocolate chip cookies, chocolate brownies, soft-scoop ice cream and donuts are popular in the United Kingdom. Drinks like cola, milkshakes and bourbon are also popular. A number of major American food trends and fads have also been popular and influential in the British palate, for example weight management diets and craft beer.
Some American foods, like cornflakes, baked beans and crisps (known as potato chips in the United States), have become so entrenched in the UK's food culture that they have completely lost their American roots and are considered part of British cuisine. Breakfast cereals like corn flakes, bran flakes and puffed rice came from the US to the UK in the beginning of twentieth century, and virtually changed the perception of breakfasts locally.[295]
Some British foods have been just as nativised in the US such as apple pie, macaroni and cheese and sandwiches.[296] British cuisine was a major influence on the cuisine of the Southern United States, including fried chicken.[297] British foods like fish and chips, shepherd's pie, Sunday Roast, Afternoon Tea and gingerbread are also entrenched in American food culture. Drinking culture in the US has been heavily influenced by Britain, especially the introduction of whisky and certain styles of beer in the colonial period.[298][299] By the late 20th Century, British cuisine was sometimes stereotyped as being unappealing in the United States, although British cuisine is commonly eaten there.[300] This reputation has been attributed to the impact that WWII rationing had on British cuisine in the mid-20th Century.[296]
Many major American food and fast moving consumer goods companies have British operations including Molson Coors,[301] McCormick & Company,[302] Kellogg's,[303] Campbell's,[304] Kraft-Heinz,[305] PepsiCo,[306] Coca-Cola[307] & Mondelez[308] The major British food manufacturers that operate in the United States are Unilever,[309] Associated British Foods[310] and Diageo.[311] The purchase of the British food company Cadbury by the American company Kraft Foods in 2010, caused a storm on whether the company would change the recipe for its signature chocolate[312] and the conditions at Cadbury's food factories.[313]
Additionally, there are several American restaurant and café chains like McDonald's, Burger King, KFC, Domino's Pizza, Pizza Hut, Krispy Kreme,[314] and Starbucks that have enterprises on the other side of the Atlantic. A small number of British chains like Pret a Manger,[315] YO! Sushi and Itsu[316] have operations in the US, principally around New York City. The British catering company Compass Group has several catering contracts in the States, including for the federal government and US military.[317] During the start of 2020, Youtube channel Insider asked their resident American and British journalists Joe Avella and Harry Kersh to compare various chain restaurant menus of both the US and UK, under the title of Food Wars. [318]
Since the 2016 EU referendum, there has been growing concern about whether a possible UK–US free trade agreement would lead to changes in food practices and laws in the UK.[319] The concern is that American food standards laws are much looser than the UK's, such as rules governing cleanliness, the use of antibiotics and pesticides, animal welfare conditions and the use of genetically modified food. Many of these concerns have been symbolised by the production process of American poultry, often known as "chlorinated chicken".[320][321]
Culture and media
[edit]Both the US and UK are considered cultural superpowers; both countries having a large scale influence around the world in film, music, literature, and television.[322]
Literature
[edit]Literature is transferred across the Atlantic Ocean, as evidenced by the appeal of British authors such as William Shakespeare, Charles Dickens, J. R. R. Tolkien, Jackie Collins, and J. K. Rowling in the United States, and American authors including Harriet Beecher Stowe, Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway, Stephen King and Dan Brown in Britain. Henry James and T. S. Eliot both moved to Britain and were well known in both countries. Eliot moved to England in 1914 and became a British subject in 1927. He was a dominant figure in literary criticism and greatly influenced the Modern period of British literature.[323]
In the UK, many American novels including The Catcher in the Rye, Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry,[324] Of Mice and Men, [325] and The Color Purple [326] are frequently used texts for British secondary-level education English and English Literature exams as set by the main examination boards.
Media
[edit]In media, connections between the US and the UK in print media are minor but strong in online content. Until 2016, a condensed version of The New York Times was inside The Observer newspaper. In some newsagents in the UK, people can find international editions of USA Today, The New York Times International Edition,[note 1] the Europe edition of Time, Newsweek, The New Yorker, New York magazine and Foreign Affairs. While in the US you would be able to find the international edition of The Economist and in New York City, the Financial Times. After Rupert Murdoch's purchase of the New York Post in November 1976,[327] he redesigned the newspaper into a populist right-wing tabloid, likewise his earlier relaunch of the British Sun newspaper as a down-market tabloid from 1969.[328][329]
In magazine publishing, the two large American magazine publishing houses, Hearst and Condé Nast, maintain operations in the UK, and British editions of the US magazines Good Housekeeping, GQ, Men's Health, Cosmopolitan, Vogue, National Geographic, Wired and others are available in Britain. On occasion, some American editions are also available for purchase usually next to the local edition or in the international section. In British magazines in the US, Northern & Shell created an American version of OK! magazine in 2005.
There are a number of Americans and British in each other countries' press corp, including editors, correspondents, journalists and columnists. Individuals born in the United States active in the British press corp include the FT's news editor Peter Spiegel, Daily Telegraph columnist Janet Daley, The Times columnist Hadley Freeman and the Guardian columnist Tim Dowling and. Originally from the UK were Christopher Hitchens (1949–2011) and the current editor of Vogue, Anna Wintour. The previous CEO of The New York Times Company between 2012 and 2020 was the former Director-General of the BBC (effectively a CEO), Mark Thompson. The current editor-in-chief of the London-based Guardian since 2015,[330] Katharine Viner was previously the editor of The Guardian's American website between 2014 and 2015.[331]
In terms of online content, three newspaper-online sites have American editions, TheGuardian.com,[332] Mail Online and The Independent.[333] BBC News Online is a frequently visited by Americans. The American online news sites BuzzFeed,[334] Breitbart News and HuffPost (formerly The Huffington Post)[335] all previously possess British-based editions before shutting them down.
Film
[edit]There is much crossover appeal in the modern entertainment culture of the United Kingdom and the United States. For example, Hollywood blockbuster movies made by Steven Spielberg and George Lucas have had a large effect on British audiences in the United Kingdom, while the James Bond and Harry Potter series of films have attracted high interest in the United States. Also, the animated films of Walt Disney as well as those of Pixar, DreamWorks, Don Bluth, Blue Sky, Illumination and others have continued to make an indelible mark and impression on British audiences, young and old, for almost 100 years. Films by Alfred Hitchcock continuously make a lasting impact on a loyal fan base in the United States, as Alfred Hitchcock himself influenced notable American filmmakers such as John Carpenter, in the horror and slasher film genres.
Production of films are often shared between the two nations, whether it be a concentrated use of British and American actors or the use of film studios located in London or Hollywood.
Theatre
[edit]Broadway theatre in New York City has toured London's West End theatre over the years, with notable performances such as The Lion King, Grease, Wicked, and Rent. British productions, such as Mamma Mia! and several of Andrew Lloyd Webber's musicals, including Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, Cats and The Phantom of the Opera have found success on Broadway. For over 150 years, Shakespeare's plays have been overwhelmingly popular with upscale American audiences.[336]
Television
[edit]Both the United Kingdom and the United States have television shows which are similar, as they are either carried by the other nations' networks, or are re-created for distribution in their own nations. Some popular British television programmes that were re-created for the American market in more recent years include House of Cards, The Office, Pop Idol (American Idol), Strictly Come Dancing (Dancing with the Stars), Top Gear, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, Weakest Link and The X Factor. Some American television shows re-created for the British market in more recent years include The Apprentice and Deal or No Deal. Many American television shows have been popular in the United Kingdom.
The BBC airs two networks in the United States, BBC America and BBC World News. The American network PBS collaborates with the BBC and rebroadcasts British television shows in the United States such as Doctor Who, Keeping Up Appearances, Masterpiece Theatre, Monty Python's Flying Circus, Nova. The BBC also frequently collaborates with American network HBO, showing recent American mini-series in the United Kingdom such as Band of Brothers, The Gathering Storm, John Adams, and Rome. Likewise, the American network Discovery Channel has partnered with the BBC by televising recent British mini-series in the United States such as Planet Earth and The Blue Planet, the latter popularly known as The Blue Planet: Seas of Life in the American format. The United States' public affairs channel C-SPAN, broadcasts Prime Minister's Questions every Sunday.[337]
On some British digital television platforms, it is also possible to watch American television channels that are tailored for British audiences such as CNBC Europe, CNN International, ESPN Classic, Comedy Central, PBS America and Fox. The Super Bowl, the National Football League's championship tournament of American football which occurs every February, has been broadcast in the United Kingdom since 1982.[338] Conversely, the Premier League has been shown on NBC Sports Network in the United States.[339] Until 2017, Formula One television coverage in the United States has used an American-based team but the announcers are British; from 2018 Sky Sports has taken over Formula One coverage through ESPN2.
Radio
[edit]Compared to music and television broadcasting, radio broadcasting is limited between both sides of the pond. There are several reasons for this. The major one is that the majority of radio broadcasting in the United States is commercial and funded by advertising and the small network of public radio stations are supported by donations, compared to the United Kingdom where the national public broadcaster, the BBC is the major player which funded by the obligatory television licence. This leads to a completely different structure of number and type of radio stations and its broadcasting schedules.
Other factors include differing technical standards of radio broadcasting. This is influenced by their countries' broadcasting authorities which shapes over-the-air radio. In the UK, it is influenced by authorities of Ofcom and the EBU which are working towards DAB and DRM. While in the United States, it influenced by FCC which is working towards HD Radio.
The British international broadcasting station, the BBC World Service is syndicated on various major city public radio stations in the United States such as WNYC, and on SiriusXM satellite radio,[340] through the broadcaster American Public Media.[341] The American international broadcaster, Voice of America has no remit in be needed to be heard in the UK, so it doesn't broadcast there and none of its programmes is relayed on domestic stations. In a resource-saving exercise between the two international broadcasters, Voice of America shares its transmission towers with the BBC World Service to help of shortwave transmissions in remote areas.
Internet radio and streaming services are growing in popularity in both countries, however listening to each other's feeds are hampered by the countries' broadcasting rights. This causes the internet radio feeds of American and British radio stations are sometimes blocked or on restricted bandwidth. For example, BBC Radio 2 is on a 128 kbit/s AAC domestic stream, while internationally it's on a 48 kbit/s AAC+ stream. However both the American and the British international broadcasters Voice of America and the BBC World Service is fully accessible online in each other's countries. Streaming services that are popular in both countries include the American TuneIn, Apple Music and Swedish-owned Spotify. The other major services in the US like Pandora Radio and Radio.com don't operate in the UK, and are inaccessible.
In the past before the Second World War, connections between the United States and the United Kingdom in the radio industry was virtually unheard of. Radio in the UK was not influenced by the US, due to the vast distance, and the only regular services that were heard was the BBC and the "pirate" station Radio Luxembourg.
When the Americans joined the war as part of the Allies, some soldiers were billeted in the UK in which the BBC provided programming for these people. So the Forces Programme, broadcast many popular American variety shows such as Charlie McCarthy, The Bob Hope Show, and The Jack Benny Program. As the Forces Programme, and the subsequent General Forces Programme, was easily available for civilians they were also heard by domestic audiences.
