Jump to content

Woodall number: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Undo Reverted
Added short description
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App description add
 
(38 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Number of the form (n * 2^n) - 1}}
In [[number theory]], a '''Woodall number''' (W<sub>n</sub>) is any [[natural number]] of the form
{{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}}
In [[number theory]], a '''Woodall number''' (''W''<sub>''n''</sub>) is any [[natural number]] of the form


:<math>W_n = n \cdot 2^n - 1</math>
:<math>W_n = n \cdot 2^n - 1</math>
Line 15: Line 17:
| title = Factorisation of <math>Q = (2^q \mp q)</math> and <math>(q \cdot {2^q} \mp 1)</math>
| title = Factorisation of <math>Q = (2^q \mp q)</math> and <math>(q \cdot {2^q} \mp 1)</math>
| volume = 47
| volume = 47
| year = 1917}}.</ref> inspired by [[James Cullen (mathematician)|James Cullen]]'s earlier study of the similarly-defined [[Cullen number]]s.
| year = 1917}}.</ref> inspired by [[James Cullen (mathematician)|James Cullen]]'s earlier study of the similarly defined [[Cullen number]]s.


==Woodall primes==
==Woodall primes==
Line 21: Line 23:
{{unsolved|mathematics|Are there infinitely many Woodall primes?}}
{{unsolved|mathematics|Are there infinitely many Woodall primes?}}


Woodall numbers that are also [[prime number]]s are called '''Woodall primes'''; the first few exponents ''n'' for which the corresponding Woodall numbers ''W''<sub>''n''</sub> are prime are 2, 3, 6, 30, 75, 81, 115, 123, 249, 362, 384, {{OEIS|id=A002234}}; the Woodall primes themselves begin with 7, 23, 383, 32212254719, {{OEIS|id=A050918}}.
Woodall numbers that are also [[prime number]]s are called '''Woodall primes'''; the first few exponents ''n'' for which the corresponding Woodall numbers ''W''<sub>''n''</sub> are prime are 2, 3, 6, 30, 75, 81, 115, 123, 249, 362, 384, ... {{OEIS|id=A002234}}; the Woodall primes themselves begin with 7, 23, 383, 32212254719, ... {{OEIS|id=A050918}}.


