Jump to content

Professional: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
More sources that prove accounting is a profession.
Tag: Reverted
firts ref makes no mention of accountants, second is very far from being independent - it is accountants own institution
Line 13: Line 13:
Although professional training appears to be ideologically neutral, it may be biased towards those with higher [[Social class|class backgrounds]] and a formal education. In his 2000 book, ''[[Disciplined Minds]]: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes Their Lives'', [[Jeff Schmidt (writer)|Jeff Schmidt]] observes that qualified professionals are less creative and diverse in their opinions and habits than non-professionals, which he attributes to the subtle indoctrination and filtering which accompanies the process of professional training. His evidence is both qualitative and quantitative, including professional examinations, industry statistics and personal accounts of trainees and professionals.<ref>Schmidt, J. (2000). Disciplined Minds – A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes their Lives. Rowman & Littlefield, pp.293.</ref>
Although professional training appears to be ideologically neutral, it may be biased towards those with higher [[Social class|class backgrounds]] and a formal education. In his 2000 book, ''[[Disciplined Minds]]: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes Their Lives'', [[Jeff Schmidt (writer)|Jeff Schmidt]] observes that qualified professionals are less creative and diverse in their opinions and habits than non-professionals, which he attributes to the subtle indoctrination and filtering which accompanies the process of professional training. His evidence is both qualitative and quantitative, including professional examinations, industry statistics and personal accounts of trainees and professionals.<ref>Schmidt, J. (2000). Disciplined Minds – A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes their Lives. Rowman & Littlefield, pp.293.</ref>


A key theoretical dispute arises from the observation that established professions (e.g. lawyers, medical doctors, accountants<ref name="ICAEW 2013">{{Citation | url =https://www.icaew.com/en/library/subject-gateways/accounting-history/resources/timeline | title =Timeline of the History of the Accountancy Profession | publisher =Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales | year =2013 | access-date =28 December 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{citation|url=http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~sazeff/PDF/Horizons,%20Part%20I%20(print).pdf |title=How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part I |author=Stephen A. Zeff |journal=Accounting Horizons |pages=189–205 |volume= 17 |issue= 3 |date=2003 |doi=10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.189 |access-date=16 May 2020}}</ref>, architects, civil engineers, surveyors) are subject to strict codes of conduct. Some have thus argued that these codes of conduct, agreed upon and maintained through widely recognized professional associations, are a key element of what constitutes any profession.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://hbr.org/2010/07/the-big-idea-no-management-is-not-a-profession|title=The Big Idea: No, Management Is Not a Profession|first=Richard|last=Barker|date=July 1, 2010|issue=July–August 2010|access-date=October 16, 2019|via=hbr.org}}</ref> Others have argued that strict [[codes of conduct]] and the [[professional associations]] that maintain them are merely a consequence of 'successful' professionalization, rather than an intrinsic element of the definition of professional(ism); this implies that a profession arises from the alignment between a shared purpose (connected to a 'greater good'), a [[body of knowledge]], actual behavior in terms of actions and decisions, and expectations held by societal stakeholders.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-quest-for-professionalism-9780198737735?cc=in&lang=en&|title=Romme, G. (2016). The Quest for Professionalism: The Case of Management and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.|access-date=October 16, 2019}}</ref>
A key theoretical dispute arises from the observation that established professions (e.g. lawyers, medical doctors, architects, civil engineers, surveyors) are subject to strict codes of conduct. Some have thus argued that these codes of conduct, agreed upon and maintained through widely recognized professional associations, are a key element of what constitutes any profession.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://hbr.org/2010/07/the-big-idea-no-management-is-not-a-profession|title=The Big Idea: No, Management Is Not a Profession|first=Richard|last=Barker|date=July 1, 2010|issue=July–August 2010|access-date=October 16, 2019|via=hbr.org}}</ref> Others have argued that strict [[codes of conduct]] and the [[professional associations]] that maintain them are merely a consequence of 'successful' professionalization, rather than an intrinsic element of the definition of professional(ism); this implies that a profession arises from the alignment between a shared purpose (connected to a 'greater good'), a [[body of knowledge]], actual behavior in terms of actions and decisions, and expectations held by societal stakeholders.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-quest-for-professionalism-9780198737735?cc=in&lang=en&|title=Romme, G. (2016). The Quest for Professionalism: The Case of Management and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.|access-date=October 16, 2019}}</ref>


==Etymology==
==Etymology==

Revision as of 09:12, 9 March 2021

For other uses, see Professional (disambiguation).
Doctor explains x-ray to patient

A professional is a member of a profession or any person who earns their living from a specified professional activity. The term also describes the standards of education and training that prepare members of the profession with the particular knowledge and skills necessary to perform their specific role within that profession. In addition, most professionals are subject to strict codes of conduct, enshrining rigorous ethical and moral obligations.[1] Professional standards of practice and ethics for a particular field are typically agreed upon and maintained through widely recognized professional associations, such as the IEEE.[2] Some definitions of "professional" limit this term to those professions that serve some important aspect of public interest[3] and the general good of society.[4][5]

In some cultures, the term is used as shorthand to describe a particular social stratum of well-educated workers who enjoy considerable work autonomy and who are commonly engaged in creative and intellectually challenging work.[6][7][8][9]

Trades

In narrow usage, not all expertise is considered a profession. Occupations such as skilled construction and maintenance work are more generally thought of as trades or crafts. The completion of an apprenticeship is generally associated with skilled labour, or trades such as carpenter, electrician, mason, painter, plumber and other similar occupations.