After the War in 1946 on the Home Service, the BBC started to broadcast the factual programme Letter from America, which was presented by Alistair Cooke, bring informing about the States to British audiences until Cook's death in 2004. It was one of the BBC's longest-running radio programmes, broadcasting on the Home Service, and continuing on BBC Radio 4. It was also relayed on the BBC World Service. The programme itself was based on a similar programme by Alistair Cooke in the 1930s for American listeners about life in the UK on the NBC Red Network. After Letter from America, the BBC continued with a factual programme about the States in Americana from 2009 to 2011, presented by the resident American correspondent.
As of 2019, the BBC co-produced with Public Radio International and WGBH Boston, a weekly factual programme called The World, which is broadcast on various American public radio stations. Parts of the show are put together for a shorter programme called Boston Calling, which is available on Radio 4 and the domestic feed of the World Service.[342] There have been attempts in the past to bring British formats to American audiences, such as the News Quiz USA.[343] From 2005 to 2011, a time-shifted version of BBC Radio 1 was available on Sirius satellite radio.[344] While in the UK, A Prairie Home Companion (called Garrison Keillor's Radio Show) was available weekly from 2002 on BBC7 to 2016, on BBC Radio 4 Extra.[345]
There has been a number of American personalities that have been on British airwaves including music journalist Paul Gambaccini, disc jockey Suzi Quattro and comedians Rich Hall and Greg Proops. While New Zealand-born disc jockey Zane Lowe, who spent much of career in the UK was recruited to Apple's Beats 1 station in the United States.
Music
[edit]American artists, including Whitney Houston, Madonna, Tina Turner, Cher, Michael Jackson, Janet Jackson, Mariah Carey, Bing Crosby, Elvis Presley, Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix, Guns N' Roses, Diana Ross, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Frank Sinatra, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, and Beyoncé, are popular in the United Kingdom. British artists, including The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, The Rolling Stones, Sting, The Who, Queen, Shirley Bassey, Tom Jones, David Bowie, Pink Floyd, Rod Stewart, the Spice Girls, the Bee Gees, Katherine Jenkins, KT Tunstall, Leona Lewis, Elton John, Coldplay, and Adele have achieved success in the large American market.
In the United Kingdom, many Hollywood films as well as Broadway musicals are closely associated and identified with the musical scores and soundtracks created by famous American composers such as George Gershwin, Rodgers and Hammerstein, Henry Mancini, John Williams, Alan Silvestri, Jerry Goldsmith, and James Horner.
The Celtic music of the United Kingdom has had a dynamic effect upon American music.[346] In particular, the traditional music of the Southern United States is descended from traditional Celtic music and English folk music of the colonial period, and the musical traditions of the South eventually gave rise to country music and, to a lesser extent, American folk.[347]
The birth of jazz, swing, big band, and especially rock and roll, all developed and originating in the United States, had greatly influenced the later development of rock music in the United Kingdom, particularly British rock bands such as The Beatles and Herman's Hermits, The Rolling Stones, while its American precursor, the blues, greatly influenced British electric rock.[348]
Sports
[edit]Despite sports being a major cultural interest in both the United States and the United Kingdom, there is little overlap in their most popular sports. The most popular team sports in the UK are football (soccer), rugby union, rugby league and cricket, while the most popular sports in the US are [American] football, baseball, ice hockey and basketball. The most popular sports in each country are considered minor sports in the other, with growing interest. Both nations are among the strongest in the world in all time sporting success, with the United States being the most successful sports nation in the world.
Association football
[edit]The United States men's team has played multiple friendlies against their Home Nations counterparts. Being members of separate confederations with the Home Nations being part of UEFA and the US being part of CONCACAF, their only chance to play competitive games is during FIFA tournaments.
The United States and England have played thrice at the FIFA World Cup — in 1950, 2010 and 2022 — and remain unbeaten. The United States' 1–0 victory over England in 1950 is considered to be one of the biggest upsets in World Cup history.[349][350][351] The other two games have both ended in draws; 1–1 in 2010[352] and 0–0 in 2022.[353] Additionally, the two have played in nine friendlies, with England winning eight and United States one.[354]
The United States and Wales have played once at the World Cup — in 2022 — in addition to two friendlies. The game ended in a 1–1 draw.[355] The United States have yet to play competitive matches against Scotland and Northern Ireland.[356][357]
The Premier League has seen many American players since its inception in 1992. Some of the prominent ones include Tim Howard, Christian Pulisic, Clint Dempsey and Landon Donovan.[358] Similarly, the Major League Soccer has seen English players, including David Beckham, Frank Lampard and Steven Gerrard.[359]
American football
[edit]Gridiron football, which is known in the United Kingdom as American football, originated from two British sports, association football and rugby union football. It came about in the later part of the 19th century due to the development into a separate code and led to becoming a separate sport from the other codes of football. Gridiron was in the past only known and played in UK by visiting American servicemen; firstly in 1910, by navy crews from USS Georgia, USS Idaho and USS Vermont, and then in the Second World War by UK-based service personnel. (The other gridiron code, Canadian football, is hardly known in UK.)
After Channel 4 started showing the highlights of the American NFL in 1982, the sport became acknowledged by the British sporting world. Due to Britons' unfamiliarity with American football, television guides and newspapers had printed articles explaining it.[360] A year later, the first match between two British teams the London Ravens and the Northwich Spartans was played; the Ravens won. Later in the 1980s, the sport grew and rival teams started to play, which was helped by support from various American players, coaches, and sponsors like Coca-Cola and Budweiser.[361] In 1986, the American Bowl was the first preseason NFL game to be played at the original Wembley Stadium, between the Chicago Bears and the Dallas Cowboys.[362]
By the early 1990s, due in part to the recession, Channel 4 ceased regular broadcasts of the NFL, but the Super Bowl has continued to be broadcast regularly on British television. The NFL has been broadcast by other British networks, including ITV, Channel 5, ESPN UK, British Eurosport, and Sky Sports.
In 2007, the NFL returned to Wembley with a regular season game between the Miami Dolphins and the New York Giants.[363][364] Since then, the NFL has held additional games at Wembley and at other British stadiums. The NFL is considering siting a team in London permanently,[365] with the Jacksonville Jaguars being the most likely team to relocate to the city.[366] Noted British NFL players active during the 2019 season are Carolina Panthers defensive end, Nigerian-born Efe Obada and Atlanta Falcons tight end, Alex Grey.[citation needed]
Baseball
[edit]The first recorded writings about baseball came in the mid-18th century when a version of the sport played indoors in 1748 in London, where it was played by then Prince of Wales, George III,[367] and played outside in 1755 in the southern English town of Guildford.[368] It was later brought over to the United States by British immigrants, where it developed in the modern version of the sport in the early 19th century in the creation and fountain of the modern baseball rule book, the Knickerbocker Rules in 1845. Eventually, it suppressed the popularity of the other notable ball-and-bat sport which was played in the US at the time which was cricket, by the end of the 19th century.
Sheffield born Harry Wright was instrumental in the development of professional baseball in the United States, and he brought his touring team to Britain to promote the sport. Later, at the end of the 19th century Francis Ley, a Derby man claimed erroneously to have had 'discovered' the game on a trip to the United States, and Albert Goodwill Spalding, an American former star player and sporting goods businessman who saw opportunities to expand his business across the Atlantic, funded a second tour to the United Kingdom (Spalding had earlier toured under Wright’s leadership). This continued with the establishment of the 1890 National League of Baseball of Great Britain, the first professional league in Britain. Baseball clubs were formed from well-known association football clubs Aston Villa, Stoke City and Preston North End, who were joined by Ley’s own Derby Baseball Club.
During World War I, visiting U.S. service personnel from the U.S. Army and Navy played a demonstration game at Chelsea's Stamford Bridge in 1918. A crowd of 38,000 people, including King George V, attended. This led to into a growing interest in the game across the Atlantic, and baseball teams were created during the inter-war period. This led to a peak in 1938 when there was a victory by Great Britain over the United States in the 1938 Amateur World Series which was held in England, which is considered the first World Cup of Baseball.[citation needed]
The popularity of baseball in the United Kingdom diminished during and after the Second World War; today, baseball is not widely played among Britons. Notwithstanding, Major League Baseball coverage is available to watch in the United Kingdom on the TNT Sports 4 channel, formerly BT Sport.[369] In 2018, Major League Baseball announced a two-year deal to start the MLB London Series, a series of regular-season games at London Stadium.[370] The 2019 series was contested between two rival teams, the New York Yankees and the Boston Red Sox. These games were broadcast on both BT Sport and the BBC.[371] The 2020 series between the St. Louis Cardinals and the Chicago Cubs was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[372] The Cardinals–Cubs rivalry series was played in London in 2023, as part of an extended agreement to resume the London Series.[373]
John Spinks, leader of the English rock band The Outfield, originally named the band "The Baseball Boys", in a reference to a gang in the film The Warriors. The band members said in 1986 that none of them were knowledgeable about baseball, but they were curious about the sport.[374]
Cricket
[edit]Cricket was one of the major sports in the United States during its time as a British colony and for about a century afterward. Its major decline began with the 1860s Civil War, as it could not compete with the far shorter playing duration of baseball, among other factors. In the 21st century, immigration from cricket-playing countries and the spread of the shortened T20 format have contributed to a minor revival of the game.[375]
Gallery
[edit]-
John Adams, the first American Plenipotentiary Minister to Great Britain being presented at the Court of St James's to King George III in 1785, as depicted in John Cassell's Illustrated History of England, Volume 5, 1865
-
A visit to the tomb of George Washington at Mount Vernon by Edward, Prince of Wales, President James Buchanan, and other dignitaries in 1860, as depicted in an 1861 painting by American artist Thomas Prichard Rossiter
-
President Woodrow Wilson and King George V at Buckingham Palace, 1918
-
Prime Minister Ramsay Macdonald and British Ambassador Esmé Howard, 1st Baron Howard of Penrith greeted at the United States Capitol in Washington by Vice President Charles Curtis, 1929
-
First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, Queen Elizabeth, King George VI, President Franklin D. Roosevelt aboard the presidential yacht USS Potomac during Their Majesties state visit to Washington, 1939
-
President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill aboard the USS Augusta after signing the Atlantic Charter, 1941
-
President Harry S. Truman and Prime Minister Winston Churchill shake hands during the Potsdam Conference, 1945
-
President Harry S. Truman shaking hands with Prime Minister Clement Attlee upon his arrival at Washington National Airport, 1950
-