In 1976 [[Christopher Hooley]] showed that [[almost all]] Cullen numbers are [[composite number|composite]].<ref name="EPSW94">{{cite book|last1=Everest|first1=Graham|title=Recurrence sequences|last2=van der Poorten|first2=Alf|last3=Shparlinski|first3=Igor|last4=Ward|first4=Thomas|publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]]|year=2003|isbn=0-8218-3387-1|series=Mathematical Surveys and Monographs|volume=104|location=[[Providence, RI]]|page=94|zbl=1033.11006|author2-link=Alfred van der Poorten}}</ref> In October 1995, Wilfred Keller published a paper discussing several new Cullen primes and the efforts made to [[Prime factorisation|factorise]] other Cullen and Woodall numbers. Included in that paper is a personal communication to Keller from [[Hiromi Suyama]], asserting that Hooley's method can be reformulated to show that it works for any sequence of numbers {{math|''n'' · 2<sup>''n'' + ''a''</sup> + ''b''}}, where ''a'' and ''b'' are integers, and in particular, that Woodall numbers are almost all composites.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Keller|first1=Wilfrid|date=January 1995|title=New Cullen primes|journal=[[Mathematics of Computation]]|volume=64|issue=212|pages=1739|language=English|doi=10.1090/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3|issn=0025-5718|doi-access=free}} {{Cite web|last1=Keller|first1=Wilfrid|date=December 2013|title=Wilfrid Keller|website=www.fermatsearch.org|location=Hamburg|language=English|url=http://www.fermatsearch.org/history/WKeller.html|access-date=October 1, 2020|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200228175855/http://www.fermatsearch.org/history/WKeller.html|archive-date=February 28, 2020}}</ref> It is an [[List of unsolved problems in mathematics#Prime numbers|open problem]] on whether there are infinitely many Woodall primes. {{As of|2018|10}}, the largest known Woodall prime is 17016602&nbsp;×&nbsp;2<sup>17016602</sup>&nbsp;−&nbsp;1.<ref>{{Citation|title=The Prime Database: 8508301*2^17016603-1|url=http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=124539|work=Chris Caldwell's The Largest Known Primes Database|accessdate=March 24, 2018}}</ref> It has 5,122,515 digits and was found by Diego Bertolotti in March 2018 in the [[distributed computing]] project [[PrimeGrid]].<ref>{{Citation|author=[[PrimeGrid]]|title=Announcement of 17016602*2^17016602&nbsp;-&nbsp;1|url=http://www.primegrid.com/download/WOO-17016602.pdf|accessdate=April 1, 2018}}</ref>
In 1976 [[Christopher Hooley]] showed that [[almost all]] Cullen numbers are [[composite number|composite]].<ref name="EPSW94">{{cite book|last1=Everest|first1=Graham|title=Recurrence sequences|last2=van der Poorten|first2=Alf|last3=Shparlinski|first3=Igor|last4=Ward|first4=Thomas|publisher=[[American Mathematical Society]]|year=2003|isbn=0-8218-3387-1|series=Mathematical Surveys and Monographs|volume=104|location=[[Providence, RI]]|page=94|zbl=1033.11006|author2-link=Alfred van der Poorten}}</ref> In October 1995, Wilfred Keller published a paper discussing several new Cullen primes and the efforts made to [[Prime factorisation|factorise]] other Cullen and Woodall numbers. Included in that paper is a personal communication to Keller from [[Hiromi Suyama]], asserting that Hooley's method can be reformulated to show that it works for any sequence of numbers {{math|''n'' · 2<sup>''n'' + ''a''</sup> + ''b''}}, where ''a'' and ''b'' are [[integer]]s, and in particular, that almost all Woodall numbers are composite.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Keller|first1=Wilfrid|date=January 1995|title=New Cullen primes|journal=[[Mathematics of Computation]]|volume=64|issue=212|pages=1739|language=en|doi=10.1090/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3|issn=0025-5718|doi-access=free}} {{Cite web|last1=Keller|first1=Wilfrid|date=December 2013|title=Wilfrid Keller|website=www.fermatsearch.org|location=Hamburg|language=en|url=http://www.fermatsearch.org/history/WKeller.html|access-date=October 1, 2020|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200228175855/http://www.fermatsearch.org/history/WKeller.html|archive-date=February 28, 2020}}</ref> It is an [[List of unsolved problems in mathematics#Prime numbers|open problem]] whether there are infinitely many Woodall primes. {{As of|2018|10}}, the largest known Woodall prime is 17016602&nbsp;×&nbsp;2<sup>17016602</sup>&nbsp;−&thinsp;1.<ref>{{Citation|title=The Prime Database: 8508301*2^17016603-1|url=http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=124539|work=Chris Caldwell's The Largest Known Primes Database|access-date=March 24, 2018}}</ref> It has 5,122,515 digits and was found by Diego Bertolotti in March 2018 in the [[distributed computing]] project [[PrimeGrid]].<ref>{{Citation|author=PrimeGrid|author-link=PrimeGrid|title=Announcement of 17016602*2^17016602&nbsp;-&nbsp;1|url=http://www.primegrid.com/download/WOO-17016602.pdf|access-date=April 1, 2018}}</ref>


==Restrictions==
==Restrictions==
Starting with W<sub>4</sub> = 63 and W<sub>5</sub> = 159, every sixth Woodall number is divisible by 3; thus, in order for W<sub>n</sub> to be prime, the index n cannot be congruent to 4 or 5 (modulo 6). Also, for a positive integer m, the Woodall number W<sub>2<sup>m</sup></sub> may be prime only if 2<sup>m</sup> + m is prime. As of January 2019, the only known primes that are both Woodall primes and [[Mersenne primes]] are W<sub>2</sub> = M<sub>3</sub> = 7, and W<sub>512</sub> = M<sub>521</sub>.
Starting with ''W''<sub>4</sub> = 63 and ''W''<sub>5</sub> = 159, every sixth Woodall number is [[divisible]] by 3; thus, in order for ''W''<sub>''n''</sub> to be prime, the index ''n'' cannot be [[modular arithmetic|congruent]] to 4 or 5 (modulo 6). Also, for a positive integer ''m'', the Woodall number ''W''<sub>2<sup>''m''</sup></sub> may be prime only if 2<sup>''m''</sup> + ''m'' is prime. As of January 2019, the only known primes that are both Woodall primes and [[Mersenne primes]] are ''W''<sub>2</sub> = ''M''<sub>3</sub> = 7, and ''W''<sub>512</sub> = ''M''<sub>521</sub>.


