Jump to content

Talk:Safoora Zargar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Girdlast888 moved page Talk:Safoora Zargar to Talk:Arrest of Safoora Zargar: WP:BLP1E notbale only for her arrest
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Safoora Zargar/Archive 1) (bot
 
(59 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Notice|
{{Old AfD multi |date=21 May 2020 |result='''keep''' |page=Safoora Zargar}}
'''Page views of this article over the last 365 days:'''<br />
{{WikiProject India |class=B |importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Biography |class=B |listas=Zargar, Safoora |living=yes}}
{{ PageViews graph |365|Safoora Zargar|en.wikipedia.org }}
}}
{{Old AfD multi|date=21 May 2020 |result='''keep''' |page=Safoora Zargar}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| blp=yes|listas=Zargar, Safoora|
{{WikiProject India|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Biography}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
}}
{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|blp|protection=semi}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
Line 13: Line 21:
{{archives}}
{{archives}}


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* [[commons:File:Safoora Zargar.jpg|Safoora Zargar.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2021-03-16T10:03:51.531835 | Safoora Zargar.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TheChunky|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 10:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
:{{ping|TheChunky}} If you want the file preserved, you need to take action on Commons.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 18:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


:: Thanks for informing me. I have provided "permission" proof many times in the commons, but I don't understand why the admins there don't understand that. They keep asking more and more. Last time, they asked me for permission of [[Masrat Zahra]] and Sagrika Kissu for using their pics. Both of them had uploaded the pic in public domain and they left those pics for 'free to use'. But I was still asked for permission and I contact them and motivated both of them to email that permission format, then later commons admin replied with another form and made it hard for getting permission after having permission from real owner.
== The conspiracy theory ==
{{ping|TheChunky}} {{ping|AaqibAnjum}} I wonder whether either this article or the article on the [[North East Delhi riots]] should have a section describing the [[conspiracy theory]] put forward by the police in their 21 June status report. Maybe the section should be developed in a sandbox. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 15:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


:{{u|Toddy1}} well I think [[North East Delhi riots]] should have the conspiracy theory. But we need to find the Sources. Should be work on same sandbox? — [[User:TheChunky|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">The Chunky urf <i> Al Kashmiri</i></span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:TheChunky|<sup><i><span style="color:green">(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)</span></i></sup>]] 20:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
:: In short, the above pic of [[Safoora Zargar]] is also uploaded with permission and I have added the link there too. But still they asked for permission. So I think instead of having the headache, I prefer they should delete it. That is better option for me. Thank You ❤️. — [[User:TheChunky|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">The Chunky urf <i> Al Kashmiri</i></span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:TheChunky|<sup><i><span style="color:green">(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)</span></i></sup>]] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 10:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)</small>
::All the newspaper articles used as sources in the article on Zargar for what happened on 22-23 June talk about what the police status report said about the alleged conspiracy. I will draft something in a private sandbox over the next day or two.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 20:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
::: Good work {{u|Toddy1}}. Please let me know if I can help anywhere in between. Thanks. - [[User:AaqibAnjum|Aaqib Anjum Aafī]] (<sup>[[User talk:AaqibAnjum|talk]]</sup>) 21:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)


== Gulfisha Fatima ==
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
{{ping|Aafi}} Regarding [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Safoora_Zargar&curid=63892752&diff=1216394333&oldid=1216394277 this edit], the article entitled [[:Gulfisha Fatima]] was deleted because it was a copyright violation. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 19:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

* [[commons:File:Safoora Zargar.jpg|Safoora Zargar.jpg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-07-19T03:44:32.368469 | Safoora Zargar.jpg -->
:@[[User:Toddy1|Toddy1]]: I did notice it. I removed it because nobody would be eventually seeing it. It could be mentioned elsewhere as a redlink in the body. But [[WP:SEEALSO]] doesn't permit it: "The "See also" section should not include red links." ─ [[User:Aafi|<span style="color:SteelBlue">Aafī</span>]] [[User talk:Aafi|<span style="color:#80A0FF">(talk)</span>]] 19:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TheChunky|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 03:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:02, 30 March 2024

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheChunky: If you want the file preserved, you need to take action on Commons.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for informing me. I have provided "permission" proof many times in the commons, but I don't understand why the admins there don't understand that. They keep asking more and more. Last time, they asked me for permission of Masrat Zahra and Sagrika Kissu for using their pics. Both of them had uploaded the pic in public domain and they left those pics for 'free to use'. But I was still asked for permission and I contact them and motivated both of them to email that permission format, then later commons admin replied with another form and made it hard for getting permission after having permission from real owner.
In short, the above pic of Safoora Zargar is also uploaded with permission and I have added the link there too. But still they asked for permission. So I think instead of having the headache, I prefer they should delete it. That is better option for me. Thank You ❤️. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) — Preceding undated comment added 10:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gulfisha Fatima

[edit]

@Aafi: Regarding this edit, the article entitled Gulfisha Fatima was deleted because it was a copyright violation. -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: I did notice it. I removed it because nobody would be eventually seeing it. It could be mentioned elsewhere as a redlink in the body. But WP:SEEALSO doesn't permit it: "The "See also" section should not include red links." ─ Aafī (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]