President Harry S. Truman and Princess Elizabeth, Duchess of Edinburgh in the presidential limousine en route to Blair House in Washington, 1951
-
Prime Minister Harold Macmillan and President Dwight D. Eisenhower meet for talks in Bermuda during the aftermath of the Suez Crisis, 1957
-
Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh posing with President John F. Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy during a dinner held at Buckingham Palace for the visiting American delegation, 1961
-
President John F. Kennedy and Prime Minister Harold Macmillan in Bermuda, 1961
-
Antony Armstrong-Jones, 1st Earl of Snowdon, Lady Bird Johnson, Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon and President Lyndon B. Johnson at the White House, 1965
-
Prime Minister Harold Wilson and President Lyndon B. Johnson conversing at the White House, 1966
-
President Richard Nixon and First Lady Pat Nixon with Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister Edward Heath at Chequers, 1970
-
Charles, Prince of Wales meets with President Richard Nixon in the Oval Office, 1970
-
President Gerald Ford and Prime Minister Harold Wilson at the International Economic Summit in Rambouillet, France, 1975
-
President Gerald Ford dancing with Queen Elizabeth II at the White House, 1976
-
President Jimmy Carter and Prime Minister James Callaghan in the Oval Office, 1978
-
President Jimmy Carter and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher at the Resolute desk in the Oval Office, 1979
-
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, First Lady Nancy Reagan, Queen Elizabeth II and President Ronald Reagan aboard HMY Britannia, 1983
-
President Ronald Reagan and First Lady Nancy Reagan with Charles, Prince of Wales and Diana, Princess of Wales at the White House during the Waleses' official visit to the United States, 1985
-
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and President Ronald Reagan in discussion during a walk at Camp David, 1986
-
President George H.W. Bush and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in London, 1989
-
President George H. W. Bush and First Lady Barbara Bush with Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh at the beginning of an official dinner at the White House, 1991
-
President George H. W. Bush and Prime Minister John Major conducting a press conference at Camp David, 1992
-
President Bill Clinton and Prime Minister John Major give remarks during at press conference at 10 Downing Street, 1995
-
First Lady Hillary Clinton and Diana, Princess of Wales chatting in the White House Map Room, 1997
-
Prime Minister Tony Blair and President Bill Clinton in a meeting with US National Security Advisor Sandy Berger in Belfast, 1998
-
President Bill Clinton, First Lady Hillary Clinton and Chelsea Clinton with Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace, 2000
-
Prime Minister Tony Blair and President George W. Bush walking at Camp David, 2001
-
President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush with Charles, Prince of Wales and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall at the White House during the Waleses' official visit to the United States, 2005
-
President George W. Bush and First Lady Laura Bush with Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh at the beginning of an official dinner at the White House, 2007
-
Prime Minister Gordon Brown and President George W. Bush having their first meeting at Camp David, 2007
-
Prime Minister Gordon Brown and President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, 2009
-
Prime Minister David Cameron and President Barack Obama at a bilateral meeting during the G20 Summit in Toronto, 2010
-
Charles, Prince of Wales meets with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, 2011
-
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama with Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge at Buckingham Palace, 2011
-
First Lady Michelle Obama and Prince Harry of Wales engaging in conversation at Kensington Palace, 2015
-
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama with Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh at Windsor Castle, 2016
-
Prime Minister Theresa May and President Barack Obama having their first meeting during the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, 2016
-
Prime Minister Theresa May and President Donald Trump conducting a press conference in the East Room of the White House, 2017
-
Prime Minister Boris Johnson and President Donald Trump conducting a bilateral meeting in New York City, 2019
-
Prime Minister Boris Johnson and President Joe Biden during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office at the White House, 2021
-
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and President Joe Biden during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office, 2023
-
President Joe Biden meets with King Charles III at Windsor Castle, 2023
-
Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Joe Biden during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office, 2024
See also
[edit]- Anglophilia & Anglophobia
- Anti-Americanism
- Foreign policy of the United States
- Foreign relations of the United Kingdom
- Foreign relations of the United States
- Great Rapprochement
- List of ambassadors of the United Kingdom to the United States
- List of ambassadors of the United States to the United Kingdom
- Special Relationship (United Kingdom–United States)
- Timeline of British diplomatic history
- Timeline of United States diplomatic history
- Transatlantic relations
- UKUSA Agreement, on sharing secret intelligence
- United Kingdom–United States relations in World War II
- United Kingdom - United States Free Trade Agreement
- CIA activities in the United Kingdom
Notes
[edit]- ^ Although the paper is edited in Paris, it is effectively a version of the New York paper
References
[edit]- ^ a b Giles, Chris (July 27, 2007). "/ Home UK / UK – Ties that bind: Bush, Brown and a different relationship". Financial Times. Archived from the original on December 11, 2022. Retrieved March 25, 2012.
- ^ Alex Spillius, 'Special relationship Britain and America share fundamental values, Clinton tells Miliband', The Daily Telegraph (February 4, 2009), p. 12.
- ^ David Williamson, "U.S. envoy pays tribute to Welsh Guards' courage", The Western Mail (November 26, 2009), p. 16.
- ^ "Foreign Trade - U.S. Trade with". Census.gov. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
- ^ Paul Johnson, The Birth of the Modern: World Society 1815-1830, (1991) Preface, p. xix.
- ^ Derek E. Mix - The United Kingdom: Background and Relations with the United States - fas.org. Congressional Research Service. April 29, 2015. Retrieved April 13, 2017.
- ^ Devlin, Kate (June 3, 2023). "Sunak stresses need for 'close' relationship with Biden ahead of US trip". INDEPENDENT. Retrieved June 7, 2023.
- ^ James Ciment, ed. Colonial America: An Encyclopedia of Social, Political, Cultural, and Economic History (2005) online
- ^ * Ember, Carol R.; Ember, Melvin; Skoggard, Ian A. (2004), Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures Around the World, Springer, p. 49, ISBN 978-0-306-48321-9
- ^ a b c Matthew Lange, James Mahoney, and Matthias vom Hau, "Colonialism and Development: A Comparative Analysis of Spanish and British Colonies", The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 111, No. 5 (March 2006), pp. 1412–1462.
- ^ Patricia U. Bonomi, Under the Cope of Heaven: Religion, Society, and Politics in Colonial America (1986) excerpt and text search
- ^ Sydney E. Ahlstrom, A Religious History of the American People (1972) pp. 121-384 excerpt and text search
- ^ John Nelson, A Blessed Company: Parishes, Parsons, and Parishioners in Anglican Virginia, 1690–1776 (2001)
- ^ A useful survey is Francis D. Cogliano, Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History (2008) excerpt and text search; the author is an American based at a British university.
- ^ George Athan Billias, American constitutionalism heard round the world, 1776-1989: a global perspective (NYU Press, 2009) p. 5.
- ^ Robert R. Palmer, The Age of the Democratic Revolution (1959) 1:282.
- ^ Jonathan R. Dull, A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution (1987); H. M. Scott, British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution (Oxford University Press, 1990).
- ^ Charles R. Ritcheson, "The Earl of Shelbourne and Peace with America, 1782–1783: Vision and Reality." International History Review 5#3 (1983): 322-345.
- ^ Jonathan R. Dull (1987). A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution. Yale up. pp. 144–151. ISBN 978-0300038866.
- ^ Maya Jasanoff, The Other Side of Revolution: Loyalists in the British Empire William and Mary Quarterly (2008) 65#2 pp. 205-232 in JSTOR
- ^ Maya Jasanoff, Liberty's Exiles: American Loyalists in the Revolutionary World (2011)
- ^ Simon Schama, Rough Crossings: The Slaves, the British, and the American Revolution (2007)
- ^ Richard B. Morris, The Peacemakers; the Great Powers and American Independence (1965), the standard scholarly history; Morris, "The Great Peace of 1783," Massachusetts Historical Society Proceedings (1983) Vol. 95, pp 29–51, a summary of his long book in JSTOR
- ^ The term "ambassador" came a century later.
- ^ Perkins (1955)
- ^ Marshall Smelser, The Democratic Republic, 1801–1815 (1968).
- ^ Samuel Flagg Bemis, Jay's Treaty: A Study in Commerce and Diplomacy (1923) ch 2
- ^ Stanley M. Elkins and Eric McKitrick, The Age of Federalism: The Early American Republic, 1788–1800 (1994), ch. 9
- ^ Perkins p. vii
- ^ Bradford Perkins, The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805 (1955) p. 1.
- ^ Joseph Ellis, Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation (2000) pp. 136–7.
- ^ Bradford Perkins, Prologue to war: England and the United States, 1805-1812 (1961) full text online Archived December 3, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Donald R Hickey, The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict (1989), pp. 11, 107–110.
- ^ Francis M. Carroll (2001). A Good and Wise Measure: The Search for the Canadian-American Boundary, 1783–1842. U. of Toronto Press. p. 24. ISBN 9780802083586.
- ^ Norman K. Risjord, "1812: Conservatives, War Hawks, and the Nation's Honor," William and Mary Quarterly (1961) 18#2 pp. 196–210 in JSTOR
- ^ H.W. Brands (2006). Andrew Jackson: His Life and Times. Random House Digital. p. 163. ISBN 9780307278548.
- ^ J.C.A. Stagg, "James Madison and the Coercion of Great Britain: Canada, the West Indies, and the War of 1812," William and Mary Quarterly (1981) 38#1 pp. 3–34 in JSTOR
- ^ Kate Caffrey: The Lion and the Union, (1978), p. 270.
- ^ Ralph W. Hidy and Muriel E. Hidy, "Anglo-American Merchant Bankers and the Railroads of the Old Northwest, 1848–1860," Business History Review (1960) 34#2 pp. 150–169 in JSTOR
- ^ Scott Kaufman, and John A. Soares, "'Sagacious Beyond Praise'? Winfield Scott and Anglo-American-Canadian Border Diplomacy, 1837–1860," Diplomatic History, (2006) 30#1 pp p57-82
- ^ Howard Jones, "Anglophobia and the Aroostook War," New England Quarterly (1975) 48#4 pp. 519–539 in JSTOR
- ^ William E. Lass (1980). Minnesota's Boundary with Canada: Its Evolution Since 1783. Minnesota Historical Society. pp. 63–70. ISBN 9780873511537.
- ^ George L. Bernstein, "Special Relationship and Appeasement: Liberal policy towards America in the age of Palmerston." Historical Journal 41#3 (1998): 725-750.
- ^ Howard Jones and Donald A. Rakestraw, Prologue to Manifest Destiny: Anglo-American Relations in the 1840s (Scholarly Resources, 1997).
- ^ David M. Pletcher, The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War (1973).
- ^ Richard W. Van Alstyne, "Anglo-American Relations, 1853–1857." American Historical Review 42.3 (1937): 491-500 online.
- ^ Kenneth Bourne, "The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty and the Decline of British Opposition to the Territorial Expansion of the United States, 1857-60." Journal of Modern History 33.3 (1961): 287-291. online
- ^ Mary Wilhelmine Williams, Anglo-American isthmian diplomacy, 1815-1915. (1916) online free
- ^ Richard W. Van Alstyne, "British Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, 1850–60." Journal of Modern History 11.2 (1939): 149–183. online
- ^ Paul Poast, "Lincoln's Gamble: Fear of Intervention and the Onset of the American Civil War." Security Studies 24.3 (2015): 502-527. online
- ^ Amanda Foreman, A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War (2012)
- ^ Howard Jones, Union in Peril: The Crisis over British Intervention in the Civil War (1992)
- ^ Charles Francis Adams, "The Trent Affair," American Historical Review (1912) 17#3 pp. 540–562 in JSTOR
- ^ Niels Eichhorn, "The Intervention Crisis of 1862: A British Diplomatic Dilemma?." American Nineteenth Century History 15.3 (2014): 287-310.