==Divisibility properties==
==Divisibility properties==
Like Cullen numbers, Woodall numbers have many divisibility properties. For example, if ''p'' is a prime number, then ''p'' divides
Like Cullen numbers, Woodall numbers have many divisibility properties. For example, if ''p'' is a prime number, then ''p'' divides


:''W''<sub>(''p'' + 1) / 2</sub> if the [[Jacobi symbol]] <math>\left(\frac{2}{p}\right)</math> is +1 and
:''W''<sub>(''p''&nbsp;+&thinsp;1)&thinsp;/&thinsp;2</sub> if the [[Jacobi symbol]] <math>\left(\frac{2}{p}\right)</math> is +1 and


:''W''<sub>(3''p''&nbsp;−&nbsp;1)&nbsp;/&nbsp;2</sub> if the Jacobi symbol <math>\left(\frac{2}{p}\right)</math> is −1.{{Citation needed|date=December 2011}}
:''W''<sub>(3''p''&nbsp;−&thinsp;1)&thinsp;/&thinsp;2</sub> if the Jacobi symbol <math>\left(\frac{2}{p}\right)</math> is −1.{{Citation needed|date=December 2011}}


==Generalization==
==Generalization==
A '''generalized Woodall number base ''b''''' is defined to be a number of the form ''n'' × ''b''<sup>''n''</sup>&nbsp;−&nbsp;1, where ''n''&nbsp;+&nbsp;2&nbsp;>&nbsp;''b''; if a prime can be written in this form, it is then called a '''generalized Woodall prime'''.
A '''generalized Woodall number base ''b''''' is defined to be a number of the form ''n'' × ''b''<sup>''n''</sup>&nbsp;−&nbsp;1, where ''n''&nbsp;+&nbsp;2&nbsp;>&nbsp;''b''; if a prime can be written in this form, it is then called a '''generalized Woodall prime'''.


Least ''n'' such that ''n'' × ''b''<sup>''n''</sup> - 1 is prime are<ref>[http://harvey563.tripod.com/GWlist.txt List of generalized Woodall primes base 3 to 10000]</ref>
The smallest value of ''n'' such that ''n'' × ''b''<sup>''n''</sup> 1 is prime for ''b'' = 1, 2, 3, ... are<ref name="tripod">[http://harvey563.tripod.com/GWlist.txt List of generalized Woodall primes base 3 to 10000]</ref>
:3, 2, 1, 1, 8, 1, 2, 1, 10, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 167, 2, 1, 12, 1, 2, 2, 29028, 1, 2, 3, 10, 2, 26850, 1, 8, 1, 42, 2, 6, 2, 24, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 140, 1, 2, 2, 22, 2, 8, 1, 2064, 2, 468, 6, 2, 1, 362, 1, 2, 2, 6, 3, 26, 1, 2, 3, 20, 1, 2, 1, 28, 2, 38, 5, 3024, 1, 2, 81, 858, 1, 2, 3, 2, 8, 60, 1, 2, 2, 10, 5, 2, 7, 182, 1, 17782, 3, ... {{OEIS|id=A240235}}
:3, 2, 1, 1, 8, 1, 2, 1, 10, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 167, 2, 1, 12, 1, 2, 2, 29028, 1, 2, 3, 10, 2, 26850, 1, 8, 1, 42, 2, 6, 2, 24, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 140, 1, 2, 2, 22, 2, 8, 1, 2064, 2, 468, 6, 2, 1, 362, 1, 2, 2, 6, 3, 26, 1, 2, 3, 20, 1, 2, 1, 28, 2, 38, 5, 3024, 1, 2, 81, 858, 1, 2, 3, 2, 8, 60, 1, 2, 2, 10, 5, 2, 7, 182, 1, 17782, 3, ... {{OEIS|id=A240235}}


