Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Princesses: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Don't need this! Tags: Blanking Reverted |
→Secret Princesses: Closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
|||
<!--Template:Afd top |
|||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
|||
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:Eddie891|Eddie891]] <small>''<sup> [[User talk:Eddie891|Talk]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Eddie891|Work]]</sub>'' </small> 19:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
===[[:Secret Princesses]]=== |
|||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
|||
:{{la|Secret Princesses}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret Princesses|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 16#{{anchorencode:Secret Princesses}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
|||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Secret Princesses}}) |
|||
Article about a children's book series failing to meet [[WP:NBOOK]]. [[User:Mcmatter|McMatter]] <sup>([[User talk:Mcmatter|talk]])</sup>/<sub>([[Special:Contributions/Mcmatter|contrib]])</sub> 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature|list of Literature-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Mcmatter|McMatter]] <sup>([[User talk:Mcmatter|talk]])</sup>/<sub>([[Special:Contributions/Mcmatter|contrib]])</sub> 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)</small> |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Mcmatter|McMatter]] <sup>([[User talk:Mcmatter|talk]])</sup>/<sub>([[Special:Contributions/Mcmatter|contrib]])</sub> 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)</small> |
|||
*'''Delete''' as I found a single review. Nothing in Publishers Weekly or Gale Literature. [[User:DiamondRemley39|DiamondRemley39]] ([[User talk:DiamondRemley39|talk]]) 18:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete'''. I'm a little surprised at the lack of coverage out there as a whole, to be honest. There's just not enough out there to establish notability. [[User:ReaderofthePack|ReaderofthePack]]<small>(formerly Tokyogirl79)</small>[[User talk:ReaderofthePack|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 07:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 23 November 2020
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Secret Princesses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a children's book series failing to meet WP:NBOOK. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as I found a single review. Nothing in Publishers Weekly or Gale Literature. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm a little surprised at the lack of coverage out there as a whole, to be honest. There's just not enough out there to establish notability. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.