- ^ Lincoln, Seward, and U.S. Foreign Relations in the Civil War Era. University Press of Kentucky. April 5, 2019. p. 162. ISBN 9-7808-1317-7151.
- ^ Civil War Chronology, 1861-1865. Naval Operations Office. 1966. p. 114.
- ^ David Keys (June 24, 2014). "Historians reveal secrets of UK gun-running which lengthened the American civil war by two years". The Independent.
- ^ Paul Hendren (April 1933). "The Confederate Blockade Runners". United States Naval Institute.
- ^ Adams (1925)
- ^ Howard Jones (2002). Abraham Lincoln and a New Birth of Freedom: The Union and Slavery in the Diplomacy of the Civil War. U of Nebraska Press. pp. 83–84. ISBN 9780803275652.
- ^ MacKenzie, Scott A. (2017). "But There Was No War: The Impossibility of a United States Invasion of Canada after the Civil War". American Review of Canadian Studies. 47 (4): 357–371. doi:10.1080/02722011.2017.1406965. S2CID 148776615.
- ^ C.P. Stacey, "Fenianism and the Rise of National Feeling in Canada at the Time of Confederation" Canadian Historical Review, 12#3, 238-261.
- ^ Niall Whelehan, The Dynamiters: Irish Nationalism and Political Violence in the Wider World, 1867–1900 (2012)
- ^ Michael J. Hogan (2000). Paths to Power: The Historiography of American Foreign Relations to 1941. Cambridge U.P. p. 76. ISBN 9780521664134.
- ^ Maureen M. Robson, "The Alabama Claims and the Anglo‐American Reconciliation, 1865–71." Canadian Historical Review (1961) 42#1 pp: 1–22.
- ^ C. P. Stacey, "Britain's Withdrawal from North America, 1864–1871." Canadian Historical Review 36.3 (1955): 185-198.
- ^ Marc-William Palen, "Protection, Federation and Union: The Global Impact of the McKinley Tariff upon the British Empire, 1890-94," Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History (2010) 38#3 pp 395-418, online
- ^ Simon Mollan, and Ranald Michie, "The City of London as an International Commercial and Financial Center since 1900," Enterprise & Society (2012) 13#3 pp 538-587 online
- ^ Matthew Simon and David E. Novack, "Some Dimensions of the American Commercial Invasion of Europe, 1871-1914: An Introductory Essay," Journal of Economic History (1964) 24#4 pp. 591-605 in JSTOR
- ^ Paul Readman, "The Liberal party and patriotism in early twentieth century Britain." Twentieth Century British History 12.3 (2001): 269-302.
- ^ R. A. Church, "The Effect of the American Export Invasion on the British Boot and Shoe Industry 1885-1914," Journal of Economic History (1968) 28#2 pp. 223-254 in JSTOR
- ^ J. A. S. Grenville, Lord Salisbury, and Foreign Policy: The Close of the Nineteenth Century (1964) pp 54-73.
- ^ R.A. Humphreys, "Anglo-American Rivalries and the Venezuela Crisis of 1895" Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (1967) 17: 131-164 in JSTOR
- ^ Nevins, 550, 647–648
- ^ Nelson M. Blake, "The Olney-Pauncefote Treaty of 1897," American Historical Review, (1945) 50#2 pp. 228-243 in JSTOR
- ^ David G. Haglund, and Tudor Onea, "Victory without Triumph: Theodore Roosevelt, Honour, and the Alaska Panhandle Boundary Dispute," Diplomacy and Statecraft (March 2008) 19#1 pp 20–41.
- ^ William C. Reuter, "The Anatomy of Political Anglophobia in the United States, 1865–1900," Mid America (1979) 61#2 pp. 117-132.
- ^ John Dumbrell (2009). America's Special Relationships: Allies and Clients. Taylor & Francis. p. 31. ISBN 9780415483766.
- ^ Eric Ouellet, "Multinational counterinsurgency: the Western intervention in the Boxer Rebellion 1900–1901." Small Wars & Insurgencies 20.3-4 (2009): 507-527.
- ^ Matthias Maass, "Catalyst for the Roosevelt Corollary: Arbitrating the 1902–1903 Venezuela Crisis and Its Impact on the Development of the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine." Diplomacy & Statecraft 20.3 (2009): 383-402.
- ^ Henry J. Hendrix, Theodore Roosevelt's Naval Diplomacy: The U.S. Navy and the Birth of the American Century (2009)
- ^ Mark Albertson, They'll Have to Follow You!: The Triumph of the Great White Fleet (2008) excerpt and text search
- ^ Stephen Broadberry and Peter Howlett. "The United Kingdom During World War I: Business as Usual?." in The Economics of World War I (2005): 206-234.
- ^ Ronald Spector, "'You're Not Going to Send Soldiers Over There Are You!': The American Search for an Alternative to the Western Front 1916–1917," Military Affairs (1972) 36#1 pp. 1–4 in JSTOR
- ^ J Ellis & M Cox, The WW1 Databook (Aurum press 2001) p. 245
- ^ Arthur S. Link, ed., The Papers of Woodrow Wilson: vol. 53 1918-1919 (1986) p. 574.
- ^ Bilyana Martinovsky (2015). Emotion in Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer. p. 83. ISBN 9789401799638.
- ^ Tennant S. Mcwilliams, "John W. Davis and Southern Wilsonianism." Virginia Quarterly Review 64.3 (1988): 398-416 online.
- ^ Kevin Smith, "Reassessing Roosevelt's View of Chamberlain after Munich: Ideological Affinity in the Geoffrey Thompson-Claude Bowers Correspondence." Diplomatic History 33.5 (2009): 839-864.
- ^ C. J. Low and M. L. Dockrill, eds. The Mirage of Power: volume 3: The documents: British Foreign Policy 1902-22 (1972) p. 647
- ^ Carolyn J. Kitching, Britain and the Problem of International Disarmament, 1919–1934 Rutledge, 1999 online Archived June 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Benjamin D. Rhodes, "British diplomacy and the silent oracle of Vermont, 1923-1929'." Vermont History 50 (1982): 69-79.
- ^ A.J.P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (1965) pp 202-3, 335
- ^ Allan Todd (2001). The Modern World. Oxford University Press. p. 53. ISBN 9780199134250.
- ^ Norman Gibbs, "The Naval Conferences of the Interwar Years: A study in Anglo-American Relations" Naval War College Review 30#1 (Special issue Summer 1977), pp. 50-63 Online
- ^ B. J. C. McKercher, "'A Certain Irritation': The White House, the State Department, and the Desire for a Naval Settlement with Great Britain, 1927–1930." Diplomatic History 31.5 (2007): 829-863.
- ^ Ronald E. Powaski (1991). Toward an Entangling Alliance: American Isolationism, Internationalism, and Europe, 1901-1950. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 53–54. ISBN 9780313272745.
- ^ Richard Pomfret (1997). The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. Oxford University Press. p. 58. ISBN 9780198233350.
- ^ Frederick W. Jones, ed. The Economic Almanac 1956 (1956) p 486
- ^ Jeannette P. Nichols, "Roosevelt's Monetary Diplomacy in 1933," American Historical Review, (1951) 56#2 pp. 295-317 in JSTOR
- ^ Hollowell; Twentieth-Century Anglo-American Relations (2001)
- ^ David Nasaw, The Patriarch: The Remarkable Life and Turbulent Times of Joseph P. Kennedy (2012) pp 281-486
- ^ Martin S. Alexander, "'[…] the best security for London is the nine Kennedy children.' Perceptions by US Officials in Washington, DC and London of Britain's Readiness for War in 1939." Contemporary British History 25#1 (2011): 101-123.
- ^ Priscilla Roberts, "Lord Lothian and the Atlantic world." The Historian 66.1 (2004): 97-127 online[dead link ].
- ^ Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones, "Lord Lothian and American Democracy: An Illusion in Pursuit of an Illusion." Canadian Review of American Studies 17.4 (1986): 411-422.
- ^ Leo T. Crowley, "Lend Lease" in Walter Yust, ed. 10 Eventful Years (1947)1:520, 2, pp. 858–860.
- ^ William Hardy McNeill, America, Britain and Russia: Their Cooperation and Conflict 1941–1946 (1953) pp. 137-50, 772-90
- ^ McNeill, America, Britain and Russia: Their Cooperation and Conflict 1941–1946 (1953) pp 90-118, 129-37
- ^ Paul Kennedy, Engineers of Victory: The Problem Solvers Who Turned The Tide in the Second World War (2013)
- ^ James W. Brennan, "The Proximity Fuze: Whose Brainchild?," U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings (1968) 94#9 pp 72–78.
- ^ Septimus H. Paul (2000). Nuclear Rivals: Anglo-American Atomic Relations, 1941–1952. Ohio State U.P. pp. 1–5. ISBN 9780814208526.
- ^ John Reynolds, Rich Relations: The American Occupation of Britain, 1942–45 (Random House, 1995)
- ^ Eric S. Rubin, "America, Britain, and Swaraj: Anglo-American Relations and Indian Independence, 1939–1945," India Review (Jan–March 2011) 10#1 pp 40–80
- ^ Arthur Herman (2008). Gandhi & Churchill: The Epic Rivalry That Destroyed an Empire and Forged Our Age. Random House Digital, Inc. pp. 472–539. ISBN 9780553804638.
- ^ Nicholas Owen, "Attlee governments: The end of empire 1945–51." Contemporary British History 3.4 (1990): 12-16.
- ^ R. J. Moore, "Decolonisation in India: Towards partition and independence in India." Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 20.2 (1982): 189-199.
- ^ Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1949 p. 846 online
- ^ C. C. S. Newton, "The Sterling Crisis of 1947 and the British Response to the Marshall Plan," Economic History Review (1984) 37#3 pp. 391–408 in JSTOR
- ^ William C. Cromwell, "The Marshall Plan, Britain and the Cold War." Review of International Studies 8.4 (1982): 233-249 online.
- ^ Michael J. Hogan, The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952 (Cambridge UP, 1987).
- ^ Henry Pelling, Britain and the Marshall Plan (1988).
- ^ Charles S. Maier, "American Visions and British Interests: Hogan's Marshall Plan." Reviews in American History 18#1 (1990), pp. 102-111 DOI: 10.2307/2702734 online.
- ^ C. C. S. Newton, "The sterling crisis of 1947 and the British response to the Marshall plan." Economic History Review (1984): 391-408 online.
- ^ Jim Tomlinson, "Balanced accounts? Constructing the balance of payments problem in post-war Britain." English Historical Review 124.509 (2009): 863-884.
- ^ George M. Alexander, The Prelude to the Truman Doctrine: British Policy in Greece, 1944–1947 (1982); Lawrence S. Wittner, American Intervention in Greece, 1943–1949 (1982)
- ^ Ervand Abrahamian, A History of Modern Iran (2008)
- ^ Kowert, Paul (2002), Groupthink or deadlock: when do leaders learn from their advisors? (illustrated ed.), SUNY Press, pp. 67–68, ISBN 978-0-7914-5249-3
- ^ Tucker, Spencer (1999), Vietnam (illustrated ed.), Routledge, p. 76, ISBN 978-1-85728-922-0
- ^ Logevall, Fredrik (2012). Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America's Vietnam. random House. pp. 550–51. ISBN 978-0-679-64519-1.