{{As of|2021|11}}, the largest known generalized Woodall prime with base greater than 2 is 2740879&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;32<sup>2740879</sup>&nbsp;−&nbsp;1.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Top Twenty: Generalized Woodall |url=https://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=45 |website=primes.utm.edu |access-date=20 November 2021}}</ref>
{|class="wikitable"
|''b''
|numbers ''n'' such that ''n'' × ''b''<sup>''n''</sup> - 1 is prime (these ''n'' are checked up to 350000)
|[[OEIS]] sequence
|-
|1
|3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 18, 20, 24, 30, 32, 38, 42, 44, 48, 54, 60, 62, 68, 72, 74, 80, 84, 90, 98, 102, 104, 108, 110, 114, 128, 132, 138, 140, 150, 152, 158, 164, 168, 174, 180, 182, 192, 194, 198, 200, 212, 224, 228, 230, 234, 240, 242, 252, 258, 264, 270, 272, 278, 282, 284, 294, ... (all primes plus 1)
|{{OEIS link|id=A008864}}
|-
|2
|2, 3, 6, 30, 75, 81, 115, 123, 249, 362, 384, 462, 512, 751, 822, 5312, 7755, 9531, 12379, 15822, 18885, 22971, 23005, 98726, 143018, 151023, 667071, 1195203, 1268979, 1467763, 2013992, 2367906, 3752948, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A002234}}
|-
|3
|1, 2, 6, 10, 18, 40, 46, 86, 118, 170, 1172, 1698, 1810, 2268, 4338, 18362, 72662, 88392, 94110, 161538, 168660, 292340, 401208, 560750, 1035092, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A006553}}
|-
|4
|1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 14, 23, 63, 107, 132, 428, 530, 1137, 1973, 2000, 7064, 20747, 79574, 113570, 293912, ..., 1993191, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A086661}}
|-
|5
|8, 14, 42, 384, 564, 4256, 6368, 21132, 27180, 96584, 349656, 545082, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A059676}}
|-
|6
|1, 2, 3, 19, 20, 24, 34, 77, 107, 114, 122, 165, 530, 1999, 4359, 11842, 12059, 13802, 22855, 41679, 58185, 145359, 249987, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A059675}}
|-
|7
|2, 18, 68, 84, 3812, 14838, 51582, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A242200}}
|-
|8
|1, 2, 7, 12, 25, 44, 219, 252, 507, 1155, 2259, 2972, 4584, 12422, 13905, 75606, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A242201}}
|-
|9
|10, 58, 264, 1568, 4198, 24500, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A242202}}
|-
|10
|2, 3, 8, 11, 15, 39, 60, 72, 77, 117, 183, 252, 396, 1745, 2843, 4665, 5364, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A059671}}
|-
|11
|2, 8, 252, 1184, 1308, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299374}}
|-
|12
|1, 6, 43, 175, 821, 910, 1157, 13748, 27032, 71761, 229918, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299375}}
|-
|13
|2, 6, 563528, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299376}}
|-
|14
|1, 3, 7, 98, 104, 128, 180, 834, 1633, 8000, 28538, 46605, 131941, 147684, 433734, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299377}}
|-
|15
|2, 10, 14, 2312, 16718, 26906, 27512, 41260, 45432, 162454, 217606, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299378}}
|-
|16
|167, 189, 639, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299379}}
|-
|17
|2, 18, 20, 38, 68, 3122, 3488, 39500, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299380}}
|-
|18
|1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 28, 30, 39, 45, 112, 348, 380, 458, 585, 17559, 38751, 43346, 46984, 92711, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299381}}
|-
|19
|12, 410, 33890, 91850, 146478, 189620, 280524, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299382}}
|-
|20
|1, 18, 44, 60, 80, 123, 429, 1166, 2065, 8774, 35340, 42968, 50312, 210129, ...
|{{OEIS link|id=A299383}}
|-
|21
|2, 18, 200, 282, 294, 1174, 2492, 4348, ...
|
|-
|22
|2, 5, 140, 158, 263, 795, 992, 341351, ...
|
|-
|23
|29028, ...
|
|-
|24
|1, 2, 5, 12, 124, 1483, 22075, 29673, 64593, ...
|
|-
|25
|2, 68, 104, 450, ...
|
|-
|26
|3, 8, 79, 132, 243, 373, 720, 1818, 11904, 134778, ...
|
|-
|27
|10, 18, 20, 2420, 6638, 11368, 14040, 103444, ...
|
|-
|28
|2, 5, 6, 12, 20, 47, 71, 624, 1149, 2399, 8048, 30650, 39161, ...
|
|-
|29
|26850, 237438, 272970, ...
|
|-
|30
|1, 63, 331, 366, 1461, 3493, 4002, 5940, 13572, 34992, 182461, 201038, ...
|
|}

{{As of|2018|10}}, the largest known generalized Woodall prime is 17016602×2<sup>17016602</sup> − 1.

