Jump to content

Talk:Dornier Do 17: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Archiving posts over 12 months old to Talk:Dornier Do 17/Archive 1
Tag: Replaced
Wing trailing edge: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| topic =War
| topic =War
}}
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Germany|class=GA|importance=low
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=low
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
|B-Class-1=yes
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|B-Class-2=yes
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|B-Class-3=yes
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|B-Class-4=yes
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|B-Class-5=yes
}}
}}
{{WPMILHIST|Aviation-task-force=yes|class=GA
{{WikiProject Military history|Aviation-task-force=yes|class=GA
|German-task-force=yes
|German-task-force=yes
|WWII-task-force=yes
|WWII-task-force=yes
Line 36: Line 27:
|B-Class-5=yes
|B-Class-5=yes
}}
}}
{{WPAVIATION|class=GA|Aircraft-project=yes
{{WikiProject Aviation|Aircraft-project=yes
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->
|B-Class-1=yes
|B-Class-1=yes
Line 48: Line 39:
|B-Class-5=yes
|B-Class-5=yes
}}
}}
}}
}}


== Inconsistency in units order for speed between chapters ==
== Inconsistency in units order for speed between chapters ==
Line 54: Line 45:
Some of the chapters give Imperial units and some metric units first when mentioning the speed of the plane, could someone edit them to be in consistent order? And since this is German (European) plane, I propose to standard view of metric units first.
Some of the chapters give Imperial units and some metric units first when mentioning the speed of the plane, could someone edit them to be in consistent order? And since this is German (European) plane, I propose to standard view of metric units first.
--[[Special:Contributions/86.115.22.83|86.115.22.83]] ([[User talk:86.115.22.83|talk]]) 22:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
--[[Special:Contributions/86.115.22.83|86.115.22.83]] ([[User talk:86.115.22.83|talk]]) 22:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

== Airborne Flamethrower ==

Apparently an airborne flamethrower was mounted experimentally on some Do-17s

https://www.key.aero/forum/historic-aviation/35945-luftwaffe-airborne-flamethrower

Would be worth writing up if someone can verify some of the following references

* Flypast, approximately November 2003
* Sky Spy - autobiography of Ray Holmes who shot down one such plane

[[User:StacksofHoy|StacksofHoy]] ([[User talk:StacksofHoy|talk]]) 17:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

::There is only one report of a flamethrower being fitted to one aircraft.[[User:Newzild|Newzild]] ([[User talk:Newzild|talk]]) 08:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

== Remove tail fin photo ==

I propose removing the photo of a tail fin from this article. The photo shows bad camera-shake. [[User:Newzild|Newzild]] ([[User talk:Newzild|talk]]) 08:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

== MG FF? ==

"After heavy losses of Do 17s during the [[Battle of Britain]] it was decided to replace the [[MG FF cannon]] with the more powerful [[MG 151 cannon|MG 151/15]]."

What MG FF? The article said nothing about it having anything except MG 15s before this. Now we are replacing a cannon with another? [[User:Idumea47b|Idumea47b]] ([[User talk:Idumea47b|talk]]) 00:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

== Wing trailing edge ==

Also what is the point of the emphasis about the trailing edge "ending a third of the way down the fuselage to increase wing incidence" and how this was "used on all subsequent Dornier bombers"? From the way it's phrased it took me a minute to figure out what is talking about, because I expected some unusual design aspect used only by Dornier aircraft. It's talking about camber and angle of incidence. That's how aircraft wings are built. You can look at any high wing aircraft of a similar sort and they are all built that way. Either the wing is raised over the fuselage and the trailing edge is level with the top (like in cabin monoplanes) or the upper surface is flush with the top of the fuselage, and the trailing edge is some distance down (Do 17, B-24. Low wing aircraft have flush trailing edge and the top of the wing rises to some point higher on the side of the fuselage ahead of it. That's what angle of incidence is, that's why almost all aircraft have it. It's necessary. [[User:Idumea47b|Idumea47b]] ([[User talk:Idumea47b|talk]]) 00:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:40, 28 June 2024

Good articleDornier Do 17 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 22, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Inconsistency in units order for speed between chapters

[edit]

Some of the chapters give Imperial units and some metric units first when mentioning the speed of the plane, could someone edit them to be in consistent order? And since this is German (European) plane, I propose to standard view of metric units first. --86.115.22.83 (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Airborne Flamethrower

[edit]

Apparently an airborne flamethrower was mounted experimentally on some Do-17s

https://www.key.aero/forum/historic-aviation/35945-luftwaffe-airborne-flamethrower

Would be worth writing up if someone can verify some of the following references

  • Flypast, approximately November 2003
  • Sky Spy - autobiography of Ray Holmes who shot down one such plane

StacksofHoy (talk) 17:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one report of a flamethrower being fitted to one aircraft.Newzild (talk) 08:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove tail fin photo

[edit]

I propose removing the photo of a tail fin from this article. The photo shows bad camera-shake. Newzild (talk) 08:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MG FF?

[edit]

"After heavy losses of Do 17s during the Battle of Britain it was decided to replace the MG FF cannon with the more powerful MG 151/15."

What MG FF? The article said nothing about it having anything except MG 15s before this. Now we are replacing a cannon with another? Idumea47b (talk) 00:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wing trailing edge

[edit]

Also what is the point of the emphasis about the trailing edge "ending a third of the way down the fuselage to increase wing incidence" and how this was "used on all subsequent Dornier bombers"? From the way it's phrased it took me a minute to figure out what is talking about, because I expected some unusual design aspect used only by Dornier aircraft. It's talking about camber and angle of incidence. That's how aircraft wings are built. You can look at any high wing aircraft of a similar sort and they are all built that way. Either the wing is raised over the fuselage and the trailing edge is level with the top (like in cabin monoplanes) or the upper surface is flush with the top of the fuselage, and the trailing edge is some distance down (Do 17, B-24. Low wing aircraft have flush trailing edge and the top of the wing rises to some point higher on the side of the fuselage ahead of it. That's what angle of incidence is, that's why almost all aircraft have it. It's necessary. Idumea47b (talk) 00:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]