- ^ Richard M. Filipink Jr, "'Force is the Last Method': Eisenhower, Dulles and American Intervention in the Suez Crisis." Critique 35.2 (2007): 173-188.
- ^ Cole C. Kingseed, "Eisenhower and Suez: An Appraisal of Presidential Leadership" (Naval War College, 1992) online.
- ^ Fowler (2017). "Lion's Last Roar, Eagle's First Flight: Eisenhower and the Suez Crisis of 1956". Rhetoric and Public Affairs. 20 (1): 33–68. doi:10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.1.0033. JSTOR 10.14321/rhetpublaffa.20.1.0033. S2CID 149354373.
- ^ Andrew Priest, Kennedy, Johnson and NATO: Britain, America and the dynamics of alliance, 1962–68 (Routledge, 2006) p. 2.
- ^ Jonathan Colman, "The London Ambassadorship of David K. E. Bruce During the Wilson-Johnson Years, 1964–68." Diplomacy and Statecraft 15.2 (2004): 327-352. online
- ^ Colman, Jonathan (2007). "Dealing with disillusioned men': the Washington Ambassadorship of Sir Patrick Dean, 1965–69". Contemporary British History. 21 (2): 247–270. doi:10.1080/13619460600785358. S2CID 143361772.
- ^ Alasdair Blair (2014). Britain and the World Since 1945. Routledge. pp. 59–60. ISBN 9781317665748.
- ^ Tiley, Marc (2013). "Britain, Vietnam and the Special Relationship". History Today. 63 (12).
- ^ Pimlott, Wilson pp 388-94.
- ^ Sandbrook, Dominic (2009). White Heat: A History of Britain in the Swinging Sixties 1964-1970. p. 361.
- ^ Jonathan Colman, A 'Special Relationship'? Harold Wilson, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Anglo-American Relations 'At the Summit', 1964-68 (2004)
- ^ a b Smith, Sally Bedell (2012). Elizabeth the Queen: inside the life of a modern monarch. New York: Random House. pp. 177-178. ISBN 9781400067893.
- ^ a b Cooper, Zaki (February 6, 2022). "Ahead of Platinum Jubilee, a look at Queen Elizabeth's diplomacy in US and Chicago". The Chicago Tribune. p. 16.
Over the seven decades of her reign, she...met with 13 of the 14 presidents...starting with President Harry Truman. The odd one out was Lyndon Johnson, who was prohibited by his physicians from traveling to Britain for the funeral of Winston Churchill in 1965, when he would undoubtedly have met the queen.
- ^ Estabrook, Robert H. (February 1, 1965). "Humphrey's Absence At Funeral Criticized". The Washington Post. p. A8.
- ^ a b Loftus, Joseph A. (February 5, 1965). "Johnson Suspects a 'Mistake' in Not Sending Humphrey to Churchill Rites". The New York Times. p. 14.
- ^ "February 4, 1965: Press Conference". Miller Center. University of Virginia. October 20, 2016. Retrieved October 17, 2022.
- ^ Heath, Edward (1998). The course of my life : my autobiography. London: Hodder & Stoughton. p. 471. ISBN 978-0340708521.
- ^ Curtis, Mark. "Britain's Secret Support For US Aggression: The Vietnam War". Secret Affairs. Retrieved November 3, 2014.
- ^ Peters, Gerhard; Woolley, John. "Remarks of Welcome to Prime Minister Edward Heath of Great Britain". The American Presidency Project. UCSB. Retrieved November 3, 2014.
- ^ Seitz, Raymond (1999). Over here (4 ed.). London: Phoenix. p. 317. ISBN 978-0753805190.
- ^ Rossbach, Niklas H. (2009). Heath, Nixon and the rebirth of the special relationship : Britain, the US and the EC, 1969-74. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 85. ISBN 978-0-230-57725-1.
- ^ Aldrich, Richard. "Transcript of Nixon phone call reveals depth of collapse of the US UK special relationship in 1973". University of Warwick.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|url=
(help) - ^ Hughes, R. G.; Robb, T. (May 2, 2013). "Kissinger and the Diplomacy of Coercive Linkage in the "Special Relationship" between the United States and Great Britain, 1969-1977". Diplomatic History. 37 (4): 872–879. doi:10.1093/dh/dht061.
- ^ Hughes, Geraint (2008). "Britain, the Transatlantic Alliance, and the Arab-Israeli War of 1973". Journal of Cold War Studies. 10 (2): 3–40. doi:10.1162/jcws.2008.10.2.3. S2CID 57566713. Retrieved October 6, 2014.
- ^ "Dangerous Liaisons: Post-September 11 Intelligence Alliances". Harvard International Review. 24 (3): 49–54. September 2002.
- ^ Hughes, R. G.; Robb, T. (May 2, 2013). "Kissinger and the Diplomacy of Coercive Linkage in the "Special Relationship" between the United States and Great Britain, 1969-1977". Diplomatic History. 37 (4): 884–886. doi:10.1093/dh/dht061.
- ^ David Cannadine, "Thatcher [née Roberts], Margaret Hilda, Baroness Thatcher (1925–2013)" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/106415
- ^ "Lockheed Martin Awarded Support Contract for United Kingdom's Fleet Ballistic Missile Program?". Archived from the original on August 13, 2011. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- ^ Simon Jenkins, "American Involvement in the Falklands" The Economist, March 3, 1984
- ^ Christopher Coker (2016). United States, Western Europe and Military Intervention Overseas. Springer. p. 32. ISBN 9781349084067.
- ^ Jan Goldman (2015). The Central Intelligence Agency: An Encyclopedia of Covert Ops, Intelligence Gathering, and Spies. Abc-Clio. p. 254. ISBN 9781610690928.
- ^ James Naughtie, The Accidental American: Tony Blair and the Presidency (Pan Macmillan, 2005).
- ^ Alan Dobson, and Steve Marsh, eds. Anglo-American Relations: Contemporary Perspectives (2013) p. 72
- ^ Shawcross (2004) ch 2
- ^ Montgomery: Lessons in Leadership from the Soldier's General By Trevor Royle pg. 180
- ^ Police reject UK rendition claims, BBC News Online, June 9, 2007
- ^ The findings that the UK intelligence agencies knew of torture during the Iraq War reveals the dark side of the special relationship, The Independent
- ^ "Sometimes, I pretend I am Canadian". Helen Kirwan-Taylor. London. November 13, 2004. Archived from the original on March 23, 2005. Retrieved July 13, 2007.
- ^ "US and UK: A transatlantic love story?". BBC. November 17, 2003. Retrieved September 6, 2009.
- ^ Julian Glover and Ewen MacAskill (July 25, 2006). "Stand up to US, voters tell Blair". The Guardian. London. Retrieved November 22, 2007.
Britain should take a much more robust and independent approach to the United States, according to a Guardian/ICM poll published today, which finds strong public opposition to Tony Blair's close working relationship with President Bush.
- ^ "PM's speech on US Elections". number10.gov.uk. November 3, 2004. Archived from the original on July 19, 2007. Retrieved May 29, 2007.
- ^ Young, Hugo (November 14, 2002). "Blair has not been a poodle, but poodleism still beckons". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
- ^ James K. Wither, "British bulldog or Bush's poodle? Anglo-American relations and the Iraq War." Parameters 33.4 (2003): 67+ online.
- ^ They were Khaleel Mamut, Hozaifa Parhat, Salahidin Abdulahat, and Abdullah Abdulqadirakhun.
- ^ Naughton, Philippe (June 11, 2009). "Foreign Office fury over settlement of Guantánamo Uighurs in Bermuda". The Times. London. Retrieved May 26, 2010.[dead link ]
- ^ Keesing's Contemporary Archives Volume 55, (August 2009) Page 49368
- ^ "Ambassador: US-UK ties intact despite Lockerbie". Associated Press.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ Jones, Sam (August 25, 2009). "Lockerbie bomber's Libya reception 'repulsed' Brown". The Guardian. UK.
- ^ "U.S. hails 'special ties' with UK". BBC News. February 3, 2009. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
- ^ John Dumbrell, A Special Relationship: Anglo-American Relations from the Cold War to Iraq (2006) p. 33.
- ^ "Obama's Blockbuster Gift for Brown: 25 DVDs –". Fox News. March 6, 2009. Archived from the original on March 10, 2009.
- ^ a b "Poll ranks Canada second in list of top U.S. allies". CTV News. CTV.ca news staff. March 4, 2009. Retrieved December 5, 2017.
- ^ Spence, Matt (July 24, 2009). "President Obama makes U.S. popular in Europe again, Pew poll says". The Times. London. Retrieved May 26, 2010.[dead link ]
- ^ "Obama: "the United States has no closer friend and ally than the United Kingdom"". May 12, 2010.
- ^ Moore, Matthew (February 4, 2011). "WikiLeaks cables: U.S. agrees to tell Russia Britain's nuclear secrets". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on February 5, 2011. Retrieved February 6, 2011.
- ^ Full video of the speech. "YouTube". YouTube. May 26, 2010.
- ^ "Scottish independence: Barack Obama backs 'strong and united' UK". BBC News. June 5, 2014. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
- ^ "President Obama-Prime Minister May G-20 News Conference - C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org.
- ^ "Britain's May prepares to become first foreign leader to meet President Trump - The Washington Post". The Washington Post.
- ^ Knight, Sam (November 30, 2016). "Nigel Farage on the Story Behind His Friendship with Trump". The New Yorker. Retrieved July 4, 2017.
- ^ Campbell, Scott (November 9, 2016). "Anti-Donald Trump protests erupt outside US embassy in London as placards compare him to Hitler". The Mirror. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Rawlinson, Kevin (January 20, 2017). "Anti-Donald Trump protests take place around UK during inauguration". The Guardian. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Rahim, Zamira (January 31, 2017). "12 of the Most British Signs at Anti-President Trump Protests in the U.K." Time. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ "Trump travel ban: Thousands join protests across UK". BBC News. January 30, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ "Thousands protest in Britain against Trump's Jerusalem announcement". Middle East Monitor. December 9, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ "London attacks: Mayor Sadiq Khan dismisses Trump criticism". BBC News. June 4, 2017. Retrieved June 5, 2017.
- ^ "Donald Trump hits back at British PM Theresa May on Twitter over far-right retweets". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. November 30, 2017. Retrieved November 30, 2017.
- ^ Smith, David (November 30, 2017). "Donald Trump attacks Theresa May over her criticism of his far-right retweets". The Guardian. Retrieved November 30, 2017.
