Jump to content

Talk:List of Bluetooth protocols: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 14.161.24.105 - "Talk: "
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=List|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Telecommunications|class=List|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Telecommunications|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Technology|class=List}}
{{WikiProject Technology}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=List|importance=low|network=yes|network-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=low|network=yes|network-importance=mid}}
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 18:27, 15 February 2024

Talk

[edit]

Yes I think that an overview of all of the bluetooth protocols would be a better place for this article

Should ACL and SCO logical transports be moved to a different section? Those are really not protocols, and therefore I do not believe they belong here. Introiboad (talk) 15:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


1. can not find reason why the SCO/eSCO do not require to go through Host stack? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.118.171.95 (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2. hehe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.161.24.105 (talk) 02:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]