==Dual form==

If we let ''n'' take negative values, and choose the [[numerator]] of the [[absolute value]] of these numbers, then we get

:(−''n'')×''b''<sup>−''n''</sup>−1 = −(''b''<sup>''n''</sup>+''n'')/(''b''<sup>''n''</sup>)

and we choose the number ''b''<sup>''n''</sup>+''n'' (we assume that ''n'' is coprime to ''b''<sup>''n''</sup>)

For ''b'' = 2, this number is prime for ''n'' =

:1, 3, 5, 9, 15, 39, 75, 81, 89, 317, 701, 735, 1311, 1881, 3201, 3225, 11795, 88071, 204129, 678561, ... {{OEIS|A052007}}

For ''b'' = 3, this number is prime for ''n'' =

:2, 8, 34, 1532, 18248, ... {{OEIS|A057900}}


==See also==
==See also==
Line 192: Line 52:


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* {{Citation |first=Richard K. |last=Guy |authorlink=Richard K. Guy |title=Unsolved Problems in Number Theory |edition=3rd |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |location=New York |year=2004 |isbn=0-387-20860-7 |pages=section B20 }}.
* {{Citation |first=Richard K. |last=Guy |author-link=Richard K. Guy |title=Unsolved Problems in Number Theory |edition=3rd |publisher=[[Springer Verlag]] |location=New York |year=2004 |isbn=0-387-20860-7 |pages=section B20 }}.
* {{Citation |first=Wilfrid |last=Keller |title=New Cullen Primes |journal=[[Mathematics of Computation]] |volume=64 |issue=212 |year=1995 |pages=1733–1741 |url=http://www.ams.org/mcom/1995-64-212/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3.pdf |doi=10.2307/2153382}}.
* {{Citation |first=Wilfrid |last=Keller |title=New Cullen Primes |journal=[[Mathematics of Computation]] |volume=64 |issue=212 |year=1995 |pages=1733–1741 |url=http://www.ams.org/mcom/1995-64-212/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3.pdf |doi=10.2307/2153382|jstor=2153382 |doi-access=free }}.
* {{Citation |first=Chris |last=Caldwell |url=http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=7 |title=The Top Twenty: Woodall Primes |work=The [[Prime Pages]] |accessdate=December 29, 2007 }}.
* {{Citation |first=Chris |last=Caldwell |url=http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=7 |title=The Top Twenty: Woodall Primes |work=The [[Prime Pages]] |access-date=December 29, 2007 }}.


==External links==
==External links==
Line 201: Line 61:
* Steven Harvey, [http://harvey563.tripod.com/GeneralizedWoodallPrimes.txt List of Generalized Woodall primes].
* Steven Harvey, [http://harvey563.tripod.com/GeneralizedWoodallPrimes.txt List of Generalized Woodall primes].
* Paul Leyland, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120204131629/http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cullen_woodall/gcw.htm Generalized Cullen and Woodall Numbers]
* Paul Leyland, [https://web.archive.org/web/20120204131629/http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cullen_woodall/gcw.htm Generalized Cullen and Woodall Numbers]
* [https://www.rieselprime.de/ziki/Woodall_number Woodall number] in [[Prime wiki]]


{{Prime number classes|state=collapsed}}
{{Prime number classes|state=collapsed}}
{{Classes of natural numbers}}
{{Classes of natural numbers}}
__NOTOC__


{{DEFAULTSORT:Woodall Number}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Woodall Number}}
[[Category:Integer sequences]]
[[Category:Integer sequences]]
[[Category:Unsolved problems in mathematics]]
[[Category:Unsolved problems in number theory]]
[[Category:Classes of prime numbers]]

Latest revision as of 20:05, 12 December 2024

In number theory, a Woodall number (Wn) is any natural number of the form

for some natural number n. The first few Woodall numbers are:

1, 7, 23, 63, 159, 383, 895, … (sequence A003261 in the OEIS).