- ^ Adam, Karla (February 20, 2017). "British parliament debates Trump visit". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ "US ambassador hopeful for Trump UK visit". BBC News. December 12, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Castle, Stephen; Ramzy, Austin (2018). "Trump Won't Visit London to Open Embassy. His U.K. Critics Say He Got the Message". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Donald J. Trump [@realDonaldTrump] (January 11, 2018). "Reason I canceled my trip to London is that I am not a big fan of the Obama Administration having sold perhaps the best located and finest embassy in London for "peanuts," only to build a new one in an off location for 1.2 billion dollars. Bad deal. Wanted me to cut ribbon-NO!" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ Taylor, Adam (January 12, 2018). "'As usual, he's dead wrong': Former U.S. ambassadors explain London Embassy move after Trump criticism". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ "First Steps Toward Embassy Relocation". U.S. Embassy & Consulates in the United Kingdom. October 2, 2008. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Grierson, Jamie (January 12, 2018). "Debunked: Trump reasons for cancelling London visit". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Stewart, Heather; Smith, David (January 12, 2018). "Donald Trump cancels London visit amid protest fears". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
- ^ Roache, Madeline (June 4, 2019). "While Thousands March, President Trump Dismisses London Protests as 'Fake News'". Time. Archived from the original on June 13, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
- ^ Cranley, Ellen (June 4, 2019). "Photos show hundreds of people protesting Trump's visit in the UK, which the president called 'fake news'". Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 8, 2019. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
- ^ "Trump administration is 'inept and insecure', says UK ambassador". BBC News. July 7, 2019. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
- ^ Michelle Kosinski; Schams Elwazer; Stephen Collinson (July 7, 2019). "Cables from UK's ambassador to the US blast Trump as 'inept,' 'incompetent'". CNN. Retrieved July 7, 2019.
- ^ "Trump sharpens attack on UK ambassador Kim Darroch over emails". BBC News. July 8, 2019. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
- ^ Mason, Rowena; Walker, Peter (July 8, 2019). "Theresa May has 'full faith' in Kim Darroch but rejects his view of Trump". The Guardian. Retrieved July 10, 2019.
- ^ a b Walker, Peter (July 10, 2019). "Kim Darroch resigns as UK ambassador to US after leaked Trump comment". The Guardian. Retrieved July 10, 2019.
- ^ Walker, Peter; Wintour, Patrick; Syal, Rajeev; Siddiqui, Sabrina (July 10, 2019). "Boris Johnson blamed after Kim Darroch quits as UK ambassador to US". The Guardian. Retrieved July 10, 2019.
- ^ "Trump's UK ambassador hits out at US farming 'smears'". politico.eu. March 2, 2019.
- ^ "UK-US trade deal: Envoy attacks 'myths' about US farming". BBC News. March 2, 2019.
- ^ Ian M. Sheldon, "Brexit: Why did the 'chlorinated chicken' cross the pond?." (paper presented at IATRC Symposium, 2019) online p. 1.
- ^ "US ambassador to UK under fire over defence of chlorinated chicken". The Guardian. March 2, 2019.
- ^ "American chickens covered in chlorine have become a hot-button Brexit issue in Britain". Fast Company. August 26, 2020.
- ^ "US ambassador to UK slams critics of American agriculture". AP News. AP News. March 2, 2019.
- ^ Sheldon, 2019, p. 2.
- ^ "No 10 says Johnson's row with Trump over Huawei was 'overblown'". The Guardian. February 6, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
- ^ Katwala, Amit (February 22, 2019). "Here's how GCHQ scours Huawei hardware for malicious code". Wired UK. ISSN 1357-0978. Retrieved July 31, 2020.
- ^ Garside, Juliette (August 7, 2016). "The Chinese firm taking threats to UK national security very seriously". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
- ^ Schwartz, Matthew S. (July 14, 2020). "In Reversal, U.K. Will Ban Huawei Equipment From Its 5G Network". NPR. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
- ^ "Huawei to be removed from UK 5G networks by 2027". GOV.UK. Retrieved July 30, 2020.
- ^ Culbertson, Alix (May 4, 2021). "Boris Johnson meets US Secretary of State in attempt to build ties with Biden administration - as G7 foreign ministers meet". Sky News. Retrieved May 20, 2021.
- ^ "G7: Joe Biden is breath of fresh air, says Boris Johnson". BBC News. June 11, 2021. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
- ^ Sanger, David E.; Shear, Michael D. (June 10, 2021). "Eighty Years Later, Biden and Johnson Revise the Atlantic Charter for a New Era". The New York Times. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- ^ "The New Atlantic Charter". The White House. June 10, 2021. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- ^ "UK struggles for influence as Afghan crisis strains US ties". Associated Press. August 23, 2021.
- ^ "Nosedive in UK-US relations is another casualty of Afghanistan's fall". The Guardian. August 22, 2021.
- ^ Gordon Lubold, "U.S. to Share Nuclear Submarine Technology With Australia in New Pact" Wall Street Journal Sept 15, 2021
- ^ McGuinness, Alan (September 21, 2021). "Boris Johnson refuses to commit to US-UK trade deal by 2024 - as he says Joe Biden has 'a lot of fish to fry'". Sky News. Retrieved September 22, 2021.
- ^ "Trade and Investment with the United States". UK Trade and Investment.[permanent dead link ]
- ^ "Top Trading Partners – Total Trade, Exports, Imports". US Census Bureau.
- ^ "Trade and Investment with the United States". Foreign TradeX. Archived from the original on October 1, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
- ^ "Press Conference by Kerry, British Foreign Secretary Hague". US Department of State. September 9, 2013. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013.
- ^ Riley-Smith, Ben (April 12, 2023). "Exclusive: US trade deal talks won't start until 2025 at the earliest". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved June 28, 2023.
- ^ "Britain Eyes Trade Agreements With California, Utah". US News. December 9, 2022.
- ^ "UK-US: What's happened to their free trade deal?". Made for Minds. July 7, 2023.
- ^ "UK and Indiana trade and economic memorandum of understanding". GOV.UK. May 27, 2022.
- ^ "UK and North Carolina co-operation and trade memorandum of understanding". GOV.UK. July 20, 2022.
- ^ "UK and South Carolina co-operation and trade memorandum of understanding". GOV.UK. December 8, 2022.
- ^ "UK and Oklahoma co-operation and trade memorandum of understanding". GOV.UK. April 19, 2023.
- ^ "UK and Utah trade and economic cooperation memorandum of understanding". GOV.UK. June 22, 2023.
- ^ "UK signs sixth US state deal with Washington State". GOV.UK. September 25, 2023.
- ^ "UK and Florida sign pact to boost trade". GOV.UK. November 15, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
- ^ "UK minister sees 'huge opportunities' from trade pact with Florida". Reuters. November 14, 2023. Retrieved November 15, 2023.
- ^ "UK signs trade pact with second biggest US state – Texas". GOV.UK. March 13, 2024. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
- ^ "UK Signs Trade Pact With Texas in Effort to Boost Green Industry". Bloomberg. March 13, 2024. Archived from the original on March 13, 2024. Retrieved March 13, 2024.
- ^ "UK has no plans to strike US trade deal during Rishi Sunak visit to Washington". Financial Times. May 30, 2023.
- ^ a b "UK puts pen to paper on fifth trade pact with a US state". GOV.UK. June 22, 2023.
- ^ "Joint Statement on UK-Colorado Trade: Huddleston – Polis Meeting". GOV.UK. May 31, 2023.
- ^ "Joint Statement on UK-Illinois Trade: Huddleston – Pritzker Meeting". GOV.UK. July 18, 2023.
- ^ "UK minister to sign trade pact with Florida Governor DeSantis". The Strait Times. November 8, 2023. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
- ^ "US and UK back new 'Atlantic Declaration' for economic cooperation". Reuters. June 8, 2023.
- ^ "Sunak and Biden agree 'Atlantic Declaration' to boost economic security". Sky News. June 8, 2023.
- ^ "What Sunak's Atlantic Declaration is – and isn't". BBC News. June 9, 2023.
- ^ "UK and US launch first-of-its kind economic partnership". GOV.UK. June 8, 2023.
- ^ "Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak unveil 'Atlantic declaration' to strengthen economic ties". Financial Times. June 8, 2023.
- ^ "Kemi Badenoch signs treaty for UK to join Indo-Pacific trade bloc". The Guardian. July 16, 2023.
- ^ "UK Joins Pacific Trade Deal, Sees 'Very Low' Chance of US Pact". Bloomberg. July 16, 2023.
- ^ "Revealed: Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak seek UK/US trade pact before 2024 elections". Politico. October 3, 2023. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
- ^ "US wants UK to open up its agriculture markets as part of new trade deal". The Guardian. October 3, 2023. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
- ^ "UK minister says "zero" chance of free trade deal with Biden". Reuters. October 3, 2023. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
- ^ "UK & USA relations". UK in the USA Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Archived from the original on June 16, 2009. Retrieved August 29, 2009.
- ^ "UK Airport Statistics". BAA.
- ^ "Concorde". Super 70s.com.
- ^ "Greyhound". FirstGroup PLC. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
- ^ Raine, George (August 2, 2007). "Bargain bus company riding into Bay Area next week". SFGate. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
- ^ Colman, Jonathan (2005). Kaufman, Will; Macpherson, Heidi Slettedahl (eds.). "Summit Meetings". Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History. 3: 941–945.
- ^ Pitofsky, Marina (September 8, 2022). "Queen Elizabeth met every US president since Truman – except one: See her visits with US leaders". USA Today.
- ^ "HM The Queen - Interests". The British Monarchy. Crown Copyright. February 27, 2014.
- ^ "The Royal Visit: 7–12th June 1939".
- ^ "State Visit". Embassy of the US London. Archived from the original on April 28, 2009. Retrieved October 18, 2009.
- ^ Kleinfield, N. R. (July 6, 2010). "The Queen Breezes In for an Afternoon". The New York Times.
- ^ "Visit of President Bush to the United Kingdom 18–21 November 2003". USEmbassy.gov. Archived from the original on May 27, 2010. Retrieved October 18, 2009.
- ^ United States Department of State
- ^ "Tips Cepat membakar lemak - wivtc.com". wivtc.com.
- ^ "US unveils Atlantic co-operation pact". Financial Times. September 19, 2023.
- ^ "International cyber-cop unit girds for uphill battles". NetworkWorld.com. Archived from the original on May 26, 2013. Retrieved October 18, 2009.
- ^ "The UKUSA Community".
- ^ "Trenton twinning tourism boost for Jersey?". Jersey Evening Post. November 29, 2019. Retrieved November 29, 2019.
- ^ "Differences Between American and British English". Archived from the original on March 5, 2012. Retrieved October 18, 2009.
- ^ Robert D. Putnam; David E. Campbell; Shaylyn Romney Garrett (2010). American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. Simon and Schuster. p. 316. ISBN 9781416566885.
- ^ "The Two Types of Capitalism". innovationzen.com. October 19, 2006.
- ^ American Community Survey Total British ancestry reported as a collective group [1]
- ^ British-American ancestry ACS 2009. Archived November 24, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "About Ancestry.co.uk". www.ancestry.co.uk. Archived from the original on March 30, 2012. Retrieved May 9, 2019.
- ^ "United States 1980 Census" (PDF).
- ^ "America's Changing Religious Landscape". Pew Research Center. May 12, 2015. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
- ^ "How many people go regularly to weekly religious services?". Religious Tolerance website. Archived from the original on April 20, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
- ^ "'One in 10' attends church weekly". BBC News. April 3, 2007.
- ^ "'Why Believe in a God?' Ad Campaign Launches on D.C. Buses". Fox News. November 12, 2008. Archived from the original on February 8, 2009. Retrieved January 19, 2009.