Theory

Although professional training appears to be ideologically neutral, it may be biased towards those with higher class backgrounds and a formal education. In his 2000 book, Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes Their Lives, Jeff Schmidt observes that qualified professionals are less creative and diverse in their opinions and habits than non-professionals, which he attributes to the subtle indoctrination and filtering which accompanies the process of professional training. His evidence is both qualitative and quantitative, including professional examinations, industry statistics and personal accounts of trainees and professionals.[10]

A key theoretical dispute arises from the observation that established professions (e.g. lawyers, medical doctors, architects, civil engineers, surveyors) are subject to strict codes of conduct. Some have thus argued that these codes of conduct, agreed upon and maintained through widely recognized professional associations, are a key element of what constitutes any profession.[11] Others have argued that strict codes of conduct and the professional associations that maintain them are merely a consequence of 'successful' professionalization, rather than an intrinsic element of the definition of professional(ism); this implies that a profession arises from the alignment between a shared purpose (connected to a 'greater good'), a body of knowledge, actual behavior in terms of actions and decisions, and expectations held by societal stakeholders.[12]

Etymology

The etymology and historical meaning of the term professional is from Middle English, from profes, adjective, having professed one's vows, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin professus, from Latin, past participle of profitēri to profess, confess, from pro- before + fatēri to acknowledge; in other senses, from Latin professus, past participle. Thus, as people became more and more specialized in their trade, they began to 'profess' their skill to others, and 'vow' to perform their trade to the highest known standard. With a reputation to uphold, trusted workers of a society who have a specific trade are considered professionals. Ironically, the usage of the word 'profess' declined from the late 1800s to the 1950s, just as the term 'professional' was gaining popularity from 1900–2010.[13][14] Notably, in American English the rise in popularity of the term 'professional' started at the beginning of the 20th century[15] whereas in British English it started in the 1930s and grew fastest in the 1960s and 70s.[16]

See also

References

Media related to People by occupation at Wikimedia Commons

Wikiquote has quotations related to Professional.
  1. ^ Postema, Gerald J. (1980). "Moral responsibility in professional ethics". N.Y.U. L. Rev. 55. Retrieved March 26, 2016.
  2. ^ "IEEE.org Index Page". IEEE.ORG. IEEE.ORG. Archived from the original on 2015-05-15. Retrieved March 26, 2016.
  3. ^ Harvey, L.; Mason, S.; Ward, R. (1995). Role of Professional Bodies in Higher Education Quality Monitoring. Birmingham: Quality in Higher Education Project. ISBN 1-85920-108-3.
  4. ^ Sullivan, William M. (2nd ed. 2005). Work and Integrity: The Crisis and Promise of Professionalism in America. Jossey Bass.
  5. ^ Gardner, Howard and Shulman, Lee S., The Professions in America Today: Crucial but Fragile. Daedalus, Summer 2005. (pgs. 13–14)
  6. ^ Gilbert, D. (1998). The American class structure: In an age of growing inequality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Press.
  7. ^ Beeghley, L. (2004). The structure of social stratification in the United States. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  8. ^ Eichar, D. (1989). Occupation and Class Consciousness in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-26111-4
  9. ^ Ehrenreich, B. (1989). Fear of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York: Harper Perennial.
  10. ^ Schmidt, J. (2000). Disciplined Minds – A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes their Lives. Rowman & Littlefield, pp.293.
  11. ^ Barker, Richard (July 1, 2010). "The Big Idea: No, Management Is Not a Profession". Retrieved October 16, 2019 – via hbr.org.
  12. ^ "Romme, G. (2016). The Quest for Professionalism: The Case of Management and Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press". Retrieved October 16, 2019.
  13. ^ "Simple Definition of profess". merriam-webster.com. Merriam Webster. 2015. Retrieved 26 March 2016.
  14. ^ "Google Books NGram Viewer". books.google.com/ngrams. 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  15. ^ "Google Books NGram Viewer (American English)". books.google.com/ngrams. 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
  16. ^ "Google Books NGram Viewer (British English)". books.google.com/ngrams. 2018. Retrieved 14 November 2018.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Professional&oldid=1011149896"