History

Woodall numbers were first studied by Allan J. C. Cunningham and H. J. Woodall in 1917,[1] inspired by James Cullen's earlier study of the similarly defined Cullen numbers.

Woodall primes

Unsolved problem in mathematics:
Are there infinitely many Woodall primes?

Woodall numbers that are also prime numbers are called Woodall primes; the first few exponents n for which the corresponding Woodall numbers Wn are prime are 2, 3, 6, 30, 75, 81, 115, 123, 249, 362, 384, ... (sequence A002234 in the OEIS); the Woodall primes themselves begin with 7, 23, 383, 32212254719, ... (sequence A050918 in the OEIS).

In 1976 Christopher Hooley showed that almost all Cullen numbers are composite.[2] In October 1995, Wilfred Keller published a paper discussing several new Cullen primes and the efforts made to factorise other Cullen and Woodall numbers. Included in that paper is a personal communication to Keller from Hiromi Suyama, asserting that Hooley's method can be reformulated to show that it works for any sequence of numbers n · 2n + a + b, where a and b are integers, and in particular, that almost all Woodall numbers are composite.[3] It is an open problem whether there are infinitely many Woodall primes. As of October 2018, the largest known Woodall prime is 17016602 × 217016602 − 1.[4] It has 5,122,515 digits and was found by Diego Bertolotti in March 2018 in the distributed computing project PrimeGrid.[5]

Restrictions

Starting with W4 = 63 and W5 = 159, every sixth Woodall number is divisible by 3; thus, in order for Wn to be prime, the index n cannot be congruent to 4 or 5 (modulo 6). Also, for a positive integer m, the Woodall number W2m may be prime only if 2m + m is prime. As of January 2019, the only known primes that are both Woodall primes and Mersenne primes are W2 = M3 = 7, and W512 = M521.

Divisibility properties

Like Cullen numbers, Woodall numbers have many divisibility properties. For example, if p is a prime number, then p divides

W(p + 1) / 2 if the Jacobi symbol is +1 and
W(3p − 1) / 2 if the Jacobi symbol is −1.[citation needed]

Generalization

A generalized Woodall number base b is defined to be a number of the form n × bn − 1, where n + 2 > b; if a prime can be written in this form, it is then called a generalized Woodall prime.

The smallest value of n such that n × bn − 1 is prime for b = 1, 2, 3, ... are[6]

3, 2, 1, 1, 8, 1, 2, 1, 10, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 167, 2, 1, 12, 1, 2, 2, 29028, 1, 2, 3, 10, 2, 26850, 1, 8, 1, 42, 2, 6, 2, 24, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 140, 1, 2, 2, 22, 2, 8, 1, 2064, 2, 468, 6, 2, 1, 362, 1, 2, 2, 6, 3, 26, 1, 2, 3, 20, 1, 2, 1, 28, 2, 38, 5, 3024, 1, 2, 81, 858, 1, 2, 3, 2, 8, 60, 1, 2, 2, 10, 5, 2, 7, 182, 1, 17782, 3, ... (sequence A240235 in the OEIS)

As of November 2021, the largest known generalized Woodall prime with base greater than 2 is 2740879 × 322740879 − 1.[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ Cunningham, A. J. C; Woodall, H. J. (1917), "Factorisation of and ", Messenger of Mathematics, 47: 1–38.
  2. ^ Everest, Graham; van der Poorten, Alf; Shparlinski, Igor; Ward, Thomas (2003). Recurrence sequences. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. Vol. 104. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 94. ISBN 0-8218-3387-1. Zbl 1033.11006.
  3. ^ Keller, Wilfrid (January 1995). "New Cullen primes". Mathematics of Computation. 64 (212): 1739. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1995-1308456-3. ISSN 0025-5718. Keller, Wilfrid (December 2013). "Wilfrid Keller". www.fermatsearch.org. Hamburg. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020. Retrieved October 1, 2020.
  4. ^ "The Prime Database: 8508301*2^17016603-1", Chris Caldwell's The Largest Known Primes Database, retrieved March 24, 2018
  5. ^ PrimeGrid, Announcement of 17016602*2^17016602 - 1 (PDF), retrieved April 1, 2018
  6. ^ List of generalized Woodall primes base 3 to 10000
  7. ^ "The Top Twenty: Generalized Woodall". primes.utm.edu. Retrieved 20 November 2021.

Further reading