- ^ Lawrence, Felicity (November 23, 2010). "Drop that spoon! The truth about breakfast cereals: an extract from Felicity Lawrence's book". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ a b "The American Misconception of English Food". pastemagazine.com. August 28, 2016. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- ^ Jessie (December 22, 2015). "Southern cooking that doesn't just whistle Dixie". Backwoods Home Magazine. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- ^ "A Short History of 'a Beer and a Shot'". www.vice.com. March 16, 2018. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- ^ Macdonald, Fiona (January 5, 2012). Whisky, A Very Peculiar History. Andrews UK Limited. ISBN 978-1-908759-24-5.
- ^ Collins, Spencer (2003). British Food: An Extraordinary Thousand Years of History. Grub Street Publishers.
- ^ "Home". Molson Coors. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Company | McCormick Corporation". McCormick Corporation. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Home | Kellogg's". Kellogg's United Kingdom. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Campbell's Soup UK | The World's Most Iconic Soup Brand". Campbell's Soup UK. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Heinz | Home". Heinz UK. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "About Us| PepsiCo.com". pepsico.co.uk. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Coca-Cola European Partners". Coca-Cola European Partners. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Home | Europe". Mondelēz International, Inc. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Home". Unilever USA. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "About us - Global manufacturing". Associated British Foods plc. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "North America". Diageo. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "The Cadbury Brand – does it matter if it is British or American?". www.birmingham.ac.uk. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Cadbury union bosses meet Kraft". BBC News. November 19, 2009. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Home". Krispy Kreme UK. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Pret a Manger US". Pret a Manger. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "itsu New York". itsu us. Archived from the original on May 23, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Home Page - Compass Group USA". Compass USA. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "US vs UK | Food Wars". Youtube.
- ^ "UK consumers could be forced to accept insects, mould and rat hair in food as part of post-Brexit trade deal". The Independent. October 9, 2018. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Dispatches - The Truth About Chlorinated Chicken". Channel 4. Archived from the original on August 4, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2019.
- ^ "Brexit: The Hidden Danger of Chlorinated Chicken. With Stephen Fry", Pindex, March 26, 2019, archived from the original on December 13, 2021, retrieved August 4, 2019
- ^ "US overtakes Britain as world's top 'soft power'". Financial Times. June 14, 2016. Archived from the original on December 11, 2022.
- ^ Worthen, John (2011). T. S. Eliot: A Short Biography.
- ^ Pilgrim, Imelda (July 4, 1997). Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry: York Notes for GCSE (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman. ISBN 9780582314559.
- ^ "Of Mice and Men - GCSE English Literature". BBC Bitesize. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
- ^ The Color Purple: Advanced - York Notes for A Level Study Guide. York Notes. 2003. ISBN 9780582784345.
- ^ Carmody, Deirdre (November 20, 1976). "Dorothy Schiff Agrees to Sell Post To Murdoch, Australian Publisher". The New York Times. Retrieved December 30, 2017.
- ^ Anderson, Clive (August 11, 2003). "What if Rupert Murdoch hadn't bought The Sun?". The Independent. London. Retrieved December 30, 2017.
- ^ Brogan, Patrick (October 11, 1982). "Citizen Murdoch". The New Republic. Retrieved December 30, 2017.
- ^ Sherwin, Adam (March 20, 2015). "Katharine Viner appointed editor-in-chief of The Guardian". The Independent.
- ^ Perlberg, Steven (June 21, 2017). "How The Guardian Lost America". Buzz Feed. Retrieved June 21, 2017.
- ^ "The Guardian - US Edition". TheGuardian.com.
- ^ "The Independent - US Edition". Independent.co.uk.
- ^ "BuzzFeed - UK Edition".
- ^ "HuffPost - United Kingdom".
- ^ Kim C. Sturgess (2004). Shakespeare and the American Nation. Cambridge University Press, ch 1. ISBN 9780521835855.
- ^ "Prime Minister's Questions | Series | C-SPAN.org". www.c-span.org. Retrieved July 31, 2019.
- ^ "American Football: The whole nine yards: The NFL comes to Wembley". The Independent. London. October 25, 2008. Retrieved May 26, 2010.
- ^ Sandomir, Richard (August 10, 2015). "NBC Retains Rights to Premier League in Six-Year Deal". The New York Times.
- ^ "BBC World Service - A GUIDE TO LISTENING IN ENGLISH MARCH – OCTOBER 2017" (PDF). BBC World Service. September 22, 2017.
- ^ "Programs". American Public Media. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ "Boston Calling - BBC World Service". BBC. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
- ^ Dowell, Ben (March 12, 2012). "Radio 4 pilots US version of News Quiz". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
- ^ "BBC - Press Office - Sirius Satellite Radio to broadcast BBC's Radio 1". BBC. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
- ^ "Garrison Keillor's Radio Show - BBC Radio 4 Extra". BBC. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
- ^ "Traditional Celtic Music's Contributions to American Music".
- ^ "Origins of Country Music". Country Music Hall of Fame and Museum.
- ^ "Pop and Rock Music in the 60s A Brief History". Spectropop.
- ^ "When England-USA served up one of the World Cup's biggest upsets". Inside FIFA. April 2, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Morse, Ben (November 24, 2022). "'The greatest sporting upset of all time': When the US beat the 'giants' of England at the 1950 World Cup". CNN. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ "The greatest FIFA World Cup upsets". FIFA. November 22, 2022. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ McNulty, Phil (June 13, 2010). "England 1-1 USA". BBC Sport. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ McNulty, Phil (November 24, 2022). "World Cup 2022: England 0-0 USA - Three Lions labour to goalless draw". BBC Sport. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ "USA national football team: record v England". 11v11. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Church, Ben (November 21, 2022). "Gareth Bale saves Wales to frustrate USMNT at Qatar 2022". CNN. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ "USA national football team: record v Scotland". 11v11. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ "USA national football team: record v Northern Ireland". 11v11. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Reese, Derek (January 28, 2024). "Americans who played in the Premier League: The definitive list". World Soccer Talk. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Rodriguez, Alicia (November 27, 2016). "Top 10 English players in MLS history". Major League Soccer. Retrieved August 5, 2024.
- ^ Butturini, Paula (January 29, 1983). "British newspapers and television presented a guide to 'Football..." UPI. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ Matthews, Kieran (December 30, 2015). "Is American Football about to take Nottingham by storm?". Notts TV News | The heart of Nottingham news coverage for Notts TV. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ TheFA. "A History Of American Football At Wembley". wembleystadium.com. Archived from the original on March 31, 2016. Retrieved April 14, 2016.
- ^ Adamson, Mike (October 5, 2007). "NFL: Mike Adamson on the Miami Dolphins' poor start to the season". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ "The NFL comes to Wembley". The Guardian. October 29, 2007. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ Ingle, Sean (October 12, 2018). "NFL ready for another London party and edging closer to permanent move". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved July 27, 2019.
- ^ Carpenter, Les (October 23, 2017). "'London's team' are finally threatening to become an NFL force". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
- ^ Sulat, Nate (July 26, 2013). "Why isn't baseball more popular in the UK?". BBC News. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
- ^ "Major League Baseball Told: Your Sport Is British, Not American". Telegraph. London. September 11, 2008. Archived from the original on October 16, 2008. Retrieved February 3, 2009.
- ^ Miller, Chris (September 12, 2023). "Get TNT Sports on Virgin TV: BT Sport is now TNT Sports". Virgin Media. Retrieved July 13, 2024.
- ^ "Red Sox and Yankees confirmed to meet in London MLB games". The Guardian. Associated Press. May 8, 2018. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved August 1, 2019.
- ^ "MLB London Series: All you need to know about New York Yankees v Boston Red Sox". BBC Sport. June 29, 2019. Retrieved August 1, 2019.
- ^ "St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago Cubs to play in Mitel & MLB London Series 2020". MLB.com. June 7, 2019. Retrieved May 10, 2022.
- ^ "MLB announces that Cubs will play Cardinals in London in 2023". cubshq.com. August 4, 2022. Retrieved August 6, 2022.
- ^ Hunt, Dennis (June 1, 1986). "Hit Puts The Outfield Team in the Big Leagues". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 13, 2024.
- ^ "Why cricket and America are made for each other". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved December 15, 2024.
Further reading
[edit]General surveys and studies to 1921
[edit]- Allen, H. C. Great Britain and the United States: A History of Anglo-American Relations, 1783–1952 (1954), 1032pp. online; most thorough scholarly coverage
- Bailey, Thomas A. A Diplomatic History of the American People (10th edition 1980) online
- Burk, Kathleen. The Lion and the Eagle. The Interaction of the British and American Empires 1783-1972 (2018) online review
- Burk, Kathleen. Old World, New World. The Story of Britain and America (2009) online review Archived January 18, 2022, at the Wayback Machine.
- Burk, Kathleen. Britain, America and the Sinews of War, 1914–1918 (1985), Financial and material support.
- Burt, Alfred L. The United States, Great Britain, and British North America from the Revolution to the Establishment of Peace after the War of 1812 (1940), detailed history by Canadian scholar.
- Campbell, Charles S. Anglo-American Understanding 1898–1903 (1957)
- Collier, Basil. The lion and the eagle; British and Anglo-American strategy, 1900-1950 (1972) online
- Cook, James Gwin. Anglophobia: An Analysis of Anti-British Prejudice in the United States (1919) online
- Crawford, Martin. The Anglo-American Crisis of the Mid-Nineteenth Century: The Times and America, 1850–1862 (1987)
- Cullinane, Michael Patrick. "100 Years of Peace among English‐Speaking People: Anglo‐American Cultural Diplomacy, 1909–1921." Peace & Change 46.1 (2021): 5-34.
- Dobson, Alan P. "The evolving study of Anglo-American relations: the last 50 years." Journal of Transatlantic Studies 18.4 (2020): 415–433. major review of historiography
- Dunning, William Archibald. The British Empire and the United States (1914) online celebratory study by leading American scholar, written before World War I began.
- Ellis, Sylvia. Historical Dictionary of Anglo-American Relations (2009) and text search
- Foreman, Amanda. A World on Fire: Britain's Crucial Role in the American Civil War (Random House, 2011), 958 pp.
- Geoffrey Wheatcroft, "How the British Nearly Supported the Confederacy," New York Times Sunday Book Review June 30, 2011 online
- Hollowell; Jonathan. Twentieth-Century Anglo-American Relations (2001)
- Hitchens, Christopher. Blood, Class and Empire: The Enduring Anglo-American Relationship (2004)
- Kaufman, Will, and Heidi Slettedahl Macpherson, eds. Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History (3 vol 2005), 1157pp; encyclopedic coverage
- MacKenzie, Scott A. "But There Was No War: The Impossibility of a United States Invasion of Canada after the Civil War" American Review of Canadian Studies (2017) online
- Masterson, William H. Tories and Democrats : British diplomats in pre-Jacksonian America (1985) online
- Mowat, R. B. The diplomatic relations of Great Britain and the United States (1925).online; scholarly survey; 350pp
- Ovendale, Ritchie. Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century (1998)
- Pederson, William D. ed. A Companion to Franklin D. Roosevelt (2011) pp 493–516, covers FDR's policies to 1945
- Perkins, Bradford. The First Rapprochement: England and the United States, 1795–1805 (1955)
- Perkins, Bradford. Prologue to war: England and the United States, 1805–1812 (1961) online
- Perkins, Bradford. Castlereagh and Adams : England and the United States, 1812-1823 (1964) online
- Perkins, Bradford. The great rapprochement; England and the United States, 1895-1914 (1968) online
- Perkins, Edwin J. Financing Anglo-American trade: The House of Brown, 1800–1880 (1975)
- Peskin, Lawrence A. "Conspiratorial Anglophobia and the War of 1812." Journal of American History 98#3 (2011): 647–669. online
- Rakestraw, Donald A. For Honor or Destiny: The Anglo-American Crisis over the Oregon Territory (Peter Lang Publishing, 1995)
- Pletcher, David M. The Diplomacy of Annexation: Texas, Oregon, and the Mexican War (U of Missouri Press, 1973) online
- Reid, Brian Holden. "Power, Sovereignty, and the Great Republic: Anglo-American Diplomatic Relations in the Era of the Civil War" Diplomacy & Statecraft (2003) 14#2 pp 45–76.
- Reid, Brian Holden. "'A Signpost That Was Missed'? Reconsidering British Lessons from the American Civil War," Journal of Military History 70#2 (2006), pp. 385–414.
- Schake, Kori. Safe Passage: The Transition from British to American Hegemony (Harvar UP, 2017) excerpt, major study of military relations between the two from 1820s to 1940s.
- Spender, Stephen. Love-Hate Relations: English and American Sensibilities (Hamish Hamilton, 1974) online focus on 19th century visitors and writers.
- Tilchin, William N. Theodore Roosevelt and the British Empire: A Study in Presidential Statecraft (1997)
- Tuffnell, Stephen. ""Uncle Sam is to be Sacrificed": Anglophobia in Late Nineteenth-Century Politics and Culture." American Nineteenth Century History 12#1 (2011): 77-99.
- Tulloch, Hugh A. "Changing British attitudes towards the United States in the 1880s." Historical Journal 20.4 (1977): 825–840. online
- Watt, D. Cameron. Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain's place 1900–1975: a study of the Anglo-American relationship and world politics in the context of British and American foreign-policy-making in the twentieth century (1984). 302pp. online
- Williams, Andrew J. France, Britain and the United States in the Twentieth Century 1900–1940 (2014). 133–171.
- Woods, Randall Bennett. Changing of the Guard: Anglo-American Relations, 1941–1946 (1990)
- Woodward, David R. Anglo-American Relations. 1917-1918 (1993) complete book online
Since 1920, and "Special relationship"
[edit]- Abrahamian, Ervand. A History of Modern Iran (2008).
- Bartlett, Christopher John. The Special Relationship: A Political History of Anglo-American Relations Since 1945 (1992).
- Baylis, John. Anglo-American Defence Relations 1939–1984: The Special Relationship (1984)
- Baylis, John, and Steve Marsh. "The Anglo-American “Special Relationship”: the Lazarus of International Relations", Diplomacy and Statecraft 17#1 (2006): 173–211.
- Beloff, Max. "The Special Relationship: An Anglo-American Myth", in Martin Gilbert, ed. A Century of Conflict: Essays for A.J.P. Taylor (Hamish Hamilton, 1966)
- Brinton, Crane, The United States and Britain (1945) online focus on World War II
- Bullock, Alan. Ernest Bevin: Foreign Secretary 1945-1951 (1984) online
- Charmley, John. Churchill's Grand Alliance: The Anglo-American Special Relationship 1940–57 (1996)
- Coker, Christopher. "Britain and the new world order: the special relationship in the 1990s," International Affairs (1992): 407–421. in JSTOR
- Colman, Jonathan. A 'Special Relationship'?: Harold Wilson, Lyndon B. Johnson and Anglo-American Relations' at the Summit, 1964-8 (Manchester University Press, 2004)
- Dimbleby, David, and David Reynolds. An Ocean Apart: The Relationship Between Britain and America in the Twentieth Century (1988)
- Dobson, Alan P. US Wartime Aid to Britain (Croom Helm, 1986); in World War II.
- Dobson, Alan P. Anglo-American Relations in the Twentieth Century (1995).
- Dobson, Alan and Steve Marsh, eds. Anglo-American Relations: Contemporary Perspectives (Routledge, 2013), 10 essays by experts
- Dobson, Alan and Steve Marsh. "Anglo-American Relations: End of a Special Relationship?" International History Review 36:4 (August 2014): 673–697. DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2013.836124. online review argues it is still in effect
- Dobson, Alan J. The Politics of the Anglo-American Economic Special Relationship (1988)
- Dobson, Alan. "The special relationship and European integration." Diplomacy and Statecraft (1991) 2#1 79–102.
- Dumbrell, John. A special relationship: Anglo-American relations from the cold war to Iraq (2nd ed. 2006) excerpt
- Dumbrell, John. "The US–UK Special Relationship: Taking the 21st-Century Temperature." The British Journal of Politics & International Relations (2009) 11#1 pp: 64–78. online
- Gardiner, Juliet. 'Over Here', the GI’s in Wartime Britain (Collins and Brown, 1992)
- Gibb, Philip. Bridging the Atlantic: Anglo-American Fellowship and the Way to World Peace (Hutchinson, 1943), compiles public opinion of how each viewed the other.
- Glancy, Mark. "Temporary American citizens? British audiences, Hollywood films and the threat of Americanisation in the 1920s." Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television (2006) 26#4 pp 461–484.
- Hendershot, Robert M. Family Spats: Perception, Illusion, and Sentimentality in the Anglo-American Special Relationship (2008).
- Hollowell, Jonathan ed. Twentieth-Century Anglo-American Relations (Palgrave, 2001)
- Holmes, Alison R. and J. Rofe, eds. The Embassy in Grosvenor Square: American Ambassadors to the United Kingdom, 1938-2008 (2012)
- Hopkins, Michael F. et al. eds. Cold War Britain, 1945–1964: New Perspectives (2003)
- Jones, Matthew; Ruane, Kevin (2019). Anthony Eden, Anglo-American Relations and the 1954 Indochina Crisis. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9781350021167.
- Johnsen, William Thomas. The Origins of the Grand Alliance: Anglo-American Military Collaboration from the Panay Incident to Pearl Harbor (2016). 438 pp. online review
- Law, Michael John. Not Like Home: American Visitors to Britain in the 1950s (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2019) Online book review
- Louis, William Roger, and Hedley Bull, eds The "Special Relationship": Anglo-American Relations since 1945 (1987), 25 scholarly essays by British and American experts.
- Louis, William Roger. Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire, 1941–1945 (1978)
- Lyons, John F. America in the British Imagination: 1945 to the Present (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
- McKercher, B. J. C. Transition of Power: Britain's Loss of Global Pre-eminence to the United States, 1930-1945 (1999) 403pp
- Malchow, H.L. Special Relations: The Americanization of Britain? (Stanford University Press; 2011) 400 pages; explores American influence on the culture and counterculture of metropolitan London from the 1950s to the 1970s, from "Swinging London" to black, feminist, and gay liberation. excerpt and text search
- Pells, Richard. Not like Us: How Europeans Have Loved, Hated and Transformed American Culture since World War II (1997) online
- Ratti, Luca. Not-So-Special Relationship: The US, The UK and German Unification, 1945-1990 (Edinburgh UP, 2017).
- Reynolds, David. Rich relations: the American occupation of Britain, 1942-1945 (1995) online
- Reynolds, David. "A 'special relationship'? America, Britain and the international order since the Second World War." International Affairs (1985): 1-20.
- Reynolds, David. From World War to Cold War: Churchill, Roosevelt, and the International History of the 1940s (2007) excerpt and text search
- Rofe, J. Simon and Alison R. Holmes, eds. The Embassy in Grosvenor Square: American Ambassadors to the United Kingdom, 1938-2008 (2012), essays by scholars how the ambassadors promoted a special relationship.
- Scott, Andrew. Allies Apart: Heath, Nixon and the Anglo-American Relationship (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)
- Shawcross, William. Allies: The U.S., Britain, Europe and the War in Iraq (2004)
- Thorne, Christopher. Allies of a Kind: the United States, Britain and the War Against Japan, 1941–45 (Hamish Hamilton, 1978)
- Watry, David M. Diplomacy at the Brink: Eisenhower, Churchill, and Eden in the Cold War. (Louisiana State UP, 2014).
- Watt, D. Cameron. Succeeding John Bull: America in Britain's place, 1900-1975: a study of the Anglo-American relationship and world politics in the context of British and American foreign-policy-making in the twentieth century (1984) online
- Williams, Paul. British Foreign Policy under New Labour (2005)
- Wilson, T.A. The First Summit: Roosevelt and Churchill at Placentia Bay (Houghton Mifflin, 1969) in 1941
- Woolner, David B. "The Frustrated Idealists: Cordell Hull, Anthony Eden and the Search for Anglo-American Cooperation, 1933–1938" (PhD dissertation, McGill University, 1996) online bibliography pp 373–91.
Primary sources
[edit]- Blair, Tony. A Journey: My Political Life (2010), memoir by UK prime minister
- Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. The American Revolution through British Eyes 2v (2013)
- Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. The American Civil War through British Eyes: Dispatches from British Diplomats - Vol. 1 (2003) online Archived October 23, 2018, at the Wayback Machine
- Barnes, James J. and Patience P. Barnes, eds. Private and Confidential: Letters from British Ministers in Washington to the Foreign Secretaries in London, 1844-1867 (1993)
- Frankel, Robert. Observing America : the commentary of British visitors to the United States, 1890-1950 (2007) online
- Loewenheim, Francis L. et al. eds. Roosevelt and Churchill, their secret wartime correspondence (1975)
Other sources
[edit]- W. N Medlicott. British foreign policy since Versailles, 1919-1963 (1968)
- David Sanders and David Houghton. Losing an Empire, Finding a Role: British Foreign Policy Since 1945 (2nd ed. 2017)
- Robert F. Worth, "The End of the Show" (review of James Barr, Lords of the Desert: The Battle Between the United States and Great Britain for Supremacy in the Modern Middle East, Basic Books, 454 pp.; and Derek Leebaert, Grand Improvisation: America Confronts the British Superpower, 1945–1957, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 612 pp.), The New York Review of Books, vol. LXVI, no. 16 (October 24, 2019), pp. 44–46.
External links
[edit]- "History of United Kingdom – United States relations" from the US State Department
- Atlantic Archive: UK-US Relations in an Age of Global War 1939–1945
- John Bull and Uncle Sam: Four Centuries of British American Relations
- An analysis of the Special Relationship from a British perspective. From the Second World War to the latest global problems facing the United States.
- Lecture: Anti-Americanism and American Exceptionalism Archived June 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
- Goldwin Smith, "The Hatred of England," (1890) essay by Canadian scholar
- British Embassy in the United States of America Archived March 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
- Embassy of the United States of America in the United Kingdom
- The Woodrow Wilson Center's Nuclear Proliferation International History Project or NPIHP is a global network of individuals and institutions engaged in the study of international nuclear history through archival documents, oral history interviews and other empirical sources.